014-22 - Ordinance - New Chapter 20.70 Wireless Communication FacilitiesDocuSign Envelope ID: OE91833A-F2D1-4FOA-8C34-9E5F36F8ADD2
ORDINANCE NO. 014-22
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF PORT ORCHARD, WASHINGTON,
ADDING A NEW CHAPTER 20.70 THE PORT ORCHARD MUNICIPAL CODE
REGARDING ZONING FOR WIRELESS COMMUNICATIONS FACILITIES,
INCLUDING ESTABLISHING PERMITTING PROCEDURES, PERFORMANCE
STANDARDS, EXEMPTIONS, DEFINTIONS, CONDITIONS AND CRITERIA
FOR APPROVAL, STANDARDS FOR DIFFERENT LAND USE ZONES;
PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY AND CORRECTIONS; AND ESTABLISHING
AN EFFECTIVE DATE.
WHEREAS, in 1934 Congress enacted the Communications Act of 1934, creating the
Federal Communications Commission and granting it authority over common carriers
engaged in the provision of interstate or foreign communications services; and
WHEREAS, in 1996 Congress enacted Pub. L. No. 104-104, 110 Stat. 70 (the
"Telecommunications Act of 1996"), amending the Communications Act of 1934 and
implementing regulations applicable to both wireless and wireline communications
facilities for the purpose of removal of barriers to entry into the telecommunications
market, while preserving local government zoning authority except where specifically
limited under the Telecommunications Act of 1996; and
WHEREAS, in the Telecommunications Act of 1996, Congress imposed substantive and
procedural limitations on the traditional authority of state and local governments to
regulate the location, construction, and modification of wireless facilities and incorporated
those limitations into the Communications Act of 1934; and
WHEREAS, in 2012, Congress passed the "Middle Class Tax Relief and Job Creation Act
of 2012" (the "Spectrum Act") (PL-112-96; codified at 47 U.S.C. § 1455(a)); and
WHEREAS, Section 6409 of the Spectrum Act (hereafter "Section 6409") implements
additional substantive and procedural limitations upon state and local government
authority to regulate modification of existing wireless antenna support structures and base
stations; and
WHEREAS, Congress, through its enactment of Section 6409, has mandated that local
governments approve, and cannot deny, an application requesting modification of an
existing tower or base station if such modification does not substantially change the
physical dimensions of such tower or base station; and
WHEREAS, the Telecommunications Act of 1996 empowers the Federal
Communications Commission (the "FCC") to prescribe such rules and regulations as may be
necessary in the public interest to carry out the provisions of the 1996 Act, and
DocuSign Envelope ID: OE91833A-F2D1-4FOA-8C34-9E5F36F8ADD2
Ordinance No. 014-22
Page 2 of 24
subsequently added portions of the 1996 Act such as Section 6409; and
WHEREAS, the FCC, pursuant to its rule -making authority, has continued to adopt new
rules to implement Section 6409 and such rules have been subject to litigation with the
Federal Courts weighing in on the rules, which have been mostly upheld; and
WHEREAS, the City Council finds that it is in the best interest of the City to adopt and
implement local development and zoning regulations that are consistent with Section 6409;
and
WHEREAS, in accordance with RCW 36.70A.106 and WAC 365-196-630, a notice of
intent to adopt the proposed new development regulations was sent to the State of
Washington Department of Commerce and to other state agencies to allow for a 60-day
review and comment period, which comment period ended prior to adoption of this
ordinance; and
WHEREAS, on April 1, 2022, the City's SEPA official issued a determination of
nonsignificance for the proposed amendments, which was published and provided to the public
in accordance with POMC 20.160.190 and WAC 197-11-510, and there have been no appeals;
and
WHEREAS, on March 21, 2022, the City issued a Notice of Public Hearing for the proposed
amendments creating new POMC Chapter 20.70, Chapter 20.72, and amending POMC
20.39.270 which was published and provided to the public in accordance with POMC 20.25.050;
and
WHEREAS, the City worked collaboratively with the telecommunications providers to
improve the Ordinance; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission conducted a public hearing on the substance of this
Ordinance on April 5, 2022, and recommended its adoption by the City Council; and
WHEREAS, the Land Use Committee of the City Council considered this Ordinance on April
20, 2022; and
WHEREAS, the City Council opted to conduct a 2nd public hearing on the substance of this
Ordinance on May 10, 2022; and
WHEREAS, on April 18, 2022, the City issued a Notice for a 2nd Public Hearing for the
proposed amendments creating new POMC Chapter 20.70, Chapter 20.72, and amending POMC
20.39.270 which was published and provided to the public in accordance with POMC 20.25.050;
and
DocuSign Envelope ID: OE91833A-F2D1-4FOA-8C34-9E5F36F8ADD2
Ordinance No. 014-22
Page 3 of 24
WHEREAS, the City Council, after careful consideration of the recommendation from the
Planning Commission, all public comment, and the Ordinance, finds that this Ordinance is
consistent with the City's Comprehensive Plan and development regulations, the Growth
Management Act, Chapter 36.70A RCW, Section 6409, and that the amendments herein are in
the best interests of the residents of the City and further advance the public health, safety and
welfare; now, therefore,
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PORT ORCHARD, WASHINGTON, DOES HEREBY
ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS:
SECTION 1. Recitals. The recitals set forth in this ordinance are hereby
incorporated as if fully set forth herein.
