The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About11/19/2024 - Work Study - Additional Doc-Comp Plan2024 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN PERIODIC UPDATE Community Development Department November 19, 2024 TONIGHT'S PRESENTATION - Brief Comprehensive Planning Overview - 2024 Periodic Update & Timeline - Plan Element/Chapter Update Summary - Next Steps & Council Discussion 2 BUILDING BLOCKS OF PLANNING Washington State Growth Management Act BUILDING BLOCKS OF PLANNING Puget Sound Regional Council Vision 2050 Washington State Growth Management Act BUILDING BLOCKS OF PLANNING Kitsap County Countywide Policies Puget Sound Regional Council Vision 2050 Washington State Growth Management Act 5 BUILDING BLOCKS OF PLANNING Port Orchard Comprehensive Plan Kitsap County Countywide Policies Puget Sound Regional Council Vision 2050 Washington State Growth Management Act PERIODIC UPDATE TIMELINE Task 1: Tasks3&4: & 4: Initial Task _2: Draft Task 5: Task _ Evaluation Public Engagement Updates Final Draft Updates Update Adoption • Collect Data • Review Current Plans and Policies • Establish Schedule for Update Process • Establish Public Participation Program for Update Process • Update Kick -Off and Visioning Meeting • Policy and Land -Use Strategy Workshops • First and Revised Drafts of the Comprehensive Plan Update and Subarea Planning Efforts • Public Workshops for Plans • Finalize Draft Plans based on Input from all Stakeholders • Planning Commission and City Council Meetings • Development Code Assessment and Revisions • SEPA and Commerce Review • City Council Adoption Ongoing Spring 2023 — Summer 2024 — Summer 2024 — Fall 2022 throughout Summer 2024 Winter 2024 Winter 2024 Update Process PERIODIC UPDATE TIMELINE Task 2: Draft& 4: Task 6: Task 5: Evaluation Public Engagement Tasks U dates Final Draft Updates Update Adoption • Collect Data • Review Current Plans and Policies • Establish Schedule for Update Process • Establish Public Participation Program for Update Process • Update Kick -Off and Visioning Meeting • Policy and Land -Use Strategy Workshops • First and Revised Draft; of the Comprehensive Plan Update and Subarc,_ Planning Efforts • Public Workshops for Plans • Finalize Draft Plans based on Input from all Stakeholders • Planning Commission and City Council Meetings • Development Code Assessment and Revisions • SEPA and Commerce Review • City Council Adoption Summer 2024 — Summer 2024 — Winter 2024 Winter 2024 8 PUBLIC ENGAGEMENT PROCESS REVISIONS • 01/31/202 Kickoff Open • 02/28/2024: Policy Workshop • 06/04/2024: Draft Plan Workshop • 07/24/2024: Bethel Subarea Plans Workshop • 07/28/2023: Social Pinpoint for Kickoff Open House • 08/19/2023: Port Orchard Farmers Market Booth • 09/09/2023: Port Orchard Farmers Market Booth • 02/28/2024: Social Pinpoint for Policy Workshop • 06/04/2024: Social Pinpoint for Draft Plan Workshop • 07/20/2024: Port Orchard Farmers Market Booth • 02/06/2024: Review of Draft Elements • 03/05/2024: Review of Draft Elements • 04/02/2024: Review of Draft Elements • 06/04/2024: Review of Draft Elements • 10/01/2024: Public Hearing on CPU • 10/29/2024: Public Hearing on CPU and PC Recommendation • 02/21/2024: Land Use Committee • 02/26/2024: Economic Development Committee • 03/20/2024: Land Use Committee • 4/16/2024: City Council Land Use/Zoning Map Disc. • 04/24/2024: Land Use Committee • 05/22/2024: Land Use Committee • 06/27/2024: Land Use Committee Public Meeting • 07/17/2024: Land Use Committee Public Meeting • 09/11/2024: Land Use Committee Public Meeting • 09/17/2024: Work -Study Meeting on CPU • 10/16/2024: Land Use Committee Public Meeting • 11/19/2024: City Council Work Study Review TO DRAFT PLAN 9 REGULATORY ADOPTION PROCESS MILESTONES COMPLETE? ❑iC MILESTONE: • SE PA Environmental Review — Issues Determination of Non -Significance (DNS) on September 24, 2024 • Notice of Intention to Adopt to Department of Commerce - Sent to Commerce on September 25, 2024 — Initiates a 60 -day review period — Pending review comments, to be incorporated into subsequent revisions • Notice of Intention to Adopt to PSRC - Sent to PSRC on October 1, 2024 — Met with PSRC staff to discuss review comments on October 21, 2024 Review memo from PSRC provided to City staff on October 21, 2024 (review of PSRC