The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About04/13/2010 - Regular - Packeti City Council Meeting Agenda CITY OF PORT ORCHARD April 13 , 2010 Mayor: 7:00 p.m. Lary Coppola Administrative Official 1. CALL TO ORDER Councilniembers: Fred Chang A. Pledge of Allegiance Chair: LTAC Staff: Clerk's Office Tourism Committee 2. CITIZENS COMMENTS Public Property Committee Please limit your comments to ,g minutes for items not up for Public Hearing. When Jerrychilds recognized by the Mayor, please state your name and address for the official record Chair: Tourism Committee (please complete the sign -in sheet located in the hallway). Staff: Clerk's Office Finance Comnvttee . APPROVAL OF AGENDA John Clauson Chair: Finance Committee Staff. City Treasurer 4. CONSENT AGENDA Utilities/SAC Committee (Approval of Consent Agenda passes all routine items Iisted below, which have been Kitsap County Health distributed to each Councilmemberfor reading and study. Consent Agenda items are not Jim Colebank considered separately unless a Councilmember• so requests. In the event of such a request, Tourism Committee the item is returned to Business Items.) KRCC/PSRC/KPDA A. Approval of Claim Warrants, Payroll & Treasurer's check book Fred olio B. Approval of the March 16, 2010 Work Study Session Minutes Chair: Public Property Committee Staff. Planning Department C. Approval of Public Event Applications (Kirkpatrick): Utilities/SAC Committee - Saints Car Club "The Cruz" Carolyn Powers -- Port Orchard Farmers Market Public Property Committee KRCC/TransPol - Sidney Glen Dolphin Dash 5K - Mustangs on the Waterfront Rob Putaansuu Chair: Utilities Committee Staff: Public works Department �, PRESENTATION Finance Committee Kitsap Housing Authority A. South Kitsap Fire & Rescue Update — Chief Wayne Senter SAC Committee B. Legislative Session Wrap -Up — Senator Derek Kilmer Department Director: Patti Kirkpatrick, CMC Administrative Services 6. PUBLIC HEARING City clerk A. 2009 City of Port Orchard Water System Plan (Dorsey) Allan Martin B. Downtown Overlay District Design Review for Proposed CityTreasurer Development at 710 Bay Street, File No. DRB oo1-10 (Weaver) Debbie Hunt Court Administrator 7, BUSINESS ITEMS James Weaver A. Approval of the March 23, 2010, Council Meeting Minutes Development Director B. Adoption of Resolution No. 019-10, Authorizing the Purchasing of a Al Townsend 201oVehicle from the Storm DrainageUtilityFund (Dorsey) Police Chief C. Adoption of Ordinance No. 005-10, 2009 Water System Plan Mark Dorsey, P.L. (Dorsey) Public Works Director City Engineer D. Adoption of Resolution No. 020-10, Approving the Design Review Contact us: Board's Recommendation for Proposed Development at 710 Bay 216 Prospect street Street, File No. DRB ooi-10 (Weaver) Port Orchard, WA 98366 (36o)876-4407 Please turn off cell phones during meeting and hold your questions for staff until the meeting has been adjourned The Council may consider other ordinances and matters not listed on the Agenda, unless specific notification period is required Meeting materials are available on the City's website at: www.cityofportorchard.us or by contacting the City Clerk's office, 36o.876.4407 Meetings are available for viewing on the City's website: www.cityofportorchard.us April 13, 2010, Meeting Agenda Page i of 2 E. Approval of Contract No. CO21-1o, Authorizing the Mayor to Execute a Memorandum of Agreement Between the City of Port Orchard, the City of Bremerton, and the Port of Bremerton for Festival Foot Ferry Services (Kirkpatrick) F. Approval of Contract No. CO22-10, Authorizing the Mayor to Execute an Agreement with BHC Consultants for the Bay Street Pump Station Upgrade Pre -Design Report (Dorsey) G. Meeting with Initiating Parties Regarding Notice of Intent to Petition for Blueberry Road Annexation (Weaver) H. Authorizing Pet License Exemption to Have More Than Three Licensed Animals (Kirkpatrick) 8. REPORTS OF COUNCIL COMMITTEES 9. REPORT OF MAYOR 1o. REPORT OF DEPARTMENT DIRECTORS A. Update: Federal Transportation Projects (Dorsey) B. Update: Annexations (Weaver) ii. CITIZEN COMMENTS (Please limit your comments to 3 minutes for items not up for Public Hearing. When recognized by the Mayor, please state your name and address for the official record. It is asked that you do not speak on the same matter twice.) 12. EXECUTIVE SESSION: Pursuant to RCW 42.30.i1o, the City Council may hold an executive session. The topic(s) and the session duration will be announced prior to the executive session. 13. ADJOURNMENT COMMITTEE MEETINGS Finance Committee Tourism Committee Utilities Committee Date & Time April 23, 2010 7:30 a.m. April 14, 2010 5:30 p.m. April 14, 2010 7:30 a.m. Sewer Advisory Committee (SAC) April 14, 2010 6:30 p.m. Public Property Committee April 14, 2010 7:30 a.m. Work Study Session May 18, 2010 7:00 p.m. Location .... ............ Myhre's City Hall Myhre's S.K.W.R.F. Myhre's City Hall Please turn off cell phones during meeting and hold your questions for staff until the meeting has been adjourned The Council may consider other ordinances and matters not listed on the Agenda, unless specific notification period is required Meeting materials are available on the City's website at: www.cityofportorchard.us or by contacting the City Clerk's office, 36o.876.4407 Meetings are available for viewing on the City's website: www.cityofportorchard.us April 13, 2010, Meeting Agenda Page 2 of 2 City of Port Orchard 216 Prospect Street, Port Orchard, WA 98366 (36o) 876-4407 0 FAX (36o) 895-9029 Agenda Staff Report Agenda Item No. Consent Agenda 4C Meeting Date: April 13, 2010 Subject: _Approval of Public Event Application: Prepared by: Patti Kirkpatrick, CMC Saints Car Club "The Cruz" City Clerk Port Orchard Farmers Market Atty Routing No: NA Sidney Glen Dolphin Dash 5K Atty Review Date: NA Mustangs on the Waterfront Summary: Each year several organizations request permission to close certain City streets; request the use of City parking lots; or use City Parks. Saints Car Club, Port Orchard Farmers Market, Sidney Glen Elementary PTA, and The Mustang Club have submitted their applications for their public events to use a portion of the City's parking lots and right-of-ways. City Departments, as well as the Fire Department, have reviewed the applications and have submitted their recommendations and/or comments. These Public Event Applications are not new events; they have been granted permission to host their event on City streets and City parking lots for several years. Recommendation: Staff recommends approving the Public Event applications. Motion for consideration: I move to approve the public event applications for the Saints Car Club, Port Orchard Farmers Market, Sidney Glen Elementary PTA, and The Mustang Club and allow them to hold their public events using a portion of the City's parking lots and right-of- ways. Alternatives: Deny the applications or approve with conditions. Attachments: Application for Public Event Map City Departments and Fire Department Comments City of Port Orchard 216 Prospect Street, Port Orchard, WA 98366 (360) 876-4407 0 FAX (36o) 895-9029 Public Event Application NOTE: Acceptance of this application by the City Clerk's Office does NOT indicate or guarantee approval of the application or the dates requested. Each application will be reviewed by City staff and Council Committe + /A�. 0clitional information may be requested by city personnel prior to submittal of the application to the City Council � fi�al �cc igration. No statement made by city staff or elected official prior to final consideration by the City Council shal�dbligai�fh,�ity Council in any manner. BAN t, C t92 ., � . Name Name of Sponsoring liy nH U70 Name of Person Completing This Application: / Bomzc4 5j:t-Yt- Point of Contact: —reuke P.-D&WeA6.- n— n Telephone: (3bO) 710 -- QC%l, b Address: Zf9O 00-561AJ 51 SC Atf4!�) PQ41 04C 46 (. 4 963 Street City State Zip Code Dates of Event (Inclusive) S".m So 4bf6U51 60 2ol O Location of Event: jolt 1JT—Q-WAJ POKE 04CFII" (If Event Will Have Multiple Activities and Locations, List On Separate Sheet) Anticipated Number Of Exhibitors: 450 Time Open To Public: (o &1 Anticipated Number Of Visitors: Ig O&D 2S`i 000 Time Open To Vendors: 6A0, Closing Time: This application form was designed for use by applicants for various types of events. Please answer all questions; you may attach additional pages if necessary. 1. Describe type of event and how this event will benefit the community: 2. What is expected traffic pattern for the event? Attach a site map indicating location lanes, garbage, and restroom/sani-can(s): C Lj 2jF ZUW Sir l5Ey,&n K/?SAY 5�- 1.�7�Zi'CC �itK9. ' 3. Describe how public safety, traffic and crowd control will be provided. How many police will be needed for (1) traffic control and (2) crowd control? A96eA&416 eueti Qk ll� S7" &LLY1 L)At;e SnWS Ah) n 9 rj66fejasY 0A LeaG &L)6WT 4. Describe how sanitation control (garbage and restrooms) will be provided and maintained: z?,.)M�'s'TFK AT C4-lfe OC 4YOU. 5. How many participants and visitgr cars are anticipated and where will parking be 614) /S activity/vendor(s), fire officers do you 6. How have parking impacts been coordinated with the and/or 7. Has shuttle service/park and ride lots been coordinated with Kitsap Transit? Describe locations, frequency of service and name of contact at Kitsap Transit. Attach written verification of commitment for service from Kitsap Transit: 8. Describe how fire lanes will be identified and kept 9. Will this event require the closure of any street? If so, list street name with date ©AS aS6rV� 4/,57- J ZO/D 10. If any event activity or vendor requires electrical connections or other accomm and how you anticipate meeting their needs: IZAA411 ELEZ7290 6, ti 11. How will the event area be cleaned before, during and after the event? time of requested closure:_ to operate, indicate location _57J1LJ1R'4 7.1PG VJTZe* )P4<_7XAs/}. - — 12. If your event requires vehicles to be towed, your organization must accept responsibility and indemnify the City of Port Orchard and other authorizing property owner(s) by agreeing to pay tow/storage charges or damage claims which result from the vehicle being towed, if a court rules in favor of the re istered owner and orders payment of such charges or damage claims. Do you accept this responsibility? No If yes, name of person responsible for rendering payment of tow/storage charges. If no, explain why: 13. When specifying location of event activity/vendor(s), do you anticipate utilizing any area not owned or managed by the City of Port Orchard? yes no If yes, the owner/manager of subject Property must complete and sign the following: (Please ask for additional forms if multiple properties are being used and have different owners.) Name of property owner Authorizing authority: _ Address: Signature of authorizing A. If the City of Port Orchard approves this application for public event, will your organization grant permission for the sponsoring organization to us your property on the dates specified, for the purpose and activities described in this application? a No If yes, please complete the following: B. Are there any limitations or restrictions on use of your property? Yes (ND If yes, please describe in detail: C. Do you require the event sponsor list you as an Additional Named Insured and provide an insurance certificate to your organization prior to the event date? (!S) No If yes, please indicate coverage limits you require for general liability, property damage and or personal injury? 14. If nature of this event requires event workers to stay overnight (such as carnival or other event workers) where and how do you anticipate providing their lodging? If you anticipate utilizing private property(s) for lodging or other purposes, the owner of the subject property(sl must complete and sign the following: Name of property owner: Authorizing authority: Address: Signature of authorizing authority: Title: Telephone: A. Are there any limitations or restrictions on use of your property? Yes No If yes, please describe in detail: B. Do you require the event sponsor list you as an Additional Named Insured and provide an insurance certificate to your organization prior to the event date? Yes No If yes, please indicate coverage limits you require for general liability, property damage and or personal injury? C. How will use of your property by event workers impact neighboring property owners? Describe steps that will be taken to mitigate any adverse impact(s): 15. Please provide any other information, which you believe, will assist the city in the review process: '7211.0 A)aJ i Jt r. I rr4 2 4 rm /imp cni. !''r /?ens /7i 'i ZIA� " 16. INSURANCE REQUIREMENTS: Sponsoring organization must provide an insurance certificate, 10 days prior to the event, with the City of Port Orchard and other applicable parties shown as Additional Named Insured. Minimum coverage to be as follows: $1,000,000 Liability; $1,000,000 Bodily Injury A. Can you provide this Insurance Certificate? Ke5 SIGNATURE OF APPLICANT: 8Z Date: R G g � r v� c u u m nn�,, 11 m t 7 n PORT ORCHARD POLICE DEPARTMENT MEMORANDUM DATE: JANUARY 27, 2010 TO: CITY CLERK'S OFFICE FROM: CHIEF ALTOWNSEND SUBJECT: FESTIVAL BY THE BAY/CRUZ REQUIREMENTS A) Road Closures - The City will request the road closure from 7 am to 5pm from the State DOT. This allows time for registration of Cruz participants and Festival By The Bay Vendor access. The closure allows time for the Festival vendors to take down after 4pm and vacate their sites no later than 5pm. INSURANCE CERTIFICATES MUST BE PROVIDED BY JUNE 1 st TO ENSURE ROAD CLOSURE. Failure to provide by this date may result in the state declining authorization for Bay Street to be closed. The certificate must include the City of Port Orchard and the Port of Bremerton as additional insured. B) Vehicles Prohibited from Entrance or Exit from the Event Areas- From 8am until 4pm, no vehicles will be allowed to come in or out through the barricades placed at Rockwell and Bay or at Kitsap and Bay. i) Merchants needing access during those hours will be encouraged to use transit by parking in the designated park and ride lots (sites and hours of operation to be provided to the POBSA by Festival by the Bay organizers). Festival by the Bay organizers will work with the merchants to find parking at such sites as the Prosecutor's office on Prospect Street or Westbay (and provide shuttle service). ii) Port of Bremerton Marina users with appropriate "hanger" (hanger design to be provided to the Chief of Police by July 1, 2010) will be directed to the Boat Launch area for parking. They will need to walk to the Marina. The Port will make a shuttle vehicle available to transport heavy items and will advertise the closure in all their materials. iii) Festival by the Bay organizers will notify residents of downtown apartments of these road closures through a letter to landlords and a door hanger two days prior to the event. They will be provided with the park and ride info in addition to the access limits. iv) Any Merchant or Car Club participant who has an appropriate placard (placard design to be provided to the Chief of Police no later than July 1, 2010 - design shall be on paper 8 Yz x 11, numbered, and dated to prevent unauthorized duplicates) on their dashboard may be allowed through the police staffed barricade at Rockwell or Kitsap prior to 8am, but will not be able to leave until 4pm. The Saints Car Club will investigate the opportunity to park those arriving after 8am at the Cloise and Mike parking lot just east of Harrison or the street stalls closest to Kitsap and Bay Streets (note: The company providing the sound system for the Cruz will likely need access after 8am but before the full closure at 9am. The Cruz will provide the vendor with a Cruz placard to help alleviate frustration upon entrance at the Rockwell barricade). v) Any Port of Bremerton Marina user who has an appropriate "hanger" may access the Port parking south of the Port office prior to 8am by showing the "hanger" to the officer at the barricade at Kitsap and Bay Streets. Those attempting to enter at the Rockwell barricade will be directed to the detour route. C) Barricades: These will be placed to limit vehicle traffic throughout the Event site. Initial placement is at Rockwell and Bay; Kitsap and Bay (for the Cruz registration); Boat Launch east entrance and Bay; Boat Launch east entrance and Port Orchard Yacht Sales; Water and Bay (for the vendor check -in); Frederick and Bay; Sidney and Bay; and Bay and Harrison at the western edge. No vehicles will be allowed through the inner barricades (Bay at Harrison; Bay at Water; Bay at Sidney; and Bay at Frederick) except for vendor loading and unloading. D) Event Openings: The Cruz registration is from 6 a.m. to 8 a.m. Vehicles registering for the Cruz are to be directed to Kitsap & Bay entrance. Those attempting to enter the Cruz site at other barricades will be directed to the detour to reach that entrance. The Cruz opens officially at 8 a.m. The Festival By The Bay vendors also will enter through the Kitsap and Bay barricade and will be directed to that site if attempting to enter at other barricades. The Festival By The Bay opens officially at 9am. E) Event Conclusion: The Cruz ends as soon as awards are presented. Award presentation is planned to begin at 3pm. If a car needs to leave prior to the ending (due to emergency, etc.), the Cruz will work to move the vehicle through the event site by leading the vehicle with a Saints Member escort, either by walking or with a golf cart. The egress points will be westward through the Orchard and Bay Street Entrance or eastward through the Harrison and Bay Street entrance. This allows the least pedestrian interaction through the Cruz or Festival By The Bay event sites. The Festival By The Bay will end at 4pm with the Vendors being expected to be packed up and off Bay Street by 5pm when the road will reopen fully to all traffic. F) Garbage issues: The Cruz has placed additional garbage receptacles with liners throughout the Cruz event site. This will continue. The Festival By The Bay will also place additional garbage receptacles next to the City receptacles along Bay Street. The City Public Works Department will place liners in existing garbage cans on Friday morning after garbage pickup to allow those cans to be emptied periodically through the day. Any key necessary for access will be provided to Al Mahoney. G) Phone Contacts During Event: Prior to July 1, 2010 with an update on August 1, 2010, a list of contact phone numbers for the Cruz/Saints Car Club event coordinator and the Festival By The Bay coordinator will be provided to the Chief of Police. These phone numbers will be used during the event to solve any issues that may occur at the barricades or on -site during the event day. H) Kitsap Transit: Transit has provided service from designated park and ride areas during the event. The Cruz organizers will be responsible for coordinating with KT for hours of operation and park and ride lots no later than JULY 1 sr. This information will be communicated far and wide to alleviate parking issues for merchants, boaters, residents and attendees. A meeting shall be held that includes all affected persons no later than 30 days prior to the event and shall be the responsibility of the Cruz organizers and Festival