The URL can be used to link to this page

04/24/2024 - Packet, 2nd RevisionPROJECT MEMO O©= O TO: Nick Bond, AICP DATE: April 11, 2024 Community Development Director City of Port Orchard FROM: Alex Campbell, AICP PROJECT NO.: 2220437.30 Seattle - (206) 267-2425 PROJECT NAME: City of Port Orchard - 2024 Comprehensive Plan Periodic Update SUBJECT: Comprehensive Plan Update - Policy Workshop Summary Mr. Nick Bond and the City Comprehensive Plan Update Team: This memo serves to provide a summary of the Policy Workshop that the City held on February 28, 2024 in association with the 2024 Comprehensive Plan Periodic Update process. The primary focus of the Policy Workshop was to present existing Goal and Policy language in the Comprehensive Plan, and provide the public an opportunity to review and provide feedback on: 1. How well the existing Goal language supports respondents' ideas and preferences for the city over the 20-year planning horizon of the 2024 Comprehensive Plan Update; and 2. How well the existing Policy language supports and implements the intent of each Goal. The Policy Workshop was held in -person at the City Council chambers with both City Staff and members of the consulting team supporting the Comprehensive Plan Update in attendance to answer questions from the community and assist with providing feedback on the Goals and Policies. An estimated ten community members attended the in -person meeting, with 7 individuals providing their contact information on the meeting's sign -in sheet. Attendees of the Policy Workshop were provided an opportunity to review, ask questions, and comment on the existing Comprehensive Plan's Goals and Policies. Page 1 of 14 The existing Goal and Policy language from each of the Comprehensive Plan Elements were provided to the public at the meeting, which consisted of the following: • Land Use Element — 9 Goals, 30 Policies • Housing Element — 10 Goals, 28 Policies • Parks Element — 12 Goals, 41 Policies • Natural Systems Element — 22 Goals, 63 Policies • Economic Development Element — 10 Goals, 43 Policies • Utilities Element — 5 Goals, 30 Policies • Transportation Element — 25 Goals, 112 Policies • Capital Facilities Element — 12 Goals, 68 Policies Given the large volume of information provided for public feedback, the city provided respondents over a month to provide their feedback either online via the Social Pinpoint platform (https://engage.ahbl.com/PortOrchard2O44) or by providing written/email feedback to City Staff. The City accepted feedback on the Policy Workshop from the date of the public meeting (February 28, 2024) through the end of March (March 31, 2024). The city received 211 views from 92 unique visitors to the Social Pinpoint platform during the commenting period for the Policy Workshop. Of these views and visits, 48 responses were provided on the existing Comprehensive Plan's Goals and Policies. Out of the 48 responses, 9 responses were provided on the Housing Element, 13 responses were provided on the Parks Element, and 26 responses were provided on the Transportation Element. The feedback that was received on the Housing Element includes the following — please note that responses were not provided for all Goals and Policies: Goal 1. Ensure that the City's housing stock responds to changes in desired housing types based on demographic trends and population growth. Average 7.0 a 1Go�; aa=s bass 4G',6 2C?a i 0 G 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 1G P.- Neutral Great (continued on next page) Project Memo Page 2 of 14 Q©OO City of Port Orchard - 2024 Comprehensive Plan Periodic Update 2220437.30 April 11, 2024 Goal 2. Ensure that housing is affordable and available to all socioeconomic levels of Port Orchard residents. 100% 80?5 603h 40''6 20'h D% D 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 a Poor Neutral Goal 3. Encourage the clustering of new housing developments in designated mixed -use Centers where residential uses are co- located with commercial uses. Average 9.60 41 9 11 Great Average 9.DD 10D% 80% 60% 40% zo% Dv D 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 a 9 10 Poor Neutral Great Goal 4. Promote the efficient provision of municipal infrastructure and services to new housing developments. Slicer S< p—(,, Average 7.00 a 100% 80% 60°% 40% 20% D% 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Poor Neutral Goal 5. Promote the efficient use of residential land in order to maximize development potential. Slicer POee. 100% BO% 60% 40% 20% Dui D Poor 2 3 4 5 6 7 Neutral 9 11 Great Average 9.00 i 9 1D Great Project Memo Page 3 of 14 Q©OO City of Port Orchard - 2024 Comprehensive Plan Periodic Update 2220437.30 April 11, 2024 Goal 6. Formulate and implement innovative development regulations and design standards that maintain and strengthen neighborhood character. Average6.00 Slider I Skipped: 0I Answered: 1 (100%) 100% 60% 60% 40% 20% 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 S 9 10 Poor Neutral Great Goal 8. Provide on -going support to homeowners to preserve, maintain and improve their properties in order to enhance the quality and character of neighborhoods and the overall City. Average 7.00 Slider I Skipped: 01 Answered, 1 (100%) a 100% 60% 60% 40% 20% 0% .. .. 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 - _ 9 10 Poor Neutral Great Goal 9_ Ensure that future residential development protects and maintains natural ecosystems and critical areas, including wetlands, streams, and wildlife habitats. Average 5.00 Slider I Skipped: 01 Answered: 1 (100%) a 160% 60% 60% 40% — 20% 0% 0 1 2 3 4 5 0 - a' 9 10 Poor Neutral Great Goal 10. Monitor population growth rates to ensure that the City is accommodating its share of regional growth as allocated in the Countywide Planning Policies. Average 4.00 Slider I Skipped: 0 I Answered: 1 (100%) 100% 60% 60% 40% 20% o% 0 1 Poor Ne utra I (continued on next page) a 6 9 Great Project Memo Page 4 of 14 City of Port Orchard - 2024 Comprehensive Plan Periodic Update 2220437.30 April 11, 2024 Additional feedback received on the Housing Element, copied from the public comments received for the Policy Workshop, include: Implementing density bonuses allows developers to build more units than would typically be permitted in exchange for including affordable housing units within their projects. This encourages the construction of a mix of housing types and helps increase the overall supply of affordable housing. "Any city or county planning under RCW 36.70A.040 may enact or expand affordable housing incentive programs providing for the development of low-income housing units through development regulations or conditions on rezoning or permit decisions, or both, on one or more of the following types of development: Residential; commercial; industrial; or mixed -use. An affordable housing incentive program may include, but is not limited to, one or more of the following: (i) Density bonuses within the urban growth area; (ii) Height and bulk bonuses; (iii) Fee waivers or exemptions; (iv) Parking reductions; or (v) Expedited permitting". • Examples of successful mixed -use centers include: o The Pearl District, Portland, Oregon: Once a neglected industrial area, the Pearl District has been transformed into a vibrant mixed -use neighborhood featuring residential lofts, retail shops, art galleries, and restaurants. The district is well-connected to public transportation and has become a highly desirable destination for residents and visitors alike. o The concept of the 15-minute city, where residents can access essential services, amenities, and employment opportunities within a 15-minute walk or bike ride from their homes. This approach prioritizes mixed -use development, public transit, and active transportation infrastructure to create livable and sustainable neighborhoods. Infrastructure Financing Tools: Explore innovative financing tools, such as tax -increment financing (TIF), special assessment districts, or municipal bonds, to fund infrastructure upgrades and expansions in areas experiencing new housing development. These mechanisms can help distribute the cost of infrastructure improvements more equitably among property owners and developers. For instance, in Seattle, Washington, the city has utilized local improvement districts (LIDs) to finance public infrastructure projects in growing neighborhoods. • Lower impact fees reduce the upfront costs associated with development, making it more financially feasible for property owners and developers to undertake new projects. This can lead to increased housing affordability by lowering the cost of construction and potentially reducing housing prices for buyers and renters. • Design assistance programs offer architectural and design services to property owners to help them envision and execute improvements to their housing units. This may include assistance with space planning, interior design, material selection, and landscaping. For instance, the Design Assistance Program in Portland, Oregon, provides free design consultations and technical assistance to property owners undertaking residential renovations or additions. Advocate to legalize detached accessory dwelling units (DADLls) separate from a main house in rural areas. (continued on next page) Project Memo Page 5 of 14 Q©OO City of Port Orchard - 2024 Comprehensive Plan Periodic Update 2220437.30 April 11, 2024 The feedback that was received on the Parks Element includes the following — please note that responses were not provided for all Goals and Policies: Goal is Establish a coordinated and connected system of open space throughout the City that preserves natural systems, protects wildlife habitat and corridors, provides land for both active and passive recreation, increases Average 7.00 opportunities for physical activity, preserves natural landforms and scenic areas, and is accessible by a safe non - motorized transportation system. Slier i S,pr__ 01 ",, — 100,E SG% Gcs 4C% 2a 00 D 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 a 9 1D Poor Neutral Great Goal 2: Encourage the development and maintenance of open space and recreational facilities, where possible, in the established areas of the City_ Average 7.01) S11c I Ssgpr_' e I Ans.:er- 100% sa=s bare 40°6 20?a o% D 2 3 4 5 6 Poor Neutral Goal 3: To provide open space or natural landscaping throughout the City limits. slc_r I Skq�reca Ia-,:.,- - r1 -, 7 a 9 100% SO bo% 40% 2096 0% D 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 a Poor Neutral Goal 4: Neighborhood parks and recreational facilities should be conveniently located throughout the City. Slicer I Skipp- 0 - r1Da=.:D; 100% SO. 60°5 40-A 20% or D Poor N 2 3 4 5 u 7 a 9 Neutral a 16 Great Average B.00 a 1D Great Average 8.00 a Project Memo Page 6 of 14 Q©OO City of Port Orchard - 2024 Comprehensive Plan Periodic Update 2220437.30 April 11, 2024 QGoal 5: Athletic endeavors and organized sports should be encouraged throughout the community. Slider Skipped: 0I Answered: 1 (100%; Average 9.00 a 100% 80% 60% 40% 20% 0% 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Poor Neutral Great Goal 6: The waterfront should be preserved and protected to enhance public use. Slider Skipped: 0 � Ansvered�, 1 (100°0} Average 10.00 a 100% 80% 60% 40% 20% 0% 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Poor Neutral Great Goal 7. Provide a variety of water and shoreline related recreational opportunities for the public. Slider Skipped: 0 I Answered: 1 1100%3 Average 10.110 a 100% 60% 60% 40% 20% 0% 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Poor Neutral Great Goal S. Provide open space within residential and commercial developments and preserve critical areas within open space. Average 10.00 Slider I Skipped: 0 1 Answered, 1 (100%) a 100% 80% 60% 40% 20% 0% 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 1D Poor Neutral Great Project Memo Page 7 of 14 Q©OO City of Port Orchard - 2024 Comprehensive Plan Periodic Update 2220437.30 April 11, 2024 0 Goal 9_ Promote the acquisition and maintenance of open space through public and private investment. Sider I Skipped: 0 I Answered: 1 (100%) 100% 80% 60% 40% 20% 1 0% 0 1 2 3 4 5 5 7 8 9 Poor Neutral DGoal 10. Enhance and expand existing park facilities. Slicer Skipped: 0 I Answered: 1(1 DT9� 100% 80% 60% 40% 20% 0% 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Poor Neutral DGoal 11. Place and construct community entry monuments on arterial city entrances. Slider Skipped:0 [Answered, 1 (100%) 100% 80% 60% 40% 20% 0% 0 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Poor Neutral DGoal 12. Provide dedicated oversight and encourage citizen participation in planning for City parks and recreation facilities. Slider I Skipped: 0 I Answered: 1 (100%) 100% 80% 60% 40% 20% 0% 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 S 9 Poor Neutral (continued on next page) 10 Great Average 7.00 a 9 1D Great Average 10.00 10 Great Project Memo Page 8 of 14 City of Port Orchard - 2024 Comprehensive Plan Periodic Update 2220437.30 April 11, 2024 rR H B L Additional feedback received on the Parks Element, copied from the public comments received for the Policy Workshop, include: • The need to create a Parks department is urgent. Recent park impact fee increases should be used to implement improvements to our current parks and plan for the creation of the Parks department. • In relation to wayfinding (Policy PK-39), this should be an improvement to our current parks. The feedback that was received on the Transportation Element includes the following — please note that responses were not provided for all Goals and Policies: Goal 1. Encourage development of an efficient multi -modal transportation system based on local, municipal, tribes, countywide, and regional priorities in coordination with existing comprehensive and corridor development average 7.oa plans. Slider I Skipped:0 I Answered: 1 (100%) a 100% 80% 60% 40% 20% 0% 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 3 9 10 Poor Neutral Great DGoal 2. provide a safe, comfortable and reliable transportation system. Slider Skippea: 01 Answered: 1(1 CO=-% Average 9.00 i 100% 80% 60% 40% 20% 0% 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 a 9 10 Poor Neutral Great Goal 3. Develop a funding strategy and financing plan to meet the multi -modal and programmatic needs identified in the transportation element. A-9e7.00 Slider I Skipped: 01 Answered, 1 (100%) s 100% Y 80% 60% 40% 20% 0% 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Pao' Neut.3 Great Project Memo Page 9 of 14 Q©OO City of Port Orchard - 2024 Comprehensive Plan Periodic Update 2220437.30 April 11, 2024 QGoal 6. Provide a range of infrastructure incentives to encourage the use of non -single -occupancy vehicle modes of travel. Average 3.00 Slider I Skipped: 0 I Answered: 1 (100%) toy% 8D% 60% 40% 20% 0` 0 2 3 4 5 6 7 6 Poor Neutral Goai 7. Work with Kitsap Transit to provide increased transit service to the City as development occurs. Sllder Skipped: 01 Answered: 1 (100%) a 9 10 Great Average 6.00 a 100% 00% 60% 40% 20% 0% 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Poor Neutral Great Goal 8. Create a Transit Oriented Development (TOD) program in coordination with Kitsap Transit, Port Orchard Public Works Department, the Kitsap County Public Works Department, Port Orchard Planning Department and Average3.o0 the Kitsap County Department of Community Development, with a special focus on the City's approved centers of local importance. Slider I Skipped:0 1 Answered: 1 (100%) 100% 80% 60% 40% 20% 0% 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Poor Neutral Goal 9. Work with Kitsap Transit to establish and designate convenient park and ride locations. Slider Skipped: 0 1 Answered: 1 (100%) 100% 60% 60% 40% 20% 0% 0 1 2 3 4 5 Poor Neutral 6 7 8 9 a 10 Great Average 3.00 I 10 Great Project Memo Page 10 of 14 Q©OO City of Port Orchard - 2024 Comprehensive Plan Periodic Update 2220437.30 April 11, 2024 Goal 10. Promote pedestrian, bicycle and other non -motorized travel. Slicer SkippE✓'. rF.nsnered: " (� OOY�; 100% 8096 65% 40% 25-A 0% 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 a Poor Neutral Goal 12. Create a walking and bicycling network for Port Orchard that prioritizes safety, connectivity, convenience, and cost effectiveness. Slicer I xippec.;- IFns.;; ere ,' (106°2} Average 4.00 a 9 10 Great Average 7.00 a 1 co% so% 6c% 40',£ zc;o 0% D 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 a 9 10 Poor Neutral Great i Goal 13. Create a citywide pedestrian and bicycle network for Port Orchard. Average 8.00 a 100°' 60% 60% 40% za% 5 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 3 9 16 Poor Neutral Great Goal 14. Integrate walking and bicycle facilities into private development in a way that minimizes impacts on the development process and property owners. Average 6.00 Sh&r I Skipped: 01 Answered: 1 (100%) 100% 80% 60% 40% 20% 0% 0 Poor 1 3 4 5 6 7 3 9 19 Neutral Great Project Memo Page 11 of 14 Q©OO City of Port Orchard - 2024 Comprehensive Plan Periodic Update 2220437.30 April 11, 2024 Goal 15. Commit to an implementation plan and partner with other local jurisdictions, including Kitsap County and the Port of Bremerton, to complete the trail network outside of the City's jurisdiction. Average 5.01) Slider I Skipped: 01 Answered: 1 (100%) a 100% 80% 60% 40% 20% 0% D 1 2 3 4 5 f 7 3 9 10 Paor Neutral Great Goal 18. Provide aesthetically pleasing streets. Slider Skipped: 0 I Answered, 1 (1 DiAverage G.00 s 100% I 80% 6056 40% 201, ov D 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Is— Neutral Great Goal 19. Recognize the importance of easily accessible, attractive, and well dispersed parking as a valuable community asset. Average 8.00 Slider I Ski pped:0 I Answered: 1 (1 DO.) 100% 80% 60% 40% 20% 0% 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 Poor Neutral Goal 21. Promote environmentally sensitive and "Green" transportation solutions. Slider Skipped: 0 1 Answered: 1 (100%; 100% 60% 60% 40% 20% 0% D Paor 7 8 9 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 66 9 Neutral a 10 Great Average 3.00 a 1D Great Project Memo Page 12 of 14 Q©OO City of Port Orchard - 2024 Comprehensive Plan Periodic Update 2220437.30 April 11, 2024 Goal 22. Support and reinforce coordination between land use and transportation. Slider I Skipped: Q 1 Answered: 1 (10Q%) Average TO a 100% 80% 60% 40% 20% 0% 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 1D Poor Neutral Great 0 Goal 23. Require implementation of the Bethel Road Corridor Development Plan. Slider I Skipped: 0 I Answered: 1 (1 Do% Average 9.90 i 100% 80% 60% 40% 20% 0% D 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Poor Neutral Great DGoal 24. Provide a transportation system that will support economic development. SliderI Skipped:0 1 Answered: 1 (100%) Average 7.00 l 1 OD% 50% 60% 40% 20% 0% D 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Poor Neutral Great Goal 25. Develop transportation improvements that respect the natural and community character and are consistent with both the short- and long-term vision of the Comprehensive Plan. Average 6.00 Slider I Skipped: 01 Answered, 1 (100%) 100% 80% 60°5 40% 20°% 0% D 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Poor Neutral (continued on next page) 1D Great Project Memo Page 13 of 14 Q©OO City of Port Orchard - 2024 Comprehensive Plan Periodic Update 2220437.30 April 11, 2024 Additional feedback received on the Transportation Element, copied from the public comments received for the Policy Workshop, include: • Increase the community's awareness of proposed developments and provide more public outreach opportunities. • Please also add focus to improving walkers and bicyclists in existing neighborhoods and roadways in the older sections of Port Orchard. • Most residences of Port Orchard work elsewhere. We are a bedroom community and I believe the number or percentage of people doing the same will only increase in the future. • No to traffic cameras, speed humps, or speed tables, specifically in relation to Policy TR-69. Anything that creates a problem for snow removal is not a good idea. • I'd prefer more police officers to enforce the speeding and traffic laws already on the books, specifically in relation to Policy TR-71. As the Comprehensive Plan Periodic Update continues, the information and feedback received in association with the Policy Workshop will be used to inform updates to individual Goals and Policies in each individual Element. City Staff and the consultant team will review and incorporate the feedback in association with the regulatory requirements for the Periodic Update established by the Department of Commerce and the Puget Sound Regional Council for Plan certification. Sincerely, Alex Campbell, AICP Planning Project Manager Project Memo Page 14 of 14 Q©OO City of Port Orchard - 2024 Comprehensive Plan Periodic Update 2220437.30 April 11, 2024 Chapter 2. Land Use 2.1 Introduction The Land Use element represents the heart intersection point of the Comprehensive Plan, aswhere land use goals, policies, map designations, and decisions are created to connect and felate-incorporate all other elements through a future -looking lens as the City continues to develop. The purpose of this section is to provide a framework to guide future land use to help the city grow in an orderly, rational, and efficient way and help the community realize its potential during the 20-year planning horizon. The goals and policies contained herein recognize that "....r...zaFel and dmSBFdeF' y deve'elan+ef+unplanned growth can reduce efficiency and increase the cost of utilities, roads, and other services, consume valuable open space, and result in higher taxes and fees fee ser„se to fund and maintain infrastructure and services. The Growth Management Act (GMA) requires Comprehensive Pplans to contain land use elements that describe the proposed distribution, location, and extent of land uses. Once adopted, land use goals and policies will be functionally implemented throughin Port Orchard's development regulations. Tke ""'The primary goal of this element is to plan for population and employment growth protections in accordance with GMA requirements while ensuFing -balancing new development needs with ^C�fs a �-�'acc'orc�a Rr p with the •• i+"•• +h the community's aspirations and values and the FeqbiiFeFnPRtq,.f+h,, GAA A. 2.2 Key Issues and Concepts As a community, Port Orchard is growing due to a healthy birth rate, immigration, and annexation. This plan accommodates Port Orchard's 2036 2044 population and employment growth allocation_ as distributed through the Vision 2040-2050 framework and agreed upon in coordination with other Kitsap County municipalities in the Countywide Planning Policies. Port Orchard's land use and zoning designations currently provide sufficient land capacity within city boundaries to accommodate the projected 972351 5500 additional residents who will make Port Orchard their home (during the 20102024-204436 planning period). In conjunction with the findings of the Buildable Lands Report, the Future Land Use Map shows how the 6T2-3-53 552 additional projected and allocated residents in the adjacent Urban Growth Area can be accommodated. .. ;- -- have phasized that ;+; ;+; � + A common theme heard throughout the public engagement process for this Comprehensive Plan Update has been focused on how to manage new growth in a way that protects the s^^a'� ,a-o..,+^ ^small-town character of the community while allowing for new and innovative development that responds to changing household needs and growth press ures._Figure 1 below shows the changes in different age graupsa!ge brackets from 2000 2010 to 20102021, with ^ significant' geneFatiGna noted increase in the 35-54 age bracket (+4% since 2010). As Port Orchard's population ages, the city needs the flexibility to adapt to the changing needs and desires of this age gFe p and the f..Fesigh to plan for these changes as wpllthe various age groups and their unique needs and desires from a land -use perspective. ®Port Orchard Comprehensive Plan Adopted: June 2016 Revised: Nov 2019, July 2020, May 2021, December 2021 100 % 90% 80 % 70 % 60% 50% 40% 30 % 20% 10% 0% Port Orchard (2010) Port Orchard (2021) Kitsap County Washington ■ 65 and older ■55to64 ■ 45 to 54 ■35to44 ■ 20 to 34 ■ 19 and younger Figure 1 The fundamental goal of the Land Use element, as established by the GMA, is to establish broad, general direction forthe City's land use policies. The land use policies are established notonly in accordance with the forward - looking population and employment growth projections allocated to the 6ita butCity but are also responsive to the existing population changes that the City has experienced since the last major Comprehensive Plan update. This element provides the City's policy plan for growth over the next twenty years. It also implements many of the goals and objectives in the other plan elements through suggested land use designations and other action recommendations. The Land Use Element specifically considers the general distribution and location of land uses; and the appropriate intensity and density of land uses designations given develepment4en&4pAto accommodate allocated population and employment growth projections. The City's development regulations and permitting processes are used to dieeet establish adequate development standards for growth, to ensure it occurs in a manner consistent with both the provisions of th;, e'm-RtGMA and the community's vision for the future. To accomplish this, the Land Use element establishes goals and policies that seek to: • Accommodate changes in population and demographics • Encourage development in urban areas, reduce sprawl, and deliver services efficiently • Ensure land use designations reflect need and demand • Minimize traffic congestion and encourage the development of a multimodal transportation system • Protect open spaces and the natural environment • Promote physical activity ®Port Orchard Comprehensive Plan Adopted: June 2016 Revised: Nov 2019, July 2020, May 2021, December 2021 • Support a range of employment opportunities • Allow middle housing types in areas predominantly characterized by single family detached housing. 2.3 Current Land Use Characteristics Figure 2 shows the peFeent of land uses and zoning based on the ^ tVes t .al Iand area ^"^'^overall acreage of each zoning district within the City. Most land in the C-City is devoted to housing. Commercial areas aa^•' t"^ ''^ •^t^•• ^ throughout the City offer a range of goods and services, provide employment for liaca4esidents and those living in surrounding rural areas.7aadCommercial areas also provide additional tax revenue to help fund and maintain public services and facilities. Industrial lands allow for light manufacturing and warehousing businesses, which also provide job opportunities and support the area's economy. Ci. wFe 2 A shows the a nt of ,J...,elopaI.I., land i residential land use areas. Port Orchard Zoning, 2023 Legend Q Port orchard City Llmits 1._l PortOrchard UGA Water Bodes Zone Greenbelt(GB) Resdental 1 IN) -dental 2IQ) Res dent a13 (R3) Residential 4(R4) n Residential B(es) Neighl ,hand Mixed Use (NMU) Business Prof. Mixed U.(BPMU) y %/ Commercial Mixed Use (CMU) %/ Downtown Mixed Use (DMU) V1 Gateway Mind Use (GMU) 11111 Commerce) Carrtdor (Cc) Commercial Heavy (CH) Industr al Hex (IF) LA Light l ndurtnal(U) Civic and Ins[Rutional (CI) Parks and Rxreation (PR) Public Facilities (PR) Roads State Highway — follenor / Arterial — Local Road Figure 2 2.4 Land Use Designations Zone Acres gyp% GB 503.4 R1 311.9 / R2 2,068.2 / R3 1,047.9 j�ijr�iw une R4 123.6 -w1•7 R6 321.1 �� NMU 17.1 a BPMU 51.9 /` CMU 336.2 DMU 48.2 GMU 35.1 CC 189.6 ,..,.,�o�w«aa - CH 162.3 1 IF 7_6 LI 137.6 3 _ _ i� if B I - CI 113.8 i 1 PR 134.1 .. rn,xao NI os imiA PF 280.6 rl nrPs x;a.c c an o)roe ornara, tcc Total 5894.5 The City's comprehensive plan land use element identifies 7-seven different land use designations which are Il#'-d On Table 'shown in the Future Land Use Map below. These land use designations are implemented through the city's zoning regulations contained in the municipal code. Each land use designation may correspond to one or more zoning designations for implementation. As the City develops sub -area plans for ®Port Orchard Comprehensive Plan Adopted: June 2016 Revised: Nov 2019, July 2020, May 2021, December 2021 Commented [AC7]: This Zoning Map is the most recent published, and will be updated as this Comprehensive Plan Update is finalized. its designated centers as described in section 2.7, the eCity may wish to create new zones and standards consistent with this plan, its goals and policies, and these land use designations. When doing so, the Ceity should ensure that it doesn't significantly alter the land capacity for the Ceity such that the City's population and employment growth allocations adopted in the countywide planning policies can't be accommodated. Likewise, if sub -area plans are likely to accelerate population and employment growth rates, the City should take reasonable measures to ensure that it doesn't surpass its 2036 2044 growth targets. Commented [AC2]: This Future Land Use Map is the most recent published, and will be updated as this Comprehensive Plan Update is finalized. CITY OF PORT ORCHARD 123 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN MAP reenry�siaembl Metllum Oan¢9y Fetitlmliel Canmww UHvn I — - ban ban Growth Area [Insert UGA Future Land Use Map —Update based on Kitsap County's pending amendmentsl ®Port Orchard Comprehensive Plan Adopted: June 2016 Revised: Nov 2019, July 2020, May 2021, December 2021 The Kitsap County 2021 Buildable Lands Report found that the City of Port Orchard has room to develop, through vacant or underutilized lands, a total of 6,659 dwelling units, or enough space for 16,250 residents using a variety of housing types, assuming 2.44 people per housing unit. This means that the city has sufficient capacity to accommodate its growth allocation developed under the Vision 2050 framework, but also that it has surplus capacity which could potentially allow the city to exceed its growth allocation. The City's Population Capacity is shown in Table 1: City of Port Orchard Population Capacity and Demand 2044 Population Capacity 16,250 2024-2044 Allocated Population Growth 10,500 Net 20-Year Population Capacity (+ or -) -5750 UGA Pop. Capacity/Demand Ratio 1.55 Table 1 2.5.1 Current and Projected Growth and Performance The growth allocation described in Table 1 above provided a target of 10,500 people that need to be accommodated between 2024 and 2044. As part of the City's 2024 Periodic Update, the city has the benefit of reviewing historic population growth data to evaluate its performance in accommodating population allocations. Since the City's last Comprehensive Plan Update in 2016, the City grew at an average rate of 3.5% per year as shown in Table 2 below. Given the characteristics of the areas annexed by the city, including numerous entitled projects, the annual growth rates allow the City to project and anticipate future growth rates. OFM Population OFM Forecasting Year Annual Growth Estimate Rate 13,810 2016 _ 13,990 2017 1.3% 14,160 2018 1.2% 14,390 2019 1.6% 15,587 2020 8.3%* 15,960 2021 2.4% 16,400 2022 2.8% 17,480 2023 6.65. ®Port Orchard Comprehensive Plan Adopted: June 2016 Revised: Nov 2019, July 2020, May 2021, December 2021 Commented [AC3]: This section (both 2.5 and 2.5.1) has been updated and moved from the Housing Element into this Land Use Element, as it more directly relates to land uses accommodating projected growth patterns. Table 2 * The 2020 annual growth rate includes population adjustments for the 2020 Census, including population adjustments between the 2010 and 2020 Census, resulting in a noticeably higher annual growth rate than adiacent years. The City of Port Orchard, similar to many communities throughout the Puget Sound region, has experienced significant growth over the last decade. Annual growth rates between 2016 and 2023 ranged from 1.2% to 6.6%. A unique outlier to the City's growth rates occurred during and immediately following the Covid-19 pandemic, in which the City experienced unprecedented growth rates exceeding 8%. Following 2020, annual growth rates returned to the more traditional growth rates between 2.4% and 6.6%, indicating continued 6,923 people above the City's growth allocation from PSRC for the Comprehensive Plan's planning horizon of 2044. The City will need to experience an average annual growth rate of 1.925% in order to meet (and not exceed) PSRC2sthe Countywide Planning Policy growth allocation of an additional 10,500 population in 2044. While a 1.925% annual growth rate is lower than the annual growth rates that the City has experienced in the last five years, it is similar to growth rates that the City has experienced prior to the uniquely high growth rate in 2020. Over the 20-year planning horizon the City anticipates lower growth rates than experienced in the last five years, bringing overall growth closer to the 1.925% average growth rate needed to meet the Citv's growth allocation. �52.6 Overlay Districts The city's development regulations include land use overlay districts which are applied in parts of the city, as summarized below. • Downtown Height Overlay District (DHOD) • Self -Storage Overlay District (SSOD) • Ruby Creek Overlay District (RCOD) • View Protection Overlay District (VPOD) • McCormick Urban Village Overlay District (MVOD) Port Orchard's overlay districts accomplish varying objectives including implementing subarea plans, providing regulations for the development in centers, regulating specific uses, and determining building heights. The creation of a new overlay district may be appropriate as the City continues to develop subarea plans under the Centers approach to growth. "2.7 Land Use Goals & Policies Goals are not listed in any particular order. Port Orchard strives to: Port Orchard Comprehensive Plan Adopted: June 2016 Revised: Nov 2019, July 2020, May 2021, December 2021 Commented [AC4]: This number to be provided once OFM publishes 2024 population data at the end of June. Commented [ACS]: This number to be provided once OFM publishes 2024 population data at the end of June. Commented [AC6]: Based on 3.5%growth rate from 2023 population number in Table 1. Will be updated with 2024 population data once published. Goal I. Retain Port Orchard's small town commercial and residential character while accommodating allocated growth citywide. Policy LU-1. Ensure that land use and zoning regulations maintain and enhance e 'S"^^ S'^^'^ FFIR+ y ^g'^', t*;;'low density residential neighborhoods, while encouraging that new development provides a mixed range of housing types. Policy LU-2. Limit industrial development to locations accessible from arterials or freeways and discourage industrial access through residential areas. Policy LU-3. Wpelat^ @Rd ^s`^b"s"Maintain building and site design standards that support an attractive and functional built environment in all areas of the City. Policy LU-4. Encourage the subdivision of large parcels and, through private subdivisions and public acquisitions, the creation of a continuous street grid similar in scale to the downtown's, especially in designated centers of lee@! iWpeFtaRee Goal 2. Ensure that sufficient land is available for development to accommodate allocated growth in population and employment. Policy LU-5. Ensure land use and development regulations enable a supply of housing units within the city and adjacent UGA that will accommodate forecasted population growth. Ensure land use and development regulations enable a supply of commercial retail and office space within the city and adjacent UGA that will accommodate forecasted employment growth. Policy LU-6. Ensure adequate land is available for light industrial and commercial uses, including high technology, medical, and office uses, in appropriate areas to diversify Port Orchard's economic base and provide for the community's changing needs. Policy LU-7. Monitor the rate of residential, light industrial and commercial growth against the 20- year targets established in VISION 20540 and the Countywide Planning Policies, and if growth appears to deviate from a rate that complies with these targets, consider adopting reasonable measures such as reducing/increasing adopted transportation levels of service, reducing/increasing impact fees, or accelerating/delaying projects within the City's Capital Improvement Program. Policy LU-8. grevide Allow for a variety of single-family, middle housing, and multi -family housing types and employment opportunities that meet the needs of diverse socioeconomic interests. Policy LU-9. Notify adjacent military facilities of relevant local land use decisions. Peliey Im �.Policy LU-10. Allow for the siting of organic materials (OM) management facilities to meet Goal 3. Implement a strategy to develop centers. °ralmey Im �—'�.PolicyLU-11. In consultation with stakeholders and the general public, develop a comprehensive strategy to implement centers as a means of directing and prioritizing ®Port Orchard Comprehensive Plan Adopted: June 2016 Revised: Nov 2019, July 2020, May 2021, December 2021 Commented [BP7]: From Commerce Periodic Update Checklist: Development regulations newly developed, updated, or amended after January 1, 2025 allow for the siting of organic materials (OM) management facilities as identified in local solid waste management plans (SWMP) to meet OM reduction and diversion goals. Siting must meet criteria described in RCW 70A.205.040(3). See also RCW 36.70.330. For applicability, see RCW 70A.205.540. residential and commercial growth. Peliey L -� ..Policy LU-12. Within centers, set minimum building densities that enable lively and active streets and commercial destinations. Such limits may take the form of: minimum floors or building height, floor -area -ratios, and lot coverage; and maximum street setbacks and parking spaces. Goal 4. Ensure that both public services and infrastructure are developed in an efficient and cost-effective manner. P, 'i^ '��''.Pohcy LU-13. Prioritize capital facilities and transportation investment in those locations targeted for growth and higher land use densities. Policy�'.Policy LU-14. Coordinate with Kitsap County to develop a plan and timeline to annex UGA land adjacent to the city, consistent with the city's capability to provide municipal services and applicable law. Policy4-.Policy LU-15. Identify land in the UGA that is useful for public purposes, such as utility corridors, transportation corridors, parks, schools, and other public uses. Goal S. Protect, enhance, and maintain the values and functions of Port Orchard's natural areas, open spaces, and critical areas. °, "ems � "�'S.Policy LU-16. Evaluate a range of incentives to encourage compact development to preserve open space throughout the city, possibly to include density credits, incentive zoning, and/or transfer of development rights. Peliey L -i ..Pohcy LU-17. Prioritize the development of new parks, open space, and passive and active recreational opportunities in underserved neighborhoods and centers. Policy Policy LU-18. Incentivize infill development to preserve and protect open space, critical areas, and natural resources. Paliey LU 18. Identify land in the that is useful for open space cerFiders, including land for recreation, Policy LU-19. Protect the quality and quantity of groundwater used for public water supplies through zoning designations, development regulations, and the local critical areas ordinance. Goal 6. Reduce congestion and greenhouse gas emissions, promote public health, reduce auto dependency, and increase multimodal transportation opportunities for accessing retail services, health care services, and places of employment. Policy LU-20. Ensure orderly development, concurrency of infrastructure provision, and protection of environmentally sensitive areas through an effective and predictable permitting process. Policy LU-21. Remove barriers to low -impact development in zoning, subdivision, and street regulations. Encourage the minimization of impervious surface areas in development. ®Port Orchard Comprehensive Plan Adopted: June 2016 Revised: Nov 2019, July 2020, May 2021, December 2021 Policy LU-22. Promote local food security and public health by enabling the establishment of urban agriculture, community gardens, farmers markets, and food production and distribution infrastructure. Policy LU-23. Enable land use patterns that allow all residents to safely and efficiently access commercial services, especially grocery stores and healthcare facilities, without an automobile. Policy LU-24. Encourage the expansion of transit networks that enable both incorporated and unincorporated neighborhoods outside of the cityto accessjob centers within Port Orchard. Goal 7. Encourage the development of active, vibrant, and attractive destinations throughout the community. Policy LU-25. Incorporate the following principles in planning for commercial areas: • Create lively and attractive places aton a human scale. • Support a mix of retail, office, and residential uses in multistory structures. • Create transitions between commercial areas and surrounding residential neighborhoods. • Protect residential areas from excessive noise, exterior lighting, glare, visual nuisances, and other conditions that detract from the quality of the living environment. • Encourage multi -modal transportation options, especially during peak traffic periods. • Promote an intensity and density of land uses sufficient to support effective transit and pedestrian activity. • Promote a street pattern that provides through connections, pedestrian and vehicular access. • Establish urban and architectural design standards that support an attractive and functional pedestrian environment, such as block size limits and requiring street - facing windows and doors. • Encourage pedestrian travel to and within commercial areas by providing: • Safe and attractive walkways. • Close groupings of land uses. • Parking lot design that provides safe walking routes and pedestrian connections between adjacent properties. • Off-street surface parking to the backs or sides of buildings to maximize pedestrian access from the sidewalk(s). Goal 8. Connect new and existing neighborhoods to each other, to commercial and employment centers, and to public facilities. Policy LU-26. Require adequate transitions between different land uses to mitigate potential negative impacts of noise, light, and air pollution. Policy LU-27. Require new development to provide connections to and through -access for existing and ®Port Orchard Comprehensive Plan Adopted: June 2016 Revised: Nov 2019, July 2020, May 2021, December 2021 planned trails and roads. Explore strategies to encourage existing development to provide the same as part of a city- and region -wide trail and open space network. Goal 9. Encourage the ongoing development of downtown as an active, vibrant community, commercial, social, and civic center while respecting its historic character. Policy LU-28. In conjunction with the Centers Strategy as provided in Section 2.7, enhance downtown Port Orchard's role as the center of the South Kitsap region, reflecting the following principles in development standards and land use plans: • Encourage land uses that support transit centers and promote pedestrian activity. • Promote a mix of uses, including retail, office, and housing. • Encourage uses that will provide both daytime and evening activities. • Support civic, cultural, and entertainment activities. • Provide sufficient public open space and recreational opportunities. • Enhance, and provide access to, the waterfront. • Develop enhanced design guidelines and design review requirements that promote attractive, pedestrian -scale development and redevelopment within the City's historic downtown area. Policy LU-29. Consider conducting a downtown parking study to assess current and future parking needs and develop solutions and strategies to address identified constraints or oversupply. Policy LU-30. Ensure land use designations and development support existing maritime industries, promote creative uses of the waterfront, and facilitate the planning and construction of waterfront parks and gathering places. Goal 10. (Collaborate with the County and nearby cities to develop a Policy LU-32. (Coordinate land use planning with the County and nearby cities to identify changes that may Policy LU-33. Implement the recommendations contained within the Downtown Basin Stormwater Plan to ensure that development of the Downtown subarea does not result in increased stormwater runoff and pollution to Puget