Loading...
08 August 1, 2023, Planninig Commission Meeting PacketCITY OF PORT ORCHARD Planning Commission 216 Prospect Street, Port Orchard, WA 98366 (36o) 874-5533 planning@portorchardwa.gov PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING AGENDA Tuesday, August 1, 2023 — 6:00 pm *** Attendees and Planning Commissioners may attend in person at City Hall or via Zoom*** Join Zoom Meeting, Public Link: https://us02web.zoom.us/i/86180242823 Dial -in (phone audio) only: + 1253 215 8782 Webinar ID: 8618024 2823 Planning Commissioners please use individual webinar links. 1. Call to Order: 6:00 p.m. Pledge of allegiance. 2. Welcome and Introduction. Planning Commission and City Staff Introductions. 3. Audience Comments: Topics not listed for public hearing on tonight's agenda. Please limit comments to 3 minutes. 4. Approval of Minutes from June 6, 2023. (Attachment)(ACTION) 5. Business Items: a) DISCUSSION: 2024 Comprehensive Plan Periodic Update (Attachment) The City and its consultant prepared a draft Existing Conditions Report to function as the baseline for the 2024 Comprehensive Plan Periodic Update. As part of continued public outreach, the City has developed Center boundaries for the Bethel/Sedgwick, Bethel/Lund and the Mile Hill subareas which meet the Puget Sound Regional Council's centers requirements. The subarea boundaries will be published using Social Pinpoint to solicit public opinion regarding the Comprehensive Plan Update. Staff Contact: Jim Fisk, Senior Planner b) DISCUSSION: 2023 Comprehensive Plan Transportation Improvement Program (Attachment) The City of Port Orchard initiated a Comprehensive Plan amendment to amend the 2022-2041 Transportation Improvement Program (TIP). City staff has identified several projects which require amendment based on funding availability, design/construction status and other priorities. The City may update the Comprehensive Plan more than once annually provided the amendment is to the Capital Facilities element that occurs concurrently with the adoption or amendment of the City budget. Staff Contact: Jim Fisk, Senior Planner c) DISCUSSION: Temporary Signage in Right-of-way In 2023, DCD staff has periodically documented temporary signage in public right -of way in anticipation of revising POMC 20.132. DCD staff asks the Planning Commission to review the results of the documentation effort prior to scheduling a public hearing for revisions to POW 20.132. Staff Contact: Jim Fisk, Senior Planner d) DISCUSSION: Director's Report Update to the Planning Commission on recent related to past and upcoming Planning Commission activity. Staff Contact: Nick Bond, Community Development Director 6. Adjourn Next Planning Commission Meeting — September 5, 2023 CITY OF PORT ORCHARD Planning Commission Minutes 216 Prospect Street, Port Orchard, WA 98366 Phone: (36o) 874-5533 • Fax: (36o) 876-498o Planning Commission Meeting Minutes June 6, 2023 Hybrid Zoom Teleconference COMMISSIONERS: Present: Bek Ashby, Tyler McKlosky, Stephanie Bailey, Dave Bernstein, Joe Morrison, and Paul Fontenot. Absent: Annette Stewart. CITY STAFF: Community Development Director Nick Bond, Senior Planner Jim Fisk, Assistant Planner Josie Rademacher, and Planning Intern Connor Dahlquist. 1. CALL TO ORDER: Chair Ashby called the meeting to order at 6:10 p.m. and led the Pledge of Allegiance. 2. WELCOME AND INTRODUCTION: Chair Ashby introduced the present Planning Commissioners, Vice Chair McKlosky, Commissioner Bailey, Commissioner Bernstein, Commissioner Morrison and Commissioner Fontenot and present City staff, Community Development Director Nick Bond, Senior Planner Jim Fisk, Assistant Planner Josie Rademacher, and Planning Intern Connor Dahlquist. 3. PUBLIC COMMENTS: Public comment was open to any subject not related to the public hearing. There were no comments from the public regarding issues not on the agenda. 4. APPROVAL OF MINUTES FROM MAY 2, 2023: Commissioner McKlosky made a motion to approve the minutes as corrected from the May 2nd meeting. Commissioner Fontenot seconded the motion. The motion passed unanimously. 5. BUSINESS ITEMS: A. PUBLIC HEARING: HOUSING ACTION PLAN (HAP) Community Development Director, Nick Bond, introduced the continuation of the public hearing on the revised Housing Action Plan (HAP) which identifies strategies, actions, and policy tools to create enough housing options to meet the communities needs. Bond states that the HAP is a policy document with a set of steps for the City to support and encourage new housing production that meets local housing needs for residents of all income levels. Bond states that it is the City Staff s intent to get a recommendation from the Planning Commission to accept the Housing Action Plan as presented to forward onto the City Council for adoption. Bond stated that in addition to testimony provided by the Planning Commission at the last meeting, the document presented includes City Councilmembers' comments as well. Bond walked the Planning Commission through the changes to the document. Chair Ashby re -opened the public hearing. There were no comments from the public. Chair Ashby closed the public hearing. Commissioner Morrison made a motion to accept the Housing Action Plan as presented and move it forward for City Council consideration. Commissioner Fontenot seconded the motion. The motion passed unanimously. Commissioner Bernstein abstained from the vote. B. PUBLIC HEARING: LR23-CODE AMENDMENT-04 POMC 2.20 PLANNING COMMISSION Assistant Planner, Josie Rademacher, introduced the proposed amendment to POW 2.20 providing updated and clearer guidance and regulations for the Planning Commission. Rademacher notes that an additional amendment was recommended while drafting the ordinance to require that the Chair be present at the place of the meeting. Rademacher further states that should the Chair not be present at the place of the meeting, that the gavel should be given to the Vice Chair or other present Planning Commissioner to chair the meeting. Chair Ashby opened the public hearing. There were no comments from the public. Chair Ashby closed the public hearing. Commissioner McKlosky made a motion to recommend that the City Council approve an ordinance amending Port Orchard Municipal Code (POMC) 2.20.010, 2.20.020, 2.20.025, 2.20.30, 2.20.035, 2.20.040, 2.20.050, and 2.20.060, 2.20.065, 2.20.070, and 2.20.080, as presented. Commissioner McKlosky seconded the motion. The motion passed unanimously. C. DISCUSSION: OPEN SPACE REQUEST Senior Planner, Jim Fisk shared that McCormick Development Corporation made application to Kitsap County in March for classification of the property (APN 5686-000-058-0001) by the Kitsap County Assessor requesting a one -acre parcel within the `Amherst Plat' to be designated with an Open Space Tax Classification. Fisk explained the process of the application and associated review regulations. Fisk stated that the Planning Commission should review the request prior to scheduling a public hearing and that Staff recommends that a public hearing be scheduled for August 1, 2023, on the requested designation. The Planning Commission directed staff to schedule a public hearing for the August 1, 2023, Planning Commission meeting. Page 2 of 3 D. DISCUSSION: MCCORMICK VILLAGE REPORT Community Development Director, Nick Bond, shared a 3D walk through exhibit that was provided to the City by McCormick Development Corporation that provides visuals of their upcoming McCormick Village Commercial Development project. E. DIRECTOR'S REPORT Senior Planner, Jim Fisk, shared that the 2023 Comprehensive Plan Map amendment was approved by City Council, and the properties along Meline Rd. are now zoned Residential 1 (R1). The code amendment for Port Orchard Municipal Code (POMC) 20.24.040 Counter Completeness was also adopted by the City Council and allows for the Permit Center staff to take in applications electronically. ADJOURN: Chair Ashby adjourned the meeting at 7:10 pm. Bek Ashby, Chair Nick Bond, Community Development Director Page 3 of 3 CITY OF PORT ORCHARD DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT 216 Prospect Street, Port Orchard, WA 98366 Ph.: (36o) 874-5533 • FAX: (36o) 876-4980 PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT Agenda Item No: 5a 2024 Comprehensive Plan Subject: Periodic Update Existing Conditions Report Meeting Date: August 1, 2023 Prepared by: Nick Bond, AICP, Development Director Issue: The City of Port Orchard and its consultant prepared a draft Existing Conditions Report to function as a baseline for the 2024 Comprehensive Plan Periodic Update. The Existing Conditions Report presents population, demographics, households, housing stock, economy, and planning targets to assist in the decision -making process while developing goals and policies for the 2024 Comprehensive Plan. Current trends, future projections, and key takeaways for various elements of the Comprehensive Plan are discussed, and the report establishes common baseline data which will inform the various elements of the Comprehensive Plan. The data is based on a variety of sources including the US Census Bureau, City permitting data and the Puget Sound Regional Council among others. In summary, the Report describes baseline data for: • Port Orchard's Population and Demographics - Rapid growth and diversity of the Port Orchard population. • Port Orchard Households - Household and housing unit size, and household incomes. • Housing Stock and Affordability — Vacancy rates and a lack of missing middle housing types. • Economy — Describes the local economy as primarily service and retail and most employees in Port Orchard reside elsewhere. • Population and Job Targets — Historic rates of population and job growth in Port Orchard As part of continued public outreach, the City developed Center boundaries for the Beth el/Sedgwick, Bethel/Lund and the Mile Hill subareas which meet the Puget Sound Regional Council's centers requirements. The subarea boundaries will be published using Social Pinpoint to solicit public opinion regarding the Comprehensive Plan Update. Additionally, the City intends to utilize Social Pinpoint to reach a broader audience than what is otherwise anticipated through traditional public outreach. However, the City still intends to use traditional public outreach such as in -person workshops, presentations with local organizations and information booths at local civic events. While social Pinpoint expands the reach or the public outreach, the City does not intend to fully rely on an online presence. Recommendation: N/A. Suggested Motion: N/A Attachments: City of Port Orchard 2024 Comprehensive Plan Periodic Update Existing Conditions Report. Port Orchard 2024 Comprehensive Plan Existing Conditions Report I DRAFT v2 [7-18-23] Executive Summary This report sets the background framework for the 2044 periodic update of Port Orchard's comprehensive plan by presenting baseline data on the City's population, demographics, households, housing stock, economy, and planning targets. This executive summary section presents key findings from each of the sections in this report, with further details, charts, graphs, data sources, and discussion found subsequently in the full report. Population & Demographics • Port Orchard is a rapidly growing city, with population growth rates in recent decades exceeding those of the county and state due to annexation, in -migration, and natural population growth. • The city has a diversity of built environments and densities ranging from older buildings downtown to corridor commercial development and modern apartments along Sidney Ave. and more dispersed single-family new construction in McCormick Woods. • Port Orchard's population is younger and more diverse than regional averages, with lower levels of educational attainment than the county and state. • The Kitsap County Jail, located in Port Orchard, contained 411 inmates as of the 2020 Census, and there were an additional 146 residents in group quarters outside of the jail. The OFM estimates the 2023 number of group quarters residents at 694, or 3.9 percent of the city's population. Households • Port Orchard has a similar household size to the county and state, and there are a large number of households with children in the city, including single parent households. • There is a mismatch between household size and housing unit size, with a larger share of smaller households than smaller units, which can impact housing choice. • About 39 percent of Port Orchard households are renters. Renters in the city earn considerably less than homeowners and have different household size needs. • Port Orchard incomes have increased over the past decade but have not kept pace with county and statewide incomes in recent years. There is a higher share of low-income households and a smaller share of middle -income households in the city, and incomes are not distributed evenly around Port Orchard. Housing Stock and Affordability • Vacancy rates in Port Orchard decreased significantly between 2015 and 2021 but have since rebounded due to increased multifamily housing production. • Most housing in Port Orchard is in single-family homes and apartment complexes, with relatively little "middle housing." The city's housing stock is relatively new, with over half of the housing in the city built since 1990. • The high rate of housing production and permitting is continuing in Port Orchard, with over 5,000 units in the permitting or production pipeline. • Most recent single-family construction has been in new subdivisions in McCormick Woods and the Bethel- Sedgwick area. Recent and forthcoming apartment projects have been more evenly spread throughout the city. Port Orchard Comprehensive Plan I Existing Conditions Report DRAFT v2 Page 1 Port Orchard incomes have stagnated in recent years. Ownership housing prices have continued to increase, making it more difficult for residents to purchase housing, but rental prices have begun to decrease in 2022, due to the large amount of multifamily construction in the city. A household earning the median income in Port Orchard would not be able to afford the median home sales price in the city as of 2021. Although incomes and housing prices vary across the city, this indicates high demand for housing overall. About a third of low- and moderate -income Port Orchard households are cost -burdened, paying more than 30 percent of their income on housing costs. Many of the lowest -income households in the city are paying more than half their income in housing costs. Economy • Port Orchard's economy is dominated by the service and retail sectors, as well as government jobs. The