by the Bay organizers to schedule. Representatives from the City Public Works, Police and Mayors Office will be included, as will members of each organizing group, downtown merchants group, Port of Bremerton, Kitsap Transit, and Fire. The purpose of the meeting will be to cover all items contained within the permit and conditions placed by each reviewing government agency. It will also allow for us to resolve any logistical issues well in advance of the event. Memo To: Jenine Dennison, City of Port Orchard From: Shawn Shepherd, Fire Prevention Technician CC: Date: January 27, 2010 Re: The Cruz 2010 The South Kitsap Fire & Rescue Prevention/Education Office has completed a review of the application for public event dated received by City of Port Orchard dated January 19, 2010 for the Cruz 2010, located along Bay Street downtown, and approves the plans with the following comments and stipulations: • Fire department access around the area must consist of the following: o The unobstructed width of a fire apparatus access road shall be not less than 20 feet. o Access roads shall be extended to within 150 feet of all parts of all exterior walls (of the first story) on all buildings or portions of buildings. • A minimum acceptable fire extinguisher for tents is a 5-pound, dry chemical, ABC extinguisher. Extinguishers shall be located so that an extinguisher is within 75 feet of travel distance from any point. Tents or areas with cooking are required to provide a class K fire extinguisher and these areas are required to be inspected prior to cooking. Nothing in this review is intended to authorize or approve of any aspect of the design that does not comply with all applicable codes and standards. Should additional information become available, these comments may require modification. Please insure that additional information regarding this project is forwarded to our office. If you have any questions, please contact me at 871-2411. Sincerely, Shawn hep e Fire Prevention Tech. Page 1 of 1 CITY OF PORT ORCHARD Planning Department 216 Prospect Street, Port Orchard, WA 98366 Phone: (36o) 876-4991 • Fax: (36o) 876-498o planning@cityofportorchard.us www.cityofportorchard.us Date: January 27, 2009 To: Patricia Kirkpatrick, City Clerk From: James R. Weaver, City Development Director RE: 2010 Event Application: The Cruz The Planning & Building Departments have reviewed the submitted 2010 Public Event application with the City of Port Orchard for the enterprise located at the address identified in the following comments. Public Event Application; The Cruz Date: Sunday, August 81h, 2010 Location: Downtown Port Orchard, WA Organization: Saints Car Club/Kitsap Bank Comments: Planning Department has no Comments on this application. NOTE: This section to be completed by City staff after application is submitted to the City. REVIEW AND COMMENT BY POLICE DEPARTMENT: REVIEW AND COMMENT BY FIRE DEPARTMENT: REVIEW AND COMMENT BY PUBLIC WORKS: REV EW,ANDC0 4MENTBYFINANCE ARTMENT: )L, C� Q SoI iC�C3� REVIEW AND COMMENT BY PLANNING DEPARTMENT: DATE APPLICATION RECEIVED: DECISION OF CITY COUNCIL: ❑ APPROVE ❑ DISAPPROVE DATE OF DECISION: CONDITIONS: Approved By Patricia J. Kirkpatrick, CMC City Clerk/Assistant to the Mayor Revised 03/03/2009 NOTE: This section to be completed by City staff after application is submitted to the City, REVIEW AND COMMENT BY POLICE DEPARTMENT: REVIEW AND COMMENT BY FIRE DEPARTMENT: REVIEW AND COMMENT BY PLANNING DEPARTMENT: DATE APPLICATION RECEIVED: DECISION OF CITY COUNCIL: ❑ APPROVE ❑ DISAPPROVE DATE OF DECISION: Approved Patricia J. Kirkpatrick, CMC City Clerk/Assistant to the Mayor Revised 03/03/2009 City Clerk's Office 216 Prospect Street Port Orchard, WA 98366 :'l,' `} ` 0'iC 360-876-4407 * 360-895-9029(fax) Public Event Application NOTE: Acceptance of this application by the City Clerks Office does NOT indicate or guarantee approval of the application or the dates requested. Each application will be reviewed by City staff and Council Committee. Additional information may be requested by city personnel prior to submittal of the application to the City Council for final consideration. No statement made by city staff or elected official prior to final consideration by the City Council shall obligate the City Council in any manner. Name of Event: pork- Ct N a YOvyyvters M Cw4* Name of Sponsoring Name of Person Completing This of Contact: LcLur& `1�ampv„ Ejeo A 207 N !�' CCe�Y/, J.. 4- Dates Location of Event: PemlgtA n —L/'/D—f3�2 A- 1734,4 Street r,dB City State Zip Code Anticipated Number Of Exhibitors: .J D b Yrr ein% Time Open To Public: c� ' t-b 4 vK Anticipated Number Of Visitors: % DD clo a(u Time Open To Vendors: -00 cryr, Closing Time: 3 _ 01) a PA 77)is application form was designed for use by applicants for various types of events. Please answer al/ questions; you may attach additional pages if necessary. 1. 2. What is expected traffic pattern for the evgnt? Attach a site map indicatin location of a ch activity/vedyr(s), fire lanes, garbage, and respoem/sani•can(s): F7 t- ytiln 3. Describe how pdblic safety, will be needed for (1) traffic 4. Describe how sanitation cor and crowd control will and restrooms) will be many 5. How many participants ar d wsitor cars I e nticipated and where will p be OWWVQYYQY%A IA, ,-)twi n„ Ana-;�db �v C � - TS you anticipate `CR-r, sx.S her—Cete. 6. How have City Clerk's Office 216 Prospect Street Port Orchard, WA 98366 360-876-4407 * 360-895-9029 with / J U 7. Has shuttle service/park and ride lots been coordinated with Kitsap Transit? Describe locations, frequency of service and name of contact at Kitsap Transit. Attach written verification of commitment for service from Kitsap Transit:_ 8. Descrbe how fire lanes 7111 be identified and ke open: n 9. Will this event require fhe closur of street If hst stibet name ith at Ad time of requested closure:_ 10. If any event activity or vendor requires electrical cw nection5 or other accom�o�ation to oiler te, indicat location and how You anticipatemeetina their needs: Gi 1''i 1i eoA oy-rd-? a&1.M &Si?rV IM 11. How Will the event area cleaned before, duririq and after a event 12. If your event requires vehicles to be towed, your organization must accept responsibility and indemnify the City of Port Orchard and other authorizing property owner(s) by agreeing to pay tow/storage charges or damage claims which result from the vehicle being towed, if a court rules in favor of the registered owner and orders payment of such charges or damage claims. Do you accept this responsibility? � Yes ❑ No If yes, name of person responsible for rendering payment of tow/storage charges. If no, exp ain why: 13. When specifying location of event activity/vendor(s), do you anticipate utilizing any area not owned or managed by the City of Port Orchard? ❑ yes ❑ no If yes, the owner/manager of subject property must complete and sign the following: (Please ask for additional forms if multip/�le properties are being used and have different owners.) J�V ,�,�� )%of _Ll'Q is P,A0 loe- Q/e.,rG�YY'�+i— lnw wl-z 7 ,-c Name of cerly owner:/_ VV 71 Authorizing authority: _ Address: Signature of authorizing Telephone: A. If the City of Port Orchard approves this application for public event, will your organization grant permission for the sponsoring organization to use your property on the dates specified, for the purpose and activities described in this application? ❑ Yes ❑ No If yes, please complete the following: B. Are there any limitations or restrictions on use of your property? ❑ Yes ❑ No If yes, please describe in detail: lv-e City Clerk's Office 216 Prospect Street Port Orchard, WA 98366 360-876-4407* 360-895-9029 C. Do you require the event sponsor list you as an Additional Named Insured and provide an insurance certificate to your organization prior to the event date? 'fib Yes ❑ No If yes, please indicate coverage limits you require for general liability, property damage and or personal injury? Ii�� 14. If nature of this event requires event workers to stay overnight (such as carnival or other event workers) where and how do you anticipate providing their lodging? If you anticipate utilizing private property(s) for lodging or other purposes, the owner of the subfect pronertv(s) must complete and lion the following: Name of property owner: b( A — Authorizing authority: Title: Address:' Telephone: Signature of authorizing authority: A. Are there any limitations or restrictions on use of your property? ❑ Yes ❑ No If yes, please describe in detail: B. Do you require the event sponsor list you as an Additional Named Insured and provide an Insurance certificate to your organization prior to the event date? ❑ Yes ❑ No If yes, please indicate coverage limits you require for general liability, property damage and or personal C. How will use of your property by event workers impact neighboring property owners? Describe steps that will be taken to mitigate any adverse impact(s): 15. Please provide any other Information, which you believe, will assist the city in the review process: 16. INSURANCE REQUIREMENTS: Sponsoring organization must provide an insurance certificate, 10 days prior to the event, with the City of Port Orchard and other applicable parties shown as Additional Named Insured. Minimum coverage to be as follows: $1,000,000 Liability; $1,000,000 Bodily Injury A. Can you provide this IInnJsurance Certificate? 1619—O SIGNATURE OF APPLICANT: L Q ,2a hat `Yu Date: TO KEEP IHEPtAC.tAI MAKKtI, UUt I UUVVNiUMN )nvnmVc. MANDATORY VENDORVEHICLE POLICIES Approved Parking areas we are allowed to use: (A) In the Child Support Division of the KC Prosecutors lot. Access this lot on Prospect St. (B) (Only IF Prosecutors Office lot is full) Kitsap Bank Employee parking lot on the south side of Bay Street. °Note that the Kitsap Bank Employee lot can be used by another organization at any time without notifying us. If it is being used, please find a different place to park, ABOVE PROSPECT STREET. Where NOT to Park: NOT on Prospect Street, NOT in spaces adjacent to retail buildings. NOT on side streets leading off Bay Street or the block above it. NOT ANYWHERE BETWEEN BAY STREET AND THE WATER. CLOSING TIME -VEHICLES 3:15PM Vendors or their drivers WILL NOT wait in their vehicles clogging Market Approaches, Entrances and adjoining parking areas. This extends our danger zone out past our borders. Our customers will be walking to their cars at closing time, don't bar their way out, AUTOS ENTER AT 3:15- IF THE MANAGER FEELS THE CUSTOMERS ARE GONE AND IT IS SAFE TO DO SO Center vendors in the driving Booths set up in a parking space rows pack up and load out first! they will drive into market at 3:15. you must wait until the Center is loaded & their AUTOS ARE GONE City of Port Orchard 216 Prospect Street, Port Orchard, WA 9836� (36o) 876-4407 9 FAX (36o) 895-9029 sic p P ��A MASrEREVENPVENDORLICEN3EAPPLICATI0IF0j. R so iPnrt nmhnrd Mnnininal rnAo c n61 y nn Name of Event: ?° r{ Yc�(�a �'cQ �0.r ✓yi er s M r, ✓ I Name of Sponsor: k) +Sci n n aQ� ✓ww-y% Haoc IT A7%%oe. , PhoneNo.: 3(,0 22S-S$32- Emergency Phone No.: 3 G O g O( 19 � .© 9g%G State Sales Tax Number: Jo o ( 38 - 35 1 City Business license Number: —Date(s) and Time of Event (Inclusive): i WA City State Zip Code State Non Profit I.D. Number: to O i 3 8 2 351 Anticipated Number of Vendors 5 O - (00 fOP5 1 2.oi o 9a ' 3C'� 1 (Attached Additional Sheet IfNeoeswy) Type of Event: ra-v ~S AA aX 161 � Will this event require closure of a public street, parking Lot and/or sidewalk; if yes an application for Public Event Application must be submitted to the Clerk's office for City Council Approval: Yes 7No A list of all vendors participating in the master event must be submitted to the City Clerk's Office unthin three days gf ler the each day of a master event. This list shall contain the name, address and state sales tax revenue number of each vendor. No state sales tax revenue number is required for tax exempt vendors. g Describe propos-1 location of event (attach map with area highlighted): W Ot-6 �Y� ^^ C �✓ fO%A,reu . e,� r✓I Zvi � S f O�a�yV v%nc� P6AW*t 01t.L pf� L, 4n I a 4-_''1'' -f—� n c No public vending is allowed within twenty-five (25) feet of any municipal building, monument orfountain OR within ten (1o) feet of intersecting sidewalks. Is this location accessible for the disabled? Y Yes No If no, what accommodations will be provided to make location reasonably I the undersigned do certify that I have received and read Ordinance No. 1567 and (we) (I) do hereby agree to abide by rules and regulations established which govern Public Property Vending and Master Events within the City of Port Orchard. , / SIGNATURE OF APPLICANT: 4_-'✓✓'�, Date: 3° J DATE APPLICATION RECEIVED: DATE RECEIVED PAYMENT: RECEIPT NO: c� % LICESNSE FEE: (maximum duration is go continuous calendar days or 3 months) No. of day(s) at $15 per day Total Due: N C-n or of month(s) at $200 per month PUBLIC EVENT: ❑ APPROVE ❑ DISAPPROVE Total Due: DATE OF DECISION: Approved Patricia J. Kirkpatrick, CMC City Clerk/Asst. to the Mayor Revised 04/02/2009 Permit Review DATE: MARCH 9, 2010 TO: CITY CLERKS OFFICE FROM: CHIEF TOWNSEND SUBJECT: SPECIAL EVENT PERMIT — FARMERS MARKET The Port Orchard Police Department approves of the special event permit application with the following requirements: 1. Report any problems or suspicious activity to the Port Orchard Police immediately. 2. Comply with all city ordinances and regulations. 3. Public works will need to coordinate any signage necessary to block the street, parking areas, etc. 4. Ensure adequate access for emergency vehicles. 5. Any vehicles requiring to be towed will be the financial responsibility of the Farmer's Market in the event the vehicle's owner is not required to pay the fees. 6. The Farmers Market will name the City and the Port of Bremerton as additional insured and provide a copy of the insurance certificate prior to the commencement of events. Memo To: City of Port Orchard City Clerk Office From: Greg Rogers, Fire Prevention Manager CC: Date: March 12, 2010 Re: Port Orchard Farmer's Market The South Kitsap Fire & Rescues Prevention/ Education Office has completed a review of the application for public event that was dated received March 10, 2010 for the Farmer's Market, located at the waterfront parking lot, and approves the plans with the following comments and stipulations: Tents or areas with cooking or deep -fat fryers shall have a minimum 40-B:C fire extinguisher or a Class K type extinguisher. An inspection of the cooking operation will be required before opening, by a member of the Fire District 7 Prevention/Education office. Fire department access around the area must consist of the following: The unobstructed width of a fire apparatus access road shall be not less than 20 feet. Access roads shall be extended to within 150 feet of all parts of all exterior walls (of the first story) on all buildings or portions of buildings. Nothing in this review is intended to authorize or approve of any aspect of the design that does not comply with all applicable codes and standards. Should additional information become available, these comments may require modification. Please insure that additional information regarding this project is forwarded to our office. If you have any questions, please contact me at 871-2411. Moe s Fire Prevention Manager Page 1 of 1 CITY OF PORT ORCHARD Planning Department 216 Prospect Street, Port Orchard, WA 98366 Phone: (36o) 876-4991 • Fax: (36o) 876-4980 planning@cityofportorchard.us www.cityofportorchard.us Date: March 18, 2010 To: Patricia Kirkpatrick, City Clerk From: James R. Weaver, City Development Director RE: 2010 Event Application: Port Orchard Farmers Market The Planning & Building Departments have reviewed the submitted 2010 Public Event application with the City of Port Orchard for the enterprise located at the address identified in the following comments. Public Event Application; Port Orchard Farmers Market Date: April 4th through October 9`h, 2010 Location: Downtown Port Orchard, WA Organization: Kitsap Regional Farmers Market Org. Comments: Planning Department has no Comments on this application REVIEW AND COMMENT BY ADMINISTRATIVE DEPARTMENT: City Clerk's Office 216 Prospect Street Port Orchard, WA 98366 360-876-4407 * 360-895-9029 KtTme�- mf�ei NOTE; This section to be completed by City staff after application is submitted to the City. REVIEW AND COMMENT BY POLICE DEPARTMENT: REVIEW AND COMMENT BY FIRE DEPARTMENT: REVIEW AND COMMENT BY PUBLIC WORKS: REVIEW AND COMMENT BY PLANNING DEPARTMENT: DATE APPLICATION RECEIVED: DECISION OF CITY COUNCIL: ❑ APPROVE ❑ DISAPPROVE DATE OF DECISION: CONDITIONS: Approved By Patricia J. Kirkpatrick, CMC City Clerk/Assistant to the Mayor Revised 03/03/2009 City Clerk's Office('i� 216 Prospect Street Port Orchard, WA 98366 360-876-4401 * 360-895-9029 (fax) NOTE: Thls action to be compteted.by City staff after application is submitted to the City. REVIEW AND COMMENT BY POLICE DEPARTMENT: REVIEW AND COMMENT BY FIRE DEPARTMENT: REVIEW AND COMMENT BY REVIEW AND COMMENT BY FINANCE DEPARTMENT: REVIEW AND COMMENT BY ADMINISTRATIVE DEPARTMENT: REVIEW AND COMMENT BY PLANNING DEPARTMENT: DATE APPLICATION DECISION OF CITY COUNCIL: 11 APPROVE ❑ DISAPPROVE DATE OF DECISION: Approved By Patricia J. Kirkpatrick, CMC City Clerk/Assistant to the Mayor Revised.03/0312009 City Clerk's Office 216 Prospect Street Port Orchard, WA 98366 360-876-4407 * 360-895-9029(fax) PUBLIC EVENT APPLICATION c NOTE: Acceptance of this application by the City Clerk's Office does NOT indicate or guarantee approval of the application or the dates requested. Each application will be reviewed by City staff and Council Committee. Additional information may be requested by city personnel prior to submittal of the application to the City Council for final consideration. No statement made by city staff or elected official prior to final consideration by the City Council shall obligate the City Council in any manner. Name of Name of Sponsoring Name of Person Completing This Application:yPt/lG{f l CI SSbY� I /S `�, f��( (�� \�}'Y 8 Point of Contact: 1110AC) / {�/ L Telephone: � Loo -nis (p -'r� Ra Ar[&[r ,- 0OU iW I ii'V�11..11i�\ l / � 1'nY hr&1i�✓14 WA CM:1 iFl Street Dates of Event 24 city 2 State Zip Code � • . -7i/.1L[��L�II%%�%Ly➢�l%ifLPlflkil.i�JlL`9��lY!Jl/I><IL�i/.1'lC�/�f/�iC.Z' ` Anticipated Number Of Exhibitors: 6Time Open To Public: Anticipated Number Of Visitors: Time Open To Vendors: i Closing Time: t . C 1�✓I'1 This application form was designed for use by applicants for carious types of events. Please answer all questions; you may attach additional pages if necessary. 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. What is expected traffic pattern for the event? Attach a site rpap indigating locatign of each activity/vendor(s), fire Describe how public safety, traffic and crowd control will berovid How will be np,�ded for (1) traffic control and (2) crowd control? t do you anticipate How many.participants and_vi�itor cars are,anticipated and where will parking be provided? AGE "M 6. 13 a 10. City Clerk's Office 216 Prospect Street Port Orchard, WA 98366 360-876-4407 * 360-895-9029 (fax) How have parking impacts been coordinated with the neighbors (residential and/or business)? Has shuttle service/park and ride lots been coordinated with Kitsap Transit? Describe locations, frequency of service and name of contact at Kitsap Transit. Attach written verification of commitment for service from Kitsap Transit:_ M n. - ...fir .9%rRr—�■idrt. 3£rir%.Wintr%.iii. .. .. . 