SECTION 2. Adoption of Chapter 20.70 POMC. A new Chapter 20.70 entitled
"Wireless Communication Facilities" is hereby added to the Port Orchard Municipal Code to
read as follows:
,0la_1�1�1:i��Xl�]
IJill1:tMIS.Td9]►TiI►TiIII L11WIN V[Q►Iy_[4l141VLV
Sections:
20.70.010 Purpose
20.70.020 Authority and Application
20.70.030 Exemptions
20.70.040 Permits Required
20.70.050 Types of Permits —Priority —Restrictions
20.70.060 New Towers
20.70.070 General Requirements
20.70.080 Electrical Transmission Tower Co -Location -Specific Development Standards
20.70.090 Adding Antennas to Existing WCF Tower -Specific Development Standards
20.70.100 Concealed Building Mounted Development Requirements
20.70.110 Non -concealed Building Mounted Development Requirements
20.70.120 Utility Pole Co -location
20.70.130 Towers -Specific Development Standards
20.70.140 Request to Use Non -concealed Building Attached in Lieu of a Concealed
Building Attached
20.70.150 Landscaping/Screening
20.70.160 Zoning Setback Exceptions
DocuSign Envelope ID: OE91833A-F2D1-4FOA-8C34-9E5F36F8ADD2
Ordinance No. 014-22
Page 4 of 24
20.70.170 Height Waivers
20.70.190 Removal of Abandoned Wireless Communication Facilities
20.70.200 Standards for Eligible Facilities Modifications
20.70.210 Expiration of Wireless Facility Permits
20.70.010 Purpose
A. The purpose of this Chapter is to regulate the placement, construction and modification
of wireless communication facilities, in order to protect the health, safety and welfare of the
public, while not unreasonably interfering with the development of the competitive wireless
telecommunications marketplace in the City. The purpose of this Chapter will be achieved
through adherence to the following objectives:
1. Establish clear and nondiscriminatory local regulations concerning wireless
telecommunications providers and services that are consistent with Federal and State laws and
regulations pertaining to telecommunications providers;
2. Protect residential areas and land uses from potential adverse impacts that wireless
communication facilities might create, including but not limited to impacts on aesthetics,
environmentally sensitive areas, historically significant locations, flight corridors, and health
and safety of persons and property;
3. Encourage providers of wireless communication facilities to locate these facilities,
to the extent possible, in areas where the adverse impact on the community is minimal;
4. Encourage the location of wireless communication facilities in nonresidential areas
and allow wireless communication facilities in residential areas only when necessary, to meet
functional requirements of the telecommunications industry;
5. Minimize the total number of wireless communication facilities in residential areas;
6. Require cooperation between competitors and, as a primary option, joint use of
new and existing towers, tower sites and suitable structures to the greatest extent possible,
in order to reduce cumulative negative impact upon the City;
7. Allow wireless communication companies to use City property (i.e., City Hall,
Community Center, utilities property, parks, etc.) for the placement of wireless facilities,
where consistent with other public needs, as a means to generate revenue for the City;
8. Ensure wireless communication facilities are configured in a way that minimizes
the adverse visual impact of the wireless communication facilities, as viewed from different
vantage points, through careful design, landscape screening, minimal impact siting options
and camouflaging techniques, and through assessment of technology, current location
options, siting, future available locations, innovative siting techniques and siting possibilities
beyond the jurisdictional boundaries of the City;
9. Enhance the ability of the providers of telecommunications services to provide
such services to the community quickly, effectively and efficiently;
10. Provide for the removal of wireless communication facilities that are abandoned
DocuSign Envelope ID: OE91833A-F2D1-4FOA-8C34-9E5F36F8ADD2
Ordinance No. 014-22
Page 5 of 24
or no longer inspected for safety concerns and Building Code compliance, and provide a
mechanism for the City to cause these abandoned wireless communication facilities to be
removed, to protect the residents from imminent harm and danger;
11. Avoid potential damage to adjacent properties from tower failure, through
engineering, careful siting, height limits, and maintenance of wireless communication
facilities; and
12. Provide a means for public input on major wireless communications facility
placement, construction, and modification.
B. In furtherance of these objectives, the City shall give due consideration to the
Comprehensive Land Use Plan, Land Use and Development Regulations, existing land uses, and
environmentally sensitive areas in approving sites for the location of communication towers
and antennas.
C. These objectives were developed to protect the public health, safety, and welfare, to
protect property values, and to minimize visual impact, while furthering the development of
enhanced telecommunication services in the City. These objectives were designed to comply
with the Telecommunications Act of 1996. The provisions of this Chapter are not intended to
and shall not be interpreted to prohibit or to have the effect of prohibiting personal wireless
services. This Chapter shall not be applied in such a manner as to unreasonably discriminate
between providers of functionally equivalent personal wireless services.
D. To the extent that any provision of this Chapter is inconsistent or conflicts with any
other City ordinance, this Chapter shall control. Otherwise, this Chapter shall be construed
consistently with the other provisions and regulations of the City.
E. In reviewing any application to place, construct or modify wireless communication
facilities, the City shall act within a reasonable period of time after an application for a permit
is duly filed, taking into account the nature and scope of the application. Any decision to deny
an application shall be in writing, supported by substantial evidence contained in a written
record. The City shall approve, approve with conditions, or deny the application in accordance
with Title 20 of the Port Orchard Municipal Code, this Chapter, the adopted Port Orchard
Comprehensive Plan, and other applicable ordinances and regulations.
20.70.020 Authority and Application.
The provisions of this Chapter shall apply to the placement, construction, or modification
of all wireless communication facilities, except as specifically exempted in POMC Section
20.70.030.
20.70.030 Exemptions.
The provisions of this Chapter shall not apply to the following:
1. Wireless communication facilities permits are not required for subparagraphs 1.a
through 1.e of this section; however, other permits, such as a grading permit, street excavation
permit, traffic management plan, or building permit may be required:
DocuSign Envelope ID: OE91833A-F2D1-4FOA-8C34-9E5F36F8ADD2
Ordinance No. 014-22
Page 6 of 24
a. Routine maintenance and repair of wireless communication facilities when no
traffic impacts will occur. This shall not include changes in height or dimensions of towers or
buildings; provided that the wireless communication facility received approval from the City of
Port Orchard or Kitsap County for the original placement, construction, or subsequent
modification. When traffic impacts will occur, a traffic control plan approved by the City is
required prior to performing the work.
b. Changing of antennas on wireless communication facilities is exempt from
wireless facilities permits, provided the total area of the new antennas and support structure
is not increased more than ten percent (10%) of the previous area or if the area is reduced.
c. Changing or adding additional antennas within a previously permitted concealed
building -mounted installation is exempt provided there is no visible change from the outside.
d. Bird exclusionary devices may be added to towers and are not subject to height
limitations.
e. Additional ground equipment may be placed within an approved equipment
enclosure, provided the height of the equipment does not extend above the screening fence.
2. An antenna that is designed to receive or send direct broadcast satellite service
and/or broadband signals, or other means for providing internet service including direct -to -
home satellite services, and that is one (1) meter or less in diameter or diagonal measurement,
and when the antenna is attached to the residence or business that is utilizing the service.
3. An antenna that is designed to receive video programming services via multipoint
distribution services, including multi -channel multipoint distribution services, instructional
television fixed services, and local multipoint distribution services, and that is one (1) meter
or less in diameter or diagonal measurement.