city has smaller shares of the types of information and technology jobs prevalent in the greater Puget Sound region. • Port Orchard experiences a net inflow of commuters, primarily from Bremerton and nearby areas. The primary commuting destinations for Port Orchard residents are Seattle and Bremerton. Many of the city's retail, health care, and public employees commute from elsewhere. • Government, hospitality, and retail are expected to see significant regional growth in the coming decades. There is also forecast growth in some sectors which are less represented in Port Orchard's employment landscape, including professional and business services. • The proximity to Naval Base Kitsap in Bremerton results in a large number of military employees, both enlisted and civilian, who likely live in Port Orchard. These residents have unique economic situations, such as receiving military housing stipends. Anecdotal reports also suggest military employees move in and out of the city more frequently than other residents as work demands shift. • There has been considerably less commercial development than residential development in the city in over the past decade. Population and Job Targets If past development trends continue, Port Orchard could see a 2044 population of 26,972, slightly exceeding the planning target of 26,087. This suggests the city should plan for infrastructure in excess of that which would be needed over the next 20 years. A continuation of the historic rate of employment growth in the city does not reach the full 2044 employment allocation of 13,962. If the job growth rate over the last decade continues, the city could expect to see a total of 11,898 jobs by 2044. However, the city is required to plan for the full amount of the job allocation. Port Orchard Comprehensive Plan I Existing Conditions Report DRAFT v2 Page 2 Overview and Zoning This report sets the background framework for the 2044 periodic update of Port Orchard's comprehensive plan by presenting baseline data on the City's population, demographics, households, housing stock, economy, and planning targets. Current trends, future projections, and key takeaways for various elements of the Comprehensive Plan are discussed, and the report establishes common baseline data which will inform the various elements of the Comprehensive Plan. This information is drawn from a variety of sources, primarily the 2020 American Community Survey (ACS) conducted by the U.S. Census Bureau, as well as City permitting data, Puget Sound Regional Council (PSRC) and Census employment data, U.S. Bureau of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) housing data, and real estate data from Costar and Redfin. The map below in Figure 1 shows Port Orchard's current City and Urban Growth Area (UGA) boundaries. Per state law (RCW 36.70A.110), UGAs are intended to provide land supply for 20 years of projected growth, and the area outside UGAs should accommodate growth "only if it is not urban in nature." Much of the southwestern area of Port Orchard, the McCormick Woods area, was annexed in the 2000s. As of 2023, the total size of the city, including right-of-way and water, is 7,175 acres, with another 3,095 acres outside the city but within the UGA. Figure 1. Port Orchard Boundaries Port Orchard City Limits and UGA, 2023 Navy Yard City 41­iaa,i,iel a� a �P m y �P4 ST � tt �e t � -SF'` SE MILEHILL-DR SE MILE HILL DR - V Z `oN E 1 ' SE SALMONBERRY RD SW BERRY LAKE RD -W p Legend Sll ��EDGWICK RD A i 0 Port Orchard City Limits r F 7J Port Orchard LIGA Roads-- W — State Highway Bethel - - Collector / Arterial Local Road sw LIDER RD \\ m o V Water Bodies se uoe 0 0 0,5 1 mi /t �tioRr a I I i Source. Kitsop County, City orport Orchard, LCG The map below in Figure 2 shows the zoning in Port Orchard as of June 2023. Port Orchard's residential zones increase in density from R1 to R4, with R1 allowing detached houses and cottage courts, R2 adding duplexes and townhomes, R3 adding apartments, and R4 allowing only apartments, townhomes and fourplexes. R6 allows detached houses, cottage courts, and duplexes. The R5 zone is not currently mapped. The mixed -use zones (NMU, BPMU, CMU, DMU, and GMU) allow a variety of commercial uses ranging from medical to retail and residential uses ranging from detached and attached single-family units to apartments and live/work uses. The commercial zones focus on more auto -oriented commercial Port Orchard Comprehensive Plan I Existing Conditions Report DRAFT v2 Page 3 uses, particularly in the CH zone. The city has two industrial districts: IF focuses on light industrial, commercial and residential whereas LI is geared towards manufacturing and similar uses. There is also a HI district in the code which is not currently mapped. Other zones include the Cl zone for schools and religious facilities, PF for city offices and similar uses, and PR for parks. There is also a Greenbelt zone which is intended to protect natural resources and critical areas and allows only very sparse development. The full zoning code can be found in Port Orchard Municipal Code (POMC) Title 20, and a comprehensive review of residential zoning can be found in the Housing Action Plan (HAP) Existing Conditions and Housing Needs Analysis Report, adopted in June 2023. A table of parcel acreage by zone, excluding right-of-way and water, is also shown below in Figure 2. Figure 2. Port Orchard Zoning Map and Parcel Acreage by Zone Port Orchard Zoning, 2023 Legend Q Port Orchard City Limits =_j Per Orchard UGA Water Bodies Zone Greenbelt (GB) Residential 1 (Rt) Residential 2 (1 Residential 3 (R3) Residential 4 (1 Residential 6 (1 Neighborhood Mixed Use (Ni Business Prof. Mixed Use (BPMU) Commercial Mixed Use (CMU) Downtown Mixed Use (DMU) ®0 Gateway Mixed Use (GMU) Commercial Corridor (CC) Commercial Heavy (CH) Industrial Flex (IF) Light Industrial (U) - Civic and Institutional (CI) Parks and Recreation (PR) Public Facilfties (PF) Roads — State Highway — Collector / Arterial ocal Road 0 j — Wi 3—Y LAKE RD�t Ru J � J Y. �I � swu❑ERao V/ q, ST 0 '2F i /SeMILE.HI LL �N G F / z/ r` 4 ; SFSAL".'Er itYRD Bethel Ifi I m �I N lmi, SE LIDER'p 1 I LI, Source: Kitson County, City of Parr Orchard, LCG Zone Acres GB 503.4 R1 311.9 R2 2,068.2 R3 1,047.9 R4 123.6 R6 321.1 NMU 17.1 BPMU 51.9 CMU 336.2 DMU 48.2 GMU 35.1 CC 189.6 CH 162.3 IF 7.6 LI 137.6 Cl 113.8 PR 134.1 PF 280.6 Total 5,894.5 Port Orchard Comprehensive Plan I Existing Conditions Report DRAFT v2 Page 4 Population & Demographics Population Trends Port Orchard's population in 2020 was 15,587 according to the U.S. Census. The Washington Office of Financial Management (OFM) 2023 population estimate for the city is 17,480. The Kitsap County Jail, located in Port Orchard, contained 411 inmates as of the 2020 Census, and there were an addition 146 residents in group quarters outside of thejail. The OFM estimates the 2023 number of group quarters residents at 694, or 3.9 percent of the city's population. Figure 3 shows the city's population trends since 1960 along with average annual growth rates by decade. The rate of population increase slowed down from the 1970s-1990s, but picked up significantly in the 2000s and 2010s, partially due to annexation. Since 2000 the city has grown on average 4.0 percent annually, a total increase of 10,522 residents. Figure 3. Port Orchard Population and Growth Rate, 1960-2020 20,000 6% ■ Population 15,000 c O 10,000 Q 0 a 5,000 0 — GI:Ii�G1rI�i�iZs @ i rl�1011�,ii�:?t 5% 1% 0% Source: Washington Office of Financial Management, U.S. Census Bureau, LCG As shown below in Figure 4, Port Orchard's population has significantly outpaced county and statewide averages over the past two decades. The city's population is now more than four times larger than in 1960. The City annexed a large amount of acreage between 2010 and 2020, which contributed to the comparatively rapid population growth in the 2010s. During this period, the City annexed 1,400 acres comprising 515 parcels. Together, the newly annexed areas make up 19.5% of Port Orchard's total acreage. Without granular population numbers at a parcel level, it is difficult to assess exactly how many new residents are represented by this area, but these annexations have certainly affected the rapid growth rates seen over the past 20 years. Future population targets are discussed below under "Population and Job Targets" on page 27. Figure 4. Port Orchard Population Change 1960-2020 with Regional Comparisons 500% 400% 300% 200% 100% 0% u my Iton 1960 1970 1980 1990 2000 2010 2020 Source: Washington Office of Financial Management, U.S. Census Bureau, LCG Port Orchard Comprehensive Plan I Existing Conditions Report DRAFT v2 Page 5 Population density varies across Port Orchard geographically. As shown below in Figure 5, densities range from 1 to over 10 people per square mile across the city's Census Block Groups. Downtown and the Tremont and Sidney Ave areas have the highest population densities, with older development patterns downtown and apartment development along Sidney. On the other hand, Ruby Creek, Clifton Park, and McCormick Woods have the lowest population densities, reflecting more dispersed single-family development patterns, areas with more commercial or industrial rather than residential development, and areas which are not fully built -out. Figure 5. Population Density in Port Orchard Port Orchard Population Density, 2021 Bremerton aE-FP\RJ ALLEY RD Legend I—] Port Orchard City Limits __ j Port Orchard UGA Roads — State Highway — Collector/Arterial Local Road Water Bodies Population per Square Mile (by Census Block Group) Q 0-1 1 - 2.5 2.5-5 5-10 10+ 0 OS mi /t I I I Age and Gender QGorst 0y0 .�irnaui�la.°t City h Qy ST � i Q 6 3 � � x o O� y �F �G qVE a SW BERRY LAKE RD j _j H� 0 n4 /� m O —SF MILEHILL---DR F� `� I Bethel r w fR pD SE LIDFRQq Source., US Census 2027 American Community Survey 5-Year Estimates, Kitsap County, LCG The population of Port Orchard is notably younger than regional and statewide averages. Over half of Port Orchard residents are under 34 years old, and the share of children under 19 has grown since 2010, as shown below in Figure 6. There is a particularly small share of residents aged 45 to 54 in the city, but an increasing share of people aged 35-44. Overall, the younger population suggests the possibility of increased natural population growth due to the large share of residents in their 20s and 30s, as well as the potential for a robust workforce in the city. There will also be a continued need for schools in the City to serve the large number of children and young residents. Port Orchard Comprehensive Plan I Existing Conditions Report DRAFT v2 Page 6 Figure 6. Age Distribution in Port Orchard with Regional Comparisons, 2020-2021 100% 90% 80% 70% 60% 50% 40% 30% 20% 10% 0% 14% M Port Orchard (2010) Port Orchard (2021) Kitsap County 14% Washington Source: American Community Survey 20215-Year Estimates, Table DP05, 2070 Decennial Census, Table P72 Race & Ethnicity The racial and ethnic makeup of Port Orchard is shown at right in Figure 7. The city's residents are about two-thirds white, with significant shares of Hispanic/Latino (13 percent) and Asian (5 percent) populations. Following trends seen throughout the county in recent Census surveys, a notable share of the population identifies as mixed -race, at 8 percent. The city is more diverse than Kitsap County as a whole, which has about 25 percent BIPOC (Black, Indigenous, People of Color) residents, compared to slightly over 30 percent in Port Orchard. The city's Hispanic/Latino population is larger than the county and regional average. According to the ACS, about 2.5 percent of Port Orchard residents, or 351 residents, speak Spanish at home. Some of Port Orchard's neighborhoods are more diverse than others, particularly Downtown, Bethel-Sedgewick, and the area along Sidney Ave., as shown below in Figure 8. ■ 65 and older ■55to64 ■ 45 to 54 ■35to44 ■ 20 to 34 ■ 19 and younger Figure 7. Race & Ethnicity in Port Orchard, 2021 Two or More Native Hawaiian Races American Ind / Alaska Nati 1% Black / Africa American 2% 69% Source. American Community Survey 2027 5-Year Estimates, Table DP05 Port Orchard Comprehensive Plan I Existing Conditions Report DRAFT v2 Page 7 Figure 8. Race and Ethnicity by Census Block Group Port Orchard Race and Ethnicity, 2021 3remerton �El4P,R�pLLLY Rp Legend Q Port Orchard City Limits Port Orchard UGA Roads — State Highway — Collector/Arterial Local Road Water Bodies Share of BIPOC Population (by Census Block Group) 0 5-10% E=] 10-20% Q 20-30% - 30-40% - 40%i 0 0.5 1 m /t I I [�, Educational Attainment r __d = �� I �6ethel N 16 t SW LIVER R° ,�rl SE LI°EAe� 1 Source. US Census 2021 American Cammuntty Survey 5-Year Estimates, Kitsup County LCG Port Orchard residents have slightly lower levels of educational attainment than the county and the state, as shown in Figure 9 below. Overall, 32 percent of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher, compared with 35 percent countywide and 37 percent across Washington. This reflects Port Orchard's more "blue collar' employment landscape, detailed below under "Economy" on Page 23. Figure 9. Educational Attainment in Port Orchard with Regional Comparisons, 2021 100% 90% 80% ° ■ Graduate or Professional Degree 70 /° 60% 900■ Bachelor's Degree 50% ■ Associate's Degree 40% A ■ Some College 30% ■ High School 20% '% ■ Less than High School 10% ' 0% �' Port Orchard Kitsap County Washington Source: American Community Survey 20215-Year Estimates, Table DP05 Port Orchard Comprehensive Plan I Existing Conditions Report DRAFT v2 Page 8 Key Takeaways • Port Orchard is a rapidly growing city, with population growth rates in recent decades exceeding those of the county and state due to annexation, in -migration, and natural population growth. • The city has a diversity of built environments and densities ranging from older buildings downtown to corridor commercial development and modern apartments along Sidney Ave. and more dispersed single-family new construction in McCormick Woods. • Port Orchard's population is younger and more diverse than regional averages, with lower levels of educational attainment than the county and state. Port Orchard Comprehensive Plan I Existing Conditions Report DRAFT v2 Page 9 Households In Port Orchard, there are 5,886 occupied housing units as of the 2021 ACS. The U.S. Census Bureau considers each unit to be occupied by one "household," comprised of any combination of related family members, unrelated people, or individuals. Type & Size Figure 10 shows Port Orchard's household type breakdown. There are 3,724 married