1Yd1 this event require a closure of any street? If' 'o list street name with date and 'me f requested closure: 11. Hovvyy will the event area be cleaned Before„during and after 12. If your event requires vehicles to be towed, your organization must accept responsibility and indemnify the City of Port Orchard and other authorizing property owner(s) by agreeing to pay tow/storage charges or damage claims which result from the vehicle being towed, if a court rules in favor of the registeredgwner and orders payment of such charges or damage claims. Do you accept this responsibility? Yes (W If yes, name of person responsible for rendering payment of tow/storage charges. If no, explain why: Nt7 - A S(1fA AP 13. When specifying location of event activity/vendor(s), do you anticipate utilizing any area not owned or managed by the City of Port Orchard? yes no If yes, the owner/manager of subject property must complete and sign the �followiin : (Plea —se ask for additional forms if multiple properties are being used and have di/f fluent o ners.) Name o'€ property dine I l r © L( I i�2 CA-V I Yl l rfs CS1 AVI-ty �!1 1e Authorizing authority: Title: Address: Telephone: Signature of authorizing authority: A. If the City of Port Orchard approves this application for public event, will your organization grant permission for the sponsoring organization to use your property on the dates specified, for the purpose and activities described in this application? Yes No If yes, please complete the following: B. Are there any limitations or restrictions on use of your property? Yes No If yes, please describe in detail: City Clerk's Office 216 Prospect Street Port Orchard, WA 98366 360-876-4407 * 360-895-9029 (fax) C. Do you require the event sponsor list you as an Additional Named Insured and provide an insurance certificate to your organization prior to the event date? Yes No If yes, please indicate coverage limits you require for general liability, property damage and or personal injury? 14. If nature of this event requires event workers to stay overnight (such as carnival or other event workers) where and how do you anticipate providing their lodging? If you anticipate utilizing private property(s) for lodging or other purposes, the owner of the subject property(s) must complete and sign the following: 15 16 Name of property owner: AuUaeaiV authordy: Addness: Ggnature of authorizing z TRle: Telephone: A. Are there any limitations or restrictions on use of your property? Yes No If yes, please describe in detail: B. Do you require the event sponsor list you as an Additional Named Insured and provide an insurance certificate to your organization prior to the event date? Yes No If yes, please indicate coverage limits you require for general liability, property damage and or personal C. How will use of your property by event workers impact neighboring property owners? Describe steps that will be taken to mitigate any adverse impact(s): INSURANCE REQUIREMENTS: Sponsoring organization must provide an insurance certificate, 10 days prior to the event, with the City of Port Orchard and other applicable parties shown as Additional Named Insured. Minimum coverage to be as follows: $1,000,000 Liability; $1,000,000 Bodily Injury A. Can you provide this Insurance Certificate? y,es 500 Birch Road - Google Maps Page 1 of 1 r . ' Address 500 SW Birch Rd C Port Orchard, WA 98367 Maps Get Google Maps on your phone Textthe word "GMAPS"to 466453 t60 'SE SOUd r INSap Mall; a _ C 1 It, u r = _ uiN St 1 - _. .^Port Tie_niom st .:N. I �.1 23 xQ y3 �a SVV 6eny b)f R. _. ee' �i Waam Van ltenroral Patx' y .:. --Orchard SE Lund Ale i N r r. m 1. -: -'--- SE Seunonbeny Rd __ _.' SE _ l v. 1- E Sedgwick R m a .A _ a , P rec�is4e+�d «,,tici�a��t3) witl Ise locakd iv, 4c �jl(�vhey C�l?,v� ��M�1�G{I'`y �G1i�k�Vl� lafi l.aa_. '__,_l,__._.Y O___....____ _O_1_1__._0------ A_— O___cnn,Tl_.._t_, Tl__ A o_ 1/1 n Vlnnn Permit Review DATE: MARCH 9.2010 TO: CITY CLERKS OFFICE FROM: CHIEF TOWNSEND SUBJECT: SPECIAL EVENT PERMIT - SIDNEY GLEN DOLPHIN DASH The Port Orchard Police Department approves of the special event permit application with the following requirements: I . Report any problems or suspicious activity to the Port Orchard Police immediately. 2. Comply with all city ordinances and regulations. 3. The school is in unincorporated Kitsap County and so is a portion of the route. I would recommend that volunteers be used to monitor walkers/runners and cone off just a small portion of the southbound traffic lane to ensure the safety of the walkers. The volunteers should be in highly visible traffic vests. Volunteers should not direct traffic but instead should ensure that the participants are safe from vehicle traffic. 4. Proper signage should be placed to alert drivers of the event. 5. Police officers can be provided for the above at the off -duty rate of $40 per hour with a 3 hour minimum for each officer. City Council has declared which events are paid for by tax dollars and this event is not included per council resolution. In turn, the services would be at the applicant's expense. 6. If the applicant wishes to hire an off -duty officer, they need to schedule that with Sergeant Dale Schuster. 7. Road closure plans should be coordinated with public works. Lane closures should be limited without off duty officers present. Memo To: City of Port Orchard City Clerk Office From: Greg Rogers, Fire Prevention Manager CC: Date: March 12, 2010 Re: Sidney Glen Dolphin Dash The South Kitsap Fire and Rescues Prevention/Education Office has completed a review of the application for public event that was dated received March 7, 2010 for the Sidney Glen Dolphin Dash, located at 500 Birch Avenue, and approves the plans with the following comments and stipulations: Fire department access around the area must consist of the following: The unobstructed width of a fire apparatus access road shall be not less than 20 feet. Access roads shall be extended to within 150 feet of all parts of all exterior walls (of the first story) on all buildings or portions of buildings. A minimum acceptable fire extinguisher for tents is a 5-pound, dry chemical, ABC extinguisher Tents. Extinguishers shall located so that an extinguisher is within 75 feet of travel distance from any point. Areas with cooking will need to provide a class K fire extinguisher and these areas will need to be inspected prior to cooking. Nothing in this review is intended to authorize or approve of any aspect of the design that does not comply with all applicable codes and standards. Should additional information become available, these comments may require modification. Please insure that additional information regarding this project is forwarded to our office. If you have any questions, please contact me at 871-2411. Fire Prevention Page 1 of 1 ►I CITY OF PORT ORCHARD Planning Department 216 Prospect Street, Port Orchard, WA 98366 Phone: (36o) 876-4991 • Fax: (36o) 876-4980 planning@cityofportorchard.us www.cityofportorchard.us Date: March 18, 2010 To: Patricia Kirkpatrick, City Clerk From: James R. Weaver, City Development Director RE: 2010 Event Application: Sidney Glen Dolphin Dash 5 K The Planning & Building Departments have reviewed the submitted 2010 Public Event application with the City of Port Orchard for the enterprise located at the address identified in the following comments. Public Event Application; Sidney Glen Dolphin Dash 5 K Date: April 24th, 2010 Location: Downtown Port Orchard, WA Organization: Sidney Glen Elementary PTA . Comments: Planning Department has no Comments on this application. City Clerk's Office 216 Prospect Street Port Orchard, WA 98366 360-876-4407 x 360-895-9029 (fax) REVIEW AND COMMENT BY POLICE DEPARTMENT: REVIEW AND COMMENT BY FIRE REVIEW AND COMMENT BY PUBLIC AND COMMENT BY REVIEW AND COMMENT BY ADMINISTRATIVE: DEPARTMENT: I r �5h REVIEW AND COMMENT BY PLANNING DEPARTMENT: ........... ......... ........... .._......_................. ....._........... ...._.... ........ ...._....... .................... ..... .............. ...... .._........... ... ................. .... .......... ....... .................................... _............... _................. .......................... .... ................._...._...... _..... DECISION OF CITY COUNCIL: APPROVE- DISAPPROVE DATE OF DECISION: CONDISTIONS: Approved Patricia J. Kirkpatrick, City Clerk City Clerk's Office 216 Prospect Street Port Orchard, WA 98366 360-876-4407 k 360-895-9029(fax) REVIEW AND COMMENT BY POLICE DEPARTMENT: REVIEW AND COMMENT BY FIRE DEPARTMENT: REVIEW AND COMMENT BY PUBLIC WORKS: REVIEW AND COMMENT BY FINANCE DEPARTMENT: REVIEW AND COMMENT BY ADMINISTRATIVE DEPARTMENT: REVIEW AND COMMENT BY PLANNING DEPARTMENT: .... ............ ................. -..... -................ ........ .._............ .......... .................... -.................................................................. ....... .............. ._.......................................... _............... __.... _.......... _..................................................... -............. DECISION OF CITY COUNCIL: APPROVE DISAPPROVE DATE OF DECISION: CGidDISTIONS: Approved Patricia J. Kirkpatrick, City Clerk 02/25/10 12:29 FAX 360 N 476 5176 PSS CODE 1224 _ _ RECEIVEDQDD City Clerk's Office 216 Prospect Street Port Orchard, WA 98366 360-876-4407 * 360-895-9029 (fax) PUBLIC EVENT APPLICATION FEB 2.5 2010 CITY OF PORT ORCHARD CITY CLERKS OFFICE NOTE: Acceptance of this application by the City Clerk's Office does NOT indicate or guarantee approval of the application or the dates requested. Each application will be reviewed by City staff and Council Committee. Additional Information may be requested by city personnel prior to submittal of the application to the City Council for final consideration. No statement made by city staff •or elected official prior to final consideration by the City Council shall obligate the City Council In any manner. Name of Sponsoring Name of Person Com Point of Contact: dC(/% Telephone: /r?;�-17a:� `IM GZLO . p C 6U, Address: L ��' � ii /d P-4—knee" Lli/ 2{=e/ylL! `MD7M 1.(/A �/O � // Street City State Zip Code Dates of Event Locadonof&vent: / �� DYCi%�t/af GUR 2rf]O/Jf ana/ i1'laru�a mark (If Event Will Have Multiple Activities and Locations, List On Separate Sheet) Anticipated Number Of Exhibitors: 416-0 Time Open To Public: h d,Yn — 41-30 0 m Anticipated Number Of Visitors: O Time Open To Vendors: 6,241 4130/OM Closing Time: t/30 .Om This application form was designed for use by applicants for various types of events. Please answer all questions; you may attach additional pages if necessary. 1. Describe type of event and how this event will benefit the 2. What Is expected traffic pattern for the event? Attach a site map indicating location of each lanes, garbage, and restroomisani•can(s): i'%9e SfIOLU e ?79-,a4 e AaZ2k4hQ/77LS ei5 5 a,:4 r on/ i2 ire, t- 3. Describe how public safety, traffic and crowd control will be provided, How many police off will be needed for (1) traffic control and (2) crowd control? 4ss/Sfi_ 12e6 darn fh 4. Describe how sanitation will be provided and 5. How many participants and visitor cars are anticipated and where will do you antidpate 02/25/10 12:30 FAX 360 476 5176 PSNS CODE 1224 [it 002 H� ride ots enmr 7, written eveen coordinatedelfYcl�atindL of co`mmmltii a of contact at spbir—" Jhw/� gent for service from Kitsap Transit: h B. Describe how lanes will beidentified and kept open; cr •, -- g, Will this event require the closure of any sS oWf solit street name with date and time of requested closure:_ ,�reu'er/ usure dv cei rr' s s art BuncC�f 741.i a - (� am - y 3upm // 2E Ii%CLJ7/1tt�.V, P./ l / eQOU�Ir S 'Ali11 7L 10, If any event activity or vendor requires electrical connections or other accommodation to operate indicate location and how you anticipate meeting their needs: Q,00/lC . e., _ _ % ritavvlLl/ LU�7tJ7 .r-� n�ir C 4st�r 11, How will the event area be cleaned before, during and after he evente rs mo( q�n'r' of oGvr/!19 ev¢!7fi �tnd ov7jPr� area !s 12. If your event requires vehicles to be towed, your organization must accepttow/storage charges dor damage mage clfy the aims Port Orchard and other authorizing property owner(s) by agreeing to pay / If which result from the vehicle being towed, if a court rules in favor of the registered owner and orders payment o me of person this such charges or damage claims, D tow/storage aaccepthar es.pIf no, y es, na lain why: ^ ✓/useA C/viz. responsible for rendering payment 9 ng any area not owned or managed by 13. When he City of PortgO10archard? off e0 a no tyIf yes,theawno�/anal anticipate of�slubiec* or aerty must comalete� si the following: Please ask for addition/ forms if multiple properties are being used and have different owners Name of property Title�sln�rl rsvv� �oR _ Telephone: 260' a7i _ 6-53.5 Address: oa"' " Signature of authorizing author : A. If the City of port Orchard approves this application for public event, oon the datesspecified,fortnt hepurpose permission for the sponsoring organization to use your properly No If yes, please complete the following: and activities described in this application? Yes B. Are there any limitations or restrictions on use of your properly? Yes No If yes, please describe In detail: CBTIr iYl ei79 uJ/42 ca�r� �Rur� r ie- &?n/n/z-rn� Miele /3 02/25/10 12:31 FAX 360 476 5176 PSNS CODE 1224 Q 003 City Clerk's Office _ - 216 Prospect Street Port Orchard, WA 98366 360-876-4407 * 360-895-9029 (fax) norc Kh.,d C. Do you require the event sponsor list you as an Additional Named Insured and provide an insurance certificate to your organizadon prior to the event date? Yes No If yes, please indicate coverage limits you require for general liability, property damage and or personal injury? 14. If nature of this event requires event workers to stay overnight (such as carnival or other event workers) where and how do you anticipate providing their lodging? If you anticipate utilizing private property(s) for lodging or other purposes, the owner of the subject orooerty(s) must complete and sign the following; Name of property owner: AJIA Authorizing authority: Title: Address: Telephone: Signature of authorizing authority; A. Are there any limitations or restrictions on use of your property? Yes No If yes, please describe in detail: B. Do you require the event sponsor list you as an Additional Named Insured and provide an insurance certificate to your organization prior to the event date? Yes No If yes, please indicate coverage limits you require for general liability, property damage and or personal C. How will use of your property by event workers impact neighboring property owners? Describe steps that will be taken to mitigate any adverse impact(s): 15, Please provide any other information, which you believe, will assist the tl-ru.var/re- 19endn 16. INSURANCE REQUIREMENTS; Sponsoring organization must provide an event, with the City of Port Orchard and other applicable parties shown coverage to be as follows: $1,000,000 Liability; $1,000,000 Bodily Injury A. Can you provide this Insurance Certificate? Y2,5 in insurance .certificate, 10 days prior to the as Additional Named Insured. Minimum � z a U; w¢ HV Cr LU - W , U- o O CO wQT 4Q Q City of Port Orchard R F4 C E �, V E ° 216 Prospect Street, Port Orchard, WA 98366 (360) 876-4407 • FAX (36o) 895-9029 MAR 3 0 2 3 ,u EITY v RCHARD MASTEREVENTVENDORLICENSEAPPLICATION CITY CLERKS OFFICE (Port Orchard Municipal Code.5.96) Name of Event;. MU-SAaL4g6 ah Wu-- Ak-fei—ki -k Name of Phone No.: 34'0 -G 92-I 7.7 j Emergency Phone No.: Address: Po• i34k 30441 WA- f63/0 Street City State Zip Code State Sales Tax Number: City Business License Number: Date(s) and Time of Event (Inclusive): Type of Event: eale . Fh &W State Non Profit I.D. Number: i 4-31 / 9 '175 Anticipated Number of Vendors a=3 Will this event require closure of a public street, parldng Lot and/or sidewalk, if yes an application for a Public Event Application must be submitted to the Clerles office for City Council Approval: Yes _No A list of all vendors participating in the master event must be submitted to the City Clerk's Office within three days of ter the each day of a master event. This list shall contain the name, address and state sales tax revenue number of each vendor. No state sales tax revenue number is required for tax exempt vendors. Describe proposed location of event (attach map with area highlighted):_ �uGsr� �4&d W14A 'Pub/« Even e No public vending is allowed within twenty-five (25) feet of any municipal building, monument orfountain OR within ten (1o)feet of intersecting sidewalks. Is this location accessible for the disabled? ✓Yes No If no, what accommodations will be provided to make location reasonably I the undersigned do certify that I have received and read Ordinance No. 1567 and (we) (1) do hereby agree to abide by rules and regulations established which govern Public Property Vending and Master Events within the City of Port Orchard. SIGNATURE OF APPLICANT: C/� Date: .3"'26/O DATE APPLICATION DATE RECEIVED PAYMENT: RECEIPT LICESNS : (maximum duration is go continuous calendar days or 3 months) No. of day(s) at $15 per day Total Due: sffe'n or of month(s) at $200 per month PUBLIC EVENT: ❑ APPROVE ❑ DISAPPROVE Total DATE OF DECISION: Approved Patricia J. Kirkpatrick, CMC City Clerk/Asst. to the Mayor Revised 04/02/2009 Permit Review DATE: FEBRUARY 25, 2010 TO: CITY CLERKS OFFICE FROM: CHIEF TOWNSEND SUBJECT: SPECIAL EVENT PERMIT - MUSTANGS ON THE WATERFRONT The Port Orchard Police Department approves of the special event permit application with the following requirements: I . Report any problems or suspicious activity to the Port Orchard Police immediately. 2. Comply with all city ordinances and regulations. 3. An officer will not be supplied and is not needed for the event, but officers will be in the area as a part of regular patrol functions. 4. Public works will need to coordinate any signage necessary to block the side streets, etc. 5. Ensure adequate access for emergency vehicles. Memo To: Port Orchard City Clerk Office From: Greg Rogers, Fire Prevention Manager CC: Date: February 26, 2010 Re: Mustangs on the Waterfront The South Kitsap Fire and Rescues Prevention/Education Office has completed a review of the application for public event that was dated received February 25, 2010 for the Mustangs on the Waterfront, located at the waterfront parking lot, and approves the plans with the following comments and stipulations: • Fire department access around the area must consist of the following: The unobstructed width of a fire apparatus access road shall be not less than 20 feet. Nothing in this review is intended to authorize or approve of any aspect of the design that does not comply with all applicable codes and standards. Should additional information become available, these comments may require modification. Please insure that additional information regarding this project is forwarded to our office. If you have any questions, please contact me at 871-2411. Fire Prevention Manager Page 1 of 1 CITY OF PORT ORCHARD Planning Department 216 Prospect Street, Port Orchard, WA 98366 Phone: (36o) 876-4991 • Fax: (36o) 876-498o planning@cityofportorchard.us www.cityofportorchard.us Date: March 1. 