Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutGeneral Sewer Plan Update 2016`CITY OF PORT ORCHARD General Sewer an Update -- �., �.. • �,�;_. _ - �:� *_ - � - _ .. � ice, ��� 40 i.; a EMM `./\.lIYVV LIP11V 1 V `` June 2016 STA e STATE 01: WASHINCTON DEPARTMENT OF ECOLOGY Norlhiresf Regional Office i 3190 1h0th Ave,VF • 0010 c, WA 913a0fi•5451 * 4Z7-649.7000 %I I for Wa,shing(on Relay Semite * Persarhs willh A speech dfsdo flly ran call 877-H33-6341 July 05, 2016 Mr. Mark Dorsey Public Works Director City of Port Orchard 216 Prospect Street Port Orchard, WA 98366 Re: City of Port Orchard General Sewer Plan (June 2016) Dear Mr. Dorsey: Pursuant to RCW 90.48,110 and WAC 173-240-050, the above -referenced general sewer plan has been reviewed and, with the exception of references to privately -owned and maintained grinder pumps, is hereby approved. WAC 173-240-104 states that domestic sewage facilities (e.g. grinder pumps) are not approved unless ownership and responsibility of operation and maintenance is by a public entity. The City of Port Orchard has not clearly presented a ease that privately -owned grinder pumps is of public interest. Therefore, Ecology has not approved private ownership of grinder pumps. Sewage collection facilities within the planning area boundary shall be constructed according to the approved general sewer plan or amendments thereto. Prior to construction, the City is required to submit a written description of the project and written assurance that the extension is in conformance with the general sewer plan. Engineering reports and plans and specifications for planned collection facilities including sewer line extensions and pump stations, need not be submitted for approval, unless: a) The proposed sewers or pump stations involve installation of overflows or bypasses; or b) The proposed sewers or pump stations discharge to an overloaded treatment, collection, or disposal facility. If you have any questions concerning this approval, please contact Lazaro Eleuterio at lazaro.eleuterio a,ecy.wa.g_o_v or 425-649-7027. do Sine rely. . Kevin C. Fitzpatrick Section Manager NWRO Water Quality Section KF:le; cc: Randy Screws, Senior Operator at West Sound Utility District Adam Schuyler, PC, BHC Consultants, LLC Lazaro Eleuterio, Department of Ecology, Permit Manager Department of Ecology Central Records, City of Port Orchard, WQ 4 �[�I:1�L�I��I i�iT�T►�j� The technical material and data contained in this Plan was prepared by Peter Cunningham, P.E. and Adam Schuyler, PE of BHC Consultants, LLC. Samuel Adam Schuyler, RE. Project Manager )ACT o W �4G352 � C5 ebsl SSroIVAL E�o tc Peter Benedict Cunningham, P.E. Project Engineer City of Port Orchard General Sewer Plan Update TABLE OF CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY......................................................................................................... E-1 E.1 Introduction (Chapter 1).......................................................................................... E-1 E.2 Policies and Standards (Chapter 2)........................................................................ E-2 E.3 Service Area Characteristics (Chapter 3)............................................................... E-3 EA Population (Chapter 4)............................................................................................ E-3 E.5 Existing Sewer Facilities (Chapter 5)...................................................................... E-4 E.6 Wastewater Flows (Chapter 6)............................................................................... E-4 E.7 Sewer System Analysis (Chapter 7)....................................................................... E-4 E.8 Capital Improvements Plan (Chapter 8).................................................................. E-5 E.9 Financial (Chapter 9).............................................................................................. E-6 E.10 Operations and Maintenance (Chapter 10)............................................................. E-6 E.11 Reclaimed Water (Chapter 11)............................................................................... E-6 SECTION 1 INTRODUCTION...................................................................................................1-1 1.1 Introduction..............................................................................................................1-1 1.2 Purpose and Scope.................................................................................................1-5 1.3 Ownership and Management...................................................................................1-6 1.4 Sewer History...........................................................................................................1-6 SECTION 2 POLICIES AND STANDARDS...............................................................................2-1 2.1 Introduction..............................................................................................................2-1 2.2 Design Standards....................................................................................................2-1 2.3 Construction Standards...........................................................................................2-2 2.4 Pretreatment............................................................................................................2-2 2.5 Developer Sewer System Extensions and Upgrades..............................................2-2 2.6 Septic to Sewer Conversion.....................................................................................2-2 SECTION 3 SERVICE AREA CHARACTERISTICS.................................................................3-1 3.1 Land Use and Zoning...............................................................................................3-1 3.2 Topography..............................................................................................................3-1 3.3 Geology....................................................................................................................3-1 3.4 Streams and Water Bodies......................................................................................3-1 =� ■ r♦ Table of Contents Page i CONSTANTS City of Port Orchard General Sewer Plan Update 3.5 Critical areas............................................................................................................3-2 3.6 endagered species habitat.......................................................................................3-2 3.7 Puget Sound Water Quality Management Plan.......................................................3-2 3.8 Growth Management Act.......................................................................................3-11 3.9 Water Systems.......................................................................................................3-11 3.9.1 City of Port Orchard............................................................................................3-11 3.9.2 McCormick Woods Water Company..................................................................3-12 3.9.3 Berry Lake Manors.............................................................................................3-12 3.9.4 West Sound Utility District..................................................................................3-13 SECTION 4 POPULATION........................................................................................................4-1 4.1 General....................................................................................................................4-1 4.2 Existing Population and employment.......................................................................4-1 4.2.1 Population............................................................................................................4-1 4.2.2 Employment.........................................................................................................4-1 4.3 Future Population and employment.........................................................................4-2 4.3.1 Population............................................................................................................4-2 4.3.1 Employment.........................................................................................................4-3 SECTION 5 EXISTING SEWER FACILITIES............................................................................5-1 5.1 Introduction..............................................................................................................5-1 5.2 Existing and Planned Mini-Basins............................................................................5-1 5.3 Existing Sewer Piping..............................................................................................5-1 5.4 Existing Pump Stations............................................................................................5-2 5.5 McCormick Woods STEP System...........................................................................5-8 5.6 South Kitsap Industrial Area....................................................................................5-8 5.7 West Sound Utility District Facilities.........................................................................5-8 SECTION 6 WASTEWATER FLOWS.......................................................................................6-1 6.1 Introduction..............................................................................................................6-1 6.2 Existing Wastewater Flows......................................................................................6-1 6.3 Wastewater Unit Flows............................................................................................6-2 6.4 Infiltration and Inflow................................................................................................6-3 6.5 Peaking Factors.......................................................................................................6-5 6.6 Diurnal Curves.........................................................................................................6-6 =� ■ rr Table of Contents CONSULTANTS Page ii City of Port Orchard General Sewer Plan Update 6.7 Industrial Connections.............................................................................................6-7 6.8 Projected Wastewater Flows...................................................................................6-7 SECTION 7 CONVEYANCE SYSTEM ANALYSIS...................................................................7-1 7.1 Introduction..............................................................................................................7-1 7.2 Model Software........................................................................................................7-1 7.3 Model Development.................................................................................................7-1 7.3.1 Gravity Sewers.....................................................................................................7-2 7.3.2 Lift Stations...........................................................................................................7-2 7.4 Model Loading.........................................................................................................7-2 7.4.1 Sanitary Sewer Flows...........................................................................................7-2 7.4.2 Infiltration and Inflow(1/1)......................................................................................7-3 7.5 Model Calibration.....................................................................................................7-4 7.5.1 Calibration to Recorded Flow Data......................................................................7-4 7.5.2 Calibration Results...............................................................................................7-5 7.6 Future Sewer System Expansion.............................................................................7-5 7.7 Modeling Scenarios.................................................................................................7-5 7.8 Hydraulic Modeling Analysis....................................................................................7-5 7.8.1 Design Capacity...................................................................................................7-5 7.8.2 Existing System — Results....................................................................................7-6 7.8.3 2022 Scenario — Results......................................................................................7-6 7.8.4 2026 Scenario — Results....................................................................................7-13 7.8.5 2036 Scenario — Results....................................................................................7-14 7.8.6 Build -Out Scenario — Results.............................................................................7-19 7.9 Sedgwick subarea analysis....................................................................................7-23 SECTION 8 COLLECTION FACILITIES IMPROVEMENTS ......................................................8-1 8.1 introduction..............................................................................................................8-1 8.2 Six -Year Capital Improvement Program..................................................................8-2 8.2.1 Project Descriptions.............................................................................................8-2 8.2.2 Summary..............................................................................................................8-3 8.3 10-Year Capital Improvement Program...................................................................8-9 8.3.1 Project Descriptions.............................................................................................8-9 8.3.2 Summary..............................................................................................................8-9 =� ■ rr Table of Contents CONSTANTS Page iii City of Port Orchard General Sewer Plan Update 8.4 20-year Capital Improvement Program..................................................................8-15 8.4.1 Project Descriptions...........................................................................................8-15 8.4.2 Summary............................................................................................................8-15 8.5 Opinions of Probable Cost.....................................................................................8-21 8.6 Sewer Extensions into Undeveloped Basins.........................................................8-24 SECTION 9 FINANCIAL............................................................................................................9-1 9.1 Financial Summary..................................................................................................9-1 SECTION 10 OPERATIONS AND MAINTENANCE PROGRAM............................................10-1 10.1 Introduction............................................................................................................10-1 10.2 City Management and Personnel...........................................................................10-1 10.3 Operations and Maintenance Activities..................................................................10-1 10.4 Staffing Needs.......................................................................................................10-2 10.5 Recommended Operation and Maintenance Improvements.................................10-4 SECTION 11 RECLAIMED WATER........................................................................................11-1 11.1 Reclaimed Water...................................................................................................11-1 Appendices Appendix A SEPA Checklist Appendix B Interlocal Agreements Appendix C Design Standards for Sanitary Sewer Extensions Appendix D Projected Populations and Flows per Basin Appendix E Pump Curves Appendix F Discharge Permits Appendix G Model Results Appendix H Gap Analysis Table E-1 Comprehensive Sewer Plan Requirements per WAC 173-240-050 ....................... E-2 Table E-2 Service Area Population and Employment Estimates ............................................. E-3 Table E-3 Unit and Projected Flows........................................................................................ E-4 Table E-4 Opinion of Probable Project Costs, 6-Year CIP(2016-2021).................................. E-6 Table 1-1 Comprehensive Sewer Plan Requirements per WAC 173-240-050 .........................1-5 Table 3-1 City of Port Orchard Water Facilities......................................................................3-12 Table 4-1 Service Area Population and Employment Estimates..............................................4-2 Table5-1 Gravity Sewers.........................................................................................................5-2 =� ■ r♦ Table of Contents CONSTANTS Page iv City of Port Orchard General Sewer Plan Update Table5-2 Force Mains..............................................................................................................5-2 Table 5-3 Existing Pump Stations.............................................................................................5-7 Table 6-1 Wastewater Flow Summary......................................................................................6-1 Table 6-2 Average Monthly Flows (mgd)..................................................................................6-2 Table 6-3 Residential Unit Flow................................................................................................6-2 Table 6-4 Employee Unit Flow..................................................................................................6-3 Table 6-5 Infiltration and Inflow.................................................................................................6-4 Table 6-6 EPA/DOE Excessive 1/I Criteria................................................................................6-5 Table6-7 Peak Day Factor.......................................................................................................6-5 Table6-8 Peak Hour Factor......................................................................................................6-6 Table 6-9 Projected Wastewater Flows....................................................................................6-8 Table 7-1 Projected Wastewater Flows(mgd)..........................................................................7-5 Table 7-2 2016 Gravity Sewer Deficiencies..............................................................................7-6 Table 7-3 2016 Pump Station Deficiencies...............................................................................7-6 Table 7-4 2022 Gravity Sewer Deficiencies..............................................................................7-6 Table 7-5 2022 Pump Station Deficiencies...............................................................................7-7 Table 7-6 2026 Gravity Sewer Deficiencies............................................................................7-13 Table 7-7 2026 Pump Station Deficiencies.............................................................................7-13 Table 7-8 2036 Gravity Sewer Deficiencies............................................................................7-14 Table 7-9 2036 Pump Station Deficiencies.............................................................................7-14 Table 7-10 Build -Out Gravity Sewer Deficiencies...................................................................7-19 Table 7-11 Build -Out Pump Station Deficiencies....................................................................7-20 Table 7-12 Build -Out Force Main Deficiencies.......................................................................7-20 Table 7-13 Sedgwick Subarea Basin 8 Build -Out Changes...................................................7-23 Table 7-14 Sedgwick Subarea Build -Out Gravity Sewer Deficiencies....................................7-24 Table 7-15 Sedgwick Subarea Build -Out Pump Station Deficiencies.....................................7-24 Table 7-16 Sedgwick Subarea Build -Out Force Main Deficiencies........................................7-25 Table 8-1 6-Year CIP (2016-2021)...........................................................................................8-5 Table 8-2 10-Year CIP (2022-2026).......................................................................................8-11 Table 8-3 20-Year CIP (2027-2036).......................................................................................8-17 Table 8-4 Opinion of Probable Project Costs, 6-Year CIP (2016-2021).................................8-21 Table 8-5 6-Year Capital Improvement Program (2016-2021) in 2014 Dollars ......................8-23 =� ■ rr Table of Contents Page v CONSTANTS City of Port Orchard General Sewer Plan Update Table 10-1 Recommended Collection System Maintenance Standards.................................10-2 Table 10-2 Sewer Utility Staffing Comparison per Total Length of Pipe.................................10-3 Table 10-3 Sewer Utility Staffing Comparison per Pump Station...........................................10-3 Figures Figure1-1 Vicinity Map.............................................................................................................1-3 Figure 3-1 Urban Growth Area..................................................................................................3-3 Figure3-2 Zoning Map..............................................................................................................3-5 Figure3-3 Topography Map.....................................................................................................3-7 Figure 3-4 FEMA Floodplain & Wetlands..................................................................................3-9 Figure3-5 Water System Map................................................................................................3-15 Figure5-1 Sewer System.........................................................................................................5-3 Figure5-2 System Schematic...................................................................................................5-5 Figure 6-1 Diurnal Curves.........................................................................................................6-7 Figure 7-1 Existing Peak Day Flow...........................................................................................7-9 Figure 7-2 2022 Peak Day Flow.............................................................................................7-11 Figure 7-3 2026 Peak Day Flow.............................................................................................7-15 Figure 7-4 2036 Peak Day Flow.............................................................................................7-17 Figure 7-5 Build -Out Peak Day Flow......................................................................................7-21 Figure 7-6 Sedgwick Subarea Alternative Build -Out Peak Day Flow.....................................7-27 Figure8-1 6-Year CIP...............................................................................................................8-7 Figure8-2 10-Year CIP...........................................................................................................8-13 Figure8-3 20-Year CIP...........................................................................................................8-19 Figure 8-4 Future Sewer Extensions......................................................................................8-25 Figure 11-1 Reclaimed Water.................................................................................................11-3 =� ■ rr Table of Contents CONSTANTS Page vi City of Port Orchard General Sewer Plan Update List of Abbreviations AAF Annual Average Flow APWA American Public Works Association ArcMap ArcGIS BOD Biological oxygen demand CCTV Closed -Circuit Television CIP Capital Improvement Plan City City of Port Orchard d/D Flow Depth/Pipe Diameter DOE Department of Ecology DWF Dry Weather Flow ESU Evolutionary Significant Unit fps Feet per second FTE Full Time Employees GIS Graphic Information Systems GMA Growth Management Act gpcd Gallons per Capita Per Day gpd Gallons per Day gped Gallons per Employee per Day gpm Gallons per Minute HGL Hydraulic Grade Line HP Horsepower 1/1 Infiltration and Inflow KRCC Kitsap Regional Coordinating Council LF Linear Feet LIDAR E-4 — not defined, does it need to be? MPS Marina Pump Station mgd Million Gallons per Day NPDES National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System O&M Operation and Maintenance PDF Peak Day Factor, Peak Day Flow PHF Peak Hour Factor, Peak Hour Flow Plan General Sewer Plan Update PODG City of Port Orchard 2014 Development Guidelines PSRC Puget Sound Regional Council RCW Revised Code of Washington SCADA Supervisory Control and Data Acquisition SEPA State Environmental Policy Act SKIA South Kitsap Industrial Area SKWRF South Kitsap Water Reclamation Facility STEP Septic Tank Effluent Pump =� ■ rr Table of Contents CONSTANTS Page vii City of Port Orchard General Sewer Plan Update TDH Total Dynamic Head TSS Total Suspended Solids UGA Urban Growth Area ULCA Updated Land Capacity Analysis ULID Utility Local Improvement District VFD Variable Frequency Drives WAC Washington Administrative Code WRIA Water Resource Inventory Area WSDOT Washington State Department of Transportation WSUD West Sound Utility District WWTP Wastewater Treatment Plant -� ■ rr Table of Contents CONSULTANTSPage viii City of Port Orchard General Sewer Plan Update EXECUTIVE SUMMARY E.1 INTRODUCTION (CHAPTER 1) The City of Port Orchard's (City) General Sewer Plan Update (Plan) provides a summary of the City's current sewage capacities, an analysis of the impact of projected growth on the City's sewage collection and conveyance system, and proposes a Capital Improvement Program to alleviate system deficiencies. It also documents the utility's policies, operation and maintenance practices, and financial condition. The City is located in Kitsap County and is bounded to the north by Sinclair Inlet. The location is shown on Figure 1-1. The surrounding area is a combination of rural and suburban lands in unincorporated Kitsap County. The City was incorporated in 1890 as the Town of Sidney, and was renamed in 1903 as the City of Port Orchard. The City is primarily residential with some commercial areas and industrial activity. The current population within the existing City limits was estimated by the Washington State Office of Financial Management to be 13,150 in 2014. As of 2015, approximately 11,550 are within the City's sewer service area. Residents outside of the City's service area are served by the West Sound Utility District (WSUD) or by individual septic tanks. The City owns, operates, and maintains existing wastewater collection and conveyance facilities that provide sewer service to the City's current service area of approximately 2,100 acres. The collection system consists of gravity sewers, pump stations, force mains, Septic Tank Effluent Pump (STEP) systems in McCormick Woods, and grinder pump systems that convey wastewater to the South Kitsap Water Reclamation Facility (SKWRF). The SKWRF is owned jointly by the City and WSUD, and operated and maintained by WSUD. Over the next twenty years the population within the Urban Growth Area (UGA) in the City's sewer service area is expected to grow to over 24,000 people. The City's sewer service area is expected to grow to approximately 5,700 acres. This Plan evaluates future facilities required to accommodate both existing and future wastewater collection needs. This Plan complies with the Washington State Department of Ecology (DOE) regulations for general sewer plan (Washington Administrative Code [WAC] 173-240-050) as shown in Table E-1. -� ■ L~ Executive Summary CONSULTANTSPage E-1 City of Port Orchard General Sewer Plan Update Table E-1 Comprehensive Sewer Plan Requirements per WAC 173-240-050 WAC 173-240-050 Description of Requirement Location in Plan Reference Paragraph 3a Purpose and need for proposed plan Section 1.2 3b Who owns, operates, and maintains Section 1.3 system 3c Existing and proposed service boundaries Chapter 5 Layout map showing boundaries; existing sewer facilities; proposed sewers; Figures 3-3, 3-5, 5-1, 3d topography and elevations; streams, and 8-4 lakes; and other water bodies; water systems 3e Population trends Chapter 4 3f Existing domestic and/or industrial Figure 1-1 wastewater facilities within 20 miles 3g Infiltration and inflow problems Section 6.4 3h Treatment systems and adequacy of such Section 5.7 treatment 3i Identify industrial wastewater sources Section 6.7 3j Discussion of water systems Section 3.9 3k Discussion of collection alternatives Chapter 7 31 Define construction cost and O&M costs Chapter 8 3m Compliance with water quality Section 3.7 management plan 3n SEPA compliance Appendix A E.2 POLICIES AND STANDARDS (CHAPTER 2) The City manages and operates their sewer system in accordance with state, local and federal regulations. The policies and standards described in the Plan provide a framework for the planning, design, operation, and management of the system to maintain the desired level of service to sewer utility customers. These policies are limited to the sewer system and its design and operation. The City's policies and criteria summarized in Chapter 2 include the following: • Design standards • Construction standards • Pretreatment • Developer sewer system extensions and upgrades • Septic to sewer conversion =� ■ rr Executive Summary OHS,TANTS Page E-2 City of Port Orchard General Sewer Plan Update E.3 SERVICE AREA CHARACTERISTICS (CHAPTER 3) The City is located along the south shore of Sinclair Inlet, which is an arm of Puget Sound. A number of streams flow north into Sinclair Inlet. The more prominent creeks within the City sewer service area are Blackjack Creek, Ross Creek, and Anderson Creek. The soils in the City consist primarily of glacial outwash, glacial till, glacial drift, volcanic ash, and glaciomarine soil. There are critical areas throughout the City which will limit development. Most of these areas are wetlands, floodplains, geologically sensitive areas, and aquifer protection areas. Several species of fish are also present, of which the Puget Sound Evolutionary Significant Unit Chinook is a State Candidate for endangered species and considered threatened by the Federal Government. In addition, other species that are State Candidates for endangered species and considered threatened by the Federal Government include bald eagle, marbled murrelet, Steller sea lion, and bull trout. A majority of the City's water supply comes from 8 active wells. There is also an intertie with the City of Bremerton. E.4 POPULATION (CHAPTER 4) The projected population for the City over the planning horizon of this Plan is presented in Table E-2. Kitsap County provided 2015 residential population estimates and the Puget Sound Regional Council (PSRC) provided 2013 Covered Employment estimates. The build out scenario is for modeling purposes only and does not reflect population growth goals or constraints. The City's service area is shown on Figure 5-1. Table E-2 Service Area Population and Employment Estimates Year Sewered Population Employment 2016 11,837 4,779 2022 13,558 5,114 2026 14,706 5,338 2036 17,575 5,898 Build Out 24,074 8,343 -� ■ L~ Executive Summary CONSULTANTSPage E-3 City of Port Orchard General Sewer Plan Update E.5 EXISTING SEWER FACILITIES (CHAPTER 5) The City of Port Orchard owns, operates, and maintains approximately 70 miles of sewer pipes ranging from 2-inch to 24-inch diameter. This includes approximately 49 miles of gravity sewers, 8 miles of force mains, and 14 miles of STEP mains. There are 16 pump stations within the City's sewer system. 17 mini -basins were defined within the City's sewer service area, shown on Figure 5-1. E.6 WASTEWATER FLOWS (CHAPTER 6) The unit and projected flows used to model the City's collection system are presented in Table E-3. Table E-3 Unit and Projected Flows Average Peak Day Year Residential Employment Annual 1/I ow Peak Hour Flow (gpcd') Flow (gped') Flow (gpd/acre) (mlgd) Flow (mgd) m d 2016 78 32 1.08 1,046 3.53 6.52 2022 78 32 1.22 1,046 3.92 7.26 2026 78 32 1.32 1,046 4.16 7.68 2036 78 32 1.56 1,046 4.75 8.74 Build Out 78 32 2.14 1,046 6.13 11.18 Notes: (1) Gallons per capita per day (2) Gallons per employee per day E.7 SEWER SYSTEM ANALYSIS (CHAPTER 7) The existing wastewater conveyance system was analyzed using the InfoSWMM modeling platform. The projected populations and their distributions are the basis for establishing future system requirements. Model files were developed from AutoCAD files of the sewer system from 2002 provided by the City which had manhole depths, and were supplemented with LIDAR obtained from PACE to determine manhole rim elevations and as-builts. Some elevations were still missing after this process, including some of the smaller pump stations. Estimates for depths, pipe slopes, wet well sizes, and pump operation elevations were made to develop a functional model that reasonably represents the sewer system. A truncated model was used consisting of all pump stations and the major sewer mains within the City's collection system. The model can be expanded in the future as needed and when budget allows. -� ■ L~ Executive Summary CONSULTANTSPage E-4 City of Port Orchard General Sewer Plan Update The design capacity of the gravity mains is considered to be 100 percent depth (1.0 d/D ratio, where d is the flow depth and D is the pipe diameter). The maximum design capacity of STEP mains and force mains are exceeded when flow velocities are greater than 8 feet per second. The firm capacity of a lift station is defined as the capacity of the lift station with the largest pump out of service. When model simulation results exceed these design capacities in piping or in lift stations, they are identified as deficient and system improvements are identified to resolve them. Where pipe sections were identified as requiring an upgrade, the proposed upgrade was sized to provide capacity equal to or greater than the estimated build -out flows according to the design criteria above. At lift stations where the estimated peak hour flows were shown to exceed the current firm capacity, the build out flow capacity was estimated and incorporated into the model for the improved system model runs. This enabled the impact of the increased flow on the downstream sewer network to be investigated. It is unlikely that the mechanical and electrical improvements to the lift stations will be sized for the build -out conditions. E.8 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PLAN (CHAPTER 8) The 6 year capital improvement projects as determined by model results and the City desired improvements are presented in Table E-4. Actual costs can and will differ from the opinions of probable costs. Volatility in the bidding climate, the number of contractors bidding on a project, and their approach to bidding and completing the work will all impact actual project costs. -� ■ L~ Executive Summary CONSULTANTSPage E-5 City of Port Orchard General Sewer Plan Update Table E-4 Opinion of Probable Project Costs, 6-Year CIP (2016-2021) Opinion of Opinion of CIP No. Project Probable Construction Probable Project COSt(1)(z) COSt(1)(3) 6-1 Marina Pump Station Improvements $2,670,000 $3,800,000 6-2 Bay Street Pump Station Improvements $730,000 $1,100,000 6-3 McCormick Pump Station 2 - Design N/A $190,000 6-4 McCormick Pump Station 2 - Construction $1,100,000 $1,100,000 6-5 McCormick Pump Station 1 - Design N/A $180,000 6-6 McCormick Pump Station 1 - Construction $1,100,000 $1,100,000 Estimated City Total $7,470,000 Notes: 1) All costs are in 2014 dollars. 2) The opinion of probable construction cost includes the costs to build the various components, sales tax, and contingency. 3) Opinions of probable project costs include planning, surveying, engineering services, permitting, bid advertisement, contract award, construction, and services during construction, in addition to the probable construction cost. E.9 FINANCIAL (CHAPTER 9) The financial analysis for the sewer system was performed by Katy Isaksen & Associates as part of the "City of Port Orchard Utility Gap Analysis" and is included as Appendix H. E.10 OPERATIONS AND MAINTENANCE (CHAPTER 10) Chapter 10 summarizes general operations and maintenance activities and staffing needs. The City has approximately 0.95 maintenance staff per 100,000 If of pipe and 0.22 maintenance staff per pump station, which is similar to other sewer utilities in this region of similar size. E.11 RECLAIMED WATER (CHAPTER 11) Only one reclaimed water customer was being served by the WSUD. The costs to provide reclaimed water to this customer were higher than what the customer is charged, resulting in the City and WSUD subsidizing the reclaimed water customer. Reclaimed water was provided to this customer until the end of 2015, at which point reclaimed water distribution was ceased. Reclaimed water is blended with effluent from the secondary clarifiers prior to discharge. If water system demands increase to the point that reclaimed water is necessary to adequately address water demands in the area, the reclaimed water distribution system will be placed back into service. -3 ■ r♦ Executive Summary CONSTANTS Page E-6 SECTION 1 INTRODUCTION 1.1 INTRODUCTION City of Port Orchard General Sewer Plan Update The City of Port Orchard (City) is located in Kitsap County and is bounded to the north by Sinclair Inlet. The location is shown on Figure 1-1. The surrounding area is a combination of rural and suburban lands in unincorporated Kitsap County. The City was incorporated in 1890 as the Town of Sidney, and was renamed in 1903 as the City of Port Orchard. The City is primarily residential with some commercial areas and industrial activity. The current population was estimated by the Washington State Office of Financial Management to be 13,150 in 2014. Approximately 11,550 are within the City's sewer service area. The remaining 1,600 residents are served by the West Sound Utility District (WSUD) or by individual septic tanks. The City owns, operates, and maintains existing wastewater collection and conveyance facilities that provide sewer service to the City's current service area of approximately 2,100 acres. The collection system consists of gravity sewers, pump stations, force mains, septic tank effluent pump (STEP) systems in McCormick Woods, and grinder pump systems that convey wastewater to the South Kitsap Water Reclamation Facility (SKWRF). The SKWRF is owned jointly by the City and WSUD, and operated and maintained by WSUD. Over the next twenty years the population within the UGA in the City's sewer service area is expected to grow to over 24,000 people. The City's sewer service area is expected to grow to approximately 5,700 acres. This Plan evaluates future facilities required to accommodate both existing and future wastewater collection needs. -� ■ L~ Introduction CONSULTANTSPage 1-1 City of Port Orchard General Sewer Plan Update PAGE INTENTIONALLY BLANK -� ■ rr Introduction CONSULTANTS Page 1-2 Snohomish Co to 00 go rci fie �22 Jefferson Co 4* 2eorad Finn r, , © ¢' 40P DIX— ,,I l 1 40P Z51,1� P",k 0/ % . . F- 2 I Blind I At Kitsap Co lvlz��f I —I 'Orglo 04) COKing Co I 96 9 Ar 9 9 Puget 09 Sound 9 9 Purn,n 99 IIV.I 99 1 rM., I—od AII.,, Aii.-Y 41 3 Mason Co V—gh" 167 Pk Au iFD Federal le 16 18 leas Pierce Co 110 100 ss Ta go QOO •1101111__�j Edg-, 3 1 P.- 'i'Alup 7 Legend Wastewater Treatment Plants Puyallup 20 MILE RADIUS 161 20 Mile Radius M IN cl User 'A 7 City of Port Orchard Hill % r Sources: Esri, D Lorme NAVTEQ, Tom'T6r" Intermap, increment P Corp., Port Orchard UGA GEBCO US@1`9 FAO LAPS, NRCAN, GeoBase, IGN, Kadaster NL, Ordnance H.M, co rs. S u ry ey),- - swisstopo, and County ,Esri Japan, METI, Esri Chi b` (Hong Kongllk—ks� iMjnq the GIS Community This map is a geographic representation based on available information. No warranty is made concerning the accuracy, currency, or completeness of data depicted on this map. Vicinity Map General Sewer Plan Update Figure -d Miles City of Port Orchard, Washington ;WJ;LTPS 0 3 6N r91110--hard . I -I COPYRIGHT(g) 2015 BHC CONSULTANTS LLC. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED City of Port Orchard General Sewer Plan Update PAGE INTENTIONALLY BLANK -� ■ L~ Introduction CONSULTANTSPage 1-4 City of Port Orchard General Sewer Plan Update 1.2 PURPOSE AND SCOPE This General Sewer Plan Update (Plan) is prepared for the City to fulfill the requirements of Chapter 173-240-050 of the Washington Administrative Code (WAC), Chapter 90.48 of the Revised Code of Washington (RCW), and RCW 36.70A (Growth Management Act). The Plan provides the City with a guide for managing and operating the sewer system and coordinating expansions and upgrades to the infrastructure through build -out. The Plan serves as a guide for policy development and decision making processes for the City. The WAC requirements are outlined in Table 1-1. This Plan is being updated concurrently with the General Water Plan and General Transportation Plan in preparation for an update to the City's Comprehensive Plan. The Plan provides the public and regulatory agencies with information on the City's plans for sewer system extensions to areas designated as urban. Table 1-1 Comprehensive Sewer Plan Requirements per WAC 173-240-050 WAC 173-240-050 Description of Requirement Location in Plan Reference Paragraph 3a Purpose and need for proposed plan Section 1.2 3b Who owns, operates, and maintains Section 1.3 system 3c Existing and proposed service boundaries Section 5 Layout map showing boundaries; existing sewer facilities; proposed sewers; Figures 3-3, 3-5, 5-1, 3d topography and elevations; streams, and 8-4 lakes; and other water bodies; water systems 3e Population trends Section 4 3f Existing domestic and/or industrial Figure 1-1 wastewater facilities within 20 miles 3g Infiltration and inflow problems Section 6.4 3h Treatment systems and adequacy of such Section 5.7 treatment 3i Identify industrial wastewater sources Section 6.7 3j Discussion of water systems Section 3.9 3k Discussion of collection alternatives Section 7 31 Define construction cost and O&M costs Section 8 3m Compliance with water quality Section 3.7 management plan 3n SEPA compliance Appendix A The Plan is based on projections for a six year period to 2022, a ten year period to 2026, a twenty year period to 2036, and a full build -out capacity scenario. =� ■ rr Introduction CONSULTANTS Page 1-5 City of Port Orchard General Sewer Plan Update The existing and future capacities of the sewer system were evaluated based on current and anticipated future wastewater flow rates. Future wastewater flow rates are estimated from existing flow data and population and employment growth projected within the sewer service area by Kitsap County and the Puget Sound Regional Council (PSRC). A capital improvement plan is provided that prioritizes improvements, and provides opinions of probable project costs. A Water and Sewer Financial Gap Analysis is being completed by Katy Isaksen & Associates and is not included as part of this Plan. 1.3 OWNERSHIP AND MANAGEMENT The wastewater utility is owned by the City of Port Orchard and is funded through wastewater rates and general facility charges. These revenues must provide for future capital improvements, and pay for current operating expenses, maintenance of the system, replacement, and/or emergency repairs. Sewer collection in the eastern part of the City is provided by WSUD and is not included in this Plan. Management and administration of the wastewater utility is provided by the Public Works Department. This support includes operation, repair, and maintenance of the collection system, major improvements and development, engineering design and construction, administrative support, accounting and financial services, billing and collection. The City has an interlocal agreement with WSUD to treat the City's sewage. WSUD operates and maintains the SKWRF, which is owned jointly by the City and WSUD, and provides treatment of all sewage in the City's sewer service area, except for on -site septic systems. A copy of the interlocal agreement between the City and WSUD is included in Appendix B. 1.4 SEWER HISTORY Construction of the wastewater collection system began in the early 1960's. This system included a network of gravity pipes along Bay Street and a sewage treatment plant located by the marina. The treatment plant was decommissioned in the early 1980's and replaced with the Marina Pump Station, which pumps the sewage generated in the City's sewer service area to the SKWRF. More detailed information about the existing sewer system can be found in Section 3. The reclaimed water system is discussed in Section 10. -� ■ L~ Introduction CONSULTANTSPage 1-6 City of Port Orchard General Sewer Plan Update SECTION 2 POLICIES AND STANDARDS 2.1 INTRODUCTION The City owns, operates, and maintains their sewer system in accordance with state, local and federal regulations. The policies and standards described in the Plan provide a framework for the planning, design, operation, and management of the system to maintain the desired level of service to sewer utility customers. These policies are limited to the sewer system and its design and operation. While the City has discretion in setting performance and design criteria and standards for its sewer system, the criteria set must meet or exceed the minimum standards for public sewers as set forth by the Washington State Department of Ecology (DOE) through Chapters 90.48, 90.52, and 90.54 of the Revised Code of Washington (RCW). The criteria focus on planning, design parameters, and other details that have been developed to establish consistency and to ensure that adequate levels of service are provided throughout the system. The criteria also provide the planning process with measuring tools to identify any areas of the existing system that need to be improved to achieve the desired level of customer service. The City establishes the following goals for sewer service: • Goal 1: Provide safe, reliable and timely sewer service to its consumers at a fair and reasonable price. • Goal 2: Provide reliable levels of service and ensuring adequate capacity within the sewer system by upgrading the system to protect the natural environment, as deemed necessary. • Goal 3: Ensure that sewer system infrastructure expansion provides an adequate level of public service to support new development consistent with the City's policies, criteria, and standards. In addition, sewer system expansion should also be consistent with current land use plans and development regulations of the State of Washington, Kitsap County, and appropriate local planning agencies. 2.2 DESIGN STANDARDS All sewer system improvements are designed in accordance with Department of Ecology Criteria for Sewage Works Design, Port Orchard Municipal Code Chapter 13.04, and Chapter 12 of the City of Port Orchard 2014 Development Guidelines (PODG) and meet or exceed the design standards referenced in WAC 173-240. -� ■ rF Policies and Standards CONSULTANTSPage 2-1 City of Port Orchard General Sewer Plan Update 2.3 CONSTRUCTION STANDARDS All sewer system improvements are constructed in accordance with Department of Ecology Criteria for Sewage Works Design, Port Orchard Municipal Code Chapters 13.04, Section 7-08 through 7-15 of the WSDOT/APWA Standard Specifications, and Chapter 12 of the PODG (provided as Appendix C) and meet or exceed the construction standards referenced in WAC 173-240. 2.4 PRETREATMENT Pretreatment systems may be required to reduce, eliminate or alter the nature of a pollutant's properties prior to discharging to the public sewer collection system. Pretreatment systems include grease traps, interceptors, oil/water separators and other units to treat metals, solvents, fats, oils, grease, excessive BOD or TSS, and other constituents. Pretreatment systems are to be installed in compliance with Chapter 12 of PODG. 2.5 DEVELOPER SEWER SYSTEM EXTENSIONS AND UPGRADES Sewer system extensions are allowed to provide sewer service within the City's sewer service area and UGA if the development is consistent with adopted development polices and all sewer utility policies and criteria, including those described in 13.04.040 of the City's Municipal Code. Developers are required to pay the City to analyze the impacts of the development on the existing sewer system. If the City makes a determination that the development's impact to the existing sewer system requires upgrades, the upgrades may be made at the cost of the developer in exchange for a credit to the capital facilities charge per 13.04.040 of the City Municipal Code. The developer may also recoup costs using latecomers agreements. The City may require the developer to oversize new sewer infrastructure to accommodate future growth. The developer may recoup the additional cost for the oversized infrastructure using latecomers agreements or other mechanisms, including contributions from the City, or discounts to their general facility charges. 2.6 SEPTIC TO SEWER CONVERSION All homes and businesses within 200 feet of a sewer main that have failing on -site systems and are within the UGA shall connect to that main in compliance with WAC 246-272A-0025. -� ■ rF Policies and Standards CONSULTANTSPage 2-2 City of Port Orchard General Sewer Plan Update SECTION 3 SERVICE AREA CHARACTERISTICS 3.1 LAND USE AND ZONING The City of Port Orchard (City) is located in Kitsap County on Sinclair Inlet south of Bremerton. The City is bounded to the north by Sinclair Inlet. The surrounding area is a combination of rural and suburban lands in unincorporated Kitsap County. The City Limits and Urban Growth Area (UGA) designated by Kitsap County are shown on Figure 3-1. City zoning within the City Limits and County zoning within the UGA are shown on Figure 3-2. 3.2 TOPOGRAPHY The City is located adjacent to Sinclair Inlet. Much of the area between Bay Street and Sinclair Inlet is built on fill. The City is cut irregularly by streams and ravines that are generally unbuildable. The City generally slopes towards Sinclair Inlet from south to north, with a maximum elevation of approximately 500 feet above sea level in the southwestern portion of the City. The City's topography is shown as Figure 3-3. 3.3 GEOLOGY The soils in the City consist primarily of glacial outwash, glacial till, glacial drift, volcanic ash, and glaciomarine soil. 3.4 STREAMS AND WATER BODIES The City is located along the south shore of Sinclair Inlet, which is an arm of Puget Sound. A number of streams flow north into Sinclair Inlet. The more prominent creeks within the City sewer service area are Blackjack Creek, Ross Creek, and Anderson Creek. Many of the streams flowing through the City are believed capable of supporting fish runs, though stream flows are often small. The City has agreed to augment the flow in two streams at the locations described below: • Ross Creek at the future extension of St. Andrews Drive SW • Blackjack Creek at SW Sedgwick Road west of SR 16 Augmentation is seasonal using potable water at the rate of 5 GPM. Other streams may be augmented in the future. -3 ■ r♦ Service Area Characteristics CONSULTANTSPage 3-1 City of Port Orchard General Sewer Plan Update Several small ponds, marshes, and wetlands exist within the City sewer service area. 3.5 CRITICAL AREAS The majority of the City area lies outside of the 100-year floodplain. Areas within the 100-year floodplain include the area immediately adjacent to Blackjack Creek, along Arnold Avenue E, and Ruby Creek near Highway 16. Several small ponds and wetlands exist within the City's UGA; development would need to be limited or carefully planned at these locations. Figure 3-4 shows floodplains and wetlands located within the UGA. 3.6 ENDAGERED SPECIES HABITAT Critical Habitat in the City include the Puget Sound Evolutionary Significant Unit (ESU) Chinook salmon, which are known to inhabit the marine areas of Sinclair Inlet adjacent to the City. The Puget Sound ESU Chinook is a State Candidate for endangered species and considered threatened by the Federal Government. In addition, other species that are State Candidates for endangered species and considered threatened by the Federal Government include bald eagle, marbled murrelet, Steller sea lion, and bull trout. Coho salmon occur in the majority of streams located in City and are considered threatened by the Federal Government. 3.7 PUGET SOUND WATER QUALITY MANAGEMENT PLAN The Federal Water Pollution Control Act established the requirement for a Water Quality Management Plan. In response to this requirement, RCW 90.71 established the need of a Puget Sound Water Quality Management Plan. The stated objectives of these regulations are to recover the health of the Puget Sound waters by the year 2020. This General Sewer Plan Update is consistent with the intended goals of the Water Quality Management Plan. -� ■ rF Service Area Characteristics CONSULTANTSPage 3-2 City of Port Orchard General Sewer Plan Update PAGE INTENTIONALLY BLANK ■ r� Service Area Characteristics G S•TAN7S Page 3-4 j rll I ol ♦ 1 �l t/ 1 �.� 1 1 1 1 1 t � (► City of Port Orchard General Sewer Plan Update PAGE INTENTIONALLY BLANK ■ r� Service Area Characteristics G S•TAN7S Page 3-6 City of Port Orchard General Sewer Plan Update PAGE INTENTIONALLY BLANK ■ r� Service Area Characteristics G S•TAN7S Page 3-8 City of Port Orchard General Sewer Plan Update PAGE INTENTIONALLY BLANK ■ r� Service Area Characteristics G 9 •TAN7S Page 3-10 City of Port Orchard General Sewer Plan Update 3.8 GROWTH MANAGEMENT ACT The State of Washington adopted the Growth Management Act with the intent of concentrating most new development and population gains within the urban areas of the more populous and rapidly growing counties and cities. State and local governments are required to define an urban growth area boundary within which urban services like sewers are provided, and any new parcels created outside that boundary must be at a very low density with sufficient acreage to support on -site sewage disposal systems conforming to State Department of Health regulations. Only two exceptions to the prohibitions of sewers outside the urban growth boundary are recognized under state law: • Public schools outside the urban growth boundary can be served by sewers, but are not required to be served. • Areas of existing development outside the urban growth boundary where sufficient on - site sewage disposal systems have failed as to create a "severe public health hazard" can be served by sewers. Sewers provided in either of these cases can be satellite system limited to serving just the qualified and defined parcels, or a sewer extension can be `tight -lined' to convey wastewater from the qualified and defined parcels into the urban growth area for connection to an existing sewer system. 3.9 WATER SYSTEMS Four water purveyors provide water service within the City and the sewer service area as described below: 3.9.1 City of Port Orchard City of Port Orchard serves within the City limits and selected adjacent areas as shown on Figure 3-5. The system is supplied by six active wells into a Low Zone with a hydraulic grade line (HGL) of 260 feet, an Intermediate Zone at HGL 336, and a High Zone at HGL 391. Five reservoirs provide 4,200,000 gallons in storage. There is an intertie to the City of Bremerton HGL 256 Zone and a second to the West Sound Utility District. Two booster pump stations can move water from the Low Zone through the Intermediate Zone to the High Zone. The pipe system totals over 300,000 feet of pipe ranging from 4 to 18-inch diameter. The principal facilities comprising the City's water system are summarized in Table 3-1. -� ■ rF Service Area Characteristics CONSULTANTSPage 3-11 Description PO 6 — Maple Street PO 7 — Port Orchard Blvd PO 8 — Sidney Avenue PO 9 — Sidney Avenue PO 10 —(pending) McCormick Woods 1 McCormick Woods 2 McCormick Woods 3 McCormick Woods 11 Bremerton Bremerton West Sound - Van Zee Morton Street Maple Street Old Clifton Sedgwick McCormick Woods 580 McCormick Woods Tank 1 McCormick Woods Tank 2 City Hall Melcher Street McCormick 580 Well 6 Booster Table 3-1 City of Port Orchard Water Facilities Dimensions Wells 806 feet x 10-inches 804 feet x 10-inches 577 feet x 12-inches 624 feet x 12-inches 1,074 feet x 10-inches 281 feet x 12-inches 210 feet x 12-inches 183 feet x 12-inches Interties 260 zone 580 zone 390 zone Reservoirs 130 feet diameter 14.59 diameter x 100 feet high 100 diameter x 30 feet high 68 diameter x 40 feet high 42 feet high 25 diameter x 15 feet high 25 diameter x 15 feet high Booster Pump Stations 260 zone 390 zone 580 zone 260 zone City of Port Orchard General Sewer Plan Update Capacity 250 GPM 725 GPM 450 GPM 450 GPM 1,600 — 2,000 GPM 175 GPM 350 GPM 350 GPM 8-inch meter 8-inch meter 6-inch meter 2,000,000 gallons — 260 zone 100,000 gallons — 260 zone 50,000 gallons — 260 zone 1,000,000 gallons — 390 zone 1,000,000 gallons — 390 zone 450,000 gallons — 580 zone 60,000 gallons — 431 to 580 zone 60,000 gallons — 431 to 580 zone 690 and 620 GPM 1000 and 750 GPM 350 and 350 GPM 400 GPM 3.9.2 McCormick Woods Water Company McCormick Woods Water Company is owned and operated by the City and serves McCormick Woods. The existing facilities include a 450,000 gallon reservoir with a booster pump station serving the existing 580 zone from two tanks totaling 120,000 gallons supplied by three wells. Pipe sizes range from 6 to 10-inch diameter. 3.9.3 Berry Lake Manors Berry Lake Manors buys water from the City and serves a 30-unit mobile home park. =� ■ rr Service Area Characteristics CONSULTANTS Page 3-12 City of Port Orchard General Sewer Plan Update 3.9.4 West Sound Utility District West Sound Utility District serves properties east of Blackjack Creek and generally outside the City sewer service area. -� ■ rF Service Area Characteristics CONSULTANTSPage 3-13 City of Port Orchard General Sewer Plan Update PAGE INTENTIONALLY BLANK -� ■ rF Service Area Characteristics CONSULTANTSPage 3-14 City of Bremerton �G :1 W BELFAIR VALLEY:RD 5 W FRONE DR 0 STATE HWY 3 W - 0 3 -B=Sr M■ a' 1 + r a' S i \ar Sinclair Intel _. L T KITSA•P Sl DEKALB ST L r h� w \ City rt f O Q j O SMITH ST KEN' )ALL ST as 1 Orchard * Q SROUFE ST W * _ _ w \N STATE HWY I-6 14j� + o SW'/CO of K RD ■1 Lj •ewes r 3 n ■ City of Bremerton Z. r ■ �J 'v H O ■ �eO a■w■■w■■w■■!r■w■ Cliftonwood �dR Water 5 System Unnyslope ■�OJ SW OLD CLIFTONF Water ■■■�■ District ■ ■ ■ ■ cl ■ �z ' o o° o° ■ o , � P ■ O U a e� City of Port Orchard ■ � ■ r ■ �wraR!■Mw■■nna wa R!I■!■■� 0 z z 0? ES K �! W MAY ST W� ■ ■ %L 'a 2 W M ■.!r o z ■ R a r LI PPERT DR W 41 o ■ \\ Q Clifton1-y •^ W Water Works s Weyer o Lane Water :'--'9W BFRRY LAKE System ■ - City of Port Orchard ■ i + m ■ ,lk rR SW HARPER RD �:!■■ a' ■ /P9�iU U /� ■■ ' Zw■�.. 4 ma 0 O �■ Ilia!■■� O Isar i■■Am■■ ��1 SW DOGWOOD RD ■ * o ■ M � N ± SW LIDER r * Glenwood • a 2■$ Station ■!■ni � SW MI LER RI w 3 RO Navy "C' PEE Ya rd s� Park Lider Water System K� ��R RQ Park Lake L Gatewood Mobile Manor 0 w O Manchester - Water District " w x (7 J m Y W Z N Q I ❑ N �o G� aD sE o MPy Joo SE LAKE VALLEY RD ri r, Long Lake View Est 2-5 J SE NORTH ST Asuelo 0 Legend Water System Q Pump Station O Intertie ® Reservoir w O Wells O PRV Water Mains Base Layers �1■L City of Port Orchard IrI Port Orchard UGA i Water Service Area Parcels 1 Water Bodies Water Courses Water System: City of Port Orchard 2015 ` BHC Consultants, LLC Kitsap County base data 2014 �' Water System Map Figure r • B Fifth Avenue, Suite t Data sources supplied may not reflect current or actual conditions. This map r not Seattle, Washington98101 isaesentsury representation nowarantyi on adeconceningth acle.curacy, It uracy, urr l General Sewer Plan Update represent survey data. No warranty is made concerning the accuracy, currency, - 206.505.3400 or completeness of data depicted on this map. 0 3,000 6,000 S. 206.505.3406(fax) BHCCcnsultantsLLC., assumes noresponsibility for the validity ofany Fee1 �` City of Port Orchard, Washington 206.50 c3406u(tants.com information presented herein, nor any responsibility for the use or misuse of the data. N CrTy 3-5 Port Qrchatd City of Port Orchard General Sewer Plan Update PAGE INTENTIONALLY BLANK ■ r� Service Area Characteristics G 9 •TAN7S Page 3-16 SECTION 4 POPULATION 4.1 GENERAL City of Port Orchard General Sewer Plan Update Population estimates for the City's service area have been established for each mini -basin for 2016, 2022, 2026, 2036, and build out. Sewage quantities are projected and analyzed for two categories: population; and, employment. The methodology used various available resources to establish accurate population estimates and projections for the purpose of sewer modeling and CIP identification. Years 2022 and 2036 are used for 6- and 20- year CIP planning purposes. The service area consists of 17 sewer mini -basins. Since these mini -basins do not include the portion of the City served by WSUD, the service area population and employment totals do not reflect City-wide population and employment totals. 4.2 EXISTING POPULATION AND EMPLOYMENT The baseline population and employment are representative of the most recent year for which data was available. Year 2016 existing population and employment estimates were interpolated between the baseline and projected growth. The results are summarized in Table 4-1. 4.2.1 Population Year 2015 served as the baseline year for residential population analysis. Kitsap County provided 2015 residential population estimates for each mini -basin based on County Tax Assessor data. The population was estimated for each parcel as a function of total housing units and average household size. The City provided parcel -level review in instances where housing unit counts were unknown. The assumed average household size was 2.4 for single family residences and 1.8 for multi -family residences based on data provided by the City. Parcel -level results were aggregated by mini -basin. 4.2.2 Employment Year 2013 served as the baseline year for employment analysis. The Puget Sound Regional Council (PSRC) provided 2013 Covered Employment custom estimates per mini -basin. Covered employment refers to positions covered by the Washington Unemployment Insurance Act, and accounts for approximately 85-90% of all employment. =� ■ rr Population CONSULTANTS Page 4-1 City of Port Orchard General Sewer Plan Update Table 4-1 Service Area Population and Employment Estimates Year Population Employment 2016 11,837 4,779 2022 13,558 5,114 2026 14,706 5,338 2036 17,575 5,898 Build Out 24,074 8,343 4.3 FUTURE POPULATION AND EMPLOYMENT The target years for population and employment analyses are 2022 (used for 6-year CIP), 2026, 2036 (used for 20 year CIP), and build out. Assuming a constant growth rate, population and employment estimates for target years were interpolated between the baseline and 2036 projected growth. Kitsap County provided population capacity estimates per mini -basin for year 2036, which is the 20-year planning horizon for the County land capacity analysis. The population capacity estimates represent a build out scenario. The build out scenario is for modeling purposes only and does not reflect population growth goals or constraints. The results are summarized in Table 4-1. 4.3.1 Population Residential population estimates were interpolated for 2016, 2022 and 2026 between the baseline and 2036 for each mini -basin. In accordance with the Growth Management Act (GMA), the Kitsap Regional Coordinating Council (KRCC) has established 2036 population targets for each jurisdiction in the Countywide Planning Policies. Additionally, the 2015 City-wide population estimate was obtained from the state Office of Financial Management. The calculated growth rate was applied to the 2015 baseline residential population to establish the projected total growth for 2036. The total growth was distributed throughout the service area based on the future population capacity captured by each mini -basin. Kitsap County provided the additional residential capacity for each mini -basin for the year 2036. This figure was added to the 2015 baseline estimate to establish the total 2036 population capacity for each mini -basin to approximate a build out scenario for modeling purposes. The population per mini -basin is included as Appendix D. =� ■ rr Population CONSULTANTS Page 4-2 City of Port Orchard General Sewer Plan Update 4.3.1 Employment Employment estimates were interpolated for 2016, 2022 and 2026 between the baseline and 2036 for each mini -basin. In accordance with the GMA, the KRCC has established 2036 job growth targets for each jurisdiction in the Countywide Planning Policies. Additionally, the 2013 City-wide covered employment estimate was obtained from the PSRC. The calculated growth rate was applied to the 2013 baseline employment population to establish the projected total growth for 2036 for each mini -basin. The total growth was distributed throughout the service area based on the future employment capacity captured by each mini -basin. Kitsap County provided the additional employment capacity for each mini -basin for the year 2036. To approximate a build out scenario for modeling purposes, this figure was added to the 2013 baseline estimate to establish the total 2036 employment capacity for each mini -basin. The population per mini -basin is included as Appendix D. -� ■ L~ Population CONSULTANTSPage 4-3 City of Port Orchard General Sewer Plan Update PAGE INTENTIONALLY BLANK -� ■ L~ Population CONSULTANTSPage 4-4 City of Port Orchard General Sewer Plan Update SECTION 5 EXISTING SEWER FACILITIES 5.1 INTRODUCTION Construction of the wastewater collection system began in the early 1960's and included a network of gravity pipes along Bay Street and a sewage treatment plant located by the marina. The treatment plant was decommissioned in the early 1980's and replaced with the Marina Pump Station that pumps the sewage in the City's sewer service area to the SKWRF. The City has continued to expand the sewer collection system with gravity sewers, pump stations, and with septic tank effluent pump (STEP) systems. The existing City sewer system is shown in Figure 5-1, which is assembled from the graphic information system (GIS) files maintained by Kitsap County and as-builts from the City. 5.2 EXISTING AND PLANNED MINI -BASINS A mini -basin is defined as an area from which the collection system drains to a specified discharge point. Delineations of mini -basins are based on existing sewer service and topography. Mini -basins were delineated with approval from the City and are shown in Figure 5- 1. The mini -basins and lift stations are shown schematically in Figure 5-2. 5.3 EXISTING SEWER PIPING The City of Port Orchard owns, operates, and maintains approximately 70 miles of sewer pipes ranging from 2-inch to 24-inch diameter. This includes approximately 49 miles of gravity sewers, 8 miles of force mains, and 14 miles of STEP mains. The gravity sewers and force mains are summarized in Tables 5-1 and 5-2. For additional modeling information, see Section 7. -� ■ rF Existing Sewer Facilities CONSULTANTSPage 5-1 City of Port Orchard General Sewer Plan Update Table 5-1 Gravity Sewers Pipe Diameter (inches) Modeled Length (feet) Total Length (feet) 8 12,400 207,800 10 11,200 11,200 12 11,600 11,600 15 20,500 20,500 16 3,300 3,300 18 2,800 2,800 24 1,200 1,200 30 200 200 Total Gravity Sewers 63,200 (--12 miles) 63,200 (-49 miles) Notes: 1) Only trunk sewers and portions of 8-inch diameter are included in the model. 2) It is assumed the remaining 37 miles of gravity sewers are 8-inch diameter. Table 5-2 Force Mains Pipe Diameter (inches) Length') (feet) 4 11,400 6 17,700 8 1,800 10 800 12 3,000 18 6,700 Total Force Mains 41,400 -8 miles Notes: 1 All for mains are included in the model. 5.4 EXISTING PUMP STATIONS The City's pump stations are in Table 5-3 with the general information derived from City records. Pump curves are included in Appendix E. The firm capacity of the Marina Pump Station is defined as the total pump capacity with the largest pumps out of service. The smaller pumps cannot pump with a single large pump in service. Therefore, the firm capacity is equal to the 3,800 gpm capacity of a single large pump. No overflows have been recorded within the sewer pipe systems or at the pump stations. -� ■ rF Existing Sewer Facilities CONSULTANTSPage 5-2 _ ° •ti' — — L - c m °° • �a South Kitsap Water Reclamationsoo l �•% / ■y,lys� -. Facility ECHESTER RD p �rIlkoo t G: ! f j � i j o W W 00 i Y — ��. r7 :1 1 -r;: ray■■M■� • > Sinclair Marina Bay S� � o a 0I j RID o41l� 11si��l a ° �.•f� / I - ..Jw I � � -- � sP�N� F r`irI oIlk o �■ SE MILE HILL oR L G f Eagle Crest 1 O 15 17 s 1-- rr~a ; 14 m r�■� Golden r i +_. _"•/ . STATE HWY 16 -!P �'• W i i / •I 6 J iTremont �< 19-m_ Canyo�nlFCt Place-Iem �< •Curley �V ■ J� H� T�.- McCormick -Woods #1 10 Harrispin`1 1, o I /y�aa+■� Hospital sE a DA E Q Pottery '� �...i \ .` Fj y� to Flower ■� o� Ridge 3 I a= The Ridge Cedar Height hts� \" ' tip` ■da a■ a� % I 9 9 � Meadows ♦ r ga% • i --� �'p ••} . SE SALMI p� �• I� ■■■ ��`/• ■ , SW BERRY LAKE RD � Z j ■ � l ;�� • � Ira `< � o-�.l ■ - "� / lit4w■ of 1 mw .� �y�!■� '�� �lp.0 JQCJ� w ry SE SED,GWICK RD / McCormick ! Sedgwick a�z. ■ % K Woods #2 Xx ■ ✓ ` �� ■ 1 ■ Lowes rlev C, " �� QAlbertson ■ -- / �.� ■ r .1 i y" rYe Creek..) , Gong . ' �'��t iay�■ Ssti ) Lake I.w1 1■w ..-■ \ . SW LIDER RD ° ■ % i�■agar%■a�ar�■�ii C""dosl Sewer System: City of Port Orchard 2015 Sewer System & Basins Map Kitsap County base data 2015 Figure Data sources supplied may not reflect current or actual conditions. This map ■ is a geographic representation based on information available. It does not General Sewer Plan Update represent survey data. No warranty is made concerning the accuracy, currency, Y or completeness of depicted no th esponsme p. 0 3,000 6,0Feet �` h �— . City of Port Orchard, Washington �-� BHC Consultants LLC., assumes no responsibility for the validity of any \\\ �i � Y y 5 1 S information presented herein, nor any responsibility for the use or misuse of the data. N P� �� COPYRIGHT©2015 BHC CONSULTANTS LLC-ALL RIGHTS RESERVED City of Port Orchard General Sewer Plan Update PAGE INTENTIONALLY BLANK ■ r� Existing Sewer Facilities G S•TAN7S Page 5-4 XRFFS XOXF LEGEND Gravity Main — Force Main ♦ STEP Main 9LS No. Lift Station No. Mini -Basin 12 Golden Pond Wastewater Tremont WWTP Treatment 12 Place Plant A Trunk Designation Canyon 12 Court w 2 10 McCormick Woods 1 McCormick North T 1 McCormick Ridge Meadows 3 3 � I McCormick Woods 2 J K Eli I Harrison `I Hospital 7� I 1z Cedar Heights Marina — —4SKWRF] ® Bay " 1s St B 17 E 9 G Flower ►F ® Meadows I Albertsons tSedgewick �❑B 7 Lowes B Existing Sewer Schematic Figure City of Port Orchard General Sewer Plan Update 5-2CONSULTANTS C11 Par[ Orchard COPYRIGHT © 2016 BHC CONSULTANTS, LLC. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED City of Port Orchard General Sewer Plan Update PAGE INTENTIONALLY BLANK �� ■ �F Existing Sewer Facilities CONSULTANTS Page 5-6 City of Port Orchard General Sewer Plan Update Table 5-3 Existing Pump Stations Single Pump Pump Head Pump Motor Firm Number Force Station Location Capacity (TDH) Power (hp) Capacity of Pumps Main (in) Albertsons 350 S.W. Sedgwick Road 176 100 30 176 2 6 Bay Street(') 1207 Bay Street 730 22 7.5 730 2 10 Canyon Court 512 Cedar Canyon Court 50 150 7.5 75(2) 3 4(4) Cedar Heights 2220 Pottery Avenue 50 150 7.5 50 2 4 Eagle Crest 1091 Eagle Crest Place 100 35 5 100 2 4(4) Flower Meadows 345 Flower Meadows Street 104 91 7.5 104 2 6 Golden Pond 385 Golden Pond Road 137 78 7.5 137 2 4(4) Harrison Hospital 444 South Kitsap Boulevard 280 110 40 280 2 6/8 Marina Typical Flow 1,150 37 20 2 Pumps(3) 700 Sidney Parkway 3,800 18 Marina High Flow Pumps(3) 3,800 95 150 2 McCormick Woods #1 1190 Old Clifton Road 1,000 122 75 1,000 2 16 McCormick Woods #2 2200 Old Clifton Road 1,000 60 30 1,000 2 16 Pottery 2014 Pottery Avenue 1,800 75 60 1,800 2 12 Sedgwick 505 Sedgwick Road 180 165 25 180 2 6 Tremont Place 281 Tremont Place 60 23 3 60 2 4 Ridge 1&2 2476 SW Siskin Circle 200 90 15 200 2 6 Ridge 3 4383 Riflebird Place 690 95 30 690 2 4 Notes: 1) Bay Street PS has an overflow into Sinclair Inlet. 