05/10/2022 - PacketUtilities Committee Meeting Agenda
May 10, 2022, 5:00 p.m.
Pursuant to the Governor's "Stay Home - Stay Safe" Order, the City is prohibited from conducting meetings unless
the meeting is NOT conducted in person and instead provides options for the public to attend through telephone
access, internet or other means of remote access, and also provides the ability for persons attending the meeting
(not in person) to hear each other at the same time. Therefore;
Remote access only
Link:
https://us02web.zoom.us/j/82559401512
Meeting ID: 825 5940 1512
• DWSRF Well #11 Design —Update
o Preliminary Engineering Report
httns://msaeD.shareDoint.com/:b:/s/EFS/EciXUuD tnZJFaAZays7rsUcB31
FugR9MW5y1S-gToE33CQ?e=oOJFaE
o Next Steps
• Foster Pilot Project — Update
o Stream Augmentation Report - DRAFT
o Tribal Relations
o Next Steps
• Splash Pad Retrofit — Update
o Updated Engineers' Estimate
o Schedule
• Water and Sewer Rate Setting Policy Direction
o Commercial sewer rates based on water consumption?
o Water base charge for service with all consumption rates?
• Public Works Board Projects — Update
o Melcher Pump Station
0 390 Booster Station
o Sewer Lift Station Upgrades
• Bay Street Lift Station
Next Meeting: July 12, 2022
Future Agenda Items:
• Well 13 and PRV's
• McCormick Sewer PS #1 Repairs
• Storm Drainage Comprehensive Plan
• Option to Levy Excise Taxes on W/S
• Bay Street - Street Lighting & Marquee
• Water System Fluoridation
• Sanitary Side Sewer Policy
back to agenda
lw—�—�-,
Yl-
--�
Air
X�,
-W .4
City of Port Orchard
er-W
OPCHARD Waterbody Augmentation
STREAM AUGMENTATION
DRAFT I April 2022
C,'*r►,Wff1
ftoola
back to agenda
ORCHARD
City of Port Orchard
Waterbody Augmentation
STREAM AUGMENTATION
DRAFT I April 2022
This document is released for the
purpose of information exchange review
and planning only underthe authorityof
Aurelie Nabonnand, April 19, 2022,
State of Washington PE No. 56703.
back to agenda
STREAM AUGMENTATION I WATERBODY AUGMENTATION I CITY OF PORT ORCHARD
Contents
Section 1 - Project Overview
1.1 Background
1.2 Identified Waterbodies
1.3 Augmentation Infrastructure
Section 2 - Methodology of Alignment Development
2.1 Augmentation Alignment Criteria
2.2 Hydraulic Analysis
Section 3 - Proposed Alignments
3.1 Proposed Alignments
3.1.1 East Branch
3.1.2 Central Branch
3.1.3 West Branch
Section 4 - Proposed Alignment Cost Estimates
4.1 Cost Development Methodology
4.2 Cost Assumptions
4.3 Proposed Alignment Cost Estimates
Appendices
Appendix A Hydraulic Analysis
Appendix B Cost Estimates
Tables
Table 1
Hydraulic Characteristics of Waterbodies Requiring Augmentation
Table 2
Burley Creek Pipeline Comparison
Table 3
East Branch's Hydraulic Characteristics
Table 4
Huge Creek's Hydraulic Characteristics
Table 5
Gorst Creek's Hydraulic Characteristics
Table 6
Unit Cost Development and Assumptions
Table 7
Proposed Alignment Cost Estimates
1
1
1
5
7
7
7
9
9
9
12
12
17
17
17
18
5
8
10
12
12
17
18
C—Corvlw° DRAFT I APRIL2022 1 i
pw://Ca rol I o/Doc uments/C I ient/WA/Port Orcha rd/10453 B00/Del Nee bles/R PTOl/Stream Augmentation
back to agenda
CITY OF PORTORCHARD I WATERBODYAUGMENTATION I STREAM AUGMENTATION
Figures
Figure 1
Study Area Creeks
3
Figure 2
Schematic of Augmentation Diffuser (Goldsmith and Associates, Inc.)
6
Figure 3
East Branch Proposed Alignment and Augmentation Sites
11
Figure 4
Huge Creek Proposed Alignment and Augmentation Site
13
Figure 5
Gorst Creek Proposed Alignment and Augmentation Site
15
ii I APRIL 2022 1 DRAFT C Car�.I1^o
back to agenda
STREAM AUGMENTATION I WATERBODY AUGMENTATION I CITY OF PORT ORCHARD
Abbreviations
AACE
Am eri can Assoc iati on of Cost Estimators
Carollo
Carollo Engineers, Inc.
cfs
cubic feet persecond
City
City of Port Orchard
ENR CCI
Engineering News Record Construction Cost Index
Ft
feet
ft/s
feet per second
GIs
geographic information system
gpm
gallons per minute
in.
inch(es)
PRV
pressure -reducing valve
psi
pounds persquare inch
PVC
polyvinyl chloride
RN
Robinson Noble
ROE
report of examination
ROW
right-of-way
WSUD
West Sound Utility District
4ircarollo- DRAFT I APRIL 2022 1 iii
back to agenda
STREAM AUGMENTATION I WATERBODYAUGMENTATION I CITY OF PORT ORCHARD
Section 1
PROJECT OVERVIEW
1.1 Background
The City of Port Orchard (City) is currently having several water rights applications being
processed under the Foster pilot program. As part of the process of completing water right
reports of examination (ROES) for the applications, a mitigation plan must be developed for any
identified impairments of senior water rights including stream flows. Groundwater modeling of
the proposed water rights indicates streamflow impairment will occur at several local creeks. As
part of the mitigation plan, the City is considering the direct discharge of potable or wholesale
water purchased from nearby utilities or water purveyors into local creeks, rivers, and lakes for
augmentation. The mitigation plan and complete ROES are subject approval from the
Washington State Department of Ecology.
For a previous water right mitigation plan, Robinson Noble (RN), the City's primary project
consultant, developed the5tream Augmentation Plan (2006),which preliminarily defined local
waterbodies that require augmentation, potential discharge locations, and conceptual designs
for required infrastructure. Forthe current work, RN has received updated information and new
direction from the City, which were used to revise RN's hydrogeological model of the
augmentation project.
RN has tasked Carollo Engineers, Inc. (Carollo) to develop conceptual understandings of where
and how augmentation infrastructure will be situated on waterbodies against specific
augmentation rates generated through RN's most recent hydrogeological-modeling effort.
This report focuses on evaluating and selecting alignments of pipelines that will route and
discharge potable water into each identified waterbody. More specifically, thefollowing sections
define which local waterbodies require augmentation, the infrastructure leading to each
discharge point, criteria for selecting viable pipeline alignments and discharge points, and
proposed alignments to each identified waterbody and their planning -level cost estimates.