2010 To: Patricia Kirkpatrick, City Clerk From: James R. Weaver, City Development Director RE: 2010 Event Application: Mustangs on the Waterfront The Planning & Building Departments have reviewed the submitted 2010 Public Event application with the City of Port Orchard for the enterprise located at the address identified in the following comments. Public Event Application; Mustangs on the Waterfront Date: Sunday, July 25th, 2010 Location: Downtown Port Orchard, WA Organization: Kitsap Mustang Club Comments: Planning Department has no Comments on this application. 02/25/10 12:31 FAX 360 476 5176 PSNS CODE 1224 City Clerk's Offlce 216 Prospect Street Port Orchard, W A 98366 . 360.816-4401 * 360-89S-9029 (fax) C�tY u port OrchaM VW AND COMMENT BY POLICE DEPARTMENT: REVIEW AND COMMENT BY FIRE DEPARTMENT: REVIEW AND COMMENT BY PUBLIC �rCO REVIEW AND COMMENT BY FINANCE DEPARTMENT: REVIEW AND COMMENT BY ADMINISTRATIVE DEPARTMENT: REVIEW AND COMMENT BY PLANNING DEPARTMENT: .... ....�,..M_,...__...__.._...____.._...._.-.._. ...."_- DISAPPROVE APPROVE DECISION OP CITY COUNCIL: DATE OF DECISION; la 004 Approved By Patricia J. Kirkpatrick, City Clerk 02/25/10 12:31 FAX 360 476 5176 PSNS CODE 1224 City Clerk's Office 216 Prospect Street •.; Port Orchard, WA 99366 360-876-4407 * 360-895-9029 (fax) P rcOrcFad , Lem REVIEW AND COMMENT BY POLICE DEPARTMENT: l� REVIEW AND COMMENT BY FIRE DEPARTMENT: REVIEW AND COMMENT BY PUBLIC REVIEW REVIEW AND COMMENT BY ADMIMSTRATIVE DEPARTMENT: REVIEW AND COMMENT BY PLANNING DEPARTMENT: -- .,......... APPROVE DISAPPROVE DECISION OF CITY COUNCIL; DATE OF DECISION: Approved By Patricia I. Kirkpatrick, City Clerk City of Port Orchard 216 Prospect Street, Port Orchard, WA 98366 (36o) 876-4407 • FAX (36o) 895-9029 Agenda Staff Report Agenda Item No. Public Hearing 6A Meeting Date: Subject: 2009 City of Port Orchard Water Prepared by: System Plan April 13, 2010 Mark R. Dorsey, P.E. Public Works Director Atty Routing No: 042-10 Atty Review Date: April 6, 2010 Summary: In 2009, Public Works staff and PACE Engineers, Inc. began working on an update to the City's Water System Plan. On February 5, 2010 the City of Port Orchard issued a Programmatic SEPA threshold Determination of Non -Significance (DNS) for the proposed 2009 Water System Plan. The City published the DNS on February 5, 2010 and received comments on the SEPA determination from the City of Bremerton. The comment period ended on February 19, 2olo and the appeal period ended on March 5, 2010. This evening's public hearing meets the public participation phase of the Plan adoption process, as required by the Washington Growth Management Act (GMA) and the Revised Code of Washington (RCW). The next step in the adoption process is to incorporate and address comments received from tonight's public hearing with the previous comments received. It is anticipated that once adopted, the 2009 Water System Plan will be incorporated into the 2010 Port Orchard Comprehensive Plan, scheduled for December 2010. Recommendation: Open the Public Hearing. Alternatives: Do not open the Public Hearing. Attachments: 2009 Water System Plan (CD is attached) J r WAT .:T ORCHARD a _ �0 %F.�. LAN f >: Pr pared e IP �r r WAT .:T ORCHARD a _ �0 %F.�. LAN f >: Pr pared e IP �r IP:AYiI "4'; EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The City of Port Orchard's 2009 Comprehensive Water System Plan represents a compilation of planning and engineering studies completed by PACE Engineers, Inc. The purpose of the Plan is to determine the adequacy of the City of Port Orchard's existing water system(s) to meet the existing and projected needs of the community it serves. The Plan puts forth a long-range planning document that addresses the regulations and concerns associated with operating the two public water systems that serve the retail service area designated in the Kitsap County Coordinated Water System Plan. The two water systems are referred to as the "City" System and the "McCormick Woods System throughout this Plan. Although they are both owned and operated by the City of Port Orchard under one combined water utility, the two systems each have unique water system identification numbers assigned by the State Department of Health and the US Environmental Protection Agency. A primary goal of the water utility is to physically connect the two systems with the requisite transmission, pumping and pressure reducing facilities. This Plan puts forth a program for doing that as a means of maximizing existing and proposed sources of supply, increasing the reliability of both systems and simplifying the compliance and regulatory requirements of operating the system independently. The 2009 Water System Plan supersedes and updates the City's current water plan, the Water System Plan for the McCormick Woods system and any previous drafts of this document. This document has been prepared in accordance with the rules and regulations governing the operation of public water systems as administered by the State of Washington Departments of Health and Ecology, Kitsap County, and the codes and policies of the City of Port Orchard. History and Location The City of Port Orchard is located on the Kitsap Peninsula of Washington State along the southern shore of Sinclair Inlet on the Puget Sound. The City is south of the City of Bremerton and from downtown Port Orchard, one can look north across the inlet to the Puget Sound Naval Shipyards. The study area for this planning document is the City's of Port Orchard's water service area as put forth in the Kitsap County Coordinated Water System Plan. The 15.5 square mile service area includes the majority of the current city limits, as well as the recently annexed community of McCormick Woods in the western portion of the service area. While the City maintains service to the majority of its residents and a variety of commercial and governmental activities within the city limits, the West Sound Utility District serves a small area in the eastern portion of the City. The West Sound water system abuts and is intertied with the Port Orchard system in several locations. The City of Port Orchard took over the McCormick Woods system and has owned and City of Port Orchard 2009 Comprehensive Water System Plan operated it since 1988 as a remote and self sufficient system. Service to existing McCormick Woods development and future development in the area and connection to the main Port Orchard water system is contemplated in this Plan. Expansion of the retail service area beyond the area established in the Kitsap County Coordinated Water System Plan is limited to any potential service area exchange negotiations between the City and neighboring purveyors and/or expansions associated with annexations to the City of Port Orchard's corporate limits. Land Use, Population and Employment The majority of the service area is designated for varying densities of residential uses and supporting commercial activities, with the highest concentration of density and development occurring in the downtown area and newer residential construction occurring in the area south of Tremont Street. The southern part of the service area is characterized by more rural development. As part of the planning process, the current population and employment within the city limits and ultimate water service area were estimated and Equivalent Residential Units (ERU's) were determined. As previously noted, the City does not currently serve the entire city limits or the entire service area. An estimated population of 8,550 people, or approximately 5800 ERU's, are currently served by the two city systems. As noted earlier, the City does not currently serve the entire water service area or the entire city limits. Population and employment is expected to increase significantly within the long-term 20 year planning horizon. Water Demands Identification of historical and projected water system demands is a critical element of the planning process. In 2008, total water production was approximately 375 million gallons, while sales were approximately 334 million gallons with average day demands of approximately 0.9 million gallons per day. Water use per ERU differs between the two water systems, averaging approximately 165 gallons per day for the City system and 260 gallons per day for the McCormick System. While these numbers are considered typical for the type of developments served by each system, it is believed that the McCormick Woods use per ERU may be skewed by unaccounted for irrigation uses and reservoir overflows that have since been curtailed. The City looks forward to obtaining more accurate and detailed water system use data as part of its compliance with Water Use Efficiency requirements. Using the same estimated use per capita to provide a conservative estimate of future water supply requirements, water demand by 2030 would be approximately 2 million gallons per day. A summary of the total water use by customer class is illustrated below. The City is currently processing additional water rights to support needed well source production beyond the 20 year planning period. Source production has recently declined due to decreasing yields from existing groundwater wells. While total water rights, as documented in recent approval of Well 10 water rights, together with pending water Executive Summary P� ACE Page iii City of Port Orchard 2009 Comprehensive Water System Plan rights, the physical ability to withdraw water and deliver adequate flows to to all areas of the service area are limited. This Plan outlines the improvements required to support new development in the western portion of the service area through interconnection of the two systems. This is expected to occur as part of the proposals to develop the Glenwood JPA that lies between the City system and the McCormick Woods system. It is important to note that population/employment growth will at some future point be dependent on the ability to meet water demands. The source improvements identified in this plan are critical to the City's ability to support the levels of growth projected for the existing service area. TYPICAL CUSTOMER WATER SYSTEM DEMANDS Commercial 18% on Churches Other 8% 2% Government 4% Executive Summary P� ACE Page iv City of Port Orchard 2009 Comprehensive Water System Plan Existing Water System As previously noted the City of Port Orchard's water utility includes two separate water systems, the original City System that serves the majority of the City through a series of wells, storage reservoirs and distribution facilities; and the isolated McCormick Woods system (also referred to as the 580 Zone) which serves McCormick Woods community with a separate water supply wells, storage tanks and distribution system facilities. The City System includes the older portions of the City along the waterfront as well as the more rapidly developing uplands. The area currently served by the Port Orchard system is generally bounded by the waterfront on the north, Sedgwick Road in the vicinity of State Highway 16 on the south, Anderson Hill Road on the west and West Sound Utility District on the east. The system consists of three pressure zones: Low, High, and Intermediate (at hydraulic gradelines of 260, 390, and 336 respectively) to regulate pressure within the community. The Low Zone (260 Zone)is extends from sea level to an approximate maximum service elevation of 200 feet and serves approximately 45% of the existing population and employment base served by the Port Orchard System at a hydraulic grade line of 260 feet. The Low Zone is fed primarily by Wells 6 and 7 but can receive backup supply from a wholesale meter connection to the City of Bremerton system west of the City and through a PRV from the Port Orchard High Zone. Approximately 2.15 million gallons of storage in the Low Zone is provided in Morton Street Standpipe, Park Reservoir, and Maple Street Elevated Tank. The High Zone (390 Zone) of the Port Orchard system serves approximately 55% of current connections and covers the residential uplands in the southern portion of the City and commercial area in the east. Ground elevations within the High Zone range from approximately 210 feet to approximately 330 feet. The High Zone is primarily fed by Wells 8 and 9 located at the Van Zee Park site, although additional supply can also be received from the City wells or Bremerton supply in the Low Zone via the Melcher Street Pump Station. The High Zone operates at a hydraulic grade elevation of 390 feet and approximately 2.1 million gallons of storage in this zone are provided in the Old Clifton, Sedgwick, and South Sidney reservoirs. To improve pressures in the higher elevations of the City lying east of Blackjack Creek the High Zone was expanded in 1983 with a 12-inch main across the creek. Interties with West Sound Utility System in this area, as well as the ability to revert back to serving the area from the Low Zone, provide the necessary reliability for the isolated portion of the High Zone. A new intertie to the West Sound water system was constructed in 2006 and provides a backup source to the southernmost reaches, and is located on the 1 million gallon Sedgwick Reservoir. The Intermediate Zone (336 Zone) was created in 1984 to provide satisfactory water pressure to a small area north of Kendall Street in the vicinity of Harrison Avenue. The Zone is supplied by a PRV from the High Zone and storage is provided from the High Zone. Because the Intermediate Zone is so small, it has been considered as a sub -zone to the High Zone. Executive Summary P� ACE Page v City of Port Orchard 2009 Comprehensive Water System Plan The McCormick Woods (or 580) System area consists of the 580 Zone and is currently not connected to the City's system. It has its own source and storage and an intertie with Bremerton augments supply to the area. As noted in Section 6, the agreement with Bremerton is complicated by the City of Bremerton's lack of storage in the area and provisions in the agreement that prohibit introduction of fluoride into the 580 zone until separate storage is constructed by Bremerton. The recommendations of this Plan include projects that will intertie the 580 Zone and City systems, eliminating dependence on Bremerton for water supply and allowing for isolation of the two systems and Bremerton's issues with Port Orchard policies for fluoridation of water. Water System Analysis Analysis of the existing systems was completed to determine the requirements for the orderly expansion of and improvements to the City and McCormick Systems as well as service to the Glenwood JPA that lies between the two systems. The primary focus of the analysis is on evaluation of existing facilities to meet the projected needs of the anticipated population of the service area. For large scale and costly facilities such as source of supply, transmission lines and storage reservoirs, that means addressing the ultimate service area needs to ensure that any improvements to this type of general facilities will be of sufficient capacity and location to meet needs well in the future. For distribution system facilities, the primary goal was to develop a more detailed program for upsizing to meet the fire flow requirements, and the regular renewal and replacements required as part of an asset management program to protect the investment of ratepayers to the system. Identification of facilities required to connect the main City System with the McCormick Woods System, and the general network of piping to bring City water service to the south and western portions of the service area are also discussed. The City of Port Orchard has water rights for a total of nine groundwater wells, six within the Port Orchard system and three serving the McCormick Woods area. Water rights are currently being finalized for Well No. 10, a new groundwater well to augment supply to the Port Orchard system. Also, the City has made application to consolidate water rights for McCormick Woods Wells 1, 2, and 3. By bringing the new deep aquifer well (Well 1 1) online, the City will increase its water rights from 600 to 750 gpm at this location. Well No. 10 was drilled in 2006 and it appears that the well will yield more than 1,500 gallon per minute, possibly up to 2000 gpm, of high quality water that will require minimal treatment. As a result, the City has requested water rights be increased from 500 gpm to 1500 gpm. A permit for this request is currently pending. This additional capacity will augment supply from the existing City wells, some of which are experiencing declining yields and help support the anticipated population of the Port Orchard System. Construction of Well 10 itself along with treatment, and transmission pipeline to connect the new well to the 390/260 zones is required to bring Well 10 on line and is detailed in the CIP presented in Section 7. The remote location of the well at the far Executive Summary P� ACE Page vi City of Port Orchard 2009 Comprehensive Water System Plan eastern edge of the City will necessitate a new transmission line from east to west to transfer the water to where it is needed. Several alternatives for routing transmission mains and locating the required treatment facility have been identified in a separate Well 10 Engineering Report completed in 2009. One alternative includes delivering raw water form Well 10 to the Well 6 site for treatment. This alternative provides a solution to the much needed upgrade of the Well 6 equipment and facilities by constructing on new treatment faicity to accommodate water from both wells. Additional transmission and pumping will also be required to deliver water to the southern portion of the service area, in the vicinity of the Glenwood JPA. This work, coupled with a pumping and PRV station will ultimately allow for water transfer between the main City system and the McCormick Woods area. Growth projection for the Glenwood JPA and McCormick Woods West have been included in the ultimate service area projections used for Well 10 water rights applications. The City has also made a water right application to formally recognize a withdrawal that has been part of the Port Orchard water supply since early in the City's history. Well 5, an old artesian flowing well, has reached a point of disrepair that makes it unsuitable as a source. When considering moving the roughly 50 gallon per minute production to nearby Well 4, it was discovered that the City had never registered Well 5 with the Department of Ecology, and did not have the water right that it had presumed it had. The application for 50 gpm is intended to rectify that long -ago oversight. The City has experienced taste and odor issues associated with hydrogen sulfide in some of its groundwater wells. This issue has historically been addressed by the use of stilling basins which assist with dissipation of the hydrogen sulfide and additionally, provide required chlorine contact time. As discussed below, the City's City Hall Pump Station is equipped with these basins and it is recommended that the City consider alternative treatment methods at the time that pump station is either updated or relocated as part of regular renewal and replacements. The only other anticipated water quality improvements is the possibility of additional rechlorination facilities to ensure that