HomeMy WebLinkAbout009-25 - Ordinance - Transportation Impact Fee ScheduleDocusign Envelope ID: 399C6961-D9D3-4B73-9303-FA78B79BA7AA
ORDINANCE NO. 009-25
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF PORT ORCHARD, WASHINGTON,
RELATING TO IMPACT FEES, ADOPTING A NEW TRANSPORTATION
IMPACT FEE SCHEDULE AND REPEALING THE PRIOR
TRANSPORTATION IMPACT FEE SCHEDULE ADOPTED AS EXHIBIT
A TO ORDINANCE NO. 007-21; PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY
AND CORRECTION; AND ESTABLISHING AN EFFECTIVE DATE.
WHEREAS, the State of Washington Growth Management Act, Chapter 36.70A RCW
and related sections ("GMA") requires the City to adopt a Comprehensive Plan that provides
adequate public facilities to serve development; and
WHEREAS, counties, cities, and towns that are required or choose to plan under RCW
36.70A.040 are authorized to impose impact fees on development activity as part of the
financing for public facilities, provided that the financing or system improvements to serve
new development must provide for a balance between impact fees and other sources of
public funds and cannot rely solely on impact fees; and
WHEREAS, RCW 82.02.050 -.110 and WAC 365-196-850 authorize counties, cities, and
towns planning under the Growth Management Act (GMA) to impose impact fees for public
streets and roads, publicly owned parks, open space, and recreation facilities, and school
facilities, and fire protection facilities; and
WHEREAS, the City of Port Orchard has adopted transportation, school, and park
impact fees, as codified in subsection 20.182.060 of the Port Orchard Municipal Code (POMC)
and Appendices A -C in Exhibit 1 of Ordinance 019-17, as amended by Ordinance 007-21, 013-
22, 001-25, and 002-35; and
WHEREAS, in 2023 the Washington Legislature passed SB 5258 related to housing
affordability; and
WHEREAS, SB 5258 includes a requirement codified in RCW 82.02.060 that impact fee
schedules reflect the proportionate impact of new housing units, including multifamily and
condominium units, based on the square footage, number of bedrooms, or trips generated,
in or by the housing unit in order to produce a proportionally lower impact fee for smaller
housing units; and
WHEREAS, consistent with SB 5258 and RCW 82.02.060, the transportation impact
fee rate schedule has been and will continue to be assessed based on trip generation, one of
the three approved methods under law; and
WHEREAS, The City hired a consultant, Transportation Solutions, Inc. to prepare a
Transportation Impact Fee Study and 3 alternatives were presented, reviewed, and discussed
Docusign Envelope ID: 399C6961-D9D3-4B73-9303-FA78B79BA7AA
Ordinance No. 009-25
Page 2 of 21
at the May 20 City Council Work Study meeting; and
WHEREAS, the City Council directed city staff and the City's consultant to prepare a
preferred alternative as attached to this ordinance as Exhibit A; and
WHEREAS, a properly noticed public hearing on this Ordinance was conducted on July
8, 2025; and
WHEREAS, on July 8, 2025, at its regular meeting and after conducting a public
hearing, the City Council considered the updated transportation impact fee schedule and
written public testimony was received; and
WHEREAS, this Ordinance is exempt from the requirements of the State
Environmental Policy Act (SEPA), Chapter 43.21C RCW, and the City's environmental
regulations, Chapter 20.160 POMC; and
WHEREAS, the City Council finds that the transportation impact fee schedule attached
as Exhibit A is consistent with goals and policies of the City's Comprehensive Plan and related
regulations, and serve the public health, safety, and general welfare of the citizens of Port
Orchard; now, therefore,
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PORT ORCHARD, WASHINGTON, DO ORDAIN AS
FOLLOWS:
SECTION 1. The City Council adopts the "Whereas" sections of this ordinance as findings
in support of this ordinance.
SECTION 2. Adoption of Transportation Impact Fee Schedule. In accordance with POMC
20.182.060, the City Council hereby adopts a new Transportation Impact Fee Schedule which is
attached to this Ordinance as Exhibit A and incorporated herein by this reference as if set forth
in full. This transportation impact fee schedule shall become effective on the effective date
established in Section 4 below and shall replace and supersede any previously adopted
transportation impact fee schedule. No other Impact Fee Schedules (transportation or school
district) are modified by this Ordinance.
SECTION 3. Section 2 of this Ordinance is deemed of special effect and shall not be
codified.
SECTION 4. Effective Date of New Transportation Impact Fee Schedule. The
Transportation Impact Fee Schedule which is adopted pursuant to Section 2 of this Ordinance
shall take effect and be in full force and effect on 12:01 AM on July 28, 2025.
Docusign Envelope ID: 399C6961-D9D3-4B73-9303-FA78B79BA7AA
Ordinance No. 009-25
Page 3 of 21
SECTION 5. Savings Clause. The Transportation Impact Fee Schedule which is repealed
and replaced by this ordinance shall remain in force and effect as set out prior to this ordinance
until the effective date set out in Section 4 hereof. Such repealer shall not be construed as
affecting any existing right acquired under the laws repealed, nor as affecting any proceeding
instituted thereunder, nor any rule, regulation or order promulgated thereunder.
SECTION 6. Severability. If any section, sentence, clause, or phrase of this ordinance
should be held to be invalid or unconstitutional by a court of competent jurisdiction, such
invalidity or unconstitutionality shall not affect the validity of constitutionality of any other
section, sentence, clause or phrase of this ordinance.
SECTION 7. Corrections. Upon the approval of the city attorney, the city clerk and/or
code publisher is authorized to make any necessary technical corrections to this Ordinance,
including but not limited to the correction of scrivener's/clerical errors, references, Ordinance
numbering, section/subsection numbers, and any reference thereto.
SECTION 8. Effective Date. This ordinance shall be posted and published as required by
law and shall be effective and in full force five (5) days following publication. A summary of this
ordinance may be published in lieu of publishing the ordinance in its entirety.
PASSED by the City Council of the City of Port Orchard, APPROVED by the Mayor and
attested by the Clerk in authentication of such passage this 8th day of July 2025.
Signed by:
I°oti esttiu.
G.....
Robert Putaansuu, Mayor
ATTEST:
Signed by:
rra�n
Brandy Wallace, MMC, City Clerk
APPROVED AS TO FORM: ■■
SS o.
Signed by: �� • ` i
■ SEAL ■
Charlotte A. Archer, City Attorney %�S • t�,D ,�$�►
•
PUBLISHED: July 11, 2025 �''►�,OFWA�,�;;�'`�,
EFFECTIVE DATE: July 16, 2025
Docusign Envelope ID: 399C6961-D9D3-4B73-9303-FA78B79BA7AA
Transportation Solutions
.� p
INNOVATIVE I PRACTICAL I EQUITABLE
Ordinance No. 009-25
Exhibit A
CITY OF PORT ORCHARD
2025 TRANSPORTATION IMPACT FEE RATE STUDY AND FEE SCHEDULE
FINAL REPORT
June 2025
Prepared for:
City of Port Orchard
Prepared by:
Transportation Solutions, Inc.