Sound. Policy LU-34. (Integrate community health, equity, and displacement into appropriate planning practices ®Port Orchard Comprehensive Plan Adopted: June 2016 Revised: Nov 2019, July 2020, May 2021, December 2021 Commented [BP8]: From Commerce Periodic Update Checklist: Where applicable, a review of drainage, flooding and stormwater run-off in the area and nearby jurisdictions and provide guidance for corrective actions to mitigate or cleanse those discharges that pollute waters of the state. RCW 36.70A.070(1) (amended in 2023) and WAC 365-196- 405(2)(e) Commented [BP9]: Visoin 2050 MP-EN-18 Commented [BP10]: Kitsap County CPP NE-7a Commented [BPI I]: From Commerce Periodic Update Checklist: Give special consideration to achieving environmental justice in goals and policies, including efforts to avoid creating or worsening environmental health disparities. RCW 36.70A.070(1) amended in 2023. and decision -making processes. Commented [BPI2]: vision 2050 MPP-DP-16 and Kitsap Policy LU-35. (Reduce impacts to vulnerable populations and areas that have been disproportionately County CPP CW-3-h affected by noise, air pollution, or other environmental impacts.) Commented [BP13]: vision 2050 MPP-En-g Goal 12. Establish land use patterns that increase the resilience of the built environment, ecosystems, and community to climate change. Policy LU-36. Establish development regulations that incorporate best practices for reducing the risk of wildfire, extreme heat, flooding, and other climate -exacerbated hazards. Policy LU-37. Identify and implement strategies for reducing residential development pressure in the Wildland Urban Interface (WUI). Policy LU-39. Develop regulations for elevating ^• so k-new and substantially improved structures that are at demonstrated t9 .e4wc, toe risk of damage caused by sea level rise. Policy LU-40. Address rising sea water by siting and planning for relocation of hazardous industries and essential public services away from the 500-year floodplain. Goal 13. (Monitor population growth rates to ensure that the City is Policy LU-41. If the City's population growth rate falls below the rate needed to meet the 2044 population growth target, the city should consider adopting reasonable measures such as reducing adopted transportation levels of service, impact fees, or accelerating growth -related projects within the City's Capital Improvement Program. Policy LU-42. If the Citys population growth rate exceeds the rate needed to meet the 2044 population growth target, the City should consider adopting reasonable measures including increasing transportation level of service standards, impact fees, or delaying projects within the City's Capital Improvement Program. Port Orchard Comprehensive Plan Adopted: June 2016 Revised: Nov 2019, July 2020, May 2021, December 2021 Commented [BP14]: From Commerce Periodic Update Checklist: p. The land use element must reduce and mitigate the risk to lives and property posed by wildfires by using land use planning tools and through wildfire preparedness and fire adaptation measures. RCW 36.70A.070(1) amended in 2023. Commented [AC15]: This goal relocated from Housing Element to Land Use Element. It is more aligned with Land Use practices and planning. -2-.72.8 The Centers Strategy 2-.7F2.8.1 Introduction The post • aF 192GSThroughout the post-war housing booms of the 1920s and 1940s, suburban residential development #nave -has become synonymous with the beginning of a development pattern known as urban sprawl. Sprawl expands development over large amounts of land, resulting in long distances between homes, jobs, and stores. It also significantly increases dependence on the automobile and traffic on neighborhood streets and highways, as driving is required for nearly every activity. This development pattern also draws economic resources away from existing communities and spreads them thinly and inefficiently, far away from a community's historic core. This increases spending on new roads, new water and sewer lines, and police and fire protection. This ultimately leads to the degradation of the older city, higher taxes, and fewer available resources for already existing communities. In the early 1990s, Washington sought to combat this adverse development style by adopting the Growth Management Act (GMA). Among other ambitions, the GMA suggested a new development pattern broadly known as "centers". In association with the City's 2016 major update to the Comprehensive Plan,2014, the City designated ten "local centers" iR its G9FR Fehe....;•,,. PlaR, in accordance with the criteria provided in the Puget Sound Regional Council's (PSRC) VISION 2040, which is a regional strategy for accommodating the expected 2040 p„latieR of the Puget c. wRd Fe ; population and employment growth over the next 20 years. In subsequent years, VISION 2040's criteria and terminology for centers have been revised, and the City has revised its center terminology and boundaries for consistency. Based on the new criteria established in PSRC's VISION 2050, the City now has seven six designated "countywide centers" and fetw-three designated "local centers". . Port Orchard Comprehensive Plan Adopted: June 2016 Revised: Nov 2019, July 2020, May 2021, December 2021 Compact development Power Sewer enables efficiency in LEM capital facilities construction and service delivery Roads Water A. Least Dense B. Moderately Dense C. Most Dense I a®® a0© Figure 3 —The advantages of infrastructure and land use concurrency 2-.7—.22.8.2 What are Centers? Traditional neighborhoods often had smaller business districts that served surrounding residential areas. These districts typically had retail shops, markets, and services that were a short walk from the homes in the area. Additionally, these districts created a unique identity that solidified the neighborhood. With the increased cost of fuel and the economic recession, residents of Port Orchard have expressed a preference for the development of smaller, local retailers and service providers in places that knit people and commerce together on a local level. Centers are focused areas of development that have key uses which enable the City to deliver services more cost -efficiently and equitably pursue a development pattern that is environmentally and economically sew, apAsound and provide a means of influencing growth and change through collaboration with the community in planning for the future of these areas. This strategy helps to accommodate growth in designated areas while preserving the existing character of the community, thereby retaining more open space and the dominant pattern of existing development. Centers accomplish these objectives by: • Concentrating a thoughtful mix of supporting uses. • Allowing more intense development while maintaining appropriate scale. • Offering a wider variety of housing types that meets the needs of the broader community. • Minimizing the dependence on vehicle trips. The Centers strategy is a comprehensive and long-term approach to planning for a sustainable future that helps preserve those aspects of the community that residents' value. This approach is intended to maximize the benefit of public investment in infrastructure and services and promote collaboration with private interests and the community to achieve mutual benefits. Providing opportunities for residents, jobs, stores, services, and open spaces to be located in close proximity Port Orchard Comprehensive Plan Adopted: June 2016 Revised: Nov 2019, July 2020, May 2021, December 2021 can reduce the reliance on cars for shopping and commuting and offer better access to daily wants and needs. Increasing residential and employment densities in key locations makes transit and other public services convenient for more people and therefore makes these services more efficient. acce dating the expeeted 2040 population of the Puget Sound . n According to VISION 2QQ2 550 centers serve important roles as sub -regional hubs and secondary concentrations of development. They provide a dense mix of housing and services, such as stores, medical offices, and libraries. They serve as focal points where people come together for a variety of activities, including business, shopping, living, and recreation. They often have a civic character with community facilities, such as municipal buildings and other public places. Local centers should be served by regular local transit and regional express transit service and should have a complete network of sidewalks and access to bicycle paths and transit facilities. The Regional Centers Framework defines five different types of Centers: 1. Regional Growth Centers 2. Manufacturing Industrial Centers 3. Countywide Centers 4. Local Centers 5. Military Installations Several of the identified center types include subtypes. Port Orchard Comprehensive Plan Adopted: June 2016 Revised: Nov 2019, July 2020, May 2021, December 2021 Figure 5 — Rendering of a concept for a pedestrian -focused town center 2-.n2.8.3 Designated Centers (Existing and Planned) The following centers have been designated in the City's comprehensive plan by center type: Regional Centers. The City has no designated regional centers at this time. Downtown Port Orchard was evaluated as part of the Downtown Subarea Planning Process as a candidate for regional center designation but achieving the PSRC requirement for 45 activity units per acre was determined to be too large of a change to Downtown Port Orchard. As Downtown continues to grow and evolve, its candidacy as a regional center should be revisited in the future. Manufacturing Industrial Centers. The City has no designated Manufacturing Industrial Centers currently. The City's only industrial park is too small to be considered either a Manufacturing Industrial Center or a Countywide Center. Port Orchard is served by the nearby Puget Sound Industrial Center — Bremerton. Port Orchard Comprehensive Plan Adopted: June 2016 Revised: Nov 2019, July 2020, May 2021, December 2021 Countywide Centers. The City has gsix designated Countywide Centers. Not all of these Countywide Centers meet the minimum activity units per acre threshold per the PSRC Regional Centers Criteria for Countywide Centers (&eight activity units per acre). The City intends that these Countywide Centers which don't presently meet the activity unit threshold set by PSRC will ....t that thrP,;h .ld in the c,,., reundergo land use capacity analysis in association with future subarea planning efforts +a-�to meet the activity unit threshold. These centers may temporarily be recognized as candidate countywide centers or local centers until the activity unit threshold is met. The City's designated Countywide Centers are as follows: 1. Downtown Port Orchard 2. Tremont Center R. Lnydpr Mile H.644 43.l per Pdile k1. Mill Hill -5-.4.Sedgwick Bethel 6.5.Bethel Lund -7-.6.Sedgwick Sidney (Ruby Creek Neighborhood) Local Centers. The City has designated the following local centers: 1. Annapolis 2. Old Clifton Industrial Park 3. McCormick Village Military Installations. The City has no military installations within the City Limits. Port Orchard Comprehensive Plan Adopted: June 2016 Revised: Nov 2019, July 2020, May 2021, December 2021 FST 2 CITYOFPORT ORCHARD sindd`1Wet �" " 2021 CENTERS Lur Lulu-; oP i _ sv eAYST a a w T D Centers F! Ruby Creak 6E MILE HILL DR 'Mnapols z 2 i[_ G BeVtcl Lund J BFLFAIR'✓A.LLEY SE =1k 5! P S� lJ ST41t HJlY 10 Oown[oxn W FRONE DR ti 3 O Lowe r rttoe Hill _ ,:� � IAccormla woaac Old Cli— Ind Park � iWVDA/Ey J Sedges ek Be".[ `� ; � SauVr Betltel m\ i / �E', 5 Q A 2 Tremont p � Upper klle HR SWBERRYLAKFR 71 lUr=' e a y ( � 1C s e y -BE SFnc;W3CK RD SEEDAR ip RD '. SEa/nKER RD 11 3F vqN SKI R R" LID[R RD 2.-7-.42.8.4 General Center Goals and Policies The following are a list of general goals and suggested policies that Centers should seek to fulfill. Although Centers have common elements, it should be acknowledged that each Center is unique and have/will have a different set of priorities. Centers goals should be tailored to the specific Center in question. Generally, Centers should seek to: Policy CN-1. Prioritize the City's residential, commercial and light industrial growth and infrastructure investments within designated Centers, in accordance with VISION 20540 and the Countywide Planning Policies. Policy CN-2. Focus future growth in designated, higher intensity areas in an effort to encourage the preservation of open space and maintain surrounding neighborhood character. Policy CN-3. Shorten commutes by concentrating housing and employment in strategic locations, which provides residents opportunities to live and work in the same neighborhood. Port Orchard Comprehensive Plan Adopted: June 2016 Revised: Nov 2019, July 2020, May 2021, December 2021 Commented [AC16]: This map to be updated following the Bethel North (Bethel/Lund) and Bethel South (Sedgwick/Bethel) subarea planning efforts. Policy CN-4. Provide commercial services that serve the population of the Center, surrounding neighborhoods, the city, and the region (dependent on the suitability of the scale of each Center). Policy CN-5. Support pedestrian and transit uses by promoting compact, mixed -use areas with appropriate infrastructure that provide a variety of activities. Policy CN-6. Balance objectives for accommodating growth, encouraging compatibility, promoting housing affordability, and offering a wide range of housing types. Policy CN-7. Provide access to parks and public pedestrian spaces by creating them within each Center or by creating connections to existing public and open spaces. Policy CN-8. During subarea planning for Centers, develop an implementation plan that addresses how the City will meet Center goals through appropriate land use designations, annexation, development of capital facilities and utilities, and related measures. Policy CN-9. The City shall direct growth to Centers of all types through focused regulations and directed capital projects. Policy CN-10. The City should support employment growth, the increased use of non -automobile transportation options, and the preservation of the character of existing built-up areas by encouraging residential and mixed -use development at increased densities in designated Centers. Policy CN-11. The City shall ensure that higher density development in Centers is either within walking or biking distance of jobs, schools, and parks and is well -served by public transit. as Policy CN-12. The City shall create and designate zoning that allows a mix of uses to accommodate concentrations of employment and housing. (renters Goals " ^• EceneF ie Development and Housing Elements) Policy CN-13. The City shall encourage a broad range of housing types and commercial uses within designated Centers, through zoning and development regulations that serve a local, citywide, or regional market. (rent^"' Goals ' 5; Housing and Econa iG DevelOpMen� Elements) Policy CN-14. The City shall encourage the creation of public open space, private open space, and parks within and serving designated centers. Port Orchard Comprehensive Plan Adopted: June 2016 Revised: Nov 2019, July 2020, May 2021, December 2021 2-.7-.52.8.5 Specific Center Descriptions and Policies 27 1; E2.8.5.1 Downtown Port Orchard (Countywide Center In 2021, the City completed a subarea plan for Downtown Port Orchard which is adopted by reference in appendix D. This plan combined two previous centers, the Downtown Port Orchard and County Campus Centers into one center. The center was evaluated for possible designation as a Regional Urban Growth Center, but there was a lack of support for increasing the level of activity in the center to a planned target of 45 activity units per acre. The boundaries of this center are shown on the map below: Port Orchard Comprehensive Plan Adopted: June 2016 Revised: Nov 2019, July 2020, May 2021, December 2021 27922.8.5.2 Tremont (Countywide Center) 1. Purpose. The purpose of the Tremont sub -area plan is to ensure that future development in the Tremont Corridor is guided by specific guidelines and land use regulations that have been generated by community wide involvement. This Comprehensive Plan and Tremont Corridor District plan incorporates existing comprehensive or other documents related to properties within the Tremont Corridor Sub Area. This plan will establish certain important Visions, Goals, and Policies as well as standards and guidelines within the Tremont Corridor sub -area. 2. Vision. The Tremont Corridor is one of three primary entry points into the City of Port Orchard from Highway 16. Presently the area is a mix of single-family residences, commercial, health care facilities and multi -family residences. The expanded Harrison Hospital Urgent Care Campus and Kaiser Permanente facilities are the anchors for businesses along the corridor, particularly from Pottery Avenue west to Highway 16 forming the basis for a Hospital Benefit District. The Tremont Corridor is a through -way for travelers and residents wanting to access shops and services in the core of the city and businesses and homes in outlying areas. The Tremont Corridor also announces to residents and visitors alike that the city has economic vitality and provides services and opportunities to its citizens and residents in the south Kitsap area. Tremont Corridor and Port Orchard residents ;;Rd PArt ^FChRF' ni+izeRs have determined that they would like to see the corridor developed in way that encourage professional businesses that Port Orchard Comprehensive Plan Adopted: June 2016 Revised: Nov 2019, July 2020, May 2021, December 2021 support the health care facilities already in place and businesses that allow the continuing free flow of traffic from Highway 16 into the downtown areas. Focus should be placed upon pedestrian connections within the district as well as providing a regional connection to the South Kitsap areas served by the hospitals and emergency service providers within the district. the City completed a roadway reconstruction project within the Tremont Corridor in 2018, whichTFement ^veRwe will be improved intersections, created bicycle Ianes,aR4 widened w4,- sidewalks, provided -street trees in landscape strips, and a landscaped island median that will create a boulevard style of roadway. The Tremont corridor is promoted to include design standards that will necessitate new development to provide a consistent, attractive landscape edge while maintaining a human scale to new and redevelopment projects. A system of trails that are pedestrian and bike friendly connecting the Tremont Corridor to the Port Orchard marine walkway with trails through natural areas are key to the success of the Tremont district. The Tremont district is envisioned with some multi -family residences to accommodate the combination of residential and employment land uses within walking distances of the major health care facilities. Some cafes and neighborhood services are also envisioned to support those living, working or visiting the health care facilities. Regulations and design guidelines should help to ensure that parking is provided in a manner that is beneficial to the neighborhood and enhances the flow of transportation through the district. In addition, Tremont Corridor stakeholders envision monument signage that are tastefully designed and constructed of natural materials. The corridor from Pottery Avenue east to Sidney Road consists primarily of single-family residences and small clinics. Single family uses are encouraged as a desired mix of services and residential uses within this district. 3. Housing and Employment. As of 2018, the Tremont Countywide Center measured 215 acres containing 1,092 residents and 702 jobs. This equates to 8 activity units per acre under the PSRC regional centers framework. Commented [AC17]: This data to be updated to reflect current PSRC information for the center. 4. Tremont Center Goals Goal 1 D.Goal 14. Encourage development within the area that supports the major hospital and medical installations (Harrison Hospital and Kaiser Permanente) and assists the emergency response agencies in the corridor (South Kitsap Fire Bistricand Rescue). Port Orchard Comprehensive Plan Adopted: June 2016 Revised: Nov 2019, July 2020, May 2021, December 2021 Policy CN-15. Encourage regulations that enhance existing businesses while providing incentives that promote economic growth in the corridor while maintaining sensitivity to residents in the area. Policy CN-16. Encourage professional and office uses that support the medical industry and create pedestrian oriented health care focus. Policy CN-17. Promote the creation of a hospital benefit district that will create opportunities for additional community and economic development funding. Goal 1 LGoal 15. Encourage residential units +nwithin walking distance to employment, services, and health care facilities. Policy CN-18. Require sidewalks or interconnected pedestrian paths or a system of trails for non - motorized transportation with all new development. Gomel 12.Goal 16. Encourage development of an efficient multimodal transportation system and develop a funding strategy and financing plan to meet its needs. Policy CN-19. Encourage all new developments to limit direct access to Tremont Street. Policy CN-20. All future City paving projects on streets within the Tremont Corridor should include continuous 6-foot paved walkways for pedestrian use. Policy CN-21. Developments abutting public rights -of -way within the Tremont Corridor should include sidewalks and bicycle lanes consistent with the non -motorized improvements identified in the Transportation Element. Policy CN-22. The City shall help to facilitate the development of trail systems that connect the Tremont Corridor with transportation facilities in the surrounding areas. Policy CN-23. Encourage the expansion of Kitsap Transit's service to increase trip frequency within the Tremont Corridor. Port Orchard Comprehensive Plan Adopted: June 2016 Revised: Nov 2019, July 2020, May 2021, December 2021 2 7 9.32.8.5.3 Lower -Mile Hill Countywide Center The Lower Mile Hill Countywide Center consists of ^f the .1eyieF sections of thedevelopment along the Mile Hill Road commercial corridor and adjacent multi fa+41ymultifamilydevelopment from the South Kitsap Mall to the eastern city boundary near Whittier Avenue SW. The area is served by Kitsap Transit. The WI9Fl( te develop a sub aFea plan for this aFea PFOeF tG the next peF*Od'G compFehensiye plan update. As of 2018, the Lower Mile Hill Countywide Center measured 70 acres containing 174 residents and 288jobs. This equates to seven activity units per acre under the PSRC regional centers framework. ®Port Orchard Comprehensive Plan Adopted: June 2016 Revised: Nov 2019, July 2020, May 2021, December 2021 ®Port Orchard Comprehensive Plan Adopted: June 2016 Revised: Nov 2019, July 2020, May 2021, December 2021 9 77 9 42.8.5.4 Sedgwick/Bethel Countywide Center [This Center is getting a specific look through this Comprehensive Plan Update process. This section will be updated with the findings of the subarea planning efforts once completed.] develepFnent and cernrnercially zoned vacant land, this area ineludes a f- plan for this area pFier to the next periedie cwnpFehensive plan update. As of 2020, the Sedgwick/Bethel Port Orchard Comprehensive Plan Adopted: June 2016 Revised: Nov 2019, July 2020, May 2021, December 2021 2 7 9 32.8.5.5 Bethel Lund Countywide Center [This Center is getting a specific look through this Comprehensive Plan Update process. This section will be updated with the findings of the subarea planning efforts once completed.l The Bethel/Lund Countywide Center eensists Af the -gethel rAnqrqprr';;' rerrider near thp ntersi-rt*An e develop a sub area plan fE)F this area to the next pek)die eempFehensive plan update. As E)f 2018, the ®Port Orchard Comprehensive Plan Adopted: June 2016 Revised: Nov 2019, July 2020, May 2021, December 2021 2.7.5.8 SedgwicWSidney_(Ruby Creek Neighborhood) Countywide Center The Sedgwick/Sidney Countywide Center is a rapidly developing area of the city at the intersection of Sidney Road SW and Sedgwick Ave that has seen FAeFe ♦L...n 220 of `"ultifamil • "ewsiRg develop siRee 201 ^ along with signifleant new ial developmen*significant multifamily and commercial development since its designation in the 2016 Comprehensive Plan as a Countywide Center.. -The area is served by Kitsap Transit. The City rhoidld ,,.k- to a,..,elo a „ti area plan fee this area prior to the next peFiE)diE- comprehensive has developed the Ruby Creek Neighborhood Subarea Plan, which was adopted in September 2020. As Of 2019 the SiGIR@Y, Sea..•. iGk r,.W.,..,• ide GeRteF F ,.a 149 at: -Fes GeRtaiRiRg 490 re-side-nt-,; and 252 jobs. This equates to 5 activity units peF aGFe ---ndP-.F the PS14-C Feg*E)nal centeFS �Famewe*kAs detailed in the Subarea Plan, the center is planned to consist of 14.82 activity units per acre Commented [AC18]: This data to be updated to reflect current PSRC information for the center. Port Orchard Comprehensive Plan Adopted: June 2016 Revised: Nov 2019, July 2020, May 2021, December 2021 2.7.5.8 Old Clifton Industrial Park Local Center The Old Clifton Industrial Employment Local Center is located at the site of reclaimed sand and gravel mine. Its close proximity to transportation facilities and its isolation as a result of past mining activities make it an ideal site for industrial and employment uses. The site is served by Kitsap Transit and is located along Old Clifton Road near SR-16. The City should work to develop a sub area plan for this area PNGF te the next '�a'Ecomprehensive . as time and resources allow. This is the potential to expand this center boundary to the south along Old Clifton Road. Any expansion should be evaluated as part of the development of a subarea plan. Port Orchard Comprehensive Plan Adopted: June 2016 Revised: Nov 2019, July 2020, May 2021, December 2021 2.7.5.9 McCormick Woods Local Center The McCormick Woods Local Center is located along Old Clifton Road near the western boundary of the citV. The Subarea includes the McCormick Village commercial district which is surrounded bV a mix of single family and middle housing types. The Center includes the McCormick Village Regional Park and a future South Kitsap School District school site. In 2021, a subarea plan for this local center was prepared. See Appendix E to the Comprehensive Plan — McCormick Urban Village Subarea Plan. Port Orchard Comprehensive Plan Adopted: June 2016 Revised: Nov 2019, July 2020, May 2021, December 2021 2.7.5.10 Annapolis Local Center The Annapolis Local Center is located on the Sinclair Inlet shoreline east of the city's Downtown Countywide Center. This center includes Mitchell Point and the Annapolis Pier, from which Kitsap Transit operates a foot ferry service to Bremerton during the work week. Commuter parking is located east of the pier. The area also includes ;; n--mheF efseveral historic buildings, commercial services, and residences, as well as a public dock and kayak launch point. The Bay Street Pedestrian Pathway will end at the foot ferry facility. Port Orchard Comprehensive Plan Adopted: June 2016 Revised: Nov 2019, July 2020, May 2021, December 2021 2-.7-.62.8.6 Road Map to Implementation Further planning for each idt-RtifiRd '; ' centers is required 4i--�to implement the City's vision for the overall eenterscenters' strategy. The Ceity is committed to undertaking a sub area planning process for each center, to better identify center boundaries, and to develop a vision statement, goals, and policies for each center that are responsive to the unique attributes of that center. This planning process will a4e pfevWeestablish recommendations for amending tk�_—development regulations, zoning designations, design guidelines and capital facility plans to reflect and implement the sub area plans. It also ensures that public engagement and community outreach efforts will be conducted to provide members of the community the opportunityto help steerthe direction of the planning efforts. Sub -area plans forthe centers will be adopted into the City's comprehensive plan. Port Orchard Comprehensive Plan Adopted: June 2016 Revised: Nov 2019, July 2020, May 2021, December 2021 Chapter 3: Housing Chapter 3. Housing 3.1 Introduction The intent of the Housing element is to establish coordinated and comprehensive policies that will help guide decisions on housing issues within and around the City. Provisions that ensure suitable housing opportunities for all socioeconomic levels are a primary consideration in enhancing the quality of life found in Port Orchard. Information in the Housing Element is supplemented by the June 2023 Housing Action Plan, which identified current housing trends and developed actionable strategies through an equity lens to support and encourage housing production that meet local community housing needs. The Housing Element also alse intended to "^ inteFnally consistefftworks— in cenju ;�tk)n w44conlunction w i t h the ousing Vision overarching goals of the entire Comprehensive Plan, Commented [AC1]: Planning commission: Please review as well as the housing goals of Washington's Growth and provide feedback on existing Vision statement. Ensure suitable housing Management Act (GMA). opportunities for all socioeconomic levels, including a variety of housing types, in a manner that accommodates anticipated population growth while respecting the character of existing neighborhoods. As Port Orchard grows, itwill be importantto provide a variety of housing types in ^,gin• ••^to suit the needs and preferences of the expanding population. Addressing housing from various perspectives such oromotine homeownership and creatine more diverse housing opportunities to allow inresidents to live near their work or transit , , quality and neighborhood ffeservation will be necessary in order to meet the housing needs of all of Port Orchard's residents now and into the future. Port Orchard Comprehensive Plan DRAFT Update: March 2024 Chapter 3: Housing Through the adopted goals and policies under the Housing Element, the City pursue opportunities to: • Preserve and improve existing housing stock • Expand overall housing supply • Encourage housing that is affordable to all income levels • Establish ways to mitigate displacement • Promote thriving, equitable, healthy neighborhoods. Port Orchard Comprehensive Plan DRAFT Update: March 2024 Chapter 3: Housing Serne heusing trends v.;ithin the City are well ..FIB �.....- ng he psi.... n be {.J....+ifi...J +h Fo gh -- nfORnation, census data, and related trade 3.2 Existing Housing Stec! Condit As „f 2010+hereiwere 4,630 heusing u n is the 6+t;der eeRsasd;#a. S Rgle #�"•; 62,14 ef these units. Multi family heusing e 19IN I-IR 1; makes up the next lafgest 0 ever O data, ' YORS Rg 0495 family units. Frown 201-2 201-3 thelce %ve.re 240 multifamily buNding permits issued, which will family to multi family housing has thei:efeice stayed Felatiyely stable dwing the past five yeaFS. PGF Figwe 1 breaks dewn heusing types within the City. 2996 2996 2997 2999 2999 2919 2944 2942 2943 2944 2945 A4obile 9 4 3 2 9 8 4 9 9 3 9 Single family 2-9 49 apfachpd A4ir1Ei- 47 �2 €a-il� Total 45 52 Units 54 54 54 444 57 85 44 52 494 29 9 8 46 2 402 42G 9 9 57 -34 59 438 7-9 299 476 55 494 h Port Orchard Comprehensive Plan DRAFT Update: March 2024 Commented [QG2]: This section has been reorganized below under Housing Stock subsection. Chapter 3: Housing Types of Housing in Port Orchard (2009-2013 ACS 5-Year Estimates) 241 171 5% 3% 499 ■ 1-unit, detached 10% ■ 1-unit, attached 9r. ■ 2 units ■3or4units 187 ■ 5 to 9 units 3% -0; PVA • 10 to 19 units 143 3,26) 143 3,269 3% 64% ■ 20 or more units 152 ■ Mobile home 3% AgWe Port Orchard Comprehensive Plan DRAFT Update: March 2024 Chapter 3: Housing .. _ I .': 0 111! No, s1 1 01, _ . __. ._.. 0Kitsap an oweF an ounty 0 ) and slightly higher 0 peFsens ne eF an tsap 0 slightly F.,...... than Washington state !11 o/1 nao% p ..+.n ale R d 51o% F...n- les 0 ) aFe "werldng age" persons between 25 54 years E)f age. 0 SPRAFSaFe0 inceme ...dim AppFaximately F... Kitsap l'..unty 0 ($62 nnn) and Washi... tGR state ($60 nnn) slightly higher than Kitsa . County (11%) and Washington ton stare (1 4%) Washington state rt1 17-7/.,-...1 rFLUA\ Port Orchard Comprehensive Plan DRAFT Update: March 2024 Commented [QG3]: Removed and added as a subsection below. 3.2.1 Housing Stock Housing Type. As of 2021, there were 64,165 housing units in the City, per census data. Port Orchard's housing stock is predominantly single -unit buildings (70%), nearly all of which are single-family detached home and a small number of attached townhomes. Larger apartment building with 5+-units makes up the next largest category (22%). There are relatively few "middle housing" 2-4 units and manufactured homes. The breakdown of housing unit type is shown in 3-4 4 Figure 1. Housing Age and Production. Port Orchard's housing stock is considerably younger than regional averages. Over half of the housing stock was built since 1990, and two-thirds was built since 1980. This is reflective of Port Orchard's high rate of housing production and permitting in recent decades. -Figure 2 shows the uptick in permitting starting in the early 2000s s and the prevalence of single-family and larger apartment developments. Note that this data Chapter 3: Housing —. 4.1"'M Source: 2020 American Community Survey 5-Year Estimates Table DP04. Figure 1— Housing Unit Tvpe in Port Orchard, shows issued permits, not all these protects were and will be necessarily completed. Most of the single family development seen in the past five year have been in McCormick Woods subdivision, which was annexed by the city in 2009, and the Bethel-Sedgwick Area. Although, recent forthcoming project of multifamily homes have been more spread out throughout the city. Additionally, according to the City's permit data, over 5,000 units are currently in the pipeline and shows some increase in housing diversity with future development of fourplex, townhomes, and mixed use. (See Figure 3). This high rate of housing production will almost double the city's housing inventory within the next several years. Port Orchard Comprehensive Plan DRAFT Update: March 2024 Chapter 3: Housing 600 ■ 5+ Unit Multifamily � 500 Triplex / 4-Plex 400 ■ Duplex � a A Single -Family 300 0 200 E z 100 0 1982 1984 1986 1988 1990 1992 1994 1996 1998 2000 2002 2004 2006 2008 2010 2012 2014 2016 2018 2020 2022 Source: U.S Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) State of the Cities Data Systems (SOCDS) 3,000 Figure 2 — Permits Issued in Port Orchard by Unit Type, 1982-2022 ■ Mixed -Use Development 2,500 ■ 5+ Unit Apartment Y 2,000 ■ 4-Plex w 1,500 ■ Townhouse E z 1,000 ■Development including single- 500 family homes and townhomes Single Family 0 2022 2023 2024 Permitting Initiated, Timeline Uncertain Source: City of Port Orchard. Figure 3 — Number of Units Permitted with Certificates of Occupancy, Expected 2022 and Later by Unit Type Tenure. The maioritv of Port Orchard residents are homeowners and about 39 oercent are renters. hieher than county (30%) and statewide (36%) averages. Many communities of color and low-income households are renters, who often face compounding housing challenges and instability due to evictions and rent increases. Renters also experience slower income growth compared to homeowners, which raises concerns about their ability to transition into homeownership. Vacancy Rates. During the mid-2010s, vacancy rates for both renters and homeowners decreased but have recently rebounded due to the increase in housing demand and prices. The overall vacancy rate is currently around 11 percent as of July 2023. Port Orchard Comprehensive Plan DRAFT Update: March 2024 Chapter 3: Housing What is Middle Housing? "Middle housing" includes duplexes, townhouses, cottages, courtyard apartments, and other building types that fall between single-family detached houses and high -density apartments. Middle housing units tend to be more affordable to build than single-family "euses-, ,^^',^dhouses and offers greater varieties of layout and sizes that are suited for a wider range of households. Expanding the areas where middle housing is allowed offer greater opportunities for "starter homes", or homeownership, to the new generation. ADUs Duplexes/ Triplexes Fourplexes Cottage Clusters s rs4 - -- Small apartments (5-10 units) 3.2.2 Demographics Port Orchard is a rapidly growing city, currently home to 17,480 residents as of 2023. Since the last Comprehensive Plan Update in 2016, the city has grown on average 3.5 percent annually. Over the 20- year planning horizon for this 2024 Comprehensive Plan Update, the city is required to plan for 10,500 additional population by 2044 based on Countywide Planning Policies and population allocations. The historical growth rate and population allocation suggests a sustained demand for housing in Port Orchard in the coming years. Please refer to the Land Use Element Section 2.5.1 for additional population growth and Dopulation allocation information. 0 20,000 6 % � Population 15,000 10,000 0- 0 a 5,000 1960 1970 1980 1990 2000 2010 2020 2023 Source: Washington Office of Financial Management, U.S Census Bureau, LCG Figure 4 — Port Orchard Population and Growth Rate, 1960 — 2020 Port Orchard Comprehensive Plan DRAFT Update: March 2024 Port Orchard's population is notably younger. During the 2010-2021 period, over half the residents were under 34 years old, typically working and family -building ages, which explains the corresponding increase in children under 19. Port Orchard has a smaller share of residents of adults FS nnrd nvpr Figure 5 shows the racial and ethnic makeup of Port Orchard residents. About two-thirds of the City's residents are white and has a relatively large share of Hispanic/Latino and Asian populations. The city is more diverse than Kitsap County, which has about 25 percent persons of color compared to 30 percent in Port Orchard. And according to ACS, about 3.5 percent of Port Orchard residents, or 351 residents, speak Spanish at home. American Ind /Alaska Nati 1% Black / Africai American 2% Chapter 3: Housing Two or More Native Hawaiian Races 69% Source: American Community Survey 2021, 5-year Estimate, 3.2.3 Households Table DP02 Overall, Port Orchard's average household size is 2.56 People, slightly higher than the county average of 2.53 Figure 5 — Race & Ethnicity in Port Orchard, 2021 and similar to the statewide average of 2.55. Port Orchard has a high share of households of married or cohabitating couples with no children (34%) and those with children (29%). Additionallv, most of the single- arent households are single mothers. (See Figure 6 Older Adults Living Aloni 9% Single Adult(s) 20% Single parents 8% Couple, No children 34% pie, with Aldren 29% Source: Washington Office of Financial Management, U.S Census Bureau, LCG Figure 6— Port Orchard Population and Growth Rate, 1960— 2020 Port Orchard's younger population and changing household dynamic suggest the current need for smaller affordable housing units and potential for larger units as younger residents age and form households in Port Orchard Comprehensive Plan DRAFT Update: March 2024 Chapter 3: Housing the coming decades. However, as shown in Figure 7, there is a current mismatch between the need and availability of housing units for smaller household size. This could have negative implications as smaller households may not be able to find units suitable to their need and budget. r Household Size Housing Unit Size 1-Derson ?hold rson ?hold 35% 4+ Studio / 1 bed 42% Source: American Community Survey 2021 5-Year Estimates, Tables DPO4, S2501 Figure 7— Household Size and Housing Unit Size in Port Orchard, 2021 3.3 Housing Affordablflty Commented [QG4]: New section to discuss housing Lack of affordable housing has ranked as a very high community concern. In recent years, rising housing challenges and racially disparate impacts and rental costs and stagnating income has strained all households across the state, including Port Orchard. While all households are impacted, communities of color and lower -income households face greater instability as they tend to spend more of their income on housing and own fewer homes. The majority of ownership households in Port Orchard are White and Asian, and lower among Native Hawaiian and Pacific Islanders, Hispanic and Latino, and other races and ethnicities. (See Figure 7). ALL HOUSEHOLDS WHITE, NON -HISPANIC OR LATINO ASIAN BLACK HISPANIC AND LATINO OTHER / TWO OR MORE RACE NATIVE HAWAIIAN / PACIFIC ISLANDER ■ Rent ■ Own Source: AC2 2020 5-year Estimates, Table B25003 Figure 7—Share of Household Tenure by Race/Ethnicity Current relationship between housing prices and income have become strained, as housing become more difficult to afford for the average Port Orchard resident. Households earning median income may not be able to afford, or have difficulty, in purchasing a median home sale price. This gap indicates an overall market with high demand for housing. (See Figure 8). Port Orchard Comprehensive Plan DRAFT Update: March 2024 Chapter 3: Housing $900 ■ Household Income ($1,000s) $810 $800 House Price($1,000s) A household earning $100,000 $700 could not afford the median Port Orchard sales price of $468,000 even though they are earning $607 $600 Median Sales Price ($468) nearly $30,000 more than the median household income. $500 $400 $304 $300 Median Household $202 $200 $200 Income ($75) $150 $101 $75 $100 $100 $25 Source: American Community Survey 20215-Year Estimates, Table S2503, Zillow, Freddie Mac, LCG Figure 8 — Housing Affordability at Various Price and Income Levels in Port Orchard, 2021- In addition, 39% of Port Orchard's low- and moderate -income households are cost burdened. These households are most at risk of displacement or housing hardship and in need of housing support, such as subsidized affordable housing. Figure 9 below shows the most recent data on Port Orchard's cost - burdened households. Port Orchard Comprehensive Plan DRAFT Update: March 2024 80-100 % AMI C a n 50-80%AMI v E 0 V C 0 30-50%AMI L N O 2 < 30%AMI Chapter 3: Housing ■ Severely Cost Burdened ■ Cost Burdened ■ Not Cost Burdened 0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 900 1000 Number of Households Source: 2015-2019 HUD Comprehensive Housing Affordability Strategy (CHAS) Figure 9 — Cost -Burdened Low -Income Households by Income Bracket in Port Orchard, 2019- Port Orchard Comprehensive Plan DRAFT Update: March 2024 Chapter 3: Housing 3.4 Population Growth, Allocations, and Cap"Housing Projection Tb'^ 2 1--rffirellortoal; r,...... 9erol nt PequlatieA riFewt#a 2036 TaFgeara 4;17�9 44�88� CitV Gf BFeFAeFtGFI 9082 443 i39$3 468iT i83W 6`i" :rAta1 Qr rAprtan City of BainbFidge Island ^�RtlWS qGgq cl o ,C 2055 'tRgptl 2736 2TTfV 483 Port Orchard Comprehensive Plan DRAFT Update: March 2024 Commented [QG5]: in -progress. Updated section to discuss housing targets instead of growth allocations Chapter 3: Housing 9222IRR9 3955� CReulsl�e 47-8 3778 4456 9709 C4 44$El$ TA*21 pa, drhe Geatxal Kitsap UGA I ;Eqqf3 5779 "�' 5 SiIuerellale -GA 2074 Port Orchard Comprehensive Plan DRAFT Update: March 2024 Chapter 3: Housing Commented IQG61: Moved from Housing and relocated to Land Use, as it more directly relates to land uses accommodating projected growth patterns. Seattle Tops Local Cities SeaHlc Belleruc �W 71007 Renton 6,717 Auburn 6, 355 Kern 5,031 Redmond /, f Marysville = 4.1 Tacoma a 3,90 Sammamish 36 Issaquah 2,6 0 10000 2%000 30 000 ad 000 63,7±0 Ruston Snogealmie Gig Harbor DuPont Part Orchard 8gnney Lake North 8and ewall Issaquah Redmond 0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25% E Population growth and percent increase 2010-15 excluding annexations Port Orchard Comprehensive Plan DRAFT Update: March 2024 Chapter 3: Housing nFr rV.•ae rr !