Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout01/20/2026 - Work Study - Additional Doc-Gorst Presentation12/12/2025 Welcome to the SR 3 Gorst PEL Study Executive Advisory Group Meeting We'll start soon. While you're waiting... • Make sure your audio is working. If your computer doesn't have a mic, you can call in on your phone. • Find the chat box! If you want to write instead of talk, that's the way to do it. • Find Raise Hand under reactions • Change your Participant Name — Option #1: Hover over your video and click on ellipses and "Rename" — Option #2: Hover over your name under Participant List and click on ellipses and "Rename" 1 WI WSDOT SR 3 Gorst Area Planning & Environmental Linkages Study Executive Advisory Group Mtg #2 December 18, 2025 JoAnn Schuler WSDOT Olympic Region Assistant Region Administrator Ricardo Gotla WSDOT Interim Olympic Region Study Manager Erinn Ellig Consultant Team Lead Transportation Planner—Parametrix Kirk Wilcox Consultant Team Lead Design—Parametrix 2 1 12/12/2025 Agenda 1:00 Welcome and introductions 1:10 Study overview and updates 1:20 Review Level 1 alternatives and results 1:30 Review Level 2 alternatives evaluation and results 2:10 Review potential programmatic mitigation strategies 2:25 Next steps 2:30 Adjourn 3 Welcome and thank you WSDOT is engaging study area jurisdictions, including tribes, counties, cities, and national and local resource agencies. Roll call • Introductions • We will call your organization name — please respond with your name • To change your participant name in Zoom — Hover over your video, click on ellipses, and "Rename" — Click Participant List, hover over your name, click on ellipses, and "Rename" 4 2 12/12/2025 participants Invited to participate • City of Bremerton • City of Port Orchard • City of Poulsbo • Federal Highway Administration • Kitsap County • Kitsap Regional Coordinating Council • Kitsap Transit 5 • Kitsap Transit Ferries • Mason County • Naval Base Kitsap-Bremerton • Port of Bremerton • South Kitsap Fire and Rescue • South Kitsap School District • Suquamish Tribe Meeting participation Input opportunities • Chat box throughout the meeting • Discussion opportunities at the end of each topic Virtual participation • Mute yourself when you're not speaking • "Raise your hand" or use chat box for questions or comments • Say your name before speaking • If calling in from your phone: — Dial *6 to mute/unmute — Dial *9 to raise your hand Ii 3 12/12/2025 Meeting goals and outcomes Meeting goals • Share Level 1 and Level 2 alternatives evaluation and results • Share programmatic mitigation strategies Outcomes • Collect input on Level 2 alternatives evaluation results and programmatic mitigation strategies 7 Charleston Boulevard overpass at SR 3. 8 r 12/12/2025 r If PEL Study Corridor1J Study PEL Study Area STUDY LIMITS 310 urn sc Division Ave W/SR 3 area © SR 3/Loxie Eagans Boulevard emeron Brt aurwell sr © SR 3/SR 304 Interchange - NAVAL BASE KITSAP-BREMERTON �, � SR 166 (east of the Kitsap Marina) Ii Iii 1 t S N 0 Tremont St W/SR 16 304 T` Pk I ' � 1 Sound KITSAP COUNTY 1) wt Schedule ' Port Orchard 2024 2025 202E Project Activities JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT Nov DEC JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL Ave SEP OCT NOV DEC JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT nab Assembly Purpose and Need MetnpdssndAssumpdons Range otAlS T sponatbn ElisingcoMidonsaad Baseline Environmental EAsdn5[ondidocs AIternativea for 15511 Level I Evabadrn and 5.5.55155 3 Re5e<Aleemadv .InrLrel2 level? Evabade5 and Srrcering Rrak PEI Ruaon Final PEL Report AMA 2025 202E Meetingsaod Open Houses JUN JUL AUG SEP 0CT NOV GEC JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT Fetleral niFnwayamnwro-admprwv5 Medinp O a O O O a O O O O O O O a o a a O o O O O O O a a sugpamian rrme Meen5ps O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O Aa.