053-19 - Terraphase Engineering - Robinson Noble - Contract Amendment 3DocuSign Envelope ID: 054CBBEA-3BDA-4E63-9739-A14C9181344F
Amendment No. 3 to Contract No. 053-19
CITY OF PORT ORCHARD PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT WITH
Robinson Noble, Inc
THIS AMENDMENT No. 3 to Contract No. 053-19 ("Amendment") is entered into between the City of Port
Orchard, a Washington municipal corporation ("City" or "Port Orchard") and Robinson Noble, Inc., a
Washington corporation ("Consultant"). City and Consultant are each a "Party" and together "Parties" to this
Amendment.
RECITALS:
WHEREAS, on the September 10, 2019, the City executed a Professional Services Agreement for
2019-2020 ESSB 6091 Foster Pilot Project Services with the Consultant ("Underlying Agreement"); and
WHEREAS, on December 3, 2020, Amendment No. 1 was approved, extending the Underlying
Agreement's termination date to December 21, 2021; and
WHEREAS, on November 15, 2021, Amendment No. 2 was approved, extending the underlying
agreements termination date to December 31, 2022; and
WHEREAS, Section 4 (compensation) of the Underlying Agreement, as amended, provides that
compensation for these services shall not exceed $324,900 without written authorization, and will be based
on the list of billing rates and reimbursable expenses attached to the Underlying Agreement, as amended,
as Exhibit "A through E"; and
WHEREAS, continuing services for the 2019-2020 ESSB 6091 Foster Pilot Project are required by the
City that will exceed the current value of the Underlying Agreement; and
WHEREAS, the Consultant and the City have conferred and agreed to extend the termination date,
Section 3 (Terms), of the agreement, as amended to June 30, 2023, and to increase the "Time and Materials
Not to Exceed" amount, Section 4 (Compensation), of the agreement from $324,900 to $463,857 in
anticipation of the additional work; and
WHEREAS, the parties wish to memorialize their agreement and so modify the Underlying
Agreement;
NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual benefits accruing, it is agreed by and between
the parties thereto as follows:
Amendment No. 3 to Agreement between City of Port Orchard and Robinson Noble, Inc.
Contract No. C053-19
Page 1
Updated 4/2022 IBDR
DocuSign Envelope ID: 054CBBEA-3BDA-4E63-9739-A14C9181344F
THIRD AMENDMENT TO AGREEMENT:
1. Amendment.
a. Section 3 Terms of the Agreement is hereby amended to read as follows:
This agreement shall commence on September 10, 2019 ("Commencement Date") and shall
terminate June 30, 2023, unless extended or terminated in writing as provided herein.
b. Section 4 Compensation of the Agreement is hereby amended to read as follows:
TIME AND MATERIALS NOT TO EXCEED. Compensation for these services shall not exceed
$463,857, inclusive of all amounts paid prior to the execution of Amendment No. 3 to this
Agreement, without written authorization and will be based on the list of billing rates and
reimbursable expenses attached hereto as Exhibit "A thru E"
2. Severability. The provisions of this Amendment are declared to be severable. If any provision
of this Amendment is, for any reason, held to be invalid or unconstitutional by a court of competent jurisdiction,
such invalidity or unconstitutionality shall not affect the validity or constitutionality of any other provision.
3. Entire Agreement. The written provisions and terms of this Amendment shall supersede all
prior verbal statements of any officer or other representative of the parties, and such statements shall not
be effective or be construed as entering into or forming a part of or altering in any manner whatsoever, this
Amendment. The entire agreement between the Parties with respect to the subject matter hereunder is
contained in the Agreement and exhibits thereto, any prior executed amendments and this Amendment.
Should any language in any of the Exhibits to the Agreement or prior amendments conflict with any
language contained in this Amendment, then this Amendment shall prevail. Except as modified by this
Amendment, all other provisions of the original Agreement and any amendments thereto not inconsistent
with this Amendment shall remain in full force and effect.
4. Effective date. This Amendment shall be effective as of June 28, 2022.
DATED this 28th day of June, 2022.
Amendment No. 3 to Agreement between City of Port Orchard and Robinson Noble, Inc.
Contract No. C053-19
Page 2
Updated 4/2022 IBDR
DocuSign Envelope ID: 054CBBEA-3BDA-4E63-9739-A14C9181344F
CITYDQ&s n(��1� ORCHARD, WASHINGTON
F�Fbbt,ri PlntMln,W,
E8865DUET4E ...
Robert Putaansuu, Mayor
ATTESTS/AUTHENTICATED:
F�DOo.gned by::
u 1Na�a(t,
Brana'Y'Wafface, MMC, City Clerk
A e.TO FORM:
Charlotte A. Archer, City Attorney
Crjmtl*,
oSo�JsAdNb�i:
E ...
Signature
Joseph Becker President
Printed Name and Title
Amendment No. 3 to Agreement between City of Port Orchard and Robinson Noble, Inc.
Contract No. C053-19
Page 3
Updated 4/2022 IBDR
DocuSign Envelope ID: 054CBBEA-3BDA-4E63-9739-A14C9181344F
li CITY OF PORT ORCHARD
Authorization for Amendment No. 3
Date: June 28. 2022
2019-2020 ESSB 6091 Foster
Project: Pilot Project Services
Contract / Job # C053-19
Contractor: Robinson Noble, Inc
2105 South C Street
Tacoma, WA 98402
This amendment increases Section 4 (Compensation) of the agreement by $138,957, from $324,900 to
$463,857 (inclusive of all amounts paid prior to the execution of this amendment), to provide
continuing services for the 2019-2020 ESSB 6091 Foster Pilot Project and extends the agreement
termination date to June 30, 2023.
Contract History
Amount Sales Tax Total Date Ap vd by
Original Contract
$324,900.00
$0.00
$324,900.00
10-Sep-19
Council
Amendment 1
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
03-Dec-20
PW Director
Amendment 2
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
15-Nov-21
PW Director
Amendment 3
$138,957.00
$0.001
$138,957.00
28-Jun-221
council
Total Contract $463,857.00 $0.00 $463,857.00
have reviewed -the Change Order information above and certify that to the best of my knowledge descriptions and
costs are true and accurate.
(�DocuSignedpby:
J ire p� &k-M
0524 &F.
Contractor Approval Signature
Joseph Becker President
Printed Name & Title
Pub Wor ector/City Engineer
MARK R. DORSEY, P.E.
Printed Name
Change Orders that do not exceed 10%, with a maximum of
$50,000, of either legally authorized budget limit or contract Approved:
amount established by City Council can be approved by the Public
Works Director.
Change Orders that do not exceed 10%, with a maximum of
$100,000, of either legally authorized budget limit or contract
amount established by City Council are to be approved by the
Mayor.
Change Orders over $100,000 or exceed a total of 10% require
Council Action.
Attest:
FDocuSigned by:
a�t v� P4MM W,
EBB65BBE74E ...