��rr�e erne. _ �str�e�nr srernr� rrx�rso - - - Port Orchard is designated as a High -Capacity Transit Community in Vision 2050 (PSRC March 2021). Using the Vision 2050 framework, the Kitsap Regional Coordinating Committee's (KRCC) adopted Countywide Planning Policies and set a regional framework for its cities to accommodate growth while providing a share of the region's housing. This means Port Orchard is required to meet housing target at all income levels as shown in (Table X belowL Target Type Target: Net Increase E XX-XX Table X Port Orchard Housing Supply and Need by Income One of the primary goals of the GMA and subsequent plans such as Puget Sound Regional Council (PSRC) Vision 20540, Kitsap County Comprehensive Plan, and this Plan, is to manage growth effectively. To achieve that, a land capacity analysis needed to be performed to determine how many potential housing units could be developed or redeveloped on current land. Port Orchard Comprehensive Plan DRAFT Update: March 2024 Commented [QG7]: Will be updated once the existing and projected housing needs data is published Chapter 3: Housing Port Orchard's current zoning results in a capacity for about additional 6,659 dwelling units, reaching the total housing target of XX,XXX. This means that the current plan would have the sufficient capacity to Commented IQG8]: Will be updated after the land use capacity data is released Table X Land Use Capacity 3.3 Goals and Policies The ability of the region to provide various housing opportunities for residents in and around Port Orchard is very important. Limited housing opportunities adversely impact housing choice, economic development, neighborhood/community image and pride. Creating policy language that champions housing availability and affordability across all income levels serves to foster these concepts. This section seeks to establish basic policy principles related to housing availability and affordability. Port Orchard strives to: Port Orchard Comprehensive Plan DRAFT Update: March 2024 Goal 1. Chapter 3: Housing desired housing types based on demographic trends and population gre.Housing stock is planned to accommodate growth targets, housing demands, and changes in the population. Policy HS-1 Ensure zoned capacity is sufficient to accommodate housing development to meet needs consistent with adopted targets. (Link Income Band figure) Policy HS-2 Encourage production of a diversity housing types throughout the City to expand housing choice and access for residents in all stages of life and all household sizes to meet the goals set under RCW 36.70A.020(4). These housing types include but are not limited to detached single-family homes, middle housing forms, multifamily dwelling units (within both single -purpose and mixed -use buildings), live -work dwelling units, accessory dwelling units, pre -fabricated homes, and clustered housing forms. Policy HS-3 Periodically evaluate City development standards and regulations to ensure it reflects Goal 2. market trends and, where appropriate, modify development regulations that unnecessarily add to housing costs and minimize the feasibility of building affordable housing. Periodically assess the amount of housing produced under these standards. (Housing Action Plan 2.3 and 2.4). Ensure that housing is affordable and available to all socioeconomic levels of Port Orchard residents. Policy HS-4 Provide opportunities through future land use and zoning districts for an economically diversified housing supply, including extremely low, very low-, low-, moderate-, and upper -income levels, to maximize housing options and serve a broad range of Port Orchard Comprehensive Plan DRAFT Update: March 2024 Commented [QG9]: In accordance to RCW 36.70A.070(2) (a), (b) (a) Inventory of existing and projected housing needs (b) Development of housing -single family, multifamily moderate density Commented [QG10]: Align with (RCW 36.70A.070(2) (c), (b) and (d)) (c ) Capacity for permanent supportive housing, emergency shelters multifamily, low income housing (b) Development of housing - single family, multifamily, and moderate density (d) Makes adequate provisions for existing and projected needs of all economic segments of the community Chapter 3: Housing community needs. (RCW 36.7Oa.O7O(2) (d)). Policy HS-5 Support the development of housing and related services that are provided by regional housing programs and agencies for special needs populations, especially the homeless, children, the elderly, and people with mental or physical disabilities. Policy HS-6 Coordinate with other public entities, nonprofits, and religious organizations to preserve and facilitate development of permanent supportive housing, emergency shelters, and emergency housing. (RCW 36.7Oa.O7O(2) (c)) Policy HS-8 Allow an increased density bonus for affordable housing located on property owned by a religious organization. (Housing Action Plan 2.3.4) (RCW 36.7OA.545 and RCW 35A.63.3OO). Commented [QG11]: https://mrsc.org/stay- informed/mrsc-i nsi¢ht/ia n ua rv-2024/affordable-housi ng- from-su rplus-property IP^;.'rWS ;QI c*r,.amlo. *ng the pPFF..:**:^^ nra .,.,.,. fpF d^.,^i,.prAP^+ by OpApi pnti.^ amli^:^. ^A Commented [QG72]: Relocated and revised HS-22 from arpr^a„r^,. that r^a,,,.^ the i, nLxth p f tmn;^ deleted Goal 7 Policy HS-9 Ensure that City fees and permitting time are balanced between housing affordability considerations and the need for supporting City services. Policy HS-10 Provide incentives and work in partnership with not -for profit and for -profit developers land trusts, and public housing authorities, such as Housing Kitsap, to develop and preserve long-term affordable housing options. Policy HS-11 Encourage development of housing that is affordable for workers at all income levels that is located near transit, education and training opportunities and other employment centers. (Policy HS-1244 ^°^••'+''^ `'^"+'^l "esSE)F' `welling "^'*` � _. Commented [QG13]: Relocated and revised HS-15 from n.,o..--�.,�Promote development of r^`' attached and detached ADUS I and ^'^+^^hpd ;; ger ^^'+` (PAP' ` in all aggrAeFl2Ee previous Goal 5 residential to provide additional housing choices for all economic income levels, multi -generational households, and smaller households in residential neighborhoods. (RCW 36.7OA.68fe&O). W^..*. Policy HS-13 Expand capacity for middle housing in low -density residential neighborhoods that are unencumbered by critical areas or their buffers throughout the city to increase home ownership and rental housing options. (RCW 36.7OA.635). Policv HS-14 Streamline development reeulations Dermittine middle housine and multifamilv uses to accommodate family -sized units (Housing Action Plan 2.3 and 2.4). Policy HS-15- Consider the creation of zoning and other land use incentives for the private Port Orchard Comprehensive Plan DRAFT Update: March 2024 Chapter 3: Housing construction of affordable and special needs housing as a percentage of units in multi- family development. Policy HS-168 Consider adopting incentives for development of affordable multi -family homes through property tax abatement in accordance with 84.14 RCW, focusing on designated rnmxp'mca local loc ''^�al centers with identified needs for residential infill and redevelopment. Port Orchard Comprehensive Plan DRAFT Update: March 2024 Goal Chapter 3: Housing designated mixed use Centers where residential uses are ce located . 0th commerceal uses. Promote the efficient use of residential land in order to maximize development potential and make efficient use of municipal infrastructure. Commented [QG14]: Combined Goal 3-5 and merged policies. There are similar in topics with promoting efficient land use Pplo .,, uc PC U.i...... r .. i.dpntial .. A4h i n+...r ..F I.. ,I i ..,.+........ Policy HS-1� -Encourage housing growth within walking and bicycling distance of public schools, parks, " Commented [QG15]: Combined HS-11 and HS-16 Since transit service, and commercial centers. they have similarthemes. All of these amenities should be located in the City's centers of local importance. Policy HS-1819 Encourage the development of both vertical and horizontal forms of mixed use developments featuring a combination of multi -family housing ctmnmprrial .,i+wi.. +,,... Af'or-.I i ...+-,.,,.,..and nonresidential uses within centers. Policy HS-1914 Implement zoning and development regulations which encourage infill housing on empty and redevelopable parcels. n order to increase land and nfFaStFLIGWFe efficienc�- Polic HS-2044 Consider increasing maximum housing densities and implementing minimum - Commented [QG16]: Combined HS-9 and HS-16 housing densities in appropriate areas to increase land and infrastructure efficiency. (Housing Action Plan 2.3.3). (Policy HS-2I1 Protect critical areas, or environmentally sensitive areas, from future housing Commented [QG17]: Relocated and revised policy HS-24 development. Determine appropriate densities and uses and implement flexible from old Goal 9 development standards to balance the goals of housing targets and environmental protection. Commented [QG18]: Relocated above Commented [QG19]: Relocated above Policy HS-2244 Require that new housing developments occur concurrently with necessary infrastructure investments. Port Orchard Comprehensive Plan DRAFT Update: March 2024 Chapter 3: Housing Policy HS-2344 Establish an orderly process of annexation informed by the need for infrastructure investments that will ensure levels of service to new residential areas are not diminished. Port Orchard Comprehensive Plan DRAFT Update: March 2024 Chapter 3: Housing impacts to vulnerable communities. Policy HS-24 When plans and investments are expected to create neighborhood change, use public investment and coordinate with nonprofit housing organizations to mitigate impacts of market pressure that cause involuntarily displacement of low-income households and vulnerable communities. (Housing Action Plan 3.1.2) programs that: • facilitate home ownership for low- to moderate -income resident, • prevent, avoidable, involuntary evictions and foreclosures, and • provide assistance for repair, rehabilitation, energy efficiency, and weatherization. Policv HS-26 Encourage a variety of ownership opportunities and choices by allowing and suDoortin including but not limited land trusts, tenant opportunity to purchase programs, limited equity cooperative, and sweat equity. Policy HS-2739 Consider programs and other maintenance support, such as use of Community Development Block Grants or Housing Repair Programs to preserve or rehabilitate neighborhoods and areas that are showing signs of deterioration due to lack of maintenance or abandonment. Policy HS-28 Encourage senior and special needs housing to be integrate throughout the community and be located near services. Policy HS-29 Strengthen coordination between the City, county, and service providers to provide Port Orchard Comprehensive Plan DRAFT Update: March 2024 Commented [QG20]: Relocated above ' Commented [QG21]: Relocated policy to Goal 2 Commented [QG22]: Relocated above and combined with HS-9 Commented [QG23]: New goal in accordance to RCW 36.70A.070(2) (f) and (h) (f) undo disparate impacts, displacement, and exclusion in housing (h) establish anti displacement policies Commented [QG24]: Combined policy HS-23 and HS-20. Similar in theme to provide assistance for renovation and maintenance of existing homes Chapter 3: Housing homelessness support service and outreach. Adopt a Housing First approach. (Housing Action Plan 3.2) emote functional and livable forms of housing that integrates Commented [QG25]: change the focus of Goal 6 an 8 to well with its surroundings and accommodates people in all neighborhood livability and the health, safety, and we being of residents. In lieu of policies and goals that relates stages of life. to neighborhood preservation/character that may be perceived as exclusionary Policy HS-30 Encourage the development and maintenance of all housing, especially multifamily housing, that protects health and safety of residents and support healthy lifestyle and active living. POIICV HS-31 Encourage energy efficient housing types that conserve non-renewable energy and... Commented [QG26]: Relocated policy from old Goal9 help minimize impact on air quality and climate. their homes or neighborhoods. Promote awareness of Universal Design improvements to improve accessibility. Policy HS-33 Promote healthy, livable, and functional forms of housing at all scales through code provisions that provide for usable open space and/or recreational facilities, pedestrian connectivity, and safe and welcoming development frontages. Commented [QG27]: Awareness in Universal Design allow more homes to be accessible, not just for the elderly, but also for people with disabilities Cities like Bellevue are promoting this universal design approach https://bellevuewa.gov/sites/default/files/media/pdf docu ment/bnoa-Universal-Design-presentation-6-4-19. pdf Commented [QG28]: Change the focus of Goal 6 to Goal and design standards that maintain and strengthen hen 8 neighborhood livability and the health, safety, and well- being of residents. In lieu of policies and goals that relates neighborhood character. to neighborhood preservation/character that may be perceived as exclusionary Poky HS 171 The City shall identify formal neighbOlPheeds thl:eugheUt PGFt C)rGhaFd, With bE)UndaF*es Commented [QG29]: Deleted. Aligns more with Land Use based an building types and styles hiS+l..., tepegFaph., school locations ,-...... eFeial P..c,... Wr ,ol Programs +.. .._ ..Aah:I:+_+,. ..,.:R' w.._�......�.. .,..a ....,...,. +w..+ ..p@ Commented [QG30]:Relocated tOGoal 4 Commented [QG31]: Deleted. This has been accomplished Policy HS-2434 IProvidel information and assistance to property owners of historically significant Commented [AC32]:Staff -retain this policy?Does this housing to encourage preservation of these cultural resourceees. occur? Goal 7. improve the tome associated with p . — d approvin proposed development whole ensuring housing and design standards are suetable for maentagning—an efficient, attractive Commented [QG33]: Relocated policy to Goal 2, therefore Goal 7 is deleted. Port Orchard Comprehensive Plan DRAFT Update: March 2024 Chapter 3: Housing !Goal 8.1 D. eyed......_going support to homeowners t..preserve, maintain Commented [QG34]: Goal 8folded into new Goal and impreve their properties in order to enhanee the qua!*q-F and character of neighborhoods and the overall Qty. Commented [QG35]: Relocated to Goal 4 %h.e quality and a tw t:_' _ctw � .. :__ .. :. Goal 9. Ensure that future resWential development protects and maontains natural ecosystems and critical areas, including wetlands,streams, and wildlife habitats. Commented [QG36]: Relocated to Goal 3 Commented [QG37]: Relocated policy to Goal 5 help pqipimig@ al SwA4h ;A @FS o'Commented [QG38]: Relocated to Goal 3 Port Orchard Comprehensive Plan DRAFT Update: March 2024 Chapter 3: Housing rr_�na�nrsr•=ram.. .r . Port Orchard Comprehensive Plan DRAFT Update: March 2024 Chapter 9. Capital Faciliti 9-1. Introduction This periodic update to the Capital Facilities Element of the 2024 Comprehensive Plan provides information about the City's existing facilities and plans for future facilities needed to service the growing population. The Capital Facilities Element helps guide the City in providing appropriate facilities and desirable levels of service to its residents and businesses. The Capital Facilities Element first reviews the general requirements and available funding, connects planning to other functional plans, and reviews goals and policies that guide planning. It also provides an overview of the current capital facility portfolio and identifies future needs and investments for the next six years. Capital Facilities Vision Provide outstanding community facilities that serve the needs of a growing and changing city. This is achieved by maintaining existing facilities that are working well and adding facilities when needed to address I the city'sgrowth and evolving needs. i New facilities should address multiple objectives, such as creating new open space and enhancing neighborhood character, even as they serve basic The City of Port Orchard owns and manages a variety of capital facilities, including roads, parks, utility systems, police facilities, and administrative buildings. In addition to the facilities owned and managed by the City, there are publicly owned capital facilities managed by other entities. These include, but are not limited to, schools, library, sewage treatment, and public transit. Privately owned utilities (electrical, natural gas, and telecommunications) conduct their own planning processes and maintain their own system plans. The City influences private system planning through its authority to regulate land uses and its obligation to develop and maintain a Comprehensive Plan. funrtionalrequirements. The state requires the City to demonstrate comprehensive and coordinated planning for all capital facilities serving the City's residents, businesses, and community. The Public Facilities and Services Goal of the Growth Management Act (GMA) requires that the level of service ("LOS") of public facilities and services necessary to support development shall be adequate to serve the development at the time of occupancy and use, without decreasing current service levels below locally established minimum standards. Kitsap County's Countywide Planning Policies also require the City to have a plan that ensures adequate facilities and services are or will be available to serve the City's population allocation. If limited funding or other circumstances would prevent the city from providing adequate facilities and services, the GMA requires the city to re-evaluate the Land Use Element and make sure that plans for capital facilities and land use are consistent. Ensuring that public facilities are available when growth occurs is critical to the quality of life for Port Orchard's residents, businesses, and visitors. The implementation of the Capital Facilities Element and related plans will help realize the community's vision for community facilities, as well as the vision and Commented [13131]: Sections 9-3 is new draft text. All other sections have tracked changes to language from the current CFE. goals of the Land Use Element. This Element also functions in coordination with the Comprehensive Plan's Utilities, Parks, and Transportation Elements and functional system plans for water, wastewater, and stormwater. These are discussed in more detail in Section 9-3 Capital facilities and functional plans guide planning and budgetary decisions. A list of capital facility improvements planned in the next six years are described in Section 9-3. The functional plans provide a complete facility inventory, as well as needs, projected costs, and funding sources. Financial Overview The City strategically manages community resources and carefully balances investments in new facilities and infrastructure with costs to maintain and operate existing facilities. Identifying costs and funding for capital projects planned in the next six years supports the development of the City's annual budget and provides a path toward implementing facility projects. The Capital Facilities Element uses many revenue sources to fund the capital improvement projects, including sales tax, business and occupation tax, utility rates, state revenues, bonds, and grants. Impact fees and other specific revenues allowed under the Growth Management Act also offer potential funding sources. A partial list of capital facilities funding sources and financing tools is included below: Tax Revenue • Property Tax • Retail Sales and Use Tax • Business License Fees • Real Estate Excise Taxes • Other tax revenue may include lodging excise taxes, admission tax, liquor tax, and motor vehicle fueltaxes. Impact Fees • Transportation Impact Fees • Park Impact Fees Enterprise Activities • System Development Fees • User Fees/Rates • Water User Fees • Sewer User Fees • Stormwater Utility Fees Bonds • General Obligation Bonds • Revenue Bonds • Levy Lid Lift Grants • Federal Grants • Surface Transportation Program (STP) • Highway Bridge Program (HBP) • Transportation Enhancement Program • Safe Route to School Program • Grant Funding to Address Indoor Air Pollution at Schools Program - EPA • Intersection and Corridor Safety Program • Transportation, Community, and System Preservation (TCSP) Program • Recreational Trails Program • Washington State Transportation Board • Energy Retrofits for Public Buildings — Department of Commerce • Public Works Board funding — Department of Commerce • Climate Pollution Reduction Grants Other WA State Funding Programs • The Pedestrian Bicycle Safety Program • Community Development Block Grants Planning Connections Capital improvement recommendations are drawn primarily from City leadership and the functional plans specific to each City department or facility type. Water, sewer, and stormwater have specific requirements according to state and federal law and planning for parks and recreation facilities is included in a parks focused functional plan. Each plan contains a system inventory and a forecast of demand and capacity based on population and regulatory mandates. The functional plans identify capital investments that replace or maintain existing facilities for continued service required to meet future demand for at least a twenty-year period. The plans also define the customer service level for each facility and provide system - specific operating policies. Planning for capital facilities also coordinates with other agency efforts. For example, Port Orchard's capital facilities plan considers Kitsap County's plans to redevelop the governmental campus, invest in transportation infrastructure, etc. Functional Plans The Capital Facilities Element highlights recommendations from the City's functional plans in the table below. FUNCTIONAL PLAN UPDATE FREQUENCY Water System Plan 10-year cycle, as needed Provides a basis for six -year capital improvement planning and forecasts 20-year needs General Sewer System Plan 6-10-year cycle, as needed Addresses aging infrastructure and system expansion to accommodate development; updates policies and practices, data, finances, and growth forecasts; Recommends improvements for the City's wastewater system Stormwater and Watersheds Comprehensive Plan 6-10-year cycle, as needed Establishes the city's storm and surface water policy Parks. Recreation & Open Space (PROS) Plan 6-10-year cycle, as needed Recommends 20-year capital project projects to guide growth and development of Port Orchard's parks and open space system. Transportation Improvement Program every two years Six -year plan indicates needs for maintenance and improvement of the City's transportation network Future Needs While there are unique challenges in each functional area, aging infrastructure, compliance with new laws and regulations, and increased demand for services impact all Port Orchard's capital facilities plans. Aging Infrastructure. Some of Port Orchard's capital facilities are aging or inadequate for current service needs and will require repairs and replacement over the next twenty years. The costs of replacing utility infrastructure, roads, and municipal buildings can be substantial and take years to plan and implement. To get an accurate picture of capital facility needs, Port Orchard will conduct a comprehensive facility condition assessment (FCA). The FCA will highlight current deficiencies at the systems and facility level and projected repairs needed over the long term. It could include recommendations to prioritize preventative maintenance and develop a feasible schedule to address capital facility needs. The FCA is a critical first step to improve the way Port Orchard manages, maintains, and funds its capital facilities to be more resilient and cost-effective. New Laws and Regulations. Changing state and federal mandates governing capital facilities systems require the city to monitor and review its systems to ensure compliance. For example, requirements for implementing projects, programs, and maintenance continue to evolve and are more stringent than in 2007 when the City received its first National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System Municipal Stormwater Permit (NPDES), a Federal Clean Water Act mandate that affects programs citywide. The City operates in accordance with the 2019-2024 Permit (Ecology 2019), adopting a new stormwater manual and meeting new requirements for watershed planning, public education, and the business source control and inspection program. Additionally, the City anticipates new requirements from the 2024 NPDES Permit. Increased Demand. Capital facility investments will also be needed to ensure the City continues to deliver the high -quality municipal services customers expect and keep pace as the community grows and changes. Increased demand for services will also require investing in capital facilities across all functional areas. To plan to meet future service demands, the City should conduct a citywide facilities study. Building on findings from the facility condition assessment, this plan will assess current and future space needs, recommend investments to address critical near -term deficiencies, and develop an implementation strategy to provide facilities needed to serve the Port Orchard community into the future. This plan will consider facilities investments to better serve the community that could potentially include expanding the downtown civic campus, investing in appropriately sized public works and police facilities, and increasing investments in maintenance and operations of City parks and throughout the portfolio. Partner Efforts. The Port Orchard community benefits from its proximity to centers for recreation, open space, and sports fields outside City limits and/or owned and managed by other agencies or groups, such as the South Kitsap School District and Kitsap County. Creating and strengthening regional partnerships enable Port Orchard and its partners to provide greater facilities and opportunities than would be possible alone. The City should coordinate with and support these non -city service providers, such as school districts, libraries, and solid waste processors, as they plan for new or improved facilities, such as Kitsap County's campus redevelopment. The City of Port Orchard is already working with Kitsap County and other nearby jurisdiction to create and expand a regional water trail including shoreline access with launch points, rest areas, and parking facilities. I X,, IF 9-2. GOdIS and POIICI@S ' Commented [BB2]: Goals and policies are originally from previous CFE and have been updated/consolidated. DEI- related policies have been added or incorporated into The goals and policies for Port Orchard's capital facilities align with the Comprehensive Plan vision and existing policies. Policies mentioned in other Comp Plan goals and policies In each Element. elements have been removed and similar policies have been combined. Goal 1. Ensure that infrastructure, facilities, and services are adequate to meet present and future needs. Policy CF-1 Establish minimum levels of service (LOS) and regularly monitor and update standards for staffing and public facilities to reflect community preferences for quality -of -service delivery and align with functional plans. Correct LOS deficiencies through capital improvements. Policy CF-2 Require that urban level facilities and services are provided prior to or concurrent with development. These services include, but are not limited to, transportation infrastructure, parks, potable water supply, sewage disposal, stormwater and surface water management, and solid waste management. Policy CF-3 Facilitate adequate planning for services and facilities by coordinating with utility providers on annual updates of population, employment, and development projections. Encourage providers to improve accessibility to public services by making information available, convenient, and complete. Policy CF-4 Address disparities in historically underserved populations by ensuring transportation, utilities, telecommunications, and other infrastructure are equitably distributed and maintained, and that siting or expansion of essential public facilities does not unduly affect any one group of people or geographic area. Policy CF-5 Maintain an inventory of existing capital facilities owned by public entities. Policy CF-6 Acquire property sufficient to provide capital facilities at established levels of service, accordingto the deficiencies and needs provided in the City's functional plans. Policy CF-7 Ensure that new growth and development pay a fair, proportionate share of the cost for facilities needed to serve such growth and development. Seek to reduce the per unit cost of facilities and services by coordinating improvements such as utilities and roads and encouraging urban intensity development within the City and Urban Growth Areas. Goal 2. Leverage facilities investments to efficiently use public resources and improve quality of life. Policy CF-8 Direct growth within the community where adequate public facilities exist or can be efficiently provided when feasible. Policy CF-9 Encourage the joint use of utility corridors for open space and non -motorized pathways and trails, provided that such joint use is consistent with limitations prescribed by applicable law and prudent utility practice. Coordinate and cooperate with other jurisdictions to encourage cooperative planning of future facilities, reduce redundancy, and implement multijurisdictional utility facility expansions and improvements. Policy CF-10 Explore opportunities to acquire surface parking areas within the downtown core to serve the public and municipal purposes. Policy CF-11 Consider developing multi -use facilities that can serve more than one public need. Explore opportunities for public/private partnerships and funding sources that could provide a mix of public facilities and other uses such as commercial and residential within the same development, where appropriate. Policy CF-12 Make facilities investments that seek to reduce health disparities and improve well-being and quality of life. Policy CF-13 Design and locate capital facility improvements to reduce crime risks and optimize public safety through increased visibility at joint use facilities (e.g., streets, public buildings, etc.). Policy CF-14 Ensure that site selection, construction, operation, and maintenance of capital facilities is environmentally sensitive, safe and reliable, aesthetically compatible with surrounding land uses, economical to consumers, and does not have adverse social impacts on marginalized communities. Goal 3. Equitably engage with the community around capital facilities planning. Policy CF-15 Provide meaningful inclusive opportunities for community involvement in the planning of capital facilities, prioritizing the inclusion of historically underrepresented populations. Policy CF-16 Coordinate with local tribes in planning capital facilities, especially in areas with cultural significance. Policy CF-17 Encourage public awareness and consult public input when considering the need for and proposed locations of new public facilities. Goal 4. Develop and maintain adequate and convenient parks, recreation, and open space areas and facilities for all age groups to serve both the existing and future population of Port Orchard and surrounding areas. Policy CF-18 Encourage private property owners and developers to donate public trail access and parcels for park development in areas identified for future municipal parks and trail connections. Policy CF-19 Increase the size and number of parks and open spaces by providing input on development plans for public parks within Port Orchard's Urban Growth Boundary. Policy CF-20 Reevaluate the City's park impact fee at least every four years to ensure that the fee is appropriate based on the City's LOS for parks acquisition, improvement, and maintenance. Policy CF-21 Collaborate with Kitsap County to explore forming a Municipal Parks District to help fund and develop community and neighborhood scale parks throughout the city and Urban Growth Area. Policy CF-22 Encourage implementation of the County's Greenways Plan that outlines a citywide system of trails that will serve park, recreation, and open space needs. Link a system of trails between neighborhoods and parks, school sites, and other public property. Utilize public lands and existing rights -of -way for trail purposes whenever feasible. Policy CF-23 Place interpretive signs along trails to encourage community, historical, and environmental awareness, and place distance markers along the trail for walkers and runners. Policy CF-24 Create new parks in recently annexed areas or update existing parks within newly annexed portions of the City. Policy CF-25 In conjunction with partners, develop the Port Orchard Community Events Center as a recreational and civic amenities hub for Port Orchard and the South Kitsap region. Goal 5. Ensure that an adequate water supply is available to support the level of population growth and land development projected within the City. Policy CF-26 Maintain water system facilities and drinking water quality in accordance with State and Federal standards to ensure the high quality of drinking water and level of service is provided to all customers while maximizing the life of facilities to protect the investment of ratepayers. Policy CF-27 Provide high quality domestic and fire protection service within the retail service area. Policy CF-28 Utilize City -owned and operated sources of supply to maximize efficiency and cost effectiveness of the water system. Policy CF-29 Construct new facilities as required to serve the existing and future populations of the established water service area and South Kitsap Urban Growth Area. Policy CF-30 Interconnect the City's main water system with the independent facilities serving the City's 580 and 660 Pressure Zones (McCormick Woods System). This will allow for combining the two existing systems under one water system identification number. Policy CF-31 Encourage, implement, and maintain land use and water use efficiency and conservation programs to discourage water waste, promote the prudent use of water resources, and support protection of habitat and the environment. Policy CF-32 Work with neighboring water utilities, participate in regional water planning efforts to establish common goals of uniform water system standards, and facilitate coordination of efforts toward the adequate provision of water service throughout the region. Policy CF-33 Revise water service boundaries in cases where the designated water service provider cannot provide timely or reasonable service. Policy CF-34 Ensure that land uses permitted in aquifer recharge areas do not lead to contamination of water resources. Policy CF-35 Encourage new developments adjacent to properties with private wells or existing septic systems to connect to the City's water system or, if not feasible, ensure that adverse impacts to existing wells or septic systems from new development is avoided or mitigated. Goal 6. Provide safe, reliable, and timely sewer service to consumers at a fair and reasonable price. Policy CF-36 Coordinate construction of sewage improvements with other utilities. The City shall require all new development to connect to public sewer and water systems, unless physically or financially infeasible. Goal 7. Ensure that all utility and transportation infrastructure expansion provides an adequate level of public service to support new development and is consistent with current land use plans and development regulations. Policy CF-37 Utilize best construction methods and practices and innovative techniques in the design and construction of utilities. Policy CF-38 Evaluate, monitor, and reduce greenhouse gas emissions in the construction and operation of capital facilities. Policy CF-39 Whenever possible, utility construction should be scheduled to minimize disruption of access to area residences and businesses. Policy CF-40 Schedule utility construction activities to avoid sensitive times in the lifecycle of fish and wildlife, such as spawning, nesting, and migration. Goal 8. Minimize development related impacts to existing hydrologic conditions and functions and strive to correct current deficiencies resulting from past development practices such as stormwater-related flooding. Policy CF-41 Identify areas within and adjacent to the City and its UGA which are highly sensitive to changes in hydrologic conditions and functions. Within these highly sensitive areas, establish standards that provide for near zero change in hydraulic and hydrologic function on a property, such as no net increase in the peak flow or volume of runoff or erosion products leaving a site post- development. Policy CF-42 Encourage Low Impact Development (LID) strategies for stormwater management through incentives and flexibility in application of regulatory requirements. Policy CF-43 Utilize new inventories of flood hazard -prone properties in the decision -making process to prioritize stormwater system improvements. Policy CF-44 Coordinate the basin planning process with the community planning process to address surface water runoff and flooding issues. Policy CF-45 Integrate public regional stormwater detention and retention facilities into the natural environment. Policy CF-46 Recognize that regional facilities can provide aesthetics, recreation, and fish and wildlife habitat in a community park -like or open space setting. Goal 9. Support provision of adequate, timely, and efficient fire protection and emergency medical service within the City. Policy CF-47 Coordinate with South Kitsap Fire and Rescue on planning for the location of new fire stations to ensure that they are dispersed throughout the City and located near areas of high population concentration. Policy CF-48 Encourage consolidation of duplicate services between fire districts to use resources more effectively. Goal 10. Coordinate land use and school district capital facilities planning. Policy CF-49 Recognize that schools provide a unifying social and physical amenity that are key foci for successful neighborhoods. Encourage elementary schools to be located in or near neighborhood centers and middle schools, junior high schools and senior high schools to be located near community centers. Policy CF-50 Support the South Kitsap School District School Board in maintaining and funding individual school levels of service as adopted, in accordance with the City's intent to provide adequate school facilities for the community. Policy CF-51 Coordinate with the South Kitsap School District to develop strategies to ensure that students are not forced to attend a school outside their neighborhood. Policy CF-52 Review annual reports and update school impact fees as needed. Policy CF-53 Explore opportunities to develop joint use facilities with the South Kitsap School District, such as recreational and community center facilities. Develop neighborhood parks adjacent to school sites whenever possible to promote facility sharing. Facilities on the neighborhood park site should supplement uses that the school does not provide such as trails, open space, picnic areas, playground equipment, and multi -purpose paved sport courts. 