1.2 Identified Waterbodies
In March 2022, RN provided Carollo with hydrogeological modeling data for 17 creeks, one river,
and one lake that are located across 162 square miles in the Kitsap Peninsula. Figure 1locates all
the waterbodies included in this analysis.
DRAFT I APRIL2022 1 1
back to agenda
Arc
'• 1 ~ J
r � �0 rk l
o
EastFo <
°fZ
h m
NUnion
10
40 ` /
Gee
G°Ui{er
tee T'
STREAM AUGMENTATION I WATERBODY AUGMENTATION I CITY OF PORT ORCHARD
Legend
City of Port Orchard Retail Water
Service Area
Waterways For Study
Adjacent Streams
: r
Feet
0 5,000 10,000
Data Sources: Kitsap County GIS,
Pirece County GIS
Disclaimer: Features shown in this
figure are for planning purposes and
represent approximate locations.
= Engineering and/or survey accuracy
is not implied.
pop ,1 4
fie
r
0
. K
4drcaro/%®
Last Revised: April 20, 2022
N
,
Y
U
J
�
i
Figure 11 Study Area Creeks
back to agenda
STREAM AUGMENTATION I WATERBODY AUGMENTATION I CITY OF PORT ORCHARD
Table 1 lists the local waterbodies that were reviewed in RN's hydrogeological analysis and
identified as requiring augmentation. The table also tabulate required augmentation rates for
each of the 10 waterbody identified.
Table 1 Hydraulic Characteristics of Waterbodies Requiring Augmentation
Gorst
22.7
0.09
Parrish
5.6
0.02
Ross
4.3
0.02
Blackjack
43.4
0.17
Salmonberry
11.1
0.04
Curley
7.4
0.02
Olalla
14.5
0.06
Purdy
4.1
0.02
Burley
31.7
0.11
Huge
5.6
0.02
Notes:
Abbreviations: cfs - cubic feet per second; ft -feet.
Of the 10 waterbodies listed in Table 1, three - Ross Creek, Blackjack Creek, and Parrish Creek
have augmentation projects already underway. As such, Carollo's analysis and work did not
include these creeks and instead, only encompass the remaining seven waterbodies.
1.3 Augmentation Infrastructure
As part of the Stream Augmentation Plan (RN 2006), RN's subconsultant Goldsmith and
Associates, Inc. prepared primary designs of two pieces of infrastructure that will foster
streambank infiltration:
1. A meter and valve vault.
2. A diffuser station.
Each discharge site will have a tap on a potable water line associated with the City's system or
that of another nearby water purveyor. Each connection between the water line and the
augmentation pipeline will be equipped with a vault that contains a pressure -reducing valve
(PRV) and flowmeter, called the meter and valve vault.
At the opposite end of the augmentation pipeline (i.e., discharge point), a diffuser station will be
constructed. This station will contain a backflow preventer and flowmeter, both of which will
also be housed in a vault, followed by a perforated pipe or augmentation diffuser that is filled
with gravel. Figure 2 shows a schematic of the diffuser and its associated piping.
To summarize, water will pass through the two vaults (i.e., each at opposite ends of the pipeline)
and flow out of the diffuser into the ground, infiltrating selected waterbodies.
4w7carollo- DRAFT I APRIL2022 1 5
CITY OF PORTORCHARD I WATERBODYAUGMENTATION I STREAM AUGMENTATION
back to agenda
BACRFLow
FLOW METER
P REYE NT OR
VALVE BOX
PERE PIPE
HTED
I
FLLED WITH 1/4' MIN. WASHED GRAVEL
FILLED
STANDARD S!A'
SERVICE FAP
D-DEPTH
G ° O °
SEEE TABLE)
°
EXISTING WATERLINE
INTERFLew AUGIVENTATI°N
JVARMBLE SIZ E1
RELEAGEO TO STREAM
IJNIDN
VALVE BGM
Flew
PRESSURE REDUCING
VALVE
Y-TYPE DR T-TYPE
FILTER 4 AEe°IRED1
FLOW cDNTR°L VALVE
Figure 2 Schematic of Augmentation Diffuser (Goldsmith and Associates, Inc.)
SIRE4W
6 1 APRIL2022 1 DRAFT C
back to agenda
STREAM AUGMENTATION I WATERBODY AUGMENTATION I CITY OF PORT ORCHARD
Section 2
METHODOLOGY OF ALIGNMENT
DEVELOPMENT
2.1 Augmentation Alignment Criteria
The following criteria were developed for use in selecting pipeline alignments and discharge -site
locations for each identified waterbody:
• All discharge sites must be placed near perennial waterbodies.
• Sites selected must be located at the road crossings of creeks to maintain the pipe
alignment in the public right-of-way (ROW).
• Prioritized upstream locations upstream offlow impairment.
• Sites must be selected in sections of waterways with known fish habitats.
• Sites must avoid discharging into wetlands, where possible.
• Sites must avoid discharging into steep slope or erosion hazard areas, where possible.
The following geographic information system (GIS) data files from Kitsap County and
Pierce County, within which the City's boundaries or select waterbodies fall within. This data was
overlayed and used to identify wetlands and areas of concern within the project site:
• "Areas of concern" data from Kitsap County: Identifies geological areas of concern.
• "Areas" data from Kitsap County: Identifies geological areas that are highly erodible or
pose the potential for high erosion.
• "Wetlands" from Kitsap and Pierce Counties: Identifies known wetlands.
• "Elevations" from Kitsap and Pierce Counties: Identifies general ground elevations in
the project area.
2.2 Hydraulic Analysis
Each waterbody's hydraulic model was built using GIS elevation profiles of each proposed
alignment. During the modeling process, the following general notes and assumptions
were made:
• All pipes are flowing full and pressurized.
• Major and minor losses in pipes were calculated using the Darcy-Weisbach equations.
• Many waterbodies share the same trunk pipeline.
• Each branch pipeline to the individual waterbody delivers just the required volume of
augmentation flow.
• Trunk flow at the Cityconnection is the sum of all waterbodies in that particular branch
(Section 3 defines the specific three branches used in this analysis). After each split to a
waterbody, thetrunk flow is reduced to only include all remaining waterbodies further
downstream.
4ircarvlw- DRAFT I APRIL2022 1 7
back to agenda
CITY OF PORT ORCHARD I WATERBODY AUGM ENTATION I STREAM AUGMENTATION
• The City connection will be capable of providing the required pressure for the whole
system to flow by gravity.
• Cityconnections were assumed to be 88 pounds per square inch (psi) at connection
point to simulate typical pressure in distribution pipes.