2) Firm capacity at Canyon Court is estimated based on two pumps operating in parallel. 3) Marina PS has two pumps for typical flows, two pumps for high flows, and an overflow into Sinclair Inlet. 4 Record drawings were unavailable so a 4-inch force main size was assumed. ■ 11�- Existing Sewer Facilities CONSULTANTS Page 5-7 City of Port Orchard General Sewer Plan Update 5.5 MCCORMICK WOODS STEP SYSTEM Sewer service to McCormick Woods is provided with a STEP system. These operate like an on -site septic system by collecting sewage into a septic tank, and settling out solids. However, instead of discharging the effluent to a drain field, it is instead pumped into a force main which ultimately discharges to gravity conveyance piping. The septic tanks need periodical cleaning to remove grease and accumulated solids. McCormick Woods was originally developed with individual on -site septic systems. These were converted to STEP units discharging to a community drain field south of Old Clifton Road near the west of the City. Under Utility Local Improvement District (ULID) #6, the City of Port Orchard agreed to provide sewer service and to assume responsibility for the STEP units. McCormick Woods Pump Station #1, McCormick Woods Pump Station #2, and associated piping were built to convey sewage to the City's sewer collection system. 5.6 SOUTH KITSAP INDUSTRIAL AREA The City of Bremerton annexed the SKIA in 2009. Port Orchard will not provide sewer service to this area as was indicated in the 2009 City of Port Orchard Comprehensive Sanitary Sewer Plan Update. 5.7 WEST SOUND UTILITY DISTRICT FACILITIES The City sewer system formerly included a wastewater treatment facility adjacent to the Port Orchard Marina and the trunk sewers conveyed all flow to that location. In 1983, the City's treatment facility was replaced with the Marina Pump Station, which conveys flow east through an 18-inch force main to the SKWRF. WSUD operates the SKWRF which is jointly owned by the City and WSUD under NPDES Permit WA-002034-6 from the State Department of Ecology. The City and WSUD have had an operating agreement which initiated in 1982 and was extended in 2014. The facility consists of three interrelated and complementary systems: • Activated sludge secondary treatment system • Membrane bioreactor secondary treatment system production reclaimed water • Ballasted clarifier for advanced primary treatment system for peak storm flows The facility has a current rated capacity of 4.2 mgd during the average day of the maximum month with a peak day capacity of 16 mgd. Flows exceeding 16 mgd may be treated through the ballasted clarifier to achieve a blended effluent meeting the effluent requirements defined in the NPDES permit. The City and WSUD have agreed that this capacity is to be shared equally. -3 ■ r♦ Existing Sewer Facilities CONSULTANTSPage 5-8 City of Port Orchard General Sewer Plan Update The highest average daily flows recorded during November and December 2006 were 3.94 mgd and 4.6 mgd during days of measured rainfall of 2.1 and 2.41 inches. Neither flow was sufficient to require operation of the ballasted clarifier. However, the 3 December 2007 storm produced about 8.8 mgd and the ballasted clarifier performed as designed. Annual average day flow for 2007 was about 1.7 mgd. WSUD projects wastewater flow will increase to about 2.3 mgd by 2025. WSUD also operates an extensive sewerage collection system. Some of WSUD sewers in the immediate vicinity of City sewers are shown on Figure 5-1. Figure 5-1 also shows that some parcels within the city limits are served by WSUD. The sewer service area boundary has not been defined by formal agreement, but has evolved as various properties have developed and needed sewer service based on topography and guidance from the Sewer Advisory Committee. The intent is for service to be provided by the agency at the least infrastructure cost to the developer. WSUD serves east of Blackjack Creek except for the SR 16 intersection. Eventually, the City expects to annex the entire UGA. =� ■ rr Existing Sewer Facilities CONSULTANTS Page 5-9 City of Port Orchard General Sewer Plan Update PAGE INTENTIONALLY BLANK -� ■ rr Existing Sewer Facilities CONSULTANTSPage 5-10 SECTION 6 WASTEWATER FLOWS 6.1 INTRODUCTION City of Port Orchard General Sewer Plan Update Wastewater flow data recorded at the Marina Pump Station (MPS) and the South Kitsap Water Reclamation Facility (SKWRF) for the years of 2012 through 2014 were analyzed to determine current wastewater flow characteristics. 6.2 EXISTING WASTEWATER FLOWS All wastewater from the City sewer collection system is pumped through the MPS to the SKWRF. Flow at the MPS is recorded on a daily basis using a low flow meter and a high flow meter. There is a third flow meter at the SKWRF that records data on a 1-minute basis. The low flow meter at MPS regularly recorded lower flows than the SKWRF meter, while the high flow meter closely matched the SKWRF flows. Therefore, SKWRF flows were used for average annual and minimum day flows for the purpose of unit sewer flow calculations. Selected flow records are summarized in Table 6-1. SKWRF data for years prior to 2013 are unavailable due a change in WSUD flow monitoring software. Table 6-1 Wastewater Flow Summary Parameter 2012 (MPS) 2013 (SKWRF) 2014 (SKWRF) Average Annual Flow (mgd) --- 0.947 1.006 Minimum Day Flow (mgd) --- 0.757 0.797 Peak Day Flow (mgd) 3.433(2) 1.646 2.564 Peak Day Flow Date 11 /19/2012 1 /10/2013 3/6/2014 Peak Day Rainfall(3) (inches) 2.26 1.10 1.56 Notes: 1) Average annual and minimum day flows measured at the MPS were consistently lower than those measured at the SKWRF. Therefore, SKWRF data was used for average annual and minimum day flows. 2) A higher flow of 4.36 mgd was recorded on 1/1/2012 at the Marina Pump Station but was disregarded because it greatly exceeded the 1.65 mgd recorded at the SKWRF, and only 0.05-inches of rain was recorded on that day. 3) Rainfall is for the day previous to the Peak Day Flow Date. Average monthly flows for the City's portion of the sewer system are summarized in Table 6-2. =� ■ rr Wastewater Flows CONSULTANTS Page 6-1 City of Port Orchard General Sewer Plan Update Table 6-2 Average Monthly Flows (mgd) Month 20120) (MPS) 2013 (SKWRF) 2014 (SKWRF) January 0.891 0.937 0.900 February 0.768 0.888 1.145 March 0.899 0.912 1.191 April 0.760 0.931 0.921 May 0.746 0.964 0.940 June 0.771 1.006 0.981 July 0.702 1.030 0.958 August 0.681 1.026 0.931 September 0.686 1.124 0.953 October 0.785 0.965 1.053 November 1.079 0.894 1.061 December 1.155 0.845 1.047 Annual Average 0.830 0.947 1.006 Notes: 1) 2012 flows were measured at the MPS; 2012 SKWRF data are not available. Average annual and minimum day flows measured at the MPS were consistently lower than those measured at the SKWRF. 6.3 WASTEWATER UNIT FLOWS Total residential sewer flow was estimated by taking annual average sewer flows measured at the SKWRF and subtracting wet weather non-residential water demands. Wet weather water usage does not include irrigation and is used to approximate average annual sewer flows. Total residential sewer flow was then divided by total estimated residential population to determine unit per capita flow rates as summarized in Table 6-3. Table 6-3 Residential Unit Flow Parameter 2013 2014 Average Annual Flow (mgd) 0.947 1.007 Wet Weather Non -Residential Water Demand (mgd) 0.146 0.131 Estimated Residential Sewer Flow (mgd) 0.801 0.856 Population 11,002 11,242 Gallons per Capita per Day (gpcd) 73 78 A residential sewer rate of 78 gpcd is used for planning purposes. This is similar to other communities in the Puget Sound area. =� ■ rr Wastewater Flows CONSULTANTS Page 6-2 City of Port Orchard General Sewer Plan Update Wet weather water demand more accurately reflects actual water demand, and hence sewer flows, without summer irrigation. The estimated per employee wastewater rates based on wet weather water demand are summarized in Table 6-4. A per employee sewer rate of 32 gallons per employee per day (gped) will be used for planning purposes. Table 6-4 Employee Unit Flow Parameter 2013 2014 Employment 4,611 4,667 Average Commercial and Government Water Demand m d 0.146 0.131 Employee gped 32 28 6.4 INFILTRATION AND INFLOW Infiltration and inflow (1/1) is the wastewater component consisting of stormwater surface runoff entering the sewer system and infiltration from storm -saturated ground conditions. Inflow is runoff entering the sewer directly, typically from storm sewer connections, basement sump pumps, roof drains and submerged manholes. Infiltration occurs as groundwater leaks into the sewer system through cracked or broken pipes and manholes, or through loose joints and connections. 1/1 is important in determining the peak day and peak hour flows through the system. They can vary significantly due to changes in groundwater tables, intensity of rainfall, duration of rainfall, and when the peak of the rain event occurs during the day. Calculated 1/1 rates are presented in Table 6-5. Based on these uncertainties, an 1/1 rate of 1,046 gpd/acre is used for planning purposes. =� ■ rr Wastewater Flows CONSULTANTS Page 6-3 City of Port Orchard General Sewer Plan Update Table 6-5 Infiltration and Inflow Parameter 2012 (MPS) 2013 (SKWRF) 2014 (SKWRF) Peak Day Flow (mgd) 3.433 1.646 2.564 Average Annual Flow (mgd) ---(1) 0.947 1.007 Peak Day Infiltration and Inflow(2) (mgd) 2.4560) 0.752 1.643 Sewered Area (acres) 2,349 2,349 2,349 Infiltration and Inflow (gpd/acre) 1,046 298 663 Notes: 1) Average annual and minimum day flows measured at the MPS were consistently lower than those measured at the SKWRF. Therefore, the average of 2013 and 2014 measured at the SKWRF was used instead of the 2012 average annual flow measured at the MPS for a more accurate flow rate to calculate 1/1 rates. 2) Peak day infiltration and inflow was calculated by subtracting the average annual flow from the peak day flow. 3) Sewered area is the area of all parcels and right-of-way adjacent to a sewer line in 2015. The sewered area for individual years was not available but assumed to be similar. The EPA publication `Infiltration/Inflow — 1/1 Analysis and Project Certification' dated May 1985 was reissued by the Department of Ecology as Ecology Publication No. 97-03. This publication established the following thresholds for possibly excessive infiltration and inflow: • If average dry weather flow is less than 120 gpcd, infiltration is non -excessive. • If average wet weather flow is less than 275 gpcd, inflow is non -excessive. The average dry weather and wet weather flows are summarized in Table 6-6. The average dry weather flows indicate that infiltration is non -excessive. The average wet weather flows indicate that inflow is non -excessive. =� ■ rr Wastewater Flows CONSULTANTS Page 6-4 City of Port Orchard General Sewer Plan Update Table 6-6 EPA/DOE Excessive 1/1 Criteria Parameter 2012 (MPS) 2013 (SKWRF) 2014 (SKWRF) Population 10,762 11,002 11,242 Average Dry Weather Flow (mgd) 0.7450) 0.905 0.911 Average Dry Weather Flow (gpcd) 690) 82 81 Average Dry Weather Dates(2) 2/3-2/7 1/12-1/23 4/8-4/15 Average Wet Weather Flow (mgd) 2.770 1.408 2.145 Average Wet Weather Flow (gpcd) 257 128 191 Notes: 1) Average annual and minimum day flows measured at the MPS were consistently lower than those measured at the SKWRF. 2) Dry weather flows are the average flow on days where no rainfall has occurred during a season of high groundwater. 3 Wet weather flows are the average of the seven highest flow events per year. 6.5 PEAKING FACTORS Comparison of the maximum day events recorded in recent years defines the peak day factors experienced by the City sewer system summarized in Table 6-7. Table 6-7 Peak Day Factor Peaking Elements 20120) 2013 2014 Peak Day Flow (PDF) (mgd) 3.433 1.646 2.564 Average Annual Flow (AAF) (mgd) 0.9770) 0.947 1.006 Peak Day Factor (PDF/AAF) 3.5140) 1.738 2.549 Notes: 1) Flows for 2012 were measured at the Marina Pump Station. Average annual and minimum day flows measured at the MPS were consistently lower than those measured at the SKWRF. Therefore, the average of 2013 and 2014 measured at the SKWRF was used in place of the 2012 average annual flow for a more accurate peak day factor. Peak hour flows based on flow meter data at the SKWRF are summarized in Table 6-8. Hourly data was not available for 2012 or 2013. Therefore, only the 2014 peak hour factor was calculated. =� ■ rr Wastewater Flows CONSULTANTS Page 6-5 City of Port Orchard General Sewer Plan Update Table 6-8 Peak Hour Factor Peaking Elements 2014 Peak Hour Flow (PHF) (mgd) 3.466 Average Annual Flow (mgd) 1.006 Peak Hour Factor (PHF/AAF) 3.445 6.6 DIURNAL CURVES Typically, sewer flows are lowest at night and highest during the morning and evening. This distribution of flow throughout the day is described by a diurnal curve. These curves are used by the computer model to simulate flow variations throughout the time period being modeled. Two curves are used to vary flow throughout the day: one for the sanitary sewer component, and one for the 1/1 component. The sanitary sewer diurnal curve was calculated by normalizing hourly flow on a day with a similar flow to the average annual flow. The 1/1 curve was calculated by taking peak day flow on an hourly basis, subtracting the average annual flow, and normalizing the results. The sanitary and 1/1 diurnal curves are presented as Figure 6-1. For future model runs, the 1/1 curve was shifted to align peak sanitary and peak 1/1 flows to simulate peak flows to the system. The shift increases the peak hour factor to approximately 6.037. This is a conservative approach since a major storm flow may occur at any time of the day. Existing model runs were used for calibration purposes and do not utilize the shifted 1/1 curve. -� ■ L~ Wastewater Flows CONSULTANTSPage 6-6 City of Port Orchard General Sewer Plan Update 2.50 2.00 0.50 M pOP� OOP OOP OOP OOe� .00�� 00�� 00�� pOP� Sa n ita ry Sewe r — — — Infiltration/Inflow Figure 6-1 Diurnal Curves 6.7 INDUSTRIAL CONNECTIONS The former Kitsap County Landfill, located within the South Kitsap Industrial Area (SKIA), has been closed and capped. Leachate from the facility is trucked to the City sewer system and discharged into a manhole in Bay Street and SW Wilkins Drive. The State Waste Discharge Permit No. ST0007271 is included as Appendix F. 6.8 PROJECTED WASTEWATER FLOWS Wastewater flows are projected to future conditions based on the land uses established by current zoning for the future service area. Unit flows developed above are assumed to remain constant throughout the planning horizon. A summary of unit flows and projected flows for the planning horizon are shown as Table 6-9. A breakdown per basin is included as Appendix D. �� ■ L~ Wastewater Flows CONSULTANTSPage 6-7 City of Port Orchard General Sewer Plan Update Table 6-9 Projected Wastewater Flows Residential Residential Employment Employment Average 1/1 Sewered Peak Day Peak Hour Year population Flow population Flow (gpcd) Annual (gpd/ Area Flow Flow0) (gpcd) Flow (mgd) acre) (acres) (mgd) (mgd) 2016 11,837 78 4,779 32 1.08 1,046 2,349 3.53 6.52 2022 13,558 78 5,114 32 1.22 1,046 2,583 3.92 7.26 2026 14,706 78 5,338 32 1.32 1,046 2,716 4.16 7.68 2036 17,575 78 5,898 32 1.56 1,046 3,051 4.75 8.74 Build Out 24,074 78 8,343 32 2.14 1,046 3,808 6.13 11.18 Notes: 1) Peak hour flows were calculated by shifting the 1/1 curve to maximize peak hour flows as described in Section 6-5. This results in a more conservative peak hour factor than calculated in Table 6-7. �� ■ 1F Wastewater Flows CONSULTANTS Page 6-8 City of Port Orchard General Sewer Plan Update SECTION 7 CONVEYANCE SYSTEM ANALYSIS 7.1 INTRODUCTION Analysis of the City's wastewater conveyance system is a critical component in determining the ability of the existing infrastructure to accommodate future growth. This section describes the analysis necessary for strategic, long-term infrastructure planning and development of the Capital Improvement Plan (CIP). The City's conveyance system was analyzed using a truncated model, simulating only trunk and interceptor gravity mains and all pump stations. This allows for an accurate representation of the most critical components of the City's conveyance system, and the simultaneous analysis of both gravity and pressure systems. The system was analyzed for existing conditions (2016), a 6-year planning horizon (2022), a 10-year planning horizon (2026), a 20-year planning horizon (2036), and the theoretical build -out conditions. 7.2 MODEL SOFTWARE InfoSWMM 12.0 by Innovyze was the hydraulic modeling software used to model the City sewer system. InfoSWMM 12.0 is a dynamic hydraulic model that uses the EPA SWMM 5.0 computer program for the hydraulic analysis calculations. The model is designed specifically for modeling urban sanitary and combined sewer systems. The current version operates within an ArcGIS (ArcMap) platform. 7.3 MODEL DEVELOPMENT Model files were developed from AutoCAD files of the sewer system from 2002 provided by the City which had manhole depths, and were supplemented with LIDAR obtained from PACE to determine manhole rim elevations and as-builts. Some elevations were still missing after this process, including some of the smaller pump stations. Estimates for depths, pipe slopes, wet well sizes, and pump operation elevations were made to develop a functional model that reasonably represents the sewer system. A truncated model was used consisting of all pump stations and the major sewer mains within the City's collection system. The model can be expanded in the future as needed and when budget allows. The following information was used in developing the hydraulic model of the existing sewer collection system. Additional detail on the existing sewer system is included in Section 6. -� ■ rF Conveyance System Analysis CONSULTANTSPage 7-1 City of Port Orchard General Sewer Plan Update 7.3.1 Gravity Sewers Elevations were obtained using LIDAR for rim elevations and depth to invert provided by the City in an AutoCAD file to calculate invert elevations. Record drawings were used to evaluate pipe invert elevations in areas where abnormal or adverse grades were present. Where no elevation data was available, reasonable estimates based on pipe slopes and depths were used. 7.3.2 Lift Stations Lift stations were imported to the model from the AutoCAD file provided by the City. Pump curves were added to simulate pump operation. Wet wells are modeled based on lift station data sheets maintained by O&M staff. Depth to volume relationships and pump on/off set points were also added. Modeled pumping rates were compared against factory pump curve data when available to ensure model accuracy and that the model outputs were within a range of reasonably expected values. Data for some of the smaller lift stations were unavailable. Reasonable estimates were used for depth, wet well size, and pump curves. Because these smaller lift stations represent a fraction of the flows, this will not significantly impact the results of the model. These lift stations can be updated in the future. 7.4 MODEL LOADING Meaningful modeling results can only be obtained if the quantity of flows and the location where they enter the system in the model reflect actual conditions. Wastewater flow consists of two separate elements: sanitary sewer flow and infiltration and inflow (1/1). Sanitary sewer flow is typically referred to as Dry Weather Flow (DWF) in the model (DWF in the collection system usually includes a minor amount of base 1/1 that is accounted for in the model 1/1 loading). 1/1 is loaded into the model as an external source of flow. All flow is loaded to model "nodes", which are manholes in gravity systems. 7.4.1 Sanitary Sewer Flows Existing and projected sanitary sewer flow rates were developed for each basin on a gpd/acre basis using the following information: • Population and employment data and projections (described in Section 4) • Existing measured flow rates (described in Section 5) • Unit sewer flows (described in Section 5) • Diurnal curves (described in Section 5) • Mini -basin areas (described in Section 6) =� ■ rr Conveyance System Analysis CONSULTANTS Page 7-2 City of Port Orchard General Sewer Plan Update Model loading is assigned on a flow per unit area basis for nodes identified in each basin. The model assigns flow to the nodes, based on the amount of contributing area calculated for each node using the Thiessen polygon method. 7.4.2 Infiltration and Inflow (1/1) Existing and projected 1/1 rates were developed on a gallons/acre basis using the following information: • 1/1 (described in Section 5) • Diurnal curves (described in Section 5) • Mini -basin areas (described in Section 6) • Sewered areas (described below) Total 1/1 for each basin was calculated using the unit 1/1 rates described in Section 5 and approximate area contributing to the sewer system. The existing sewered area was derived from the area of parcels and right-of-ways adjacent to existing sewers, and was adjusted based on engineering judgment and knowledge of the sewer system. Build -out sewered area was calculated by taking the existing sewered area and adding the net developable area from the Kitsap County Updated Land Capacity Analysis (ULCA) plus 54 percent for right-of-way and public and quasi -public facilities based on assumptions in the ULCA. Sewered areas for 2022, 2026, and 2036 were interpolated between existing and build -out sewered areas by calcuting the change in sewered area divided by the change in population between existing conditions and build -out conditions, which is approximately 3,300 sf per person and includes parcels, right-of-way, and other public facilities. Model 1/1 loading was assigned to nodes based on the ratio of contributing area calculated for each node using the Thiessen polygon method to total basin area. Determining how 1/1 is projected into the future as the collection system expands and ages is a key issue. Based on the King County Regional Infiltration/Inflow Control Program, a widely accepted assumption in Western Washington is to increase the 1/1 component of sewer flow by 7 percent per decade, up to a maximum of 28 percent. Much of the City's existing sewer collection system was built 40 years ago or more, and has reached the maximum 1/1 rate. Newer infrastructure typically has lower rates of 1/I. As the sewer system expands with new construction, it is likely that the 1/1 rate will remain the same or drop due to improved materials and construction. Therefore, a constant 1/1 rate was assumed for future 1/1 projections. =� ■ rr Conveyance System Analysis CONSULTANTS Page 7-3 City of Port Orchard General Sewer Plan Update For future model runs, the 1/1 curve is shifted to maximize flows to the system, effectively increasing the peak hour factor. This is a conservative approach since a major storm flow may occur at any time of the day. Existing model runs were used for calibration purposes and do not utilize the shifted 1/1 curve. �I4•�►,WI]=1t9Y_1,1-3[7_rIIIW The model was calibrated using the flow meters at the SKWRF for average flows and MPS for peak day flows. 7.5.1 Calibration to Recorded Flow Data Average Annual Flow Calibration The first step in calibrating the model was to compare predicted sanitary flows calculated in Section 5 to measured average annual flow data. After the modeled sanitary sewer volumes were verified, diurnal flow patterns were loaded and adjusted until the variations in simulated flow throughout the day reasonably matched the measured average annual flow conditions. Peak Day Flow Calibration Peak day 1/1 was loaded into the model and simulation results were compared with the peak day flow at the MPS. The modeled flow volume was compared with the measured flow volume during peak days to ensure model loading reasonably matched the field data. Peak Hour Flow Calibration There was not sufficient data available to calibrate peak hour flow. The peak day flow occurred in 2012, for which only total daily flow volumes were available. Therefore, an 1/1 curve was developed using the peak day flow from 2014, which was the second largest peak day flow, and applied to the peak day flow of 2012. Based on the calibration of the average annual flow, peak day flow, and sanitary sewer diurnal curve, this gives a reasonable result. As more data is made available, the peak hour flow calibration may be revisited. For future model runs, the 1/1 curve was shifted to align peak sanitary and peak 1/1 flows to simulate peak flows to the system. This is a conservative approach since a major storm flow may occur at any time of the day. Existing model runs were used for calibration purposes and do not utilize the shifted 1/1 curve. =� ■ rr Conveyance System Analysis CONSULTANTS Page 7-4 City of Port Orchard General Sewer Plan Update 7.5.2 Calibration Results The model was calibrated to SKWRF flow meter data for average annual flow and MPS flow monitoring data for peak day flow. Average annual flows were calibrated to within 3 percent and peak day flows to within 2 percent. This is within the accuracy limits of the flow meters used and is acceptable. 7.6 FUTURE SEWER SYSTEM EXPANSION Future sewer system expansion was modeled by adding flow from all future population growth into the existing system model. Sewer extensions were not sized, but as the need arises, the model can be updated to ensure that the new sewer systems are constructed with adequate capacity for future growth. It is anticipated that most of the future infrastructure into unsewered areas will be constructed by developers. Due to the topography, some new developments may require pump stations. 7.7 MODELING SCENARIOS Five scenarios were developed to analyze the City's wastewater conveyance system utilizing the population and unit flow projections described in Sections 4 and 5 and are summarized in Table 7-1. Table 7-1 Projected Wastewater Flows (mgd) Flow 2016 2022 2026 2036 Build -Out Average Annual 1.08 1.22 1.32 1.56 2.14 Peak Day 3.53 3.92 4.16 4.75 6.13 Peak Hour 6.52 7.26 7.68 8.74 11.18 7.8 HYDRAULIC MODELING ANALYSIS 7.8.1 Design Capacity The design capacity of the gravity mains is considered to be 100 percent depth (1.0 d/D ratio, where d is the flow depth and D is the pipe diameter). The maximum design capacity of STEP mains and force mains are exceeded when flow velocities are greater than 8 feet per second. The firm capacity of a lift station is defined as the capacity of the lift station with the largest pump out of service. When model simulation results exceed these design capacities in piping or in lift stations, they are identified as deficient and system improvements are identified to resolve them. Modeling results for all scenarios are included in Appendix G. =� ■ rr Conveyance System Analysis CONSULTANTS Page 7-5 City of Port Orchard General Sewer Plan Update 7.8.2 Existing System — Results The existing system model results for peak day flow are shown on Figure 7-1. The gravity sewer and pump station capacity deficiencies are summarized in Tables 7-2 and 7-3. The modeled surcharging in the McCormick Woods Drive SW gravity sewer has not been confirmed by the City. The City will monitor the sewer to verify if there is a capacity issues in that pipeline. Table 7-2 2016 Gravity Sewer Deficiencies Map Location Diam. Length Upstream Downstream Flooding Surcharge ID (in) (If) Manhole Manhole (gallons) (d/D) McCormick 506-2-2- 1 Woods Drive 10 11130 0060 506-2-2-0030 0 2.2 SW Table 7-3 2016 Pump Station Deficiencies Map Lag Pump PS PS Peak Flooding ID pump Stations Runtime Capacity Inflow llons (gallons) (minutes) (gpm) (gpm) A Flower Meadows 22 104 230 0 7.8.3 2022 Scenario — Results The 2022 model results for peak day flow are shown on Figure 7-2. The gravity sewer and pump station capacity deficiencies are summarized in Tables 7-4 and 7-5. The City will monitor the McCormick Woods Drive SW gravity sewer to verify if it surcharges. Orchard Avenue and Bay Street surcharge due to insufficient capacity in the MPS. Table 7-4 2022 Gravity Sewer Deficiencies Map Location Diam. Length Upstream Downstream Flooding Surcharge ID (in) (If) Manhole Manhole (gallons) (d/D) McCormick 506- 1 Woods Drive 10 2,420 0100 506-2-2-0030 0 4.5 SW 2 Orchard 30 110 115-2-2- Marina PS 0 1.3 Avenue 0020 3 Bay Street 24 1,170 115-2-2- 115-2-2-0020 0 1.5 0190 4 Bay Street 18 1,620 313-2-2- 115-2-2-0190 0 2.2 0060 =� ■ rr Conveyance System Analysis CONSULTANTS Page 7-6 City of Port Orchard General Sewer Plan Update Table 7-5 2022 Pump Station Deficiencies Lag Pump PS PS Peak ding ID Pump Pump Stations Runtime Capacity Inflow (gallons) minutes pm pm A Flower Meadows 103 104 285 0 B Albertsons 243 176 193 0 C Marina 245 3,800 4,800 0 D McCormick Woods 1 150 1,000 1,750 0 -� ■ rr Conveyance System Analysis CONSULTANTSPage 7-7 City of Port Orchard General Sewer Plan Update PAGE INTENTIONALLY BLANK -� ■ rr Conveyance System Analysis CONSULTANTSPage 7-8 U a z w 0 sgNO 00 4 4 A& R0 W s�PTE b� G� 5� G ", Sinclair Inlet it"�F■�""fir -"r �'' -1 - Eagle Crest �iy�■.�a■� Golden+Fond 3 1 rB�FPtRNpLLEYR� ..7L ��y..; _ �.���++ .-.►f4 Lr� / r f ` .'•_!•SP��. WSTATE HWY IS S iiiiii■■■ffflllq���� (Tremont :' ��■Irr�■■�r Ct r !:� / % r �• � ,, 4 � ■ ■ anyon PEace ���1l, � TR'�N1UNT ST W TREA � McCormick Woods #1 l ' ■ r ... .._...._ . 1 Y D., - I L L 11■■all■.■ �' ! 1 Harrison 1 ,1 i ■ _ �. ■■�aN Hospital _� 1 j'/' I� m �• `�PP� jl ' V of ■■■ I Pottery A AW 'The c/ ■ H 1NcC�rmlck r Mea'dows The Ridge 3 I a Ridge ir�a■■!n■ Rr■ r� +'� Q 1 T7 a I Cedar Weighs 9 -��-T-X SW BE R` i z r 1 ST �• 1 SE IU jvE Ti ■ r y 7 _ RRY LAKE RD y l C 1 ■ 4- 1 ` ii I ■ 1. j \ t 1 i,j ++�■■�+■ ■■ _ SWOLDCLIFIITON RD �■ �BLacklaekCt r■ ■■ , 11 .3edgwick ■�� r■■ra tMcCormick ■ Woods #2 + 1 r �/ ■air A i J� butarY ,.� r i ■ f .■ �''l R ,' f■■umbsom■■j G�,\CKR` Lowes i �] ��`il?ttt«*ar�■■� 7 �se�° � PrAIhertson 81 Gad'■■rrlr Sr..... z �' ! ■ �,.� �. SW LIDER RD ■N9, 11 ■ ,il RRo; ;' rr�` ��■■ir■r■a■■ram■■■rni �■�■r� ,... rNm f ! �-•1...� . ] � ■�Ial e■1� O �...� 1 R Flower �. Meadows N y_St 1C- /■�� Fw . z i V 4 C O + vL a man"AL 71 j 1 ee l Cyr 0 SE SALMONBERRY RD South Kitsap '— Water Reclamation ; Facility , ECHESTERRD o w ; Q Y 16r,r is � ■ 1■.�•�.1� 1 �� I , SE MILE HILL DR 1 r•�I Met. r 1 1 -- - -- i C•PP�� Goo j 1 J Long Lake 1 w � 0 r>' � � m a > a O 0 � z Y 0 = a Q U r • , Curiep C • f rr♦ Sewer System: City of Port Orchard 2015 -� Existing Peak Day Flow s Kitsap County base data 2015 Figure Data sources supplied may not reflect current or actual conditions. This map ■ is a geographic representation based on information available. It does nots General Sewer Plan Update represent survey data. No warranty is made concerning the accuracy, currency, - Y or BHc Cpoleteness of data depicted on this map. 0 3,000 6,000 el �` �r y� City of Port Orchard, Washington BHC Consultants LLC., assumes no responsibility for the validity of any \\\ y g Kd 7_ ay W 5�1 C information presented herein, nor any responsibility for the use or misuse of the data. j�J P oTt�� COPYRIGHT©2015 BHC CONSULTANTS LLC., ALL RIGHTS RESERVED City of Port Orchard General Sewer Plan Update PAGE INTENTIONALLY BLANK ■ r� Conveyance System Analysis G 9 •TAN7S Page 7-10 o P��S •*���,� South Kitsap '— �E °� 40, Water Reclamation \— y■'��y�/! ` +�` Facility r , ECHESTER RD ISM ..1 j i ` .�♦ Marina___ say 5t.� 1 ° ♦ 3 'y iL s��+ . o j ' ] qN° Sinclair Inlet(N4 ��� sr - 1 V e r t 1 \N a o. a° ❑ ' ♦ _ qq o 1 ■ ` ° ` / Eagle Crest ° i`15 i �iy� �� sEMILE HILL DR Itwr 14 `rrir�ri-17 Golden Pond _ - J.I B� FP\LEY Rom' �" -..T ` `•L �`�y`-. _ r - 16 -�.��� `+ _ -_i .. - - r'WSTATE 'Tremont w l F' ■ �� �=' j �'ir• ■r�ri�w^ o m i- ,L; �f Curie Canyon Ct Place 5 ; 1 ^. �cFe, moo i T E oNT srW TREMONT Sr McCormick Woods #9 9 1 r !t � r +� J 10 .1 ti _ 11 �r!■yii■ ' ✓ �: _ - Harrison ] ■ 1 ■ i!� Has Ital ' �y �.� ' .._�' 3 _ 1 ■ P SE LUNDVE a J P,F- I `�■ f z r. I a ■t `� I. 1 1 ■ r o� ! w iPP Y •`'- B Pottery[ _ w= �� t' J ■J �} , 1 i : 110h s flower ■ �,: P� } ,# The Ridge 3 )1 �= The Ridge J fi l f ■ �tiot g Cedar Heightsa 9 Meadows .'•�oR yc MCC ! `-'■fii�a■�A■ R:�r i! �] ; s�_ J - '7 - r Legend �1 Meaidows f [ y vm--'J.'— # SE SALMONBERRY RD • �'�� ' 0 1 ; 1 f i SW BERRY LAKE RD ■ y l Cl J i 1 l ~ }� 4 1 •ry� ' I �' i� i� �t LA O Deficiency '� ► tiO t ■ V ► o No Flooding _ i r i t( i f • ,,,�, ' ■ k■i SW OLD CLIFTON RD i°f _ 1 # Flooding �rOR!! �laCk%aCJ� - f! - SE SED,777GWICK RD' I' + r tdgwick w +Yr ----- Force Main o McCormick * +� ■ j ■ 1 ° Woods #2 • 1 ■■~e Gravity, No Sul 'butary �� ;' :— �■ Gp°`c,��t 1 ` �ypar■ r Gravity,Surch< ■■ �jr . ■ �n�rr'rir! O� f Lowes `y i . FUrfeytiC,eek Pump Station \CK RD + tiht\t4*lr�ir, ��e�o oAlbertson J ` Sufficient Capc a + ♦. �` 0 Exceeds Capa B ♦� + rA �r�!'ir■trl��■ w---.� ....:-_-_ _ 0 Treatment Plar Q ■ ��/ j y ■� o f.. ti...l z �isLayers 0 Q ra w p¢ Long t!od; n City of Port O �ti�i ! ■ •r�l + n rre Creek, N + - f Lake r� Port Orchard l �■ If I i SW LIDER RD ] .. ■9 ' ����✓� ►... 1 ,' � -••f � West Sound UI ■ 1 �■ ; ih. sF 0 o / J`I '��rl�ir�rl�i#�■ii �EGA �• *+ �...- FR'4pi ■��� 1 � •,1 Parcels fo ! �.. ...�I ' rNm� i..• : Water Bodies °RPM` Z r'• 1 t � rP,�EF � �.....� ���i � j' y' • - Water Courses Sewer System: City of Port Orchard 2015 2022 Peak Day Flow 9 Kitsap County base data 2015 4 Figure Data sources supplied may not reflect current or actual conditions. This map jW;LT;tS is a geographic representation based on information available. It does notsGeneral Sewer Plan Undate represent survey data. No warranty is made concerning the accuracy, currency, YBHCCoor letenessultant of.C., depicted no this map0 3,000 6,0Feel �`�—yCit of Port Orchard, Washin tonBHC Consultants ted assumes no responsibility for the validity of any \\\ City W y g 7-2 information presented herein, nor any responsibility for the use or misuse of the data. j�J P� ��� COPYRIGHT©2015 BHC CONSULTANTS LLC., ALL RIGHTS RESERVED City of Port Orchard General Sewer Plan Update PAGE INTENTIONALLY BLANK ■ r� Conveyance System Analysis G 9 •TAN7S Page 7-12 City of Port Orchard General Sewer Plan Update 7.8.4 2026 Scenario — Results The 2026 model results for peak day flow are shown on Figure 7-3. The gravity sewer and pump station capacity deficiencies are summarized in Tables 7-6 and 7-7. The McCormick Woods Drive SW gravity sewer may not surcharge. The City will monitor the sewer to verify if there is a capacity issues in that pipeline. Orchard Avenue and Bay Street surcharge due to insufficient capacity in the MPS, and Albertsons surcharges due to insufficient capacity in the Albertsons Pump Station. Table 7-6 2026 Gravity Sewer Deficiencies Map Location Diam. Length Upstream Downstream Flooding Surcharge ID (in) (If) Manhole Manhole (gallons) (d/D) McCormick 506-2-2- 1 Woods Drive 10 2,420 0100 506-2-2-0030 905 4.9 SW 2 Orchard 30 110 115-2-2- Marina PS 0 1.3 Avenue 0020 3 Bay Street 24 1,170 115-2-2- 115-2-2-0020 0 1.6 0190 4 Bay Street 18 1,900 313-2-2- 115-2-2-0190 0 2.3 0070 5 Albertsons 8 570 507-2-2 Albertson PS 0 12 0040 Table 7-7 2026 Pump Station Deficiencies Ma p Lag Pump PS PS Peak Flooding ID Pump Stations Runtime Capacity Inflow (gallons) minutes m m A Flower Meadows 134 104 295 0 B Albertsons 441 176 228 0 C Marina 305 3,800 5,243 0 D I McCormick Woods 1 229 1,000 2,046 0 =� ■ rr Conveyance System Analysis CONSULTANTS Page 7-13 City of Port Orchard General Sewer Plan Update 7.8.5 2036 Scenario — Results The 2036 model results for peak day flow are shown on Figure 7-4. The gravity sewer and pump station capacity deficiencies are summarized in Tables 7-8 and 7-9. Table 7-8 2036 Gravity Sewer Deficiencies Map Location Diam. Length Upstream Downstream Flooding Surcharge ID (in) (If) Manhole Manhole (gallons) (d/D) McCormick 506-2-2- 1 Woods Drive 10 2,420 0100 506-2-2-0030 7,915 4.9 SW 2 Orchard 30 110 115-2-2- Marina PS 0 3.5 Avenue 0020 3 Bay Street 24 1,170 115-2-2- 115-2-2-0020 2,693 4.2 0190 4 Bay Street 18 2,620 313-2-2- 115-2-2-0190 40,611 6.0 0100 5 Albertson 8 570 507-2-2 Albertson PS 37,473 13 0040 6 Bay Street 8 120 313-2-2- 313-2-2-0100 0 4.6 0110 7 Bay Street 30 40 115-2-2- 115-2-2-0020 11 3.1 0030 8 Bay Street 24 10 115-2-2- 115-2-2-0030 0 3.3 0040 9 Bay Street 18 230 115-2-2- 115-2-2-0040 39 4.0 0070 10 Bay Street 15 950 115-2-2- 115-2-2-0050 0 4.2 0090 11 Bay Street 12 840 115-2-2- 115-2-2-0090 0 2.4 0110 12 Port Orchard 12 890 114-2-2- 115-2-2-0200 0 7.0 Boulevard 0040 Table 7-9 2036 Pump Station Deficiencies Lag Pump PS PS Peak ding ID Pump Pump Stations Runtime Capacity Inflow (gallons) minutes pm pm A Flower Meadows 198 104 320 0 B Albertsons 816 176 317 0 C Marina 400 3,800 5,984 0 D McCormick Woods 1 425 1,000 2,444 0 E McCormick Woods 2 88 1,000 1,730 0 =� ■ rr Conveyance System Analysis CONSULTANTS Page 7-14 .01 J° D O� # ■ � I L •*�..�+� 1 South Kitsap � �' °�P yi�•a Water Reclamation �yy�°•� l . Facility r , ECHESTER RD j 1 r 1 ►- I �. a a �'. ,F■a .40 Marina___ Bay 5t iC 1z 'Ili j `•■ � ��ti..•� � sq�eDo44�RRDw � Sinclairinlet 4 � �►6�..�s�r� g � V,���,a�Rir Apoi Q � . yL � rwn m ■ 1 f J sP�E 1 oOao l� m . 1 0 > 3. its : Q 1 ■..:� �; •� �_. \ ` / Eagle Crest Q. 15 7 i ■1�i�■■� �M;* SE MILE HILL DR _ ._ ° 14 •,-.. LEY Rom' / } �• y3- ■ ��i•�a■- ¢ ■�� ■�i� i .._ .. J ' 1 J Gaiden Pond ■ WOW \ _ J`I 6E . r % •f ` ''�lSSP��. t -- W STATE HWY 16 . JF ITref� Oflt 2�' w _ _ l 1 1 i' I mow- o no } LF ✓ ! �rir. ■ram■■. j r I t ii Ganynn'Ct Place 1 c:',. larr�� y CurleyC�e �` %"•� • / %�� r �• 4 ■ ` THE O�NT ST W TREMONT ST O^ McCormick Woods #1 r , - lL. LT �_ 11 �ra■yl(■ia ' ✓ �: _ 10 Harrison 1 �,1 � i � ! � o `...I. . Has Ital _� Q ! v� P� sELuvDIt �r !' I■ w aJ �,PP� 1 ■ C Pottery �� J' J ■J �} 1 i : sry'M Flower ■ �,: ■FF PK Irk J The Ridge 3 I �= The Ridge I fi �L ❑❑ l f ■ �tio! '1 •'• Co c i111cC�rmick iia�a■mod■ Ir:>e�r a� r7 Meadows-'�_ a� 5 �J 9 Cedar Heights Meadows r` f [ 1 �� is ■T—'�i——�''�v SE SALMONBERRY RD ! r � � f SW BERRY LAKE RD Z 1 L � ■ ■ / ' m■7t Legend N 4 a ■ M■ r o � 1 p�! J I 1 I `' L■* o; i • No Flooding ' L ■i SW OLD CLIFTON RD 4 ❑ Kli�. l ■ Flooding Eason MORE ■ d r�lpckjac/r t ■ :•5ed wick w Ir sEW.GWiCKRD 1 + 9 ----- Force Main McCormick ■ •� ■ j ■ 1 Woods #2 ■ I .~• jai Gravity, No Sul Ic r CJ 1 i ypa■■ j Y'� l �� r `•�. Gravity, Surch< ■■ I y r -1 �■7�r■�i■, 0�1CKRD f Lowes % 1. I CUrfeytiCreek _� Pump Station bttta! ■ �e�° �IAlhertson 8 J , Sufficient Ca �.•.. ■ i..:�*ar,ii■ai 7 5 0 ■ - ��. l 1 ■ 0 PE on '� ► — 1 0 Exceeds Capa IB • ■■r �■ f - 1 ►��� u - -.. 13 Treatment Plar z ■ � �i■r.r■� �aY 5 1 %..� a J 1 Base Layers 0 Q ra =e.J. / • v. ■ I 'fi •r p¢ � ' a4i■`L `' : A j ' a Long■� City of Port On ■�� ! ■ r■�■I + + n rre Creek, Luke ; - N + -'f r� Port Orchard L �■ If I i r l ■ �,..� �. SW LIDER RD ] .. ■9 ' ����a� ►... 1 — f West Sound UI o J`I '��■a�ir■�■a�ira�■ii ■�■r� �• �+ �...\ FR'40l ■tj Parcels aI 1 i�■a��ei� ,....fo ! �.. .�...�� ' rNm� i.._ : ' � Water Bodies y' �• - Water Courses Sewer System: City of Port Orchard 2015 2026 Peak Day Flow 9 Kitsap County base data 2015 Figure Data sources supplied may not reflect current or actual conditions. This map ■ is a geographic representation based on information available. It does nots General Sewer Plan Update represent survey data. No warranty is made concerning the accuracy, currency, Y BHC Coor nstenessultants of data depicted no this map. 0 3,000 6,0Feet � ` �— y� City of Port Orchard, Washington BHC Consultants ted assumes no responsibility for the validity of any \\\ Y7-3 �1 C information presented herein, nor any responsibility for the use or misuse of the data. j�J P� ��� COPYRIGHT ©2015 BHC CONSULTANTS LLC., ALL RIGHTS RESERVED City of Port Orchard General Sewer Plan Update PAGE INTENTIONALLY BLANK ■ r� Conveyance System Analysis G 9 •TAN7S Page 7-16 0 �` I m ��� ♦F*� # South Kitsap • r'— GAP 4 y 1 Water Reclamation %,Sao Facility r , ECHESTER RD J r. > o Marina Bay -St «w r _ �. Sinclair Inlet ��z �t o °•` � ti.. 1 = S1 N00044,q W 6 4_l 4 i ' ■ I 3 N i ° o !Ise rsr44 7� l w AL 8 9-� ■ o a 1 ■..:� �..1 �_., L 4 Eagle Crest.. 1 7�I�rsE. __ ■r .� SE MILE HILL DR I O 14 � i Golden Pond W -J.I B�FPtLEYR •.7 3 — r Y'♦ I .r j I % ` '••��•SP•(�• _ -NI STATEH16 .J.'7 n Sw4 (Tremont ��> J.I--..•I w I.1 ,rQ' , ' !. r . s t Derr ■r�■r■�w-�►+ o no a -G 74+rt■�� - Curle Canyon CtIPlace k _.: l E:',. �...�F-. yCFti� ` -• % r j ist�� ■ TREMONT ST W TREMONT ST- 1 i McCormick Woods #1 i -11 r 7 12 t I .■ai■■ ' .._ .._..._ =' 1 ! ✓ j Harrison t i 3 ■ ■ram. Hospital I' sEIL TUN o'!vE Q 10 Pottery,- � ;� ■ w � e� �y/' ' � � �� �' j ■J �}� F y _ 1,r�'r s ry Flower t. h°�,: ■ P� The Ridge 3 I The Ridge I Cedar Wei htsa ` �"' .'•Co5 iJ. MWETIrmick "r- IIl�jir�arr�n■ . weir■ -. ■! + g 7 Meadows -_ r Sp.J 1�s� yc: r : Qr ■ j +■ sue_ J- a ] •. �� Meadows 1 • # v- -*--T- ,�:", tt : SE SALMONBERRY RD r Legend < .` �i� �ti� ■ }4 .. 5 �] f SW BERRY LAKE RD ### y 1 G i - } 4a 1 •r I i "... j rc t O# Deficiency ■ f ■ 4■r 1 q ❑ No Flooding `/rr SW OLD CLIFTON RD Q Q 1 G/ f • Flooding t �rrsrrr A V ■ ■r ` �I •+�tr+ �: p ; JBlacklack� ■ 5ed wick w + SEW.GVViCKRD 1 ■ I s r ----- Force Main McCormick ■ 4-54 ■ , j ■ 1 Woods #2 + I f �r�r w, o • ar —I Gravity, No Surcharging i f ❑ ° -h■ Gravity, Surchar in 1 r J ` y 9 g �rr�rr�rr40 °vLowes 11. I f 'fey�� eek I \CK RD Cu r Pump Station olAlherfson 8 I t 1 ■; Q Sufficient Capacity �.•.. a` Lu —_ . w ■■ ♦ % = f Q Exceeds Capacity �ffmarmmo am � � 13 Treatment Plant i �. �r�rrt i■rr■r� j !.� a } Base Layers 0 �.� �e..J■ v. : F t J y f Port Orchard ZI �r� p¢: - [are r4rr� a j Long l_� City o ■tom �. � Cr;ee.... ■ 0 ■■ ` �Numo r "ure o� - . , ■ - f Luke Port Orchard UGA SW LIDER RD f .. ■N9 ' ����✓� �... ] ■ ji ■ h a V- - f West Sound LID Boundary o r ;' i �r�rrirrr�rr�rr�rri �rri * �...� Ror ■ i Parcels ORPIP j Water Bodies u, y' �• - Water Courses SeFigure System: City of Port Orchard 2015 2036 Peak Day Flow Kitsap County base data 2015 Data sources supplied may not reflect current or actual conditions. This map ■ is a geographic representation based on information available. It does nots General Sewer Plan Update represent survey data. No warranty is made concerning the accuracy, currency, - Y or completeness of.C., depicted no th esponsma p. 0 3,000 6,0Feet �` �— y� City of Port Orchard, Washington BHC Consultants LLC., assumes no responsibility for the validity of any \\\ �� � y7-4 S;1 ts information presented herein, nor any responsibility for the use or misuse of the data. j�J P� cg t COPYRIG HT©2015 BHC CONSULTANTS LLC., ALL RIGHTS RESERVED City of Port Orchard General Sewer Plan Update PAGE INTENTIONALLY BLANK ■ r� Conveyance System Analysis G 9 •TAN7S Page 7-18 City of Port Orchard General Sewer Plan Update 7.8.6 Build -Out Scenario — Results The build -out model results for peak day flow are shown on Figure 7-5. The gravity sewer, pump station capacity, and force main deficiencies are summarized in Tables 7- 10, 7-11, and 7-12. Table 7-10 Build -Out Gravity Sewer Deficiencies Map Location Diam. Length Upstream Downstream Flooding Surcharge ID (in) (If) Manhole Manhole (gallons) (d/D) McCormick 506-2-2- 1 Woods Drive 10 2,620 0100 506-2-2-0020 56,344 4.9 SW 2 Orchard 30 110 115-2-2- Marina PS 0 3.6 Avenue 0020 3 Bay Street 24 1,170 115-2-2- 115-2-2-0020 51,233 4.4 0190 4 Bay Street 18 2,620 313-2-2- 115-2-2-0190 284,218 6.0 0100 5 Albertson 8 570 507-2-2 Albertson PS 146,123 13 0040 6 Bay Street 8 120 313-2-2- 313-2-2-0100 0 4.8 0110 7 Bay Street 30 40 115-2-2- 115-2-2-0020 35 3.1 0030 8 Bay Street 24 10 115-2-2- 115-2-2-0030 0 3.3 0040 9 Bay Street 18 230 115-2-2- 115-2-2-0040 207 4.0 0070 10 Bay Street 15 950 115-2-2- 115-2-2-0050 0 4.2 0090 11 Bay Street 12 840 115-2-2- 115-2-2-0090 0 3.7 0110 12 Port Orchard 12 1,670 114-2-2- 115-2-2-0200 55,869 7.2 Boulevard 0090 13 Port Orchard 10 1,620 114-2-2- 114-2-2-0100 0 5.8 Boulevard 0170 =� ■ rr Conveyance System Analysis CONSULTANTS Page 7-19 City of Port Orchard General Sewer Plan Update Table 7-11 Build -Out Pump Station Deficiencies ID Pump Pump Stations Lag Pump Runtime minutes PS Capacity pm PS Peak Inflow pm Flooding (gallons) A Flower Meadows 505 104 449 1,930 B Albertsons 1,384 176 448 0 C Marina 742 3,800 7,142 0 D McCormick Woods 1 731 1,000 3,221 0 E McCormick Woods 2 372 1,000 2,500 0 F Eagle Crest 365 100 313 831 Table 7-12 Build -Out Force Main Deficiencies Map Pump Station Diameter Length Peak Velocity Time Exceeding 8 ID (in) (If) (fps) fps minutes 20 Marina Pump Station 18 8,200 8.81 92 =� ■ rr Conveyance System Analysis CONSULTANTS Page 7-20 o s� I •. P��S •*���,� South Kitsap '— �E °� 40, Water Reclamation ■■ I�- yy�°���■ ` i +�` Facility r , ECHESTERRD ISM 10 1—i J J -- ° Marina Bay 5t �w j Q �.••V 't-, � Sinclair Inlet � a` � � p � � o �: ~••• 1 .i SgND R ■' •� _ 1 = °O<<qRD w 6 4 S .fir` i wr■ a■ r 1 -1 I i ■_ ■ I I ��'� t a a 1 m rxmoo _ \N _ v v� . ♦ 1. v ■ 1 f 1 / sP�E r a o aao 7 L .■ Eagle Crest 1 15 l' A 7 :rrfidEr■r�=r■ SE MI E HILL DR 14 `r�.aaa,� r t r w �aw)t�.�rr Golden Pvnd . � Q -J.I B�FPtLEYR J• J ` `•L ��y~� ,.. T - -�.0*� fir♦ J�' l_ -.- .. HWY 16 1�I � fie" = j : Q'r, At -`PISTATE sa 'Tremont Q�� m } L1F , ��� ? �'■r. ■ra�r■�w- �.. ■i Canyon Ct Place 5 J l �, �'1 Cu^ley e �s r r / 1 ■ TREMONr sr w rkEMONr sr 1 = i McCormick Woods #1 ►+ r' �" ■ 10 r-- =' 1 ! ✓ ! 12 Harrison ' 3 • 1 1 n�. Hospital sE !AVE Q ! ■ < Y 16 D Pottery` _ w= �� / J ■J �}p �` I y _ �'■ s flower ■ o�^• ■ P� The Ridge 3 I The Ridge I Cedar Heightyss 9 Meadows .'•�oR y/. McC�rmick f ` �i■ ■�A■ R:�r a� r SJ �� r ��-- - r Legend Meadows f r ■ _ .9T—K— SE SALMONBERRY RD • �PF, 7 1 f SW BERRY LAKE RD a• �: c } 'y, •} 4- : 1JSWOLD y� I i % ■ � m i � ■ .___; � �• O Deficiency ''� '• ■■io No Flooding CLIFTON RD Q Q 1 / =.� L ' ■#ir■aa■ V . i 1 0 ■ �_ ` - Flooding �MORE ■ I p� �Blackiiackt � �:•5ed wick w StAD,cwICKRD' 1 9 ----- Force Main McCormick ■ ■ a� ■ j ■ 1 Woods #2 • I .~e Via■ I' -I = Gravity,No Sul i j o i J ■ -■ butary �` i� �■ r GpCfPP�` �. ❑ 1 ` iypar■ '� l: ��7 r `•�. Gravity, Surch< ■■ �jr �n�rrr■ra! °� Lowes Furfey�C,eek Pump Station 1CK RD + •- E £. ■ s�° _ Albertson 8 I �. �.,• ( ■. O ` Sufficient Ca � ibtlt *ar■ru � ' f - � � � � � •■ 0 PE aIF Exceeds Capa - ■ ' 7 Q,u m B 1. 1 , �■ + - Q Treatment Plar �ri~rr� �aYa■e�i {_ .. J j Base Layers 'o 0 Q a ■ ■ �• � t ■1 ■ City of Port On 1 e Cree4■ram l , a Long G/■�� ■ frr�al�' +purk, 1 ; - �..1 : Luke r� Port Orchard L a: .... ■ SW LIDER RD I .. ■9 ' ����✓� ►... ' West Sound UI </° I, ■y �..,�� � � Parcels "I I _� /' '�■�ra■r•■ram■a■�■ra■!r■i �...- s ! % j °f P� Water Bodies Water Courses SeFigure System: City of Port Orchard 2015 -� Build -Out Peak Day Flow Kitsap County base data 2015 Data sources supplied may not reflect current or actual conditions. This map ■ is a geographic representation based on information available. It does nots General Sewer Plan Update represent survey data. No warranty is made concerning the accuracy, currency, - Y BHC Coor nstenessultants of.C., depicted no this map. 0 3,000 6,0Feet �` �— y� City of Port Orchard, Washington BHC Consultants ted assumes no responsibility for the validity of any \\\ s", � Y7Kid 5 1 C information presented herein, nor any responsibility forthe use or misuse of the data. j�J P �� COPYRIGHT©2015 BHC CONSULTANTS LLC., ALL RIGHTS RESERVED City of Port Orchard General Sewer Plan Update PAGE INTENTIONALLY BLANK ■ r� Conveyance System Analysis G 9 •TAN7S Page 7-22 City of Port Orchard General Sewer Plan Update 7.9 SEDGWICK SUBAREA ANALYSIS The City and WSUD are currently investigating changing the service area boundary between the two sewer utilities in Basin 8 to more accurately reflect how parcels in that area would be served. The resulting changes under build -out conditions are shown in Table 7-13. Table 7-13 Sedgwick Subarea Basin 8 Build -Out Changes Area Average Annual Peak Day Scenario Population Employment (acre) Flow (mgd) Flow (mgd) Current Boundary 1,193 993 529 0.125 0.201 Revised Boundary 1,299 1,061 323 0.135 0.218 The updated build -out peak day flows were loaded into the model to determine additional deficiencies as a result of the service area boundary change. The peak hour flow to the Sedgwick Pump Station is approximately 250 gpm, which exceeds the rated capacity of 180 gpm. However, the model results indicate that the actual capacity may be up to 290 gpm based on the pump curve. It is recommended that a draw down test be performed at the station as flows to the station approach the rated capacity of the pump station. As development occurs, developers will need to obtain a Certificate of Reservation, which will include a capacity analysis. If sewer flows from the development exceed the capacity of the Sedgwick Pump Station, the developer will be required to make capacity upgrades to the station. This project is therefore not included in the CIP. The Sedgwick Subarea Analysis build -out model results for peak day flow are shown on Figure 7-6. The gravity sewer, pump station capacity, and force main deficiencies are summarized in Tables 7-14, 7-15, and 7-16. -� ■ rF Conveyance System Analysis CONSULTANTSPage 7-23 City of Port Orchard General Sewer Plan Update Table 7-14 Sedgwick Subarea Build -Out Gravity Sewer Deficiencies Map Location Diam. Length Upstream Downstream Flooding Surcharge ID (in) (If) Manhole Manhole (gallons) (d/D) McCormick 506- 1 Woods Drive 10 2,620 0100 506-2-2-0020 54,221 4.9 SW 2 Orchard 30 110 115-2-2- Marina PS 0 3.6 Avenue 0020 3 Bay Street 24 1,170 115-2-2- 115-2-2-0020 18,735 4.4 0190 4 Bay Street 18 2,620 313-2-2- 115-2-2-0190 354,451 6.0 0100 5 Albertson 8 570 507-2-2 Albertson PS 134,335 13.0 0040 6 Bay Street 8 120 313-2-2- 313-2-2-0100 0 4.8 0110 7 Bay Street 30 40 115-2-2- 115-2-2-0020 93 3.1 0030 8 Bay Street 24 10 115-2-2- 115-2-2-0030 0 3.3 0040 9 Bay Street 18 230 115-2-2- 115-2-2-0040 184 4.0 0070 10 Bay Street 15 950 115-2-2- 115-2-2-0050 9 4.2 0090 11 Bay Street 12 840 115-2-2- 115-2-2-0090 0 3.7 0110 12 Port Orchard 12 1,670 114-2-2- 115-2-2-0200 19,014 7.2 Boulevard 0090 13 Port Orchard 10 1,620 114-2-2- 114-2-2-0100 0 5.8 Boulevard 0170 Table 7-15 Sedgwick Subarea Build -Out Pump Station Deficiencies ID Pump Pump Stations Lag Pump Runtime minutes PS Capacity pm PS Peak Inflow pm Flooding (gallons) A Flower Meadows 500 104 449 1,834 B Albertsons 1,353 176 448 0 C Marina 655 3,800 7,571 0 D McCormick Woods 1 709 1,000 3,230 0 E McCormick Woods 2 365 1,000 2,468 0 F Eagle Crest 355 100 300 770 =� ■ rr Conveyance System Analysis CONSULTANTS Page 7-24 City of Port Orchard General Sewer Plan Update Table 7-16 Sedgwick Subarea Build -Out Force Main Deficiencies Map Pump Station Diameter Length Peak Velocity Time Exceeding 8 ID (in) (If) (fps) fps minutes 20 Marina Pump Station 18 8,200 9.32 133 -� ■ rr Conveyance System Analysis CONSULTANTSPage 7-25 City of Port Orchard General Sewer Plan Update PAGE INTENTIONALLY BLANK -� ■ rr Conveyance System Analysis CONSULTANTSPage 7-26 sqN� 004 4 A& R0 W e� D �O� .0' �■*�• 2 C �*rr�rr�■*� / 10 �� / Marina d Sinclair Inlet /'� Q.. m � 10013 Eagle Crest r� . �1 Gulden Pond iLI �gE p\R'VPLLEYR� ...T .L ��y,• — r.._ .rMw+, _ r •! �lSSP�� t-'-NISTATEH mi ollow remoIn r•r�+Mrr�rC Ct - r an on ace TR�'NONTST v McCormick Woods #1 ~ ! i _ .._..._ Y 1 �I lrr+ri.r■ l?' ✓ Harrison II'i 3 • _ J rr� Hospital I j .I� mPP� GY o� r■ Pottery. . r: so 4 ommick �,. (�J 1 Mea'dows The Ridge 3 I °= The Ridge irma■■m is "ion- on, r • �.. N 1 f Cedar Heights. yT-�- SW BE # �` 3 z r 1 ['� --Bay-St ri Q w P ' a�' ^ •-I w NT ST i M j � South Kitsap — i Water Reclamation ; Facility , ECHESTER RD ■ O P I j? }00 w a s w el6— k .o i Ames= V4 i AL m a tj its r% wI� ■nnov Q1 Cyr ' 0 f SE MILE HILL DR l r. -- r 7 I 1 � .;r'. l� �0 0 RRY LAKE RD ■ * 1 ido �■ SW OLD CLIFTON RD E ■ `/ 1 o L.— �rrsrrr • 1, •+ter■+ r r6lpckjacIca- Woo 5edgwick w ra� sE tGWICK.RD r McCormick ■ rrr� ■ j ■ 1 ds #2 ■ J r ■ter u j r j • a■ huta.yGoolC.���� I. r 0vd\CKRo jLowes Fu�eytiCreek 1 tx£! ■ coV �MAlhertson e�G ■ rrlrr�e e° �• + ,- j a Long . titer � �. � Creek.. ■ 0 r , _ av�• err■ o ��Ure � � � l �■ � � -�f � Lake A �..� �. SWLIDERRD } .. ■�9 ���m� �... _1 h. ..f I. . I: � of � f ��� I I •—i 10- ;- f �r�■Rir+ram■ra4rr�r+i �r�■r� ,.... J /P " -_... f . w � � � m rr a > z O Y 0 0 O Q U Sewer System unty base of Port Orchard 2015 �. Sedgwick Subarea Alternative Kitsap County base data 2015 ' Data sources supplied may not reflect current or actual conditions. This map !.� Figure is a geographic representation based on information available. It does not Build -Out Peak Day Flow represent survey data. No warranty is made concerning the accuracy, currency, or completeness ofdata depicted on this map. 0 3,000 6,000 General Sewer Plan Update BHC Consultants LLC., assumes no responsibility for the validity of any -- te 1 A N S information presented herein, nor any responsibility for the use or misuse of the data. NJ Feel �m 7_ L A J P��•,,� City of Port Orchard, Washington COPYRIGHT © 2016 BHC CONSULTANTS LLC., ALL RIGHTS RESERVED City of Port Orchard General Sewer Plan Update PAGE INTENTIONALLY BLANK ■ r� Conveyance System Analysis G 9 •TAN7S Page 7-28 City of Port Orchard General Sewer Plan Update SECTION 8 COLLECTION FACILITIES IMPROVEMENTS 8.1 INTRODUCTION This section provides a compilation of specific projects, improvements, and programs the City should implement to alleviate the deficiencies identified in Section 7. These projects are derived primarily from the system analysis and discussions with the City's operations and engineering staff. Each project is accompanied by a planning level opinion of probable cost and a schedule identifying when the project is anticipated to begin and end. The City should review the CIP periodically to adjust for significant changes in the priority of each project, its cost, and scope. Collection facilities improvement projects for the City wastewater system are categorized into the following five categories: • Capacity: Improvements classified as insufficient in capacity are determined based on whether or not the infrastructure can effectively convey the incoming flow. Gravity sewer pipes are considered to have insufficient capacity when the pipe is full or surcharged. Force mains are considered to have insufficient capacity when the velocities exceed 8 feet per second. Pump stations are considered to have insufficient capacity when inflow exceeds the flow produced by the pump station with the largest pump out of service. As described in Section 7, the conveyance system was evaluated using existing flows and flows projected for 2022, 2026, 2036, and build -out conditions. The evaluations determined system deficiencies when subjected to these existing and future flow conditions. Following identification of system deficiencies, the computer model was used to evaluate and select system improvements to alleviate the system deficiencies. • Operations & Maintenance (O&M): O&M projects will rehabilitate or replace facilities identified by the City O&M staff as having unacceptably high maintenance requirements, both in terms of frequency and in magnitude. • Obsolescence: Improvements classified as obsolete are based on the age of the infrastructure. Mechanical and electrical equipment is expected to have a typical usable life of 25 years. Structures are expected to have a typical usable life of 50 years. Pipes are expected to have a typical usable life of 100 years. • General: General improvement projects are those identified by City staff for various reasons that do not fall within any of the remaining four categories. These projects may be needed to simplify system operation, ease O&M efforts and reduce O&M costs, consolidate and/or eliminate redundant facilities, reduce or eliminate non -critical O&M concerns, or to meet ongoing sewer system management needs. • Developer: Projects identified as developer dependent are needed to serve new developments but are not needed to provide continuation of service to existing customers. -3 ■ r♦ Collection Facilities Improvements CONSULTANTSPage 8-1 City of Port Orchard General Sewer Plan Update When possible, system improvement projects should be coordinated with other utilities to minimize disruption and reduce associated costs such as road and surface restoration. 8.2 SIX -YEAR CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM 8.2.1 Project Descriptions CIP 6-1: Marina Pump Station Improvements The high flow pumps are reaching the end of their useful life, and are projected to have insufficient capacity for peak hour flows within the 6-year planning horizon. The sea wall protecting the controls building is failing and needs to be replaced along with a seismic retrofit of the controls building. This project will include replacement of the high flow pumps; installation of new variable frequency drives for the new pumps; installation of a bypass vault; replacement of mechanical equipment as necessary; replacement of the emergency generator, automatic transfer switch, and upgrade the fuel storage to include secondary containment; upgrading the drywell ventilation to meet Department of Ecology requirements; removal of the sanitary sewer overflow pipe; relocation of the 8-inch sewer inlet; upgrade of the electrical, instrumentation, and controls; replacement of the sea wall; and a seismic retrofit of the existing controls building. CIP 6-2: Bay Street Pump Station Improvements The pumps, mechanical, and electrical components have reached the end of their useful life. There is no generator set on site. There is some structural degradation in the wet well riser. Replace dilapidated wet well riser; replace dry well access with flush hatch; coat interiors of wet well and dry well; replace existing constant speed dry pit pumps with new constant speed dry pit pumps; replace all mechanical components; replace all electrical components; reroute gravity main from the west around the north side of dry well; install generator set; relocate sidewalk to provide better access for wet well manhole lid. CIP 6-3 and 6-4: McCormick Pump Station 2 — Design and Construction The pumps, mechanical, and electrical components have reached the end of their useful life. There is significant corrosion on the mechanical equipment. Replace pumps, controls and panels, level sensors, rails, and reducers connecting to existing discharge elbows. Provide free standing roof structure above the pump control panel with integrated lights to illuminate area and to protect workers from the rain with a design similar to the McCormick Ridge installation. Replace check valves, plug valves and saddles downstream of the pump station in kind. Reduce the volume of storage in the wet well to reduce odors caused by long residence time. Employ new corrosion -3 ■ r♦ Collection Facilities Improvements CONSULTANTSPage 8-2 City of Port Orchard General Sewer Plan Update control system utilizing less toxic chemicals. If odor remains an issue at the station with the new corrosion control system, provide an odor control system that treats hydrogen sulfide and also the complex odors formed by STEP system effluent. CIP 6-5 and 6-6: McCormick Pump Station 1— Design and Construction The pumps, mechanical, and electrical components have reached the end of their useful life. There is significant corrosion on the mechanical equipment. Replace pumps, controls and panels, level sensors, rails, and reducers connecting to existing discharge elbows. Provide free standing roof structure above the pump control panel with integrated lights to illuminate area and to protect workers from the rain with a design similar to the McCormick Ridge installation. Replace check valves, plug valves and saddles downstream of the pump station in kind. Reduce the volume of storage in the wet well to reduce odors caused by long residence time. Employ new corrosion control system utilizing less toxic chemicals. If odor remains an issue at the station with the new corrosion control system, provide an odor control system that treats hydrogen sulfide and also the complex odors formed by STEP system effluent. CIP 6-7: Eagle Crest Generator Set The Eagle Crest pump station does not have an on -site generator set. This project would install a generator set and related equipment necessary for the proper function of the generator set, and would include site grading, equipment pads, and an automatic transfer switch. CIP 6-8: Albertsons Pump Station The pumps, mechanical, and electrical components have reached the end of their useful life. Flows are expected to exceed pump station capacity as new development occurs. This pump station rehabilitation will be funded by developers. Replace pumps, controls and panels, level sensors, rails, and reducers connecting to existing discharge elbows. Provide free standing roof structure above the pump control panel with integrated lights to illuminate area and to protect workers from the rain with a design similar to the McCormick Ridge installation. Replace check valves, plug valves and saddles downstream of the pump station in kind. Install odor control facilities. 8.2.2 Summary The projects recommended for the 6-year Capital Improvement Program (CIP) are described in Table 8-1 and illustrated on Figure 8-1. The project order was developed with the City. -� ■ rF Collection Facilities Improvements CONSULTANTSPage 8-3 City of Port Orchard General Sewer Plan Update PAGE INTENTIONALLY BLANK -� ■ rF Collection Facilities Improvements CONSULTANTSPage 8-4 City of Port Orchard General Sewer Plan Update Table 8-1 6-Year CIP (2016-2021) a� V L CL CIP No. Project a c m Project Description U y O O ■ Replace existing high flow pumps and install Variable Frequency Drives (VFDs) for new Pumps. ■ Install bypass vault ■ Replace mechanical equipment ■ Replace the existing emergency generator set, automatic transfer switch, and upgrade the fuel storage 6-1 Marina Pump Station Improvements 0 0 0 to include secondary containment. ■ Upgrade electrical, instrumentation, and controls equipment ■ Upgrade the drywell ventilation to meet Department of Ecology requirements. ■ Remove sanitary sewer overflow pipe. ■ Relocate 8" sewer inlet ■ Replace sea wall ■ Replace dilapidated wet well riser ■ Replace dry well access with flush hatch ■ Coat interiors of existing wet well and dry well ■ Replace existing constant speed dry pit pumps with new constant speed dry pit pumps ■ Replace all mechanical components 6-2 Bay Street Pump Station Improvements 0 0 ■ Replace all electrical components ■ Reroute gravity main from the west around the north side of dry well ■ Install generator set ■ Relocate sidewalk to provide better access for wet well manhole lid ■ Site paving/restoration ■ Install fencing around site ■ Replace pump system including pumps, controls and panels, level sensors, rails and reducers connecting to existing discharge elbows ■ Provide free standing roof structure above the pump control panel with integrated lights to illuminate area and to protect workers from the rain with a design similar to the McCormick Ridge installation 6-3 McCormick Pump Station 2 - Design 0 0 0 ■ Replace check valves, plug valves and saddles downstream of the pump station in kind ■ Reduce the volume of storage in the wet well to reduce odors caused by long residence time ■ Employ new corrosion control system utilizing less toxic chemicals ■ If odor remains an issue at the station with the new corrosion control system, provide an odor control system that treats hydrogen sulfide and also the complex odors formed by STEP system effluent ■ Replace pump system including pumps, controls and panels, level sensors, rails and reducers connecting to existing discharge elbows ■ Provide free standing roof structure above the pump control panel with integrated lights to illuminate area and to protect workers from the rain with a design similar to the McCormick Ridge installation 6-4 McCormick Pump Station 2 - Construction 0 0 0 ■ Replace check valves, plug valves and saddles downstream of the pump station in kind ■ Reduce the volume of storage in the wet well to reduce odors caused by long residence time ■ Employ new corrosion control system utilizing less toxic chemicals ■ If odor remains an issue at the station with the new corrosion control system, provide an odor control system that treats hydrogen sulfide and also the complex odors formed by STEP system effluent . r♦ Collection Facilities Improvements G S �iANTS Page 8-5 City of Port Orchard General Sewer Plan Update Table 8-1 6-Year CIP (2016-2021) m CIP No. Project a � L @ Project Description U N O °� O ■ Replace pump system including pumps, controls and panels, level sensors, rails and reducers connecting to existing discharge elbows ■ Provide free standing roof structure above the pump control panel with integrated lights to illuminate area and to protect workers from the rain with a design similar to the McCormick Ridge installation 6-5 McCormick Pump Station 1 - Design Q Q Q ■ Replace check valves, plug valves and saddles downstream of the pump station in kind ■ Reduce the volume of storage in the wet well to reduce odors caused by long residence time ■ Employ new corrosion control system utilizing less toxic chemicals ■ If odor remains an issue at the station with the new corrosion control system, provide an odor control system that treats hydrogen sulfide and also the complex odors formed by STEP system effluent ■ Replace pump system including pumps, controls and panels, level sensors, rails and reducers connecting to existing discharge elbows ■ Provide free standing roof structure above the pump control panel with integrated lights to illuminate area and to protect workers from the rain with a design similar to the McCormick Ridge installation 6-6 McCormick Pump Station 1 - Construction Q Q Q ■ Replace check valves, plug valves and saddles downstream of the pump station in kind ■ Reduce the volume of storage in the wet well to reduce odors caused by long residence time ■ Employ new corrosion control system utilizing less toxic chemicals ■ If odor remains an issue at the station with the new corrosion control system, provide an odor control system that treats hydrogen sulfide and also the complex odors formed by STEP system effluent 6-7 Eagle Crest Generator Set Q Q ■ Install new generator set, equipment pad, automatic transfer switch, and any other appurtenances necessary for proper function of generator set ■ Replace pumps 6-8 Albertsons Pump Station Q Q ■ Replace all electrical equipment ■ Replace all mechanical equipment ■ Clean and re -coat wet well .J ■ re Collection Facilities Improvements CONs•TAN75 Page 8-6 ! Qa f: •*���+Ole 1 South Kitsap 0 Water Reclamation +yea' l Facility r , ECHESTER RD Id o 6-2 z +40"r+•r■���� ���. *' '< ��' ire .� iJ o ..� Marina Bay St kGf z AMr ^,J .� r =ti..• 1 syNooO f Sinclair Inlet 0 o 3' ®. �' # % 6_7 I .10 r• 1 1 q +�■�a..I r ■rt 1: 4 10 j #e' 1 0 �7- `■ �7 00 0 {l ■W�� A , _ I 1 1 3i O } ;j * ! i. SE MILE HILL DR �" F U 1 \: Qk # % Eagle Cres 4 15 7-1 J fir* �Mrw ill' Golden Pond Qa■� LEY •\ _�NB�YF .1 ,• / r• `% ` `.L•..�/SSP���� `� •. — VVSTATEHWYI6 �W•~���+ 1__i 'Tremont �`�P w •I1 YFQ'r ' �+il■��� ?Curley Mill ram■ice.' �+ ✓ I ! r.•? �, .. l Canyon Ct Place ` TR'E NIU „T W THEMONT ST Q' • • C 1 �• 1 ' �' ( McCormick Woods #1LT ! !L _ _. 10 1 � �• ► 1 �a■+rGi. �' BpiHarrison Fill Pi i �•. _�`� °� �... os Hpital SE 7 �._ -� i l` �.._ w Pottery �... \ IN o ±v I 6 3 6 4 6-5 6-6 ��� J j ■J 4 w'# Flower _ The Ridge 3 The Ridge ° Cedar Heights 9 Meadows Goi■■�ai■�gr�i' �M:ti■.■ a �a tAcC�rMick ■ I fL ■r IMidst� T # 9T_�_�'v. SE SALMONBERRY RD.SW BERRY LAKE RDn Mil 3SW OLD CLIFTON RD 1 l ek' - - SE SED,GWICK �,,, ■O■■ gla lack 1 #r 1 Sedgwick w ►I■ - McCormick ■ r +Mill j ; I Woods #2 • 1 1 ■~e A ■ -■ �� 'b+�Ry �— IF r � ■ r r ■ r f■ice■i�■■■g G�\CKRR .' p blxtavia MINE am ■ �e�° Albertson �... .. LAMEMO, V z ■ irirr■ ■ 0 e �" i ■ tare ( reek.. l a Long . a. fr■�■ Sh," ! - I ► j - f Lake r r ■ .`•' � e SW LIDER RD .. ►N9 ' asidds■■■ Mae �... ' o� i J`I ��■■�ir�■.�ii�iii �■ri � *� � ..� FRRo j �`� i � Z w w Q Y N Q Q w w a Y Sewer System: City of Port Orchard 2015 Kitsap County base data 2015 A 1 6-Year C I P Figure Data sources supplied may not reflect current or actual conditions. This map is a geographic representation based on information available. It does notGeneral Sewer Plan U date represent survey data. No warranty is made concerning the accuracy, currency, porcomple enessintent of.C., depicted no this map. 0 3,000 6,000 Feet ,,,� r� City of Port Orchard, Washington BHC Consultants LLC., assumes no responsibility for the validity of any y g ;LT;ts information presented herein, nor any responsibility for the use or misuse of the data. N gym` Portcgtatd COPYRIGHT © 2016 BHC CONSULTANTS LLC., ALL RIGHTS RESERVED City of Port Orchard General Sewer Plan Update PAGE INTENTIONALLY BLANK ■ r� Collection Facilities Improvements G S•TAN7S Page 8-8 City of Port Orchard General Sewer Plan Update 8.3 10-YEAR CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM 8.3.1 Project Descriptions CIP 10-1: McCormick Woods Drive SW Gravity Sewer Upgrades If development occurs in Basin 6, the existing gravity sewer could surcharge and flood during peak hour conditions. It is recommended that the pipe be upsized as necessary to prevent surcharging. This project will be funded by developers. CIP 10-2: Flower Meadows Pump Station The pumps, mechanical, and electrical components have reached the end of their useful life. Replace pumps, controls and panels, level sensors, rails, and reducers connecting to existing discharge elbows. Provide free standing roof structure above the pump control panel with integrated lights to illuminate area and to protect workers from the rain with a design similar to the McCormick Ridge installation. Replace check valves, plug valves and saddles downstream of the pump station in kind. Install odor control facilities. CIP 10-3: Golden Pond Generator Set or Abandonment The existing generator set is undersized for the pump station. This project would either replace the existing generator set and automatic transfer switch, or would abandon the pump station entirely and install a new gravity sewer to convey flows from the Golden Pond and Tremont Place pump stations to the Eagle Crest pump station. This alternative would need to be further evaluated in the future. 8.3.2 Summary The projects recommended for the 10-year Capital Improvement Program (CIP) are described in Table 8-2 and illustrated on Figure 8-2. -� ■ rF Collection Facilities Improvements CONSULTANTSPage 8-9 City of Port Orchard General Sewer Plan Update PAGE INTENTIONALLY BLANK -� ■ rF Collection Facilities Improvements CONSULTANTSPage 8-10 City of Port Orchard General Sewer Plan Update Table 8-2 10-Year CIP (2022-2026) m CIP L No. Project a � @ Project Description U N O °� O 10-1 McCormick Woods Drive SW Gravity Sewer Upgrades R1 0 Replace 1,390 If of 10-inch pipe with 15-inch pipe from manhole 115-2-2-0200 to manhole 115-2-2-0020 ■ May not be necessary depending on future development patterns ■ Replace pumps 10-2 Flower Meadows Pump Station 0 0 Replace all electrical equipment ■ Replace all mechanical equipment ■ Clean and re -coat wet well ■ Evaluate feasibility and cost effectiveness of rerouting flows from Golden Pond and Tremont Place 10-3 Golden Pond Generator Set or Abandonment 0 0 Q pump stations to the Eagle Crest pump station ■ Either install new gravity sewers and abandon Golden Pond and Tremont Place, or replace existing generator set and automatic transfer switch at Golden Pond .J ■ re Collection Facilities Improvements CONs•TAN75 Page 8-11 City of Port Orchard General Sewer Plan Update PAGE INTENTIONALLY BLANK ■ r� Collection Facilities Improvements G 9 •TAN7S Page 8-12 m ,*4 i �# South Kitsap ,� '+ram*• Water Reclamation ��: \— z •�i+ l Facility r , ECHESTER RD ■ of 14' 1 � Marina .J a �■r� o �■•�q 0 �-Bay_st �C^,,' Iz 1r ,AN r ! r =�••.7 1 8%C00 ,1RR �� Sinclairinlet egYsr '� 6� i�r■ 1 o W 11I J •o t •�'! ' _•'t,.l f J %, s�P�e � m� 1 r� II •' - I i m � ` �— _ ,1 � a Eagle Cres� a 15 ; 17 -� �r*+�p il�rs - �r+t��7 ' o } l * rr iil� 7 SE MILE HILL DR O • � :�... � J j• �P 00 Golden Pond Q ■wr� ■�e\1 r .