adequate levels of chlorine residual are maintained in the outermost reaches of the system. Additional recommendations on this are expected as the results from federally mandated elevated chlorine residual monitoring become available. Water Quality Monitoring program information is provided in Appendix E. The three pump stations serving the City System are of adequate capacity to meet near term demand requirements, although the Melcher Street Pump Station may require upsizing at some future date beyond the six year planning horizon, depending on how service is provided to the southern portion of the service area. The Melcher Station is also in need of upgrade in the near future to replace certain equipment and modernize the station. As discussed above, the City Hall Station will require abandonment or a significant upgrade with new piping, pumps, and associated controls within the six year planning horizon unless this station is abandoned and replaced with a new station at Well 7. Consideration of relocation of the pump station may be warranted based Executive Summary P� ACE Page vii City of Port Orchard 2009 Comprehensive Water System Plan on the quantity and quality of water from the proposed Well 10 and a specific engineering report addressing transmission and pumping of water from Well 10 will be required based on the yields from the new facility. Consideration of hydrogen sulfide dissipation and chlorine contact times provided by the existing pump station configuration will be important considerations when evaluating relocation of the pump station. The third station is located at Well 6 and as mentioned previously, the Well 6 site, equipment and facilities are all in need of significant upgrades which could be accomplished with the construction of a centralized treatment plant at that site. Currently only one pump station serves the McCormick Woods System and that facility pumps water from the source and associated small storage reservoirs to the 580 zone tank. The 580 Pump Station is of adequate capacity to meet the immediate service area needs of that development and now improvements are contemplated in the near term six -year planning period. Evaluation of the City's five storage reservoirs serving the City System was conducted to ensure that adequate storage is available to provide for equalizing storage as well as both standby and fire suppression storage. A slight deficit in High Zone Storage was identified under current conditions and through the planning horizon of 2025. Consideration of a small -pressurized zone to serve the high elevation immediately surrounding the Sedgwick Tank would rectify the problem by making more water in existing tanks available under emergency conditions, reducing dead storage quantity. Automatic interties with pressure reducing valves from the High Zone to the Low Zone are also recommended to improve system reliability and the availability of standby storage to the low zone for operational flexibility. A storage deficit shown for the 580 Zone and Glenwood JPA area is anticipated due to development of McCormick Woods West and the Glenwood JPA. A new 1.3 million gallon reservoir is proposed to satisfy the needs of the 580 zone. Any additional storage required as part of any development proposals in the area and will be financed by developers or future connection charge revenue. Additional source of water will also be needed for the continued growth in this area. A plan to supply the 580 Zone and higher zones in the area through and interconnection with the City System in the vicinity of the Glenwood JPA is put forth as the most cost effective and efficient solution to meeting long term supply needs of the entire service area. This is somewhat complicated by the fact that Bremerton water is not fluoridated and either an amendment to the existing interlocal agreement prohibiting fluoridation or an alternate source of supply would be required to prevent mixing. Section 6 provides a detailed description of the proposal for interconnecting the two systems and as noted therein, development of the Glenwood JPA will require the referenced interconnection. A computerized system model was constructed and used to evaluate the transmission and distribution systems and determine areas where system deficiencies exist, or are likely to develop, under various flow conditions. These deficiencies include areas of high or low pressure, areas with high flow velocities in the pipelines, and areas with low available fire flow. Executive Summary P� ACE Page viii City of Port Orchard 2009 Comprehensive Water System Plan In most areas, the water system is sufficient to handle ADD and MDD flows through 2030 while generally maintaining working pressures above 40 psi. Pressures below 40 psi exist at higher elevations near tanks as to be expected, and in isolated areas of small mains in the distribution system and the Melcher Pump Station feed line. Consideration of a small constant pressure booster station to serve the high elevations immediately surrounding the 1.0 million gallon Sedgewick reservoir may be warranted. This will allow for better circulation of water in the reservoir through increasing the operational range and decreasing the unused volume of the tank. These areas become problems in fire flow events and construction of larger diameter mains as discussed below will alleviate the deficiencies. Based on computer model results confirmed by operator information, a significant water main replacement program has been identified to meet minimum fire flow requirements at the State mandated minimum pressures, replace undersized pipes and take a proactive approach to regular system renewal replacements and avoid catastrophic failure of aging and under capacity lines. The first and highest priority water main replacement project is for replacement of the smaller diameter mains in the downtown area of the of the low pressure zone. High priority Low Zone distribution system improvements are recommended for completion within the six year planning horizon. Following that, smaller diameter mains in the eastern and southern portions of the high pressure zone will need to be addressed. Some of these improvements may be accomplished by developer extensions. Summary of Limiting Factors The biggest challenge facing the City of Port Orchard is meeting the needs of future development while maintaining sufficient yield from its permitted supply. While water rights are sufficient to meet both near and long terms needs of the City, the ability to withdraw, treat and supply water is currently limited. Construction of Well 10 supply, treatment and transmission is critical to alleviating the declining supply yields from existing wells. Consideration of additional water rights at and/or transfer of rights to Well 10 may become equally important if yields from other wells continue to decrease. Another critical consideration for operating and regulatory simplification is combining the two water systems into one system. While construction of additional storage and continued use of the Bremerton supply to 580 Zone provides an interim solution, development of the Glenwood JPA cannot occur without an intertie between the City and McCormick Systems. This will bring additional supply to 580 Zone, allow for integration of the systems, provide operating independence, improve reliability and reduce paperwork, testing and confusion associated with operating under two separate water system Identification numbers. Executive Summary P� ACE Page ix City of Port Orchard 2009 Comprehensive Water System Plan Lastly, portions of the City Water System will soon approach the end of their useful life. Funding for needed upgrades and replacement of the aging water infrastructure is needed to improve fire flows, replace undersized mains and take a proactive approach to renewals and replacements prior to more costly replacements following facility failure. An aggressive approach to acquiring funding from current Economic Recovery program grants, low interest bonds or low interest loans is recommended and discussed further in Section 10. Capital Improvement Plan The total capital improvement plan for identified water system upgrades totals approximately $24 million dollars (at present value). Of that amount, approximately $17.6 million has been identified as high priority items for the six -year planning horizon. Projects which would could be financed by growth charges (connection charge) include construction of Well 10 and Well 11 and associated transmission improvements, construction of a new reservoir in the 580 Zone, interconnection of the two water systems, installation of pressure reducing valves between the High and Low Zones, and rehabilitation or replacement of the City Hall pump station. The amount of water improvements that can be constructed over the next 6 year period will depend on funding. It is recommended that the City fund the suggested improvements in the following manner. First, any grants or low interest loans should be utilized to finance needed projects. Next, cash on hand from connection charges, rates and any other sources of money should be utilized. Any short -fall in these funding sources required to finance the required system improvements may be obtained from selling revenue bonds or securing low interest loans from the State. Loan funding and Bond issues, however, must consider available funding for repayment. Based on this comprehensive plan and a subsequent rate study also by PACE Engineers, Inc., existing rates and charges were increased sufficient to cover projected City costs or needed improvements to the system at that time. Rates were again adjusted in 2009 to fund operation costs and accommodate current revenue projections following annexation of the McCormick Woods area. The City of Port Orchard's Municipal Water Code, which includes current rates and charges has been included as the last element of Appendix E. Another key element of recent rate reviews was implementation of a strong conservation program through rate incentives for stewardship of water resources and compliance with recently implemented municipal water laws requiring water conservation. In addition, updated connection charges were recommended and implemented. It is recommended that after this Comprehensive Plan is adopted, the City's connection charges be reviewed again and updated to include all CIP recommendations at current project budgets. Rates and charges should be reviewed yearly to confirm they are adequate to meet all Water Department requirements. Executive Summary P� ACE Page x City of Port Orchard 2009 Water Svstem Plan The technical material and data contained in this report was prepared by PACE Engineers, Inc. under the supervision of the below listed individuals. Those responsible staff members who are registered professional engineers are licensed in the State of Washington. �� pF WAS�r coo z Z �`d04� 16067 `ISTER�' `\ SSjONAL� ti3O \.21 Martin L. Penhallegon, P.E. Principal Engineer JUJdI I L. UVyU Vice President Project Certification PACE Page i CITY OF PORT ORCHARD s 37sp �.IIII 2009 Water System Plan - 3 Table of Contents Section 11 - Introduction 1.1 Introduction...................................................................................................................... 1-1 1.2 Authorization.......................................................................................................................... 1.3 Goals and Objectives........................................................................................................ 1-2 1.4 Purpose and Objectives of the Study............................................................................... 1-5 1.5 Overview of the City........................................................................................................ 1-6 1.5.1 Location and History ............................................................................................ 1-6 1.5.2 Overview of Existing Water System..................................................................... 1-6 1.6 Rules and Regulations...................................................................................................... 1-7 1.6.1 Federal Regulations.............................................................................................. 1-7 1.6.1.1 Safe Drinking Water Act....................................................................... 1-7 1.6.1.2 Clean Water Act.................................................................................... 1-7 1.6.1.3 Endangered Species Act....................................................................... 1-7 1.6.2 State of Washington Requirements..................................................................... 1-7 1.6.2.1 Washington Administrative Code / Revised Code of Washington........ 1-7 1.6.2.2 Growth Management Act...................................................................... 1-8 1.6.2.3 State Environmental Policy Act............................................................. 1-8 1.6.2.4 Department of Health............................................................................ 1-8 1.6.2.5 Department of Ecology.......................................................................... 1-9 1.6.2.6 Public Water System Coordination Act ................................................. 1-9 1.6.2.7 Municipal Water Law............................................................................. 1-9 1.6.3 County and City Regulations.............................................................................. 1-10 1.7 Interlocal Agreements.................................................................................................... 1-10 1.8 Previous Planning Studies.............................................................................................. 1-10 Section 2 - Basic Planning Data 2.1 General............................................................................................................2-1 2.2 Study and Service Area.................................................................................................... 2-1 2.3 Service Area Policies........................................................................................................ 2-1 Table of Contents Page A City of Port Orchard 2009 Water System Plan 2.3.1 Responsibility and Authority................................................................................. 2-1 2.3.2 Annexation............................................................................................................2-2 2.3.3 Service Area......................................................................................................... 2-2 2.3.4 Satellite Management.......................................................................................... 2-3 2.3.5 Other Local Government Policies Affecting Provision of Water ........................... 2-3 2.3.6 Water Meters and Interties.................................................................................. 2-3 2.3.7 Rates and Charges............................................................................................... 2-3 2.3.8 Condition of Service Policy................................................................................... 2-4 2.4 Neighboring Utilities......................................................................................................... 2-6 2.4.1 West Sound Utility District.................................................................................. 2-6 2.4.2 City Bremerton..................................................................................................... 2-6 2.4.3 Other Water Systems.......................................................................................... 2-7 2.5 Topography............................................................................................................2-7 2.6 Land Use and Zoning........................................................................................................ 2-8 2.7 Population and Employment........................................................................................... 2-13 Section 3 — Water Demands and Conservation 3.1 General.............................................................................................................................3-1 3.2 Historical Water Demands............................................................................................... 3-1 3.3 Projected Water Demands............................................................................................... 3-6 3.4 Water Use Efficiency Rule................................................................................................ 3-9 3.5 Water Conservation Program........................................................................................... 3-9 3.5.1 Internal Conservation Measures........................................................................... 3-9 3.5.2 Conservation Program Promotion...................................................................... 3-10 3.5.3 Rate Setting to Encourage Conservation........................................................... 3-10 3.5.4 Encouraging Water Saving Devices................................................................... 3-10 3.5.5 Water Efficient Toilets and Appliances............................................................... 3-1 1 3.5.6 Water Reuse and Recycling................................................................................ 3-1 1 3.6 Conservation Program Implementation and Monitoring ................................................. 3-1 1 Section 4 — Existing Water System 4.1 Overview 4.2 Port Orchard (City) Water System ............ 4.3 580 zone (McCormick) System .................. 4-4 Water Supply .............................................. 4-5 Pumping ...................................................... 4.6 Storage Reservoirs .................................... 4.7 Distribution System .................................... Table of Contents Page xii City of Port Orchard 2009 Water System Plan Section 5 - Minimum Design Criteria 5.1 Introduction...................................................................................................................... 5-1 5.2 State Agency Regulations................................................................................................ 5-1 5.3 Reference Datum............................................................................................................ 5-1 5.4 General Considerations....................................................................................................5-1 5.4.1 Design Period....................................................................................................... 5-1 5.4.2 Planning............................................................................................................5-2 5.4.3 Reliability............................................................................................................5-2 5.5 Water Supply Recommendations and Requirements....................................................... 5-2 5.5.1 Water Supply and Source Pump Stations............................................................ 5-2 5.5.2 Booster Pump Stations........................................................................................ 