16932 Woodinville -Redmond Rd NE
Suite A206
Woodinville, WA 98072
Docusign Envelope ID: 399C6961-D9D3-4B73-9303-FA78B79BA7AA
City of Port Orchard 2025 Transportation Impact Fee Rate Study and Fee Schedule
Table of Contents
1. Introduction....................................................................................................................................... 1
Definitionof Impact Fees.................................................................................................................................... 1
Statutory Basis for Impact Fees.......................................................................................................................... 1
2. Impact Fee Analysis............................................................................................................................ 2
Methodology...................................................................................................................................................... 2
Current Impact Fee and Context........................................................................................................................ 2
Projects Eligible for Impact Fees......................................................................................................................... 3
EligibleProject Costs........................................................................................................................................... 3
Impact Fee Calculation Methodology................................................................................................................. 4
3. Additional Issues for Consideration..................................................................................................... 5
Anticipated Annual Impact Fee Revenue........................................................................................................... 5
AnticipatedGrant Revenue................................................................................................................................ 5
Anticipated Need for Other Public Funds........................................................................................................... 5
4. Transportation Impact Fee Rate Comparison....................................................................................... 6
5. Credits and Adjustments..................................................................................................................... 6
ImpactFee Credits.............................................................................................................................................. 6
IndependentFee Calculation.............................................................................................................................. 6
Appendices
Appendix A. Transportation Impact Fee Project List
Appendix B. Comparison of 2024 TIE Rates in Western Washington
Appendix C. Transportation Impact Fee Rate Schedule
List of Tables
Table 1. Average Annual Unfunded Commitment.................................................................................................. 5
Table 2. Transportation Impact Fee Rates for Nearby Jurisdictions....................................................................... 6
Transportation Solutions, Inc. i June 2025
Docusign Envelope ID: 399C6961-D9D3-4B73-9303-FA78B79BA7AA
City of Port Orchard 2025 Transportation Impact Fee Rate Study and Fee Schedule
1. Introduction
The City of Port Orchard has maintained a transportation impact fee (TIF) program since 2015. Since its
implementation, the TIF program has provided funding to transportation improvement projects,
including the Tremont Street Widening Project and Bethel Road and Sedgwick Road Corridor
improvements, which have provided multimodal capacity to accommodate growth throughout the city.
This report summarizes the development of an updated transportation impact fee rate which reflects
the transportation improvement project list and growth forecasts described in the Transportation
Element of the 2025 Comprehensive Plan.
Definition of Impact Fees
Impact fees are a comprehensive grouping of charges based on new development. These fees are
assessed to pay for capital facility improvement projects necessitated by new development growth,
including but not limited to parks, schools, and streets/roads.
Transportation impact fees are collected to fund improvements that add capacity to the transportation
system, accommodating the travel demand created by new development. The Revised Code of
Washington (RCW) Section 82.02.050 identifies the intent of impact fees as:
• To ensure that adequate facilities are available to serve new growth and development;
• To promote orderly growth and development by establishing standards by which counties, cities,
and towns may require, by ordinance, that new growth and development pay a proportionate
share of the cost of new facilities needed to serve new growth and development; and
• To ensure that impact fees are imposed through established procedures and criteria so that
specific developments do not pay arbitrary fees or duplicative fees for the same impact.
Statutory Basis for Impact Fees
Transportation impact fees are a financing mechanism authorized by the Washington State Growth
Management Act (GMA) (see RCW 37.70A and 82.0). State law imposes limitations on impact fees to
assure property owners that the fees collected are reasonably related to their actual impacts and will
not be used for unrelated purposes.
If impact fees are imposed, the funds collected from developments can be expended only on
transportation system improvements which are: (a) identified in the comprehensive plan, capital
improvement program, or other policy documents (including this study) as needed for growth, and (b)
reasonably related to the impacts of the new development from which fees are collected.
Specifically, condition (a) requires that impact fees are not used on improvements needed to remedy
existing deficiencies. Those needs must be entirely funded from public sector resources. Condition (b) is
satisfied if the local government defines a reasonable service area, identifies the public facilities within
the service area that require improvement during the designated planning period, and prepares a fee
schedule taking into account the type and size of the development as well as the type of public facility
being funded.
To achieve the goal of simplicity, impact fee calculations are applied on an average basis for the entire
transportation system, rather than project -by -project. This is a key difference between impact fees and
Transportation Solutions, Inc. 1 June 2025
Docusign Envelope ID: 399C6961-D9D3-4B73-9303-FA78B79BA7AA
City of Port Orchard 2025 Transportation Impact Fee Rate Study and Fee Schedule
State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA) mitigation, whereby pro -rata shares of specific project
improvements are collected. However, impact fees are not a replacement for SEPA mitigation.
Pre -calculated impact fees are easier to administer than traditional SEPA development mitigation, at the
point of development review. However, more complex administrative procedures are necessary to track
the funds collected from each development. This is necessary to assure that the funds are expended
only on eligible transportation system improvements and to assure that impact fee revenues are used
within ten years. Fees not expended within ten years must be refunded with interest to the current
owner of the property.
The methodology and results described below are consistent with the requirements of the GMA. The
procedures and recommendations described herein can be formally enacted by an impact fee ordinance
incorporating this report by reference.
2. Impact Fee Analysis
Methodology
The conceptual basis for the transportation impact fee is that new development (growth) should pay a
proportionate share of the cost of transportation infrastructure required to support growth. This
proportionate share is calculated based on the estimated cost of growth -related transportation
improvement projects and on an estimate of growth's share of capacity utilization for each project. The
impact fee analysis is limited to projects that provide capacity improvements needed for growth.
Projects related to maintenance, such as pavement overlays and physical obsolescence, as well as
improvements necessary to mitigate existing capacity deficiencies, are not eligible for impact fee
funding. However, multimodal transportation improvements, including shoulder widening, sidewalks,
bike lanes and parallel trails are reasonable to include as both motorized and nonmotorized capacity
enhancements.
Current Impact Fee and Context
The Port Orchard transportation impact fee program was initially adopted in 2015 and has been
regularly updated to reflect changes in transportation improvement projects, housing and employment
forecasts, and construction and engineering costs. As of June 2025, the City of Port Orchard has a
transportation impact fee of $6,288 per PM peak hour trip or $6,225 per single-family dwelling unit.
This study updates the impact fee program to maintain consistency with the Transportation Element of
the Comprehensive Plan as well as the Transportation Improvement Program, including updated project
needs, cost estimates, and development forecasts. This allows the transportation impact fee program to
remain compliant with current RCW requirements.