�:pay uwwlneennrr O O O II Publk Open House 10 5 12/12/2025 Study engag Tribal engagement Active coordination with Suquamish Tribe Open houses and pop -ups Online and in -person open houses Feb. to March 2025 111 participants; 540 comments Community Advisory Group • Meetings in Feb. and June 2025 • Active transportation workshop in Aug. 2025 Business engagement Meetings and surveys in June and Nov. 2025 11 Study team member sharing information at an open house at Naval Avenue Elementary in February 2025. 12 6 Range of Alternatives Prescreen and Level 1 Evaluation and Screening Level 2 Evaluation We are here and Screening PEL Study a WSDOT Level 2 alternatives evaluation results 13 •Ti WSDOT 14 12/12/2025 Level 2 range of alternatives: Roadway Alternative A, A-1, A-2: Widen SR — AlernatheA ..F Breerton Alternative A-1 3 with sub options in Gorst Alternative A.1 — Alternative B2 3 (3 lanes each direction) "` AllemaBveCp,;;�«•° Alternallve C1-1 �:�. Alternative C-2 y �, AllernaRveD cnv/ Gomt Improvements (Alts B, C, D) Alternative B-2, B-3: Windy Point N planned/Proposed Roundabouts Bridge (2 lanes each direction on AItC bridge) Alts �..�.•. ., Alt 8-3 Alternative C-1, C-2: Ross Point/ Windy Point Bridges (3 lanes each direction on bridge) Alternative D: Inland Full Bypass (3 lanes each direction) 15 16 12/12/2025 Summary of Level 2 results Alternative A Alternative A-1 Alternative A-2 Alternative B-2 Alternative B-3 Alternative C-1 Alternative C-2 Alternative D 17 Mobility summary Alternatives B -2/B-3 and C -1/C-2 • Provide the greatest congestion relief, best use of added capacity • Serve the highest percentage of peak period demand • Decrease trip lengths with bridge Alternatives A-1 and D • Increase travel distance for most regional trips Retain pending further coordination Eliminate Retain pending further coordination Eliminate Retain pending further coordination Eliminate Retain pending further coordination Eliminate pending further coordination Alternative Travel Time Score Trip Length Score A 4 2 A-1 2 A-2 4 2 B-2 B-3 C-1 C-2 D 2 Travel Time %Change Categories Trip Length %Change Categories 0% -10% 1 20% 0% 1 -10% -20% 2 0% -10% 2 -20% -30% 3 -10% -20% 3 -30% -40% 4 -20% -30% 4 -40% 5 -30% 5 18 Ranking Low High a 12/12/2025 Alternative A - Widen SR 3 All figures and exhibits are conceptual and for discussion purposes only. © Looking north or south 19 Level 2 evaluation detail Alternative A - Widen SR 3 Mobility • Safety Resiliency Access • Funding Approximate displacements ■ 31 residential ■ 26 businesses 20 Ranking • • Low High 10 12/12/2025 21 Level 2 evaluation outcomes — EdNing Hlgbway - - -- Alternative A - Widen SR 3: — FH tlngMerlel Proposed Hlg vaY-at-grade N • Higher potential for near term funding Plannetl RoundabaN and easiest to construct in phases Recommendation: Retain pending further coordination "'%" 6remerton Alternative A-1 - Widen SR 3 with Gorst elevated roadway OLooking north O Looking northeast Existing Highway .10.gAn¢dal j �ProPosed A.r'Y-elevated �Ill�l� P Propoud Aderlal 444 _ • Plannetl Roantlabout r Proposetl Roantlabout 'a HE`g O Looking east O Looking northeast 3 U.5. Navy Railroad _„ U y Sinclair nlet W Belfair Valley Rtl / nLOLooking northeast © O 16 st All figures and exhibits are conceptual and for discussion purposes only. 22 Looking southwest 11 12/12/2025 Level 2 evaluation detail Alternative A-1 Widen SR 3 with Gorst elevated roadway Mobility Safety Resiliency Funding Socioeconomics • Approximate displacements ■ 55 residential ■ 22 businesses 23 hMing Highway "'19RHerial _ PmpPsetl Hlgkray-a iRide M Pmposetl Hidmy-eleuatetl PmooseanrceHal _ `• Pknnee Roundabout NPmPosetl Rountlabout �C"''a 3 U.