comments upcoming) • Planning Commission Review and Recommendation to City Council • City Council Review and Adoption 10 TONIGHT'S MEETING Planning Commission Recommended Comprehensive Plan DRAFT COMPREHENSIVE PLAN UPDATE Comprehensive Plan Update — Table of Contents • Chapter 1— Introduction • Appendix C— Ruby Creek Subarea Plan • Chapter 2 — Land Use (no revisions) • Chapter 3 — Housing • Appendix D — Downtown Subarea Plan • Chapter 4 — Parks and Recreation (no revisions) • Chapter 5 — Natural Systems • Appendix E — McCormick Village Subarea Plan • Chapter 6 — Economic Development (no revisions) • Chapter 7 — Utilities • Appendix F — Bethel -Lund Subarea Plan • Chapter 8 — Transportation (new) • Chapter 9 — Capital Facilities • Appendix G — Sedgwick-Bethel Subarea Plan • Chapter 10 — Climate Change (new) (new) • Appendix A— Comprehensive Plan Land Use Designation Map • Appendix B — Plans Adopted by Reference • mppenclix H — Housing Action Plan • Appendix I — Land Capacity Analysis Appendix J — Report on Racially Disparate Impacts 12 11 DWAI m WKS] LVA I a Dal 2 ME 10 0 M UA 0 a WAI 0 so] m DTAI I �A0 DRAFT COMPREHENSIVE PLAN UPDATE Appendix F — Bethel -Lund Subarea Plan • Conducted an Existing Conditions Assessment (Chapter 2) — Economic profile — Existing development pipeline — Buildable lands capacity • Established a preferred alternative site plan (Chapter 3.2-3.4) based on community engagement and feedback Support efforts to activate Lundberg Park Zoning. Create more flexible development regulations, including height overlay zones, and parking requirements to allow for more housing and a mix of land uses Create a trail network to connect parks and open spaces between Sedgwick-Bethel and Bethel -Lund SALMONBERRY PARK. (NAME TBD) Create a central park to buffer the ravine and support recreational needs in the area undberg 4 SF w �� r Park U East �P r �•r•r•—•t Pod Orchard t ti.�.r. •\j, ��c `Sp� Elementary v r t school 'Y f T•r.� SLUND6 E E G.RI: r � `F i 9 MCK NLEY PL SE "�Es ,r� Chrlstlan F South Kitsap ent o Regional Park Center 1 o F✓// R3 -R2 ❑ Monstar Oar ms`s 0 Wash Io G i tio• /•— , R3 R2 :a -� Kihap Veiterinary 9F` w f7 > ,r/ -Hospital. .r I > o r / / _ CC C Puerto •r'�'�' o .,, �'�"' Valltirta g Wpl reens SE BASIL CT r ; r Rite w Wf ' y r t,.y Aid BETH EL i Fuel r 1 JUNCTION w Sotewoy i SE VALLIR CT U East Port arc l ♦ Walmad t SE TIBURON CT I `�, SE SER �� SE SERENADE WAY r CC -PF w o 0 r i Saloo LE 4 �✓ Connect to � •� Sedgwick-Bethel trail c i A0 400 800 Feet SE SALMONBERRY RD N I Maxar, Mic[OS Improve connectivity and explore other active transportation improvements, such as midblock crossing and sidewalk buffer enhancements, along key routes to schools and other destinations Bethel/Sedgwick improvements and other street projects will occur as planned Support Kitsap Transit bus service enhancements Hub Features Transportation Ideas Zoning Existing Conditions pocg�arfon fiexfblel Mobility ~lm Safe Residential I ER!) Commercial Corridor {CC) — Blackjack Creek IA"Park/plaza P rovements to scrooes to school Residential2 R2 f ) Commerical Heavy (CH) Greenbelt ffc�� F-i Potential street Residential 3 fR3) Commercial Mixed Use (CMU) Parks and Recreation - + Ravine frail connection 0 0 Support BR] Public Facilities EPF) M %/. Business Prof. Mixed Use (BPMU) Be,hel-Lund q I'll ♦ Planned t - . Potential new O Port Orchard Roundabout bus routes =Zoning change Port Orchard UGA DRAFT COMPREHENSIVE PLAN UPDATE Bethel -Lund Subarea Plan • Developed an Action Plan (Chapter 4) to prioritize improvements and investments over time to implement the Plan • New Concept Illustration — Figure 3-4. EXHIBIT 3-4 Bethel -Lund Concept o Through -block come ftion pat vehicular I. f C°opF r° Lfve)work units Puerto Wal�eena • vaiwno q ! RE1HH Redevelopment example II 4 -story aparimentl t J{JNC11ON wOh townhomes I Fnved-uL4B buildings RM RAM A vauar Court flethe! vairey 260 lees Retail irA buidin9 wish small plaza and streetscope Irnprn' emenis tlnked to future bus stops 3aleway SE VA LLAIR rr Punned roundabout Smal eommerclal I infill development J walrnart 17 Commercial %f Llve-Work „=j Beihel-Lund Apartments Mixed -Use with 7 Fort Orchard UGA Townhomes AnnrmPn tS nvP..r C.n mmprrinl Note: This concept is an example only and illustrates just one of many