• The outlet ofthe flow intothe waterbody is modeled as open exit loss.
The hydraulic model was broken down into sections oftrunk and waterbody pipelines, for each
of which the model was run using pipe sizes between three to eight inches (in.). Per pipe size, the
following parameters were calculated:
• Velocity: Foreach alignment, a hydraulic profile was developed to match the outfall
velocity with the required impairment flow (i.e., 0.4 percent of the seasonal flow).
• Pressure: Pressure of greater than 150 psi was considered too high, and lower
than 10 psi was considered too low. This parameter was used to confirm pipe size was
reasonable forthe required impairment flow.
• Headloss: Headloss of greater than 30 ft was considered too high; therefore, all
scenarios with headloss of greater than 30 ft were eliminated from consideration.
• Water Age: This parameter is important to consider in ensuring that water will reach the
waterbody at a timely rate to prevent algae build-up.
Pipe diameters were selected to meet thevelocity and pressure requirements, minimize
headloss, and foster a low water age.
Table 2 presents an example comparison of pipe diameters that may serve the Burley Creek
pipeline. Specific to Burley Creek, a pipeline diameter of 4 in. was selected, given that it
generates headloss below 30 ft and maintains a low water age. Appendix A offers a full table of
similar comparisons for all identified waterbodies.
Tablet Burley Creek Pipeline Comparison
3 2.3 46.8 49.7 124 0.53
4 1.3 11.56 50.4 133 0.95
50.4 4,400
6 0.6 1.61 50.6 135 2.1
8 0.3 0.4 50.6 136 3.8
Notes:
Abbreviations: ft/s -feet per second; gpm - gallons per minute.
8 1 APRIL2022 1 DRAFT C
back to agenda
STREAM AUGMENTATION I WATERBODYAUGMENTATION I CITY OF PORT ORCHARD
Section 3
PROPOSED ALIGNMENTS
3.1 Proposed Alignments
In developing alignments, waterways requiring augmentation were grouped into three separate
areas: The west, central, and east branches.
Note that, in certain instances, a different utilityor water purveyor was found to be closer to the
required waterbody than that of the City. In such cases, the augmentation pipeline was assumed
to be connected to the closest system.
3.1.1 East Branch
The east branch are divided into two groups to serve thefollowing waterways:
• Group A:
a. Burley Creek.
b. Olalla Creek.
c. Purdy Creek.
• Group B:
a. Salmonberry.
b. Curley Creek.
The West Sound Utility District (WSUD) is the closest water utilityto waterbodies requiring
augmentation in the east branch; therefore, augmentation pipelines will be connected totheir
system instead of the City's potable water system.
Figure 3 shows the proposed pipeline and connections for the east branch. Note that the E1
through E3 are segments of thetransmission line that will bring water from WSUD's system to all
the waterbodies in the east branch. Furthermore, Salmonberry and Curley Creeks are combined
in thetable because augmentation of Salmonberry Creek is assumed to flow into Curley Creek,
contributing to this downstream waterbody's eventual augmentation.
Table 3 shows the selected pipe diameter of each segment as well as its pipe length, headloss,
pressure, and flow (i.e., hydraulic characteristics).
4ircarollo- DRAFT I APRIL2022 1 9
back to agenda
CITY OF PORT ORCHARD I WATERBODYAUGMENTATION I STREAM AUGMENTATION
Table3 East Branch's Hydraulic Characteristics
Length
•
.
�- •
.• .
n.A.-
-• ment
••
.
.
•
GroupA
E1 9,500
6 87.8
0.2
1.0
9.7
54.3
104
0.95
E2 18,300
4 37.3
0.08
0.42
3.9
58.3
103
2.5
E3 7,970
4 10.2
0.02
0.26
1.0
41.3
99
1.1
Burley 4,400
4 50.4
0.11
1.3
11.6
50.4
133
0.95
Olalla 6,800
4 27.2
0.06
0.70
5.7
57.8
175(4)
2.7
Purdy(l) 10
4 10.2
0.02
0.26
0(2)
131(3)
--
0.01
Group B
Salmon berry/Cu rley(l) 10
4 29.7
0.07
0.76
0(2)
88(3)
-
0.004
Notes:
(1) Stream is right off of major trunk or utility pipeline, so 10 feet is assumed from pipeline
to stream.
(2) At 10 feet length, can assume no significant headloss.
(3) Since line is only assumed 10 feet, only one pressure is reported as min and max pressure difference is minimal.
(4) Max pressure due to low elevation of discharge point.
10 1 APRIL 2022 1 DRAFT 4drcarvlw-
back to agenda
STREAM AUGMENTATION I WATERBODY AUGMENTATION I CITY OF PORT ORCHARD
Legend
WWTP
Potential West Sound O
Discharge Site
West Sound Utility
District Water Main
Ile
City Pipeline
Proposed Pipeline
East Branch Trunk
' Mainline (E1- E3)
3
Burley Creek
r - -
Olalla Creek
A w Roads
w 44/ >
\IESE
G� ¢ �0 - Water Bodies
L / = U
�P (D E GO�iLL
�y a o m Q� C'J\
a �e
Feet
ti oC'> 0 2,500 5,000
� v
Data Sources: Kitsap County GIS,
t N SE SEDGWICK RE Pierce County GIS
Salmonberry SE SE
u
O _ Disclaimer: Features shown in this
�, �� 1 F figure are for planning purposes and
w ` SE KING RID / represent approximate locations.
Q mr
lj SE EDAR D l L Engineering and/or survey accuracy
\\ w • ., is not implied.
m
SE OVERAA RD
a J, F
SW LIDER RD �D �
E?- T Q
BIELMEIER)RD a E'I. �• _
`> oPB m
LU
• � 5 SE OLALLA VALLEY FtD
� Burley �
SE MULLENIX RD
�U
/SEE FRAGARIA RD
w — c/)
w z
Z � �
co rn Z 0
O m m Z SE WILLOCK RD
J co P m w Q
U cc m Q
w w w w aCKRD w
a o ~ in - W
W E2 Cn o
of It
w { 'a w
co
SEB RLEYOLALLA D 01alla ��S' 0 m
Uj
Q SE OAK RD co ai E3-�
0 a x U ooa a Creek
2 } a
VE: RD E PI E D O 00 E NELSON RD� I SE NELSON RD
UCE RD w Q Purdy
�� ,SCFNn/ALLEY
4irearo/%° Figure 3 East Branch Proposed Alignment and Augmentation Sites
Last Revised: April 20, 2022 pw:\\IO-PMNT.Carol lo.loca l: Carol to\Documents\Client\WA\Port Orchard\10453Boo\GIS\MXD\Port_Orchard.APRX
back to agenda
CITY OF PORT ORCHARD I WATERBODY AUGM ENTATION I STREAM AUGMENTATION
3.1.2 Central Branch
In the central branch, Huge Creek is the only waterway that requires augmentation. Due tothe
long distance and steep topography between the City connection and thedischarge point, it is
assumed that the Citywould be able to increase the starting pressure of the line to 115 psi to
maintain a minimum of 10 psi throughout the alignment. The pipeline will be connectedtothe
City's potable water line, as shown in Figure 4.
