The URL can be used to link to this page

11/04/2020 - PacketCity of Port Orchard Land Use Committee November 4, 2020 4:30 pm Remote access on Zoom Link: https://us02web.zoom.us/i/81389647839?pwd=NkFwblBZSXYydTdZb3hkMmQwNTdwZzO9 Meeting ID: 813 8964 7839 Passcode: 263503 Dial -In: 1 253 215 8782 AGENDA 1. Discussion: Rental/Use of Van Zee Park for Sports Organizations (Rinearson) 2. Discussion: Shoreline Master Program Update; Draft Code Revisions Addressing Sea Level Rise (Bond) 3. Update: Draft Downtown/County Campus Subarea Plan (Bond) 4. Update: DCD Permit Applications (Bond) REAL PROPERTY LEASE AGREEMENT No. 069-19 LESSOR: CITY OF PORT ORCHARD, a municipal corporation LESSEE: Special Olympics Washington, South Kitsap Flag Football Program, a non-profit corporation in the State of Washington ASSESSOR'S TAX PARCEL ID#: Portion of tax parcel #352401-3-026-2000; 300 Tremont Street, Port Orchard, WA This Lease is made and entered into by and between the CITY OF PORT ORCHARD, a municipal corporation organized and existing under the laws of the State of Washington, herein referred to as Lessor or the City, and Special Olympics Washington, South Kitsap Flag Football Program, herein referred to as Lessee. Section 1 - PREMISES For and in consideration of the mutual covenants hereinafter contained, Lessor does hereby agree to lease, let and demise unto the Lessee a portion of the park described below "as is" between the hours of 5:00 p.m. and 8:00 p.m., on Tuesdays and Thursdays: Van Zee Park: A portion of Van Zee Park measuring approximately 150 feet by 240 feet as delineated on the attached Exhibit "A". Section 2 - TERM This lease shall commence on September 25, 2019, at 5:00 p.m. and end on November 21, 2019, at 8:00 p.m., unless extended pursuant to Section 3, or earlier terminated pursuant to Section 8. Section 3 - RENT The rent shall be Fifty Dollars ($50.00) for the term of the lease payable in full without deduction or offset, to the Treasurer of the City of Port Orchard on or before October 15, 2019. Section 4 — LEASE EXTENSION This lease may be extended upon written request of either party, prior to the end date. Section 5 - CONDITIONS OF USE A. It is understood and agreed between the parties that the Lessee shall not utilize the premises other than for organizing and administering youth athletic programs. B. The Lessee is prohibited to make any improvements to the PREMISES and the areas immediately adjacent to the PREMISES. C. Lessee shall maintain a clean and operational portable restroom available for use during practice hours. D. Lessee shall not sublease or rent any portion of the above -described real property without the prior written consent of Lessor, and consent to a sub -lease or rental agreement shall not be deemed to be consent to any subsequent sub -lease or rental agreement. E. Lessee agrees to maintain the above -described real property during the term of this lease and shall be responsible for the maintenance and upkeep of said area at all times, including but not limited to turf and shall be responsible for maintaining said area in an orderly state and sanitary condition. Section 6 - INDEMNIFICATION; INSURANCE. A. Lessor, its officers, elected officials, employees and agents, shall not be liable for any loss, damage or injury of any kind or character to any person or property arising from any use of the leased premises or any part thereof, or caused by and/or arising from any act or omission of Lessee or any of its agents, employees, licensees or invitees or by or from any accident on the leased premises or any fire or other casualty thereon or occasioned by the failure of Lessee to maintain said premises or to cause the same to be maintained in a safe condition or by a nuisance made or suffered thereon, or arising from any other cause whatsoever; and Lessee, as a material part of the consideration of this lease, hereby waives on its behalf all claims and demands against Lessor and hereby indemnifies and agrees to defend and hold Lessor, its officers, elected officials, employees and agents, entirely free and harmless from all liability for damages and costs of other persons for any such loss, damage or injury, together with all costs, reasonable attorney's fees and expenses arising therefrom. B. Lessee shall procure and maintain during the lease term a commercial general liability policy against claims for injuries to persons or damage to property that may arise from or in connection with Lessee's use of the leased premises. Said policy shall have insurance limits no less than $1,000,000 each occurrence and $2,000,000 general aggregate. Said policy shall be endorsed to name the Lessor as an additional insured and to state that coverage shall not be cancelled unless Lessor has received thirty (30) days written notice by certified mail, return receipt requested. Section 7 - ASSIGNMENT Lessee shall not assign or transfer this lease or any interest therein without the prior written consent of Lessor, and such consent to an assignment shall not be deemed to be consent to any subsequent assignment. Any such assignments without such consent shall be void, and shall at the option of Lessor, terminate with this lease. Section 8 - DEFAULT In the event the Lessee shall fail to keep and perform any of the covenants and agreements herein contained, including the maintenance of a proper insurance policy as described above, Lessor may terminate this lease by giving written notice to Lessee. Provided, however, that with the exception of Lessee's failure to maintain a proper insurance policy as described above, Lessee shall be given a minimum of five (5) days upon receiving written notice to cure any default prior to lease termination. Lessee's failure to maintain a proper insurance policy as described above is not subject to Lessee's right to cure and shall be grounds for immediate termination of the lease by Lessor. In the event of any such lease termination, Lessor, in addition to the other rights and remedies it may have, shall have the immediate right of re- entry and may remove all persons and property from the premises. Section 9 - WAIVER Lessor's waiver of one or more covenants or conditions shall not be construed as a waiver of a subsequent breach of the same or other covenants or conditions. Section 10 - PARTIES BOUND The covenants and conditions herein contained shall, subject to the provisions as to assignment and transfer, apply to and bind the heirs, successors, executors, administrators, and assigns of all the parties hereto. Section 11 - LESSOR'S RESERVATION Lessor reserves the right, without liability to Lessee, to inspect the premises at reasonable times, upon reasonable notice, and without unreasonable interference to Lessee's activities on the premises. Section 12 - ENTIRE AGREEMENT This lease sets forth the entire agreement between the parties and it shall not be modified in any manner except by an instrument in writing executed by the parties. Section 13 - JURISDICTION, VENUE AND ATTORNEY FEES Any action for claims arising out of or relating to this lease shall be governed by the laws of the State of Washington. Venue shall be in Kitsap County Superior Court. In any suit or action instituted to enforce any right or obligation granted in this lease, the substantially prevailing party shall be entitled to recover its costs, disbursements, and reasonable attorney's fees from the other party. [SIGNATURE PAGE FOLLOWS] IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have signed and sealed this lease the 81h day of October 2019. LESSOR: LESSEE: City of Port Orchard Special Olympics Washington, South Kitsap Flag Football Program By: Signature: It's: Mayor Title: CA 5it Q r, Aita a F �aGJI� ATTEST/AU14fEI6TICATED: Fan6 Rinearson, MMC, City Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM: do Cates, City Attorney _ • SEAL Brandy Rinearson From: Tony Lang Sent: Tuesday, October 20, 2020 9:36 AM To: Mark Dorsey; Brandy Rinearson Cc: Jenine Floyd; Kara Sexton; Patti Saltsgaver Subject: RE: Use of Givens Park Baseball Field at night Attachments: 2019 Van Zee Usage.pdf See attached. I'm not sure if you need this much information but here you go, In 2019: September: 88KWh used at .07cents per KWh= $6.16 October: 332KWh used at .07cents per KWh= $23.24 November: 364KWh used at .07cents per KWh= 25.48 Total $54.88 The last group that used the lighting used it for a total of 50 hours for a total of 784KWh at .07 per KWh. We would need the actual price per KWh from Patti so we can update billing rate appropriately. It would be nice to know as I can change the rate in the Musco lighting system to get averages and totals Tony Lang vperarrons manager City of Port Orchard 216 Prospect St. Port Orchard, WA 98366 P-360.535.2490 ORCHARD. From: Mark Dorsey <mdorsey@cityofportorchard.us> Sent: Monday, October 19, 2020 3:44 PM To: Brandy Rinearson<brinearson@cityofportorchard.us>; Tony Lang <tlang@cityofportorchard.us> Cc: Jenine Floyd <jfloyd@cityofportorchard.us>; Kara Sexton <ksexton@cityofportorchard.us> Subject: Re: Use of Givens Park Baseball Field at night Yes, there was a different soccer club there before. They were the ones that got the grant to install the lights. Finance has the payout information. I'm not sure who has the power usage information, possibly the company in Nebraska (?) that activates the power if that still happens. Tony? On: 19 October 2020 15:39, "Brandy Rinearson"<brinearson@cityofportorchard.us> wrote: Van Zee..he originally wanted Givens, but we told him it is under contract .... so he couldn't use them... Best Wishes, Brandy Rinearson, MMC, CPRO City Clerk/Assistant to the Mayor City of Port Orchard Direct (360) 876-7030 Fax (360) 895-9029 www.cityofportorchard.us Our doors are closed to the public, however we continue to serve the citizens of Port Orchard via telephone and email, Monday through Friday 8am to 4:30pm. Emergency services are available 24 hours a day by calling 911. Please consider the environment before printing this e-mail. Please be aware that a -mails which pertain to City business may be considered public records and may be subject to public disclosure laws. If you think that you have received this e-mail message in error, please notify the sender via e- mail or telephone at (360) 876-7030. From: Mark Dorsey <mdorsey@cityofportorchard.us> Sent: Monday, October 19, 2020 3:38 PM To: Brandy Rinearson<brnearson@cityofportorchard.us>; Tony Lang <tlan cit of ❑rtorchard.us> Cc: Jenine Floyd <jfloyd@cityofportorchard.us>; Kara Sexton <ksexton cit ❑f ortorchard.us> Subject: Re: Use of Givens Park Baseball Field at night Givens? That's Bob Showers world and he has the leases, correct? Other then the constant fight with SK Per Wee football. They should just use Van Zee, on Showers is fight hard to not allow yet another use of the fields On: 19 October 202015:02, "Brandy Rinearson"<brinearson@citvofportorchard.us> wrote: Tony and Mark, See email below ... do we know how much lights were when the other sports organization used the field... Looks like we have another one that wants to use it... Best Wishes, Brandy Rinearson, MMC, CPRO City Clerk/Assistant to the Mayor City of Port Orchard Direct (360) 876-7030 Fax (360) 895-9029 vniw.cit of ❑rtorchard.us 10/19/2020 Control -Link Central - Usage Report Musco Control -Link Usage Report (Auto Only) By Facility, Field Usage Type of Light Usage Sun 09/01/2019 - Tue 12/31/2019 Owner: City of Port Orchard Port Orchard,WA Summary by Facility Total Hours Total Auto Saved from Facility. Hours Usage Early Offs William A Vanzee Memorial Park 50:07 0:29 City of Port Orchard 50:07 0:29 Summary by Facility, Field Total Hours Total Auto Saved from Facility Fiel Hours Usage Early Offs William A Vanzee Memorial Park Soccer 50:07 0:29 CI of Port Orchard 50:07 0:29 Detail For Faciii : William A Vanzee Memorial Park Start End Scheduler User Group Description Mon 09/23/2019 2:55p Mon 09/23/2019 3:01 p Mike DeLine Test EarlyOn 2:55p Schedule EarlyOff 3:01 p Originally 3:30p Added Mon 09/23/2019 3:08p Mon 09/23/2019 3:30p Mike DeLine EarlyOn 3:08p Schedule Added Tue 09/24/2019 9:21a Tue 09/24/2019 10:45a Mike DeLine EarlyOn 9:21 a Schedule Added Tue 09/24/2019 11:01 a Tue 09/24/2019 12:00p Mike DeLine EarlyOn 11:01a Schedule Added Tue 09/24/2019 6:37p Tue 09/24/2019 8:00p Mike DeLine Special Olympics Flag Football Thu 09/26/2019 6:32p Thu 09/26/2019 8:00p Mike DeLine Special Olympics Flag Football Tue 10/01/2019 6:22p Tue 10/01/2019 8:00p Mike DeLlne Special Olympics Flag Football Thu 10/03/2019 6:18p Thu 10/03/2019 8:00p Mike DeLine Special Olympics Flag Football Tue 10/08/2019 6:08p Tue 10/08/2019 8:00p Mike DeLine Special Olympics Flag Football Thu 10/10/2019 6:04p Thu 10/10/2019 8:00p Mike DeLine Special Olympics Flag Football Tue 10/15/2019 5:54p Tue 10/15/2019 8:00p Mike DeLine Special Olympics Flag Football Thu 10/17/2019 5:50p Thu 10/17/2019 8:00p Mike DeLine Special Olympics Flag Football Tue 10/22/2019 5:41 p Tue 10/22/2019 8:00p Mike DeLine Special Olympics Flag Football Thu 10/24/2019 5:38p Thu 10/24/2019 8:00p Mike DeLine Special Olympics Flag Football Tue 10/29/2019 5:29p Tue 10/29/2019 8:00p Mike DeLine Special Olympics Flag Football Thu 10/31/2019 5:26p Thu 10/31/2019 8:00p Mike DeLine Special Olympics Flag Football Tue 11/05/2019 4:18p Tue 11/05/2019 8:00p Mike DeLine Special Olympics Flag Football Thu 11/07/2019 4:15p Thu 11/07/2019 8;00p Mike DeLine Special Olympics https://www.control-link.com/cgi-bin/wspd_cgi.shlWService=cicwslive/h-clinq-usagerpt-printrptfacfleld.html?cdSession=DKEumafFkxcoYrYagreportTyp.. 