Transportation Solutions, Inc. 2 June 2025
Docusign Envelope ID: 399C6961-D9D3-4B73-9303-FA78B79BA7AA
City of Port Orchard 2025 Transportation Impact Fee Rate Study and Fee Schedule
Projects Eligible for Impact Fees
Not all planned transportation projects and programs are eligible for impact fees. Planned improvement
projects are divided below into the following categories to establish a list of qualifying projects that will
form the basis for this impact fee rate update:
• Project Improvements,
• Maintenance Projects, and
• Planned Transportation Projects needed within 20 years
Protect Improvements
Project improvements are transportation improvements necessary for a specific development that do
not provide significant system benefits. These are typically low -volume local streets that serve driveways
and parking areas. They may provide connections to other developments, but not for the purpose of
significant system capacity. Other project improvements include safety improvements and new access
connections to existing arterials that serve only one development. Project improvements are typically
required by other development regulations or as SEPA mitigation for specific development impacts not
anticipated in the Comprehensive Plan. Project improvements are not eligible for impact fees.
Maintenance Protects
Maintenance programs, general studies, and non -capital activities are generally not eligible for impact
fees. A component of ongoing pavement preservation could be eligible for impact fees if it is
demonstrated that growth increases the magnitude of pavement reconstruction requirements. For
instance, if existing conditions require a two-inch asphalt overlay, but added traffic from growth
requires a three-inch asphalt overlay to achieve the same pavement life, the cost of the additional inch
of asphalt could be attributed to growth. If the overlay provides increased lane width, intersection
improvements, or shoulder widening, the cost of the expansion could be considered eligible.
Planned Transportation Projects
The Port Orchard 2025-2044 Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) identifies transportation
projects which are needed to serve traffic growth for the next 20 years. The TIP list is consistent with the
growth forecasts and transportation improvement needs identified in the Transportation Element of the
Port Orchard Comprehensive Plan. Projects with capacity benefits are eligible for transportation impact
fee funding, provided capacity improvements are reasonably related to growth. Capacity -related
improvements may include but are not limited to adding turn lanes, separating nonmotorized modes,
and modifying intersection control by adding signals or roundabouts. The methodology for intersection
and street segment capacity calculation is described in the Transportation Element.
Based on the criteria and plans identified above, a total of 38 transportation improvement projects were
identified as eligible for transportation impact fee funding. The TIF project list is provided in Appendix A.
Projects which are not capacity -related, or which are considered maintenance programs, are not eligible
for impact fee funding and were not included in the TIF project list.
Eligible Project Costs
The eligible portion of impact fee project costs includes elements which are necessary for the
construction of improvements, including design, permitting, right-of-way, construction, and construction
management. Ongoing or future maintenance is not an eligible impact fee cost.
Transportation Solutions, Inc. 3 June 2025
Docusign Envelope ID: 399C6961-D9D3-4B73-9303-FA78B79BA7AA
City of Port Orchard
2025 Transportation Impact Fee Rate Study and Fee Schedule
Impact Fee Calculation Methodology
The impact fee rate was calculated by identifying growth's per -trip share of eligible transportation
improvement costs. The methodology is described below.
Grant and Intergovernmental Funding Assumptions
Federally classified (collector and arterial) streets are generally eligible for state and federal grant funds.
These funds are not predictable, typically have very restrictive eligibility criteria, and vary in amount by
grantor. Additionally, cost -sharing agreements with Washington State Department of Transportation
(WSDOT) and Kitsap County are anticipated to reduce some of the City's cost burden.
This analysis assumed that several eligible projects will receive grant funding or other intergovernmental
funding. Known grant awards were applied where possible, and target amounts were applied on
projects for which grant funding had not yet been secured but is reasonably likely to be secured in the
future. Fourteen projects were assumed to receive a total of $51,875,848 in grant funding through 2045.
This represents 31 percent of total impact fee eligible project costs. The remaining project costs are
expected to be funded by the City of Port Orchard or by new development (growth). Anticipated grant
funding for each project is identified in the TIF project list in Appendix A.
Pr000rtionate Share of Proiect Cost
The growth share of non -grant funded impact fee eligible project costs was calculated using the Port
Orchard travel demand model, which is the technical basis for the transportation needs forecasts
identified in the Transportation Element as well as the Port Orchard transportation concurrency
management system. The travel demand model forecasts the quantity, distribution, and route choice of
trips associated with new and existing development in and near Port Orchard. The travel demand model
indicates that new development will generate a total of 8,579 new PM peak hour trips citywide between
2025 and 2045.
Growth share was calculated by project based on the proportion of new development trips in 2045
relative to 2025 traffic volume on each project street segment or intersection. For eligible multimodal
shared -use path projects, growth share was calculated based on travel demand growth on a street
segment or intersection in the project vicinity.
The proportionate share for each project was capped at the anticipated non -grant share of project cost.
For example, if a project improved an intersection with anticipated traffic volume growth of 40 percent
but that project was anticipated to receive 80 percent grant funding, the growth share of project cost
was limited to the non -grant -funded share of 20 percent. The proportionate share of growth
responsibility for each TIF-eligible project is identified in Appendix A.
The sum of the growth share of project cost for all impact fee projects is $68,431,221, or approximately
41 percent of total impact fee eligible project cost. The remaining $46,881,924 (28%) will require
funding from other sources.
Transportation Impact Fee Rate
The TIF rate was calculated by dividing the total growth share of eligible project costs by the citywide
2025-2045 PM peak hour trip growth forecast, as shown:
Development share of project costs $68,431,221
New PM peak hour trips citywide
8,579 trips
= $7,977 / PM peak hour trip
Transportation Solutions, Inc. 4 June 2025
Docusign Envelope ID: 399C6961-D9D3-4B73-9303-FA78B79BA7AA
City of Port Orchard 2025 Transportation Impact Fee Rate Study and Fee Schedule
3. Additional Issues for Consideration
Anticipated Annual Impact Fee Revenue
The amount of revenue generated annually by impact fees are variable, subject to general economic and
social conditions. The anticipated annual revenue from the proposed transportation impact fee, based
on the travel demand growth forecast of 8,579 new trips by 2045, is shown below:
429 trips $7,977
* = $3,422,133 / year
year PM trip
The transportation impact fee is anticipated to generate an average of $3,422,133 per year. This
represents a 20 -year average and may be more or less in any given year.
Anticipated Grant Revenue
Grant funding totaling $51,875,848 for impact fee eligible projects was subtracted from the total project
cost used in the impact fee rate calculation. These funds were estimated on a per -project basis but are
unpredictable and may vary. If actual grant funding falls short of the assumed awards, the City of Port
Orchard will need to identify other revenue sources to cover the funding gap.
Anticipated Need for Other Public Funds
The anticipated impact fee revenue does not fully fund the non -grant share of TIF project costs. The
anticipated need for other public funds is summarized in Table 1.