ways that portions of the subarea could be developed consistent with the plan's goals and policies. Source: MAKERS. DRAFT COMPREHENSIVE PLAN UPDATE Appendix G — Sedgwick-Bethel Subarea Plan • Conducted an Existing Conditions Assessment (Chapter 2) — Economic profile — Existing development pipeline — Buildable lands capacity • Established a preferred alternative site plan (Chapter 3.2-3.4) based on community engagement and feedback Create a trail network to connect parks and open spaces between Sedgwick-Bethel and Bethel -Lund Bethel/Sedgwick improvements and other street projects will occur as planned '+1 Connect to rBethel-Lvnd trail r I SE SALMONBEI Ge 1 h R2>R1 Iji -- SEBZ 1{ 1L7�1 GEIGER SEDGWICK. + II R1 +R3 (NAME DL)) Create a large iconic park and public I gathering space SR 16 Center within mixed -use easotofSdne developments that make use of active transit corridors Support Kitsap Transit's planned bus service enhancements and propose extending the planned BRT route to the SR 16 Transit Center to link Sedgwick-Bethel and Ruby Creek 0 400 800 Feet N R3>R] SE KODA OR SE SE IVES MILL RD SALMONBERRY PARK. (NAME TBD) Create a central park to buffer the ravine and support recreational SEFAYCT needs in the area cnioatsvn Zoning. Create more Buffet -•+.1 flexible development j regulations, including height overlay sesnvisw G zones, and parking requirements to allow AY z for more housing and a mix of land uses East SEDGWIC-K Port Orchard Encourage the PLAZA development of ,SE�sEoewi �.,— is •- a gateway plaza through public - Fred Meyer private partnerships �airif � W U G Improve connectivity and explore other active transportation improvements, such y as midblock crossing I� and sidewalk buffer enhancements, along key routes to schools and Hidden Creek other destinations Elementary School Maxar Microsoft Hub Features Transportation Ideas Zoning Existing Conditions (rocarton rrexrble) .Mobility Safe routes O SR 16 Transit Residential 1 )R I) 11• Commercial Corridor (CC) — Blackjack Creek Mixed use improvements to school Center Residential 2 (R2J 1• Commerical Heavy (CH) M Greenbelt Parks and Recreation hub; investment t-i Potential street 0' Support BET Residential 3 (R3) . Commercial Mixed Use (CMU) _M focus area connection - ► Potential new Residential 4 (R4) WO, Business Prof. Mixed Use IBPMU) •••• Sedgwick-Bethel Park/plaza �1P Planned D bus routes 1� Public Facilities (FE) Port Orchard Port Orchard UGA Roundabout onng c =Zihange - a Ravine trail DRAFT COMPREHENSIVE PLAN UPDATE Sedgwick-Bethel Subarea Plan • Developed an Action Plan (Chapter 4) to prioritize improvements and investments over time to implement the Plan • New Concept Illustration — Figure 3-4. EXHIBIT 3-4 Sedgwic k -Bethel Concept Mognalfa Ridge Tawnhomes Andofso Featuring on street I VRTpge with vehicle occes Coordinating) Creating centralized in back street access L common open space crgonivng new developments around an integrated Sound trail system liii storage Sidney Ridge r r,a: ir. Er New multl-use park Taw7UA BETHEL apCENTRE with mix of active civi and passive uses li.e. playground, community garden. mini -pitch nod skptedof] �yyy�I _ IS f _ --Y�.f Potential future 5-stury❑p❑rtment _ -- — -4f� r = fill connections ---- building with butfeature parking, Troll Ca nnectian but Featuring ground floor townhomes Wesico t along perimeter - FNnes r: r< Single -story retoll commercial; 0 long term mixed -Use opportunity --- Small plaza spaces integrated with commercial development Planned roundabout i � o 50 zoo reef N fi Commercial ;_) Sedgwick-Bethel fi Civic Port Orchard UGA fi Apartments Tawnhomes Note. This concept is an example only and illustrates just one of many ways that a portion of the subarea could be developed consistent with the plan's goals and policies. Source: MAKERS. 