& Navy UIroaA W Beftk V,ky Rd 16 Gorst I Ranking • N Low High Level 2 evaluation outcomes Alternative A-1 - Widen SR 3 with Gorst elevated roadway: • Minimal improvement to mobility • Bisects community with potential for socioeconomic impacts • Impacts to residential areas and businesses Recommendation: Eliminate 24 Hing Hlg�waY ' — EaLadngNhdal _ PmdPSeb Howal-a[.YaCa - PIP�hH�.y al Nd _ P�Nbal N • P�PPaetl R-adarom U Navy Rallrcatl $IrKId11 W Bel/air Valley Rd 16 Gorst 12 12/12/2025 Alternative A-2 - Widen SR 3 with Gorst frontage roads F'stingHighway Fasting Phenol e Proposed Highway -at -grade Proposed Highway - elevated Proposed Frontage Roadsand Ramps -at -grade Proposed Aherialsand Ramps- elevated • Planned Roundabout 0 Proposed Roundabout NO Cal -de aae US. Navy Railroad W Belfair Valley Rd See Alternative Afor the remainder of the align ment 5inclail Inlet All figures and exhibits are conceptual and for discussion purposes only. 25 COLooking northeast 166j 0 Looking north I 0 Looking northeast 26 13 12/12/2025 27 Level 2 evaluation detail Alternative A-2 - Widen SR 3 with -=;e:„; y Gorst frontage roads - � PropasM Hlgyiway-NevasM Pmp°sad Fr°ma& RdatlsaM Ramps-rtgrwe mppsed Adanals antl Ramps-akva�etl Mobility Pl ndRpuntlabpul _ Q PmPnsM R°undahPN .ayeaa N O aide.aa° 3 Safety N us. navy Rall.oaa �„„„ W BeHair Valley Rd P Resiliency 's` sas Funding Gorst Approximate displacements - ■ 31 residential Ranking ■ 30 businesses Low High 28 14 12/12/2025 Level 2 screening outcomes Alternative A-2 - Widen SR 3 with — snngnrte"ei Gorstfrontage roads: � Pmppsetl Ni@may-Ne+awtl • Moderate mobility improvement°&ad` Plannnl Rpu boo • Concern from businesses that A-2 h o P.,-a.oadabII would be confusing to navigate U.S. Navy Rdnr°ad W eelfair Valley Rd Recommendation: Retain pending further coordination 29 Gorst d Alternative B-2 - Windy Point Bridge partial bypass west o� E.isbngxlgnway ereroerton 0 Looking north © Looking east or northeast EustingArlerial � 3 w w Proposed Highway -at -grade r Proposed Highway-ele✓atetl Proposed Arterial • Planned Roundabout Nay 3. NO Proposed Roundabout Ron P p 0 Looking north 3 d r ry Port '',fie. me Orchard 0 Looking southwest / & All figures and exhibits are conceptual and for discussion purposes only. 30 15 12/12/2025 Level 2 evaluation detail Alternative B-2 -Windy Point Bridge EristingMeul partialbypass west � R°p°Ytl Hi�way-elnahtl o PmP°utl AHelal Mobility _ • Plan.....Mab°ul N o PPPPHpu tlab°N k =o� Safety Resiliency " `° -ha,d` Funding Safe marine access for fishing Approximate displacements ■ 57 residential Ranking ■ 18 businesses — N Low High 31 .eve. '' screening outcomes Alternative B-2 - Windy Point Bridge partial bypass west: Potential impacts to tribal fishing areas and residential displacements in Windy Point Recommendation: Eliminate 32 16 12/12/2025 Alternative B-3 - Windy Point Bridge partial bypass east Existing Highway - `.........d.. _. ..