9-3. Capital Facilities This section addresses capital facilities in the following four categories: 1. Administration and Community Facilities 2. Public Safety Facilities 3. Public Works Facilities 4. Parks Facilities Each section contains a capital facilities inventory, summarizes key context and issues, recommends improvements, and proposes projects for the next six -year planning period, with estimated costs and potential funding sources. Administration and Community Facilities This section first covers the facilities supporting City administration and the overall community. It also briefly covers the Fire Protection and Schools, community facilities that are owned and maintained by partner agencies. Inventory Facility City Hall (includes Police Station & Municipal Court) Location 216 Prospect St Size (sq ft) 28,370 Prospect Street Facility 720 Prospect St 2,925 Library 87 Sidney Ave 8,586 Employee Parking Lot (Gravel) 213 & 215 Prospect Street 6,500 Existing Conditions City Hall City Hall has served as the primary municipal building for Port Orchard's administrative functions since it was built in 1999. The building is approximately 28,370 square feet with three stories and a partial fourth floor. The first floor is occupied by the Police Department and the second floor by the Mayor's Office, City Clerk, Public Works Administration, and Finance. The City Council Chambers and Municipal Court are located on the third floor. Public Works operations staff are located in the Public Works Shop. Refer to Public Works Facilities and Public Safety Facilities sections for more information. City Hall is in good condition for its age and was renovated in 2024 to address needed repairs, security, and ADA accessibility, and improve the first floor. Condition and improvement information for the first floor is Figure 1: City Hall Commented [BB3]: This section is a full re -write from the original section 9.2. This section should include maps of current facilities. discussed in the Public Safety Facilities section. Even with these improvements, functional issues remain, including security concerns, challenging wayfinding, and limited parking. There is also not enough work and support space; for example, breakrooms have been repurposed as workspace and the Community Development Department was relocated due to space limitations. Municipal Court is rightsized to accommodate future growth. Planning for City Hall should consider the space needed to accommodate future growth and the operational efficiency gained by co -locating all departments. In response to a need for a new community event center and aligned with Policy CF-25, the City is in the process of designing the new Port Orchard Community Event Center. This new facility would have rentable event space for community programming. Designs also include space for the library to relocate. The City's Council Chambers could also be relocated if supported by leadership, which would free up space for use in City Hall. See the Library section below for more information on existing conditions and needs. Prospect Street Facility Community Development is in two facilities, one located adjacent to City Hall at 720 Prospect Street with Building, Code Enforcement, and Parking Enforcement functions (as well as the City's IT department), and one at 600 Kitsap Street with Planning functions. The Kitsap Steet facility is leased. The Prospect Street facility is undersized for current and future operations and in fair condition, requiring maintenance to address age -related needs such as upgrades to the HVAC system. The division of staff between two buildings and separation from City Hall creates communication and operational inefficiencies. There is limited parking and City vehicles are parked at City Hall. The public interface also requires patrons to go between the Prospect Street facility and City Hall to complete applications. For pedestrians passing between these two buildings, there are no crosswalks and limited ADA compliance. Library Built in 1960, the City -owned library building houses the local branch of the Kitsap Public Library. The building is nearing the end of its useful life requiring upgrades or relocation of the library functions. Figure 2: Kitsap Regional Library's Port Orchard branch Future Needs As Port Orchard's population has grown, City staffing has increased to maintain service standards and meet basic functional requirements. The following investments are needed: In accordance with Policy CF-14, perform required maintenance at all administrative and community facilities, including upgrading the HVAC system at the Prospect Street facility. Conduct a facilities condition assessment to understand the current conditions and near- and long-term maintenance needs for all capital facilities. • Invest in the following near -term projects: o Improve wayfinding at City Hall by installing a centralized reception kiosk and improved signage. o Increase security by adding lighting and safety features around exits and limiting publicly accessible areas. o Aligned with Policy CF-10, consider paving gravel lots, acquiring property, or constructing structured parking to increase available staff and public parking. Provide ADA-accessible parking near public entrances. o As space becomes available, add staff work and support space, including workstations, break rooms, and a lactation room. As part of a citywide facilities plan, estimate future staff and operational space needs and to guide near -term improvements and property acquisition as well as longer term investments. Encourage public awareness and input as stated in Policies CF-15 and CF-19. Endeavor to accommodate future needs, consolidate staff to improve operational efficiency, address accessibility, and other functional challenges. Aligned with Policy CF-11, consider developing multi -use facilities and partnering opportunities to meet public need. Consider Police Department needs and coordinate with plans; see the Public Safety Facilities section. • As the City designs the Port Orchard Community Event Center, consider relocating the Council Chambers as an interim or long-term solution to free up space at City Hall and improve security. Relocate the library to the event center and determine the best use for the current property. Priority Investments Maintaining and strategically planning for Administration and Community capital facilities are the priorities for the next six years. Funding Source Project City Hall Renovations City 555,000 Grant Unfunded 6,240,000 5-Year Total 6,540,000 Prospect Street Facility HVAC Upgrade TBD Facility Condition Assessment TBD Citywide Facilities Plan TBD TOTAL 555,000 6,540,000 Expenditures Prior Years 2024 2025r r27 2028 2029 City Hall Renovations 555,000 2,992,500 2,992,500 Prospect Street Facility HVAC Upgrade Facility Condition Assessment Citywide Facilities Plan TOTAL 1 555,000 2,992,500 Fire and Schools Fire Protection The City of Port Orchard formerly maintained its own Municipal Fire Department. In 1998, that department was merged with Kitsap County Fire District 7, which served the greater South Kitsap area. In 2005, Kitsap County Fire District 7 was renamed South Kitsap Fire and Rescue to better represent the communities it serves. There are currently two manned fire stations located within the City of Port Orchard: Station 17, located at 7990 McCormick Woods Drive SW, and Station 31, at 200 Tremont Street. Figure 3: Tremont Fire Station More information on Fire Protection levels of service can be found in South Kitsap Fire and Rescue's Strategic Positioning Plan 2021-2023. Schools The South Kitsap School District provides public education to Kindergarten through 12th Grade for the residents of Port Orchard and the South Kitsap area. It serves 9,815 students within 135 square miles. The facilities include ten elementary (K-6) schools, three junior high (7-9) schools, one high school, one alternative high school, and an academy that encourages family involvement. One elementary school, Sidney Glen, is located within Port Orchard city limits, as is one junior high (Cedar Heights), and South Kitsap High School and Explorer Academy. The South Kitsap School District Capital Facilities Figure 4: Aerial view of South Kitsap High School Plan can provide more information on the facilities and plans to improve them. It is adopted by reference as a part of this document. Public Safety Facilities Inventory Facility Location Size City Hall Police Station 216 Prospect St 5,500 SF Police Shooting Range & Storage 11278 Lloyd Parkway 13.2 acres In addition to the facilities above, Fire Station #7 operates as the operations center in case of an emergency. This facility is owned by the City and leased and operated by South Kitsap Fire and Rescue. Existing Conditions City Hall The Police Department occupies 5,500 square feet of the first floor of City Hall. While the 2024 renovations to the Police Department will maximize space use and provide some operational improvements, they will not address many of the department's critical needs. To alleviate the severely limited space in the near term, some staff are located in a secure off -site leased space. Like the administrative department, most support space has been converted to offices or workspace. Storage space is also ,'f _�,;t;�-� •_ inadequate; many areas have been repurposed as storage, " `•' ^t' such as the sallyport. Police officers have take-home AMM 13 vehicles, but there is no secured parking area for staff Figure 5: Police offices on ground floor of City Hall vehicles and inadequate parking for department meetings. In addition to City Hall, the Police rent a 3,000 square foot warehouse for tactical training and storage. This facility is also used to process vehicles for evidence prior to moving them to long-term storage. Police Shooting Range & Storage The police shooting range provides a safe location for officers to train and practice using firearms. The range is aging, in poor condition, and in need of maintenance investments, including lane resurfacing and roof replacement. There is a Conex box on -site that offers limited storage, but the site lacks bathroom facilities. There is also concern the outdoor range may cause increased noise disturbance as the surrounding residential areas grow. Long-term storage is located in a fenced area on the same parcel adjacent to the Public Works Operations Yard. Future Needs Figure 6: Shooting range The Police department has grown a lot in recent years and expects to grow aligned with the City's population growth. Many Public Safety facilities are aging with most not sized to accommodate current staff or future growth. Continued operations to meet Port Orchard's needs rely on the following steps: Review operations and establish level of service standards, where appropriate to assess current and future needs. The plan should consider workload, geography, and Port Orchard community needs. Once current and future staffing goals are in place, space needs can be assessed in accordance with Policy CF-13, to determine the facility space needed to support the Police department into the future. • Incorporate plans to construct a Public Safety facility to accommodate future staff and operations into the citywide facilities plan. Provide secure fleet parking, co -locate large vehicle evidence storage, and determine the future use of the large evidence storage property. If possible, include tactical training space and an indoor shooting range. Consider building in a central location free from natural hazards. Purchase property when feasible or use existing City property for a new facility as outlined in Policies CF-6 and CF-14. Encourage public awareness and input as stated in Policies CF-15 and CF-17. • If unable to include in a new Public Safety facility, modernize the existing range by covering and resurfacing lanes and upgrading parking; install sanitation, water, and electric utilities; and add secure storage, classroom space, and a firearm cleaning station. Priority Investments Funding and expenditures for the needs assessment, facilities plan, and Police Station renovations are included with financing for City Hall renovations; refer to the Priority Investments chart in the Administration and Community Facilities section. There are no other major investments budgeted for Public Safety in the six -year planning period. Public Works Facilities The City of Port Orchard and the Public Works Department owns, operates, and maintains infrastructure to provide drinking water, sewer, stormwater, and surface water services to its residents and businesses. Investment in this infrastructure is necessary for continued delivery of utility services that are critical for human health and safety, economic development, as well as supporting a sustainable, healthy environment. Capital facility investment helps to ensure that the City can continue to deliver the high -quality municipal utility services customers expect. This section first covers the general facilities supporting staff and then briefly covers the individual utilities. See the Utilities Element or individual functional plans for more detailed utility information. Inventory Facility Address Size (acres) Public Works Shop 1535 Vivian Court 1.82 South Shed Storage 2051 Sidney Ave 3.77 Operations Yard 1278 Lloyd Parkway 14.46 Existing Conditions Public Works Shop The Public Works Shop houses Public Works operations crews and the City's maintenance vehicles and equipment. The main building is in fair condition and provides space for crew support, shops, and storage. Materials storage is severely limited, often forcing crews to obtain supplies from local vendors. Transportation signage is purchased as the existing shop space does not include an area for sign fabrication. Limited crew space is unable to support growth Figure 7: Public works shop in staff and operations. Staff and fleet parking space is limited and unable to accommodate growth. There are also two adjacent structures providing covered parking for fleet and equipment. Fleet requiring heated parking can be stored in the main building's shop space as well as in one bay at the South Shed. The rest of the site is significantly undersized with limited yard material storage and no room for expansion. The facility is located on the west side of Highway 16, making it well located near the McCormick Woods development, but separated from a large portion of the City, staff, and facilities, including City Hall. This location may provide operational challenges in the event of a natural hazard. South Shed The South Shed Facility is located on a 3.77-acre site located at 2035 Sidney Avenue with 2,000 square feet of warehouse for material and equipment storage. Most of the land at this location is utilized as a park. Originally a fire station, the South Shed was repurposed for Public Works storage in addition to seasonally providing heated parking for equipment such as sweeper and vactor trucks. This aging facility is in poor condition, inappropriate for staff workspace, and is too small to meet storage needs. Figure 8: South Shed Operations Yard The Operations Yard is located near the Shop and contains a decant facility and materials laydown storage. The decant is in good condition but is at capacity as it is used as a regional facility. Spoils frequently do not have adequate time to dewater, requiring the City to add wicking materials that add weight and cost when taken to the Kitsap transfer station. The site has limited materials storage but is large enough to accommodate additional crew space and materials bins. Future Needs Public Works is anticipating an estimated staffing increase in the next ten years, growing from 25 to 32-40 or more staff to meet the needs of the rapidly growing community. The City will need to expand Public Work facilities to accommodate needed staff and equipment. Major needs for this planning period as identified by Public Works leadership include: • In accordance with Policy CF-14, perform required maintenance at all public works facilities. Conduct a facilities condition assessment to understand the current conditions and near- and long- term maintenance needs for Public Works and other capital facilities. • In accordance with Policy CF-1, conduct a citywide facilities plan to review current and future level of service standards, add staff where needed, and increase operational space to accommodate current and future staff and operations. • Provide a new public works annex at the industrial center public works yard to house operations utility staff. The proposed facility should include crew support space (offices, bathroom, showers, etc.); a heated warehousing for plumbing, electrical, and other materials storage; employee parking; heated and covered storage bays for equipment and materials; and expanded yard areas for laydown and materials storage. • Upgrade the existing Public Works Shop facility to better utilize vertical storage. • Upgrade the decant facility to increase capacity and add a new composting facility. • Provide a new Operations East satellite streets facility west of SR16, preferably near the intersection of Bethel and Lund, and include a crew room and restroom facilities, heated bays for snowplow equipment, and material storage yard. • Decommission the south shed facility and determine the best use for the current property. Priority Investments Financial information to support the facility condition assessment and citywide facilities plan can be found in the Administration and Community Facilities section. Investments for the next six years have not been identified for the general Public Works capital facilities. Please see the Utilities section below for priority infrastructure investments. Funding Source Project PW Shop Upgrades City Grant Unfunded 6-Year Tota I TBD Utilities Operations Annex TBD Decant Facilities and Yard Improvements TBD PW Operations East Station TBD TOTAL TBD Expenditures PW Shop Upgrades Prior Years 2024 r Utilities Operations Annex Decant Facilities and Yard Improvements PW Operations East Station TOTAL Utilities and Transportation Port Orchard's Public Works Department operates and maintains the City's utilities and transportation systems. Some of Port Orchard's capital facilities are aging or inadequate for current service needs and will require repairs and replacement over the next twenty years. The costs of replacing utility infrastructure and roads are substantial and take years for planning and implementation. The City is working to address substandard infrastructure and comply with changing state and federal mandates governing capital facilities. In accordance with Goal 1, the City should ensure that all utility infrastructure expansion provides an adequate level of public service to support new development consistent with the City's policies, criteria, and standards. In addition, utility expansion should also be consistent with current land use plans and development regulations of the State of Washington, Kitsap County, and appropriate local planning agencies. The following sections list priority projects for Transportation, Stormwater, Sewer, and Water between 2023-2028. More information on these facilities is provided in the Transportation and Utilities Elements as well as the individual functional plans. Transportation Port Orchard is responsible for City roads and other aspects of the City's transportation system. Details on all City transportation systems can be found in the Transportation Element. Priority investments and funding assumptions targeted in the next six years are summarized below. Funding Source Annual Maintenance City Grant Unfunded 6-Year Total Projects 4,800,000 4,800,000 Citywide Street Lighting 210,000 890,000 1,100,000 Bethel Phase la: Blueberry 3,591,000 3,591,000 RAB Bethel Phase 4a: Lund RAB 4,500,000 1,000,000 Bethel Phase 4b; Vallair Ct Connector 3,500,000 1,500,000 Bethel Phase 1b: Salmonberry 11,848,000 3,000,000 3,000,000 14,848,000 Bethel Phase Sa: Bethel/Lincoln RAB 1,500,000 2,600,000 4,100,000 Old Clifton Non -Motorized Improvements 450,000 2,700,000 3,150,000 Old Clifton/Anderson Hill Intersection Improvements 2,300,000 2,300,000 Pottery Ave Non -Motorized Improvements 400,000 644,000 1,044,000 Sedgewick Rd W Study 300,000 300,000 Sidney Rd Sidewalk 500,000 1,395,000 1,895,000 Sidney Rd SW Design 500,000 500,000 SR 160/Sedgewick Phase 2a 1,550,000 1,550,000 SR 166/Bay St Reconstruction 784,000 3,000,000 3,784,000 Tremont Phase 2 & 3 732,000 2,500,000 3,232,000 TOTAL 6,552,000 8,852,000 2,700,000 18,104,0 Expenditures Annual Maintenance Projects 1,020,500 800,000 800,000 800,000 800,000 800,000 Citywide Street Lighting 210,000 100,000 1,000,000 Bethel Phase la: Blueberry RAB 250,000 294,000 259,000 2,788,000 Bethel Phase lb: Salmonberry 375,000 2,100,000 1,997,000 7,370,000 Bethel Phase 4a; Lund Int 500000 1,000,000 Bethel Phase 4b; Vallair Ct Intersection and Connector 500000 Bethel Phase Sa: Bethel/Lincoln RAB 800,000 3,200,000 Old Clifton Non -Motorized Improvements 150,000 450,000 2,700,000 Old Clifton/Anderson Hill Intersection Improvements 258,000 1,738,000 Pottery Ave Non -Motorized Improvements 185,000 1,044,100 Sedgewick Rd W Study 300,000 Sidney Rd Sidewalk 235,000 1,660,000 Sidney Rd SW Design 500,000 SR 160/Sedgewick Phase 2a 600,000 950,000 SR 166/Bay St Reconstruction 200,000 1,135,000 2,649,000 Tremont Phase 2 & 3 732,000 2,500,000 TOTAL 1,760,000 6,484,000 4,666,000 12,858,000 858,000 2,688,000 6,484,000 Stormwater Port Orchard owns, maintains, and manages its stormwater collection system. Goal 8 states the City should minimize development related impacts to existing hydrologic conditions and functions and strive to correct current deficiencies resulting from past development practices such as stormwater-related flooding. Details on the City's stormwater system can be found in the Utilities Element as well as the 2023 Stormwater and Watersheds Comprehensive Plan. Priority investments and funding assumptions targeted in the next six years are summarized below. Funding Sources Project City Grant Sidney Regional Storm 1,200,000 Unfunded 14,000,000 6-Year Total 15,200,000 Sidney Rd. Fish Pass Culvert 1,911,386 1,911,386 Sedgwick Balancing Culvert 450,000 450,000 Annapolis Creek Culvert 1,300,000 1,300,000 Downtown Retrofit 1,350,000 1,350,000 19,011,386 211,386 Expenditures 2028 2029 Sidney Regional Storm 1,666,667 466,667 6,766,667 6,300,000 Sidney Rd. Fish Pass Culvert 80,764 955,693 874,929 Sedgwick Balancing Culvert 22,500 225,000 202,500 Annapolis Creek Culvert 43,333 43,333 628,333 585,000 Downtown Retrofit 175,000 675,000 500,000 TOTAL 1,813,264 1,865,693 9,147,429 7,385,00 Sewer The City is tasked to provide safe, reliable, and timely sewer service to consumers at a fair and reasonable price, as seen in Goal 6. Port Orchard owns, operates, and maintains existing wastewater collection and conveyance facilities. As of 2016, the City's sewer service area was approximately 2,100 acres and was expected to grow to 5,700 acres. Details on the City's sewer system can be found in the Utilities Element as well as the 2016 General Sewer Plan Update. Priority investments and funding assumptions targeted in the next six years are summarized below. Funding Source Project Marina Lift Station City Loan Unfunded 6-Year Total $13,000,000 6,200,000 19,200,000 Bay Street LS Cap Upgrades 1,000,000 1,000,000 Lift Station Controls (6) & Generator(1) 800,000 800,000 Expenditures Marina Lift Station 7,533,333 5,833,333 5,833,333 Bay Street LS Cap Upgrades 100,000 900,000 Lift Station Controls (6) & Generator(1) 400,000 400,000 33 6,33 Water Port Orchard Public Works Department maintains and manages the City's water system. With two systems serving the City (City System) and McCormick Woods (McCormick Woods System), Port Orchard serves over 4,000 connections. Goal 5 and its related policies state the City will ensure that an adequate water supply is available to support the level of population growth and land development projected within the City. Details on the City's water system can be found in the Utilities Element as well as the 2020 Water System Plan. Priority investments and funding assumptions targeted in the next five years are summarized below. Funding Source VFW city Loan Well#13, 90% DN -> CN (#2) Unfunded 6-Year Total Well #11 (#3) $8,000,000 8,000,000 Melcher PS Rebuild (#30) 500,000 70,000 570,000 Well #7 500,000 500,000 580 to 660 Zone Booster Sta Developer funded 660 Zone Storage 9,000,000 1 70,00 Expenditures Well#13, 90% DN -> CN (#2) 150,000 2,038,000 2,038,000 Well #11 (#3) 4,500,000 3,500,000 Melcher PS Rebuild (#10) 370,000 200,000 Well #7 TBD TBD 580 to 660 Zone Booster Sta 660 Zone Storage TOTAL 1 4,870,000 3,850,000 2,038,000 2,038,000 Parks Facilities The Parks Element of the 2024 Comprehensive Plan, supplemented by the Parks, Recreation and Open Space (PROS) Plan, outlines the goals, expectations, and community vision for the City's Parks. This section draws from those plans with a concentration on capital facilities. Inventory Port Orchard owns 89.7 acres of parkland, with a ratio of approximately six acres per every 1,000 residents. This includes conservancies, resource parks, trails, athletic parks, community centers, special use facilities, and support facilities. Parks capital facilities are listed below; refer to the PROS Plan for a full inventory of parks. Facility Blackjack Creek Multi -Modal Bridge Address 1301 Area Bay St e Size Boat Ramp -Launch 533 Bay St 0.82 Central Park (Clayton Park/Dwight Park) 915 Dwight 1.4 Dekalb Pier 467 Bay St 4.1 Etta Turner Park/Blackjack Creek Park 1301 Arena Bay Street 0.16 Givens Field/Active Club 1025 Tacoma Ave 0.6 Marina And Observation Deck 1 707 Sidney Pkwy McCormick Village Park 3201 SW Old Clifton Rd 28.6 Van Zee Park 300 Tremont St 8.3 Existing Conditions In general, the City has adequate outdoor park and recreational facilities to serve the population during the planning period, however, playground, picnic, sports court, and field sites are not evenly distributed within a 5- or 10-minute walk of all residential areas, creating a need for more neighborhood parks. There are also deficits in indoor recreation facilities, community gardens, and multipurpose trails. Additional information on the City's parks and more detailed planning strategies can be found in the City's PROS Plan and in the Parks Element of this Comprehensive Plan. Future Needs The City is committed to providing parks that are safe and well -maintained, enhance residential neighborhoods, encourage shoreline access, and activate downtown areas. Considering existing level -of -service for Port Orchard owned parks, the City's projected population growth will create a need for an additional 61.4 acres of land and 15,661 facility units (square feet of courts, fields, etc.) by the year 2040, requiring an estimated expenditure of $32,326,076. This does not account for any maintenance, operation, or repair costs. See the PROS Plan for more information on existing -level -of - service standards. The PROS plan highlights the following investments that update and expand existing park facilities. • In accordance with Policy CF-14, perform required maintenance at all parks and recreation facilities. Conduct a facilities condition assessment to understand the current conditions and near - and long-term maintenance needs for all capital facilities. • As part of a citywide facilities plan, develop a space needs analysis to determine and justify staff growth and investments needed to achieve the Parks goals. Aligned with Policy CF-11, consider developing multi -use facilities and partnering opportunities to meet public need. • Continue plans to design and construct the Port Orchard Community Event Center. The center will be located at 619 Bay Street on the downtown waterfront and include 7,600-8,600 square feet of event space and meeting facilities, as well as a 7,000-9,500 square foot library facility with outdoor decks and an activities area. Consider also relocating the Council Chambers to consolidate community functions. • In accordance with Goal 4, perform required maintenance at all parks facilities. • Protect existing open space and conservancies and acquire and develop parks and trail systems. • Designate and conserve cultural and historic resources located within park properties; seek joint funding partnerships with local jurisdictions to create wayfinding and educational signage, artworks, streetscapes, and gateways. • Develop master plan for Givens Park and assess condition, repurposing, or removal of the Active Club. • Develop a master plan for expanding Etta Turner Park to the west side of Blackjack Creek. Install lighting on the bridge and enhance Blackjack Creek. • Develop master plans for Ruby Creek Regional Park and Sherman Ave Stormwater Park. • Create and strengthen regional partnerships to enable the City and its partners to provide greater facilities and opportunities than would be possible alone. Priority Investments Details on current and planned investments in the next 20 years can be found in the PROS Plan. Financial information to support the facility condition assessment and citywide facilities plan can be found in the Administration and Community Facilities section. Priority investments and funding assumptions targeted in the next six years are summarized below. Funding Impact Source Park Impact Unsecured 6-Year Project City Fee Credit Port Orchard Community Fees Grant Grant Unfunded Tota I Event Center 927,430 283,900 18,729,963 6,500,000 1,658,707 28,100,000 Waterfront Plaza Shoreline Restoration/Enhancement 278,920 352,300 500,000 1,376,780 2,508,000 Orchard St Plaza 792,000 500,000 3,008,000 4,300,000 Givens Park Sport Court Remodel 24,080 176,4001 100,000 300,480 McCormick Village Park Phase 3 1 1,250,000 1,250,000 Telford Way Multimodal Pathway 979,012 979,012 McCormick Village Or Multimodal Pathway 1,468,518 1,468,518 Sherman Ave Stormwater Park 862,765 1,861,039 2,723,804 63__LWLOOO 7,904,526 41,629,814 Expenditures 2024 2025 2026r Port Orchard Community Event Center 4,064,132 951,620 23,084,247 Waterfront Plaza Shoreline Restoration/Enhancement 360,194 271,006 1,876,800 Orchard St Plaza 78,822 691,378 3,529,800 Givens Park Sport Court Remodel 66,480 234,000 McCormick Village Park Phase 3 1,250,000 Telford Way Multimodal Pathway 979,012 McCormick Village Dr Multimodal Pathway 1,468,518 Sherman Ave Stormwater Park 862,765 1,861,039 TOTAL 5,365,913 1,980,485 234,000 34,049,416 Chapter 10. 10.1 Introduction Climate Change Chapter 10: Climate Change The City of Port Orchard is likely to face challenges due to climate change over the next twenty years, including rising sea levels, extreme weather events, and ecological shifts that will directly affect the City's existing businesses, residents and the environment. This chapter will begin the important process of planning for climate change in the City of Port Orchard, focusing on reducing greenhouse gas emissions and enhancing the City's resilience to the impacts of climate change. Puget Sound Regional Council's (PSRC) Vision 2050 provides a roadmap for managing growth, transportation, and economic development across our region. By 2050, the Puget Sound region population is projected to reach 5.8 million people.' Vision 2050 plays an important role in addressing climate change as the region grows by emphasizing clean energy, sustainable transportation, and resilient communities. The document serves as a guide for local jurisdictions, including Port Orchard, to prepare for growth while preserving the environment and promoting equity. In 2023, the Washington State Legislature passed House Bill 11811 enhancing the state's response to climate change. This legislation amends the Growth Management Act (GMA), requiring cities and counties fully planning under the GMA to incorporate a dedicated climate element into their comprehensive plan. Within this element, two sub -elements must be addressed: Reduction of Greenhouse Gas (GHG) Emissions: • The City of Port Orchard commits to ambitious goals for reducing emissions, promoting cleaner energy sources, and minimizing our carbon footprint, consistent with Washington State's GHG goal of net zero emissions by 2050. • The City seeks to explore innovative strategies to encourage sustainable transportation, energy efficiency, and renewable energy adoption. Climate Resiliency Planning: • The City of Port Orchard recognizes the inevitability of climate impacts and prioritizes resilience. This chapter will outline strategies to enhance community preparedness, response, and recovery efforts. • The City aims to protect vulnerable populations, critical infrastructure, and natural systems from climate -related disruptions. During the course of 2024, this chapter will be a living document and will be updated as the City's ' Puget Sound Regional Council Vision 2050 ® Port Orchard Comprehensive Plan Adopted: XX 2024 Commented [AC1]: PLANNING COMMISSION: Based on the Vision statement of other elements of the Comprehensive Plan, how should this one read? Chapter 10: Climate Change planning efforts progress. The development of a climate change element is anticipated to take approximately one year of study and should incorporate input from stakeholders and the public. In order to fully understand the impacts of climate change, the City must also have a baseline of current greenhouse gas emissions and other climate change indicators. Some of this information is currently available through the University of Washington Climate Impacts Group's (UW CIG) Climate Mapping for a Resilient Washington (CMRW) webtoolz. The City is awaiting baseline greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions from the Department of Commerce for Kitsap County, which will then need to be disaggregated down to the City level for Port Orchard. The City will also be seeking grants from the Department of Commerce to complete this work. This chapter should be read as a first draft of the City's Climate Change element, with the expectation that future study and planning work will be completed in the future as funding is available. 10.2 Greenhouse Gas Emissions HB 1181 identifies three minimum requirements that the GHG emissions reduction sub -element of this chapter must address. These requirements can be met through the adoption of goals and policies that identify actions to meet these requirements. • Requirement 1: Result in reductions in overall greenhouse gas emissions generated by transportation and land use within the City but without increasing emissions elsewhere in Washington. • Requirement 2: Result in reductions per capita vehicle miles traveled within the City but without increasing greenhouse gas emissions elsewhere in Washington. • Requirement 3: Prioritize reductions that benefit overburdened communities in order to maximize the co -benefits of reduced air pollution and environmental justice. The Department of Commerce in its Intermediate Planning Guidance' has outlined three pathways that the City may take to set emissions -reduction targets and goals and policies to achieve those targets. The City of Port Orchard has elected to pursue Pathway 3, which the Department of Commerce has recommended for jurisdictions that are required to create a GHG reduction sub -element. Pathway 3 requires the City of Port Orchard to utilize the GHG emissions inventory provided by the Department of Commerce to set mitigation goals and policies to satisfy the minimum requirements. The City is required to adopt goals and policies from the transportation, buildings and energy, and zoning and development sectors of the Menu of Measures provided by the Department of Commerce that support achieving net -zero emissions by 2050. The City may also adopt goals and policies from the other sectors of the Menu of Measures based on the emission inventory. 10.3 Climate Resilience HB 1181s identifies three minimum requirements that the climate resilience sub -element of this chapter must address. These requirements can be met through the adoption of goals and policies that identify actions to meet these requirements. z https://cig-wa-climate.nkn.uidaho.edu/ 3 RCW 36.70A.070(9)(e)(i) ° Department of Commerce Intermediate Planning Guidance, December 2023 s RCW 37.70A.070(9)(d)(i)(A-C) ® Port Orchard Comprehensive Plan Adopted: XX 2024 Chapter 10: Climate Change • Requirement 1: Address natural hazards created or aggravated by climate change, including sea level rise, landslides, flooding, drought, heat, smoke, wildfire, and other effects of changes to temperature and precipitation patterns. • Requirement 2: Identify, protect and enhance natural areas to foster climate resilience, as well as areas of vital habitat for safe species migration. • Requirement 3: Identify, protect, and enhance community resilience to climate impacts, including social, economic, and built -environment factors, which support adaptation to climate impacts consistent with environmental justice. The Department of Commerce in its Intermediate Planning Guidance' has outlined 11 sectors of climate resiliency that the City's Comprehensive Plan should address, with potential climate -related impacts. Not all of these sectors or climate -related impacts will affect Port Orchard, and at the time of the development of this chapter, the City is currently beginning the process of studying the impacts of climate change and assessing vulnerability and risk to the City's community assets (social, economic and environmental assets). Once complete, the City will explore how changes in the climate could exacerbate natural hazards and impact these assets and develop goals and policies to address these impacts. In 2020, Kitsap County, in coordination with the City of Port Orchard, prepared the Kitsap County Climate Change Resiliency Assessment'. This assessment provides a comprehensive understanding of climate impacts and risks specific to the City. The Kitsap County Climate Change Resiliency Assessment highlights several specific risks that the City faces due to climate change: Sea Level Rise: As global temperatures increase, sea levels are rising. This poses a significant risk to coastal areas, including Port Orchard. Rising sea levels are expected to exacerbate challenges with flooding and saltwater intrusion in the City's downtown area, which the City has addressed in its Downtown Subarea Plan and Shoreline Master Program through policies that seek to address the impacts of sea level rise through the raising of the elevation of Bay Street. Extreme Heat Events: More frequent and intense heatwaves are expected. Extreme heat impacts public health, especially vulnerable populations. It strains energy systems, increases wildfire risk, and affects outdoor activities. Ocean Acidification: Acidification of marine waters due to increased carbon dioxide absorption harms shellfish, fish, and other marine life. Healthy marine ecosystems play an important role in the City's economy, ecosystems, and are critical to the cultural practices and way of life of the Suquamish Tribe who have inhabited South Kitsap County for thousands of years. Changing Precipitation Patterns: Altered rainfall patterns affect water availability, agriculture, and stormwater management. Increased precipitation intensity leads to flooding, landslides, and soil erosion. The City may expect to see impacts ' Department of Commerce Intermediate Planning Guidance, December 2023 ' Kitsap County Climate Resiliency Assessment, 2020 ® Port Orchard Comprehensive Plan Adopted: XX 2024 Chapter 10: Climate Change to public infrastructure as a result of increased flooding, including disruption of transportation routes and damage to ferry terminals, as well as damage to stormwater and wastewater infrastructure from flood inundation and saltwater intrusion. Health Impacts: Climate change exacerbates respiratory illnesses, heat -related illnesses, and mental health issues. Vulnerable populations, including the elderly and low-income communities, are at higher risk. More frequent heat waves may result in increased deaths, and will require the investment in cooling centers and/or public subsidies for low income households to install air-conditioning. Increased need for air conditioning will also have an adverse impact on greenhouse gas emissions in the City. Habitat Disruption: Changing ecosystems affect wildlife migration, breeding patterns, and food availability. Protecting habitats is critical for biodiversity and ecosystem services. Warmer stream temperatures and lower summer flows will affect fish species that use these habitats. New invasive species and diseases could also emerge due to changes in the climate. Economic Disruptions: Climate impacts can disrupt local businesses, tourism, and agriculture. Planning for economic resilience is vital. The City has a large workforce employed in construction. Outdoor laborers are especially vulnerable to extreme heat events and are likely to experience lost labor hours due to extreme heat and poor air quality. Sea level rise and increased flooding may also affect property values within coastal areas or floodplains. Water Resources Challenges: The City provides drinking water within the City supplied by six active wells and from additional planned wells. Altered hydrology due to climate change will affect water supply, groundwater recharge, and streamflow. Balancing water needs for residents, agriculture, and ecosystems is a priority. Resiliency planning will address these risks, ensuring Port Orchard remains adaptable and prepared for a changing climate. 10.4 Baseline Conditions Effective decision -making requires understanding baseline conditions, including greenhouse gas emissions and climate resiliency indicators. This information will serve as a benchmark to measure the effectiveness of any strategies or initiatives implemented towards achieving these goals. Greenhouse Gas Emissions Baseline Emissions (2022) The baseline for greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions represents the starting point against which we measure progress. It encompasses historical emissions data, including those from energy production, transportation, industry, and land use changes. The Department of Commerce is creating emissions inventories for the 11 counties that are required to include a GHG reduction sub -element in their comprehensive plan. The inventories use 2022 as a baseline year but do not disaggregate emissions to the city level. Once the GHG emissions inventory for Kitsap County is available, the City will need to hire a consultant ® Port Orchard Comprehensive Plan Adopted: XX 2024 Chapter 10: Climate Change to complete the technical analysis required to disaggregate the emissions down to the city level consistent with guidance published by the Department of Commerce. Per Capita Vehicle Miles Traveled (VMT) (2021) Per capita VMT serves as a critical indicator of transportation -related emissions. The baseline VMT includes historical data on miles traveled by various vehicle types (cars, trucks, buses) over time. Future analysis will be necessary to establish per capita vehicle miles traveled for the City. Climate Resilience The CMRW developed by the UW CIG has identified the following climate hazards that may pose a risk to the City of Port Orchard. The following climate indicators have been identified based on the historical normal for the period of 1980-2009 and provide a baseline for addressing the risk climate change poses to the City under the high emissions scenario for the years 2020-2049 (30-year period). Sector(s) Climate Indicator Hazard Climate Impacts Notes Agriculture & Drought 29% chance any Below normal summer High emissions Food Systems given year will precipitation indicates a scenario. Increase Emergency have a total greater likelihood of in likelihood for Management summer drought. Drought can 30-year period. precipitation affect the well-being of Water below 75% of the people and water Resources historical normal availability for crops and summer ecosystems. More precipitation frequent droughts is also expected to increase need for emergency services to respond to water shortages that may occur due to voluntary or mandatory conservation requirements. ® Port Orchard Comprehensive Plan Adopted: XX 2024 Chapter 10: Climate Change Sector(s) Climate Indicator Hazard Climate Impacts Notes Agriculture & Extreme 3.5° increase in Warmer summers will High emissions Food Systems Heat average summer directly impact the health scenario. Increase Economic temperature and well-being of people, in likelihood for Development create stress for crops and 30-year period. reduce water availability. Ecosystems Warmer summer Human Health temperatures could also decrease opportunities for warm season recreation activities. Warmer summer temperatures are expected to reduce soil moisture and increase stress on plants and animals. Buildings and Extreme +177 degree-days An increase in cooling High emissions Energy Heat during the 30-year degree days will increase scenario. Increase period energy demand for air in likelihood for conditioning in the 30-year period. summer when regional hydropower supply is expected to decrease ® Port Orchard Comprehensive Plan Adopted: XX 2024 Chapter 10: Climate Change Sector(s) Climate Indicator Hazard Climate Impacts Notes Cultural Sea Level .75' Likely Sea Sea Level Rise will High emissions Resources and Rise Level Rise to 1.5' inundate culturally scenario. Increase Practices High Sea Level relevant and important in likelihood for Economic Rise sites, such as traditional the year 2050. Development fishing grounds. Sea level rise may also intensify Ecosystems coastal flooding which can Emergency disrupt business Management operations, damage property, reduce the land Transportation area suitable for Water development, impact Resources coastal transportation infrastructure, and Zoning and increase need for Development emergency services to recover from flooding. Sea level rise can also increase coastal erosion and flooding reducing habitats for some aquatic, wildlife and plant species. Sea level rise is also expected to increase salt water intrusion into groundwater and coastal aquifers, which could reduce water quality. Cultural Extreme 14.3° increase in Warmer stream High emissions Resources and Heat August stream temperatures are scenario. Increase Practices temperature expected to reduce habitat in likelihood for Ecosystems quality for salmonids, 2030-2059. reducing abundance of Zoning and and access for Northwest Development Tribes. Warmer stream temperature have the potential to reduce the ability to meet water quality standards set on wastewater treatment facilities. ® Port Orchard Comprehensive Plan Adopted: XX 2024 Chapter 10: Climate Change Sector(s) Climate Indicator Hazard Climate Impacts Notes Economic Flooding Return Interval of The 25-year peak High emissions Development 25-yr Peak streamflow is the scenario. Increase Ecosystems Streamflow streamflow that occurs on in likelihood for Blackjack Creek— average every 25 years, 30-year period. Emergency 9.8 years heavier precipitation is Management anticipated to cause this to Transportation occur every 9.8 years for Blackjack Creek, which Waste could leak to increased Management flooding and impacts to Zoning and homes and businesses, Development increased need for emergency services, as well as increased flood damage to roads, bridges, and railway. Increased flood zones could also reduce the suitability of some areas for development. Increased streamflows can also cause juvenile salmonids to be flushed downstream prematurely, reducing salmonid migration returns. Flooding of waste management facilities can also release contaminants and hazardous materials. ® Port Orchard Comprehensive Plan Adopted: XX 2024 Chapter 10: Climate Change Sector(s) Climate Indicator Hazard Climate Impacts Notes Economic Extreme 7% increase in the Heavier precipitation is High emissions Development Precipitation magnitude of 2- expected to intensify scenario. Increase Transportation year storm flooding in low-lying areas in likelihood for and require higher 30-year period. Waste capacity storm water Management drainage systems. Heavier Zoning and precipitation events may Development lead to flooding, landslides and erosion which can interrupt transportation routes, damage infrastructure and increase maintenance and repair costs. Storm damage may also generate waste and debris. Increased urban flooding could also affect zoning restrictions on new buildings and require revised building codes or increased development in frequently flooded areas. Ecosystems Drought 7.8% decrease in A decrease in summer High emissions Water late summer precipitation is expected scenario. Increase Resources precipitation to lower streamflows, in likelihood for reduce water quality and 30-year period. increase water temperatures. Less summer precipitation will also contribute to drought stress on plant growth and will contribute to summer water shortages. Water quality may also decrease with less summer precipitation and warmer water temperatures. ® Port Orchard Comprehensive Plan Adopted: XX 2024 Chapter 10: Climate Change Sector(s) Climate Indicator Hazard Climate Impacts Notes Emergency Extreme +14.4 days above More frequent extreme High emissions Management Heat 90' during the 30- heat event are expected to scenario. Increase Human Health year time period increase the demand for in likelihood for emergency services. They 30-year period. may also impact emergency services due to transportation disruptions such as warped and buckling pavement on roads. An increase in the number of days above 900 is also expected to increase heat -related deaths, illnesses and hospitalizations. 