112 10/19/2020 Control -Link Central - Usage Report Tue 11/12/2019 4:08p Tue 11/12/2019 8:00p Flag Mike DeLine Specialall Y Oil m Pics Thu 11/14/2019 4:06p Thu 11/14/2019 8:00p Flag Football Mike DeLine Special Olympics Tue 11/19/2019 4:00p Tue 11/19/2019 8:00p Flag Football Mike DeLine Special Olympics Thu 11/21/2019 3:58p Thu 11/21/2019 8:00p Football Mike DeLine SP Olympics Olym ics Flag Football m vallcaG memorial rarK iota[ Auto Hours Usage = 50:07 William A Vanzee Memorial Park Total Hours Saved from Early Offs - 0:29 City of Port Orchard Total Auto Hours Usage = 50:07 City of Port Orchard Total Hours Saved from Early Offs = 0:29 https://www.control-link.comlcgi-binlwspd_cgi.sh/W Service=cicwslivelh-clinq-usagerpt-printrptfacfield.html?cdSession=DKEumafFkXcoYrYa&reportTyp.. 2/2 10/19/2020 Control -Link Central MUSCO Control -Link" Control System Call us at: (877) 347-3319 Home My Schedules Facility Management Reports Admin DASHBOARD SERVICES Owner: City of Port Orchard Facility: All Facilities Field: All Fields All Facilities for City of Port Orchard William A Vanzee Memorial Park Welcome Tony Lang Today Is Monday, October is, 2D20 Help Logout v ' Energy Used KWh: 0 0 Service Malts: 0 0 Schedules: 0 0 Phone Calls to CLC: 0 0 Web Logins: 0 0 Lamp Controls Service Call Musco Service Contact I Service to be Outages In Process Owner Contact Completed By ' Loma Ou;npna: p Ouragee. YalIM- Lump Out• DtlIM,WK = System hea OrJOa controls, but not Lamp Monitoring CopabIlty. ' n:rnla: Gov ntml Syataenp n® are OK. V014-- cnl Iyalan, Iaaan n.A00 4 2019 ► Life Tl 4 2020 ► Life Time Total: $55 @.07 per KWh Total Savings: $0 Average Monthly: S18 Est Usage 5 Est Usage KWh Hrs Saved From Early Off Total Hrs Scheduled 400 0 i V 200 3 0 Y 0 � � Ian Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 0 0 O 0.025 o.OS 0A75 0.1 0.125 0.1'i https:llwww.control-link.com/cgi-bin/wspoLogi.sh(WService=alcwslivelh-dinq-Facmgni-dashboard.Yltml?cdSession-DKEuma(FkxcoYrYa 1/1 2021 SHORELINE MASTER PROGRAM PERIODIC UPDATE ISSUE: POTENTIAL SEA LEVEL RISE DRAFT PROPOSED POLICY AND CODE REVISIONS SHOWN AS RED UNDERLINE, BLACK STRIKE011Tr, PER SECTION EXCERPT Explanations for changes are listed in italic bluf before each change Date: October 22, 2020 New SMP Definitions: 100 Year Coastal Flood Elevation means the elevation in feet of the area which has a one percent chance or greater of being flooded in any given year. 100 Year Coastal Flood Hazard Area means an area which has a one percent chance or greater of being flooded in any given year. Channel Migration Zone means an area in a floodplain where a stream or river channel can be expected to move naturally over time in response to gravity and topography. Freeboard means the difference between the height of a shoreline armor structure and the water depth at the seaward toe of the structure. 1. Consultant Recommendation: Coastal High Hazard Designation for City's Marine Shoreline "It is recommended that all the City's marine shoreline be designated a coastal high hazard area due to the frequency and spatial extent of coastal flooding, the abundance of nearshore fill, and the risk of tsunamis. Coastal flooding will increase infrequency over a relatively short period of time with additional implications associated with mass wasting, coastal roads, and other heavily utilized public areas. The mapping developed for this effort does not include flooding from stormwater. Recent research has documented the projected increase in the frequency of 100-year floods. In Seattle, with 1.6 feet of SLR the 10 percent 1 percent and 0.2 percent annual chance of floods are expected to recur 108, 335, and 814 times as often (Buchanan et al. 2017). "According to (POMC) 20.170, "Coastal high hazard area" means an area of special flood hazard extending from offshore to the inland limit of a primary frontal dune along an open coast and any other area subject to high velocity wave action from storms or seismic sources". Current and past flood mapping of the City of Port Orchard is largely mapped as A (or AE in the past (2010) mapping method), which does not qualify as a high coastal hazard area. Code language currently includes the V-zone for coastal high hazard areas, which is not mapped anywhere within the City, and is therefore irrelevant. "The spatial extent of nearshore fill also contributes to the recommendation to consider all shores coastal high hazards areas in Port Orchard. Although there is not substantial wave energy in Sinclair Inlet, shorter frequency waves can do considerable damage when sustained over longer duration, particularly in flooded areas. "The threat of wave action from tsunamis contributes to the recommended coastal hazard status of the Port Orchard shoreline. According to the Washington Department of Geology and Earth Resources, much of the City of Port Orchard's downtown shore is considered to be within areas mapped as having "High Liquefaction Susceptibility" due to the extent of nearshore fill (Figure 9). The Seattle fault zone earthquake that occurred in 900-930 resulted in at least 9.8 feet (3 meters) of uplift near Gorst, located at the head of Sinclair Inlet (Arcos 2012). Tsunami and debris flow deposits in the salt marsh sediment at Gorst further document this historical occurrence of tsunamis from a large Seattle fault earthquake in Sinclair inlet. Arcos (2012) confirmed paleotsunami modeling of a Seattle fault earthquake by Koshimura et al. (2002). Model results showed that a tsunami wave measuring up to 13.1 feet (4 meters) in height would develop in Sinclair Inlet (Figure 10), which had some of the largest tsunami wave heights resulting from a Seattle fault earthquake in the Puget Sound region." (1) Proposed Code Revision: POMC 20.170.110 — Flood Damage Prevention (7) Coastal High Hazard Area: means Port Orchard's marine shoreline, including: Sinclair Inlet and associated submerged lands and tidelands; shorelands extending landward for two hundred feet in all directions as measured on a horizontal plane from the ordinary high water mark of Sinclair Inlet; and the floodway and contiguous floodplain areas landward two hundred feet of such floodways associated with the tidal estuary portion of Blackjack Creek. an Fea o The iQnn �i _2n VE V ss�Ees�Tea� ^s+g+�-ale � c-F�as-2�„��1�� (2) Proposed Code Revision: POMC 20.170.360 — Coastal High Hazard Areas Located within areas of special flood hazard established in POMC 20.170.060 are coastal high hazard areas, dts+gRated-as-;-zA-„ts 1-2n, "E and/ . These areas have special flood hazards associated with high velocity waters from surges and, therefore, in addition to meeting all provisions in this chapter, the following provisions shall also apply: (1) All new construction and substantial improvements in coastal high hazard areas ze„es V130 nd- VE (V ;f base f!AA.J ^i�Va +,^n d-at, ;-Available) ^n the n;+„< PIRMshall be elevated on pilings and columns so that: (a) The bottom of the lowest horizontal structural member of the lowest floor (excluding the pilings or columns) is elevated one foot or more above the base flood level; and (b) The pile or column foundation and structure attached thereto is anchored to resist flotation, collapse and lateral movement due to the effects of wind and water loads acting simultaneously on all building components. Wind and water loading values shall each have a one percent chance of being equaled or exceeded in any given year (100-year mean recurrence interval). 2 A registered professional engineer or architect shall develop or review the structural design, specifications and plans for the construction, and shall certify that the design and methods of construction to be used are in accordance with accepted standards of practice for meeting the provisions of subsections (1)(a) and (b) of this section. (2) Obtain the elevation (in relation to mean sea level) of the bottom of the lowest structural member of the lowest floor (excluding pilings and columns) of all new and substantially improved structures in coastal high hazard areas ze„esV1 30, VE, and V en the rcel,llml Rit PIR54 and whether or not such structures contain a basement. The city shall maintain a record of all such information. (3) All new construction within coastal high hazard areas ze„esV1 30, VET and V „iq the c;eRqRquRety's FIRM shall be located landward of the reach of mean high tide. (4) Provide that all new construction and substantial improvements within coastal high hazard areas ze„esV1 30, VE, and " eR the c^mmunity's C1D""have the space below the lowest floor either free of obstruction or constructed with nonsupporting breakaway walls, open wood lattice -work, or insect screening intended to collapse under wind and water loads without causing collapse, displacement, or other structural damage to the elevated portion of the building or supporting foundation system. For the purposes of this section, a breakaway wall shall have a design safe loading resistance of not less than 10 and no more than 20 pounds per square foot. Use of breakaway walls which exceed a design safe loading resistance of 20 pounds per square foot (either by design or when so required by local or state codes) may be permitted only if a registered professional engineer or architect certifies that the design proposed meets the following conditions: (a) Breakaway wall collapse shall result from water load less than that which would occur during the base flood; and (b) The elevated portion of the building and supporting foundation system shall not be subject to collapse, displacement, or other structural damage due to the effects of wind and water loads acting simultaneously on all building components (structural and nonstructural). Maximum wind and water loading values to be used in this determination shall each have a one percent chance of being equaled or exceeded in any given year (100-year mean recurrence interval). If breakaway walls are utilized, such enclosed space shall be usable solely for parking of vehicles, building access, or storage. Such space shall not be used for human habitation. (5) Prohibit the use of fill for structural support of buildings within coastal high hazard areas z4nes V! 30sir and V „n the eemmunity's, FIRM (6) Prohibit manmade alteration of sand dunes within coastal high hazard areas ae„esV1 307 VE, and- "^^ *"^ r-9^^^^61R;+„'S C1D"4which would increase potential flood damage. 3 (7) All manufactured homes to be placed or substantially improved within coastal high hazard areas zeRes V1 30, V, and yr „r the rity's FIRM on sites: (a) Outside of a manufactured home park or subdivision; (b) In a new manufactured home park or subdivision; (c) In an expansion to an existing manufactured home park or subdivision; or (d) In an existing manufactured home park or subdivision on which a manufactured home has incurred "substantial damage" as the result of a flood; shall meet the standards of subsections (1) through (6) of this section, and manufactured homes placed or substantially improved on other sites in an existing manufactured home park or subdivision within coastal high hazard areas zenes V1 30, V, and VE en the C1RM shall meet the requirements of POMC 20.170.330. (8) Recreational vehicles placed on sites within coastal high hazard areas ZeResV1 30, ", and "E eR the G Rity'S FIRM shall either: (a) Be on the site for fewer than 180 consecutive days; or (b) Be fully licensed and ready for highway use, on its wheels or jacking system, attached to the site only by quick disconnect type utilities and security devices, and have no permanently attached additions; or (c) Meet the requirements of POMC 20.170.120, Development permit required, and subsections (1) through (6) of this section. ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 2. Consultant Recommendation: Formally Adopt 2017 Flood Insurance Rate Mapping (FIRM) "Coastal flooding in the City of Port Orchard is an existing problem that will continue to get worse with sea level rise. Existing flood regulations (POMC) 20.170.060 referenced "The Flood Insurance Study for the Kitsap County, Washington and Incorporated Areas," dated November 4, 2010. The (POMC) adopts the Federal Emergency Management Agency 2010 and any revisions thereto. The new FIRM developed in 2017 is therefore technically adopted but the updated mapping should be explicitly referenced and related base flood elevations for added clarity." Proposed Code Revision: POMC 20.170.060 Basis for establishing the areas of special flood hazard. The areas of special flood hazard identified by the National Flood Insurance Program (NFIP) F,,deFal insurance Adm*nestFat*e in a scientific and engineering report entitled "The Flood 4 Insurance Study for the Kitsap County, Washington and Incorporated Areas," dated February 3, 2017 ;'R-yem—he 4, 201-0, and any revisions thereto, with accompanying flood insurance maps, is adopted by reference and declared to be a part of this chapter. T"^ h^.+ The most current NFIP flood insurance study and flood insurance maps are +s on file at the city clerk's office: 216 Prospect Street, Port Orchard, WA 98366. (Also see proposed SMP-GP-20 and SMP-GP-21 below.) 