__... Bremerton Existing Arterial Purposed Highway -at -grade 3 CM1arlezron _ 4� aa- Proposed Highway -elevated Dioncts 0„+'TP� '_ _ Proposed Adedal w _ • Planned Roundabout ; N o s. cm Proposetl Pountlabout p' / u, w„ P+ o -O3 Gor\ All figures and exhibits are conceptual and for discussion purposes only. 33 34 0 Looking northeast Level 2 evaluation detail Alternative B-3 - Windy Point Bridge partial bypass east Mobility Safety Resiliency Funding Approximate displacements ■ 42 residential ■ 16 businesses Ranking • N Low High 17 12/12/2025 35 Level 2 screening outcomes Alternative B-3 - Windy Point Bridge EVafingAenal Euslingnrtedal partial bypass east: _ Proposed Hlghway-,1,Me r_ Proposed Highway-eleuahtl • Substantial improvement to mobility, • Planned ROOnd1WW safety performance, active N O PrOpased ROandah°at transportation and resiliency • Fewer impacts to business visibility compared to Alternative C-2 P.w. Recommendation: Retain pending further coordination s I /G/oCJrs[ Alternative C-1 - Ross Point Bridge full bypass EusfingHighw, EoengArteria — Proposed HIgh Proposed High ProposedArtel • Planned Rounr OProposed Raur . Proposed Perry - • for Regional Tn NpProposedlnter i All figures and exhibits are conceptual and for discussion purposes only. 36 0 Looking north or northeast, © Looking east 0 Looking north 0 Looking northeast Port 18 12/12/2025 Level 2 evaluation details Alternative C-1 - Ross Point Bridge full bypass Mobility -HI Safety way Resiliency Funding • Impacts to Ross Point / Waterman future mitigation site and to sensitive tribal fishing areas Reduction in business mobility in Gorst Approximate displacements ■ 6 residential ■ 10 businesses 37 Ranking • • Low High Level 2 evaluation outcomes Alternative C-1 - Ross Point Bridge full bypass: Potential impacts to open water tribal fishing areas and Ross Point Beach as well substantial impacts to Kitsap Umbrella Mitigation Bank sites Recommendation: Eliminate 38 E sungHIplway Ea ing AHedal w. Proposed Hledway-at-grade Proposed Highway- elerated Pea posed Aderial • Planned Roundabout ® Rapooad Roundabout Proposed Permanent Closure _ for Regional Traffic Npprnpasedlnterchange 19 12/12/2025 Alternative C-2 - Windy Point Bridge full bypass EAstingHighway Existing Arterial Proposed Highway - at-g,ade Proposed Highway - elevated Proposed A heHeI • Planned Roundabout OProposed Roundabout . Proposed Permanent Closure - r fonReglonalTrofly NO Proposed Interchange .1-1-',a Bremerton 3 Charleston Busines istdc[z ��,e ntaare w s Cur Y V 1! a GOR[ Id � 16 All Figures and exhibits are conceptual and for discussion purposes only. 39 40 jjinsnjorjhjjjse ast r© Looking north 1lii \ 0 Looking northeast Level 2 evaluation details Alternative C-2 - Windy Point Bridge full bypass • Mobility • Safety • Resiliency Funding • Reduction in business mobility in Gorst Approximate displacements ■ 23 residential ■ 6 businesses F'stingHigvwa F'stingAAenal Pmonexaylgnv P.Posea Hignx Pmna0M Aden • elan net Round 0 Pmpo-MNnoni S torneglonalTra N penenoeslntcti out Ranking • 0 Low High 20 12/12/2025 Level 2 screening outcomes Alternative C-2 Windy Point Bridge f U 19Hl�way — UWgAAenal w °• °mBeroerten full bypass: �Proposetl HigM1way-algmtle � Proaosotl HigM1way-elrva[etl '"p° Provides substantial improvement to P nnao.a;�at 0.n mobility, safety performance, active ® Proposed Roontla— n •-• prna�18CnSClasarc transportation, and resiliency but N OProP: aima Wane potentially higher impacts to business visibility compared to Alternative B_ Port Recommendation: Retain pending p 9 further coordination `orn 41 Alternative D - Overland full bypass EdstingHighwgay °".r,e*�' ereroertoo Q Looking north © Looking east or northeast Eaisgng Arterial wr. Proposed Highway -at -grade charleironIP Proposetl Highway-elevatetl p': r: — _ Prop—dAdenal • V °I5� III : \ Planned Roundabout