Mayor
FDocuSigned by:
� (1av,t,
City C'Cer
June 28, 2022
Council Approval Date
DocuSign Envelope ID: 054CBBEA-3BDA-4E63-9739-A14C9181344F
Exhibit A
ROBINSON
NOBLE
August 13, 2019
Mr. Mark Dorsey
Public Works Director
City of Port Orchard
216 Prospect Street
Port Orchard, WA 98366
Subject: Robinson Noble scope of work and cost estimate for ESSB 6091 'Foster' Pilot Project
Streamflow Augmentation/Restoration, Net Ecological Benefits & Hydrogeological Services
Dear Mark,
In February, the City of Port Orchard contracted with Robinson Noble to provide hydrogeologic
and water rights consulting in relation to the City's Foster pilot project. In July, with changes in
the project, the City decided to send out a competitive request for qualifications to complete
the work. Earlier today, you emailed me to say that the Robinson Noble team was selected to
continue the Foster pilot work and asked for a new scope of work. We appreciate the City's
confidence in our work.
With this letter, I am providing a new scope of work and cost estimate. It is based on the
previous scope, as well as new information that has come to light since the previous scope
was written. This new information includes the final guidance from Ecology for the net
ecological benefit analysis (dated July 31) and the latest modeling. As you directed, this scope
includes, as noted below, the work previously completed.
I've broken down the scope into two general tasks: 1) completing the modeling and providing a
hydrogeologic impact report; and 2) providing CRA services, including writing the draft Report
of Examinations. Subtasks that are complete or partially complete as of the time of writing this
scope are noted with comments on status. If a subtask description does not have a status
comment, work has yet to begin.
Task 1: Modeling and Hydrogeologic Impact Report
Subtask 1A: Initial Model Modifications and Error Estimates
As a requirement of the preliminary permits for Wells 12 and 13, Ecology requires the USGS
Kitsap groundwater model be used to analyze potential impacts of withdrawals from the wells.
Prior using the model, slight modifications were needed, such as inserting Wells 12 and 13 and
changing the number of stress periods. In addition, an estimate of model error was necessary
so that modeled changes in streamflow can be addressed with respect to model error. The
estimate of model error was also used to estimate the area of potential influence of the new
wells, i.e. the area in which stream impacts may rise above the level of model error.
Status: this work is complete
Subtask 1 B: Steady-state Modeling
2105 South C Street 17625 1301 Avenue NE, Suite 102
Tacoma, Washington 98402 www.robinson-nobla.com Woodinville, Washington 98072
P: 253.475.7711 1 F: 253.472.5846 P:425.488.0599 1 F:425.488.233D
DocuSign Envelope ID: 054CBBEA-3BDA-4E63-9739-A14C9181344F
August 13, 2019
Mr. Mark Dorsey
Robinson Noble Foster Pilot Project Services Scope of Work
Page 2
As a requirement of the preliminary permits, the USGS Kitsap groundwater flow model needs
to be used to conduct steady-state modeling simulations of the proposed new water
withdrawals under water right applications G1-28476A (Well 12) and G1-28162A (Well 12) as
well as the change applications related to G1-*04166C, GI-2458gC, G1-26119P, G1-24437P,
G1-2644P, and G1-26454P which make Well 13 as an additional point of withdrawal for Wells 6,
7, and 10; make Well 11 an additional point of withdrawal for McCormick Wells 1, 2, 3, and 4B;
and make Well 12 an additional point of withdrawal for Well 11 and McCormick Wells 1, 2, 3,
and 413.
Baseline model simulations will first be run using currently allowed water rights withdrawals.
Then predictive simulations will be run with the newly propose withdrawals under the above
listed applications. The results of the two sets of runs will be compared to determine projected
stream flow impairments. Separate model runs will be conducted for each of the applications
as well as combinations of all the applications.
Status: the majority of this work is complete, and it likely will be all complete by the effective
date of the new contract (unless Ecology requests additional model modifications, see optional
subtask 1 E below). The simulations had to be re -run when the projected future water demand
was revised in July.
Subtask 1C: Stream Record Analysis.
In order to prioritize timing of potential mitigation, as well as examine the relationship between
critical periods of natural streamflow and any projected impacts to stream flow, an analysis of
the hydrographs of the potentially impacted streams needs to be made. We will examine and
analyze existing stream gage records available from Kitsap PUD and the USGS for each of the
potentially impacted streams where such data is available. Results will be provided in the Task
1 report.
Status: the majority of this work is complete, and it likely will be all complete by the effective
date of the new contract.
Subtask 1D: Transient Modeling.
Transient modeling will allow timing of impacts to be defined. However, based on the
provisions of the preliminary permits for Wells 12 and 13, transient modeling is to occur
following consultation with Ecology and the Tribes. In a previous meeting with Ecology, the City
requested Ecology concurrence on conducting transient modeling. Ecology's concurrence was
given.
Transient modeling will look at several combinations of the above listed water rights
applications and compare results to baseline simulations under currently authorized rights.
Various simulations will be run including looking at the effects of instantaneously changing to
the new water rights amounts and phasing in the new rights over a 50-year period based upon
projected water demands provided by the City's engineer, BHC. Because of the extremely long
run times for the USGS Kitsap model, most the transient simulations will use year -long stress
periods. However, to investigate the effect of seasonal changes in production, several
DocuSign Envelope ID: 054CBBEA-3BDA-4E63-9739-A14C9181344F
August 13, 2019
Mr. Mark Dorsey
Robinson Noble Foster Pilot Project Services Scope of Work
Page 3
simulations will be made with month -long stress periods. (A single model run of 50 years with
month -long stress periods takes about four full days.)
Results will be analyzed to look to total projected impairments of streams as well the timing of
the impairments, both annually and seasonally. Results will be presented to the Tribe and
Ecology for comment.
Status: the majority of this work is complete. It is likely the analysis of results will be
completed by the effective date of the new contract. The simulations had to be re -run with the
revision to the water demand in July. The presentation of results to the Tribe and Ecology is not
yet scheduled.
Subtask 1E: (Optional) Refinement/Modification of the Model
According to the preliminary permits, Ecology may require refinement or modification of the
model (based on the model results) followed by re -running some or all of the previous model
simulations. We will not know whether this will be required until after results are presented to
the Tribe and Ecology. There are two main concerns that may prompt modification of the
model. The first is that the deep aquifer at Well 12 location is poorly represented in the model.
In the model, the aquifer at Well 12 is essentially absent (the modeled Well 12 produces from a
low permeability zone'). The second is the depth of Well 13. The deep aquifer at the Well 13
site in the model is at about 800 feet below sea level. Drilling of Well 13 found the aquifer
considerably deeper, at about -1100 to -1500 below sea level (this zone is partially in a confining
unit and partially in bedrock within the model).
If required, the model will be modified to address these conditions and the simulations re -run
as necessary. In this case, an additional meeting with the Tribe and Ecology presenting the
revised model results will likely be required.
Subtask 1 F: Hydrogeology and Impact Report.
The deliverable for Task 1 will be a technical memorandum describing the hydrogeology of the
area, the stream hydrographic analysis, the modeling procedures and results, and a summary of
projected impacts to area streams. The report will be written so that it is easily incorporated
into a later draft Reports of Examination for the various water right applications.
Subtask 1G: Project Management, Meetings, and other Assistance.
Task 1 includes a number of meetings, including meetings between the team members, two
meetings with the Tribe and Ecology (either together or separately), and attendance Foster
legislative committee meetings as directed. It also includes additional general project
management time. Other non-scoped technical assistance will be provided as requested by the
City.
Status: several team member meeting have occurred, as well as one meeting with Ecology
and one informal meeting with the Tribe.
' This situation results in the simulated Well 12 producing a very large amount of drawdown in the
model. Of course, since Well 12 has yet to be drilled, the lack of a deep aquifer at the site may be real.