Table 1. Average Annual Unfunded Commitment
Amount Share of Total
Total TIF-Eligible Project Cost $167,188,993 100%
Anticipated Grant & Intergovernmental Revenue $51,875,848 31%
Growth/Development Share of Project Cost $68,431,221 41%
Remaining Unfunded Commitment (2025-2045) $46,881,924 28%
Average Annual Unfunded Commitment $2,344,096
The City will need to identify other revenue sources to fund the remaining unfunded revenue
commitment of $46,881,924 associated with the TIF projects. This represents an average funding
commitment of $2,344,096 per year.
Transportation Solutions, Inc. 5 June 2025
Docusign Envelope ID: 399C6961-D9D3-4B73-9303-FA78B79BA7AA
City of Port Orchard 2025 Transportation Impact Fee Rate Study and Fee Schedule
4. Transportation Impact Fee Rate Comparison
Current transportation impact fee rates for several cities in Kitsap and Pierce County as of June 2025 are
identified below. A full comparison chart of transportation impact fee rates, current as of 2024, is
provided in Appendix B.
Table 2. Transportation Impact Fee Rates for Nearby Jurisdictions
Jurisdiction
Transportation Impact Fee Rate
$/PM trip'
$/DU2
City of North Bend (Western WA maximum)
$17,149
$16,120
Pierce County3
$9,917
$9,322
City of Port Orchard — Proposed
$7,977
$7,498
City of Gig Harbor
$7,577
$7,122
City of Port Orchard — Existing
$6,288
$6,225
Western Washington 2024 Average
$5,717
$5,374
City of Poulsbo
$5,640
$5,302
Kitsap County
$5,382
$5,059
City of Bainbridge Island
$5,000
$5,319
City of Oak Harbor (Western WA minimum)
$589
$907
'Fee rate per new PM peak hour trip; 2Fee rate per new single-family detached dwelling unit (DU)
3Pierce County TIF rate varies by service area
5. Credits and Adjustments
Impact Fee Credits
An applicant may request a credit for impact fees in the amount of the value of system improvements,
including dedications of land, improvements, and/or construction provided by the applicant. Credits
should be considered on a case -by -case basis and should not exceed the impact fee payable.
Claims for credit should be made before the payment of the impact fee. Credits for construction should
be provided only if the land, improvements, and/or the facility constructed are listed as planned
transportation projects in the Rate Study and Impact Fee Ordinance. No credit should be given for code
based frontage improvements or right or way dedications, or direct access improvements to and/or
within the subject development (project improvements) unless the improvement is part of a project
listed in the Rate Study and Impact Fee Ordinance.
Independent Fee Calculation
An applicant may submit an independent fee calculation for a proposed development activity. The
documentation submitted should be prepared by a traffic engineer licensed in Washington State and
should be limited to adjustments in the trip generation rates used in the fee calculation.
Transportation Solutions, Inc. 6 June 2025
Docusign Envelope ID: 399C6961-D9D3-4B73-9303-FA78B79BA7AA
Appendix A. Transportation Impact Fee Project List
Transportation Solutions, Inc.
Docusign Envelope ID: 399C6961-D9D3-4B73-9303-FA78B79BA7AA
OPM 2025 Transportation Impact Fee Rate Study
ORCHARD Project List
Total $167,188,993 $51,875,848 (31%) $46,881,924 (28%) $68,431,221 (41%)
2025-2045 Trip Growth
Impact Fee Rate per Trip
8,579
$7,977
Impact Fee per Single -Family Home $7,498
*
Tremont Street Widening Ph. 1 (Complete)
$23,600,000
$16,030,336 (68%)
$0 (0%)
$7,569,664 (32%)
1.1
Bay Street Pedestrian Pathway ROW
$2,804,800
$1,923,590 (69%)
$180,210 (6%)
$701,000 (25%)
1.2
Bay St Pedestrian Pathway Construction
$4,115,000
$3,000,000 (73%)
$86,000 (2%)
$1,029,000 (25%)
1.3
Bethel Phase 1 Design
$2,242,000
$0 (0%)
$1,121,000 (50%)
$1,121,000 (50%)
1.4
Old Clifton Rd/Anderson Hill Rd Roundabout
$2,300,000
$0 (0%)
$230,000 (10%)
$2,070,000 (90%)
1.5/2.07
Old Clifton Rd Nonmotorized Improvements
$3,150,000
$0 (0%)
$315,000 (10%)
$2,835,000 (90%)
1.7
Bethel Phase 5a (Bethel/Lincoln Roundabout)
$4,000,000
$1,500,000 (38%)
$0 (0%)
$2,500,000 (63%)
1.8
Bethel Phase 1 a (Blueberry Roundabout)
$3,591,000
$0 (0%)
$1,795,000 (50%)
$1,796,000 (50%)
1.9
Bethel Phase 1 b (Salmonberry Roundabout)
$11,842,000
$0 (0%)
$5,921,000 (50%)
$5,921,000 (50%)
1.10
Bethel Phase 4b (Vallair Ct Connector)
$3,000,000
$0 (0%)
$1,500,000 (50%)
$1,500,000 (50%)
1.14
Sidney Rd SW Nonmotorized (Hovde Rd to SR 16)
$1,895,000
$1,251,000 (66%)
$0 (0%)
$644,000 (34%)
1.16
Bay Street Impr. Ph. 1 (Robert Geiger St to Frederick)
$7,259,000
$2,000,000 (28%)
$1,629,000 (22%)
$3,630,000 (50%)
1.18
Tremont Ph. 2 & 3 Design/ROW (PO Blvd to Sidney Ave)
$4,732,000
$2,232,000 (47%)
$134,000 (3%)
$2,366,000 (50%)
1.19
SR 160/Sedgwick Phase 2a (Sedgwick Rd roundabout)
$3,000,000
$0 (0%)
$1,500,000 (50%)
$1,500,000 (50%)
1.20
Bethel Phase 4a (Lund Ave Roundabout)
$4,000,000
$3,000,000 (75%)
$0 (0%)
$1,000,000 (25%)
1.21
Old Clifton/McCormick Woods Dr Roundabout
$3,000,000
$0 (0%)
$300,000 (10%)
$2,700,000 (90%)
2.01
Sidney Ave (s. of Tremont) Complete Street (Design/ROW
$3,750,000
$0 (0%)
$2,812,000 (75%)
$938,000 (25%)
2.02A
Sedgwick Rd West Design/ROW (SR1 6 to Sidney Rd SW)
$1,156,070
$924,856 (80%)
$214 (0%)
$231,000 (20%)
2.02B
Sedgwick Rd West Construction (SR 16 to Sidney Rd SW)
$3,468,208
$2,774,566 (80%)
$0 (0%)
$693,642 (20%)
2.04A.2
Ramsey Road Widening (Sedgwick Rd to Salmonberry)
$4,000,000
$0 (0%)
$400,000 (10%)
$3,600,000 (90%)
2.04C
Bethel/Sedgwick Corridor Ph. 3 (Blueberry to Piperberry)
$1,800,000
$0 (0%)
$900,000 (50%)
$900,000 (50%)