10.5 Goals and Policies In this Chapter the City has set forth its vision and commitment to a sustainable future. Recognizing the challenges posed by a changing climate, these goals and policies are designed to steer the City towards resilience and adaptability while also aiming to reduce greenhouse gas emissions. The goals and policies contained within this iteration of the Climate Change element represent direction to complete this Chapter as well as preliminary goals and policies adopted from the Department of Commerce's Menu of Measures' to address the sectors and climate hazards identified from the CMRW in Section 10.4 above. Goal I. Complete this Climate Change Element. Policy CC-1 Apply for funding from the Department of Commerce to complete the climate planning related activities necessary to complete this Chapter and implement House Bill 1181. Policy CC-1a. When funding is available, hire a consultant to help complete the technical analysis required to establish baseline greenhouse gas emissions and VMT. Policy CC-2 Complete a Community Assets Inventory and risk assessment of the City's social, economic and environmental assets that the community wants to protect. Policy CC-2a. Evaluate the current risk exposure and vulnerability of the city's community assets against the impacts of climate change. Policy CC-3 Complete an audit of the City's existing plans to identify gaps, opportunities and barriers to building resilience to climate change. Policy CC-4 Refine the goals and policies contained within this first iteration of the City's Climate $ Department of Commerce Intermediate Planning Guidance, December 2023, Appendix L = Port Orchard Comprehensive Plan Adopted: XX 2024 Chapter 10: Climate Change Change element, either adapting the goals and policies, developing new goals and policies, or adopting a hazard mitigation plan (see Climate Resilience Pathways in the Department of Commerce's Intermediate Planning Guidance). Policy CC-5 Conduct robust public engagement on the development of this Chapter. Policy CC-6 Set incremental emissions reduction targets that lead to achieving net zero emissions in 2050. Goal 2. Reduce greenhouse gas emissions within the City consistent with the Washington State target of net -zero emissions by 2050. Buildings and Energy Policy CC-7 Maximize solar access of site design, where practicable, for new solar -ready residential and commercial buildings. Policy CC-7a. Encourage solar panels on buildings with large rooftops, as well as within or over parking areas. Policy CC-8 Encourage buildings use renewable energy, conservation, and efficiency technologies and practices to reduce greenhouse gas emissions. Policy CC-8a. Encourage energy efficient housing types that conserve non-renewable energy and help minimize impact on air quality and climate. (Policy HS- 25) Policy CC-8b. Encourage the retrofit of buildings for energy efficiency. Policy CC-8c. Incentivize green building certification to improve energy and environmental performance. Policy CC-9 Encourage the adaptive reuse of buildings, recognizing the emission -reduction benefits of retaining existing buildings. Policy CC-9a. Encourage the preservation and weatherization of housing in overburdened communities, particularly at higher densities, to reduce emissions and increase resilience. Ecosystems Policy CC-10 Increase tree canopy cover to boost carbon sequestration, reduce heat islands, and improve air quality, prioritizing overburdened communities. Policy CC-1Oa. Require the retention and replacement of significant trees in the City.(Policy NS-9) Policy CC-10b. Adopt a canopy coverage target for the City and monitor progress on a regular basis to determine if policy changes are necessary to reach the City's target. (Policy NS-10) Policy CC-10c. Identify parks and open spaces in the City where tree canopy coverage could be increased. (Policy NS-11) Policy CC-10d. Use trees and vegetation to mitigate erosion potential, meet drainage ® Port Orchard Comprehensive Plan Adopted: XX 2024 Chapter 10: Climate Change needs and reduce the impacts of development. (Policy NS-12) Policy CC-10e. Establish programs and policies that maintain and increase forests and vegetative cover and prioritize the connectivity of forests that provide valuable wildlife corridors within the City. (Policy NS-14) Transportation Policy CC-11 Convert public fleets to zero emission vehicles and develop supporting infrastructure and programs (e.g., charging stations and dedicated lanes for electric cars and buses). Policy CC-11a. Require electric vehicle charging infrastructure in new and retrofitted buildings. Policy CC-12 Implement multimodal transportation planning to reduce single -occupancy vehicle dependence and greenhouse gas emissions. Policy CC-12a. Emphasize moving people rather than vehicles by providing a variety of ways to commute to work. (Policy TR-45) Policy CC-12b. Provide preferential treatments for transit, such as queue bypass lanes, traffic signal modifications, and safe, convenient, transit stops. (Policy TR-20) Policy CC-12c. Create a safe, well connected, and attractive bicycle and pedestrian transportation network to encourage active transportation. Policy CC-13 Reduce vehicle miles traveled to achieve greenhouse gas reduction goals. Policy CC-13a. Implement travel demand management (TDM) programs and strategies. Prioritize, develop, and maintain mobility hubs in transportation - efficient locations — especially in overburdened communities experiencing a scarcity of transportation alternatives. Policy CC-13b. Shorten commutes by concentrating housing and employment in strategic locations, which provides residents opportunities to live and work in the same neighborhood. (Policy CN-3) Policy CC-13c. The City shall ensure that higher density development in Centers is either within walking or biking distance of jobs, schools, and parks and is well -served by public transit. (Centers Goals 1,2,3,4,5,6; Housing, Parks, Economic Development, Transportation, and Capital Facilities Elements) (Policy CN-11) Policy CC-13d. Prioritize permitting for transit -oriented development (TOD) proposals. Zoning & Development Policy CC-14 Increase housing diversity and supply within urban growth areas to reduce greenhouse gas emissions and support environmental justice. Policy CC-14a. Within centers, set minimum building densities that enable lively and active streets and commercial destinations. Such limits may take the form of: minimum floors or building height, floor -area -ratios, and lot coverage; and maximum street setbacks and parking spaces. (Policy LU- 11) ® Port Orchard Comprehensive Plan Adopted: XX 2024 Chapter 10: Climate Change Policy CC-14b. Evaluate a range of incentives to encourage compact development to preserve open space throughout the city, possibly to include density credits, incentive zoning, and transfer of development rights. (Policy LU- 15) Goal 3. Strengthen the City's resilience against the impacts of climate change. Buildings and Energy Policy CC-15 Ensure that energy infrastructure — including generation and transmission — is able to accommodate renewable energy opportunities and to withstand and recover quickly from the impacts of extreme weather and other natural hazards worsened by climate change. Policy CC-15a. Plan and build facilities, utilities, and infrastructure projects to avoid or withstand flooding from rising sea levels and associated climate impacts. Policy CC-15b. Work with energy utilities to improve the safety and reliability of infrastructure vulnerable to climate change. Policy CC-16 Ensure that buildings are designed and built sustainably to reduce environmental impacts and remain resilient to extreme weather and other hazards worsened by climate change. Policy CC-16a. Require the design and construction of commercial and residential buildings and their surrounding sites to reduce and treat stormwater runoff and pollution. Policy CC-16b. Develop or modify design standards to integrate exterior building features that reduce the impacts of climate change and increase resilience. Cultural Resources & Practices Policy CC-17 Ensure that cultural resources and practices — including significant historic sites and culturally important traditional foods and natural resources — are resilient to the impacts of extreme weather and other natural hazards worsened by climate change. Policy CC-17a. Protect, enhance, and restore ecosystems in order to meet tribal treaty rights and conserve culturally important consumptive and nonconsumptive resources including foods, medicinal plants, and materials that could be adversely impacted by climate change. Policy CC-17b. Establish and maintain government -to -government relations with Native American tribes for the preservation of archaeological sites and traditional cultural properties that are vulnerable to climate impacts. Policy CC-18 Ensure environmental justice by providing all residents an equitable opportunity to learn about climate impacts, influence policy decisions, and take actions to enhance community resilience. Policy CC-18a. Create and implement culturally contextualized outreach and education ® Port Orchard Comprehensive Plan Adopted: XX 2024 Chapter 10: Climate Change initiatives and materials that will inform the community about near - term and longer -term climate change threats and build resilience. Economic Development Policy CC-19 Ensure that the local economy is resilient to climate disruptions and fosters business opportunities associated with climate mitigation and adaptation. Policy CC-19a. Support local businesses' efforts to bolster climate preparedness and continuity of operations. EcosVstems Policy CC-20 Ensure the protection and restoration of streams, riparian zones, estuaries, wetlands, and floodplains to achieve healthy watersheds that are resilient to climate change. Policy CC-2Oa. Implement actions identified in restoration and salmon recovery plans to improve the climate resilience of streams and watersheds. Policy CC-20b. Increase the climate resilience of native fish species and aquatic ecosystems by reducing the threat of aquatic invasive species (e.g., fish, plants, invertebrates). Policy CC-2Oc. Protect and restore watershed -scale processes to maximize the ecological benefits and climate resilience of riparian ecosystems. Policy CC-20d. Protect and restore riparian vegetation to reduce erosion, provide shade, and support other functions that improve the climate resilience of streams. Policy CC-2Oe. Increase aquatic habitat resilience to low summer flows by increasing water residence time, storing water on the landscape, conserving water, protecting groundwater, keeping waters cool, and protecting water quality. Policy CC-21 Protect and restore coastal ecosystems to increase the resilience of species, habitats, and communities to climate change. Policy CC-21a. Consider sea -level rise in coastal and nearshore habitat restoration projects. Policy CC-21b. Identify, protect, and restore submerged aquatic vegetation (eelgrass, kelp, etc.) that provides aquatic habitat, "blue" carbon storage, and other ecosystem services. Emergency Management Policy CC-22 Develop and maintain local government staff members' technical expertise and skills related to climate change and environmental justice so as to improve communitywide policy implementation, equity, and resilience. Policy CC-22a. Create evacuation plans and outreach materials to help residents plan and practice actions that make evacuation quicker and safer. Policy CC-23 Enhance emergency preparedness, response, and recovery efforts to mitigate risks and impacts associated with extreme weather and other hazards worsened by climate change. ® Port Orchard Comprehensive Plan Adopted: XX 2024 Chapter 10: Climate Change Policy CC-23a. Map transportation infrastructure that is vulnerable to repeated floods, landslides, and other natural hazards, and designate alternative travel routes for critical transportation corridors when roads must be closed. Policy CC-23b. Incorporate sea -level rise information, along with tsunami hazard mapping, into critical area delineation for siting critical infrastructure, land -use planning, and emergency management. Policy CC-23c. Develop resilience hubs — community -serving facilities that are designed to support residents, coordinate communication, distribute resources, and reduce carbon pollution while enhancing quality of life. Policy CC-23d. Factor climate impacts into the planning of operations and coordination of preparedness, response, and recovery activities among first - responders and partners, including public health, law enforcement, fire, school, and emergency medical services (EMS) personnel. Health & Well-Beins Policy CC-24 Protect community health and well-being from the impacts of climate -exacerbated hazards — prioritizing focus on overburdened communities — and ensure that the most vulnerable residents do not bear disproportionate health impacts. Policy CC-24a. Promote the use of health impact assessments and other tools to address the potential impacts of health, equity, and climate change on vulnerable communities. Policy CC-24b. Prioritize the development of anti -displacement programs in overburdened communities when increasing densities. Policy CC-24c. Review land use maps and identify opportunities or barriers to responding to rapid population growth or decline, rebuilding housing and services after disasters, and other extreme climate impact scenarios. Policy CC-24d. Provide overburdened communities subsidies to offset potential cost increases associated with conversion to non -fossil -fuel energy sources. Policy CC-24e. Develop and maintain a program to distribute cooling units and install heat pumps, prioritizing households with residents (e.g., low-income seniors) most vulnerable to extreme temperature events. Transportation Policy CC-25 Ensure that the local transportation system — including infrastructure, routes, and travel modes — is able to withstand and recover quickly from the impacts of extreme weather events and other hazards exacerbated by climate change. Policy CC-25a. Design and site new and expanded roads to have the least possible adverse effect on the shoreline, account for sea level rise projections, not result in a net loss of shoreline ecological functions, or adversely impact existing or planned water -oriented uses, public access, and habitat restoration and enhancement projects. Watpr Rpcourrpc ® Port Orchard Comprehensive Plan Adopted: XX 2024 Chapter 10: Climate Change Policy CC-26 Protect and preserve water quality and quantity from drought, extreme heat, and other hazards exacerbated by climate change. Policy CC-26a. Utilize water conservation methods and technologies in development of irrigation infrastructure within parks and recreation areas so as to foster climate resilience. Policy CC-26b. Develop and implement a comprehensive drought resilience strategy that factors in projected climate impacts and sets action levels for different drought stages. Policy CC-26c. Identify and implement strategies to prepare for and mitigate the effects of saltwater intrusion into aquifers and drainage systems. Policy CC-26d. Require the use of green infrastructure and low -impact development to address increased storm intensities and stormwater runoff. Policy CC-26e. Evaluate the long-term adequacy of water delivery infrastructure to ensure that changes in hydrological patterns (e.g., increases in flooding frequency or reduction of late -summer water availability associated with climate change) can be anticipated and managed effectively. Zoning & Development Policy CC-27 Establish land use patterns that increase the resilience of the built environment, ecosystems, and communities to climate change. Policy CC-27a. Restore and maintain critical areas and open space areas to maximize the climate resilience benefits they provide. Policy CC-27b. Direct new development into areas where exposure to climate hazards is low. Policy CC-27c. Identify and implement strategies to increase the resilience of the shoreline environment to sea -level rise and other climate hazards, while also protecting shoreline ecological functions, allowing water - dependent uses, and providing public access. Policy CC-28 Ensure that development and redevelopment projects are resilient to the impacts of climate change. Policy CC-28a. Establish development regulations that incorporate best practices for reducing the risk of wildfire, extreme heat, flooding, and other climate - exacerbated hazards. Policy CC-28b. Consider future climate conditions during siting and design of capital facilities, including changes to temperature, rainfall, and sea level, to help ensure they function as intended over their planned life cycle. Policy CC-28c. Identify and plan for climate impacts to valued community assets such as parks and recreation facilities, including relocation or replacement. Policy CC-28d. Consider climate change, including sea -level rise, extreme precipitation, increased winter streamflow, and other impacts, in floodplain management planning. ® Port Orchard Comprehensive Plan Adopted: XX 2024 CITY OF PORT ORCHARD Department of Community Development s Nui;, 216 Prospect Street Port Orchard, WA 98366 Phone (36o) 874-5533 - Fax (36o) 876-4980 Memorandum To: The Port Orchard City Council From: Nicholas Bond, AICP Date: April 1, 2024 Re: Middle Housing Options - Implementation of Washington State Department of Commerce Middle Housing Grant At Issue: In 2023, the Washington State Legislature passed House Bill 1110, requiring significant changes to housing planning for many Washington cities. This legislation mandates that cities of specific sizes and locations permit multiple dwelling units per lot in areas that historically are exclusive to detached homes. In 2024, the Legislature passed Engrossed Substitute House Bill 2321, which modified the requirements created under HB 1110. This memorandum has been prepared as a requirement of the City's Washington State Department of Commerce Middle Housing Grant, which funds the City's efforts to implement regulations to comply with these new laws. The City Council accepted the grant in 2023 (Department of Commerce Interagency Agreement with the City of Port Orchard ,Department of Commerce Contract Number 24-63326-132 and City Contract Number 087-23). This memorandum provides the City Council with the tools needed to evaluate the available options for compliance with these new laws by outlining the requirements of HB 1110 and ESHB 2321 and summarizing the City of Port Orchard Housing Action Plan (accepted by the City Council on June 13, 2023 and accepted by Commerce in June 2023) and associated 2023 community survey results, as well as Middle Housing guidance provided by the Washington State Department of Commerce. Finally, it serves as a guide for City decision -makers to implement the new middle housing laws by providing a menu of options intended to increase the availability of middle housing types, while considering the recommendations outlined in the City of Port Orchard Housing Action Plan. What is Middle Housing? Page 1 of 22 10850357.1 - 366922 - 0001 As defined in RCW 36.70A.030, "Middle housing" is a term used to refer to homes that offer an option that is in the middle between detached single-family houses and large multifamily complexes. Ideally, these buildings harmonize in scale, form, and character with traditional single-family houses. Most commonly the term is used to encompass two or more attached, stacked, or clustered homes such as duplexes, triplexes, fourplexes, fiveplexes, sixplexes, townhouses, stacked flats, courtyard apartments, and cottage housing. These housing types typically offer multiple units within a single structure, providing a variety of living arrangements and densities within neighborhoods. , Middle housing is important in addressing housing needs for o. several reasons as it promotes: ` .� iir � it � � � ®• -- . Ile Diverse I M Housing Options: Middle Exampfesofthe nine middle housrngtypes. Source: MAKERS housing diversifies the housing stock within a community, catering to a broader range of household sizes, incomes, and preferences. This variety accommodates individuals and families at different stages of life, from young professionals to empty nesters, and promotes inclusive and vibrant neighborhoods. Affordability: Middle housing often offers more affordable options than single-family homes or large apartment complexes. By allowing for the development of smaller, more compact units, middle housing helps increase housing affordability, particularly in high -demand urban areas where land costs are prohibitive. Density and Efficient Land Use: Middle housing promotes higher residential densities, which can lead to more efficient land use and support transit - oriented development. By accommodating more housing units within existing neighborhoods, middle housing reduces urban sprawl, preserves green space, and fosters sustainable growth patterns. Walkability and Accessibility: Middle housing encourages walkable neighborhoods by increasing housing density and supporting mixed -use development. This, in turn, enhances access to amenities, services, and public transportation, reducing reliance on cars and promoting healthier, more active lifestyles. 10850357.1 - 366922 - 0001 Where is Middle Housing Required? The Legislature has adopted middle housing requirements that target zones designated for predominantly residential use, unless zoning already exists to permit higher densities or intensities. Port Orchard has six residential zoning designations subject to the middle housing requirements of HB 1110 and ESHB 2321.The Port Orchard Municipal Code (POMC) describes the impacted designations as follows: • Residential 1 (R1): The R1 district is intended to accommodate single-family detached houses with a minimum lot size of 5,000 to 6,000 square feet. (Cottage court developments may have individual lots as small as 1,200 square feet, as indicated below.) R1 may be applied in areas designated as residential low or residential medium in the Port Orchard comprehensive plan. Uses and building types that would substantially interfere with the single- family residential nature of the district are not allowed. (POMC 20.34.010) • Residential 2 (R2): The R2 district is primarily intended to accommodate detached house, duplex, and townhouse development with a minimum lot size that varies based on building type. The R2 district is intended to implement the residential medium density comprehensive plan designation. Additional building types that are allowed include backyard cottage (detached accessory dwelling unit), cottage court, duplex and attached house. Uses that would substantially interfere with the residential nature of the district are not allowed. (POMC 20.34.020) • Residential (R3): The R3 district is intended to accommodate a variety of residential options limited to three stories in height. The R3 zone should be applied in areas designated as residential medium density in the Port Orchard comprehensive plan. Uses that would substantially interfere with the residential nature of the district are not allowed. (POMC 20.34.030) • Residential (R4): The R4 district is intended to accommodate a variety of multifamily residential options at heights of 45 feet or less. Uses that would substantially interfere with the residential nature of the district are not allowed. (POMC 20.34.040) • Residential (R5): The R5 district is intended to accommodate a variety of multifamily residential options at heights of 55 feet or less. Uses that would substantially interfere with the residential nature of the district are not allowed. (POMC 20.34.050) • Residential (R6): The R6 district is primarily intended to accommodate detached house development with a minimum lot size that varies based on building type. The R6 district is intended to implement the residential medium density comprehensive plan designation in selected parts of the McCormick Woods master planning area. Additional building types that are allowed include backyard cottage (detached accessory dwelling unit), cottage court, duplex and attached house. Uses that would substantially interfere with the residential nature of the district are not allowed. (POMC 20.34.060) 3 10850357.1 - 366922 - 0001 The R3, R4, and R5 zones allow for apartments and thus these zones allow densities that are higher and more intense than what is required for middle housing and are not impacted by the middle housing legislation. The City's R1 zone allows for detached houses and ADUs, while the City's R2 zone allows for Detached Houses, ADUs, Cottage Courts, Duplexes, and Townhomes (which can contain 3-4 units). The R1 and R2 zones are primarily dedicated to Single Family use. The R6 zone is like R1 and R2 and is proposed for elimination (changing to R2) in the 2024 Comprehensive Plan Update. Port Orchard residents recognize the importance of flexibility in integrating a variety of housing options to expand housing supply and land capacity. The Housing Action Plan (HAP) community survey revealed strong support, with 70% of respondents endorsing the idea of "[a]llow more housing types like duplexes, cottages, and townhouses in single-family neighborhoods if they're compatibly sized and designed." A summary of the basic requirements for Cities subject to HB 1110 and ESHB 2321 are provided in Table 1: 4 10850357.1 - 366922 - 0001 Table 1 Minimum number NEAR A MAJOR WITH Requires of middle TRANSIT STOP: AFFORDABLE allowance for housing units Minimum number HOUSING: six of nine that must be of middle Minimum number middle allowed per lot in housing units of middle housing types predominately that must be housing units in zones residential zones allowed per lot that must be predominantly within 1/4 mile allowed per lot for middle walking distance with affordable housing. of major transit housing in stop in predominately predominately residential zones residential where density in zones applicable zone does not otherwise allow this number (See also HB 1110, Sec. 3 2 TIER ONE: 4 du/lot, unless 6 du/ lot, unless 6 du/lot if at least 2 Yes Cities with zoning permits zoning permits units are population of higher densities higher densities affordable, unless at least 75,000 zoning permits E2SHB 1110, higher densities Sec. 3(1)(b) TIER TWO: 2 du/lot unless 4 du/lot, unless 4 du/lot if at least 1 Yes Cities with zoning permits zoning permits unit is affordable, population of higher densities higher densities unless zoning at least 25,000 permits higher but less than densities 75,000 E2SHB 1110, Sec. 31 a TIER THREE: 2 du/lot, unless N/A N/A No *Amended Cities with zoning permits by HB 2321 population higher densities passed in under 25,000 2024. that are contiguous with a UGA that includes the largest city in a county with a population over 275,000 E2SHB 1110, Sec. 3(1)(c) 10850357.1 - 366922 - 0001 As a Tier Three city, Port Orchard is required to allow for at least two units per lot in zones predominantly for residential use, unless the residential zone already allows for higher densities or intensities. This means that every R1 and R2 lot will need to allow for at least two units per lot, but the City is not yet required to meet the requirements identified for Tier 1 and Tier 2 cities. However, Port Orchard is rapidly growing and could surpass 25,000 residents in the next few years and even sooner if it were to annex additional lands. This would mean that, upon reaching this population threshold, the City would move into Tier 2 and would be required to provide for six of the nine middle housing types in the R1 and R2 zones. In anticipation of the likely move into Tier 2, the City may need to make additional preemptive modifications to R1 and R2 (beyond those required for Tier 3). For example, the R2 zone, as it currently exists, may satisfy some of the Tier 2 requirements, but some minor amendments to create distinctive building types (for instance, permitting and creating a distinct "triplex" building type — currently the city lumps triplex and fourplex types together) are warranted to ensure full compliance. Additionally, the R1 zone as adopted would not satisfy the minimum requirements for a Tier Two city. Port Orchard's Current Middle Housing Regulations: In 2019, the City of Port Orchard adopted POMC Title 20 — Unified Development Code which is a form -based code' (Ord. 011-19) offering several advantages in promoting middle housing development. POMC Title 20 prioritizes the physical characteristics and design of buildings and streets over strict land use regulations. This allows for more flexibility in accommodating a variety of housing types, including middle housing like duplexes, triplexes, and townhouses, within existing neighborhoods. POMC Title 20 also allows the City to be more responsive and flexible to changing demographic and market trends . As housing needs evolve, Port Orchard can adjust the regulations to encourage the development of middle housing types that meet the demands of residents, such as smaller units for aging populations or affordable options for young families. POMC 20.32, Building Types, addresses the differentiation of building types and provides standards for the construction of different building types. The focus of POMC 20.32 is the physical form of development rather than just land use emphasizing the design and layout of buildings, streets, and public spaces to create a cohesive and visually appealing built environment. ' Form -based zoning is an approach to zoning that emphasizes built form over land use. This emphasis distinguishes it from conventional (Euclidean) zoning, which prioritizes a separation of potentially incompatible land uses, and performance zoning, which prioritizes mitigating the potential negative effects of new land uses or development. Over the past several decades, hundreds of cities and counties have adopted form -based zoning regulations (i.e., form -based codes) to foster or protect a pedestrian -oriented development pattern. American Planning Association. 6 10850357.1 - 366922 - 0001 POMC 20.32 provides a framework to facilitate the development of middle housing in Port Orchard in a manner that is compatible with the city's overall urban design goals and vision for sustainable growth including middle housing types as described in HB 1110. Title 20 currently incorporates many of the identified housing types in HB 1110 and permits them in all Residential zoning districts as shown in Table 2. POMC 20.32 establishes specific requirements and standards for building types in Port Orchard and identifies where those building types are appropriate. Table 2 Building Type R1 R2 R3 R4 R5 R6 Detached House P P P -- -- P Backyard Cottage P P P -- -- P Cottage Court P P P -- -- P Duplex: Side -by -Side -- P P -- -- -- Duplex: Back -to -Back -- P P -- -- -- Attached House -- P P -- -- -- Four lex -- -- P P P -- Townhouse -- P* P P P Apartment -- P P P -- *Restricted to three units in the R2 zone. As illustrated in Table 2, POMC 20.32 currently includes several building types that satisfy the requirements of HB 1110 and ESHB 2321, which encourages the development of middle housing options. These include backyard cottages (Accessory Dwelling Units), cottage courts, duplexes (both side -by -side and back-to- back configurations), attached houses, fourplexes, and townhouses. These building types are permitted in the appropriate zoning designations. However, to align more closely with the requirements of HB 1110 and ESHB 2321 and in anticipation of exceeding the 25,000-population threshold which would require Port Orchard to have at least six of the nine required middle housing types and to provide clarity and distinction between different types of housing, the City could make minimal amendments as described in Alternative 2 in the following section. By adopting certain amendments, Port Orchard's Municipal Code 20.32 would better align with the requirements of HB 1110 and ESHB 2321, supporting the development of diverse middle housing options while providing clear and coherent regulations for developers, residents, and city officials. Middle Housing Alternatives 7 10850357.1 - 366922 - 0001 HB 1110 and ESHB 2321 allow for alternatives in its implementation. The following three alternatives have been identified by staff, in consultation with the Department of Commerce and review of the Middle Housing Bills as solutions to compliance with the mandates. In Alternatives 1 and 2, it is assumed the R6 district will be eliminated through the 2024 Comprehensive Plan Periodic Update process. Those properties currently designated R6 would be redesignated to R2. Historically, most middle housing types have been rental units without the opportunity for fee simple ownership. The "unit lot subdivision" process provides a solution to this issue. This process allows for singular ownership of individual housing units while enabling common ownership of shared facilities and lands. RCW 58.17.060 mandates that cities, including Port Orchard, incorporate provisions for unit lot subdivisions into their short plat regulations and procedures. To comply with this mandate and address the need for fee simple ownership opportunities in middle housing, amendments to the Port Orchard Municipal Code are necessary. These amendments will ensure compliance with state law while facilitating the implementation of unit lot subdivisions within Port Orchard, providing residents with greater flexibility and ownership options in the middle housing market. These amendments will be necessary in the implementation of Alternatives 1 and 2. Alternative 1: To ensure compliance with the mandates outlined in RCW 36.70A.635(1)(c) regarding middle housing, Port Orchard must allow for a minimum of two dwelling units per lot. Currently, the Port Orchard Municipal Code accommodates several middle housing types as required. However, to fully align with the requirements of HB 1110, a straightforward code amendment permitting duplexes within the Residential 1 designation is warranted. This adjustment will effectively meet Port Orchard's existing obligations and ensure full compliance with HB 1110 and ESHB 2321. Alternative 2: Alternative 2 proposes the redesignation of properties from R1 to R2 zoning districts to comply with HB 1110. This involves repealing existing R1 zoning standards and implementing middle housing building types mandated by HB 1110 in the R2 district. Port Orchard anticipates population growth, prompting compliance with density requirements outlined in RCW 36.70A.635(1)(a), allowing for at least two units per lot and higher densities near major transit stops and for affordable housing units. Though lacking Major Transit Stops, the City recognizes the importance of increased densities near transit for equitable access to transportation. By analyzing existing regulations and identifying suitable areas for higher -density development, Port Orchard aims to plan effectively for growth, promote affordability, and encourage sustainability. Alternative 3: RCW 36.70A. provides relief from the requirements of HB 1110 where certain criteria can be met and demonstrated. The Department of Commerce was directed to establish a process for cities to seek approval of alternative local actions to meet the HB 1110 requirements. Approval may be granted for cities that s 10850357.1 - 366922 - 0001 have adopted comprehensive plans and development regulations substantially similar to the requirements of HB 1110 by January 1, 2023. Port Orchard could potentially seek approval of alternative local action under 36.70A.636(3)(a) if the City can demonstrate that its adopted form -based code is substantially similar to the requirements of HB 1110. This would involve showing that the code results in an overall increase in housing units allowed in single-family zones, allows for middle housing throughout the city, and permits additional density near major transit stops, although Port Orchard does not have any major transit stops, and for projects with dedicated affordable housing. If the Department of Commerce approves such action, the City's implementation efforts would be exempt from appeals, providing a streamlined path for compliance. However, careful consideration and documentation of how the form -based code aligns with the specified criteria would be essential to support any exemption request. Middle Housing Alternatives Implementation Alternative 1 Alternative 1 proposes the inclusion of duplex building types within the R1 district. This adjustment aligns with the mandates of HB 1110 and ESHB 2321, advocating for increased density and housing diversity while addressing the demand for affordable housing options. By allowing at least two dwelling units, through the inclusion of duplexes, on all lots primarily designated for single-family residential use, the proposed amendment ensures full compliance with the Middle Housing Bills. Alternative 1 represents a strategic response to housing needs and the legislative mandates outlined in HB 1110. By permitting duplex building types within the R1 zoning district, compliance with state directives is achieved with minimal disruption to property owners. Zoning designations and currently allowed uses would remain largely unchanged; the amendment would simply introduce another building type to the R1 designation. However, it's important to acknowledge potential negative impacts. Established single-family neighborhoods currently designated as R1 would now have redevelopment potential that includes duplexes, which may alter the character of these areas. Approximately 17.38% of properties, which currently allow detached housing but not duplex building types, would be affected by this change. It's worth noting that the remaining 82.62% of properties already allow for duplexes in addition to other middle housing types such as townhouses or cottage courts. It is important to note that the R6 district would be redesignated as R2 through the 2024 Comprehensive Plan Periodic Update process. Alternative 1 limits change to the minimum necessary to comply with HB 1110 and ESHB 2321 mandates. 9 10850357.1 - 366922 - 0001 Table 3 describes the current area and the percentage of the whole of Residential zones that permit detached houses. Table 3 Zone Area in Acres Percent R1 309.01 8.69% R2 1929.21 54.25% R3 1008.97 28.37% R6 308.95 8.69% Total 3556.14 100.00% Furthermore, except for eliminating the R6 zone, this amendment would not necessitate alterations to the currently adopted Zoning Map or change a property's zoning designation; it would simply broaden the scope of allowable building types within the R1 district. The affected properties are identified in Attachment A. Alternative 2 The following analysis provides a functional path for compliance with HB 1110 and ESHB 2321 as described in Alternative 2 above. To ensure compliance with HB 1110, Alternative 2 involves the redesignation properties currently within the R1 district to R2 and requires the repeal of the currently adopted R1 zoning designation development standards. The amended R2 district would include the required middle housing building types mandated by HB 1110. Port Orchard anticipates surpassing the minimum population threshold outlined in RCW 36.70A.635(1)(a) within the next five years, driven by historic growth rates and potential annexations. In anticipation of this increase, the city will comply with RCW 36.70A.635(1)(a) by allowing for at least two units per lot on residential -zoned lots, with higher density requirements near major transit stops and for affordable housing units. Although Port Orchard lacks Major Transit Stops as defined in RCW 81.104.015, the City should recognize the importance of increasing densities near transit stops to promote equitable access to transportation and sustainable growth. While not mandated by the law, the City would acknowledge the benefits of such actions. By taking proactive measures, Port Orchard will effectively plan for anticipated population growth, promote housing affordability, and encourage sustainable development in line with the requirements of HB 1110. Currently, Port Orchard operates under a form -based code established in 2019, which largely aligns with the requirements of HB 1110. However, certain adjustments to the code are necessary to effectively integrate the new mandates outlined in HB 1110. City staff has conducted a thorough examination of the relevant regulations within the Port Orchard Municipal Code, particularly those related to zoning designations and building types. Through this review, modifications 10 10850357.1 - 366922 - 0001 necessary for compliance have been identified, while also considering the recommendations suggested in Port Orchard's June 2023 Housing Action Plan. The R2 zone as currently written mostly complies with the impending requirements for allowing middle housing pursuant to HB 1110 and ESHB 2321. As such, the City would designate all residential land in the City where middle housing is required as R2. This means that properties currently zoned R1 would be changed to R2. The elimination of the R6 district through the 2024 Comprehensive Plan Periodic Update process would result in those properties being designated Residential 2 prior to any amendments to achieve compliance with the Middle Housing Bills. It is important to note that while the proposed zoning change and middle housing allowances would be permitted by city code, there may be instances where compliance with these regulations is restricted by existing conditions such as restrictive covenants (CC&Rs) established prior to the enactment of HB 1110. In addition, privately owned stormwater facilities serving neighborhoods could pose limitations on the development of middle housing, unless additional measures are taken to manage stormwater impacts on the lots where middle housing is proposed. These caveats underscore the need for thorough analysis and consideration of site - specific factors when implementing middle housing strategies, ensuring that regulatory compliance is balanced with practical constraints and environmental considerations. The required amendments to the POMC would introduce one new building type (stacked flat) and create distinction in requirements of existing building types to achieve at least six of the nine building types required by HB 1110 and ESHB 2321 through the following actions: Combine Duplex Types: Combine the three types of duplexes (attached house, side -by -side, and back-to-back) into a singular type. This consolidation simplifies the regulations and eliminates unnecessary distinctions between these similar housing types. Create a Stacked Flat building type: To further consistency with HB 1110 and enhance the diversity of housing options in Port Orchard, a suggested code amendment to POMC 20.32 could be considered to introduce a new building type termed "stacked flat." The stacked flat would be similar in nature to a duplex but would offer a distinct configuration and characteristics, providing additional flexibility for housing development. Permit and Create Distinction Between Triplex and Fourplex: Currently, the fourplex building type in the Municipal Code may be three to four units which would include both the triplex and fourplex configurations required by HB 1110. To create clarity and distinguish between these housing options, and to further compliance with HB 1110, the City could amend the fourplex building type to divide the fourplex category into two distinct building types: triplex and fourplex. This revision ensures that each housing type is clearly defined and 11 10850357.1 - 366922 - 0001 regulated separately within the code, facilitating easier compliance and enforcement. Create Infill Cluster Housing: Create a housing type that allows a mix of up to nine residential units within compact detached and/or and/or duplexes on unit lots with common areas and private open space. It may be allowed in R2 and R3 districts. The specifications should include provisions for lot size, setbacks, building height, private usable open space, parking location, shared driveway materials and design, landscaping requirements among other site - design issues. The Infill Cluster Housing aims to provide a flexible and efficient housing option within the R2 and R3 districts. Table 4 depicts the minimum resultant permitted building types required of HB 1110 and ESHB 2321 in Alternative 2. The amendments are illustrated where additions are identified in bold text and deletions with italicized text. The R6 district, depicted with black fill, would be repealed in its entirety and properties currently designated R6 would be redesignated as R2. The amendments identified below would be the minimum necessary to comply with HB 1110 and ESHB 2321 as currently adopted. Table 4 Building Type R1 R2 R3 R4 R5 '. Detached House P P F, -- -- ' Backyard Cottage P P P -- -- ' Cottage Court P P P -- -- ' Duplex: Side -by -Side -- P P -- -- Duplex: Back -to -Back -- P P -- -- Duplex P P P Stacked Flat P P P Attached House -- P F, -- -- Triplex P P Fourplex -- P P P P Townhouse -- P* P P P Apartment --I I P I P IF, • *The current restriction of three units in the R2 zone would be repealed. It is important to note that the Housing Action Plan provides guidance promoting middle housing and some of those recommendations have been incorporated into the implementation of HB 1110 and ESHB 2321. Some amendments would include the elimination of the Residential 5 zoning designation which is currently in the Port Orchard Municipal Code but has not been utilized since adoption, and the redesignation of R6 properties to R2. Alternative 3 12 10850357.1 - 366922 - 0001 To analyze Port Orchard Municipal Code (POMC) Title 20 in relation to middle housing implementation and its alignment with the requirements of HB 1110, the City must examine key provisions of Title 20 and evaluate how they address the following criteria: Overall Increase in Housing Units Allowed in Single -Family Zones: The City must assess whether Title 20 facilitates an increase in housing units within single-family zones compared to previous regulations. As demonstrated in the Kitsap County 2014 and 2021 Buildable Lands Reports, the City of Port Orchard increased its residential density in all residential zones. This is demonstrated by a significant increase in platted lots from 288 in 2013 to 503 in 2019. The maximum allowed densities permitted in the form -based code also increased significantly as illustrated in the R2 district, formerly the R8 district, to a maximum allowed density at 21.7 du/acre from 8 du/acre. Allowance for Middle Housing Throughout the City: The City has determined that Title 20 permits various types of middle housing, such as duplexes, triplexes, and townhouses, in residential areas beyond just specific zones or targeted locations. The Residential 1 district allows for Accessory Dwelling Units in a zoning designation that otherwise only permits detached houses. The inclusion of ADUs in all residential zones may create consistency with the requirement that all districts allow at least two dwelling units per lot. The current residential zoning districts which primarily allow single family housing (R1, R2, R3 and R6) comprise approximately 3,556.14 acres within Port Orchard, of which only 17.38% within the R1 and R6 districts does not permit some sort of middle housing. Zone Area in Acres Percent R1 309.01 8.69% R2 1929.21 54.25% R3 1008.97 28.37% R6 308.95 8.69% Total 3556.14 100.00% Additional Density near Major Transit Stops and for Projects with Dedicated Affordable Housing: While Title 20 does not specifically allow densities bonuses, the lack of major transit stops makes compliance with this requirement moot. The City should consider discussion regarding the former multifamily tax exemption process to be revisited and potentially expanded to include middle housing types. By conducting a thorough review of Title 20 of the Port Orchard Municipal Code, particularly sections related to zoning, development standards, and housing regulations, we can assess its compliance with the stated requirements. However, initial review of the mandates of HB 1110 and ESHB 2321 and the 2019 Unified Development Code is likely to satisfy the exemption allowance. 