4. An antenna that is designed to receive television broadcast signals.
5. Antennas for the receiving and sending of amateur radio devices or HAM radios,
provided that the antennas meet the height requirements of the applicable zoning district,
and are owned and operated by a Federally -licensed amateur radio station operator or are
used exclusively for receive -only antennas. In order to reasonably accommodate licensed
amateur radio operators as required by Federal Code of Regulations, 47 CFR Part 97, as
amended, and Order and Opinion (PRB-1) of the Federal Communication Commission of
September 1985, and RCW 35A.21.260, a licensed amateur radio operator may locate a tower
not to exceed the height requirements of the applicable zoning district, provided the following
requirements are met for such towers located in a residentially -zoned district:
a. The tower and any antennas located thereon shall not have any lights of any
kind on it and shall not be illuminated either directly or indirectly by any artificial means;
b. The color of the tower and any antennas located thereon must all be the same
and such that it blends into the sky, to the extent allowed under requirements set forth by the
Federal Aviation Administration;
c. No advertising logo, trademark, figurine or other similar marking or lettering
shall be placed on the tower or any wireless communication facilities mounted or otherwise
DocuSign Envelope ID: OE91833A-F2D1-4FOA-8C34-9E5F36F8ADD2
Ordinance No. 014-22
Page 7 of 24
attached thereto or any building used in conjunction therewith;
d. The tower shall be located a distance equal to or greater than its height from
any existing residential structure located on adjacent parcels of property, including any
attached accessory structures;
e. A tower must be at least three-quarters of its height from any property line on
the parcel of property on which it is located, unless a licensed engineer certifies that the tower
will not collapse or that it is designed in such a way that, in the event of collapse, it falls within
itself, and in that event, it must be located at least one-third of its height from any property
line;
f. No signs shall be used in conjunction with the tower, except for one sign not
larger than 8%" high and 11" wide and as required by Federal regulations;
g. Towers shall not be leased or rented to commercial users, and shall not
otherwise be used for commercial purposes; and
h. All towers must meet all applicable State and Federal statutes, rules, and
regulations, including obtaining a building permit from the City, if necessary.
6. Emergency communications equipment during a declared public emergency, when
the equipment is owned and operated by an appropriate public entity.
7. Wireless Communications Facilities ("WCFs") used for temporary emergency
communications in the event of a disaster, or emergency preparedness, and for any other public
health or safety purpose, including, by way of illustration and not limitation, any
communications systems utilized by first responders such as police or fire.
8. Any wireless internet facility that is owned and operated by a government entity.
9. Antennas and related equipment no more than 3 feet in height that are being
stored, shipped or displayed for sale.
10. Radar systems for military and civilian communication and navigation.
11. Small wireless facilities as defined by POMC Section 20.29.030.
20.70.040 Permits Required.
A. No person may place, construct, or modify a wireless communication facility subject to
this Chapter without first having in place a permit issued in accordance with this Chapter.
Except as otherwise provided herein, the requirements of this Chapter are in addition to the
applicable requirements of POMC Title 20.
B. Any application submitted pursuant to this Chapter shall be reviewed and evaluated by
the Director for all projects located on public or private property. The Director of Public Works
or his/her designee shall review all proposed wireless communication facilities that are totally
within City right-of-way. If a project is both on private or public property and City right-of-way,
the Community Development Director shall review the application. Regardless of whether the
Community Development Director or the Director of Public Works is reviewing the application,
all applications will be reviewed and evaluated pursuant to the provisions of this Chapter.
C. The applicant is responsible for obtaining all other permits from any other appropriate
DocuSign Envelope ID: OE91833A-F2D1-4FOA-8C34-9E5F36F8ADD2
Ordinance No. 014-22
Page 8 of 24
governing body (i.e., Washington State Department of Labor and Industries, Federal Aviation
Administration, etc.). For purposes of this chapter, the "applicant" is inclusive of the party who
applies for permits and the party or parties will own, operate, or manage the wireless
communication facility.
D. This Chapter provides guidelines for the placement, construction, and modification of
wireless communication facilities, which are not otherwise exempt as set forth in POMC Section
20.70.030.
E. No provision of this Chapter shall be interpreted to allow the installation of a wireless
communication facility to reduce the minimum parking or landscaping required on a site.
F. Wireless communication facilities that are governed under this Chapter shall not be
eligible for variances under POMC Chapter 20.28. Any request to deviate from this Chapter
shall be based on the exceptions or waivers set forth in this Chapter.
G. Third Party Expert Review. Applicants use various methodologies and analyses,
including geographically -based computer software, to determine the specific technical
parameters of the services to be provided utilizing the proposed wireless communication
facilities, such as expected coverage area, antenna configuration, capacity, and topographic
constraints that affect signal paths. In certain instances, a third party expert may be needed
to review the engineering and technical data submitted by an applicant for a permit. The City
may at its discretion require an engineering and technical review as part of a permitting
process. The costs of the technical review shall be borne by the applicant.
H. The selection of the third -party expert may be by mutual agreement between the
applicant and the City, or at the discretion of the City, with a provision for the applicant and
beneficially interested parties to comment on the proposed expert and review his/her
qualifications. The third party expert review is intended to address interference and public
safety issues and be a site -specific review of engineering and technical aspects of the proposed
wireless communication facilities and/or a review of the applicants' methodology and
equipment used, and is not intended to be a subjective review of the site which was selected
by an applicant. Based on the results of the expert review, the City may require changes to the
application. The expert review shall address the following:
1. The accuracy and completeness of submissions;
2. The applicability of analysis techniques and methodologies;
3. The validity of conclusions reached;
4. The viability of other sites in the City for the use intended by the applicant; and
5. Any specific engineering or technical issues designated by the City.
I. No alterations or changes shall be made to plans approved by the Director, Director of
Public Works, or Hearing Examiner without approval from the City. Minor changes which do
not change the overall project may be approved by the Community Development Director as
a minor modification.
DocuSign Envelope ID: OE91833A-F2D1-4FOA-8C34-9E5F36F8ADD2
Ordinance No. 014-22
Page 9 of 24
20.70.050 Types of Permits -Priority --Restrictions.
A. Applications will be reviewed based on the type of wireless communication facilities
requested to be permitted. Each wireless communication facility requires the appropriate type
of project permit review, as shown in Table A. In the event of uncertainty on the type of a
wireless facility, the Community Development Director shall have the authority to determine
how a proposed facility is incorporated into Table A.
TABLE A
Type of Permit Required, Based on Type of
Wireless Communication Facility
Zoning(1)
Type of Facility
Residential
Commercial /
Industrial
Public
Adding antennas to an
Type 1 (2)
Type 1(2)
Type 1(2)
existing or replacement
tower or utility pole
Eligible facilities
Type 1
Type 1
Type 1
modification
Utility pole co-
Type 2
Type 2
Type 2
location
Concealed building
Type 2 (3)
Type 2 (3)
Type 1
attached
Non -concealed building
Type 2
Type 2
Type 1
attached
New tower or
Type 3
Type 3
Type 3
height adjustment
request beyond the
limitations in the
Spectrum Act
(1) Zoning for any private/public property or right-of-way: Residential — R1, R2, R3,
R4, R5, R6, RMU. Commercial and Public— NMU, BPMU, CMU, DMU, GMU, CC,
CH, IF. PF, PR, Cl, Industrial — LI, HI.
(2) Provided the height of the tower or utility pole does not increase and the square footage
of the enclosure area does not increase beyond the limits set forth in Section 6409 of
the Spectrum Act.
(3) An applicant may request to install a non -concealed building attached facility, under
POMC Section 20.70.140.