2.04D
Bethel/Sedgwick Corridor Ph. 4 (Lund to Salmonberry)
$8,744,000
$4,372,000 (50%)
$0 (0%)
$4,372,000 (50%)
2.04E
Bethel/Sedgwick Corridor Ph. 5 (Mile Hill Dr to Lund)
$8,535,000
$4,267,500 (50%)
$2,133,500 (25%)
$2,134,000 (25%)
Transportation Solutions *Growth share is calculated using travel demand model and capped at non -grant share of project cost
1of2
INNOVATIVE I PRACTICAL I EQUITABLE
Docusign Envelope ID: 399C6961-D9D3-4B73-9303-FA78B79BA7AA
ORCHARD
2025 Transportation Impact Fee Rate Study
Project List
2.05
Sidney Rd SW Widening Ph. 2 (Ruby Crk to s. city limits)
$1,750,000
$0 (0°%o)
$875,000 (50%)
$875,000 (50%)
2.10
Fireweed Rd Widening (Sidney to Flower)
$1,500,000
$0 (0%)
$750,000 (50%)
$750,000 (50%)
2.11
Sherman Ave Widening (Fireweed to terminus)
$2,000,000
$0 (0°%o)
$1,000,000 (50%)
$1,000,000 (50%)
2.12
Tremont St Widening Ph. 2: Port Orchard Blvd
$8,554,915
$7,400,000 (86%)
$0 (0%)
$1,154,915 (14%)
2.20
Bay Street Ped. Pathway W. Ph. 1 (Tremont to Foot ferry)
$4,000,000
$0 (0°%o)
$3,000,000 (75%)
$1,000,000 (25%)
2.23
Bay St Complete Street (PO Blvd to Mile Hill Dr)
$10,000,000
$0 (0%)
$7,500,000 (75%)
$2,500,000 (25%)
2.21
Bethel Business Connector
$1,400,000
$0 (0%)
$700,000 (50%)
$700,000 (50%)
2.27
Sidney Ave (Downtown) Impr. (Prospect to Waterfront)
$1,500,000
$0 (0°%o)
$1,125,000 (75%)
$375,000 (25%)
2.28
Harrison Ave Improvements (Prospect to Waterfront)
$1,000,000
$0 (0°%o)
$750,000 (75%)
$250,000 (25%)
1.22
Frederick Ave Improvements (Prospect to Waterfront)
$1,500,000
$0 (0°%o)
$1,125,000 (75%)
$375,000 (25%)
2.30
Tremont St Widening Ph.3 (PO Blvd to Sidney Ave)
$5,000,000
$1,200,000 (24%)
$1,300,000 (26%)
$2,500,000 (50%)
2.31
Glenwood & McCormick Woods Dr Roundabout
$3,000,000
$0 (0%)
$300,000 (10%)
$2,700,000 (90%)
2.32
Bay St Ped. Pathway W. Ph. 2 (Kitsap Transit to PO Blvd)
$1,000,000
$0 (0°%o)
$750,000 (75%)
$250,000 (25%)
2.34
Bay St Reconstruction Ph. 2 (PO Blvd to Robert Geiger St)
$5,000,000
$0 (0°%o)
$3,750,000 (75%)
$1,250,000 (25%)
2.35
Bay St Reconstruction Ph. 3 (Frederick to Harrison)
$4,000,000
$0 (0°%o)
$3,000,000 (75%)
$1,000,000 (25%)
Transportation Solutions *Growth share is calculated using travel demand model and capped at non -grant share of project cost
2of2
INNOVATIVE I PRACTICAL I EQUITABLE
Docusign Envelope ID: 399C6961-D9D3-4B73-9303-FA78B79BA7AA
Appendix B. Comparison of 2024 TIF Rates in Western Washington
Transportation Solutions, Inc.
Docusign Envelope ID: 399C6961-D9D3-4B73-9303-FA78B79BA7AA
2024 Transportation Impact Fee Comparison: 74 Cities + 5 Counties in Western Washington
Data compiled March 2024 from web sites, fee sheets, telephone, and email by
Chris Comeau, FAICP-CTP, Senior Transportation Planner, chris.comeau@transpogroup.com
North Bend
Sammamish
Bothell
$12,477
Renton
$12,209
Edgewood
$11,489
Issaquah
$11,132
Shoreline
$10,830
Duvall
$10,810
Kenmore
$10,752
Camas
$10,372
Newcastle
$10,013
Kent
$8,979
Carnation
$8,815
Sultan
$8,787
Redmond
$8,284
Federal Way
$8,138
Bellevue
$7,946
Kirkland
$7,827
Washougal
$7,811
La Center
$7,561
Maple Valley
$7,504
Des Moines
$7,465
Bainbridge Island
$6,815
Lynnwood
$6,525
Sumner
$6,490
Gig Harbor
$6,449
Fife
$6,413
Marysville
$6,300
Edmonds
$6,249
Mount Vernon
$6,151
Auburn
$6,146
Port Orchard
$6,064
Arlington
$5,841
WA Average TIF
$5,717
Pierce County
$5,705
Snohomish County
$5,475
Poulsbo
$5,302
Clark County
$5,168
Ridgefield
$5,081
Mount Lake Terrace
$4,991
Milton
$4,807
Shelton
$4,655
Everett
$4,652
Puyallup
$4,500
Covington
$4,461
Mercer Island
$4,319
Kitsap County
$4,304
Tumwater
$4,275
Buckley
$4,188
Lake Stevens
$4,155
Woodinville
$4,154
Monroe
$4,026
Bonney Lake
$3,955
Mill Creek
$3,900
Ferndale
$3,793
SeaTac
$3,733
Tukwila
$3,726
Pacific
$3,650
Bellingham
$3,638
Thurston County
$3,561
Stanwood
$3,523
Battleground
$3,508
Olympia
$3,241
Enumclaw
$3,239
University Place
$3,193
Vancouver
$3,124
Anacortes
$3,044
Sedro Woolley
$3,022
Burlington
$2,665
Granite Falls
$2,500
Blaine
$2,500
Sequim
$2,491
Lynden
$2,168
Orting
$2,149
Lacey
$2,013
Mukilteo
$1,875
Snohomish
$1,603
Yelm
$1,497
Burien
$948
Oak Harbor
$907
$14,204
$15,427
$0 $2,000 $4,000 $6,000 58,00c $10,000 $12,000 $14,000 $16,000 $18,000
Cost Per P.M. Peak Hour (4:00 - 6:00pm) Vehicle or Person Trip
Docusign Envelope ID: 399C6961-D9D3-4B73-9303-FA78B79BA7AA
2024 Transportation Impact Fee Comparison: 74 Cities + 5 Counties in Western Washington
Data compiled March 2024 from public web sites, fee sheets, telephone calls, and email inquiries by
Chris Comeau, FAICP-CTP, Senior Transportation Planner at Transpo Group, Inc. chris.comeau(c transpogroup.com
City
2024
Population
2024
Base Rate
Urban Center
Incentive
City
2023
Population
2024
Base Rate
Urban Center
Incentive
Anacortesl
18,326
$3,044
Milton
8,835
$4,807
Arlington
22,121
$5,841
Monroe
18,574
$4,026
Auburn2
88,750
$6,146
Yes: Downtown
Mount Vernon
35,753
$6,151
Yes: Commercial Uses
Bainbridge Island
24,153
$6,815
Mount Lake Terrace
21,804
$4,991
Battleground3
22,395
$3,508
Mukilteo
20,681
$1,875
Bellevue
153,768
$7,946
Yes: Downtown & TOD
Newcastle
12,664
$10,013
Bellingham4
95,921
$3,638
Yes: Urban Villages
North Bend20
8,302
$15,427
Blaine5
6,130
$2,500
Oak Harbor21
24,187
$907
Yes; CBD
Bonney Lake
22,948
$3,955
Olympia22
55,731
$3,241
Yes; Downtown & High Density Corridors
Bothell
48,871
$12,477
Yes: Main Street
Orting
8,857
$2,149
Buckley
5,421
$4,188
May apply for 30% Reduction
Pacific
6,807
$3,650
Burien6
49,627
$948
Port Orchard
18,564
$6,064
Burlington
10,253
$2,665
Poulsbo23
12,101
$5,302
Camas?