Table 4 shows the hydraulic characteristics of Huge Creek.
Table 4 Huge Creek's Hydraulic Characteristics
Huge 34,570 4 5.6 0.02 0.2 3.1 10.8 115(1) 45.7
Notes:
(1) Assuming City connection can start at115 psi.
3.1.3 West Branch
In the west branch, only Gorst Creek requires augmentation. As shown in Figure 5, this creek will
be connected to the nearby City of Bremerton's water system. One of the City of Bremerton's
pipelines directly passes Gorst Creek, so the pipeline is assumed to rest approximately 10 ft from
the creek.
Table 5 shows the hydraulic characteristics of Gorst Creek.
Table5 Gorst Creek's Hydraulic Characteristics
Gorst 10 4 49 0.11 1.26 0.03 88 0.002
Notes:
(1) Stream is right off of utility pipeline, so 10 feet is assumed from pipeline to stream.
(2) Since line is only assumed 10 feet, only one pressure is reported as min and max pressure difference is minimal.
12 1 APRIL 2022 1 DRAFT Carte. <l,�o
back to agenda
4f
0
v�
sco
w
O
c/1
Y
�I I
�Z � /
0
SW LP,Ke
J\EVIL
y
An
LNSM/ A
U _
a
u)
a
uj
O= � Y
ay 3
SW L E HELENA RD
i
SW 69�Y ST 1 '
m� SW WAVA LN O
tJ w
v O
40) P V
O I z
Huge Creek
Q
�O 0E1LINE00 , ASWUNTERRD
wcc SW PARADSW
STREAM AUGMENTATION I WATERBODY AUGMENTATION I CITY OF PORT ORCHARD
SE EDAR RD
- 1.y
CLEVER ,
/ SWJHRD
U)
r All o
_a m
SW WILDWOOD RD
w
AB6� / LL
SW OAK RL
SW N TF 3
O
O
SW PINE RD , o
r - <
S RUCE RD
o�
E DO'? m
SE BIELMEIER Rl�
Ilk III V I
�arley I
Z
J
U Z
D
m HCRF
Legend
Q Potential Discharge Site
City Pipeline
Proposed Pipeline
Huge Creek
Roads
Water Bodies
Feet
0 2,000 4,000
Data Sources: Kitsap County GIS,
Washington State DNR
Disclaimer: Features shown in this
figure are for planning purposes and
represent approximate locations.
Engineering and/or survey accuracy
is not implied.
[taro/%® Figure 4 Huge Creek Proposed Alignment and Augmentation Site
Last Revised: April 20, 2022 pw:\\IO-PW-INT.Carol lo.loca l: Carol lo\Documents\Client\WA\Port Orchard\104S313oo\GIS\MXD\Port_Orchard.APRX
back to agenda
Gorst Creek
G In rst
STREAM AUGMENTATION I WATERBODY AUGMENTATION I CITY OF PORT ORCHARD
rn
Z
J
W
M 0
W
oJF �4(/
OHO CLIFTON RID
Legend
Potential City of
Q Bremerton Discharge
Site
Proposed Pipeline
City of Bremerton
Water Main
Roads
P
`b Water Bodies
A
Feet
0 1,000 2,000
Data Sources: Kitsap County GIS,
Washington State DNR
Disclaimer: Features shown in this
figure are for planning purposes and
represent approximate locations.
Engineering and/or survey accuracy
is not implied.
S� PNOR��S DR ok
o
. I
QCaPO//O® Figure 5 Gorst Creek Proposed Alignment and Augmentation Site
Last Revised: April 20, 2022 pw:\\IO-PW-INT.Carol lo.loca l: Carol lo\Documents\Client\WA\Port Orchard\10453Boo\GIS\MXD\Port_Orchard.APRX
back to agenda
STREAM AUGMENTATION I WATERBODY AUGMENTATION I CITY OF PORT ORCHARD
Section 4
PROPOSED ALIGNMENT COST ESTIMATES
4.1 Cost Development Methodology
Carollo developed cost estimates fort he proposed alignments according to thefirm's experience
working on other projects of similar scope and capacity. These estimates have been prepared for
general planning purposes, and final costswill depend on actual labor and material costs,
competitive market conditions, final project scope, implementation schedule, preliminary
alignment generation, results of investigations that review alternative routings, and results of
detailed utility and topography surveys.
Cost estimates are Class 4 budget estimates, as established by the American Association of Cost
Estimators (AACE). This level of estimate is used for budgeting and feasibility studies and
assumes a 10 to 40 percent level of project definition. The expected accuracy range is minus
20 percent to plus 30 percent, meaning the actual cost should fall in the range of 20 percent
below the estimate to 30 percent above the estimate.
4.2 Cost Assumptions
The following key assumptions were made to develop unit costs for the pipelines, meter and
valve vaults, and diffuser stations:
• Cost estimates were developed in 2022 dollars and against the Engineering News
Record Construction Cost Index's (ENR CCI) city average of 12791.
• Cost estimates do not include costs for land, easement, or ROW acquisitions.
• The following contingencies were defined:
- Construction: 30 percent.
- General conditions: 10 percent.
- Contractor overhead and profit: 15 percent.
- Engineering, legal, and administration: 20 percent.
• Same unit costs are assumed for four and six-inch schedule 80 polyvinyl chloride (PVC)
piping.
• Municipal and purveyor connections will each have a meter and valve vault.
Appendix B documents additional cost assumptions that were employed while Table 6 lists unit
costs and assumptions without contingencies.
Table 6 Unit Cost Developmentand Assumptions
Pipeline
4-inch PVC Pipe
$169
Linearft
6-inch PVC Pipe
$169
Linearft
Water Source PRV
$32,252
Each
Diffuser System
$41,420
Each
4ircarollo
DRAFT I APRIL2022 1 17
back to agenda
CITY OF PORT ORCHARD I WATERBODY AUGM ENTATION I STREAM AUGMENTATION
4.3 Proposed Alignment Cost Estimates
Applying the cost assumptions introduced in Section 3.2, Table 7 breaks down estimated costs
per pipeline.