�6E Fp\R'VPLLEYR ..7 3 l y`� _..WSTATE HwY16 ��•~�■rR iTremont Canyon Ct Place -,; t ��•- r % I� �- : � TaEMONT sr'w TaEMONr sr 0 � I •' �� -- McCormick Woods #1 f r rL 10 l i 1 wri+rG.■■ �' ! JI I Harrison 1'I iN:I 1 i i ■ -�.i J j : ■e�� Hosp'Y I _� I` } — SELU dAVE z .__� l ; u •y<< �i� i� f 10 Pottery ■ Q Gee i ;� ■ai Flower qP �■ ■ The Ridge 3 I �= The Ridge Cedarei ht3 r awir■�rr�n■ eirr r■� 9 Meadows a 1NcC�rmick ■ jMeldows ■ ; �• ■ 1—�'�i��- _ -I : SE SALMONBERRY RD SW BERRY LAKE RD Z 1 y } 4, ■�iak i i r �� 10-2 t j SW OLD CLIFTO 3; r■ , ' w r - -- ri � ■ it �o+mer+ - ,�lackjack� i Sedgwick w rat sED.GWICK RD r ■ McCormick ■ r f i 10-1 Woods #2 e + 1 * r } .~i a ■ r butar_y r ; N, is � �'• 1 -' Ii■ r r. � r ■ ■ GV`I\CK R` r Lowes -'.. ■ R .-.' fii�ii�ri.i Q■ ;• � .j. b bay ; ■ �5� kiberlson �yl - *■r�ii.i h o B. •- - - I �. • w N 0 Creek.. ■ o I ■■ Long . �..� ■ -f Lake SWLIDERRD l .. ■w ����� �... ] o� i �' ��ie�ir�re�ei�ni Seri ;�• *� �...� FRRo� ■��� i � CgO Z r 1 �P�EF` N a w w a Y Q Sewer System: City of Port Orchard 2015 Kitsap County base data 2015 r*PS"1C9.tKd 10-Year CIP Figure Data sources supplied may not reflect current or actual conditions. This mapIse geographic representation based on information available. It does notGeneral Sewer Plan U date represent survey data. No warranty is made concerning the accuracy, currency, - por completeness of data depicted on this map. 0 3,000 6,000 Cit of Port Orchard, Washin ton BHC Consultants LLC., assumes no responsibility for the validity of any y gS;1S information presented herein, nor any responsibility for the use or misuse of the data. NJ 8-Z L V COPYRIGHT © 2016 BHC CONSULTANTS LLC., ALL RIGHTS RESERVED City of Port Orchard General Sewer Plan Update PAGE INTENTIONALLY BLANK ■ r� Collection Facilities Improvements G 9 •TAN7S Page 8-14 City of Port Orchard General Sewer Plan Update 8.4 20-YEAR CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM 8.4.1 Project Descriptions CIP 20-1: Bay Street Gravity Sewer Upgrades The existing gravity sewer between Port Orchard Boulevard and the Marina Pump Station is projected to be under capacity within the 20-year planning horizon. The pipe should be upsized, or a parallel gravity sewer should be installed, to ensure sufficient hydraulic capacity and to prevent flooding and surcharging during peak hour conditions. CIP 20-2: Port Orchard Boulevard Gravity Sewer Upgrades The existing gravity sewers in Port Orchard Boulevard are projected to be under capacity within the 20-year planning horizon. The pipes should be upsized to ensure sufficient hydraulic capacity and to prevent flooding and surcharging during peak hour conditions. Because there are two parallel pipes, pipe bursting or pipe reaming may be used to minimize costs and disruptions during construction. 8.4.2 Summary The projects recommended for the 20-year Capital Improvement Program (CIP) are described in Table 8-3 and illustrated on Figure 8-3. -� ■ rF Collection Facilities Improvements CONSULTANTSPage 8-15 City of Port Orchard General Sewer Plan Update PAGE INTENTIONALLY BLANK -� ■ rF Collection Facilities Improvements CONSULTANTSPage 8-16 City of Port Orchard General Sewer Plan Update Table 8-3 20-Year CIP (2027-2036) a� V L CL CIP No. Project a 06 O c m Project Description U y > O 20-1 Bay Street Gravity Sewer Upgrades Q ■ Replace 1,330 If of 18-inch pipe with 30-inch pipe from manhole 115-2-2-0200 to manhole 115-2-2-0020 20-2 Port Orchard Boulevard Gravity Sewer Upgrades Q ■ Replace 5,760 If of 12-inch pipe with 15-inch pipe from manhole 312-2-2-0220 to manhole 115-2-2-0200 . r♦ Collection Facilities Improvements G S �iANTS Page 8-17 City of Port Orchard General Sewer Plan Update PAGE INTENTIONALLY BLANK ■ r� Collection Facilities Improvements G 9 •TAN7S Page 8-18 i An �: I m . ��5 �•*�..�+� 1 South Kitsap Water Reclamation ;• i—►+�M+f l . Facility r I ECHESTER RD iw► �`� x I r • Jok i j io w w ..40 Marina wry, Bay -St iCi L1prw j, Q o Sq r� NOSinclair Inlet OO qo RR ►� sr Vi��a �Rir 1 4 r ' ... t _ `�, "tip I r...i ow �� #� j� ` ❑oho I �!. t2mgoein* D o° r i N i_ I Q J m ■ a o ►M` 13o is j 1i� ���w. r F 3 U Q Eagle CirB5t. 4 , .12 * ■■moo _do SE MILE HILL DR i I 0. `ri,�,i� 1 li e Golden Pond l r Q �'i.I�r'man" .I j 1- f `'•��'SP��• _-`PI STATE HWY 15 F� P -• [Tremont u, •I i 1Fe, �� % . ■ram■i�I r y o m! j i �.G: Jarr �u^lei ee j r'•I t ,, ii Can on Ct Place � •-' ycF : �. lTtz�MONr sr w rkEMONr sr McCormick Woods #1 f r rL t11 !#iaii■ �' Harrison II' I I o �... . . in a Hospital sE4o'!vE `It z in In. in/ Pottery G<r is in �� J ■J 4 1 �. z : r+ Flower P� 1 �� F / The Ridge 3 I �= The Ridge I Cedar ei hts G 5 i1 tJlcC�rmlck Bell Rid mar■ i� i 9 9 Meadows t ! atio/ i it` _ ■r J^�...�. Meadows T` * !r ! 1 # y—�'��'r�j- �r"1 I . SE SALMONBERRY RD ■� S. , "Y r '� SW BERRY LAKE RD ### / ■ -. -■ r 5� ` LA ;•� j � I • f � *i �■* i q; t i � I 3 ' ..p�—. I Legend I L t ii SW OLD CLIFTON RD _ * � !IFMO MORE �Laeklac/r, I '� - p - - - SW.GWiCKRD i� CIP McCormick t ■ . edgwick +� +Yr j ■ I Woods #2 • I r .~e�i I O Manhole [ but ... ,• L oc,: • — � g.rF , . r o eP ■ i. �i■ '• r in Force •�-�� � Force Main ■ ■ : ] ■ P\CK R` Cu j Lrley'ij'C Gravity Main T .-. f■i�r■�■■� OOy owes � 1. I f ��C ',• f �. .1 ee j i yitut-t*+14ri■a, ��e� oQlifertSOn tile `l 1•�•�411190M C I P 7 N ! �`` z�ii+ ► _ Pump Station Treatment Plant w (i&=Vol %R■►� 4 !... �. f 1 ---- Base Layers of 0 Q`ai ; ■ =e.J. � �■� fPortOrchard ■ w o ••� ' � � `� t ■ Cityo �� Cr;ee4iin ■� j a Long ■1_ o�?• fti�i Slggre Luke r� Port Orchard UGA i r ■ .`•.�e in SW SW LIDER RD 1 .. ■N9 ' ��� �... ' i — f West Sound LID Boundary �EGA I *+ �...- FR'40 Parcels aI I i�es��ee� ,....fo ! �.. .�...�� ' rNm� i..• : ' � Water Bodies y' �• — Water Courses Sewer System: City of Port Orchard 2015 20-Year C I P Kitsap County base data 2015 Figure Data sources supplied may not reflect current or actual conditions. This map ■ is a geographic representation based on information available. It does nots General Sewer Plan Update represent survey data. No warranty is made concerning the accuracy, currency, - Y BHC Coor nstenessultants of data depicted no this map. 0 3,000 6,0Feet �` �— y� City of Port Orchard, Washington BHC Consultants ted assumes no responsibility for the validity of any \\\ y8-3 1 C information presented herein, nor any responsibility forthe use or misuse of the data. j�J P �� COPYRIGHT©2015 BHC CONSULTANTS LLC., ALL RIGHTS RESERVED City of Port Orchard General Sewer Plan Update PAGE INTENTIONALLY BLANK ■ r� Collection Facilities Improvements G 9 •TAN7S Page 8-20 City of Port Orchard General Sewer Plan Update 8.5 OPINIONS OF PROBABLE COST Opinions of probable project costs for the 6-year CIP are listed in Table 8-4. These projects have been defined only to a preliminary level of design with approximate dimensions. All projects will require further definition and design refinement as part of the design process. Construction costs were estimated from bid results for similar projects in the Puget Sound area and RS Means cost data for 2014. 2014 is used as the cost basis to match the project costs developed as part of the 2014 Sewer Utility Gap Analysis described further in Section 9 - Financial. The opinion of probable construction cost includes the costs to build the various components, sales tax, and contingency. Opinions of probable project costs include planning, surveying, engineering services, permitting, bid advertisement, contract award, and services during construction. No costs are included for financing, easements, right-of-way, or property acquisition. Actual costs can and will differ from the opinions of probable costs. Volatility in the bidding climate, the number of contractors bidding on a project, and their approach to bidding and completing the work will all impact actual project costs. Table 8-4 Opinion of Probable Project Costs, 6-Year CIP (2016-2021) Opinion of Opinion of CIP No. Project Probable Probable Construction Project cost(' )(2) cost(')(3) 6-1 Marina Pump Station Improvements $2,670,000 $3,800,000 6-2 Bay Street Pump Station Improvements $730,000 $1,100,000 6-3 McCormick Pump Station 2 - Design N/A $190,000 6-4 McCormick Pump Station 2 - Construction $1,100,000 $1,100,000 6-5 McCormick Pump Station 1 - Design N/A $180,000 6-6 McCormick Pump Station 1 - Construction $1,100,000 $1,100,000 6-7 Eagle Crest Generator Set $119,000 $155,000 Estimated City Total $7,625,000 Notes: 1) All costs are in 2014 dollars. 2) The opinion of probable construction cost includes the costs to build the various components, sales tax, and contingency. 3) Opinions of probable project costs include planning, surveying, engineering services, permitting, bid advertisement, contract award, construction, and services during construction. Additional improvements required as development occurs will be funded by developers under a less definite time frame. Some further sewer extensions from the existing system will also be required to serve specific parcels within the various developments. These extensions are not =� ■ rr Collection Facilities Improvements CONSULTANTS Page 8-21 City of Port Orchard General Sewer Plan Update included in the CIP and cannot be identified until the development plan is defined, which may occur in several phases. The City -funded 6-year capital improvement program schedule is shown as Table 8-5. -� ■ rr Collection Facilities Improvements CONSULTANTSPage 8-22 City of Port Orchard General Sewer Plan Update Table 8-5 6-Year Capital Improvement Program (2016-2021) in 2014 Dollars CIP Project Costs per Year') No. Project Total 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 6-1 Marina Pump Station $3,800,000 $1,900,000 $1,900,000 Improvements 6 2 Bay Street Pump Station $1,100,000 $1,100,000 Improvements 6-3 McCormick Pump Station 2 - $190,000 $190,000 Design 6-4 McCormick Pump Station 2 - $1,100,000 $1,100,000 Construction 6-5 McCormick Pump Station 1 - $180,000 $180,000 Design 6-6 McCormick Pump Station 1 - $1,100,000 $1,100,000 Construction 6-7 Eagle Crest Generator Set $155,000 $155,000 Total $7,625,000 $1,900,000 $1,900,000 $370,000 $2,200,000 $1,100,000 $155,000 Notes: 1) Opinions of probable project costs include planning, surveying, engineering services, permitting, bid advertisement, contract award, construction, and services during construction. �� ■ 1F Collection Facilities Improvements CONSULTANTS Page 8-23 City of Port Orchard General Sewer Plan Update 8.6 SEWER EXTENSIONS INTO UNDEVELOPED BASINS New sewer extensions will be needed to serve new developments expected in unsewered areas of the City as shown on Figure 8-4. Specific plans for the sewer extensions have not been prepared and will be the responsibility of the developer. Some of the developments shown will require local pump stations. Major land developers will be preparing site -specific plans for street layouts, residential lot distribution, commercial parcels, sensitive area delineations, required setbacks with buffers, and other land use intentions for approval by the permitting authorities. These land use decisions, and the timing of when specific parcels are developed will influence the sewer collection facilities within these basins. The City has decided that no additional STEP units will be allowed. Coordination between the City and the West Sound Utility District will be required as properties are developed along the fringes of their two sewer service areas to establish which agency will serve which properties. These sewer extensions are not expected to require significant financial investment by the City. -� ■ rF Collection Facilities Improvements CONSULTANTSPage 8-24 • �o � I l D 5l0 # ■ F*���*iI # South Kitsap "— is Water Reclamation go'+��■ l w•r• [~ Facility r :I ECHESTER RD IS 0 i� i _ _ � ■t �'. i I J � � a o _ Q • *� l I iMarina Bay St 1G z. f'.ffl r Sinclair net a ►'a/�� �: ti,• '� SAND ST 11�6 + O Jo � •`I ••`'-• , �' SAPS m� 2� I m , ■ I— r N Q 1 r �. \• } 4 �Le ■■ G7 ' SE MILE HILL DR 1 �,.:� . -� ! l • Eagle Crest '� 15 l 7 rrrt" ► }n r Golden Pond If '•.\ �'P\LEY Rom' J - '� _ ♦ •r• I 1-._ _ �% I _ " _.__ N STATE HWY16 r�� f (Tremont o� P I 1 G`�? I ■ 1 . / �• ! + +' s y arr.■r■oan•C❑n Ct Place Cu^ley_c, �` •,/ l -F % r �• r• • TR'E ON•T,ST � THEMONT ST-- 1 McCormick -Woods #1 ! ft _ I -PAP -112 .10 t 11 'r■�rfr■■ ' is _ •.— i Harrison f _ i rr■■a■ o 1 3 ■ _ I Hospital F SEwNDE AVv,� ! J. L_ �5s I �'•w� f �' of �a■ PotteryIF a Flower ■ ti�i The Ridge 3 �I a The Ridge I ■ Cedar Heights. MCCMMk r9 Meadows �oR yc IC■■4aa A0MI•� Rl�■a5 rr! + r S! _ + 'K■ SE SALIVIONBE RRv RD Meadows % �+� �f t— ♦ X\. a ; I I SW BERRY LAKE RD +,: ; I1C �4 C� ■ j tiJ _ E ••.~: •..i � j r f• / '� �� Li is - % '•� j� . a �` ! j .� r f � bra � ; ti�'� - ► ! t" ' ■ r a, sw DLD cuFro d Ro , l •'� ' arrrg ■ i o ,blackjack t ,- W we SE4 .GWICKRD 3 ■ I McCormick edgwick ■ , t 5a *■ Woods #2 I r ��rr w ■ ■ .b ta:r � 0 C. _ i 5 � �� I r� � I : i +' ULowes " n ■ . 1 �Ira�r■raaa♦ QG`N\GK R4-- e`� S �• l � E 4l! 'Albertson Ij �yil?tt-->harlual ��1�— ' ■ j. ..••I---J - w �f ♦ per: i �+ ��irr.rrArrr, rt� {.. .`. z 0 I t� � 5. r■rrrr 4 ..i11 � o � .�• .."1 � :: Power r�ar r '%' ■ a `" Creek,• �,. - ---� a Long . Ga. r:./l ftr�r �.. l ..j r r - Luke 5 ' i' � , `�a I■ y ...� ti � � SW LIDER RD F ■ —..3 'I o �• Islas emu r—■samsom.&J Maas �• tea+ ...� ��RRo �• I�� i ;: ..,� rley -Creek , Sewer System: City of Port Orchard 2015 Kitsap County base data 2015 ' Future Sewer Extensions Data sources supplied may not reflect current or actual conditions. This map r Figure is a geographic representation based on information available. It does not l General Sewer Plan Update represent survey data. No warranty is made concerning the accuracy, currency, / or completeness ofdata depicted on this map. 0 3,000 6,OOF0 �eet` �r �" City of Port Orchard, Washington BHC Consultants LLC., assumes no responsibility for the validity of any \\\ S;j A N S information presented herein, nor any responsibility for the use or misuse of the data. NJ s"' � 8-4 lJ L ►•1 Port Qrchatd COPYRIGHT © 2015 BHC CONSULTANTS LLC., ALL RIGHTS RESERVED City of Port Orchard General Sewer Plan Update PAGE INTENTIONALLY BLANK ■ r� Collection Facilities Improvements G 9 •TAN7S Page 8-26 SECTION 9 FINANCIAL 9.1 FINANCIAL SUMMARY City of Port Orchard General Sewer Plan Update The financial analysis for the sewer system was performed by Katy Isaksen & Associates as part of the "City of Port Orchard Utility Gap Analysis", and is included as Appendix H. -� ■ rr Financial CONSULTANTSPage 9-1 City of Port Orchard General Sewer Plan Update PAGE INTENTIONALLY BLANK -� ■ L~ Financial CONSULTANTSPage 9-2 City of Port Orchard General Sewer Plan Update SECTION 10 OPERATIONS AND MAINTENANCE PROGRAM 10.1 INTRODUCTION The operation and maintenance activities performed by the City to ensure performance and reliability of the wastewater collection system are summarized in this chapter. City personnel maintain approximately 8 miles of force mains, 49 miles of gravity sewers, 14 miles of STEP mains, 16 pump stations, and a Supervisory Control and Data Acquisition (SCADA) telemetry system. 10.2 CITY MANAGEMENT AND PERSONNEL The City's Public Works Department is composed of approximately 21 full time employees (FTE) that comprise a combined crew for road, water, sewer, and stormwater maintenance. The City is governed by a City Council and Mayor, and the Public Works Director oversees the Public Works Utilities Department. This department is responsible for the operation and maintenance of the City's road, water, sewer, and stormwater systems. 10.3 OPERATIONS AND MAINTENANCE ACTIVITIES This section presents the operations and maintenance activities, including preventive and corrective routines. Pump Stations City staff currently visits and inspects each pump station on a daily basis, and should continue maintenance at this level. The stations, including wet wells, should be hosed down daily. The wet wells should be pumped out and cleaned on a bi-annual basis or as needed. The pumps should be cleaned out as needed to continue operating at or near their design point. Force Mains City staff should operate all force main valves on an annual basis. Force mains should be inspected on an annual basis, and should be flushed when pressure increases. Gravity Sewers and Manholes Preventive maintenance for gravity sewer lines includes programs for inspection and cleaning. Inspections should include visual observation of manholes and a program of closed-circuit television (CCTV) inspection of sewer pipes. Gravity lines should be cleaned by flushing or jetting at least every year. The cleaning and inspection programs should identify the majority of problems so that they may be repaired in the maintenance or capital improvement programs, instead of resulting in a failure or overflow. -3 ■ r♦ Operations and Maintenance Program CONSULTANTSPage 10-1 City of Port Orchard General Sewer Plan Update Summary A summary of the sewer collection system recommended maintenance standards is provided as Table 10-1. Table 10-1 Recommended Collection System Maintenance Standards Maintenance Task Quantity or Length of Component Recommended Standard Pump Station Inspections 16 0.1 FTE per station per year(') Gravity Sewer CCTV Inspections 369,600 LF 369,600 LF per year Gravity Sewer Cleaning 369,600 LF 369,600 LF per year Force Main Flushing 41,400 LF Annual inspection; flushing if force main pressure increases(2) Notes: 1) FTE is full time equivalent and is equal to 1,768 hours per year (85 percent of a full year). 2) Recommendation based on EPA 832-F-00-071, Wastewater Technology Fact Sheet, Sewers, Force Main, September 2000. 10.4 STAFFING NEEDS The City employs 21 FTE's, of which 15 are assigned to the Public Works Shop and 6 are administrative staff. There are no staff members who work solely on the sewer system. The City employs 4 field people who work primarily in the sewer division. One metric to compare staffing rates among sewer utilities is employees per 100,000 LF of pipe. While this does not account for variations in number of pump stations, customers served, treatment plant operations, or other factors, it is a useful way to compare approximate staffing efficiency with similar utilities. A summary of the sewer utility staffing for some utilities in the Puget Sound region and the City is presented as Table 10-2. =� ■ rr Operations and Maintenance Program CONSULTANTS Page 10-2 City of Port Orchard General Sewer Plan Update Table 10-2 Sewer Utility Staffing Comparison per Total Length of Pipe Agency Total Current Staff Total Length of Pipe (LF) Employees per 100,000 LF of Pipe City of Port Orchard (2) 3.5 369,600 0.95 City of Monroe(') 4 223,600 1.79 City of Bellevue (2) 22 2,777,280 0.79 City of Enumclaw(') 2 248,160 0.81 City of Kent(2) 9 1,056,000 0.85 City of Kirkland (2) 5.5 633,600 0.87 City of Lacey(2) 6 897,600 0.67 City of Mercer Island(2) 4 707,520 0.57 Average Employee per 100,000 LF of Pipe 0.91 Median Employee per 100,000 LF of Pipe 0.83 Notes: 1) Operates one or more wastewater treatment plant (WWTP)(s). 2) Does not operate a WWTP. Table 10-3 Sewer Utility Staffing Comparison per Pump Station Agency Total Current Staff Pump Stations Employees per Pump Station City of Port Orchard (2) 3.5 16 0.22 City of Monroe(') 4 10 0.40 City of Bellevue (2) 22 46 0.48 City of Enumclaw(') 2 12 0.17 City of Kent(2) 9 11 0.82 City of Kirkland (2) 5.5 6 0.92 City of Lacey(2) 6 47 0.13 City of Mercer Island (2) 4 18 0.22 Average Employee per Pump Station 0.42 Median Employee per Pump Station 0.31 Notes: 1) Operate a WWTP(s). 2) No WWTP. =� ■ rr Operations and Maintenance Program CONSULTANTS Page 10-3 City of Port Orchard General Sewer Plan Update Based on the results of the poll, the City is above the average and median in the number of employees per 100,000 linear feet of pipe, and below the average and the median in number of employees per pump station. 10.5 RECOMMENDED OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE IMPROVEMENTS The City has been proactive in taking steps to solve the most critical maintenance issues. The City has been responsive to these improvements and has incorporated them into the CIP. Therefore, no specific improvements are required, but it is recommended that the City adjust operations and maintenance procedures as issues arise. =� ■ rr Operations and Maintenance Program CONSULTANTS Page 10-4 City of Port Orchard General Sewer Plan Update SECTION 11 RECLAIMED WATER 11.1 RECLAIMED WATER In 2006, WSUD received a grant to assist in the planning, permitting, and engineering design of a reclaimed water distribution system. The intent of such a system was to aid in optimizing the District's wastewater management and environmental stewardship by reducing the South Kitsap Water Reclamation Facilities marine discharge and beneficially reusing a precious water resource and reducing potable water demand. In 2011, approximately one mile of reclaimed water distribution piping was constructed by the City and the WSUD. The distribution system piping is shown on Figure 11-1. In 2013, a hydrogeologic study was performed for WSUD which is part of Water Resource Inventory Area 15 (WRIA 15). This study determined that the existing aquifer and recharge have sufficient capacity to meet demand for the next 20 to 50 years. Per capita water demand has also been decreasing due to lower flow water fixtures and conservation. As a result, reducing potable water demand is not currently necessary. Until the end of 2015, there was only one reclaimed water customer being served. The costs to provide reclaimed water to this customer were higher than what the customer was charged, resulting in the City and WSUD subsidizing the reclaimed water customer. Reclaimed water was provided to this customer until the end of 2015, at which point reclaimed water distribution ceased. Reclaimed water is blended with effluent from the secondary clarifiers prior to discharge. If water system demands increase to the point that reclaimed water is necessary to adequately address water demands in the area, the reclaimed water distribution system will be placed back into service. -� ■ L~ Reclaimed Water CONSULTANTSPage 11-1 City of Port Orchard General Sewer Plan Update PAGE INTENTIONALLY BLANK -� ■ L~ Reclaimed Water CONSULTANTSPage 11-2 I � i:llserp 5 Lake v � Q G1. ".' Kits 2 Kltsap z Lake � Park ; W Werner Rd I , U 31v 111h St aa� x , G1h St Burwell-si Bremerton Puget [3v4� Sound Navat 1 shipyard South Kitsap 1 Water Reclamation W lot rya' •00 1 • 3 P Orc �aia� ; a r "<CMarr Valley Rd I ••�., y ; ay,,rdv�.._ tprHlghy+ .3. i j Y - ram•' �` I` _..1•� I j ------------------ �._..J �..�•.� 1 _•` tin � � � �� 1 r••_•......... I••_•' !j Square Lake F Stale Park �. Camp C aiY l nw,Ood t f tti a O Legend ❑ Treatment Plant Water Reuse Mains sa '�••_: TSQna � City of Port Orchard �a Port Orchard UGA y I his map is a geographic representation based on vailable information . No warrantv is made concerning the accuracy, currency, or completeness of data depicted on this map. jWS;LTPTS 01 (Facility �••� Sinclair Inlet �,• IJ E Collins Rd I ort �r 4�t �.. Lti "RdL. hard south �•—..% a Kitsap , SE yiOle rJ High n r Howe Fart ;a`� 1 • i `L wkk South Kitsap Roles i •:L Regional P;rrk Park r� L. +` Bethel SE Lund Ave r--J Corridar � I . j SF Salmonherry Ind I SE Sedgwrc Y a L—Aj J a N I ' lung �i a Sources: Esri, DeLorrr GEBCO, USGS, FAO, Survey, Esri Japan, MI User Community 4 SE Muller•ttx Rd rt. NAVTEQ, TomTom, Intermap, increment P Corp., IS, NRCAN, GeoBase, IGN, Kadaster NL, Ordnance Esri China (Hong Kong), swisstopo, and the GIS- Reclaimed Water General Sewer Plan Update Figure or Miles _ City of Port Orchard, Washington 0.5 1 IN p 10-hard 11 City of Port Orchard General Sewer Plan Update PAGE INTENTIONALLY BLANK -� ■ L~ Reclaimed Water CONSULTANTSPage 11-4 APPENDICES Appendix A SEPA Checklist CITY OF PORT ORCHARD Department of Community Development 216 Prospect Street, Port Orchard, WA 98366 Phone: (36o) 874-5533 • Fax: (36o) 876-498o planning@cityofportorchard.us . N- wWw.citvofportorchard.us CITY OF PORT ORCHARD DETERMINATION OF NON -SIGNIFICANCE (DNS) DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL: The subject proposal is the 2015 update to the City's comprehensive sewer plan, as required by the state Growth Management Act. The comprehensive sewer plan provides guidance for the City's capital projects improvements and operations, maintenance and repair needs through 2036, based on updated population and programmatic information. PROPONENT: City of Port Orchard Public Works Department LOCATION OF PROPOSAL: Citywide (Non -Project Action) LEAD AGENCY: City of Port Orchard SEPA OFFICIAL: Nicholas Bond, Development Director City of Port Orchard 216 Prospect Street Port Orchard, WA 98366 DETERMINATION: The lead agency for this proposal has determined that it does not have a probable significant adverse impact on the environment. An environmental impact statement (EIS) is not required under RCW 43.21C.030(2)(c). The decision was made after review of a completed environmental checklist and other information on file with the lead agency. This information is available to the public on request. The proposal is a non -project action per WAC 197-11-774; however, all project -level improvements will be subject to individual environmental review at the time of their application. The DNS is issued pursuant to WAC 197-11-340(2)(a)(v); the lead agency will not act on this proposal for 15 days from the date of issue. DATE OF ISSUANCE: COMMENT DEADLINE: April 8, 2016 April 22, 2016 at 4:00pm Niirhol�sSond, AICP, Department of Community Development Director Date APPEAL PERIOD: Pursuant to RCW 43.21C, any person wishing to appeal this determination may file such an appeal within fourteen (14) days from the date of the end of the comment period. You should be prepared to make specific factual objections. There is a fee to appeal this determination. SEPA ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST UPDATED 2014 Purpose of checklist. Governmental agencies use this checklist to help determine whether the environmental impacts of your proposal are significant. This information is also helpful to determine if available avoidance, minimization or compensatory mitigation measures will address the probable significant impacts or if an environmental impact statement will be prepared to further analyze the proposal. Instructions for applicants: hf elp] This environmental checklist asks you to describe some basic information about your proposal. Please answer each question accurately and carefully, to the best of your knowledge. You may need to consult with an agency specialist or private consultant for some questions. You may use "not applicable" or "does not apply" only when you can explain why it does not apply and not when the answer is unknown. You may also attach or incorporate by reference additional studies reports. Complete and accurate answers to these questions often avoid delays with the SEPA process as well as later in the decision - making process. The checklist questions apply to all parts of your proposal, even if you plan to do them over a period of time or on different parcels of land. Attach any additional information that will help describe your proposal or its environmental effects. The agency to which you submit this checklist may ask you to explain your answers or provide additional information reasonably related to determining if there may be significant adverse impact. Instructions for Lead Agencies: Please adjust the format of this template as needed. Additional information may be necessary to evaluate the existing environment, all interrelated aspects of the proposal and an analysis of adverse impacts. The checklist is considered the first but not necessarily the only source of information needed to make an adequate threshold determination. Once a threshold determination is made, the lead agency is responsible for the completeness and accuracy of the checklist and other supporting documents. Use of checklist for nonproject proposals: ffipM For nonproject proposals (such as ordinances, regulations, plans and programs), complete the applicable parts of sections A and B plus the SUPPLEMENTAL SHEET FOR NONPROJECT ACTIONS (part D) Please completely answer all questions that apply and note that the words "project," "applicant," and "property or site" should be read as "proposal," "proponent," and "affected geographic area," respectively. The lead agency may exclude (for non -projects) questions in Part B - Environmental Elements —that do not contribute meaningfully to the analysis of the proposal. A. BACKGROUND h[ elp] 1. Name of proposed project, if applicable: hf gM City of Port Orchard - 2015 Comprehensive Sanitary Sewer Plan Update 2. Name of applicant: hf elp] City of Port Orchard Public Works Department SEPA Environmental checklist (WAC 197-11-960) May 2014 Page 1 of 16 3. Address and phone number of applicant and contact person: thelpI City of Port Orchard Public Works Department 216 Propsect Street Port Orchard, WA 98366 (360) 876-4991 Contact. Mark R. Dorsey, P.E. 4. Date checklist prepared: hel May 2015 5. Agency requesting checklist: hL elp] City of Port Orchard Planning Department Washington State Department of Ecology 6. Proposed timing or schedule (including phasing, if applicable): hf elpl The proposed date for adoption of the 2015 Comprehensive Sanitary Sewer Plan Update (Plan) by the Port Orchard City Council is expected to be May 2016. 7. Do you have any plans for future additions, expansion, or further activity related to or connected with this proposal? If yes, explain. hj elpl This is a non -project action adopting the Plan. In addition to the City's Plan and the Capital Improvement Plan (CIP), incremental sanitary sewer facilities may be constructed in conjunction with private development, as they occur. 8. List any environmental information you know about that has been prepared, or will be prepared, directly related to this proposal. h[ elp] City of Port Orchard 2013 Comprehensive Plan Update (update will be prepared in 2016) City of Port Orchard 2015 Water System Plan Update (in process) City of Port Orchard 2015 Comprehensive Sewer Plan (in process) Kitsap County Comprehensive Plan Update, August 2012 West Sound Utility District Sewer Comprehensive Plan, November 2007 9. Do you know whether applications are pending for governmental approvals of other proposals directly affecting the property covered by your proposal? If yes, explain. ffigjpj Property owners and developers have, and are expected to apply for, approval of development that will require sanitary sewer service. These developments are not addressed specifically in the Plan. The Plan provides for necessary public sewer collection and treatment improvements necessary to support such development in accordance with the Comprehensive Plan and development code. All project -level improvements will be subject to environmental review at the time of their application. No pending proposal will affect this non -project action. 10. List any government approvals or permits that will be needed for your proposal, if known. h[ elp] The Plan must be approved by the Washington State Department of Ecology. Review by other jurisdictions and agencies include Kitsap County, West Sound Utility District, The City of Bremerton, the City of Port Orchard City Council, Kitsap County Health District SEPA Environmental checklist (WAC 197-11-960) May 2014 Page 2 of 16 and the State Department of Health. 11. Give brief, complete description of your proposal, including the proposed uses and the size of the project and site. There are several questions later in this checklist that ask you to describe certain aspects of your proposal. You do not need to repeat those answers on this page. (Lead agencies may modify this form to include additional specific information on project description.) h� e As needed for for demonstrating compliance with the Growth Management Act (GMA), this proposal involves adoption of amendments to the 2009 City of Port Orchard Comprehensive Sewer Plan. The amendments identify three categories of action: Programmatic — Updating the Comprehensive Sewer Plan to address a revised 20-year population forecast for the urban growth area which has been expanded since the 2009 Plan. This will enable the City to address future needs for sanitary sewer service within the defined urban growth area. Capital Proiects — Updating the list of specific capital projects that are necessary to implement the Comprehensive Sewer Plan. These will be included in the Comprehensive Plan Capital Improvement Program Element. Subsequent project -level environmental review will be conducted at the time these projects are proposed for implementation. Operation. Maintenance& Repair — Day-to-day and periodic projects necessary to maintain the current and future sewer system in working order are described in the Comprehensive Sewer Plan as further addressed in the sewer utility operations and maintenance standards and procedures. 12. Location of the proposal. Give sufficient information for a person to understand the precise location of your proposed project, including a street address, if any, and section, township, and range, if known. If a proposal would occur over a range of area, provide the range or boundaries of the site(s). Provide a legal description, site plan, vicinity map, and topographic map, if reasonably available. While you should submit any plans required by the agency, you are not required to duplicate maps or detailed plans submitted with any permit applications related to this checklist. [help] The service area covered by the 2015 Comprehensive Sanitary Sewer Plan Update includes area within the current City of Port Orchard municipal limits and portions of the designated Urban Growth Area (UGA), which includes established boundaries of Kitsap County ULID #6, as agreed upon by Kitsap County, the City of Bremerton and the West Sound Utility District. Port Orchard is located on the Kitsap peninsula, south of Sinclair Inlet. The main body of Puget Sound is to the east. B. ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS h�el j 1. Earth a. General description of the site h[ elpj (circle one): Flat, rolling, hilly, steep slopes, mountainous, other The City of Port Orchard is characterized by shoreline adjacent to Sinclair Inlet. The topography is generally hilly with some flat areas. SEPA Environmental checklist (WAC 197-11-960) May 2014 Page 3of16 b. What is the steepest slope on the site (approximate percent slope)? hf elp] There are steep slopes within the City, however, this non -project action will not impact slopes generally, and any project proposed under this ordinance will be reviewed separately for SEPA compliance where required c. What general types of soils are found on the site (for example, clay, sand, gravel, peat, muck)? If you know the classification of agricultural soils, specify them and note any agricultural land of long-term commercial significance and whether the proposal results in removing any of these soils. h[ epl Soils and soil types are not generally impacted by this non -project action. An extensive discussion of the soils and their properties can be found in the USDA Soil Survey ofKitsan County. d. Are there surface indications or history of unstable soils in the immediate vicinity? If so, describe. h[ e Unstable soils and steep slopes will not be impacted by this non -project action. Separate site -specific review will determine impacts to soils and slopes and SEPA compliance. e. Describe the purpose, type, total area, and approximate quantities and total affected area of any filling, excavation, and grading proposed. Indicate source of fill. hI elpj No filling or grading is proposed as part of this non -project action. Fill or grading related to site -specific proposals under this ordinance will be reviewed separately for SEPA compliance. f. Could erosion occur as a result of clearing, construction, or use? If so, generally describe. h[ pjo No clearing or construction is proposed as part of this non -project action. g. About what percent of the site will be covered with impervious surfaces after project construction (for example, asphalt or buildings)? f, heil-)] No construction is proposed as part of this non -project action. h. Proposed measures to reduce or control erosion, or other impacts to the earth, if any: hf elp] No specific measures are proposed as part of this non -project action. Each project will be evaluated as part of site -specific project review for compliance with SEPA and other regulations in the Port Orchard Municipal Code. 2. Air a. What types of emissions to the air would result from the proposal during construction, operation, and maintenance when the project is completed? If any, generally describe and give approximate quantities if known. h[ elpl This non -project action will have no impact on air quality. Air quality will be evaluated as part of site -specific project review and SEPA analysis. b. Are there any off -site sources of emissions or odor that may affect your proposal? If so, generally describe. hI elpl SEPA Environmental checklist (WAC 197-11-960) May 2014 Page 4of16 This non -project action will have no impact on air quality. Air quality will be evaluated as part of site -specific project review and SEPA analysis. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control emissions or other impacts to air, if any: JLeIPJ This non -project action will have no impact on air quality. Air quality will be evaluated as part of site -specific project review and SEPA analysis. 3. Water a. Surface Water: hf elp] 1) Is there any surface water body on or in the immediate vicinity of the site (including year- round and seasonal streams, saltwater, lakes, ponds, wetlands)? If yes, describe type and provide names. If appropriate, state what stream or river it flows into. hf glp] Port Orchard is bordered on the north by the waters of Puget Sound. There are numerous wetlands, streams and creeks. Impacts on shoreline, surface water, seasonal streams and wetlands will be evaluated as part of site -specific project review and SEPA analysis. 2) Will the project require any work over, in, or adjacent to (within 200 feet) the described waters? If yes, please describe and attach available plans. hf elpl This non -project action will not require any work over, in or adjacent to these waters. Impacts on wetlands, surface water, seasonal streams and shoreline will be evaluated as part of site -specific project review and SEPA analysis. 3) Estimate the amount of fill and dredge material that would be placed in or removed from surface water or wetlands and indicate the area of the site that would be affected. Indicate the source of fill material. h[ elpj This non -project action will not require any filling or dredging. Impacts as a result of filling or dredging will be evaluated as part of site -specific project review and SEPA analysis. 4) Will the proposal require surface water withdrawals or diversions? Give general description, purpose, and approximate quantities if known. h[ elpl This non -project action will not require any surface water withdrawals or diversions. The proposed permit, policy, and ordinances will provide additional protection for all water bodies. Impacts of this type will be evaluated as part of site -specific project review and SEPA analysis. 5) Does the proposal lie within a 100-year floodplain? If so, note location on the site plan. hj elp, Some areas of the City are identified as lying within the 100-year flood plain (as defined in the Federal Flood Disaster Protection Act of 1973.) This non -project action does not impact flood areas specifically. Any proposal involving flood areas will comply with Chapter 15.38, Flood Damage Prevention, of the Port Orchard Municipal Code and will be evaluated as part of site -specific review and SEPA analysis. 6) Does the proposal involve any discharges of waste materials to surface waters? If so, describe the type of waste and anticipated volume of discharge. hI elpl This non -project action will not require discharge of materials to surface waters. The proposed ordinance will prohibit the discharges of water materials and provide additional SEPA Environmental checklist (WAC 197-11-960) May 2014 Page 5 of 16 protection for all water bodies. Impacts of this type will be evaluated as part of site -specific project review and SEPA analysis. b. Ground Water: 1) Will groundwater be withdrawn from a well for drinking water or other purposes? If so, give a general description of the well, proposed uses and approximate quantities withdrawn from the well. Will water be discharged to groundwater? Give general description, purpose, and approximate quantities if known. 1hel This non -project action will not require any withdrawal of groundwater or discharge to groundwater. Impacts of this type will be evaluated as part of site -specific project review and SEPA analysis. 2) Describe waste material that will be discharged into the ground from septic tanks or other sources, if any (for example: Domestic sewage; industrial, containing the following chemicals... ; agricultural; etc.). Describe the general size of the system, the number of such systems, the number of houses to be served (if applicable), or the number of animals or humans the system(s) are expected to serve. h[ elp] This non -project action will not require any discharge of waste material to groundwater. Existing health regulations control the location, type and density of development which utilizes septic tanks. c. Water runoff (including stormwater): 1) Describe the source of runoff (including storm water) and method of collection and disposal, if any (include quantities, if known). Where will this water flow? Will this water flow into other waters? If so, describe. hI elpj This non -project action will not impact surface and stormwater. Stormwater flow, runoff of any type and outfalls will be evaluated as part of site -specific project review and SEPA analysis 2) Could waste materials enter ground or surface waters? If so, generally describe. hf elpl This non -project action will not impact ground or surface waters and the goals to minimize the effects of discharge of waste materials. Possible contamination of ground or surface waters with waste materials will be evaluated as part of site -specific project review and SEPA analysis. 3) Does the proposal alter or otherwise affect drainage patterns in the vicinity of the site? If so, describe. This non -project action will not have a effect on drainage patterns. Possible impacts to drainage patterns will be evaluated as part of site -specific project review and SEPA analysis. d. Proposed measures to reduce or control surface, ground, and runoff water, and drainage pattern impacts, if any: This non -project action will not have a effect on surface, ground or runoff waters. Possible impacts to surface, ground, and runoff water will be evaluated as part of site -specific project review and SEPA analysis. SEPA Environmental checklist (WAC 197-11-960) May 2014 Page 6 of 16 4. Plants hf elpl a. Check the types of vegetation found on the site: Itg1pl deciduous tree: alder, maple, aspen, other evergreen tree: fir, cedar, pine, other shrubs grass pasture crop or grain Orchards, vineyards or other permanent crops. wet soil plants: cattail, buttercup, bullrush, skunk cabbage, other water plants: water lily, eelgrass, milfoil, other other types of vegetation b. What kind and amount of vegetation will be removed or altered? hf elpl This non -project action will have no effect on vegetation removal or alteration. Vegetation removal and enhancement will be evaluated as part of site -specific project review and SEPA analysis. c. List threatened and endangered species known to be on or near the site. h[ eIP This non -project action will have no impact on threatened or endangered species. Species will be evaluated as part of site -specific project review and SEPA analysis. d. Proposed landscaping, use of native plants, or other measures to preserve or enhance vegetation on the site, if any: Jtelpl No landscaping is proposed as part of this non -project action. Open space and planting regulations will be evaluated as part of site -specific project review and SEPA analysis. e. List all noxious weeds and invasive species known to be on or near the site. This non -project action will have no impact on noxious weeds and invasive species. Flora will be evaluated as part of site -specific project review and SEPA analysis. 5. Animals a. List any birds and other animals which have been observed on or near the site or are known to be on or near the site. Examples include: h[ elpl birds: hawk, heron, eagle, songbirds, other mammals: deer, bear, elk, beaver, other: sea lion, raccoon fish: bass, salmon, trout, herring, shellfish, other b. List any threatened and endangered species known to be on or near the site. hL e This non -project action will not have an effect on wildlife. Effects of proposals on wildlife will be evaluated as part of site -specific project review and SEPA analysis. c. Is the site part of a migration route? If so, explain. hf elpl SEPA Environmental checklist (WAC 197-11-960) May 2014 Page 7 of 16 The Puget Sound, including Port Orchard, is an important nesting place, feeding area, and wintering ground for thousands of birds in the Pacific Flyway. This non -project action will have no effect on migration patterns. Effects on wildlife will be evaluated as part of site - specific project review and SEPA analysis. d. Proposed measures to preserve or enhance wildlife, if any: hf elp] This non -project action will not have an effect on animals or birds so there are no proposed measures to preserve or enhance wildlife. Effects of site -specific project proposals on wildlife will be evaluated as part of the site -specific project review and SEPA analysis. e. List any invasive animal species known to be on or near the site. This non -project action will not have an effect on invasive animal species. Effects of proposals on wildlife will be evaluated as part of site -specific project review and SEPA analysis. 6. Energy and natural resources a. What kinds of energy (electric, natural gas, oil, wood stove, solar) will be used to meet the completed project's energy needs? Describe whether it will be used for heating, manufacturing, etc. h[ elo No energy is required for this non -project action. Energy consumption will be evaluated as part of site -specific project review and SEPA analysis and in accordance with the Washington State Energy Code which the City has adopted. b. Would your project affect the potential use of solar energy by adjacent properties? If so, generally describe. JtLeM This non -project action will have no effect on solar access. Solar access will be evaluated as part of site -specific project review and SEPA analysis. c. What kinds of energy conservation features are included in the plans of this proposal? List other proposed measures to reduce or control energy impacts, if any: h[ elpl None. The City uses the Washington State Energy Code to enhance electricity conservation. Energy conservation features will be evaluated as part of site -specific project review and SEPA analysis. 7. Environmental health a. Are there any environmental health hazards, including exposure to toxic chemicals, risk of fire and explosion, spill, or hazardous waste, that could occur as a result of this proposal? If so, describe. hI elpl This non -project action will cause threats of environmental health hazards. Environmental health hazards will be evaluated as part of site -specific project review and SEPA analysis. 1) Describe any known or possible contamination at the site from present or past uses. This non -project action will not have an effect on any known or possible contamination sites. Effects of individual proposals on contamination sites will be evaluated as part of site -specific project review and SEPA analysis. 2) Describe existing hazardous chemicals/conditions that might affect project SEPA Environmental checklist (WAC 197-11-960) May 2014 Page 8of16 development and design. This includes underground hazardous liquid and gas transmission pipelines located within the project area and in the vicinity. This non -project action will not have an effect on any known hazardous chemicals/conditions. Effects of individual proposals on existing hazardous chemicals/conditions that might effect project development and design will be evaluated as part of site -specific project review and SEPA analysis. 3) Describe any toxic or hazardous chemicals that might be stored, used, or produced during the project's development or construction, or at any time during the operating life of the project. This non -project action will not involve any hazardous chemicals. Individual proposals will be evaluated for toxic or hazardous chemicals as part of site - specific project review and SEPA analysis. 4) Describe special emergency services that might be required. No special emergency measures will be required as part of this non -project action. 5) Proposed measures to reduce or control environmental health hazards, if any: No measures to reduce or control environmental health hazards are necessary as part of this non -project action. b. Noise 1) What types of noise exist in the area which may affect your project (for example: traffic, equipment, operation, other)? hj ei Noise levels in Port Orchard are regulated under Chapter 9.24 (Offenses Against Public Order) of the Port Orchard Municipal Code. This non -project action will not be affected by noise levels. 2) What types and levels of noise would be created by or associated with the project on a short-term or a long-term basis (for example: traffic, construction, operation, other)? Indicate what hours noise would come from the site. 1hel This non -project action will have no effect on noise levels. Noise impacts of individual proposals will be evaluated as part of site -specific project review and SEPA analysis. 3) Proposed measures to reduce or control noise impacts, if any: Jtgm Noise levels on Port Orchard are regulated under Chapter 9.24 (Offenses Against Public Order) of the Port Orchard Municipal Code. 8. Land and shoreline use a. What is the current use of the site and adjacent properties? Will the proposal affect current land uses on nearby or adjacent properties? If so, describe. hj elp] Land uses in Port Orchard are primarily residential and commercial, with some industrial, light Manufacturing, recreation, and open space. This non -project action will have no effect on current land uses on nearby or adjacent properties. Impacts of individual proposals on current land uses on nearby or adjacent properties will be evaluated as part of site -specific project review and SEPA analysis. SEPA Environmental checklist (WAC 197-11-960) May 2014 Page 9of16 b. Has the project site been used as working farmlands or working forest lands? If so, describe. How much agricultural or forest land of long-term commercial significance will be converted to other uses as a result of the proposal, if any? If resource lands have not been designated, how many acres in farmland or forest land tax status will be converted to nonfarm or nonforest use? h[ elp, Not applicable since this is a non -project action. Individual proposals will be evaluated for the site's previous land use as part of site -specific project review and SEPA analysis. 1) Will the proposal affect or be affected by surrounding working farm or forest land normal business operations, such as oversize equipment access, the application of pesticides, tilling, and harvesting? If so, how: This non -project action will have no effect on, nor would be effected by, surrounding working farm or forest land normal business operations. The impact of surrounding working farm or forest land normal business operations to individual proposals will be evaluated as part of site -specific project review and SEPA analysis. c. Describe any structures on the site. ltgM The proposal is a non -project action, and includes no specific development activity. Any future proposed development activity will be evaluated as part of site -specific project review and SEPA analysis. d. Will any structures be demolished? If so, what? h[ elp] This non -project action requires no demolition. Any future proposed demolition will be evaluated as part of site -specific project review and SEPA analysis. e. What is the current zoning classification of the site?[Lelpj Zoning in Port Orchard is according to the Official Zoning Map, adopted January 14th, 2014, which is available at the Department of Planning and Community Development. What is the current comprehensive plan designation of the site? hf gm Comprehensive Plan designations are according to the Comprehensive Plan Land Use Map, adopted January 14th, 2014, in accordance with GMA requirements. The Land Use Map is available at the Department of Planning and Community Development. g. If applicable, what is the current shoreline master program designation of the site? h[ elp] Not applicable. h. Has any part of the site been classified as a critical area by the city or county? If so, specify. h� e Environmentally sensitive areas in Port Orchard include wetlands, aquifer recharge areas, geologically hazardous areas, continuous and seasonal streams and waters including the waters of Puget Sound, and fish and wildlife habitat. These areas are inventoried in the City's Comprehensive Plan and are regulated under Chapter 14.04, State Environmental Policy Act, of the Port Orchard Municipal Code. Environmentally sensitive areas will be evaluated as part of site -specific project review and SEPA analysis. SEPA Environmental checklist (WAC 197-11-960) May 2014 Page 10of16 Approximately how many people would reside or work in the completed project? hf elpl Not applicable to this non -project action. j. Approximately how many people would the completed project displace? h[ elp] None. k. Proposed measures to avoid or reduce displacement impacts, if any: hf elpl Not applicable to this non -project action. �. Proposed measures to ensure the proposal is compatible with existing and projected land uses and plans, if any: h[ elp] None. m. Proposed measures to ensure the proposal is compatible with nearby agricultural and forest lands of long-term commercial significance, if any: None. 9. Housing a. Approximately how many units would be provided, if any? Indicate whether high, middle, or low-income housing. h[ elal Not applicable to this non -project action. b. Approximately how many units, if any, would be eliminated? Indicate whether high, middle, or low-income housing. h[ elpj No units will be eliminated by the non -project action. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control housing impacts, if any: hf elpl None. 10. Aesthetics a. What is the tallest height of any proposed structure(s), not including antennas; what is the principal exterior building material(s) proposed? hL elpl This non -project action has no effect on building and structure height. Building and structure height are regulated in the Zoning Code. b. What views in the immediate vicinity would be altered or obstructed? h� elp] This non -project action will have no impact on views. View alteration and obstruction is regulated by the Zoning Code and the Shoreline Management Master Program. Views will be evaluated as part of site -specific project review and SEPA analysis. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control aesthetic impacts, if any: hL elpl None. 11. Light and glare SEPA Environmental checklist (WAC 197-11-960) May 2014 Page 11 of 16 a. What type of light or glare will the proposal produce? What time of day would it mainly occur? hj elp] This non -project action will not produce any light and/or glare. Light and glare will be evaluated as part of site -specific project review and SEPA analysis. b. Could light or glare from the finished project be a safety hazard or interfere with views? hel This non -project action will not produce any light and/or glare. Light and glare will be evaluated as part of site -specific project review and SEPA analysis. c. What existing off -site sources of light or glare may affect your proposal? lbglpl This non -project action will not be affected by any off -site source of light or glare. Off -site sources of light and glare will be evaluated as part of site -specific project review and SEPA analysis. d. Proposed measures to reduce or control light and glare impacts, if any: [help] None. 12. Recreation a. What designated and informal recreational opportunities are in the immediate vicinity? h[ elp] Not applicable to this non -project action. b. Would the proposed project displace any existing recreational uses? If so, describe. hf elp] This non -project action will not displace any existing recreational uses. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts on recreation, including recreation opportunities to be provided by the project or applicant, if any: h[ elJ None. 13. Historic and cultural preservation a. Are there any buildings, structures, or sites, located on or near the site that are over 45 years old listed in or eligible for listing in national, state, or local preservation registers located on or near the site? If so, specifically describe. h] ei] Archeological and historic resources are recorded at the State of Washington Departments of Community, Trade and Economic Development, Office of Archeology and Historic Preservation. b. Are there any landmarks, features, or other evidence of Indian or historic use or occupation? This may include human burials or old cemeteries. Are there any material evidence, artifacts, or areas of cultural importance on or near the site? Please list any professional studies conducted at the site to identify such resources. hf�el ] A map and listing of all the historic resources is available at the Department of Planning and Community Development, 216 Prospect Street, Port Orchard, WA. 98366. c. Describe the methods used to assess the potential impacts to cultural and historic resources on or near the project site. Examples include consultation with tribes and the SEPA Environmental checklist (WAC 197-11-960) May 2014 Page 12 of 16 department of archeology and historic preservation, archaeological surveys, historic maps, GIS data, etc. hf elpJ Not applicable to this non -project action. d. Proposed measures to avoid, minimize, or compensate for loss, changes to, and disturbance to resources. Please include plans for the above and any permits that may be required. None. 14. Transportation a. Identify public streets and highways serving the site or affected geographic area and describe proposed access to the existing street system. Show on site plans, if any. hL jPJ State Route 16 connects the City with the balance of the Kitsap Peninsula. The City has an extensive system of arterials, suburban and local public streets. Location of, and access to, public streets and highways will be evaluated as part of site -specific project review and SEPA analysis. b. Is the site or affected geographic area currently served by public transit? If so, generally describe. If not, what is the approximate distance to the nearest transit stop? hI elpl The City is served by Kitsap Transit. Kitsap Transit operates a commuter system which is coordinated with the ferry schedules in neighboring communities in addition to a dial -a -ride service. c. How many additional parking spaces would the completed project or non -project proposal have? How many would the project or proposal eliminate? hL elpl This is a non -project action. Parking requirements are contained in Chapter 16.45, Parking Standards, of the Port Orchard Municipal Code. d. Will the proposal require any new or improvements to existing roads, streets, pedestrian, bicycle or state transportation facilities, not including driveways? If so, generally describe (indicate whether public or private). h� el ] This non -project action will not create the need for any new or improved streets. Transportation facilities will be evaluated as part of site -specific project review and SEPA analysis. e. Will the project or proposal use (or occur in the immediate vicinity of) water, rail, or air transportation? If so, generally describe. h[ elo The various modes of transportation will be evaluated as part of site -specific project review and SEPA analysis. How many vehicular trips per day would be generated by the completed project or proposal? If known, indicate when peak volumes would occur and what percentage of the volume would be trucks (such as commercial and nonpassenger vehicles). What data or transportation models were used to make these estimates? lheM This non -project action will have no direct impact on vehicular trips. Trip generation and the cumulative impact will be evaluated as part of site -specific project review and SEPA analysis. SEPA Environmental checklist (WAC 197-11-960) May 2014 Page 13 of 16 g. Will the proposal interfere with, affect or be affected by the movement of agricultural and forest products on roads or streets in the area? If so, generally describe. This non -project action will have no direct impact on, or be effected by, the movement of agricultural and forest products on roads or streets in the area. Movement of agricultural and forest products on roads or streets in the area will be evaluated as part of site -specific project review and SEPA analysis. h. Proposed measures to reduce or control transportation impacts, if any: lb@M None. 15. Public services a. Would the project result in an increased need for public services (for example: fire protection, police protection, public transit, health care, schools, other)? If so, generally describe. fhelpl This non -project action will have little effect on public services, except as would normally be required for individual proposals. The need for public services will be evaluated as part of site -specific project review and SEPA analysis. Proposed measures to reduce or control direct impacts on public services, if any. h( elpl None. 16. Utilities a. Circle utilities currently available at the site: JLPjPJ electricity, natural gas, water, refuse service, telephone, sanitary sewer, septic system, other b. Describe the utilities that are proposed for the project, the utility providing the service, and the general construction activities on the site or in the immediate vicinity which might be needed- Jtgjo This non -project action will not directly affect public utilities. The provision of utilities for individual proposals will be evaluated as part of site -specific project review and SEPA analysis. C. SIGNATURE LUELpj The above answers are true and complete to the best of my knowledge. I understand that the lead agency is relyirt -on them to mak de Signature: Name of signee 4 M m 5c.4L;\/LF Position and Agency/Organization Date Submitted: _IZ/2-ett# D. SUPPLEMENTAL SHEET FOR NONPROJECT ACTIONS hf elpl SEPA Environmental checklist (WAC 19T-11-960) May 2015 Page 14 of 16 (IT IS NOT NECESSARY to use this sheet for project actions) Because these questions are very general, it may be helpful to read them in conjunction with the list of the elements of the environment. When answering these questions, be aware of the extent the proposal, or the types of activities likely to result from the proposal, would affect the item at a greater intensity or at a faster rate than if the proposal were not implemented. Respond briefly and in general terms. How would the proposal be likely to increase discharge to water; emissions to air; pro- duction, storage, or release of toxic or hazardous substances; or production of noise? This non -project action will have no effect on discharges to water bodies. No negative impacts will occur in terms of emissions to air; production or storage of toxic or hazardous substances; or production of noise. Proposed measures to avoid or reduce such increases are: Effects on discharge to water; emissions to air; production, storage, or release of toxic or hazardous substances; or production of noise will be reviewed as part of site -specific review and SEPA analysis. 2. How would the proposal be likely to affect plants, animals, fish, or marine life? This non -project action will have no effects to plants, animals, fish or marine life. All specific effects to plant, animal, fish and other marine life will be evaluated as part of site -specific project review and SEPA analysis. Proposed measures to protect or conserve plants, animals, fish, or marine life are: Effects of individual proposals on wildlife and marine life will be reviewed as part of site - specific review, and SEPA analysis. 3. How would the proposal be likely to deplete energy or natural resources? This non -project action will not affect energy or natural resources. Effects of individual proposals on energy or natural resources will be reviewed as part of site - specific review, and SEPA analysis. Proposed measures to protect or conserve energy and natural resources are: Construction of individual projects is reviewed under the Washington State Energy Code, adopted under Chapter 15 of the Port Orchard Municipal Code. 4. How would the proposal be likely to use or affect environmentally sensitive areas or areas designated (or eligible or under study) for governmental protection; such as parks, wilderness, wild and scenic rivers, threatened or endangered species habitat, historic or cultural sites, wetlands, floodplains, or prime farmlands? This non -project action not impact environmentally sensitive areas or other areas designated for protection. Effects of individual proposals on environmentally sensitive areas or other protected areas will be reviewed as part of site -specific review, and SEPA analysis. Proposed measures to protect such resources or to avoid or reduce impacts are: SEPA Environmental checklist (WAC 197-11-960) May 2014 Page 15 of 16 Impacts of individual proposals on environmentally sensitive areas or other protected areas will be reviewed as part of site -specific review, and SEPA analysis. 5. How would the proposal be likely to affect land and shoreline use, including whether it would allow or encourage land or shoreline uses incompatible with existing plans? This non -project action will not affect land or shoreline use. Impacts of individual proposals on land or shoreline use will be reviewed as part of site -specific review, and SEPA analysis. Proposed measures to avoid or reduce shoreline and land use impacts are: Impacts of individual proposals on land or shoreline use will be reviewed as part of site - specific review, and SEPA analysis. 6. How would the proposal be likely to increase demands on transportation or public services and utilities? This non -project action will have no effect on the demand for transportation or public service and utilities. Proposed measures to reduce or respond to such demand(s) are: None. Projects approved under this ordinance are subject to review by the City Planning Department, Public Works Department, and the local Health District. 7. Identify, if possible, whether the proposal may conflict with local, state, or federal laws or requirements for the protection of the environment. The non -project proposal is consistent with all local, state and federal requirements for the protection of the environment. SEPA Environmental checklist (WAC 197-11-960) May 2014 Page 16 of 16 Interlocal Agreements WEST SOUND UTILITY DISTRICT RESOLUTION 01-07 A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS OF WEST SOUND UTILTIY DISTRICT NO.1 FORMALIZING AND PROVIDING GUIDANCE TO THE NEW DISTRICT WHEREAS RCW 57.32.010 authorizes water and sewer districts to consolidate into combined districts if such combination "shall be conducive to the public health, welfare, and convenience and be of special benefit to the lands of the districts.", and WHEREAS, the voters in Annapolis Water District and Karcher Creek Sewer District ("prior districts") approved the consolidation of each district into a new district entitled "West Sound Utility District No. I" at the November 6, 2007 general election; and WHEREAS, Kitsap County certified the said election on November 27, 2007, which served to formally establish West Sound Utility District as a municipal corporation of Washington State, and terminate the legal existence of the prior districts; and WHEREAS, West Sound's Board of Commissioners have determined to enter into this resolution to formalize creation of the new district and to establish initial guidance for its operation, now, therefore, THE BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS OF WEST SOUND UTILITY DISTRICT ("West Sound") HEREBY RESOLVES as follows: 1. Prior Resolutions to Remain Valid. The resolutions entered into by the prior districts shall continue to be valid, to wit, the resolutions previously entered into by Annapolis Water District shall continue to govern West Sound's water operations, and the resolutions entered into by Karcher Creek Sewer District shall continue to govern West Sound's waste water operations. From this starting point, West Sound will act accordingly to consolidate, amend, and/or terminate the resolutions of the prior districts, so one uniform set of resolutions governing all district operations and matters will result. 2. Pre -Consolidation Debts. All pre -consolidation debts duly incurred, and agreements entered into, by Annapolis Water District and/or Karcher Creek Sewer District, shall continue to be honored by West Sound and satisfied according to their terms. 3. Management of Joint Wastewater Treatment Facility. Karcher Creek Sewer District presently has management responsibility for the Joint Wastewater Treatment Facility in South Kitsap County owned and operated with other governmental entities. West Sound shall assume all of Karcher Creek's prior management responsibilities for this facility as of the date of its formal creation. West Sound Utility District Resolution OI -07 Page I of 3 4. One Finance Department. West Sound shall have one financial department and shall prepare a single consolidated district annual report. 5. Existing Water & Sewer Expenses / Future Expenses. All debts of Annapolis Water District at the time of consolidation shall be paid from the water supply related revenues of the West Sound, and all debts of Karcher Creek Sewer District at the time of consolidation shall be paid from the wastewater related revenues of West Sound. Thereafter, as a general proposition, water supply related debts shall be paid from water supply related revenues, and wastewater operation debts shall be paid from wastewater related revenues. 6. Revenue Bonds. Any revenue bonds representing the sole obligation of Annapolis Water District prior to consolidation, shall be satisfied after consolidation from water supply related revenues, and any revenue bonds representing the sole obligation of Karcher Creek Sewer District prior to consolidation, shall be satisfied after consolidation from wastewater operation revenues. Any cost sharing agreements for the repayment of revenue bonds in place between the prior districts before consolidation, shall continue unabated: that portion of the bonds to be repaid by Annapolis Water District, shall continue to be repaid from water supply operation revenues, and that portion of the bonds to be repaid by Karcher Creek Sewer District, shall continue to be repaid from wastewater operation revenues. 7. Administrative Expenses. The administrative expenses of West Sound, for those joint services provided to water supply and sewer operations, such as district management, financial administration, customer service, and the like, shall be paid jointly from water supply and sewer operation related revenues as determined by the board members of West Sound from time to time. 8. Insurance. At the time of consolidation, West Sound shall consolidate all the prior districts' respective insurance coverage, such as liability and casualty insurance, and obtain the same through the Water -Sewer Risk Pool. After consolidation, prior separate requirements placed on developers for project insurance dealing with water supply and wastewater shall be combined into one unified requirement. 