28,275
$10,372
Puyallup
41,880
$4,500
Carnation
2,199
$8,815
Redmond24
80,116
$8,284
Y; CBD; Overtake
Covington
21,891
$4,461
Renton
101,386
$12,209
Des Moines
31,946
$7,465
Ridgefield25
17,666
$5,081
Duvall
8,824
$10,810
Sammamish26
64,250
$14,204
Edgewood
13,380
$11,489
SeaTac
29,652
$3,733
Edmonds
42,027
$6,249
Sedro Woolley27
13,368
$3,022
Yes; CBD
Enumclaw
12,645
$3,239
Sequim
8,403
$2,491
Yes; CBD
Everett
111,793
$4,652
Yes: Parking "A"
Shelton
10,896
$4,655
Federal Way8
94,745
$8,138
Yes: City Center
Shoreline
62,908
$10,830
Ferndale9
16,562
$3,793
Yes: Downtown
Snohomish
10,124
$1,603
Fife10
10,573
$6,413
Yes: Use -based
Stanwood
9,817
$3,523
Gig Harbor
12,892
$6,449
Sultan
7,243
$8,787
Yes; 50% for Commercial
Granite Falls
5,117
$2,500
Sumner28
10,543
$6,490
Issaquah11
38,601
$11,132
Yes: Commercial Uses
Tukwila29
21,000
$3,726
Kenmore12
23,067
$10,752
Tumwater
26,427
$4,275
Kent13
132,204
$8,979
Yes; Downtown
University Place
34,371
$3,193
Kirkland14
91,568
$7,827
Vancouver30
197,765
$3,124
La Center15
5,262
$7,561
Washougal
16,764
$7,811
Lacey
60,485
$2,013
Woodinville31
13,044
$4,154
Lake Stevens16
40,598
$4,155
Yes; TIF Zone 1
Yelm
10,676
$1,497
Lynden17
16,540
$2,168
County
Population
Base Rate
Lynnwood18
47,880
$6,525
Yes; Citywide
Clark County32
520,900
$5,168
Maple Valley19
28,355
$7,504
Kitsap County
280,900
$4,304
Marysville
73,578
$6,300
Yes: Commercial Uses
Pierce County33
937,400
$5,705
Mercer Island
24,600
$4,319
Snohomish County34
847,300
$5,475
Mill Creek
20,753
$3,900
Thurston County35
300,500
$3,561
Notes: All data above and below obtained from public web sites, fee sheets, telephone calls, emails, and ITE Trip Generation Manuals. 2023 OFM Population data not released until June.
1. Anacortes updated TIF system in 2019.
2. Auburn adopted rates 2017; has downtown reduced rate.
3. Battle Ground uses an ADT-based TIF system; SFD = 9.57 trips x $347
4. Bellingham TIF = Person trips; alutomatic 22% to 30% Urban Village TIF reduction with voluntary TDM measures up to 50% UV TIF reduction.
5. The City of Blaine future pm peak hour vehicle trip rate is currently being evaluated.
6. Burien limited improvement project costs to keep rates low. TIF was adopted in 2009.
7. Camas uses a 2 -zone TIF system; North = $9,833; South = $3,800; Average = $6,817
8. Federal Way charges 3% admin. fee + base rate + 3-yr WSDOT construction cost index. City Center TIF Reduction.
9. Ferndale uses 3 -zone TIF system. $3,855 citywide; $4,822 for 443 -acre "Main Street" Planned
Action; $2,701 downtown Ferndale. Average =
$3,793.
10. Fife uses a VMT-based TIF system adjusted from ITE ADT rates.
11. Issaquah created development incentive in which the first 10,000 SF of commercial TIF paid from other public funding sources (per WA State law).
12. Kenmore TIF rates based on mobility units and person trips.
13. Kent TIF rates are based on person trips; TIF Rate Study (2021) with reductions for downtown Kent.
14. Kirkland TIF rates are based on person trips at $5,397/person trip
15. La Center allows TIF to be deferred to occupancy by requiring lien on property.
16. Lake Stevens uses a 3 -zone TIF system; average - $3,257
17. Lynden TIF citywide is $2,168, but NW Lynden Pepin Creek subarea TIF is $17,328 (Highest in WA).
18. Lynnwood has two TIF zones: City Center/Mall $5,107and remainder of City $7,944. Average is $6,525.
19. Maple Valley fee per 2023 rate schedule
20. North Bend has highest citywide TIF ($15,210) in WA (See Lynden Pepin Creek) Primarily residential with little to no pass-by/diverted link trips.
21. Oak Harbor uses a dated TIF system; $907 residential and $589 non-residential.
22. Olympia allows TIF reduction in downtown and on high-desnity corridors.
23. Poulsbo uses an ADT-based TIF system;ITE 11th Ed. SFD = 9.4 ADT x $564 =$5,301.60
24. Redmond uses "Person Trips/Mobility Units" for Concurrency and TIF; Citywide $9336; Overlake $7890; Downtown $7626; Average = $8284.
25. Ridgefield uses an ADT-based TIF system
26. Sammamish has 2nd highest citywide TIF ($14,064) in WA (See Lynden Pepin Creek). Primarily residential development; no pass-by/diverted link trips.