3. Consultant Recommendation: Revise Coastal Flood Hazard Regulations "Much of the current 700-year flood hazard areas intersect with areas with existing development and areas proposed for redevelopment. These primarily occur in Urban Conservancy and High Intensity shoreline environmental designations. Code revisions should address reducing known flood hazards, including the following: "6.4 Flood Hazard Reduction. Removing, moving, elevating and building at new, higher elevations should augment the existing language in section 6.4 - Flood Hazard Reduction. Adding freeboard to existing shore armor, in areas that are frequently flooded landward of shore armor." (1) Proposed Code Revision: SMP Section 6.4 Flood Hazard Reduction Management Policies SMP-GP-14 Discourage future non -water -dependent development, including redevelopment and expansion of existing non -water -dependent development, in areas lying at or below the 100 year coastal flood elevation, f'^^e' ;-+^^+,.,,+h the G;+ fleed damage p; eYeRt+9R Fegulatiens (D^�Rtle 20). unless flood hazard is reduced by removing, moving, elevating, and/or building structures at new, higher elevations. Flood hazard reduction may also include adding freeboard to existing shore armor in areas that are frequently flooded (i.e. within a 100-vear coastal flood hazard area) landward of existing shore armor. in compliance with FEMA reauirements for coastal flood protection structures. SMP-GP-16 When feasible, give preference to nonstructural flood hazard reduction measures over structural measures, except that in areas that are frequently flooded (i.e. within a 100- year coastal flood hazard area) landward of existing shore armor, hazard reduction measures may include adding freeboard to existing shore armor. SMP-GP-17 Ensure c]to the greatest extent „Teansfeasible that flood hazard protection measures do not result in a net loss of ecological functions. SMP-GP-18 The creation of new lots or tracts that would be located entirely within a t#e-100- yearfleedplaiR coastal flood hazard area should not be allowed -Shell*' "^ disc;e Fage', unless the intent of the subdivision is for the lot or tract to remain undeveloped for the purposes of ecological restoration and/or development setback, consistent with the City's flood damage prevention and subdivision regulations (POMC Title 20) and other provisions of this Plan addressing mitigation and restoration. 5 SMP-GP-20 The City shall create and maintain for public reference and planning purposes a coastal flood hazard map which shows the City's base 100 year coastal flood elevation areas at the time of map creation, and includes a future projection of any additional areas which have at least a 50% probability of being flooded within 20 years. This map shall be based on best available science provided by the State of Washington and shall be updated, at minimum, with each required periodic and comprehensive update of the City's shoreline master program. SMP-GP-21 For each required periodic and comprehensive update to the City's shoreline master program, the City shall evaluate the program's coastal flood hazard reduction policies and development regulations, and coastal flood hazard map, and shall revise them according to best available science arovided by the State of Washington. Development Regulations G-DR-12 New or expanded development or uses in the shoreline zone, including the subdivision of land. that would reauire structural flood control works within a 100 vear coastal flood hazard area, a stream, a channel migration zone and/or a floodway are prohibited. (2) Proposed Code Revision: Shoreline Master Program Appendix E Redevelopment Within a Shoreline Buffer 1. Within a shoreline buffer, redevelopment of an existing non -water -dependent, legal conforming or nonconforming building or portion of such building, may be allowed subject to the following: f. Redevelopment within a shoreline buffer is not allowed in areas of special flood hazards as established according to din POMC Section 20.170.060 , 5.2�0-, or geologica4 hazardeys areas as defined in POMC Section 20.162.0441 S.2n-22 QN). ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 4. Consultant Recommendation: Additions to Appendix E of the SMP (Mitigation and Restoration for Redevelopment Activities in the High Intensity Shoreline Environment Designation) "Consider adding more of the pollution abatement functions of marine riparian areas (vegetation), particularly along paved parking lots adjacent to the marine shoreline." Proposed Code Revision: SMP Section 6.6 Shoreline Vegetation Conservation and Restoration New Development Regulations: G-DR-36 The Citv shall reauire. where feasible. restoration of native shoreline and aauatic vegetation in mitigation and restoration plans and in stormwater management for redevelopment activities within the shoreline area. 0 G-DR-37 Redevelopment activities in the High Intensity (HI) shoreline environment designation shall comply with the shoreline vegetation conservation and restoration requirements of Appendix E of this plan, in addition to any other applicable City requirements and regulations. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 5. Consultant Recommendation: "Consider evaluating all locations in which there are known contaminated sediments that are within coastal flooding areas and develop a long-term plan to address those in need of attention." Proposed Code Addition: SMP Chapter 6 General Policies and Regulations 6.4 Flood Hazard Reduction Management Policies SMP-GP-22 The City should map all shoreline locations in which there are known contaminated sediments, and develop a long-term plan to evaluate and address those in need of attention due to risk of mobilization due to coastal flooding. Development Regulations G-DR-13 As part of the City's shoreline permit application review process, all proposed development and redevelopment activities in the City's shoreline requiring a permit shall determine and disclose whether any sediment material on the development site, including fill, is contaminated and requires remediation to prevent spread of contamination through mobilization due to coastal flooding events. This requirement applies whether or not the contaminated area on the site will be disturbed as part of the development process. If contaminated sediment at risk of mobilization is determined to be present, the City shall require a remediation plan as a condition of shoreline permit approval. The City may require independent review at the applicant's expense of findings and recommendations regarding contamination and remediation, by a hydrologist, geologist, engineer or other qualified professional. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 6. Consultant Recommendation: "Create standards for sea level rise for the downtown waterfront redevelopment based on design lifetimes and offering leadership for other small coastal cities." Proposed Code Addition: SMP Chapter 6 General Policies and Regulations (New Section) 6.7 Sea Level Rise and Coastal High Hazards. Management Policies SMP-GP-38 The City should create specific development and design standards for the downtown shoreline that address issues related to coastal high hazards and future sea level rise, including but not limited to: coastal flooding, earthquake liquefaction and tsunami risk, 7 saltwater intrusion, mobilization of contaminated sediments, and impacts to geologic hazard areas. Development Regulations G-DR-39 During each periodic review of the City's shoreline master program, the City will evaluate its development and design standards and revise them as needed for the downtown shoreline to protect against risks from sea level rise and coastal high hazards including but not limited to: coastal flooding, earthquake liquefaction and tsunami risk, saltwater intrusion, mobilization of contaminated sediments, and impacts to geologic hazard areas. 0 _ _ - _ - 7R't' .-_ , r +•f,�,. � Rtir.: 4a �- 'i f '"��' -� r � • �* � -` :tlt ' * �•4 7- S'4m -.— �%AA ` �`� '�'"'. �_� -..•- gip. I dr - r n i ea- i r- ' now . ti t' Port Orchard is a small but growing city in the Puget Sound region of Washington State. It enjoys an outstanding natural setting in close proximity to major urban employment centers. This setting and its role as Kitsap County Seat, Port Orchard has the opportunity to be an important regional center for growth. Keeping these opportunities in mind the Department of Community Planning at City of Port Orchard, along with its consultants are conducting a subarea plan and planned action EIS for the Port Orchard Downtown and County Government Campus Subarea Plan (POSP). These areas have land uses and condjLT1i1& that are unique to the City and would benefit fro area process as they will need to accommo ortionate share of the City's future growth. T sub rea an nned action EIS planning proces ress issues s current land uses, develo capacity, future dev ent mix and location of de s ag�s, transporta utilities, public f cilities, amenit atural resources.The result of the ing process e a neighborhood plan which will be ted in the Comprehensive Plan. equires early and continuous public ation c nsistent with RCW 43.21 C.420. The planned n EIS shall meet the requirements of RCW 43.21 C.440(1) ( ). The subarea plan and planned action EIS, which will be partly funded by an E2SHB 1923 grant administered by the Washington State Department of Commerce, must also comply with the requirements of the Engrossed Second Substitute House Bill (E2SHB) 1923 (Chapter 248, Laws of 2019). Additionally, the subarea plan shall address the PSRC regional centers plan checklist criteria, regional center application requirements, and provide the City with a plan suitable for seeking designation as an Urban Growth Center. 2 Port Orchard Subarea Plan I Port Orchard, WA 1 10.28.2020 3 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS CONSULTANT TEAM City of Port Orchard Department of Community Development 216 Prospect Street Port Orchard, WA 98366 planning @cityofportorchard.us Mayor: Robert Putaansuu City Council Members: Bek Ashby John Clauson Fred Chang Cindy Lucarelli Scott Diener Jay Rosapepe Shawn Cucciardi Planning Commission: Trish Tierney Stephanie Bailey Annette Stewart Mark Trenary David Bernstein Phil King Joe Morrison Suanne Martin Smith City Staff: Nicholas Bond, AICP, Director Keri Sallee, Long Range Planner Jim Fisk, Associate Planner Stephanie Andrews, Associate Planner Josie Rademacher, Intern Contact: Nick Bond nbond@cityofportorchard.us Keri Sallee kSallee@cityofportorchard.us Urban Design, Architect GGLO 1301 First Avenue, Suite 300 Seattle, WA 98101 Contact: Jeff Foster jfoster@GGLO.com Mitch Ptacek mptacek@gglo.com Engineers and Environmental Services EA Engineering, Science and Technology, Inc., PBC 2200 6th Ave #707, Seattle, WA 98121 Contact: Rich Schipanski rschipanski@eaest.com Civil Engineer - Storm Water Reid Middleton, Inc. 728 134th Street SW Everett, WA 98204 Contact: Julian Dodge jdodge@reidmiddleton. Real Estate and Economic Analysis Heartland 1301 First Avenue, Suite 200 Seattle, WA 98101 Contact: Mark Goodman mgoodman@htland.com Civil Engineer - Sanitary Sewer and Water Infrastructure BHC Consultants, LLC 1601 Fifth Avenue, Suite 500 Seattle, WA 98101 / Contact: John Gillespie john.gillespie cconsultiW PPVF?W Solutions, Inc. 165th Ave NE, Suite 100 ond, WA 98052 Andrew Bratlien andrewb@tsinw.com Port Orchard Subarea Plan I Port Orchard, WA 1 10.28.2020 5 CONTENTS CONTENTS 09 SECTION 1 - INTRODUCTION 1.1 INTRODUCTION 1.2 STUDY AREA 1.3 PSRC FRAMEWORK 15 SECTION 2 - EXISTING CONDITIONS SUMMARY ANALYSIS 2.1 HISTORY 2.2 RECENT ACHIEVEMENTS AND CURRENT PLANNING 2.3 EXISTING BUILT FORM AND CONTEXT 2.4 PREVIOUS PLANNING EFFORTS 2.5 EXISTING LAND USE AND ZO 2.6 CIRCULATION, ACCESS AND P, 2.7 UTILITIES 2.8 ENVIRONME EN SPA INO S A MENT 2.9.1 E MI ROFILE .9.-VELOPMENT PIPELINE .3 BUILD -ABLE LANDS 2.9.4 BASELINE ASSESSMENT AND ACTIVITY UNITS 2.9.5 MARKET YIELD ASSESSMENT 59 SECTION 3 - DRAFT SUBAREA PLAN GOALS AND VISION 3.1 PROPOSED ALTERNATIVES 3.2 URBAN DESIGN FRAMEWORK 3.2.1 WEST DOWNTOWN 3.2.2 EAST DOWNTOWN 3.2.3 COUNTY GOVERNMENT CAMPUS 3.3 LAND USE AND HOUSING 3.4 ENVIRONMENT AND OPEN SPACE 3.5 CIRCULATION, ACCESS, AND PARKING SECTION 06 - APPENDIX A PUBLIC OUTREACH PLAN AND OUTREACH SUMMARY B HEARTLAND ECONOMIC PROFILE AND BUILD -ABLE LA C - EXISTING LAND USE CODE SUMMARY D REFERENCES 6 Port Orchard Subarea Plan I Port Orchard, WA 1 10.28.2020 7 SECTION 01 INTRODUCTION 1.1 Introduction -1.1. rLHN BACKGROUND AND CONTEXT The 2014 City of Port Orchard periodic Comprehensive Plan update incorporated a new "centers" strategy to guide future planning and designated the first en "local centers" (See section 2.7 of the Port Orchard Comprehensive Plan). The Centers strategy evolved from the State Growth Management Act of the early 1990's as a means to combat urban sprawl development patterns that defined the post-war era. This strategy strives to accommodate growth in designated areas while preserving the existing character of the community, thereby retaining more open space and the dominant pattern of existing development. The centers approach to planning is provided in Vision 2050, the regional plan completed by the Puget Sound Regional Council, and in the County- wide Planning Policies adopted by all jurisdictions in Kitsap County. The latest Comprehensive Plan designated eight "countywide centers" and four designated "local centers". In addition, the City identified the Downtown and the County Campus as a candidate Regional Center under Pugent Sound Regional Council Vision 2050. This plan addresses how the City will meet Center goals through appropriate land use designations, annexation, development of capital facilities and utilities, and related measures. In late 2019 the City received a Depart E2SHB 1923 Grant intended to develop p that will increase residential b ' ing capac provided partial fundin Port contract with cons o compl e D County Campus Cen ubarea Pla d plannIrction EIS. The Center boun VSRCre he Comprehensive Plan do not meet theIments for Regional Centers. After consultatioas decided to expand the study