Table7 Proposed Alignment Cost Estimates
Segment
(WaterPurveyor)
East Branch Total Cost $15.6
GroupA
E1(WSU D) 9,400
6
$3.1
E2 (WSUD) 18,400
4
$5.9
E3(WSUD) 8,000
4
$2.6
Burley (WSUD) 4,400
4
$1.5
Olalla (WSUD) 6,700
4
$2.3
Purdy(WSUD) 10
4
$0.08
Group B
Salmon berry/Cu Hey (WSU D) 10
4
$0.08
Central Branch Total Cost
$11.2
Huge (City) 34,600
4
$11.2
West Branch Total Cost
$0.08
Gorst (Bremerton) 10
4
$0.08
18 1 APRIL 2022 1 DRAFT
back to agenda
STREAM AUGMENTATION I WATERBODY AUGMENTATION I CITY OF PORT ORCHARD
AppendixA
HYDRAULIC ANALYSIS
4rcarollo- DRAFT I APRIL2022
back to agenda
STREAM AUGMENTATION I WATERBODY AUGMENTATION I CITY OF PORT ORCHARD
Appendix B
COST ESTIMATES
4rcarollo- DRAFT I APRIL2022
back to agenda
City of Port Orchard
Stream Augmentation
Notes:
(1) Original cost estimates were made in 2022 dollars.
Engineering News Report (ENR) U.S. 20-City Construction Cost Index:
(2) To update cost assumptions below using an updated cost index, insert it here: Mar-22 1 12791
(3) Cost estimates do not include costs for land acquisition, easements or ROW acquisition unless noted.
(4) Cost estimates per foot of pipe are before contingencies.
Costs in 2022 Dollars
Pipe Installation Unit Costs
Pipeline Diameter (inches) Cost per LF
4 $169
6 $169
Pressure Reducing Valves Station Cost per Each
Pressure Reducing Valve Station $32,325
Diffuser Station
Cost per Each
Diffuser Station
$41,420
Adjustment Factors
Construction Contingency
30%
General Conditions
10%
Contractor Overhead and Profit
15%
Engineering, Legal, and Administrative (ELA)
20%
The cost estimates within this CIP tool are based on our perception of current conditions at the project location. This estimate reflects our
professional opinion of accurate costs at this time and is subject to change as the project design matures. Carollo Engineers, Inc. has no
control over variances in the cost of labor, materials, equipment; nor services provided by others, contractor's means and methods of
executing the work or of determining prices, competitive bidding or market conditions, practices or bidding strategies. Carollo Engineers
cannot and does not warrant or guarantee that proposals, bids or actual construction costs will not vary form the costs presented as shown.
Port Orchard Stream Augmentation CIP Assumptions
back to agenda
City of Port Orchard
Stream Augmentation C Ca,,,,IJ,,
e
=Diffuer
$ 3,541,000
$ 11,403,000
$ 639,000
...
Project Information Project Cost
Total
Contractor
Unit Cost
Construction
General
Project
Project Name
Improvement
Pipe
Proposed
Units
Project
Description
($/Unit)
Subtotal
Contingency
Construction
Conditions
Overhead and
ELA
Total Cost
No.
Type
Length (LF)
Size (inches)
Element
Cost
Profit
30%
10%
15%
20%
P-1
Salmonberr /Curie
Y Y
New Pipe
P
io
4
Inches
Pipe
4' P
Install 4-inch pipe to Salmonberry Creek. Connects directly to WSUD
$ 169
$ 1,690
$ 507 $ 2,197
$ 220 $ 329 $ 439
$ 3,000
connection.
P-2
Burley
New Pipe
4400
4
Inches
4" Pipe
Install 4-inch pipe to Burley Creek. Connects to the E-i pipe section
$ 169
$ 743,466
$ 223,040
$ 966,506
$ 96,651
$ 144,976
$ 193,301
$ 1,401,000
P-3
Olalla
New Pipe
6700
4
Inches
4" Pipe
Install 4-inch pipe to Olalla Creek. Connects to the E-2 pipe section.
$ 169 $ 1,132,096
$ 339,629 $ 1,471,725
$ 147,173
$ 220,759 $ 294,345
$ 2,134,000
P-4
Purdy
New Pipe
10
4
Inches
4" Pipe
Install 4-inch pipe to PurdyCreek. Connections to the E-3 pipe section.
$ 169
$ 1,690
$ 507
$ 2,197
$ 220
$ 329
$ 439
$ 3,000
P-8
Huge
New Pipe
34575
4
Inches
4" Pipe
Install 4-inch pipe to Huge Creek. Connects dicrectlyto City connection.
$ 169
$ 5,842,125
$ 1,752,637
$ 7,594,762
$ 759,476
$ 1,139,214
$ 1,518,952
$ 11,012,000
P- 9
Gorst
New Pie
P
20
4
Inches
Pie
4' P
Install 4-inch pipe to Gorst Creek. Connects dicrectlyto City of Bremerton
$ 169
$ 1,690
$ 507
$ 2,197
$ 220
$ 329
$ 439
$ 3,000
connection.Nor-
E-i
East Branch Line
Supply
PP Y
9400
6
Inches
6" Pipe
e
Install 6-inch pipe connected to the WSUD system for distribution for stream
$ 169
$ 1,588,314
$ 476,494
$ 2,064,809
$ 206,481
$ 309,721
$ 412,962
$ 2,994,000
augmentation. Will augment Burley Creek.
E-2
East Branch Line 2
Supply
3.8400
4
Inches
4" Pipe
Connected to E-2. Will augment Olalla Creek.
$ 169
$ 3,109,041
$ 932,712
$ 4,041,753
$ 404,175
$ 606,263
$ 808,351
$ 5,861,000
E-3
East Branch Line a
Supply
8000
4
Inches
4" Pipe
Connected toE-2.Will augment PurdeyCreek.
$ 169
$ 1,351,757
$ 405,527
$ 1,757,284
$ 175,728
$ 263,593
$ 351,457
$ 2,548,000
DiffuserPRV and
G-2
Diffuser Cost
Supply
6
EA
Diffuser Setup
Total cost for all six discharge sites.
$ 41,418
$ 248,508
$ 74,552
$ 323,060
$ 32,306
$ 48,459
$ 64,612
$ 468,000
G-2
East Branch - PRV Box
Supply
i
EA
PRV Vault
PRV Box forthe connection at WSUD
$ 30,325
$ 30,325
$ 9,098
$ 39,423
$ 3,942
$ 5,913
$ 7,885
$ 57,000
G-3
Central Branch - PRV Box
Supply
1
EA
PRV Vault
PRV Box for connection at City
$ 30,325
$ 30,325
$ 9,098
$ 39,423
$ 3,942
$ 5,913
$ 7,885
$ 57,000
G-4
Gorst - PRV Box
Supply
i
Ea
PRV Vault
PRV Box for connection with City of BermertonLine
$ 30,325
$ 30,325
$ 9,098
$ 39,423
$ 3,942
$ 5,913
$ 7,885
$ 57,000
back to agenda
City of Port Orchard
Stream Augmentation Carte„�
Project Title: Salmonberry/Curley Project No.: P-1
Facility Type: Creek Branch Pipeline Go to CIP Summary Table
Project Information:
Description: Install 4-inch pipe to Salmonberry Creek. Connects directly to WSUD connection.