B. The priorities for the type of wireless communication facility shall be based upon their
DocuSign Envelope ID: OE91833A-F2D1-4FOA-8C34-9E5F36F8ADD2
Ordinance No. 014-22
Page 10 of 24
placement in Table A; the most desirable location for facilities are located toward the top of
the table and least -desirable location for facilities are located toward the bottom of the table.
Any application for a wireless communication facility must follow the hierarchy of Table A. For
example, an applicant must demonstrate by engineering evidence that using a transmission
tower co -location is not possible before moving to a utility pole replacement for co -location,
and so forth, with the last possible siting option being a new tower or waiver request.
C. The City's preferences for locating new wireless communication facilities areas follows:
1. Place antennas on existing or replacement structures, such as buildings, towers,
water towers, or electrical transmission towers.
2. Place wireless communication facilities in non- residentially zoned districts and non-
residential property.
3. Place antennas and towers on public property and on appropriate rights -of -way if
practical, provided that no obligation is created herein for the City to allow the use of City
property or public right-of-way for this purpose.
4. City Property/Public Rights -of -Way. The placement of personal wireless
communication facilities on City -owned property and public rights -of -way will be subject to
other applicable sections of the Port Orchard Municipal Code and review by other
departments (i.e., Public Works, Parks and Recreation, etc.) and may require a facilities lease.
5. Wireless communication facilities shall not be permitted on property designated
as landmark or as part of a historic district.
D. Applicants shall submit all of the information required pursuant to POMC Section
20.24.030 and the following:
1. Type 1: Applicant shall submit:
a. A completed application form provided by the Department of Community
Development.
b. Four sets of plans prepared by a design professional. The plans shall include a
vicinity map, site map, architectural elevations, method of attachment, proposed screening,
location of proposed antennas, and all other information which accurately depicts the
proposed project. Minimum size is 8.5" by 11". Plans shall be no greater than 24" x 36".
a. A letter from the applicant outlining the proposed project and an evaluation from
the applicant with regard to the City's Code requirements and whether the
proposal qualifies for review under Section 6409 of the Spectrum Act.
b. Information sufficient to determine whether a proposed facilities modification
per POMC Section 20.70.200 would be a substantial change to an existing eligible
support structure.
c. Sensitive Area studies and proposed mitigation (if required).
d. If an outdoor generator is proposed, a report prepared by an acoustical engineer
demonstrating compliance with Chapter 173-60 WAC and POMC 9.24.050.
e. SEPA Application (if required).
2. Type 2: Applicant shall submit all information required for a Type 1 application,
DocuSign Envelope ID: OE91833A-F2D1-4FOA-8C34-9E5F36F8ADD2
Ordinance No. 014-22
Page 11 of 24
plus the following:
a. Four sets of photo simulations that depict the existing and proposed view of the
proposed facility.
b. Materials board for the screening material.
c. If landscaping is proposed, four sets of a landscaping plan prepared by a
Washington State -licensed landscape architect.
d. Letter from a radio frequency engineer that demonstrates that the facility meets
Federal requirements for allowed emissions.
e. If the facility is located within a residential zone, a report from a radio frequency
engineer explaining the need for the proposed wireless communication facility. Additionally,
the applicant shall provide detailed discussion on why the wireless communication facility
cannot be located within a commercial or industrial zone.
3. Type 3: The applicant shall submit all the information required for Type 1 and Type
2 applications, plus the following:
a. All information required for new towers under POMC Section 20.70.060.
b. The radio frequency engineer report shall include a discussion of the information
required under POMC Section 20.70.060.
c. Provisions for mailing labels for all property owners and tenants/residents within
500 feet of the subject property.
d. Engineering plans for the proposed tower.
e. A vicinity map depicting the proposed extent of the service area.
f. A graphic simulation showing the appearance of the proposed tower and
ancillary structures and ancillary facilities from five points within the impacted vicinity. Such
points are to be mutually agreed upon by the Director of Community Development and
applicant. All plans and photo simulations shall include the maximum build -out of the proposed
facility to the extent such information is known by the applicant.
g. Evidence that the tower has been designed to meet the minimum structural
standards for wireless communication facilities for a minimum of three providers of voice,
video or data transmission services, including the applicant, and including a description of the
number and types of antennas the tower can accommodate, to the extent known by the
applicant.
R ,�j677-M
A. New towers are not permitted within the City unless the Hearing Examiner finds that
the applicant has demonstrated by a preponderance of the evidence that:
1. Alternates: No existing tower or structure, or other feasible site not requiring anew
tower in the City, can accommodate the applicant's proposed wireless communication facility;
and
2. Least intrusive: The proposed new wireless communication facility is designed and
located in a manner that is, in consideration of the values, objectives and regulations set forth
in this chapter, POMC Title 20, and the Comprehensive Land Use Plan, the least intrusive upon
DocuSign Envelope ID: OE91833A-F2D1-4FOA-8C34-9E5F36F8ADD2
Ordinance No. 014-22
Page 12 of 24
the surrounding area.
B. The Hearing Examiner shall be the reviewing body on the application to construct a
new tower and shall determine whether or not each of the above requirements is met.
Examples of evidence demonstrating the foregoing requirements include, but are not limited
to, the following:
1. That the tower height is the minimum necessary in order to achieve the coverage
objective;
2. That no available existing towers or structures or alternative sites are located
within the geographic area required to meet the applicant's engineering requirements to meet
its coverage objective (regardless of the geographical boundaries of the City);
3. That available existing towers or structures are not of a sufficient height or could
not feasibly be extended to a sufficient height to meet the applicant's engineering
requirements to meet its coverage objective;
4. That available existing structures or towers do not have sufficient structural
strength to support the applicant's proposed antenna and ancillary facilities;
5. That the applicant's proposed antenna would cause electromagnetic interference
with the antenna on the existing towers or structures, or the antenna on the existing
structures would cause interference with the applicant's proposed antenna;
6. That the fees, costs, or contractual provisions required by the owner or operator
in order to share an existing tower or structure, or to locate at an alternative site, or to adapt
an existing tower or structure or alternative site for sharing, are unreasonable. Costs
exceeding new tower construction by 25% are presumed to be unreasonable; and/or the
applicant demonstrates other limiting factors that render existing towers and structures or
other sites unsuitable or unavailable.
All radiofrequency (RF) engineering evidence must be provided and certified by a RF engineer
and clearly demonstrate the evidence required. Any required structural engineering evidence
shall be provided and certified by a Washington registered and qualified professional
engineer.
C. The Hearing Examiner, after holding a public hearing, shall either approve, approve
with conditions, or deny the application, or remand the application back to staff for further
investigation in a manner consistent with the Hearing Examiner order.
20.70.070 General Requirements.
The following shall apply to all wireless communication facilities regardless of the type of
facility:
1. Noise: Any facility that requires a generator or other device which will create noise
must demonstrate compliance with Chapter 173-60 WAC and POMC 9.24.050. A noise report,
prepared by an acoustical engineer, shall be submitted with any application to construct and
DocuSign Envelope ID: OE91833A-F2D1-4FOA-8C34-9E5F36F8ADD2
Ordinance No. 014-22
Page 13 of 24
operate a wireless communication facility that will have a generator or similar device. The City
may require that the report be reviewed by a third party expert at the expense of the
applicant.