area bify recommendations of expansion of the current Centers. The City and their consultants explored design alternatives for the subarea to be analyzed under the Environmental Impact Statement (See Section 3). Due to most of subarea being previously developed land, the alternatives include a single redevelopment plan for the East Downtown, West Downtown, and Government Campus while considering different programmatic approach to identified developable lands. The alternatives considered are as follows: • Alternative 1 - No Action • Alternative 2 - Residential Focus • Alternative 3 - Mixed -Use Focus COMMUNITY AND STAKEHOLDER ENGAGEMENT This original Public Participation Plan (See Appendix A) was developed just prior to state and local mandated closures to prevent the spread of corona -virus. This resulted in project delays and the cancellation of the City's plans to conduct in person workshops with neighborhood residents and property owners. The City has instead relied on on-line surveys and public hearings before the Planning Commission that were held remotely. INITIAL GOALS 'Establish a vision for a vibrant ur n center that is economically feasijan t sensitive' The city is defined by its phocial environments and the ways in which theyd. This subarea plan seeks to lay oev''r hat is founded on connectiveonnections will ultimately lea�y. Ilowing initlWals were derived from City of Port Departme Community Development initial ition go mmary: WelogSubarea Plan that establishes a vision for Port Orchard as vibrant urban center that supports denser residential living in a walkable neighborhood. • Increase Housing supply consistent with the goals of E2SHB grant. • Focused growth in designated centers to support denser residential living in a walkable neighborhood. • The plan should support a potential future PSRC Regional Center designation. • Planned Action EIS to barriers to SEPA regulatory compliance and encourage economic development. • Plan for the City of Port Orchard to accommodate a share of regional growth as a proposed high capacity transit community under Vision 2050. 8 Port Orchard Subarea Plan I Port Orchard, WA 1 10.28.2020 9 SECTION 01 1 INTRODUCTION SECTION 01 1 INTRODUCTION 1.2 Study Area City of Port Orchard Centers • County Campus • Downtown Study Area • 329 total acres Principle Arterials • Bay Street & Bethel Ave • Port Orchard and Mitchell Streets • Sidney Ave and Cline Ave I� STUDYAREA MAP AND EXISTING URBAN CENTERS SCALE: 1 " = 1000' Existing Land Use • Neighborhoods - Residential • Private Property / Commercial Uses • Government - City / Kitsap County • South Kitsap High School • Marina Waterfront Targeted Redevelopment Areas • West Downtown Waterfront • East Downtown Waterfront • County Campus N DEFINING THE SUBAREA BOUNDARY The original Subarea Boundary consisted of the Downtown and the County Government Campus Centers as delineated in the Comprehensive Plan. After initial evaluation and consultation with the City and PSRC three additional study area boundaries were developed for consideration. The goals of the study area boundary evaluations included: • Include sufficient context to allow the plan to include a holistic approach. • Preference for boundaries to cross streets such that planning can encompass a corridor approach. • Provide sufficient developable land inventory. • Provide a strong basis for a future PSRC Regioanl Centers Application. Ws A SN F I �• 3 '•g� --H:� s �� : P 8 8 ,� r sE�w� 11 82 Acre Original nupR .� • ' c' � 'Y° k �1V11•>: a s N „�r,.rg,•e . me • r � r i 2s8.81rAcres Option 1 STUDYAREA OPTIONS SCALE: N.T.S. The selected subarea boundary is a combination of option 1 and option 3. The selected boundary Guidance from PSRC suggested that it would be easier to reduce the boundary for a centers application than it would be to propose a large application boundary than what was previously studied. While the study area is extensive (329 acres), changes will not be proposed in all areas. Planned development is envisioned to primarily occur in or near the existing urban centers, along existing principle Arterials, and at currently underutilized parcels (see Section 2 and enclosed Appendix B). City of Port Orchard 2019 Urban Center ' ■ . Alternatives ..._. { r r • *; 2U 83 Acre ii ■ �4wm a�i � �.o 'attl=j r �` • 222.89Acres 3 Urban Center Options Option -0 itrrnr � 2 '. 3 WE 5 F-1 0 S00 1,000 2,000 Cty of P.0 Orchard D p of C.—, ty Development 216 Pp &— P.d Orchard W 98366 Ph...'.(360)874 5533 Fax'.(360)876-0980 'tyofportorcMrd — O 10 Port Orchard Subarea Plan I Port Orchard, WA 1 10.28.2020 11 SECTION 01 1 INTRODUCTION SECTION 01 INTRODUCTION 1.3 PSRC Urban Countywide Growth Centers Framework SUBAREA BOUNDAR7 �PULATION AND EMPLOYMENT The City has no designated Regional Growth centers at this time, but the Downtown and County Government Campus Centers are being considered as a candidate for a future combined regional growth center. The selected subarea boundary does not meet the PSRC existing activity unit requirements, but it will identify the location of potential future capacity. URBAN GROWTH CENTER CRITERIA • Existing density - 18 activity units per acre minimum • Planned target density - 45 activity units per acre minimum • Mix of uses - Regional growth centers should have a goal for a minimum mix of at least 15% planned residential and employment activity in the center. • Size - 200 acres minimum - 640 acres maximum r� • Transit - Existing or planned fixed route bus, regional bus, Bus Rapid Transit, or other frequent and all -day bus service. May substitute high -capacity transit mode for fixed route bus. Service quality is defined as either frequent (< 15-minute headways) and all -day (operates at least 16 hours per day on weekdays) -or- high capacity Market potential - Evidence of future market potential to support planning target Role - Evidence of regional role • Clear regional role for center (serves as important destination for the county) Jurisdiction is plan significant rest under Resxiona r, modate yment growth Alternate Downtown and Coun rn Center Study Area Boundaries T . overed P ation Employment Tota I Acres* Activity Units/Acres Option 0- Current r Option 1 Option 2 7 1,607 120 20 1,275 2,113 259 13 1,163 2,018 208 15 Option 3 Option 4-SelecteL bar .udy Boundary 1 1,424 1,697 223 14 1,806 2,150 329 Source: PSRC, 2020 TOTAL ACRES: PSRC references the total acreage of the Study Area, which includes the gross parcel and public right of way acreage. Analysis contained later in the report referencing gross and net buildable lands does not include existing public right of way. VP 12 Port Orchard Subarea Plan I Port Orchard, WA 1 10.28.2020 13 2 Existing Conditions SECTION 02 1 EXISTING CONDITIONS INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK 2.1 History iii�, ixi OF PORT ORCHARD Port Orchard, located in south Kitsap County, was platted as Sidney in 1886 by Frederick Stevens who wanted to name the future town after his father, Sidney Merrill Stevens. He chose a site on the southern shore of the Sinclair Inlet, part of Port Orchard Bay. Sidney quickly became known for its lumber industry, pottery works, small businesses, and agricultural opportunities. In 1890 it became the first town to incorporate in Kitsap County. Sidney residents took an active role in bringing the Puget Sound Naval Station (later Puget Sound Naval Shipyard) to Kitsap County. The navy employed many residents of Port Orchard and greater Kitsap County from the turn of the century onwards, and became the most important employer in the county. In 1893, after building a courthouse and donating it to the county, Sidney was chosen as county seat. After 1903, Port Orchard continued to grow due to the expansion of the naval yard during the Great Depression, World War II, the Korean War, and the 1960s, and due to Port Orchard's reputation as a quiet waterfront community located in a beautiful environment and close to Seattle. 1908 Ferry Docks ,�5pr1 {JlfAOrd WaskiHgtoA Ferry Docks L7 1950's Street in Port Orchard, WA 14 It 7 12M Wf o chwd. Wcefio[ tun Street in Port Orchard, WA 110 rll--i . - '_ _ ?5 � 1940's Kitsap County Court House Port Orchard Subarea Plan I Port Orchard, WA 1 10.28.2020 15 SECTION 02 1 EXISTING CONDITIONS SECTION 02 1 EXISTING CONDITIONS 2.1 History Upland Bluff SINCL.,AIR INLET Commercial Filled Tidelands Westbay !(( City r\� 1 Co y r g Por rcha Blackjack Blvd avine Creek Ravine Historic Geographic Inf L Development Pattern NATURAL FEATURES AND GEOGRAPHY The geography and natural landscape of Port Orchard is defined by its waterfront on Sinclair inlet, the multiple stream ravines, and the steep topography that divides them. Just as these stream valleys bring rains to Sinclair Inlet, the valleys at Port Orchard Boulevard and Bethel Avenue now discharge residents and visitors into the West and East Downtown as they travel from the uphill and inland neighborhoods. The original waterfront shoreline was generally located at the current site of Bay Street prior to the infill of historic waterfront tidelands. These filled lands present a challenge potential redevelopment due to flood risks, poor soil conditions, and a high water table F�j le ocery produce ,\-P' mo tag �f et navy Viel hotel . terminal lY®ery 11 lj�' / "k k Ab dance ha M. on nt Fig e-Ground - 1914 8 I I � 4 00 ILK Historic Waterfront Figure -Ground - 1982 16 Port Orchard Subarea Plan I Port Orchard, WA 1 10.28.2020 17 SECTION 02 1 EXISTING CONDITIONS 2.1 History 1994 SECTION 02 1 EXISTING CONDITIONS 1908 - Port Orchard - Ferry Docks 18 1950's - Port Orchard - Bay Street 2020 - Port Orchard - Ferry Docks 2020 - Port Orchard - Bay Street Port Orchard Subarea Plan I Port Orchard, WA 1 10.28.2020 19 SECTION 02 1 EXISTING CONDITIONS SECTION 02 1 EXISTING CONDITIONS 2.2 Existing Built form and Context The analysis has identified three distinct areas within the broader study area, the West Downtown, the East Downtown and the County Government Campus. All three areas have a different built -form and character. They areas are divided by the geographic barriers including the change in topography between West Downtown and the County Campus, and the Blackjack Creek Ravine between the County Campus and Bethel Corridor. The West Downtown Neighborhood The West Downtown Neighborhood is the current and historical cultural and civic hub of the community. Its is also the recreational hub with ferry connections to the neighboring cities. The area includes a mix of land uses like the City Hall and public library, the Kitsap Bank and 10 restaurants and retail services. Restaurant and Retail along Bay Street The East Downtown Neighborhood The East Downtown is geographically separated from the West Downtown and was developed later with a more auto - centric development pattern. The neighborhood includes a mix of commercial uses from the junction of Bay Street and Bethel Ave and the waterfront. Further it extends in south to Mitchell Corridor which is higher in density with a mixture of single-family homes surrounding South Kitsap High School. County Camp Kitsap Cou overnment campus is both the heart of ter and t y's largest employer. The Port Orchard Blv ck Jac eek valley's along with the historic isolates the Center from the Downtown. County ampus is surrounded by single family houses parated from the campus by Sidney and Cline Ave which e also the neighborhood arterials providing vehicle and transit access to downtown. Single Family Homes Around County Campus 11"F =PF 1 GEOGRAPHIC DISTRICT MAP U E9 20 Port Orchard Subarea Plan I Port Orchard, WA 1 10.28.2020 21 SECTION 02 1 EXISTING CONDITIONS SECTION 02 1 EXISTING CONDITIONS 2.3 Recent Achievement and Current Planning BAY STREt i vtutb PATHWAY The City of Port Orchard is constructing a new 1.0 mile long multi -purpose path/trail, broken into 11 segments beginning at the downtown Port Orchard ferry facility and ending at the Annapolis ferry facility. The completed multi -purpose trail will become a part of the Mosquito Fleet Trail. This portion of the Mosquito Fleet Trail along also known as the Bay Street Pedestrian P significant segment of the off -road Ii e Trail, which eventually will connect Kin t along the eastern shore of a Count a much needed recr within Orchard, and a ernative t ortatio de for' its citizens and w ce. Users a pecte clude lunchtime walkers, le commu families with children, and recreational cycle n bot nized and independent tours. The trail is also li rience heavy multiple use during special events or d and hosted by the City of Port Orchard. BAY/ BETHEL STREET INTERSECTION REDESIGN Roundabouts are safer than traditional traffic signals or stop sign controlled intersections, and they accommodate vehicles of various sizes, including emergency vehicles, buses, semi -trucks with trailers, farm and logging equipment. Studies show roundabouts reduce injury crashes by 75% at intersections where stop signs or traffic signals previously existed. Roundabouts improve the flow of traffic because users don't have to wait for a green light to get through the intersection. Other benefits of a roundabout include vehicles moving in the same direction which helps improve traffic flow. Roundabouts reduce maintenance and repair costs when compared to traffic signals. The South Kitsap Community Events Center (SKCEC) is a collaboration between the City of Port Orchard, and the Kitsap Regional library. Concepts suggested a 24,000-square- foot multi -use facility that includes 9,000 square feet for the new Library. In 2019, the Kitsap Public Funding District allocated up to $12 million in phased funding to support the p roj e