9. Property Ownership. At the time of consolidation, all prior monies, personal property, and real property, owned by Annapolis Water District and Karcher Creek Sewer District, shall become the sole property of West Sound. 10. Consolidation Agreement. The Consolidation Agreement entered into by Annapolis Water District on March 28, 2007, and by Karcher Creek Sewer District on April 2, 2007, shall continue in effect as applicable. 11. General Manger / Legal Counsel. The General Manager of both prior districts, namely, LAWRENCE J. CURLES, shall continue to be the General Manager of West Sound. The prior general legal counsel for Annapolis Water West Sound Utility District Resolution 01-07 Page 2of 3 District, RICHARD GROSS, shall continue as the general legal counsel for West Sound. INTRODUCED, CONSIDERED, AND PASSED THIS 12th DAY OF E William Hunly gton Susan Way U \ OX7 times Hart,(," West Sound Utility District Resolution 0I-07 Page 3of3 INTERGOVERNMENTAL CONTRACT FOR WASTEWATER FACILITIES MANAGEMENT I. Purpose of A reeme`nt. It is the purpose of this con- tract to provide for an intergovernmental arrangement appropri- ate to carry out the improvement of the existing wastewater transmission, treatment and discharge facilities serving the City of Port Orchard and Sewer District No. 5 and capable of serving other areas as may in the future be so served, as called for in the Sinclair Inlet Sewerage Plan, dated June, 1976, and to operate and maintain such facilities. It is recognized that this contract may be relied on by the holders of revenue bonds of the Participants in tnis contract.. Tnis contract is entered into in accordance with RCW 35.13A.070 and amends and supersedes (1) the Intergovernmental Contract for Wastewater Facilities Management entered into by the City and the District on August 1, 1977; and (2) the Agreement for Trunk Line Expense entered into by the City and the District on August 9, 1977. 2. Definitions. The following words and phrases -used in this contract shall have the following meanings: (a) "City" shall mean the City of Port Orchard, Washington. (b) "District" shall mean sewer District No. 5, Kitsap County, Washington. (c) "Equivalent Residential Unit ERU)" shall mean: {1) One separate single family residence; or (2) With respect to residential duplexes and multiple residential structures, one per single family unit; or (3) With respect to all remaining users served by the Joint Facilities, each 700 cunic feet or less 40 of monthly discharge of sewage based on metered water consumption. An ERU shall De counted if the structure to which it is charged is either connected to or billed for availability of use by Local Facilities. Any structure having a mixed residential and nonresi- dential use snail be charged one ERU for each residential unit and the estimated value of ERU usage for the balance of the, structure. (d) "Future Joint Facilities" shall mean any Joint Facilities, not Original Joint Facilities, which include all future additions and betterments to and improvements of the treatment plant described in subparagraph 2(e) as that will have been expanded and upgraded and all other sewerage facilities which the Participants shall from time to time agree in writing to include as Joint Facilities. (e) "Joint Facilities" shall mean the sewage treat- ment facilities, sewage outfall lines, sewage pumping stations, sewage force mains, and appurtenances and communication facili- ties related thereto, and other sewage facilities which are used to transport, treat and dispose of sewage from more than one participant, and which include the Original Joint Facilities and Future Joint Facilities. (f) "Joint Facilities bonds" shall mean sewer revenue bonds issued by the City to pay only Joint Facility Costs of the Joint Facilities or Future Joint Facilities, and bonds issued to refund such bonds. The payment of the revenue bonds shall be made by assessments of properties within a utility local improvement district or districts to be created by the City, and which will include all property of the District together with properties adjoining that of the District. - 2 (g) "Joint Facilities Costs" shall include all costs and expenses attributable to the construction and installation of Joint Facilities and financing thereof, including out not limited to the actual cost of design and construction, reloca- tion of the District's office, compliance with any applicable environmental policy act or procedures, engineering fees, legal fees, financial consultant fees, interest during construction, Joint Facilities Bond discount, taxes, publication costs, con- tract administration costs and other costs and expenses relating to the planning, design, construction, installation, and financ- ing -Of the in treatinehf-plant-and such office relocation, excluding the costs of acquiring all land necessary to the construction of the treatment plant as a part of the Original Joint Facilities. Joint Facilities costs include the costs and expenses attribut- aole to the construction and installation of the Port Orchard Marina pump station and force main. (h) "Joint Facilities Maintenance and Operation Expenses" shall mean all costs and expenses relating to labor, fringe benefits, power, light, water, heat, chemicals, equipment including repair and replacement thereof, tools, materials, supplies, insurance premiums, contract services, legal services, inspections and tapes and "in lieu of taxes" directly and prop- erly chargeable to the operation and maintenance of the Joint Facilities plus administrative overhead expenses chargeable to the Joint Facilities. (i) "Local Facilities" shall mean all sewer facili- ties other than Joint Facilities owned or operated by individual Participants for the local collection and transmission of sewage to be delivered to the Joint Facilities. (j) "Original Joint Facilities' shall mean the sewage treatment plant constructed pursuant to this contract, the force main and the pumping station from the City, and the necessary 40 - 3 - r i�land required therefor, all as more specifically described in Exhibits A and B. M "Partici ants" shall mean the City and the District, and hereafter any other political subdivision or municipal corporation which contracts with the then existing Participants to be served by the Joint Facilities pursuant to the terms of this contract and such other terms as may then be agreed upon, but Participants may agree to permit any person,or governmental entity to use the Joint Facilities without becoming a Participant. 3. La-nd and -Right -of -Way --Acquisition. it is understood by and between the Participants that the treatment plant as a part of the Original Joint Facilities shall be wholly con- structed on land, described on Exhibit A attached hereto and by this reference made a part hereof, which is located outside the present corporate limits of the City. The portion of such land 40 identified as "state land" on Exhibit A shall be acquired by the City from the State of Washington at the sole expense of the City. The cost of acquiring the "state land" by the City shall i to not be included within the Joint Facilities -Costs. All right, title and interest in and to the remaining portion of the land necessary to the construction and completion of the treatment plant, identified as "sewer district land" on Exhibit A, is presently owned by the District. In consideration of the exer- cise of the rights set forth herein, the District hereby cove- nants to convey to the City all of its right, title and interest to the "sewer district land" for Joint Facilities purposes, but subject to reversion to the District when it is no longer used for such purposes. 4. Construction of the Ori inal Joint Facilities. Except as otherwise provided in the Agreement, the City shall construct - 4 - • 1 f the sewage treatment plant and the other original ,joint Facili- ties described on Exhibit B, attached hereto and by this refer- ence made a part hereof. Construction shall include, but not be limited to, engineering desi§n and inspection, financing and legal services, advertising for bids, awarding construction con- tracts, supervising and inspecting construction and accepting work as complete. (a) The City, with the participation of the District as described below, will create a utility local improvement dis- trict or districts, and assessments shall be pledged to the pay- ment -of revenue bonds which shall be issued to finance the joint Facility Costs. Such utility local improvement district or dis- tricts will' include all property of the District, together with properties adjoining that of the District. (b) The District shall have the right to approve the inclusion of any properties outside the District within the 40 utility local improvement district and shall further have the right to final approval of the assessment formula for the util- ity local improvement district for properties within and outside the District, but not within the corporate boundaries of the City. (c) In addition to revenue raised from bonds, as pro- vided herein, the City shall apply for and administer federal and state grants available therefor, and shall secure such regulatory approvals and make such environmental assessments as may be required. (d) During construction of the original Joint Facilities, any change order exceeding by $1,UOO.Oo the amount stated in the original contract specifications, as bid, must be approved by one representative of Doth the City and the Dis- trict, those representatives being voting members of the Advisory Committee as provided below. I 10 - 5 - 4 (e) The District reserves the right .to withdraw from this Agreement before the award of a construction contract if the total Joint Facil ties costs exceed $16,0001000 after bids U CNPCI ' have been ; . 5. Maintenance_and_Operation of Joint Facilities. The maintenance and operation of the Joint Facilities shall be con- ducted as follows. (a) The District shall maintain and operate the Joint Facilities in accordance with high engineering standards and in conformity with the then current standards and requirements established bX applicable skate and federal agencies having jurisdiction over such maintenance and operation. Included with such maintenance and operation shall be the carrying of public liability insurance with limits in accordance with standard practice at any such time. The District shall hold the other Participants harmless and defend all claims for personal injury or property damage arising out of the maintenance and operation of the Joint Facilities which are not caused by neglect or fail- ure of such Participants to perform maintenance or operation as contemplated in.paragraph 11. (b) In -the event of.mismanagement by the District 'materially affecting the cost of maintenance or operation of the Joint Facilities, or a material violation of state or federal standards or requirements due to neglect, misfeasance or mal- feasance by the District, operation and maintenance shall revert to the City subject to the maintenance and operations standards set forth in paragraph 5. It shall oe the responsibility of the Advisory Committee and/or an Arbitrator, as provided in para- graph 15, to determine whether there has been a violation, mis- management or failure by the District so'material as to warrant transfer of management and operation of the Joint Facilities to the City.. ` - 6 - R (c) The party responsible for operation and mainte- nance of the Joint Facilities shall De liable for all penalties and assessments charged against the Facility by any state or federal agency resulting from negligence, misfeasance or mal- feasance in the maintenance and operation of the facility, and ify and hold harmless the other from any shall fu=ther indemn such penalty or assessment. (d) The employment of the Chief operator of the Joint Facilities shall be made by the District only upon the express approval --Of the Advisory Committee. (e) In the event that a supervisor of the District is operator, not responsible to oversee the function of the Chief op more than 2D% of the salary of the supervisor shall be charged as a Joint Facility Maintenance and Operation Expense. Clerical support will be a Joint Facility maintenance and operation Expense as required, subject t0 review of the Advisory Committee. Financin Construction and maintenance of Joint 6• Facilities - (a) The Joint Facilities Costs shall be financed by a utility local improvement district as provided in paragraph 4• lities shall be shared as follows: The costs for said Joint Faci (1) Each party shall pay an amount proportionate to the assessed valuation of the properties of each party as it the properties included. bears to the total assessed valuation of in the- utility local improvement district. (2) For purposes of determining the assessed valuation of the properties of the parties, the District shall r include all properties within and adjoining its boundaries Dut not within the corporate boundaries of the City. (3) snare of the cost Each party's proportionate for the original Joint- Facilities, as provided above, shall - 7 - ' determine the proportionate interest that each party has in the plant capacity, measured in terms of ERU's. (b) Either party shall have the right to acquire additional ERU's from the other party. The party acquiring any additional ERU shall pay to the 'other an amount agreed upon by the parties. If the parties cannot agree upon an amount, the valuation of the ERU shall be sunmitted to the Advisory Committee and in the event of dispute the valuation shall ae determined by binding arbitration, as provided in paragraph 13. (c) The costs of those facilities not included within the Joint Facilities as defined in paragraph 2(e) or within the Joint Facilities Costs as defined in paragraph 2(g), shall be the sole responsibility of the party constructing them. (d) Joint Facilities Maintenance and Operations Expenses shall be paid as follows: (1) Within three months of completion of con- struction and by October 1 of each year thereafter, the District shall notify the City of its proposed budget for the Joint Facilities, showing the ,joint Facilities Maintenance and Opera- tion Expense and the ERU charge rate for the ensuing year. Thereafter the District shall adopt its final budget, suoject to 'approval of the Advisory Committee. The ERU charges for the Participants shall be based on that final budget, except as otherwise provided in this paragraph. By October 1 of each year following the year in which the estimates apply, the District shall determine and notify the City of the actual Joint Facili- ties Maintenance and Operation Expenses. If the actual require- ments and expenses exceed the total payments made by the City and District pursuant to this paragraph for that preceding calendar year, then the City within thirty (30) days after such notification shall pay to the District its share, based on its '4 total ERUs for the previous year, of that deficit. If the actual requirements and expenses were less than the total pay- ments made by the City and District pursuant to this paragraph for that preceding calendar year, then the District shall retain those excess payments and credit the excess payments against the next payments due from the City. (2) During any year the District shall operate within the ,joint Facilities budget. Expenditures not included in the budget shall not be made without the approval of the Advisory Committee. Should the Joint Facilities Maintenance and Operation Expenses increase above budget estimates, the District shall--notify-the Advisory Committee, which shall have the sole power to amend the Joint Facilities oudget and to increase the ERU charge rate to the Participants, after first notifying the City of such increase. Any amendment to the ,joint Facilities budget will be made only after demonstrating actual need, based on unforeseen circumstances over which the District had no reasonable control. (3) Neither the District nor the City shall have an interest in the Local Facilities of the other, and each party shall be solely responsible for the management, operation, and t expense of its Local Facilities. The management-operationonf ca, of the Port Orchard Marina Pump Station and transmission line, and force main transmissjgn line from Port Orchard to the treat- ,,,/ Y1'e !'a N riel`Aelte.f I meet plant, shall be the, responsibility of the City. 7. Billings - Payments. Commencing on for all City ERU charges prescribed in paragraph 6, the District shall bill the City on the first day of each calendar month for charges accrued to the first day of the immediately preceding month, and the City shall pay such charges so billed by the 20th day of the month in which such bill is received, after which time such billing shall be delinquent. Charges omitted in one month may be billed in the following months. Delinquent charges - 9 - i NNW shall accrue interest on the unpaid balance at the rate of 88 per annum from date of delinquency until paid. 8. Covenants to Make Payments. The City irrevocably covenants, obligates and binds itself to pay the District the charges representing the Cityls share of the Joint Facilities Maintenance and Operation Expenses as determined in accordance with paragraph G(d), out of the gross sewed revenues and/or water and sewer revenues of the mat., or from such other money legally available to the -D- or such purpose as P+•Zy determined by the -D e , and such sewage service charges shall, subject to the qualification below, be deemed maintenance and operation expenses of the City's system of sewers or water and sewer system in any future bond issue or other financing of the City payable in whole or in part from the revenues of such system and shall be payable and constitute a charge prior and superior to any charge or lien of any revenue bonds issued by the City payable from the gross revenues of its system, unless such future bond issue or other financing shall be on a parity of lien on such revenues with presently outstanding revenue bonds and such outstanding bonds do not permit such priority of payment. It' is recognized that the City has outstanding revenue bonds payable in whole or in part from the gross revenues of its sewerage and/or water system. Nothing in this section is intended to violate, nor shall it be construed to violate, any covenants respecting those outstanding bonds, and such cove- nants, to the extent there is a conflict between them and this section, shall control with respect to such outstanding bonds and bonds issued on a parity therewith. The City irrevocably covevants•and agrees to establish rates and collect fees for sewer service or sewer and water service in the' case of a combined utility which will be at least - 10 - 1 j r v sufficient to pay the sewer service charge to the District and to pay the other maintenance and operation expenses of its system and the principal of and interest on all revenue ponds issued by it for its sewer or water and sewer utility and to meet the coverage covenants thereof which will constitute a charge upon the gross revenues of its system. The District agrees to establish rates and collect fees for sewer service which will be at least sufficient to pay the expenses of mainte- nance and operation of its water and sewer utility and meet the principal, interest and coverage requirements of any and all ---revenue--bonds--of--the--Dist-r-ict: which constitute a charge upon the gross revenue of such utility. 9. Maintenance of _Local Facilities and Sewage Quality_- Insurance --Liability. The Participants shall maintain and operate their respective Local Facilities and control and regu- late the discharge of sewage into those Local Facilities in accordance with high engineering standards and in conformity with the standards established by the state and federal agencies having jurisdiction over the same. If there are any deficien- cies in the respective Local Facilities or the discharge of sewage into them causing excessive flow or below standard qual- ity sewage, such deficiencies shall be corrected by the appli cable Participant forthwith. Deficiencies may constitute exces- sive flow, BOD discharges for a five-day period of over 300 parts per million, suspended solids over 300 parts per million, or quality -of sewage discharge which damages the sewage treat- ment process or Joint Facilities, increases the Joint Facilities Maintenance and operation Expenses per unit of sewage treated, or causes the violation of any federal or state law or regula- tion. The offending Participant shall pay for any additional cost or expense caused by its Dreach of this paragraph. r� 10. Local Rates and Charges. Each Participant agrees to conform its rates and charges for sewage collection, treatment and disposal service to equitable standards consistent with the requirements of applicable federal and state agencies, including the United States Environmental Protection Agency. 11. Expansion- Improvement of Joint Facilities. (a) Expansion. At such time as any of the Joint Facilities (a) reach 90% of capacity, or (b) are required to.be expanded by federal, state or other governmental agencies having jurisdiction over the facilities, the City shall immediately .-commence --- the -plann-i-ng;- des ign--and construction of the expansion Of such Future Joint Facilities. Expansion of the Joint Facili- ties shall be deemed required if directed by a federal, state or other governmental agency in order to comply with existing standards or regulations of such agency or applicable statutes. The Future Joint Facilities to be constructed shall be agreed upon by the Participants, but in no event shall be of a less capacity and quality than is required by applicable federal, state or local standards or regulations or the minimum capacity and quality which good engineering practice would dictate under the circumstances.. Should the City fail to initiate and/or complete the expansion, the District may assume the planning and design responsibilities and cause the construction to ae done, and may issue its revenue bonds to pay the costs thereof, and such bonds shall be deemed Joint Facilities 13onds for the pur- poses of required payments under this contract. The Partici- pants shall confer and negotiate a method for financing the expansion which shall be cased on the method of payment for the original Joint Facilities Costs as set forth in this contract at paragraph b. (b) Imj2rovement. If regulatory agencies with juris- diction over the Joint Facilities direct the upgrading of the - 12 - ' y i Joint Facilities by the making of qualitative improvements to such facilities, the City shall immediately commence the plan- ning, design and construction of the improvements. Should the City fail to initiate and/or complete the improvements, the District shall assume the planning and design responsibilities and cause the improvements to be made, and may issue its sewer revenue bonds to pay the costs thereof, and such bonds shall be deemed Joint Facilities Bonds for the purposes of required pay- ments under this contract. The Participants shall confer and negotiate a method for financing the improvements which shall be --based-on—the meth-ad-of--payinent- for the original Joint Facilities Costs as set forth in 'this contract at paragraph 6. 12. Advisory -Committee. For the purpose of reviewing the maintenance and operation of the Joint Facilities, the plans for Future Joint Facilities, to foster cooperation between the Participants under this Contract and otherwise perform the duties assigned to it by this Contract, there is created the Joint Sewerage Facilities Advisory Committee which shall consist of three (3) representatives of each of the Participant's legis- lative bodies, which appointments shall be made as determined by the individual Participants. Each representative shall have one vote in the committee, including the chairperson. The Advisory Committee shall select its chairman and such other officers, shall fix a time and place of its meetings, and establish such rules and procedures as it deems appropri- ate. Except as provided below, the Advisory Committee shall be advisory to the Participants respecting all conditions required in the Contract. The District shall submit to the Advisory Committee all 'proposed and final budgets, grants, grant applica- tions and other matters it deems appropriate or the Advisory Committee requests relating to the Joint Facilities. All Participants shall submit to the Advisory Committee annually and i - 13 - at other times when requested, all data pertaining to water con- sumption, sewerage discharge, sewer connections, sewage quality, plans for additional Local Facilities, ERUs and other informa- tion relating to the Joint Facilities, The first task of the Advisory Committee shall be the review and assessment of all nonresidential units of each Participant connected or billed for availability of use to the Local Facilities and the assignment of an initial ERU factor for each such use. The Advisory Committee shall annually review the ERU factor assigned to each nonresidential unit .and shall make necessary adjustments based on actual or estimated sewage dis- charge as the committee deems appropriate. 13. Disputes. In the event of a dispute between any of the Participants relating to the amount of Joint Facilities Costs, the estimated or actual Joint Facilities Maintenance and Operation Expenses, the number of ERUs of any Participant or the compliance with any maintenance, operation or construction standards or requirements, Any party to such dispute may submit the dispute to the Superior Court of Kitsap County for arnitra- tion proceedings provided by Chapter 7.04 RCW. Such arbitration shall be limited to the interpretation and application of this contract and may_not impair the contract and debt obligations of 7h r or the District, or the powers of the District to determine the methods used in the management of the Joint Facilities.-. The arbitrator appointed shall prescribe the rules of the arbitration not agreed upon by the parties to the dis- pute. The parties to the dispute may agree upon any other method of resolving this dispute. 14. Industrial Cost Recover -. Industrial Share Payment. Under the provisions of United States Public Law 92-500 sewerage agencies providing wastewater treatment must identify all industrial/commercial waste dischargers as defined by the United - 14 - States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). Once identified, PL 92w.500 requires that the industry must repay that portion of any federal grant received by local agencies for wastewater treatment relating to the treatment of that discharger's industrial waste discharges. Each Participant agrees that any waste discharger whose total discharge into the Joint Facilities is sufficient to cause that discharger to be classified as a significant indus- trial waste discharger (as described by Pretreatment of pollut- ants Introduced into Publicly Owned Treatment Works, October, ____ly__73.,_..EPAa._.a"ha.t-publication or the standards contained therein may be changed from time to time by EPA) shall be required to enter into a contract with the Participant into the Local Facilities of which that discharger discharges sewage in order to provide for waste treatment services and the payment of the required local and industrial cost recovery costs pursuant to PL 92-5U0 and federal and state regulations. Any Participant which receives industrial cost recov- ery funds from any affected industry or a federal or state agency shall pay all such money to the City which in turn shall use that money for the same purposes as set forth for payments by the District attributable to bond coverage in paragraph 10, out no matching money from any Participant shall be required. In addition to the industrial cost recovery .payment and any sewer charges of a Participant for its, Local Facilities, the industry shall pay to the City or to the District for pay- ment to the City its share of the Joint Facilities Costs based on its share of sewage flow capacity and the cost of those por- tions of the Joint Facilities designed to handle BOD loadings and suspended solids from that industry and the industry's share of the Joint Facilities Maintenance and Operation Expenses and bond coverage requirements based on sewage flow and the expenses W of handling and treating the SOD loadings and suspended solids for that industry, which additional payment is referred to in this contract as the "industrial share payment." The precise amount of the industrial shale payment payable by any industry cannot be determined at this time, Out will be specified in a later contract netween that industry, the Participant, the Local Facilities into which that industry initially discharges it sewage, and the City, which later contract shall also provide for the times and manner such payment will be made. 15. Access to Joint Facilities - Cool2eration. The Partic- ipants enter into this contract committing all sewage discharges into their Local Facilities to be transported to the Joint Facilities for treatment and disposal,. thus foregoing the oppor- tunity of treating and disposing of such sewage individually and not risking the control of the growth of, or the accessibility to, sewers to property owners within their respective communi- 40 ties by other Participants or, to property owners lying outside the boundaries of all Participants but within the areas for which the Joint Facilities are designed to serve, by any Par- ticipant. Because this contract contemplates that all Partici- pants will be using the Joint Facilities and most, if not all, participants will be transporting sewage collected in their' Local Facilities through the political jurisdictions of one or more other Participants, the Participants declare and agree that this contract is not intended as an instrument to permit one Participant`to control the amount of sewerage collection service furnished by another or by a nonparticipant within the area for which the Joint Facilities are designed to serve, and all Par- ticipants will cooperate to provide the others, Participants and such nonparticipants alike, with reasonable access for sewage flow to the Joint Facilities either Dy sharing capacity, if reasonably available, through Local Facilities at reasonable and i 40 - 16 - i - nondiscriminatory charges or by permitting the acquisition of necessary rights -of -way, franchises and permits through and under puolic streets and property under reasonable conditions for such access. Participants agree that they will permit any area outside their boundaries but within the designed service area of the Joint Facilities to be served by those Joint Facilities in accordance with the above standards and under terms respecting the quantity and quality of sewage discharge no more burdensome than those applicable to Participants. Other terms may be pro- ---vided-r-e-lating--to--"-Ia-te—comets'"--sharing equitably in the capi- tal investment of the Participants in the Joint Facilities. The Participants may agree to permit other municipal corporations and political subdivisions to become Participants under this contract as long as such new Participant agrees to abide by the covenants in paragraph 8 and assumes like responsibilities of the District provided in this contract. lb. Assi nment. without the written consent of all Par- ticipants no Participant snail have the right to assign this contract or any of its rights and obligations hereunder either by operation of law or by voluntary agreement or to terminate its obligations hereunder by dissolution or otherwise unless one Participant shall be lawfully merged into another Participant, municipal corporation or political subdivision, or all of the Local Facilities of one Participant located within the area for which the Joint Facilities were designed to serve shall be law- fully acquired by another Participant, and this contract shall be binding upon and inure to the benefit of the respective suc- cessors and assigns of the Participants, except that in the event that a metropolitan municipal corporation shall be created pursuant to law to perform the function of sewage disposal for the area for which the Joint Facilities are designed to serve, - 17 - I the City may assign the Joint Facilities' responsibilities here- under to such metropolitan municipal corporation subject to all other terms and conditions of this contract. In the event that any Participant should be dissolved or should no longer be authorized to operate sewer facilities, the Local Facilities owned and operated by such Participant shall be assigned and transferred to the City subject to any outstanding debts of the Participant which had been incurred for the specific purpose, of constructing or acquiring such facilities and subject to the acceptance by the City of the obligation to continue to piovide - ---sewer service--to-the-=e-ttlents sefved'by such Local Facilities upon payment by such residents of sewage disposal charges deter- mined as herein provided and the reasonable costs of local sewer service. 17. Notices. Whenever in this contract notice is required 'to be given, the same shall be given by registered mail addressed to the respective Participants at the following addresses: City of Port Orchard Kitsap County'Sewer istrict No. 5 City Hall 13« r:�23$� Beach Drive 216 Prospect Port Orchard, Wash-gton 98366 P. 0. Box 186 Port Orchard, Washington 98366 .unless a different address shall be hereafter designated in writing by either of the Participants. The date of giving such notice shall De deemed to be the date of mailing thereof. Billings and payments described in paragraph 7 may oe made by regular mail. 18. Effective Date - Term of Contract. The effective date of this contract shall be , 1983. Because this contract gives all Participants rights to use and, there- fore, interest in the Joint Facilities, such rights must con- tinue until by agreement they are terminated. This contract i shall be for at least a term of 35 years from August 1, 1977, or - 18 » *40 such longer period as any Joint Facilities Bonds are outstanding or the payment thereof is not fully provided for, secured and funded, and shall continue thereafter until terminated by the agreement of all Participants.. Any Participant may individually withdraw from the obligations of this contract with the consent of the other Participants after all of such bonds are retired or payment thereof is fully provided for, secured and funded, and the remaining Participants shall continue to be bound by this contract as it may be amended. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Participants hereto have exe- cuted this contract as-- of , 1983. CITY OF PORT ORCHARD, WASHINGTON SEWER DISTRICT NO. 5 KITSAP COUNTY, WASHINGTON By Title Attest Title 0205p - 19 - oner oner i M MO.lV i PORT ORCHARD -SEWER DISTRICT NO. 5 WASTEWATER FACILITIES MANAGEMENT CONTRACT AMENDMENTS The January 31, 1983, 'Intergovernmental Contract for Wastewater Facilities Management' is amended as follows: 1. There is added to subparagraph 2(h), (definition of 'Joint Facilities Maintenance and Operation Expenses`) between the word 'types' and the word 'and" on line six of that subparagraph, the following words: ,'debt service coverage requirements on City -issued revenue bonds'. 2. A new subparagraph 6(e) is added as follows: '(e) The parties shall share debt service coverage ' requirements for the revenue bonds issued by the City under Section 4(a), consistent with the coverage provisions of the ordinance authorizing the issuance of such bonds; each party shall maintain debt service coverage in an amount proportionate to the initial assessed valuation of the properties of each party as it bears to the total initial assessed valuation of the properties included in the utility local improve- ment district. The cost of maintaining coverage requirements shall be treated as a maintenance and operation expense of the Joint Facilities. If, when any principal or interest payment is due on the City revenue bonds referred to in paragraph 4(a), above, sufficient money is not available to make such payment from utility local improvement district assessments or any reserve fund established for payment of debt service on the bonds, the City may draw upon funds maintained by the District for debt service coverage and apply those funds to the payment of principal and interest on the bonds. The City shall draw upon each party's debt service coverage funds in an amount proportionate to the initial assessed valuation of the properties included in the utility local improvement district. In the event the City issues additional obligations to pay for improvements relating to a utility local improvement district that includes properties within the District, the District shall adjust the debt service coverage amounts it maintains in order to maintain an amount of coverage consistent with the terms of the ordinance authorizing such additional obligations." - 2 - IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed these amendments as of 1983. CITY OF PORT ORCHARD, SEWER DISTRICT NO. 5 WASHINGTON f Mayor 7 COmmi'5510 Attest City Clerk Commissioner 1 0391p ,PoAmmissloner - 3 - RESOLUTION NO. 1328 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF PORT ORCHARD AUT40RIZING THE MAYOR TO SIGN CONTRACT RELATIVE TO AMENDMENTS TO WASTEWATER FACILITIES MANAGEMENT CONTRACT BETWEEN C17Y OF PORT ORCHARD AND KITSAP COUNTY SEWER DISTRICT NO. 5 THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PORT ORCHARD DOES HEREBY RESOLVE: THAT: the Mayor of the City of Port Orchard be and hereby is authorized to sign City of Port Orchard - Kitsap County Sewer District No. 5 Wastewater Facilities ilanagement Contract Amendments adding subparagraphs relative to both parties sharing debt service coverage requirements for the revenue bonds issued by the City of Port Orchard. PASSED by the City Courcil and APPROVED by the Mayor of the City of Port Orchard on this 28th day of November, 1983. CAL EL , OR ATTEST: R. G. Lloyd, City erk ' IN'1jt;qq RGOVERNMENTAL CONTRACT FOP, WASTEWATER FACILITIES MANAGEMENT 1. Purpose of Agreement. It is the purpose of this con- tract to provide for an intergovernmental arrangement appropri- ate to carry out the improvement of the existing wastewater transmission, treatment and discharge facilities serving the City of Port Orchard and Sewer District No. 5 and capable of serving other areas as may in the future be so served, as called for in the Sinclair Inlet Sewerage Plan, dated June, 1976, and to operate and maintain such facilities. It is recognized that this contract may be relied on by the holders of revenue bonds of the Participants in tnis contract. This contract is entered into in accordance with RCW 35.13A.070 and amends and supersedes (1) the Intergovernmental Contract for Wastewater Facilities Management entered into by the City and the District on August 1, 1977; and (2) the Agreement for Trunk Line Expense entered into by the City and the District on August 9, 1977. 2_ Definitions. The following words and phrases used in this contract shall have the following meanings: (a) "Cif" shall mean the City of Port Orchard, Washington. (b) "District" shall mean Sewer District No. 5, Kitsap County, Washington. : __ a �c, "Equivalent � lent Residential Unit (ERU)" shall mean: (1) One separate single family residence; or (2) with respect to residential duplexes and multiple residential structures, one per single family unit; or (3) with respect to all remaining users served by the Joint Facilities, each 700 cubic feet or less of monthly discharge of sewage based on metered water consumption. An ERU shall be counted if the structure to which it is charged is either connected to or billed for availaoility Of use by Local Facilities. Any structure having a mixed residential and nonresi- dential use shall be charged one ERU for each residential unit and the estimated value of ERU usage for the balance of the structure. (d) "Future Joint Facilities" shall mean any Joint Facilities, not Original Joint Facilities, which include all future additions and uetterments to and improvements of the treatment plant described in subparagraph 2(e) as that will have been expanded and upgraded and all other sewerage facilities which the Participants shall from time to time agree in writing to include as Joint Facilities. (e) "Joint Facilities" shall mean the sewage treat- ment facilities, sewage outfall lines, sewage pumping stations, sewage force mains, and appurtenances and communication facili- ties related thereto, and other sewage facilities which are used to transport, treat and dispose of sewage from more than one participant, and which include the Original Joint Facilities and Future Joint Facilities. (f) "Joint Facilities Bonds" shall mean sewer revenue bonds issued by the City to pay only Joint Faciii�j% Costs of the Joint Facilities or Future Joint Facilities, and bonds issued to refund such bonds. The payment of the revenue bonds shall be made by assessments of properties within a utility local improvement district or districts to De created by the City, and which will include all property of the.District together with properties adjoining that of the District. - 2 - (g) "Joint Facilities Costs" shall .include all costs and expenses attributable to the construction and installation of Joint Facilities and financing thereof, including but not limited to the actual cost of design and construction, reloca- tion of the District's office, compliance with any applicable environmental policy act or procedures, engineering fees, legal fees, financial consultant fees, interest during construction, Joint Facilities Bond discount, taxes, publication costs, con- tract administration costs and other costs and expenses relating to the planning, design, construction, installation, and financ- ing of the treatment plant and such office relocation, excluding tie costs of acquiring all land necessary to the construction of the treatment plant as a part of the Original Joint Facilities. Joint Facilities costs include the costs and expenses attribut- able to the construction and installation of the Port Orchard Marina pump station and force main. (h) "Joint Facilities Maintenance and_Operation Expenses" shall mean all costs and expenses relating to labor, fringe benefits, power, light, water, heat, chemicals, equipment including repair and replacement thereof, tools, materials, supplies, insurance premiums, contract services, legal services, inspections and tapes and "in lieu of taxes" directly and prop- erly chargeable to the operation and maintenance of the Joint Facilities plus administrative overhead expenses chargeable to the Joint Facilities. (i) "Local Facilities" shall mean all sewer facili- ties other than Joint Facilities owned or operated by individual Participants for the local collection and transmission of sewage to be delivered to the Joint Facilities. (j) "Original Joint Facilities" shall mean the sewage treatment plant constructed pursuant to this contract, the force main and the pumping station from the City, and the necessary - 3 - land required therefor, all as more specifically described in Exhibits A and B. (k) "Participants" shall mean the City and the District, and hereafter any other political subdivision or municipal corporation which contracts with the then existing Participants to be served by the Joint Facilities pursuant to the terms of this contract and such other terms as may then be agreed upon, but Participants may agree to permit any person or governmental entity to use the Joint Facilities without becoming a Participant. 3. Land and Right -of -Way Acquisition. It is understood by and Detween the Participants that the treatment plant -as a part of the Original Joint Facilities shall be wholly con- structed on land, described on Exhibit A attached hereto and by this reference made a part hereof, which is located outside the present corporate limits of the City. The portion of such land identified as "state land" on Exhibit A shall be acquired by the City from the State of Washington at the sole expense of the City. The cost of acquiring the "state land" by the City shall not be included within the Joint Facilities Costs. All right, title and interest in and to the remaining portion of the land necessary to the construction and completion of the treatment plant, identified as "sewer district land" on Exhibit A, is presently owned by the District_ In consideration of the exer- cise of the rights set forth herein, the District hereby cove- nants to convey to the City all of its right, title and interest to the "sewer district land" for Joint Facilities purposes, but subject to reversion to the District when it is no longer used for such purposes. 4. Construction_ of the Original__JontFacilities. Except as otherwise provided in the Agreement, the City shall construct - 4 - the sewage treatment plant and the other Original Joint Facili- ties described on Exhiait B, attached hereto and by this refer- ence made a part hereof. Construction shall include, but not be limited to, engineering design and inspection, financing and legal services, advertising for bids, awarding construction con- tracts, supervising and inspecting construction and accepting work as complete. (a) The City, with the participation of the District as described below, will create a utility local improvement dis- trict or districts, and assessments shall be pledged to the pay- ment of revenue bonds which shall be issued to finance the Joint Facility -Costs. Such utility local improvement -district or -dis- tricts will include all property of the District, together with properties adjoining that of the District. (b) The District shall have the right to approve the inclusion of any properties outside the District within the utility local improvement district and shall further have the right to final approval of the assessment formula for the util- ity local improvement district for properties within and outside the District, but not within the corporate boundaries of the City. (c) In addition to revenue raised from bonds, as pro- vided herein, the City shall apply for and administer federal and state grants available therefor, and shall secure such regulatory approvals and make such environmental assessments as may be required. (d) During construction of the original Joint Facilities, any change order exceeding by $1,000.00 the amount stated in the original contract specifications, as bid, must be approved oy one representative of both the City and the Dis- trict, those representatives being voting members of the Advisory Committee as provided below. - 5 - (e) The District reserves the right to withdraw from this Agreement before the award of a construction contract if the total Joint Facilities costs exceed $16,000,000 after bids have been ad-ver*-i^^^- 5. Maintenance_and__OperationofJoint_ Facilities. The maintenance and operation of the Joint Facilities shall be con- ducted as follows: (a) The District shall maintain and operate the Joint Facilities in accordance with high engineering standards and in conformity with the then current standards and requirements established by applicable state and federal agencies having jurisdiction over such maintenance and operation.. Included with such maintenance and operation shall be the carrying of public liability insurance with limits in accordance with standard practice at any such time. The District shall hold the other Participants harmless and defend all claims for personal injury or property damage arising out of the maintenance and operation of the Joint Facilities which are not caused by neglect or fail- ure of such Participants to perform maintenance or operation as contemplated in paragraph 11. (b) In the event of mismanagement by the District materially affecting the cost of maintenance or operation of the Joint Facilities, or a material violation of state or federal standards or requirements due to neglect, misfeasance or mal- feasance by the District, operation and maintenance shall revert to the City suDject to the maintenance and operations standards set forth in paragraph 5. It shall be the responsibility of the Advisory Committee and/or an Arbitrator, as provided in para- graph 15, to determine whether there has been a violation, mis- management or failure by the District so material as to warrant transfer of management and operation of the Joint Facilities to the City. - 6 - (c) The party responsible for operation and mainte- nance of the Joint Facilities shall be liable for all penalties and assessments charged against the Facility by any state or federal agency resulting from negligence, misfeasance or mal- feasance in the maintenance and operation of the facility, and shall further indemnify and hold harmless the other from any such penalty or assessment. (d) The employment of the Chief Operator of the Joint Facilities shall be made by the District only upon the express approval of the Advisory Committee. (e) in the event that a supervisor of the District is responsible to oversee the function of the Chief Operator, not more than 20% of the salary of the supervisor shall be charged as a Joint Facility Maintenance and Operation Expense. Clerical support will be a Joint Facility Maintenance and Operation Expense as required, suoject to review of the Advisory Committee. 6. Financing Construction and Maintenance of Joint Facilities. (a) The Joint Facilities Costs shall De financed by a utility local improvement district as provided in paragraph 4. The costs for said Joint Facilities shall be shared as follows: (1) Each party shall pay an amount proportionate to the assessed valuation of the properties of each party as it bears to the total assessed valuation of the properties included in the utility local improvement district. (2) For purposes of determining the assessed valuation of the properties of the parties, the District shall include all properties within and adjoining its Doundaries but not within the corporate boundaries of the City. (3) Each party's proportionate share of the cost for the Original Joint Facilities, as provided above, shall - 7 - determine the proportionate interest that each party has in the plant capacity, measured in terms of ERU's. (b) Either party shall have the right to acquire additional ERU's from the other party. The party acquiring any additional ERU shall pay to the other an amount agreed upon by the parties. If the parties cannot agree upon an amount, the valuation of the ERU shall be submitted to the Advisory Committee and in the event of dispute the valuation shall be determined by binding arbitration, as provided in paragraph 13. (c) The costs of those facilities not included within the Joint Facilities as defined in paragraph 2(e) or within the Joint Facilities Costs as defined in paragraph 2(g), shall be the sole responsibility of the party constructing them. (d) Joint Facilities Maintenance and Operations Expenses shall be paid as follows: (1) Within three months of completion of con- struction and by October 1 of each year thereafter, the District shall notify the City of its proposed budget for the Joint Facilities, showing the Joint Facilities Maintenance and Opera- tion Expense and the ERU charge rate for the ensuing year. Thereafter the District shall adopt its final budget, subject to approval of the Advisory Committee. The ERU charges for the Participants shall be based on that final budget, except as otherwise provided in this paragraph. By October 1 of each year following the year in which the estimates apply. the District shall determine and notify the City of the actual Joint Facili- ties Maintenance and Operation Expenses. If the actual require- ments and expenses exceed the total payments made by the City and District pursuant to this paragraph for that preceding calendar year, then the City within thirty. (30) days after such notification shall pay to the District its share, based on its total ERUs for the previous year, of that deficit. If the - 8 - actual requirements and expenses were less than the total pay- ments made by the City and District pursuant to this paragraph for that preceding calendar year, then the District shall retain those excess payments and credit the excess payments against the next payments due from the City. (2) During any year the District shall operate within the Joint Facilities budget. Expenditures not included in the budget shall not be made without the approval of the Advisory Committee. Should the Joint Facilities maintenance and Operation Expenses increase above budget estimates, the District shall notify the Advisory Committee, which shall have the sole power to amend the Joint Facilities budget and to increase the ERU charge rate to the Participants, after first notifying the City of such increase. Any amendment to the Joint Facilities budget will be made only after demonstrating actual need, based on unforeseen circumstances over which the District had no reasonable control. (3) Neither the District nor the City shall have an interest in the Local Facilities of the other, and each party shall be solely responsible for the management, operation, and expense of its Local Facilities. The management and operation,wd of the Port Orchard marina Pump Station and transmission line, and force main transmission line from Port Orchard to the treat- ment plant,As.�l be theresponsibilityof the City. Qr/ 5, cE 7. Billings - Payments. Commencing or. for all City ERU charges prescribed in paragraph 6, the District shall bill the City on the first day of each calendar month for charges accrued to the first day of the immediately preceding month, and the City shall pay such charges so billed by the 20th day of the month in -which such bill is received, after which time such billing shall be delinquent. Charges omitted in one month may be billed in the following months. Delinquent charges - 9 - shall accrue interest on the unpaid balance at the rate of 8% per annum from date of delinquency until paid. 8. Covenants to Make payments. The City irrevocably covenants, obligates and binds itself to pay the District the charges representing the City's share of the Joint Facilities Maintenance and operation Expenses as determined in accordance with paragraph 6(d), out of the gross se r revenues and/or water and sewer revenues of the Distriet, or from such other money legally available to the ^�st____ or such purpose as (A ^� determined by the , nd such sewage service charges shall, subject to the qualification below, be deemed maintenance and operation expenses of the City's system of sewers or water and sewer system in any future bond issue or other financing of the City payable in whole or in part from the revenues of such system and shall be payable and constitute a charge prior and superior to any charge or lien of any revenue bonds issued by the City payable from the gross revenues of its system, unless such future bond issue or other financing shall be on a parity of lien on such revenues with presently outstanding revenue bonds and such outstanding bonds do not permit such priority of payment. It is recognized that the City has outstanding revenue bonds payable in whole or in part from the gross revenues of its sewerage and/or water system. Nothing in this section is intended to violate, nor shall it be construed to violate, any covenants respecting those outstanding bonds, and such cove- nants, to the extent there is a conflict between them and this section, shall control with respect to such outstanding bonds and bonds issued on a parity therewith. The City irrevocably covevants and agrees to establish rates and collect fees for sewer service or sewer and water service in the case of a combined utility which will be at least -la- sufficient to pay the sewer service charge to the District and to pay the other maintenance and operation expenses of its system and the principal of and interest on all revenue bonds issued by it for its sewer or water and sewer utility and to meet the coverage covenants thereof which will constitute a charge upon the gross revenues of its system. The District agrees to establish rates and collect fees for sewer service which will be at least sufficient to pay the expenses of mainte- nance and operation of its water and sewer utility and meet the principal, interest and coverage requirements of any and all revenue bonds of the District which constitute a charge upon the gross revenue of such utility. 9. Maintenance of Local Facilities and Sewage Quality - Insurance - Liabilit . The ,Participants shall maintain and operate their respective Local Facilities and control and regu- late the discharge of sewage into those Local Facilities in accordance with high engineering standards and in conformity with the standards established by the state and federal agencies having jurisdiction over the same. if there are any deficien- cies in the respective Local Facilities or the discharge of sewage into them causing excessive flow or below standard qual- ity sewage, such deficiencies shall be corrected by the appli- cable Participant forthwith. Deficiencies may constitute exces- sive flow, BOD discharges for a five-day period of over 300 parts per million, suspended solids over 300 parts per million, or quality of sewage discharge which damages the sewage treat- ment process or Joint Facilities, increases the Joint Facilities Maintenance and Operation Expenses per unit of sewage treated, or causes the violation of any federal or state law or regula- tion. The offending Participant shall pay for any additional cost or expense caused by its breach of this paragraph. 10. Local Rates and Charges. Each Participant agrees to conform its rates and charges for sewage collection, treatment and disposal service to equitable standards consistent with the requirements of applicable federal and state agencies, including the United States Environmental Protection Agency. 11. Expansion -Improvement of Joint Facilities. (a) Expansion. At such time as any of the Joint Facilities (a) reach 90% of capacity, or (b) are required to be expanded by federal, state or other governmental agencies having jurisdiction over the facilities, the City shall immediately commence the planning, design and construction of the expansion of such Future Joint Facilities. Expansion of the Joint Facili- ties shall be deemed required if directed by a federal, state or other governmental agency in order to comply with existing standards or regulations of such agency or applicable statutes. The Future Joint Facilities to be constructed shall be agreed upon by the Participants, but in no event shall be of a less capacity and quality than is required by applicable federal, state or local standards or regulations or the minimum capacity and quality which good engineering practice would dictate under the circumstances. Should the City fail to initiate and/or complete the expansion, the District may assume the planning and design responsibilities and cause the construction to be done, and may issue its revenue bonds to pay the costs thereof, and such bonds shall be deemed Joint Facilities Bonds for the pur- poses of required payments under this contract. The Partici- pants shall confer and negotiate a method for financing the expansion which shall be based on the method of pavment for the original Joint Facilities Costs as set forth in this contract at paragraph 5. (b) Improvement. If regulatory agencies with juris- diction over the Joint Facilities direct the upgrading of the - 12 - C Joint Facilities by the making of qualitative improvements to such facilities, the City shall immediately commence the plan- ning, design and construction of the improvements. Should the City fail to initiate and/or complete the improvements, the District shall assume the planning and design responsibilities and cause the improvements to be made, and may issue its sewer revenue bonds to pay the costs thereof, and such bonds shall be deemed Joint Facilities Bonds for the purposes of required pay- ments under this contract. The Participants shall confer and negotiate a method for financing the improvements which shall be based on the method of payment for the original Joint Facilities Costs as set forth in this contract at paragraph 6. 12. Advisory Committee. For the purpose of reviewing the maintenance and operation of the Joint Facilities, the plans for Future Joint Facilities, to foster cooperation between the Participants under this Contract and otherwise perform the duties assigned to it by this Contract, there is created the Joint Sewerage Facilities Advisory Committee which shall consist of three (3) representatives of each of the -Participant's legis- lative bodies, which appointments shall be made as determined by the individual Participants. Each representative shall have one vote in the committee, including the chairperson. The Advisory Committee shall select its chairman and such other officers, shall fix a time and place of its meetings, and establish such rules and procedures as it deems appropri- ate. Except as provided below, the Advisory Committee shall be advisory to the Participants respecting all conditions required in the Contract. The District shall submit to the Advisory Committee all proposed and final budgets, grants, grant applica- tions and other matters it deems appropriate or the Advisory Committee requests relating to the Joint Facilities. All Participants shall submit to the Advisory Committee annually and - 13 -- at other times when requested, all data pertaining to water con- sumption, sewerage discharge, sewer connections, sewage quality, plans for additional Local Facilities, ERUs and other informa- tion relating to the Joint Facilities. The first task of the Advisory Committee shall be the review and assessment of all nonresidential units of each Participant connected or billed for availability of use to the Local Facilities and the assignment of an initial ERU factor for each such use. The Advisory Committee shall annually review the ERU factor assigned to each nonresidential unit and shall make necessary adjustments based on actual or estimated sewage dis- charge as the committee deems appropriate. 13. Disputes. In the event of a dispute between any of the Participants relating to the amount of Joint Facilities Costs, the estimated or actual Joint Facilities Maintenance and Operation Expenses, the number of ERUs of any Participant or the compliance with any maintenance, operation or construction standards or requirements, any party to such dispute may submit the dispute to the Superior Court of Kitsap'County for arbitra- tion proceedings provided by Chapter 7.04 RCW. Such arbitration shall be limited to the interpretation and application of this contract anr%pay not impair the contract and debt obligations of -Port ^r^hares or the District, or the powers of the District to determine the methods used in the management of the Joint Facilities. The arbitrator appointed shall prescribe the rules of the arbitration not agreed upon by the parties to the dis- pute. The parties to the dispute may agree upon any other method of resolving this dispute. 14. Industrial Cost Recovery _-Industrial Share Pa ment. Under the provisions of United States Public Law 92-500 sewerage agencies providing wastewater treatment must identify all industrial/commercial waste dischargers as defined by the United - 14 - States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). Once identified, PL 92-500 requires that the industry must repay that portion of any federal grant received by local agencies for wastewater treatment relating to the treatment of that discharger's industrial waste discharges. Each Participant agrees that any waste discharger whose total discharge into the Joint Facilities is sufficient to cause that discharger to be classified as a significant indus- trial waste discharger (as described by Pretreatment of Pollut- ants Introduced into Publicly Owned Treatment Works, October, 1973, EPA, as that publication or the standards contained therein may be changed from time to time by EPA) shall be required to enter into a contract with the Participant into the Local Facilities of which that discharger discharges sewage in order to provide for waste treatment services and the payment of the required local and industrial cost recovery costs pursuant to PL 92-500 and federal and state regulations. Any Participant which receives industrial cost recov- ery funds from any affected industry or a federal or state agency shall pay all such money to the City which in turn shall use that money for the same purposes as set forth for payments by the District attributable to bond coverage in paragraph 10, but no matching money from any Participant shall be required. In addition to the industrial cost recovery payment and any sewer charges of a Participant for its Local Facilities, the industry shall pay to the City or to the District for pay- ment to the City its share of the Joint Facilities Costs based on its share of sewage flow capacity and the cost of those por- tions of the Joint Facilities designed to handle BOD loadings and suspended solids from that industry and the industry's share of the .joint Facilities Maintenance and Operation Expenses and bond coverage requirements based on sewage flow and the expenses - 15 -- of handling and treating the BOD loadings and suspended solids for that industry, which additional payment is referred to in this contract as the "industrial share payment." The precise amount of the industrial share payment payable by any industry cannot be determined at this time, nut will be specified in a later contract between that industry, the Participant, the Local Facilities into which that industry initially discharges it sewage, and the City, which later contract shall also provide for the times and manner such payment will be made. 15. Access to Joint Facilities - Cooperation. The Partic- ipants enter into this contract committing all sewage discharges into their Local Facilities to be transported to the Joint Facilities for treatment and disposal, thus foregoing the oppor- tunity of treating and disposing of such sewage individually and not risking the control of the growth of, or the accessibility to, sewers to property owners within their respective communi- ties by other Participants or, to property owners lying outside the boundaries of all Participants but within the areas for which the Joint Facilities are designed to Serve, by any Par- ticipant. Because this contract contemplates that all Partici- pants will be using the Joint Facilities and most, if not all, participants will be transporting sewage collected in their Local Facilities through the political jurisdictions of one or more other Participants, the Participants declare and agree that this contract is not intended as an instrument to permit one Participant to control the amount of sewerage collection service furnished by another or Dy a nonparticipant within the area for which the Joint Facilities are designed to serve, and all Par- ticipants will cooperate to provide the others, Participants and such nonparticipants alike, with reasonable access for sewage flow to the Joint Facilities either by sharing capacity, if reasonably available, through Local Facilities at reasonable and - 16 - nondiscriminatory charges or by permitting the acquisition of necessary rights -of -way, franchises and permits through and under public streets and property under reasonable conditions for such access. Participants agree that they will permit any area outside their boundaries but within the designed service area of the Joint Facilities to be served by those Joint Facilities in accordance with the above standards and under terms respecting the quantity and quality of sewage discharge no more burdensome than those applicable to Participants. Other terms may be pro- vided relating to "late comers" sharing equitably in the capi- tal investment of the Participants in the Joint Facilities. The Participants may agree to permit other municipal corporations and political subdivisions to become Participants under this contract as long as such new Participant agrees to abide by the covenants in paragraph 8 and assumes like responsibilities of the District provided in this contract. 16. Assignment. Without the written consent of all Par- ticipants no Participant shall have the right to assign this contract or any of its rights and obligations hereunder either by operation of law or by voluntary agreement or to terminate its obligations hereunder by dissolution or otherwise unless one Participant shall be lawfully merged into another Participant, municipal corporation or political subdivision, or all of the Local Facilities of one Participant located within the area for which the Joint Facilities were designed to serve shall be law- fully acquired by another Participant, and this contract shall be binding upon and inure to the benefit of the respective suc- cessors and assigns of the Participants, except that in the event that a metropolitan municipal corporation shall be created pursuant to law to perform the function of sewage disposal for the area for which the Joint Facilities are designed to serve, - 17 - the City may assign the Joint Facilities' responsibilities here- under to such metropolitan municipal corporation subject to all other terms and conditions of this contract. In the event that any Participant should be dissolved or should no longer be authorized to operate sewer facilities, the Local Facilities owned and operated by such Participant shall be assigned and transferred to the City subject to any outstanding debts of the Participant which had been incurred for the specific purpose of constructing or acquiring such facilities and subject to the acceptance by the City of the obligation to continue to provide sewer service to the residents served by such Local Facilities upon payment by such residents of sewage disposal charges deter- mined as herein provided and the reasonable costs of local sewer service. 17. Notices. Whenever in this contract notice is required to be given, the same shall be given by registered mail addressed to the respective Participants at the following addresses: City of Port Orchard Kitsap County.Sewer District No. 5 City Hall 60 Beach Drive 216 Prospect 0--Port Orchard, Washington 98366 P. O. Box 186 Port Orchard, Washington 98366 unless a different address shall be hereafter designated in writing by either of the Participants. The date of -giving such notice shall be deemed to be the date of mailing thereof. Billings and payments described in paragraph 7 may be made by regular mail. 18. Effective Date - Term of Contract. The effective date of this contract shall be , 1983. Because this contract gives all Participants rights to use and, there- fore, interest in the Joint Facilities, such rights must con- tinue until by agreement they are terminated. This contract shall be for at least a term of 35 years from August 1, 1977, or - 18 - such longer period as any Joint Facilities Bonds are outstanding or the payment thereof is not fully provided for, secured and funded, and shall continue thereafter until terminated by the agreement of all Participants. Any Participant may individually withdraw from the obligations of this contract with the consent of the other Participants after all of such bonds are retired or payment thereof is fully provided for, secured and funded, and the remaining Participants shall continue to be bound by this contract as it may be amended. IN WITNESS WHEREOF he Participants hereto have exe- cuted this contract as of i , 1983. CITY OF PORT ORCHARD, WASHINGTON SEWER DISTRICT NO. 5 KITSAP COUNTY, WASHINGTON By Title Attes L Commissioner Title L 1 0205p - 19 - /_� �"= f Confmissioner RESOLUTION NO. 1288 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF PORT ORCHARD AUTHORIZING THE MAYOR TO SIGN INTERGOVERN- MENTAL SERVICES AGREEMENT WITH KITSAP COUNTY SEWER DISTRICT NO. 5 RELATIVE TO THE JOINT SEWER TREATMENT PLANT. THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PORT ORCHARD DOES HEREBY RESOLVE: THAT: The Mayor of the City of Port Orchard be and hereby is authorized to sign an Intergovernmental Services Agreement with Kitsap County Sewer District No. 5 relative to Joint Sewer Treatment Plant. PASSED by the City Council and APPROVED by the Mayor this 10th day of January, 1983. L E . CALDWEL , MAYOR ATTEST: R. G. Lloyd, City Cl rk SJ iLn J c - ! AGREEMENT f THIS AGREEMENT, made this I/S'day of / c.e � y , 1974, between the CITY OF PORT ORCHARD, a municipal corporation and a city of the third class in the State of Washington, hereinafter called Port Orchard, and KITSAP COUNTY SEWER DISTRICT NO. 5, a municipal corporation, located in ;:itsap County, Washington, herein- after called Sewer District; W I T N E S S E T H: WHEREAS, Port Orchard and Sewer District are contiguous, and both operate a system of sewers, and each has under its juris- diction a sewage disposal plant; and WHEREAS, Port Orchard and the Sewer District wish to enter into an agreement providing for payment from the Sewer District to Port Orchard for the use of Port Orchard's sewer facilities; and WHEREAS, an agreement has been entered into between Port Orchard and the Sewer District on July 1, 1971, for a term of three years, which is subject to renewal on agreeable terms; NOW, THEREFORE, it is agreed between the parties hereto, as follows: 1. Sewer District has a 12" sewer line, northeasterly on an easement adjacent to the north side of Third Streetin Retsil from its intersection with Park Avenue to the Retsil Sewage Disposal Plant. This line is connected with the present sewer line serving property to the south of Third Street in Retsil. 