or cohabitating couple households in Port Orchard, about 63 percent of households. Of these, nearly half, or 1,708 households, have children. There are 2,162 households which have a single person householder. This includes people living alone and single parents. Of these single - parent households, 443 households have children and most of those are single mothers. This is a higher share of single - parent households than the county and the state. In addition, 543 of the single -person households in Port Orchard are householders over age 65 living alone. Overall, according to the Washington OFM, Port Orchard's average household size is 2.56 people, slightly higher than the county average of 2.53 and similar to the statewide average of 2.55. Figure 10. Household Type in Port Orchard, 2021 Port Orchard Kitsap County Households Share Households Share Total Households 5,886 100% 104,977 100% Married or cohabitating couple household 3,724 63% 64,160 61% With children under 18 7,708 29% 22,220 21 % Male householder, no spouse/partner 856 15% 18,368 17% With children under 18 84 1 % 7,506 1 % Householder living alone 547 9% 12,407 12% 65 years and over 136 2% 3,780 4% Female householder, no spouse/partner 1,306 22% 22,449 21% With children under 18 359 6% 3,880 4% Householder living alone 760 73% 73,000 72% 65 years and over 407 7916 7,322 7916 Total Households with Children 2,372 40% 31,107 30% Total Householders over 65 living alone 543 9% 11,102 11% Source: American Community Survey 20215-Year Estimates, Table DP02 Over half of Port Orchard's households are made up of one or two people. On the other hand, 25 percent of housing units are studios, one -bedroom or two -bedroom units, as shown below in Figure 11. Although smaller households may choose to live in larger units, this mismatch between household size and housing unit size can have negative implications for housing affordability if smaller households are not able to find units suitable to their needs and budgets. Port Orchard Comprehensive Plan I Existing Conditions Report DRAFT v2 Page 10 Figure 11. Household Size and Housing Unit Size in Port Orchard, 2021 Housenold Size 4+ per— housO 26°r 3-persor househol, 17% 1-nPrson hold rson hold 35% Housing Unit Size 4+ Studio / 1 Of herirnnm bedre 42% Source: American Community Survey 2027 5-Year Estimates, Tables DP04, S2507 Tenure s The majority of Port Orchard's households are ownership households, although a sizeable 39 percent are renters, higher than county and statewide averages. Renters can face increased housing instability due to evictions and rent increases not faced by homeowners. In addition, renters are more likely to be BIPOC and lower -income households, compounding the effects of these housing challenges. According to the 2021 ACS, 88 percent of ownership households in Port Orchard have a householder who identifies as White, compared with 72 percent of renter households. Additionally, as discussed further under "Income" below, renters in Port Orchard earn less than homeowners, with a median household income for renter households of $47,785 in 2021 compared to $101,318 for ownership households. Figure 12. Tenure in Port Orchard with Regional Comparisons, 2021 100% 90% 80% 70% 60% 50% 40% 30% 20% 10% 0% Port Orchard Kitsap County Source: American Community Survey 2027 5-Year Estimates, Table DP05 Washington ■ Renter -occupied ■ Owner -occupied Port Orchard Comprehensive Plan I Existing Conditions Report DRAFT v2 Page 11 Port Orchard's renter households are also distributed unevenly by household size. Figure 13 shows this breakdown, with one- and three -person households evenly divided between renters and owners. Two -person households are the most common size of household overall and are skewed slightly towards owners, whereas large households of over four people are much more likely to be ownership households. This has implications for unit size, since many rental units tend to have fewer bedrooms than ownership units, but in Port Orchard there seems to be a demand for rental units for 3-person as well as one- and two -person households. Figure 13. Port Orchard Household Size by Tenure, 2021 4-or-more-person household 3-person household 2-person household 1-person household ■ Ownership Households ■ Renter Households 0 500 1,000 1,500 2,000 2,500 Source: American Community Survey 20215-Year Estimates, Table DP05 Income Port Orchard incomes have increased steadily over the past decade, as shown below in Figure 14. Incomes in the city were keeping pace with county and statewide averages throughout the mid-2010s but have fallen behind in the past several years as regional incomes have grown even more quickly since the COVID-19 pandemic. Figure 14. Port Orchard Median Household Income with Regional Comparisons, 2010-2021 $90,000 $85,000 $80,000 $75,000 $70,000 $65,000 $60,000 $55,000 $50,000 Kitsap County 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 Source: American Community Survey 20215-Year Estimates, Table S2503 Washington Port Orchard Port Orchard Comprehensive Plan I Existing Conditions Report DRAFT v2 Page 12 A breakdown of income bands in the city and county shows more detail about the variety of household incomes in Port Orchard, as shown below in Figure 15. Compared with the county, Port Orchard has a higher share of very low-income households earning under $10,000 per year and a smaller share of upper middle -income households earning $50,000 to $100,000 per year, though there are also a significant amount of high -income earners in the city, with roughly a third of Port Orchard households earning over $100,000 per year. Figure 15. Port Orchard and Kitsap County Income Distribution, 2021 16% 14% 12% ■ Port Orchard 10% OKitsap County 8% .6% 4% 2% 0% ,L O Ln �n ,L CDul Ln O Ln O Un O N M M b4 to to b4 b4 ta4 b4 V O O Ln CDLn O N N M M 17 b2 kfi 41q b4 b4 {{} b4 Y ,L Y Y -lL ,L OLn CD l0 r- O N O b4 to b4 b4 tA -11 O O Y __\z _sz Ln Q0 U1 O Ln O tq to Il- b9 O N Ln b4 b4 Source: American Community Survey 2027 5-Year Estimates, Table 819007 A different picture emerges when considering incomes broken down by renter and ownership households, as shown below in Figure 16: renters in the city earn considerably less than homeowners, and renters in Port Orchard have seen only a 28 percent increase in incomes between 2010 and 2021, compared to a 58 percent increase in incomes of ownership households. Rental households' lower incomes and slower income growth compared with ownership households raises concerns over the ability of renters to keep up with rising housing costs or to move into homeownership, particularly given that wealthier ownership households may be able to pay more for housing. Figure 16. Median Household Income by Tenure in Port Orchard, 2010-21 $75,766 $50,275 All Households $101,318 $64,068 0 Ownership Households Source: American Community Survey 2027 5-Year estimates, Table S2503 ■ 2010 2021 $47,785 $37,351 M I Renter Households Port Orchard Comprehensive Plan I Existing Conditions Report DRAFT v2 Page 13 Figure 17 shows incomes in Port Orchard geographically by Census block group. Incomes are not distributed evenly around the city, with McCormick Woods and areas west of Downtown showing the highest income levels, whereas the Bethel and Mile Hill areas show the lowest household incomes. Figure 17. Incomes by Census Block Group in Port Orchard, 2021 Port Orchard Median Household Income, 2021 tsvemcr marl 4E�FP\RJ ALLEY Rp S� Legend 0 Port Orchard City Limits j Port Orchard UGA Roads — State Highway — Collector/Arterial —Local Road Water Bodies MHI (] $35k-$50k $50k - $65k ® $65k - $80k $Bak - $95k - $95k + 0 0.5 1 m i , I I I 41� M Gorst Navy Yard City yh �P 6 h 'A SW BERRY LAKE RD W 0 J� P J� P 2 r Bethel � o \ � m , SW LIDER ID \ i � sE uoeR� r Source. US Censu52027 American Community Survey 5-Year Estimates, Kitsap County, LCG Key Takeaways • Port Orchard has a similar household size to the county and state, and there are a large number of households with children in the city, including single parent households. • There is a mismatch between household size and housing unit size, with a larger share of smaller households than smaller units, which can impact housing choice. • About 39 percent of Port Orchard households are renters. Renters in the city earn considerably less than homeowners and have different household size needs. • Port Orchard incomes have increased over the past decade but have not kept pace with county and statewide incomes in recent years. There is a higher share of very low income households and a smaller share of middle - income households in the city, and incomes are not distributed evenly around Port Orchard. Port Orchard Comprehensive Plan I Existing Conditions Report DRAFT v2 Page 14 Housing Stock and Affordability Housing Units and Vacancy As of 2021, there were 6,165 total housing units in Port Orchard, of which 5,886 were occupied. The other 279 were vacant. Since this latest Census data, the city has seen a significant amount of multifamily construction, discussed further below under "Production" on page 18. Vacancy rates for both renters and homeowners decreased in Port Orchard from the mid-2010s until recently as housing demand and prices increased. Vacancy rates as reported by the Census Bureau's American Community Survey through 2021 are shown below in Figure 18. Figure 18. ACS Reported Vacancy Rates in Port Orchard, 2010-2021 12.0% 10.0% 8.0% 6.0% 4.0% 2.0% 0.0% 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 Source: American Community Survey 2027 5-Year estimates, Table DP04 Census -reported vacancy rates were reported as 1.8 percent for ownership properties and 2.0 percent for rental properties as of 2021.). However, the large amount of multifamily production seen since 2021 has had a noticeable effect on vacancy rates as shown below in Figure 19, which shows vacancy rates for multifamily properties of 5 units or more in the city, as reported by Costar, a leading commercial real estate data provider. Since early 2021, the overall vacancy rate has spiked at over 14 percent and is currently around 11 percent as of July 2023. The "stabilized vacancy rate", which smooths rapid increases in vacancy resulting from new inventory being added to the market, is currently at 7.7 percent. This brings vacancy rates back within or sightly above the range generally considered healthy in the housing market, around 5-6 percent. Port Orchard Comprehensive Plan I Existing Conditions Report DRAFT v2 Page 15 Figure 19. CoStar Reported Multifamily Vacancy in Port Orchard, 2013-2023 Overall Vacancy ` 11.449% • .W • Stabilized Vacancy 7.651% 2% — 0% 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 Source: Costar Type & Age The majority of Port Orchard's housing stock, about 70 percent, is in single -unit buildings, nearly all of which are detached single-family homes, plus a small number of attached townhomes. There is a much smaller amount of "middle housing" of 2-4 units, and a large share of the city's housing stock is in larger apartment buildings, at 22 percent. The remaining three percent are manufactured homes. The breakdown of housing unit type is shown below in Figure 20. Port Orchard's housing stock is considerably newer than regional averages, as shown below in Figure 21. Twice as much of Port Orchard's housing was built since 2010 than the share of countywide housing built in the same period. Over half of the housing stock was built since 1990, and two-thirds was built since 1980. This reflects the very active housing development seen in the McCormick Woods area since it transitioned from forest land to housing and later was annexed by the City. Port Orchard Comprehensive Plan I Existing Conditions Report DRAFT v2 Page 16 Figure 20. Housing Unit Type in Port Orchard, 2021 Manufactured 5+ 3-4 Units 4% 2-Uni 1% lit Yo Source: American Community Survey 20215-Year estimates, Table DP04 Figure 21. Age of Housing in Port Orchard and Kitsap County, 2021 100% 90% 80% 70% 60% 50% 40% 30% 20% 10% 0% Port Orchard Kitsap County Source: American Community Survey 2027 5-Year estimates, Table DP04 ■ 2010-2021 ■ 2000-2009 ■ 1990-1999 ■ 1980-1989 ■ 1970-1979 ■ 1960-1969 ■ 1950-1959 ■ 1940-1949 ■ 1939 or earlier Port Orchard Comprehensive Plan I Existing Conditions Report DRAFT v2 Page 17 Production Port Orchard has been producing housing very rapidly in recent decades. Figure 22 shows a breakdown of new permits issued by housing type over the past 40 years. Note that this data shows permits which were issued, and not all of these projects were or will necessarily be completed. However, it does give an indication of important trends, including a recent uptick in permitting and a lack of multifamily construction in the early 2000s which has restarted more recently. It also shows the prevalence of single-family and larger apartment development in Port Orchard, compared with the small number of permitted 2-4 unit building types. Figure 22. Permits Issued in Port Orchard by Unit Type, 1982-2022 .