13 10850357.1 - 366922 - 0001 Additional Steps To achieve success in meeting the Middle Housing Bill requirements, additional steps for implementation include: Stakeholder Engagement: Port Orchard's Housing Action Plan included a robust outreach process which engaged community stakeholders, including property owners, residents, and developers to gather input and provides a guide to the community's needs and preferences. Allow an opportunity for the public to review and comment on proposed zoning changes, as described in Alternative 2 Implementation, through the Department of Community Development Viewer. • Public Outreach and Education: The Land Use Workshop and potential outreach efforts at the Port Orchard Farmer's Market offer an opportunity to residents about the benefits and implications of middle housing, fostering understanding and support for the proposed changes. • Policy Development: Formulate policies and guidelines to regulate the design, density, and compatibility of middle housing developments, ensuring they enhance neighborhood character and quality of life. • Incentive Programs: Explore incentive programs, such as density bonuses or fee reductions or property tax exemptions, to encourage the development of middle housing and facilitate affordability. • Zoning Code Amendments: Draft and propose amendments to the Port Orchard Municipal Code to introduce the new building types and revise existing regulations to facilitate middle housing development. By incorporating these additional steps into the City's process, we can ensure a complete approach to middle housing that addresses community needs, promotes sustainable growth, and enhances the overall livability of Port Orchard while meeting the requirements of HB 1110 and ESHB 2321. Conclusion This memorandum outlines the implementation of the Washington State Department of Commerce Middle Housing Grant in accordance with the Middle Housing Bills (HB 1110 and ESHB 2321) with consideration to the City of Port Orchard Housing Action Plan. It provides guidance for City decision -makers to align zoning regulations with the objectives of promoting middle housing and affordable housing within Port Orchard, consistent with the requirements of the Middle Housing Bills. 14 10850357.1 - 366922 - 0001 To implement middle housing effectively, Port Orchard is reviewing its zoning regulations, considering critical areas, and proposing amendments to align with HB 1110 and ESHB 2321 requirements. Additional steps for implementation include stakeholder engagement, public outreach, policy development, potential incentive programs, and zoning code amendments. Alternatives 1 and 2 are the minimum necessary in the short-term as a Tier 3 city and proactively addressing the requirement of becoming a Tier 2 city. These Alternatives offer the most direct solution to the Middle Housing compliance with minimal impact to most property owners. Port Orchard has taken proactive steps to foster development of middle housing through the adoption of the 2019 Unified Development Code. Alternative 3 offers a path to compliance but comes with risk as it is subject to a qualitative assessment by others. Port Orchard aims to meet the requirements of the Middle Housing Bills through a comprehensive approach to middle housing, and community needs, promote sustainable growth, and enhance the livability of Port Orchard fostering a vibrant and inclusive community for all residents. 15 10850357.1 - 366922 - 0001 Housing Action Plan Recommendations Summary The Housing Action Plan presents a comprehensive approach to addressing various challenges and opportunities within the housing landscape of Port Orchard. While the Plan encompasses a wide range of issues, the significant barriers related to middle housing are highlighted below. Alternatives 1 and 2 are proposed as key strategies to address them through the development regulation framework. These alternatives aim to expand allowed uses, streamline building type standards, adjust form and intensity standards, and revise other development regulations to promote the production of diverse middle housing options while enhancing affordability.. Although the HAP provides suggested solutions, the City Council may utilize other means to meet the statutory requirements than what is noted in the HAP summary below. 1) Expand Allowed Uses. These proposed changes aim to create a more inclusive and diversified housing landscape within the City of Port Orchard by evaluating and updating zoning regulations to permit a broader range of housing types in various zones, facilitating the development of middle housing and enhancing affordability. a) Allow more housing types in more zones to promote middle housing and affordable housing. i) R5 Zone: Considering the absence of current mapped R5 zones and the proposed changes to R4, this section recommends eliminating the R5 zone from the code. Proposed changes to the R6 zone, including a potential renaming to R5, aim to ensure a seamless zoning framework. ii) NMU Zone: To address inconsistencies in the use table, it is recommended to allow the apartment building type in Neighborhood Mixed Use (NMU) zones, correcting the existing disparity. iii) Congregate Living Housing: Streamlining standards for congregate living housing, acknowledging its historical significance as an affordable housing option, is proposed. Specific recommendations include: (1) Moving land use standards from the definition to POMC 20.39.100. (2) Allowing congregate living housing in some non-residential zones, particularly in the CMU zone. (3) Clarifying parking requirements in POMC 20.124.130 and Table 20.124.140. (4) Amending standards for more flexible lease arrangements. iv) Adult Family Homes: In response to new state legislation (RCW 70.128.066), it is recommended to update standards and definitions under POMC 20.39.100(10) to accommodate adult family homes with seven or eight beds. v) Supportive Housing: Acknowledging state legislation (RCW 35A.21.430, 2021) and ensuring compliance, recommendations include providing definitions referencing state law for emergency housing, emergency shelter, permanent supportive housing, and transitional housing. Operational plans and information - sharing requirements, inspired by examples from other jurisdictions, are also suggested to enhance oversight and community engagement. 2) Streamline the Building Types. These modifications aim to simplify and streamline building type standards, reducing complexity and encouraging the production of diverse middle housing options. a) Adjust Cottage Court Standards: 16 10850357.1 - 366922 - 0001 i) Option 1: Remove or Reduce Minimum Site Size (1) Building footprints, setbacks, parking, and open space largely dictate land requirements. Eliminate the minimum site size. Alternatively, consider 12,000 sq. ft. for standard lots and 10,000 sq. ft. for lots with alley access. ii) Option 2: Reduce Minimum Number of Cottages (1) Lower minimum from five to four, aligning with standards in other regions. Enhances flexibility for cottage court design on smaller sites. iii) Option 3: Adjust Minimum Courtyard Size Standards. (1) Replace complex standards with a simpler approach: Require a minimum of 400 sq. ft. of common courtyard space per cottage cluster. Set minimum dimensions at 15-20 feet for greater alignment with regional practices. iv) Option 4: Allow Duplex Cottages in All Zones (1) Enable efficient land and material use. May require a clear code statement due to current impracticality with a 1,200 sq. ft. maximum building footprint. b) Consolidate Duplex Types: i) Option 1: Merge "Duplex: Side -by -Side" and "Duplex: Back -to -Back" into "Duplex" (a) Simplify duplex standards to encourage greater production. Suggest replacing "Two-family" with "Duplex" for naming consistency in Chapter 20.39 POMC. (b) Consider further consolidation by providing a comprehensive duplex building type definition. c) Rename the Fourplex Type: i) Option: Change "Fourplex" to "Triplex/Fourplex" (1) Clarify that this building type allows 3-4 units. (2) Avoid misleading interpretations and promote triplexes as a viable middle housing option. d) Adjust Townhouse Type Standards: i) Option: Remove Minimum Site Size and Width (1) Allow other zoning standards and market factors to determine land area needed for townhouse development. (2) Enhance flexibility without compromising necessary standards like open space, parking, setbacks, and landscaping. e) Consolidate the Live -Work Type: i) Option: De-emphasize Live -Work Type (1) Recognize limited feasibility outside strong urban markets. (2) Acknowledge the rarity of households with self-employed businesses suitable for live -work spaces. (3) Consider de-emphasizing live -work in the code due to its infrequent occurrence and potential cost implications. f) Adjust Shopfront House Standards: i) Option: Allow a Range of 2-4 Units per Lot (1) Provide flexibility in configuration options by permitting 2-4 units per lot for the Shopfront House building type. g) Building Height: i) Option: Remove Maximum Building Height, Except for Backyard Cottages and Cottage Courts (1) Ensure clear and consistent standards by eliminating maximum building height from all building types, excluding backyard cottages and cottage courts. (2) Regulate accessory structure height limits in zoning chapters. 17 10850357.1 - 366922 - 0001 h) Minimum Private Usable Open Space: i) Option: Introduce Minimum Private Usable Open Space Requirements (1) Address the need for usable open space in middle housing types. (a) Recommended standards: (i) Minimum 300 sq. ft. per unit. (ii) Dimensions: 10 feet per unit (6 feet for rooftop patio or balcony). (iii) Shared open spaces permitted, subject to specific dimensions. (iv) Front yard usage allowed with a demarcating low fence. (v) Prohibit parking or driving, except for emergency access. i) Ground Floor Elevation: i) Option: Apply Elevation Standard to Detached Houses and Duplex Types Only (1) Reduce minimum elevation from two feet to 16 inches. (2) Align with block frontage standards for improved transition and privacy. j) Blank Walls: i) Option: Remove Blank Wall Standards for Selected Building Types (1) Eliminate or adjust standards for blank walls in apartment, single -story shopfront, mixed -use shopfront, and general building types. (2) Consider applying a standard consistent with POMC 20.127.460 for smaller building types where applicable. k) Transparency: i) Option: Move Transparency Standards to Chapter 20.32 POMC for Consistency (1) Shift the minimum transparency standard of 8% from POMC 20.139.025(3) to Chapter 20.32 POMC for uniformity among building types. (2) Retain the measurement method of transparency in Chapter 20.139. 3) Adjust Form & Intensity Standards. a) To reduce barriers to "middle" housing/building types, consider the following recommendations for adjusting minimum lot dimensions: i) R2 Zone: (1) Retain current minimum lot dimensions for detached houses. (2) For cottage courts, refer to Strategy 2.2.1 for updated suggestions on minimum site area. (3) Exempt other "middle" building types (duplexes, attached houses, triplexes/fourplexes, and townhouses) from minimum lot area and width standards. ii) R3 Zone: (1) Retain current minimum lot dimensions for detached houses. (2) For cottage courts, refer to Strategy 2.2.1 for updated suggestions on minimum site area. (3) Exempt other "middle" building types (backyard cottages, duplexes, attached houses, fourplexes, and townhouses) from minimum lot area and width standards. (4) For apartments, consider reducing the current 10,000 sq. ft. lot size minimum to 7,000 sq. ft., with the option for 5,000 sq. ft. lots where alley access is available. Reduce minimum lot width from 80 feet to 70 feet, with the option for 50-foot wide lots where alley access is available. iii) R4 Zone: (1) Consider eliminating lot dimension standards entirely, especially as detached houses are not allowed, relying on other standards to meet community objectives. iv) R5 Zone: 18 10850357.1 - 366922 - 0001 (1) If not eliminating this zone (refer to Strategy 2.1.6), consider removing lot dimension standards for the same reasons as in the R4 zone. v) R6 Zone: (1) Retain the current 4,000 sq. ft. minimum lot size and 40-feet lot width for a detached house. (2) Exempt other "middle" building types from minimum lot area and width standards (duplexes, attached houses, triplexes/fourplexes, and townhouses). vi) Commercial and Mixed -Use Zones: (1) Retain existing minimum lot size and width provisions for detached houses. (2) Eliminate such standards for all other building types to maximize flexibility, including the McCormick Village Overlay District. Rely on existing standards to ensure integration in a compatible manner. b) To address housing affordability and economic feasibility, consider the following recommendations for adjusting height limits and introducing affordable housing bonuses: i) Base Height Limit Adjustments: (1) Explore modest changes to base height limits (up to one floor) in key multifamily and commercial zones. (2) Enhance economic feasibility for multifamily and mixed -use development. ii) Bonus Height Limits for MFTE Participants: (1) Introduce bonus height limits allowing up to two additional floors for developments participating in the City's Multifamily Tax Exemption (MFTE) program. (2) Incentivize greater production of multifamily housing, especially affordable (subsidized) housing. (3) Limit the MFTE bonus to the Type 1, 12-year affordability program, with potential expansion to the 20-year program if adopted by the City. iii) Consideration of TDR Program Impact: (1) Acknowledge the existing Transfer -of -Development -Rights (TDR) program in place since 2019. (2) Recognize that proposed height changes may impact the attractiveness of the TDR program, but highlight the tradeoff of incentivizing affordable housing. (3) Emphasize that TDR remains the exclusive way to achieve the tallest allowed buildings in certain locations (up to eight stories or 88 feet). iv) Mitigation through Design Standards: (1) Emphasize that increased height limits and potentially larger buildings will be mitigated by existing multifamily and commercial design standards. (2) Highlight existing standards for building massing, light and air access, usable open space, attractive materials, windows and entries, ensuring high -quality development. c) To align with Comprehensive Plan policies and state law, consider the following options for adjusting minimum residential density standards: i) Citywide Minimum Density Requirements: (1) Implement citywide minimum residential density requirements in alignment with Comprehensive Plan policies LU-11, HS-9, and HS-16. (2) Mandate a minimum of 15 units per acre in locations eligible for the Multifamily Tax Exemption (MFTE) 12-year and 20-year programs. ii) Thresholds for Application: 19 10850357.1 - 366922 - 0001 (1) Apply minimum density requirements only to new developments on sites above a specified size, such as % acre or'/2 net acre. (2) Define "net acre" as per the MFTE chapter, excluding critical areas, buffers, and undevelopable land like shoreline buffers and tidelands. (3) Aim to reduce complications for small infill development and promote economies of scale. iii) Centers -Focused Density Standards: (1) Consider applying minimum density standards exclusively to sites within designated centers, directing growth more intensely in these areas. (2) Align with the City's goal of promoting compact and walkable development in specific zones. iv) Limited Zoning Application: (1) Propose minimum residential density standards for a limited number of zones based on public feedback and the typical application of the MFTE program. (2) Tailor the application to zones where the City seeks to encourage growth and development. d) To address the religiously owned land density bonus mandated by state law (RCW 35A.63.300), consider the following options: i) Zoning Update or Overlay Zone: (1) Explore updating underlying zoning or creating a new overlay zone to accommodate the density bonus for religiously -owned land. (2) Assess the impact on residential and mixed -use neighborhoods with existing churches. ii) Development Agreements: (1) Prefer development agreements as the implementation option, considering the potential rarity of utilizing this density bonus. (2) Provide flexibility for religious organizations seeking to develop affordable housing. iii) Comprehensive Plan Policy Addition: (1) Introduce a Comprehensive Plan policy specific to religiously owned affordable housing. (2) Specify a minimum density requirement, such as 30 dwelling units per net acre, ensuring alignment with state law. iv) Proactive Engagement: (1) Proactively engage with religious organizations to gauge their interest in developing affordable housing on their properties. (2) Consider assigning responsibilities for this outreach to a Housing Coordinator staff position. 4) Adjust Other Standards. Adjust other development regulations to help reduce barriers to housing production by identifying and revising additional development regulations that may pose obstacles to housing production, ensuring a streamlined process for middle housing projects. a) To refine the residential design standards outlined in Chapter 20.139 POMC, consider the following options: i) Enhance Cross -References: (1) Include additional cross-references in Chapter 20.32 POMC, connecting building type standards with residential design standards for improved code navigation. ii) Consolidate Garage Configuration Standards: (1) Consolidate duplex garage configuration standards (20.139.015). 20 10850357.1 - 366922 - 0001 (2) Utilize the 40-feet lot width threshold for all configurations to streamline and simplify standards. iii) Transparency Standards Placement: (1) Place transparency standards (20.139.025(3)) for specific building types directly within the building type standards for consistency. iv) Roof Pitch Modification: (1) Modify the minimum 4:12 roof pitch standard (20.139.045(2)) to allow for modern architectural styles with flat roofs and roof decks. (2) Consider deleting the first sentence and maintaining the roof elements standard without the term "pitched." v) Resolve Duplex Standards Conflicts: (1) Resolve conflicting transparency standards and repetitive driveway standards in Section 20.139.055 for duplexes. (2) Address duplication of porch projection standards (subsection (2)) by aligning with POMC 20.122.060 to avoid redundancy. 5) Adjust Significant Tree Standards: To address challenges associated with significant tree standards in Port Orchard, consider the following options: a) Explore Alternative Approaches: i) Investigate alternative approaches for tree standards that are easier to administer and have a reduced impact on soft costs and housing capacity. b) Canopy Coverage Requirement: i) Consider shifting the focus from individual trees to requiring a minimum tree canopy coverage at the time of tree species maturity. ii) Allow both newly planted and existing trees to contribute to the required canopy coverage. c) Align with McCormick Village Overlay District Method: i) Align with the method applied in the McCormick Village Overlay District (POMC 20.38.280), where tree removal for new development is managed by considering overall tree canopy coverage. d) Exemption for Middle Housing Developments: i) In the near term, consider exempting middle housing developments or mixed housing developments with a significant number of middle housing types (duplexes, cottage housing, townhouses, triplexes/fourplexes) from the requirement to prepare a significant tree retention plan. e) Balance Benefits and Costs: i) Weigh the benefits and costs of the existing significant tree code to ensure a balanced approach that addresses environmental considerations without imposing excessive costs on development. 6) Adjusting Family Definition: To align with state law and address family definition in Port Orchard, consider the following options: a) Amend Definition to Reflect State Law: i) Amend the definition of "family" under POMC 20.12.010 to align with state law RCW 35A.21.314 (2021). ii) Ensure that the definition does not regulate or limit the number of unrelated persons occupying a household or dwelling unit. b) Simplified Family Definition: i) Adopt a simplified family definition, such as: 21 10850357.1 - 366922 - 0001 (1) "Family" means any number of persons related by blood, marriage, or legal adoption, including foster children and exchange students living together as a single housekeeping unit. 7) Adjusting Elevator Penthouse Standards: To enhance the functionality and livability of multifamily and mixed -use housing in Port Orchard, consider the following options related to elevator penthouses: a) Increase Height Allowance for Elevator Penthouse: i) Amend POMC 20.40.050(2)(c)(i) to increase the allowable height for structures screening elevators, particularly when providing access to roof decks. ii) Consider raising the height allowance from the current limit of 10 feet to 17 feet to accommodate modern elevator designs and facilitate features like 10-feet tall elevator cabs and elevator -accessible roof decks. b) Adapt Standards to Evolving Elevator Technology: i) Recognize advancements in elevator technology, such as the "Machine Room - Less" design, which offers cost-effective options for taller buildings. ii) Adjust code provisions to accommodate the unique characteristics of modern elevator designs, allowing for increased overrun above the roof level. c) Flexible Design Considerations: i) Introduce flexibility in standards to account for evolving design trends and resident preferences. ii) Ensure that the code provides sufficient leeway for incorporating features like 10- feet tall elevator cabs and rooftop decks without compromising structural integrity or violating height restrictions. 8) Adjusting Parking Lot Landscaping Standards: To enhance the efficiency of land use in smaller lots, particularly for infill multifamily and townhouse development, consider the following options related to parking lot landscaping: a) Reduce Minimum Planting Area Widths: i) Amend POMC 20.128.070(3) to reduce the minimum width requirements for planting areas along public streets and internal lot lines. ii) Consider a uniform minimum width of 7.5 feet for landscaping along public streets and five feet along internal lot lines, promoting more efficient land utilization. b) Simplify Planting Area Standards: i) Streamline and simplify the planting area standards to facilitate easier interpretation and compliance. ii) Ensure that the revised standards align with the purpose of parking lot landscaping while accommodating the constraints of smaller lots. c) Create a Dedicated Code Section: i) Establish a separate code section specifically addressing parking lot landscaping standards for better organization and accessibility. ii) Consider renumbering or creating a new section, such as 20.128.075, to specifically address parking lot landscaping, making it more visible and user- friendly in code documents. 22 10850357.1 - 366922 - 0001 STARVIEW DR SW SW SUNSHINE WAY E U ❑ z O n ry Q w m Residential 1 Properties U J w O _ O a E z J of w m w Z O J UNNAMED W JARSTAD DR 2 O O � <2 Q W BELFAIR VALLEY RD 3� �A w %/yO Q Rs 0 z W FRONE DR SR O Okv0 QW PLEASANT ST _ U cy- W ALDER ST m W FRONTAGE RD wS-r a E HVVY U 6 RAMP z W IRVIN WAY O 0 r� U ry Of Q U U SW CLAIR RD SW CEDARVALE CT SW HUDSON DR SAND DOLLAR RD W �I EONO �P� pF2 i O /—CI) O Q w z w Y Z Y W STATE HWY 16 SW COOK RD SW WHITECAP LN SW HANSON RD U SW DURFEY LN J ry z p O w U w F 0 < Q PUGET SOUND BLVD U z J I— U Z) Y Q O SW HARPER RD U Z F— w Z U 2 U WEYERS LN SW f a U Z J Q z Q w JJ SW BERRY LAKE RD ITA w ❑ co c SW HONEY RD ■111 NE! N w U 0 op° cD O ❑ SE ROSE RD / V, E 2ND ST uw W w E 3RD ST Q > ' Q 9 yo��f C ATLI nr O DR c- m w m c/) �0 Of � O ui Z >< W Q U z M om SE HOPI WAY G w w U U Q w > LL O 00 �w SE BASIL CT ii amino llr�p, �ii1111eIII11 , w Q cwn w J w 0 w w❑ Q Y SE MAPLE ST SE PLYMOUTH WAY w U ❑ R' U w U m J = U SE TIBURON CT Y w U w w w U .J SE MORITZ WAY a } Q a z w w < m of O ❑ ❑ ❑ x w w U U O Q 2 SE SALMONBERRY RD w U z SE FAY CT w � U SE VALE RD U z w Y Y SE DOWNING PL SE FIR ST w U Q J J > SE FOREST VILLA CT SE BERGER LN w U SE ARIE CT w w w U Q z O Z � J Y ❑ J Q U Q � Z U O z OJ Q U m w U z wSE COLUSA ST SE COLVEA DR F-- SE CALAVERAS ST SE PIERSON ST SE TRAVERA DR SE TIFFANY LN SE BEECHCREST CT w Q m w co U w co z Q = o L U Y w U Q SE COPPER CREEK DR w U ui o U z w w U w < z Q F— -i W U w Q ❑ j Q Q W J U) LIJ Uz Q Y 0 [if > w J > Z z Uw GRANADA PL SE 2 SE CELEBRITY CT HASTINGS LN SE SE RICHMOND LN MARTELL MOBILE MNR T SE HILLWOOD LN SE DALEA PL SE CEDAR RD n ALONAH PL SE T r PERDEMCO AVE SE w J a z 0 N SE CONCEPT LN w U ❑ U U Qrr m R1 _properties m SE KRISTA ST 612112I9mlIsIe DOO DODU12fic F", 0 D23_Zon ew 7nnp Ordinance Amending 20.200 — Code Clean-up Redline 20.200.012 Local amendments of International Building Code. (1) IBC Section 101.1 is amended as follows: 101.1 Title. These regulations shall be known as the Port Orchard Building Code herein referred to as "this code." (2) IBC Section 105.2, entitled "Work exempt from permit," subsection "Building:" is hereby amended to read as follows: Building: (1) One-story detached accessory structures used as tool and storage sheds, playhouses and similar uses, provided the floor area does not exceed 120 square feet (11 m2). (2) Fences not over 6 feet high. (3) Oil derricks. (4) Retaining walls which are not over 4 feet (1,219 mm) in height measured from the bottom of the footing to the top of the wall, unless supporting a surcharge or impounding Class I, II or III -A liquids. (5) Water tanks supported directly on grade if the capacity does not exceed 5,000 gallons (18,925 L) and the ratio of height to diameter or width does not exceed 2 to 1. (6) Sidewalks and driveways not more than 30 inches (762 mm) above grade and not over any basement or story below and which are not part of an accessible route. (7) Painting, papering, tiling, carpeting, cabinets, counter tops and similar finish work. (8) Temporary motion picture, television and theater stage sets and scenery. 10854759.1- 366922 - 0001 Ordinance Amending 20.200 — Code Clean-up Redline (9) Prefabricated swimming pools accessory to a Group R-3 occupancy, as applicable in Section 101.2, which are less than 24 inches (610 mm) deep, do not exceed 5,000 gallons (18,925 L) and are installed entirely above ground. (10) Shade cloth structures constructed for nursery or agricultural purposes and not including service systems. (11) Swings and other playground equipment accessory to detached one- and two-family dwellings. (12) Window awnings supported by an exterior wall which do not project more than 54 inches (1,372 mm) from the exterior wall and do not require additional support of Group R-3, as applicable in Section 101.2, and Group U occupancies. (13) Nonfixed and movable fixtures, cases, racks, counters and partitions not over 5 feet 9 inches (1,753 mm) in height. (3) IBC Section 105.5, entitled "Expiration," is hereby amended to read as follows: 105.5 Expiration. A. Every permit issued shall become invalid unless the work on the site authorized by such permit is commenced within 180 days after its issuance, or if the work authorized on the site by such permit is suspended or abandoned for a period of 180 days after the time the work is commenced. The building official is authorized to grant, in writing, one or more extensions of time, for periods not more than 180 days each. The extension shall be requested in writing and justifiable cause demonstrated. B. Notwithstanding the above, if the City has issued a Land Disturbing Activity Permit and/or Stormwater Drainage Permit under Chapters 20.140 and/or 20.150 POMC in conjunction with a building permit for the same site, then the building permit shall expire concurrent with and under the same terms as set forth in Chapters 20.140 and/or 20.150 POMC as the issued Land Disturbing Activity Permit and/or Stormwater Drainage Permit. (4) IBC Section 111.1 is amended to read as follows: 10854759.1- 366922 - 0001 Ordinance Amending 20.200 — Code Clean-up Redline 111.1 Use and Occupancy. A. A building or structure shall not be used or occupied in whole or in part, , and a change in the existing use or occupancy classification of a building or structure or portion thereof shall not be made, until the building official has issued a certificate of occupancy therefor as provided herein. Issuance of a certificate of occupancy shall not be construed as an approval of a violation of the provisions of this code or of other ordinances of the jurisdiction. Certificates presuming to give authority to violate or cancel the provisions of this code or other ordinances of the jurisdiction shall not be valid. Exception: Certificates of occupancy are not required for work exempt from permits in accordance with Section 105.2. B. When a building is constructed with future tenant spaces to be finished or occupied at a later date, a shell only certificate of occupancy shall be issued. A separate tenant improvement permit is required for each tenant space prior to any tenant occupancy. C. A certificate of occupancy shall be required prior to occupancy when there is a change in tenant whether or not construction or alterations are performed or proposed and regardless of the use or occupancy classification. Exceptions: 1. R-3 occupancies. 2. Group U occupancies. 3. Individual dwelling units of R-1 and R-2 occupancies. 4. Individual rental units of mini -storage buildings with S occupancy classification. 5. A second business in the same location as another tenant with the same use classification which already has a Certificate of Occupancy for the space. 10854759.1- 366922 - 0001 Ordinance Amending 20.200 — Code Clean-up Redline 6. Individual business license holders within a space with a current Certificate of Occupancy. 7. A business that changes ownership but does not change location, business name, use, or make any structural changes. The new owner is required to provide ownership and business license information to the Department of Community Development Permit Center. An updated certificate will be issued to the new owner. 8. A business that changes its name but does not change location, ownership, use, or make any structural changes. The owner is required to provide updated business license information showing the name change to the Department of Community Development Permit Center. An updated certificate will be issued with the new business name. D. When a Certificate of Occupancy is required, or a business's ownership or name is changed, an application shall be submitted to the Department of Community Development Permit Center using the applicable city form, along with supporting documentation as required. The fee shall be as adopted under the city's current fee schedule resolution. (5) IBC 903.2.1.1 is hereby adopted to read as follows: 903.2.1.1 Group A-1. An automatic sprinkler system shall be provided for Group A-1 occupancies where one of the following conditions exists: An automatic sprinkler system shall be provided throughout stories containing Group A-1 occupancies and throughout all stories from the Group A-1 occupancy to and including the levels of exit discharge serving that occupancy where one of the following conditions exists: 1. The fire area exceeds 10,000 square feet (929 m2); 2. The fire area has an occupant load of 300 or more; 3. The fire area is located on a floor other than the level of exit discharge; or 4. The fire area contains a multi theater complex. 10854759.1 - 366922 - 0001 Ordinance Amending 20.200 — Code Clean-up Redline (6) IBC Section 903.2.1.3 is hereby adopted to read as follows: 903.2.1.3 Group A-3. An automatic sprinkler system shall be provided throughout stories containing Group A-3 occupancies and throughout all stories from the Group A-3 occupancy to and including the levels of exit discharge serving that occupancy where one of the following conditions exists: 1. The fire area exceeds 10,000 square feet (929 m2); 2. The fire area has an occupant load of 300 or more; or 3. The fire area is located on a floor other than the level of exit discharge. Exception: passenger rail system stations, an automatic sprinkler system shall be provided in accordance with Section 3116. (7) IBC Section 903.2.1.4 is hereby adopted to read as follows: 903.2.1.4 Group A-4. An automatic sprinkler system shall be provided for Group A-4 occupancies where one of the following conditions exists: An automatic sprinkler system shall be provided throughout stories containing Group A-4 occupancies and throughout all stories from the Group A-4 occupancy to and including the levels of exit discharge serving that occupancy where one of the following conditions exists: 1. The fire area exceeds 10,000 square feet (929 m2); 2. The fire area has an occupant load of 300 or more; or 10854759.1 - 366922 - 0001 Formatted: Strikethrough Formatted: Not Strikethrouah Ordinance Amending 20.200 — Code Clean-up Redline 3. The fire area is located on a floor other than the level of exit discharge. Formatted: Strikethrough (8) IBC Section 903.2.13 is hereby adopted to read as follows: 903.2.13 Group B. An automatic sprinkler system shall be provided for Group B occupancies where the fire area exceeds 10,000 square feet. (9) IBC Section 903.2.4 is hereby adopted to read as follows: 903.2.4 Group F. An automatic sprinkler system shall be provided throughout all buildings containing Group F occupancy where one of the following conditions exists: 1. Where a Group F fire area exceeds 10,000 square feet (929 m2); 2. Where a Group F fire area is located more than three stories above grade plane. 3. The combined area of all Group F-1 fire areas on all floors, including any mezzanines, exceeds 24,000 square feet (2,230 m2). . • A GF9UP P 1 eeGupaney used feF the_ of uphelsteFed Formatted: Strikethrough (10) IBC Section 903.2.7 is hereby adopted to read as follows: 903.2.7 Group M. An automatic sprinkler system shall be provided throughout buildings containing a Group M occupancy where one of the following conditions exists: 10854759.1- 366922 - 0001 Ordinance Amending 20.200 — Code Clean-up Redline 1. Where a Group M fire area exceeds 10,000 square feet (929 m2); 2. Where a Group M fire area is located more than three stories above grade plane. 3. The combined area of all Group M fire areas on all floors, including any mezzanines, exceeds 24,000 square feet (2,230 m2). A Group M eccupaney used for the display and sale of upholstered furniture er rna#rLn.,;rP(; Pmecepris Formatted: Strikethrough 5,000 square feet (464 m2). 111) 903.2.9 Group S-1 is hereby adopted to read as follows: Formatted: Not Strikethrough Formatted: Not Strikethrough An automatic sprinkler system shall be provided throughout all buildings containing a Group S-1 occupancy where one of the following conditions exists: 1. A Group S-1 fire area exceeds 10,000 square feet (929 m2). 2. A Group S-1 fire area is located more than three stories above grade plane. 3. The combined area of all Group S-1 fire areas on all floors, including any mezzanines exceeds 24,000 square feet (2,230 m2). (Ord. 066-21 § 2 (Exh. A); Ord. 038-19 § 1; Ord. 019-17 § 18 (Exh. 1)). 20.200.014 Local amendments of International Residential Code. (1) IRC Section 101.1 is amended as follows: 10854759.1 - 366922 - 0001 Ordinance Amending 20.200—Code Clean-up Redline 101.1 Title. These regulations shall be known as the Port Orchard Residential Code for One- and Two - Family dwellings and will be referred to herein as "this code" (2) IRC Section 105.2, entitled "Work exempt from permit," subsection "Building:" is hereby amended to read as follows: Building: (1) Other thane torm shelters, Gone -story detached accessory structures, provided that the floor area Formatted: Font: Italic does not exceed 200 square feet (18.58 m2). (2) Fences not over 6 feet (2,134 mm) high. (3) Retaining walls that are not over 4 feet (1,219 mm) in height measured from the bottom of the footing to the top of the wall, unless supporting a surcharge. (4) Water tanks supported directly upon grade if the capacity does not exceed 5,000 gallons (18,927 Q and the ratio of height to diameter or width does not exceed 2 to 1. (5) Sidewalks and driveways. (6) Painting, papering, tiling, carpeting, cabinets, counter tops and similar finish work. (7) Prefabricated swimming pools that are less than 24 inches (610 mm) deep. (8) Swings and other playground equipment. (9) Window awnings supported by an exterior wall that do not project more than 54 inches (1,372 mm) from the exterior wall and do not require additional support. 10854759.1- 366922 - 0001 Ordinance Amending 20.200 — Code Clean-up Redline (10) Decks not exceeding 200 square feet (18.58 m2) in area, that are not more than 30 inches (762 mm) above grade at any point, are not attached to a dwelling and -do not serve the exit door required by Section R311.4. (11) Roof covering replacement (re -roofing) provided the roof area does not exceed 2,100 square feet (21 squares) and further provided the existing sheathing remains in place and no structural work is performed. (12) Residential siding replacement providing the area does not exceed 1,000 square feet and further provided the existing sheathing remains in place and no structural work is performed. The remainder of Section 105.2 remains unamended. (3) IRC Table R301.2(1) is hereby amended by adding the following into the corresponding table blanks: (i) Ground Snow Load = 25 Ibs psf (ii) Wind Speed = 110 mph Topographic Effects = No Special Wind Region = No Wind -Born Debris Zone = No (iii) Seismic Design Category = D2 (iv) Weathering = Moderate (v) Frost Line Depth = 12 inches 10854759.1- 366922 - 0001 Ordinance Amending 20.200 — Code Clean-up Redline (vi) Termite = Slight to Moderate (vii) Decay = Moderate to Severe (ix) Winter Design Temp = 26 (x) Ice Shield Underlayment Required = No (xi) Flood Hazards = (a) 1980, (b) 1980 (xii) Air Freezing Index = 148 (xiii) Mean Annual Temp = 51.4 Formatted: Strikethrough Formatted: Strikethrough Formatted: Strikethrough 10854759.1 - 366922 - 0001 Ordinance Amending 20.200 — Code Clean-up Redline (Ord. 066-21 § 2 (Exh. A); Ord. 019-17 § 18 (Exh. 1)). 20.200.016 Local amendments to the International Fire Code. (1) IFC Section 101.1 is amended as follows: 101.1 Title. These regulations shall be known as the Port Orchard Fire Code and will be referred to herein as "this code." (2) IFC Section 202 is amended as follows: (1) Whenever "municipality" is used in the International Fire Code, it means the city of Port Orchard. (2) Whenever "jurisdiction" is used in the International Fire Code, it means the City of Port Orchard. (3) Whenever "department of fire prevention" is used in the international Fire Code, it means the fire department serving the jurisdiction. (4) Whenever "Fire Code Official" is used in the international Fire Code it means the Building Official or other designated authority charged with the administration and enforcement of the code, or a duly authorized representative. (5) Whenever "counsel" is used in the code, it means the city attorney. (6) Whenever "police" is used in the code, it means the city of Port Orchard police department. Formatted: Strikethrough 10854759.1- 366922 - 0001 Ordinance Amending 20.200 — Code Clean-up Redline {84 Whenever "governing body" is used in the International Fire Code, it means the city council of — Formatted: Strikethrough Port Orchard. (3) IFC Section 503 is hereby adopted to read as follows: 503.1 Where required. Fire apparatus access roads shall be provided and maintained in accordance with Sections 503.1.1 through 503.1.3. 503.1.1 Buildings and facilities. Approved fire apparatus access roads shall be provided for every building, facility or portion of building or facility hereafter constructed or moved into or within the jurisdiction. The fire apparatus access shall comply with the requirements of this section and shall extend to within 150 feet (45,720 mm) of all portions of the facility and all portions of the exterior walls of the first story of the buildings as measured by an approved route around the exterior of the building or facility. Exceptions: 1. The fire code official is authorized to increase the dimension of 150 feet (45,720 mm) where any of the following conditions occur: 1.1 The building is equipped with an approved automatic fire sprinkler system installed in accordance with Section 903.3.1.1, 903.3.1.2 or 903.3.1.3. 1.2 Fire apparatus access roads cannot be installed because of location on property, topography, critical areas, waterways, non-negotiable grades or other similar conditions, and an approved alternative means of fire protection is provided. 1.3 There are not more than two (2) Group R-3 (single-family dwellings) or Group U occupancies. 1.4 Where the fire apparatus access road serves only residential accessory building/occupancies (private garages, carports, sheds, agricultural buildings), as defined by the International Building Code. 10854759.1- 366922 - 0001 Ordinance Amending 20.200 — Code Clean-up Redline 2. Where approved by the fire code official, fire apparatus access roads shall be permitted to be exempted or modified for solar photovoltaic power generation facilities. 503.1.2 Additional access. The fire code official is authorized to require more than one fire apparatus access road based on the potential for impairment of a single road by vehicle congestion, condition of terrain, climatic conditions or other factors that could limit access. 503.1.3 High -piled storage. Fire department vehicle access to buildings used for high -piled combustible storage shall comply with the applicable provisions of Chapter 32. 503.2 Specifications. Fire apparatus access roads shall be installed and arranged in accordance with Sections 503.2.1 through 503.2.8. 503.2.1 Dimensions. Fire apparatus access roads shall have an unobstructed width of not less than 20 feet (6,096 mm), inclusive of bike lanes, shoulders, flat and mountable curbs exclusive of shoulders, except for approved security gates in accordance with Section 503.6, and an unobstructed vertical clearance of not less than 13 feet 6 inches (4,115 mm). 503.2.2 Authority. The fire code official shall have the authority to require or permit modifications to the required access widths where they are inadequate for fire or rescue operations or where necessary to meet the public safety objectives of the jurisdiction. 