5-3 5.6 Water Distribution Recommendations and Requirements ................................................ 5-3 5.6.1 Water Pressure.................................................................................................... 5-3 5.6.2 Pipe Sizing and Materials..................................................................................... 5-3 5.6.3 Valves............................................................................................................5-4 5.6.4 Fire Hydrants........................................................................................................ 5-5 5.6.5 Cross Connection Control.................................................................................... 5-5 5.7 Storage Recommendations and Requirements................................................................. 5-5 5.7.1 Operational Storage............................................................................................. 5-6 5.7.2 Equalizing Storage................................................................................................ 5-6 5.7.3 Standby Storage.................................................................................................. 5-7 5.7.4 Fire Suppression Storage..................................................................................... 5-7 5.7.5 Dead Storage....................................................................................................... 5-7 5.8 General Facility Placement...............................................................................................5-7 5.9 Water Quality Standards.................................................................................................. 5-8 5.10 Standard Plans and Details.............................................................................................. 5-8 Section 6 — System Analysis 6.1 Overview........................................................................................................................... 6-1 6.2 Water Supply.................................................................................................................... 6-1 6.2.1 City System Source Analysis.............................................................................. 6-2 6.2.2 580 (McCormick) System Source Analysis.......................................................... 6-3 6.3 Pumping............................................................................................................................6-4 6.3.1 City System Pumping Analysis............................................................................ 6-8 6.3.2 580 (McCormick) System Pumping Analysis....................................................... 6-8 6.4 Storage Analysis............................................................................................................... 6-9 6.4.1 City System Storage Analysis............................................................................. 6-9 6.4.2 580 (McCormick) System Storage Analysis......................................................... 6-9 6.5 Distribution System Analysis......................................................................................... 6-15 6.5.1 Hydraulic Modeling Software............................................................................. 6-15 P Table of Contents E Page xiii City of Port Orchard 2009 Water System Plan 6.5.2 Hydraulic Model Calibration............................................................................... 6-15 6.5.3 Hydraulic Analysis.............................................................................................. 6-16 6.5.4 Pressure Evaluation............................................................................................6-19 6.5.4.1 City System Pressure Analysis.......................................................... 6-19 6.5.4.2 580 (McCormick) System Pressure Analysis ...................................... 6-21 6.5.5. Fire Flow Evaluation.......................................................................................... 6-22 6.5.5.1 City System Fire Flow Analysis.......................................................... 6-22 6.5.5.2 580 (McCormick) System Fire Flow Analysis ...................................... 6-24 6.5.5.3 Fire Flow Improvements..................................................................... 6-27 6.5.6 Small Main Replacements.................................................................................. 6-28 6.5.7 Analysis of CIP Alternatives.............................................................................. 6-28 6.5.8 Interconnecting the 580 Zone into the City's System ....................................... 6-29 6.5.9 New 660 Pressure Zone..................................................................................... 6-29 6.5.10 Additional 580/660 Zone Reservoir................................................................... 6-29 6.5.1 1 Melcher Pump Station Upgrade......................................................................... 6-30 6.5.12 Hydraulic Analysis General Conclusions............................................................. 6-30 6.6 System Analysis Overview Limiting Factors....................................................... 6-31 Section 7 — Capital Improvement Plan 7.1 Objectives .................................................................................................. 7.2 Project Cost Estimates and Schedules .................................................... 7.3 Capital Facilities Plan................................................................................ 7.3.1 Project 1 - Telemetry Upgrades .................................................... 7.3.2 Project 2 - Well 11 /Treatment Upgrades ...................................... 7.3.3 Project 3 - Well 10......................................................................... 7.3.4 Project 4 - Wells 6 and 10 Treatment Improvements .................... 7.3.5 Project 5 - Well 10 Transmission Main .......................................... 7.3.6 Project 6 - PRVs High to Low Zone ............................................... 7.3.7 Project 7 - City Hall Pump Station Elimination/Well 7 Treatment 7.3.8 Project 8 - 1.7± Million Gallon 580 Reservoir ............................... 7.3.9 Project 9 - 390 to 580 Booster Pump Station ............................... 7.3.10 Project 10 - 390 to 580 Transmission Main ................................... 7.3.1 1 Project 11 - 580 to 660 Constant Pressure Booster Station ........ 7.3.12 Project 12 - Melcher Street Pump Station Upgrade ..................... 7.3.13 Project 13 - 390 Zone Storage ...................................................... 7.3.14 Projects 14, 15, and 16 — Water Main Replacement Program ...... ..7-2 ..7-2 ..7-2 ..7-2 ..7-2 ..7-3 ..7-3 ..7-3 ..7-3 ..7-3 ..7-3 ..7-4 ..7-4 ..7-4 Section 8 — Water Quality 8.1 Introduction............................................................................................................8-1 8.2 Regulatory Background.................................................................................................... 8-1 Table of Contents Page xiv City of Port Orchard 2009 Water System Plan 8.3 Current Regulations, Data and Impacts........................................................................... 8-2 8.3.1 Total Coliform Rule............................................................................................... 8-3 8.3.2 Fluoride Regulation.............................................................................................. 8-3 8.3.3 Lead and Copper Rule.......................................................................................... 8-4 8.3.4 Phase I - Volatile Organic Compounds................................................................ 8-4 8.3.5 Phases 11 and V — SOC's and IOC's..................................................................... 8-5 8.3.6 Iron and Manganese.............................................................................................8-7 8.3.7 Wellhead Protection............................................................................................. 8-7 8.3.8 Stage 1 Disinfectants/Disinfection By -Products Rule ........................................ 8-7 8.3.9 Radionuclides Rule............................................................................................... 8-8 8.3.10 Arsenic Rule.......................................................................................................... 8-9 8.3.1 1 Consumer Confidence Reports Rule.................................................................... 8-9 8.3.12 State Regulated Contaminants............................................................................ 8-9 8.3.13 Cross Connection Control.................................................................................. 8-10 8.4 Anticipated Regulations.................................................................................................. 8-10 8.4.1 Stage 2 Disinfection Byproduct Rule.................................................................. 8-10 8.4.2 Groundwater Rule............................................................................................... 8-1 1 8.4.3 Proposed Radon Rule.........................................................................................8-12 8.5 City of Bremerton Supply.............................................................................................. 8-12 8.6 Treatment Improvements.............................................................................................. 8-12 Section 9 — Operations Program 9.1 Introduction ......................................... 9.2 General Information ............................. 9.3 Responsibility and Authority ................ 9.4 Personnel Certification ........................ 9.5 Routine Operations .............................. 9.5.1 Supply Wells ........................... 9.5.2 Storage Reservoirs .................. 9.5.3 Pump Stations ......................... 9.5.4 Valves and Hydrants ................ 9.5.5 Distribution System ................. 9.5.6 Inspection ................................ 9.6 Water Quality Monitoring .................... 9.7 Cross Connection Control .................. 9.8 Emergency Plan .................................. 9.9 Water Shortage Response ................. .......................................................................... 9-1 .......................................................................... 9-1 .......................................................................... 9-1 .......................................................................... 9-2 .......................................................................... 9-2 .......................................................................... 9-3 ......................................................................... 9-3 ......................................................................... 9-3 ......................................................................... 9-3 ......................................................................... 9-3 .......................................................................... 9-4 ......................................................................... 9-4 .......................................................................... 9-4 .......................................................................... 9-6 .......................................................................... 9-6 Table of Contents P E Page xv City of Port Orchard 2009 Water System Plan SECTION 10 - FINANCING AND IMPLEMETATION 10.1 General...........................................................................................................................10-1 10.2 Financial Considerations................................................................................................. 10-1 10.3 Water System Budget.................................................................................................... 10-1 10.4 Funding Sources............................................................................................................. 10-4 10.4.1 Rates............................................................................................................... 10-3 10.4.2 Connection Charges........................................................................................ 10-5 10.4.3 Local Improvement District (LID) Financing .................................................. 10-5 10.4.4 Developer Financing........................................................................................ 10-6 10.4.5 Combination Financing by Developers and the City ........................................ 10-6 10.4.6 Bond Financing................................................................................................ 10-6 10.4.7 Grant Financing............................................................................................... 10-6 10.4.8 Public Works Trust Fund (PWTF) Loans......................................................... 10-7 10.4.9 State Revolving Fund (SRF)............................................................................ 10-7 10.4.10 Rural Development Direct Loans and Grants .................................................. 10-7 10.4.1 1 ARRA Funding................................................................................................. 10-7 10.5 Financing Capital Improvements.................................................................................... 10-8 10.5.1 General Facilities................................................................................................ 10-8 10.5.2 Local Facilities.................................................................................................... 10-9 10.5.3 Private Facilities................................................................................................. 10-9 10.6 Financing Strategy.......................................................................................................... 10-9 10.7 Developer Extension Policies......................................................................................... 10-9 10.8 Environmental Review................................................................................................. 10-10 Appendices Appendix A State Environmental Policy Act Documentation Appendix B Municipal Water Law Appendix C Water Rights Information Appendix D Water Quality Information Appendix E Water Quality Monitoring Plan Appendix F Interlocal Agreements Appendix G Water System Standards Appendix H Comments and Approval Appendix I Water System Plan Map Table of Contents Page xvi City of Port Orchard 2009 Water System Plan List of Tables Table 2-1 Population and Employment............................................................................... 2-13 Table 3-1 Historical Water Production and Sales................................................................. 3-3 Table 3-2 Historical Water Sales by Customer Class.......................................................... 3-3 Table 3-3 Monthly Water Production (vs. Annual Sales) ...................................................... 3-4 Table 3-4 Water Demands (Without Conservation)............................................................. 3-7 Table 3-5 Water Demands (With Conservation).................................................................. 3-8 Table4-1 Sources of Supply................................................................................................ 4-5 Table4-2 Pump Stations..................................................................................................... 4-7 Table 4-3 Storage Reservoirs............................................................................................... 4-7 Table 4-4 Pipe Size and Material.......................................................................................... 4-8 Table 6-1 Sources of Supply (Water Rights)........................................................................ 6-3 Table6-2 Source Analysis................................................................................................... 6-4 Table6-3 Storage Analysis................................................................................................... 6-7 Table 6-3 City System Pressure Analysis.......................................................................... 6-15 Table 6-5 580 Pressure Zone Deficient Areas .................................................................... 6-17 Table 7-1 Water System Capital Improvements Plan........................................................... 7-5 Table 7-1A Recommended Pipe Upgrades Phase 1(Project 14)............................................. 7-6 Table 7-1 B Recommended Pipe Upgrades Phase 2 (Project 15)............................................ 7-7 Table 7-1 C Recommended Pipe Upgrades Phase 2 (Project 16)............................................ 7-7 Table 8-1 Primary Drinking Water Standards for Contaminants ......................................... 8-2 Table 8-2 Volatile Organic Compounds (VOCs).................................................................. 8-5 Table 8-3 Inorganic Contaminant Monitoring Results.......................................................... 8-6 Table 8-4 Untreated Iron and Manganese Concentrations(2002)....................................... 8-7 Table 8-5 Stage I Disinfection By -Products Rule................................................................. 8-8 Table 8-6 State Regulated Contaminants........................................................................ 8-10 Table 9-1 Water System Certification.................................................................................. 9-2 Table 10-1 Water Utility Anticipated Six -Year Budget......................................................... 10-2 Table 10-2 Existing Water Rates.......................................................................................... 10-4 P Table of Contents E Page xvii City of Port Orchard 2009 Water System Plan List of Figures Figure1-1 Location Map........................................................................................................ 1-3 Figure2-1 Boundary Map..................................................................................................... 2-5 Figure 2-2 UGA Boundaries and Water Service Area........................................................... 2-9 Figure2-3 Zoning Map........................................................................................................ 2-1 1 Figure 3-1 Average Water Demands by Customer Class ...................................................... 3-5 Figure 3-2 Seasonal Water Demands by Customer Class .................................................... 3-5 Figure 3-3 Total Monthly Water Production.......................................................................... 3-6 Figure 5-1 Storage Facility Schematic................................................................................... 5-6 Figure 4-1 Existing Hydraulic Profile...................................................................................... 4-3 Figure 6-1 Proposed Hydraulic Profile................................................................................. 