ct. Under Rice Fergus Miller's guidance, potential sites will be studied to determine the most optimal location for the community center. Initial concepts placed the new facility in downtown Port Orchard with a project scope that would include shoreline restoration, public open space, and parking solutions. Public input will be sought in the determination of the building uses and design amenities, according to Steve Rice, RFM partner and lead architect. WATERFRONT LIFT STATION AND PLAZA The City of Port Orchard (City) uses its Marina Pump Station to collect all the City's wastewater and discharges it to the West Sound Utility District's (District) Wastewater Treatment Facility (WWTF). With the City's rapidly grow' ment, the Marina Pump Station must remain re and c le of handling the expected increased flow rat ou jected build out. The existing statio critical pi s sewer system and mus e durin h fl events. Currently, t ina water s use uently y the City's residents a sitors. Whe posing rnatives to upgrade the Marina Station, City stressed the importance of maintaini e aes s of the waterfront environment for generati0 . This Predesign Report analyzes alternative pump s improvements based on current, future, and build -out peak hour flow rates, reliability, expected resiliency, and cost. PARKS PLAN UPDATE The City currently has approximately 70 acres of park area, as well as trails and other open space. However, the Parks Plan has not been substantively updated since 2011. Once updated, the Parks Plan will provide a 20-year vision for the City's parks, recreation, open space, and trails, as well as a 6-year action plan for implementing short- and medium - term steps to succeed in this vision. Steps in development of the Parks Plan update will include research, public involvement, and the creation of recommendations for all aspects of Port Orchard's park system, including a community demand, supply and needs analysis. The Parks Plan will also include a framework for fiscally sound decision -making over a multi -year planning period. The Parks Plan functions in coordination with the City's Comprehensive Plan and Shoreline Master Program. 22 Port Orchard Subarea Plan I Port Orchard, WA 1 10.28.2020 23 SECTION 02 1 EXISTING CONDITIONS SECTION 02 1 EXISTING CONDITIONS 2.4 Previous Planning Efforts SUMMARY As the team prepares to draft a subarea plan for the City of Port Orchard we reviewed the previous planning efforts done by the city. We found a lot of similarities in the recommendations of these planning efforts and we plan on addressing them in the Sub -area plan. Following are the planning efforts: 1. Comprehensive Plan of 1966 2. Port Orchard Waterfront Revitalization Plan Kasperian Plan - 1983 3. Downtown Port Orchard: Suggestion for Revitalization - 1999 4. Port Orchard: Economic Development Plan - 2004 I 2.1. PREVIOUS PLANNING EFFORTS COMPREHENSIVE PLAN - 1966 In 1966, Port Orchard completed a comprehensive plan for the city and downtown area. As a point of reference, the redevelopment recommendations for the downtown and waterfront area are summarized below. Key recommendations include: • a scenic waterfront beach drive, from the De Kalb Street right-of-way connecting to Bay Avenue East of the West Bay Commercial area. • A substantial fill of the tidelands along the waterfront from the De Kalb Street waterway to include Blackjack Creek and West Bay. +• " ! _ +r_ia L� L • rap 4. `� .�••_ +�Y�� 1. �. �, fez yr}Iq• A..��Y}y fM•� �_ F ua •-�::rn �OC+riIC aL� _ WMMU 1 � ,�11lV++l cw� .yvl• 4 IY44 IJ •wrfA�4yr! -E4VeRA Milll+41 PM/1/4/l f(D way -0Gh�Q� Pof W, TOM ■ •41r1r ro 4k La� •fit pxa ru¢TM ,wt tlrF.r irrW E" HU M" Rl�ara� • 1 , 2004 Port Orchard Economic Development Plan - Streetscape and Pedestrian Connections Concept Plan 1 4 • A waterfront park and restaurant on the newly filled tidelands • A new yacht club marina, boat sale are on filled tidelands at the north of Blackjack Creek • And an expanded, east -west commercial wall to the north side of the existing Bay Street complex, a civic center/ auditorium was included in the development. • a relocation of city hall to Sidney Street and the Blackjack Creek extension (present by-pass proposal) • A new waterfront motel. --Fer. uditoriu New oM E Facil New pity xal 10 .,. 11 Au."' Orient/_/Gi 0mma.i - estbay Sr 160 Comprehensive Plan - 1966 24 Port Orchard Subarea Plan I Port Orchard, WA 1 10.28.2020 25 SECTION 02 1 EXISTING CONDITIONS SECTION 02 1 EXISTING CONDITIONS 2.4 Previous Planning Efforts 2.1. PREVIOUS PLANNING EFFORTS KASPERIAN PLAN - 1983 The objectives of this study are to develop recommendations for revitalization the downtown and waterfront areas of the City of Port Orchard. Key Recommendations: • Waterfront Drive • Substantial tidelands infill • Waterfront Park • Yacht Club and Marina • Expanded east -west commercial corridor • Relocate City Hall to Sidney and new highway bypass SR 160 • New waterfront motel Sidney Hotel Hill Climb S i I �11 Kasperian Plan - 1983 • Building and landscape improvements • Return waterfront and stream right-of-ways to public use • Downtown as a historic marine center • Integrate plans with Kitsap transit • Prioritize by-pass • Waterfront pedestrian walkway • Visual access to the waterfront from upland areas • Prioritize water dependent / related uses on th waterfront • Improve connections to up ghborhoods through possible hill -climb an at "Fort Hill" Blackjack Creek Pedestrian Bridge t } 1 t d � { i' Blackjack Creek "West Bay" 1 c 0 26 Port Orchard Subarea Plan I Port Orchard, WA 1 10.28.2020 27 SECTION 02 1 EXISTING CONDITIONS SECTION 02 1 EXISTING CONDITIONS 2.4 Previous Planning Efforts 2.1. PREVIOUS PLANNIN.3 EFFORTS REVITALIZATION PLAN - 1999 In 1999, the University of Washington Department of Urban Design and Planning, prepared a revitalization strategy for downtown. This planning process included an opinion survey focused on the transportation and buying habits/preferences of individuals living in and passing through downtown Port Orchard. Key Recommendations: • Add strategic anchors • Up -zone to allow 24-30 dwelling units / acre • Increase height limits to 55' measured from Bay Street • Improve pedestrian connectivity Suggestion for Revitalization - 1999 • Develop mixed -use commercial pier along the waterfront in N A Ii WE 11 AA Mouth of Blackjack Creek . i_r owe Mouth of Blackjack C, 28 Port Orchard Subarea Plan I Port Orchard, WA 1 10.28.2020 29 SECTION 02 1 EXISTING CONDITIONS SECTION 02 1 EXISTING CONDITIONS 2.4 Previous Planning Efforts 2.1. PREVIOUS PLANNIN.3 EFFORTS EDAW PLAN - 2004 The City selected a team of consultants led by EDAW, Inc. (urban design and planning) and including Property Counselors (market analysis) for these studies. Key Recommendations: • Frame the District. • Enhance the Streetscape • Strengthen the Sense of Place in the Core • Better Connections with the Waterfront • Enhance Streetscape from Bethel to Port Orchard Boulevard • Strengthen Connections with the County • Create a Pedestrian Corridor for the Downtown Core • Tie Waterfront Park with an Expanded Waterfront Greenway OPPORTU N ITI E5 City Center - Specialty Retail Core Retain active on street uses 0 Underutilized - infill or redevelop; Encourage mix of uses, emphasis on residential ner core nnnnn Marquee - Explore alternatives for Downtown idenity Encourage authenticity in architecture Enhance 5treet5cape - improve experience of pedestrians - visual enhancement of street corridor View Corridors - preserve views to water terminate views at Land mark features Activity Generators - Link and encourage development of added active uses Parks * Greenways - Extend, enhance, maximize pedestrian linkages and water access Identity - Storytelling elements - ad cus on art, r history, architecture �j v�l Key Intersection - section to provide �QT�Ty� _focu and s f place gym- 30 Port Orchard Subarea Plan I Port Orchard, WA 1 10.28.2020 31 SECTION 02 1 EXISTING CONDITIONS SECTION 02 1 EXISTING CONDITIONS 2.5 Existing Land Use and Zoning %—URRCIV I LHIMU USE I tKIS I lLb Updated in 2019, Port Orchard's adopted land use code takes a form based approach to establish standard procedures for all land use and development. The code attempts to foster predictable built results and a high -quality public realm by using physical form (rather than separation of uses) as the organizing principle for the code. Because the code does not include density limits such as maximum floor -area -ratios, we used assumed residential densities included in the City Comprehensive plan amendment to establish assumed residential densities. The primary Ian( is medium dense however the stu designation. The facilities campus Kitsap High Schl Most land in the areas and the d< provide employe surrounding run to help fund puk allow for light m which also provi economy. The Land Use element establishes goals and policies that seek to: • Accommodate changes in population and demographics • Encourage development in urban areas, reduce sprawl, and deliver services efficiently • Ensure land use designations reflect need and demand • Minimize traffic congestion and encourage the development of a multimodal transportation system • Protect open spaces and the natural environment Promote physical activity • Support a range of OVERLAY DIST.Rl� c Center District: ion Overlay District LJ WUIVVI\n GG InG Sedgwirk Sidney South Bethel Tremont Upper Mike Hill �ortunities land use overlay DOWNTOWN PORT ORCHARD (COUNTYWIDE CENTER) Port Orchard's downtown is the cultural, civic, and recreational hub of the community. The downtown currently contains a mix of land uses, including Port Orchard's City Hall and public library, numerous retail and service businesses, a marina and ferry dock, public parking, and a waterfront park and trail. With access from the water and from state highways 3 and 16, it remains the City's primary center for community events and activities. The City continues to work toward a balance of historic preservation, env' al restoration, and economic improvement o n center. Downtown Port Orchard coupled the C Campus may be a future candidate as a re As of 2018, the Downto rd Cen eas acres containing 19 nts an obs. quates 14 activity units per under the P Region nters Framework. a r 1 r r I I� , COUNTY CAM (COUNTY CENTER) jj_ The City of PoX enefited frolMeing the Kitsap my seat, asap County ving aargest employer. Kitsap County has p evdevelopment nari ns for the expansion of County It City of Port Orchard the next 40 years. The District included land use and lation proposals derived from the ap County Campus Master Plan created in 2003, which was designed to accomplish the expansion of community facilities and allow uses that would serve to buffer the residential areas from the Campus. Port Orchard Comp Plan Centers 32 Port Orchard Subarea Plan I Port Orchard, WA 1 10.28.2020 33 SECTION 02 1 EXISTING CONDITIONS SECTION 02 1 EXISTING CONDITIONS 2.5 Existing Land Use and Zoning LEGEND 0 BUSINESS PROFESSIONAL MIXED USE (BPMU) COMMERCIAL CORRIDOR (CC) ® COMMERCIAL MIXED USE (CMU) GREENBELT (GB) PARKS AND RECREATION (PR) PUBLIC FACILITY (PF) CIVIC AND INSTITUTIONAL (CI) 0 DOWNTOWN MIXED USE (DMU) 0 NEIGHBORHOOD MIXED USE (NMU) RESIDENTIAL (R1) RESIDENTIAL (R2) RESIDENTIAL 4 (R4) COMMERCIAL HEAVY (CH) ® GATEWAY MIXED USE (GMU) r ■ + am ■ }1 r1'#, IL �vq4T J4Am . � ■ Y r• r r rIF� *�n ■ � ■i �f � � • • rt ref �� u � L� t r , ■ � u or j w 16 •. % i'■� t ■ 7 ti a *f 1 vMq*r� ■ ff ' -Mid � � . •- I � - +1 ,_'x ■ * .: .ems,• �•_ t r ■ y !I t t Lam{ r! !7 -* d'. m % ! ZONING PLAN # * #*'& .•• , + • # • f It 4t' Jr it L <, * -4& .. • •j. • / 4? . i ��.) � 1.� .� r ;� ter• � • ■ s ! ��' • } ` • # � � Y FEET O 0 500 1,000 2,000 LEGEND DOWNTOWN HEIGHT OVERLAY DISTRICT DHOD 3 DHOD 4 DHOD 5 VIEW PROTECTION OVERLAY DISTRICT . i # e, r r4 [ , d 4 I �■1 — _ ♦ � � i 0 it • -�- ■ iu • rr■ • .a �- ■ �(.:•_- ■art 4 J �.w". +F ` iy j'rtr-■ir *._ - ri M 'f ■ • - _ y r _ �� +. * ■ m# r PP m lrzm BUILDING HEIGHT OVERLAY FEET O 0 500 1,000 2,000 34 Port Orchard Subarea Plan I Port Orchard, WA 1 10.28.2020 35 SECTION 02 1 EXISTING CONDITIONS SECTION 02 1 EXISTING CONDITIONS 2.5 Existing Land Use and Zoning s ago-; ■■ County Campus EXISTING LAND USE - BLOCK FRONTAGES 2.6 Circulation, Access and Parking VEHICULAR CIRCULATION AND ACCESS Minor county arterial roads serve as key elements in the county transportation system. These minor arterial roads link together state routes or connect the state route system to Port Orchard, to other major centers, and to the ferry system. For example, Bethel Road is a two lane north/south road located in eastern Port Orchard. As a north/south road, Bethel Road connects and intersects with Sedgwick Road, Lund Avenue, and SR 166. Bethel Road terminates in Port Orchard at Bay Street. Bay Street is the East-West connector for downtown waterfront. Cline Ave and Sydney Ave are the primary vehicle connectors for county campus and downtown Port Orchard. PEDESTRIAN CIRCULATION AND ACCESS There are an assortment of pedestrian facilities located throughout Port Orchard and its UGA. Pedestrian facilities include sidewalks, trails and designated crosswalks. The majority of sidewalks are located along commercial corridors and in some neighborhoods. However there are somebreaks in the sidewalks, continuous sidewalks would improve the safety and utility of the pedestrian environment. TRANSPORTATION STUDY Additional analysis and summary of tran tion st be provided by TSI will _I< 36 Port Orchard Subarea Plan I Port Orchard, WA 1 10.28.2020 37 SECTION 02 1 EXISTING CONDITIONS SECTION 02 1 EXISTING CONDITIONS 2.6 Circulation, Access and Parking ■■■■■■■■■� Principal Arterial Street Minor Arterial Street MENOMONEE Collector Arterial Street MENOMONEE Primary Neighborhood Street OEM, OEM, Bus route • Bus stop # k# ar y I I� r • to i 4. dk i iV.