Unit Cost
Quantity Unit ($/Unit) Subtotal
Total Contractor
Constructio General
Construction Overhead an
Contingent Cost Conditions Profi
30% 10% 15%
ELA
MtaCos
Project Elem
----------
----------
----------
----------
----------
----------
Total Anticipated Project Cost r
Cost Allocation:
1� Project Type Percent
Improvement: 1 100% $ 81,073
Capacity: 0%1 $ -
Repair & Replacement: 1 0%1 $ -
100% $ 81,073
roiect Timing:
Project Element Timing Cost —
ntire Project 0 $ 81,07?
Total Anticipated Project Cost : r
Project Location Map:
Go to Maps Tab
saimeneerry
��
a et s
NA+Dab
S
1
4m.rwu�ppp OWE
F ES�
Purdy �
•'r..�,nr
n.. w
back to agenda
City of Port Orchard
Stream Augmentation <c7caro/%
Project Title: Olalla Project No.: P-3
Facility Type: Creek Branch Pipeline Go to CIP Summary Table
Protect Information:
Description: Install 4-inch pipe to Olalla Creek. Connects to the E-2 pipe section.
t Element
WC
10 LF
r
Total Contractor
Construction General
Unit Cost Construction Overhead and ELA
$/Unit) Subtotal Contingency Cost Conditions Profit 10
W AN 30% 10% 15%MN 20% -
169 1,132,09611�
----------
----------
----------
----------
----------
----------
----------
Total Anticipated Project Cost
Cost Allocation: Project Timing:
Project Type Percent Cost Project Element Timing Cost
Improvement: 100% $ 2,212,073 Entire Project 0 $ 2,212,073
Capacity: 0% $
Condition: 0% $
100% $ 2,212,073 1 Total Anticipated Project Cost 2,212,073
Protect Location Map:
i
d Et' 3
I.N.V .. •. •L '
{ xa'na'b
s.e .•wwa q,
Y
Q
Guru `x
4
back to agenda
City of Port Orchard
Stream Augmentation
Proiect Title: Purdy
Facility Type: Creek Branch Pipeline
Proiect Information:
Description: Install 4-inch pipe to PurdyCreek. Connections to the E-3 pipe section.
Proiect No.: P-4
Go to CIP Summary Table
Anticipated Project Cost:
Project Element Quantity Unit
Total Contractor
Construction General
Unit Cost Construction Overhead and ELA
Lta
($/Unit) Cost Profit Contingency Conditions Total Cost
30% 10% 15% 20%
off
----------
----------
----------
----------
----------
----------
Total Anticipated Project Cost
Notes on Cost Estimation:
Total cost does not include easement acquisition.
Go to Assumptions Tab
8
Total Anticipated Project Cost r 0' .
Project Element Timing Cost
.-itire Project
Total Anticipated Project Cost r
Proiect Location Map: - a .gene Go to Maps Tab IM
f�
� ro
„•ram PI,,.,.
f lm Mnn rrvnk
,p � Wlnlwitl�E]V
IS.111.onberry
back to agenda
City of Port Orchard
Stream Augmentation
ProiectTitle: Burley ProiectNo.: P-2
FacilitvTvpe: Creek Branch Pipeline Go to CIP Summary Table
Project Information:
Description: Install 4-inch pipe to Burley Creek. Connects to the E-1 pipe section
• �R
roject Element Quantity Unit
,
Total Contractor
Construction eneral
Unit Cost Construc Overhead and
Subtotal Contingency WM
($/Unit) C rofit
30%---
Uot-lCost
----------
----------
----------
----------
----------
----------
----------
----------
Total Anticipated Project Cost
Notes on Cost Estimation:
Total cost does not include easement acquisition.
Go to Assumptions Tab
Cost Allocation: Project Timing:
Project Type Percent cost I Project Element Timing Cost
Improvement: 100% $ 1,479,073 Entire Project 0 1 $ 1,479,073
Capacity: 0%1 $ -
Condition: 0%1 $
100% $ 1,479,073 $ 1,479,073
Project Location Map:
Go to Maps Tab
r
f Ell
3ud.y
£ xvna b
E2
v wr.o OYlla -'
MY �,
back to agenda
City of Port Orchard
Stream Augmentation
C
Ca
Project Title: East Branch Line 1
Facility Type: Supply Trunk Line
Project No.: E-1
Go to CIP Summary Table
Project Information:
Description: Install 6-inch pipe connected to the WSUD system for distribution for stream augmentation.
Will augment Burley Creek.
Anticipated Project Cost:
Construction
Unit Cost
Total General Contractor
Tp,oject IrQuantity
Element
Unit
Subtotal Contingency
($/Unit)
L'
Construction Conditions Overhead
Cost
L
and ELA Total Cost
Profit
0'
6" Pipe
6
IF
$ 169 $ 1,588,314 $ 476,494
$ 2,064,809 $206,481 $
309,721 $ 412,962 $ 2,994,000
PRV Vault
1
EA
$ 30,325 $ 30,325 $ 9,098
$ 39,423 $ 3,942
$
5,913 $ 7,885 $ 57,000
$ 3,051,000
Notes on Cost Estimation:
Total cost does not include easement acquisition.
Go to Assumptions Tab
Cost Allocation:
Project Timing:
Project Type Percent
Improvement: 100% $
Cost
3,051,000
Project Element
Entire Project
Timing Cost
0 $ 3,051,000
Capacity: 0%1 $
Condition: 0% $
100% $
3,051,000
Total Anticipated
Project Cost
3,051,000
Project Location Map:
—b I ameLawe
Go to Maps Tab
�
� .wwr.rw LewO
I � nn W.►.
WWwiel <31
.� ' N'•1[LeSn
cwo Lcw
•
,�}ITOnEeeey Ll x
1LLner
,[...s ....,
f
iLIA[!ab
Q
p%
E$
..
urdy
back to agenda
City of Port Orchard
Stream Augmentation
Care„^
Project Title: East Branch Line 2
Project No.: E-2
Facility Type: Creek Branch Pipeline
Go toClPSummaryTable
Project Information:
Description: Connected to E-1. Will augment Olalla Creek.