DocuSign Envelope ID: 054CBBEA-3BDA-4E63-9739-A14C9181344F
August 13, 2019
Mr. Mark Dorsey
Robinson Noble Foster Pilot Project Services Scope of Work
Page 4
Task 1 Schedule
The complexity of the model simulations coupled with changing guidance from Ecology has
significantly changed the scheduling of Task 1. Currently, Task 1 can likely be completed by the
end of September provided model modification is not required. If the model needs to be
modified and various simulations re -run, task 1 could potentially run to the end of November.
Task 2: Water Right Processing
This scope of work assumes the applications will be processed through a streamlined Cost
Reimbursement Agreement (CRA) with Robinson Noble acting as the consultant conducting all
work, including drafting the Reports of Examination (ROEs), Matt Rakow with Ecology
previously indicated a streamlined CRA will be allowed. The work is divided into six subtasks.
Subtask 2A: Tier 1 Avoidance Analysis.
The ROEs will need to address the three tiers of analysis described in pilot project legislation.
The first tier is avoidance. For this subtask, Robinson Noble will work with Tom Pors to address
avoidance of impairments in the ROEs. Tom Pors has indicated, based on Ecology guidance,
that the tier 1 analysis will be rather simple.
Subtask 2B: Tier 2 Minimization Analysis.
This work will involve two set types of mitigation: stream augmentation and replacement water
rights. Work on the stream augmentation portion of this subtask will be completed by Robinson
Noble in conjunction with our subconsultant, Carollo Engineers (Carollo). Carollo's scope of
work is summarized here but the full body of their scope is included as part of this scope and is
attached as Exhibit A. For the replacement water rights portion of this subtask, work will be
completed by Robinson Noble in conjunction with our subconsuitant, WestWater Research
(WestWater). WestWater's scope of work is summarized here but the full body of their scope
is included as part of this scope and is attached as Exhibit B. Subtask 2B will start with a team
meeting to discuss the results of the impairment analysis and to coordinate subtask
communications and workloads between team members and the City.
Stream augmentation will be proposed for those impacted creeks where it is reasonably
attainable. Currently this includes creeks within the Port Orchard service area (Blackjack, Ross,
Anderson, and Parrish), as well as creeks in within neighboring purveyors service areas where
agreements might be reached to provide augmentation. Specifically, these are Salmonberry
Creek via West Sound Utilities and Gorst Creek (and possibly the Union River) via the City of
Bremerton.
Stream augmentation at Blackjack, Ross, Anderson, and Parrish will use the previous stream
mitigation plan developed for the City in 2006 which provided design concept stream
augmentation on these four creeks provided the sites can handle the (presumed) new larger
flows. Carollo will use the City's hydraulic model to confirm transmission capacities to the sites
Similar conceptual designs will be provided for Salmonberry and Gorst Creeks if agreements
can be worked out with West Sound and the City of Bremerton.
DocuSign Envelope ID: 054CBBEA-3BDA-4E63-9739-A14C9181344F
August 13, 2019
Mr. Mark Dorsey
Robinson Noble Foster Pilot Project Services Scope of Work
Page 5
For other impacted creeks, Robinson Noble will provide support for determining that stream
augmentation as being not reasonably attainable. Carollo will assist with definition of
conceptual -level stream augmentation and provide definition of where it is not reasonably
attainable by looking at costs and impediment to extending City service to the more distant
impacted streams.
For creeks where stream augmentation is not reasonably attainable (currently scoped as upper
Blackjack, Clalla, Crescent, Purdy, Burly, Huge/Minter, Rocky, and Coulter Creeks), a search will
be conducted for replacement water rights that potentially could be purchased to mitigate
modeled impacts. The water right search will be accomplished WestWater Research. Based on
our experience in the area, we believe that few if any such water rights will be found. However,
the search needs to be accomplished to satisfy Ecology's tier 2 guidance. Should suitable water
rights be identified by the search, we will attempt to ascertain the owners of said rights and
contact them as to their interest in selling the rights. Negotiating the actual sale of rights to the
City is outside the current scope, More details on the water right search are provided in the
attached scope of work from WestWater.
Subtask 2C: Tier 3 Compensation Analysis.
The third tier is compensation analysis. Work on subtask 2C will be completed by Robinson
Noble in conjunction with our subconsultant, Environmental Science Associates (ESA). ESA's
scope of work is summarized here but the full body of their scope is included as part of this
scope and is attached as Exhibit C.
The compensation analysis will consist of several major facets: developing the compensation
plan, completing the NEB analysis to demonstrate the plan adequately offsets impairments,
and working with stakeholders to get general agreement on the plan and the NEB analysis. We
plan for three meetings with stakeholders.
We assume the development of projects for the tier 3 mitigation will occur from potential
mitigation projects in existing reports and that no new projects will need to be identified. We
also assume no field work will be required for either the selection/development of mitigation
projects or calculations of ecological benefit. ESA will develop an analysis framework with
mitigation projects and preliminary credit/debit calculations which will be shared with the City
and stakeholders and subject to revisions to address comments.
When the framework is agreed upon, ESA will prepare a NEB report following Ecology's final
guidance dated July 31". The report will include an evaluation and description of impacts and
ecological offsets, as well as a matrix that describes all impacts and offsets, summing up the
net benefits in a quantitative or semi -quantitative manner. It will also include a discussion of
financial and other assurances that mitigation will be implemented and remain in place,
monitoring or evaluations plans to ensure lasting benefits, and descriptions of contingency
plans or corrective actions to be taken if goals are not met. We anticipate the City will need to
participate in developing with the assurances and contingency sections. Assistance from the
City may also be required to obtain support from tribal, state and local resource managers.
Subtask 2D: Monitoring, Reporting, Compliance, and Assurance.
DocuSign Envelope ID: 054CBBEA-3BDA-4E63-9739-A14C9181344F
August 13, 2019
Mr. Mark Dorsey
Robinson Noble Foster Pilot Project Services Scope of Work
Page 6
This subtask will involve designing monitoring, reporting, compliance, and assurance conditions
for the ROEs. We will work together with Tom Pors, and in consultation with Ecology, to
identify compatible conditions for inclusion as provisions in the ROEs. ESA will provide
monitoring and assurance plans within their subtask 2C report that will be used as input for this
subtask.
Subtask 2E: Draft Reports of Examination.
Robinson Noble will write draft ROEs for the two new and six change applications that are
pending. The results of Task 1 and Subtasks 2A — 2D will be incorporated into the draft ROEs.
We presume that preliminary drafts may be submitted to the Tribe for comment. Following
possible incorporation of Tribal comments, the drafts will be delivered to Ecology. Ecology's
comments will be worked into final drafts for posting on Ecology's website.
Subtask 2F: Project Management, Meetings, and other Assistance.
This scope includes five in -person meetings between Robinson Noble and various team
members as the project progresses, attendance at Foster legislative committee meetings as
requested, and attendance at three meetings with Tribal or other stakeholders. This task also
includes project management following the end of Task 1 and any assistance of Robinson
Noble with other parts of the process not specified in Tasks 1 and 2.
Task 2 Schedule
Task 2 was scheduled to start in June but has been delayed due to the time Task 1 has taken.
Task 2 work will begin following the effective date of the new contract, assumed to be
September 1st. Because of the evolving nature of the Foster program and the uncertainty of
whether subtask 1 E will be required, as well as meetings with and review by the Tribes and
Ecology, the schedule below is an estimate.