2. Signage: Only safety signs or those mandated by other government entities may
be located on wireless communication facilities. No other types of signs are permitted on
wireless communication facilities.
3. Parking: Any application must demonstrate that there is sufficient space for
temporary parking for regular maintenance of the proposed facility.
4. Finish: A tower shall either maintain a galvanized steel finish or, subject to any
applicable standards of the FCC, be painted a neutral color so as to reduce its visual
obtrusiveness.
5. Design: The design of all buildings and ancillary structures shall use materials, colors,
textures, screening, and landscaping that will blend the tower facilities with the natural setting
and built environment.
6. Color: All antennas and ancillary facilities located on buildings or structures other
than towers shall be of a neutral color that is identical to or closely compatible with the color
of the supporting structure so as to make the antenna and ancillary facilities as visually
unobtrusive as possible.
7. Lighting: Towers shall not be artificially lighted unless required by the FCC or other
applicable authority. If lighting is required, the reviewing authority shall review the lighting
alternatives and approve the design that would cause the least disturbance to the surrounding
areas. No strobe lighting of any type is permitted on any tower.
8. Advertising: No advertising is permitted at wireless communication facility sites or
on any ancillary structure or facilities equipment compound.
20.70.080 Specific Development Standards for Electrical Transmission Tower Co -Location.
The following requirements shall apply:
1. Height: There is no height requirement for antennas that are located on electrical
transmission towers.
2. Antenna aesthetics: There are no restrictions on the type of antennas located on
the electrical transmission tower. The antennas must be painted to match the color of the
electrical transmission tower.
3. Antenna intensity: There is no limit on the number of antennas that maybe located
on an electrical transmission tower structure.
4. Feed lines and coaxial cables: Feed lines and coaxial cables shall be attached to one
of the legs of the electrical transmission tower. The feed lines and cables must be painted to
match the color of the electrical transmission tower.
5. Cabinet equipment: Cabinet equipment shall be located directly under the
electrical transmission tower where the antennas are located or a concealed location. The
wireless communication equipment compound shall be fenced; the fence shall have a
DocuSign Envelope ID: OE91833A-F2D1-4FOA-8C34-9E5F36F8ADD2
Ordinance No. 014-22
Page 14 of 24
minimum height of six (6) feet and a maximum height of eight (8) feet. The fence shall include
slats, wood panels, or other materials to screen the equipment from view. Barbed wire is not
allowed.
6. Setbacks: Since the facility will be located on an existing electrical transmission
tower, setbacks shall not apply.
20.70.090 Specific Development Standards for Adding Antennas to Existing WCF Tower.
The following requirements shall apply:
1. Height: The height must not exceed what was approved under the original
application to construct the tower. If the height shall exceed what was originally approved,
approval as a Type 2 decision is required, provided, however, that increases up to the
limitation set forth in Section 6409 of the Spectrum Act shall be allowed.
2. Antenna aesthetics: Antennas shall be painted to match the color scheme of the
tower.
3. Antenna intensity: There is no limit on the number of antennas that maybe located
on an existing tower.
4. Feed lines and coaxial cables: Feed lines and coaxial cables shall be located within
the tower. Any exposed feed lines or coaxial cables (such as when extended out of the tower
to connect to the antennas) must match the tower.
5. Cabinet equipment: Anew cabinet shall be located within the equipment enclosure
that was approved as part of the original application. If the applicant wishes to expand the
equipment enclosure from what was approved by the City or County under the previous
application beyond the increase limitations set forth in Section 64.09 of the Spectrum Act, the
applicant shall seek a wireless communication facility (Type 2) application for only the
equipment enclosure increase.
6. Setbacks: Setbacks shall not apply when an applicant installs new antennas on an
existing tower and uses an existing equipment enclosure. If the equipment enclosure is
increased, it must meet setbacks.
20.70.100 Concealed Building Mounted Development Requirements.
The following requirements shall apply:
1. Height: The proposed facility must meet the height requirement of the
applicable zoning category including, as applicable, allowed mechanical equipment
encroachments consistent with POMC 20.40.050(2)(c). The antennas can qualify under POMC
Section 20.127.360, "Roof- Mounted Mechanical Equipment", if the antennas are located in a
church spire, chimney or fake chimney, elevator tower, mechanical equipment room, or other
similar rooftop appurtenances usually required to be placed on a roof and not intended for
human occupancy. Stand-alone antennas shall not qualify as rooftop appurtenances.
DocuSign Envelope ID: OE91833A-F2D1-4FOA-8C34-9E5F36F8ADD2
Ordinance No. 014-22
Page 15 of 24
2. Antennas aesthetics: The antennas must be concealed from view by blending with
the architectural style of the building. This could include steeple -like structures and parapet
walls. The screening must be made out of the same material or complementary materials and
be the same color as the building. Antennas shall be painted to match the color scheme of the
building(s).
3. Feed lines and coaxial cables: Feed lines and cables should be located below the
parapet of the rooftop.
4. Cabinet equipment: If cabinet equipment cannot be located within the building
where the wireless communication facilities will be located, then the City's first preference is
to locate the equipment on the rooftop of the building. If the equipment can be screened by
placing the equipment below the parapet walls, no additional screening is required. If screening
is required, then the proposed screening must be consistent with the existing building in terms
of color, style, architectural style, and material. If the cabinet equipment is to be located on the
ground, the equipment must be fenced with a six (6) foot -tall fence, and materials shall be used
to screen the equipment from view. Barbed wire may not be used.
5. Setbacks: The proposed wireless communication facilities facility must meet the
setback of the applicable zoning category where the facility is to be located.
20.70.110 Non -concealed Building Mounted Development Requirements.
The following requirements shall apply:
1. Height: The proposed facility must meet the height requirements of the applicable
zoning category. If the building where the facility is located is at or above the maximum height
requirements, the antennas are permitted to extend a maximum of three (3) feet above the
existing roof line. Non -concealed building mounted facilities shall not qualify as "Roof -Mounted
Mechanical Equipment" under POMC Section 20.127.360.
2. Antenna aesthetics: The first preference for any proposed facility is to utilize flush -
mounted antennas. Nonflush mounted antennas may be used when their visual impact will be
negated by the scale of the antennas to the building. "Shrouds" are not required unless they
provide a better visual appearance than exposed antennas. Antennas shall be painted to match
the color scheme of the building(s).
3. Feed lines and coaxial cables: Feed lines and cables should be located below the
parapet of the rooftop. If the feed lines and cables must be visible, they must match the color
scheme of the building(s).