Anticipated Proiect Cost:
Unit Cost
Construction
Total tor
Construction General CIContr:c
d
T
Project Element Quantity
Unit ($/Unit) Subtotal
Co ntingency
verhe and
Total Cost
Cost Conditions Profit
4" Pipe 18,400
LF $ 169 $ 3,109,041
$ 932,712
$ 4,041,753 $404,175 $ 606,263 $ 808,351 $ 5,861,000
$ 5,861,000
Notes on Cost Estimation:
Total cost does not include easement acquisition.
Go to Assumptions Tab
Cost Allocation:
Project Timing:
F—I
Project Type Percent
Improvement: 1 100% $
Cost
5,861,000 1 Entire Project
Project Element
Timing Cost
1 0 1$ 5,861,000
Capacity: 1 0%1 $
Repair & Replacement: 1 0%1 $
100$5 $
5,861,000 Total
Anticipated
Project Cost$ 5,861,000
Project Location Map:
-
irGo to Maps Tab
1f
4
,miemnrn.nawe
•NM
d
,��yIrTOnEeery
FL
f E1
Y
1.1.y r' .... .
w.mb
Y
K2 F.
�
tl E4
It
back to agenda
City of Port Orchard
Stream Augmentation
Care„^
Project Title: East Branch Line 3
Project No.:
E-3
Facility Type: Creek Branch Pipeline
Go toClPSummaryTable
Project Information:
Description: Connected to E-2. Will augment Purdey Creek.
Anticipated Proiect Cost:
Unit
Cost
Total
Construction Construction
General CIContr:c tor
d
T
Project Element Quantity
Unit ($/Unit)
Subtotal
Co ntingency Cost
verhe and
Total Cost
Conditions Profit
4" Pipe 8,000
LF $
169 $ 1,351,757
$ 405,527 $ 1,757,284
$175,728 $ 263,593 $ 351,457 $ 2,548,000
$ 2,548,000
Notes on Cost Estimation:
Total cost does not include easement acquisition.
Go to Assumptions Tab
Cost Allocation:
Project Timing:
F—I
Project Type Percent
Improvement: 1 100% $
Cost
2,548,000
Entire Project
Project Element
Timing Cost
0 $ 2,548,000
Capacity: 1 0%1 $
-
Repair & Replacement: 1 0%1 $
100$2 $
2,548,000
Total
Anticipated Project Cost$
2,548,000
Project Location Map:
irGo to Maps Tab
.3i
r
—
..u.,. °"
saimeneerry r-riaona
d Et
!�Y
4
I
b'.
E2
.+ °Fdy
back to agenda
City of Port Orchard
Stream Augmentation
Project Title: Gorst
Facility Type: Creek Branch Pipeline
Project Information:
Description: Install 4-inch pipe to Gorst Creek. Connects dicrectly to City of Bremerton connection.
Project No.: P-9
Go to CIP Summary Table
Anticipated Pro'ect Cost.,
�roject Element uantit
Diffuser
Contractor
Construction eneral
Unit Cost Construction Overhead an
S I Contingency �nditions ��
($/Unit) Cost Profit
•a $ 507 2,197 $ 220a00
���
Total Cost
aI78,073
Total Anticipated Prol
Notes on Cost Estimation:
Total cost does not include easement acquisition. Go to Assumptions Tab
Cost Allocation: Project Timing:
Project Type Percent Cost Project Element Timing Cost Improvement: 1 100% $ 81,073 1 Entire Project 0 $ 81,073
Capacity: 0% $ -
Repair & Replacement: 0% $ -
100% $ 81,073 Total Anticipated Project Cost$ 81,073
Project Location Map:
Gorst
Go to Maps Tab
":' nn[IIARD STRLAMF tD W Aucmf R mim
STUDY I CM U FM i,' YNA
Utw
Patentvl Uty of
9rernertm DrAmrp
ME
— PNgpa d PIWInt
City d&eirwrim
-
_
WYer Man
hw%
AL4�t
- VAmiff WWs
r
O
V l.IIW NIX
or�r srirry rrw I4.r, ea.
I,
rrrrpm>terbr►
��
tawrM� rwe.n>•arrr n do
Wrr�arr.
i4��
�eFr�wr�+Fr�
4
Hf rewgarna r.r.r-"F
N
J
back to agenda
City of Port Orchard
Stream Augmentation
Project Title: Huge ProjectNo.: P-8
Facility Type: Creek Branch Pipeline Go to CIP Summary Table
Project Information:
Description: Install 4-inch pipe to Huge Creek. Connects dicrectly to City connection.
Anticipated Project Cost:
roject Element Quantity Unit
1:P
Construction Contractor
Unit Cost Cnonstructil Overhead
lub;AVontingen L C t IL
a k Cost Prof
0•.
Total Cost
4" Pipe 34,575 LF
$ 169 $ 5,842,125 $ 1,752,637 $ 7,594,762 $759,476 $ 1,139,214
$ 1,518,952 $ 11,012,000
Diffuser Cost 1 EA
$ 41,418
$ 41,418
$ 12,425
$ 53,843
$ 5,384
$ 8,077
$ 10,769
$ 78,073
PRV Vault 1 EA
$ 30,325
$ 30,325
$ 9,098
$ 39,423
$ 3,942
$ 5,913
$ 7,885
$ 57,000
Notes on Cost Estimation:
Total cost does not include easement acquisition.