Subtask 2A: Tier 1 Avoidance Analysis
Subtask 2B: Tier 2 Minimization Analysis
Subtask 2C: Tier 3 Compensation Analysis
Subtask 2D: Monitoring, Reporting, etc.
Subtask 2E: Draft Reports of Examination
Subtask 2F: PM, Meetings, Other Assistance
Estimated Cost
September
September - November
September - November
December — January 2020
February — August 2020
September 2019 — August 2020
While this current version of the scope of work is better defined than the version from earlier
this year, it is still expected that the exact nature of the required work may evolve as the
project progresses and with input from the Tribe, WDFW, and Ecology. Therefore, the following
cost estimate is truly an estimate and could be higher or lower depending upon how the project
progresses.
Based on our current understanding of the project and the conditions outlined in this scope, we
estimate the cost of our services for Task 1, as described above, to be $80,500. This includes
DocuSign Envelope ID: 054CBBEA-3BDA-4E63-9739-A14C9181344F
August 13, 2019
Mr. Mark Dorsey
Robinson Noble Foster Pilot Project Services Scope of Work
Page 7
$17,500 for optional subtask 1 E and $3,500 for other assistance as request under subtask 1 G.
Our estimate for Task 2, including the services of ESA, Carollo, and WestWater, is estimated at
$294,400. Together, the total estimated cost is $374,900. This estimate is based upon
Robinson Noble's current fee schedule, attached as Exhibit D.
The estimated cost includes work to date. As of today, we have invoiced $41,659 under the
existing contract and have another $3,472 booked against the project but not yet invoiced. It is
likely that we will accrue another $4,000 or $5,000 worth of work prior to the end of the current
contract and the start of the new contract. This projects to approximately $50,000 worth of
work being completed prior to the execution date of the new contract. Consequently, the work
yet -to -be completed under the new contract is estimated at $324,900. Of course, this total
depends on how much work we actually complete prior to the new contract as well as the start
date of the new contract.
I hope this scope of work and cost estimate is adequate for your needs. Please contact us if we
can provide additional information or modify the scope of work to better assist the City. If you
have questions or need additional information, please contact me. Thank you for the
opportunity to continue being of service to the City.
Sincerely,
Robinson Noble`, Inc.
/Osph E, Becker, LHG
Principal Hydrogeologist
DocuSign Envelope ID: 054CBBEA-3BDA-4E63-9739-A14C9181344F
Exhibit B
SCOPE OF WORK
ROBINSON NOBLE
PORT ORCHARD STREAMFLOW AUGMENTATION STUDY
SCOPE OF SERVICES
The following Scope of Services has been developed to assist the City of Port Orchard (City) with the
identification of conceptual infrastructure needed for stream augmentation. The task will consider using
City water or wholesale water from Group A water systems and identify the water system infrastructure
needed to deliver the water, including pipes, pump station, etc.
PROJECT ASSUMPTIONS
• Carollo Engineers, Inc. will be referred to as "Consultant" in this document.
• The City of Port Orchard and its staff will be referred to as "City" in this document.
• Robinson Noble Inc. will be referred to as "Prime".
• Environmental Sciences Associates will be referred to as "ESA"
• All meetings will be held at the City offices unless specified as a teleconference.
• Draft deliverables will be provided in electronic copy (PDF and/or Microsoft Word) transmitted
via email or secure file transfer.
• Consultant to provide an agenda, meeting materials, and a meeting summary documenting
discussions, action items, and decisions for all facilitated meetings. Meeting summary and
related materials will be transmitted electronically in MS Word and PDF formats via email.
• The Prime and City will print and produce additional copies of all documents as necessary for
their use beyond what will be provided by the Consultant, as stated within this scope of
services.
• Consultant shall not be responsible for warranties, guarantees, fitness for a particular purpose,
breach of fiduciary duty, loss of anticipated profits, or for economic, incidental or consequential
damages to the Prime, City or any third party arising out of breach of contract, termination, or
for professional negligence. Additionally, Consultant shall not be responsible for acts and
decisions of third parties, including governmental agencies, other than Consultant's
subconsultants, that impact project completion and/or success.
DRAFT: 6/ 13/2019 1
DocuSign Envelope ID: 054CBBEA-3BDA-4E63-9739-A14C9181344F
The Prime shall furnish Consultant with available studies, reports, and other data pertinent to
Consultant's services; obtain or authorize Consultant to obtain or provide additional reports and
data as required; furnish to Consultant services of others required for the performance of
Consultant's services hereunder, and Consultant shall be entitled to use and rely upon all such
information and services provided by the Prime, City or others in performing Consultant's
services under this Agreement.
• The services to be performed by Consultant are intended solely for the benefit of the Prime or
City. No person or entity not a signatory to this Agreement shall be entitled to rely on
Consultant's performance of its services hereunder, and no right to assert a claim against
Consultant by assignment of indemnity rights or otherwise shall accrue to a third party as a
result of this Agreement or the performance of Consultant's services hereunder.
• The City shall arrange for access to and make all provisions for Consultant to enter upon public
and private property, as required for Consultant to perform services hereunder.
• In providing opinions of cost, financial analyses, economic feasibility projections, and schedules
for potential projects, Consultant has no control over cost or price of labor and material;
unknown or latent conditions of existing equipment or structures that may affect operation and
maintenance costs; competitive bidding procedures and market conditions; time or quality of
performance of third parties; quality, type, management, or direction of operating personnel;
and other economic and operational factors that may materially affect the ultimate project cost
or schedule. Therefore, Consultant makes no warranty that the City's actual project costs,
financial aspects, economic feasibility, or schedules will not vary from Consultant's opinions,
analyses, projections, or estimates.
• Project is anticipated to last four (4) months. It is assumed each Monthly Progress Report
and Invoice requires 3 hours of Project Manager (PM) effort, 1 hour of Quality Manger/PIC,
and 1 hour for Document Processing.
• It is assumed meetings or workshops will be attended by two Consultant Staff: Project
Manager (4 hours) and Professional (6 hours). Document Processing of 1 hour is assumed for
meeting minutes.
• It is assumed teleconferences will be attended by two Consultant Staff: Project
Manager (1.5 hours) and Professional (3 hours). Document Processing of 1 hour is assumed for
meeting minutes.
• It is assumed that each stream augmentation option in Task 200 will require 4 hours of
Professional effort, 2 hours of GIS effort, 1 hour of PM effort, and 15 minutes of Quality
Manager Effort.
• It is assumed that costing each stream augmentation option in Task 300 will require 2 hours of
Professional effort, 1.75 hour of GIS effort, 0.25 hours of PM effort, and 5 minutes of Quality
Manager Effort.
DRAFT: 6/13/2019
DocuSign Envelope ID: 054CBBEA-3BDA-4E63-9739-A14C9181344F
Tasks
Task 100 — Project Management
The objective of this task is to track and execute the project in accordance with the schedule, budget,
and quality expectations that are established. This task includes the following project management work
activities:
1. Monthly Progress Reports and Invoices. This subtask includes preparing and submitting the
work -in -progress reports and monthly invoices showing current project scope, budget, and
schedule status and identifying key issues or elements of the project that will need to be
addressed in the proceeding weeks. An electronic version of the monthly progress reports and
invoices will be sent to the Prime for review and approval. Provide regular communication on
project progress to the Prime. Conduct internal coordination as required to manage the project.
2. Kick-off Teleconference. Attend a kick-off meeting with City to establish goals and criteria for
analyses. Discuss available data and tools.