27. Sedro-Woolley uses a 2 -zone TIF system; $3,022 Non-CBD; $1,681 in CBD
28. Sumner converted 3 -zone TIF system to 1 Citywide Zone as of April 15, 2024
29. Tukwila = 4 -zone TIF system: Z1 = $4,439; Z2 = $4,863; Z3 = $5,345; Z4= $2,058; Average =$3,726
30. Vancouver uses 3 -zone ADT-based TIF system; Columbia $240; Pacific $428; Cascade $329; Average = $332.33 x 9.4 = $3,124 / SFD
31. Woodinville uses an ADT-based TIF system. 1 SFD = 9.44 x $440 = $4,154
32. Clark County has a four zone TIF system based on ADT; Z1 = $487; Z2 = $930; Z3 =$421; Z4 =$352; Average $547.50 x 9.44 = $5240
33. Pierce County uses a 4 -zone TIF system based on model -derived VMT; A = $5,654; B= $5,654; C = $9,242; D=$2,270. Average TIF for SFD = $5,705
34. Snohomish County updated its 6 -zone TIF system based on ADT in 2020. Average is $580/trip or $5,475 per SFD.
35. Thurston County uses a 6 -zone TIF system based on ITE PM Peak Trips; Average = $3561/trip or $3,248 per SFD
Docusign Envelope ID: 399C6961-D9D3-4B73-9303-FA78B79BA7AA
Appendix C. Transportation Impact Fee Rate Schedule
Transportation Solutions, Inc.
Docusign Envelope ID: 399C6961-D9D3-4B73-9303-FA78B79BA7AA
City of Port Orchard Traffic Impact Fee Rate Schedule - Residential (2025 Update)
210
Ill!
Single -Family Detached Housing
JI1iL
0.94
DU
rTuaxI,xgurnr
$7,498
$4,547
215
220
221
Single -Family Attached Housing (Duplex/Townhome)
Multifamily Housing (1-3 floors)
Multifamily Housing (4-10 floors)
0.57
DU
0.51
DU
$4,068
0.39
DU
$3,111
230
Low -Rise Residential w/ 1st Floor Commercial
0.36
DU
$2,872
240
Mobile Home Park
0.58
DU
$4,627
251
Senior Housing Detached
0.30
DU
$2,393
252
253
254
Senior Housing Attached
Congregate Care Facility
Assisted Living
0.25
DU
$1,994
0.18
DU
$1,436
0.24
bed
$1,914
260
270
Recreational Home
Residential PUD
0.29
DU
$2,313
0.69
DU
$5,504
-
-
Accessory Dwelling Unit (≤ 450 sf)
Accessory Dwelling Unit (> 450 sf)
0.29
DU
$2,313
0.47
DU
$3,749
1 Institute of Transportation Engineers, Trip Generation Manual (11th Edition)
2 Trip generation rate per development unit for PM peak hour of the adjacent street traffic (4-6 PM)
3 DU = Dwelling Unit
0�84
HARD
Transportation Solutions
•� p
INNOVATIVE I PRACTICAL I EQUITABLE
Docusign Envelope ID: 399C6961-D9D3-4B73-9303-FA78B79BA7AA
City of Port Orchard Traffic Impact Fee Rate Schedule — Non -Residential LUC 1-799 (2025 Update)
30
90
•
Intermodal Truck Terminal
Park and Ride with Bus Service
1.87
*
1.870
ksf
$14,917
0.49
0.490
space
$3,909
110
General Light Industrial
Industrial Park
Manufacturing
Warehousing
Mini Warehouse
Utilities
Speciality Trade Contractor
0.65
*
0.650
KSF
$5,185
130
0.34
*
0.340
KSF
$2,712
140
0.74
*
0.740
KSF
$5,903
150
0.18
*
0.180
KSF
$1,436
151
0.15
*
0.150
KSF
$1,197
170
180
••
2.16
1.93
*
*
2.160
KSF
KSF
$17,230
$15,396
1.930
310
Hotel
0.59
*
0.590
room
$4,706
311
All Suites Hotel
0.36
*
0.360
room
$2,872
312
Business Hotel
0.31
0.310
room
$2,473
320
Motel
•
0.36
0.360
room
$2,872
411
Public Park
0.11
0.110
acre
$877
416
Campground/RV Park
0.27
*
0.270
site
$2,154
430
Golf Course
0.28
*
0.280
acre
$2,234
432
Golf Driving Range
1.25
*
1.250
tee
$9,971
433
Batting Cages
2.22
*
2.220
cage
$17,709
434
Rock Climbing Gym
1.64
*
1.640
KSF
$13,082
435
Multi -Purpose Recreational Facility
3.58
*
3.580
KSF
$28,558
437
Bowling Alley
1.16
*
1.160
KSF
$9,253
445
Movie Theater
13.96
*
13.960
screen
$111,359
488
SoccerCom lex
16.43
*
16.430
field
$131,062
490
Tennis Courts
4.21
*
4.210
court
$33,583
491
Racquet/Tennis Club
3.82
*
3.820
court
$30,472
492
Health Fitness Club
3.45
*
3.450
KSF
$27,521
493
Athletic Club
6.29
*
6.290
KSF
$50,175
495
Recreational Community Center
•
i 2.50
*
2.500 i
KSF
$19,943
520
Elementary School
0.16
0.160
student
$1,276
522
Middle/Junior High School
0.15
*
0.150
student
$1,197
525
High School
0.14
*
0.140
student
$1,117
528
School District Office
2.04
*
2.040
student
$16,273
530
Private School (K-8)
0.26
*
0.260
student
$2,074
534
Private High School
0.19
*
0.190
student
$1,516
536
Charter Elementa School
0.16
*
0.160
student
$1,276
540
Junior / Communi Colle a
0.11
*
0.110
student
$877
560
Church
0.49
*
0.490
KSF
$3,909
565
Da Care Center
11.12
44%
4.893
KSF
$39,030
566
Cemetery
0.46
*
0.460
acre
$3,669
571
Adult Detention Facility
0.08
*
0.080
bed
$638
575
Fire & Rescue Station
0.48
*
0.480
KSF
$3,829
590
i'il*1[Wi
Library
8.16
*
8.160 •
KSF
$65,092
610
Hospital
0.86
*
0.860
KSF
$6,860
620
Nursing Home
0.14
*
0.140
KSF
$1,117
630
Clinic
3.69
*
3.690
KSF
$29,435
640
Animal Hos ital / Veterina Clinic
3.53
*
3.530
KSF
$28,159
650
•
Freestanding Emergency Room
1.52
*
1.520
KSF
$12,125
710
General Office
1.44
1.440
KSF
$11,487
712
Small Office Bldg (<10,000 s
2.16
*
2.160
KSF
$17,230
715
Single Tenant Office ≥10,000 s
1.76
*
1.760
KSF
$14,040
720
Medical/Dental Office (Stand -Alone)
3.93
*
3.930
KSF
$31,350
730
Government Office Building
1.71
*
1.710
KSF
$13,641
732
US Post Office
11.21
*
11.210
KSF
$89,422
750
Office Park
1.30
*
1.300
KSF
$10,370
760
Research and Development Center
0.98
*
0.980
KSF
$7,817
770
Business Park
1.22
*
1.220
KSF
$9,732
' Institute of Transportation Engineers, Trip Generation Manual (11th Edition)