2. Sewer District has raised the sewer line on Mitchell Street to an elevation sufficient to allow it to be connected into the present Port Orchard Line at the junction of Tracy and Hay Streets at manhole 25. - 1 - 3. Port Orchard will provide the Sewer District with the use of its sewage disposal plant to process all sewage originating in the area indicated in Paragraphs 1 and 2 hereof. 4. Sewer Distract will maintain and operate all of the sewer lines owned by Sewer District West of Park Ave. and North of Third Street in Retsil, Washington. Manhole #25 plug is to be replaced with a permanent plug and cemented in place. 5. Sewer District will pay Port Orchard, bi-monthly, an amount of THREE DOLLARS ($3.00) less than the current Port Orchard residential rate for each user under the jurisdiction of the Sewer District which has been connected hereunder to the Port Orchard sewer system. These rates will be increased or decreased in the same amount as any increase or decrease in the city's rates. 5. In the event the Sewer District determines that a rate increase is in order, such increase shall not be effective until a study of the terms of this agreement is completed and an increase, as indicated, is agreed to by both parties. 7. This agreement shall terminate three (3) years after its date, but shall be subject to renewal on agreeable terms. DATED this �� day of 6t/, 19 74. CITY OF PORT ORCHARD n By l M A Y 0 R J ATTEST.- � CITY CLERK r APPROVED AS TO FORM: BY Zz-�-- ' TERM K. MCCLUSKEY ASSISTANT CITY ATTORNE - 2 - INTERLOCAL AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF PORT ORCHARD AND KARCHER CREEK SEWER DISTRICT FOR USE OF THE CITY DECANT STATION I. PREAMBLE This Interlocal Agreement (hereafter "AGREEMENT") for reference purposes only is dated2007 and is entered into by and between the City of Port Orchard (hereafter "CITY") and Karcher Creek Sewer District (hereafter "DISTRICT"). II. RECITALS This AGREEMENT establishes the terms with which the DISTRICT may use the CITY's decant station located at 1272 Lloyd Parkway, Port Orchard, WA 98366. The Interlocal Cooperation Act, Chapter 39.34 RCW, authorizes the parties hereto to enter into the AGREEMENT. Accordingly, the parties agree as follows: III. AGREEMENT A. Purpose. 1. The CITY owns and operates a decant station in which the liquid in its municipal vactor truck is decanted into the CITY's sanitary sewer system. 2. The DISTRICT currently decants the liquid from its DISTRICT vactor truck into its sanitary sewer system via manholes and prefers to use an established decant station in Iieu of constructing a new facility. 3. The CITY currently has an agreement with Kitsap County to allow the County's vactor truck to use the CITY's decant station, as defined by Interlocal Agreement KC-219-03. B. Payment. The DISTRICT shall pay the CITY a sanitary sewer fee corresponding to one (1) sanitary sewer equivalent residential unit (ERU) at the Class 2 rate. Fees for use will be billed bimonthly. The current bimonthly fee is $72.00 however the CITY reserves the right in its sole discretion to increase the sewer rate fees upon reasonable notice. The DISTRICT will pay the bimonthly sewer bill in accordance with CITY utility billing terms, which are thirty (30) days after the due date. 2. The DISTRICT shall pay its fair share pro-rata payment of the cost of operation and maintenance of the decant station, as located on 1272 Lloyd ILA for Decant Station Page 1 of 9 Karcher Creek Sewer District/City of Port Orchard Parkway. It is understood that this cost will be calculated and billed quarterly by the CITY based on actual annual operation and maintenance costs for the decant station. C. City and DISTRICT Representatives. This AGREEMENT shall be jointly administered by the representatives identified in this section. This AGREEMMENT does not create any separate legal or administrative entity. The CITY's representative is the Public Works Director, 216 Prospect Street, Port Orchard, Washington 98366. This person shall represent the CITY in all matters pertaining to the services to be rendered under this AGREEMENT. All requirements of the DISTRICT pertaining to the services and materials to be rendered under this AGREEMENT shall be coordinated through the CITY representative. 2. The DISTRICT's representative is the General Manager, 2924 SE Lund Avenue, Port Orchard, Washington 98366. This person shall represent the DISTRICT in all matters pertaining to the services to be rendered under this AGREEMENT. All requirements of the CITY pertaining to the services and materials to be rendered under this AGREEMENT shall be coordinated through the DISTRICT representative. D. ResponsibiIities of the parties. It is mutually understood that the DISTRICT will provide the CITY with timely payment of all amounts due the CITY as described in Section III, Paragraph B, above. It is mutually understood that the CITY will provide the DISTRICT with the following: 1. 24-hour access to the decant station for DISTRICT employees, agents, and equipment only. Private vendors' use of the facility is prohibited. 2. Timely notice in advance if the decant station will be temporarily closed for maintenance or repair. 3. Bi-monthly sewer billings and invoices for a pro-rata share of operation and maintenance costs mailed to the attention of the DISTRICT's representative. E. Hold Harmless/indemnification. 1. The CITY shall defend, indemnify and hold the DISTRICT, its officers, officials, employees and volunteers harmless from any and all claims, injuries, damages, losses or suits including attorney fees, arising out of or resulting from the acts, errors or omissions of the CITY, its agents, employees, or sub consultants in performance of this .ILA for Decant Station Page 2 of 4 Karcher Creek Sewer District/City of Port Orchard AGREEMENT, except for injuries and damages caused by the sole negligence of the DISTRICT. 2. The DISTRICT shall defend, indemnify and hold the CITY, its officers, officials, employees and volunteers harmless from any and all claims, injuries, damages, losses or suits including attorney fees, arising out of or resulting from the acts, errors or omissions of the DISTRICT, its agents, employees, or sub consultants in performance of this AGREEMENT, except for injuries and damages caused by the sole negligence of the CITY. 3. This mutual indemnification and hold harmless shall apply regardless of whether the claim is brought pursuant to the Worker's Compensation Act, RCW Title 51, or otherwise. F. Amendments. This AGREEMENT shall not be amended except in writing signed by both parties to the AGREEMENT. G. Duration. This AGREEMENT shall become effective as set forth in paragraph K, below. This AGREEMENT will continue automatically for twelve (I2) month increments commencing with the effective date of the AGREEMENT, unless terminated by either party as detailed in paragraph H, below. H. Termination. Either party to this AGREEMENT may elect to terminate this AGREEMENT for any reason by delivering a thirty (30) day written Notice to Terminate to the other party. I. Severability. If any provision of this AGREEMENT is determined to be invalid, the remaining provisions shall continue in full force and effect. J. Financing: Budget. This AGREEMENT does not contemplate joint financing of the activities within its scope, nor does it contemplate a joint budget. K. Effective Date; Recording or Web Posting. This AGREEMENT shall be effective upon being recorded with the Kitsap County Auditor or, alternatively, on the date it is posted on the CITY's and the DISTRICT's web sites or other electronically retrievable public source. ILA for Decant Station Page 3 of 4 Karcher Creek Sewer District/City of Port Orchard L. Authorization by Governing Body. The governing bodies of the CITY and the DISTRICT have taken appropriate action by ordinance, resolution or otherwise pursuant to law to authorize the execution of this AGREEMENT. City of Port Orchard Karcher Creek Sewer District j- <:: Ike Z . .�. Kim Abel Z� 7.Ob `� La •ence J. C es 2/ Mayor 7 f General M ager ATTEST: Michelle Merlino City Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM: }! City Attor ey ILA for Decant Station Page 4 of 4 Karcher Creek Sewer District/City of Port Orchard INTEI ICAL AGREE, BETWEEN THE CITY OF POR T OR CHARD AND THE POR T OF BREMER TON FOR WASTE WATER SERVICES This is an Interlocal Agreement entered into between the City of Port Orchard (hereafter "City') and the Port of Bremerton (hereafter "Port"), herein designated as "Parties. " WHEREAS a principle mandate of the Port is to create economic development, and WHEREAS the Port is owner of over 1700 acres of land designated under the Growth Management Act as an Urban Growth Area, with Airport and Industrial zoning in the Kitsap County Comprehensive Plan, and said land is planned by the Port and Kitsap County as the location of major employment growth in the future; and WHEREAS the Kitsap County Comprehensive Plan calls for the addition of 9350 jobs in the next 20 years on lands at and surrounding the Port's lands, said area being named the South Kitsap Industrial Area (SKIA); and WHEREAS in order for the Port to fulfill its economic development mandate it must ensure that adequate infrastructure is available, including wastewater treatment; and WHEREAS the Port is owner of a Washington State Department of Ecology approved on -site waste water treatment plant located in the Port's Olympic View Industrial Parr said plant having a limited 72,500 gallon per day domestic waste treatment capacity; and WHEREAS the City of Port Orchard is a provider of urban services and has stated that it will provide wastewater collection and treatment service to the South Kitsap Industrial Area to stimulate economic development and job creation in South Kitsap; and WHEREAS there is a need identified in the County Comprehensive Plan and in the S)m sub area plan now being drafted by Kitsap County for expanded wastewater treatment capacity to the SKIA area; and WHEREAS the Port, through a series of communications over a number of years with both the City of Port Orchard and the City of Bremerton and through technical documents developed during the SKIA sub area planning process, has determined that connection to the City of Port Orchard wastewater collection system will be the most economical and efficient method of providing municipal wastewater service to the Port and SKIA lands; and WHEREAS the City has advised that its existing and planned collection system, and the existing and planned capacity of its wastewater treatment facility, can accommodate the anticipated flows from the SKIA service area defined below; and Page I of 9 Port of Bremerton/City of Port Orchard ILA for Wastewater Service Port City WHEREAS the City has , _ted a willingness to expand its se? . area to include Port and SKIA service area lands and assume the ownership of the Port's wastewater facility and the operational and administrative duties that accompany ownership; and WHEREAS on November 13, 2001, the Port and the City entered into a Letter of Intent to facilitate the expanded provision of wastewater treatment service to the Port and the SKIA area; NOW THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual promises of the Parties to this Interlocal Agreement, the Parties agree as follows: 1. Service Area Designation A. The service area of this Interlocal Agreement for the City's providing of wastewater service, hereafter known as "Service Area", will be the (1) Port of Bremerton properties, which include Bremerton National Airport and Olympic View Industrial Park, (2) the Olympic View Sanitary Landfill, including Waste Management's new transfer station, and (3) such other property designated by Kitsap County to be within the South Kitsap Industrial Area, as defined by the SKIA Sub Area Plan (see Exhibit The City agrees that it will amend it planning and wastewater documents, as necessary, to indicate said Service Area. B. The wastewater planning will anticipate service to the entire Service Area. However, the specific service planning may be phased to accommodate market growth and economic development patterns. C. Annexation of the Service Area is not a prerequisite for wastewater service. Z Port On -site Plant A. The Port will retain ownership of its on -site treatment plant and collection system within the Olympic View Industrial Park until the wastewater system connects to the City collection system. B. The Port will contract with the City to administer and operate the Port's wastewater collection and treatment system during the period from Kitsap County adoption of the SKIA Sub Area plan to the time of connection of the Port's wastewater system to the City's wastewater collection system. C. The City shall be responsible for administering connections, setting of the sewer fees, collection of the revenue and payment of the applicable wastewater expenses. D. Service Area wastewater customers shall pay the out -of -city surcharge, as established by City ordinance. This surcharge is currently 50% of the in -city rate. Page 2 of 9 Port of Bremerton/City of Port Orchard �s ILA for Wastewater Service Port City .y' E. New sewer conneCU and expansions shall pay the -,p , cable sewer fees. as established by City ordinance. F. Existing customers, as listed on Exhibit - , shall retroactive sewer fees as defined in City Ordinance / `' %�: 1) Connection fee 2) Fee in Lieu of Assessment for collection not be charged the following G. At the time the wastewater of these properties is treated at the City's wastewater treatment facility, all the Service Area customers shall be required to pay all applicable fees, which shall include the Kitsap County ULID #6 Latecomers Fee and the City's Facility Fee. H. The existing Port wastewater facility is described in Exhibit C . 3 Properly Transfer A. The Port agrees to transfer its wastewater collection system, at no additional charge, and free and clear of all liens or other valid claims, to the City at the time that Service Area wastewater is pumped to the City wastewater collection system. Until the transfer is completed, the Port shall retain all risk of loss to the system, except for that caused by the sole negligence of the City. B. The Port will retain ownership of its wastewater treatment facility (aeration ponds, settling ponds and drain -fields) and associated property. The Risk of loss to the facility and associated property shall remain, at all times, with the Port, except for loss caused by the sole negligence of the City. C. Upon assumption of ownership of the collection system, the City shall assume all obligations related to the US Economic Development Administration agreements that assisted in the funding of the collection system. EDA agreements are provided as Exhibit ,T 4. Compensation, equitable A. The parties acknowledge good and valuable consideration for the asset transfers, and assumption of obligations contained herein. The Port is receiving value because of the City's sewer system will allow for continued economic growth on its property. The City is receiving value for its increased obligation by charges user fees, and obtaining the benefit of economies of scale in operating its treatment system. Page 3 of 9 Port of Bremerton/City of Port Orchard l� ILA for Wastewater Service Port City 5. Easement vu`umentation A. Property deeds and recorded easements (WSDOT, Kitsap County, etc.) are Isted in Exhibit E for reference purposes. B. At the time of transfer of the collection system, the Port shall provide the City utility easements for all portions of the collection system without additional cost to the City. Unless mutually agreed otherwise, all utility easements shall be 20 feet wide. The easement conveyance document shall warrant that the easement areas are clear of liens and any other claims that would adversely affect the intended purpose. 6. Availability of Caaaeity of the ports On -Site Wastewater Treatment Plant A. Prior to the City's assumption of management and operation of the Port's wastewater system, the Port will have the capacity of the existing treatment facility determined by a qualified company, mutually agreed to by the Port and City. B. The last 10,000 gallons per day of treatment capacity is reserved for the Port and any party or parties it so designates. If the capacity limit is modified, the "last 10,000 gallons" will be based on that newly modified maximum limit. C. The capacity between the existing capacity and the last 10,000 gallons shall be available to any Service Area property on a first -come -first -serve basis. D. The City will manage the allocation of capacity of the Port's treatment facility. E. No residential property will be served by the Port's treatment facility during Phase 1, described below, unless both the City and the Port agree. 7. Customer Status A. The existing customers are listed in Exhibit 9 . B. The Port and City shall notify the existing customers of the change in system management and provide the City with points of contact for future inquiries. C. Existing customers shall be subject to future rate adjustments and costs for wastewater collection and treatment, as established by City ordinance. 8. Rates and Service Cha es A. Rates for the Service Area shall be established by City ordinance. 9. Develoaer Extension Requirements Page 4 of 9 Port of Bremerton/City of Port Orchard ILA for Wastewater Service Port City -tom', A. Developer Extema,_. "Agreements within the Service A,. _ shall be in accordance with City ordinances. 10. Pre-treatment A. All Service Area customers shall comply with applicable Federal, State, Health, and Local Government laws and regulations for wastewater systems. B. Prior to issuing a sewer permit, the City shall provide the Kitsap County Health District an opportunity to review and comment upon the wastewater connection. C. The City shall be responsible for administering the wastewater treatment system, which includes pre-treatment requirements. IL Impkmentation Responsibilities Phase I (City assumption of treatment plant and collection system operation and wastewater service) A. Phase 1 is defined as the period from when the SKIA Sub Area Plan is adopted by Kitsap County until the Service Area wastewater is pumped to the City's collection system. 1) The Port shall retain ownership of its treatment facility and collection system and insure the same for all risks during all three Phases. The risk of loss from any and all causes, other than the sole negligence of the City, shall remain with the Port until the collection system is transferred to the City, at which time the risk of loss to the collection system shall be the Ch 's except for loss caused by the sole negligence of the Port. 2) The Port shall contract with the City to manage and administer the wastewater treatment system that now serves the Port's Bremerton National Airport and Olympic View Industrial Park areas, which systems will be available to the Service Area in the manner described in this agreement. 3) The City shall be responsible for the following: a) Routine maintenance of the wastewater system including but not limited to pump repair. b) Rate setting and financial management of the system c) Coordination with the Department of Ecology, Kitsap County Health District, and other agencies with regards to wastewater treatment. d) Sewer permitting for new accounts and coordination with Kitsap County Department of Community Development. Page 5 of 9 Port of Bremerton/City of Port Orchard ILA for Wastewater Service Port City Auditing of the wastewater, tre'. accounts by the State of Washington. 4) The Port shall be responsible for the following: a) Previous actions or issues regarding the port's wastewater system. b) Debts or financial obligations associated with the wastewater system established prior to ownership of the collection system by the City. c) Providing leadership in the SKIA development process. d) Participating in the anticipated LID or ULM or other funding mechanisms which will fund Phase 2 e) Capital improvements including but not limited to nu,n renlacemen� B. The planning and construction of the wastewater connection between the Port's system and the City's system is considered Phase 2 and can occur simultaneously with Phase 1. Phase 2 (Construction of transmission and pumping facilities to City collection line) C. Phase 2 shall commence with passage of a Resolution from the City authorizing the planning for the connection of the Port's collection system to the City's collection system. Page 6 of 9 1) The City shall be responsible for the following: a) To serve as lead agency for planning the implementation of the connection of the Port's collection system to the City's collection system. b) Cooperate with the Port in investigating alternative technologies, means and methods that may be more cost effective than pumping the Service Area's wastewater to the City's collection system. . c) Maintaining its Comprehensive Sewer Plan and the Capital Facilities Plan to reflect the wastewater needs for the service area in a manner consistent with the Growth Management Act and the Act's capital facilities planning requirements. 2) The Port shall be responsible for the following: a) Support the local improvement district or other funding mechanism to help fund the required collection system. b) Cooperate with the City in investigating alternative technologies, means and methods that may be more cost effective than pumping the Port's wastewater to the City's collection system. Port of Bremerton/City of Port Orchard ILA for Wastewater Service port City 3. The City shall not be responsible for funding any of the required Phase II construction and related costs. It will cooperate in the formation of an LID, so long as its costs associated therewith are reimbursed from the LID funding. Phase 3 (Operation of the Service Area collection system) D. Phase 3 will commence when the connection of the Port's wastewater collection to the City's collection system has been accepted by the City. 1) The City shall be responsible for the following: a) Maintenance and operation of the wastewater system b) Rate setting and financial management of the system c) Coordination with the Department of Ecology, Kitsap County Health District, and other agencies with regard to wastewater treatment. d) Sewer permitting for new accounts and coordination with Kitsap County Department of Community Development. 2) The Port shall be responsible for the following: a) Compliance with rules and regulations of the City wastewater program. 12. Dispute Resolution A. In the event any suit, action or other proceeding shall be brought in connection with any of the terms or conditions of this Interlocal Agreement, the Parties hereby stipulate that jurisdiction and venue of each suit, action or other proceeding shall be in Kitsap County, Washington. 13. Indemnification and Hold Harmless A. Each Party shall indemnify and hold the other harmless from any claims, in law or equity, of whatever kind and nature, and from all sources, whether known or unknown at this time, arising directly or indirectly, from matters which regards to which the other party has assumed the risk of loss. B. Each Party shall indemnify and hold the other party harmless from any claims, in law or equity, of whatever kind and nature, and from all sources, whether known or unknown at this time, arising directly or indirectly, from their own actions, or their failure to act when they had an affirmative duty to take action. C. The indemnity and hold harmless requirements in paragraph 13 shall extend to the officers, elected official, employees and agents of each party. The requirements also include the costs, expert witness fees, and attorneys fees incurred with regards thereto, whether or not legal action is commenced, or if the matter is resolved in mediation, arbitration, or litigation. Page 7 of 9 Port of Bremerton/City of Port Orchard ILA for Wastewater Service Port City D. in the cas- ins for damages, or other relief, in w,ach it is alleged that both parties are negligent, then the parties will work together to minimize duplication of effort in providing the defense, and each party will be responsible to indemnify and hold the other harmless only to the extent of the percentage of liability attributable to that party. 14. Genera! provisions A. Sole A Bement This Agreement may not be amended or modified in any respect whatsoever except by instrument in writing signed by the parties hereto. B. Ca tions. The captions of this Agreement are for convenience of reference only and shall not define or limit any of the terms or provisions hereof. C. Governin9Law. This Agreement shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of the State of Washington. D. Seve` r_ ability. The invalidity or unenforceability of any particular provision of this Agreement shall not affect the other provisions hereof, and this Agreement shall be construed in all respects as it such invalid or unenforceable provisions were omitted. E. Counterparts. This Agreement may be executed in any number of counterparts, each of which shall be an original; but such counterparts shall together constitute but one and the same instrument. This Agreement may be executed (i) on an original, toii) a copy of an original, or (iii) by a facsimile transmission copy of an original followed by delivery of an original. F. Exhibits. The exhibits attached hereto, together with all documents incorporated by reference therein, form an integral part of this Agreement and are hereby incorporated into this Agreement wherever reference is made to them to the same extent as if they were set out in full at the point in which such reference is made. G. Incorporation of Recitals. The recitals are incorporated in the body of this Agreement as if set forth at length. H. Time of the Essence. The time for performance of the parties hereunder is of the essence of this Agreement. I. Attorney Fees Recoverable. In the event any suit or action is instituted to enforce or interpret any of the terms of this Agreement including any action or participation in or in connection with a case or proceeding under any Chapter of the Bankruptcy Code or any successor statute, the prevailing party shall be entitled to such sum as the court may adjudge reasonable as attorney fees in such suit, action or proceeding or upon any appeal from any judgment, order or decree entered therein. Page 8 of 9 Port of Bremerton/City of port Orchard ILA for Wastewater Service Port City J. Interpretation No Presumption. It is acknowledged by the parties that this Agreement has undergone several drafts with the negotiated suggestions of both and therefore no presumptions shall arise favoring either party by virtue of the authorship of any of its provisions. KK Binding Effect. This Agreement and the terms, covenants, benefits and duties set forth herein shall inure to the benefit of and be binding upon the parties, their heirs, successors, legal representatives and assigns of each of the parties. L. No Waiver. No waiver of any default under this Agreement shall constitute or operate as a waiver of any subsequent default hereunder, and no delay, failure or omission in exercising or enforcing any right, privilege or option under this Agreement shall constitute a waiver, abandonment or relinquishment thereof or prohibit or prevent any election under or enforcement or exercise of any right, privilege or option hereunder. Dated this day of NUy, -2002. Crry ,O. ORCHARD 1iEATHERILL, _' ity Attorney PORT OF B METON APPROVED AS TO FORM: PORT ATTORNEY M0766'U' Lk5-10-02Jev 1 O.DOC ATTEST: City Clerk C'f1KOL L : 67Z&J BILL MAHAN, Secretary Page 9 of 9 Port of Bremerton/City of Port Orchard ILA for Wastewater Service Port Ciry Appendix C Design Standards for Sanitary Sewer Extensions The City of Port Orchard 2014 Developer Guidelines includes the Design Standards for Sanitary Sewer Extensions and can be found here: http://www.citVofportorchard.us/docs/publicworks/publications/2014 dev guide rev1.pdf http://www.cityofportorchard.us/public-works-publications Appendix D Projected Populations and Flows per Basin City of Port Orchard General Sewer Plan Update 2015 Basin Flow Projections Prepared by: Peter Cunningham Reviewed By: Adam Schuyler 10/21/2015 Basin Total Area 2015 Sewered 2015 Population 2015 2015 Sewer 2015 Sewer Flow 2015 1/1 Flow 2015 1/1 Flow 2015 Peak Day 2015 Peak Hour (acre) Area (acres) Employment Flow (gallons) (gpm/total acre) (gallons/day) (gpm/total acre) Flow (gallons/day) Flow (mgd) 1 56 56 71 415 680 308 5 9 6 0 32,534 0.400 0.528 59,021 0.726 0.738 91,555 127,800 0.17 0.23 2 70 53,335 74,465 3 130 96 24,182 0.129 100,002 0.535 124,184 56,239 0.24 0.10 4 177 35 258 20,085 0.079 36,154 0.142 5 888 0 0 0 0 0.000 301 0.000 301 0.00 6 977 428 1,735 97 138,444 0.098 448,054 0.318 586,498 1.11 7 677 122 160 377 24,542 0.025 128,011 0.131 152,552 0.30 8 529 24 604 432 60,951 0.080 25,220 0.033 86,171 0.14 9 222 133 921 13 72,225 0.226 138,813 0.435 211,038 0.39 10 262 143 65 382 17,296 0.046 149,444 0.396 166,739 0.33 11 50 46 350 166 32,571 0.456 48,005 0.672 80,576 0.14 12 345 290 2,326 766 205,960 0.415 302,894 0.610 508,855 0.91 13 393 147 445 29 35,628 0.063 153,546 0.271 189,174 0.36 14 155 133 499 27 39,805 0.178 139,093 0.623 178,899 0.34 15 371 340 1,887 1,299 188,754 0.354 355,205 0.665 543,959 0.99 16 77 115 597 96 49,6241 0.4491 120,072 1.087 169,696 0.32 17 293 170 301 1,018 56,0661 0.133 178,267 0.422 234,3321 0.44 Total 1 5,671 2,349 11,550 4,723 1,052,0011 2,456,566 3,508,567 6.52 City of Port Orchard General Sewer Plan Update 2022 Basin Flow Projections Prepared by: Peter Cunningham Reviewed By: Adam Schuyler 10/21/2015 Basin Net New Sewered 2022 Sewer Total Area 2022 Sewered 2022 2022 Sewer Flow 2022 1/1 Flow 2022 1/1 Flow 2022 Peak Day 2022 Peak Hour Developable Areas incl. ROW 2022 Employment Flow (acre) Area (acres) Population (gpm/total acre) (gallons/day) (gpm/total acre) Flow (gallons/day) Flow (mgd) Area (acre) (acres) (gallons/day) 1 56 0 70 0 - 56 - 71 10 106 415 5 9 6 - - 32,530 0.400 0.528 59,021 74,465 110,832 42,917 0.726 91,551 0.738 127,793 0.593 141,938 0.169 67,330 0.17 2 680 53,328 0.23 3 130 7 396 313 727 31,107 0.166 0.27 4 177 4 6 41 24,413 0.096 0.12 5 888 55 85 85 56,701 0.044 88,910 0.070 145,612 0.26 6 977 19 30 458 1,991 95 158,334 0.113 479,252 0.341 637,586 1.21 7 677 29 44 166 538 513 58,384 0.060 174,104 0.178 232,488 0.44 8 529 7 11 35 699 500 70,488 0.093 36,733 0.048 107,221 0.17 9 222 5 8 141 990 13 77,619 0.243 147,258 0.461 224,876 0.41 10 262 0 - 143 65 448 19,414 0.051 149,444 0.396 168,858 0.33 11 50 0 0 46 351 170 32,794 0.459 48,162 0.674 80,956 0.14 12 345 4 6 295 2,374 781 210,136 0.423 308,700 0.622 518,836 0.93 13 393 11 16 163 586 37 46,877 0.083 170,728 0.302 217,605 0.42 14 155 5 8 141 570 36 45,609 0.204 147,714 0.662 193,322 0.37 15 371 3 4 344 1,924 1,308 191,900 0.360 359,642 0.674 551,542 1.01 16 77 1 1 116 608 97 50,544 0.457 121,499 1.100 172,043 0.32 17 2931 2 4 1 1741 332 1,098 61,012 0.1451 182,0001 0.431 243,0121 0.46 Total 5,6711 152 2341 2,5831 13,558 5,114 1,221,189 1 2,701,3811 3,922,570 7.26 City of Port Orchard General Sewer Plan Update 2026 Basin Flow Projections Prepared by: Peter Cunningham Reviewed By: Adam Schuyler 10/21/2015 Basin Net New Sewered 2026 Sewer Total Area 2026 Sewered 2026 2026 Sewer Flow 2026 1/1 Flow 2026 1/1 Flow 2026 Peak Day 2026 Peak Hour Developable Areas incl. ROW 2026 Employment Flow (acre) Area (acres) Population (gpm/total acre) (gallons/day) (gpm/total acre) Flow (gallons/day) Flow (mgd) Area (acre) (acres) (gallons/day) 1 56 0 70 0 - 56 - 71 16 112 415 5 9 6 32,530 0.400 0.528 59,021 74,465 117,020 0.726 91,551 0.738 127,793 0.626 152,086 0.17 2 680 53,328 0.23 3 130 11 447 35,067 26,886 0.188 0.106 0.29 4 177 7 10 45 345 - 46,782 0.184 73,668 0.13 5 888 87 133 133 1,142 - 89,102 0.070 139,544 0.109 228,646 0.41 6 977 30 47 475 2,137 95 169,742 0.121 497,080 0.353 666,821 1.26 7 677 45 69 192 754 577 77,298 0.079 200,443 0.205 277,741 0.52 8 529 11 17 41 753 535 75,808 0.100 43,312 0.057 119,120 0.20 9 222 8 13 145 1,029 13 80,707 0.253 152,083 0.476 232,790 0.43 10 262 0 - 143 65 482 20,484 0.054 149,444 0.396 169,928 0.34 11 50 0 0 46 352 173 32,962 0.461 48,251 0.675 81,213 0.15 12 345 6 9 298 2,401 795 212,722 0.428 312,017 0.628 524,739 0.94 13 393 17 26 173 667 40 53,282 0.094 180,547 0.319 233,829 0.45 14 155 8 13 146 611 40 48,897 0.219 152,640 0.684 201,537 0.38 15 371 4 7 346 1,944 1,326 194,096 0.364 362,178 0.679 556,274 1.02 16 77 1 2 117 615 98 51,101 0.462 122,315 1.107 173,416 0.32 17 2931 4 6 1 1761 349 1,144 63,857 0.1511 184,134 0.436 247,9911 0.47 Total 5,6711 239 3681 2,7161 14,706 5,338 1,317,869 1 2,841,2751 4,159,143 7.68 City of Port Orchard General Sewer Plan Update 2036 Basin Flow Projections Prepared by: Peter Cunningham Reviewed By: Adam Schuyler 10/21/2015 Basin Net New Sewered 2036 Sewer Total Area 2036 Sewered 2036 2036 Sewer Flow 2036 1/1 Flow 2036 1/1 Flow 2036 Peak Day 2036 Peak Hour Developable Areas incl. ROW 2036 Employment Flow (acre) Area (acres) Population (gpm/total acre) (gallons/day) (gpm/total acre) Flow (gallons/day) Flow (mgd) Area (acre) (acres) (gallons/day) 1 56 0 70 0 - 56 - 71 31 127 19 54 415 5 9 6 32,530 0.400 0.528 59,021 74,465 132,490 0.726 91,551 0.738 127,793 0.709 177,457 0.17 2 680 53,328 0.23 3 130 20 574 44,966 0.241 0.33 4 177 13 424 - 33,069 0.130 56,444 0.222 89,513 0.16 5 888 165 254 254 2,181 - 170,104 0.133 266,129 0.208 436,233 0.79 6 977 58 89 518 2,503 95 198,261 0.141 541,648 0.385 739,909 1.39 7 677 86 132 255 1,294 738 124,582 0.128 266,291 0.273 390,872 0.72 8 529 21 33 57 887 621 89,107 0.117 59,760 0.078 148,867 0.25 9 222 16 24 157 1,128 13 88,426 0.277 164,147 0.514 252,573 0.46 10 262 0 - 143 65 565 23,159 0.061 149,444 0.396 172,603 0.34 11 50 0 0 46 353 182 33,382 0.467 48,475 0.678 81,857 0.15 12 345 11 17 306 2,469 831 219,186 0.441 320,311 0.645 539,497 0.97 13 393 32 49 196 868 50 69,296 0.122 205,093 0.362 274,389 0.52 14 155 16 25 158 712 51 57,119 0.256 164,955 0.739 222,074 0.42 15 371 8 13 352 1,996 1,371 199,587 0.374 368,517 0.690 568,103 1.04 16 77 3 4 119 632 100 52,495 0.475 124,353 1.125 176,848 0.33 17 2931 7 11 1 1811 393 1,260 70,969 0.1681 189,4671 0.449 260,4361 0.49 Total 5,6711 456 7021 3,0511 17,575 5,898 1,559,566 0.1911 3,191,0101 0.391 4,750,576 8.74 City of Port Orchard General Sewer Plan Update Build Out Basin Flow Projections Prepared by: Peter Cunningham Reviewed By: Adam Schuyler 10/21/2015 Basin Net New Sewered Build Out Build Out Sewer Build Out Sewer Build Out Peak Total Area Build Out Build Out Build Out I/I Flow Build Out I/I Flow Build Out Peak Developable Areas incl. ROW Sewered Area Flow Flow (gpm/total Day Flow (acre) Population Employment (gallons/day) (gpm/total acre) Hour Flow (mgd) Area (acre) (acres) (acres) (gallons/day) acre) (gallons/day) 1 56 0 70 0 - 56 - 71 59 155 - 35 415 680 5 9 6 - - 32,534 0.400 59,021 74,465 161,877 0.726 0.738 0.866 91,555 0.17 0.23 0.43 2 53,335 0.528 127,800 3 130 38 862 67,394 0.361 229,271 4 177 0 604 4,533 47,073 0.185 36,154 0.142 83,227 0.14 5 888 320 492 493 353,574 0.277 515,335 0.403 868,909 1.55 6 977 143 219 648 3,331 97 262,932 0.187 677,579 0.482 940,510 1.76 7 677 127 195 317 2,518 1,418 241,778 0.248 332,061 0.340 573,839 1.02 8 529 32 49 73 1,193 993 124,845 0.164 76,023 0.100 200,868 0.33 9 222 65 99 232 1,353 13 105,921 0.332 242,785 0.760 348,707 0.65 10 262 0 - 143 65 923 34,608 0.092 149,444 0.396 184,051 0.35 11 50 10 15 61 358 222 34,987 0.490 63,969 0.895 98,956 0.18 12 345 31 47 337 2,623 1,000 236,614 0.477 352,040 0.709 588,654 1.05 13 393 95 145 292 1,324 91 106,174 0.188 305,683 0.540 411,856 0.78 14 155 27 42 175 940 96 76,411 0.342 182,607 0.818 259,018 0.48 15 371 20 31 370 2,114 1,589 215,740 0.404 387,357 0.726 603,098 1.10 16 77 30 47 161 670 114 55,894 0.506 168,719 1.527 224,613 0.42 0.54 17 2931 12 19 1 189 492 1 1,766 94,900 0.2251 198,0441 0.469 292 ' 9441 Total 1 5,6711 949 1,4591 3,808 24,0741 8,343 2,144,713 1 3,983,1631 6,127,876 11.18 City of Port Orchard General Sewer Plan Update Sedgwick Alternative Build Out Basin Flow Projections Prepared by: Peter Cunningham Reviewed By: Adam Schuyler 12/23/2015 Basin Net New Sewered Build Out Build Out Sewer Build Out Sewer Build Out Peak Total Area Build Out Build Out Build Out I/I Flow Build Out I/I Flow Build Out Peak Developable Areas incl. ROW Sewered Area Flow Flow (gpm/total Day Flow (acre) Population Employment (gallons/day) (gpm/total acre) Hour Flow (mgd) Area (acre) (acres) (acres) (gallons/day) acre) I I (gallons/day) 1 56 0 70 0 0 0 59 0 56 415 680 5 32,534 9 53,335 6 67,394 0.400 59,021 74,465 161,877 36,154 0.726 0.738 0.866 0.142 91,555 0.17 0.23 0.43 2 71 0.528 127,800 3 130 38 155 862 0.361 0.185 229,271 4 177 0 35 604 0 47,073 83,227 0.14 5 888 320 492 493 4,533 0 353,574 0.277 515,335 0.403 868,909 1.55 6 977 143 219 648 3,331 97 262,932 0.187 677,579 0.482 940,510 1.76 7 677 127 195 317 2,553 1,964 261,982 0.269 332,061 0.340 594,043 1.05 8 529 32 49 73 1,299 1,061 135,274 0.178 76,023 0.100 211,297 0.35 9 222 65 99 232 1,353 13 105,921 0.332 242,785 0.760 348,707 0.65 10 262 0 0 143 65 1,108 40,526 0.107 149,444 0.396 189,970 0.36 11 50 10 15 61 358 222 34,987 0.490 63,969 0.895 98,956 0.18 12 345 31 47 337 2,623 1,000 236,614 0.477 352,040 0.709 588,654 1.05 13 393 95 145 292 1,324 91 106,174 0.188 305,683 0.540 411,856 0.78 14 155 27 42 175 940 96 76,411 0.342 182,607 0.818 259,018 0.48 15 371 20 31 370 2,114 1,589 215,740 0.404 387,357 0.726 603,098 1.10 16 77 30 47 161 670 114 55,894 0.506 168,719 1.527 224,613 0.42 17 293 12 19 189 492 1,766 94,900 0.225 198,0441 0.4691 292,9441 0.54 Total 5,6711 949 1,459 3,808 24,2151 9,1421 2,181,264 3,983,1631 1 6,164,427 11.24 Appendix E Pump Curves 1 JANI-=St3-95 tION 1 S : S8 CASCADE MACH I FIERY M ELECT I P.02 Model 6NHTA 900 and Various RPM I 60 Hertz Enclosed Impeller 1 00 RPM erformances shown are for cool ,ter, close -coupled electric YonftgureHon with packing. Other *ounting styles or liquids may ,quire horsepower endlor � rformance adjustments. seat x .305 = Meters ctles:x 25.4 = Millimeters PM x .227 = Cubic Meters/Hour PM x &7B5 s: LltersfMlnute Px,746=KW' i arlous ,RPM rformances shown are for cool ter,lalose-coupled electric ifiguration with pecking. Other iunting styles or liquids may lulre horsepower andlor rformance adjustments. et x ,305 = Meters lies x 26.4 : Millimeters IM x .227 -- Cubic MeterslHour IM 3185 = LlterslMinute x .746 = KW MODEL F� I Fool -� g�_04 - I F VF vc vs SINGLE speed ImpellerM%and style He BondsGIR VDtIJTE 086 RPM yArlomvSe 2120 Ur parlarmances st"n are forood water. W _' 3..».r.:...--?....;»,„.,!....:..�.;.....4,.,....--. class x WtedelecMoavnfguretionwlthpecking.. 11 twr mounting AWN or Hqutds ms require Igrsapower .......r.......................- ...... 1.......•.....j-..- endlor performance ad�uslmenls • 's t . i a4 f , , h T CI . I ►d. ... a.. r......:.......� I ! ......;.... _... ....,..._....... . ...... ..... »....... . T a4 i......a.......` . , 40 ra. .J so ............. /• �. ..»t....... i._.... i _e.' ...$....._1.� 4 r 4Fr'.l1F�H NEo'0. iItp J. • I r r t � 1 i a at* boo 750 Iwo 111110 1300 T5 U.S.GALLONS40 CAPACITY PFfl 111AUT6 CORNELL PUMP COMPANY . PuPoartd,Cra on 6NHTA-0—HF A m{JLCL 13 "Fri) C ' ri M EM C V SINGLE Spmd ImpaHer0le, Orb He I Solid IL VOLUM Wftili Brur fodaisd 3110 PdrfOrmanros shown are for cod water, close Ueupled aleclde oon%vm11onwllh packing.. 4tllcrmountingstylesorIguldsm mqulre holeapowarartdlwPadormenoesd�tmerus. _ CAPACITY Wo. W.M.9ms PIN MI 16"L I CORNELL PUMP COMPANY � . PaArarld,0�re -on I 6N11TA--VarlayeRPiII JI CORNELL PUMP COMPANY 827 *-TAN La—ej--95 MOM IZ :59 CASCADE MACHINERY c. ELECT LL J J !` m J 0 / ( p V 0 J 1 -•� J v J J ° � N r +I i r r al z II! r •_• co cx 0 M \ UgD N E a 0 c Q LL ,cwq:rN Nm ca)Ntr7 CYM xyy xa�I xx 7+v N ' 'tibves�r7 hGpNvr opN�ati+= 1pQ47 TQvvwwinm KYONO ppTvvy<x+ OOIO8 pp�1e�tivxl+J 1oop 4 �NN�cOx� eopOiOepprxdi YnnrvYxI �xC'I Nv�O�rxO IWopt�vAq- qq >pC0O LaO� pLgO pp8O 9aaPH W) aiN 0NW N cV NNciNN 1"cdViWtg444vS-4 f .0 m Lin a� 'd .- d{dei�d C3ppcodd0000 �hcV �ra'),Nc�4N cr9 tD 4cOl eli� 00 O Oi+ai 4y rra- tO til r v O m r r r (Q co r 2 W r r O O r W r eq 00 r r r m m F m oG d OO OO OCi dcia ea 'OCG J » ZLLLn v00000daoo� rr rrrr r• rrr*'r 0 dd � r e+ _ �yNNN NNNNNNN,N rrrw N NpQrrrrrT Z!iJ' y i iNIiy�I} P Y1NN rNrr, 00 Il'lu'1 OO4�11 1f:WYfh NeAUI hhh Q ©ID 10 rrCl�rrr�wr r,- rpp 'coi r(p pp 41 ^ IOAA�AufAUI Qp -.a- pp � " pp b �a warm d ddcddd ay cs _d V4 481wryon��Orysh oi mp cpy h c�pi hM^iV g N1+7 N C4 at cil iil pppp R7 c0 �p mEOm��(O pp�� �eqp o4 m�p iQ m � pryp� cD� c�D J:reV tV a+I NtV�NSYrt4 ww44 rrrppr r e'd r �aJN r'r r pprrp P pp� C$ W S N N 04 N Iq CQ 44 cm �t7 rl 0Yid V V -0YVV V 0 c6 w m 44m"cn-0V v v V V Vv CO tow0 O L Q L] 2 s l:a K100�mrlpr mrf0 if11e1 LL LL U. U. LL U. U. 1L IL 4- rMOrr W LL U. LL lit J x x z T m x x x t t7 a V V a v H a r2 W 132 Ima 00 0L 0 N a 1AN--31-9 TUE 14:01 P. 02 Centrifia 4.1 SOLIDS HANDLING SELECTIONS PERFORMANCES SHOWN ARE APPROXIMATE WATER PERFORMANCES i CHECK CATALOG FOR NPSHR, CURVE SHAPE, ETC. BEFORE MAKING FINAL SELECTION i DESIGN POINT 550 GPM 20 Ft. @ 0 RPM ---------- ------ 'm--------- NORMAL SPEED OPTIONS E , Model Trim -Angle HP $ Eff. 4NHTA 10.88 0 3.65 75 6NHTA 10.69 0 3,73 73 4414T 11.06 0 3.90 71 6NHG 10.13 0 3.99 67 ------ ADDITIONAL OPTIONS--CONSt7LT-FACTORY _---__..-_----- ---- NOTE, These Selections also meet your design point Consult with Cornell prior to final selection Calculated Model Speed Trim -Angle HP % Eff. 4NNT 925 10.09 0 3,56 76 Above Spored 6NNTB 742 12.00 0 4.31 64 Ae1ow Spiced 8NHTA 733 12.00 0 4,56 59 Below Speed a"G 686 12.00 0 4.93 55 Below Speed BNHT 798 12.00 0 6.25 37 Below Speed 109HTA 592 15.00 0 7.13 34 Below Spied CORNELL PUMP COMPANY 2323 S.E. Harvester Drive Phone (503) 653-0330 Po]rtland,Oregon 97222 FAX (503) 653-0338 JAN-31-9E TUE 14:01 P. 03 v ■ I : ■ : I I � f7ii 1 • : : : � 1 ■ .....r.....:..... j..r •.f..-. r....1.....y u.•:.. •. ........... / d' 1 s ■ : : 1 ■ 1 . I 1 I .• I • • 1 ■ 1 W iY . ■ . . I ■ 1 1 . ■ l 1 ' 11 I 1 I ■ : : ' � 1 1 �11 1 { }■1 ■ 1 1 ; I ■ ■ Y i g 9 SA v 9 8 o 133=4 N Y atMH 1b 101 0 0 0 al In Q v i y �Em�iFt'7 SUPERSEDES FFBRUARY 1968 75T- APRIL 1987 T.l! TT.Lj N LIJ N{A+u vz� 133J MI.4V3H iVldl x 0 - d-Loa-im s ANa" I1 ovw aavosvo e0: 9 T Now s6 -O -IMdr ► Customer Pump Performance Datasheet P E N TA I R Project name : Encompass 2.0 - 14.5.0.0 Item number : Default Size : Myers - 4VC/4VCX Service Stages : 1 Quantity : 1 Based on curve number : SUB_S_E_AH_00027_E_4 Rev Quote number 2012-03-23 Date last saved :20 Feb 2015 6:25 PM Operating Conditions Liquid Flow, rated : 1,349.3 USgpm Liquid type : Water Differential head / pressure, rated (requested) : 108.8 ft Additional liquid description Differential head / pressure, rated (actual) : 108.8 ft Solids diameter, max : 0.00 in Suction pressure, rated / max : 0.00 / 0.00 psi.g Solids concentration, by volume : 0.00 % NPSH available, rated : Ample Temperature, max : 68.00 deg F Frequency : 60 Hz Fluid density, rated / max : 0.999 / 0.999 SG Performance Viscosity, rated : 1.00 cP Speed, rated : 1,750 rpm Vapor pressure, rated : 0.34 psi.a Impeller diameter, rated : 12.00 in Material Impeller diameter, maximum : 12.00 in Material selected : Standard Impeller diameter, minimum : 8.00 in Pressure Data Efficiency : 75.00 Maximum working pressure : 77.88 psi.g NPSH required /margin required : - / 0.00 ft Maximum allowable working pressure : N/A n Im eye flow / S Im eye flow q (imp. y ) (imp. y ) : N/A Metric units Maximum allowable suction pressure : N/A Minimum Continuous Stable Flow : 300.0 USgpm Hydrostatic test pressure : N/A Head, maximum, rated diameter : 180.0 ft Head rise to shutoff : 65.38 % Driver & Power Data Flow, best eff. point (BEP) : 1,349.3 USgpm Driver sizing specification : Maximum power Flow ratio (rated / BEP) : 100.00 % Margin over specification : 0.00 % Diameter ratio (rated / max) : 100.00 % Service factor :1.00 Head ratio (rated dia / max dia) : 100.00 % Power, hydraulic : 37.07 hp Cq/Ch/Ce/Cn [ANSI/HI 9.6.7-2010] :1.00 / 1.00 / 1.00 / 1.00 Power, rated : 49.42 hp Selection status : Acceptable Power, maximum, rated diameter : 56.64 hp 80 60 �B 40 3 0 a 20 0 200 180 160 140 - 120 - m 100 x 80 60 40 20 1 12 1 8.00 in 60 72 Minimum recommended motor rating : 60.00 hp / 44.74 kW Power - Minimum Continuous Stable Flow Preferred operating region 69 0 0 200 400 600 800 1,000 1,200 1,400 1,600 1,800 2,000 Flow - USgpm MYERS PHONE: FAX PENTAIR Company: PumpTech, Inc. Name: McCormick Woods 2 PS Date: 3/3/2015 Pump: Size: S6L/S6LX Type: NCLOG-6 Synch speed: 1800 rpm Curve: S61_1750 Specific Speeds: Dimensions: Pump Limits: Temperature: 140 °F Pressure: 125 psi g Sphere size: 3.25 in ---- Data Point ---- IR Flow: 1000 US gpm Head: 71.1 ft Eff: 66% Power: 27 hp NPSHr: --- ---- Design Curve ----- AM Shutoff head: 109 ft Shutoff dP: 47.3 psi Min flow: 401 US gpm BEP: 70% @ 1337 US gpm NOL power: 28.4 hp @ 1278 US gpm -- Max Curve -- Max power: 50 hp @ 1800 US gpm McCormick Woods 2 PS, Hydromatic, model S6LX, 25 hp, 1,000 gpm, 60 ft tdh, 10.50" impeller I',1?0 HYDROMATIC Speed: 1750 rpm Dia: 10.5 in Impeller: Ns: --- Nss: --- Suction: --- Discharge: 6 in Power: --- Eye area: --- 160 140 120 100 d 80 2 60 40 20 0 Search Criteria: Flow: 1000 US gpm Head: 60 ft Fluid: Water Temperature: 60 °F Density: 62.37 Ib/ft3 Vapor pressure: 0.2563 psi a Viscosity: 1.105 cP Atm pressure: 14.7 psi a NPSHa: --- Motor: - Consult HYDROMATIC to select a motor for this pump. Ji_ 3 40- bo 10.5 in \ 7 ` 70 73 ` 0 8.37 in 65, 50 hp 40 hp 40 30 h 50 6 5 hp 7.5 0 hp 10 hp LVV 'FOu OVV OVV Iuuu I4W 11FOu IOVu IOVu LVVV LLOu L'FOu LOVu US gpm Performance Evaluation: Flow Speed Head Efficiency Power NPSHr US gpm rpm ft % hp ft 1200 1750 64.2 69 28 --- 1000 1750 71.1 66 27 --- 800 1750 76.6 61 25.6 --- 600 1750 80.2 52 23.4 --- 400 1750 --- --- --- --- H2Optimize Hydromatic 9 Selected from catalog: Non -Clog Pumps 60Hz Vers: Nov 2009 Pump Data Sheet - HYDROMATIC Iq Company Pumptech Inc Name: Date: 5/29/2007 imp: Size: H4H/H4HX-1000 Type: NCLOG-4 Synch speed: 1800 rpm Curve: Specific Speeds: Dimensions: Pump limits: Temperature: 140 °F Pressure: 150 psi Sphere size: 3 in — Data Pant --- Flow: 200 US gpm Head: 65.8 ft Eff: 47% Power: 7.01 hp NPSHr: -- ft — Design Curve -- Shutoff head: 89.8 ft Shutoff dP: 38.8 psi Min flow. -- US gpm BER 65% @ 451 US gpm 1OL paver: 9.67 hp @ 700 US gpm — Max Curve — Max power: 14 hp @ 840 US gpm Speed: 1750 rpm Dia: 8.75 in Impeller: 15146 Ns: --- Nss: --- Suction: --- in Discharge: 4 in Power: --- hp Eye area: --- in' 9.5 in 100 75 25 C 10 m 3 0 0 a Performance Evaluation: Flow Speed US gpm rpm 240 1750 200 1750 160 1750 120 1750 80 1750 H2Optimize Hydromatic 8 Search Criteria: Flow: 200 US gpm Head: 63 ft Fluid: Water Temperature: 60 °F Density: 62.25 lbtft' Vapor pressure: 0.2563 psi a Viscosity 1.105 cP Alm pressure: 14.7 psi a NPSHa: --- ft Motor: Consult HYDROMATIC to select a motor for this pump. 0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 US gpm Head Efficiency Power NPSHr ft % hp ft 62.4 52 7.13 --- 65.8 47 7.01 --- 69.3 40 6.93 --- 73.8 31 6.97 --- 78.4 22 7.02 --- Selected from catalog: Non -Clog Pumps 60Hz Vers: Oct 2006 Section NON -CLOG Page 212A Dated OCTOBER 2005 Dimensional z R Data DISCHARGE FLANGE 4"-125# FLG. A B C D E F G H I H4H 32-3/16 16-1/2 20-3/4 6-1/2 12-1/2 8-13/16 1-11/16 3-3/16 8-1/4 H4HX 36-5/8 16-1/2 20-3/4 6-1/2 12-1/2 8-13/16 1-11/16 3-3/16 8-1/4 ALL DIMENSIONS IN INCHES NOTE: CASTING DIMENSIONS MAY VARY ± 1/8" IrUIP0 HYDROMATIC Section NON-QOG Page 312B Dated OCOBER 2005 Electrical I Em Data MODEL: H4H/H4HX-Non-C1og Sewage Pump R. P M. 1750 MOTOR TYPE ENCLOSED, OIL COOLED INDUCTION, VFD SUITABLE MOTOR DESIGN NEMA TYPE B (3o) L (1 o) GENERAL INSULATION CLASS H STATOR WINDING CLASS H MAXIMUM STATOR TEMPERATURE 180°C [356°F] MOTOR PROTECTION BI-METALLIC, TEMPERATURE SENSITIVE DISC, SIZED TO OPEN AT 130°C AND AUTOMATICALLY RESET @ 30-35°C DIFFERENTIAL, ONE IN SINGLE PHASE, TWO IN THREE PHASE ELECTRICAL RATINGS HEAT SENSOR 24VDC 5AMPS 115VAC 5AMPS 230VAC 5AMPS VOLTAGE TOLERANCE SEAL FAIL 300VAC 5mA ±10% � 4, Q O Q�,l• O,l. O,l. O,`. 4 ? -� O 4 v0 -� 4 -� Q -� 2 Q 2 4, 4, F 4, v 4, v ? ? v Q• v Q v JP CV h �, Q -� Q O' 4 QJ � �QJQ QJ JQ Q' S4 Q. \ Q' � Q• 4 � h4 � o `� 4 F 4v 7.5 230 1 D 1.2 32.2 38.7 137 7.3 31.5 7.4 .77 .77 .75 .67 .98 .98 .97 .92 7.5 200 3 H 1.2 25.2 29.5 147 7.0 51 8.8 .80 .80 .79 .73 .82 .80 .76 .66 230 21.9 25.7 128 460 11 12.8 64 575 8.8 10.3 51.2 10 200 3 1 H 1.2 33.9 39.9 186 9.3 64.5 11.7 .80 .81 .79 .75 .81 .79 .75 .66 230 29.4 34.7 162 460 14.7 17.3 81 575 1 11.8 13.9 1 65 15 200 3 G 1.2 50.8 60.9 267 13.7 92.5 17.6 .80 .82 .81 .79 .80 .78 .71 .60 230 44.2 53 232 460 22.1 26.5 116 575 17.7 21.2 92.8 I� HYDROMATIC° Section NON -CLOG Page 410( Technical I Dated APRIL 2007 Data Supersedes MAY 2006 MODEL: H4HX — Explosion Proof Non -Clog Sewage Pumps Physical Data: DISCHARGE SIZE 4" 125# ANSI SOLIDS SIZE 3" SPHERICAL IMPELLER TYPE BALANCED, ENCLOSED, MONO -VANE CABLE LENGTH 25' STANDARD 50' OPTIONAL PAINT PAINTED AFTER ASSEMBLY. GREEN, WATER REDUCIBLE ENAMEL, ONE COAT, AIR DRIED Temperature: MAXIMUM LIQUID 104°F LABELED/140°F MAXIMUM STATOR 356°F OIL FLASH POINT 390°F HEAT SENSOR Open: Closed: 257°F MAX./239°F MIN. 194°F MAX./119°F MIN. Technical Data: POWER CORD TYPE STW-A WATER RESISTANT 600V, 60°C SENSOR CORD TYPE 18-5 STW-A WATER RESISTANT 600V, 60°C, 5.5 AMPS MOTOR HOUSING CAST IRON ASTM A-48 CLASS 30 z ob CASING CAST IRON ASTM A-48 CLASS 30 J U IMPELLER DUCTILE IRON ASTM A-536 � CASING WEAR RING BRONZE ASTM B-584-836ALLOY 115 w 0 �z MOTOR SHAFT 416 STAINLESS STEEL 2 00 HARDWARE 300 SERIES STAINLESS STEEL "O" RINGS BUNA N MECHANICAL SEALS Standard: UPPER AND LOWER CARBON /CERAMIC /BUNA-N, TYPE 21 Optional: LOWER TUNGSTEN CARBIDE/TUNGSTEN CARBIDE/BUNA-N, TYPE 21 Optional: LOWER SILICON CARBIDE/SILICON CARBIDE/BUNA-N, TYPE 21 UPPER BEARING (RADIAL) SINGLE ROW — BALL LOWER BEARING (THRUST) SINGLE ROW —BALL irP HYDROMATIC` Company: PumpTech, Inc. Name: McCormick North Phase 2 Date: 3/3/2015 Pump: Size: H4H/H4HX-1000 Type: NCLOG-4 Synch speed: 1800 rpm Curve: Specific Speeds: Dimensions: Pump Limits: Temperature: 140 °F Pressure: 150 psi g Sphere size: 3 in ---- Data Point ---- .11110 Flow: 200 US gpm Head: 65.8 ft Eff: 47% Power: 7.02 hp NPSHr: --- ---- Design Curve ---- Shutoff head: 89.8 ft Shutoff dP: 38.9 psi Min flow: --- BEP: 65% @ 451 US gpm NOL power: 9.69 hp @ 700 US gpm -- Max Curve -- Max power: 14 hp @ 840 US gpm ( McCormick North Phase 2, H4HX1000EC 1750 RPM, 8.75" for 200GPM at 63ft - Contractor: Rotschy, , MAS # 77938)- McCormick Meadows, Hydromatic, model H4HX, 10 hp, flow unknown, f HYDROMATIC 65.8 ft Speed: 1750 rpm Dia: 8.75 in Impeller: 15146 Ns: --- Nss: --- Suction: --- Discharge: 4 in Power: --- Eye area: --- 110 100 90 80 70 60 M d = 50 40 30 20 10 0 Search Criteria: Flow: 200 US gpm Head: 63 ft Fluid: Water Temperature: 60 °F Density: 62.37 Ib/ft3 Vapor pressure: 0.2563 psi a Viscosity: 1.105 cP Atm pressure: 14.7 psi a NPSHa: --- Motor: Consult HYDROMATIC to select a motor for this pump. ri 8.75 in ` 40 50 8 in 6p ` 65 8 �40 64.8 68 ` 60 5 50 50 \ 10 7.5 hp IVV LVV JVV Performance Evaluation: Flow Speed Head Efficiency US gpm rpm ft % 240 1750 62.4 52 200 1750 65.8 47 160 1750 69.3 40 120 1750 73.8 31 80 1750 78.4 22 H2Optimize Hydromatic 9 'FVV JVV OVV /VV OVV US gpm Power NPSHr hp ft 7.15 --- 7.02 --- 6.95 --- 6.99 --- 7.03 --- Selected from catalog: Non -Clog Pumps 60Hz Vers: Nov 2009 Company: PumpTech, Inc. Name: Ridge 3 PS, H4QX3000FC Date: 3/3/2015 Pump: Size: H4Q/H4QX Type: NCLOG-4 Synch speed: 1800 rpm Curve: Specific Speeds: Dimensions: Pump Limits: Temperature: 140 °F Pressure: --- Sphere size: 3 in ---- Data Point Flow: 690 US gpm Head: 96 ft Eff: 55% Power: 28.7 hp NPSHr: --- ---- Design Curve ---- Shutoff head: 157 ft Shutoff dP: 67.8 psi Min flow: --- BEP: 58% @ 829 US gpm NOL power: 31 hp @ 829 US gpm -- Max Curve -- Max power: 33 hp @ 851 US gpm Ridge 3 PS, Hydromatic, model H4QX3000FC, 30 hp, 690 gpm, 95 ft tdh, 11.5 impeller 1',1?0 HYDROMATIC Speed: 1750 rpm Dia: 11.5 in Impeller: Ns: --- Nss: --- Suction: --- Discharge: 4 in Power: --- Eye area: --- 150 125 100 d 2 75 50 25 Search Criteria: Flow: 690 US gpm Head: 95 ft Fluid: Water Temperature: 60 °F Density: 62.37 Ib/ft3 Vapor pressure: 0.2563 psi a Viscosity: 1.105 cP Atm pressure: 14.7 psi a NPSHa: --- Motor: Consult HYDROMATIC to select a motor for this pump. 12 in 11.5 i 30 0 50 9 in h04O 58 30 p 30 ` ` 025 hp 40 ` 20 p IVV LVV JVV Performance Evaluation: Flow Speed Head Efficiency US gpm rpm ft % 828 1750 85.6 58 690 1750 96 55 552 1750 106 53 414 1750 117 50 276 1750 130 37 H2Optimize Hydromatic 9 'iVV JVV OVV /VV OVV 5VV US gpm Power NPSHr hp ft 30.9 --- 28.7 --- 26.4 --- 24.1 --- 24.2 --- Selected from catalog: Non -Clog Pumps 60Hz Vers: Nov 2009 Company: PumpTech, Inc. Name: Ridge 3 PS, H4QX3000FC Date: 3/3/2015 Pump: Size: H4Q/H4QX Type: NCLOG-4 Synch speed: 1800 rpm Curve: Specific Speeds: Dimensions: Pump Limits: Temperature: 140 °F Pressure: --- Sphere size: 3 in ---- Data Point Flow: 690 US gpm Head: 96 ft Eff: 55% Power: 28.7 hp NPSHr: --- ---- Design Curve ---- Shutoff head: 157 ft Shutoff dP: 67.8 psi Min flow: --- BEP: 58% @ 829 US gpm NOL power: 31 hp @ 829 US gpm -- Max Curve -- Max power: 33 hp @ 851 US gpm Ridge 3 PS, Hydromatic, model H4QX3000FC, 30 hp, 690 gpm, 95 ft tdh, 11.5 impeller 1',1?0 HYDROMATIC Speed: 1750 rpm Dia: 11.5 in Impeller: Ns: --- Nss: --- Suction: --- Discharge: 4 in Power: --- Eye area: --- 150 125 100 d 2 75 50 25 Search Criteria: Flow: 690 US gpm Head: 95 ft Fluid: Water Temperature: 60 °F Density: 62.37 Ib/ft3 Vapor pressure: 0.2563 psi a Viscosity: 1.105 cP Atm pressure: 14.7 psi a NPSHa: --- Motor: Consult HYDROMATIC to select a motor for this pump. 12 in 11.5 i 30 0 50 9 in h04O 58 30 p 30 ` ` 025 hp 40 ` 20 p IVV LVV JVV Performance Evaluation: Flow Speed Head Efficiency US gpm rpm ft % 828 1750 85.6 58 690 1750 96 55 552 1750 106 53 414 1750 117 50 276 1750 130 37 H2Optimize Hydromatic 9 'iVV JVV OVV /VV OVV 5VV US gpm Power NPSHr hp ft 30.9 --- 28.7 --- 26.4 --- 24.1 --- 24.2 --- Selected from catalog: Non -Clog Pumps 60Hz Vers: Nov 2009 xylem Let's Solve Water CP 3102 MT 3- 433 Technical specification Head t] 4 2- 0- 6 4 2 0 8 6 4 2 0 8 6 4 2 0 8 6-- 4 3 168mm 4- 2 0 FLYGT Note: Picture might not correspond to the current configuration General Shrouded single or multi -channel impeller pumps with large throughlets and single volute pump casing for liquids containing solids and fibres. Cast iron design with double sealing technology. Some models available as stainless steel versions. Impeller Impeller material Grey cast iron 0 100 200 300 400 500 600 [US g.p.m.] Discharge Flange Diameter 3 15/16 inch Suction Flange Diameter 100 mm Water, pure Curve according to: ISO 9906 grade 2 annex 1 or2 Impeller diameter 168 m m Number of blades 1 Throughlet diameter 3 inch Installation: P - Semi permanent, Wet Motor Motor # C3102.090 18-11-4AL-W 5hp Stator v ariant 1 Frequency 60 Hz Rated voltage 460 V Number of poles 4 Phases 3— Rated power 5 hp Rated current 6.8 A Starting current 42 A Rated speed 1745 rpm Power factor 1/1 Load 0.81 3/4 Load 0.75 1/2 Load 0.63 Efficiency 1/1 Load 85.0 % 3/4 Load 85.0 % 1/2 Load 83.5 % Configuration zaa, o� &1T03b(M) d Project Project ID Created by Created on Last update 2015-04-07 xylem Let's Solve Water CP 3102 MT 3- 433 FLYGT Performance curve Pump Motor Discharge Flange Diameter 3 15/16 inch Motor# C3102.090 18-11-4AL-W 5hp Powerfactor Suction Flange Diameter 100 mm Stator variant 1 1/1 Load 0.81 Impeller diameter 08" Frequency 60 Hz 3/4 Load 0.75 Number of blades 1 Rated voltage 460 V 1/2 Load 0.63 Throughlet diameter 3 inch Number of poles 4 Phases 3- Efficiency Rated power 5 hp 1/1 Load 85.0 % Rated current 6.8 A 3/4 Load 85.0 % Starting current 42 A 1/2 Load 83.5 % Rated speed 1745 rpm [h 3. 2. 1. 0. 4 3 3 2 2 1 1 Project Head t] 0 p] ft] ft 37.8 6 640o 2 8 4- 0- 6- 2- 8 4 33 68mm 0 Efficie cy ] Total efficienc 0 42.8 0 0 0 m 35.5 % 0 0 Shaft p owerinpu 0 wer P2 16 16 mm (P ) mm (P 2.8 hp 0 0 2.32 hp 0 0 alues 33 168mm 19.7 ft 5 0 5 0 5 or 104 US g.p.m. 0 50 100 150 260 250 360 350 460 450 560 550 660 650 700 [US g.p.m.] Water, pure Curve according to: ISO 9906 grade 2 annex 1 or 2 Project ID Created by Created on Last update 2015-04-07 xylem Let's Solve Water CP 3102 MT 3- 433 Duty Analysis FLYGT ft] .6 Head — — .5 .4 3 2 1 .0 37.8 ft i9 '8 17 i6 i5 i4 i3 12 11 i0 .9 '8 '7 16 0 5 !4 !3 '2 1 '0 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 11 0 9 33 168mm 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 104 US m. g.p. 0 0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350 400 450 500 550 600 650 700 [US g.p.m.] Water, pure Curve according to: ISO 9906 grade 2 annex f or 2 Individual pump Pumps running /System Flow Head 1 104 USg.p.m. 37.8it Total Shaft power Flow Head 2.32hp 104USg.p.m. 37.8ft Specific Shaft power Pump eff. energy NPSHre 2.32hp 42.8% 335kVVWUSMG 19.7ft Project I Project ID Created by Created on Last update 2015-04-07 xylem Let's Solve Water CP 3102 MT 3- 433 VFD Curve [h 4 3 3 2 2 1 1 0 0 FLYGT t] Head 6- 64°o 4- 2- 0- 8- 6-- 4 2 0 8 6 4 2 0 64 8 6 64°0 4 2 0 0 64 0 8 6 33 168mm 4 0 Hz 2 Hz 0 Efficie ;]-Total cy efficient 0- 0- 0- z 5 33 68mm 0 Hz-45Hz 0 Hz z 68mm 0 0 haft power P �] 0 - Power input PI mm 5 16 mm P 0 5 Hz 5 5 Hz 0 5 z 0 5 0 ]z NPSH-N t 0 alues 33 68mm 5 0-04) z 5 z 0 z 5- — 0- 5 0 50 Water, pure L ProjectMW 100 150 200 250 300 350 400 450 500 Project ID Created by 550 600 650 700 [US g.p.m.] Curve according to: ISO 9906 grade 2 annex 1 or 2 Created on Last update 2015-04-07 xylem Let's Solve Water CP 3102 MT 3- 433 VFD Analysis 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 1 1 1 1 1 FLYGT ft] 7 6 5 4 3 2- 1- 0 9 8 37.8 ft 7 6 5 4 3 2- 1 0 9 8 7 6 ° 5 4 3- 2- 1 0 0 9 8 7 ° 6 5 4 0 3 2 1 0 0 9 8 7 6 4Hz 3 H- 2 1 104 US � g.p.m. 0 50 100 150 260 250 360 350 460 450 560 550 660 650 700 [US g.p.m.1 Water, pure Curve according to., ISO 9906 grade 2 annex 1 or 2 0 50 100 150 260 250 360 350 460 450 560 550 660 650 700 [US g.p.m.1 Water, pure Curve according to., ISO 9906 grade 2 annex 1 or 2 Individual pump Total Pumps running Specific /System Frequency Flow Head Shaft power Flow Head Shaft power Hyd eff. energy NPSHre 1 60Hz 104USg.p.m. 37.8ft 2.32hp 104USg.p.m. 37.8ft 2.32hp 42.8% 335WVtVUSMG 19.7ft 1 55Hz 92.8USg.p.m. 30.2ft 1.65hp 92.8USg.p.m. 30.2ft 1.65hp 42.8% 279WVIVUSMG 16.5ft 1 50Hz 84.4USg.p.m. 24.9ft 1.24hp 84.4USg.p.m. 24.9It 1.24hp 42.8% 243kWh/USMG14.1ft 1 45Hz 76USg.p.m. 20.2ft 0.906hp 76USg.p.m 20.2ft 0.906hp 42.8% 213WVIyUSMG11.9ft 1 40Hz 67.5USg.p.m. 16ft 0.637hp 67.5USg.p.m. 16ft 0.637hp 42.8% 188 WVWUS M G 9.89 ft Project Project ID Created by Created on Last update 2015-04-07 xylem Let's Sole Water CP 3102 MT 3- 433 Dimensional drawing FLYGT 371/4 (rORRTHEST POW) FEFLINE 26 3/8 7 3' COLN C� 6 7/ 1/ � o 3 3/815 3/4 FEFUNE 1 1/8 93/ 49/1 I 2' GUOE RAPS I I o MNLEVEL 4 p N ❑Z Z� M 2 3/4 2 3/ VIEW ❑Z — ❑Z 0 — 9 7/8 B T0314 (4x) 0 J U W.jgl Qbs) " UKE SICNTOENMCFCUDEBARS Punp asch 250 80 Dirresial� w e N< �� 080814 are ° AUFOCAD CP31CQMf 5399 DRNMNG53854M 1 4 Project Project ID Created by Created on Last update 2015-04-07 :::7' jn ECH SERVING THE PACIFIC NORTHWEST 7 1,f 7,CwPUMP SALES & SERVICE Factory Performance Test Report Pottery Road Lift Station City of Port Orchard Vaughan Submersible Chopper Pump, Model # SE6W-107, Qty -3- Vaughan Chopper Pump, Submersible ( 2 serve + Spare) Design Condition: 1,800 GPM at 75 ft TDH 60 HP, 1800 RPM, 460 Volt, 3 Phase rated for Class 1, Div 1, Grp C&D locations ( Explosion poof ) RH2 Engineers Reference Plans & Specification, March 7, 2014 THE RUSH COMPANIES HD Fowler Company PumpTech Inc. Reference MAS # 112585 Municipal ❑ PumpTech Inc. 12020 SE 32nd St, Suite 2 Bellevue, WA 98005 Ph: 425-644-8501 Fax: 425-562-9213 pumptech@pumptechnw.com Oct 6, 2014 Industrial ❑ PumpTech Inc. 209 S Hamilton Rd Moses Lake, WA 98837 Ph: 509-766-6330 Fax: 509-766-6331 moseslake@pumptechnw.com Packaaed Svstems ❑ PumpTech Inc. 321 S. Sequoia Parkway Canby, OR 97013 Ph:503-659-6230 Fax: 503-659-8718 inquiries@pumptechnw.com WA CONTRACTORS # PUMPTI*945QG www.pumptechnw.com OR CONTRACTORS # 154997 MOTa"- • --per Pumps Date: Monday, October 06, 2014 TO: PumpTech Inc. attn: Mr. Erick Merklinghaus e-mail : emerklinghaus@pumptechnw.com; derek@chopperpumps.com; bryan@chopperpumps.com FROM : Ian Dorsch SUBJECT: Pump Performance Test Certificates for POTTERY ROAD STATION, PORT ORCHARD, WA Spec # none, P.O. # 46086 for Lift Station service 3 each Vaughan model SE6W-107 serial # 123193-A/B/C Dear: Mr. Erick Merklinghaus Please find the enclosed pump test certificates as required by the specification. Please forward this information to the Engineer for review and approval. We request the Engineer's written approval of these test certificates prior to shipment. If you have any questions, please contact me by phone at 360-249-4042, extension 245 or by e-mail at ian@chopperpumps.com. Sincerely, Ian Dorsch Vaughan Co., Inc. cc: 123193 attachments: "Solids Handling Specialists" Vaughan Co., Inc. • 364 Monte-Elma Road • Montesano, WA USA 98563 • Phone 1-360-249-4042 • FAX 1-360-249-6155 E-mail: info@chopperpumps.com Road - Website : http://www.chopperpumps.com 130 120 110 100 90 80 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 Vaughan Co., Inc., 364 Monte-Elma Road, Montesano, WA 98563 Phone 360-2494042 Fax 360-249-6155 PERFORMANCE TEST CERTIFICATE CUSTOMER: POTTERY ROAD STATION, PORT ORCHARD, WA MODEL: SE6W-107 SERIAL # 123193 -A VAUGHAN CO., INC. MOTOR: 60 HP, 74.9 Full Load Amps at 460 Volts MOTOR SPEED: 1770 RPM PUMP SPEED: 1770 RPM October 3, 2014 REQUIRED PERFORMANCE: 1800 GPM @ 75' TDH ACCEPTABLE OPERATING RANGE: 650 to 2300 gpm SE6W-107 w/ 60 HP, 1770 RPM JOB MOTOR; SN 123193-A; TEST # 61209 0� 0 200 400 600 800 1000 1200 1400 1600 1800 2000 2200 2400 2600 CAPACITY (U.S GALLONS PER MINUTE) 130 120 110 100 90 80 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 0 0 Vaughan Co., Inc., 364 Monte-Elma Road, Montesano, WA 98563 Phone 360-249-4042 Fax 360-249-6155 PERFORMANCE TEST CERTIFICATE CUSTOMER: POTTERY ROAD STATION, PORT ORCHARD, WA MODEL: SE6W-107 SERIAL # 123193 -B MOTOR: 60 HP, 74.9 Full Load Amps at 460 Volts HAN CO., INC. MOTOR SPEED: 1770 RPM PUMP SPEED: 1770 RPM October 3, 2014 REQUIRED PERFORMANCE: 1800 GPM @ 75' TDH ACCEPTABLE OPERATING RANGE: 650 to 2300 gpm SE6W-107 w/ 60 HP, 1770 RPM JOB MOTOR; SN 123193-B; TEST # 61210 ' - - TOTAL DYNAMIC HEAD (FT),- J __r_ - --_r__ ----- ~ -- - -- -- - ---- - � . , r_-__ __r__r__r__ , r r , , r J r - -' ~ ----------- -• -• - --r--r-,- �- -r- '--' DESIGN - - --;- 1800 GPM POINT: � 75' -`--`- TDK-�- �- i__J__1__ --'--�--;-- - -- -- --;-- --; - �-�-- - --r-- --r-r -,-- --t--r--r- ,--r-- --r--r-r- --,--r--r-- � - -- - r r-- --r--r-,-' - �-- '__J_- -_,--r -r-- --i--� --� -- --�--,--�-- - - i--i-- --*--r"r- --� --� --'- -- -- -- -- -- i-- -- ---- -- -- - -- ----- --=--+--�-- -- - -- -- -- -- - r -- - - -- -- - -- -------- -- -- - -- ----------------- r_r---- �__T__r__ r__r_ __t__t__r__ __r__r _ -_ ! , r r - - MOTOR CURRENT - (AMP$} - '__ r _ J__J_-__J__'__ „ L_ POWER (HP} r-- r, --r--r-,-- - --,--r--r- --r-,--,-- --r--r-- -r- -i•----•i--- --,,---- ----Fr-- - -- HEFFICIENCY (%Yrr __- - -- - -t- -- - -- - -- - - , --r--r-,-- ,--r--r-- --r-,--,-- --r--r--r- -- -r-- --� -,--,-- --r--r--r- --,--,--," -- - r -- -'r , T -r--r-� ' r r --r--r--r-- --r -,--,-- r r r --r--r--r- , , , � ,--r-- r r , --r--r--r- --,--,--r-- --r--r-,-- -- --r--r'-r-- -, -------- -r-r -,-- -------- ,------,--, --r--r-r- ----r-- --i--i'-i'- r-,-- --�- �-i-- 200 400 600 800 1000 1200 1400 1600 1800 2000 2200 2400 2600 CAPACITY (U.S GALLONS PER MINUTE) 130 120 110 100 90 80 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 0 0 Vaughan Co., Inc., 364 Monte-Elma Road, Montesano, WA 98563 Phone 360-249-4042 Fax 360-249-6155 PERFORMANCE TEST CERTIFICATE CUSTOMER: POTTERY ROAD STATION, PORT ORCHARD, WA tVA MODEL: SE6W-107 SERIAL # 123193 -C MOTOR: 60 HP, 74.9 Full Load Amps at 460 Volts AN CO., iNC. MOTOR SPEED: 1770 RPMf' PUMP SPEED: 1770 RPM October 3, 2014 REQUIRED PERFORMANCE: 1800 GPM @ 75' TDH ACCEPTABLE OPERATING RANGE: 650 to 2300 gpm SE6W-107 w/ 60 HP, 1770 RPM JOB MOTOR; SN 123193-C; TEST # 61211 - --- r ~ - i i TOTAL ; ; i DYNAMIC HEAD i FT} - - - - -i i J L -- -- -- -- - -- -- - -- r, --r'-r-,-- --L-�--J-- '-,-- -- --+--L-- - --r',--,-- - -+-- --r--r--,-- --1--L--L- , --,--,'-,-- --J--J--J-- -- r'-r--r- --L--L-�-- r-- --J--L--L-- --r'-r-,-- --�-J--�-- --,--r-_r-- -- -- -- -- -- , - -• -- � ,--,-- - -- -- -- - -- --r'_r--r- -- -- --�- --•--•--•- -',--,--,-- --•--�-� --r-'r_-r- - �--r-r- . -,--r-r-- --r --r -,-- --r--r--r -J--,--,-- --r--r- �-- --;--i--i-- l - --------- r r , •--. ---DESIGN DESIGN • :1800 GPM POINT: a� 75' -- TDFC_• r- - - - - ' - - - r, „ , r. ,--• r- __ -__T -_i r r r ,--, r T J____ __L_ !__ __i__.__1__ _- ----------------- __r__f_--- _ __r__r__ . - - - - - - . --;- , r -r - 1__L__L_ - , -,- _ !__i__�__ __-- . r _;-_L__L_ MOTOR CURRENT (A P , - , r r r -r - ,-- r POWER�(HP} ---J--J-- --L--L-- - - �- - -- --'-- r --J--J--L-- -L--;- - -- -- -- -- __ ------- -- r , __r__r_�__ --i--i--- ---- -- -- -- -- -- - --r--r -- -- --i-- - r __ r __L__ --- L__ _ !__J__J-_ EFFICIENCY-�If- --- __L__L_ !__ - __!__J__1__ , __L_-_! 1L_- J �- JLr-_ __ -'--' i__J__L__ __L_ . . . . . . . ................. . r r . . . __ i____ _ __ __ __ . . __ __ _ __ ____ . . __-__i__T__ _i__J__J__ __ f f t __L__L__L__ _J__J__J-_ __L__L__L_ __J__J__+__ __L__l_J__ __'__1__L__ __ ____ __ __1__ __ __ _ __ __ __ __ __ __L- __i__J__L__ __ 200 400 600 800 1000 1200 1400 1600 1800 2000 2200 2400 2600 CAPACITY (U.S GALLONS PER MINUTE) Vaughan Co., Inc., 364 Monte-Elma Road, Montesano, WA 98563 Phone 360-249-4042 Fax 360-249-6155 FACTORY MEGGER TEST CUSTOMER: \,*%ED p� POTTERY ROAD STATION, PORT ORCHARD, WA Spec # none �S Sold by: PumpTech Inc. UGHAN CO., INC.) PUMP: MODEL: SE6W-107 SERIAL # 123193 MOTOR VOLTS: 460 DESCRIPTION OF TEST: MEGGER TEST BEFORE RUNNING: CHECK FOR PROPER ROTATION: PUMP WATER FOR 15 MINUTES: MEGGER TEST AFTER RUNNING: OIL CHECKED, NO CONTAMINATION: Pump A Pump B Pump C ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ DATE: 6ccAev6, 2074 TESTED BY: Company: PumpTech, Inc. Name: McCormick Woods 1 PS Date: 3/3/2015 Pump: Size: S8L/S8LX Type: NCLOG-8 Synch speed: 1800 rpm Curve: S81_1750 Specific Speeds: Dimensions: Pump Limits: Temperature: 140 'F Pressure: 125 psi g Sphere size: 4 in ---- Data Point ---- Flow: 1000 US gpm Head: 125 ft Eff: 54% Power: 62.1 hp NPSHr: --- ---- Design Curve ---- Shutoff head: 132 ft Shutoff dP: 57.3 psi Min flow: 873 US gpm BEP: 71 % @ 2727 US gpm NOL power: 101 hp @ 3900 US gpm -- Max Curve -- Max power: 156 hp @ 3526 US gpm McCormick Woods 1 PS, Hydromatic, model S8LX, 75 hp, 1,000 gpm, 122fttdh, 12.13"x11.13" I',1?0 HYDROMATIC`R) Speed: 1750 rpm Dia: 12.375 in Impeller: Ns: --- Nss: --- Suction: --- Discharge: 8 in Power: --- Eye area: --- 200 180 160 140 120 m 2 100 80 60 40 20 Search Criteria: Flow: 1000 US gpm Head: 122 ft Fluid: Water Temperature: 60 'F Density: 62.37 Ib/ft3 Vapor pressure: 0.2563 psi a Viscosity: 1.105 cP Atm pressure: 14.7 psi a NPSHa: --- Motor: Consult HYDROMATIC to select a motor for this pump. 14.5 in 60 70 74 12.375 in � � 11.625 in —T 74 150 hp 7. 60 72 6 75 hp Ion hp Ouu iuuu IOuu Performance Evaluation: Flow Speed Head Efficiency US gpm rpm ft % 1200 1750 123 58 1000 1750 125 54 800 1750 --- --- 600 1750 --- --- 400 1750 --- --- H2Optimize Hydromatic 9 zuuu zOuu 3uuu JOuu 4uuu US gpm Power NPSHr hp ft 65.7 --- 62.1 --- Selected from catalog: Non -Clog Pumps 60Hz Vers: Nov 2009 12-12-2001 10:16AM FROM 360 769 9684 01- P. 4 low- Vaughan HP Series Chopper •tfauc 11 .1han , � Pumps PERFORMANCE CURVES Models: C6U S6U V6U H6U8 P6U8 6" Discharge 8" Suction 4 Blade Impeller PV -0 CURVE I HP F 15 10 7.5 SPEED IMPELLER IRPM ) DIA. 1170 11.75 1170 11.50 1170 10.90 1170 10.40 1170 9.40 1170 8.80 DO NOT OPERATE PUMP IN DOTTED PORTION OF CURVE. CURVES SUBJECT TO CHANGE WITHOUT NOTICE. CAPACITY (CUBIC METERS PER HOUR) 70 0 100 200 300 400 000- 60 so LU Lu LL 0 o 40 >_ 30 20 10 0 0 ... ....... ... .... .............. ........ ..... ........ ... .......... ... ...... ........ ................ ............ .. . ........ %6% ......... ................ . ......... ... . ............. ............. . .... .... ....... �Ilj .... ........ . ........... ".. '7 ......... .. . ....... . ....... .. ... . . .... ! ....... .. ........... .............. ....... . ....... ....... ... ............. ... ........ AL._..,,..._... J ............... .................. .......... 444, ... ......... . ........ . . ... .... ....... .... . ... ;w4 ....... .... ............. .... ... . ..... ! _J :_z ... ........... ... . ....... .......... I ... ............. ........ ... ... . .... .. ... I. . ........ ... . .... ............. .. . ... ... 7 20 is 10 ......... 5 ... ....... . . .. .... ...... .......... .................. ... ... 200 400 600 Soo 1 000,� 1200 1400 pm 16140 IcsomISM Jose, -,P"% CAPACITY (U.S. GALLONS PER MINUTE) FORM V0A7_174%A35 Apr 23 09 04:25p City of Port Orchard 360-876-4607 p,1 City rt Orchard PORT ORCHARD, WASHINGTON 98366 FAX COVER SHEET Date sent: - (? To: .4-4041,d r' Sc /��� Fax No.: Crnany� ��✓s �t i,y 7-1r, Subject: FL o[416',02 lei 9 c 4- 2 61,6; S L 7"F7- Sent by: 0,4y (} Remarks: Number of sheets transmitted (including coversheet) PUBLIC WORKS SHOP 360.876.2722 FAX 360.976.4607 Apr 23 09 04:26p City of Port Orchard 360-876-4607 p.2 PUMP STAT[ON DATA SHEET PROJECT: LOWES PORT ORCHARD LOCATION: PORT ORCHARD, WA DISTRIBUTOR: L.L. LINDBERG CO 9210 N E 621m AVE VANCOUVER, WA 98665 PH: 360-546-3992 STATION TYPE: MODEL 421 SUBMERSIBLE PUMP PACKAGE CONDITIONS OF SERVICE: DESIGN DUTY: 380 GPM a@ 72 ' TDH @ 1750 RPM PUMP DATA: PUMP MODEL: VAUGHAN CHOPPER PUMP MODEL SE41-2-460V-089 460 VOLT 13 PH / 60 HZ 20 HORSEPOWER 1750 RPM 8.90" TRIM 210TY FRAME SIN: 89453A / 89453B SERIAL NO. 61871 ENGINEER: PACLAND SEATTLE, WA PH: 206-522-9510 STARTUP DATE: DUPLEX PUMP CONTROLLER PANEL: L2 SYSTEMS, LLC 2420 38"" STREET, UNIT B EVERETT, WA 98201 PH: 425-258-2402 NOTES: C:HOMEIO&M%421 LIQUID: SEWAGE Apr 2: i 3 09 04;26p City of Port Orchard Models: HE4L6 PE4L6 SE4L 4E= Back -Pull -Out Casing 4 Blade impeller 4" Discharge DO NOT OPERATE PUMP IN DOTTED PORTION OF CURVES. CURVES 6" Suction SUBJECT TO CHANGE WITHOUT NOTICE. EFFICIENCIES SHOWN ARE NOMINAL. GUARANTIED MINIMUM EFFICIENCIES PER H.E. LEVEL B. CAPACITY (CUBIC METERS PER HOUR) 81) 11)n ign lAn ion qon lb nnn 360-876-4607 p.3 Vaughan E Series Chopper Pump PERFORMANCE CURVE 8( 7( I- w 6C w L Q Lij 50 x L) z 40 } ❑ Q 30 20 10 20 40 60 I I• 1 1 1 1 1 ' f l ; 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I I f l:; If , ', I 1;;; ' 1 '45%1 , 1 ♦ 1 1 1 [ ` 1 1 1 1 1 I 1 I , I 1 1 1 f I f t I B; , , � ' 11 f ° I ?I- r� -r- r i'�- -5 %�'�- - ,--'� i"i -r"'i--i--:-'r' 1 1 I I b 1 /°: _ �_L___ .L-: 1__ __ 1_1_ _ _1_ _J_J•. I. J_J_!