# •w� t � #r#+ 41 qr . 1� • 141 � •, : { r 1 Am * _+III 1 . ,a = �.� f. • M 1-! { _ — r .0 Air ■Ia r`li+p r i w4■f'F.� + HT ST + i ■ * ram; o� ■, 1 _+,�� # , S j a AYLOR ST i iL Is r ■ jr � • a � �. � � it r ■ + � ` • ■■■� �.-. --. �� = 4% AM a !' �+ L4-.* Ir �. #: 11 SIR 1 �I •■ di r Ir k� ■ �1 Il # i 1r-. � .'Li.r�:-■ raw •r�: -------�J l � ' , VEHICULAR CIRCULATION AND ACCESS FEET O 0 500 1,000 2,000 • x #A+, ar �• y ' �f #i * I t �• aF * S `* #* 14* FERRY DOCK I- 1/4 MILE, 5 MIN VfALK r I I • ■ # ■ 174 MILE,r 5 MIN WALK � + A �r Pip I� EI �' a� ✓r 1 ` + + 1/4 MILE, 9 M. _K - 1 ■'s i ■ - COURT W. 941 r '� ■ ` 4 iL, • 1 1 �': s ■ a1 R� f Awif qy + I C Ism IL ' Y= `ENPALLST {� •s ' liAIL t * ■ * ` K AMR am jC do Al I jr za do +' #, PEDESTRIAN CIRCULATION AND ACCESS FEET O 0 500 1,000 2,000 38 Port Orchard Subarea Plan I Port Orchard, WA 1 10.28.2020 39 SECTION 02 1 EXISTING CONDITIONS SECTION 02 EXISTING CONDITIONS 2.6 Circulation, Access and Parking LEGEND WA FERRY STOP WA FERRY ROUTE TRANSIT STOP -- -- TRANSIT ROUTE ■# ' It * *'*' ! It' 4r * • '* e . r� # ..� # � 01 4 it AM in Or ~ ,771I ram I& , rl.z! A MON 1hI ■ R li. ■r + t .. . I J ■ F . � I� On 46 Ai a r { ■ j�� JI rI `�40.1 i ~ R 7I i■ a ■' 1 a a 1 J`, I■i S .Y1 %FA; ALI Y r y 1i fr I1■ f • .16 i■ � I*�i. ti■�I. �• mp J. ONO L-1 IL Re - 46 14 ■ # 1 �i N ' it �y * ! w -R io �i 4 +i� 1 % , R 11� • f ■. Lj I 1 II At. 41 i /Y� L ■ ki yr F ! III* Mill 1 TRANSPORTATION STUDY PLAN FEET O 0 500 1,000 2,000 2.7 Utilities and Capital Facilities TRANSPORTATION See existing conditions summary and EIS development analysis provided byTSI Engineers to be incorporated into the EIS and enclosed in the document appendix. STORM WATER See existing conditions summary and EIS development analysis provided by Reid Middleton Civil Engineers to be incorporated into the EIS and enclosed in the document appendix. WATER SERVICE See existing conditions summary and EIS development analysis provided by BHC Civil Engineers to be incorporated into the EIS and enclosed in the document appendix. SEWER SERVICE See existing conditions sur analysis provided by BHC ( into the EIS and enclosed i 40 Port Orchard Subarea Plan I Port Orchard, WA 1 10.28.2020 41 SECTION 02 1 EXISTING CONDITIONS SECTION 02 1 EXISTING CONDITIONS 2.8 Environment and Open Spaces EXIS i iimu i iviva Port Orchard is a community which provides a full range of parks, recreation, open space, and ecosystem services by protecting native wildlife habitat, restoring and preserving natural systems, enjoying majestic marine and mountain views, and ensuring new development enhances the natural environment. The existing City parks system is supplemented by the schools of the South Kitsap School District, and the Kitsap County Parks and Recreation Department. EXISTING COMPREHENSIVE PLAN - PARK VISION The City of Port Orchard 2016 Comprehensive Plan Update identifies ten (10) Centers of Local Importance. The vision of the Parks Element and Comprehensive Parks Plan is to ensure that every center contains and/or is connected to a park by safe non -motorized routes. The Port Orchard Parks and Trails map on the following page depicts existing park facilities in relation to the ten local centers as well as the planned trail connections be lines. Walking/joggin in the 2015 Parl with safe non-n- right-of-way su< increase access benefit the enti the Transportati and future trails O City Boundary Flood Hazard Area ® 0.2%Annual Chance Flood Hazard ® FEMAZone AE ® FEMAZone A Environmental Map HILL DF .el 42 Port Orchard Subarea Plan I Port Orchard, WA 1 10.28.2020 43 SECTION 02 1 EXISTING CONDITIONS SECTION 02 1 EXISTING CONDITIONS 2.8 Environment and Open Spaces Public Park Natural Corridor - — - Bike/Ped Path Bay Street Pedestrian Pathway io ♦ A I` `'0 1`. ♦ !, • :. •4P r .`, Mi• 44 ' w P7 V K 5 It 44 4*1 • .� .. 7 a F "f ♦ ♦ �;♦ _ > _�� °■ �� . 1■■ .■ y s �■ SAP ST G .i ■ a_ or+- ■1�ir� E�1 •.�'!,NF :tier• i ' i w — o• �. D KALB L b�' ■ ■ i ■ `� �r ST - d �1 � ■* a s ■■ +�1� • w Lf�i7.- — ■■ qL *fit �MMGHTST ■i ■. 1 AL 41 DIVISION o V. 1 MI. lid Id�, - �� I � �r-r-� f--� -. _.. • •� po F r _ ; ■7: IN t I 1 11 lr ♦ . .i MP II• rVK di -- 8� �•• - F � 1 — a r Ji �. r w 1 IJI ■r .� ti■- --- *L E ■ `�r. Ale • ■ s a s ♦ ♦ — %in Natural Open Space Corridors n.t.s. SHORELINE MASTER PROGRAM The shoreline uses that are addressed below are outlined and required in WAC 173-26-241 and have been correlated with the existing uses provided with the City of Port Orchard 1994 Shoreline Program (SMP) adoption. The provisions apply to specific common uses and types of development that may occur within shoreline jurisdiction. This section also includes a matrix outlining which uses are allowed in particular SHORELINE DESIGNATION AND FLOOD ZONE prevalence of flooding events is expected to increase due to anticipated sea level rise. Legend 0 NATURAL - URBAN CONSERVANCY - HIGH INTENSITY SHORELINE RESIDENTIAL mo■■■ Shorellne Segmem Lines © Pori o"ard UGA City Boundary 44 Port Orchard Subarea Plan I Port Orchard, WA 1 10.28.2020 45 SECTION 02 1 EXISTING CONDITIONS SECTION 02 1 EXISTING CONDITIONS 2.8 Environment and Open Spaces SNIP - Shoreline uevelopment btanUardS Below is an excerpt of the typical height and set -back requirements for development envisioned within the subarea study boundary. See Shoreline Management Plan table 7.2 for a full listing. DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS SETBACKS AND HEIGHT REQUIREMENTS J < z u < Of 2!w Q N cc Z oU ~ � z = _ z a w w oc o O V_ _ Q < Upland (See underlying zoning Code or overlay districts — POMC Title 20) Overwater structures x x x 30 Commercial Development' Water -dependent setback x x 0 Water -related setback' x 1 5 x 0 Non -water oriented setback' x 75 x x Building height limit (See POMC Title 20) Parking Accessory 1 0 10 25 10 0 x x Primary Recreational Development Water-dep a 0 0 0 0 Water- or 10 10 0 0 x Non- oriented s spec below) 100 75 25 25 x Access R restro & accessory buildings x 100 25 25 x Parking Area x 50 10 0 x Golf Courses or sports fields x 200 100 100 x Trails, boardwalks, or overlooks 0 0 0 0 0 Residential Development3 Single-family setbacks — building setback' 150 100 x 25 x Single-family setbacks — accessory use setback (patios, decks, etc.) 100 50 x 15 x 2 to 4 dwelling units — building setback' x x 40 50 x 2 to 4 dwelling units — accessory use setbackl Transportation x x 20 25 x Arterials, Highways, Railroads x 200 50 50 x Multi -use trails, paths x 0 0 0 0 Secondary/Access Roads x 100 1 50 1 50 x SMP Table 7.2 PROJECTED 100 YEAR Fj PORT ORCHARD MARINA 46 Port Orchard Subarea Plan I Port Orchard, WA 1 10.28.2020 47 SECTION 02 1 EXISTING CONDITIONS SECTION 02 1 EXISTING CONDITIONS PROJECTED 100 YEA BLACKJACK CREEK NT UNDER SEA LEVEL RISE SCENARIOS: i egYsi LU U O �� ro DEKALB ST C 200 400 800 Fee4 2.9 Market Conditions Assessment A detailed study of Economic Profile and Capacity Analysis can be found in the Section 06 - Appendix under B - Heartland Economic Profile and Build -able Lands Analysis 2.9.1 Economic Profile POPULATION GROWTH Current and Historical (Source: Washington OFM) *flag years with annexations Foretasted (PSRC Forecasts) Overall Port Orchard has added over 3,200 residents since 2010 The City's growth rates was higher than other Kitsap County communities and the County as a whole. FORETASTED POPULATION GROWTH • Currently available forecasts produced by the Puget Sound Regional Council (PSRC) call for anXt, 7,146 residents in Port Orchard by 2 Neighboring Bremerton is anticipa o a than 25,000 new residents during th period. - DEMOGRAPHI Composition (famNe ✓s non -family) Housing tenure Age Gender Race and ethnicity - Port Orchard's population is more racially diverse than Kitsap County - Port Orchard, Bremerton and Silverdale share similar levels of racial diversity. Household income - Port Orchard has a median household income of over $70,000 - Port Orchard's median income is slightly lower than the median income for Kitsap County, but exceeds that of neighboring Bremerton. Educational attainment - Over one-third (36%) of Port Orchard's population has college degree (Associates, Bachelors or Graduate/Professional). Thistographies. percentage points below Kitsap Counhole. - Just under 10% of th tion of Port Orchard has not g t chool. This is higher th�he compan HOUSING 1 &BEA (ASS Y IN THMIRTUDY using gro the City of hou units by Type (single, multifamily, ran p quarters) orchard has added 1,379 housing units since 2010, erage of over 150 units per year HOUSEHOLD COMPOSITION Port Orchard has the highest percentage of family households of the comparison geographies. Family households make up to 68% of households in Port Orchard, which is slightly higher than Kitsap County Non -family make up almost half of Bremerton household composition. Single family housing is the predominant existing land use in the study area (38% of land) Single family housing represents 62% of total housing inventory (by unit) There are 742 housing units in the study area 48 Port Orchard Subarea Plan I Port Orchard, WA 1 10.28.2020 49 SECTION 02 1 EXISTING CONDITIONS SECTION 02 1 EXISTING CONDITIONS 2.4.2 Development Pipeline DEVtLvrrvSr_im I Fir"CLIIML The Map Below illustrate the development pipeline, representing projects that are known to be in planning or permitting stages of development. All parcels in the development pipeline were excluded in the gross buildable land area calculations in Step 1. ry� �Ir Y11YY....1v'��fYr � .aI t 'i i x � i r � r i — W.53r -•-lill .l•��•.l lli # i ! ' • �R•y I ti•••..11-Y.fi..........a.li�•....�.�..,.,...��„•1��.,,.r _i Li' J DEVELOPMENT PIPELINE NTS KITSAP BANK CAMPUS MASTER PLAN Planning for the redevelopment of the existing Kitsap Bank Campus, to revitalize and create a sense of place on the Port Orchard waterfront. Design of the waterfront will capture beautiful views of the surrounding Puget Sound and Olympics. Elements of the redevelopment include a blend of public and private spaces; residential over commercial, office and community centers surrounded by parks and open waterfront spaces. Organic themes are drawn from the natural beauty of the site, incorporating warm woods, stone and natural materials into the architecture and landscape. Mitigation of stormwater is integral to landscape planning and incorporated into the overall site plan in functional and aesthetically pleasing design. The entire project is planned for phased redevelopment. 429 BAY STREET The development of a mixed -use building located at 429 Bay Street consisting of 39 residential units, 500 square feet of commercial space with enclosed parking provided on the ground or. The applicant seeks approval of a Type II Variance to allow a reduction to minimum off-street parking requirements described in POMC 20.124 which would provide 41 off-street parking stalls instead of the required 66 space A ;M -e- , This is a conce y to construcW'hew and anded Kitsap y Courthouse facility in Port Orchard, is is an exp on of an Option which includes an a use of th ting to along with a new JCCKe om bu Ina, with field construction targeted u 2020, and be substantial complete in mid The work is figured to be done in four construction es, all under a single contract, with the intent to maintain ourthouse and jail operations during the process, and have no net loss of parking spaces ~� I F--a�--al II aI Fr--y II J L — _.J 14 - TL � 'xiaHcr ion' _ I I • •. - I Y it I -�•' ,Y _ I I I I •• I I T 1 . . d-i — r 12. g¢ I I I I I I 1 J L_ JT — 1 I I I a L_ J7.7-7-141f I 50 Port Orchard Subarea Plan I Port Orchard, WA 1 10.28.2020 51 SECTION 02 1 EXISTING CONDITIONS SECTION 02 1 EXISTING CONDITIONS 2.4.3 Build -able Lands The map below, highlight both the net vacant and reclevelopable lands along with the planned development pipeline. These maps indicate where future development capacity is located within the Study Area. WF =f A �j .J W9 L-1 rj WNW • 46 -4 fir F3 Gtudy Area I - - I C oil , . I VacanVIRedlevelopable MIXED USE ZONE CIVICfGPEN SPACE ZONE CC MMERGIAL ZONE RE-$IDENTIALZONE CAPACITY MAP BY LAND USE CATEGORY NTS r ti ................. .. � .06"' P Cl CAPACITY MAP BY VACANT AND REDEVELOPABLE NTS . . ........ L SludyArm VaconvRedevabpable 5ftle-Farrk M Oen!iill�V = Vacanj UN el AlILE@d 52 Port Orchard Subarea Plan I Port Orchard, WA 1 10.28.2020 53 SECTION 02 1 EXISTING CONDITIONS SECTION 02 1 EXISTING CONDITIONS 2.4.3 Build -able Lands BVILUHDLC LHIVU HMr-/A The gross buildable land area is the sum of all land area for all parcels meeting one or more of the criteria listed to the right. This does not include existing public right of way which accounts for approximately 85 acres of land within the Study Area. Certain parcels were excluded from this calculation to improve the accuracy of the analysis (see Parcel Exclusions). City of Port Orchard Review. In addition, the City of Port Orchard conducted a detailed review of the study area to inform designation of vacant and redevelopments parcels and to better reflect known parcel level conditions in the City. PARCEL EXCLUSIONS Properties with zero total assessed value were manually reviewed for ownership, land use and were visually inspected. Properties that were significantly improved or public facilities, including city owned beach -front parks, were excluded. All the parcels in the pipeline were also excluded including the current phased expansion of the County Courthouse. The development capacity in the pipeline is re -incorporated in Step 3c. — Examples of Exclusions: • Government Services (Prop Class) • Parks (Prop Class) • Cemeteries • Educational Se • Utilities • Condominiums GROSS BUILDA DS CRITERIA VACANT Using data from the Kitsap County Assessor, this analysis identifies vacant parcels using the assessed values of the improvements. Lots with zero improvement value are then compared against other factors such ownership and property class descriptions to determine vacancy. UNDERUTILIZED Using Kitsap County Assessor data, this analysis calculates an improvement ratio by dividing the assessed improvement value by the total assessed value. This ratio of assessed improvement value to total assessed value is a commonly used indicator for a property's level of improvement. A ratio less than 0.5 indicates the land is worth more than the improvements. This analysis uses an improvement ratio of 0.5 as the threshold. Any parcels with an improvement ratio under this threshold are considered underutilized. SINGLE-FAMILY Any Single -Family use, as defined by assessor property class field, in a high -density base -zone, is deemed to be redevelopable. 