ara aoA, r,.u�.. OProposed Roundabout Uty F N •-: PreppsedPermanentClosure 0 Looking north for Regional Traffic Port ° o1° Orchard © r 0 / Sin•1°i. 166 Imes 0 0 Looking northeast 0 Looking northeast o0 3 G —t - 6 16 §fit / 5N All figures and exhibits are conceptual and for discussion purposes only. 42 21 12/12/2025 Level 2 evaluation detail EvsxagxW.y Alternative D - Inland full bypass _ Praae°xa,_a«a°e _ ° ps°°xlgnwry-°Ivat°° ppsetl NR°al Mobility Prppo �xa°ma -pre N O mrs°�oa�namp°" Safety • Resiliency • Funding w-oa Socioeconomic°af • Wildlife / wetland / tribal restoration• Approximate displacements ■ 182 residential Ranking ■ 12 businesses Low High 43 . s'r'. Bremerton ro� m par NA Level 2 evaluation outcomes Alternative D — Inland full bypass: _ h°°gxgwa � �eremerton Easxngnnenal `� _ Pmpp°ea xlgnway-atpx°e _ Pmpas xlgA'.reY-Naalep o.r n:^yi`W —: Prppasptl Arterial N��.. • Substantial residential • °"°°`°"°"°°'°°"' O Pmp°se°P°un°a0°us displacement and community N disruption • Impacts on wetlands and headwaters draining into Sinclair. Inlet a o Recommendation: Eliminate pending further coordination 44 22 12/12/2025 Summary of Level 2 results Alternative A Alternative A-1 Alternative A-2 Alternative B-2 Alternative B-3 Alternative C-1 Alternative C-2 Alternative D 45 Retain pending further coordination Eliminate Retain pending further coordination Eliminate Retain pending further coordination Eliminate Retain pending further coordination Eliminate pending further coordination 46 23 12/12/2025 Potential programmatic mitigation strategies overview The PEL process aims to identify alternatives with the fewest potential impacts. The PEL process includes: • Inventorying existing environmental conditions • Identifying potential areas of concern • Screening alternatives and design options Key mitigation strategies include: • Designing refinements to avoid and minimize impacts • Following federal, state, and local mitigation requirements and guidelines • Identifying potential construction best management practices (BMPs) 47 Next steps • Post -meeting follow up o EAG #2 meeting summary and slides o Comments due by Jan. 9 • Upcoming technical work o Level 2 evaluation through early 2026 o Draft PEL report in May 2026 • In -person and online open houses in mid -2026 • Upcoming meetings o Resource agency meeting in January 2026 o CAG meeting #3 January 2026 o TAG meeting #5 mid -2026 o EAG meeting #3 mid -2026 48 24 12/12/2025 50 Contact Study website https:/wsdot.wa.gov/construction-planning/search-studies/sr-3-gorst-area- planning-and-environmental-linkages-study Study email address SR3GorstArea(a�wsdot.wa.gov Study contact Ricardo Gotla, WSDOT Interim Olympic Region Study Manager Ricardo.Gotla(c-wsdot.wa.gov 49 25 12/12/2025 51 Open houses and pop -ups - February and March 2025 • The study team invited review and input on the draft Purpose and Need statement and range of alternatives • Held two pop -ups in the Gorst area • Held two in -person open houses and one online open house o Mailed 17,818 postcards o Posted flyers at 13 community locations o Engaged 111 community members o Received 540 comments 52 Study team member sharing information at an open house at Naval Avenue Elementary in February 2025. 