�1 500 400 a 300 0 iv 200 E Z) WWI 0 ■ 5+ Unit Multifamily ■ Triplex / 4-Plex ■ Duplex fi �I:�i E:I:�I:�:�i GI:I:i ��I�i ���> r��I:��I:�iZ�Z�i�iI��iI�L i�iI�L3�iI�Y3�iS [iZ�iy f��ZiS L i�iS [:i�iS E:�iL►�iZ�i� Source: U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) State of the Cities Database (SOCDS) City permit data indicates over 5,000 units currently in the permitting pipeline at some stage, as shown below in Figure 23. The majority of these are single-family units and apartments, although there are several developments which incorporate both detached and attached units as well as some units in mixed -use projects forthcoming in 2023 and beyond, showing some increasing housing diversity in the city. Figure 23. Recent and Forthcoming Permit Activity in Port Orchard, 2022-2025+ 3,000 2,500 2,000 .E 1,500 E z 1,000 500 — — 0 2022 2023 2024 Source: City of Port Orchard Port Orchard Comprehensive Plan l Existing Conditions Report DRAFT v2 ■ Mixed -Use Development ■ 5+ Unit Apartment ■ 4-Plex ■ Townhouse ■ Development including single- family homes and townhomes Single Family Permitting Initiated, Timeline Uncertain Page 18 The map below in Figure 24 shows recent completed single-family and multifamily development in Port Orchard, according to Redfin and Costar data. Most single-family development in the past five years has been part of new subdivisions in McCormick Woods, in the Bethel-Sedgwick area, and in East Port Orchard outside the city limits, with some scattered new construction elsewhere in the city. Apartment construction (as well as forthcoming development shown with dashed borders) has been distributed throughout the city, including several projects in the Mile Hill area and near Bethel and Sedgwick as well as proposed a pa rtm ents/town homes as part of a new project in McCormick Woods. Figure 24. Recent Housing Production in Port Orchard Port Orchard i Residential Development, 2018-2023 Legend ty Port Orchard City Limits eP Port Orchard UGA Roads 1 - State Highway me / o0 0 Collector/Arterial ^� o O MILEH,uuR sEMaiHauDR Local Road - o _ Water Bodies O Single -Family Homes rs Built Since 2018 O 2018 O 2019 2020 2021 1 SESALMONeERRYRD SW BERRY LAKURD - .I 2022 4\ ZO 2023L�oWICI9 RD Multifamily Development 4 Built Since 2018 ./X -- 1 / Multi -Family i.4 Proposed / Under Construction O a Development Size 4j 1 z -- 1 RBA — 2- B�thei1-4 T 500+k SF { o^ SW LIDER RD r 10k �SELIDER,P © m 0,5 I I o Al i� s� urce Kitsap LC County, Redfin, Costar, G ' Cost & Affordability Port Orchard has traditionally been considered a relatively affordable city compared to the region. Considering the relationship between rents, home prices, and household incomes shown below in Figure 25, Port Orchard was relatively affordable throughout most of the 2010s, with increases in rents and home prices overall matching increases in household incomes. However, incomes have stagnated since 2018, and both rents and home values increased dramatically between 2019 and 2021. Port Orchard Comprehensive Plan I Existing Conditions Report DRAFT v2 Page 19 Figure 25. Change in Rent, Home Value, and Income in Port Orchard, 2010-2021 100% 80% 60% 40% 20% 0% -20% 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 Source: American Community Survey 20215-Year Estimates, Table S2503, DP04, Zillow More recent rent trends in multifamily projects of 5 or more units tracked by Costar indicate that the large amount of multifamily construction in the city seen in the past two years is beginning to mitigate rent prices, as shown below in Figure 26. Recent ownership housing data does not show a similar pattern, however. Nonetheless, this data does suggest that the continued rapid rate of rental housing in the city is helping to keep rents more affordable to a wider variety of income levels. Figure 26. Average Multifamily Rent Per Unit, 2013-2023 $1,800 2022 Q2 $1,700 $1,675 $1,600 — $1,500 — 2023 Q3 QTD, $1,400 $1,597 $1,300 $1,200 $1,100 $1,000 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 Source: Costar Figure 27 shows the current relationship between housing prices and household incomes in Port Orchard. The average household earning the 2021 median income of $75,766 would be able to afford a home worth about $310,000. However, the median sales price in 2021 was $468,000, a full $158,000 higher. In order to afford that home at the median sales price, a household would need to earn about $114,000, nearly $40,000 more than the median household Port Orchard Comprehensive Plan I Existing Conditions Report DRAFT v2 Page 20 income. The chart also shows a variety of household incomes and the housing price which would be affordable to each income level, since Port Orchard residents vary significantly in income levels as discussed above under "Households." The gap between median income and median housing sales price indicates an overall market with high demand for housing and in which many households may not be able to afford to purchase a home or may have more difficulty doing so. Figure 27. Housing Affordability at Various Price and Income Levels in Port Orchard, 2021 $900 ■ Household Income ($1,000s) $800 ■ House Price ($1,000s) $700 $600 Median Sales Price ($468) $500 $400 $300 Median Household $202 $200 Income ($75) $101 $100 ' $25 A household earning $100,000 could not afford the median Port Orchard sales price of $468,000 even though they are earning nearly $30,000 more than the median household income. $607 $405 $304 $200 $150 $75 : $100 - 0 Source: American Community Survey 20215-Year Estimates, Table S2503, Zillow, Freddie Mac, LCG $810 In addition to income, HUD uses a measurement of "cost burden" to further determine which subset of a community's residents are most in need of housing support or most at risk of displacement or housing hardship. A household is considered to be "cost -burdened" if they are spending more than 30% of monthly income on housing costs (including rent/mortgage and utilities). A "severely cost -burdened" household spends more than 50% of their monthly income on housing costs. Figure 28 below shows the most recent HUD data on Port Orchard's cost -burdened households by income level based on percentage of HUD Area Median Income, which was $85,500 in 2019. The lowest -income households (earning less than 30 percent of AMI) are overwhelmingly cost -burdened, with nearly 500 of the 715 households in this category spending more than half their income on housing costs. More than half of households earning up to 80 percent AMI are also cost -burdened or severely cost -burdened, and about a quarter of households earning 80-100 percent AMI are also paying more than 30 percent of their income on housing costs. In total, 1,670 low- and moderate -income households, or 32 percent of Port Orchard's households, are facing cost burden, and these households are likely the most in need of subsidized affordable housing in the city. Port Orchard Comprehensive Plan I Existing Conditions Report DRAFT v2 Page 21 Figure 28. Cost -Burdened Low -Income Households by Income Bracket in Port Orchard, 2019 ■ Severely Cost Burdened Cost Burdened Not Cost Burdened 80-100% AM I 0 � 50-80%AMI a� E 0 V C 0 30-50% AMI Z3 0 < 30% AMI , 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 900 1000 Number of Households Source: 2075-2079 HUD Comprehensive Housing Affordability Strategy (CHAS) Key Takeaways • Vacancy rates in Port Orchard decreased significantly between 2015 and 2021 but have since rebounded due to increased multifamily housing production. • Most housing in Port Orchard is in single-family homes and apartment complexes, with relatively little "middle housing." The city's housing stock is relatively new, with over half of the housing in the city built since 1990. • The high rate of housing production and permitting is continuing in Port Orchard, with over 5,000 units in the permitting or production pipeline. • Most recent single-family construction has been in new subdivisions in McCormick Woods and the Bethel- Sedgwick area. Recent and forthcoming apartment projects have been more evenly spread throughout the city. • Port Orchard incomes have stagnated in recent years. Ownership housing prices have continued to increase, making it more difficult for residents to purchase housing, but rental prices have begun to decrease in 2022-3, due to the large amount of multifamily construction in the city. • A household earning the median income in Port Orchard would not be able to afford the median home sales price in the city as of 2021. Although incomes and housing prices vary across the city, this indicates high demand for housing overall. • About a third of low- and moderate -income Port Orchard households are cost -burdened, paying more than 30 percent of their income on housing costs. Many of the lowest -income households in the city are paying more than half their income in housing costs. Port Orchard Comprehensive Plan I Existing Conditions Report DRAFT v2 Page 22 Economy Employment Figure 29 below shows the latest employment data for workers in Port Orchard. In total, there were 7,722 jobs in the city in 2022, an increase of 56 percent over the past 20 years, or an average increase of 2.2 percent per year. Jobs in the city are dominated by the service and retail sectors, with a significant number of jobs in government as well, due to the presence of Kitsap County administration in the city. Overall, job growth has been primarily confined to the service and retail sectors, with some small growth in construction jobs over the past decade, likely reflecting the large amount of homebuilding going on in the city. Port Orchard has a notably smaller share of technology and information jobs compared to Seattle and other parts of the Puget Sound region. Current estimates as of summer 2023 suggest that up to 25 percent of workdays nationally are worked from home, and this trend has potential implications for the city, particularly if technology and other knowledge industry workers in the region choose to live in Port Orchard due to lower costs of living. The presence of the Bremerton fast ferry also provides an added incentive for commuters to Seattle. Figure 29. Employment by Sector in Port Orchard, 2000-2022 3,500 3,000 2,500 2,000 1,500 111 500 Reta i I Services Government Warehousing,Transport. Education p Finance, Real Estate � on Manufactu 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 Source: Puget Sound Regional Council (PSRQ Covered Employment Port Orchard Comprehensive Plan I Existing Conditions Report DRAFT v2 Page 23 Commuting As shown at right in Figure 30, Port Orchard experiences a net inflow of commuters as of the most recent Census LEHD data in 2020. Employees in the city who commute from elsewhere primarily live in Bremerton (7 percent) and nearby unincorporated communities including Parkwood, East Port Orchard, and Manchester (8.6 percent total). About 2 percent each of Port Orchard employees live in Tacoma, Silverdale, and Seattle. On the other hand, Port Orchard residents' primary commuting destination is Seattle, with about 14 percent of residents working there. Another 12 percent each work in Bremerton and in Port Orchard itself. About 4 percent each work in Tacoma, Silverdale, Gig Harbor, and East Port Orchard. Figure 30. Commuting Patterns in Port Orchard, 2020 4,435 pp - Commuters out of Port Orchard Live and work in Port Orchard Source: US Census Longitudinal Employer Household Dynamics (LEND) via Census OnTheMap Figure 31 shows the breakdown of commuting patterns by job sector. Sectors above the diagonal line have more out - commuters than in -commuters. Since Port Orchard has a net inflow, there are relatively few jobs in this category, but some more traditionally "white collar' sectors such as Administration, Professional Services, and Finance are in this area. Job sectors under the line have more commuter inflow than outflow. Most notably is the large number of retail employees who commute into the city as well as government employees. Health care is more balanced between in- and out - commuters. Figure 31. Port Orchard Commuting by Sector, 2020 2,000 1,500 -a 0 tf ° 1,000 w J 500 It Administration Professional Education Services — r Construction Manufacturing Wholesale Trade Finance / Insuran Other Services 0 500 Food / Hospitality oe Health Care / Social Assistance Public Administration 1,000 1,500 WORK in Port Orchard Source: U.S. Census Bureau Longitudinal Employer Household Dynamics (LEHD), via Census OnTheMap Retail Trade 2,000 Port Orchard Comprehensive Plan I Existing Conditions Report DRAFT v2 Page 24 Employment Forecasts The Washington Employment Security Department (ESD) publishes medium- and long-term forecasts of employment growth by region. The chart below in Figure 32 shows forecast newjobs by sector in Kitsap, Clallam, and Jefferson Counties through 2030. Many of Port Orchard's prominent sectors, including government, leisure and hospitality, and retail trade, are expected to see significant regional growth in the coming decades, some of which should be captured by Port Orchard. On the other hand, there are also expected to be a significant number of new professional, business, and health carejobs in the region as well, which Port Orchard may wish to consider strategies for attracting. Figure 32. Job Growth Forecast, Olympic Consortium (Kitsap, Clallam, Jefferson Counties), 2020-2030 GOVERNMENT . - OTHER SERVICES � ■ 2020-2025 ■ 2025-2030 LEISURE and HOSPITALITY EDUCATION and HEALTH SERVICES PROFESSIONAL and BUSINESS SERVICES - FINANCIAL ACTIVITIES . INFORMATION . TRANSPORTATION, WAREHOUSING AND UTILITIES ■ RETAIL TRADE . WHOLESALE TRADE . MANUFACTURING ■ CONSTRUCTION . NATURAL RESOURCES and Mining 0 Source: Washington Employment Security Department Military Employment 1,000 2,000 3,000 4,000 5,000 Forecast New Jobs A unique characteristic of the Port Orchard population is the presence of military personnel, families, and contractors due to the proximity of the Puget Sound Naval Shipyard in Bremerton. The shipyard is part of Naval Base Kitsap, a large military installation across multiple sites in Kitsap County. The military is a significant contributor to the economy of the region. The installation as a whole has 45,532 employees, including 31,585 military and civilian personnel residing in the same counties.' Average salaries of enlisted personnel were $33,400, plus an annual housing allowance of $12,000 - $25,000, and average salaries of civilian employees were $74,000 as of 2014.1 The military provided countywide data on its ' Naval Base Kitsap. "Naval Base Kitsap Operations and Economic Contributions." http://www2.economicciateway.com/media/userfiles/subsite 197/files/nbk-economic-impact-factsheets.pdf 2 Naval Base Kitsap and Naval Magazine Indian Island Joint Land Use Study, September 2015. Port Orchard Comprehensive Plan I Existing Conditions Report DRAFT v2 Page 25 civilian population for this report, but provided no data on active duty population nor data specific to personnel living in Port Orchard. Census data shows approximately 645 Port Orchard residents, representing 5.5% of the employed population of the city, employed in the Armed Forces overall, with a moderate margin of error.' This likely reflects enlisted personnel rather than civilian employees but provides a general picture of the extent of military employment in the city. The Kitsap Economic Development Alliance notes that the shipyard is anticipated to see significant investment through the Navy's 21-year, $20 billion Shipyard Infrastructure Optimization Program (SIOP), suggesting continued economic and housing impacts in the region.' Commercial Building Stock Port Orchard's commercial building stock is concentrated downtown and along several large arterials including Bethel Ave, Mile Hill Dr, and Sidney Rd, as shown below in Figure 33. The Clifton Industrial Park has a cluster of existing industrial development. Although there is a large amount of retail development in the city, particularly along Bethel, there has been almost no recent nonresidential commercial development in the past five years, aside from a Dutch Brothers Coffee built in 2020 and a new 5,000 square foot industrial building built just outside the city limits in 2022. There is some commercial development in the