3. Ecology Coordination Meeting. Facilitate a meeting with Ecology Staff to review and obtain
comments on the Stream Augmentation infrastructure methodology. Incorporate comments
into Tasks 200 through 400.
Task 200 — Stream Augmentation Analysis
The objective of this task is to identify infrastructure needed to provide direct stream augmentation
with potable water. The task will consider using City water or wholesale water from Group A water
systems. Infrastructure needed to deliver the water will be identified, including pipes, pump station, etc.
Subtasks include:
1. Stream Augmentation Meeting. Attend a meeting with Prime and City to review the location and
quantity of stream augmentation needed based on data and input provided from the City, the
City's water rights attorney, Prime, and ESA. It is assumed that 15 sites will be considered: four
sites in or directly adjacent to the City Service area and eleven sites outside the City's service
area. It is assumed the City will identify Group A water systems that have sufficient available
supply for stream augmentation outside of the City's service area, including West Sound Utility
District, City of Bremerton, and Washington Water.
2. City Stream Augmentation Verification. Evaluate stream augmentation by the City to up to four
existing sites in or directly adjacent to City's Service Area that have current conceptual designs.
These designs were based on a previously proposed lower augmentation rates. The evaluation
will use the City's hydraulic model to verify the transmission capacity for to the new
augmentation rates. Document any new pressure or velocity deficiencies due to stream
augmentation during the hydraulic modeling from the Maximum Day Demand (MDD) and MDD
plus fire flow scenario for near -term and long-term demand projections. Propose improvements
to mitigate new deficiencies. It is assumed the City will provide a calibrated model and demand
scenarios representing the study conditions and includes the augmentation sites. Review of the
on -site stream augmentation conceptual design is not included in this task.
3. Outside City Service Area Stream Augmentation. Evaluate up to eleven sites outside the current
service area. Two options for stream augmentation: 1. Extend City service to the site and 2.
DRAFT: 6/13/2019
DocuSign Envelope ID: 054CBBEA-3BDA-4E63-9739-A14C9181344F
Purchase wholesale supply from nearby Group A. Evaluations will be made using engineering
calculations; the City's hydraulic model will not be used.
a. Extend City Service. Identify a potential option to extend the City water system to up to
eleven stream augmentation sites outside of current service area. Assess the
infrastructure needed to convey supply to the augmentation site, based on engineering
calculation, including booster pump stations and transmission piping.
b. Group A Stream Augmentation. it is assumed that Group A systems identified by the City
with sufficient available supply will only be identified for two stream augmentation
sites. For those two sites, Consultant will identify infrastructure needed to convey
wholesale supplies. It is assumed that the City will provide a meter location, available
supply, minimum pressure, and typical disinfection residual concentrations. Assess the
infrastructure needed to convey supply to the augmentation sites, based on engineering
calculations, including booster pump stations and transmission piping. Identify sites that
cannot be served by Group A system.
4. Transmission Routing Teleconference. Facilitate a teleconference with the Prime and City to
coordinate preferred routes for transmission piping.
5. Stream Augmentation Infrastructure Workshop. Facilitate a workshop with City to review and
comment on the potential infrastructure needed to supply for the 15 potential stream
augmentation sites.
Task 300 —Stream Augmentation Infrastructure Costs
The objective of this task is to estimate the infrastructure costs for stream augmentation sites. Costs will
be calculated based on capital infrastructure and potential connection charges for wholesale water
purchases for up to 17 stream augmentation options identified in Task 200. Subtasks include:
1. Infrastructure Costs. Calculate infrastructure costs for up to 25 stream augmentation options.
Capital costs will be based on planning -level conceptual estimates. Transmission costs will be
based on typical cost per linear foot of water main installation. Connection charges for the
purchase of Group A supply is assumed to be provided by the City.
2. Cost Teleconference. Facilitate a teleconference with the Prime and City to review infrastructure
costs.
3. Selection Workshop. Attend a workshop facilitated by the Prime to review stream augmentation
options.
Task 400 — Documentation
The objective of this task is to document the stream augmentation evaluations in previous tasks.
Subtasks include:
1. Draft Report. Document Tasks in a short report, including stream augmentation locations,
required infrastructure, and costs. Provide a draft Report for Prime review and comment.
2. City Review Draft Report. Incorporate Prime comments into a City Review Draft Report. Submit
Report to City for review and comment.
3. Final Report. Incorporate City comments into a final signed and sealed Report forsubmittal to
Prime.
DRAFT: 6/13/2019
DocuSign Envelope ID: 054CBBEA-3BDA-4E63-9739-A14C9181344F
Meeting List:
• Kick-off Teleconference.
• Ecology coordination Meeting.
• Stream Augmentation Meeting.
• Transmission Routing Teleconference.
• Stream Augmentation Infrastructure Workshop.
• Cost Teleconference.
• Selection Workshop.
Deliverable List:
• Meeting Agenda, materials, and summary.
• Draft Report.
• City Review Draft Report.
• Final Report.
DRAFT: 6/13/2019 5
DocuSign Envelope ID: 054CBBEA-3BDA-4E63-9739-A14C9181344F
Main office
W*esl �� 805 W Idaho Street #310
Wo Base, 10 83702
(208)433-0255
,cwarch c
To:
Robinson Noble
From:
WestWater Research
Date:
June 10, 2019
Re:
City of Port Orchard
Background and Purpose
West Coast Southwest Rocky Mountain
20522 NE 116" Circle 4747 N 71, Sheet 9412 320E Vine drive #223
Brush Prairie, WA 98606 Phoenix, AZ 85014 Fort Collins, CO 80524
(360) 695-5233 (602) 595-7009 (970) 672-1811
Exhibit C
The City of Port Orchard is attempting to move municipal water supply wells to alternative locations. Hydrologic studies
have shown evidence that doing so may have negative impact on surface water stream flow and senior water right
holders. To reduce these impacts, the city may be required to acquire available water rights to provide in -kind mitigation
for reduced stream flows, New draft legislation affecting water rights may allow other out -of -kind mitigation efforts if
there is evidence no water rights are "reasonably attainable" for in -kind mitigation. This proposal provides a scope of
work and budget to evaluate water rights within certain regions to determine if there are potentially available water
rights for acquisition that would be considered "reasonably attainable".
Scope of Work
Water Rights Desktop Review
Task 1: Review Ecology Water Rights Data
• WestWater will acquire updated versions of Ecology's GWIS geodatabase as well as other
tabular datasets in the WRTS database system. Study area will be determined and delineated
in coordination with client to cover the Blackjack, Olalla, Crescent, Purdy, Burley, Huge/Minter,
Rocky, and Coulter Creek systems.
• WestWater will perform initial selection of diversion data for all water rights. GIS data will be
crosschecked to tabular water rights datasets to ensure that all water rights have been mapped
and no water rights are being missed. Any discrepancies between GIS datasets and tabular
data, if any, will be researched and resolved resulting in a master list of water rights within the
defined geographic area.
• A web based map will be set up to host and maintain data on the ArcGIS online platform to
provide access to original and filtered water rights data, and any other geospatial data utilized
or developed during the process.
• Water rights will initially be filtered down based on water rights status, ownership, size, use type
and other screening criteria as determined by WestWater. All records will be properly noted to
identify reason for exclusion. Any remaining water rights will be reviewed with additional scrutiny
in Task 2.