6-13 Figure6-2 Fire Flow Summary ..................................................................................................... Figure 7-1 Water System Improvements............................................................................... 7-3 Table of Contents Page xviii City of Port Orchard 2009 Water System Plan GLOSSARY ACRONYMS ADD Average Daily Demand AWWA American Water Works Association ccf One hundred cubic feet cfs Cubic Feet per second CFP Capital Facilities Plan CWSP Coordinated Water System Plan CWSSA Critical Water Supply Service Area DOE Washington State Department of Ecology DOH Washington State Department of Health DOT/APWA Standard Specifications for Road, Bridge, and Municipal Construction, Washington State Department of Transportation and the American Public Works Association, 2000 Edition EPA United States Environmental Protection Agency ERU Equivalent Residential Unit GFC General Facility Charge GMA Growth Management Act gpad Gallons per acre per day gpcd Gallons per capita per day gpd Gallons per day gpm Gallons per minute & I Infiltration and Inflow LFC Local Facility Charge MDD Maximum Daily Demand MG Million Gallons MGD Million gallons per day mg/I Milligrams per liter PHD Peak Hour Demand ppb Parts per Billion ppm Parts per Million PSRC Puget Sound Regional Council PRV Pressure Reducing Valve psi Pounds per square inch RCW Revised Code of Washington SDWA Safe Drinking Water Act SEPA State Environmental Policy Act ULID Utility Local Improvement District WAC Washington Administrative Code P Table of Contents E Page Ax City of Port Orchard 2009 Water System Plan TERMS Annual Demand — Total water system demand for one calendar year, expressed in millions of gallons (MG), including all uses and unaccounted-for water. Average Daily Demand (ADD) — The annual demand divided by the number of days per year, expressed in million gallons per day (MGD). Cross Connection — A physical arrangement connecting a public water system, directly or indirectly, with anything other than another potable water system, and capable of contaminating the public water system. Dead Storage — The volume of stored water not available to all customers at the minimum design pressure in accordance with WAC 246-290-235 (5) and (6). Equalizing Storage — The volume of water required to meet hourly variations in demand in excess of the available rate of supply. Equivalent Residential Unit (ERU) — The amount of water consumed by a typical full time single- family residence. An ERU is used for converting users other than single-family residences into an equivalent number for the purpose of demand forecasting, system analysis and facility sizing. Fire Flow — The rate of water flow, in gpm, required to fight fires under WAC 246-293-640 or adopted city or county standards. Fire Suppression Storage — The volume of water required to accommodate fire demand. Franchise Area — A designated area within which the utility system is permitted, by franchise, to own, operate and maintain facilities within public right-of-ways. Legal Boundary — The corporate boundary established for the District. Extension of service beyond the District's legal boundary requires annexation to the District or specific agreement for the provision of such service. Also referred to as corporate area. Maximum Contaminant Level (MCL) — The maximum permissible level of a contaminant in water the purveyor delivers to any public water system user. Maximum Daily Demand (MDD) — The highest water demand anticipated for any given day, expressed in MGD. Table of Contents Page xx City of Port Orchard 2009 Water System Plan Operational Storage — The volume of the reservoir devoted to supplying the water system while, under normal operating conditions, the source(s) are in "off" status. Peak Hour Demand — The maximum rate of water use, excluding fire flow, which has occurred or is expected to occur within a defined service area at any instant in time. Potable Water — suitable for drinking by the public. Pressure Zone — A water supply or distribution subsystem operating at a uniform hydraulic gradient. Retail Service Area — The recognized area within which the City of Port Orchard intends to provide water service, as established by the Kitsap County Coordinated Water System Plan. The service area referred to throughout this plan is the "retail water service area for Port Orchard. Standby Storage — The volume of water required to augment the available supply of water during a period of partially or fully restricted flow from the supply source, due to such things as pipeline or pump failure or power outages. Usable Storage — That portion of the total available storage that is available on a continuous basis, either by gravity flow or by reliable pumping facilities. P Table of Contents E Page xxi CITY OF PORT ORCHARD 2009 WATER SYSTEM PLAN City of Port Orchard Public Works Department 216 Prospect Street Port Orchard, Washington 360-876-4991 Mayor Lary Coppola Public Works Director Mark Dorsey, P.E. Prepared By.• PACE PACE Engineers, Inc. 1601 Second Avenue Suite 1000 Seattle, Washington, 98101 SECTION 1 flAYii � INTRODUCTION L-_ I 1.1 INTRODUCTION The City of Port Orchard is located on the Kitsap Peninsula of Washington State. The City's water system consists of two separate water systems owned and operated by the City of Port Orchard: the City system serving the majority of the City limits, and; the McCormick Woods system serving the recently annexed McCormick Woods area in the western portion of the City. Collectively the two systems served a total of approximately 5,800 Equivalent Residential Units (ERUs) in 2008 with nearly 5,000 ERUs in the City system and just over 800 ERUs in the McCormick Woods system. The general location of Port Orchard is shown on Figure 1-1. Port Orchard is a Group A public water system. Under Washington State Law (WAC246-290) all Group A water systems (those serving 1,000 or more services) are required have a comprehensive water system plan approved by the State Department of Health and other agencies having jurisdictions, and adopted by the water system. Comprehensive water system plan updates are required to occur at least every six years. This document represents the City of Port Orchard's most recent water system planning effort and updates and supersedes the City's 1995 Comprehensive Water System Plan and 2003 Water System Plan Amendment regarding the McCormick Woods area of the water service area. As demonstrated later in this section and throughout the Plan, a variety of other planning efforts, including land use planning by the City and others and coordinated water system planning for the region, were utilized in the development of this document. In accordance with State Department of Health requirements, this document: ■ Identifies and describes the retail water service area; ■ Provides a summary of historical and projected water use within the system; ■ Describes the existing water system serving the two systems (City System and McCormick Woods System) that are owned, operated and maintained by the City. Establishes minimum design criteria for evaluation of the water system(s); ■ Identifies system deficiencies and presents a detailed capital facilities plan; ■ Provides an implementation plan for the recommendations contained herein, and; ■ Complies with all appropriate regulations regarding the Kitsap County Coordinated Water System Plan, the Municipal Water Law and the State Environmental Policy Act A computerized hydraulic water system model was developed to facilitate a complete evaluation of the water system and simulate alternatives for recommended water system improvements. The City's electronic mapping has also been updated in conjunction with this water system plan update and has been coordinated with Geographic Information System (GIS) mapping provided by Kitsap County. Introduction P� ACE Page 1-1 City of Port Orchard 2009 Water System Plan 11.2 AUTHORIZATION In 2005 the City of Port Orchard acknowledged the need to update the 1995 Comprehensive Water System Plan and subsequent amendments and authorized PACE Engineers, Inc. (formerly known as Penhallegon Associates Consulting Engineers, Inc.) to prepare this document in accordance with all applicable rules and regulations and with the City's existing code, policies and procedures. 11.3 GOALS AND OBJECTIVES A variety of goals and objectives guide the operation of the City of Port Orchard's public water system. These goals and objectives are in addition to the policy statements put forth in Section 2 of this Plan. They have been verified and utilized in the evaluation of the water system and development of this Plan and are summarized as follows: ■ Maintain drinking water quality in accordance with State and Federal standards to insure the quality of drinking water delivered to customers of the water system; ■ Provide high quality domestic and fire protection service to all areas within the retail service area. ■ Utilize City owned and operated sources of supply to maximize efficiency and cost effectiveness of the water system. ■ Maintain water system facilities to ensure a high level of service is provided to all customers and maximize the life of facilities to protect the investment of ratepayers. ■ Construct new facilities as required to serve the existing and future populations of the established water service area and City of Port Orchard Urban Growth Area. ■ Develop a long range program for interconnecting the City's main water system with the independent facilities serving the City's 580 and 660 Pressure Zones (McCormick Wood System). This will allow for combining the two existing systems under one water system identification number. ■ Implement and maintain water use efficiency and conservation programs to discourage water waste, promote the prudent use of water resources and support protection of habitat and the environment. ■ Work with neighboring water utilities, participate in regional water planning efforts to establish common goals of uniform water system standards and facilitate coordination of efforts toward the adequate provision of water service throughout the region. ■ Conduct water system operations in a manner that insures high quality service in accordance with all applicable rules and regulations, at the lowest reasonable cost. Introduction Page 1-2 P o E 411; 104 0 r; V }. I f' O Q f. y; a 307 \SnohomC ty i w �' �. �. I ;--_— is -"-------- -- J •' y o��; King Co r i 101 1 / / 305 1 oulsbo ; Bainbri ge - 3 Islan 99 520 im i l Joe Bremerton -------------------- O C O 0 O Kitsap County Pierce County i O f o °hty 11 .-c, Ly U1 ort Orchard 161 Vashon Island - -------- - - f y Figure 1-1 �1 Location Map City of Port Orchard a Seattl City of Port Orchard 2009 Water System Plan Mfl� rrrjfflTrjrrff- jTfE7 rsT-rr Cf l rs Introduction Page 1-4 P City of Port Orchard 2009 Water System Plan 1.4 PURPOSE AND OBJECTIVE OF THE STUDY The purpose of this comprehensive water system plan is to provide the City of Port Orchard with a guideline for future development of its water system. This Plan represents the consolidation and update of two separate planning documents for the Port Orchard Water System: the City of Port Orchard 1995 Comprehensive Water System Plan and 2003 Water Comprehensive Plan Amendment. The planning process has been based on 2008 conditions and projected needs throughout the water service area through 2030. As development within the service area occurs, modifications to the recommendations of the Plan may be required. Significant changes, such as a change in the water service area, may require a plan amendment to accurately reflect the future needs of the City and keep neighboring jurisdiction informed of those needs. Changes in the Capital Improvement Plan schedule, however, may occur from time to time as actual development dictates the exact need and location for water system improvements, extensions and facilities, and as the City reviews its capital improvement needs in relation to available funds and project priorities. These minor changes are anticipated and are not expected to require Plan amendment. Instead, these changes are anticipated as part of the City's annual budgeting process. The overall objective of this study is to establish a comprehensive water system plan for the City of Port Orchard that provides for routine maintenance and the orderly development of water system facilities in a manner that meets the needs of existing and future customers of the City's system as well as the requirements of all applicable regulations governing operation of a public water supply. The process used to meet this objective is summarized by the following activities: ■ Presentation of descriptions and characteristics of the water service area, land use and population, water consumption trends, and water system features and characteristics; ■ Identification of minimum design criteria and construction of a hydraulic computer model for the purpose of evaluating the existing source, storage and pumping facilities, and the distribution system's capabilities to meet existing and projected system demands; ■ Identification of existing and projected water system deficiencies, alternatives for improvements, and recommendations for system improvements; ■ Evaluation of City owned sources of supply and intertie connections and development of a comprehensive water supply strategy that ensures adequate supply for projected development conditions as well as water resource management. Key considerations include water quality monitoring, watershed protection, water use efficiency and water shortage response. ■ Presentation of a detailed capital improvement program and implementation plan, including project cost estimates and proposed project sequencing, scheduling and financing. Introduction PACE Page 7-5 City of Port Orchard 2009 Water System Plan ■ Completion of an environmental checklist considering the environmental ramifications of implementing the Plan and issuance of a State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA) Determination. 11.5 OVERVIEW OF THE CITY 1.5.1 Location and History The City of Port Orchard is located in Kitsap County, Washington along the shoreline of Sinclair Inlet on the Puget Sound. The City is south of the City of Bremerton and from downtown Port Orchard, one can look directly north across the inlet at the Puget Sound Naval Shipyards. Port Orchard was the first city in Kitsap County and was incorporated in 1890 under its original name of Sidney. The city was renamed in 1903 to Port Orchard. The first water system components were installed in 1911. The City of Port Orchard has grown to a vibrant waterfront community with a variety of commercial and governmental activity as well as a strong residential community. The area has experienced significant growth in more recent years, and serves in part as a bedroom community to naval shipyard employees and residents that commute by ferry to downtown Seattle for employment. 1.5.2 Overview of Existing Water System The water system has grown right along with the City and the majority of existing pipe was installed in the 1960's. Additional wells and other general facilities have been constructed to accommodate the growing population and keep up with the ever increasing regulations associated with operating a public water system. A network of approximately 47 miles of water pipe, six active groundwater wells and six storage reservoirs serve what is referred to in this Plan as the "Port Orchard system" and serves the majority of the City. A small portion of the City is served by the West Sound Utility District (formerly known as Annapolis Water District), whose service area lies east of Port Orchard and includes portions of the City's eastern potential annexation, or urban growth area. Emergency interties with the Annapolis Water System are detailed in Section4. An independent system referred to as McCormick Water Company was constructed in the late 1980's to serve a residential community within 1300 acres known as the McCormick Woods Planned Unit Development (PUD). The City assumed the McCormick Woods Water Company in 1998 and the area was annexed in 2009. The McCormick Woods System currently consists of the 580 Pressure Zone serving the McCormick Woods development and is planned for expansion to serve additional development in the western portion of the City. The area system is supplied by groundwater wells, three storage reservoirs, a network of distribution mains and a 16-inch transmission main from the supply site to a recently constructed 450,000 gallon reservoir. Approximately 11 miles of 6 to 12-inch pipe serve the area. As detailed in Section 4, alternate, temporary back-up Introduction Page 1-6 P� A^E City of Port Orchard 2009 Water System Plan supply to the area is available from an intertie with the City of Bremerton located near the entrance to the development that was constructed in 2006. 1.6 RULES AND REGULATIONS As a public water system, the City of Port Orchard operates under the requirements of WAC 246- 290 and in accordance with a myriad of regulations pertaining to the production and delivery of safe drinking water for the purpose of public consumption and fire protection. A brief summary of the primary rules and regulations effecting operation of the water utility is presented below. 1.6.1 Federal Regulations 1.6.1.1 Safe Drinking Water Act Public Law 93-523, the Safe Drinking Water Act (SDWA), directs the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) to establish minimum national drinking water standards limiting the amount of various substances that may be present in drinking water sources. These limits are regulated by the State of Washington Department of Health and adhered to by the City. Complete details of current regulations and the City's water quality monitoring program are provided in Section 8 of this Plan. 1.6.1.2 Clean Water Act The Clean Water Act puts forth regulations and requirements for restoration and maintenance of the integrity of the nations waters in terms of physical, chemical and biological characteristics. The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency is the primary administrator of the Clean Water Act but has delegated many aspects of administration of it to the State of Washington Department of Ecology (DOE). 1.6.1.3 Endangered Species Act Because of the listing of the Puget Sound Chinook Salmon and Bull Trout as "threatened species", rules and regulations under the authority of the Endangered Species Act (ESA) impact the City's water and sewer systems operations. The City administers and complies with all permit requirements associated with construction of its utility systems and exercises the most current techniques in system design, construction, operation and maintenance to reduce the threat of impacting endangered species. 1.6.2 State of Washington Requirements 1.6.2.1 Washington Administrative Code / Revised Code of Washington The rules and regulations regarding public water supplies are a part of the Washington Administrative Code (WAC) and are adopted pursuant to the Introduction P CE Page 7-7 City of Port Orchard 2009 Water System Plan provisions in the Revised Code of Washington (RCW) 43.20.050 for the protection of public health. They provide the minimum standards for design, construction, operations and maintenance of public water systems in conformance with the Safe Drinking Water Act of 1974 and all subsequent amendments thereto. 