pipeline, including the new Kitsap Bank headquarters and Port Orchard Community Center & Library, as well as a KFC, Starbucks, and some retail associated with the McCormick Village development. Overall, the city's recent commercial development trends contrast significantly with the large amount of residential development discussed earlier in this report, although it is not surprising given recent trends in commercial development, both office and retail, in recent years and particularly since the COVID-19 pandemic. Many developers nationwide are reticent to build purely commercial buildings, though ground floor retail continues to be built in mixed -use buildings around the Puget Sound. Office development has been essentially negligible in the larger Bremerton market over the past few years, with none under construction.' a 2021 American Community Survey, Table DP03 ° Kitsap EDA. "Kitsap is a Leader in the States and Nation's Defense Industry." https://www.kitsar)eda.ora/key-industries/defense s Costar. "Bremerton, WA Office Market Profile" June 2023. Port Orchard Comprehensive Plan I Existing Conditions Report DRAFT v2 Page 26 Figure 33. Commercial Development in Port Orchard / f TIE, Orchard ifE I fI � All Commercial Development Legend [1 !,J_ tyl Q Port Orchard City Limits j Port Orchard UGA Roads — State Highway • Collector / Arterial Local Road Water Bodies Development Type 19 r� Office Health Care Retail Hospitality • Education / Government Industrial Self Storage Specialty S ? ` O [Built Since 20181 i-t [Proposed / Under Construction] Development Size RBA 500+k SF 10k II twm— Dutch Brothers Coffee SESALMONRERRY�RD (Built 2020) 5W BERRYlAKE-RD �.. i. ,...aeRo I Retail at j/`--,� ) _ McCormick Lz ' F © B tkel I� Village n� �; rr f6 T Source., Kitsap County, '`ostor, LCG - Key Takeaways • Port Orchard's economy is dominated by the service and retail sectors, as well as government jobs. The city has smaller shares of the types of information and technology jobs prevalent in the greater Puget Sound region. • Port Orchard experiences a net inflow of commuters, primarily from Bremerton and nearby areas. The primary commuting destinations for Port Orchard residents are Seattle and Bremerton. Many of the city's retail, health care, and public employees commute from elsewhere. • Government, hospitality, and retail are expected to see significant regional growth in the coming decades. There is also forecast growth in some sectors which are less represented in Port Orchard's employment landscape, including professional and business services. • The proximity to Naval Base Kitsap in Bremerton results in a large number of military employees, both enlisted and civilian, who likely live in Port Orchard. These residents have unique economic situations, such as receiving military housing stipends. Anecdotal reports also suggest military employees move in and out of the city more frequently than other residents as work demands shift. • There has been considerably less commercial development than residential development in the city in over the past decade. Port Orchard Comprehensive Plan I Existing Conditions Report DRAFT v2 Page 27 Population and Job Targets The Washington Office of Financial Management (OFM) and Puget Sound Regional Council (PSRC) allocate future population and jobs forecasts to counties, which in turn distribute those allocations to individual cities. Cities are responsible for planning to accommodate the level of population, housing, and job growth provided in these countywide allocation targets as part of their comprehensive planning process. This section contains a citywide review of past growth trends in relation to targets. A detailed forecast at smaller geographic levels will be conducted later in the comprehensive planning process to inform transportation and infrastructure planning. Population Port Orchard's 2023 population is 17,480, according to the OFM. The 2044 population allocation for the City is 26,087, according to the most recent Kitsap County Countywide Planning Policies. This target does not factor in the population in group quarters, including the Kitsap County jail, as discussed previously under "Population & Demographics." In order to reach this target, Port Orchard would need to see an average annual increase of 440 residents. Over the past decade, the City has seen an average increase of 452 residents, slightly higher than the rate implied by the Countywide target. Therefore, if past development trends continue, Port Orchard could see a population of 26,972, slightly exceeding the planning target. This suggests the city should plan for infrastructure in excess of that which would be needed over the next 20 years.Figure 34. Port Orchard Historic Population Growth Rate and 2044 Allocation 25,000 c 0 15,000 Q 0 a 5,000 Population Grows at 26,972 2012-2022 rate ,dP • •/ 26,087 ,• �,� % • • Port Orchard J s Population Allocation / • & S�. Ob 0% ,� �ti �� �O �O LO LL v� ti0 ti� �O �1 �D 30 �O �O �1 LO LO LO �O ,§O ,LO LO ro �O LO �O �O LO LO �O LO LO LO �O �O LO LO Source: OFM, Kitsop County, LCG Port Orchard Comprehensive Plan I Existing Conditions Report DRAFT v2 Page 28 Employment Figure 35 below shows the same chart for employment. A continuation of the historic rate of employment growth in the city does not reach the full employment allocation of 13,962. If the job growth rate over the last decade continues, the city could expect to see a total of 11,898 jobs by 2044. However, the city is required to plan for the full amount of the job allocation. Figure 35. Port Orchard Historic Employment Growth Rate and 2044 Allocation 13,9� 14,000 Port Orchard • • Employment Allocation 10 • 12,000 • • 40 • 1\ • . ' 11,898 • 10,000 • • • • . ' ' Jobs Grow at 10- Ln Historic Employment • �� ' year rate 0 8,000 ' 6,000 4,000 2,000 0 OOti 00� 000 00� OHO O�ti O�� OHO O�� OLO OL1 OLD OHO 01R� OHO O,a, Oft. OHO O�� OHO OI ti ti ti ti ti ti ti ti ti ti ti ti ti ti ti ti ti ti ti ti ti ti Source: PSRC, Kitsap County, LCG Port Orchard Comprehensive Plan I Existing Conditions Report DRAFT v2 Page 29 Glossary of Abbreviations ACS — American Community Survey — A yearly survey conducted by the U.S. Census Bureau with detailed demographics, employment, income, educational attainment, and other data. AMI — Area Median Income — A HUD measurement of median income in a region used to determine eligibility for subsidized housing programs. CHAS — Comprehensive Housing Affordability Strategy — A Census -based HUD dataset on the share of household incomes being spent on housing, a metric referred to as "cost burden." HAP — Housing Action Plan, adopted by Port Orchard City Council in 2023. HUD — U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development — The federal government bureau which oversees housing programs and funding. LEHD — Longitudinal Employer -Household Dynamics — A Census dataset that provides spatial employment data. MHI — Median Household Income — The median (average) income for households in a city or region. OFM — Washington Office of Financial Management — The state government bureau which provides population data and forecasts, as well as fiscal services and policy for the state. POMC — Port Orchard Municipal Code PSRC — Puget Sound Regional Council — The planning organization for the greater Puget Sound region comprising King, Pierce, Snohomish and Kitsap Counties. PSRC develops policies and coordinates decisions about regional growth, transportation and economic development planning. TAZ — Transportation Analysis Zone — A small geography used in Transportation Demand Modeling to aggregate origin and destination trips. UGA — Urban Growth Area — Areas outside cities required by Washington's Growth Management Act to allow urban growth over the next 20 years based on population projections, and outside which urban growth should not be allowed. Port Orchard Comprehensive Plan I Existing Conditions Report DRAFT v2 Page 30 CITY OF PORT ORCHARD DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT 216 Prospect Street, Port Orchard, WA 98366 Ph.: (36o) 874-5533 • FAX: (36o) 876-4980 PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT Agenda Item No: 5(b) Meeting Date: August 1, 2023 2023 Comprehensive Plan Prepared by: Nick Bond, Development Director Subject: Amendments Summary: The City of Port Orchard initiated a Comprehensive Plan amendment to amend the 2022-2041 Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) in conjunction with the City budget adoption. City staff has identified several projects which require amendment based on funding availability, design/construction status and other priorities. These amendments will be part of the 2024-2043 TIP. The City may update the Comprehensive Plan more than once annually provided the amendment is to the Capital Facilities element that occurs concurrently with the adoption or amendment of the City budget. In this instance, the City prepared amendments to the TIP in anticipation of budget adoption by the City Council later this year. The suggested amendments were discussed with the Transportation Committee at the July 25, 2023 meeting. The amendments are summarized as follows: • TIP 1.18 Tremont Phase 2 and 3; This project was moved from the outer years into the 6-year TIP. The City received grant funding (no match) for study and design. • TIP 1.2 BSPP Segments 6 to 11 CN: The program year for CN was delayed to 2024 due to design and permitting issues. • TIP 1.4 Old Clifton/ Anderson Hall Intersection: Project schedule modified. Lesser priority given other funded projects. • TIP 1.8 and 1.9 Bethel Phase 1; City passed sales tax measure. Project schedule accelerated. • TIP 1.13 Lippert Sidewalk Retrofit and Road Repair: Project completed. Removed. • TIP 1.14 Sidney Road Sidewalk: The project received a grant. Funding sections have been updated. • TIP 1.16 SR166/ Bay Street Reconstruction: Received grants. Funding updated. • TIP 1.17 Street Lighting Improvements: This project received a grant for some, but not all, of the programed work. The schedule was updated to program awarded dollars in the near term and other work at future dates that are eligible for additional grant funding. The suggested amendments identify projects for the 2024-2043 TIP. The Planning Commission is asked to hold a public hearing on the 2024-2043 TIP at the September 5, 2023 Planning Commission meeting. Relationship to Comprehensive Plan: Pursuant to RCW 36.70A.470 and 36.70A.106, the City may adopt amendments the capital facilities element of the comprehensive plan that occurs concurrently with the adoption or amendment of the city's budget. Recommendation: Staff recommends approval of the proposed Comprehensive Plan amendment. Attachments: 2022-2041 Transportation Improvement Program, Draft 2024-2043 Transportation Improvement Program City of Port Orchard Six -Year Transportation Improvement Program For 2024-2029 TIER 1 (Reasonably Constrained) Proj# Road Name Total Federal State (TIF Begin Termini Project Total Est. Spent Prior to Future Phase Funding Fund Fund Proj#) Project Title/Project Description End Termini Length Cost 2023 2023 Expenditures 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 Start Year Status Phase Code Federal Funds Code State Funds Local Funds Capital Projects 1.1 Bay Street Ped. Pathway ROW Phase PO Shoreline: Add 14-ft Multi -Modal (bikes & pedestrians) Sidney Ave. Foot 1.2 2,280,000 1,140,000 1,140,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2013 S ROW STP(U) 1,923,590 0 300,212 waterfront pathway & cantilevered retaining wall Ferry to Annapolis 3,000,000 3,000,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2018 P ROW 0 581,000 following historic Mosquito Fleet trail and pedestrian Foot Ferry N/A bridge across Black Jack Creek. 1.2 Bay Street Pedestrian Pathway Construction (S#1, S#6-11) The CN phase for the 14-ft Multi -Modal (bike & ped) 1.2 1,115,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2018 650,000 465,000 S CN waterfront pathway/cantilevered retailing wall 3,000,000 0 3,000,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2021 S CN following the historic Mosquito Fleet trail. Includes the demolition/removal of (5) overwater structures. N/A Inrli irloc r., ff2 Arl Roarly r)nr Pron 1.3 Bay Street Pedestrian Pathway West Port Orchard Blvd Situational study and Bay St: Ft Ferry 1.5 566,474 0 2022 490,000 0 76,474 to Tremont 0 566,474 0 0 0 0 0 0 P PL N/A 1.4 Old Clifton/ Anderson Hill Intersection Improvements Old Clifton Rd / Intersection Improvements (roundabout) as identified Anderson Hill Rd. 0 258,000 200,000 0 58,000 0 58,000 0 0 2016 S PE 0 258,000 in the McCormick Urban Village Trans Plan and Intersection 1,680,000 0 0 1,680,000 0 0 840,000 840,000 0 2021 P CN Grant? 1,213,000 525,000 TIF 1.4 partially funded by Bayside Mit Funds. 1.5 Old Clifton Rd Non -Motorized Improvements Old Clifton Road: Rodway Improvements identified in the McCormick Campus PKWY to 0.75 450,000 0 150,000 450,000 0 0 450,000 0 0 0 2022 P PE 0 450,000 Urban Village Trans Plan. Design and Construction. Anderson Hill Rd. 2,000,000 2700000 2026 P CN STP(U), TIB/CS TIF 1.5, 2.07 Seperated pathway and shoulder facilities. RCO 1.7 Bethel/Sedgwick Phase 5a - Bethel/Lincoln RAB Bethel/Lincoln/Lunb Safety and capacity improvements to intersection and erg/ Mitchell 0 3,674,000 326,000 474,000 2021 S PE 800,000 reconfiguration of approaches. 0 0 3,200,000 3200000 2022 S CN HSP 1,S00,000 TIB UAP 1,100,000 700,000 TIF 2.04e 1.8 Bethel/ Sedgwick Cooridor Phase la - Blueberry RAB Bethel Road: blueberry Phase la. Bethel/ Blueberry RAB 60% PE in 2022 0 2,094,000 0 250,000 170,000 100,000 0 70,000 2022 S PE 0 344,374 74,626 and start ROW for Phase la/b. Intersection 0 268,000 2023 S ROW 220,238 47,732 1,924,000 1924000 2025 P CN TIB/ 1,568,178 307,051 UAP/CS IF 2.04a et e e gwlc orn or ase - a mon erry Bethel Road: Salmonberry intersection Phaselb. Bethel/ Salmonberry RAB Round and roadway segment design from Blueberry to Salmonberry. 60% PE in 2022. 0 5,056,450 0 0 800,000 100,000 450000 50,000 200,000 2023 P PE 0 328,058 57,893 1,328,450 1,328,450 0 2023 P ROW 1,129,183 199,238 2,928,000 2928000 2028 P CN TIB/UAP/ 2,489,055 439,245 rlF 2.04a CS 1.10 Val lair Ct Connector Bethel Road / Road extension and intersection improvements Walmart Drive 0.25 1,000,000 0 0 1,000,000 0 0 0 0 1,000,000 0 2027 P PE & ROW 0 0 1,000,000 previously included in the Bethel Road Corridor ROW Intersection 1,000,000 0 0 1,000,000 0 0 0 0 0 1,000,000 2028 P CN 0 TIB 0 1,000,000 TIF 1.7 & Construction project. 