DocuSign Envelope ID: 054CBBEA-3BDA-4E63-9739-A14C9181344F
Port Orchard Water Rights Assessment
..Page 2 —
Task 2: Perform a preliminary validity analysis
• Any water rights identified from the initial selection and review will undergo further analysis. This
will involve an additional screening based on initial mapping of water rights and may include
aerial imagery analysis, document review, and other research as needed.
• Based on the results of the analysis, a list of candidate water rights will be compiled to be further
analyzed in Task 3.
Task 3: Water Right Ownership Research
To determine if identified water rights are potentially available for acquisition, current ownership
will need to be determined in order to contact water right holders. Current water right ownership
is not actively maintained by Ecology and requires additional review of water rights place of use
information and county land ownership records.
All existing places of use within Ecology's GIS layers will be utilized and verified against water
right documents to assure accuracy. A preliminary review of GIS layers indicates that there are
a significant number of unmapped water rights within the region. Unmapped places of use may
need to be mapped using water rights application maps and/or legal descriptions on water rights
documents. Due to the large amount of unmapped water rights in the subject area, mapping
place of use could require considerable efforts and may affect budget depending on how many
records require review.
Parcel data maintained by relevant counties will be acquired and overlaid on the place of use
data. Water right ownership is generally appurtenant to landownership. Landowner information
for parcels adjoining the place of use of a water right will be recorded. WestWater anticipates
that multiple landowners may be identified for some water rights due to general legal
descriptions of the water right place of use or quality limitations of legal descriptions provided
on water right certificates. This information will assist in further narrowing the list of candidate
water rights. For example, water rights that have been divided through multiple property sales
often do not represent viable acquisition opportunities.
Task 4: Water Right Field Inspection Analysis
If potential water right acquisition opportunities arise, field inspections for each candidate water
right may be conducted if determined necessary and beneficial to determining if the rights are
reasonably available. Data developed in the ArcGIS online webmap under Task 1 will be utilized
to collect pictures, additional notes, and any other relevant data supporting water rights. The
field inspections provide an opportunity to verify the location of the water rights, ownership
information, as well as determine the current use of the water right.
Task 5: Water Right Owner Outreach
Letters of inquiry may be sent to landowners that fulfil criteria of potential acquisition
opportunities to determine willingness to sell. WestWater will consult with R&N, Port Orchard
and other legal counsel to determine if this task is necessary and the best approach to execute.
Z
www.waterexchange.corn
DocuSign Envelope ID: 054CBBEA-3BDA-4E63-9739-A14C9181344F
Port Orchard Water Rights Assessment
Page 3
Task 6: Summary report of findings
• A summary report outlining the research process and findings will be developed. Accompanying
maps will be developed to display diversions researched and any identified candidate water
rights. Detailed profile maps of candidate water rights will be identified along with field
observations and photos if applicable.
Project Schedule
Work will be completed within 12 weeks of engagement. At approximately the 4t� week of the project a conference call
will be held to discuss the results of Task 1 and 2 to determine next required steps of project, If candidate water rights
are identified, Task 3 will be completed to further filter the results at approximately week 5. A second conference call
may be required to discuss findings. If determined that field visits are required, Task 4 will be completed at
approximately week 6 followed by Task 5 if water rights are determined to be potentially available for acquisition. A
report will be furnished at the completion of the project.
Task/Week
1 112
3
4
5
6
17
8
Task 1: Review Ecology Water Rights Data
Task 2: Perform a preliminary validity analysis
Task 3: Water Right Ownership Research
Task 4: Water Right Field Inspection Analysis
Task 5. Water Right Owner Outreach
Task 6: Summary report of findings
Project Deliverables
Project deliverables to the following:
• Web map built displaying Points of Diversion information and filtered datasets displaying
analysis results
• Up to 3 conference calls to discuss results and findings
• Summary report discussing methodology and research results
I&
www.wa unge.com
DocuSign Envelope ID: 054CBBEA-3BDA-4E63-9739-A14C9181344F
Port Orchard Water Rights Assessment
Page 4
Project Budget
To complete all tasks within the scope it is estimated to cost between $31,300 and $44,240. Depending on the results
of the analysis, field verification and water right owner outreach (Tasks 4 and 5) may not be necessary.
Task 1: Review Ecology Water Rights Data
$12,560
Task 2: Perform a preliminary validity analysis
$7,180
Task 3: Water Right Ownership Research
$6,000
Task 4: Water Right Field Inspection Analysis
$9,360
Task 5: Water Right Owner Outreach
$3,580
Task 6: Summary report of findings
$5,560
Subtotal
$31,300
$12,940
Optional Tasks Subtotal
Grand Totals
$31,300 - $44,240
i&
www.waterexchange.com
DocuSign Envelope ID: 054CBBEA-3BDA-4E63-9739-A14C9181344F
1969-2019
5309 Shilshale Avenue NW
Suite 200
Seattle, WA 98107
206.769.9658 phone
206.789.9684 tax
Exhibit D
Scope of Work
Preparation of Net Ecological Benefit Analysis
For the City of Port Orchard ESSB 6091 Pilot Project
June 4, 2019
Project Understanding
The City of Port Orchard's (City) application for an additional municipal water right has been accepted as a pilot
project for the joint legislative task force on water mitigation formed by the Washington State Legislature in
ESSB 6091. RCW 90.94.090(8) outlines a mitigation sequence that the City, as a pilot project participant, must
follow when creating a mitigation plan to offset impacts from the proposed projects. The mitigation sequence
includes avoidance, minimization, and compensation. As part of the compensation step, "net ecological benefit"
to fish and related aquatic resources are to be provided using in -kind and/or out -of -kind mitigation.
The City has applied for water right changes and new water rights for new Wells 12 and 13. To mitigate for the
water withdrawal effects, the City is planning for both in -kind and out -of -kind mitigation actions. Achieving "net
ecological benefit" necessitates that the anticipated benefits of the mitigation portfolio offset the anticipated
impacts of the project. A scientifically -sound, defensible analysis framework is needed characterize the
anticipated impacts and benefits. In May 2019, Ecology published Draft Final Guidance for Determining Net
Ecological Benefit which provides an overview of the information Ecology will be looking for in such analysis.
This document is out for public comment which will be addressed in a final version. This scope of work is based
on the Draft Final Guidance and may need to be adjusted pending changes included in the final version expected
to be issued in July 2019.
Robinson Noble has been hired by the City to provide hydrogeological and water rights services for the pilot
project. However, they need assistance in performing the required net ecological benefit analysis. This proposed
scope of work is for Environmental Science Associates (ESA) to develop and implement an analysis comparing
the anticipated water withdrawal impacts to the anticipated mitigation benefits. This analysis will document the
extent to which the proposed mitigation portfolio meets the net ecological benefit threshold. Following is ESA's
understanding of the anticipated impacts and mitigation portfolio:
• The City's water rights applications are for the deep sub -sea level aquifer, which will reduce impacts on
Kitsap County streams from existing shallower municipal wells, but which could result in smaller impacts
to a larger geographic area.
• The geographic area of potential effect includes approximately 20 named creek systems in the project
vicinity. Preliminary analysis indicates the largest magnitude of flow depletion is on the order of 0.15
cubic feet per second (110 acre-feet per year).