$ 11,147,073
Go to Assumptions Tab
Cost Allocation: Project Timing:
Improvement: 100% $ 11,147,073 Entire Project 0 $ 11,147,073
Capacity: 0% $ -
Repair & Replacement: 0% $ -
100% Total Anticipated Project Cost$ 11,147,073
Project Location Map:
Go to Maps Tab
ro�QRP P$MIWFL�wcuE—r VUW1 Cmov.r Qx D
•�
i`
1
�
E I � _
� ma.nw wrau�[asm
k
z
r wxneup aware }
��.rnr�w�h+�w
back to agenda
City of Port Orchard
Stream Augmentation
Project Title: PRV Vault Proiect No.: N/A
Facility Type: Creek Branch Pipeline Go to CIP Summary Table
Anticipated Project Cost:
Project Element
6
6" Pipe
6" Pressure Reducing Valve
,dr
0
1
i
LF
EA
$ 41,418
$ 7,800
Subtotal
r
$
$ 7,800
Constructio
ingenc JJnT
ft
i
$ -
$ 2,340
o.1
Cost
$ -
1 $ 10,140
Gen.&Cornt'r
Condit
i
$ -
1 $ 1,014
r
Profit
$ -
$ 1,521
T44
$ - $ -
$ 2,028 $ 14,703
6" Gate Valve
2
EA
$ 2,000
$ 4,000
$ 1,200
1 $ 5,200
$ 520
1 $ 780
1 $ 1,040 $ 7,540
Excavation
141
CY
$ 25
$ 3,525
$ 1,058
1 $ 4,583
1 $ 458
1 $ 687
1 $ 917 $ 6,645
Valve Box
1
CY
$ 15,000
$ 15,000
$ 4,500
1 $ 19,5001
$ 1,950
1 $ 2,925
1 $ 3,900 $ 28,275
$ 57,163
Notes on Cost Estimation:
Total cost does not include easement acquisition.Ism-
Go to Assumptions Tab
Cost Allocation: Project Timing:
Project Type Percent Cost Project Element Timing
Improvement: 100% $ 57,163 Entire Project #N/A $ •57,163
Capacity: 1 0% $
Repair & Replacement: 10% $
100% $ 57,163 Total Anticipated Project Cost$ 57,163
Project Location Map: Go to Maps Tab
back to agenda
City of Port Orchard
Stream Augmentation
Project Title: Diffuser Station Proiect No.: N/A Go to CIP Summary Table
Facility Type: Creek Branch Pipeline
Anticipated Project Cost:
Project Element
6 lod"unit
6" Pipe
Manhole
15
1
LF
EA
"(s/u]-)
$ 160
$ 2,110
Lubt-tmM30
$ 2,400
$ 2,110
$
$
ti ngen
720
633
Cost
$ 3,120
$ 312
Contractor
r
Profit
$ 468
T41
0•
$ 624 $ 4,524
$ 2,743
$ 274
$ 411 $
549 $ 3,977
6" Pressure Reducing Valve
1
EA
$ 8,190
$ 8,190
$
2,457
$ 10,647
$ 1,065
$ 1,597
$ 2,129 $ 15,438
6" Backflow Preventer
1
EA
$ 5,915
$ 5,915
$
1,775
$ 7,690
$ 769
$ 1,153
$ 1,538 $ 11,150
6" Flow Meter
1
EA
$ 4,278
$ 4,278
$
1,283
$ 5,561
$ 556
$ 834
$ 1,112 $ 8,064
Excavation
141
CY
$ 25
$ 3,525
$
1,058
$ 4,583
$ 458
$ 687
$ 917 $ 6,645
Valve Box
1
CY
$ 15,000
$ 15,000
$
4,500
$ 19,500
$ 1,950
$ 2,925
$ 3,900 $ 28,275
$ 78,073
Notes on Cost Estimation:
Total cost does not include easement acquisition.
-
Go to Assumptions Tab
Cost Allocation: Project Timing:
Project Type Percent Cost Project Element Timing
Improvement: 100% $ 78,073 Entire Project #N/A $ •78,073
Capacity: 1 0% $
Repair & Replacement: 10% $
100% $ 78,073 Total Anticipated Project Cost$ 78,073
Project Location Map: Go to Maps Tab
back to agenda
murraysm�I
Opinion of Probable Cost of Construction
MCCORMICK VILLAGE PARK SPLASH PAD TREATMENT FACILITY INSTALLATION
Project: MCCORMICK VILLAGE PARK SPLASH PAD TREATMENT FACILITY INSTALLATION
Submittal: 100%(Class 1 Estimate)
Owner: City of Port Orchard, WA
Date: 04/08/2021
Item No.
Quantity
Unit Costs
Total Cost
Material
Labor/Equipment
E
Total
Civil (site work)
1
Demolition and Removals
1
LS
$10,000.00
$25,000.00
$35,000.00
$35,000.00
2
Erosion Control
1
LS
$5,000.00
$7,000.00
$12,000.00
$12,000.00
3
Construction Entrance
1
EA
$1,200.00
$1,300.00
$2,500.00
$2,500.00
4
Temporary fence
1
LS
$1,200.00
$1,300.00
$2,500.00
$2,500.00
5
Excavation Export excess materials
1
LS
$5,000.00
$15,000.00
$20,000.00
$20,000.00
6
Gravel 7"
551
SF
$10.00
$15.00
$25.00
$13,775.00
7
Base Rock4"
315
Ton
$18.00
$32.00
$50.00
$15,750.00
8
Concrete
10
CY
$1,320.00
$400.00
$1,720.00
$17,200.00
9
Asphalt paving 3"
236
Ton
$56.00
$69.00
$125.00
$29,500.00
10
Landscaping (includes tree pruning)
1
LS
$5,000.00
$7,500.00
$12,500.00
$12,500.00
11
Overexcavation
466
CY
$10.00
$40.00
$50.00
$23,300.00
12
Pre Cast Structure
1
EA
$5,500.00
$1,500.00
$7,000.00
$7,000.00
13
Site Piping
1
LS
$6,000.001
$18,000.001
$24,000.001
$24,000.00
SubTotal:
$215,025
Architectural
14
New Building
1 252 SF
$200.00
$200.00
$50,400.00
SubTotal:
$50,400.00
Concrete
15
1 Building Foundation
I 3
CY
1 $800.00
1 $800.00
$2,400.00
16
SuhTntaln 57 Ann_nn
Mechanical
17
Grinder Pump Package
1
LS
$5,000.00
$1,250.00
$7,500.00
$7,500.00
18
Media Filter
1
LS
$5,000.00
$1,250.00
$7,500.00
$7,500.00
19
Chemical Feed Tanks
1
LS
$1,200.00
$300.00
$1,800.00
$1,800.00
20
Chemical Feed Pumps
1
LS
$5,000.00
$1,250.00
$7,500.00
$7,500.00
21
Miscellaneous Chemcial Equipment
1
LS
$5,000.00
$1,250.00
$7,500.00
$7,500.00
22
Interior Mechancical Piping
1
LS
$3,500.00
$1,050.00
$5,460.00
$5,460.00
SubTotal:
23 1 HVAC Equipment I 1 LS 1 $2,500.001 $625.001 $3,125.001 $3,125.00
SubTotal: $3,125.00
Electrical and Control
24 1200 Amp Breaker Sub Panel I 1 LS 1 91.200.001 S300.001 91.500.001 $1.500.00
SubTotal:
Material & Labor Total:
$309,710
Bonds and Insurance: 2%
$6,194
Mobilization: 10%
$30,971
Contractor's Overhead & Profit: 15%
$46,457
Supply Chain Disruption 14%
$43,359
1
$393,332
Owner's Allowance/Contingency: 20%
$78, 666
Environmental Mitigation Not included
Right of Way Acquisition Not included
Construction Cost of WTP
Construction Eng./Admin. $0
Estimated Project Cost $472,000
Construction Cost w/sales Tax and Owner's Allowance (minimum range: -10%) $425,000
Construction Cost w/sales Tax and Owner's Allowance (maximum range: +20%) $566,000
back to agenda