4. Cabinet equipment: If cabinet equipment cannot be located within the building
where the wireless communication facilities will be located, then it must be located on the
rooftop of the building. If the equipment can be screened by placing the equipment below the
parapet walls, no additional screening is required. If screening is required, then the proposed
screening must be consistent with the existing building in terms of color, style, architectural
style, and material. If the cabinet equipment is to be located on the ground, the equipment
DocuSign Envelope ID: OE91833A-F2D1-4FOA-8C34-9E5F36F8ADD2
Ordinance No. 014-22
Page 16 of 24
must be fenced with a six (6) foot -tall fence and materials shall be used to screen the equipment
from view. Barbed wire may not be used.
20.70.120 Utility Pole Co -location.
The following requirements shall apply:
1. Height: The height of a utility pole co -location is limited to 25 feet above the
replaced utility pole, and may be not greater than 65 feet in height in residential zones.
2. Replacement pole: The replaced utility pole must be used by the owner of the utility
pole to support its utility lines (phone lines or electric). A replaced utility pole cannot be used
to provide secondary functions to utility poles in the area.
3. Pole aesthetics: The replaced utility pole must have the color and general
appearance of the adjacent utility poles.
4. Pedestrian impact: The proposal shall not result in a significant change or cause
degradation in the pedestrian environment. For replacement poles, the proposal shall be
consistent with the City's adopted public works engineering standards and specifications such
that the ability to make future pedestrian improvements shall not be impacted. In addition,
the location of the replacement pole shall be selected to reduce impacts to the current and
future pedestrian environment.
5. Cabinet equipment: Unless approved by the Director of Public Works, all cabinet
equipment and the equipment enclosure must be placed outside of City right-of-way. If located
on a parcel that contains a building, the equipment enclosure must be located next to the
building, or where it has the least visual impact on surrounding properties. The cabinet
equipment must be screened from view. The screening must be consistent with the existing
building in terms of color, style, architectural style, and material. If the cabinet equipment is
to be located on the ground, the equipment must be fenced with a six (6) foot -tall fence and
materials shall be used to screen the equipment from view. Barbed wire is not allowed.
6. Setbacks: Any portion of the wireless communication facilities located within City
right-of-way is not required to meet setbacks. The City will evaluate setbacks on private
property under the setback requirements set forth in POMC Section 20.70.170.
20.70.130 Towers -Specific Development Standards.
The following requirements shall apply:
1. Height: Any proposed tower with antennas shall not exceed 70 feet without a
height waiver as described in POMC 20.70.170. Bird exclusionary devices are not subject to
height limitations.
2. Antenna and tower aesthetics: The applicant shall utilize a wireless communication
concealed facility and shall use such methods as to help the tower to blend with the natural
and built environment. The choice of concealing the wireless communication facility must be
consistent with the overall use of the site. For example, having a tower appear like a flagpole
DocuSign Envelope ID: OE91833A-F2D1-4FOA-8C34-9E5F36F8ADD2
Ordinance No. 014-22
Page 17 of 24
would not be consistent if there are no buildings on the site. If a flag or other wind device is
attached to the pole, it must be appropriate in scale to the size and diameter of the tower.
3. Setbacks: A facility that is used for wireless communications, must beset back from
all property lines the greater of:
a. Fifty (50) feet; or
b. One hundred ten percent of the height from the highest engineered break
point to the top of structure, as certified by a professional engineer. For
example, a 100 foot pole with no breakpoint would require a 110 foot setback.
If the breakpoint is located at the 50 foot level, then the setback would be 55
feet.
However, if an exception is granted under POW Section 20.70.170 with regard to
height, the setback from all property lines of the proposed wireless communication facilities
will increase two (2) feet for every one (1) foot in excess of the maximum permitted height in
the zoning district.
4. Color: The color of the tower shall be based on the surrounding land uses.
5. Feed lines and coaxial cables: All feed lines and cables must be located within the
tower. Feed lines and cables connecting the tower to the equipment enclosure, which are not
located within the wireless communication facility equipment compound, must be located
underground.
20.70.140 Request to Use Non -concealed Building Attached in Lieu of a Concealed
Building Attached.
The use of concealed building facilities shall have first priority in all residential and
commercial zones. However, an applicant may request to construct a non -concealed building
attached wireless communication facility in lieu of a concealed wireless communication facility.
The following criteria shall be used:
1. Due to the size of the building and the proposed location of the antennas, the visual
impact of the exposed antennas will be minimal in relation to the building.
2. Cables are concealed from view and any visible cables are reduced in visibility by
sheathing or painting to match the building where they are located.
3. Cabinet equipment is adequately screened from view.
4. Due to the style or design of the building, the use of a concealed facility would
reduce the visual appearance of the building.
5. The building where the antennas are located is at least 200 feet from any body of
water or waterway that is designated as either shoreline or critical area.
20.70.150 Landscaping/Screening.
A. The visual impacts of wireless communication facilities shall be mitigated and softened
through landscaping or other screening materials at the base of the tower, facility equipment
compound, equipment enclosures, and ancillary structures, with the exception of wireless
DocuSign Envelope ID: OE91833A-F2D1-4FOA-8C34-9E5F36F8ADD2
Ordinance No. 014-22
Page 18 of 24
communication facilities located on transmission towers, or if the antenna is mounted flush
on an existing building or camouflaged as part of the building and other equipment is housed
inside an existing structure. The Community Development Director, Director of Public Works
or Hearing Examiner, as appropriate, may reduce or waive the standards for those sides of the
wireless communication facility that are not in public view, when a combination of existing
vegetation, topography, walls, decorative fences or other features achieve the same degree
of screening as the required landscaping; in locations where the visual impact of the tower
would be minimal; and in those locations where large wooded lots and natural growth around
the property perimeter may be a sufficient buffer, provided that the applicant shall be
required to preserve the existing landscaping the same as if it were newly installed
landscaping.
B. Landscaping shall be installed on the outside of fences. Existing vegetation shall be
preserved to the maximum extent practicable and may be used as a substitute for or as a
supplement to landscaping or screening requirements, provided that the applicant shall be
required to preserve the existing landscaping the same as if it were newly installed
landscaping. The following requirements apply:
1. Type A landscaping consistent with the requirements of POMC 20.128.060 (A) shall
be placed around the perimeter of the equipment cabinet enclosure, except that a maximum
ten (10)-foot portion of the fence may remain without landscaping in order to provide access
to the enclosure.
2. The landscaping area shall be a minimum of ten (10) feet in width around the
perimeter of the enclosure.
3. The applicant shall utilize evergreens that shall be a minimum of six (6) feet tall at
the time of planting.
4. Applicant shall utilize irrigation or an approved maintenance schedule that will
ensure that the plantings are established after two years from the date of planting.
C. The applicant shall replace any unhealthy or dead plant materials in conformance with
the approved landscaping development proposal and shall maintain all landscape materials
for the life of the facility. In the event that landscaping is not maintained at the required level,
the Community Development Director, after giving thirty (30) days advance written notice,
may maintain or establish the landscaping at the expense of the owner or operator and bill
the owner or operator for such costs until such costs are paid in full.