26 12/12/2025 Community Advisory Group • CAG activities o Community Advisory Group meetings in Feb. 2025 and June 2025 o CAG Active Transportation workshop in Aug. 2025 o Next CAG meeting in Jan. 2026 • CAG priorities include congestion relief, safety, and active transportation • Subgroup of CAG members shared an official stance in letter received Aug. 2025: o Top priorities are active transportation, avoiding impacts to existing private property, and improved access to transportation options o Prefer Alternative C-2 53 Business engagement (June 2025) Reliance on regional traffic (versus local) • 9 of 14 businesses depend on regional traffic • 5 of 14 businesses do not rely on regional traffic Safety and access concerns • Gorst congestion affects safe access • Traffic conditions deter some customers • Walking to local businesses seen as unsafe or inconvenient 54 Business outreach area — the 'Gorst Triangle' 27 12/12/2025 Business engagement (November 2025) Business owners expressed: • Support for bridge alternatives • Support for solutions that focus on easing congestion • Mixed support for diverting regional traffic from the Gorst area • Desire to prioritize safety over visibility to customers • Consideration for future population growth • Desire for speed reduction in the Gorst Triangle • Concern around maintaining existing driveway access 55 Tribal engagement In planning improvements in the area, what should WSDOT focus on? 14% 14% ZV • Regional traffic bypassing Gorst with reduced congestion in Gorst Regional trafficcontinuing through Gorst improving business visibility while increasing congestion in... • Easier access to local businesses 43% Safer access to businesses for pedestrians and cyclists • Other • Active coordination with Suquamish Tribe • August boat tour highlighted cultural resources, natural habitats, and fishing activities • Identified priority fishing and beach areas • Shared restoration plans and natural resources recovery goals in the area to inform screening 56 28 12/12/2025 No Build Alternative - Traffic No Build - 2050 AM Peak Period No Build - 2050 PM Peak Period Freeway Congestlon-2050AM Peak Periotl lwlm,•s=eA Bremerton Freeway Cd.ges0on- 2050 PM Peak Period �wrm. s=eat Bremerton ;g No Bulltl Congestion (approrima.tmvelspeetl) Congestion(approrima.tmvelspeetl) light. Nan. (45 mph pr higher) light. N—(45 mph prhigh.0 .-I . (25- 45 mph) olzr Motlemte (25- 45 mph) olsr He (25mphpr.wm) � � Heavy(25 mph prlpxe,) � � N Plannetl flou h.. N Plannetl flountlaboul Port Port r Orchard r Orchard SlncWr p tte Gors ¢ Gors ¢ �W 57 Level 2 evaluation detail - Traffic Alt A - 2050 AM Peak Period Alt A - 2050 PM Peak Period Freeway Cd.g.b.. 2050AMPeak PeriOE +er B rton I FreewyCongeshon 2050PMPeakPeriotl wr=+•rBremerton Altema[I— AN —:2A Congeston(appros ma.tmvelspeetl) Ly�� Con&edm(approx ma[etrnel speetl) LighttoNon.(45myho, high¢,) '°�'r ^, ! Light. None (45 mph or high¢,) °^ �Motlemte(25-45 mph) Isr ns `r■ �ModeW(25-45mph) olzmr�z mi`� Heavy(25mph orlowerl w{+ r Heavy(25mphorlawe,) +{� N Planned flountlabout N Plannetl Roundabout I / Swr^tl Imet Mmno cklr�� 58 29 12/12/2025 Level 2 evaluation detail - Traffic Alt A-1 - 2050 AM Peak Period Alt A-1 - 2050 PM Peak Period Freeway Congestion -20502M Peak Period 'wr=-r=e^0 grton Freeway Congestion - 2050 PM Peak Period wro,z r,e^'0 gremerton AltemativeA-1 \ remeAltemativeA-1 Congestion (apprmrimatetmvelspeetll Congestion (apprmimatetrevHspaetli 5ghtto None (45 mph orhigh04 5ghten None (45 mph orhigh05 • Moderate (25- 45 mph) OHr • Moderate (25- 45 mph) oHr • Heary(25mphorlowa0 w / r) • Heary(25mphorlowaw �d N PetllannR.