503.2.3 Surface. Fire apparatus access roads shall be designed and maintained with an asphalt, concrete or other approved driving surface capable of supporting the imposed load of fire apparatus weighing up to 75,000 pounds (34,050 kg). 503.2.4 Turning Radius: The required turning radius of a fire apparatus access road shall be consistent with the city's - Public Works Engineering Standards and where no standard is Formatted: Strikethrough specified in the Public Works Engineering Standards, shall be determined by the Formatted: Strikethrough fire code official. Formatted: Not Strikethrough 503.2.5 Dead ends. Dead-end fire apparatus access roads in excess of 150 feet (45,720 mm) in length shall be provided with an approved area for turning around fire apparatus. 10854759.1- 366922 - 0001 Ordinance Amending 20.200 — Code Clean-up Redline 503.2.6 Bridges and elevated surfaces. Where a bridge or an elevated surface is part of a fire apparatus access road, the bridge shall be constructed and maintained in accordance with AASHTO HB-17. Bridges and elevated surfaces shall be designed for a live load sufficient to carry the imposed loads of fire apparatus. Vehicle load limits shall be posted at both entrances to bridges where required by the fire code official. Where elevated surfaces designed for emergency vehicle use are adjacent to surfaces that are not designed for such use, approved barriers, approved signs or both shall be installed and maintained where required by the fire code official. 503.2.7. Grade. The grade (slope) of fire apparatus access roads shall not exceed 12% as measured from the roadway centerline. At no point along the centerline shall the road grade exceed 12%. Exception: The grade of the fire apparatus access road may be increased if buildings or facilities are equipped with an approved automatic fire sprinkler system when approved by the fire district chief and Fire Code Official. 503.2.8 Angles of approach and departure. The angles of approach and departure for fire apparatus access roads shall be within the limits established by the fire code official based on the fire department's apparatus. 503.3 Marking. Where required by the fire code official, approved signs or other approved notices or markings that include the words NO PARKING —FIRE LANE shall be provided for fire apparatus access roads to identify such roads or prohibit the obstruction thereof. The means by which fire lanes are designated shall be maintained in a clean and legible condition at all times and be replaced or repaired when necessary to provide adequate visibility. 503.4 Obstructions of fire apparatus access roads. Fire apparatus access roads shall not be obstructed in any manner, including the parking of vehicles. The minimum widths and clearances established in Section 503.2.1 shall be maintained at all times. When posted in accordance with section 503.3, owners or operators of vehicles shall be liable for a fine in accordance with Chapter 10.12 POMC. The Police Department may assist the Fire Code Officials with enforcement of this section. 503.4.1 Traffic calming devices. Traffic calming devices shall be prohibited unless approved by the Public Works Director after soliciting input on the proposed device from the Fire Chief and Fire Code Authority. 503.5 Required gates or barricades. The fire code official is authorized to require the installation and maintenance of gates or other approved barricades across fire apparatus access roads, trails or other accessways, not including public streets, alleys or highways. Electric gate operators, where provided, 10854759.1- 366922 - 0001 Ordinance Amending 20.200 — Code Clean-up Redline shall be listed in accordance with UL 325. Gates intended for automatic operation shall be designed, constructed and installed to comply with the requirements of ASTM F2200. 503.5.1 Secured gates and barricades. Where required, gates and barricades shall be secured in an approved manner. Roads, trails and other accessways that have been closed and obstructed in the manner prescribed by Section 503.5 shall not be trespassed on or used unless authorized by the owner and the fire code official. Exception: The restriction on use shall not apply to public officers acting within the scope of duty. 503.6 Security gates. The installation of security gates across a fire apparatus access road shall be approved by the fire code official. Where security gates are installed, they shall have an approved means of emergency operation. The security gates and the emergency operation shall be maintained operational at all times. Electric gate operators, where provided, shall be listed in accordance with UL 325. Gates intended for automatic operation shall be designed, constructed and installed to comply with the requirements of ASTM F2200. 503.7 Residential Non -Conforming Existing Private Access. Group R-3, R-4, or Group U occupancies allowed on an existing, non -conforming private access if a residential sprinkler system is installed in each new structure. Exception: There are not more than two Group R-3, R-4, or Group U occupancies. (4) 903.2.1.1 Group A-1 is hereby adopted to read as follows: An automatic sprinkler system shall be provided for Group A-1 occupancies where one of the following conditions exists: An automatic sprinkler system shall be provided throughout stories containing Group A-1 occupancies and throughout all stories from the Group A-1 occupancy to and including the levels of exit discharge serving that occupancy where one of the following conditions exists: 1. The fire area exceeds 10,000 square feet (929 m2); 10854759.1- 366922 - 0001 Ordinance Amending 20.200 — Code Clean-up Redline 2. The fire area has an occupant load of 300 or more; 3. The fire area is located on a floor other than the level of exit discharge; or 4. The fire area contains a multi theater complex. (5) 903.2.1.3 Group A-3 is hereby adopted to read as follows: An automatic sprinkler system shall be provided throughout stories containing Group A-3 occupancies and throughout all stories from the Group A-3 occupancy to and including the levels of exit discharge serving that occupancy where one of the following conditions exists: 1. The fire area exceeds 10,000 square feet (929 m2); 2. The fire area has an occupant load of 300 or more; or 3. The fire area is located on a floor other than the level of exit discharge. Exception: Section 4901. (6) 903.2.1.4 Group A-4 is hereby adopted to read as follows: An automatic sprinkler system shall be provided throughout stories containing Group A-4 occupancies and throughout all stories from the Group A-4 occupancy to and including the levels of exit discharge serving that occupancy where one of the following conditions exists: 1. The fire area exceeds 10,000 square feet (929 m2); 10854759.1- 366922 - 0001 Formatted: Strikethrough Formatted: Not Strikethrough Formatted: Not Strikethrouah Ordinance Amending 20.200 — Code Clean-up Redline 2. The fire area has an occupant load of 300 or more; or 3. The fire area is located on a floor other than the level of exit discharge. ,�)(eeptew AFeas used exelusively as paFt4eipapt spens areas vihere the main finer area is ineated at the Formatted: Strikethrough SaFne .1 ey l as the .1 eve -1 A-f e-Mit dis .I....ge of the PR 0R eRt..,..,-.. an(1, exit (7) 903.2.13 Group B. An automatic sprinkler system shall be provided for Group B occupancies where the fire area exceeds 10,000 square feet. (8) 903.2.4 Group F is hereby adopted to read as follows: An automatic sprinkler system shall be provided throughout all buildings containing Group F occupancy where one of the following conditions exists: 1. Where a Group F fire area exceeds 10,000 square feet (929 m2); 2. Where a Group F fire area is located more than three stories above grade plane. 3. The combined area of all Group F-1 fire areas on all floors, including any mezzanines, exceeds 24,000 square feet (2,230 m2). FARRI-IfAGNIFe ef wphelsteFed_ O _ Formatted: Strikethrough (9) 903.2.7 Group M is hereby adopted to read as follows: An automatic sprinkler system shall be provided throughout buildings containing a Group M occupancy where one of the following conditions exists: 1. Where a Group M fire area exceeds 10,000 square feet (929 m2); 10854759.1- 366922 - 0001 Ordinance Amending 20.200 — Code Clean-up Redline 2. Where a Group M fire area is located more than three stories above grade plane. 3. The combined area of all Group M fire areas on all floors, including any mezzanines, exceeds 24,000 square feet (2,230 m2). A Greup N! occupancy used for the display and sale of uphelstered furRiture n_.r.m.a#rP,;qP,; pxrppd,; Formatted, Strikethrough 5,000 square feet (464 m2) (10) 903.2.9 Group S-1 is hereby adopted to read as follows: An automatic sprinkler system shall be provided throughout all buildings containing a Group S-1 occupancy where one of the following conditions exists: 1. A Group S-1 fire area exceeds 10,000 square feet (929 m2). 2. A Group S-1 fire area is located more than three stories above grade plane. 3. The combined area of all Group S-1 fire areas on all floors, including any mezzanines exceeds 24,000 square feet (2,230 m2). 4. A Group S-1 fire area used for the storage of commercial motor vehicles where the fire area exceeds 5,000 square feet (464 m2). A group S 1 occupancy used for self staFage where the fire are;; exeeeds 2,500 square feet (232 m2). Formatted: Strikethrough Formatted: Strikethrough (11) Appendix D. The following sections of IFC Appendix D are hereby adopted to read as follows: 10854759.1- 366922 - 0001 Ordinance Amending 20.200 — Code Clean-up Redline D101.1 Scope. Fire apparatus access roads shall be in accordance with this appendix and all other applicable requirements of the International Fire Code as adopted and amended in this chapter. D102.1 Access and Loading. [This section is not adopted]. D103.1 Access road width with a hydrant. [This section is not adopted] D103.2. Grade. [This section is not adopted] D103.3 Turning Radius. [This section is not adopted] D103.4 Dead ends. Dead-end fire apparatus access roads in excess of 150 feet (45,720 mm) shall be provided with width and turnaround provisions in accordance with Table D103.4. D103.5. Fire apparatus access gates. Gates securing the fire apparatus access roads shall comply with all of the following criteria: 1. Where a single gate is provided, the gate width shall be not less than 20 _feet (6,096 mm). Where a fire apparatus road consists of a divided roadway, the gate width shall be not less than 12 feet (3,658 mm). vertical lift or vertical pivot tVpe. 3. Construction of gates shall be of materials that allow manual operation by one person. 4. Gate components shall be maintained in an operative condition at all times and replaced or repaired when defective. 5. Electric gates shall be equipped with a means of opening the gate by fire department personnel for emergency access. Emergency opening devices shall be approved by the fire code official. 10854759.1- 366922 - 0001 Formatted: Strikethrough Formatted: Not Strikethrough Ordinance Amending 20.200 — Code Clean-up Redline 6. Methods of locking shall be submitted for approval by the fire code official. 7. Electric gate operators, where provided, shall be listed in accordance with UL 325. 8. Gates intended for automatic operation shall be designed, constructed and installed to comply with the requirements of ASTM F2200. D103.6. Signs. Where required by the fire code official, fire apparatus access roads shall be marked with permanent NO PARKING —FIRE LANE signs complying with Figure D103.6. Signs shall have a minimum dimension of 12 inches (305 mm) wide by 18 inches (457 mm) high and have red letters on a white reflective background. Signs shall be posted on one or both sides of the fire apparatus road as required by Section D103.6.1 or D103.6.2. FIGURE D103.6 FIRE LANE SIGNS D104. [This section is not adopted] D105. Aerial Fire Apparatus Access Road. D105.1 Where required. Where the vertical distance between the grade plane and the highest roof surface exceeds 30 feet (9,144 mm), approved aerial fire apparatus access roads shall be provided. For purposes of this section, the highest roof surface shall be determined by measurement to the eave of a pitched roof, the intersection of the roof to the exterior wall, or the top of parapet walls, whichever is greater. D105.2 Width. Aerial fire apparatus access roads shall have a minimum unobstructed width of 20 feet (7,925 mm), inclusive of bike lanes, shoulders, flat and mountable curbs, in the immediate vicinity of the building or portion thereof. 10854759.1- 366922 - 0001 Ordinance Amending 20.200 — Code Clean-up Redline D105.3 Proximity to building. One or more of the required access routes meeting this condition shall be located not less than 15 feet (4,572 mm) and not greater than 30 feet (9,144 mm) from the building, and shall be positioned parallel to one entire side of the building. The side of the building on which the aerial fire apparatus access road is positioned shall be approved by the fire code official. D105.4 Obstructions. Overhead utility and power lines shall not be located over the aerial fire apparatus access road or between the aerial fire apparatus road and the building. Other obstructions shall be permitted to be placed with the approval of the fire code official. D106 [This section is not adopted] D107 [This section is not adopted] (Ord. 066-21 § 2 (Exh. A)). 20.200.018 Appeals Whenever the fire code authority shall disapprove an application or refuse to grant a permit applied for, or when it is claimed that the provisions of the codes do not apply or that the true intent and meaning of the codes have been misconstrued or wrongly interpreted, the applicant may appeal from the decision of the fire authority within 30 days from the date of the decision in accordance with Section,43111 of Formatted: Strikethrough the 2918-2021 Edition of the International Fire Code, as adopted herein. (Ord. 050-22 § 14; Ord. 066-21 § 2 (Exh. A)). 20.200.020 Violations. (1) Any person who shall violate any of the provisions of the codes hereby adopted or fail to comply therewith, or who shall violate or fail to comply with any order made thereunder, or who shall build in violation of any detailed statement of specifications or plans submitted thereunder, and from which no appeal has been taken, or who shall fail to comply with such an order as affirmed or modified by the city council or by a court of competent jurisdiction, within the time fixed herein, shall for each and every such violation and noncompliance respectively be subject to the penalties and provisions specified in POMC 20.200.022. (2) Each day or portion of a day in which a violation occurs or is allowed to continue shall constitute a separate offense and may be punished as such. (Ord. 066-21 § 2 (Exh. A)). 10854759.1 - 366922 - 0001 Ordinance Amending 20.200 — Code Clean-up Redline 10854759.1 - 366922 - 0001 Ordinance Amending 20.200 — Code Clean-up Redline 10854759.1- 366922 - 0001 ORDINANCE NO. Oxx-24 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF PORT ORCHARD, WASHINGTON, PERTAINING TO THE CITY CONSTRUCTION CODE; AMENDING CHAPTER 20.200, CITY CONSTRUCTION CODE, OF THE PORT ORCHARD MUNICIPAL CODE TO CONFORM WITH UPDATES TO THE STATE BUILDING CODE UNDER CHAPTER 19.27 OF THE REVISED CODE OF WASHINGTON AND THE REVISED WASHINGTON STATE BUILDING CODE ACT; ADOPTING THE CURRENT STATE BUILDING CODES; PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY AND CORRECTIONS; AND ESTABLISHING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, the Washington State Building Code Council (Code Council) periodically recommends and adopts uniform codes of statewide applicability, collectively referred to as the State Building Code; and WHEREAS, the Washington state legislature has updated Chapter 19.27 of the Revised Code of Washington (RCW), the Washington State Building Code Act, to adopt the 2021 versions of the State Building Code; and WHEREAS, by Ordinance No. 013-23, the City of Port Orchard adopted by reference the State Building Codes as required by state law, to locally enforce said rules for the health, safety, and welfare of the public, with an effective date of July 1, 2023, consistent with state direction at the time of adoption; and WHEREAS, following the adoption of Ordinance No. 013-23, the State Building Code Council exercised its delegated authority to delay the implementation of the State Building Code multiple times, and accordingly the City Council amended the effective date of Ordinance No. 013-23 in Ordinance No. 015-23 and Ordinance No. 028-23, setting the final effective date of March 15, 2023; and WHEREAS, the City has identified necessary local amendments of the City's Construction Code so that the existing local amendments are consistent with the 2021 versions of the Washington State Building Code; and WHEREAS, the SEPA Responsible Official for the City determined that adoption of this ordinance is categorically exempt from environmental review as a procedural action under WAC 197-11-800(20); WHEREAS, the City Council finds it in the best interests of the City and consistent with the 10853370.1 - 366922 - 0001 Ordinance No. Oxx-24 Page 2 of 18 City's Comprehensive Plan and associated regulations to enact this ordinance; now therefore THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PORT ORCHARD, WASHINGTON, DOES ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1. Amendment. Section 20.200.012, Local amendments of International Building Code, is hereby amended in part to read as follows: 20.200.012 Local amendments of International Building Code. (4) IBC Section 111.1 is amended to read as follows: 111.1 Use and Occupancy. A. A building or structure shall not be used or occupied in whole or in part, and a change in the existing use or occupancy classification of a building or structure or portion thereof shall not be made, until the building official has issued a certificate of occupancy therefor as provided herein. Issuance of a certificate of occupancy shall not be construed as an approval of a violation of the provisions of this code or of other ordinances of the jurisdiction. Certificates presuming to give authority to violate or cancel the provisions of this code or other ordinances of the jurisdiction shall not be valid. Exception: Certificates of occupancy are not required for work exempt from permits in accordance with Section 105.2. B. When a building is constructed with future tenant spaces to be finished or occupied at a later date, a shell only certificate of occupancy shall be issued. A separate tenant improvement permit is required for each tenant space prior to any tenant occupancy. C. A certificate of occupancy shall be required prior to occupancy when there is a change in tenant whether or not construction or alterations are performed or proposed and regardless of the use or occupancy classification. Exceptions: 1. R-3 occupancies. 2. Group U occupancies. 10853370.1 - 366922 - 0001 Ordinance No. Oxx-24 Page 3of18 3. Individual dwelling units of R-1 and R-2 occupancies. 4. Individual rental units of mini -storage buildings with S occupancy classification. 5. A second business in the same location as another tenant with the same use classification which already has a Certificate of Occupancy for the space. 6. Individual business license holders within a space with a current Certificate of Occupancy. 7. A business that changes ownership but does not change location, business name, use, or make any structural changes. The new owner is required to provide ownership and business license information to the Department of Community Development Permit Center. An updated certificate will be issued to the new owner. 8. A business that changes its name but does not change location, ownership, use, or make any structural changes. The owner is required to provide updated business license information showing the name change to the Department of Community Development Permit Center. An updated certificate will be issued with the new business name. D. When a Certificate of Occupancy is required, or a business's ownership or name is changed, an application shall be submitted to the Department of Community Development Permit Center using the applicable city form, along with supporting documentation as required. The fee shall be as adopted under the city's current fee schedule resolution. (5) IBC 903.2.1.1 is hereby adopted to read as follows: 903.2.1.1 Group A -I. An automatic sprinkler system shall be provided for Group A-1 occupancies where one of the following conditions exists: An automatic sprinkler system shall be provided throughout stories containing Group A- 1 occupancies and throughout all stories from the Group A-1 occupancy to and including the levels of exit discharge serving that occupancy where one of the following conditions exists: 1. The fire area exceeds 10,000 square feet (929 m2); 10853370.1 - 366922 - 0001 Ordinance No. Oxx-24 Page 4 of 18 2. The fire area has an occupant load of 300 or more; 3. The fire area is located on a floor other than the level of exit discharge; or 4. The fire area contains a multi theater complex. (6) IBC Section 903.2.1.3 is hereby adopted to read as follows: 903.2.1.3 Group A-3. An automatic sprinkler system shall be provided throughout stories containing Group A- 3 occupancies and throughout all stories from the Group A-3 occupancy to and including the levels of exit discharge serving that occupancy where one of the following conditions exists: 1. The fire area exceeds 10,000 square feet (929 m2); 2. The fire area has an occupant load of 300 or more; or 3. The fire area is located on a floor other than the level of exit discharge. Exception: For fixed guideway transit and passenger rail system stations, an automatic sprinkler system shall be provided in accordance with Section 3116. (7) IBC Section 903.2.1.4 is hereby adopted to read as follows: 903.2.1.4 Group A-4. An automatic sprinkler system shall be provided for Group A-4 occupancies where one of the following conditions exists: An automatic sprinkler system shall be provided throughout stories containing Group A- 4 occupancies and throughout all stories from the Group A-4 occupancy to and including the levels of exit discharge serving that occupancy where one of the following conditions exists: 1. The fire area exceeds 10,000 square feet (929 m2); 2. The fire area has an occupant load of 300 or more; or 3. The fire area is located on a floor other than the level of exit discharge. 10853370.1 - 366922 - 0001 Ordinance No. Oxx-24 Page 5of18 (8) IBC Section 903.2.13 is hereby adopted to read as follows: 903.2.13 Group B. An automatic sprinkler system shall be provided for Group B occupancies where the fire area exceeds 10,000 square feet. (9) IBC Section 903.2.4 is hereby adopted to read as follows: 903.2.4 Group F. An automatic sprinkler system shall be provided throughout all buildings containing Group F occupancy where one of the following conditions exists: 1. Where a Group F fire area exceeds 10,000 square feet (929 m2); 2. Where a Group F fire area is located more than three stories above grade plane. 3. The combined area of all Group F-1 fire areas on all floors, including any mezzanines, exceeds 24,000 square feet (2,230 m2). (10) IBC Section 903.2.7 is hereby adopted to read as follows: 903.2.7 Group M. An automatic sprinkler system shall be provided throughout buildings containing a Group M occupancy where one of the following conditions exists: 1. Where a Group M fire area exceeds 10,000 square feet (929 m2); 2. Where a Group M fire area is located more than three stories above grade plane. 3. The combined area of all Group M fire areas on all floors, including any mezzanines, exceeds 24,000 square feet (2,230 m2). (11) 903.2.9 Group S-1 is hereby adopted to read as follows: An automatic sprinkler system shall be provided throughout all buildings containing a Group S-1 occupancy where one of the following conditions exists: 1. A Group S-1 fire area exceeds 10,000 square feet (929 m2). 2. A Group S-1 fire area is located more than three stories above grade plane. 10853370.1 - 366922 - 0001 Ordinance No. Oxx-24 Page 6 of 18 3. The combined area of all Group S-1 fire areas on all floors, including any mezzanines exceeds 24,000 square feet (2,230 m2). SECTION 2. Amendment. Section 20.200.014, Local amendments of International Residential Code, is hereby amended in part to read as follows: 20.200.014 Local amendments of International Residential Code. (1) IRC Section 101.1 is amended as follows: 101.1 Title. These regulations shall be known as the Port Orchard Residential Code for One- and Two -Family dwellings and will be referred to herein as "this code." (2) IRC Section 105.2, entitled "Work exempt from permit," subsection "Building:" is hereby amended to read as follows: Building: (1) Other than storm shelters, one-story detached accessory structures, provided that the floor area does not exceed 200 square feet (18.58 m2). (2) Fences not over 6 feet (2,134 mm) high. (3) Retaining walls that are not over 4 feet (1,219 mm) in height measured from the bottom of the footing to the top of the wall, unless supporting a surcharge. (4) Water tanks supported directly upon grade if the capacity does not exceed 5,000 gallons (18,927 L) and the ratio of height to diameter or width does not exceed 2 to 1. (5) Sidewalks and driveways. (6) Painting, papering, tiling, carpeting, cabinets, counter tops and similar finish work. (7) Prefabricated swimming pools that are less than 24 inches (610 mm) deep. (8) Swings and other playground equipment. (9) Window awnings supported by an exterior wall that do not project more than 54 inches (1,372 mm) from the exterior wall and do not require additional support. 10853370.1 - 366922 - 0001 Ordinance No. Oxx-24 Page 7 of 18 (10) Decks not exceeding 200 square feet (18.58 m2) in area, that are not more than 30 inches (762 mm) above grade at any point, are not attached to a dwelling and do not serve the exit door required by Section R311.4. (11) Roof covering replacement (re -roofing) provided the roof area does not exceed 2,100 square feet (21 squares) and further provided the existing sheathing remains in place and no structural work is performed. (12) Residential siding replacement providing the area does not exceed 1,000 square feet and further provided the existing sheathing remains in place and no structural work is performed. The remainder of Section 105.2 remains unamended. (3) IRC Table R301.2(1) is hereby amended by adding the following into the corresponding table blanks: (i) Ground Snow Load = 25 Ibs psf (ii) Wind Speed = 110 mph Topographic Effects = No Special Wind Region = No Wind -Born Debris Zone = No (iii) Seismic Design Category = D2 (iv) Weathering = Moderate (v) Frost Line Depth = 12 inches (vi) Termite = Slight to Moderate (vii) Decay = Moderate to Severe (ix) Winter Design Temp = 26 10853370.1 - 366922 - 0001 Ordinance No. Oxx-24 Page 8 of 18 (x) Ice Shield Underlayment Required = No (xi) Flood Hazards = (a) 1980, (b) 1980 (xii) Air Freezing Index = 148 (xiii) Mean Annual Temp = 51.4 SECTION 3. Amendment. Section 20.200.016, Local amendments of International Fire Code, is hereby amended in part to read as follows: 20.200.016 Local amendments to the International Fire Code. (1) IFC Section 101.1 is amended as follows: 101.1 Title. These regulations shall be known as the Port Orchard Fire Code and will be referred to herein as "this code." (2) IFC Section 202 is amended as follows: (1) Whenever "municipality" is used in the International Fire Code, it means the city of Port Orchard. (2) Whenever "jurisdiction" is used in the International Fire Code, it means the City of Port Orchard. (3) Whenever "department of fire prevention" is used in the international Fire Code, it means the fire department serving the jurisdiction. (4) Whenever "Fire Code Official" is used in the international Fire Code it means the Building Official or other designated authority charged with the administration and enforcement of the code, or a duly authorized representative. (5) Whenever "counsel" is used in the code, it means the city attorney. (6) Whenever "police" is used in the code, it means the city of Port Orchard police department. (7) Whenever "governing body" is used in the International Fire Code, it means the city council of Port Orchard. 10853370.1 - 366922 - 0001 Ordinance No. Oxx-24 Page 9 of 18 (3) IFC Section 503 is hereby adopted to read as follows: 503.1 Where required. Fire apparatus access roads shall be provided and maintained in accordance with Sections 503.1.1 through 503.1.3. 503.1.1 Buildings and facilities. Approved fire apparatus access roads shall be provided for every building, facility or portion of building or facility hereafter constructed or moved into or within the jurisdiction. The fire apparatus access shall comply with the requirements of this section and shall extend to within 150 feet (45,720 mm) of all portions of the facility and all portions of the exterior walls of the first story of the buildings as measured by an approved route around the exterior of the building or facility. Exceptions: 1. The fire code official is authorized to increase the dimension of 150 feet (45,720 mm) where any of the following conditions occur: 1.1 The building is equipped with an approved automatic fire sprinkler system installed in accordance with Section 903.3.1.1, 903.3.1.2 or 903.3.1.3. 1.2 Fire apparatus access roads cannot be installed because of location on property, topography, critical areas, waterways, non-negotiable grades or other similar conditions, and an approved alternative means of fire protection is provided. 1.3 There are not more than two (2) Group R-3 (single-family dwellings) or Group U occupancies. 1.4 Where the fire apparatus access road serves only residential accessory building/occupancies (private garages, carports, sheds, agricultural buildings), as defined by the International Building Code. 2. Where approved by the fire code official, fire apparatus access roads shall be permitted to be exempted or modified for solar photovoltaic power generation facilities. 503.1.2 Additional access. The fire code official is authorized to require more than one 10853370.1 - 366922 - 0001 Ordinance No. Oxx-24 Page 10 of 18 fire apparatus access road based on the potential for impairment of a single road by vehicle congestion, condition of terrain, climatic conditions or other factors that could limit access. 503.1.3 High -piled storage. Fire department vehicle access to buildings used for high - piled combustible storage shall comply with the applicable provisions of Chapter 32. 503.2 Specifications. Fire apparatus access roads shall be installed and arranged in accordance with Sections 503.2.1 through 503.2.8. 503.2.1 Dimensions. Fire apparatus access roads shall have an unobstructed width of not less than 20 feet (6,096 mm), inclusive of bike lanes, shoulders, flat and mountable curbs exclusive of shoulders, except for approved security gates in accordance with Section 503.6, and an unobstructed vertical clearance of not less than 13 feet 6 inches (4,115 mm). 503.2.2 Authority. The fire code official shall have the authority to require or permit modifications to the required access widths where they are inadequate for fire or rescue operations or where necessary to meet the public safety objectives of the jurisdiction. 503.2.3 Surface. Fire apparatus access roads shall be designed and maintained with an asphalt, concrete or other approved driving surface capable of supporting the imposed load of fire apparatus weighing up to 75,000 pounds (34,050 kg). 503.2.4 Turning Radius: The required turning radius of a fire apparatus access road shall be consistent with the city's public works standards and where no standard is specified in the public works standards, shall be determined by the fire code official. 503.2.5 Dead ends. Dead-end fire apparatus access roads in excess of 150 feet (45,720 mm) in length shall be provided with an approved area for turning around fire apparatus. 503.2.6 Bridges and elevated surfaces. Where a bridge or an elevated surface is part of a fire apparatus access road, the bridge shall be constructed and maintained in accordance with AASHTO HB-17. Bridges and elevated surfaces shall be designed for a live load sufficient to carry the imposed loads of fire apparatus. Vehicle load limits shall be posted at both entrances to bridges where required by the fire code official. Where elevated surfaces designed for emergency vehicle use are adjacent to surfaces that are not designed for such use, approved barriers, approved signs or both shall be installed and maintained where required by the fire code official. 10853370.1 - 366922 - 0001 Ordinance No. Oxx-24 Page 11of18 503.2.7. Grade. The grade (slope) of fire apparatus access roads shall not exceed 12% as measured from the roadway centerline. At no point along the centerline shall the road grade exceed 12%. Exception: The grade of the fire apparatus access road may be increased if buildings or facilities are equipped with an approved automatic fire sprinkler system when approved by the fire district chief and Fire Code Official. 503.2.8 Angles of approach and departure. The angles of approach and departure for fire apparatus access roads shall be within the limits established by the fire code official based on the fire department's apparatus. 503.3 Marking. Where required by the fire code official, approved signs or other approved notices or markings that include the words NO PARKING —FIRE LANE shall be provided for fire apparatus access roads to identify such roads or prohibit the obstruction thereof. The means by which fire lanes are designated shall be maintained in a clean and legible condition at all times and be replaced or repaired when necessary to provide adequate visibility. 503.4 Obstructions of fire apparatus access roads. Fire apparatus access roads shall not be obstructed in any manner, including the parking of vehicles. The minimum widths and clearances established in Section 503.2.1 shall be maintained at all times. When posted in accordance with section 503.3, owners or operators of vehicles shall be liable for a fine in accordance with Chapter 10.12 POMC. The Police Department may assist the Fire Code Officials with enforcement of this section. 503.4.1 Traffic calming devices. Traffic calming devices shall be prohibited unless approved by the Public Works Director after soliciting input on the proposed device from the Fire Chief and Fire Code Authority. 503.5 Required gates or barricades. The fire code official is authorized to require the installation and maintenance of gates or other approved barricades across fire apparatus access roads, trails or other accessways, not including public streets, alleys or highways. Electric gate operators, where provided, shall be listed in accordance with UL 325. Gates intended for automatic operation shall be designed, constructed and installed to comply with the requirements of ASTM F2200. 503.5.1 Secured gates and barricades. Where required, gates and barricades shall be secured in an approved manner. Roads, trails and other accessways that have been 10853370.1 - 366922 - 0001 Ordinance No. Oxx-24 Page 12of18 closed and obstructed in the manner prescribed by Section 503.5 shall not be trespassed on or used unless authorized by the owner and the fire code official. Exception: The restriction on use shall not apply to public officers acting within the scope of duty. 503.6 Security gates. The installation of security gates across a fire apparatus access road shall be approved by the fire code official. Where security gates are installed, they shall have an approved means of emergency operation. The security gates and the emergency operation shall be maintained operational at all times. Electric gate operators, where provided, shall be listed in accordance with UL 325. Gates intended for automatic operation shall be designed, constructed and installed to comply with the requirements of ASTM F2200. 503.7 Residential Non -Conforming Existing Private Access. Group R-3, R-4, or Group U occupancies allowed on an existing, non -conforming private access if a residential sprinkler system is installed in each new structure. Exception: There are not more than two Group R-3, R-4, or Group U occupancies. (4) 903.2.1.1 Group A-1 is hereby adopted to read as follows: An automatic sprinkler system shall be provided for Group A-1 occupancies where one of the following conditions exists: An automatic sprinkler system shall be provided throughout stories containing Group A- 1 occupancies and throughout all stories from the Group A-1 occupancy to and including the levels of exit discharge serving that occupancy where one of the following conditions exists: 1. The fire area exceeds 10,000 square feet (929 m2); 2. The fire area has an occupant load of 300 or more; 3. The fire area is located on a floor other than the level of exit discharge; or 4. The fire area contains a multi theater complex. (5) 903.2.1.3 Group A-3 is hereby adopted to read as follows: 10853370.1 - 366922 - 0001 Ordinance No. Oxx-24 Page 13of18 An automatic sprinkler system shall be provided throughout stories containing Group A- 3 occupancies and throughout all stories from the Group A-3 occupancy to and including the levels of exit discharge serving that occupancy where one of the following conditions exists: 1. The fire area exceeds 10,000 square feet (929 m2); 2. The fire area has an occupant load of 300 or more; or 3. The fire area is located on a floor other than the level of exit discharge. Exception: For fixed guideway transit and passenger rail system stations, an automatic sprinkler system shall be provided in accordance with Section 4901. (6) 903.2.1.4 Group A-4 is hereby adopted to read as follows: An automatic sprinkler system shall be provided throughout stories containing Group A- 4 occupancies and throughout all stories from the Group A-4 occupancy to and including the levels of exit discharge serving that occupancy where one of the following conditions exists: 1. The fire area exceeds 10,000 square feet (929 m2); 2. The fire area has an occupant load of 300 or more; or 3. The fire area is located on a floor other than the level of exit discharge. (7) 903.2.13 Group B. An automatic sprinkler system shall be provided for Group B occupancies where the fire area exceeds 10,000 square feet. (8) 903.2.4 Group F is hereby adopted to read as follows: An automatic sprinkler system shall be provided throughout all buildings containing Group F occupancy where one of the following conditions exists: 1. Where a Group F fire area exceeds 10,000 square feet (929 m2); 2. Where a Group F fire area is located more than three stories above grade plane. 10853370.1 - 366922 - 0001 Ordinance No. Oxx-24 Page 14 of 18 3. The combined area of all Group F-1 fire areas on all floors, including any mezzanines, exceeds 24,000 square feet (2,230 m2). (9) 903.2.7 Group M is hereby adopted to read as follows: An automatic sprinkler system shall be provided throughout buildings containing a Group M occupancy where one of the following conditions exists: 1. Where a Group M fire area exceeds 10,000 square feet (929 m2); 2. Where a Group M fire area is located more than three stories above grade plane. 3. The combined area of all Group M fire areas on all floors, including any mezzanines, exceeds 24,000 square feet (2,230 m2). (10) 903.2.9 Group S-1 is hereby adopted to read as follows: An automatic sprinkler system shall be provided throughout all buildings containing a Group S-1 occupancy where one of the following conditions exists: 1. A Group S-1 fire area exceeds 10,000 square feet (929 m2). 2. A Group S-1 fire area is located more than three stories above grade plane. 3. The combined area of all Group S-1 fire areas on all floors, including any mezzanines exceeds 24,000 square feet (2,230 m2). 4. A Group S-1 fire area used for the storage of commercial motor vehicles where the fire area exceeds 5,000 square feet (464 m2). (11) Appendix D. The following sections of IFC Appendix D are hereby adopted to read as follows: D101.1 Scope. Fire apparatus access roads shall be in accordance with this appendix and all other applicable requirements of the International Fire Code as adopted and amended in this chapter. D102.1 Access and Loading. [This section is not adopted]. 10853370.1 - 366922 - 0001 Ordinance No. Oxx-24 Page 15of18 D103.1 Access road width with a hydrant. [This section is not adopted] D103.2. Grade. [This section is not adopted] D103.3 Turning Radius. [This section is not adopted] D103.4 Dead ends. Dead-end fire apparatus access roads in excess of 150 feet (45,720 mm) shall be provided with width and turnaround provisions in accordance with Table D103.4. D103.5. Fire apparatus access gates. Gates securing the fire apparatus access roads shall comply with all of the following criteria: 1. Where a single gate is provided, the gate width shall be not less than 20 feet (6,096 mm). Where a fire apparatus road consists of a divided roadway, the gate width shall be not less than 12 feet (3,658 mm). 2. Gates shall be of the horizontal swing, horizontal slide, vertical lift or vertical pivot type. 3. Construction of gates shall be of materials that allow manual operation by one person. 4. Gate components shall be maintained in an operative condition at all times and replaced or repaired when defective. 5. Electric gates shall be equipped with a means of opening the gate by fire department personnel for emergency access. Emergency opening devices shall be approved by the fire code official. 6. Methods of locking shall be submitted for approval by the fire code official. 7. Electric gate operators, where provided, shall be listed in accordance with UL 325. 8. Gates intended for automatic operation shall be designed, constructed and installed to comply with the requirements of ASTM F2200. D103.6. Signs. Where required by the fire code official, fire apparatus access roads shall be marked with permanent NO PARKING —FIRE LANE signs complying with Figure 10853370.1 - 366922 - 0001 Ordinance No. Oxx-24 Page 16 of 18 D103.6. Signs shall have a minimum dimension of 12 inches (305 mm) wide by 18 inches (457 mm) high and have red letters on a white reflective background. Signs shall be posted on one or both sides of the fire apparatus road as required by Section D103.6.1 or D103.6.2. FIGURE D103.6 FIRE LANE SIGNS D104. [This section is not adopted] D105. Aerial Fire Apparatus Access Road. D105.1 Where required. Where the vertical distance between the grade plane and the highest roof surface exceeds 30 feet (9,144 mm), approved aerial fire apparatus access roads shall be provided. For purposes of this section, the highest roof surface shall be determined by measurement to the eave of a pitched roof, the intersection of the roof to the exterior wall, or the top of parapet walls, whichever is greater. D105.2 Width. Aerial fire apparatus access roads shall have a minimum unobstructed width of 20 feet (7,925 mm), inclusive of bike lanes, shoulders, flat and mountable curbs, in the immediate vicinity of the building or portion thereof. D105.3 Proximity to building. One or more of the required access routes meeting this condition shall be located not less than 15 feet (4,572 mm) and not greater than 30 feet (9,144 mm) from the building, and shall be positioned parallel to one entire side of the building. The side of the building on which the aerial fire apparatus access road is positioned shall be approved by the fire code official. D105.4 Obstructions. Overhead utility and power lines shall not be located over the aerial fire apparatus access road or between the aerial fire apparatus road and the building. Other obstructions shall be permitted to be placed with the approval of the fire code official. D106 [This section is not adopted] D107 [This section is not adopted] SECTION 4. Amendment. Section 20.200.018, Appeals, is hereby amended in part to read as follows: 20.200.018 Appeals 10853370.1 - 366922 - 0001 Ordinance No. Oxx-24 Page 17 of 18 Whenever the fire code authority shall disapprove an application or refuse to grant a permit applied for, or when it is claimed that the provisions of the codes do not apply or that the true intent and meaning of the codes have been misconstrued or wrongly interpreted, the applicant may appeal from the decision of the fire authority within 30 days from the date of the decision in accordance with Section-111 of the 2021 Edition of the International Fire Code, as adopted herein. SECTION S. Severability. If any section, sentence, clause or phrase of this ordinance should be held to be invalid or unconstitutional by a court of competent jurisdiction, such invalidity or unconstitutionality shall not affect the validity of constitutionality of any other section, sentence, clause or phrase of this ordinance. SECTION 6. Corrections. Upon approval of the city attorney, the city clerk and the codifiers of this ordinance are authorized to make necessary technical corrections to this ordinance, including, without limitation, the correction of clerical errors; references to other local, state, or federal laws, codes, rules, or regulations; or section/subsection numbering. SECTION 7. Effective Date. This ordinance shall be in full force five days after posting and publication. A summary of this ordinance may be published in lieu of publishingthe ordinance in its entirety. PASSED by the City Council of the City of Port Orchard, Washington at its regular meeting on the of April 2024, and approved by the Mayor and attested by the Clerk in authentication of such passage this date here. Robert Putaansuu, Mayor ATTEST: Brandy Wallace, MMC, City Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM ONLY: Sponsored by: 10853370.1 - 366922 - 0001 Ordinance No. Oxx-24 Page 18 of 18 Charlotte A. Archer, City Attorney Jay Rosapepe Council Member 10853370.1 - 366922 - 0001 Chapter 20.54 NONCONFORMITIES* http s: //www. codepub lishing. com/WA/PortOrchard/#! /PortOrchard2O/Po... Sections: 20.54.010 Purpose. 