1.11 Sidney Road SW Design - 60% Sedgwick Rd. to Berry Lake Rd. Sidney Avenue is currently two lanes wide, it needs to 0.95 500,000 500,000 2027 0 0 500,000 be widened to three lanes (additional TWTL) including 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 500,000 p pL TIB bike lanes, sidewalks, traffic calming, and stormwater TIF 2.05 system improvements. (COMPLETE STREET). 7/21/2023 Page 1 of 9 C:\Users\ fisk\AppData\Local\Microsoft\Windows\INetCache\Content.Outlook\MGWG4FAV\2022-2041 TIP. 1_27_2023.draft City of Port Orchard Six -Year Transportation Improvement Program For 2024-2029 TIER 1 (Reasonably Constrained) Proj# Road Name Total Federal State (TIF Begin Termini Project Total Est. Spent Prior to Future Phase Funding Fund Fund Proj#) ProiectTitle/Project Description End Termini Length Cost 2023 2023 Expenditures 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 Start Year Status Phase Code Federal Funds Code State Funds Local Funds 1.12 Sedgwick Road West Study - 30% Design SR16 to Sidney Rd. Establish alignments and cross sections. Develop mitigation alternatives and identify right-of-way 300,000 0 0 300,000 300,000 2023 P Study needs for roadway and identify potential sites to accommodate stormwater run off and mitigation for TIF 2.02,2.03 filling wetlands. Include stormwater element for 1.13 Lippert Sidewalk Retrofit and Pavement Repair Sidney Rd. S. to ADA ramp and driveway retrofits, sidewalk reparis, Pottery 0.95 35,000 0 35,000 0 2021 S PE 35,000 pavement repairs, stormwater retrofit. In house des 778,000 0 2022 S CN CDBP 244,000 544,000 with consulted survey & basemap N/A 788,000 1.14 Sidney Road Sidewalk Sidney Glen Elementary Sidewalk Address gap in sidewalk along school frontage 0.95 1,895,000 0 0 0 235,000 2023 P PE 173,000 62,000 1,660,000 2024 P CN SRTS 1,222,000 438,000 TIF 2.05 1.15 Pottery Avenue Non Motorized Improvements SR16 to Lippert Dr. Address sidewalk gap from Sunset to Clay near Tremont. Road diet and road widening to provide bikeable shoulders and sidewalk improvements. 0.95 840,000 0 35,000 0 2022 P PE 35,000 150,000 2022 P 150,000 655,000 655,000 2023 S CN TIB CS 644,000 0 Safety enhancement at Pottery Lippert Intersection TIF 2.14 and School Crossing. 1.16 SR166/ Bay Street Reconstruction SR166 from Geiger to Frederick Raise street to address sea level rise and improve to current standard in accordance with redevelopment plans. Amount shown does not include water and 3,891,000 200,000 0 1,135,000 1,135,000 0 0 2022 P PE CDS 1,000,000 135,000 2,649,000 2,649,000 2026 P CN KRCC 2,000,000 649,000 sewer utility improvments. N/A City wide corridors, 1.17 Street Lighting Improvements highest priority locatoins Currently funded work includePottery, Sidney Rd. Future applications to be submitted for Tremont 1,100,000 0 0 100,000 0 100 2023 P PE HSIP 0 0 210,000 1,000,000 0 0 1,000,000 2024 P CN HSIP 210,000 0 N/A 1.18 Tremont Phase 2 and 3 Port Orchard Blvd to Sidney Ave. 2.30 Non motorized connectivity study and design of elements for future ROW and/or CN application 732,000 0 0 732,000 732,000 2023 P PE Ped Bike 732,000 0 0 2.12 & Total Capital 25973924.00 2316000.00 9045474.00 17338450.00 4996450.00 300000.00 520000.00 5972000.00 1890000.00 4628000.00 3913590.00 8392086.00 7316471.00 Maintenance Projects Total 2,022 Future Exp 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 1.51 Annual Pavement Maintenance Includes patching, crack -sealing, striping, and other 566,000 53,000 56,500 456,500 56,500 100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 0 On going S CN 456,500 activities 1.52 * Annual Sidewalk & ADA Upgrade Program Repair and replace concrete sidewalks and curb 976,000 38,000 38,000 900,000 180,000 180,000 180,000 180,000 180,000 0 On going S CN 900,000 ramps as identified in the program 1.53 ** Annual Pavement Management System Paving Projects Pavement replacement projects as identified in the pavement management system program 1.55 Overlay 2,S8S,000 300,000 S3S,000 1,750,000 350,000 350,000 350,000 3S0,000 350,000 0 On going S CN 1,750,000 7/21/2023 Page 2 of 9 C:\Users\ fisk\AppData\Local\Microsoft\Windows\INetCache\Content.Outlook\MGWG4FAV\2022-2041 TIP. 1_27_2023.draft City of Port Orchard Six -Year Transportation Improvement Program For 2024-2029 TIER 1 (Reasonably Constrained) Proj# Road Name Total Federal State (TIF Begin Termini Project Total Est. Spent Prior to Future Phase Funding Fund Fund Proj#) Project Title/Project Description End Termini Length Cost 2023 2023 Expenditures 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 Start Year Status Phase Code Federal Funds Code State Funds Local Funds Pavement preparation and overlay. Tremont: PO Tremont Str./ Lund 1.2 1,000,000 0 0 1,000,000 0 0 1,000,000 0 0 0 2025 P PE,CN KRCC 865,000 135,000 Blvd. to Bridge, Old Clifton: SR16 to City Limits, Old Ave./ Old Clifton Rd. Clifton Anderson Hill to McCormick Woods Dr. Total Maintenance Projects 5,127,000 391,000 629,500 4,106,500 586,500 630,000 1,630,000 630,000 630,000 0 865,000 0 3,241,500 * Per 2016 ADA transition plan: $180,000 annually over 20 years to comply on arterial streets. ** Per 2016 Pavement Management Analysis Report: $1.45 million annually to maintain network condition (PCI of 70), $500k to keep network PCI above 65 after 5 years. 7/21/2023 Page 3 of 9 C:\Users\ fisk\AppData\Local\Microsoft\Windows\INetCache\Content.Outlook\MGWG4FAV\2022-2041 TIP. 1_27_2023.d raft City of Port Orchard Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) For 2030-2043 TIER 2 (Unconstrained) Road Name Total Phase Priority Begin Termini Project Start Funding Federal State Fund Number Project Title/Project Description End Termini Length Total Est. Cost 2029-2034 2035-2042 Year Status Phase Fund Code Federal Funds Code State Funds Local Funds Capital Projects 2.01 Sidney Avenue (North of SR 16) Tremont Street to 1 3,750,000 3,750,000 0 2029 P PE/RW STP(U) 0 0 3,750,000 The design, permitting, right-of-way acquisition Fireweed 6,750,000 6,750,000 0 2031 P CN STP(U) 0 0 6,750,000 and construction for this project with bike lanes, storm drainage and sidewalks. (COMPLETE TIF 2.01 STREET) 2.02A Sedgwick Road West - Design, Permitting & ROW SR 16 Interchange to 0.4 462,428 462,428 0 2029 P PE STP(U) 400,000 0 62,428 The design, permitting and right-of-way Sidney Avenue 693,642 693,642 0 2030 P RW STP(U) 600,000 0 93,642 acquisition phase for this widening project with 3 lanes (continuous TWTL), bike lanes, sidewalks and box culvert across Blackjack Creek.) TIF 2.02 2.02B Sedgwick Road West - Construction SR 16 Interchange to 0.4 3,468,208 3,468,208 0 2031 P CN STP(U) 3,000,000 0 468,208 The construction phase for this widening project Sidney Avenue with 3 lanes (continuous TWTL), bike lanes, sidewalks and box culvert across Blackjack Creek.) TIF 2.02 Bethel/Sedgwick Corridor Phase 1- ROW Bethel Road: 2.04A.1 and Construction Salmonberry to ROW acquisition and construction of the first Blueberry. 0.75 2,056,000 2,056,000 0 2029 P RW 0 0 2,056,000 phase of the street improvements per the 9,124,000 9,124,000 0 2031 P CN 9,124,000 0 0 Bethel/Sedgwick Corridor Plan (2018). Includes improvements to Ramsey Road for detour per 2.04A.2 below. TIF 2.04A 2.04A.2 Ramsey Road Widening Sedgwick Road to Widen road to two travel lanes with bike lanes, Salmonberry Road 0.5 2,500,000 0 21500,000 2029 P ALL 0 0 0 sidewalks and stormwater system improvements. TIF 2.04A Bethel/Sedgwick Corridor Phase 2 - Design, Sedgwick Road: SR-16 2.04E ROW and Construction interchange to Bethel 1,110,000 1,110,000 0 2030 P PE 0 0 1,110,000 Design, ROW acquisition and construction of the 0.7 2,802,000 2,802,000 0 2031 P RW 0 0 2,802,000 second phase of the street improvements per the 12,757,000 12,757,000 0 2032 P CN 12,725,000 0 0 Bethel/Sedgwick Corridor Plan (2018). TIF 2.04E Bethel/Sedgwick Corridor Phase 3 - Design, Bethel Road: Blueberry 2.04C ROW and Construction to Sedgwick 422,000 422,000 0 2032 P PE 0 0 422,000 Design, ROW acquisition and construction of the 0.25 541,000 541,000 0 2033 P RW 0 0 541,000 third phase of the street improvements per the 4,859,000 4,859,000 0 2034 P CN 4,859,000 0 0 Bethel/Sedgwick Corridor Plan (2018). TIF 2.04C Bethel/Sedgwick Corridor Phase 4 - Design, Bethel Road: Lund to 2.04D ROW and Construction Salmonberry 616,000 0 616,000 2034 P PE 0 0 616,000 Design, ROW acquisition and construction of the 0.5 1,041,000 0 1,041,000 2035 P RW 0 0 1,041,000 fourth phase of the street improvements per the 7,087,000 0 7,087,000 2036 P CN 7,087,000 0 0 Bethel/Sedgwick Corridor Plan (2018). TIF 2.04D Bethel/Sedgwick Corridor Phase 5 - Design, Bethel Road: Mile Hill 2.04E ROW and Construction Drive to Lund 720,000 0 720,000 2036 P PE 0 0 720,000 7/21/2023 Page 4 of 9 C:\Users\fisk\AppData\Local\Microsoft\Windows\INetCache\Content.Outlook\MGWG4FAV\2022-2041 TIP. 1_27_2023.draft Priority Number Project Title/Project Description Design, ROW acquisition and construction of the fifth phase of the street improvements per the Bethel/Sedgwick Corridor Plan (2018). TIF 2.04E City of Port Orchard Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) For 2030-2043 TIER 2 (Unconstrained) Road Name Total Phase Begin Termini Project Start Funding Federal State Fund End Termini Length Total Est. Cost 2029-2034 2035-2042 Year Status Phase Fund Code Federal Funds Code State Funds Local Funds 1.1 1,532,000 0 1,532,000 2037 P RW 0 0 1,532,000 8,283,000 0 8,283,000 2038 P CN 8,283,000 0 0 7/21/2023 Page 5 of 9 C:\Users\fisk\AppData\Local\Microsoft\Windows\INetCache\Content.Outlook\MGWG4FAV\2022-2041 TIP. 1_27_2023.draft City of Port Orchard Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) For 2030-2043 TIER 2 (Unconstrained) Road Name Total Phase Priority Begin Termini Project Start Funding Federal State Fund Number Project Title/Project Description End Termini Length Total Est. Cost 2029-2034 2035-2042 Year Status Phase Fund Code Federal Funds Code State Funds Local Funds 2.05 Sidney Road SW Widening Sidney Road SW: Sidney Avenue is currently two lanes wide, it SR 16 Overpass to 0.95 500,000 500,000 0 2028 P PE 0 0 500,000 needs to be widened to three lanes (additional Sedgwick Road 5,761,850 5,761,850 0 2029 P CN STP(U) 3,600,000 TIB 1,600,000 561,850 TWTL) including bike lanes, sidewalks, traffic calming, and stormwater system improvements. TIF 2.05 (COMPLETE STREET). 2.06 Pottery Avenue Widening Pottery Avenue: Widen road to two travel lanes with bike lanes, Tremont Place to 0.22 1,600,000 1,600,000 0 2029 P ALL 0 0 1,600,000 sidewalks and stormwater system improvements. Melcher Street TIF 2.06 2.07 Old Clifton Rd Shoulder & Pedestrian Improvements Old Clifton Road: Design and construction of shoulder widening, Anderson Hill to 1.35 2,700,000 2,700,000 0 2028 P CN 0 0 2,000,000 street lighting, watermain extension and grade- Westerly City Limits seperated Pedestrian Path as identified in the TIF 2.07 McCormick Urban Village Trans Plan. 2.08 O. Clifton Rd & McC. Woods Dr. Intersection Old Clifton Rd/ Design and construction of intersecion McCormick Woods Dr. 0 250,000 0 250,000 2032 P PE 0 0 250,000 (roundabout) improvements including street Intersection 750,000 0 750,000 2033 P CN 0 0 750,000 lighting, as identified in the McCormick Urban TIF 2.08 Village Trans Plan. 2.09 Melcher Street Widening Melcher Street West is currently a narrow two- Melcher Street: 0.4 600,000 0 600,000 2032 P ALL 0 0 750,000 lane road. The reconstruction would widen the Pottery Avenue to road to allow two safe travel lanes, bike lanes, Sherman Avenue sidewalks and a stormwater system. TIF 2.09 2.10 Fireweed Road Widening Fireweed is currently a narrow two lane road. The Fireweed Road: 0.25 375,000 0 375,000 2035 P ALL 0 0 750,000 reconstruction would widen the road to allow for Sidney Avenue to safe travel lanes, bike lanes, sidewalks and a South Flower Avenue TIF 2.10 stormwater system. 2.11 Sherman Avenue Widening Sherman Avenue: Sherman Avenue is currently a narrow two-lane Fireweed Road to 0.35 525,000 0 525,000 2032 P ALL 0 0 750,000 road. The reconstruction would widen the road to Terminus at SR 16 allow two safe travel lanes, bike lanes, sidewalks and a stormwater system. TIF 2.12 2.12 Tremont St Widening - Port Orchard Blvd (Ph. 2) Port Orchard Blvd. Construct roundabouts at Tremont Street/PO Blvd. Tremont Street to 1.1 and Bay Street (SR166)/PO Blvd. and curb, gutter, Ba Street SR166 Y ( ) 809,250 0 809,250 2033 P PE STP(U) 700,000 0 109,250 bike lanes, sidewalks, street lighting, storm 520,231 0 520,231 2035 P RW STP(U) 450,000 0 70,231 drainage and Schedule 74 Undergrounding. 7,225,434 0 7,225,434 2037 P CN STP(U) 6,250,000 0 975,434 TIF 2.13 2.13 Pottery Avenue Widening Tremont to SR Pottery Avenue Pottery is currently a two-lane road, it needs to be Tremont Street 0.95 500,000 500,000 2030 P PE STP(U) 432,500 67,500 widened to a four -lane road, with sidewalks, SR 16 Overpass traffic calming and upgrades to the stormwater 750,000 750,000 0 2031 P RW STP(U) 648,750 101,250 TIF 2.14 system. 2,950,000 2,950,000 0 2033 P CN STP(U) 2,292,250 0 657,750 7/21/2023 Page 6 of 9 C:\Users\fisk\AppData\Local\Microsoft\Windows\INetCache\Content.Outlook\MGWG4FAV\2022-2041 TIP. 1_27_2023.draft City of Port Orchard Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) For 2030-2043 TIER 2 (Unconstrained) Road Name Total Phase Priority Begin Termini Project Start Funding Federal State Fund Number Project Title/Project Description End Termini Length Total Est. Cost 2029-2034 2035-2042 Year Status Phase Fund Code Federal Funds Code State Funds Local Funds 2.14 Old Clifton Berry Lake Road Intersection 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Intersection Improvement by Kitsap County k Blueberry Road Wideni Geiger Road to Bet Widen road to two travel lanes with bike lanes, Road sidewalks and stormwater system improvements. 2.16 Geiger Road Widening Sedgwick Road to Widen road to two travel lanes with bike lanes, Blueberry Road 0.25 375,000 0 375,000 2034 P ALL 0 0 0 sidewalks and stormwater system improvements. TIF 2.17 2.17 Salmonberry Road Widening Ramsey Road to Bethel Widen road to two travel lanes with bike lanes, Road 0.15 225,000 0 225,000 2028 P ALL 0 0 0 sidewalks and stormwater system improvements. TIF 2.18 2.18 Piperberry Way Extention Geiger Road to Ramsey Provide an extetion of Piperberry from Ramsey to Road 0.25 575,000 0 575,000 2034 P ALL 0 0 0 Geiger and a new street connection to the proposed round about on Sedgwick. TIF 2.19 2.19 Old Clifton & Feilgly Intersection Feigly intersection Complete streets improvemets indentified in the 0 2,800,000 0 21800,000 2040 P ALL 0 0 0 McCormicks Urban Village Transportation Plan. Continuation of 1.5A TIF 2.21 2.20 Bay Street Pathway - West Tremont to Footferry Continuation of project following study in 1.8 0 4,000,000 4,000,000 0 2030 P ALL 0 0 0 2.21 Walmart to Salmonberry Connector Salmonberry Complete roadway connnection 0 800,000 0 800,000 2040 P ALL 0 0 0 TIF 2.04A 2.22 Downtown Bay Street Study Port Orchard Blvd to Study main street in downtown port orchard for Mile Hill Dr intersection 0 1,000,000 0 11000,000 2033 P ALL 0 0 0 complete streets with bikelanes and streetscape with Bay Street. for pedestrians and storefronts. Study to address traffic cirulcation and raising streets for seal level rise and assocated stormwater and other utility imnrnvpmantc 2.23 Bay Street Improvements Port Orchard Blvd to Complete Street and utlitiy improvements. Refer Mile Hill Dr intersection 0 10,000,000 0 10,000,000 2040 P ALL 0 0 0 to Study. with Bay Street. 