2.4.4 Market Yield Assessment FU I urtt i Y S(_1:NHr,Iv f.ImALYSIS Using the zoning assumptions and FAR ranges, the analysis leverages variation in development densities to simulate different market conditions impacting the range of capacity across the subarea. The three scenarios, presented to the right, reflect the following: > The impact of surface versus structured parking on capacity -- serving as a reflection of different market conditions (for example, structured parking would require more favorable market conditions). > The concentration of commercial development as a standalone product as well as a share of mixed -used developments. > The overall range of capacity within the subarea The tables on the following page (Exhibit 49-51) provide details on each scenario in terms of assumptions for the proportion of structured versus surface parking and the proportion of commercial uses in mixed -use development. A detailed breakdown of FAR assumptions by zor nd scenario is provided in the appendix. Exhibit49. FARAllocation Exhibit 5o. FAR Allocation Commercial Only Structured Parking Surface Parking 1 -Baseline 25% 7596 2 - I i igh Capxity, Res I leavy 75% 25% 3 - H Iqh Opa c irr. Comm Heavy 70% 30 Exhibit 51. Commercial Use & Res Uses permitted Scenario 1: Baseline Capacity • Mostly residential development • Standalone commercial development only in commercial only zones. Some commercial incorporated into mixed -use developments • Majority surface parking meaning lower density development Scenario 2: High Capacity, Residential Heavy • Mostly residential development • Standalone commercial development only in commercial only zones. Some c ercial incorporated into mixed -use developme� Majority structured development_ city Commercial nix.ai residentia ning higher density Wmmercial deveFpment in mixed- mmercial development in commercial ed commercial incorporated into ctured parking meaning higher density I & Residential Building Forms for Each Scenario Residential Mixed -Use Below Grade Parking Surface Parking A in Zones Permitting Only Commercial Building Farms for Cach Scenario r— • NMU CMIJ Cemmercial Capacity Percent (%) Of Total. By Base Zone SCENARIO 1 SCENARIO 2 SCENAR10 3 5% 5% 24% 5% 5% 40% DMU 25% 25% 40% GMU 25% 2-5% 40% 8PMU 20% 2U% 36° CC 25% 25% 40% CH 100 100% 100% CI 100% 100 ° 1: 100% 54 Port Orchard Subarea Plan I Port Orchard, WA 1 10.28.2020 55 SECTION 02 1 EXISTING CONDITIONS SECTION 02 1 EXISTING CONDITIONS 2.4.5 Baseline Assessment SCtNAKIU "I - BASELINE CArH%.i i'Y The Baseline Capacity scenario more closely reflects near term market conditions in Port Orchard. In this scenario housing is the predominant highest and best use in mixed use zones. In addition, a large majority of development is assumed to be surfaced park, thus reducing overall densities achieved. • Mostly residential development • Standalone commercial development only in zones prohibiting residential building form. • Some commercial incorporated into mixed use developments. • Majority surface parking meaning lower density development. CATEGUEY LONE CIVIC AND OPEN SPADE RESIDENTIAL ZONES COMMERCKLZONES MIXED USE TOTAL w kh Wine TOW PWihm F4yx e Scenario 1 Table Net Developable Commercial Residential Residential Area Capacity Capacity Capacity MC7PJ 6F) 3-5 $51.400 V 7.9 0 UIMI 120 2Ta 20-5 *6220 9534.5 1,074 SCENARIO 2 - R IAL FOCUS The High Capacity ,Residential Heavy capacity scenario reflects more favorable economic conditions in Port Orchard and the broader Kitsap County market area. In this scenario housing is still the predominant highest and best use in mixed use zones. Alternatively, a larger proportion of development is assumed to incorporate structured parking, thus increasing overall densities achieved. • Mostly residential development • Standalone commercial development only in commercial only zones. Some commercial incorporated into mixed use developments. • Majority structured parking meaning higher density developments CATEGORYIZONE Net Developable Commercial Area Capacity (A &J i^50 Resldentlal Resldendal Capacity Capacity (cr; ah7iis) CIVIC ANO OPEN SPACE 3S 36Z900 1) 0 RE$IDENTIALZONES 7.9 p IJIW 120 COMMERCIAL ZONES 2-6 92.100 D 0 MIXED USE 205 278.600 800,900 1.247 TOTAL with Pipeline 34_5 733Aw 800r�W 11367 Foellf W (oral w,r hour w?L- i i.7 23.3 -1470W 3WW NA 800 4'k1Q ?4b 021 Scenario 2 Table SCENARIO 3 - MIXE OCUS The High Capacity , omllria vy capacity scenario reflects more fa economic itions in Port Orchard a er Kitsap market with an emphasis on comme and o ' developme this scenario a significant elopment in m ed use zones assumed to mmercial. As in Scenario 2, a larger rtion of d ment is assumed to incorporate st parkin s increasing overall densities achieved. • alanc mix of residential and commercial Som tandalone commercial development in mixed use zones plus commercial development in commercial only zone. Increased commercial incorporated into mixed use developments. • Majority structured parking meaning higher density development Net CATEGORYT£ONE developable Commercial Residential Residential Area Capacity Capacity Capacity (ric74�) f50 f50 aW7w CIVIC AND OPEN $RA[E 3.5 1()1'$W 0 RESIDENTIALZONES J9 0 VKN 120 COMMEKIALZONES 2.6 89,400 0 0 MIXEUl15@ 20.5 4T8.200 5%.155 991 TOTAL with Mpe•1ine 34.5 $6 )r M 5%rl 55 1,111 A):N W r%f l VWh2U1 F?PF + #1.2 73.3 347ON 522 NA 596155 246 865 Scenario 3 Table co 1W 56 Port Orchard Subarea Plan I Port Orchard, WA 1 10.28.2020 57 3 Subarea Plan Goals and Vision and Alternatives r� SECTION 03 1 VISION AND ALTERNATIVES SECTION 03 1 VISION AND ALTERNATIVES vp n 3.1 Proposed Alternatives Approach The proposed design concepts are a single vision for achieving the broader goals outlined in this subarea plan. In the downtown areas, this includes promoting a vibrant walkable community that showcases the City's waterfront. In the County Government Center and the uphill neighborhood the plan incorporates planned expansion at the county campus, provides development flexibility along the Sydney and Cline arterials, and preserves residential areas throughout most of the neighborhood. Due to existing neighborhood constraints and the absence of large tracks of developable land the alternatives are based on a single concept plan. The variable between each of the alternatives is whether the assumed program of future development will consist primarily residential and stand alone commercial or if will have a greater mix or mixed -use development. Alternatives Alternative 1 - No Action No action would be taken to adopt new development policies. The existing Downtown and County Campus Centers would each be retained in their present configurations; no combination or expansion of these subareas wou ake place; no changes to zoning or other land ns would be made. The capacity assumed i altern s assumes that development will still occur, t a ty similar to existing condition ery limit below grade parking. Alternative 2 - Residential Focus This alternative assumes a mostly residential development with commercial development only occurring in standalone buildings in commercial only zones. The maximum building height and densities would be consistent with the existing land use code but would assume greater mix of structured parking to achieve greater density than the existing baseline development patterns. Potential zoning changes would focus on increasing residential capacity in existing commercial only zones. Alternative 3 - Mixed -Use Focus This alternative assumes increase in mixed -use residential, commercial retail, and office developm . Some standalone commercial development in mixe nes plus commercial development in al only zones. The maximum building hei t a en would be consistent with the existing I code but assume a greater mix of struct It to achieve g density than the existing b e de ment patte otential zoning changes would creasing reside ial capacity in existing co ial and residential only zones. D Port Orchard Subarea Plan I Port Orchard, WA 1 10.28.2020 59 ALTERNATIVE 1 - NO ACTION BASELINE ALTERNATIVE 3 - MIXED -USE FOCUS Net Net CATEGORYIZONE Devlopable Commercial Residential Residential CATEGORYIZONE Devlopable Commercial Residential Residential Area Capacity Capacity Capacity Area Capacity Capacity Capacity (Acre) (SF) (SF) (Units) (Acre) (SF) (SF) (Units) CIVIC AND OPEN SPACE 3.5 351,400 0 0 CIVIC AND OPEN SPACE 3.5 361,800 0 0 RESIDENTIAL ZONES 7.9 0 UKN 120 RESIDENTIAL ZONES 7.0 0 UKN 102 COMMERCIAL ZONES 2.6 65,200 0 0 COMMERCIAL ZONES 0.0 0 0 0 MIXED USE 20.5 206,200 566,200 954 MIXED USE 24.8 486,800 752,283 1,186 TOTAL with ipe me 34.5 622,800 566,200 1,074 TOTAL with ipe me 35.4 848,600 752,283 1,288 Pipeline 11.2 347,000 NA 246 Pipeline 11.2 347,000 NA 246 Total without Pipeline 23.3 275,800 566,200 828 Total without Pipeline 24.2 501,600 752,283 1,042 ALTERNATIVE 2 - RESIDENTIAL FOCUS Summary of Changes frc dBaselineCapacity Analysis Net CATEGORYIZONE Devlopable Commercial Residential Residential Pro nd use changes i ing: proposed Area Capacity Capacity Capacity zoni anges height inc S. (Acre) (SF) (SF) (Units) CIVIC AND OPEN SPACE 3.5 362,900 0 p Additi able land assumptions due to zoning RESIDENTIAL ZONES 7.0 0 UKN 10, changes assume redevelopment areas. See COMMERCIAL ZONES 0.0 0 0 updated b ble lands map in section 3.3. MIXED USE 24.8 310,600 1,010.100 1,509 sed re red parking modifications. TOTAL with Pipeline 35.4 673,50 1,610 Pipeline 11.2 34i 246 Total without Pipeline 24.2 326, 1,0 1,364 ALTERNATIVE COMPARISON Development Scenarios with Net Developable Commercial Residential Residential Subarea Plan Recommendations Area Capacity Capacity Capacity (acres) (square footage) (square footage) (units) Alternative 1 - No Action 34.5 622,800 566,200 1,074 Alternative 2 - Residential Focus 34.5 673,800 1,010,100 1,610 Alternative 3 - Mixed -Use Focus 34.5 848,600 752,283 1,288 *Note: All scenarios include assumed development pipeline projects. ACTIVITY UNITS SUMMARY Total Covered Activity Activity Units ,ctivity Units Development Scenarios Population Employment Units Acre Dedicated I Dedicated to Hous'ng r IftEmployment Existing 1,806 2,150 12 % Alternative 1 4,051 3,396 23 Alternative 2 4,663 3,617 26 4 Alternative 3 4,128 3,889 46% • Total Population assumes 2.09 persons per unit per OFM • Employment assumed 1 employee per 5 commerc ev • Activity units calculated as total p n + loyment cres 60 Port Orchard Subarea Plan I Port Orchard, WA 1 10.28.2020 61 SECTION 03 1 SUBAREA PLAN SECTION 03 1 SUBAREA PLAN 3.2.1 West Downtown r AU i i�im REDEVELOPMEN, AREA The West Downtown is Port Orchard's current and historical cultural, civic, and recreational hub of the community. The area includes a mix of land uses, including Port Orchard's City Hall and public library, numerous retail and service businesses, a marina and ferry dock, public parking, and a waterfront park and trail. With access from the water and from state highways 3 and 16, it remains the City's primary center for community events and activities. Anticipated future development includes the South Kitsap Community Events Center and a new Kitsap Bank headquarters as part of a larger mixed -use development. The concept plan works to balance historic preservation, environmental restoration, and economic improvement. Pedestrian Plaza's from Bay Street to the waterfront Terminate Streets at the waterfront with a small pl overlook, or pocket pajjg East Downtown - Redevelopment Concept Plan Diagram Two-way traffic at Frederick Ave 4* I N New slow waterfront "shared street" to create JL TN 1 " = 200' 62 Port Orchard Subarea Plan I Port Orchard, WA 1 10.28.2020 63 SECTION 03 1 SUBAREA PLAN I I East Downtown - Redevelopment Concept Plan 64 EIGE J a w x U W O Marina Parking— y y I Pati.Ra.