17 DRAFT COMPREHENSIVE PLAN UPDATE PSRC Comment Letter Received • October 21, 2024 PSRC Comment Letter (Page 766 of Puget Sound RegIDnal Council Packet) mall Third Avarua Srire 15M Ee tIIq WA 9BI6F 2065 I pecnrg I October 21.2024 — Housing — Transportation — Regional Collaboration — Environment and Climate Change — Plan Consistency Tool — Economic Development • The plan presented in work study packet has addressed all PSRC's comments and should ensure certification. Nicholas Bong AICP, Development Director City of Port Orchard 216 Prospect Street Part Orchardto 9&366 Subject: PSRC Comments on City or Port Orchard Draft Comprehensw Plan Dear Mr. Barrel Thank you for provfdIrg an opportunity forthe Puget Sound Reglonol Councll (PSRCj to review the CNy of Port Orchard's draft comprehensive plait W e appreciate that the city has Infested a substantlal amount of time and effortI n aeielcpIrg the draft plan and appreciate the chance to review while In draft torrn this tlrnety collotroration provides an opportunity to review plan elements for the 2024 Comprehensive plan and prepares the city well for certihmton by PSRC once the full plan Dec been adopted. We suggest the airy consider the follonlrrgcamrhent as furtherwork is completed for the comprehenslve plan update to align with VISION 2050 and the Growth Management act. Importantly, we encourage tine city to wort to ardsa tool draft that clrlhesthecitys capacitytor housing to meet varlaus income levels and includes a complete long-range transportation project list and financing pion. We rest&wed thedrdit plan using the VISION d050Consl3tenCy Tool. Key rectluns of the consistency tool are listed below on the left dong with relevant comnlerlts on the draft plan on the ngnt 18 DRAFT COMPREHENSIVE PLAN UPDATE Chapter 2 — Land Use Public Comment Regarding affordable housing and multi -family development: — Concerns regarding policy language modifying impact fees in response to variable growth rates: • City Response: Policies LU-7, LU-42, and LU-43 have been revised to remove language referencing modifying impact fees as a response to growth rates that are either below or exceeding expected growth rates. There are legal implications to establishing and/or modifying impact fees that limit the feasibility of including as a policy approach. PSRC Comment: (Regional Coordination) Strengthen language addressing tribal treaty rights and ongoing coordination of policy decisions: • City Response: New Land Use Goal #14 and new Policy LU-44 have been provided to reflect PSRC policy language related to this coordination. 19 DRAFT COMPREHENSIVE PLAN UPDATE Chapter 3 — Housing Public Comments — Regarding affordable housing and multi -family development: — Explore more incentives to promote multi -family development (like the Multi -Family Tax Exemption (MFTE) program): • City Response: New Policy HS -17 recommends the City explores the re-establishment of the MFTE program as a means of increasing affordable housing supply. The Policy incorporates recommendations of the City's Housing Action Plan (HAP). — Provide more details about 'streamlining' the permit process for multi -family housing: • City Response: Policy HS -14 has been revised to incorporate more specific recommendations from the City's HAP, including refinements to the City's building form/intensity development standards, adjustments to locally adopted building codes, assessing permitting/review staffing needs, and examining funding strategies. PSRC Comment: PSRC Comments on housing have been addressed by adding appendices H (Housing Action Plan), I (Land Capacity Analysis (modified to address PSRC Comment)), and J (Racially Desperate Impacts Analysis) to the Comprehensive Plan 20 DRAFT COMPREHENSIVE PLAN UPDATE Chapter 4 — Parks • PSRC Comment: Revise Parks Element to provide LOS standards and policy language supporting providing parks within a 10 - minute walk of all residents: • City Response: Parks Level of Service and policy language for establishing parks within a 10 -minute walk of residents already exist in the City's Parks, Recreation, and Open Space (PROS) Plan. This information has been translated into new Parks Goal #13 and new Policy PK-45. Port Orchard, Washington Parks, Recreation, & Open Space (PROS) Plan January 31, 2022 21 DRAFT COMPREHENSIVE PLAN UPDATE Chapter 6 — Economic Development • PSRC Comment: — Added a new goal #12 in response to the PSRC Comments • Goal 12. Economic development strategies should address with environmental concerns, promote equity and access to opportunity, minimize displacement impacts to existing businesses, recognize the importance of existing and emerging technologies, and protect the quality of life. — Policy ED -51 Coordinate with regional jurisdictions and agencies to develop coordinated strategies and interjurisdictional processes to mitigate the impacts of displacement. — Policy ED -52 Utilize PSRC's Displacement Risk Mapping Tool to identify areas within the City that have higher risk of displacement based on neighborhood conditions, and establish mitigation programs for these areas to promote equitable outcomes. • Planning Commissioner Morrison Amendments: Planning Commissioner Joe Morrison made a motion to make some minor text revisions throughout the Economic Development Chapter. These revisions are shown in redline in the packet draft. 