20.70.160 Zoning Setback Exceptions.
A. Generally, wireless communication facilities placed on private property must meet
setbacks of the underlying zoning. However, in some circumstances, allowing modifications to
setbacks may better achieve the goal of this Chapter of concealing such facilities from view.
B. The Community Development Director or Hearing Examiner, depending on the type of
application, may permit modifications to be made to setbacks when:
1. An applicant for a wireless communication facility can demonstrate that placing the
DocuSign Envelope ID: OE91833A-F2D1-4FOA-8C34-9E5F36F8ADD2
Ordinance No. 014-22
Page 19 of 24
facility on certain portions of a property will provide better screening and aesthetic
considerations than provided under the existing setback requirements; or
2. The modification will aid in retaining open space and trees on the site; or
3. The proposed location allows for the wireless communication facility to be located
a greater distance from residentially -zoned properties.
C. This zoning setback modification cannot be used to waive/modify any required setback
required under the State Building Code or Fire Code or used to reduce the safety of the facility.
20.70.170 Height Waivers.
A. Where the Hearing Examiner finds that extraordinary hardships, practical difficulties, or
unnecessary and unreasonable expense would result from strict compliance with the height
limitations of the Land Use and Development Regulations, or the purpose of these regulations
may be served to a greater extent by an alternative proposal, it may approve an adjustment to
these regulations; provided that the applicant demonstrates that the adjustments are
consistent with the values, objectives, standards, and requirements of this Chapter, POMC Title
20, and the Comprehensive Land Use Plan, and demonstrate the following:
1. A particular and identifiable hardship exists, or a specific circumstance warrants the
granting of an adjustment. Factors to be considered in determining the existence of a hardship
shall include, but not be limited to:
a. Topography and other site features;
b. Availability of alternative site locations;
c. Geographic location of property; and
d. Size/magnitude of project being evaluated and availability of co -location.
B. In approving the adjustment request, the Hearing Examiner may impose such
conditions as it deems appropriate to assure consistency with the values, objectives, standards,
and requirements of this Chapter, POMC Title 20, and the Comprehensive Land Use Plan and
to ensure that the granting of the height adjustment will not be detrimental to the public safety,
health, or welfare, or injurious to other property, and will promote the public interest.
C. A petition for any such adjustment shall be submitted, in writing, by the applicant with
the application for Hearing Examiner review. The petition shall state fully the grounds for the
adjustment and all of the facts relied upon by the applicant.
20.70.190 Removal of Abandoned Wireless Communication Facilities.
Any antenna or tower that, after the initial operation of the facility, is not used for the
purpose for which it was intended (based on the original application) and such non-use lasts
for a continuous period of twelve (12) months or longer, shall be considered abandoned, and
the owner of such antenna or tower shall remove same within ninety (90) days of receipt of
notice from the City notifying the owner of such abandonment. Failure to remove such
abandoned tower or commence removal within ninety (90) days of such notice shall result in
DocuSign Envelope ID: OE91833A-F2D1-4FOA-8C34-9E5F36F8ADD2
Ordinance No. 014-22
Page 20 of 24
the City declaring the antenna and/or tower a public nuisance. If there are two or more users
of a single tower, then this section shall not become effective until all users cease using the
tower.
20.70.200 Standards for Eligible Facilities Modifications.
This section implements § 6409 of the "Middle Class Tax Relief and Job Creation Act of
2012" (the "Spectrum Act", PL-112- 96; codified at 47 U.S.C. § 1455(a)) see also 47 CFR § 1.6100
- Wireless Facility Modifications, which requires the City to approve any eligible facilities request
for a modification of an existing tower or base station that does not substantially change the
physical dimensions of such tower or base station. The intent is to exempt eligible facilities
requests from zoning and development regulations that are inconsistent with or preempted by
Section 6409 of the Spectrum Act, while preserving the City's right to continue to enforce and
condition approvals under this chapter on compliance with generally applicable building,
structural, electrical, and safety codes and with other laws codifying objective standards
reasonably related to health and safety.
A. Definitions.
1. "Base station" shall mean and refer to the structure or equipment at a fixed
location that enables wireless communications licensed or authorized by the FCC, between
user equipment and a communications network. The term does not encompass a tower as
defined in this chapter or any equipment associated with a tower.
a. The term includes, but is not limited to, equipment associated with wireless
communications services such as private, broadcast, and public safety services, as well as
unlicensed wireless services and fixed wireless services such as microwave backhaul.
b. The term includes, but is not limited to, radio transceivers, antennas, coaxial or
fiber-optic cable, regular and backup power supplies, and comparable equipment, regardless
of technological configuration (including Distributed Antenna Systems and small -cell
networks).
c. The term includes any structure other than a tower that, at the time an eligible
facilities modification application is filed with the City under this chapter, supports or houses
equipment described in subparagraphs (a) and (b) of POMC Section 20.70.200.A.1, and that
has been reviewed and approved under the applicable zoning or siting process, or under
another State, county or local regulatory review process, even if the structure was not built
for the sole or primary purpose of providing such support.
d. The term does not include any structure that, at the time a completed eligible
facilities modification application is filed with the City under this section, does not support or
house equipment described in subparagraphs (a) and (b) of POMC Section 20.70.200.A.1.
2. "Eligible facilities modification" shall mean and refer to any proposed facilities
modification that has been determined pursuant to the provisions of this chapter to be subject
to this chapter and that does not result in a substantial change in the physical dimensions of
an eligible support structure.
DocuSign Envelope ID: OE91833A-F2D1-4FOA-8C34-9E5F36F8ADD2
Ordinance No. 014-22
Page 21 of 24
3. "Eligible support structure" shall mean and refer to any existing tower or base
station as defined in this chapter, provided it is in existence at the time the eligible facilities
modification application is filed with the City under this chapter.
4. "Existing" shall mean and refer to a constructed tower or base station that was
reviewed and approved under the applicable zoning or siting process and lawfully constructed.
5. "Proposed facilities modification" shall mean and refer to a proposal submitted by
an applicant to modify an eligible support structure the applicant asserts is subject to review
under Section 6409 of the Spectrum Act, and involving:
a. collocation of new transmission equipment;
b. removal of transmission equipment; or
c. replacement of transmission equipment.
6. "Site" shall mean and refer to the current boundaries of the leased or owned
property surrounding a tower (other than a tower in the public rights -of -way) and any access
or utility easements currently related to the site and, for other eligible support structures, shall
mean and be further restricted to, that area in proximity to the structure and to other
transmission equipment already deployed on the ground. The current boundaries of a site are
the boundaries that existed as of the date that the original support structure or a modification
to that structure was last reviewed and approved by a State or local government, if the approval
of the modification occurred prior to the Spectrum Act or otherwise outside of the section
6409(a) process.