_ .J !- ! ___ • 1 1 1 ♦ I 1 1 1 1 1 I I f 1 1 ' k 60% ' I, I I ,F 1 45% ! 1 -r-r-r-r- I I I -r-r-r-r-- _I r T-r-'T- -r-I--- I --i-I , -r t I r- >..-. t I l 1 I I 1 I f 11 1 I I 1 ♦ I t l I I I ' I 1 ' I 1 1 1 1 , I; �f 1 f 1 1 1 1 t I ;; 1 f I t 1 1 ; l i, l; l i I ti ♦ ; i l AL 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 ♦ 1 1 ♦ I 1 1 1 � 1 1 1 ` I 1 1� I ♦ .._ I I 1 _r_,._r.r. , I I 1 I 1 0 0 IUU cUU JUU 4UU 500 600 700 CAPACITY (U.S. GALLONS PER MINUTE) 26 24 22 20 rx 18 Uj 16 ❑ w 14 = U 12 z } 10 Q 8 0 4 1 0 800 900 1000 Form V370-4L-1750 4101 Apr 23 09 04:26p City of Port Orchard 360-876-4607 p.4 't4pta han i 3" - 6" E-Series Submersible Chopper Pumps Materials of Construction: Impeller/Upper Cutter/ Cutter Nut :............................... Cast Steel, heat treated to minimum Rockwell C 60. Cutter Bar:....... ........................ Plate Steel, heat treated to minimum 60 Rockwell C Hardness. Casing/Back Pull -Out Plate/ Guide Bracket/Elbow:............ Ductile Cast Iron. Mechanical Seal: ..................... Silicon carbide or tungsten carbide. Flange: ....... _........... ......_......... 150 lb. ANSI rated. Paint: ... . ............ ....................... Stainless Epoxy. czlrsCH SE IN FrYY 110 YEFMrfii IF 01SGHXb 3E -F 15071 DISCHARGE FL} W M1dOfORFLANGE DRAWINGS AND DIMENSIONS SUBJECT TO CHANGE WITHOUT NOTICE n DO NOT USE FOR CONSTRUCTION PURPOSES, CONTACT VAUGHAN FOR CERTIFIED CONSTRUCTION PRINTS. 3.1 MODEL A B' C D E F G H J K P SEW f SEW 5 6 3A 4 Tile 71/e 7 1s 9 hs 4°/,m 11 ifs 8 h 22 z/. 3 SL I SE3M 5'/: 6 fe S tSi 7 r!fi 7 tfs 9 7/is 4 °!� 10 T%t 9 /a 23'h 3 SE3V f SE3W 5 is 6 eft 5 ha 7 /b 7 h 9 /1e 4°/ss 10 e� 9 5/a 23'/a 3 3mMK 1 SE&L 6 i/ 7 .4 4 35 7 % 7'/s 914/W 4 B/,w 11 Hs 10 5S 24110 4 SE4P/SE4R 8 9'/. 4'lb 7 l� 7 !e 9 hs 4'/�s 12 92 Ya 28 7la 4 .SESU S A. 9'/s 61� 9 is 7 11 4'/u 14 5/s 13 '/. 2813,11816 15 MINUTE IN AIR FRAME SIZES ONt_Y FENi W tiP SPEED SEEMW 1170 180TY 17V.. 12% 25 1170 250TY 25% 17 kSPEED 1750 25 1750 1760 25 35 1170 210TY 21 "Is 15 % 30 1750 1170 30 $610 10 1760 4a 1750 15 1750 40 3510 16 3510 30 1170 320TY 25 % 18 % 20 1750 1750 20 9510 60 1750 15A 1170 250TY 257� 17 75 1750 W1170 FRAME F7TSPUMPMODELS 180TY ALL 3"- e PUMPS 210TY ALL W - 5" PUMPS 250TY ALL W - 5" PUMPS 320TY 3VaWf4Kf4Lf4Pf4Rf6U CURRENT U.S. PATENTS: No. 5,460,482; No, 5.460,483; No, 5.456, 580; I'lo. 5256AM: No. Vaughan Co., Inc. 5,076,757:No.4.840,384;No. 4,842,479. 364 Monte Elma Road CURRENT FOREIGN PAMITS: W 2 371 Montesano, WA 98563 834; No. 2188 138; No.1,290.981; No. 276224; Phone: 360-249-4042, FAX: 360-249-6155 No. 0774045. e-mail: info@chopperpumps.com OTHER F.4TENi5 PENDING, Apr t 0 0 ?6 City of Port Orchard 3 G8 8-4607 ps u 0 . _ 0 § § § O ( GoCq in Q. C:) .2 / ` < ( lz o o Ci _.d § C) §/ � � k &( � �gk \ §|$ G � . /\. § §2��■ � k # � )5 Apr 23 09 04:26p City of Port Orchard 360-876-4607 p.6 a ToW Eelieeer{fl SUITE A, Box 2 5823 N.E.MINDER RD. PBULSSD, WA 9e370 Pi@Ba 1360} 297.55613 FAX (3613) 297-7951 LETTER OF TRANSNHTTAL Date: APL L 2J5 T 2Oo! Re: _ 1 LDVVEiz- MEAt)DWS 'P>L(MP S-rA-ntDr`J To: -bEAtJ r.rjk- C-o LJC5 Remarks: tg-t5: - of pu8uc- Wks ?-�to �2osPf�S�• RECEIVED APR 2 6 2001 CITY OF PORT ORCHARD PUBLIC WORKS 'PLEASE r-r nr D C-LD A o F 77->r. j0u-M P ci. • � r ry - v � wry'• v r rvr v— T'vl�^ 1�4L-iYVC.-iL !`�C L �► r1Vfn/ � r --- - TttC— 2 elVI P5 . ,$iVD I F�P.c IVD Sons E7�t FiNG- r-�s� r ,-,j Rl-& you n , G-Cr A-164 6k- �Lrrf�S CALL- Ir14AA-s— By: Apr 23 09 04:27p City of Port Orchard 360-876-4607 p.7 -TOTAL. kj�D . . ....... - --------- py, 14n"v-Lv -pesi6W RjD%A nil ip S7T—A T-1 0" ---- -------- 2AE:* gel,, D15CA4)C�W46 &L acie ee,*j EeD .4-( 2.81 ... . ...... T -DES I -?(A sue`-npt\] Apr 23 09 04:27p City of Port Orchard 360-876-4607 p.8 � 7/z8/oa � �� ��.Owra2- M � /k-►�. �ti� S Awl.:. '. V%j O t1 F)t,c ,tif r' G �v !� 0 jr-: F s Z - j 'Z/ S, C r� l t`�-►� t/� 1z �Slen1 A G E vV D rti--1L- S, J nL- % C-,At-,� -Ai, TS P' C. AVDA L t ti Cr �JF J p GP rj mot. GA-> l b P15 G A-. X M !-1 V i `TD VJ G2. L i—Z.L7() J"Z, I�r '�. � � C Y 1. 1 F.'T Tw f F=d 1 1 •_ �itl : � I / �� '�r`i � 'ice FEW ��� �%�.+ Apr 23 09 04:27p City of Port Orchard 360-876-4607 P.9 - (0 LU w ui U) z X 0 CD w C) a. CL 0 go one maa Immom n; is -N 11111111 1 111111 BIEN W11111 N111I E111111in N lli m111 g 11 11 11 1 1 111111MI11EN11Me11Effi01Nl1 i101 s olI 111111ml no 1N1111111ml i ffillff11 1011111111111 1111111191 RON I a IN1111111111011 IM1111111111111 101NOTAIN B1111111NIM111 I (D C� 0 0 cn,- C D LO 0 LO a LO CNI 0 -n Irm rip CL Apr 23 09 04:27p City of Port Orchard 360-876-4607 p.10 �4-SL .—' zr p , 702 3 61 /& C, Z i — 40 ,� = 2 , 2 PPS 2�'X? RGRAPUMP rpu- TnW- HYnR❑ Company: PumpTech, Inc. Name: Golden Pond PS Date: 3/3/2015 Pump: Size: HPGF/H/X-750 Type: GRINDER-SUBM Synch speed: 1800 rpm Curve: Specific Speeds: Dimensions: Pump Limits: Temperature: 140 °F Pressure: --- Sphere size: --- ---- Data Point ---- Flow: 137 US gpm Head: 78.5 ft Eff: --- % Power: 7.51 hp NPSHr: --- ---- Design Curve ---- Shutoff head: 107 ft Shutoff dP: 46.2 psi Min flow: 0 US gpm BEP: --- % NOL power: 7.51 hp @ 10 US gpm -- Max Curve -- Max power: 7.51 hp @ 10 US gpm Golden Pond PS, Hydromatic, model HPGHX750FD, 7.5 hp, 137 gpm, 78 ft tdh, S.O. 5 VANE impeller Ir,0 HYDROMATIC`", Speed: 1750 rpm Dia: 10.4375 in Impeller: Ns: --- Nss: --- Suction: --- Discharge: 2 in Power: --- Eye area: --- 110 10.5 in 100 90 $ 80 am 2 70 60 50 40 Performance Evaluation: Flow Speed US gpm rpm 164 1750 137 1750 110 1750 82.2 1750 54.8 1750 H2Optimize Hydromatic 9 Search Criteria: Flow: 137 US gpm Head: 78 ft Fluid: Water Temperature: 60 °F Density: 62.37 Ib/ft3 Vapor pressure: 0.2563 psi a Viscosity: 1.105 cP Atm pressure: 14.7 psi a NPSHa: --- Motor: Consult HYDROMATIC to select a motor for this pump. 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 US gpm Head Efficiency Power NPSHr ft % hp ft 64 --- 7.51 --- 78.5 --- 7.51 --- 86.3 --- 7.51 --- 92.1 --- 7.51 --- 97.4 --- 7.51 --- Selected from catalog: Grinder Pumps 60Hz Vers: Nov 2009 Company: PumpTech, Inc. Name: Canyon Court PS, Date: 3/3/2015 Pump: Size: HPGHHX Type: GRINDER-SUBM Synch speed: 3600 rpm Curve: Specific Speeds: Dimensions: Pump Limits: Temperature: --- Pressure: --- Sphere size: --- ---- Data Point ----il Flow: 50 US gpm Head: 150 ft Eff: --- % Power: 4.67 hp NPSHr: --- ---- Design Curve ---- Shutoff head: 185 ft Shutoff dP: 80.1 psi Min flow: --- BEP: --- % NOL power: 5.75 hp @ 91.3 US gpm -- Max Curve -- Max power: 6.88 hp @ 120 US gpm Canyon Court PS, Hydromatic, model HPGHHX750, 7.5 hp, 50 gpm, 150fttdh 1',1?0 HYDROMATIC`R) Search Criteria: Flow: 50 US gpm Head: 150 ft Speed: 3450 rpm Fluid: Dia: 6.75 in Impeller: Water Temperature: 60 °F 3 Density: 62.37 lb/ft Vapor pressure: 0.2563 psi a Ns: --- Viscosity: 1.105 cP Atm pressure: 14.7 psi a Nss: --- NPSHa: --- Suction: --- Discharge: --- Motor: Consult HYDROMATIC to select a motor for this pump. Power: --- Eye area: --- 200 180 160 140 120 y 100 2 80 60 40 20 0 6.87 in 6.75 in 5 in 2 hp US gpm Performance Evaluation: Flow Speed Head Efficiency Power NPSHr US gpm rpm ft % hp ft 60 3450 143 --- 4.95 --- 50 3450 150 --- 4.67 --- 40 3450 156 --- 4.39 --- 30 3450 163 --- 4.19 --- 20 3450 170 --- 4.01 --- H2Optimize Hydromatic 9 Selected from catalog: Grinder Pumps 60Hz Vers: Nov 2009 Appendix F Discharge Permits STAT,S o L O ka �t• � is '3 •1�: STATE OF WASHINGTON DEPARTMENT OF ECOLOGY Northwest Regional Office a 3190 160th Ave SE a Bellevue, WA 98008-5452 0 425-649-7000 711 for Washington Relay Service a Persons with a speech disability can call 877-833-6341 - June 3, 2015 Mr. Philip Perley Waste Management Closed Site Management Group 9081 Tujuna Avenue Sun Valley, WA 91352 Dear Mr. Perley: Re: State Waste Discharge Permit No. ST0007271 Ecology has completed processing your state waste discharge permit. The draft permit and fact sheet are enclosed for your consideration in evaluating the factual content of each document. Please review your permit and fact sheet and provide comments to this office by July 3, 2015. Comments should address factual and editorial error associated with the fact sheet, permit and logical assumptions expressed. Return your comments to the following address: Washington Department of Ecology Northwest Regional Office Water Quality Permit Coordinator 3190 160th Avenue SE Bellevue, WA 98008-5452 If you have any further questions, please contact Doug Knutson at (425) 649-7025 or e-mail him at dknu461 cni cey. va. og_v Sincerely, , Tricia Miller Permit Coordinator Northwest Regional Office By Certified Mail 7013 3020 0002 0603 1325 cc: Randy Screws, City of Port Orchard WWTP Pat Coxon, City of Bremerton WWTP Bev Poston, Permit Fee Unit Doug Knutson, Facility Manager Central Files: Olympic View Sanitary Landfill; ST-7271; WQ 13 Page 1 of 26 Permit No. ST0007271 Issuance Date: XX XX, 20XX Effective Date: XX XX, 20XX Expiration Date: XX XX, 20XX State Waste Discharge Permit Number ST0007271 State of. Washington DEPARTMENT OF ECOLOGY Northwest Regional Office 3190 - 160th Avenue SE Bellevue, WA 98008-5452 In compliance with the provisions of the State of Washington Water Pollution Control Law Chapter 90.48 Revised Code of Washington, as amended, Waste Management of Washington, Inc. - Olympic View Sanitary Landfill 9081 Tujunga Avenue Sun Valley, CA 91352 is authorized to discharge wastewater in accordance with the special and Facility Location: Olympic View Sanitary Landfill 10015 SW Barney White Road Bremerton, WA 98312-4935 POTWs Receiving Discharge: • City of Bremerton Wastewater Treatment Facility (West Plant) — NPDES Permit Number WA0029289 • City of Port Orchard/West Sound Utility District Wastewater Treatment Facility (South Kitsap Water Reclamation Facility (SKWRF)) — NPDES Permit Number WA0020346 d conditions which follow: Indust Type. Landfill SIC Code: 4953 NAICS: 56212 Industrial User Classification: Non -Categorical Significant Industrial User Kevin C. Fitzpatrick Water Quality Section Manager Northwest Regional Office Washington State Department of Ecology ST0007271—OlympicViewLandfill—DraffPermit-2015-05-27.docx DRAFT Department of Ecology—D Knutson Page 2 of 26 Permit No. ST0007271 TABLE OF CONTENTS Summaryof Permit Report Submittals......................................................................................... 4 Special Conditions .......................................................................................................................... 5 S1. Discharge limits..................................................................................................... 5 S2. Monitoring requirements..................................................................................... 6 S2.A. .............................................. Monitoring requirements ............ I.......... ...................7 S2.B. Sampling and analytical procedures.......................................................................8 SIC. Flow measurement and meters...............................................................................9 SID. Laboratory accreditation.........................................................................................9 S3. Reporting and recording requirements.............................................................. 9 S3.A. Reporting ............................................................................................................9 S3.13. Records retention.................................................................................................. I I SIC. Recording of results.............................................................................................. I I SID. Additional monitoring by the Permittee...............................................................I I S3.E. Reporting permit violations..................................................................................11 S3.F. Other reporting.....................................................................................................13 SIG. Maintaining a copy of this permit.........................................................................14 S3.H. Dangerous waste discharge notification...............................................................14 S3.I. Spill notification........................................................................................I......14 S4. Operation and maintenance...............................................................................14 S4.A. Bypass procedures................................................................................................14 S4.B. Best management practices/pollution prevention program........ I..........................16 S5. Prohibited discharges.........................................................................................18 S5.A. General prohibitions.............................................................................................18 S5.B. Specific prohibitions.............................................................................................18 S5.C. Prohibited unless approved ..................... S6. Dilution prohibited..............................................................................................19 S7. Solid waste disposal.............................................................................................19 STA. Solid waste handling.............................................................................................19 S7.13. Leachate................................................................................................................19 S8. Application for permit renewal or modification for facility changes ............. 19 S9. Non -routine and unanticipated discharges.......................................................19 S10. Slug discharge control plan.............................................................20 S 10.A. Slug discharge control plan requirements .............................................. 20 S 10.B. Slug discharge control plan components ....................................... 20 GeneralConditions...................................................................................................................... 21 G1. Signatory requirements...................................................................................... 21 G2. Right of entry....................................................................................................... 22 G3. Permit actions...................................................................................................... 22 G4. Reporting a cause for modification................................................................... 22 ST0007271_OiympicViewLandfill_DrattPermit-2015-05-27.doex DRAFT Department of Ecology_D Knutson Page 3 of 26 Permit No. ST0007271 G5. Plan review required........................................................................................... 23 G6. Compliance with other laws and statutes......................................................... 23 G7. Transfer of this permit....................................................................................... 23 GS. Reduced production for compliance................................................................. 23 G9. Removed substances........................................................................................... 23 G10. Payment of fees.................................................................................................... 24 G11. Penalties for violating permit conditions.......................................................... 24 G12. .Duty to provide information.............................................................................. 24 G13. Duty to comply.................................................................................................... 24 AppendixA................................................................................................................................... 25 ST0007271—OlympicViewLandfll_DraftPermit_2015-05-27.docx DRAFT Department of Ecology_D Knutson Page 4 of 26 Permit No. ST0007271 Summary of Permit Report Submittals Refer to the Special and General Conditions of this permit for additional submittal requirements. Fermjt Submittal ,�First Frequency77 Submittal bake-:' SectEon '`, - S&A. Monthly Discharge Monitoring Report Monthly XX XX, 20XX S3.A. Annual Priority Pollutant Organic Annually XX XX, 20XX Com ound Scan LaboratoDj Report S3.E.a. Reporting Permit Violations As necessary Immediately for violations which may endanger health or environment S3.E.b. Reporting Permit Violations As necessary Within 24 hours of becoming aware of overflows, violations of permit standards, overflows rior to treatment works S3.E.c. Reporting Permit Violations As necessary Within five days of becoming aware of violations reportable under S3.E.a. and S3.E.b. S3.F.a. Other Reporting- Spills of Hazardous As necessary In accordance with Waste and Oil deadlines established under WAC 173-303 S3.F.b. Other Reporting -Submittals to Remedy As necessary Promptly Failure to Submit Material Information S4.B. Reporting Bypasses As necessa See provisions of SA.B.3 S8. Application for Permit Renewal 11 ermit cycle XX XX, 20XX G1.3. Signatory Requirements (Notification of As necessary No later than simultaneous Change of Signatory Authority) with submittal of first document submittal under new signatory authority G4. Permit Application for Substantive As necessary No later than 60 days prior Changes to the Discharge to adoption of substantive change G5. Engineering Report for Construction or As necessary 60 days prior to the planned Modification Activities start of construction 07, Notice of Permit Transfer As necessary No later than date of transfer G10. Duty to Provide Information As necessary Within a reasonable time ST0007271_01ympicViewl-andfill_DrafiPermit 2015-05-27.docx DRAFT Department of Ecology_D Knutson Page 5 of 26 Permit No. ST0007271 Special Conditions S1. Discharge limits All discharges and activities authorized by this permit must comply with the terms and conditions of this permit. The discharge of any of the following pollutants more frequently than, or at a concentration in excess of, that authorized by this permit violates the terms and conditions of this permit. A discharge of a pollutant in excess of local limits set by City of Bremerton, for those. discharges which are made to the City of Bremerton POTW, violates the terns and conditions of this permit. A discharge of a pollutant in excess of local limits set by City of Port Orchard, or the West Sound Utility District, for those discharges which are made to the City of Port Orchard POTW violates the terms and conditions of this permit. Beginning on the effective date of this permit and lasting through the expiration date of this permit, the Permittee is authorized to discharge wastewater consisting of landfill leachate, sample well purge water, and related stonmwater, to the City of Bremerton POTW (West Plant) from Outfall 001, and the City of Port Orchard (West Sound Utility District POTW --- South Kitsap Reclamation Facility) sanitary sewer system from Outfall 002, subject to the following limits: Effl�fent.Limits.:'. Outfatf # 001 Discharge to City of Bremerton PQTW Latitude: 474957 rie'"reesNorth- ,Lon' itude. 122.79Q5 agrees:. West ., :Parameter . Maxirriern Dail .b ,. Flow, gpd 200,000 BOD5i m IL r 400 TSS, m /L 9 425 Copper, T, m 1L ° 0.75 Nickel, T, m IL ` 0.60 Zinc, T, m IL ` 2.0 Priority Pollutant Volatile Organic Compound Scan d Monitor Only Parameter ;> ., vMinimum , . - Maximum. ` .. pH (standard pH units) 6.0 1( a The monitoring point for outfall number 001 is the wastewater in the pond at the point of withdrawal for transfer to the truck immediately prior to removal from the pond, or from the truck immediately prior to haulage to the City Bremerton POTW, The grab sample must consist of leachate collected from the pond or truck which is representative of the wastewater being shipped to the POTW. The coordinates refer to the truck load -out point SW of the pond. Sample Points 001 and 002 are both the same location, but have been assigned different numbers to identify the POTW to which the load is being hauled. b The term maximum daily effluent limit means the highest allowable daily discharge. The daily discharge means the discharge of a pollutant measured during a calendar day. For pollutants with limits expressed in units of mass or volume, the daily discharge is the total mass or volume of the pollutant discharged over the day. For limits with concentration -based units of measurement (such as mg1L), the daily discharge is the average measurement of the pollutant over the day. This does not apply to H. ` The term T following the name of a metal indicates the total form of the metal as opposed to the dissolved form of the metal. ST0007271—OiympieViewLandfill_DraftPermit-2015-05-27.docx DRAFT Department of Ecology_D Knutson Page 6 of 26, Permit No. ST0007271 ° The priority pollutant volatile organic compound scan must consist of an assay of purgeable priority pollutant compounds using USEPA Method 624. (The Permittee is authorized to utilize analytical methods which are'equivalent to USEPA Methods 624, with respect to detection limits.) The Permittee is not required to report the results of the organic chemical priority pollutant scan on the Discharge Monitoring Report forms, but is instead required to submit the laboratory report with the Discharge Monitoring Report forms for the applicable monitoring period. The laboratory report must contain a list of the analytical results for each individual purgeable chemical compound amenable to quantification using the above -referenced analytical method. I e The term TSS indicates total suspended solids. r The term BODS indicates five-day biochemical oxygen demand. The Permittee must comply with any request by the City of Bremerton POTW that the BOD or flow loading be reduced. pH (standard pH units) a The monitoring point for outfall number 002 is the wastewater in the pond at the point of withdrawal for transfer to the truck immediately prior to removal from the pond, or from the truck immediately prior to haulage to the City of City of Port OrchardiWest Sound Utility District POTW. The grab sample must consist of leachate collected from the pond or truck which is representative of the wastewater being shipped to the POTW. The coordinates refer to the truck load -out point SW of the pond. Sample Points 001 and 002 are both the same location, but have been assigned different numbers to identify the POTW to which the load is being hauled. b The term maximum daily effluent limit means the highest allowable daily discharge. The daily discharge means the discharge of a pollutant measured during a calendar day. For pollutants with limits expressed in units of mass or volume, the daily discharge is the total mass or volume of the pollutant discharged over the day. For limits with concentration -based units of measurement (such as mg/t_), the daily discharge is the average measurement of the pollutant over the day. This does not apply to pH. The term Tfollowing the name of a metal indicates the total form of the metal as opposed to the .dissolved form of the metal. d The priority pollutant volatile organic compound scan must consist of an assay of purgeable priority pollutant compounds using USEPA Method 624 (The Permittee is authorized to utilize analytical methods which are equivalent to USEPA Methods 624, with respect to detection limits.). The Permittee is not required to report the results of the organic chemical priority pollutant scan on the Discharge Monitoring Report forms, but is instead required to submit the laboratory report with the Discharge Monitoring Report forms for the applicable monitoring period. The laboratory report must contain a list of the analytical results for each individual purgeable chemical compound amenable to quantification using the above -referenced analytical method. The term TSS indicates total suspended solids. f The term BODS indicates five-day biochemical oxygen demand. The Permittee must comply with any request by the South Kitsap Water Reclamation Facility POTW that the BOD or flow loading be reduced. ST0007271_OlympicViewLandfill_DraftPermit_2015-05-27.docx DRAFT Department of Ecology_D Knutson Page 7 of 26 Permit No. ST0007271 S2. Monitoring requirements S2,A. Monitoring requirements The Permittee must monitor its wastewater discharge in accordance with the following schedule and the requirements specified in Appendix A. Monftorrng Requirements Discharge to City of Bremerton ROTW Sample Poiri t]01 Latitude: 48.1708:de `tees Norif� Lori"itude.`.122.14$2 de €ees`West - Pollutant Parameter ', - Sarrf tin 'Pre raenc = Sam le T e' Flow, gpd Daily Estimate BOD5, mg/L Monthly Grab e," TSS, mg/L" Monthly Grab" Copper, T, mg/L b, f Monthly Grab " Nickel, T, mg/L b,f Monthly Grab" Zinc, T, mg/L Monthly Grab" Priority Pollutant Volatile Organic Compound Scan d Annually Grab pH (standard pH units) a Monthly Grab" a The monitoring point for outfall number 001 is the wastewater in the pond at the point of withdrawal for transfer to the truck immediately prior to removal from the pond, or from the truck immediately prior to haulage to the City Bremerton POTW. The grab sample must consist of leachate collected from the pond or truck which is representative of the wastewater being shipped to the POTW. b The term T following the name of a metal indicates the total form of the metal as opposed to the dissolved form of the metal. The volume hauled must be recorded in a log which lists each load hauled, and the volume contained in each load. The Permittee must report the flow which occurred on the day during which the maximum flow for the monthly reporting occurred, d The priority pollutant volatile organic compound scan must.consist of an assay of purgeable priority pollutant compounds using USEPA Method 624 (The Permittee is authorized to utilize analytical methods which are equivalent to USEPA Methods 624, with respect to detection limits.). The Permittee is not required to report the results of the organic chemical priority pollutant scan on the Discharge Monitoring Report forms, but is instead required to submit the laboratory report with the Discharge Monitoring Report forms for the applicable monitoring period. The laboratory report must contain a list of the analytical results for each individual purgeable chemical compound amenable to quantification using the above -referenced analytical method. e The Permittee must use Method 5210B (reference: Standard Methods for the Examination of Water and Wastewater, 20`" Edition) orequivalent with respect to method detection limit for analysis of BOD5. f The Permittee must use Method 200.8 for analysis of copper, nickel, and zinc. " The term Grab means an individual sample collected over a fifteen 15 -minute, or less, period. The terra TSS indicates total suspended solids. The term BOD5 indicates five-day biochemical oxygen demand. The Permittee must comply with any request by the City of Bremerton POTW that the BOD or flow loading be reduced. ST0007271_0lympicViewLandrill_DraftPermit_2015-05-27.docx DRAFT Department of Ecology_D Knutson Page 8 of 26 Permit No. ST0007271 Monitoring Requirements Discharge to South Kit_san Water Re,clamatioa Facility POTW Sample _Point 002 Latitude: 48.1708 degrees North Longi#ude . 22 1482 . e rees Wesf Pollutant Parameter -`; SampUng )~requenicy . . ; , Sample T pe Flow, gpd Daily Estimate; BOD$, m fL' Monthly Grab e TSS, m IL h Monthly Grab' Copper, T, m /L b' f Monthly Grab d'g Nickel, T, m 1L b' i Monthly Grab d'g Zinc, T, mg/L b, } Monthl Grab d,g Priority Pollutant Volatile Organic Compound Scan d Annually Grab d,g pH (standard pH units) I Monthly Grab g a The monitoring point for outfall number 002 is the wastewater in the pond at the point of withdrawal for transfer to the truck immediately prior to removal from the pond, or from the truck immediately prior to haulage to the South Kitsap Water Reclamation Facility (City of Port OrchardA/Vest Sound Utility District POTW). The grab sample must consist of leachate collected from the pond or truck which is representative of the wastewater being shipped to the POTW. b The term Tfollowing the name of a metal indicates the total form of the metal as opposed to the dissolved form of the metal. ` The volume hauled must be recorded in a log which lists each load hauled, and the volume contained in each load. The Permittee must report the flow which occurred on the day during which the maximum flow for the monthly reporting occurred. d The priority pollutant volatile organic compound scan must consist of an assay of purgeable priority pollutant compounds using USEPA Method 624 (The Permittee is authorized to utilize analytical methods which are equivalent to USEPA Methods 624, with respect to detection limits.). The Permittee is not required to report the results of the organic chemical priority pollutant scan on the Discharge Monitoring Report forms, but is instead required to submit the laboratory report with the Discharge Monitoring Report forms for the applicable monitoring period. The laboratory report must contain a list of the analytical results for each individual purgeable chemical compound amenable to quantification using the above -referenced analytical method. e The Permittee must use Method 6210B (reference: Standard Methods for the Examination of Water and Wastewater, 201h Edition) ore uivalent with respect to method detection limit for analysis of BOD$. 1 The Permittee must use Method 200.8 for analysis of copper, nickel, and zinc. g The term Grab means an individual sample collected over a fifteen 15 -minute, or less, period. The term TSS indicates total suspended solids. ' The term BODb indicates five-day biochemical oxygen demand. The Permittee must comply with any re nest b the South Kitsa Water Reclamation Facility POTW that the BOD or flow loading be reduced. The Permittee must record the volume hauled in a log which lists each load hauled, and the volume contained in each load. S2.B. Sampling and analytical procedures Samples and measurements taken to meet the requirements of this permit must represent the volume and nature of the monitored parameters, including representative sampling of any unusual discharge or discharge condition, including bypasses, upsets and maintenance -related conditions affecting effluent quality. ST0007271_OlympicViowl_andfll_DraftPermit_2015-05-27.docx DRAFT Department of Ecology_D Knutson Page 9 of 26 Permit No. ST0007271 S3. Sampling and analytical methods used to meet the water and wastewater monitoring requirements specified in this permit must conform to the latest revision of the following rules arid documents unless otherwise specified in this permit or approved in writing by Ecology. • Guidelines Establishing Test Procedures for the Analysis of Pollutants contained in 40 CFR Part 136. • Standard Methods for the Examination of Water and Wastewater (APHA). S2.C. ,Flow measurement and meters The Permittee must: 1. Select and use appropriate flow measurement, and continuous'monitoring devices and methods consistent with accepted scientific practices" 2. Install, calibrate, and maintain these devices to ensure the accuracy of the measurements is consistent with the accepted industry standard and the manufacturer's recommendation for that type of device. 3. Use field measurement devices as directed by the manufacturer and do not use reagents beyond their expiration dates. 4. Calibrate these devices at the frequency recommended by the manufacturer, 5. Maintain calibration records for at least three years. S2.D. Laboratory accreditation The Permittee must ensure that all monitoring data required by Ecology for permit -specified parameters is prepared by a laboratory registered or accredited under the provisions of chapter 173-50 WAC, Accreditation of Environmental Laboratories. Flow, pH, and internal process control parameters are exempt from this requirement. Reporting and recording requirements The Permittee must monitor and report in accordance with the following conditions. Falsification of information submitted to Ecology is a violation of the terms and conditions of this permit. S3.A. Reporting The first monthly monitoring period comprises the period consisting of XX XX, 20XX, through XX XX, 20XX. The Permittee must: Summarize, report, and submit monitoring data obtained during each monitoring period on the electronic Discharge Monitoring Report (DMR) form provided by Ecology within WAWebDMR. Include data for each of the parameters tabulated in Special Condition S2 and as required by the form. Report a value for each day sampling occurred (unless specifically exempted in the permit) and for the summary values (when applicable) included on the electronic form. To find out more information and to sign up for WAWebDMR go to: http://www.ecy.wa.govlprogramstwg/permits/paris/webdmr.html ST000727I-01ympicViewLandfill—DraftPermit_2015-05-27.docx DRAFT Department of Ecology_D Knutson Page 10 of 26 Permit No. ST0007271 If the Permittee is unable to submit electronically (for example, if you do not have an internet connection), the Permittee must contact Ecology to request a waiver and obtain instructions on how to obtain a paper copy DMR. 2. Enter the "no discharge" reporting code for an entire DMR, for a specific monitoring point, or for a specific parameter as appropriate, if the Permittee did not discharge wastewater or a specific pollutant during a given monitoring period. 3. Report single analytical values below the detection level as less than the detection level (DL) by entering "<" followed by the numeric value of the detection level (e.g. "< 2.0") on the DMR. If the method used did not meet the minimum DL and quantitation level (QL) identified in the permit, report the actual QL and DL in the comments or in the location provided. 4. Calculate average values (unless otherwise specified in the permit) using: a. The reported numeric value for all parameters measured between the agency -required detection level and the agency -required quantitation value. b. One-half the detection level (for values reported below the detection level) if the laboratory detected the parameter in another sample for the reporting period. c. Zero (for values reported below the detection limit) if the laboratory did not detect the parameter in another sample for the reporting period. 5. Report the test method used for analysis in the comments if the laboratory used an alternative method not specified in the permit and as allowed in Appendix A of this permit. 6. Ensure that DMRs are electronically submitted no later than the dates specified below, unless otherwise specified in this permit, 7. Submit DMRs for parameters with the monitoring frequencies specified in S2. (e.g. monthly, quarterly, annual, etc.) at the reporting schedule identified below. The Permittee must: a. Submit monthly DMRs by the 28`h day of the following month. The first monthly DMR is due April 28, 2015. The Peirnittee must also send a copy of Discharge Monitoring Report submittals to the City of Bremerton Public Works Department '(foz.IDMIZ rporhng perigcls when dfseha�ge b. The results of 1/year sampling for organic priority pollutants must be reported by submitting the laboratory analytical report no later than January 28 of each year. The Permittee is not required to submit a DMR for the organic priority pollutant scan, but must instead submit an electronic pdf facsimile of the organic priority pollutant scan as an attachment to the January DMR. ST0007271_OlympicViewLandfilI—DraftPermit_2015-05-27.docx DRAFT Department of Ecology D Knutson Page 11 of 26 Permit No. ST0007271 8. Submit reports to Ecology online using Ecology's electronic WAWebDMR submittal forms (electronic DMRs) as required above. Send paper reports to Ecology at: Water Quality Permit Coordinator Department of Ecology Northwest Regional Office 3190 -160th Avenue SE Bellevue, WA 98008-5452 S3.B. Records retention The Permittee must retain records of all monitoring information for a minimum of three years. Such information must include all calibration and maintenance records and all original recordings for continuous monitoring instrumentation, copies of all reports required by this permit, and records of all data used to complete the application for this permit. The Permittee must extend this period of retention during the course of any unresolved litigation regarding the discharge of pollutants by the Permittee or when requested by Ecology. S3.0 Recording of results For each measurement or sample taken, the Permittee must record the following information: 1. The date, exact place, method, and time of sampling or measurement. 2. The individual who performed the sampling or measurement. 3. The dates the analyses were performed. 4. The individual who performed the analyses. 5. The analytical techniques or methods used. 6. The results of all analyses. M.D. Additional monitoring by the Permittee If the Permittee monitors any pollutant more frequently than required by Condition S2 of this permit, then the Permittee must include the results of such monitoring in the calculation and reporting of the data submitted in the Permittee's DMR unless otherwise specified by Condition S2. S3.E. Reportingperrnit violations The Permittee must take the following actions when it violates or is unable to comply with any permit condition: 1. Immediately take action to stop, contain, and cleanup unauthorized discharges or otherwise stop the noncompliance and correct the problem. 2. If applicable, immediately repeat sampling and analysis. Submit the results of any repeat sampling to Ecology within thirty (30) days of sampling. 5T0007271_OlympicViewLandfill_DraftPermit 2015-05-27.docx DRAFT Department of Ecology_D Knutson Page 12 of 26 Permit No. ST0007271 a. Immediate reporting The Permittee must report any noncompliance that may endanger health or the environment immediately to the Department of Ecology's Regional Office 24-hour number listed below, as well as to the POTW receiving the non -compliant discharge. • Department of Ecology Northwest Regional Office at 425-649-7000. • City of Bremerton Public Works Department — for discharge to this plant. • West Sound Utility District — for discharge to the South Kitsap Water Reclamation Facility. • Department of Health, Shellfish Program: 360-236-3330 (business hours) or 360=786-8962 (after business hours). • Kitsap County Health District: 360-337-5235 (business hours) or 360-415-2005 (after hours pager). b. Twenty -four-hour reporting The Permittee must report the following occurrences of noncompliance by telephone, to Ecology at the telephone number listed above, and to the City of Bremerton or West Sound Utility District, within 24 hours from the time the Permittee becomes aware of any of the following circumstances. The Permittee must report: 1. Any noncompliance that may endanger health or the environment, unless previously reported under immediate reporting requirements. 2. Any unanticipated bypass that causes an exceedance of an effluent limit in the permit (See Part S4.A., "Bypass Procedures"). 3. Any upset that causes an exceedance of an effluent limit in the permit. Upset means an exceptional incident in which there is unintentional and temporary noncompliance with technology -based permit effluent limits because of factors beyond the reasonable control of the Permittee. An upset does not include noncompliance to the extent caused by operational error, improperly designed treatment facilities, inadequate treatment facilities, lack of preventive maintenance, or careless or improper operation. 4. Any violation of a maximum daily or instantaneous maximum discharge limit for any of the pollutants in Section Sl.A of this permit. 5. Any overflow prior to the treatment works, whether or not such overflow endangers health or the environment or exceeds any effluent limit in the permit. c. Report within five days The Permittee must also submit a written report within five days of the time that the Permittee becomes aware of any reportable event under subparts a or b, above. The report must contain: ST0007271WolympicMewl-andfiII—Draft Pe rmit_2015-05-27.docx DRAFT Department of Ecology_D Knutson Page 13 of 26 Permit No. ST0007271 I. A description of the noncompliance and its cause. 2. The period of noncompliance, including exact dates and times. 3. The estimated time the Permittee expects the noncompliance to continue if not yet corrected, 4. Steps taken or planned to reduce, eliminate, and prevent recurrence of the noncompliance. S. If the noncompliance involves an overflow prior to the treatment works, an estimate of the quantity (in gallons) of untreated overflow. d. Waiver of written reports Ecology may waive the written report required in subpart c, above, on a case -by -case basis upon request if the Permittee has submitted a timely oral report. e. All other permit violation reporting The Permittee must report all permit violations, which do not require immediate or within 24 hours reporting, when it submits monitoring reports for S3.A ("Reporting"). The reports must contain the information listed in subpart c, above. Compliance with these requirements does not relieve the Permittee from responsibility to maintain continuous compliance with the terms and conditions of this permit or the resulting liability for failure to comply. f. Report submittal The Permittee must submit reports to: Water Quality Program Department of Ecology Northwest Regional Office 3190 -160th Avenue SE Bellevue, WA 98008-5452 SI F. Other reporting a. Spills of oil or hazardous materials The Permittee must report a spill of oil or hazardous materials in accordance with the requirements of RCW 90.56.290 and chapter 173-303-145. You can obtain further instructions at the following website: http:l/www.ecy.wa.gov/programs/spills/othertreportaspill.htm . b. Failure to submit relevant or correct facts Where the Permittee becomes aware that it failed to submit any relevant facts in a permit application, or submitted incorrect information in a permit application, or in any report to Ecology, it must submit such facts or information promptly. ST0007271rOlympicViewLandfif(_DraflPermit_2015-05-27.docx DRAFT Department of Ecology_D Knutson Page 14 of 26 Permit No. ST0007271 S3.G. Maintaining a copy of this permit The Permittee must keep a copy of this permit at the facility and make it available upon request to Ecology inspectors. S3.H. Dangerous waste discharge notification The Permittee must notify the publicly owned treatment works (POTW) and Ecology in writing of the intent to discharge into the POTW any substance designated as a dangerous waste in accordance with the provisions of WAC 173-303-070. It must make this notification at least 90 days prior to the date that it proposes to initiate the discharge. The Permittee must not discharge this substance until authorized by Ecology and the POTW. It must also comply with the notification requirements of Special Condition S8 and General Condition G4. S3.L Spill notification The Permittee must notify the POTW immediately (as soon as discovered) of all discharges that could cause problems to the POTW, such as process spills and unauthorized discharges (including slug discharges). S4. Operation and maintenance The Permittee must, at all times, properly operate and maintain all facilities or systems of treatment and control (and related appurtenances) which are installed to achieve compliance with the terms and conditions of this permit. Proper operation and maintenance includes adequate laboratory controls and appropriate quality assurance procedures. This provision requires the operation of back-up or auxiliary facilities or similar systems, which are installed by a Permittee only when the operation is necessary to achieve compliance with the conditions of this permit. S4.A. Bypass procedures This permit prohibits a bypass, which is the intentional diversion of waste streams from any portion of a treatment facility. Ecology may take enforcement action against a Permittee for a bypass unless one of the following circumstances (1, 2, or 3) applies. 1. Bypass for essential maintenance without the potential to cause violation of permit limits or conditions. This permit authorizes a bypass if it allows for essential maintenance and does not have the potential to cause violations of limits or other conditions of this permit, or adversely impact public health as determined by Ecology prior to the bypass. The Permittee must submit prior notice, if possible, at least 10 days before the date of the bypass. 2. Bypass is unavoidable, unanticipated, and results in noncompliance of this permit. This permit authorizes such a bypass only if: ST0007271_OlympicViewLandfill_DraftPermit_2015-05-27.docx DRAFT oepariment of Ecology_D Knutson Page 15 of 26 Permit No. ST0007271 a. Bypass is unavoidable to prevent loss of life, personal injury, or severe property damage. "Severe property damage" means substantial physical damage to property, damage to the treatment facilities which would cause them to become inoperable, or'substantial and permanent loss of natural resources which can reasonably be expected to occur in the absence of a bypass. b. No feasible alternatives to the bypass exist, such as: • The use of auxiliary treatment facilities. • Retention of untreated wastes. • Stopping production. • Maintenance during normal periods of equipment downtime, but not if the Permittee should have installed adequate backup equipment in the exercise of reasonable engineering judgment to prevent a bypass. • Transport of untreated wastes to another treatment facility. c. The Permittee has properly notified Ecology of the bypass as required in Condition S3.E of this permit. 3. If bypass is anticipated and has the potential to result in noncompliance of this permit. a. The Permittee must notify Ecology at least thirty (30) days before the planned date of bypass. The notice must contain: • A description of the bypass and its cause. • An analysis of all known alternatives which would eliminate, reduce, or mitigate the need for bypassing. • A cost-effectiveness analysis of alternatives including comparative resource damage assessment. • The minimum and maximum duration of bypass under each alternative. • A recommendation as to the preferred alternative for conducting the bypass. • The projected date of bypass initiation. • A statement of compliance with SEPA. • A request for modification of water quality standards as provided for in WAC 173 -20 1 A-4 10, if an exceedance of any water quality standard is anticipated, • Details of the steps taken or planned to reduce, eliminate, and prevent reoccurrence of the bypass. b. For probable construction bypasses, the Permittee must notify Ecology of the need to bypass as early in the planning process as possible. The Permittee must consider the analysis required above during preparation of the engineering report or facilities plan and plans and specifications and must include these to the extent practical. In cases where the Permittee ST0007271_OiympicViewLandfill_DraftPermit 2015-05-27.docx DRAFT Department of Ecology_D Knutson Page 16 of 26 . Permit No. ST0007271 determines the probable need to bypass early, the Permittee must continue to analyze conditions up to and including the construction period in an effort to minimize or eliminate the bypass. c. Ecology will consider the following prior to issuing an administrative order for this type of bypass: • If the bypass is necessary to perform construction or maintenance -related activities essential to meet the requirements of this permit. • If feasible alternatives to bypass exist, such as the use of auxiliary treatment facilities, retention of untreated wastes, stopping production, maintenance during normal periods of equipment down time, or transport of untreated wastes to another treatment facility. • If the Permittee planned and scheduled the bypass to minimize adverse effects on the public and the environment. After consideration of the above and the adverse effects of the proposed bypass and any other relevant factors, Ecology will approve or deny the request. Ecology will give the public an opportunity to comment on bypass incidents of significant duration, to the extent feasible. Ecology will approve a request to bypass by issuing an administrative order under RCW 90.48.120. S4.B. Best ntanagement practices/pollution prevention program The Permittee must: 1. Dispose of sludge and scale from dip tanks, spray tanks, settling tanks, sumps and solids from grease traps in an approved manner other than to the sanitary sewer or storm sewer system, and other than to waters of the state. 2. Store all barrels or similar containers containing toxic or deleterious materials, including but not limited to petroleum products, chlorinated organic compounds, cyanide and heavy metals in a bermed (or otherwise over a collection sump or spill containment pallet) and covered area, to prevent discharge into the sanitary or storm sewer system or into ground or surface waters in the event of leakage or rupture. 3. Store empty barrels with all openings plugged, in an upright position, and at least ten feet from a storm drain. 4. Not discharge concentrated organic compounds to the sanitary sewer system. 5. Store waste chemicals awaiting disposal in such a manner as to not enter waters of the state. 6. Close the spill control valve (when so -equipped) if a spill occurs within the process area, to prevent the entry of concentrated wastes or chemicals into - the sanitary sewer system. 7. Exclude stormwater from the sanitary sewer system except as specifically authorized in this permit. ST0007271_OlympicViewLandfill_DraftPermit-2015-05-27.docx DRAFT Department of Ecology_D Knutson Page 17 of 26 Permit No. ST0007271 8. Maintain a pH log for all batch discharges of wastewater. 9. Segregate and store non -compatible chemicals securely in separate containment areas that prevent mixing of incompatible or reactive materials. 10. Locate process tanks in a bermed, roofed, secured area, capable of containing a minimum of 110% of the volume capacity of the largest tank within the bermed enclosure. 11. Maintain a sealed floor within the bermed area of all wet metal finishing areas, as well as areas which serve as storage areas for wet process chemicals and baths. 12. Maintain the pretreatment system in good operating order. 13. Not discharge motor oil, brake fluid, gear oil, and automatic transmission fluid drained from vehicles in motor vehicle or equipment maintenance areas to the sanitary sewer or storm sewer. 14. Maintain all grease traps and oil/water separators which discharge to the POTW, 'in good working order. Inspect such traps on at least a monthly basis and clean as necessary. Maintain a log of each such inspection and cleaning performed and make the log available, upon request, to Ecology during any inspection of.the facility it conducts. 15. Not discharge particles or paint chips resulting from grinding, sanding, shotpeening, abrasive blasting, cutting, and any other abrasive operations to the sanitary sewer. 16. Not discharge fire retardant foaming agents such as AFFF to the sanitary sewer system in quantities sufficient to cause excessive foaming in the POTW effluent or to otherwise cause interference at the POTW. Maintain a plan for preventing the discharge of AFFF to the sanitary sewer. Existing contingency and preparedness plans may be used in fulfillment of this requirement to the extent that such documents meet the intent of this requirement. Excessive foaming is foaming resulting in interference, pass - through, or upset at the POTW, or which otherwise impedes the normal and efficient operation of the POTW. 17. Not discharge surfactant materials such as soaps and detergents to the sanitary sewer in quantities sufficient to cause excessive foaming in the POTW effluent or to otherwise cause interference in the POTW. Excessive foaming is foaming resulting in interference, pass -through, or upset at the POTW, or which otherwise impedes the normal and efficient operation of the POTW. 18. Not discharge colored materials or other low -transmittance material to the sanitary sewer in such quantities or concentrations as to interfere with the disinfection process at the POTW, or in such amounts as to cause pass -through resulting in impairment of the aesthetic character or designated uses of the receiving water. ST0007271_0lympicViewt_andfill_DraftPermitM2015-05-27,docx DRAFT Department of Ecology_D Knutson Page 18 of 26 Permit No. ST0007271 S5. Prohibited discharges The Permittee must comply with these General and Specific Prohibitions. S5.A. General prohibitions The Permittee must not introduce into the POTW pollutant(s), which cause Pass Through or Interference. SS.B. Specific prohibitions In addition, the Permittee must not introduce the following into the POTW: 1. Pollutants which create a fire or explosion hazard in the POTW, including, but not limited to, waste streams with a closed cup flashpoint of less than 60 degrees C (140 degrees F) using the test methods specified in 40 CFR 261.21. 2. Solid or viscous pollutants in amounts, which will cause obstruction to the flow in the POTW resulting in interference. 3. Any pollutant (including oxygen -demanding pollutants (BOD5, etc.), released in a discharge at a flow rate and/or pollutant concentration that will cause interference with the POTW. 4. Heat in amounts which will inhibit biological activity in the POTW resulting in interference, but in no case heat in such quantities that the temperature at the POTW treatment plant exceeds 40 degrees C (104 degrees F) unless the approval authority, upon request of the POTW, approves alternative temperature limits. 5. Petroleum oil, non -biodegradable cutting oil, or products of mineral oil origin in amounts that will cause interference or pass through. 6. Pollutants which result in the presence of toxic gases, vapors, or fumes within the POTW in a quantity that may cause acute worker health and safety problems. 7. Any trucked or hauled pollutants, except at discharge points designated by the POTW. 8. Pollutants that will cause corrosive structural damage to the POTW, but in no case discharges with pH lower than 5.0 or greater than 11.0, unless the collection and treatment system is specifically designed to accommodate such discharges, unless otherwise specified in this permit. S5.0 Prohibited Unless Approved Any of the following discharges are prohibited unless approved by Ecology under extraordinary circumstances (such as a lack of direct discharge alternatives due to combined sewer service or a need to augment sewage flows due to septic conditions): 1. Noncontact cooling water in significant volumes. 2. Storm water and other direct inflow sources. ST0007271_OlympicViewLanditll_DraftPermitµ2015-05-27.docx DRAFT Department of Ecology_D Knutson Page 19 of 26 Permit No. ST0007271 3. Wastewaters significantly affecting system hydraulic loading, which do not require treatment or would not be afforded a significant degree of treatment by the system. 4. The discharge of dangerous wastes as defined in Chapter 173-303 WAC (unless specifically authorized in this permit). S6. Dilution prohibited The Permittee must not dilute the wastewater discharge with stormwater or increase the use of potable water, process water, noncontact cooling water, or, in any way, attempt to dilute an effluent as a partial or complete substitute for adequate treatment to achieve compliance with the limits contained in this permit. S7. Solid waste disposal S7.A. Solid waste handling The Permittee must handle and dispose of all solid waste material in such a manner as to prevent its entry into state ground or surface water. S7.B. Leachate The Permittee must not allow leachate from its solid waste material to enter state waters without providing all known, available, and reasonable methods of treatment, nor allow such leachate to cause violations of the State Surface Water Quality Standards, Chapter 173-201A WAC, or the State Ground Water Quality Standards, Chapter 173-200 WAC. The Permittee must apply for a permit or permit modification as may be required for such discharges to state ground or surface waters. S8. Application for permit renewal or modification for facility changes The Permittee must submit an application for renewal of this permit no later than XX XX, 20XX. The Permittee must submit a paper copy and an electronic copy (preferably as a PDF). The Permittee must also submit a new application or supplement at least 60 days prior to commencement of discharges, resulting from the activities listed below, which may result in permit violations. These activities include any facility expansions, production increases, or other planned changes, such as process modifications, in the permitted facility. S9. Non -routine and unanticipated discharges 1. Beginning on the effective date of this permit, the Permittee is authorized to discharge non -routine wastewater on a case -by -case basis to the sanitary sewer if approved by Ecology and the POTW. Prior to any such discharge, the Permittee must contact Ecology and, at a minimum, provide the following information: a. The proposed discharge location. ST0007277_OlympicViewLandfll DraftPermit_20'15-05-27.docx DRAFT Department of Dcology_D Knutson Page 20 of 26 Permit No. ST0007271 b. The nature of the activity that will generate the discharge. c. Any alternatives to the discharge, such as reuse, storage, or recycling of the water. d. The total volume of water it expects to discharge. e. The results of the chemical analysis of the water. f. The date of proposed discharge. g. The expected rate of discharge discharged, in gallons per day. 2. The expected rate of discharge in gallons per minute for discharges greater than 20,000 gallons. 3. The Permittee must analyze the water for all constituents limited for the discharge and report them as required by subpart Le above. The analysis must also include any parameter deemed necessary by Ecology. All discharges must comply with the effluent limits as established in Condition S 1 of this permit and any other limits imposed by Ecology. 4. The discharge cannot proceed until Ecology has reviewed the information provided and has authorized the discharge by letter to the Permittee or by an Administrative Order. S10. Slug discharge control plan SIO.A. Slag discharge control plan requirements The Pei nittee must: 1. Prepare and maintain a plan to minimize the potential of slug discharges from the facility covered by this permit. 2. Keep the current slug discharge control plan on the plant site and make it readily available to facility personnel, and Department of Ecology inspectors upon request. 3. Follow the plan and any supplements throughout the term of the permit. 4. Periodically review, the slug discharge control plan, and update it as necessary to maintain its effectiveness with respect to maintaining compliance with the provisions of this permit. SIO.B. Slrrg discharge control plan components The slug discharge control plan must include the following information and procedures relating to the prevention of unauthorized slug discharges; it must include: 1. A description of a reporting system the Permittee will use to immediately notify facility management, the POTW operator, and appropriate state, federal, and local authorities of any slug discharges, and provisions to provide a written follow-up report within five days. ST0007271_OiympicviewLandfiili_DraftPermit_2015-05-27.dccx DRAFT Department of Ecology_D Knutson Page 21 of 26 Permit No. 8T0007271 2. A description of operator training, equipment, and facilities (including overall facility plan) for preventing, containing; or treating slug discharges. 3. Procedures to prevent adverse impact from accidental spills including: a. Inspection and maintenance of storage areas. b. Handling and transfer of materials. c. Loading and unloading operations. d. Control of plant site run-off. e. Worker training. 1 Building of containment structures or equipment. g. Measures for containing toxic organic pollutants (including solvents). h. Measures and equipment for emergency response. 4. A list of all raw materials, products, chemicals, and hazardous materials used, processed, or stored at the facility; the normal quantity maintained on the premises for each listed material; and a map showing where they are located. 5. A description of discharge practices for batch and continuous processes under normal and non -routine circumstances. 6. A brief description of any unauthorized discharges which occurred during the 36-month period preceding the effective date of this permit and subsequent measures taken by Permittee to prevent or to reduce the possibility of further unauthorized discharges. 7. An implementation schedule including additional operator training and procurement and installation of equipment or facilities required to properly implement the plan. General Conditions GI. Signatory requirements All applications, reports, or information submitted to Ecology must be signed as follows: 1. All permit applications must be signed by either a principal executive officer or ranking elected official. 2. All reports required by this permit and other information requested by Ecology must be signed by a person described above or by a duly authorized representative of that person. A person is a duly authorized representative only if: a. The authorization is made in writing by the person described above and is submitted to Ecology at the time of authorization, and b. The authorization specifies either a named individual or any individual occupying a named position. ST0007271_0lympicViewLandfiill_DraftPermit-2015-05-2Tdocx DRAFT Department of Ecofogy_D Knutson Page 22 of 26 Permit No. ST0007271 3. Changes to authorization. If an authorization under paragraph G1.2, above, is no longer accurate because a different individual or position has responsibility for the overall operation of the facility, a new authorization must be submitted to Ecology prior to or together with any reports, information, or applications to be signed by an authorized representative. 4. Certification. Any person signing a document under this section must make the following certification: "I certify under penalty of law, that this document and all attachments were prepared under my direction or supervision in accordance with a system designed to assure that qualified personnel properly gathered and evaluated the information submitted. Based on my inquiry of the person or persons who manage the system or those persons directly responsible for gathering information, the information submitted is, to the best of my knowledge and belief, true, accurate, and complete. I am aware that there are significant penalties for submitting false information, including the possibility of fine and imprisonment for knowing violations." G2. Right of entry Representatives of Ecology have the right to enter at all reasonable times in or upon any property, public or private, for the purpose of inspecting and investigating conditions relating to the pollution or the possible pollution of any waters of the state. Reasonable times include normal business hours; hours during which production, treatment, or discharge occurs; or times when Ecology suspects a violation requiring immediate inspection. Representatives of Ecology must be allowed to have access to, and copy at reasonable cost, any records required to be kept under terms and conditions of the permit; to inspect any monitoring equipment or method required in the permit; and to sample the discharge, waste treatment processes, or internal waste streams. G3. Permit actions This permit is subject to modification, suspension, or termination, in whole or in part by Ecology for any of the following causes: 1, Violation of any permit term or condition; 2. Obtaining a permit by misrepresentation or failure to disclose all relevant facts; 3. A material change in quantity or type of waste disposal; 4. A material change in the condition of the waters of the state; or 5. Nonpayment of fees assessed pursuant to RCW 90.48.465. Ecology may also modify this permit, including the schedule of compliance or other conditions, if it determines good and valid cause exists, including promulgation or revisions of regulations or new information. G4. Reporting a cause for modification The Permittee must submit a new application, or a supplement to the previous application, along with required engineering plans and reports, whenever a new or ST0007271_01ympicViewLandfiII—DraftPermit_2015-05-27.docx DRAFT Department of Ecology_D Knutson Page 23 of 26 Permit No. ST0007271 increased discharge or change in the nature of the discharge is anticipated which is not specifically authorized by this permit. This application must be submitted at least 60 days prior to any proposed changes. Submission of this application does not relieve the Perrnittee of the duty to comply with the existing permit until it is modified or reissued. G5. Plan review required Prior to constructing or modifying any wastewater control facilities, an engineering report and detailed plans and specifications must be submitted to Ecology for approval in accordance with Chapter 173-240 WAC. Engineering reports, plans, and specifications should be submitted at least 60 days prior to the planned start of construction. Facilities must be constructed and operated in accordance with the approved plans. G6. Compliance with other laws and statutes Nothing in the permit excuses the Permittee from compliance with any applicable federal, state, or local statutes, ordinances, or regulations. GT. Transfer of this permit This permit is automatically transferred to a new owner or operator if; 1. A written agreement between the old and new owner or operator containing a specific date for transfer of permit responsibility, coverage, and liability is submitted to Ecology; 2. A copy of the permit is provided to the new owner and; 3. Ecology does not notify the Permittee of the need to modify the permit. Unless this permit is automatically transferred according to Section 1, above, this permit may be transferred only if it is modified to identify the new Permittee and to incorporate such other requirements as determined necessary by Ecology. G8. Reduced production for compliance The Permittee must control production or discharge to the extent necessary to maintain compliance with the terms and conditions of this permit upon reduction of efficiency, loss, or failure of its treatment facility until the treatment capacity is restored or an alternative method of treatment is provided. This requirement applies in the situation where, among other things, the primary source of power for the treatment facility is reduced, lost, or fails. G9. Removed substances Collected screenings, grit, solids, sludges, filter backwash, or other pollutants removed in the course of treatment or control of wastewaters must not be resuspended or reintroduced to the effluent stream for discharge. ST0007271w0lympicViewLandfiII—DraftPermit_2015-05-27.docx DRAFT Department of Ecoiogy_D Knutson Page 24 of 26 Permit No. ST0007271 G10. Payment of fees The Permittee must submit payment of fees associated with this permit as assessed by Ecology. Ecology may revoke this permit if the permit fees established under Chapter 173-224 WAC are not paid. G11. Penalties for violating permit conditions Any person who is found guilty of willfully violating the terms and conditions of this permit is guilty of a crime, and upon conviction thereof shall be punished by a fine of up to ten thousand dollars and costs of prosecution, or by imprisonment in the discretion of the court. Each day upon which a willful violation occurs is a separate and additional violation. Any person who violates the terms and conditions of a waste discharge permit incurs, in addition to any other penalty as provided by law, a civil penalty in the amount of up to ten thousand dollars for every such violation. Each and every such violation is a separate and distinct offense, and in case of a continuing violation, every day's continuance is a separate and distinct violation. G12. Duty to provide information The Permittee must submit to Ecology, within a reasonable time, all information which Ecology may request to determine whether cause exists for modifying, revoking and reissuing, or terminating this permit or to determine compliance with this permit. The Permittee must also submit to Ecology upon request, copies of records required to be kept by this permit. G13. Duty to comply The Permittee must comply with all conditions of this permit. Any permit noncompliance constitutes a violation of chapter 90.48 RCW and is grounds for enforcement action; for permit termination, revocation and reissuance, or modification; or denial of a permit renewal application. ST0007271_01ympicMewLandFill_DraftPermit-2015-05-27.docx DRAFT Department of Ecology_D Knutson Page 25 of 26 Permit No. ST0007271 Appendix A LIST OF POLLUTANTS WITH ANALYTICAL METHODS, DETECTION LIMITS AND QUANTITATION LEVELS The Permittee must use the specified analytical methods, detection limits (DLs) and quantitation levels (QLs) in the following table for permit and application required monitoring unless: • Another permit condition specifies other methods, detection levels, or quantitation levels. The method used produces measurable results in the sample and EPA has listed it as an EPA -approved method in 40 CFR Part 136. If the Permittee uses an alternative method, not specified in the permit and as allowed above, it must report the test method, DL, and QL on the discharge monitoring report or in the required report. If the Permittee is unable to obtain the required DL and QL in its effluent due to matrix effects, the Permittee must submit a matrix -specific detection limit (MDL) and a quantitation limit (QL) to Ecology with appropriate laboratory documentation. Ecology added this appendix to the permit in order to reduce the number of analytical `non -detects" in permit -required monitoring and to measure effluent concentrations near or below criteria values where possible at a reasonable cost. = LIST OF POLLUTANTS W1TH ANALYTICAL METHODS, ETECTION LIMITS DAND QUANTITATIONLEVELS _ - - _ - pollutant &CAS Na= Recom_mended Analytical - _._ Detection {Dt_) ug/L Quantitatton level (QL) _ (rf-avalla,bleJ - _ _ Pro#oeol = un_less specified uglL unless specified Flow Calibrated device Biochemical Oxygen SM5210-B 2 mg/L Demand pH SM4500-H+ B NIA NIA Total Suspended Solids SM2540-D 5 mglL Copper, Total (7440-50-8) 200.8 0.4 1 2.0 Nickel, Total (7440-02-0) 200.8 0.1 0.5 Zinc, Total (7440-66-6) 200.8 0.5 2.5 ST0007271_01ympicViewLandfi11_DraftPermit-2015-05-27.docx DRAFT Department of Ecology_D Knutson Page 26 of 26 Permit No. ST0007271 PRIORITY POLLUTANTS (continued) -Pollutant & _CAS No if available -, = Recommended Analytical Protocol'-- = Detection:(DL) Ng/L unless s stifled Quantitation Level (QL) ,. k unless s" eclfled 1l0.LATIL- EC0MPQUNDS Acrolein 107-02-8 624 5 10 Ac lonitrile 107-13-1 624 1.0 2.0 Benzene 71-43-2 624 1.0 2.0 Bromoform 75-25-2 624 1.0 2.0 Carbon tetrachloride 56-23-5 6241601 or SM6230B 1.0 2.0 Chiorobenzene 108-90-7 624 1.0 2.0 Chloroethane 75-00-3 624/601 1.0 2.0- 2-Chloroethylvinyl Ether 110-75-8 624 1.0 2.0 Chloroform 67-66-3 624 or SM6210B 1.0 2.0 Dibromochloromethane 124-48-1 624 1.0 2.0 1,2-Dichlorobenzene 95-50-1 624 1.9 7.6 1,3-Dichlorobenzene 541-73-1 624 1.9 7.6 1,4-Dichlorobenzene 106-46-7 624 4.4 17.6 Dichlorobromomethane 75-27-4 624 1.0 2.0 1,1-Dichloroethane 75-34-3 624 1.0 2.0 1,2-Dichloroethane 107-06-2 624 1.0 2.0 1,1-Dichloroeth lens 75-35-4 624 1.0 2.0 1,2-Dichloro propane 78-87-5 624 1.0 2.0 1,3-dichloropropene (mixed isomers) 1,2-dichloropropylene) 542-75-6 624 1.0 2.0 Eth lbenzene 100-41-4 624 1.0 2.0 Methyl bromide (74-83-9) omethane 624/601 5.0 10.0 �M�ethylchloride 74-87-3) hane 624 1.0 2.0 Methylene chloride 75-09-2 624 5.0 10.0 1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane 79-34-5 624 1.9 2.0 Tetrachloroeth lens 127-18-4 624 1.0 2.0 Toluene 108-88-3 624 1.0 2.0 1,2-Trans-Dichloroethylene 156-60-5 Ethylene dichloride 624 1.0 2.0 1,1,1-Trichloroethane 71-55-6 624 1.0 2.0 1,1,2-Trichloroethane 79-00-5 624 1.0 2.0 Trichloroethylene 79-01-6 624 1.0 2.0 Vinyl chloride 75-01-4 624/SM6200B 1.0 2.0 1. Detection level (DL) or detection limit means the minimum concentration of an analyte (substance) that can be measured and reported with a 99% confidence that the analyte concentration is greater than zero as determined by the procedure given in 40 CFR part 136, Appendix B. 2.Quantitation Level (QL) also known as Minimum Level of Quantitation (ML) - The lowest level at which the entire analytical system must give a recognizable signal and acceptable calibration point for the analyte. It is equivalent to the concentration of the lowest calibration standard, assuming that the lab has used all method -specified sample weights, volumes, and cleanup procedures. The QL is calculated by multiplying the MDL by 3.18 and rounding the result to the number nearest to (1, 2, or 5) x 1On, where n is an integer (64 FR 30417). Also Given As: The smallest detectable concentration of analyte greater than the Detection Limit (DL) where the accuracy (precision & bias) achieves the objectives of the intended purpose. (Report of the Federal Advisory Committee on Detection and Quantitation Approaches and Uses in Clean Water Act Programs). ST0007271_olympicViewLandfiII-DrafiPermit_2015-05-27.docx DRAFT Department of Ecology_D Knutson Fact Sheet for State Waste Discharge Permit ST0007271 Waste Management of Washington, Inc. — Olympic View Sanitary Landfill June 1, 2015 Purpose of this Fact Sheet This fact sheet explains and documents the decisions the Department of Ecology (Ecology) made in drafting the proposed State Waste Discharge Permit for Waste Management of Washington, Inc. --- Olympic View Sanitary Landfill, that will allow the discharge of wastewater to the City of City of Bremerton (West Plant) sanitary sewer system, and the City of Port Orchard --- West Sound Utility District (aka South Kitsap Water Reclamation Facility) sanitary sewer system. State law requires any commercial or industrial facility to obtain a permit before discharging waste or chemicals to municipal sanitary sewer collection and treatment systems. . Waste Management of Washington, Inc. has reviewed the draft permit and fact sheet for factual accuracy. Ecology corrected any errors or omissions about the facility's location, history, product type, production rate, or discharges prior to publishing this draft fact sheet for public notice. Summary Waste Management of Washington, Inc. operates a closed landfill located in Kitsap County. The proposed State Waste Discharge Permit is intended to authorize the discharge of landfill leachate, transfer station leachate, related storrnwater, and sample well purge water, to the City of Bremerton POTW and to the City of Port Orchard — West Sound Utility District (aka South Kitsap Water Reclamation Facility) sanitary sewer system. ST0007271_OlympicViewLandfill_DraftEactSheet_2015-05-27.docx DRAFT Department of Ecoiogy_D Knutson Fact Sheet for State Waste Discharge Permit No. ST0007271 Waste Management of Washington, Inc, — Olympic View Sanitary Landfill Page 2 of 24 Table of Contents LIntroduction........................................................................................................................... 