DocuSign Envelope ID: 054CBBEA-3BDA-4E63-9739-A14C9181344F
City of Port Orchard Foster Pilot Project
ESA Scope of Work
June 2019
Scope of Work
Task 1. Stakeholder Meetings
ESA will participate in up to three meetings with project stakeholders to introduce the net ecological benefit
analysis requirements and gain meeting participants' approval of the analysis method being implemented. Up to
two ESA staff will participate in each meeting. ESA will prepare PowerPoint presentations and handouts, as
needed, to support the planned topic for each meeting. Additional discussions with stakeholders to follow up on
specific topics or questions are anticipated.
Assumptions:
• The City or Robinson Noble, with input from ESA, will develop the list of stakeholders and will be
responsible for stakeholder outreach.
• ESA is not responsible for stakeholder meeting logistics. ESA will communicate with meeting organizers
to help set the agenda for net ecological benefit topics.
• Each meeting will be in the vicinity of Port Orchard or Poulsbo and last up to 3 hours in length,
• If stakeholder meetings identify tasks or effort that is beyond the established scope and budget, ESA will
notify the City and Robinson Noble and provide a written amendment to the scope and/or budget. ESA
will undertake such additional work only upon the City's written authorization.
• ESA will prepare summary notes of the net ecological benefit topic of each meeting.
• Up to 24 hours of discussions with stakeholders outside of the meetings are expected to follow up on
specific topics or questions about the mitigation or net ecological benefit analysis.
Deliverables:
• Summary of meeting discussions focusing on net ecological benefit in electronic format.
• PowerPoint presentations and handouts, as needed, to support each meeting.
Task 2. Analysis Framework Development
ESA will review available background materials and develop a structured and transparent analysis framework to
use as the basis for making a net ecological benefit determination. The framework will be developed to meet the
requirements of Ecology's 2019 Draft Final Guidance document. The framework will calculate the anticipated
ecological impacts associated with surface water flow depletions as well as the anticipated ecological benefit
associated with the proposed out -of -kind mitigation. The impacts and benefits are expected to be calculated by
assigning points.
Ecology's 2008 Implementation Plan for the Adoption of Water Resources Management Programs in WRIA 27
(Lewis) and WRIA 28 (Salmon -Washougal) will be introduced to stakeholders as a potential framework to use. It
is anticipated that the overall concept of scoring impacts and benefits will be accepted by the stakeholders, but
that revisions will be necessary. Up to three iterations of the analysis framework will be conducted to test and
refine the scoring system and address comments from stakeholders. The development of iterations will include
review and documentation of scientific literature to support the framework scoring assignments,
DocuSign Envelope ID: 054CBBEA-3BDA-4E63-9739-A14C9181344F
City of Port Orchard Foster Pilot Project
ESA Scope of Work
June 2019
Flow depletion inputs to the analysis framework will be provided to ESA. ESA will work with Robinson Noble to
obtain information on the anticipated impacts of the water withdrawals. These inputs are expected to be in
terms of the magnitude of surface water reductions (to nearest 0.1 cubic feet per second) and the length of river
(to nearest 0.1 river mile). The location of the impacts relative to proposed in -kind mitigation (i.e., upstream or
downstream) will also be needed.
Habitat type and quantity inputs will be calculated by ESA using GIS, ESA will work with Robinson Noble to
identify up to six potential habitat mitigation projects from existing reports. ESA will use GIS tools to prepare
conceptual polygons by habitat type in the project area and quantify the area and/or length. The habitat types
may include: side channels, wetlands, and connected floodplains among others. The area calculations may need
to be made under up to two flow scenarios (e.g., late summer low flow and extreme storm event).
Assumptions:
• The development of the mitigation projects and calculation of ecological uplift will be a desktop exercise
and does not include fieldwork or survey.
• No new potential mitigation projects will need to be identified by ESA other than those in existing
reports.
• Framework development discussions with the stakeholders will use the surface water depletion
estimates provided by Robinson Noble.
• Robinson Noble will provide surface water depletion inputs for the framework that indicate the spatial
extent, time duration, and magnitude of water depletion. For example, X miles of 0.1 cubic feet per
second (cfs) depletion over three weeks and Y miles of 0.2 cfs depletion over two weeks.
• Habitat type and quantity inputs will be developed by ESA using information from existing reports. It is
anticipated that assumptions about the project footprint, area of influence, and design features will be
necessary and ESA will document those in the framework
• Up to three iterations of the analysis framework will be conducted to address comments from the City
and stakeholders.
Deliverobles:
• Analysis framework table with preliminary credit and debit calculations.
Task 3. Net Ecological Benefit Analysis Report
ESA will prepare a Net Ecological Benefit Analysis Report per the requirements of Ecology's 2019 Draft Final
Guidance document, The report will describe the methods and results of the analysis framework developed in
Task 2. The analysis will be a structured and transparent ledger or matrix describing all the impacts and offsets.
The documentation of net ecological benefit analysis required in Ecology (2019) includes elements that ESA and
Robinson Noble will need to work together to prepare. Table 1 lists the elements required in Ecology (2019) anc
the responsible company.
DocuSign Envelope ID: 054CBBEA-3BDA-4E63-9739-A14C9181344F
City of Port Orchard Foster Pilot Project
ESA Scope of Work
June 2019
Table 1. Net Ecological Benefit Elements and Company Responsibilities
Element
Responsibility
Demonstrate that complete avoidance and minimization of impacts is not
Robinson Noble
reasonably attainable with water offset projects.
ESA
Structure the analysis in the form of a ledger or matrix that describes all
the impacts and offsets in detail and sums up the net benefits in a
quantitative or semi -quantitative manner.
Describe any ecological impacts that are not offset through in -place and
ESA
in -kind replacement of consumptive water use.
Include an evaluation of impacts and offsets based on a detailed
ESA
hydrological analysis, conceptual model, or numerical model.
Document financial and other assurances that the mitigation will be fully
ESA/ Robinson Noble
implemented and remain in place for the full duration of the new water
use (likely in perpetuity).
Include monitoring and evaluation plans that describe or detail
ESA
maintenance needed to ensure lasting benefits.
Include contingency plans or corrective actions to be taken if goals and
ESA/ Robinson Noble
measures are not achieved.
Include information that describes the level of support for the proposed
Robinson Noble/City
mitigation pilot from tribal, state and local resource managers (which
of Port Orchard
may be in the form of letters of support or agreement).
Identify and document scientific sources and methods of analysis
ESA
ESA will prepare a draft report in electronic format. Three rounds of review of the draft report are anticipated.
The first draft will be provided for City review. ESA will address comments and submit a second draft for
stakeholders (tribe(s)) review. ESA will address comments and submit a third draft for Ecology review. ESA will
address comments and electronically submit a final report.
Assumptions:
• City will provide compiled written comments on first draft.
• Robinson Noble or City will provide compiled written comments from stakeholders (tribe(s)) on second
draft.
• Robinson Noble or City will provide compiled written comments from Ecology on third draft.
• Robinson Noble will respond to comments on text prepared by them.
• If the comments require more effort than is included in the established scope and budget, ESA will
notify the City and Robinson Noble and provide a written amendment to the scope and/or budget. ESA
will undertake such additional work only upon the City's written authorization.
Deliverables:
• Three drafts and a final Net Ecological Benefit report will be delivered in electronic format.
4
DocuSign Envelope ID: 054CBBEA-3BDA-4E63-9739-A14C9181344F
City of Port Orchard Foster Pilot Project
ESA Scope of Work
June 2019
Task 4. Proiect Management
ESA will conduct project management activities including communication with the City, Thomas Pors, Robinson
Noble (prime consultant), and the ESA project team. In addition, monthly invoices and progress reports will be
prepared.