22 DRAFT COMPREHENSIVE PLAN UPDATE Chapter 8 — Transportation Public Comments Regarding biking / non -motorized infrastructure: — The Transportation Element (Chapter 8) needs more specific direction related to an interconnected and protected biking network throughout the City, particularly near the waterfront, schools, and businesses. Bike facilities should be physically separated from traffic. The Waterfront Park is a good example of this. The rise of e -bikes makes these facilities more likely to be used by members of the community. • City Response: Policy T-17 has been strengthened to add language about providing 'connected and protected bike and pedestrian pathways where contextually appropriate.' This approach ensures that this policy is applied to private development proposals in locations where the establishment and/or continuation of bike/pedestrian pathways should be required in relation to the impact of development proposals. — Within the Bethel subarea plans, protected multi -use pathways within the subareas should be identified. • City Response: Policy T-6 of both subareas plans identifies the development of protected bike lanes within the subareas, as feasible in relation to development proposals that occur over time throughout the development and/or redevelopment of the subareas. The subarea plans also identify 'safe routes to schools,' which will also enhance the feasibility of providing these facilities in association with development activities to promote bike and pedestrian scale infrastructure improvements. PSRC Comments: — Revise Transportation Element to more closely comply with PSRC certification requirements, including funding reassessment strategies and mobility options for all abilities: • City Response: Section 8.9.5 has been revised to address potential revenue shortfalls and alternate funding strategies, including reassessing Level of Service standards and/or exploring a development moratorium. Descriptions of ADA barriers and mitigation strategies/efforts have been added to Section 8.3.5.1. — Revise Transportation Element to more closely comply with PSRC certification requirements to address racial and social equity. • City Response: Section 8.11 has been added to the transportation element. 23 DRAFT COMPREHENSIVE PLAN UPDATE . . Chapter 9 — Capital The financial tables in Chapter 9 have been updated to reflect the current state of the 2025/26 budget. Sewer Tables Updated to Reflect Draft General Sewer Plan Facilities 24 DRAFT COMPREHENSIVE PLAN UPDATE Appendices • Suggested changes from PSRC Review: — Clarify capacity related to ADUs meeting housing needs for various income levels: • City Response: This comment was in response to information found in the City's Land Capacity Report. This report has been updated (see page 4 of the report discussing 55 ADUs in McCormick Village) to reflect PSRC concerns around the affordability of ADUs in Port Orchard and is now Appendix Ito the Comprehensive Plan. — Document the City's existing housing tools and incentives, and discuss regulatory and financial barriers to affordable housing production: • City Response: The Racially Disparate Impacts (RDI) Analysis prepared in association with this Comprehensive Plan Update provides a Policy Evaluation addressing potential barriers to affordable housing production. The findings from the RDI Analysis and the Land Capacity Analysis, were the basis for updates to the Land Use and Housing Element's goals and policies for consistency with this Update's regulatory guidance. This report is now Appendix J to the Comprehensive Plan. — Summarize the recommendations of City's Housing Action Plan (HAP) within the Comp Plan: • City Response: The HAP is now Appendix H to the Comprehensive Plan. 25