7. "Substantial Change". A proposed facilities modification will substantially change
the physical dimensions of an eligible support structure if it meets any of the following criteria:
a. For towers not in the public rights -of -way, it increases the height of the tower by
more than ten percent (10%) or by the height of one additional antenna array with separation
from the nearest existing antenna not to exceed twenty (20) feet, whichever is greater; for
other eligible support structures, it increases the height of the structure by more than ten
percent (10%) or more than ten (10) feet, whichever is greater.
Changes in height should be measured from the original support structure in cases where
deployments are or will be separated horizontally, such as on buildings' rooftops; in other
circumstances, changes in height should be measured from the dimensions of the tower or
base station, inclusive of originally approved appurtenances and any modifications that were
approved prior to the passage of the Spectrum Act.
b. For towers not in the public rights -of -way, it involves adding an appurtenance to
the body of the tower that would protrude from the edge of the tower more than twenty (20)
feet, or more than the width of the tower structure at the level of the appurtenance, whichever
is greater; for other eligible support structures, it involves adding an appurtenance to the body
of the structure that would protrude from the edge of the structure by more than six (6) feet.
c. For any eligible support structure, it involves installation of more than the
standard number of new equipment cabinets for the technology involved, but not to exceed
four (4) cabinets; or, for towers in the public rights -of -way and base stations, it involves
DocuSign Envelope ID: OE91833A-F2D1-4FOA-8C34-9E5F36F8ADD2
Ordinance No. 014-22
Page 22 of 24
installation of any new equipment cabinets on the ground if there are no pre-existing ground
cabinets associated with the structure, or else involves installation of ground cabinets that are
more than ten percent (10%) larger in height or overall volume than any other ground cabinets
associated with the structure.
d. It entails any excavation or deployment outside of the current site, except that,
for towers other than towers in the public rights -of -way, it entails any excavation or
deployment of transmission equipment outside of the current site by more than thirty (30) feet
in any direction. The site boundary from which the thirty (30) feet is measured excludes any
access or utility easements currently related to the site;
e. It would defeat the concealment elements of the eligible support
structure; or
f. It does not comply with conditions associated with the siting approval of
the construction or modification of the eligible support structure or base station equipment
provided, however, that this limitation does not apply to any modification that is non-
compliant only in a manner that would not exceed the thresholds identified in this section.
8. "Tower" shall mean and refer to any structure built for the sole or primary purpose
of supporting any antennas and their associated facilities, licensed or authorized by the FCC,
including structures that are constructed for wireless communications services including, but
not limited to, private, broadcast, and public safety services, as well as unlicensed wireless
services and fixed wireless services such as microwave backhaul, and the associated site.
9. "Break Point Technology" shall mean towers designed with break point technology
engineer points on the top portion of the tower to fold over onto itself in extreme stress such
as earthquake and extraordinary high winds, rather than fall its full length from the base.
10. "Transmission Equipment" shall mean and refer to equipment that facilitates
transmission for any wireless communication service licensed or authorized by the FCC,
including, but not limited to, radio transceivers, antennas, coaxial or fiber-optic cable, and
regular and backup power supply. The term includes equipment associated with wireless
communications services including, but not limited to, private, broadcast, and public safety
services, as well as unlicensed wireless services and fixed wireless services such as microwave
backhaul.
B. Proposed facilities modification applications are not subject to the application
requirements set forth in POW Section 20.24.020 but may still require construction permits
such as grading, street excavation, and building permits, and will also require approval of
traffic control plans if traffic will be impacted.
C. City decisions on eligible facilities modifications shall be issued within sixty (60) days
from the date the application is received by the City, subtracting any time between the City's
notice of incomplete application or request for additional information and the applicant's
resubmittal. Following a supplemental submission, the City will respond to the applicant
within ten (10) days, stating whether the additional information is sufficient to complete
review of the application. This timing supersedes Chapter 20.24 POMC.
DocuSign Envelope ID: OE91833A-F2D1-4FOA-8C34-9E5F36F8ADD2
Ordinance No. 014-22
Page 23 of 24
D. If the City fails to approve or deny an eligible facilities modification within the time
frame for review, the applicant may notify the City in writing that the review period has
expired, and that the application has therefore been deemed granted. In such case, all
limitations of this Section 20.170.200 and compliance with applicable provisions of building,
structural, electrical, and safety codes and noise regulations shall automatically be considered
conditions of such approval.
E. Applicants and the City may bring claims related to Section 6409 (a) to any court of
competent jurisdiction.
20.70.210 Expiration of Wireless Facility Permits.
A wireless facility permit shall automatically expire three (3) years after a Notice of Decision
approving the permit is issued unless a building permit conforming to plans for which the wireless
facility permit was granted is obtained within that period of time. If a building permit is not
required for the proposed work, such as changing antennas on an existing tower, then the
substantial construction of the proposed work shall be completed within one (1) year after a
Notice of Decision approving the permit is issued. The Director of Community Development may
authorize a longer period for completion of work if the applicant can demonstrate why additional
time is required and submits a written request for extension prior to expiration of the wireless
facilities permit.
SECTION 3. Conflict. In the event of a conflict between this Ordinance, and any Ordinance
or regulation of the City, the provisions of this Ordinance shall control, except that the provisions
of the City's critical areas code, shoreline master program or any International Building Code shall
supersede.
SECTION 4. Corrections. Upon the approval of the city attorney, the city clerk and/or code
publisher is authorized to make any necessary technical corrections to this ordinance, including
but not limited to the correction of scrivener's/clerical errors, references, ordinance numbering,
section/subsection numbers, and any reference thereto.
SECTION 5. Severability. If any section, subsection, paragraph, sentence, clause, or phrase
of this ordinance is declared unconstitutional or invalid for any reason, such decision shall not
affect the validity of the remaining parts of this ordinance.
SECTION 6. Effective Date. This ordinance shall be published in the official newspaper of
the city and shall take full force and effect five (5) days after the date of publication. A summary
of this ordinance in the form of the ordinance title may be published in lieu of publishing the
ordinance in its entirety.
DocuSign Envelope ID: OE91833A-F2D1-4FOA-8C34-9E5F36F8ADD2
Ordinance No. 014-22
Page 24 of 24
PASSED by the City Council of the City of Port Orchard, APPROVED by the Mayor
and attested by the City Clerk in authentication of such a s;a4gjb his 101h day of May 2022.
I�6bt*�- Pu�-MA&SWA,
F59'E8865D0'E73E _
Robert Putaansuu, Mayor
ATTEST:
randy Wallace, MMC, City Clerk
APPROVED AS TO FORM: SPONSOR:
DocuSigned by:
Char ott2s oae .
A. �rcher, City Attorney
PUBLISHED: May 13, 2022
EFFECTIVE DATE: May 18, 2022