4 II. Facility description and permitting information.................................................................. 7 A. Operations at the closed landfill.......................................................................... 7 B. Historical operations at landfill...................................................... 6..................... 7 C. Leachate collection system................................................................................... 9 D. Leachate treatment ponds.................................................................................... 9 E. Leachate evaporation operations......................................................10 F. Support facilities.......................................................6...................10 G. Stormvater management...............................................................11 H. South Kitsap Water Reclamation Facility...........................................11 1. City of Bremerton Wastewater Treatment Plant...................................11 J. State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA) Compliance ............................ 12 K. Activities of Washington State Department of Ecology Waste 2 Resources..12 III. Proposed permit limits........................................................................................................ 13 A. Technology -based effluent limits.......................................................................14 B. Effluent limitations based on local limits -- City of Bremerton ......................14 C. Effluent limitations based on local limits -South Kitsap Water Reclamation.15 D. Effluent limitations and monitoring for priority pollutant organic compounds................................. :...............................................15 IV.. Monitoring requirements.................................................................................................... IS A. Laboratory accreditation...................................................................................16 B. Wastewater monitoring...........................................................................6..........16 Y. Other permit conditions......................................................................................................16 A. Reporting and record keeping...........................................................I...........6...16 B. Operations and maintenance.............................................................................16 C. Prohibited discharges ................................................... ............................. I........ 16 D. Dilution prohibited.......................................................................I....... 6..............16 E. Non -routine and unanticipated discharges.......................................................16 F. Slug discharge plan.................................................................................6...........17 G. General conditions.............................................................................................. 17 ST0007271—OlympicViewLandfill—DraftFactSheet_2015-05-27.docx DRAFT Department of Ecology_D Knutson Fact Sheet for State Waste Discharge Permit No. ST0007271 Waste Management of Washington, Inc. — Olympic View Sanitary Landfill Page 3 of 24 H. Public notification of noncompliance................................................................................17 M. Permit issuance procedures................................................................................................ 17 A. Permit modifications...........................................................................................17 B. Proposed permit issuance................................................................................... 17 AppendixA — Public Involvement Information.......................................................................... 18 AppendixB — Your Right to Appeal ........... :................................................................................ 19 AppendixC --- Glossary................................................................................................................. 20 ST0007271_OlympieViewLandfill—DraftFactSheet_2015-05-27.docx DRAFT Department of Ecology_D Knutson Fact Sheet for State Waste Discharge Permit No. ST0007271 Waste Management of Washington, Inc. -- Olympic View Sanitary Landfill Page 4 of 24 I. Introduction The legislature defined Ecology's authority and obligations for the Wastewater Discharge Permit Program in the Water Pollution Control law, chapter 90.48 RCW (Revised Code of Washington). Ecology adopted rules describing how it exercises its authority: o State waste discharge program (chapter 173-216 WAC). • Submission of plans and reports for construction of wastewater facilities (chapter 173-240 WAC). These rules require any industrial facility owner/operator to obtain a State Waste Discharge Permit before discharging wastewater to state waters. This rule includes commercial or industrial discharges to sewerage systems operated by municipalities or public entities which discharge into public waters of the state. They also help define the basis for limits on each discharge and for other performance requirements imposed by the permit. Under the State Waste Discharge Permit Program and in response to a complete and accepted permit application, Ecology generally prepares a draft permit and accompanying fact sheet, and makes it available for public review before final issuance. If the volume of the discharge has not changed or if the characteristics of the discharge have not changed, Ecology may choose not to issue a public notice. When Ecology publishes an announcement (public notice), it tells people where they can read the draft permit, and where to send their cornrnents, during a period of thirty days. (See Appendix A — Public Involvement Information for more detail about the public notice and comment procedures). After the public comment period ends, Ecology may make changes to the draft State Waste Discharge Permit in response to comment(s). Ecology will summarize the responses to comments and any changes to the permit in Appendix D. Facility In_farmatEon _ - .` � - Applicant Name and Address Waste Management of Washington, Inc. 9081 Tujunga Avenue Sun Valley, CA 91352 Facility Name and Location Olympic View Sanitary Landfill 10015 SW Barney White Road Bremerton, WA 98312-4935 Contact at Facility Charles Lucie Landfill Supervisor Contact at Corporate Headquarters Phil Perley Waste Management of Washington, Inc. 9081 Tujunga Avenue Sun Valley, CA 91352 Responsible Official Steven D. Richtel Group Director Waste Management of Washington, Inc. 9081 Tujunga Avenue Sun Valley, CA 91352 303 914-1434 Industrial User Type I Significant Industrial User Industry Type I Landfill, Closed Type of Treatment by Industry I Flow equalization, Aeration SIC Codes 4953 NAIC Codes 56212 ST0007271—olympicViewLandrill_DraftFactSheet-2015-05-27.docx DRAFT Department of Ecology D Knutson Fact Sheet for State Waste Discharge Permit No. ST0007271 Waste Management of Washington, Inc. — Olympic View Sanitary Landfill Page 5 of 24 Facility [r forrnatlon „ Olympic View Sanitary Landfill Facility Latitude: 47.4997 degrees North Location (NAD831WGS84 reference Longitude: 122.7905 degrees West datum) (coordinates refer to truck loadout Dint SW of leachate and Treatment Plant (POTW) Receiving City of Bremerton Wastewater Treatment Plant Discharge (West Plant) NPDES Permit WA0029289 City of Bremerton WWTP Discharge- Latitude: 47.5447 degrees North Activated Sludge Plant (aka West Plant) Longitude: 122.6699 degrees West (discharge to Sinclair Inlet) Location NAD83/WGS84 reference datum Treatment Plant (POTW) Receiving South Kitsap Water Reclamation Facility (aka City of Port Discharge Orchard/West Sound Utility District WWTP) WA020346 South Kitsap Water Reclamation Facility Latitude: 47.5527 degrees North Discharge Location (NAD831WGS84 Longitude: 122.6111 degrees West reference datum Aerial View of OIympic View Sanitary Landfill ST0007271_OlympicViewLandfill_DraftFactSheet_2015-05-27.docx DRAFT Department of Ecology_D Knutson Fact Sheet for State Waste Discharge Permit No. ST0007271 Waste Management of Washington, Inc. -- Olympic View Sanitary Landfill Page 6 of 24 Olympic View Sanitary Landfill — Base of red balloon symbol indicates location of truck load -out point. Map indicating location of Olympic View Sanitary Landfill ST0007271_OlympicViewLandfill—DraftFactSheet-2015-05-27.dacx DRAFT Department of Ecology_D Knutson Fact Sheet for State Waste Discharge Permit No. ST0007271 Waste Management of Washington, Inc. -- Olympic View Sanitary Landfill Page 7 of 24 II. Facility description and permitting information A. Operations at the closed landfill The Olympic View Sanitary Landfill is a closed Subtitle D sanitary landfill under post -closure operation and maintenance. The landfill was operated since 1963 under various private ownerships. The closed landfill is owned and operated by Olympic View Sanitary Landfill, Inc. (OVSL), a subsidiary of Waste Management, Inc, The facility stopped receiving solid wastes in 2003 and was capped (received an impervious cover) and closed in 2004. The landfill site is located ten miles southwest of Bremerton (between Gorst and Belfair) off State Route 3, just west of the Bremerton National Airport, and adjacent to Port of Bremerton's Olympic View Industrial Park. Operations at the site currently consist of post -closure operation and maintenance, including the collection, pretreatment, and off -site disposal (at either of two municipal POTWs) of landfill leachate. Leachate, which forms when liquids pass -through or are generated in a landfill, are collected using a series of collection lines, a gravity transmission line, a pump station and force main, a pretreatment storage lagoon, an evaporator unit, and a truck load - out station. Leachate is also generated from solid waste at the solid waste transfer station located opposite the site, across SW Barney White Road. Pretreatment of the collected leachate occurs within a lined lagoon with a capacity of approximately 3.12 million gallons. The pretreatment train primarily consists of aeration and evaporation. The evaporator unit receives leachate influent from the lagoon. Landfill -generated methane is burned in the unit to turn the aqueous portion to steam. The generated steam is then discharged into a flare to polish the emissions to the atmosphere. Leachate evaporator unit residual liquid generated during pretreatment is returned to the lagoon. Under post -closure operations, most of the generated leachate is evaporated. However, occasionally, excess pretreated wastewater from the lagoon is transferred into 6000-gallon hauling trucks for off -site discharge at the City of Bremerton POTW. These transfers typically occur during the latter half of the wet season (January to March) and consist of batch deliveries to the POTW that can accrue from 50,000 to over 400,000 gallons over a delivery period of several days. B. Historical operations at landfill In the early 1960s solid waste disposal operations, began at the facility, then known as the Old Barney White Landfill. The facility accepted US Navy, industrial, putrescible, and self -hauled municipal waste, and was operated as an open burning dump. When Brem Air Disposal, Inc. acquired the landfill in 1970, the name was changed to "Brem Air Northwest Disposal Facility." Brem Air Disposal discontinued burning of waste by 1972. By 1975, the company had developed the new landfill operations to comply with state regulations, the Minimal Functional Standards for Solid Waste Handling, and permit requirements imposed by Bremerton-Kitsap County Health District. At that time it began spreading, compacting, and applying cover to the solid waste. In 1975, Brem Air Disposal, Inc, shareholders formed a new corporation, Kitsap County Sanitary Landfill, Inc. (KCSL). KCSL continued to operate the landfill, although its name was changed in 1995 to Olympic View Sanitary ST0007271_OlympicViewLandfill_DraftFaclSheet 2015-05-27.docx DRAFT Department of Ecology_D Knutson Fact Sheet for State Waste Discharge Permit No. ST0007271 Waste Management of Washington, Inc. -- Olympic View Sanitary Landfill Page 8 of 24 Landfill, Inc. (OVSL). OVSL was purchased by Envirofil, Inc.; on November 5, 1993. In 1994, Envirofil merged with USA Waste Services. Subsequently,'in 1997, USA Waste Services merged with Waste Management, Inc., which now owns OVSL. The facility stopped receiving solid wastes in 2003, and was capped and closed in 2004. Olympic View Sanitary Landfill site occupies 65 acres of a 500-acre parcel. The municipal solid waste landfill consists of three sections: an old unlined portion (the Old Barney White Landfill), the Phase I expansion, and the Phase 11 expansion. The Old Barney White Landfill was closed in 1985 under the standards of Chapter 173-301 WAC. This portion of the landfill is unlined and has no internal leachate collection system. The final cover, constructed in 1985, consisted of a one -foot layer of sand and gravel, a 1.5-foot layer of low permeability soil, 2.5 feet of sludge -amended soil, and six inches of topsoil. A perimeter leachate interceptor (toe seep collector) and a passive gas collection system were also installed in 1985. The total volume of waste disposed of in this 25-acre area is estimated to be approximately 2.2 million cubic yards [907,000 metric tons of municipal solid waste (MSW)]. The old landfill closure was improved in 1991 and 1992. The improved closure consists of the original layer of low permeability soil overlain by a 50-mil geo-membrane [textured very low density polyethylene (VLDPE)] layer, a geo-net composite drainage layer, 1.5 feet of cover soil, and six inches of top soil. An active gas extraction system was also added at that time. Phase I constitutes 20 acres and had an original estimated capacity of one million cubic yards. Phase I is divided into three stages. Stage A abuts the old disposal area, is lined, and is equipped with a leachate collection system. The Stage A liner, which was constructed in 1985, consists of two feet of compacted soil on the bottom and a 36-mil Hypalon liner on the side slopes. This liner does not satisfy the design requirements of Chapter 173-304 WAC (the minimal functional standards). A portion of Stage I was closed in 1992/1993 with the improvement of the old landfill closure. The Stage B liner, constructed in 1988, consists of two feet of compacted soil with a permeability of 10-6 cm/sec overlain by a 60-mil high density polyethylene geo-membrane. The 20-acre Phase II expansion area is located directly north of Phase I. Its originally proposed capacity was 1.2 million cubic yards. A vertical expansion was approved for the Phase I and Phase II areas in 1991, which increased the combined capacity of Phase I and Phase lI from 2.1 million cubic yards to 4.0 million cubic yards. Development of Phase 11 by stages began in the summer of 1996. The following sequence has been utilized with respect to filling of each of the landfill cells: 0 1997 Phase II al 0 1998 Phase 1I bl 0 1999 Phase 11 b2 0 2000 Phase II b3 Phase 1I b3 was the last of the active cells, prior to the cessation of receipt of solid wastes in 2003. Following closure of the landfill, a solid waste transfer station was constructed. Generation of leachate from the landfill continues after closure of the landfill, although at a reduced rate with respect to the time the landfill was in operation. ST0007271_OlympicViewLandf[II_DrafiFactSheet 2015-05-27.docx DRAFT Department of Ecology_D Knutson Fact Sheet for State Waste Discharge Permit No. ST0007271 Waste Management of Washington, Inc. -- Olympic View Sanitary Landfill Page 9 of 24 C. Leachate collection system Leachate is formed when liquids pass through a landfill, removing contaminants and their degradation products from the solid waste. Decay and fermentation produce gases (for example, carbon dioxide and methane) and organic acids, resulting in the dissolution of chemical constituents such as iron and manganese from the waste. Landfills in western Washington may become partially or totally saturated by winter precipitation and, in unlined landfills, horizontal or upward flow of ground water. The rate or degree of saturation and the subsequent leachate production is based on site -specific conditions and landfill operations. The amount of leachate produced and the rate of production is a function of the bulk chemical composition, particle size and hydraulic conductivity of the refuse, and the capacity of the cover and liner material to restrict infiltration of incident precipitation. The leachate management system at Olympic View Sanitary Landfill includes leachate collection lines, a gravity transmission line, a pump station and force main, pretreatment/storage lagoons, and a truck load -out station. The leachate collection system includes the toe seep collection system around the base of the old landfill and the drainage layer/leachate collection lines installed above the liner in the Phase I and Phase Il expansion areas. Pumps with a capacity of 35-65 gpm have been lowered to the bottom of the risers. The leachate is pumped to an HDPE force main. A gravity transmission line conveys the leachate from the leachate collection system to the leachate treatment/storage lagoons. This line is located along the north shoulder of the north perimeter road. There is a series of five manholes along this transmission line. A cutoff valve is provided at Manhole ##1 to stop the flow from the Phase I expansion area. Condensate is a wastewater which forms in the collection pipes of active gas extraction systems. Condensate from the active gas collection system at Olympic View Landfill is discharged into the leachate treatment/storage system at Olympic View. D. Leachate treatment ponds The leachate recovered is directed to the leachate treatment/collection lagoon, which is equipped with two aerators. The capacity of the pond is approximately 3.12 million gallons. The treatment/storage lagoon has a double composite liner system utilizing a 60-mil and 80-mil HDPE geo-membrane liner. Recent practice has been to operate the aerators during approximately May through September five days per week, typically Monday through Friday from morning through the afternoon. During October through May, one aerator is typically operated three days per week. If inspections indicate excessive color, odor or algae, aeration is increased. A leachate polishing pond, located nearby the leachate treatment pond, has been abandoned. The leachate truck load -out station is located adjacent to the lagoon. Prior to 1997, treated leachate from the treatment and storage system was in -hauled and discharged at the Port OrchardlKitsap County Sewer District No. 5 Wastewater Treatment Plant. In 1997, the landfill began hauling leachate to the City of Bremerton POTW. A leachate irrigation system, permitted in the permit issued in 1988, has been abandoned. The system consisted of a pump station, force main, system controller, and the irrigation ST0007271_OiympEcViewLandfill_DraftFactSheet_2015-05-27.docx DRAFT Department of l;cology_D Knutson Fact Sleet for State Waste Discharge Permit No. ST0007271 Waste Management of Washington, Inc. — Olympic View Sanitary Landfill Page 10 of 24 sites. The pipe to the irrigation system has been capped at the pump station, The pump flow line was converted to a recirculating line, and all leachate discharges into lagoon #1. Under post -closure conditions, most of the generated leachate is evaporated. However, occasionally, excess pretreated wastewater from the lagoon is transferred into 6000-gallon hauling trucks for off -site discharge at the City of Bremerton's POTW. These transfers typically occur during the latter half of the wet season (January to March), and consist of batch deliveries to the POTW that can accrue to between 50,000 to over 400,000 gallons over a delivery period of several days. E. Leachate evaporation operations Methane generated at the landfill is used to evaporate up to approximately 20,000 gallons of leachate per day. The evaporated leachate is passed through the flare prior to being vented to the atmosphere. The landfill receives a tax credit for utilization of the methane. The shutting down and capping of the landfill is expected to result in the reduced production of leachate, with respect to that experienced at the time the landfill was in operation. It is expected that, at some point, evaporation of the entirety of the leachate generated will be possible. F. Support facilities Support facilities for the general operations of the landfill include: o Equipment maintenance shop: The maintenance shop is located near the.general office and is equipped with facilities to overhaul landfill machinery. Landfill equipment includes refuse compactors, tracked dozers and loader, dump truck, a road grader, and waste transfer roll -off truck (for on -site containers). The equipment is used for both placing waste and moving materials. o Employee offices: Former employee facilities are located adjacent to the equipment maintenance shop. There are no employees regularly situated at Olympic View Sanitary Landfill now that the landfill is in post -closure status. • Weigh station: A weigh station consisting of two truck scales and a scale house is used occasionally to check the tare weights of company vehicles. • Transfer station: Waste water from the drainage system at the newly constructed transfer station is discharged to the leachate storage and pretreatment lagoon. The transfer station drainage system accepts contact waste water from the tipping floor and compactor. The contact wastewater is collected in a 1,I50-gallon below -ground reinforced concrete vault located below the compactor. The vault includes a two -chambered oil -water separator. When the level.of liquid in the vault reaches 675 gallons, a pump is automatically activated, and the liquid is pumped to an above -ground storage tank located near the special waste/recyclables loading area. The pump is equipped with an alarm system that alerts the operator if the pump is not working. The above -ground storage tank is equipped with a mechanical level indicator. The above -ground tank is pumped on a periodic basis and transferred to the leachate storage and treatment system. The volume of this water is expected to be relatively insignificant, with an average rate of generation expected to be less than 100 gallons per day. ST0007271_OlympicViewLandfill_DraflFactSheet_2015-05-27.docx DRAFT Department of Ecology_D Knutson Fact Sheet for State Waste Discharge Permit No, ST0007271 Waste Management of Washington, Inc. — Olympic View Sanitary Landfill Page 11 of 24 ® Landfill gas flare station: The landfill gas flare station is located west of the southwest corner of the Old Barney White Landfill. The station consists of the landfill gas flare, a leachate evaporation unit, ancillary equipment; and a contractor office trailer. Sanitary. waste from the office trailer is stored in a tank for pickup by vacuum truck and is disposed of off -site. G. Stormwater management The existing stormwater control system is described in the Olympic View Sanitary Landfill Surface Water Management Plan. The system consists of a ditch and culvert conveyance system, detention ponds, and infiltration system, erosion control measures and grass -lined swales for water quality control. The discharge of stormwater is authorized and regulated under Stormwater Baseline General Permit for Industrial Activity No. S03-002538. Stormwater incident to covered landfill areas is directed to settling ponds which are separate from the leachate lagoon. The storm water from the stormwater pond is monitored under a MTCA agreement (agreed order). The storm water is discharged under the authorization of a General Stormwater Permit. The General Industrial Stormwater Permit requires preparation of both a Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan and a Spill Prevention Plan, H. South Kitsap Water Reclamation Facility The City of Port Orchard (PO) and West Sound Utility District (WSUD) jointly own the South Kitsap Water Reclamation Facility (SKWRF). The facility was formerly known as the City of Port Orchard/West Sound Utility District Joint Wastewater Treatment Plant. WSUD operates the facility. SKWRF provides wastewater treatment with two separate treatment trains using different treatment processes: (i) complete mix activated sludge process, and (ii) Membrane Bioreactor (MBR) process. In addition, a ballasted sand clarifier at the facility can provide advanced primary treatment to peak flows that exceed the facility's secondary treatment capacity. Design Criteria for South Kitsap Water Reclamation Facility Maximum Month Design Flow (MMDF) 4.2 MGD BODS Loading for Maximum Month 6,340 Ibs/day TSS Loading for Maximum Month 6,910 Ibs/day I. City of Bremerton Wastewater Treatment Plant The City of Bremerton has owned, operated, and maintained a secondary wastewater treatment plant (West Plant) in west Bremerton since June 1985. Approximately 60% of Bremerton's sewer system consists of a combined sewage system that conveys a mixture of sanitary sewage and stormwater to the West Plant for treatment. The City of Bremerton upgraded the West Plant in 2009 to increase the amount of combined sewage it can treat and, in turn, further reduce the potential for CSO discharges. The West Plant operates as a conventional activated sludge secondary treatment system. The liquid stream treatment components include three mechanical bar screens, two aerated grit chambers, two Parshall flumes for flow measurement; two primary clarifiers, two aeration basins with fine bubble diffusers, two secondary clarifiers, two chlorine contact basins for disinfection with sodium hypochlorite solution, and a sodium bisulfite solution dechlorination system. The plant also ST0007271—OlympicViewLandfill—DraftFactSheet-2015-05-27.docx DRAFT Department of Ecology_D Knutson Fact Sheet for State Waste Discharge Permit No. ST0007271 Waste Management of Washington, Inc. — Olympic View Sanitary Landfill Page 12 of 24 has a roughing biofilter available, but not currently used for treatment. The solids stream treatment system includes two rotating drum thickeners (RDTs), two anaerobic digesters, and a centrifuge. The plant also has a gravity thickener that is currently not in use. Pumps transfer primary sludge from the primary clarifiers directly to the anaerobic digesters for stabilization. Waste activated sludge pumps direct secondary sludge to the RDTs for thickening. The thickened secondary sludge is then pumped to the anaerobic digesters. The centrifuge dewaters the digested sludge before it is shipped out as a Class B biosolids to city -owned forest lands for silviculture purposes. Water removed from solids by the RDT and the centrifuge, along with supernatant decanted from the digesters, return to the head of the plant for treatment. Design Criteria — City of Bremerton West Plant: Ecology originally approved design criteria for the City of Bremerton West Plant in the plans and specifications. dated April 1983, prepared by CH2M Hill. Subsequently, Ecology approved higher flow design criteria for this plant in the Westside Wastewater Treatment Plant Rerating Study dated December 2009, prepared by Richwine Environmental. The table below includes design criteria from the referenced reports. Design Criteria for City of Bremerton West Plant Maximum Month Design Flow (MMDF) 15.5 MGD Maximum Month Design Flow (MMDF) (May through September) 11.0 MGD BODS Loading for Maximum Month 18,100 lb/day TSS Loading for Maximum Month 22,600 lblday J. State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA) Compliance State law exempts the issuance, reissuance, or modification of any wastewater discharge permit from the SEPA process as long as the permit contains conditions are no less stringent than federal and state rules and regulations (RCW 43.21C.0383). The exemption applies only to existing discharges, not to new discharges. Olympic View Sanitary Landfill is an existing discharger with an existing state waste discharge permit. K. Activities of Washington State Department of Ecology Waste 2 Resources Program The Department of Ecology's Waste 2 Resources (formerly Solid Waste Program) Draft Cleanup and Remedial Action Plan and a State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA) determination for public review in 2010. The remedial action activities are intended to address groundwater concentrations which exceed criteria for a number of chlorinated organic compounds. The site exceeds state groundwater quality standards for volatile organic compounds and metals. The groundwater contamination prompted investigation and improvements to operations at the landfill. Improvements included replacing old leachate lagoons with anew double -lined leachate lagoon, improvements to the gas collection system, and site closure. The investigations led to an Agreed Order in 2001 to conduct a Remedial Investigation and Feasibility Study. Results of the Remedial Investigation and Feasibility Study were documented in reports that were made available to the public for review and comment in November 2010. Ecology prepared a draft Cleanup Action Plan which was also available for public review at that time. After reviewing the comments received, Ecology finalized the Cleanup Action Plan. ST0007271_OlympicViewLandfill—DraFtFactSheet_2015-05-27.docx DRAFT Department of Ecology_D Knutson Fact Sheet for State Waste Discharge Permit No. ST0007271 Waste Management of Washington, Inc. ; Olympic View Sanitary Landfill Page 13 of 24 The selected cleanup action for the OVSL Site is described in the Cleanup Action Plan and includes: • Operate and maintain the existing source control and containment systems. • Repair, modify, and upgrade the landfill systems. • Install additional landfill gas extraction wells. • Monitor groundwater and soil gas. • Monitor the natural attenuation of contaminants. • Continue institutional controls. In June 2011, Ecology and WMW signed an Agreed Order for implementing the Cleanup Action Plan. The Order requires WMW to implement the elements of the Cleanup Action Plan and includes a schedule for submitting specific documents related to the actions. The Order also specifies ongoing reporting requirements. Attachments to the Order include the Cleanup Action Plan and an Environmental (Restrictive) _Covenant that establishes limitations on the use of the landfill property. III. Proposed permit limits State regulations require that Ecology base limits in a State Waste Discharge Permit on the: • Technology and treatment methods available to treat specific pollutants (technology -based). Technology -based limits are set by the EPA and published as a regulation (40 CFR 400 - 471), or Ecology develops limits on a case -by -case basis (40 CFR 125.3, and RCW 90.48). Dischargers must treat wastewater using all known, available, reasonable methods of prevention, control, and treatment (AKART). • Effects of the pollutants on the publicly owned treatment works (POTW). Wastewater must not interfere with the operation of the POTW. Ecology considers local limits in developing permit limits. • Applicable requirements of other local, state and federal laws. Ecology applies the most stringent of these limits to each parameter of concern and further describes the proposed limits below. The limits in this permit reflect information received in the application and from supporting reports (engineering, hydrogeology, monitoring, etc.). Ecology evaluated the permit application and determined the limits needed to comply with the rules adopted by the state of Washington. Ecology does not develop effluent limits for all reported pollutants. Some pollutants are not treatable at the concentrations reported, are not controllable at the source, and are not listed in regulation. Ecology does not usually develop permit limits for pollutants not reported in the permit application but which may be present in the discharge. The permit does not authorize the discharge of the non -reported pollutants. During the five-year permit term, the facility's effluent discharge conditions may change from those conditions reported in the permit application. The facility must notify Ecology if significant changes occur in any constituent. Until Ecology modifies the permit to reflect additional discharge of pollutants, a permitted facility could be violating its permit. ST0007271_OlympicViewLandrill_DraftFactSheet_2015-05-27.docx DRAFT Department of Ecoiogy_D Knutson Fact Sheet for State Waste Discharge Permit No. ST0007271 Waste Management of Washington, Inc. -- Olympic View Sanitary Landfill Page 14 of 24 A. Technology -based effluent limitations All waste discharge permits issued by the Department of Ecology must specify conditions requiring available and reasonable methods of prevention, control, and treatment of discharges to waters of the state (WAC 173-216-110). As Waste Management only seeks authorization to discharge process wastewater (leachate) from municipal solid waste to the City of Bremerton and City of Port Orchard POTWs, the landfill categorical limitations (which are only applicable to direct discharge) are not applicable to this site. In addition, the categorical limitations for Centralized Waste Treaters (40 CFR Part 437) which became effective on January 22, 2001, contain a specific exemption for landfills and transfer stations engaged in municipal solid waste -only operations. The Department of Ecology considers aeration to be consistent with AKART requirements, with respect to removal of BOD. B. Effluent limitations based on local limits -- City of Bremerton In order to protect the City of Bremerton POTW from pass -through, interference, concentrations of toxic chemicals that would impair beneficial or designated uses of sludge, or potentially hazardous exposure levels, effluent limitations for certain parameters are necessary. Data indicates that the only metals which appear to have a potential for exceeding the permit limitations are copper, nickel, and zinc. Therefore, monitoring limitations for those three metals are included in the proposed permit. The limitations in the permit applicable to discharges to the City of Bremerton POTW are based on the City of Bremerton Municipal Code as cited in the table below, for metals and pH, The existing permit and proposed permit contain a BOD5 limitation of 400 mg/L and a TSS limitation of 425 mgjl,. Waste Management requested in its letter of May 11, 2001, that Olympic View Sanitary Landfill's BOD5 limitation be increased to 400 mg/L and its TSS limitation be increased to 425 mg/L. Olympic View Sanitary Landfill staff members discussed the proposed increase in BOD5 limitations with City of Bremerton staff members. Mr. Pat Coxon, of the City of Bremerton, sent a letter on May 10, 2001, agreeing that the BOD5/TSS limitations could be increased to 400 mg/L and 425 mg/L, respectively. The permit issued September 16, 2002, contained those limitations. Local Discharge Limitations City of Bremerton I'OTW Chapter 15.0311U,.210 rer►ised 2014) (City of Breme'r#'on MunrcipalCode._ Pollutan# Parameter= Local Lmiation Cadmium, T (mg/L) 0.10 Chromium, T (mg/L) 1.0 Copper, T (mg/L) 0.75 Lead, T (mg/L) 0.25 Nickel, T (mg/L) 0.60 Silver, T (mg/L) 0.20 Zinc, T (mg/L) 2.0 pH (standard pH units) 6.0-10.0 ST0007271_OlympicViewLandfill_DraftEactSheet_2015-05-27.docx DRAFT Department of Ecology_D Knutson Fact Sheet for State Waste Discharge Permit No. ST0007271 Waste Management of Washington, Inc. -- Olympic View Sanitary Landfill Page 15 of 24 C. Effluent limitations based on local limits — South Kitsap Water Reclamation Facility In order to protect the South Kitsap Water Reclamation Facility from pass -through, interference, concentrations of toxic chemicals that would impair beneficial or designated uses of sludge, or potentially hazardous exposure levels, effluent limitations for certain parameters are necessary for discharges to the City of Port Orchard POTW. The limitations for GODS and TSS are based on the City of Port Orchard Municipal Code as cited in the table below. The metals limits are retained from the existing permit. State regulations require that limitations set forth in a waste discharge permit must be based on the technology available to treat the pollutants (technology -based) or be based on the effects of the pollutants to the POTW (local limits). Waste water must be treated using all known, available, and reasonable treatment (AKART) and not interfere with the operation of the POTW. Aeration and settling, as conducted in the waste storage pond, together with the secondary treatment provided at the POTW are anticipated by the Department of Ecology to result in compliance with AKART requirements. The South Kitsap Water Reclamation Facility has a relatively small design capacity (4.4. million gallons per day). Based on this fact, and the fact that landfill leachate BODS values may approach 400 mg/L, the Department of Ecology proposes a flow limitation for landfill leachate the South Kitsap Water Reclamation Facility of 125,000 gallons per day. This flow limitation is intended to minimize the potential of upsets or other system perturbations at the South Kitsap Water Reclamation Facility, D. Effluent limitations and monitoring for priority pollutant organic compounds The proposed permit contains monitoring requirements for only the volatile (i.e. purgeable) moiety of priority pollutant organic compounds. The decision was made to require monitoring of this subset due to the fact that groundwater remediation at the site for organic compounds is required on the basis of the concentration of certain volatile organic compounds. IV. Monitoring Requirements Ecology requires monitoring, recording, and reporting (WAC 173-216-110) to verify that the treatment process functions correctly and that the discharge complies with the permit's effluent limits. If a facility uses a contract laboratory to monitor wastewater, it must ensure that the laboratory uses the methods and meets or exceeds the method detection levels required by the permit. The permit describes when facilities may use alternative methods. It also describes what to do in ST0007271_OlympicViewLandfill_DraftFactSheet_2015-05-27.docx DRAFT Department of Ecology_D Knutson Fact Sheet for State Waste Discharge Permit No. ST0007271 Waste Management of Washington, Inc. — Olympic View Sanitary Landfill Page 16 of 24 certain situations when the laboratory encounters matrix effects. When a facility uses an alternative method as allowed by the permit, it must report the test method, DL, and QL on the discharge monitoring report or in the required report. A. Laboratory accreditation Ecology requires that facilities must use a laboratory registered or accredited under the provisions of chapter 173-50 WAC, Accreditation of Environmental Laboratories, to prepare all monitoring data (with the exception of certain parameters). B. Wastewater monitoring Ecology details the proposed monitoring schedule under Special Condition S2. Specified monitoring frequencies take into account the quantity and variability of the discharge, the treatment method, past compliance, significance of pollutants, and cost of monitoring. V. Other permit conditions A. Reporting and record keeping Ecology based Special Condition S3 on its authority to specify any appropriate reporting and record keeping requirements to prevent and control waste discharges [WAC 173-216-110 and CFR 403.12 (c),(g), and (h)]. B. Operations and maintenance Ecology requires dischargers to take all reasonable steps to properly operate and maintain their wastewater treatment system in accordance with state regulations (WAC 173-240-080 and WAC 173-216-110). C. Prohibited discharges Ecology prohibits certain pollutants from being discharged to the POTW. These include substances which cause pass -through or interference, pollutants which may cause damage to the POTW or harm to the POTW workers (chapter 173-216 WAC) and the discharge of designated dangerous wastes not authorized by this permit (chapter 173-303 WAC). D. Dilution prohibited Ecology prohibits the facility from diluting its effluent as a partial or complete substitute for adequate treatment to achieve compliance with permit limits. E. Non -routine and unanticipated discharges Occasionally, this facility may generate wastewater not characterized in the permit application because it is not a routine discharge and the facility did not anticipate it at the time of application. These wastes typically consist of waters used to pressure -test storage tanks or fire water systems or of leaks from drinking water systems. ST0007271_OiympicViewLandfill—DraffFaclSheet_2015-05-27.docx DRAFT Deparlment of Ecology_D Knutson Fact Sheet for State Waste Discharge Permit No. ST0007271 Waste Management of Washington, Inc. -- Olympic View Sanitary Landfill Page 17 of 24 The permit authorizes non -routine and unanticipated discharges under certain conditions. The facility must characterize these waste waters for pollutants and examine the opportunities for reuse. Depending on the nature and extent of pollutants in this wastewater and on any opportunities for reuse, Ecology may: • Authorize the facility to discharge the water, • Require the facility to treat the wastewater. • Require the facility to reuse the wastewater. F. Slug discharge plan Ecology determined that the Permittee has the potential for a batch discharge or a spill that could adversely affect the treatment plant, therefore the proposed permit requires a slug discharge control plan j(40 CFR 403.8 (f)(1) (iii)(B)(6) and (f) (2)(vi)]. G. General conditions Ecology bases the standardized general conditions on state law and regulations. They are included in all state waste discharge permits issued by Ecology. VI. Public notification of noncompliance Ecology may annually publish a list of all industrial users in significant noncompliance with Pretreatment Standards or Requirements during any of the previous four quarters in a local newspaper. Accordingly, this permit Special Condition informs the facility that noncompliance with this permit may result in publication of the noncompliance. VII. Permit issuance procedures A. Permit modifications Ecology may modify this permit to impose or change the numerical limits, if necessary, to comply with changes in the pretreatment requirements, conditions in local sewer ordinances, or based on new information from sources such as inspections and effluent monitoring. It may also modify this permit to comply with new or amended state or federal regulations. B. Proposed permit issuance This proposed permit meets all statutory requirements for authorizing a wastewater discharge, including those limits and conditions believed necessary to control toxics. Ecology proposes that the permit be issued for a period of five years. ST00.07271_OlympicViewLandfilf_DraftFaclSheet 2015-05-27.docx DRAFT Department of Ecology_D Knutson Fact Sheet for State Waste Discharge Permit No. ST0007271 Waste Management of Washington, Inc. — Olympic View Sanitary Landfill Page 18 of 24 Appendix A — Public Involvement Information Ecology proposes to reissue a permit to Waste Management of Washington, Inc. — Olympic View Sanitary Landfill. The permit includes wastewater discharge limits and other conditions. This fact sheet describes the facility and Ecology's reasons for requiring permit conditions. Ecology will place a Public Notice of Draft on XX XX, 20XX in the Kitsap Sun to inform the public and to invite comment on the proposed draft State Waste Discharge permit and fact sheet. The notice: • Tells where copies of the draft permit and fact sheet are available for public evaluation (a local public library, the closest Regional or Field Office, posted on our website). • Offers to provide the documents in an alternate format to accommodate special needs. • Urges people to submit their comments, in writing, before the end of the comment period, • Tells how to request a public hearing of comments about the proposed State Waste Discharge Permit. • Explains the next step(s) in the permitting process. Ecology has published a document entitled Frequently Asked Questions about Effective Public Commenting, which is available on our website at https:llfortress.wa.gov/ecy/publications/SummaryPages/0307023. html. You may obtain further information from Ecology by telephone, (425) 649-7025, or by writing to the address listed below. Department of Ecology Northwest Regional Office 3190 - 160th Avenue SE Bellevue, WA 98008-5452 ST0007271—OlympicViewLandfill—Draf[FactSheet_2015-05-27.docx DRAFT Department of Ecology D Knutson Fact Sheet for State Waste Discharge Permit No. ST0007271 Waste Management of Washington, Inc. -- Olympic View Sanitary Landfill Page 19 of 24 Appendix B — Your Right to Appeal You have a right to appeal this permit to the Pollution Control Hearing Board (PCHB) within 30 days of the date of receipt of the final permit. The appeal process is governed by chapter 43.21B RCW and chapter 371-08 WAC. "Date of receipt" is defined in RCW 43.21B.001(2) (see glossary). To appeal you must do the following within 30 days of the date of receipt of this permit: File your appeal and a copy of this permit with the PCHB (see addresses below). Filing means actual receipt by the PCHB during regular business hours. Serve a copy of your appeal and this permit on Ecology in paper form - by mail or in person. (See addresses below.) E-mail is not accepted. You must also comply with other applicable requirements in chapter 43.21B RCW and chapter 371-08 WAC. ADDRESS AN DLOCATION;INFQRMATI�N Department of Ecology Attn: Appeals Processing Desk 300 Desmond Drive SE Lacey, WA 98503 Pollution Control Hearings Board 1111 Israel RD SW Ste 301 Tumwater, WA 98501 Department of Ecology Attn: Appeals Processing Desk PO Box 47608 Olympia, WA 98504-7608 Pollution Control Hearings Board PO Box 40903 Olympia, WA 98504-0903 ST0007271_OlympicViewLandfill_DraftFactSheet_2015-05-27.docx DRAFT Department of Ecology_D Knutson Fact Sheet for State Waste Discharge Permit No. ST0007271 Waste Management of Washington, Inc. — Olympic View Sanitary landfill Page 20 of 24 Appendix C — Glossary AKART -- The acronym for "all known, available, and reasonable methods of prevention, control and treatment." AKART is a technology -based approach to limiting pollutants from wastewater discharges, which requires an engineering judgment and an economic judgment. AKART must be applied to all wastes and contaminants prior to entry into waters of the state in accordance with RCW 90.48.010 and 520, WAC 173-200-030(2)(c)(ii), and WAC 173-216-110(1)(a). Average monthly discharge limit -- The average of the measured values obtained over a calendar month's time. Best management practices (BMPs) -- Schedules of activities, prohibitions of practices, maintenance procedures, and other physical, structural and/or managerial practices to prevent or reduce the pollution of waters of the state. BMPs include treatment systems, operating procedures, and practices to control: plant site runoff, spillage or leaks, sludge or waste disposal, or drainage from raw material storage. BMPs may be further categorized as operational, source control, erosion and sediment control, and treatment BMPs. BOD5 -- Determining the five-day Biochemical Oxygen Demand of an effluent is an indirect way of measuring the quantity of organic material present in an effluent that is utilized by bacteria. The BOD5 is used in modeling to measure the reduction of dissolved oxygen in receiving waters after effluent is discharged. Stress caused by reduced dissolved oxygen levels makes organisms less competitive and less able to sustain their species in the aquatic environment. Although BOD5 is not a specific compound, it is defined as a conventional pollutant under the federal Clean Water Act. Bypass -- The intentional diversion of waste streams from any portion of a treatment facility. Categorical pretreatment standards -- National pretreatment standards specifying quantities or concentrations of pollutants or pollutant properties, which may be discharged to a POTW by existing or new industrial users in specific industrial subcategories. Clean water act (CWA) -- The federal Water Pollution Control Act enacted by Public Law 92-500, as amended by Public Laws 95-217, 95-576, 96-483, 97-117; USC 1251 et seq. Composite sample -- A mixture of grab samples collected at the same sampling point at different times, formed either by continuous sampling or by mixing discrete samples. May be "time -composite" (collected at constant time intervals) or "flow -proportional" (collected either as a constant sample volume at time intervals proportional to stream flow, or collected by increasing the volume of each aliquot as the flow increased while maintaining a constant time interval between the aliquots). Continuous monitoring -- Uninterrupted, unless otherwise noted in the permit. Date of receipt -- This is defined in RCW 43.21B.001(2) as five business days after the date of mailing; or the date of actual receipt, when the actual receipt date can be proven by a preponderance of the evidence. The recipient's sworn affidavit or declaration indicating the date of receipt, which is unchallenged by the agency, constitutes sufficient evidence of actual receipt. The date of actual receipt, however, may not exceed forty-five days from the date of mailing. ST0007271—OiympicViewLandfill—DraRFactSheet_2015-05-27.docx DRAFT Department of EcologywD Knutson Fact Sheet for State Waste Discharge Permit No. ST0007271 Waste Management of Washington, Inc. — Olympic View Sanitary Landfill Page 21 of 24 Detection limit -- The minimum concentration of a substance that can be measured and reported with 99 percent confidence that the pollutant concentration is above zero and is determined from analysis of a sample in a given matrix containing the pollutant. Engineering report -- A document that thoroughly examines the engineering and administrative aspects of a particular domestic or industrial wastewater facility. The report must contain the appropriate information required in WAC 173-240-060 or 173-240-130. Grab sample -- A single sample or measurement taken at a specific time or over as short a period of time as is feasible. Industrial user -- A discharger of wastewater to the sanitary sewer that is not sanitary wastewater or is not equivalent to sanitary wastewater in character. Industrial wastewater -- Water or liquid -carried waste from industrial or commercial processes, as distinct from domestic wastewater. These wastes may result from any process or activity of industry, manufacture, trade or business; from the development of any natural resource; or from animal operations such as feed lots, poultry houses, or dairies. The term includes contaminated storm water and, also, leachate from solid waste facilities. Interference -- A discharge which, alone or in conjunction with a discharge or discharges from other sources, both: o Inhibits or disrupts the POTW, its treatment processes or operations, or its sludge processes, use or disposal; and Therefore is a cause of a violation of any requirement of the POTW's NPDES permit (including an increase in the magnitude or duration of a violation) or of the prevention of sewage sludge use or disposal in compliance with the following statutory provisions and regulations or permits issued thereunder (or more stringent State or local regulations): Section 405 of the Clean Water Act, the Solid Waste Disposal Act (SWDA) (including title II, more commonly referred to as the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA), and including State regulations contained in any State sludge management plan prepared pursuant to subtitle D of the SWDA), sludge regulations appearing in 40 CFR Part 507, the Clean Air Act, the Toxic Substances Control Act, and the Marine Protection, Research and Sanctuaries Act, Local limits -- Specific prohibitions or limits on pollutants or pollutant parameters developed by a POT W. Maximum daily discharge limit -- The highest allowable daily discharge of a pollutant measured during a calendar day or any 24-hour period that reasonably represents the calendar day for purposes of sampling. The daily discharge is calculated as the average measurement of the pollutant over the day. Method detection level (MDL) -- See Method Detection Level. Mixing zone -- An area that surrounds an effluent discharge within which water quality criteria may be exceeded. The permit specifies the area of the authorized mixing zone that Ecology defines following procedures outlined in state regulations (chapter 173-201A WAC). National pollutant discharge elimination system (NPDES) -- The NPDES (Section 402-of the Clean Water Act) is the federal wastewater permitting system for discharges to navigable ST0007271—OlympicViewLandfill—DraftFactSheet_2015-05-27.docx DRAFT Department of Ecoiogy_D Knutson Fact Sheet for State Waste Discharge Permit No. ST0007271 Waste Management of Washington, Inc. -- Olympic View Sanitary Landfill Page 22 of 24 waters of the United States. Many states, including the state of Washington, have been delegated the authority to issue these permits, NPDES permits issued by Washington State permit writers are joint NPDES/State permits issued under both state and federal laws. pH -- The pH of a liquid measures its acidity or alkalinity. It is the negative logarithm of the hydrogen ion concentration. A pH of 7 is defined as neutral and large variations above or below this value are considered harmful to most aquatic life. Pass -through -- A discharge which exits the POTW into waters of the State in quantities or concentrations which, alone or in conjunction with a discharge or discharges from other sources, is a cause of a violation of any requirement of the POTW's NPDES permit (including an increase in the magnitude or duration of a violation), or which is a cause of a violation of State water quality standards. Potential significant industrial user (PSIU) --A potential significant industrial user is defined as an Industrial User that does not meet the criteria for a Significant Industrial User, but which discharges wastewater meeting one or more of the following criteria: a. Exceeds 0.5 % of treatment plant design capacity criteria and discharges <25,000 gallons per day; or b. Is a member of a group of similar industrial users which, taken together, have the potential to cause pass through or interference at the POTW (e.g. facilities which develop photographic film or paper, and car washes). Ecology may determine that a discharger initially classified as a potential significant industrial user should be managed as a significant industrial user. Quantitation level (QL) -- Also known as Minimum Level of Quantitation (ML) —The lowest level at which the entire analytical system must give a recognizable signal and acceptable calibration point for the analyte. It is equivalent to the concentration of the lowest calibration standard, assuming that the lab has used all method -specified sample weights, volumes, and cleanup procedures. The QL is calculated by multiplying the MDL by 3.18 and rounding the result to the number nearest to (1, 2, or 5) x 10", where n is an integer (64 FR 30417). ALSO GIVEN AS: The smallest detectable concentration of analyte greater than the Detection Limit (DL) where the accuracy (precision & bias) achieves the objectives of the intended purpose. (Report of the Federal Advisory Committee on Detection and Quantitation Approaches and Uses in Clean Water Act Programs Submitted to the US Environmental Protection Agency, December 2007). Reasonable potential -- A reasonable potential to cause a water quality violation, or loss of sensitive and/or important habitat. Responsible corporate officer -- A president, secretary, treasurer, or vice-president of the corporation in charge of a principal business function, or any other person who performs similar policy- or decision -making functions for the corporation, or the manager of one or more manufacturing, production, or operating facilities employing more than 250 persons or have gross annual sales or expenditures exceeding $25 million (in second quarter 1950 dollars), if authority to sign documents has been assigned or delegated to the manager in accordance with corporate procedures (40 CFR 122.22). ST0007271_OlympicViewLandfll_DraftFactSheet_2015-05-27.docx DRAFT Department of Ecology_D Knutson Fact Sheet for State Waste Discharge Permit No. ST0007271 Waste Management of Washington, Inc. — Olympic View Sanitary Landfill Page 23 of 24 Significant industrial user (SIU) -- 1) All industrial users subject to Categorical Pretreatment Standards under 40 CFR 403.E and 40 CFR Chapter I, Subchapter N; and 2) Any other industrial user that discharges an average of 25,000 gallons per day or more of process wastewater to the POTW (excluding sanitary, noncontact cooling, and boiler blow -down wastewater); contributes a process wastestream that makes up 5 percent or more of the average dry weather hydraulic or organic capacity of the POTW treatment plant; or is designated as such by the Control Authority* on the basis that the industrial user has a reasonable potential for adversely affecting the POTW's operation or for violating any pretreatment standard or requirement [in accordance with 40 CFR 403.8(f)(6)]. Upon fmding that the industrial user meeting the criteria in paragraph 2, above, has no reasonable potential for adversely affecting the POTW's operation or for violating any pretreatment standard or requirement, the Control Authority* may at any time, on its own initiative or in response to a petition received from an industrial user or POTW, and in accordance with 40 CFR 403.8(f)(6), determine that such industrial user is not a significant industrial user. *The terra "Control Authority" refers to the Washington State Department of Ecology in the case of non -delegated POTWs or to the POTW in the case of delegated POTWs. Slug discharge -- Any discharge of a non -routine, episodic nature, including but not limited to an accidental spill or a non -customary batch discharge to the POTW. This may include any pollutant released at a flow rate that may cause interference or pass through with the POTW or in any way violate the permit conditions or the POTW's regulations and local limits. Solid waste -- All putrescible and non-putrescible solid and semisolid wastes including, but not limited to, garbage, rubbish, ashes, industrial wastes, swill, sewage sludge; demolition and construction wastes, abandoned vehicles or parts thereof, contaminated soils and contaminated dredged material, and recyclable materials. State waters -- Lakes, rivers, ponds, streams, inland waters, underground waters, salt waters, and all other surface waters and watercourses within the jurisdiction of the state of Washington. Stormwater -- That portion of precipitation that does not naturally percolate into the ground or evaporate, but flows via overland flow, interflow, pipes, and other features of a stoma water drainage system into a defined surface water body, or a constructed infiltration facility. Technology -based effluent limit -- A permit limit based on the ability of a treatment method to reduce the pollutant. Total dissolved solids -- That portion of total solids in water or wastewater that passes through a specific filter. Total maximum daily load (TMDL) -- A determination of the amount of pollutant that a water body can receive and still meet water quality standards. Total suspended solids (TSS) -- Total suspended solids is the particulate material in an effluent. Large quantities of TSS discharged to a receiving water may result in solids accumulation. ST0007271—OlympicViewLandfill_DraftFactSheet_2015-05-27.docx DRAFT Department of Ecology_D Knutson Fact Sheet for State Waste Discharge Permit No. ST0007271 Waste Management of Washington, Inc. -- Olympic View Sanitary Landfill Page 24 of 24 Apart from any toxic effects attributable to substances leached out by water, suspended solids may kill fish, shellfish, and other aquatic organisms by causing abrasive injuries and by clogging the gills and respiratory passages of various aquatic fauna. Indirectly, suspended solids can screen out light and can promote and maintain the development of noxious conditions through oxygen depletion. Upset -- An exceptional incident in which there is unintentional and temporary noncompliance with technology -based permit effluent limits because of factors beyond the reasonable control of the Permittee. An upset does not include noncompliance to the extent caused by operational error, improperly designed treatment facilities, lack of preventative maintenance, or careless or improper operation. Water quality -based effluent limit -- A limit imposed on the concentration of an effluent parameter to prevent the concentration of that parameter from exceeding its water quality criterion after discharge into receiving waters. ST0007271_OlympicViewLandfll_DraftFaclSheet_2015-05-27.docx DRAFT Department of Ecology_D Knutson Appendix G Model Results City of Port Orchard General Sewer Plan Update Existing Peak Day Pump Summary Sheet Prepared By: Peter Cunningham Reviewed By: Adam Schuyler 9/18/2015 ID Maximum Max.Flow Day- Minimum Min.Flow Day -Time Average Flow Total Volume Total Surcharge Percent Start -Up Time Off Low Time Off High Power Usage Instability Flow (gpm) Time (day -time) Flow (gpm) (day -time) (gpm) (Gallon) Time (Minutes) Utilized (%) Count Curve (%) Curve (%) (KW-Hr) Index PUMP-ALBERTSON1 800 0 - 00:08 hrs 29.448 0 - 22:32 hrs 172.829 0- 00:00 hrs 0 0- 00:00 hrs 0 31,400.02 557.663 38.726 0 0 0 137,192.23 594.356 41.275 129 0 _ 0.093 32.172 0 0 0 0 0 0 PUMP-ALBERTSON2 0 PUMP-BAY1 1,000.00 0 - 00:03 hrs 186.78 0 - 01:58 hrs 708.468 226 0 0.9 30.808 0 PUMP-BAY2 0 0- 00:00 hrs 0 0- 00:00 hrs 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 PUMP-CANYONPUMPI 80.599 0 - 21:44 hrs 51.666 0 - 16:28 hrs 68.796 23,032.17 1,027.57 71.359 40 0 0 29.66 0 PUMP-CANYONPUMP2 0 0- 00:00 hrs 0 0- 00:00 hrs 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 PUMP-CEDAR1 150 0 - 02:47 hrs 60.648 0 - 23:28 hrs 142.614 4,563.76 98.22 6.821 54 0 0.051 0.793 0 PUMP-CEDAR2 0 0- 00:00 hrs 0 0- 00:00 hrs 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 PUMP-EAGLECREST1 670 0 - 00:02 hrs 52.95 0 - 23:32 hrs 181.669 35,660.61 602.474 41.838 966 0 1.06 11.572 1 PUMP-EAGLECREST2 0 0- 00:00 hrs 0 0- 00:00 hrs 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 PUMP-FLOWERPUMP1 234.059 0 - 07:54 hrs 46.034 0 - 23:27 hrs 204.159 67,355.84 1,012.62 70.321 81 0 0 58.671 0 PUMP-FLOWERPUMP2 234.059 0 - 07:54 hrs 100.23 0 - 07:01 hrs 180.403 1,365.08 23.225 1.613 3 0 0 1.438 0 PUMP-GOLDENPUMP1 96.076 0 - 07:13 hrs 11.517 0 - 23:30 hrs 91.242 16,715.55 562.295 39.048 85 0 0 14.423 0 PUMP-GOLDENPUMP2 0 0- 00:00 hrs 0 0- 00:00 hrs 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 PUMP-HARRISON1 327.206 0 - 07:11 hrs 16.468 0 - 06:31 hrs 299.313 26,025.40 266.87 18.533 27 0 0 27.581 0 PUMP-HARRISON2 0 0- 00:00 hrs 0 0- 00:00 hrs 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 PUMP-LOWES1 990 0 - 00:01 hrs 39.301 0 - 05:15 hrs 423.08 13,737.28 99.686 6.923 78 0 0.957 9.177 0 PUMP-LOWES2 0 0- 00:00 hrs 0 0- 00:00 hrs 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 PUMP-MARINA1 3,877.71 0 - 08:29 hrs 1,940.25 0 - 10:00 hrs 3,778.18 787,616.50 639.842 44.433 59 0 0 732.316 0 PUMP-MARINA2 0 0- 00:00 hrs 0 0- 00:00 hrs 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 PUMP-MARINA3 1,721.43 0 - 09:56 hrs 421.33 0 - 19:09 hrs 923.115 227,657.94 756.897 52.562 59 0 0 101.512 0 PUMP-MARINA4 862.41 0 -19:30 hrs 579.827 0 - 09:57 hrs 835.262 148,006.45 543.85 37.767 62 0 0 69.327 0 PUMP-MCCORMICKMEADOWSI 299.307 0 - 00:07 hrs 28.191 0 - 00:07 hrs 171.577 18,272.81 326.876 22.7 67 0 0 12.082 0 PUMP-MCCORMICKMEADOWS2 0 0- 00:00 hrs 0 0- 00:00 hrs 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 PUMP-MCCORMICKWI-PUMP1 3,500.00 0 - 00:28 hrs 957.321 0 - 23:52 hrs 1,316.79 388,611.78 905.8 62.903 80 0 0.037 438.213 0 PUMP-MCCORMICKWI-PUMP2 0 0- 00:00 hrs 0 0- 00:00 hrs 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 PUMP-MCCORMICKW2-PUMP1 1,367.86 0 - 23:55 hrs 570.624 0 - 23:55 hrs 1,259.11 242,446.17 591.008 41.042 120 0 0 118.347 0 PUMP-MCCORMICKW2-PUMP2 0 0- 00:00 hrs 0 0- 00:00 hrs 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 PUMP-POTTERY-1 2,681.94 0 - 06:52 hrs 528.3 0 - 23:07 hrs 1,862.24 178,654.41 294.451 20.448 509 0 0 131.446 0 PUMP-POTTERY-2 0 0- 00:00 hrs 0 0- 00:00 hrs 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 PUMP-RIDGE1&2-PUMP1 266.633 0 - 11:37 hrs 100 0 - 00:45 hrs 242.589 25,462.69 322.163 22.372 14 0 0.057 17.592 0 PUMP-RIDGEI&2-PUMP2 0 0- 00:00 hrs 0 0- 00:00 hrs 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 PUMP-RIDGE3-PUMP1 850 0 - 00:00 hrs 71.872 0 - 00:00 hrs 252.142 20,956.67 255.093 17.715 490 0 0.003 26.545 0 PUMP-RIDGE3-PUMP2 0 0- 00:00 hrs 0 0- 00:00 hrs 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 PUMP-SEDGWICK1 1,196.52 0 - 23:29 hrs 21.366 0 - 23:29 hrs 275.484 28,645.30 319.141 22.162 23 0 0 44.146 0 PUMP-SEDGWICK2 0 0- 00:00 hrs 0 0- 00:00 hrs 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 PUMP-TREMONTPLACEPUMPI 150 0 - 00:12 hrs 122.056 0 - 23:13 hrs 139.57 31,578.33 694.445 48.225 85 0 0.126 7.937 0 PUMP-TREMONTPLACEPUMP2 0 0- 00:00 hrs 0 0- 00:00 hrs 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 City of Port Orchard General Sewer Plan Update 2022 Peak Day Pump Summary Sheet Prepared By: Peter Cunningham Reviewed By: Adam Schuyler 9/18/2015 ID Maximum Max.Flow Day- Minimum Min.Flow Day -Time Average Flow Total Volume Total Surcharge Percent Start -Up Time Off Low Time Off High Power Usage Instability Flow (gpm) Time (day -time) Flow (gpm) (day -time) (gpm) (Gallon) Time (Minutes) Utilized (%) Count Curve (%) Curve (%) (KW-Hr) Index PUMP-ALBERTSON1 800 0 - 00:09 hrs 25.144 0 - 14:19 hrs 140.974 0 - 12:04 hrs 70.277 0 - 11:02 hrs 85.314 41,442.98 895.764 62.206 6,836.31 245.45 17.045 103 0 _ 0.047 42.595 0 1 0 0 7.214 0 PUMP-ALBERTSON2 99.465 PUMP-BAY1 1,000.00 0 - 00:05 hrs 186.815 0 - 06:15 hrs 709.78 141,512.41 612.096 42.507 220 0 0.839 31.631 0 PUMP-BAY2 0 0- 00:00 hrs 0 0- 00:00 hrs 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 PUMP-CANYONPUMPI 87.964 0 - 12:07 hrs 18.373 0 - 17:45 hrs 66.875 22,071.34 1,011.42 70.238 36 0 0 28.675 0 PUMP-CANYONPUMP2 64.108 0 -10:48 hrs 36.371 0 -10:37 hrs 49.224 1,434.49 89.388 6.207 1 0 0 2.079 0 PUMP-CEDAR1 150 0 - 07:22 hrs 45.965 0 - 13:56 hrs 142.498 4,689.96 101.012 7.015 55 0 0.066 0.826 0 PUMP-CEDAR2 0 0- 00:00 hrs 0 0- 00:00 hrs 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 PUMP-EAGLECREST1 670 0 - 00:03 hrs 7.945 0 - 14:41 hrs 186.55 41,325.30 680.859 47.282 954 0 0.965 13.363 1 PUMP-EAGLECREST2 0 0- 00:00 hrs 0 0- 00:00 hrs 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 PUMP-FLOWERPUMP1 240 0 - 11:45 hrs 44.683 0 - 02:59 hrs 202.996 67,408.14 1,019.21 70.778 79 0 0.001 59.185 0 PUMP-FLOWERPUMP2 234.467 0 - 12:15 hrs 100.402 0 - 10:00 hrs 183.012 6,228.97 104.474 7.255 11 0 0 6.439 0 PUMP-GOLDENPUMPI 170 0 - 13:47 hrs 7.455 0 - 03:09 hrs 91.668 17,068.10 571.893 39.715 87 0 0.02 14.716 0 PUMP-GOLDENPUMP2 0 0- 00:00 hrs 0 0- 00:00 hrs 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 PUMP-HARRISON1 328.248 0 - 11:19 hrs 15.382 0 - 13:52 hrs 301.355 27,087.13 275.918 19.161 28 0 0 28.675 0 PUMP-HARRISON2 0 0- 00:00 hrs 0 0- 00:00 hrs 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 PUMP-LOWES1 990 0 - 00:18 hrs 39.263 0 - 04:37 hrs 430.774 17,082.96 121.766 8.456 153 0 2.057 11.361 0 PUMP-LOWES2 0 0- 00:00 hrs 0 0- 00:00 hrs 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 PUMP-MARINA1 4,557.45 0 - 15:03 hrs 1,895.57 0 - 10:49 hrs 3,286.01 833,679.75 772.235 53.627 48 0 0 816.385 0 PUMP-MARINA2 2,377.30 0 - 12:15 hrs 1,895.57 0 - 10:49 hrs 2,362.88 195,440.81 253.862 17.629 1 0 0 223.076 0 PUMP-MARINA3 1,721.48 0 - 08:45 hrs 421.341 0 - 04:35 hrs 939.497 193,579.34 632.391 43.916 49 0 0 85.615 0 PUMP-MARINA4 862.257 0 - 04:28 hrs 575.064 0 - 02:33 hrs 831.062 110,496.27 408.066 28.338 52 0 0 