20.54.020 Definitions. Chapter 20.54 NONCONFORM ITIES* 20.54.030 Establishing a legal nonconforming building type, lot, use or structure for the record. 20.54.040 Establishing a legal nonconforming lot for the record. 20.54.050 Restrictions on legal nonconforming uses. 20.54.060 Restrictions on legal nonconforming building types and structures. 20.54.070 Restrictions on legal nonconforming lots. 20.54.080 Permit required. 20.54.090 Administration of nonconforming permits. 20.54.100 Requirements for a complete application. 20.54.110 Criteria for approval —Permit to establish legal nonconforming building type, use or structure for the record. 20.54.120 Criteria for approval — Permit to establish legal nonconforming lot for the record. 20.54.130 Final decision on nonconforming permit. 20.54.140 Appeals of nonconforming permit. 20.54.150 Nonconformities and build -to zone requirements. * Prior legislation: Ords. 019-017 and 010-18. 20.54.010 Purpose. 1 of 11 4/23/2024, 3:11 PM Chapter 20.54 NONCONFORMITIES* http s: //www. codepub lishing. com/WA/PortOrchard/#! /PortOrchard2O/Po... This chapter provides standards and procedures for identifying nonconforming situations, establishing restrictions on the alteration or expansion of a nonconforming situation, and it also specifies when a nonconforming situation must be brought into compliance with the code. In addition, this chapter also establishes an optional process for a property owner to obtain a determination that a building, use or lot is legally nonconforming so that the property owner may use such determination for purposes of property sale/transfer, or to defend in a code enforcement action. For properties within the city's shoreline zone, the standards of the city's shoreline master program also apply, including regulations for nonconforming uses and structures within the shoreline zone. For nonconforming signs, please also see Chapter 20.132 POMC. (Ord. 011-19 § 5 (Exh. 2)). 20.54.020 Definitions. (1) Nonconforming Building Type. A nonconforming building type is a building type which lawfully existed in a zoning district prior to the adoption of this zoning code, but which is not one of the building types allowed in the current zoning district pursuant to Chapter 20.32 POMC. (2) Nonconforming Lot. A nonconforming lot is a lot which lawfully existed prior to the adoption of this zoning code, but which does not comply with one or more of the lot standards for the applicable zoning district in the current code, such as minimum lot size, minimum lot width or required access. (3) Nonconforming Use. A nonconforming use is a use which lawfully existed in a zoning district prior to the adoption of this zoning code, but which is not one of the uses that is permitted or conditionally permitted in the current zoning district per Chapter 20.39 POMC. (4) Nonconforming Structure. A nonconforming structure is a structure which lawfully existed in a zoning district prior to the adoption of this zoning code, but which does not comply with one or more requirements for the applicable zoning district in the current code for maximum height, minimum setbacks, maximum lot coverage or impervious surface coverage, or design standards. (Ord. 011-19 § 5 (Exh. 2)). 20.54.030 Establishing a legal nonconforming building type, lot, use or structure for the record. (1) Permit Required. A landowner may establish that they have a legal nonconforming building type, use or structure for the record by obtaining the permit described in POMC 20.54.080. This process is optional in situations other than code enforcement actions (in which the landowner may choose to utilize the process in order to establish the legality of the nonconforming building type, use or structure). 2 of 11 4/23/2024, 3:11 PM Chapter 20.54 NONCONFORMITIES* http s: //www. codepub lishing. com/WA/PortOrchard/#! /PortOrchard2O/Po... (2) Abandonment or Discontinuance. In order to establish a legal nonconforming building type, use or structure, the use or structure must not have been abandoned or discontinued, under the criteria in POMC 20.54.050(4). (3) Destruction. Should a nonconforming building type, structure or nonconforming portion of a structure be destroyed by any means to an extent more than 50 percent of its replacement cost at the time of its destruction, as determined by the city building official, it shall be reconstructed only in conformity with this code, and only under the following conditions: (a) a complete application for a building permit (or other applicable permit) is filed with the city within 12 months after the damage occurred, and the permit issues, with not more than one 180-day extension; (b) the cause of the damage or destruction was not the willful act of the owner or the owner's agent; and (c) the cause of the damage or destruction was not due to the ongoing neglect of the owner or the owner's agent. (4) Enforcement. If a landowner is not able to establish a legally nonconforming building type, use or structure, or, if the city proves that a legal nonconforming building type, use or structure was abandoned or discontinued, then the building type, use or structure may be subject to an enforcement action. In this enforcement action, the landowner will either be required to terminate the use, demolish the building or other structure or conform the building or other structure to the requirements of this code, including the provisions of Chapter 20.02 POMC, Administration and Enforcement. (5) Applicability of New Regulations to Legal Nonconforming Building Types, Uses and Structures. Legal nonconforming building types, uses and structures have only a vested right not to have the building type, use or structure or other development immediately terminated when a new code provision is adopted that prohibits the building type, use or structure. The building type, use or structure may still be subject to newly adopted reasonable police power regulations. A legal use of land does not become nonconforming because the zone in which it is located is changed to a zoning district which requires a conditional use permit for the use. However, any alteration, expansion or intensification of a use previously approved as a conditional use must follow the process in Chapter 20.50 POMC for approval of a new conditional use permit unless the zoning changes such that the use is now permitted outright. (Ord. 017-23 § 1 (Exh. A); Ord. 011-19 § 5 (Exh. 2)). 20.54.040 Establishing a legal nonconforming lot for the record. (1) Permit Required. A landowner may establish that they have a legal nonconforming lot for the record by obtaining the permit described in POMC 20.54.080 through 20.54.140. This process is 3 of 11 4/23/2024, 3:11 PM Chapter 20.54 NONCONFORMITIES* http s: //www. codepub lishing. com/WA/PortOrchard/#! /PortOrchard2O/Po... optional in situations other than code enforcement actions. (2) Enforcement. If a landowner is not able to establish a legally nonconforming lot, then the lot may be subject to an enforcement action. In this enforcement action, the landowner will either be required to establish a legally conforming lot through subdivision, boundary line adjustment, legal adjudication or other legally -accepted method of lot creation, or else abandon the claim to ownership of a legal lot of record, subject to the requirements of this code. (3) Applicability of New Regulations to Legal Nonconforming Lots. Legal nonconforming lots have only a vested right not to have any use, structure or other development immediately terminated when a new code provision is adopted which creates or increases the nonconformity of a lot. The lot may still be subject to newly adopted reasonable police power regulations. (Ord. 017-23 § 1 (Exh. A); Ord. 011-19 § 5 (Exh. 2)). 20.54.050 Restrictions on legal nonconforming uses. (1) Enlargement, Increase, Intensification and Extension Prohibited. A legal nonconforming use may not be enlarged, increased, intensified or extended to occupy a greater area of land or space, including air space, than was occupied at the effective date of adoption or amendment of this code. No additional structure, building or sign shall be constructed on the lot in connection with such nonconforming use of land. (2) Use Cannot Be Moved to New Location. No legal nonconforming use shall be moved in whole or in part to any portion of the building or any lot other than that occupied by such use except where that use is permitted outright at the effective date of adoption or amendment of this code. (3) Change in Use. A nonconforming use cannot be changed to another nonconforming use. A change in tenancy or ownership is not considered a change to another nonconforming use; provided, that the use itself remains unchanged. (4) No Discontinuation or Abandonment. In order to retain its legally nonconforming status, the legal nonconforming use of land cannot be discontinued or abandoned for any reason for a period of more than 180 days, or for 18 months in a three-year period. For purposes of calculating the 180-day or 18-month period, a use is discontinued or abandoned upon the occurrence of the first of any of the following events: (a) On the date when the use of land is physically vacated; (b) On the date the use ceases to be actively involved in the sale of merchandise or the 4 of 11 4/23/2024, 3:11 PM Chapter 20.54 NONCONFORMITIES* provision of services; http s: //www. codepub lishing. com/WA/PortOrchard/#! /PortOrchard2O/Po... (c) On the date of termination of any lease or contract under which the nonconforming use has occupied the land; or (d) On the date a request for final reading of water and power meters is made to the applicable utility districts. (5) Uses which vary seasonally (such as agricultural uses) shall be deemed abandoned if the seasonal use is not utilized during one full season, consistent with the traditional use. (6) Application of Code Criteria and Standards. If the use is discontinued or abandoned for any reason (other than seasonal use as allowed by subsection (5) of this section) for a period of more than 180 days or for 18 months in a three-year period, any subsequent use of land shall conform to the applicable standards and criteria specified by this code for the land use zone in which such land is located. (Ord. 011-19 § 5 (Exh. 2)). 20.54.060 Restrictions on legal nonconforming building types and structures. (1) Alterations and Maintenance. A nonconforming building type or structure may not be enlarged or altered in a way that increases its nonconformity, but any structure or portion thereof may be enlarged or altered in a way that satisfies the current requirements of this code or in a way that will not increase its nonconformity. Ordinary maintenance and repair shall be permitted. (2) Roadway Access. The owner of a nonconforming access connection (i.e., street or highway access) may be required to bring the nonconforming access into conformance with this code and other applicable standards as a condition of the city or other roadway authority approving a new access connection permit, or a landowner's requested change in land use. (3) Relocation or Removal. Should the nonconforming building type or structure be moved for any reason and by any distance, it shall thereafter conform to the regulations of this code. However, a structure may be moved on the same site without full compliance if the movement reduces the building type's or structure's degree of nonconformity with the code. (4) Historic Buildings and Structures. Nothing in this chapter shall prevent the full restoration by reconstruction of a building or structure which is either listed on the National Register of Historic Places, the Washington State Register of Historic Places, or the Washington State Cultural Resource Inventory, as shown in a historical survey meeting the standards of the State Department of Archaeology and Historic Preservation. "Restoration" means reconstruction of the historic 5 of 11 4/23/2024, 3:11 PM Chapter 20.54 NONCONFORMITIES* http s: //www. codepub lishing. com/WA/PortOrchard/#! /PortOrchard2O/Po... building or structure with as nearly the same visual design appearance and materials as is consistent with full compliance with the State Building Code and any code provisions adopted by the city on the subject of historic preservation. The reconstruction of all such historic buildings and structures shall comply with the life safety provisions of the State Building Code. (5) Mobile Homes or Manufactured Homes. Any mobile home or manufactured home located in a residential district which is a legal nonconforming use may be replaced with an approved manufactured home that conforms to the applicable requirements of this title. (Ord. 011-19 § 5 (Exh. 2)). 20.54.070 Restrictions on legal nonconforming lots. (1) A nonconforming lot may not be altered in size or shape in any way that increases its nonconformity, but it may be altered in a way that satisfies the current requirements of this code or in a way that will not increase its nonconformity. (2) Use of Legal Nonconforming Lot as a Building Site. A legal nonconforming lot may be used as a building site; provided, that all other requirements of the applicable zoning district are met or a variance is obtained. (Ord. 011-19 § 5 (Exh. 2)). 20.54.080 Permit required. A property owner may obtain a nonconforming permit to establish a legal nonconforming building type, lot, use or structure for the record. This permit is not required, unless the city has brought a code enforcement action relating to the property, or if the property owner desires the permit for another purpose, such as to obtain a building permit consistent with the desired legal nonconforming building type, lot, use or structure. In such event, the property owner has the burden to follow the procedures set forth herein to establish that the condition of the property is legally nonconforming. In the case of a code enforcement action, the director may place the code enforcement action in abeyance for a reasonable time in order to allow a property owner to gather the necessary information to demonstrate that the property is legally nonconforming. (Ord. 011-19 § 5 (Exh. 2)). 20.54.090 Administration of nonconforming permits. (1) The following steps shall be followed in the processing of nonconforming permits: (a) Determination of complete application (POMC 20.24.060); (b) Determination of consistency (POMC 20.24.100); and 6 of 11 4/23/2024, 3:11 PM Chapter 20.54 NONCONFORMITIES* https://www.codepublishing.com/WA/PortOrchard/#!/PortOrchard2O/Po... (c) Notice of decision by director (POMC 20.24.110). (2) Because the processing of these permit applications requires the submission of different information for approval, imposes different burdens on the applicant and the city, and varies in other material respects from the processing of a project permit application, these permits are exempt under RCW 36.70B.140 from all project permit processing requirements (identified in Chapter 20.22 POMC), other than those set forth in this chapter. (Ord. 033-20 § 8; Ord. 011-19 § 5 (Exh. 2)). 20.54.100 Requirements for a complete application. A complete application for a nonconforming permit shall include the following items as applicable to each classification of nonconformity (building type, lot, use, structure). Refer to the relevant city application form for numbers of copies of each item that must be included and the type of accompanying electronic submittal that is required (if relevant): (1) Completed application form; (2) Date, name, address, telephone number and email of the applicant; (3) Name, address, telephone number and email of the owner of the property identified in the application; (4) Legal description, street address and assessor's parcel number of the subject property; (5) A description and photographs of existing site conditions, any plans or permit approvals, and/or information relevant to the proposed applicant's demonstration of a legal nonconforming building type, lot, use or structure; (6) Information demonstrating that (a) the building type, structure or use is not permitted outright under the city's code, including, but not limited to, the use standards of the current zoning or applicable district; (b) the current zoning code or building code standards for the building type, lot, use or structure are not met; and (c) the use has not been abandoned or discontinued for the period identified in this chapter; (7) Proof of legal nonconforming status, including, but not limited to, planning permits/approvals, building permits, leases, aerial maps showing the structure and footprint, listings in business or phone directories (or directory with a list of businesses and residents referenced by address), etc.; 7 of 11 4/23/2024, 3:11 PM Chapter 20.54 NONCONFORMITIES* http s: //www. codepub lishing. com/WA/PortOrchard/#! /PortOrchard2O/Po... (8) If the application is for a remodel, a complete description of the proposed remodeling relating to such section(s) of the structure or the entire structure; (9) The applicant's narrative statement describing the manner in which the application satisfies the criteria for approval in the applicable section of this chapter; (10) A SEPA checklist (unless categorically exempt); (11) The application fee established by the city; and (12) Any other required information as indicated by city staff in a preapplication meeting. (Ord. 011-19 § 5 (Exh. 2)). 20.54.110 Criteria for approval — Permit to establish legal nonconforming building type, use or structure for the record. (1) Criteria. A permit will be approved establishing the legal nonconforming status of the building type, use or structure if the applicant provides sufficient evidence and demonstrates to the director's satisfaction: (a) That the building type, use or structure satisfies the definition for a legal nonconforming building type, use or structure in this chapter; and (b) That the building type, use or structure has been in existence and maintained continuously, with no interruption that would constitute abandonment or discontinuance under either former or current city codes. (2) Acceptable Documentation. The evidence presented by the applicant may include, but is not limited to, the following as documentation of the existence of a building type, use or structure from a time when it would have been permitted outright and as documentation of its uninterrupted continuation: (a) Signed written statements from persons having no financial interest in the property and who are not relatives of the applicant or property owner. Notarization is not required. (b) Occupancy listing from the Polk directory or reverse telephone directories. (c) Business and/or licensing records. (d) County records showing the previous permitted use if the property was formerly not part of 8 of 11 4/23/2024, 3:11 PM Chapter 20.54 NONCONFORMITIES* the city. http s: //www. codepub lishing. com/WA/PortOrchard/#! /PortOrchard2O/Po... (e) Assessment records. (f) Evidence of more than one electric or gas meter or sewer hookup. (g) Other evidence that the director deems useful and reliable, based on the circumstances of the individual case. Examples include, but are not limited to, photographs, U.S. Census reports, and signed written statements of experts. (3) It is the responsibility of the applicant to furnish at least two different types of documentation from the sources listed above. The city may, in its discretion, require further documentation if the documentation submitted by the applicant does not demonstrate the existence of the building type, use or structure from a time when it was permitted outright, or fails to show continuous, uninterrupted maintenance of the use. The city may also accept only one type of documentation from the sources listed above, if that documentation is particularly persuasive. Any number of written, signed statements, however, are not sufficient by themselves to document the existence of a building type, use or structure. (Ord. 011-19 § 5 (Exh. 2)). 20.54.120 Criteria for approval — Permit to establish legal nonconforming lot for the record. (1) Criteria. A permit will be approved establishing the legal nonconforming status of a lot if the applicant provides sufficient evidence and demonstrates to the director's satisfaction that the lot was lawfully created and recorded with the county auditor's office. (2) Acceptable Documentation. The evidence presented by the applicant may include, but is not limited to, a recorded subdivision, large lot subdivision, testamentary subdivision (provided, that the testamentary subdivision conformed to zoning at the time of recording), short plat or binding site plan; a recorded boundary line adjustment approved by the city if such approval was required at the time of recording; or a legal adjudication requiring the creation of the lot with subsequent recording with the county auditor's office. (Ord. 011-19 § 5 (Exh. 2)). 20.54.130 Final decision on nonconforming permit. Because the city has excluded nonconforming permits from the procedures set forth in RCW 36.70B.140, there is no deadline for the city's issuance of a final decision. (Ord. 011-19 § 5 (Exh. 2)). 20.54.140 Appeals of nonconforming permit. A nonconforming permit is a Type I decision per POMC 20.22.020. If an appeal of the director's 9 of 11 4/23/2024, 3:11 PM Chapter 20.54 NONCONFORMITIES* http s: //www. codepub lishing. com/WA/PortOrchard/#! /PortOrchard2O/Po... decision is filed, the procedures in POMC 20.22.030(7) and (8) shall be followed. (Ord. 011-19 § 5 (Exh. 2)). 20.54.150 Nonconformities and build -to zone requirements. "Build -to zone" requirements may apply to certain development proposals in residential, commercial and mixed use zoning designations. For information on build -to zone requirements and their applicability to a proposal, refer to Chapters 20.34 and 20.35 POMC. (1) Building Additions. When an existing building is being expanded and the building does not meet the build -to requirement, the following provisions apply: (a) Front. Any addition to the front of the building must be placed in the build -to zone. The addition does not have to meet the build -to percentage for the lot. (b) Rear. Rear additions are allowed because the addition does not increase the degree of the nonconformity. (c) Side. Side additions are not allowed because the extension increases the width that is not located in the build -to zone. (2) New Buildings. When a new building is proposed on a site with an existing building that does not meet the build -to requirement, the following provisions apply: (a) Front. All new buildings must be placed in the build -to zone until the build -to percentage for the lot has been met. (b) Rear. New buildings located outside of the build -to zone are not allowed until the build -to percentage for the lot has been met. (c) Side. New buildings located outside of the build -to zone are not allowed until the build -to percentage for the lot has been met. (Ord. 011-19 § 5 (Exh. 2)). The Port Orchard Municipal Code is current through Ordinance 003-24, passed February 13, 2024. Disclaimer: The city clerk's office has the official version of the Port Orchard Municipal Code. Users should contact the city clerk's office for ordinances passed subsequent to the ordinance cited above. City Website: https://www.cityofportorchard.us/ City Telephone: (360) 876-4407 10 of 11 4/23/2024, 3:11 PM Chapter 20.54 NONCONFORMITIES* https://www.codepublishing.com/WA/PortOrchard/#!/PortOrchard20/Po... Code Publishing Company_ of 11 4/23/2024, 3:11 PM Chapter 17.570 NONCONFORMING USES, STRUCTURES AND U... https://www.codepublishing.com/WA/KitsapCounty/#!/Kitsapl7/Kitsa... Chapter 17.570 NONCONFORMING USES, STRUCTURES AND USE OF STRUCTURES Sections: 17.570.010 Purpose. 17.570.015 Extensions. 17.570.020 Nonconforming uses of land. 17.570.030 Application for change of nonconforming uses of land. 17.570.040 Nonconforming structures. 17.570.050 Nonconforming uses of structures. 17.570.010 Purpose. Within the zoning districts established by this title or any amendment later adopted, there may exist uses of land and/or structures that were lawful before the effective date of the applicable regulations, but which would be restricted, regulated or prohibited under the terms of this title or future amendment. Except as specifically allowed by this chapter, this chapter is intended to permit these nonconformities to continue until they are removed or discontinued. (Ord. 534 (2016) § 7(5) (App. E) (part), 2016) 17.570.015 Extensions. As to time frames noted in this chapter, the director may extend time frames on a case -by -case basis where such time frames cannot be met. If the director extends the schedule and/or imposes deadlines other than are set forth in this chapter, he must make the following findings: (A) the reason for the required change is due to circumstances beyond the control of the applicant; (B) the change is the minimum necessary required to meet the conditions of this chapter; and (C) the change in time does not exceed the original time frame or deadline by more than twelve months. The decision of the director shall be considered a Type II decision and may be appealed to the hearing examiner. (Ord. 534 (2016) § 7(5) (App. E) (part), 2016) 17.570.020 Nonconforming uses of land. 1 of 5 4/23/2024, 3:12 PM Chapter 17.570 NONCONFORMING USES, STRUCTURES AND U... https://www.codepublishing.com/WA/KitsapCounty/#!/Kitsapl7/Kitsa... Where a lawful use of land exists that is not allowed under current regulations, but was allowed when the use was initially established, that use may be continued so long as it remains otherwise lawful, and shall be deemed a nonconforming use. A. Unless specifically stated elsewhere in this title, if a nonconforming use not involving a structure has been changed to a conforming use, or if the nonconforming use ceases for a period of twenty-four months or more, said use shall be considered abandoned, and said premises shall thereafter be used only for uses permitted under the provisions in the zone in which it is located. B. A nonconforming use not involving a structure, or one involving a structure (other than a sign) having an assessed value of less than $200.00, shall be discontinued within two years from the date of passage of the ordinance codified in this title. C. If an existing nonconforming use or portion thereof, not housed or enclosed within a structure, occupies a portion of a lot or parcel of land on the effective date hereof, the area of such use may not be expanded, nor shall the use or any part thereof be moved to any other portion of the property not historically used or occupied for such use; provided, that this shall not apply where such increase in area is for the purpose of increasing an off-street parking or loading facility to the area used by the activity carried on in the property; and provided further, that this provision shall not be construed as permitting unenclosed commercial activities where otherwise prohibited by this title. (Ord. 534 (2016) § 7(5) (App. E) (part), 2016) 17.570.030 Application for change of nonconforming uses of land. The director may grant an application for a change of use to another nonconforming use if, on the basis of the application and the evidence submitted, the director makes the following findings: A. That the proposed use is classified in a more restrictive category than existing or preexisting uses by the zone regulations of this title. The classifications of a nonconforming use shall be determined on the basis of the zone in which it is first permitted; provided, that a conditional use shall be a more restrictive category than a permitted use in the same category. B. That the proposed use will not more adversely affect the character of the zone in which it is proposed to be located than the existing or preexisting use. C. That the change of use will not result in the enlargement of the space occupied by a nonconforming use, except as allowed by Section 17.570.020(C). 2 of 5 4/23/2024, 3:12 PM Chapter 17.570 NONCONFORMING USES, STRUCTURES AND U... https://www.codepublishing.com/WA/KitsapCounty/#!/Kitsapl7/Kitsa... D. The decision of the director shall be considered a Type II decision and may be appealed to the hearing examiner. (Ord. 534 (2016) § 7(5) (App. E) (part), 2016) 17.570.040 Nonconforming structures. When, before the effective date of the adoption or amendment of the applicable regulation, a lawful structure existed that would not be permitted by the regulations thereafter imposed by this title, or amendments thereof, the structure may be continued so long as it remains otherwise lawful, and shall be deemed a nonconforming structure. A. A structure nonconforming to the dimensional standards of this title may not be altered or enlarged in any manner unless such alteration or enlargement would bring the structure into conformity with the requirements of the zone in which it is located; provided structural change may be permitted when required to make the structure safe for occupancy or use, provided structural enlargements may be allowed in conformity with the setback requirements of the zone in which it is located, and provided structural enlargements may be allowed if they would not further violate setback requirements; and provided further, that a nonconforming mobile home may be replaced notwithstanding the setback and density provisions of this title, so long as the structure does not further encroach upon any required yard. B. If a nonconforming structure is destroyed by any cause, it shall be allowed to be reconstructed as a nonconforming structure up to the same size (total square footage of structure, square footage of footprint of the building and height) and appearance; provided, however, the director has the discretion to allow a different appearance if he finds that it would be more compatible with the zone in which it is located. A complete application for such reconstruction must be filed with the department within a one-year period from the date the structure was destroyed. C. A mobile home and/or single-family residence located on a legal nonconforming lot may be replaced if destroyed. D. Notwithstanding the foregoing provisions, if a nonconforming structure presents a public health, safety or welfare hazard, it may not be considered a legal nonconforming structure. (Ord. 534 (2016) § 7(5) (App. E) (part), 2016) 17.570.050 Nonconforming uses of structures. When, before the effective date of the adoption or amendment of the applicable regulation, a lawful use of a structure existed that would not be permitted by the regulations thereafter imposed by this 3 of 5 4/23/2024, 3:12 PM Chapter 17.570 NONCONFORMING USES, STRUCTURES AND U... https://www.codepublishing.com/WA/KitsapCounty/#!/Kitsapl7/Kitsa... title, or amendments thereof, the use of the structure may be continued so long as it remains otherwise lawful, and shall be deemed a nonconforming use of structure. A. Continuation of Nonconforming Use. Any nonconforming use of a structure which was lawfully established and which has been lawfully, actively and continually maintained, may be continued subject to the limitations of this section. In all proceedings other than criminal, the owner, occupant or user shall have the burden to show that the use or structure was lawfully established. B. Change of Nonconforming Use. A nonconforming use may be changed to another nonconforming use so long as no structural alterations are needed to the structure in which the use is located, and provided the new use is a reduction in the nonconformity and intensity of the existing nonconforming use. Such determination shall be made by the director as a Type II decision and may be appealed to the hearing examiner. C. Expansion of Nonconforming Use. A nonconforming use shall not be enlarged or expanded; provided, the structure containing the nonconforming use may be structurally altered to adapt to new technologies or equipment. A nonconforming use of a structure may be extended throughout those parts of a structure which were designed or arranged to such use prior to the date when such use of the structure became nonconforming; provided, that no structural alteration, except those required by the law, are made. D. Destruction of Nonconforming Use of Structure. If any nonconforming use of structure is destroyed by any cause, it shall be allowed to be reconstructed as a nonconforming structure up to the same size (total square footage of structure, square footage of footprint of the building and height) and appearance; provided, however, the director has the discretion to allow a different appearance if he finds that it would be more compatible with the zone in which it is located. A complete application for such reconstruction must be filed with the department within a one-year period from the date the structure was destroyed. E. Discontinuance of Nonconforming Use of Structures. Any nonconforming use of structure for which the use or occupancy is discontinued for a period of twenty-four months shall not thereafter be allowed as a nonconforming use of structure. (Ord. 534 (2016) § 7(5) (App. E) (part), 2016) The Kitsap County Code is current through Ordinance 631 (2024), passed March 11, 2024, and Resolution 169-2013, passed November 25, 2013. 4 of 5 4/23/2024, 3:12 PM Chapter 17.570 NONCONFORMING USES, STRUCTURES AND U... https://www.codepublishing.com/WA/KitsapCounty/#!/Kitsapl7/Kitsa... Disclaimer: The Clerk of the Board's Office has the official version of the Kitsap County Code. Users should contact the Clerk of the Board's Office for ordinances passed subsequent to the ordinance cited above. County Website: kitsap.gov/ County Telephone: (360) 337-5777 / (800) 825-4940 Email the county: help@kitsap1.com Code Publishing Company 5 of 5 4/23/2024, 3:12 PM Jim Fisk To: Tim Honeycutt; Nick Bond; Jay Rosapepe Cc: Shannon Honeycutt; Fred Chang Subject: RE: Additional Land use committee item? From: Tim Honeycutt <timhoneycutt@gmail.com> Sent: Tuesday, April 23, 2024 2:39 PM To: Jim Fisk <jfisk@portorchardwa.gov>; Nick Bond <nbond@portorchardwa.gov>; Jay Rosapepe <josapepe@portorchardwa.gov> Cc: Shannon Honeycutt <shanhoneycutt@gmail.com>; Fred Chang <fchang@portorchardwa.gov> Subject: Re: Additional Land use committee item? Hi All, I summarized our issue below so you don't have to read through a chain of emails. Please let us know the best way to proceed. We bought our single family residence in 1998. With only 1 bath, we've recently looked into remodeling and bringing the 1940's house to more modern living accommodations, most notable, a 2nd bathroom. While inquiring about permit requirements, we were told that our house is in an R-4 zoning and cannot increase square footage or square volume unless we constructed a 4 plex unit or more dense. The city staff was very helpful providing the POMC on changing the zoning. However, the procedural process is not realistic as we simply don't have the resources to supply the required reports, assessments, and consultation fees required to navigate the process. We love Port Orchard and are in support of more dense areas to access our budding downtown. However, our neighborhood already consists of several multi-plex's, apartments, and shared housing units and the rezoning seems to solve a problem that doesn't exist. We purchased this house as a single family residence; we aren't done using it for that purpose. Our questions to the land use department: When was this change made and why? It is only a small block of 7 houses that are zoned R-4. Everyone else has a zoning of R-3. It appears as if a developer selected our block in hopes that they would acquire all our properties, level the houses, and build a multi -unit complex. However, these properties are all owned by the residents / occupants. None of the properties are decrepit and the R-4 zoning feels out of place. I watched a city council meeting a couple years back where the planning director acknowledged that the rezoning properties behind the Lowe's building had the unintended consequence of causing the houses to all be non -conforming properties. It appeared that the issue was resolved administratively because the city realized that the re -zone was preventing the current occupants from enjoying the use of their property, for the purpose they purchased it. Since we now have a non -conforming property, I feel our family is in a similar situation. There are several other properties in our area that have R-3 that are surrounded by R-4 lots. It is hard to believe that they all submitted master plan changes and re -zoning paperwork. We hope to have the same opportunities as those properties. Even if rezoned, our properties present multiple construction obstacles: • Extreme steep grade on the hill. • Our properties are only 50x100 and the updated zoning requires 70x100. • We are within the downtown VPOD, building a 4 plex will require extensive excavation • Set -backs and current design requirements will need extensive exceptions due to the way the old neighborhood is laid out. We've been unsure how to proceed and hope that you can take a look and advise a path that can work with everyone. We're not opposed to increasing density but we're both employees of SKSD and have financial limitations. We simply want to continue to enjoy Port Orchard with the convenience of a 2nd bathroom and/or bigger bedroom. I plan on attending the Land Use meeting this Thursday but I'm not sure if that is the correct forum at this point. Thank you all for your consideration: Tim and Shannon Honeycutt 140 Farragut Ave N Port Orchard, WA 98366 On Fri, Apr 19, 2024 at 10:17 AM Fred Chang <fchang@portorchardwa.gov> wrote: Hi Jay, Will you please discuss this item at the next Land Use committee meeting? I heard from the residents who wanted to add to the home they are living in. I have copied them in the event they would like to add some background. Regards, Fred Sent from my iPhone Begin forwarded message: From: Nick Bond <nbond portorchardwa.gov> Date: April 19, 2024 at 09:06:25 PDT To: Fred Chang <fchang@portorchardwa.gov> Subject: RE: POTW Message My 9am meeting is cancelled. I do have a repairman showing up later this morning but try me anytime between now and noon. Nick From: Fred Chang <fchang@portorchardwa.gov> Sent: Thursday, April 18, 2024 8:41 PM To: Nick Bond <nbond@portorchardwa.gov> Subject: Fwd: POTW Message Hi Nick, Can we talk about this Friday? Please let me know a good time for you. This seems like an unintended consequence of the up zoning. Thank you, Fred Sent from my iPhone Begin forwarded message: From: Shannon Honeycutt <shanhoneycutt@gmail.com> Date: April 18, 2024 at 20:11:56 PDT To: Fred Chang <fchang@portorchardwa.gov> Subject: Fwd: POTW Message You don't often get email from shanhonevcutt@gmail.com. Learn why this is important ------- Forwarded message --------- From: Jennifer McLinko<mennifer(a)miseen placedesign.com> Date: Fri, Apr 7, 2023 at 2:16 PM Subject: Fwd: POTW Message To: Courtney Carpenter<courtney@miseenplacedesign.com>, Shannon Honeycutt <shanhoneycutt@gmail.com>, Tim Honeycutt <timhoneycutt gmail.com> Hi Shannon and Tim, Courtney went down to the city last week to check on the set backs and such for your addition and we've run into a hiccup. Apparently your property is zoned R4 which is high density residential. What that means is that they won't allow any sort of modification to the structure that makes it bigger, including going up, unless you petition to get your zoning changed. You can do an interior remodel however. I'll be back in town next week if you'd like to discuss options or if you have questions. Let me know what you'd like to do. ---------- Forwarded message --------- From: Josie Rademacher <jademacher@portorchardwa.gov> Date: Fri, Mar 31, 2023 at 12:18 PM Subject: RE: POTW Message To: jennifer@miseenplacedesign.com <jennifer@miseenplacedesign.com> CC: Jackie Krukoff <jkrukoff@portorchardwa.gov>, Lisa Stone <lstone@portorchardwa.gov> Hi Jennifer, Thank you for your inquiry. Information about building an addition on an existing single family detached house at 140 Farragut Ave N is outlined below: 140 Farragut Ave is zoned Residential4. Detached houses are not an allowed building type in Residential zoning (POMC 20.34.040). Which makes the building type and land use nonconforming. The existing building can remain, however, per POMC 20.54.050 (1) Enlargement, Increase, Intensification and Extension is Prohibited. A legal nonconforming use may not be enlarged, increased, intensified or extended to occupy a greater area of land or space, including air space, than was occupied at the effective date of adoption or amendment of this code. No additional structure, building or sign shall be constructed on the lot in connection with such nonconforming use of land. Additional information regarding nonconformities can be found in POMC 20.54. However, the property owners could apply for a site -specific rezone. The property addressed 140 Farragut Ave N is not zoned for the proposed use and would need to go through the process of a Comprehensive Plan amendment and a site -specific rezone to a different residential zone that allows detached houses as a building type. I've linked our residential zoning chapter (POMC 20.34) that outlines the different residential zoning types for your clients reference. Information regarding Comprehensive Plan amendments can be found in POMC 20.04. Additionally, information regarding site -specific rezones can be found in POMC 20.42. Per POMC 20.04.060 (2) All comprehensive plan amendment applications must be completed and submitted to the planning department by 4:00 p.m. on January 31 st of any year in order to be considered during that year's amendment process, provided city -initiated amendments may be submitted to the director at any time prior to the adoption of the final comprehensive plan amendment agenda. Completed applications that are received after the submission date will be placed on the comprehensive plan amendment agenda for the following calendar year. If you have any additional questions, let me know. Kind regards, JOSIE RADEMACHER Assistant Planner City of Port Orchard Community Development 720 Prospect Street Port Orchard, WA 98366 Phone: (360) 874-5533 Please make official submittals to the Permit Center at permitcenter(cbportorchardwa.gov to ensure maintenance of an accurate Record. From: Lisa Stone <lstone portorchardwa.gov> Sent: Wednesday, March 29, 2023 2:22 PM To: Josie Rademacher<jademacher(a_portorchardwa.gov> Cc: Jackie Krukoff <jkrukoff@portorchardwa.gov> Subject: POTW Message Josie, Jennifer Mecklino 619-573-7910 has questions on if her clients can put an addition on 140 Farragut Ave N. She came in earlier and I gave her the code section for what they can have in the R4 zoning (that is what the zoning is on the viewer) she stated there is currently an SFR on the property and they want to do an addition to the SFR. Lisa Stone City of Port Orchard Building Permit Technician (360) 874-5533 Istone@portorchardwo.gov Jennifer McLinko, ASID, NCIDQ, MFA Owner/Principal Designer a: 2326 Wheaton Way, Ste 100, Bremerton, WA 98310 p: 360.627.7370 c: 619.573.7910 w: www.miseenplacedesign.com Tim Honeycutt 360.633.2455 TjmHoneycutt(@gmaiI.com APlease consider the environment before printing this e-mail