Assumptions:
• The project is anticipated to last up to 20 months from NTP to project closeout.
Deliverobles:
• Invoices and progress reports.
• Monthly, or more frequent, project updates via email and/or teleconference with the Robinson Noble
project manager.
Budget
The ESA budget for each task is presented in Table 1. The project will be billed on a time and materials, not -to -
exceed basis. The total authorized amount for all tasks is $88,950.00. Surplus budget from completed tasks can
be moved to other tasks.
Table 1. Budget by Task.
Task Budget
Task 1. Stakeholder Meetings$15,410.00
Task 2. Analysis Framework Development Y p $32,000.00
Task 3. Net Ecological Benefit Report $34,250.00
Task 4. Project Management $7,290.00
Total $88,950.00
5
DocuSign Envelope ID: 054CBBEA-3BDA-4E63-9739-A14C9181344F
.�rrlr.r
ROBINSON
NOBLE
General Fee Schedule Exhibit E January 1, 2019
Professional Positions
Fee per Hour
Principal Engineer, Hydrogeologist or Environmental Scientist
$187
Associate Engineer, Hydrogeologist or Environmental Scientist
$171
Senior Engineer, Hydrogeologist or Environmental Scientist
$146
Senior Project Engineer, Hydrogeologist or Environmental Scientist
$126
Project Engineer, Hydrogeologist or Environmental Scientist
$113
Staff Engineer, Hydrogeologist or Environmental Scientist
$102
Senior Field Staff
$93
Field Staff
$80
Legal Support/Expert Witness Servicesfrestimony
150% of above rates
Support Positions
Senior GIS/CAD Specialist
n
$95
Senior Technician
$95 I
Senior Administrator
$83
GIS/CAD Specialist
$83
Technician
$83
Administrator
$72
Clerical Support
$72
Other Fees and Costs
Subcontracts/ Professional services
15%
Management Fee Outside laboratory services
15%
Construction subcontracts
15%
Other Costs Travel (auto)
i
$0.64/mile
Travel (other)
Cost +10%
Per diem
Prevailing State rate +10%
Other direct expenses
Cost +10%
Field and laboratory testing/equipment rental
See following pages
This fee schedule is subject to change according to contract or Professional Services Agreement conditions.
Robinson Noble, Inc. rates effective January 1, 2019
DocuSign Envelope ID: 054CBBEA-3BDA-4E63-9739-A14C9181344F
Hydrogeologic Equipment Rental Schedule
January 1, 2019
Equipment
Unit
Rate
Water Level Transducer and Data Logger
Per day
$25
Field Laptop Computer
Per day
$40
Electric Water Level Sounder(s) 0 to 300 ft
Flat fee per project
$30
over 300 ft
Flat fee per project
$60
DC Submersible Purge Pump (Single Stage)
Per pump
List price + 10%
DC Submersible Purge Pump (Dual Stage)
Per pump
List price + 10%
Double -Ring Infiltrometer
Per day
$50
Schonstedt Gradient Magnetometer
Per day
$75
Geonics EM-61 Metal Detector
Per day
$500
Downhole Gamma/Resistivity/Temperature
Per day
$500
Logging Equipment
Downhole Caliper Logging Equipment
Per day
$350
Draw Works
Per day
$600
Mechanical Sieve Sample Equipment
Flat fee per well
$50
2-inch Gasoline -powered Centrifugal Pump
Per day
$100
(includes hoses)
2-inch Submersible Pump + Controller
Per day
$180
Generator & Fuel
Per day
$70
Hand Auger
Per day
$50
Survey Gear (laser level & rod)
Per day
$85
FlowTracker Acoustic Doppler Velocimeter
Stream Gaging Equipment
Per day
$200
pH Field Meter
Per day
$25
GPS
Per day
$20
Other Equipment
Negotiated
Negotiated
I
Digital Camera
Per day
$10
nis tee scnedule is subject to change according to contract or Professional Services Agreement conditions.
Robinson Noble, Inc. rates effective January 1, 2079
DocuSign Envelope ID: 054CBBEA-3BDA-4E63-9739-A14C9181344F
Environmental Equipment Rental and Consumable Schedule
January
1, 2019
Equipment
Unit
Rate
Water Level Transducer and Data Logger
Per day
$50
Field Laptop Computer
Per day
$40
Electronic Water Level Sounder
Per day
$30
Electronic Interface Probe
Per day
$75
DC Operated Peristaltic Pump
Per day
$45
2-inch Gasoline -powered Centrifugal Pump
Per day
$100
(includes hoses)
2-inch Submersible Pump + Controller
Per day
$350
Generator & Fuel
Per day
$70
Low -Flow Bladder Pump
Per day
$175
Photoionization Detector
Per day
$75
Combustible Gas Indicator
Per day
$65
GPS
Per day
$20
Water Quality Meter
Per day
$200
Teflon Water Bailer
Per day
$30
Soil Sampling Equipment (manual)
Per day
$25
Mechanical Sieve Sample Equipment
Flat fee per project
$50
Survey Gear (laser level & rod)
Per day
$85
pH Field Meter (soils)
Per day
$50
Soil Vapor Extraction System
Per month
$750
Digital Camera
Per day
$10
Hand Auger
Per day
$50
Other Equipment
Negotiated
Negotiated
Consumable Items:
Polyethylene Purge/Sampling Tubing
Each 10 feet
$2.50
DC Submersible Purge Pump (Single stage)
Per pump
List price + 10%
DC Submersible Purge Pump (Dual Stage)
Per pump
List price + 10%
Silicone Peristaltic Pump Head Tubing
Each foot
$4.00
Bladders for Low -Flow Bladder Pump
Each
$5.00
Water Sample Bailer
Each
$10
Bailer Rope/String
Each 10 feet
$1.00
Personal Protection Equipment
Per day per person
$50
This fee schedule is subject to change according to contract or Professional Services Agreement conditions
Robinson Noble, Inc rates effective January 1, 2073
DocuSign Envelope ID: 054CBBEA-3BDA-4E63-9739-A14C9181344F
Geotechnical Field and Laboratory Testing Schedule
Test
Portable Nuclear Density Gauge
Slope Inclinometer
Direct Shear
Moisture -Density Relationship Curves:
Sieve Analyses (Gradations -Wet Sieve)
Bulk Sieve (if gravelly or >101b)
200 Wash
Hydrometer Analysis
Falling Head Permeability
Atterberg Limits
(Liquid Limit and Plastic Limit)
Moisture Content
Dynamic Cone Penetrometer
Points
Resistivity 4-point Gauge
Hand Auger
Consolidation Test Incremental Loading
(9 loads, 0.125 TSF to 32 TSF, 4 unloads)
Shelby Tube Extrusion/Sample Description
Single -Ring Infiltrometer
.+aiivaiy 1, cv!zp
Fee
Per Hour
$5.00
Perday
$250
Point
$200
Each
1 pt $120
Each
Multiple pts $225
Each
$150
Add
$70
Each
$80
Each
$175
Each
$165
Each
$220
Each
$12
Day
$225
Each
$20
Day
$300
Per day
$50
$550
$50/each additional load
$40
Per day
$50
Phis fee schedule is subject to change according to contract or Professional Services Agreement conditions.
Robinson Noble, Inc. rates effective January 1, 2019