\'9 �RFp Y U W LU o i W I LL I i ? I q1%, SECTION 03 1 SUBAREA PLAN LEGEND LOW DENSITY RESIDENTIAL _ (Front Orientation) MED DENSITY RESIDENTIAL (Front Orientation/Retail) COMMERCIAL/RETAIL(Front �i Orientation) OFFICE (Front Orientation) CIVIC (Front Orientation) OPEN SPACE (Park, plaza, or other) - SURFACE PARKING PR ESTRIAN TION RI VEHICULAR CIRC N PROPO HICULAR L— IC_� ng ix, JL TN 1"=100, Port Orchard Subarea Plan I Port Orchard, WA 1 10.28.2020 65 r `J _jam' CRIME r I�� li\llllil)) %JJ�IIIIII� rl�}�rAr�! vw SECTION 03 1 SUBAREA PLAN 3.3 Land Use and Housing LAND USE INTr... LION The primary land use designations within the study area is medium density residential and Mixed -use commercial, however the study area include nearly all land use designation. The study are also includes two large public facilities campuses, the Kitsap County Campus and South Kitsap High School. Within the individual study areas the West Downtown contains the historic City main -street. LAND USE AND HOUSING GOALS Goal LUH - 01 Develop a land use pattern that is environmentally sustainable and economically vibrant and accommodates additional housing and businesses. Goal LUH - 02 Encourage increased development in existing centers and along existing primary circulation corridors to create vibrant walkable neighborhoods. Goal LUH - 03 Ensure that proposed new development lamely maintai existing views. Goal LUH - 04 Transform the existin dominant devel existing wal a LAND USE POLI Policy LUH - 01 Expand the CenterWbariies to capture the Sidney and Cline Corridors and additional area along the East Downtown. Policy LUH - 02 Rezone parcels along Cline and Sidney Street from R2 to Neighborhood Mixed -use to provide a moderate increase in development and provide a transition to the residential zones. Policy LUH - 03 Extend the varied frontage designation at Cline Street from Kitsap Street to Kendall Street. Policy LUH - 04 Require a varied frontage along the waterside of Bay Street in the East Downtown Area. Policy LUH - 05 Rezone the Commercial Heavy Parcels in the East Downtown to Commercial Mixed -use (CMU). Policy LUH - Ob Rezone the Commercial Corridor Parcels on the east side of Bethel between Dekalb Street to Mile Hill Drive from Commercial Corridor to Gateway Mixed -use (GMU). Policy LUH - 07 Allow for buildings up to 5-stories on the east side of Bethel between Dekalb Street to Mile Hill Drive. Policy LUH - 08 Allow for buildings up Bethel between Dekli es on the east side of p Mile Hill Drive. Conceptual Development Scale and Character Conceptual Development Scale and Character '%WON - ;f9 Y * # a /411 f } •4, h } } . �# s. # 'St t .: West *, F L ntown #• ' .. i . ; Downtown ' ° ;' _ ;l r • IrWit, I =+ �" y� • = 1,._ ` F •..� . r Count Id Y rrr. yi 1 i ■} 4- r Job vp reF a a ■ *r J,- d 11 I• ir Fr op II t ■ _ �} Proposed Centers Adjustments Expand County Center boundaries to capture the Sidney and Cline Corridors. 1 N Expand Downtown Center boundaries to incorporate areas of assumed future development. �v'1 70 Port Orchard Subarea Plan I Port Orchard, WA 1 10.28.2020 71 SECTION 03 1 SUBAREA PLAN LEGEND ® BUSINESS PROFESSIONAL MIXED USE (BPMU) COMMERCIAL CORRIDOR (CC) ® COMMERCIAL MIXED USE (CMU) GREENBELT (GB) PARKS AND RECREATION (PR) PUBLIC FACILITY(PF) CIVIC AND INSTITUTIONAL (CI) ® DOWNTOWN MIXED USE (DMU) 0 NEIGHBORHOOD MIXED USE (NMU) RESIDENTIAL (R1) RESIDENTIAL 2 (R2) RESIDENTIAL 4 (R4) COMMERCIALHEAVY(CH) ® GATEWAY MIXED USE (GMU) { PIPi. # � M � ,r_�� a, cif.■ - I� 6.11 - -' _ r . ■ j IL �•I � L r y�. � N f r ■� I '� �O l ML Residential 2 to Neighborhood Mixed -use ri% g ■ - I # aMMA r r r- l3 Z w iw ��l� - '� ■ IM r+ r a`+ R+ . Proposed Zoning Adjustments +#• it 44 x # J — Commercial Heavyto Commercial Mixed -use i� r * Commercial Heavy and Commercial Mixed -use '. to Gateway Mixed -use r I .- , " ":�?p t t a - ' ' ' " - 'P. " JP I4yr I F1 I _ I &W0 F it 4 ■ all, * ■ ir � �r1 Encourage development along existing neighborhood arterial corridors. Provide a buffer from commercial to residential areas and preserve established single family neighborhoods. .M ■ Commercial Heavy to Commercial Mixed -use � f T . ♦* i b N LEGEND DOWNTOWN HEIGHT OVERLAY DISTRICT DHOD 3 DHOD 4 DHOD 5 VIEW PROTECTION OVERLAY DISTRICT I ■ r r � M r 1� a . ILK# ■ � a � ■ I .� � � PI � J al..lwn■ wR r .* ■ ■ f a 1-4 ff w ` �,a a Ir ,1h I + r I + I C. df MI a ;�I ■ •� 1 Proposed Height Overlay Adjustments t' ir • I , f I i dbf■ _ Extend Downtown Height Overlay District 5 ■ � � y ■ .fir■ r � I .r 1 _. a 1 m6 - �__, r r - �5 arA Ni �'`L IIIII * # . ■ Ir Encourage development height increases in locations that do not impact existing protected views. 72 Port Orchard Subarea Plan I Port Orchard, WA 1 10.28.2020 73 SECTION 03 1 SUBAREA PLAN Pipeline Proiect VacantfRedvelopable Single- Fam In Density _ Vacant C Underutilized Added in Subarea Plan G 9 a •A0b F.� � °'.I i+fir � �• �'.�. 'n � � �- "'� -` t 4kh• — rn i i _ r ff A e ' � R � `� i F. Updated Build -able Lands Map Encourage development height increases in locations that do not impact existing protected views. am � - molc, 3.4 Environment and Open Space ENVIRONMENT AND ,4 SPACE OVERVIEW In addition to multiple public parks the defining Environment and Open Space features in the study area includes the shoreline along Sinclair inlet and numerous historic creek valleys. The existing waterfront includes large tracts of surface ` parking developed prior to the adoption of the Shoreline Management Act. Environment and Open Space goals strive _ to both enhance the environment and the public realm for City residents and guests. Y ENVIRONMENT AND OPEN SPACE GOALS F Goal EOS - 01 Provide increased pedestrian access and recreational opportunities at the waterfront. Goal EOS - 02 Plan to mitigate flooding during high -tides and as a result of sea -level rise. Goal EOS - 02 Incorporate new open space within required shoreline buffers such that they can serve dual -purposes. Goal EOS - 02 1 Improve safety and security along ex and around blackjack creme ENVIRONMENT Policy EOS - 01 , Encourage shorelin access to the water. Ilows for pedestrians Policy EOS - 02 Encourage the creation of a public kayak launch dock. Policy EOS - 03 Streets should terminate at the waterfront with a small plaza, overlook, or pocket park. Policy EOS - 04 Convert Orchard and Port Streets to pedestrian plazas with limited vehicle access. Policy EOS - 05 Encourage the creation of storm -water facilities in shoreline set -backs that also provide public open space amenities. Stormwater buffer with pedestrian boardwalk Concept for existing Blackjack Creek Outlet Policy EOS - 06 Support the expansion of Etta Turner Park to include a riparian buffer with bio-retention from adjacent development. Policy EOS - 07 Support the development of a new park in the existing public right -off way on the west side of the Blackjack Creek outfall. This park will work with Etta Turner park to frame the Blackjack Creek corridor from Bay Street to the Sinclair inlet. 74 Port Orchard Subarea Plan I Port Orchard, WA 1 10.28.2020 75 SECTION 03 1 SUBAREA PLAN SECTION 03 1 SUBAREA PLAN Policy EOS - 08 Encourage development to face new and existing open spaces with entries and transparency to provide visual surveillance and improve safety. Policy EOS - 09 Encourage the development of the Blackjack Creek Wilderness Trail to provide pedestrian access and visual surveillance along Blackjack Creek to improve safety and security concerns. 3.5 Circulation, Access, and Parking CIRCULATION, AC(.ts-�), PARKING l,v,RVIEW The Downtown and County Campus Centers contains a well established transportation network centered on Bay Street (SR 166) and Bethel Ave. Mitchell Street, Cline Ave, and Sidney Ave are primary minor arterials from uphill neighborhoods to the waterfront. The Downtown walk-on ferry terminal provides service to Bremerton with connections to Seattle. Improvements envisioned as part of the development include re -focusing new development towards the water and improving pedestrian access through -out the Centers. CIRCULATION, ACCESS, AND PARKING GOALS Goal CAP - 01 Improve B; for all user just a high, Goal CAP - 02 Ensure tha marina anc promoting Goal CAP - 03 Encourage the waterfr Goal CAP - 04 Provide im Downtown Goal CAP - 04 Transform dominant c existing walkable downtown West Downtown area. Goal CAP - 05 Minimize the impact of parking along the waterfront sites by a potential modification to the existing Shoreline Management Plan. Goal CAP - 06 Parking requirements should encourage economic development and promote a walkable development pattern. CIRCULATION, ACCESS, AND PARKING POLICIES Policy CAP - 01 Develop a corridor design plan for Bay Street and Bethel Ave that includes: improved pedestrian and bicycle circulation, reconfigured intersections to improve driver sight -lines, increased on street parking, streetscape design standards, and creates an identity to the downtown. Work with WSDOT to explore opportunities for potential traffic calming measures. Policy CAP - 02 Encourage urban low impact development stormwater management features in the roadway design, including bio-swales between the on -street parking lanes and sidewalks. Policy CAP - 03 Ensue that public parking in th available for downtown o commuter parking. Policy CAP - Ifa Study th and ride serves ferry vntown is cting all -day dditional park n waterfront to ;on Ave to irking and A from Cline y limits street inctions be =rfront or internally in the building. Policy CAP - 08 Reconfigure the marina parking lot to increase parking and improve multi -modal circulation from Bay Street to the waterfront. Policy CAP - 09 Include a hill -climb from Bay Street to Prospect Street aligned with either Orchard Ave or Port Street. Policy CAP - 10 Convert Orchard and Port Streets to pedestrian plazas with limited vehicle access. Policy CAP - 11 76 Port Orchard Subarea Plan I Port Orchard, WA 1 10.28.2020 77 SECTION 03 1 SUBAREA PLAN Policy CAP - 1 Modify current detached and multi -family parking requirements in recognition of the urban context and to promote denser walkable development. Reduce residential parking requirements to 1-1.25 stalls per residential unit. Convert Fredrick Ave to a two-way street with parallel parking. Policy CAP - 12 Encourage the creation of a loop street or private access drive to break down the scale of the auto -dealership site, provide waterfront access, and provide additional on - street parking. Policy CAP - 13 Extend Mitchell Ave north to terminate at the waterfront to break-up the large block and provide additional thru- site circulation. Policy CAP - 14 New development and roadways shall frame view and pedestrian corridors to the waterfront with parking located beside and adjacent to development Policy CAP - 15 Include parallel parking and sidewalks on both sides of Harrison Ave. At least on of the sidewalks should extend to the waterfront. I ff Aff "■ IL I Street Concept Image I Mitchell Street Extension from Bay Street to the Waterfront (Looking North) Str( (Lo Street Cross -Section B-B I New Waterfront Street Between Sidney and Harrison Ave (Looking West) 78 Port Orchard Subarea Plan I Port Orchard, WA 1 10.28.2020 79 aa� AVMWALM, ORCHARD_ Ctiy of Port Orchard Monthly Permit Applications October 2020 Date Submitted Permit Number Permit Type Description Site Address Applicant Project Name 10/02/2020 20-411 Commercial Tenant Improvement 1900 SE SEDGWICK RD WESTERN CONSTRUCTION SVS INC FRED MEYER PHOTO ELECTRONICS & MUSIC C-TI 10/07/2020 20-424 Tenant Certificate of Occupancy 632 BAY ST, SUITE 100 SHEPARD EASTON DUDE'S DONUTS LLC C OF O 10/12/2020 PW20-058 Minor Land Disturbing Activity Permit (Type I) 918 TAYLOR ST SPEARS GREGORY J SPEARS SEWER CONNECTION 10/13/2020 PW20-060 Street Use Permit 2005 SIDNEY AVE PLUMB SIGNS INC CARSTAR MONUMENT SIGN 10/14/2020 PW20-061 Street Use Permit ABUTTING 550 PERRY AVE N MICHEL FAWN L & WILLIAM VEHICULAR ACCESS PLATFORM STRUCTURE 10/15/2020 20-442 Zoning code compliance for signage 1434 OLNEY AVE SE PLUMB SIGNS INC ALBERTSON'S SIGN 10/15/2020 20-443 Sign building permit 1434 OLNEY AVE SE PLUMB SIGNS INC ALBERTSONS SIGNS 10/14/2020 LU20-SH EXEMPT-10 Shoreline Exemption 707 SIDNEY PKWY PORT OF BREMERTON PORT ORCHARD MARINA GEOTECH UNDERWATER SURVEY 10/15/2020 20-444 Tenant Certificate of Occupancy 1700 SE MILE HILL DR, SUITE 204 HERRERA MARGARITA CLEAN-N-THINGS C OF O 10/15/2020 LU20-SEPA-01 SEPA Review. Only use when submitted prior to the associated project application. 216 PROSPECT ST CITY OF PORT ORCHARD - PUBLIC WORKS CITY OF PORT ORCHARD WATER SYSTEM PLAN UPDATE 2019 10/15/2020 20-445 Commercial Mechanical Only 2005 SIDNEY AVE AIR MANAGEMENT SOLUTIONS INSTALL TWO GAS TUBE HEATERS 10/20/2020 20-449 Commercial Tenant Improvement 322 CLINE AVE MARTIN SMITH SUANNE HOLY WATER A HEAVENLY LOUNGE C-TI 10/20/2020 20-450 Commercial Tenant Improvement 1700 SE MILE HILL DR, #240 & 242 TOWNE SQUARE PORT ORCHARD DIVIDE TWO SUITES INTO FIVE NEW SUITES 10/21/2020 20-451 Commercial Miscellaneous 399 SOUTH KITSAP BLVD AQUINO JOANNA REPLACE COFFEE STAND 10/22/2020 20-453 Commercial Mechanical Only 1353 OLNEY AVE SE AIR MASTERS INC REPLACE ROOFTOP UNIT 10/23/2020 PW20-063 Street Use Permit ABUTTING 2220 POTTERY AVE KITSAP TRANSIT BUS STOP SIGN 10/27/2020 20-462 Tenant Certificate of Occupancy 1248 GARRISON AVE SHOLIN KRISTINA CREATIVE CORNER CHILDCARE & PRESCHOOL C OF O 10/27/2020 20-463 Commercial or Non -Residential Accessory Building, detached 1270 LLOYD PKWY CITY OF PORT ORCHARD - PUBLIC WORKS SALT STORAGE FACILITY 10/27/2020 LU20-VAR ADMIN-05 Administrative Variance **NO SITUS ADDRESS — TARRAGON LLC SIDNEY ROAD APARTMENTS 10/28/2020 20-464 Zoning code compliance for signage 1351 BAY ST, SUITE 100 NEW LIFE CHURCH ON THE PENINSULA NEW LIFE CHURCH SIGNS 10/28/2020 20-465 Sign building permit 1351 BAY ST, SUITE 100 NEW LIFE CHURCH ON THE PENINSULA NEWLIFE CHURCH SIGNS 10/28/2020 PW20-064 Major Land Disturbing Activity Permit (Type II) 4977 SIDNEY RD SW TARRAGON LLC SIDNEY RD APARTMENTS CIVIL LDAP 10/29/2020 20-467 Replacement of a previously existing SFR or MH with a Manufactured/Mobile Home on a lot 1783 SIDNEY AVE CLOUDY BAY CONSTRUCTION LLC REPLACE DEMOLISHED MANUFACTURED HOME 10/29/2020 20-468 Commercial Tenant Improvement 1585 BETHEL AVE, SUITE 140 1 HURST AND SONS LLC ADD WALL Page 1 of 1