2 Trip generation rate per development unit, for PM Peak Hour of the adjacent street traffic (4-6 pm).
3 DU = Dwelling Unit; KSF = 1,000 square feet; VSP = Vehicle servicing position
* Pass -by and diverted trip rate data not available. Primary trip rates may be applied based on local data, development context, and engineering judgment
Docusign Envelope ID: 399C6961-D9D3-4B73-9303-FA78B79BA7AA
City of Port Orchard Traffic Impact Fee Rate Schedule — Non -Residential LUC 800-999 (2025 Update)
810
811
Tractor Supply Store
Construction Equipment Rental Store
Building Materials and Lumber Store
1.40
0.99
66%
0.924
KSF
$7,371
$5,844
74%
0.733
KSF
812
2.25
74%
1.665
KSF
$13,282
813
Free -Standing Discount Superstore w/ Grocery)
4.33
71%
3.074
KSF
$24,524
814
Variety Store
6.70
66%
4.422
KSF
$35,274
815
Free Standing Discount Store w/o Grocery)
4.86
83%
4.034
KSF
$32,178
816
Hardware/Paint Store
2.98
74%
2.205
KSF
$17,591
817
Nurse (Garden Center)
6.94
74%
5.136
KSF
$40,967
818
Nurse (Wholesale)
5.24
74%
3.878
KSF
$30,932
820
Sho in Center >150k
3.40
66%
2.244
KSF
$17,900
821
Sho ing Plaza (40-150k) w/ Supermarket
9.03
66%
5.960
KSF
$47,541
821
Sho ing Plaza (40-150k) w/o Supermarket
5.19
66%
3.425
KSF
$27,324
822
Stri Retail Plaza (<40k)
6.59
66%
4.349
KSF
$34,695
823
Fa oryOutletCenter
2.29
66%
1.511
KSF
$12,056
840
Automobile Sales (New)
2.42
100%
2.420
KSF
$19,304
841
Automobile Sales (Used)
3.75
100%
3.750
KSF
$29,914
842
Recreational Vehicle Sales
0.77
100%
0.770
KSF
$6,142
843
Automobile Parts Sales
4.90
44%
2.156
KSF
$17,198
848
Tire Store
3.75
72%
2.700
KSF
$21,538
849
Tire Superstore
2.11
72%
1.519
KSF
$12,119
850
Su ermarket
8.95
64%
5.728
KSF
$45,692
851
Convenience Store
49.11
49%
24.064
KSF
$191,958
857
Discount Club
4.19
63%
2.640
KSF
$21,057
861
Sporting Goods Superstore
2.14
66%
1.412
KSF
$11,267
862
Home Improvement Superstore
2.29
58%
1.328
KSF
$10,595
863
Electronics Superstore
4.25
60%
2.550
KSF
$20,341
866
Pet Supply Superstore
3.55
66%
2.343
KSF
$18,690
867
OfficeSupplySuperstore
2.77
66%
1.828
KSF
$14,584
875
Department Store
1.95
66%
1.287
KSF
$10,266
876
Apparel Store
4.12
66%
2.719
KSF
$21,691
879
Arts and Crafts Store
6.21
66%
4.099
KSF
$32,695
880
Pharmacy/DrugPharmacy/Drug Store w/o Drive-Thru
8.51
47%
4.000
KSF
$31,906
881
Pharmacy/DrugPharmacy/Drug Store wl Drive-Thru
10.25
38%
3.895
KSF
$31,070
882
Marijuana DispenseDispensery
18.92
100%
18.920
KSF
$150,925
890
Furniture Store
0.52
47%
0.244
KSF
$1,950
899
Liquor Store I
16.62 I
64% I
10.637 I
KSF
$84,850
911
Walk-in Bank
12.13
65%
7.885
KSF
$62,895
912
Drive-in Bank
21.01
65%
13.657
KSF
$108,938
918
Hair Salon
1.45
65%
0.943
KSF
$7,518
920
Copy, Print, and Express Ship Store
7.42
66%
4.897
KSF
$39,065
930
Fast Casual Restaurant
12.55
57%
7.154
KSF
$57,063
931
Fine Dining Restaurant
7.80
56%
4.368
KSF
$34,844
932
High Turnover (Sit -Down) Restaurant
9.05
57%
5.159
KSF
$41,149
933
Fast Food w/o Drive-Thru
33.21
57%
18.930
KSF
$151,002
934
Fast Food w/ Drive-Thru
33.03
50%
16.515
KSF
$131,740
935
Fast Food Restaurant w/ Drive-Thru w/o Indoor Seating
59.50
50%
29.750
lane
$237,316
936
Coffee/Donut Shop w/o Drive-Thru
32.29
57%
18.405
KSF
$146,819
937
Coffee/Donut Sho w/ Drive-Thru
38.99
50%
19.495
KSF
$155,512
938
Coffee/Donut Shop w/ Drive-Thru w/o Indoor Seating (Espresso Stand)
15.08
11%
1.659
lane
$13,232
941
Quick Lubrication Vehicle Stop
8.70
72%
6.264
VSP
$49,968
942
Automobile Care Center
3.11
72%
2.239
KSF
$17,862
943
Automobile Parts and Service Center
2.06
72%
1.483
KSF
$11,831
944
Gasoline/Service Station
13.91
58%
8.068
VFP
$64,357
945
Convenience Store/Gas Station (<4,000 s
18.42
12%
2.210
VFP
$17,632
945
Convenience Store/Gas Station (4,000 sf -- 5,500 s
22.76
12%
2.731
VFP
$21,787
945
Convenience Store/Gas Station (>5,500 s
26.90
12%
3.228
VFP
$25,750
947
Self -Serve Car Wash
5.54
58%
3.213
stall
$25,632
948
Automated Car Wash
77.50
58%
44.950
stall
$358,566
950
970
Truck Stop (Truck Trips Only)
Winery
15.42
7.31
58%
100%
8.944
VFP
KSF
$71,343
7.310
$58,312
971
Brewery Taproom
9.83
100%
9.830
KSF
$78,414
975
Prinking Place
11.36
100%
11.360
KSF i
$90,619
' Institute of Transportation Engineers, Trip Generation Manual (11th Edition) 'Trip generation rate per development unit, for PM Peak Hour of street traffic (4-6 pm).
3 Average primary trip rates, per Trip Generation Manual. Additional primary rates based on similar land use and engineering judgment.
4 DU = Dwelling Unit: KSF = 1,000 square feet: VSP = Vehicle servicing position