51.862 0 PUMP-MCCORMICKMEADOWSI 800 0 - 01:36 hrs 21.724 0 - 11:25 hrs 181.119 21,935.09 371.845 25.823 77 0 0.009 14.297 0 PUMP-MCCORMICKMEADOWS2 0 0- 00:00 hrs 0 0- 00:00 hrs 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 PUMP-MCCORMICKW1-PUMP1 3,500.00 0 - 00:06 hrs 736.114 0 - 13:34 hrs 1,273.35 411,195.59 989.932 68.745 70 0 0.041 465.937 0 PUMP-MCCORMICKWI-PUMP2 3,500.00 0 - 10:40 hrs 736.114 0 - 13:34 hrs 996.647 52,896.81 163.114 11.327 5 0 0.072 62.724 0 PUMP-MCCORMICKW2-PUMP1 1,367.85 0 - 02:31 hrs 513.972 0 - 14:52 hrs 1,258.49 310,638.09 757.599 52.611 109 0 0 151.795 0 PUMP-MCCORMICKW2-PUMP2 0 0- 00:00 hrs 0 0- 00:00 hrs 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 PUMP-POTTERY-1 2,681.97 0 - 11:48 hrs 65.37 0 - 13:37 hrs 1,895.03 217,498.59 352.591 24.485 565 0 0 158.027 0 PUMP-POTTERY-2 0 0- 00:00 hrs 0 0- 00:00 hrs 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 PUMP-RIDGE1&2-PUMP1 266.848 0 - 12:10 hrs 100 0 - 02:15 hrs 242.529 24,222.81 306.525 21.286 13 0 0.055 16.736 0 PUMP-RIDGEI&2-PUMP2 0 0- 00:00 hrs 0 0- 00:00 hrs 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 PUMP-RIDGE3-PUMP1 850 0 - 01:21 hrs 5.208 0 - 13:18 hrs 257.013 21,061.00 252.326 17.523 568 0 0.573 26.823 0 PUMP-RIDGE3-PUMP2 0 0- 00:00 hrs 0 0- 00:00 hrs 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 PUMP-SEDGWICK1 1,196.32 0 - 23:51 hrs 16.121 0 - 13:21 hrs 279.79 34,774.13 381.862 26.518 28 0 0 53.513 0 PUMP-SEDGWICK2 0 0- 00:00 hrs 0 0- 00:00 hrs 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 PUMP-TREMONTPLACEPUMPI 150 0 - 00:01 hrs 117.795 0 - 14:07 hrs 139.406 32,424.61 713.804 49.57 80 0 0.12 8.262 0 PUMP-TREMONTPLACEPUMP2 0 0- 00:00 hrs 0 0- 00:00 hrs 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 City of Port Orchard General Sewer Plan Update 2026 Peak Day Pump Summary Sheet Prepared By: Peter Cunningham Reviewed By: Adam Schuyler 9/18/2015 ID Maximum Max.Flow Day- Minimum Min.Flow Day -Time Average Flow Total Volume Total Surcharge Percent Start -Up Time Off Low Time Off High Power Usage Instability Flow (gpm) Time (day -time) Flow (gpm) (day -time) (gpm) (Gallon) Time (Minutes) Utilized (%) Count Curve (%) Curve (%) (KW-Hr) Index PUMP-ALBERTSONI 800 0 - 00:16 hrs 28.955 0 - 05:01 hrs 130.37 0 -15:00 hrs 64.347 0 -10:00 hrs 90.917 44,602.16 1,040.26 72.24 12,909.28 435.936 30.273 82 _ 0 _ 0.031 45.945 0 1 0 0 13.58 0 PUMP-ALBERTSON2 115.33 PUMP-BAY1 1,000.00 0 - 00:05 hrs 187.077 0 - 06:16 hrs 709.977 143,537.45 620.677 43.102 221 0 0.829 32.05 0 PUMP-BAY2 0 0- 00:00 hrs 0 0- 00:00 hrs 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 PUMP-CANYONPUMP1 110 0 - 15:45 hrs 34.778 0 - 15:45 hrs 66.857 22,449.15 1,027.72 71.369 37 0 0.007 29.166 0 PUMP-CANYONPUMP2 63.358 0 - 12:07 hrs 36.089 0 - 11:07 hrs 49.736 1,311.04 81.112 5.633 1 0 0 1.897 0 PUMP-CEDAR1 150 0 - 06:03 hrs 54.649 0 - 15:12 hrs 142.473 4,778.47 102.941 7.149 56 0 0.081 0.847 0 PUMP-CEDAR2 0 0- 00:00 hrs 0 0- 00:00 hrs 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 PUMP-EAGLECREST1 670 0 - 00:00 hrs 24.522 0 - 15:36 hrs 189.075 44,362.38 721.167 50.081 955 0 1.022 14.36 1 PUMP-EAGLECREST2 0 0- 00:00 hrs 0 0- 00:00 hrs 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 PUMP-FLOWERPUMP1 240 0 - 11:51 hrs 23.825 0 - 13:37 hrs 202.64 68,279.66 1,033.71 71.785 80 0 0.012 60.055 0 PUMP-FLOWERPUMP2 234.45 0 - 13:53 hrs 97.614 0 - 11:15 hrs 183.853 7,977.05 133.185 9.249 14 0 0 8.195 0 PUMP-GOLDENPUMPI 170 0 - 15:18 hrs 9.529 0 - 11:15 hrs 91.697 17,300.76 579.437 40.239 88 0 0.02 14.916 0 PUMP-GOLDENPUMP2 0 0- 00:00 hrs 0 0- 00:00 hrs 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 PUMP-HARRISON1 328.466 0 - 13:37 hrs 15.533 0 - 13:37 hrs 302.467 26,438.03 268.348 18.635 27 0 0 27.971 0 PUMP-HARRISON2 0 0- 00:00 hrs 0 0- 00:00 hrs 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 PUMP-LOWES1 990 0 - 00:28 hrs 6.457 0 - 14:15 hrs 427.319 18,529.93 133.074 9.241 121 0 1.277 12.39 0 PUMP-LOWES2 0 0- 00:00 hrs 0 0- 00:00 hrs 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 PUMP-MARINA1 4,558.75 0 - 16:00 hrs 1,895.53 0 - 10:22 hrs 3,179.75 888,765.00 849.327 58.981 49 0 0 881.91 0 PUMP-MARINA2 2,377.40 0 - 12:37 hrs 1,895.53 0 - 10:22 hrs 2,361.65 259,682.56 337.512 23.438 1 0 0 296.437 0 PUMP-MARINA3 1,721.40 0 - 08:03 hrs 421.362 0 - 00:56 hrs 946.728 171,673.64 556.503 38.646 48 0 0 75.641 0 PUMP-MARINA4 862.195 0 - 00:49 hrs 575.313 0 - 02:29 hrs 829.871 94,103.71 348.019 24.168 51 0 0 44.19 0 PUMP-MCCORMICKMEADOWSI 298.287 0 - 00:08 hrs 32.439 0 - 00:08 hrs 184.397 24,121.37 401.606 27.889 80 0 0 15.648 0 PUMP-MCCORMICKMEADOWS2 0 0- 00:00 hrs 0 0- 00:00 hrs 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 PUMP-MCCORMICKW1-PUMP1 3,500.00 0 - 00:20 hrs 742.418 0 - 10:27 hrs 1,243.87 432,603.13 1,064.26 73.907 60 0 0.033 491.226 0 PUMP-MCCORMICKWI-PUMP2 3,500.00 0 - 10:02 hrs 742.418 0 - 10:27 hrs 963.866 76,222.85 242.581 16.846 4 0 0.041 90.326 0 PUMP-MCCORMICKW2-PUMP1 1,800.00 0 - 15:03 hrs 482.972 0 - 15:51 hrs 1,263.16 349,514.88 849.579 58.998 102 0 0.006 170.045 0 PUMP-MCCORMICKW2-PUMP2 0.00 0- 00:00 hrs 0 0- 00:00 hrs 0.00 0.00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 PUMP-POTTERY-1 2,681.96 0 - 11:49 hrs 35.884 0 - 15:52 hrs 1,908.03 239,845.44 386.175 26.818 592 0 0 174.286 0 PUMP-POTTERY-2 0 0- 00:00 hrs 0 0- 00:00 hrs 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 PUMP-RIDGE1&2-PUMP1 267.001 0 - 11:22 hrs 100 0 - 00:16 hrs 242.494 26,056.21 329.689 22.895 14 0 0.054 18.002 0 PUMP-RIDGEI&2-PUMP2 0 0- 00:00 hrs 0 0- 00:00 hrs 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 PUMP-RIDGE3-PUMP1 850 0 - 10:26 hrs 53.911 0 - 11:48 hrs 257.936 21,042.60 251.276 17.45 596 0 0.724 26.737 0 PUMP-RIDGE3-PUMP2 0 0- 00:00 hrs 0 0- 00:00 hrs 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 PUMP-SEDGWICK1 1,196.94 0 - 03:03 hrs 20.706 0 - 03:03 hrs 281.217 38,605.00 421.788 29.291 30 0 0 59.378 0 PUMP-SEDGWICK2 0 0- 00:00 hrs 0 0- 00:00 hrs 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 PUMP-TREMONTPLACEPUMPI 150 0 - 00:16 hrs 114.762 0 - 15:53 hrs 139.394 32,735.85 720.718 50.05 80 0 0.118 8.352 0 PUMP-TREMONTPLACEPUMP2 0 0- 00:00 hrs 0 0- 00:00 hrs 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 City of Port Orchard General Sewer Plan Update 2036 Peak Day Pump Summary Sheet Prepared By: Peter Cunningham Reviewed By: Adam Schuyler 9/18/2015 ID Maximum Max.Flow Day- Minimum Min.Flow Day -Time Average Flow Total Volume Total Surcharge Percent Start -Up Time Off Low Time Off High Power Usage Instability Flow (gpm) Time (day -time) Flow (gpm) (day -time) (gpm) (Gallon) Time (Minutes) Utilized (%) Count Curve (%) Curve (%) (KW-Hr) Index PUMP-ALBERTSONI 800 0 - 00:13 hrs 27.894 0 - 03:11 hrs 109.861 0 - 15:15 hrs 60.841 0 - 11:41 hrs 84.928 46,274.57 1,289.55 89.552 22,492.06 814.306 56.549 29 _ 0 _ 0.006 47.919 0 1 0 0 23.728 0 PUMP-ALBERTSON2 112.018 PUMP-BAY1 1,000.00 0 - 00:01 hrs 186.986 0 - 15:26 hrs 710.506 148,994.53 643.672 44.699 223 0 0.81 33.22 0 PUMP-BAY2 0 0- 00:00 hrs 0 0- 00:00 hrs 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 PUMP-CANYONPUMPI 96.437 0 - 12:33 hrs 36.128 0 - 10:59 hrs 66.827 22,917.04 1,052.76 73.108 34 0 0 29.815 0 PUMP-CANYONPUMP2 64.18 0 - 11:18 hrs 36.128 0 - 10:59 hrs 49.664 1,535.29 94.87 6.588 1 0 0 2.221 0 PUMP-CEDAR1 150 0 - 06:11 hrs 64.997 0 - 20:59 hrs 142.406 4,883.30 105.251 7.309 57 0 0.079 0.874 0 PUMP-CEDAR2 0 0- 00:00 hrs 0 0- 00:00 hrs 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 PUMP-EAGLECREST1 670 0 - 00:00 hrs 25.23 0 - 10:00 hrs 193.335 52,059.00 826.766 57.414 909 0 0.869 16.741 1 PUMP-EAGLECREST2 0 0- 00:00 hrs 0 0- 00:00 hrs 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 PUMP-FLOWERPUMP1 234.441 0 - 13:26 hrs 37.43 0 - 16:16 hrs 201.711 70,594.88 1,074.22 74.599 78 0 0 62.593 0 PUMP-FLOWERPUMP2 234.441 0 - 13:26 hrs 84.957 0 - 10:59 hrs 184.16 12,074.31 201.212 13.973 19 0 0 12.372 0 PUMP-GOLDENPUMP1 170 0 - 10:42 hrs 7.479 0 - 03:09 hrs 91.764 17,862.34 597.536 41.495 83 0 0.002 15.398 0 PUMP-GOLDENPUMP2 0 0- 00:00 hrs 0 0- 00:00 hrs 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 PUMP-HARRISON1 329.311 0 - 10:37 hrs 13.953 0 - 16:00 hrs 303.64 27,163.80 274.559 19.067 28 0 0 28.719 0 PUMP-HARRISON2 0 0- 00:00 hrs 0 0- 00:00 hrs 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 PUMP-LOWES1 990 0 - 00:18 hrs 22.251 0 - 16:30 hrs 427.058 23,457.94 168.616 11.709 117 0 0.791 15.733 0 PUMP-LOWES2 0 0- 00:00 hrs 0 0- 00:00 hrs 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 PUMP-MARINA1 4,558.04 0 - 16:39 hrs 1,895.61 0 - 09:14 hrs 3,143.45 1,023,083.00 994.014 69.029 46 0 0 1,023.50 0 PUMP-MARINA2 2,443.97 0 -11:56 hrs 1,895.61 0 - 09:14 hrs 2,392.78 347,908.56 446.009 30.973 1 0 0 396.036 0 PUMP-MARINA3 1,721.47 0 - 07:22 hrs 421.362 0 - 01:58 hrs 939.797 127,258.48 415.588 28.86 45 0 0 56.251 0 PUMP-MARINA4 862.256 0 - 01:52 hrs 578.043 0 - 02:46 hrs 832.59 74,537.56 274.76 19.081 48 0 0 34.946 0 PUMP-MCCORMICKMEADOWSI 800 0 - 10:49 hrs 22.96 0 - 10:49 hrs 190.155 29,437.73 475.18 32.999 90 0 0.001 18.935 0 PUMP-MCCORMICKMEADOWS2 0 0- 00:00 hrs 0 0- 00:00 hrs 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 PUMP-MCCORMICKW1-PUMP1 3,500.00 0 - 00:36 hrs 760.295 0 - 07:37 hrs 1,222.06 476,202.09 1,196.59 83.096 44 0 0.022 542.099 0 PUMP-MCCORMICKWI-PUMP2 3,500.00 0 - 07:37 hrs 760.295 0 - 07:37 hrs 999.213 136,520.97 419.503 29.132 3 0 0.018 160.595 0 PUMP-MCCORMICKW2-PUMP1 1,800.00 0 - 10:30 hrs 383.663 0 - 16:01 hrs 1,271.90 409,059.19 986.96 68.539 102 0 0.008 196.729 0 PUMP-MCCORMICKW2-PUMP2 1,281.47 0 - 10:18 hrs 613.171 0 - 10:33 hrs 1,216.85 34,933.49 88.087 6.117 10 0 0 17.731 0 PUMP-POTTERY-1 2,681.96 0 - 11:45 hrs 42.895 0 - 15:56 hrs 1,929.11 282,042.31 448.938 31.176 667 0 0 203.398 1 PUMP-POTTERY-2 0 0- 00:00 hrs 0 0- 00:00 hrs 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 PUMP-RIDGE1&2-PUMP1 266.996 0 - 11:10 hrs 100 0 - 02:47 hrs 242.466 25,631.53 324.456 22.532 13 0 0.05 17.711 0 PUMP-RIDGEI&2-PUMP2 0 0- 00:00 hrs 0 0- 00:00 hrs 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 PUMP-RIDGE3-PUMP1 850 0 - 00:01 hrs 24.732 0 - 10:56 hrs 256.378 21,062.05 252.611 17.542 556 0 0.445 26.762 0 PUMP-RIDGE3-PUMP2 0 0- 00:00 hrs 0 0- 00:00 hrs 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 PUMP-SEDGWICK1 1,196.42 0 - 02:16 hrs 19.63 0 - 10:32 hrs 283.602 48,858.01 528.83 36.724 37 0 0 75.08 0 PUMP-SEDGWICK2 0 0- 00:00 hrs 0 0- 00:00 hrs 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 PUMP-TREMONTPLACEPUMPI 150 0 - 00:06 hrs 116.667 0 - 09:42 hrs 139.356 33,645.08 741.015 51.459 79 0 0.116 8.626 0 PUMP-TREMONTPLACEPUMP2 0 0- 00:00 hrs 0 0- 00:00 hrs 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 City of Port Orchard General Sewer Plan Update Build -Out Peak Day Pump Summary Sheet Prepared By: Peter Cunningham Reviewed By: Adam Schuyler 9/18/2015 ID Maximum Max.Flow Day- Minimum Min.Flow Day -Time Average Flow Total Volume Total Surcharge Percent Start -Up Time Off Low Time Off High Power Usage Instability Flow (gpm) Time (day -time) Flow (gpm) (day -time) (gpm) (Gallon) Time (Minutes) Utilized (%) Count Curve (%) Curve (%) (KW-Hr) Index PUMP-ALBERTSONI 800 0 - 02:24 hrs 25.694 0 - 11:00 hrs 79.089 1- 00:00 hrs 25.694 0 -11:00 hrs 77.161 36,539.45 1,419.03 98.543 34,744.32 1,383.60 96.083 5 _ 0 _ 0.001 38.551 0 1 0 0 36.714 0 PUMP-ALBERTSON2 115.429 PUMP-BAY1 1,000.00 0 - 00:02 hrs 182.974 0 - 18:02 hrs 713.449 175,626.30 755.544 52.468 219 0 0.742 38.91 0 PUMP-BAY2 0 0- 00:00 hrs 0 0- 00:00 hrs 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 PUMP-CANYONPUMPI 96.421 0 - 13:18 hrs 36.042 0 - 11:32 hrs 65.116 23,337.73 1,101.14 76.468 32 0 0 30.617 0 PUMP-CANYONPUMP2 64.239 0 - 09:26 hrs 36.042 0 -11:32 hrs 49.278 3,246.10 202.184 14.041 2 0 0 4.704 0 PUMP-CEDAR1 150 0 - 00:20 hrs 63.062 0 - 17:25 hrs 142.35 5,280.67 113.86 7.907 61 0 0.029 0.953 0 PUMP-CEDAR2 0 0- 00:00 hrs 0 0- 00:00 hrs 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 PUMP-EAGLECREST1 670 0 - 00:02 hrs 26.468 0 - 17:45 hrs 175.681 62,633.75 1,094.93 76.036 651 0 0.482 20.506 1 PUMP-EAGLECREST2 144.039 0 - 11:26 hrs 108.524 0 - 08:45 hrs 129.575 15,399.51 364.52 25.314 6 0 0 5.418 0 PUMP-FLOWERPUMP1 234.51 0 - 14:04 hrs 37.196 0 - 16:52 hrs 199.972 82,663.48 1,269.17 88.136 44 0 0 74.374 0 PUMP-FLOWERPUMP2 234.51 0 -14:04 hrs 100.107 0 - 07:30 hrs 189.011 30,969.27 502.85 34.92 19 0 0 30.559 0 PUMP-GOLDENPUMPI 170 0 - 08:38 hrs 7.391 0 - 03:03 hrs 92.163 19,405.99 646.29 44.881 89 0 0.012 16.716 0 PUMP-GOLDENPUMP2 0 0- 00:00 hrs 0 0- 00:00 hrs 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 PUMP-HARRISON1 329.673 0 - 12:17 hrs 6.998 0 - 16:52 hrs 304.576 32,893.67 331.205 23 32 0 0 34.757 0 PUMP-HARRISON2 0 0- 00:00 hrs 0 0- 00:00 hrs 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 PUMP-LOWES1 990 0 - 00:10 hrs 39.884 0 - 03:15 hrs 431.773 31,309.90 222.633 15.461 173 0 1.027 20.899 0 PUMP-LOWES2 0 0- 00:00 hrs 0 0- 00:00 hrs 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 PUMP-MARINA1 4,557.63 0 - 18:45 hrs 1,895.63 0 - 07:03 hrs 2,997.27 1,218,161.63 1,242.59 86.291 27 0 0 1,245.61 0 PUMP-MARINA2 2,443.89 0 -10:14 hrs 1,895.63 0 - 07:03 hrs 2,403.93 550,113.25 701.99 48.749 1 0 0 625.621 0 PUMP-MARINA3 1,721.48 0 - 22:00 hrs 421.407 0 - 03:18 hrs 939.615 55,308.31 180.661 12.546 27 0 0 24.446 0 PUMP-MARINA4 862.082 0 - 03:13 hrs 579.63 0 - 22:00 hrs 832.743 33,071.36 121.894 8.465 27 0 0 15.5 0 PUMP-MCCORMICKMEADOWSI 800 0 - 17:02 hrs 25.015 0 - 18:22 hrs 196.824 27,140.60 423.156 29.386 90 0 0.002 17.283 0 PUMP-MCCORMICKMEADOWS2 0 0- 00:00 hrs 0 0- 00:00 hrs 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 PUMP-MCCORMICKWI-PUMP1 3,500.00 0 - 01:10 hrs 744.537 0 - 16:20 hrs 1,240.30 542,100.94 1,338.53 92.953 20 0 0.016 615.59 0 PUMP-MCCORMICKWI-PUMP2 3,500.00 0 - 06:28 hrs 744.537 0 - 16:20 hrs 1,122.09 273,062.19 744.911 51.73 5 0 0.017 315.575 0 PUMP-MCCORMICKW2-PUMP1 1,800.00 0 - 06:58 hrs 481.411 0 - 08:48 hrs 1,257.03 486,508.16 1,188.47 82.532 90 0 0.02 237.577 0 PUMP-MCCORMICKW2-PUMP2 1,282.93 0 - 11:48 hrs 643.84 0 - 08:32 hrs 1,215.21 147,426.23 372.361 25.858 27 0 0 74.976 0 PUMP-POTTERY-1 2,681.96 0 - 11:59 hrs 34.927 0 - 08:38 hrs 1,971.33 358,204.88 558.447 38.781 747 0 0 258.018 1 PUMP-POTTERY-2 0 0- 00:00 hrs 0 0- 00:00 hrs 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 PUMP-RIDGE1&2-PUMP1 266.996 0 - 11:51 hrs 100 0 - 01:28 hrs 242.685 24,755.94 313.124 21.745 14 0 0.059 17.102 0 PUMP-RIDGEI&2-PUMP2 0 0- 00:00 hrs 0 0- 00:00 hrs 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 PUMP-RIDGE3-PUMP1 850 0 - 00:00 hrs 1.126 0 - 17:49 hrs 255.299 21,053.04 253.33 17.592 518 0 0.256 26.697 0 PUMP-RIDGE3-PUMP2 0 0- 00:00 hrs 0 0- 00:00 hrs 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 PUMP-SEDGWICK1 1,196.09 0 - 02:24 hrs 15.941 0 - 18:30 hrs 292.709 65,423.36 685.947 47.635 47 0 0 100.217 0 PUMP-SEDGWICK2 0 0- 00:00 hrs 0 0- 00:00 hrs 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 PUMP-TREMONTPLACEPUMPI 150 0 - 00:09 hrs 110.321 0 - 16:52 hrs 139.174 36,603.42 807.268 56.06 76 0 0.101 9.551 0 PUMP-TREMONTPLACEPUMP2 0 0- 00:00 hrs 0 0- 00:00 hrs 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 City of Port Orchard General Sewer Plan Update Sedgwick Subarea Alternative - Build -Out Peak Day Pump Summary Sheet Prepared By: Peter Cunningham Reviewed By: Adam Schuyler 2/9/2016 ID Maximum Max.Flow Day- Minimum Min.Flow Day -Time Average Flow Total Volume Total Surcharge Percent Start -Up Time Off Low Time Off High Power Usage Instability Flow (gpm) Time (day -time) Flow (gpm) (day -time) (gpm) (Gallon) Time (Minutes) Utilized (%) Count Curve (%) Curve (%) (KW-Hr) Index PUMP-ALBERTSONI 800 0 - 02:25:00 hrs 25.729 0 - 11:00:00 hrs 84.501 39,226.65 1,424.82 98.946 81.175 35,779.49 1,352.85 93.948 4 _ 0 0_ 41.25 0 1 0 0 37.732 0 PUMP-ALBERTSON2 115.238 0 - 00:00:00 hrs 25.729 0 - 11:00:00 hrs PUMP-BAY1 749.06 0 - 11:47:00 hrs 104.194 0 - 02:57:00 hrs 701.963 175,137.86 765.783 53.179 225 0 0 37.681 0 PUMP-BAY2 0 0- 00:00:00 hrs 0 0- 00:00:00 hrs 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 PUMP-CANYONPUMPI 96.508 0 - 13:07:00 hrs 9.31 0 - 03:54:00 hrs 65.363 23,621.34 1,109.21 77.028 15 0 0 30.926 0 PUMP-CANYONPUMP2 64.171 0 - 10:19:59 hrs 36.097 0-10:03:00 hrs 49.124 2,942.93 183.875 12.769 1 0 0 4.266 0 PUMP-CEDAR1 150 0 - 00:36:00 hrs 64.535 0 - 04:37:59 hrs 142.337 5,376.32 115.933 8.051 62 0 0 0.97 0 PUMP-CEDAR2 0 0- 00:00:00 hrs 0 0- 00:00:00 hrs 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 PUMP-EAGLECREST1 670 0 - 00:02:00 hrs 20.272 0 - 02:41:00 hrs 174.792 62,947.72 1,105.35 76.76 320 0 0.241 20.406 0 PUMP-EAGLECREST2 144.314 0 - 11:27:59 hrs 109.131 0 - 14:37:59 hrs 130.133 15,068.72 355.408 24.681 5 0 0 5.298 0 PUMP-FLOWERPUMP1 234.569 0 - 09:30:59 hrs 32.906 0 - 02:14:00 hrs 200.254 82,831.73 1,269.57 88.164 44 0 0 74.275 0 PUMP-FLOWERPUMP2 234.569 0 - 09:30:59 hrs 100.415 0 - 05:37:59 hrs 189.331 30,843.16 500.008 34.723 19 0 0 30.365 0 PUMP-GOLDENPUMP1 99.039 0 - 11:19:59 hrs 11.419 0 - 02:26:00 hrs 92.702 19,401.34 642.367 44.609 84 0 0 16.692 0 PUMP-GOLDENPUMP2 0 0- 00:00:00 hrs 0 0- 00:00:00 hrs 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 PUMP-HARRISON1 328.837 0 - 12:48:00 hrs 16.24 0 - 15:17:00 hrs 304.967 32,234.11 324.417 22.529 31 0 0 34.057 0 PUMP-HARRISON2 0 0- 00:00:00 hrs 0 0- 00:00:00 hrs 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 PUMP-LOWES1 990 0 - 00:04:00 hrs 40.622 0 - 00:38:59 hrs 434.491 31,868.69 225.125 15.634 119 0 0 21.475 0 PUMP-LOWES2 0 0- 00:00:00 hrs 0 0- 00:00:00 hrs 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 PUMP-MARINA1 4,564.91 0 - 17:44:00 hrs 1,493.45 0 - 04:31:59 hrs 3,059.74 1,227,686.13 1,231.53 85.523 27 0 0 1,245.65 0 PUMP-MARINA2 2,445.40 0 - 10:15:00 hrs 1,898.25 0 - 07:22:59 hrs 2,405.83 513,757.56 655.442 45.517 2 0 0 584.238 0 PUMP-MARINA3 1,722.03 0 - 21:17:59 hrs 96.641 0 - 05:18:59 hrs 946.246 59,058.66 191.567 13.303 44 0 0 24.596 0 PUMP-MARINA4 864.676 0 - 03:11:00 hrs 569.495 0 - 21:19:00 hrs 833.078 34,952.38 128.775 8.943 26 0 0 16.373 0 PUMP-MCCORMICKMEADOWSI 214.092 0 - 11:49:59 hrs 10.265 0 - 00:16:00 hrs 196.748 27,241.14 424.967 29.512 89 0 0 17.323 0 PUMP-MCCORMICKMEADOWS2 0 0- 00:00:00 hrs 0 0- 00:00:00 hrs 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 PUMP-MCCORMICKW1-PUMP1 3,500.00 0 - 00:00:00 hrs 193.115 0-16:02:59 hrs 1,282.06 554,153.94 1,326.67 92.13 19 0 0.194 622.387 0 PUMP-MCCORMICKW1-PUMP2 3,500.00 0 - 05:56:00 hrs 722.144 0 - 07:22:00 hrs 1,145.21 264,618.03 709.208 49.251 5 0 0.006 304.532 0 PUMP-MCCORMICKW2-PUMP1 1,800.00 0 - 06:58:59 hrs 116.892 0 - 02:39:00 hrs 1,260.08 489,994.09 1,193.53 82.884 44 0 0.018 238.124 0 PUMP-MCCORMICKW2-PUMP2 1,283.71 0 - 11:42:59 hrs 673.602 0 - 11:41:59 hrs 1,218.11 144,800.28 364.858 25.337 26 0 0 73.475 0 PUMP-POTTERY-1 2,681.97 0 - 11:37:59 hrs 404.023 0-13:25:00 hrs 1,978.54 366,907.91 569.183 39.527 744 0 0 266.347 1 PUMP-POTTERY-2 0 0- 00:00:00 hrs 0 0- 00:00:00 hrs 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 PUMP-RIDGE1&2-PUMP1 265.794 0 - 11:44:00 hrs 100 0 - 01:08:59 hrs 242.559 25,693.04 325.117 22.578 14 0 0.054 17.752 0 PUMP-RIDGEI&2-PUMP2 0 0- 00:00:00 hrs 0 0- 00:00:00 hrs 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 PUMP-RIDGE3-PUMP1 850 0 - 00:00:00 hrs 69.301 0 - 02:46:59 hrs 253.069 21,073.93 255.592 17.749 487 0 0 26.672 0 PUMP-RIDGE3-PUMP2 0 0- 00:00:00 hrs 0 0- 00:00:00 hrs 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 PUMP-SEDGWICKI 317.37 0 - 12:02:00 hrs 7.87 0 - 02:14:00 hrs 294.305 71,183.83 742.375 51.554 45 0 0 108.946 0 PUMP-SEDGWICK2 0 0- 00:00:00 hrs 0 0- 00:00:00 hrs 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 PUMP-TREMONTPLACEPUMPI 150 0 - 00:18:00 hrs 121.876 0 - 02:55:00 hrs 139.129 36,265.13 800.042 55.558 79 0 0 9.495 0 PUMP-TREMONTPLACEPUMP2 134.932 0 - 11:11:00 hrs 123.437 0 - 11:52:00 hrs 132.748 497.738 11.508 0.799 3 0 0 0.207 0 Existing Peak Day Flow - Bay Street (Port Orchard Boulevard to MPS) Ground Level,,, Link Node Depth Head Input Surcharge Depth 11615-2-2-0200 14.4 12.8 11.2 9.6 8.0 6.4 4.8 3.2 1.6 0.0 -1.6 -3.2 -4.8 -6.4 -8.0 -9.6 -11.2 -12.8 0.0 4.1c n n n4on n c n n r�01 0 NA 143.7 287.4 431.1 574.8 718.5 862.2 1005.9 1149.6 1293.3 1437.0 Distance (ft) Existing Peak Day Flow - Port Orchard Boulevard (Tremont Street to Bay Street) Ground Level,,, Link Node Depth Head Input Surcharge 3111ZKD 224.0 202.1 180.2 158.3 136.4 114.5 70.7 26.9 584.5 1164.0 1743.5 2323.0 2902.5 Distance (ft) Depth 14200 3482.0 4061.5 4641.0 5220.5 5800.0 Existing Peak Day Flow - McCormick Woods Drive SW / Ground Level / Link ! Node / Depth / Head Input Surcharge Depth 40 9-2-2-0100 -0020 0.0 252.2 504.4 756.6 1008.8 1261.0 1513.2 1765.4 2017.6 2269.8 2522.0 Distance (ft) 2022 Peak Day - Bay Street (Port Orchard Boulevard to MPS) Ground Level Link Node Depth Head Input Surcharge Depth 16.0 115- 2-0200 14.4 12.8 11.2 9.6 8.0 6.4 4.8 3.2 1.6 0.0 -1.6 -3.2 -4.8 -6.4 -8.0 -9.6 -11.2 -12.8 0.0 JU]U NA 143.7 287.4 431.1 574.8 718.5 862.2 1005.9 1149.6 1293.3 1437.0 Distance (ft) 2022 Peak Day - Port Orchard Boulevard (Tremont Street to Bay Street) Ground Level,,, Link Node Depth Head Input Surcharge 3111ZKD 224.0 202.1 180.2 158.3 136.4 114.5 70.7 26.9 584.5 1164.0 1743.5 2323.0 2902.5 Distance (ft) Depth 14200 3482.0 4061.5 4641.0 5220.5 5800.0 2022 Peak Day - McCormick Woods Drive SW / Ground Level / Link ! Node / Depth / Head Input Surcharge Depth 4%9-2-2-0100 399.5 394.5 392.0 W 389.5 = 387.0 384.5 382.0 379.5 377.0 0.0 252.2 504.4 756.6 1008.8 1261.0 Distance (ft) -0020 1513.2 1765.4 2017.6 2269.8 2522.0 2026 Peak Day - Bay Street (Port Orchard Boulevard to MPS) / Ground Level / Link ! Node / Depth / Head Input Surcharge Depth 16. 11 14. 12. 6. 4. 3. 1. 0. )010 NA 143.7 287.4 431.1 574.8 718.5 862.2 1005.9 1149.6 1293.3 1437.0 Distance (ft) 2026 Peak Day - Port Orchard Boulevard (Tremont Street to Bay Street) Ground Level,,, Link Node Depth Head Input Surcharge 3111ZKD 224.0 202.1 180.2 158.3 136.4 114.5 70.7 26.9 584.5 1164.0 1743.5 2323.0 2902.5 Distance (ft) Depth 14200 3482.0 4061.5 4641.0 5220.5 5800.0 2026 Peak Day - McCormick Woods / Ground Level / Link / Node / Depth / Head 40 9-2-2-0100 Drive SW Input Surcharge Depth -0020 0.0 252.2 504.4 756.6 1008.8 1261.0 1513.2 1765.4 2017.6 2269.8 2522.0 Distance (ft) 2036 Peak Day - Bay Street (Port Orchard Boulevard to MPS) Ground Level Link Node Depth Head Input Surcharge Depth 16.0 115-2-F 200 14.4 115-2-2-0190 12.8 11.2 9.6 8.0 6.4 4.8 3.2 1.6 0.0 -1.6 -3.2 -4.8 -6.4 -8.0 -9.6 -11.2 -12.8 0.0 115-2-2-0180 115-2-2-0010 NA 143.7 287.4 431.1 574.8 718.5 862.2 1005.9 1149.6 1293.3 1437.0 Distance (ft) 2036 Peak Day - Port Orchard Boulevard (Tremont Street to Bay Street) Ground Level,,, Link Node Depth Head Input Surcharge 3111ZKD 224.0 202.1 180.2 158.3 136.4 114.5 70.7 26.9 584.5 1164.0 1743.5 2323.0 2902.5 Distance (ft) Depth 3482.0 4061.5 4641.0 5220.5 5800.0 MI 2036 Peak Day - McCormick Woods / Ground Level / Link / Node / Depth / Head 40 9-2-2-0100 Drive SW Input Surcharge Depth -0020 0.0 252.2 504.4 756.6 1008.8 1261.0 1513.2 1765.4 2017.6 2269.8 2522.0 Distance (ft) Build -Out Peak Day - Bay Street (Port Orchard Boulevard to MPS) Ground Level,,, Link Node Depth Head Input Surcharge Depth 11615-2-2-0200 14.4 12.8 11.2 9.6 8.0 6.4 4.8 3.2 1.6 0.0 -1.6 -3.2 -4.8 -6.4 -8.0 -9.6 -11.2 -12.8 0.0 Sulu NA 143.7 287.4 431.1 574.8 718.5 862.2 1005.9 1149.6 1293.3 1437.0 Distance (ft) Build -Out Peak Day — Port Orchard Boulevard (Tremont Street to Bay Street) Ground Level,,, Link Node Depth Head Input Surcharge 3111ZKD 224.0 202.1 158.3 136.4 114.5 70.7 26.9 584.5 1164.0 1743.5 2323.0 2902.5 Distance (ft) Depth 14200 3482.0 4061.5 4641.0 5220.5 5800.0 Build -Out Peak Day — McCormick Woods Drive SW / Ground Level / Link ! Node / Depth / Head Input Surcharge Depth 40 9-2-2-0100 399.5 394.5 392.0 M 4) LJJ 389.5 = 387.0 384.5 382.0 379.5 377.0 0.0 252.2 504.4 756.6 1008.8 1261.0 Distance (ft) -0020 1513.2 1765.4 2017.6 2269.8 2522.0 F C 4 1i 7 w W 1� w on 18 17 16 15 14 13 12 11 10 9 S 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 n -1 -2 -3 -q -$ -g -g -10 -11 -12 -13 -14 -15 -16 0 edgwick Alternative - Bair Street (Port orchard Boulevard to NIPS) Link — llr-rly — Haad — Ground Level 1 200 300 400 53•3 i•T] ?•]] $•]•] 1 T]•] 11 T] 1200 1300 1 �•�_• Distance (ft) 250 240 230 220 210 200 180 170 160 150 r- 140 G 130 7 120 W � 110 1� = 100 90 80 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 0 0 edgwick Alternative - Part Orchard Boulevard (Tremont Street to Bay Street) — Link — llo:l� — Heed — Ground Level 500 1000 1500 2000 25•]] 3T]•] 3500 4000 4500 5000 5500 Distance (ft) Sedgwick Alternative - McCormick Woods Drive SW — Link — Node — Hearl Ground Level 405 - ----------------------------------------------- --- --- -------- -------------------------------------------------------------------- ---------------------- ---------------------- ------------- 404 - ----------------------------------------- --------------------- -------- ----- ---------------------- ---------------------- ---------------------- --------------------- ---------------------- ---------------------- ---------------------- ---------------------- ------------- 403- ----------- ---------------------- --------------------- -------- ----- ---------------------- ---------------------- ---------------------- --------------------- ---------------------- ---------------------- ---------------------- ---------------------- ------------- 402- ----------------- ---------------------- --------------------- ---------------------- ---------------------- ---------------------- ---------------------- --------------------- ---------------------- ---------------------- ---------------------- ---------------------- ------------- 401 - -2-0-1-00------------- --------------------- ------------------------------------------------ ---------------------- ---------------------- ---------------------- --------------------- ---------------------- ---------------------- ---------------------- ---------------------- ------------- 400- . ............ ...................... ........................................... ---------- ------ 399- ..... ...... ...................... ..................... ...................... ---------------------- ---------------------- ---------------------- --------------------- ---------------------- ---------------------- ---------------------- ---------------------- ------------- 398- ....... ...................... --------------------- ---------------------- ---------------------- ...................... ----------------------- I --------------------- I ----------------------- I ----------------------- ---------------------- ---------------------- ------------- 397-------------- 396- ----------- I ---------- ------- ----------------------- ---------------------- ...................... ---------------------.I---------------------- ...................... ......................................... ...................... ............. 395- ---------- .............. 50 -009a ------------- ---------------------- ---------------------- ---------------------- ....... ---------------- I --------------------------------------------- I ----------------------- ---------------------- ---------------------- ------------- 394 - ----- ........ .... .......................................................... ...................... ...................... --------------------- ---------------------- ---------------------- ---------------------- ---------------------- ------------- 393- --------------- ............ ----- ---------------------- ---------------------- ---------------------- ----------------------- ......... 506-2-2-W5G ---------------- ---------------------- ...................... ...................... ............. 392- ------------ ----------------- --------- ----- - ------------------ ------ 506-2-2-bOM ---------------- ---------------------- --------- ------------- I -------- -------------- ---------------------- ---------------------- ------------- 391 --- ----------- - ------------------ ----------------------- ----------------------- - ---------- ----------------- ----------------------- ---------------------- ------------- 0 390- ---------- r ......... .... ............ -2-0 ............. -------- ....... ------------- ---------------- ---- ------------- ...................... -2-0040 -------------------- ---------------------- ------------- > 389- --------- ---------------- -------- ..... .......... ....... ....... ------------ -------- ...................... ...... --4 ------------------------------ ------------- . --------------- Oug 388- ....... ------------- ...... --------- -------- ...................... ........... . ........ .. ................. ...................... ............. .... ...................... . ................... ............ . ........ ......... ---------- -------------------- KD 38,3- ............... .. ...................... r ........ SD6-2-2- --- --------------- ----------- ........ ................. --- ---------------------- --------- 385- .......... ....... ..................... -------- ............... ... ----------- ........ ...................... ............ ........... 384- .......... ............ ....... ............... ---- --- ........ ---------------------- --------- -------- ------------- 383- ---- ----------------- ---- ----------------- ------------- ---- ---------------------- ---------- -- 382- ----- ---------------------- ------------------- ---- ------ ------------ --- ----- ---------- -- 381 - ----------- I ----------------------- I --------------------- ---------------------- ---------------------- ---------------------- ---------------------- --------------------- -------------------------------- 380- ---------------------- ---------------------- ---------------------- ---------------------- ---------------------- : ---------------------- --------------------- ---------------------- -------------- - - --------- ---------- -- 3-r- --------------- ---------------------- --------------------- ---------------------- ---------------------- ---------------------- ---------------------- --------------------- ---------------------- ------------------ ---------- -- ---------------- ---------------------- --------------------- ---------------------- ---------------------- ---------------------- ----------------------- I --------------------- I ----------------------- I -------------------------------------------- -------------------- ---------------------- ---------------------- ---------------------- ---------------------- ------ 37.-j ------------- ------------- 375- ............. ............. 374- ------------- ------------- 373 0 200 400 600 800 1000 12-3.3 14-13 1600 1800 2000 22M 24M Distance (ft) Appendix H Gap Analysis P 206.706.8893 PO Box 30008 5eat IIe. WA 98113-2008 Katy @ ki sa ksen as soc i at a s. cam City of Port Orchard Water & Sewer Financial Gap Analysis Final Report — November 20, 2015 Katy Isaksen & Associates Utility Financial Planning for Local Government Summary In 2016, the City's Comprehensive Plan is required to be updated and financially constrained, pursuant to the Growth Management Act. Individual Plan Elements (water, sanitary sewer, etc.) need to be updated, including adjustments to the Capital Improvement Plans (CIP) and associated fee structures. This Water & Sewer Gap Analysis provides the basis for discussion of this issue. The City contracted with Katy Isaksen & Associates (KI&A) to prepare the financial gap analysis with water and sewer rates necessary to fund a balanced and financially constrained CIP over the next six years. KI&A worked with the City's engineering consultants preparing the water and sewer updated capital improvement plans (BHC Consultants for Sewer and PACE Engineers for Water). These were reviewed with Public Works and Finance to identify those that were already included in the operating budget. KI&A developed funding plan alternatives for the improvements along with a six -year rate outlook for each scenario. These scenarios were discussed with the Utilities Committee at five meetings along with other water usage and rate adjustment issues. KI&A presented the Gap Analysis and preferred scenario six -year rate outlook to the City Council for consideration at three work study sessions. Rate Outlook. The water and sewer gap analysis and recommended six -year rates were presented at a Public Hearing on October 27, 2015. The rates shown in Tables 1 and 2 will allow the City to fund the six -year CIP projects and have financially constrained comprehensive plans. TABLE 1: WATER GAP ANALYSIS & RATE OUTLOOK WATER RATE OUTLOOK SMOOTH RATES THIS SCENARIO 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 BASE RATE Increase in Bimonthly Base Rate $7.00 $7.00 $7.00 $7.00 $7.00 Recommended Bimonthly Base Rates $46.50 $53.50 $60.50 $67.50 $74.50 $81.50 AVERAGE 2-MONTH BILL @ 7,000 gallons Average Bimonthly Bill $50.70 $58.40 $66.00 $73.60 $81.20 $88.80 Water usage rates and larger meter sizes to also be adjusted relative to the residential base rate. TABLE 2: SEWER GAP ANALYSIS & RATE OUTLOOK SEWER RATE OUTLOOK SMOOTH RATES THIS SCENARIO 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 Increase in Bimonthly Rate $13.00 $13.00 $13.00 $13.00 $13.00 Recommended Bimonthly Rate $98.00 $111.00 $124.00 $137.00 $150.00 $163.00 Residential rates by unit, commercial rates assigned by class will be adjusted an equivlent amount. Capital Improvement Program (CIP). The water utility has received a loan from the Department of Health Drinking Water State Revolving Fund for the Well 10 project currently underway. Full loan payments are estimated to begin in 2018 with a partial payment for interest only in 2017. The other CIP projects will be funded by rates and connection charges and the projects scheduled will be reviewed each year during the budget process. These include completing well and treatment projects required by Department of Health, and beginning high priority water main replacement projects. Well 10 will allow Katy Isaksen & Associates Utility Financial Planning for Local Government 6\?M) the City to become water independent and end the need to purchase water from the City of Bremerton. The current water contract ends in 2018. TABLE 3: WATER CIP PROGRAM SCENARIO A - EXISTING DWSRF LOAN + OTHER CIP BY RATES SIX -YEAR WATER CIP Estimated Cost ($2014) 2014 DWSRF Loan $6,000,000 Well 10—Pump, Generator, and Building Wells 6 and 10 Treatment Improvements Well 10 12-inch Transmission Main Highest Priority $3,193,200 Well 11 Treatment & Connection $800,000 Abandon Wells 4 & 5 $100,000 Water System Plan Update $60,000 PRVs High to Low Zone: Mitchell & Dwight, Melcher/Pottery & Eaglecrest, Kendall & Maple $195,000 Watermain Repl Ph1A: Seattle Avenue, 4" Cl to 8", 842 If $252,600 Watermain Repl Ph1A: Division Street, 4" Cl to 8", 859 If $257,700 Watermain Repl Ph1A: Hull Avenue, 4" Cl to 8", 3,524 If $1,057,200 Watermain Repl PhIA: Melcher-Tacoma-Cline, 4" CI to 8", 1,542 If $470,700 Telemetry Upgrades (medium priority) $25,000 Beyond six -years: $3+million in medium priority projects to years 7-10 and begins setting aside $45,000 per year for future upsizing The sewer utility has four high priority pump station upgrade projects that must be completed in the next six years. There are not sufficient funds to pay for these costly projects in the short term. In order to reduce the impact on sewer rates, the financial plan calls for borrowing using low -interest loans from the Department of Ecology to complete the projects within six -years and have rates set to make the loan payments for the next 20 years. TABLE 4: SEWER CIP PROGRAM SCENARIO 1 - What if NO Grant and all SRF Loans for 4 Pump Stations? Six -Year Sewer CIP Cost Est in $2014 Funding Source 2015 Sewer Plan Update, map & model $120,000 pay -as -go Marina PS Improvements $3,800,000 SRF 2016-17 McCormick PSI - Design & Construction $1,280,000 SRF 2018-19 McCormick PS2 - Design & Construction $1,290,000 SRF 2018-19 Bay St PS Improvement $1,100,000 SRF 2020 Total Sewer CIP ($2014) $7,590,000 This summary shows cost estimates in 2014 dollars. Model escalates construction costs by 4% per year. The City continues to seek grants to assist with the utility projects but grants are uncertain and difficult to obtain. For example, the City applied for a Hazard Mitigation Grant for the Marina Pump Station Upgrade (approximately $4 million). They were told to reduce the request to include only the seawall portion (approximately $1 million) and come up with the local match and other funding on their own. It KI&A PT ORCH W&S Gap Analysis Final Report DR2, 11120115, Page 2 Katy Isaksen & Associates Utility Financial Planning for Local Government 6\?M) is uncertain at this time whether the City will be successful in receiving a grant and when that may occur. The sewer outlook assumes that an Ecology SRF loan will be the funding source. The City has a couple of sewer programs that are included in the annual budget and not duplicated in the CIP. An annual pipe rehabilitation program provides a level of funding for the crew to make repairs and rehabilitation as necessary throughout the year. The City also has a 10-year STEP conversion program that allows the owners of STEP systems to convert to sewer at their option. The program is scheduled for 2012-2021 for an average of 60 conversions per year. The 2015 budget of $380,000 will be available for other capital improvements after 2021. Rate Structures. In addition to developing the six -year rate outlooks, the water and sewer rate structures were reviewed to be sure that sufficient revenue would be generated fairly from the customers to meet the needs of each utility. A detailed water consumption analysis was also completed to determine the current average usage levels of residential customers and whether the water usage tiers were a good fit. A typical residence uses an average of 7,000 gallons (938 cubic feet) per two month billing period. The base rate includes up to 5,000 gallons and then customers pay for water by usage tier. The first tier was 5,001 to 30,000 gallons. Based on the average usage and the goal of water conservation, the tiers needed to be adjusted so customers would see lower bills for conserving. The 5,000-30,000 tier is recommended to be broken into three tiers, 5,001-10,000, 10,001-20,000 and 20,001-30,000 gallons. The rate differential was $0.10 between the tiers and is recommended to be increased. TABLE 5: CHANGES TO WATER USAGE TIERS Water Usage Tiers per Bimonthly Period Existing Proposed 5, 001-30, 000 gal 5, 001-10, 000 ga I 10, 001- 20, 000 gal 20,001-30,000 gal 30,001-50,000 gal 30,001-50,000 gal 50,001-100, 000 ga 1 50, 001+ ga I 100,001-150, 000 ga 1 150,001+ gal The City offers a low use discount to residences using up to 3,000 gallons on a bimonthly bill. This is recommended to continue. Water usage rates should increase relative to the increase in base rate so that all customers are fairly sharing in the needed increase. For other customers, the larger meter sizes should pay a higher meter differential to reflect the higher demand on the water system. This is incrementally increased over the six years in the recommended rates. The City jointly owns the wastewater treatment facilities with West Sound Utility District. This is considered a separate operation in the Gap Analysis as they jointly manage and set treatment rates. The treatment services are included as a line item within the operating expenses. The sewer treatment rates have been quite stable are assumed to remain the same. The City's sewer rates to customers include the treatment services. Any changes in treatment rates would need to be passed along to the customers. KI&A PT ORCH W&S Gap Analysis Final Report DR2, 11120115, Page 3 Katy Isaksen & Associates Utility Financial Planning for Local Government 6\?M) The wastewater treatment costs are based on an equivalent residential unit (ERU) basis. The City's current sewer rate schedule includes 20 classes of customers with definitions and charges based on ERU's or portions thereof. This rate structure works well with the costs and only minor adjustments are recommended, such as adjusting definitions to match the zoning code. Council discussions resulted in a new customer class for public markets that is also included. Recommended Rates. The recommended six -year water and sewer rates are shown in Tables 6 and 7. TABLE 6: GAP ANALYSIS RECOMMENDED WATER RATES Water Rates - Bimonthly 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 a) Single Connections 3/4" Meter, 0-3,000 gal Base $30.50 $35.10 $39.70 $44.30 $48.90 $53.50 3/4" Meter, 3,001-5,000 gal Base $46.50 $53.50 $60.50 $67.50 $74.50 $81.50 5,001-10,000 gal per 1000g $2.10 $2.45 $2.75 $3.05 $3.35 $3.65 10,001-20,000 gal per 1000g $2.10 $2.55 $2.90 $3.20 $3.50 $3.85 20,001-30,000 gal I per 1000g 1 $2.101 $2.651 $3.00 $3.35 $3.70 $4.05 30,001-50,000 gal per 1000g I $2.20 1 $2.80 $3.20 $3.55 $3.90 $4.30 50,001+gal per 1000g $2.30 $3.00 $3.40 $3.80 $4.20 $4.60 b) Multiple Connections/Larger Meters $46.50 $53.50 $60.50 $67.50 $74.50 $81.50 3/4 " Meter, 0-5,000 gal I Base 3/4" Meter Base plus the following meter size differentials: 1" Meter, 0-5,000 gal Base+Diff. $1.00 $2.00 $3.00 $4.00 $5.00 $6.00 1-1/2" Meter, 0-5,000 gal Base+Diff. $4.00 $8.00 $12.00 $16.00 $20.00 $24.00 2" Meter, 0-5,000 gal Base+Diff. $7.00 $14.00 $21.00 $28.00 $35.00 $42.00 3" Meter, 0-5,000 gal Base+Diff. $13.00 $26.00 $39.00 $52.00 $65.00 $78.00 4" Meter, 0-5,000 gal Base+Diff. $25.00 $50.00 $75.00 $100.00 $125.00 $150.00 6" Meter, 0-5,000 gal Base+Diff. $46.00 $92.00 $138.00 $184.00 $230.00 $276.00 8" Meter, 0-5,000 gal Base+Diff. $67.00 $134.00 $201.00 $268.00 $335.00 $402.00 10" Meter, 0-5,000 gal Base+Diff. $91.00 $182.00 $273.00 $364.00 $455.00 $546.00 c) Plus Consumption charge in excess of 5,000 gallons 5,001-10,000 gal per 1000g $2.10 $2.45 $2.75 $3.05 $3.35 $3.65 10,001-20,000 gal per 1000g $2.10 $2.55 $2.90 $3.20 $3.50 $3.85 20,001-30,000 al per 10OOg $2.10 $2.65 $3.00 $3.35 $3.70 $4.05 30,001-50,000 gal per 1000g $2.20 $2.80 $3.20 $3.55 $3.90 $4.30 50,001+ gal per 10OOg $2.30 $3.00 $3.40 $3.80 $4.20 $4.60 d) Multiple Connections - where more than one customer is served through one meter Base rate per unit, 0-5,000 gi Base $46.501 $53.501 $60.501 $67.501 $74.501 $81.50 Plus meter differential for actual meter as shown in b) above Plus consumption charge in excess of 5, as shown in c above e) Outside City Limits 50%surcharge f) Fire Hydrant Service Schools per hydran $12.00 $13.80 $15.60 $17.40 $19.20 $21.00 Private Service perhydran $22.00 $25.30 $28.60 $31.90 $35.20 $38.50 Ig Temporary Service Greater of flat rate or as metered One -day Service Flat rate $46.50 $53.50 $60.50 $67.50 $74.50 $81.50 per 10OOg $2.20 $2.80 $3.20 $3.55 $3.90 $4.30 Construction Account Flat rate $46.50 $53.50 $60.50 $67 $74.50 $81.5 0 gal per 1000g $2.20 $2.80 $3.20 $. 351 $3.90 $4.3 0 50,001+al per 1000 $2.30 $3.00 $3.40 $3.800-50,000 $4.20 $4.60 hl Hydrant Meter Rentals Refundable deposit for meter rental; sales tax added to 30-day rental fees First60 days rental +ta $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 Next 120 days rental +ta $250.00 $260.00 $270.00 $280.00 $290.00 $300.00 In excess of 180 days rental +ta $500.00 $520.00 $540.00 $560.00 $580.00 $600.00 KI&A PT ORCH W&S Gap Analysis Final Report DR2, 11120115, Page 4 Katy Isaksen & Associates Utility Financial Planning for Local Government eN?D TABLE 7: GAP ANALYSIS RECOMMENDED SEWER RATES 2015 Water/Sewer Gap Analysis Recommended Rates $111.00 $124.00 $137.00 $150.00 $163.00 Bimonthly Rate: $98.00 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 Class Bimonthl Bimonthly Bimonthly Bimonthly Bimonthly Bimonthly No. Class Description Description y Rate Rate Rate Rate Rate Rate 1 Single-family residences and mobile home on single parcel for each dwelling unit $98.00 $111.00 $124.00 $137.00 $150.00 $163.00 2 Business and professional for each business with a fixture $98.00 $111.00 $124.00 $137.00 $150.00 $163.00 for each business with an employee present, without a fixtui $19.90 $22.20 $24.80 $27.40 $30.00 $32.60 for each floorof an office building or retail complex that has a public orcommunity bathroom $98.00 $111.00 $124.00 $137.00 $150.00 $163.00 Plusthe following surcharge, based on the store/office inter $0.00 Small, less than 15,000 sf, or $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 Medium, 15,000to_30,000sf,or $98.00 $111.00 $124.00 $137.00 $150.00 $163.00 Large, More than 30,000sf $196.00 $222.00 $248.00 $274.00 $300.00 $326.00 3 Churches forthe church, plus * $98.00 $111.00 $124.00 $137.00 $150.00 $163'00 $111.00 $137.00 forthe rectory, plus * $98.00 $124.00 $150.00 $163.00 forthe annex $98.00 $111.00 $124.00 $137.00 $150.00 $163.00 *Class 6foreducational parochial schools 4 Hotels & motels, rest homes & care centers, and Kitsap Countyjail base fee, plus $98.00 $111.00 $124.00 $137.00 $150.00 $163.00 per unit $19.90 $22.20 $24.80 $27.40 $30.00 $32.60 5 Apartments and mobile home parks per dwelling unit $98.001 $111.00 $124.001 $137.00 $150.00 $163.00 6 Schools Iforeach pupil, teacher, maintenance and administrative per. $3.00 $3.30 $3.701 $4.10 $4.50 $4.90 7 Kitsap County courthouse (main complex) $3,822.00 $4,329.00 $4,836.00 $5,343.00 $5,850.00 $6,357.00 8 Restaurants Based on the seating capacity as determined by the building official _ Espresso Bar Seating not applicable. Classification includes similar food preparation businesses which do not require the cooking of food orthe maintenance of kitchen equipment. $98.00 $111.00 $124.00 $137.00 $150.00 $163.00 Deli No seating $147.00 $166.50 $186.00 $205.50 $225.00 $244.50 Small Seatingfor Ito 50 $294.00 $333.00 $372.00 $411.00 $450.00 $489.00 Medium Seating for 51to 150 $441.00 $499.50 $558.00 $616.50 $675.00 $733.50 Large Seating for more than 150 $598.00 $666.00 $744.00 $822.00 $900.00 $978.00 9 Laundromats base fee, plus $49.00 $55.50 $62.00 $68.50 $75.00 $81.50 per washing machine $19.90 $22.20 $24.80 $27.40 $30.00 $32.60 Laundromats with less than four washing machines are considered Class 2. Dry Cleaners without washing machines are Class 2. 10 Taverns $245.001 $277.50 $310.00 $342.50 $375.00 $407.50 11 Car dealerships for sales and administrative office, plus $98.00 $111.00 $124.00 $137.00 $150.00 $163.00 for service department, plus $98.00 $111.00 $124.00 $137.00 $150.00 $163.00 for car washing when the water is used to determine cost sharing forthe sewer treatment plant. $98.00 $111.00 $124.00 $137.00 $150.00 $163.00 12 Post office $343.00 $388.50 $434.00 $479.50 $525.00 $570.50 13 Grocery stores Basic fee, plus the following surcharges $49.00 $55.50 $62.00 $68.50 $75.00 $81.50 Basic Store $49.00 $55.50 $62.00 $68.50 $75.00 $81.50 Bakery $49.00 $55.50 $62.00 $68.50 $75.00 $81.50 $150.00 $163.00 Wetted -Down Produce $98.00 $111.00 $124.00 $137.00 $150.00 $163.00 Food Disposal $98.00 $111.00 $124.00 $137.00 $300.001 $326.00 Meat Cutting Area $196.00 $222.00 $248.001 $274.00 14 Bowling alley, boat marina, health maintenance organizations and work release&juvenile facilities base fee, plus $49.00 $55.50 $62.00 $68.50 $75.00 $81.50 for each equivalent residential unit (ERU) as determined for the cost -sharing formula for the sewer treatment plant $49.00 $55.50 $62.00 $68.50 $75.00 $81.50 15 Carwashes base fee, plus $49.00 $55.50 $62.00 $68.50 $75.00 $81.50 $225.001 per car washing bay $147.00 $166.50 $Ik00l $205.501 $244.50 KI&A PT ORCH W&S Gap Analysis Final Report DRZ 11120115, Page 5 Katy Isaksen & Associates Utility Financial Planning for Local Government 6\?M) Water/Sewer Gap Analysis Recommended Rates Recommended Sewer Rates Bimonthly Rate: 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 16 Beauty shops and barber shops $98.00 $111.00 $124.00 $137.00 $150.00 $163.00 17 Day care Basic fee, plus $196.00 $222.00 $248.00 $274.00 $300.00 $326.00 for less than or equal to56children $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 for 7 to 25 children $98.00 $111.00 $124.00 $137.00 $150.00 $163.00 for more than 25 children, use Class 6 rates 18 Gas stations for gasoline retail, which could include service bay $98.00 $111.00 $124.00 $137.00 $150.00 $163.00 for non -automotive retail $98.00 $111.00 $124.00 $137.00 $150.00 $163.00 19 Assisted living units base fee, plus $98.00 $111.00 $124.00 $137.00 $150.00 $163.00 per unit with private kitchen $98.00 $111.00 $124.00 $137.00 $150.00 $163.00 per unit without private kitchen or studio apartment $19.90 $22.20 $24.80 $27.40 $30.00 $32.60 20 Bed and breakfasts base fee, plus $98.00 $111.00 $124.00 $137.00 $150.00 $163.00 per rentable bedroom $7.95 $8.90 $9.90 $11.00 $12.00 $13.00 21 Public Market (proposed new class) basicfee, plus the following surcharges $196.00 $222.00 $248.00 $274.00 $300.00 $326.00 Nonfood retail $24.50 $27.80 $31.00 $34.30 $37.50 $40.80 Nonfood service business $24.50 $27.80 $31.00 $34.30 $37.50 $40.80 Juice/Soda/Ice Cream/Espresso Bar $98.00 $111.00 $124.00 $137.00 $150.00 $163.00 Restaurant (consume and buy on premises) $196.00 $222.00 $248.00 $274.00 $300.00 $326.00 Delicatessen (counter sales takeout ready -to -eat food produ $98.00 $111.00 $124.00 $137.00 $150.00 $163.00 Retail Meat/Seafood 1 $98.00 $111.00 $124.00 $137.00 $150.00 $163.00 Retail Bakery $98.00 $111.00 $124.00 $137.00 $150.00 $163.00 Special notes: a) Home occupations will not be charged additional sewerfees. b) Fora combination of classes in one business, the highest rate will be selected c) In the event that an established rate class does not accurately reflect the impact on the sewer system, the city engineer may determine the specific monthly rate. d) Water accounts which serve a marina pier and do not have a connection to the sewer shall not be charged a sewer bill. A sewer bill will be charged and based on winter consumption ifthe water meter serves both the marina pier and any facility or pump station that is connected to the sewer system. For billing purposes, live-aboards will not be considered as a dwelling unit. e) Properties served which are outside the city limits shall have a 50 percent surcharge on the bimonthly rates. Impact on Sample Customers. The impact on a low -use residence and an average residence are shown in Table 8. Water and sewer combined would increase $17.60 per two month bill for a low -use residence and $20.70 for an average residence. TABLE 8: BIMONTHLY IMPACT ON LOW -USE AND AVERAGE RESIDENCES LOW USE RESIDENCE @ 3,000gallons 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 WATER ONLY Low Use $30.50 $35.10 $39.70 $44.30 $48.90 $53.50 Increase per Bimonthly Bill W $4.60 $4.60 $4.60 $4.60 $4.60 WATER+SEWER Low Use $128.50 $146.10 $163.70 $181.30 $198.90 $216.50 Increase per Bimonthly Bill W+S $17.60 $17.60 $17.60 $17.60 $17.60 AVERAGE RESIDENCE @ 7,000gallons 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 WATER ONLY Average $50.70 $58.40 $66.00 $73.60 $81.20 $88.80 Increase per Bimonthly Bill W $7.70 $7.60 $7.60 $7.60 $7.60 WATER +SEWER Average $148.70 $169.40 $190.00 $210.60 $231.20 $251.80 Increase per Bimonthly Bill W+S $20.70 $20.60 $20.60 $20.60 $20.60 Comparable Local Rates. Utilities are required to be self-sufficient. Each jurisdiction has its own facilities, infrastructure and customer base to pay for the system. The local utilities include the cities of Bremerton, Gig Harbor and Poulsbo, Kitsap PUD, and Kitsap County wastewater. The comparison includes 2015 bimonthly bills, except for Port Orchard proposed 2016 rates and Gig Harbor previously KI&A PT ORCH W&S Gap Analysis Final Report DR2, 11120115, Page 6 Katy Isaksen & Associates Utility Financial Planning for Local Government eN?D adopted 2016 rates. A typical residence using 7,000 gallons per two month bill is compared in Charts 1 and 2. CHART 1: COMPARABLE RESIDENTIAL WATER BILLS Typical Residence -Bimonthly Water Port Orchard, Proposed 2016 Kitsap PUD Gig Harbor, 2016 Poulsbo Bremerton West Sound UD $0 $20 $40 $60 $80 $100 $120 $140 $160 $180 $58. $58. 54.6 .07 .82 13 0 2 $4 $4 $43 Chart 1 reflects a residence with a %" meter using 7,000 gallons (938 cubic feet) per bimonthly bill. All communities increased rates for 2015. Gig Harbor has adopted annual rate increases for 2015-2020. CHART 2: COMPARABLE RESIDENTIAL SEWER BILLS Typical Residence - Bimonthly Sewer Poulsbo Kitsap Co. Port Orchard, Proposed 2016 Gig Harbor, 2016 Bremerton West Sound UD $0 $20 $40 $60 $80 $100 $120 $140 $160 $180 1 Chart 2 reflects a residence with a %" meter using 7,000 gallons (938 cubic feet) per bimonthly bill. All communities except Port Orchard increased rates in 2015. Gig Harbor has adopted annual rate increases for 2015-2020. While it is nice to know what others charge for comparable service, it is important to understand that each utility must set rates and charges to fund its own system. Connection Fees. New development pays capital facilities and connection charges for water and sewer upon connecting to each system. These will be updated when the water and sewer comprehensive plans are adopted to be sure all are paying a fair share of the existing and planned improvements. For water, all new connections pay a capital facilities charge based on meter size. Depending on the circumstance, new water customers pay for the water meter, installation, distribution system and inspection as required by city code. Table 9 shows the new water connection fees as of 11/1/15. KI&A PT ORCH W&S Gap Analysis Final Report DR2, 11120115, Page 7 Katy Isaksen & Associates Utility Financial Planning for Local Government 6\?M) TABLE 9: WATER CONNECTION FEES Water Capital Facilities Charge per ERU based on meter size 11/1/2015 3/4" Meter $5,011.81 1" Meter $8,358.58 1-1/2" Meter $16,667.04 2" Meter $26,677.31 3" Meter $53,354.59 4" Meter $84,499.10 Irrigation Meter $0.00 + Inspection fees, connection fees and in -lieu -of assessment fees as required by city code. For sewer, all new connections pay a wastewater treatment facility fee for the joint wastewater plant, a general facilities charge for city sewer general facilities and inspection and other fees as required by city code. Table 10 shows the new sewer connection charges as of 11/1/15. TABLE 10: SEWER CONNECTION FEES Sewer Wastewater Treatment Facility Fee 11/1/2015 Per ERU McCormick Land Co. Div. 1-10 $3,597.37 $881.25 Sewer General Facility Fee Per ERU $3,085.04 + Inspection & other fees as required by city code. Six -Year Summary Outlook. The six -year water and sewer outlooks are summarized in Tables 11 and 12. This provides a summary of the anticipated revenue with existing 2015 rates, projected operating expenses based on 2015 budget, existing and planned debt payments, and capital program funding and expenditures. The yellow line, Annual Increase/ (Use) of Reserves indicates the difference between existing rate revenue and expenditures for each year. If this line is positive, it means that the system is increasing reserves or savings for future years. If this line is negative ( ), it means that the reserves will need to be used to meet the planned expenditures in each year. Other alternatives include adjusting expenditures or increasing rates or other revenue. The cumulative impact on the base rate and average customer is calculated in the shaded area. In order to lessen the impact on customers, the recommended rates were set to be the same level each year. This will require the City to manage the CIP program by funding the highest priority projects in each year as can be afforded with the available funding. A large project may take more than one year to accumulate enough funds to proceed. Appendices. The appendices include the water and sewer CIP programs with funding sources and operating details such as model assumptions, operating revenue and expense details. KI&A PT ORCH W&S Gap Analysis Final Report DR2, 11120115, Page 8 Katy Isaksen & Associates Utility Financial Planning for Local Government 6N?R) TABLE 11: SIX -YEAR OUTLOOK SUMMARY- WATER The recommend rates have level increases over the six years, therefore the capital improvements will need to be reviewed each year during the budget process to balance the highest priorities with the funding available. Capital facilities charge revenue should also be used for the CIP. WATER UTILITY SIX-YR OUTLOOK Base Year 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 Comments SCENARIO 1: SIX -YEAR OUTLOOK with Capital Facilities Charges toward CIP- 20 new customers per year - Pay -As -You -Go for Highest Priority Projects, medium deferred to years 7-10 Operating Revenue W Sales to Customers, Muni, Public Auth 1,600,000 1,606,000 1,612,000 1,618,000 1,624,000 1,630,000 add new cust Other Operating Revenue 50,750 50,750 50,750 50,750 50,750 50,750 flat Subtotal W Revenue 1,650,750 1,656,750 1,662,750 1,668,750 1,674,750 1,680,750 Expenses Subtotal Operations 1,536,813 1,547,600 1,611,400 1,665,600 1,672,000 1,730,400 Water Debt W City Hall Debt (p+i) 30,592 30,592 30,592 30,592 30,592 - thru 2019 Existing DWSRF Loan - Well 10 - - 90,000 406,000 406,000 406,000 Future DWSRF Loan(s) - - - - - - Subtotal Debt 30,592 30,592 120,592 436,592 436,592 406,000 Other Revenue for Capital Transfer from Cum Res 403 for CIP - 95,380 95,380 95,380 95,380 95,380 Capital FaciI Chg = $4,769 x 2C DWSRF Proceeds 1,000,000 4,700,000 300,000 - - - this scenario Available for Capital 1,083,345 4,873,938 326,138 (338,062) (338,462) (360,270) Capital Program Equipment Replacement 9,500 9,500 9,500 9,500 9,500 9,500 carry forward Water CIP - Six -Year 1,060,000 5,468,000 1,122,000 611,600 715,600 785,800 by constr cost esca I Subtotal Capital 1,069,500 5,477,500 1,131,500 621,100 725,100 795,300 W Annual Increase/(Use) of Reserves 13,845 (603,562) (805,362) (959,162) (1,063,562) (1,155,570) Percentage Impact on W Rates - cumulative 38% 50% 59% 65% 71% over existing rates Percentage Impact on W Rates - annual 0% 38% 12% 9% 6% 5% Base Rate - 3/4" Meter, 3001-5000ga1 $46.50 Base Rate- if Balanced $46.50 $63.98 $69.73 $74.07 $76.95 $79.47 Existing Ordinance (Average Residence @ 7000gal) $50.70 Scen 1: Rates & CFC Pay CIP $50.70 $69.75 $78.39 $85.69 $91.02 $95.93 If Use of Reserves = 0 Average increase in 2-mo bill (per year) $19.05 $8.63 $7.31 $5.32 $4.92 DOH Affordability @ 1.5%of MHI $140.64 $140.64 $140.64 $140.64 $140.64 $140.64 RECOMMENDED RATE SCENARIO For Smooth Rates 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 Base needs to increase about $7.00 per year Bimonthly $46.50 $S3.50 $60.50 $67.50 $74.50 $81.50 Average 2-month water bill @ 7,000g Bimonthly $S0.70 $S8.40 $66.00 $73.60 $81.20 $88.80 KI&A PT ORCH W&S Gap Analysis Final Report DR2, 11120115, Page 9 Katy Isaksen & Associates Utility Financial Planning for Local Government 6N?R) TABLE 12: SIX -YEAR OUTLOOK SUMMARY - SEWER The recommend rates have level increases over the six years, therefore the capital improvements will need to be reviewed each year during the budget process to balance the highest priorities with the funding available. Capital facilities charge revenue should also be used for the CIP. SEWER UTILITY SIX-YR OUTLOOK Base Year 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 Comments SCENARIO 1 - What if NO Grant and all SRF Loans for 4 Pump Stations? With Capital Facilities Charges toward CIP. Loans at 2.7% Interest. Operating Revenue Sewer Services to Customers, Muni, Pub Auth 3,070,000 3,099,000 3,128,000 3,157,000 3,186,000 3,215,000 add 50 new cust per yr Other Sewer Operating Revenue 89,250 89,250 89,250 89,250 89,250 89,250 flat Subtotal S Revenue 3,159,250 3,188,250 3,217,250 3,246,250 3,275,250 3,304,250 Operating Expenses 3,195,161 3,316,500 3,442,600 3,573,800 3,710,400 3,852,600 Sewer Debt S City Hall Debt (p+i) 30,592 30,592 30,592 30,592 30,592 - thru 2019 Potential New Loan for CIP - - - 242,000 242,000 437,000 Subtotal Debt 30,592 30,592 30,592 272,592 272,592 437,000 Net Available for S Capital (66,503) (158,842) (255,942) (600,142) (707,742) (985,350) Other Revenue for Capital Transfer Facil. Charges from Cum Res 403 120,000 150,000 150,000 Local match grants & comp plan Grant Proceeds- Hazard Mitigation - - - Marina Future DOE SRF Loan Proceeds - 1,850,000 1,850,000 416,000 2,574,000 1,338,000 Available for S Capital 53,497 1,841,158 1,744,058 (184,142) 1,866,258 352,650 Capital Program Equi pment Replacement 9,500 9,500 9,500 9,500 9,500 9,500 carry forward Sewer CIP 120,000 2,000,000 2,000,000 416,000 2,574,000 1,338,000 Subtotal S Capital 129,500 2,009,500 2,009,500 425,500 2,583,500 1,347,500 S Annual Increase/(Use) of Reserves (76,003) (168,342) (265,442) (609,642) (717,242) (994,850) Percentage Impact on S Rates- Cumulative 2.5% 5.4% 8.5% 19.3% 22.5% 30.9% Percentage Impact on S Rates - annual 11% 5% 56% 20% 16% 0% Average Residence - if Balanced $98.00 $100.43 $105.75 $114.07 $132.99 $155.05 $185.38 If Use of Reserves = 0 Estimated Bimonthly Impact $2.43 $5.32 $8.32 $18.92 $22.06 $30.33 DOE says sewer is affordable at 2.0%of median household income ($56,257). At 2.0%of MHI, sewer rates would be considered affordable at $93.76 per month. RECOMMENDED RATE SCENARIO For Smooth Rates 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 Bimonthly Rates with Level Increases $98.00 $98.00 $111.00 $124.00 $137.00 $150.00 $163.00 $13.00 KI&A PT ORCH W&S Gap Analysis Final Report DR2, 11120115, Page 10 Katy Isaksen & Associates Utility Financial Planning for Local Government 426) APPENDIX A. SIX -YEAR WATER CIP SCENARIO A - EXISTING SRF LOAN + OTHER CIP BY RATES Estimated Cost Total by TEN-YEAR WATER CIP (focus on six-vearl I$20141 Catenory 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2014 DWSRF Loan 6,000,000 1 1,000,000 4,700,000 300,000 Highest Priority i 2 Well 11 Treatment & Connection $800,000 High 416,000 416,000 7a Abandon Wells 4 & 5 $100,000 High 104,000 - 14 lWater System Plan Update $60,000 High 60,000 - 6 15a PRVs High to Low Zone: Mitchell & Dwight, Melcher/Pottery & Eaglecrest, Kendall & Maple Watermain Repl Ph1A: Seattle Avenue, 4" Cl to 8", 842 If $195,000 $252,600 High High - - 203,000 211,000 60,000 15a Watermain Repl Ph1A: Division Street, 4" Cl to 8", 859 If $257,700 High - 90,000 91,000 95,000 - 15a 15a Watermain Repl Ph1A: Hull Avenue, 4" Cl to 8", 3,524 If Watermain Repl Ph1A: Melcher-Tacoma-Cline, 4" Cl to 8", 1,542 If $1,057,200 $470,700 High High - 475,600 475,600 100,000 237,800 473,000 Subtotal Highest Priority Medium Priority Telemetry Upgrades $3,193,200 - - - - - 1 $25,000 Medium 30,000 7b City Hall PS Elimination: Phase 2 New Well 7 $1,000,000 Medium - 12 Melcher Street Pump Station Upgrade $300,000 Medium 13 390 Zone Storage Improvements (Impounded Water) $500,000 Medium 15b Watermain Repl Ph1B: Dwight Street, 4" Cl to 8", 896 If $268,800 High -Medium 15b Watermain Repl Ph1B: Harrison Ave, 4" Cl to 8", 629 If $188,700 High -Medium 15b Watermain Repl Ph1B: Prospect Street, 6" Cl to 8", 940 If $282,000 High -Medium 15b Watermain Repl Ph1B: Dekalb Street, 4" Cl to 8", 861 If $258,300 High -Medium 15b Watermain Repl Ph1B: Ada -Taylor Street, 4" Cl to 8", 713 If $213,900 High -Medium Subtotal Medium Priority $3,036,700 10b Deferred to Future 390 to 580 12-inch Tr Main Oversizing (build reserve over time) $450,000 As Req by Dev 45,000 45,000 45,000 45,000 45,000 Subtotal Deferred to Future $4,147,050 Subtotal City -funded 6-Yr 10,179,600 1,060,000 5,468,000 1,122,000 611,600 715,600 785,800 Less: Existing DWSRF Funding (6,000,000) (1,000,000) (4,700,000) (300,000) - - - Less: Future DWSRF Funding Funding from Water Rates 6-Yr 4,179,600 60,000 1 768,000 822,000 611,6001 715,600 785,800 t,rr impact to water rates CIP Funded by Rates 60,000 768,000 822,000 611,600 715,600 785,800 Less: Anticipated Connection Charges for CIP Existing DWSRF Debt Repayment - - 90,000 406,000 406,000 406,000 Total CIP Impact to Water Rates 60,000 768,000 912,000 1,017,600 1,121,600 1,191,800 KI&A PT ORCH W&S Gap Analysis Final Report DRZ 11120115, Page 11 Katy Isaksen & Associates Utility Financial Planning for Local Government 426) APPENDIX B. WATER OPERATING DETAIL (ASSUMPTIONS, REVENUE, EXPENSES) City of Port Orchard Gap Analysis Water/Sewer Prenared by Katvlsaksen & Associates Budget 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 Comments WATER UTILITY SIX-YR OUTLOOK Assumptions: New Customer ERU's per year 20 20 20 20 20 20 General Cost Escalation 3.5% 3.5% 3.5% 3.5% 3.5% 3.5% Pumping/Purchased Water Cost Escalation 9.0% 9.0% 9.0% 3.5% 3.5% 3.5% back to general in 2018 Construction Cost Escalation 4.0% 4.0% 4.0% 4.0% 4.0% 4.0% Bimonthly Single Family Base Rate $46.50 $46.50 $46.50 $46.50 $46.50 $46.50 Current City Code Operating Revenue W Sales - General Customers 1,518,000 1,524,000 1,530,000 1,536,000 1,542,000 1,548,000 add new cust W Sales - Public Municipalities 5,000 _ 5,000 5,000 5,000 _5,000 5,00_0 flat WSales- PublicAuthorities 77,000 77,000 77,000 77,000 77,000 77,000 flat Late Payment/Penalties/Shut-off 21,000 21,000 21,000 21,000 21,000 21,000 flat Rent -Utility Properties 26,800 26,800 26,800 26,800 26,800 26,800 flat Other Revenue(unmetered,fire,other) 450 450 450 450 450 450 flat Concurrency Fees (inspection) - - - - - - flat Connection Fees (inspection) 2500 2,500 2500 2,500 2500 2,500 flat Subtotal W Revenue 1,650,750 1,656,750 1,662,750 1,668,750 1,674,750 1,680,750 Expenses Purchased Water 56,000 56,000 56,000 56,000 6,000 6,200 min. 50kthru 2018 Maintenance -Structures & Wells 22,153 22,900 23,700 1 24,500 25,400 26,300 by gen'l es cal. Water Treatment 139,531 144,400 149,500 154,700 160,100 165,700 by gen'l es cal. Supply Mains 94,260 97,600 101,000 104,500 108,200 112,000 by gen'l es cal. Services 39,977 41,400 42,800 44,300 45,900 47,500 by gen'l es cal. Pumping 193,107 210,500 229,400 237,400 r 245,700 254,300 by pump/purch wtr escal. Distribution System 29,650 30,700 31,800 32,900 34,100 35,300 bygen'lescal. Reservoir painting 50,000 Meters 51,844 53,700 55,600 57,500 59,500 61,600 by gen'l es cal. Hydrants 5,518 5,700 5,900 6,100 6,300 6,500 by gen'l escal. Customer Svcs - Meter Read/Billing 139,018 143,900 148,900 154,100 159,500 165,100 by gen'l escal. Customer Service -Info 500 500 500 500 500 500 by gen'l esca1. General Admin_SaIaries & Benes 155,297 160,700 166,300 172,100 178,100 184,300 by gen'l escal. Admin Clerical Salaries & Benes 160,463 166,100 171,900 177,900 184,100 190,500 by gen'l escal. Supplies -GeneralAdmin 100 100 100 100 100 100 by gen'l escal. OthrSrv&Chg- GeneralAdmin 10,350 10,700 11,100 11,500 11,900 12,300 by gen'l esca 1. Insurance- Property&Liability 126,000 130,400 135,000 139,700 144,600 149,700 by gen'l escal. Supplies - Gen Ops 2,000 2,100 2,200 2,300 2,400 2,500 by gen'l esca1. Fuel Consumed - Gen Ops 10,000 10,400 10,800 11,200 11,600 12,000 by gen'l escal. Transportation Equip. 11,195 11,600 12,000 12,400 12,800 13,200 by gen'l escal. OthrSrv&Chg - General Ops 15,700 16,200 16,800 17,400 18,000 18,600 by gen'l escal. Uti I ity Tax State 95,000 98,300 101,700 105,300 109,000 112,800 by gen'l esca 1. Utility Tax City 80,000 82,800 85,700 88,700 91,800 95,000 by gen'l escal. Other Admin k ud emer. en,ri hts,we114 49,150 50,900 52,700 54,500 56,400 58,400 by gen'l escal. Subtotal Operations 1,536,813 1,547,600 1,611,400 1,665,600 1,672,000 1,730,400 KI&A PT ORCH W&S Gap Analysis Final Report DR2, 11120115, Page 12 Katy Isaksen & Associates Utility Financial Planning for Local Government 6N?R) APPENDIX C. SIX -YEAR SEWER CIP SCENARIO 1- What if NO Grant and all SRF Loans for 4 Pump Stations? SRF Interest 2.7% Cost Est in No. Six -Year Sewer CIP - Escalated $2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 Total 1 2015 Sewer Plan Update, map & model $120,000 $120,000 $120,000 2 Marina PS Improvements $3,800,000 F$2,000,000 $2,000,000 $4,000,000 3 Bay St PS Improvement $1,100,000 $1,338,000 $1,338,000 4 McCormick PS2 - Design $190,000 $214,000 $214,000 5 McCormick PS2 - Construction $1,100,000 $1,287,000 $1,287,000 6 McCormick PS1 - Design $180,000 $202,000 $202,000 7 McCormick PS1 - Construction $1,100,000 $1,287,0001 $1,287,000 Total Sewer CIP - Escalated $7,590,000 $120,000 $2,000,000 $2,000,000 $416,000 $2,574,000 $1,338,000 $8,448,000 Sewer CIP Funding Sources Transfer Facil Charges fr 403 $120,000 $150,000 $150,000 Haz Mitigation Grant (87.5%) Future SRF Loan Proceeds $1,850,000 $1,850,000 $416,000 $2,574,000 $1,338,000 Rate Funded $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Total Sewer CIP Funding $120,000 $2,000,000 $2,000,000 $416,000 $2,574,000 $1,338,000 $0 2018 2019 2020 2021 SRF Debt Payments $242,000 $242,000 $242,000 $242,000 $195,000 $195,000 $87,000 Total SRF Debt Payments $0 $242,000 $242,000 $437,000 $524,000 Total Rate -Funded + Debt $0 $0 $0 $242,000 $242,000 $437,000 The Department of Ecology combined water quality funding assistance program is the target loan source that includes the Clean Water State Revolving Fund loan program. There is an annual application cycle for competitive applications that meet the prerequisites. The interest rate will change each year. This study assumes the City would be applying for 20-year loans. KI&A PT ORCH W&5 Gap Analysis Final Report DR2, 11120115, Page 13 Katy Isaksen & Associates Utility Financial Planning for Local Government 6N?R) APPENDIX D: SEWER OPERATING DETAIL (ASSUMPTIONS, REVENUE, EXPENSES) City of Port Orchard Gap Analysis Water/Sewer Prepared by Katy Isaksen & Associates with 2015 BUDGET Budget 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 Comments SEWER UTILITY SIX-YR OUTLOOK Assumptions: New Customer ERU's per year 50 50 50 50 50 50 Stetson/W McC/Rush General Cost Escalation 3.5% 3.5% 3.5% 3.5% 3.5% 3.5% Pumping Cost Escalation 7.0% 7.0% 7.0% 7.0% 7.0% 7.0% Construction Cost Escalation 4.0% 4.0% 4.0% 4.0% 4.0% 4.0% Bimonthly Single Family Flat Rate $98.00 $98.00 $98.00 $98.00 $98.00 $98.00 Operating Revenue S Services - Flat Rate 2,947,000 2,976,000 3,005,000 3,034,000 3,063,000 3,092,000 add new cust SServices- PublicMunicipalities 9,000 9,000 9,000 9,000 9,000 9,000 flat S Services - Public Authorities 114,000 114,000 114,000 114,000 114,000 114,000 flat Late Payment/Penalties/Shut-off 55,000 55,000 55,000 55,000 55,000 55,000 flat Rent -Utility Properties 26,800 26,800 26,800 26,800 26,800 26,800 flat Other S Revenue (other, misc, leachate) 450 450 450 450 450 450 flat Concurrency Fees (inspection) 2,000 2,000 2,000 2,000 2,000 2,000 flat Connection Fees (inspection) 5,000 5,000 5,000 5,000 5,000 5,000 flat Subtotal S Revenue 3,159,250 3,188,250 3,217,250 3,246,250 3,275,250 3,304,250 Expenses Sewer Treatment 1,441,145 1,491,600 1,543,800 1,597,800 1,653,700 1,711,600 by gen'l es cal. Structures 17,893 18,500 19,100 19,800 20,500 21,200 bygen'I es cal. Pumping 269,930 288,800 309,000 330,600 353,700 378,500 by pumping escal. Annual Programs (STEP conversion,telemetry) 420,000 434,700 449,900 465,600 481,900 498,800 bygen'I escal. Ma i ntena nce of Ma i ns 190,025 196,700 203,600 210,700 218,100 225,700 by gen'l esca 1. Services 88,123 91,200 94,400 97,700 101,100 104,600 bygen'I escal. Customer Svcs - Meter Read/Billing 68,673 71,100 73,600 76,200 78,900 81,700 by gen'I escal. General Admin Salaries & Benes 155,425 160,900 166,500 172,300 178,300 184,500 bygen'I escal. Admin Clerical Salaries & Benes 160,463 166,100 171,900 177,900 184,100 190,500 bygen'I escal. Supplies -General Admin 200 200 200 200 200 200 bygen'I escal. OthrSrv&Chg- General Admin 8,900 9,200 9,500 9,800 10,100 10,500 bygen'I escal. Insurance- Property & Liability 120,000 124,200 128,500 133,000 137,700 142,500 bygen'I escal. Supplies -General Operations 2,000 2,100 2,200 2,300 2,400 2,500 by gen'l esca 1. Fuel Consumed - Gen Ops 10,000 10,400 10,800 11,200 11,600 12,000 by gen'I escal. Transportation Equip. 12,084 12,500 12,900 13,400 13,900 14,400 bygen'I escal. OthrSrv&Chg-GeneralOps 15,300 15,800 16,400 17,000 17,600 18,200 by gen'l escal. Uti I ity Tax State 54,000 55,900 57,900 59,900 62,000 64,200 bygen'I escal. Uti I ity Tax City 160,000 165,600 171,400 177,400 183,600 190,000 by gen'l esca 1. Other Admin (safety train 1000 1000 1000 1000 1000 1000 bygen'I escal. Subtotal Operations 3,195,161 3,316,500 3,442,600 3,573,800 3,710,400 3,852,600 KI&A PT ORCH W&5 Gap Analysis Final Report DR2, 11120115, Page 14