2.24 Bay St. & Port Orchard Blvd Intersection Bay Street at Port 7/21/2023 Page 7 of 9 C:\Users\fisk\AppData\Local\Microsoft\Windows\INetCache\Content.Outlook\MGWG4FAV\2022-2041 TIP. 1_27_2023.draft City of Port Orchard Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) For 2030-2043 TIER 2 (Unconstrained) Road Name Total Phase Priority Begin Termini Project Start Funding Federal State Fund Number Project Title/Project Description End Termini Length Total Est. Cost 2029-2034 2035-2042 Year Status Phase Fund Code Federal Funds Code State Funds Local Funds Single Lane Round About to address safety and Orchard Bulivard 0 3,000,000 0 31000,000 2040 P ALL 0 0 0 capacity. Bay Street Pathway crossing. Assumed creek is not impacted by project/ no major mitigation. 2.25 Bay St. & Kitsap Street Intersection Improvement Bay Street at Kitsap Re -align Kitsap intersection to addres safety and Street 0 2,000,000 0 2,000,000 2040 P ALL 0 0 0 capacity. Cline to end at Kitsap. Relocate flag pole. Signalized Intersection? 2.26 Bay St. & Mitchell and Wetzil Bay Street at Mitchell Reconfigure intersections to address safety and Avenue and Guy Wetzil 0 2,500,000 0 2,500,000 2040 P ALL 0 0 0 capacity. Rd. 2.27 Sidney Avenue Improvements Prospect St. to the Sidewalk and streetscape improvements. Waterfront 0 1,500,000 0 1,500,000 2040 P ALL 0 0 0 Developer Imrpovements? 2.28 Harrison Avenue Improvements Bay Street to the Sidewalk and streetscape improvements. Signal Waterfront 0 1,000,000 0 1,000,000 2040 P ALL 0 0 0 replacement? Developer Project? 2.28 Fredrickson Ave Impr. Cline St. to Sidney Ave. Convert to two way street with angled parking. 0 1,500,000 0 1,500,000 2040 P ALL 0 0 0 Provide sidewalk and streetscape impr. 2.29 New Waterfront Street Cline Street to Harrson Sidewalk and streetscape improvements. "Shared Avenue 0 2,500,000 0 2,500,000 2040 P ALL 0 0 0 Street" concept. Developer Improvement? Port Orchard Blvd. to 2.30 Tremont St Widening - Port Orchard Blvd (Ph. 3) Sidney Ave. Center median, bike lane, sidewalk, and 0 5,000,000 0 51000,000 2041 P ALL STP(U) 0 FIB, Ped Biki 0 0 streetscape improvements on Tremont and Sidney. Round about at the Tremont/ Sidney intersection for non -motorized safety. Total Tier 2 Capital Projects 98,166,043 63,557,128 34,608,915 60,451,500 1,600,000 31,857,543 7/21/2023 Page 8 of 9 C:\Users\fisk\AppData\Local\Microsoft\Windows\INetCache\Content.Outlook\MGWG4FAV\2022-2041 TIP. 1_27_2023.draft City of Port Orchard Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) For 2030-2043 TIER 2 (Unconstrained) Road Name Total Phase Priority Begin Termini Project Start Funding Federal State Fund Number Project Title/Project Description End Termini Length Total Est. Cost 2029-2034 2035-2042 Year Status Phase Fund Code Federal Funds Code State Funds Local Funds Maintenance Project 2.51 Cline Avenue Repairs Replace sidewalk and parking strip. Cline Avenue: 0.13 200,000 0 0 P ALL 200,000 Kitsap Street to Dwight Street Total Tier 2 Maintenance Projects 200,000 0 0 0 0 200,000 7/21/2023 Page 9 of 9 C:\Users\fisk\AppData\Local\Microsoft\Windows\INetCache\Content.Outlook\MGWG4FAV\2022-2041 TIP. 1_27_2023.draft City of Port Orchard Six -Year Transportation Improvement Program For 2024-2029 TIER 1 (Reasonably Constrained) Proj# Road Name Total Federal State (TIF Begin Termini Project Total Est. Spent Prior to Future Phase Funding Fund Fund Proj#) Project Title/Project Description End Termini Length Cost 2023 2023 Expenditures 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 Start Year Status Phase Code Federal Funds Code State Funds Local Funds Capital Projects 1.1 Bay Street Ped. Pathway ROW Phase PO Shoreline: Add 14-ft Multi -Modal (bikes & pedestrians) Sidney Ave. Foot 1.2 2,280,000 1,140,000 1,140,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2013 S ROW STP(U) 1,923,590 0 300,212 waterfront pathway & cantilevered retaining wall Ferry to Annapolis 3,000,000 3,000,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2018 P ROW 0 581,000 following historic Mosquito Fleet trail and pedestrian Foot Ferry N/A bridge across Black Jack Creek. 1.2 Bay Street Pedestrian Pathway Construction (S#1, S#6-11) The CN phase for the 14-ft Multi -Modal (bike & ped) 1.2 1,115,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2018 650,000 465,000 S CN waterfront pathway/cantilevered retailing wall 3,000,000 0 3,000,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2024 S CN following the historic Mosquito Fleet trail. Includes the demolition/removal of (5) overwater structures. N/A Inrli irloc r., ff2 Arl Roarly r)nr Pron 1.3 Bay Street Pedestrian Pathway West Port Orchard Blvd Situational study and Bay St: Ft Ferry 1.5 566,474 0 2023 490,000 0 76,474 to Tremont 0 566,474 0 0 0 0 0 0 P PL N/A 1.4 Old Clifton/ Anderson Hill Intersection Improvements Old Clifton Rd / Intersection Improvements (roundabout) as identified Anderson Hill Rd. 0 258,000 0 0 258,000 0 258,000 0 0 2027 S PE 0 258,000 in the McCormick Urban Village Trans Plan and Intersection 1,738,000 0 0 1,738,000 0 0 0 1,738,000 0 2028 P CN Grant? 1,213,000 525,000 TIF 1.4 partially funded by Bayside Mit Funds. 1.5 Old Clifton Rd Non -Motorized Improvements Old Clifton Road: Rodway Improvements identified in the McCormick Campus PKWY to 0.75 450,000 150,000 0 450,000 0 450,000 0 0 0 2026 P PE 0 450,000 Urban Village Trans Plan. Design and Construction. Anderson Hill Rd. 2,000,000 2,700,000 2027 P CN STP(U), TIB/CS TIF 1.5, 2.07 Seperated pathway and shoulder facilities. RCO 1.7 Bethel/Sedgwick Phase 5a - Bethel/Lincoln RAB Bethel/Lincoln/Lunb Safety and capacity improvements to intersection and erg/ Mitchell 0 3,674,000 326,000 474,000 2021 S PE 800,000 reconfiguration of approaches. 0 0 3,200,000 3200000 2022 S CN HSP 1,500,000 TIB UAP 1,100,000 700,000 TIF 2.04e 1.8 Bethel/ Sedgwick Cooridor Phase la - Blueberry RAB Bethel Road: blueberry Intersection Phase la. Bethel/ Blueberry RAB 60% PE in 2022 and start ROW for Phase la/b. 0 2,094,000 0 250,000 170,000 100,000 70,000 2022 S PE 0 344,374 74,626 0 268,000 2024 S ROW 220,238 47,732 1,924,000 1924000 2026 P CN TIB/ 1,568,178 307,051 UAP/CS IF 2.04a I I I et e e gwlc orrl or ase - a mon erry Bethel Road: Salmonberry intersection Phase 1b. Bethel/ Salmonberry RAB Round and roadway segment design from Blueberry to Salmonberry. 60% PE in 2022. 0 5,056,450 0 0 800,000 100,000 700,000 2023 P PE 0 328,058 57,893 1,328,450 1,328,450 0 2024 P ROW 1,129,183 199,238 2,928,000 2,928,000 2026 P CN TIB/UAP/ 2,489,055 439,245 IF 2.04a CS 1.10 Vallair Ct Connector Bethel Road / Road extension and intersection improvements Walmart Drive 0.25 1,000,000 0 0 1,000,000 0 0 0 0 1,000,000 0 2027 P PE & ROW 0 0 1,000,000 previously included in the Bethel Road Corridor ROW Intersection 1,000,000 0 0 1,000,000 0 0 0 0 0 1,000,000 2028 P CN 0 TIB 0 1,000,000 TIF 1.7 & Construction project. 1.11 Sidney Road SW Design - 60% Sedgwick Rd. to Berry Lake Rd. Sidney Avenue is currently two lanes wide, it needs to be widened to three lanes (additional TWTL) including 0.95 500,000 0 0 500,000 0 0 0 0 0 500,000 2027 p pL 0 0 500,000 TIB bike lanes, sidewalks, traffic calming, and stormwater TIF 2.05 system improvements. (COMPLETE STREET). 7/24/2023 Page 1 of 9 U:\Planning Commission\1_PC Agendas and Meeting Packets\2023\08_August 2023\5b - 2023 Comprehensive Plan TIP\2022-2041 TIP.7_24_2023.draft City of Port Orchard Six -Year Transportation Improvement Program For 2024-2029 TIER 1 (Reasonably Constrained) Proj# Road Name Total Federal State (TIF Begin Termini Project Total Est. Spent Prior to Future Phase Funding Fund Fund Proj#) ProiectTitle/Project Description End Termini Length Cost 2023 2023 Expenditures 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 Start Year Status Phase Code Federal Funds Code State Funds Local Funds 1.12 Sedgwick Road West Study - 30% Design SR16 to Sidney Rd. Establish alignments and cross sections. Develop 300,000 0 0 300,000 300,000 2023 P Study mitigation alternatives and identify right-of-way needs for roadway and identify potential sites to accommodate stormwater run off and mitigation for TIF 2.02,2.03 filling wetlands. Include stormwater element for idewalk Retrofit and Pavement Repair ADA ramp and driveway retrofits, sidewalk reparis, Pottery 0.95 35,000 5, 35,000 pavement repairs, stormwater retrofit. In house des 78,000 CDBP 244,000 544,000 with consulted survey & basemap 1.14 Sidney Road Sidewalk Sidney Glen Address gap in sidewalk along school frontage Elementary Sidewalk 0.95 1,895,000 0 0 0 235,000 2023 P PE 173,000 62,000 1,660,000 2024 P CN SRTS 1,222,000 438,000 TIF 2.05 1.15 Pottery Avenue Non Motorized Improvements SR16 to Lippert Dr. Address sidewalk gap from Sunset to Clay near Tremont. Road diet and road widening to provide bikeable shoulders and sidewalk improvements. 0.95 840,000 0 35,000 0 2022 P PE 35,000 150,000 2022 P 150,000 655,000 655,000 2024 S CN TIB CS 644,000 0 Safety enhancement at Pottery Lippert Intersection TIF 2.14 and School Crossing. 1.16 SR166/ Bay Street Reconstruction SR166 from Geiger to Frederick Raise street to address sea level rise and improve to current standard in accordance with redevelopment plans. Amount shown does not include water and 3,891,000 200,000 0 1,135,000 1,135,000 0 0 2022 P PE CDS 1,000,000 135,000 2,649,000 2,649,000 2026 P CN KRCC 2,000,000 649,000 sewer utility improvments. N/A City wide corridors, 1.17 Street Lighting Improvements highest priority locatoins Currently funded work includePottery, Sidney Rd. Future applications to be submitted for Tremont 1,100,000 0 0 100,000 0 100 2023 P PE HSIP 0 0 210,000 1,000,000 0 0 1,000,000 2024 P CN HSIP 210,000 0 N/A 1.18 Tremont Phase 2 and 3 Port Orchard Blvd to Sidney Ave. 2.30 Non motorized connectivity study and design of elements for future ROW and/or CN application 732,000 0 0 732,000 732,000 2023 P PE Ped Bike 732,000 0 0 2.12 & Total Capital 26031924.00 2266000.00 8895474.00 17596450.00 4996450.00 1520000.00 7552000.00 258000.00 2738000.00 1500000.00 3913590.00 8392086.00 7316471.00 Maintenance Projects Total 2,022 Future Exp 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 1.51 Annual Pavement Maintenance Includes patching, crack -sealing, striping, and other 566,000 53,000 56,500 456,500 56,500 100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 0 On going S CN 456,500 activities 1.52 * Annual Sidewalk & ADA Upgrade Program Repair and replace concrete sidewalks and curb 976,000 38,000 38,000 900,000 180,000 180,000 180,000 180,000 180,000 0 On going S CN 900,000 ramps as identified in the program 1.53 ** Annual Pavement Management System Paving Projects Pavement replacement projects as identified in the pavement management system program 1.55 Overlay 2,585,000 300,000 535,000 1,750,000 350,000 350,000 350,000 350,000 350,000 0 On going S CN 1,750,000 7/24/2023 Page 2 of 9 U:\Planning Commission\1_PC Agendas and Meeting Packets\2023\08_August 2023\5b - 2023 Comprehensive Plan TIP\2022-2041 TIP.7_24_2023.draft City of Port Orchard Six -Year Transportation Improvement Program For 2024-2029 TIER 1 (Reasonably Constrained) Proj# Road Name Total Federal State (TIF Begin Termini Project Total Est. Spent Prior to Future Phase Funding Fund Fund Proj#) Project Title/Project Description End Termini Length Cost 2023 2023 Expenditures 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 Start Year Status Phase Code Federal Funds Code State Funds Local Funds Pavement preparation and overlay. Tremont: PO Tremont Str./ Lund 1.2 1,000,000 0 0 1,000,000 0 0 1,000,000 0 0 0 2025 P PE,CN KRCC 865,000 135,000 Blvd. to Bridge, Old Clifton: SR16 to City Limits, Old Ave./ Old Clifton Rd. Clifton Anderson Hill to McCormick Woods Dr. Total Maintenance Projects 5,127,000 391,000 629,500 4,106,500 586,500 630,000 1,630,000 630,000 630,000 0 865,000 0 3,241,500 * Per 2016 ADA transition plan: $180,000 annually over 20 years to comply on arterial streets. ** Per 2016 Pavement Management Analysis Report: $1.45 million annually to maintain network condition (PCI of 70), $500k to keep network PCI above 65 after 5 years. 7/24/2023 Page 3 of 9 U:\Planning Commission\1_PC Agendas and Meeting Packets\2023\08_August 2023\51b - 2023 Comprehensive Plan TIP\2022-2041 TI P.7_24_2023.d raft City of Port Orchard Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) For 2030-2043 TIER 2 (Unconstrained) Road Name Total Phase Priority Begin Termini Project Start Funding Federal State Fund Number Project Title/Project Description End Termini Length Total Est. Cost 2029-2034 2035-2042 Year Status Phase Fund Code Federal Funds Code State Funds Local Funds Capital Projects 2.01 Sidney Avenue (North of SR 16) Tremont Street to 1 3,750,000 3,750,000 0 2029 P PE/RW STP(U) 0 0 3,750,000 The design, permitting, right-of-way acquisition Fireweed 6,750,000 6,750,000 0 2031 P CN STP(U) 0 0 6,750,000 and construction for this project with bike lanes, storm drainage and sidewalks. (COMPLETE TIF 2.01 STREET) 2.02A Sedgwick Road West - Design, Permitting & ROW SR 16 Interchange to 0.4 462,428 462,428 0 2029 P PE STP(U) 400,000 0 62,428 The design, permitting and right-of-way Sidney Avenue 693,642 693,642 0 2030 P RW STP(U) 600,000 0 93,642 acquisition phase for this widening project with 3 lanes (continuous TWTL), bike lanes, sidewalks and box culvert across Blackjack Creek.) TIF 2.02 2.02B Sedgwick Road West - Construction SR 16 Interchange to 0.4 3,468,208 3,468,208 0 2031 P CN STP(U) 3,000,000 0 468,208 The construction phase for this widening project Sidney Avenue with 3 lanes (continuous TWTL), bike lanes, sidewalks and box culvert across Blackjack Creek.) TIF 2.02 Bethel/Sedgwick Corridor Phase 1- ROW Bethel Road: 2.04A.1 and Construction Salmonberry to ROW acquisition and construction of the first Blueberry. 