-h om N Plannetl flouMaboul w e.i ev .aa�•�� 5oune rv.z. ru.r n.n,vea 1mm 5oune Gorst - �i,' .e Via`. / \ OPort� Gorst o- �\ OrPchatrd u:w mrn Mronno `I I See Inset }y}y T WSDOT Level 2 evaluation detail - Traffic Alt A-2 - 2050 AM Peak Period Alt A-2 - 2050 PM Peak Period Freeway Congestlon-2050AM Peak Period lwr^•ir=e gremerton Freeway Conge000n- 2050 PM Peak Period `"rs^r gremerton AltematleeA1 \ AltemativeA-2 tong 05on(ap%otematatmrelspeetl) Congtttion(ap%otematatmrelspeetl) - LMht to None (45 mph or hlghe0 O Llgbt to None (45 mph or hlghe0 • Modesto (25-45 mph) Orstnof Qe • Moderate (25-45 mph) Orst 01 _ • Heoo(2Smphorlower) I _ • Heaay(25mphorlowe0 50/ N ® panneenoueoa0000 N ' Planne.Roueoabout .Naw ilmsi V 5. Naw Ra and / w &nar er as �3 Sauid �3 aoune E 1 7 aenalr 11 Go�! 60 30 12/12/2025 Level 2 evaluation detail - Traffic Alt B-2 - 2050 AM Peak Period freeway Congestlon- 2050 AM Peak Peri.d \wto.z t,e.^0 gremerton Alt— Wi,B2 ` f Congestion (approaimatetmvelspeetll Nghtto Nane (45 mph or highe0 �Motlem[e (25-45 mph) C Drr " e IIIM Heary(25 mph oli—) N Plann tlflouMabom �d e ■ 61 Alt B-2 - 2050 PM Peak Period Freeway Congestion- 2050 PM Peak Peri.d 1 \wto•z t=e^'0 gremerton Altema[Ivi, B 2 \ I Congestion(approaimatetmvelspeetll Nghtto Nane (45 mph orhighe0 �Motlerme(25-45 mph) C Dar ron e . HDary(25 mDM1 orloxerl N Nth. floaMabom ��� mnt Poo -..._.__. Wy+ygb epee .Morino _: -_--.�-r,t Iw Level 2 evaluation detail - Traffic Alt B-3 - 2050 AM Peak Period FreewayCongesfon-2050AM PeakPerlotl \wt^•t gremerton Altemrtive B-3 C"gastlol(approdmete Vavelspeetl) ^� Ngh- 14111(45 mph orhlgheO c/ii 'vp Motlemte (25- 45 mph) Dist m" - � Heary (25 mpM1 orlower) HrF� N Plann tlPountlabou SaNd Fernt �� 62 Alt B-3 - 2050 PM Peak Period Freeway Congestlon- 2050 PM Peak Perlotl 1 wto.e r.e Bremerton Alt— In B-3 Congestion (apProumate Vavelspeetl) Nghtt1 14011(45 mph Or M1lghe4 0 Matlemte (25-45 mph) Dist ate" - Heary (25 mpM1 orlower) nP Plann0000abo mrnt �� • 166 y, 5'nrbir aR=oe y I torsi •i��� torso _ /w 31 12/12/2025 Level 2 evaluation detail - Traffic Alt C -I - 2050 AM Peak Period Alt C-1 - 2050 PM Peak Period Freeway Congestion -20502M Peak Period 1wr=-F=e .."0 gremerton Freeway Congeston- 2050 PM Peak Period lwrw F^ gremerton Altemetive C-1 ¼ Altemative C-1 Congertioe(approtimatetm0elepeedl Congastion(apprmimatetwvelspeedi light to None (45 mph arhighet) C m" 020330 None (45 mph or higher 3 30 Motlerate(25-45mph) O1st rs�s • M02000te(25-45mph) r) / Dxt 11111 xe0vy(o5mphorl0naew ` + • He0vy(25 mph orlonah N Plann tlflountlabom N Plannedt edaboM Port kchw 63 ---- usry / carer .ev,erw mm Level 2 evaluation detail - Traffic Alt C-2 - 2050 AM Peak Period Alt C-2 - 2050 PM Peak Period Freeway COngentl0n 2050AM Peak Perlatl 1 ,car^�F=e gremerton -� f Freeway Congestlon 20bO PM Peak Perlotl =e `"gremerton Altemative F2 \ 1 I / Altemative F2 -1 Ollg.fim(0pmwimatetmvelspeetll Congeston (apPrwimatetmvelspeetll --t--I HTI:;.m LMhtt None (45 mph Or hlghe0 0 " L1ght t0 None (45 mph Or hlghe0 ^" �Motlerate(25-45mph) Dst ne.' �Motlerate(25-45m,M1) (I, one,' _ Neavy(25 mph.ri.1 f Heavy(25 mph or 1-1 N • I.—xopntla.. N ® Mannetl xopntlaboM soaa� j j I r l 64 i Port Orchard Port 32 12/12/2025 Level 2 evaluation detail - Traffic Alt D - 2050 AM Peak Period Alt D - 2050 PM Peak Period Freeway Congestlon-2050AM Peak Period .s=rA Bremerton Freerlray gangeo0on- 2050 PM Peak PerioE-E=e^0 Bremerton Alte W,D \ Altema[Ne0 Cangeetion(approti—tmyele W) Cangeetion(apprwimate t —We W) light to None (45 mph orhighe0 Ugh tto None (45 mph orhighe0 • Mo.emte(25- 45 mph) oHr III• Mod te(25- 45 mph) oHr III• Heary(gSmphorlonnr) /d 1♦ Heavy(2Smpherloeph N - plannepRo--th N plannep RouMaboul W t a� RQ Sou.e W Belfair Valley Rd Sou.e 3 O3 JI• • 16 r Port • lb r Port Gorst Orchard Gorst Oeh2 d Ihappwp PormweM Reposed parmmem -__� u pawmfw Pagimalireflk / ucW �Clawmfor Regionalimpk Seelnset — see' r„ $4 34$ 65 33