0.75 2,056,000 2,056,000 0 2029 P RW 0 0 2,056,000 phase of the street improvements per the 9,124,000 9,124,000 0 2031 P CN 9,124,000 0 0 Bethel/Sedgwick Corridor Plan (2018). Includes improvements to Ramsey Road for detour per 2.04A.2 below. TIF 2.04A 2.04A.2 Ramsey Road Widening Sedgwick Road to Widen road to two travel lanes with bike lanes, Salmonberry Road 0.5 2,500,000 0 21500,000 2029 P ALL 0 0 0 sidewalks and stormwater system improvements. TIF 2.04A Bethel/Sedgwick Corridor Phase 2 - Design, Sedgwick Road: SR-16 2.04E ROW and Construction interchange to Bethel 1,110,000 1,110,000 0 2030 P PE 0 0 1,110,000 Design, ROW acquisition and construction of the 0.7 2,802,000 2,802,000 0 2031 P RW 0 0 2,802,000 second phase of the street improvements per the 12,757,000 12,757,000 0 2032 P CN 12,725,000 0 0 Bethel/Sedgwick Corridor Plan (2018). TIF 2.04E Bethel/Sedgwick Corridor Phase 3 - Design, Bethel Road: Blueberry 2.04C ROW and Construction to Sedgwick 422,000 422,000 0 2032 P PE 0 0 422,000 Design, ROW acquisition and construction of the 0.25 541,000 541,000 0 2033 P RW 0 0 541,000 third phase of the street improvements per the 4,859,000 4,859,000 0 2034 P CN 4,859,000 0 0 Bethel/Sedgwick Corridor Plan (2018). TIF 2.04C Bethel/Sedgwick Corridor Phase 4 - Design, Bethel Road: Lund to 2.04D ROW and Construction Salmonberry 616,000 0 616,000 2034 P PE 0 0 616,000 Design, ROW acquisition and construction of the 0.5 1,041,000 0 1,041,000 2035 P RW 0 0 1,041,000 fourth phase of the street improvements per the 7,087,000 0 7,087,000 2036 P CN 7,087,000 0 0 Bethel/Sedgwick Corridor Plan (2018). TIF 2.04D Bethel/Sedgwick Corridor Phase 5 - Design, Bethel Road: Mile Hill 2.04E ROW and Construction Drive to Lund 720,000 0 720,000 2036 P PE 0 0 720,000 7/24/2023 Page 4 of 9 U:\Planning Commission\1_PC Agendas and Meeting Packets\2023\08_August 2023\5b - 2023 Comprehensive Plan TIP\2022-2041 TIP.7_24_2023Araft Priority Number Project Title/Project Description Design, ROW acquisition and construction of the fifth phase of the street improvements per the Bethel/Sedgwick Corridor Plan (2018). TIF 2.04E City of Port Orchard Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) For 2030-2043 TIER 2 (Unconstrained) Road Name Total Phase Begin Termini Project Start Funding Federal State Fund End Termini Length Total Est. Cost 2029-2034 2035-2042 Year Status Phase Fund Code Federal Funds Code State Funds Local Funds 1.1 1,532,000 0 1,532,000 2037 P RW 0 0 1,532,000 8,283,000 0 8,283,000 2038 P CN 8,283,000 0 0 7/24/2023 Page 5 of 9 U:\Planning Commission\1_PC Agendas and Meeting Packets\2023\08_August 2023\5b - 2023 Comprehensive Plan TIP\2022-2041 TIP.7_24_2023.draft City of Port Orchard Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) For 2030-2043 TIER 2 (Unconstrained) Road Name Total Phase Priority Begin Termini Project Start Funding Federal State Fund Number Project Title/Project Description End Termini Length Total Est. Cost 2029-2034 2035-2042 Year Status Phase Fund Code Federal Funds Code State Funds Local Funds 2.05 Sidney Road SW Widening Sidney Road SW: Sidney Avenue is currently two lanes wide, it SR 16 Overpass to 0.95 500,000 500,000 0 2028 P PE 0 0 500,000 needs to be widened to three lanes (additional Sedgwick Road 5,761,850 5,761,850 0 2029 P CN STP(U) 3,600,000 TIB 1,600,000 561,850 TWTL) including bike lanes, sidewalks, traffic calming, and stormwater system improvements. TIF 2.05 (COMPLETE STREET). 2.06 Pottery Avenue Widening Pottery Avenue: Widen road to two travel lanes with bike lanes, Tremont Place to 0.22 1,600,000 1,600,000 0 2029 P ALL 0 0 1,600,000 sidewalks and stormwater system improvements. Melcher Street TIF 2.06 2.07 Old Clifton Rd Shoulder & Pedestrian Improvements Old Clifton Road: Design and construction of shoulder widening, Anderson Hill to 1.35 2,700,000 2,700,000 0 2028 P CN 0 0 2,000,000 street lighting, watermain extension and grade- Westerly City Limits seperated Pedestrian Path as identified in the TIF 2.07 McCormick Urban Village Trans Plan. 2.08 O. Clifton Rd & McC. Woods Dr. Intersection Old Clifton Rd/ Design and construction of intersecion McCormick Woods Dr. 0 250,000 0 250,000 2032 P PE 0 0 250,000 (roundabout) improvements including street Intersection 750,000 0 750,000 2033 P CN 0 0 750,000 lighting, as identified in the McCormick Urban TIF 2.08 Village Trans Plan. 2.09 Melcher Street Widening Melcher Street West is currently a narrow two- Melcher Street: 0.4 600,000 0 600,000 2032 P ALL 0 0 750,000 lane road. The reconstruction would widen the Pottery Avenue to road to allow two safe travel lanes, bike lanes, Sherman Avenue sidewalks and a stormwater system. TIF 2.09 2.10 Fireweed Road Widening Fireweed is currently a narrow two lane road. The Fireweed Road: 0.25 375,000 0 375,000 2035 P ALL 0 0 750,000 reconstruction would widen the road to allow for Sidney Avenue to safe travel lanes, bike lanes, sidewalks and a South Flower Avenue TIF 2.10 stormwater system. 2.11 Sherman Avenue Widening Sherman Avenue: Sherman Avenue is currently a narrow two-lane Fireweed Road to 0.35 525,000 0 525,000 2032 P ALL 0 0 750,000 road. The reconstruction would widen the road to Terminus at SR 16 allow two safe travel lanes, bike lanes, sidewalks and a stormwater system. TIF 2.12 2.12 Tremont St Widening - Port Orchard Blvd (Ph. 2) Port Orchard Blvd. Construct roundabouts at Tremont Street/PO Blvd. Tremont Street to 1.1 and Bay Street (SR166)/PO Blvd. and curb, gutter, Ba Street SR166 Y ( ) 809,250 0 809,250 2033 P PE STP(U) 700,000 0 109,250 bike lanes, sidewalks, street lighting, storm 520,231 0 520,231 2035 P RW STP(U) 450,000 0 70,231 drainage and Schedule 74 Undergrounding. 7,225,434 0 7,225,434 2037 P CN STP(U) 6,250,000 0 975,434 TIF 2.13 2.13 Pottery Avenue Widening Tremont to SR Pottery Avenue Pottery is currently a two-lane road, it needs to be Tremont Street 0.95 500,000 500,000 2030 P PE STP(U) 432,500 67,500 widened to a four -lane road, with sidewalks, SR 16 Overpass traffic calming and upgrades to the stormwater 750,000 750,000 0 2031 P RW STP(U) 648,750 101,250 TIF 2.14 system. 2,950,000 2,950,000 2033 P CN STP(U) 2,292,250 0 657,750 7/24/2023 Page 6 of 9 U:\Planning Commission\1_PC Agendas and Meeting Packets\2023\08_August 2023\5b - 2023 Comprehensive Plan TIP\2022-2041 TIP.7_24_2023Araft City of Port Orchard Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) For 2030-2043 TIER 2 (Unconstrained) Road Name Total Phase Priority Begin Termini Project Start Funding Federal State Fund Number Project Title/Project Description End Termini Length Total Est. Cost 2029-2034 2035-2042 Year Status Phase Fund Code Federal Funds Code State Funds Local Funds 2.14 Old Clifton Berry Lake Road Intersection 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Intersection Improvement by Kitsap County k Blueberry Road Wideni Geiger Road to Bet Widen road to two travel lanes with bike lanes, Road sidewalks and stormwater system improvements. 2.16 Geiger Road Widening Sedgwick Road to Widen road to two travel lanes with bike lanes, Blueberry Road 0.25 375,000 0 375,000 2034 P ALL 0 0 0 sidewalks and stormwater system improvements. TIF 2.17 2.17 Salmonberry Road Widening Ramsey Road to Bethel Widen road to two travel lanes with bike lanes, Road 0.15 225,000 0 225,000 2028 P ALL 0 0 0 sidewalks and stormwater system improvements. TIF 2.18 2.18 Piperberry Way Extention Geiger Road to Ramsey Provide an extetion of Piperberry from Ramsey to Road 0.25 575,000 0 575,000 2034 P ALL 0 0 0 Geiger and a new street connection to the proposed round about on Sedgwick. TIF 2.19 2.19 Old Clifton & Feilgly Intersection Feigly intersection Complete streets improvemets indentified in the 0 2,800,000 0 21800,000 2040 P ALL 0 0 0 McCormicks Urban Village Transportation Plan. Continuation of 1.5A TIF 2.21 2.20 Bay Street Pathway - West Tremont to Footferry Continuation of project following study in 1.8 0 4,000,000 4,000,000 0 2030 P ALL 0 0 0 2.21 Walmart to Salmonberry Connector Salmonberry Complete roadway connnection 0 800,000 0 800,000 2040 P ALL 0 0 0 TIF 2.04A 2.22 Downtown Bay Street Study Port Orchard Blvd to Study main street in downtown port orchard for Mile Hill Dr intersection 0 1,000,000 0 11000,000 2033 P ALL 0 0 0 complete streets with bikelanes and streetscape with Bay Street. for pedestrians and storefronts. Study to address traffic cirulcation and raising streets for seal level rise and assocated stormwater and other utility imnrnvpmpntc 2.23 Bay Street Improvements Port Orchard Blvd to Complete Street and utlitiy improvements. Refer Mile Hill Dr intersection 0 10,000,000 0 10,000,000 2040 P ALL 0 0 0 to Study. with Bay Street. 2.24 Bay St. & Port Orchard Blvd Intersection Bay Street at Port 7/24/2023 Page 7 of 9 U:\Planning Commission\1_PC Agendas and Meeting Packets\2023\08_August 2023\5b - 2023 Comprehensive Plan TIP\2022-2041 TIP.7_24_2023.draft City of Port Orchard Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) For 2030-2043 TIER 2 (Unconstrained) Road Name Total Phase Priority Begin Termini Project Start Funding Federal State Fund Number Project Title/Project Description End Termini Length Total Est. Cost 2029-2034 2035-2042 Year Status Phase Fund Code Federal Funds Code State Funds Local Funds Single Lane Round About to address safety and Orchard Bulivard 0 3,000,000 0 31000,000 2040 P ALL 0 0 0 capacity. Bay Street Pathway crossing. Assumed creek is not impacted by project/ no major mitigation. 2.25 Bay St. & Kitsap Street Intersection Improvement Bay Street at Kitsap Re -align Kitsap intersection to addres safety and Street 0 2,000,000 0 2,000,000 2040 P ALL 0 0 0 capacity. Cline to end at Kitsap. Relocate flag pole. Signalized Intersection? 2.26 Bay St. & Mitchell and Wetzil Bay Street at Mitchell Reconfigure intersections to address safety and Avenue and Guy Wetzil 0 2,500,000 0 2,500,000 2040 P ALL 0 0 0 capacity. Rd. 2.27 Sidney Avenue Improvements Prospect St. to the Sidewalk and streetscape improvements. Waterfront 0 1,500,000 0 1,500,000 2040 P ALL 0 0 0 Developer Imrpovements? 2.28 Harrison Avenue Improvements Bay Street to the Sidewalk and streetscape improvements. Signal Waterfront 0 1,000,000 0 1,000,000 2040 P ALL 0 0 0 replacement? Developer Project? 2.28 Fredrickson Ave Impr. Cline St. to Sidney Ave. Convert to two way street with angled parking. 0 1,500,000 0 1,500,000 2040 P ALL 0 0 0 Provide sidewalk and streetscape impr. 2.29 New Waterfront Street Cline Street to Harrson Sidewalk and streetscape improvements. "Shared Avenue 0 2,500,000 0 2,500,000 2040 P ALL 0 0 0 Street" concept. Developer Improvement? Port Orchard Blvd. to 2.30 Tremont St Widening - Port Orchard Blvd (Ph. 3) Sidney Ave. Center median, bike lane, sidewalk, and 0 5,000,000 0 51000,000 2041 P ALL STP(U) 0 FIB, Ped Biki 0 0 streetscape improvements on Tremont and Sidney. Round about at the Tremont/ Sidney intersection for non -motorized safety. Total Tier 2 Capital Projects 98,166,043 63,557,128 34,608,915 60,451,500 1,600,000 31,857,543 7/24/2023 Page 8 of 9 U:\Planning Commission\1_PC Agendas and Meeting Packets\2023\08_August 2023\5b - 2023 Comprehensive Plan TIP\2022-2041 TIP.7_24_2023Araft City of Port Orchard Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) For 2030-2043 TIER 2 (Unconstrained) Road Name Total Phase Priority Begin Termini Project Start Funding Federal State Fund Number Project Title/Project Description End Termini Length Total Est. Cost 2029-2034 2035-2042 Year Status Phase Fund Code Federal Funds Code State Funds Local Funds Maintenance Project 2.51 Cline Avenue Repairs Replace sidewalk and parking strip. Cline Avenue: 0.13 200,000 0 0 P ALL 200,000 Kitsap Street to Dwight Street Total Tier 2 Maintenance Projects 200,000 0 0 0 0 200,000 7/24/2023 Page 9 of 9 U:\Planning Commission\1_PC Agendas and Meeting Packets\2023\08_August 2023\5b - 2023 Comprehensive Plan TIP\2022-2041 TIP.7_24_2023Araft CITY OF PORT ORCHARD DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT 216 Prospect Street, Port Orchard, WA 98366 Ph.: (36o) 874-5533 • FAX: (36o) 876-4980 PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT Agenda Item No: 5(c) Meeting Date: August 1, 2022 Revisions to POW 20.132 — Prepared by: Nick Bond, Development Subject: Temporary Signage Director Issue: The current regulations allow temporary signage as defined in Port Orchard Municipal Code (POMC) 20.132.290 to be placed within public right-of-way outside of the roadway provided the temporary signage placement is consistent with the regulations of POMC 20.132.270. Due to the proliferation of temporary signs in the right-of-way throughout the city, the Planning Commission discussed temporary signage regulations at the September, October, November and December Planning Commission meetings in 2022. At the December Planning Commission meeting, staff suggested that the perceived problems with temporary signs be documented over the coming months to create a record of possible nuisance or safety concerns. Over several months beginning in late 2022 and continuing through the end of July, staff photographed the same intersections on a periodic basis and discovered an increase in temporary signage as weather warms and as the daylight hours get longer. The photo documentation has been compiled in the attached presentation and may now function as the basis for Planning Commission recommendations concerning code amendments for temporary signage. Recommendation: The Planning Commission should review the presentation of temporary signage and provide guidance to staff regarding regulations of temporary signage in right-of-way. TEMPORARY SIGNAGE I ORCHARD AREAS OF FOCUS Annapolls ........... ... ......................... .............. Bremerton � REnil 4 I _ � 1 ! IIII ° IN�I— IAN • town • • f A ro W ,nu mulrmoweds lmman —. —NeedsYPll! NeYOU!; Y Vote YES!Vote YES �— --- Prop 1 — Qi Prop 1 — — NG . Yu � - o �► • • • 47 ra 11 S. k - aye PI616 }3 +$tr, cp^ 'y,� 3607693621fs _ s r �� ".r •«.. ra . LLOYD f a _—W JF -02 • 4� � S 3R'�di Nils fOak _fd I Porl Orcbard Indu r' . �. � , �Port orchard Industrial Park c ® I� AIyrrel i [ Are A ,warp,.. 4, � -tq - j� . 7V , w � I I f 5�y { sw Old OLD GLIF1101 DERSON HILL RC -/ w, ®� _ - 0_ : TR 4 'WCOBMICK MODDSia i 4 m . •i . kw r r c:dime 409 589 �•'� — °on1ei Car Wash ATM Ilk 9 1 a' U Tgat Car Wash A r ice•' � '� - �- ,_ 0IC►'T.`I I :m'J 0 SEDGWICK RC 7 BETHEL RD Al „�. - ! ice► � — R BETHEL Ro SE r �s ��a um� SuaWBy e�: � mieoir�acM CLEANERS YL�� �� Y3EWPY � ih Auk �a6Y ' FUEL Jan 2022 July 2023 w Nov 2022 March 2023 Aug 2023 LUND AVE. & BETHEL RD. Jan 2023 July 2023 Q Aug 2023 MILE HILL DR. & JACKSON AVE./ OLNEY ST. Q Aug 2022 Jan 2023 i`smo�'R uy B V4PE Aug 2023 MILE HILL DR. & KARCHER RD. o� w� Q 0 0 fl J 0