1.6.2.2 Growth Management Act The Growth Management Act (RCW 36.70A) has a direct impact on utility system planning by requiring a complete inventory of existing system facilities and a comprehensive effort toward determining the capability of utility systems to support anticipated growth. A primary outcome of the growth management planning is the delineation of an Urban Growth Area (UGA) boundary within which an urban level of service is required. The City of Port Orchard's water service area includes areas within established UGA and Rural Areas. Although public water service is permitted within the designated rural area, future development of the water system must be appropriate for and consistent with GMA land use designations. 1.6.2.3 State Environmental Policy Act State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA) review is generally required for all water system projects other than regular renewal and replacement projects involving pipe sizes of less than 10-inches. SEPA requirements and exemptions are detailed in WAC Chapter 197-11 and adopted City environmental policies are in place to insure that environmental concerns associated with construction are adequately addressed. Initiation of the SEPA process can be at the City's direction or as required for various permits. 1.6.2.4 Department of Health Approval of this document and operation of the water system is under the jurisdiction of the Washington State Department of Health (DOH). This document has been prepared, and the water system is operated, in accordance with the requirements set forth in the DOH "Water System Design Manual" (August 2001). This document incorporates the policies, guidelines, and practices of the Department of Health and identifies minimum engineering requirements for design, construction and operation of a public water system. 1.6.2.5 Department of Ecology The State Department of Ecology administers a variety of regulatory requirements that have a direct impact on operation of utility systems including the following: ■ Water rights and source of supply regulations; ■ Surface water quality regulations as put forth in WAC 173-201 A; ■ Contract document review as authorized by WAC 173-240; and, Introduction Page 1-8 P� A^E City of Port Orchard 2009 Water System Plan ■ Shoreline management permit administration in accordance with WAC 173-27; ■ Minimum engineering requirements for design, construction, and operation of public sanitary sewer systems. 1.6.2.6 Public Water System Coordination Act The Public Water System Coordination Act of 1977 (RCW 70.116) establishes procedures for adjacent water utilities and local government agencies to coordinate the planning and development of water facilities. These procedures are guidelines for providing future water service in the most efficient manner with the objective of coordinating water system development by geographical areas and integrating water system development with future land use plans. The City's water service area boundary has been approved by the Department of Health, Kitsap County, and neighboring jurisdictions through the Kitsap County Coordinated Water System Plan via the Water Utility Coordinating Committee. 1.6.2.7 Municipal Water Law Washington State's Municipal Water Law is a comprehensive regulation relating to certainty and flexibility of municipal water rights and efficiency of water use. The act more closely ties water system planning and engineering approvals by the Department of Health with water rights administration by the Department of Ecology. The legislation directs the Department of Health to adopt enforceable water conservation regulations for public water systems by the end of 2005. It was initiated as House Bill 1338 and became effective September 10, 2003. The Water Use Efficiency Rule associated with HB 1338 became effective in January of 2007. Compliance with the new rule requires that Public Water Systems with 1,000 or more connections develop a Water Use Efficiency (or conservation) Goal for a six year planning period. Goals had to be in place by January 22, 2008 and required a specific public involvement process. A plan for implementation and annual monitoring and reporting on progress toward the goal is also required. Other key elements of the Municipal Water Law include requirements for water rights assessment and evaluation and a requirement for demonstrated consistency between land use and water system planning. 1.6.3 County and City Regulations Because the City operates within unincorporated Kitsap County, it is subject to the rules and regulations established by the County. This is of particular importance when considering fire flow requirements and construction of water system improvements within County right-of-ways. In addition, the west side of Port Orchard water system abuts the City of Bremerton necessitating coordination with Bremerton in the event that water lines within Bremerton right -of ways are required. When performing work in any road right-of- way, the current road standards of the agency having jurisdiction must be followed. Introduction PACE Page 7-9 City of Port Orchard 2009 Water System Plan 1.7 INTERLOCAL AGREEMENTS The City of Port Orchard maintains interlocal agreements with neighboring purveyors that have been considered in development of this Water System Plan and impacts both planning and operation of the City of Port Orchard water system. These agreements are detailed in Section 2 and provided in the Appendices for reference. ■ City of Bremerton Wholesale Water Supply Agreement ■ West Sound Utility District (Annapolis Water District) Intertie Agreements ■ Kitsap County Coordinated Water System Plan Service Area Agreement ■ Port Orchard 580 Zone/Bremerton 580 Zone Plan for Cooperative Water System Development 1.8 PREVIOUS PLANNING STUDIES Development of this document has been coordinated with a variety of previous plans and studies prepared by and for the City of Port Orchard. The below listed documents were utilized as source material or are referenced herein as a source for additional information regarding specific elements of the City operation and facilities: ■ City of Port Orchard 1995 Comprehensive Water System Plan, City of Port Orchard. ■ City of Port Orchard Wellhead Protection Program, December 1997, AGI Technologies. ■ City of Port Orchard Comprehensive Plan, June 1995, City of Port Orchard. ■ McCormick Woods Water Company Inc. Water Comprehensive Water Plan Amendment August 2002, Revised February 2003, Hugh G. Goldsmith & Associates, Inc. ■ City of Port Orchard McCormick Woods Wellhead Protection Program, January 2000, AGI Technologies. ■ Kitsap County Coordinated Water System Regional Supplement 2004 Revision, HDR/EES ■ Annapolis Water District Water System Plan 2005, Annapolis Water District ■ Sunnyslope Water District Comprehensive Water System Plan Update December 2004 — Draft, Allen Consulting Engineering, Inc. ■ City of Bremerton Water System Plan, 2006. ■ Kitsap Watershed Planning (WRIA 15) Water Quality Assessment Draft Step A Report, February 27, 2003, Golder and Associates, Inc. ■ Kitsap County Comprehensive Plan. ■ McCormick Urban Village Sub -area Plan. ■ Pump Station 2-A Design Report. Introduction Page 1-10 P flAk, SECTION 2 BASIC PLANNING DATA" 2.1 GENERAL This Section provides an overview of the City of Port Orchard's water service area in relation to the city limits, the established service areas put forth by the Kitsap County Coordinated Water System Plan (CWSP) and the Urban Growth Area established for the City. A description of the service area and its geographical and demographic characteristics are presented. This Section also includes a summary of land use in the area as well as documentation of population and employment trends and projections. This information is needed for water demand projections, system analyses and recommendations presented in later sections of the Plan. 2.2 STUDY AND SERVICE AREA Figures 2-1 indicates the city limits, UGA and retail water service area for the City of Port Orchard and neighboring purveyors. The study area for this Plan is the City's retail water service area as put forth and agreed to in the Kitsap County CWSP. The 15.5 square mile service area includes the western portion of the city limits, as well as considerable land area that has not yet been annexed. While the City maintains water service to the majority of its estimated resident population of 9000 people, the West Sound Utility District (formerly known as Annapolis Water District) serves the eastern portion of the city limits and abuts the City of Port Orchard water system. The western portion of the service area contains the McCormick Woods residential community, and was annexed into the City of Port Orchard in August of 2009 during the final stages of development of this water system plan. McCormick Woods is provided water service by a technically separate water utility (with a distinct and separate DOH System Identification Number). While the system is physically independent of the Port Orchard water system serving the majority of the city, it is owned, operated and maintained under the City of Port Orchard's single water utility. All proposed development within the McCormick Woods area is addressed in this plan, including connection of the two systems and merging them into one water system. 2.3 SERVICE AREA POLICIES A variety of general goals and policies are put forth in the City of Port Orchard's 1995 Comprehensive Plan addressing Growth Management Act (GMA) Requirements and land use planning. The following service area policies provide more detailed information regarding how the system is operated and expanded. 2.3.1 Responsibility and Authority Ultimate responsibility for the City of Port Orchard's water utility is with the seven -person City Council and the City's Water and Sewer Committee is comprised of three Council Basic Planning Data P� ACE Page 2-7 City of Port Orchard 2009 Water System Plan members that monitor the activities of water utility. The City's Public Works Director oversees general operation of the utility and a field operations crew is responsible for system operation and maintenance. 2.3.2 Annexation The primary policy of the City Council is that water service will be provided to properties within the city limits. If capacity is available, water service will be provided to residents of the Urban Growth Area (UGA) outside the City limits. Properties within the UGA requesting water service area are expected to annex to the City before service is provided. The City Council may consider exemptions to this policy if it is determined to be in the best interest of the community. In such instances, the City will accept a Developer's Extension Agreement which includes provisions that prohibit the property owner from protesting future annexation proposals. Until such time that the property is annexed, customers will pay a 50% surcharge on their water bills. In the event that the City annexes a property that is adequately served by another water utility that is authorized under the laws of the State of Washington, the City will not require a change in water service based solely on the annexation. Consideration of long term adjustments to the City's service area, however, may be required as development occurs within the City's Urban Growth Area and existing water service area. 2.3.3 Service Area Expansion of the Port Orchard service area beyond that established in the Kitsap County CWSP is not contemplated in this planning document. Any service area exchange or change would require specific negotiation with the neighboring jurisdiction and consideration by the Water Utility Coordinating Committee. With the Sinclair Inlet of Puget Sound to the north, the West Sound Utility District to the east and the City of Bremerton on the west, little opportunity for expansion of the service area exists. Only minor adjustments to the service area are possible and would occur only in a rare instance. Such adjustments in the service area, if required, would be handled on a case -by -case basis by interlocal agreement with neighboring utilities. It is the intent of the City of Port Orchard to maintain service to all areas within its existing service area and the City recognizes the right to assume responsibility for water service to all areas within the city limits. The West Sound Utility District serves the eastern portion of the City as stipulated in the Kitsap County CWSP. Other utilities adjacent to or surrounded by the City of Port Orchard's established service area are recognized in the Kitsap County CWSP. No plans for assumption of service responsibility of other utilities exist at this time. However, the City recognizes that extension of service to the areas served by small independent systems may be prudent under certain Basic Planning Data Page 2-2 P� ACE City of Port Orchard 2009 Water System Plan circumstances. Examples might be if the small water system were to experience a source failure; in the event that the Port Orchard water system were to become a more cost effective and viable alternative for water service, or; if takeover of the system were requested. 2.3.4 Satellite Management The City of Port Orchard may consider satellite management of other water systems whereby the City would own, operate or assist with developments within its established service area. Such arrangements would be considered on a case by case basis and would require approval of the City Council. At this time, no such agreements exist and the City is not registered as a satellite management agency with the State Department of Health. 2.3.5 Other Local Government Policies Affecting Provision of Water The City will require all new developments such as subdivisions, to connect to the City water system. All new connections must comply with all applicable City standards. New developments outside the City limits at the time of development but served by the City's water system must meet City standards. New developments which are outside the City limits, are not currently served with City water but are located within the City's service area as established by the Kitsap County CWSP are required to meet City and CWSP standards. 2.3.6 Water Meters and Interties All water services are metered and read periodically to facilitate customer billings. The City maintains a wholesale connection from the City of Bremerton that is used from time to time as required to supplement water production from wells, but does not wholesale water to other utilities. A second intertie with Bremerton provides up to 350 gpm to the McCormick Woods portion of the system as discussed in Section 4 of this Plan. Emergency intertie connections with other utilities are permitted and considered on a case -by -case basis and depending on available water supply. Interlocal agreements dictating the financing and use of emergency interties are required. 2.3.7 Rates and Charges Water rates and charges are established by the City council and periodically reviewed and updated to ensure system viability and equitable rates. In addition to monthly rates and charges, all customers of the water system are required to pay an equitable share of the cost of water systems serving their individual properties and the cost of overall facilities required for the system as a whole. New connections to the system are required to pay for the extension of water service required to service their Basic Planning Data P� ACE Page 2-3 City of Port Orchard 2009 Water System Plan property and a connection charge for their fair share of larger scale system components such as water supply, storage and transmission facilities. Water system extensions and improvements may be financed using Local Improvement Districts (LID's) whereby properties in a given area contribute to area -wide improvements and/or Latecomer Agreements where developer's receive a payback for facilities constructed as part of a developers extension provide a benefit to properties that are developed at a later date. Consideration of this type of financing would be by the City Council on a case by case basis. All new water accounts will pay fees in lieu of assessment or latecomer costs unless the property has participated in a Local Improvement District or other similar water system improvement. The City Council can waive the fee in lieu of assessment if the new development constructed a water system improvement which substantially improved the water system, as long as these improvements have been identified in the City's Comprehensive Water System Plan. Normally, developers finance water system improvements required to serve their property and deed the improvement to the City. The City Council retains the right to participate in joint improvements or to extend the water system as needed. If a developer extends the water system the City will allow a utility extension, or latecomers, agreement to be implemented. This agreement identifies specific properties that could benefit from the developer financed improvement and assess a fair share of the cost based on the termini or front foot method of assessment. A public hearing is required prior to implementing such an agreement. City Ordinance 1385 describes the agreement process. 2.3.8 Condition of Service Policy Water and sewer system improvements are considered separately for new developments. Connection to sanitary sewer is not a prerequisite to water service connection. Basic Planning Data Page 2-4 P Legend j City Limits - Port Orchard Water Body City of Port Orchard Water Service Area City of Bremerton w • RD 3 0 Jg\ 0 Water 16 E VAN SKIVER tem Rec gen \ Park m Y, West E \KER R�f M/H Park / TYw m 1 s Ir J 1 I—t2LtLC LMAN RDIy LL r _ w a c,'r BuMey Hills ? d m Hornec wner w w m 3 J w m Assn z w w m O SW WILDWOOD RD O e C b s 0 W eir s i ion Y w ➢ R n ¢ u3i w S w KE HELENA RD w r z N Y ° WA Water Service Co. m Sw414S ST 3 ¢ w o N m Z swwavA N J o 0 2,000 4,000 6,000 Feet w I SE OAK RD W E s ' 1 inch = 6,000 feet WALTAVISTADR xw m Figure 2-1 Boundary Map Water Service Areas P� ACE City of Port Orchard City of Port Orchard 2009 Water System Plan ITIJITIJ ILT-IfEy U. - ,figrs Basic Planning Data Page 2-6 P� City of Port Orchard 2009 Water System Plan 2.4 NEIGHBORING UTILITIES 2.4.1 West Sound Utility District As mentioned above and indicated on Figure 2-1, West Sound Utility District and serves within and west of the City of Port Orchard. The two agencies maintain interties to assist each other in the event of an emergency situation. An interlocal agreement is in place and is included in the Appendices for reference. Additional discussion on interties and the operation relationship between the two utilities is documented in Section 4. 2.4.2 City of Bremerton The City of Bremerton serves west of the Port Orchard city limits and maintains a wholesale intertie connection with the Port Orchard water system along the waterfront at the western edge of the city limits. An intertie agreement is in place between the two cities and is included in the Appendices. The City of Bremerton has recently constructed a pump station and 16-inch water main to serve new development north of Old Clifton Road and west of Anderson Hill Road. This extension is consistent with the existing Port Orchard 580 Zone/Bremerton 580 Zone Plan for Cooperative Water System Development agreement between the two cities. The new pipe is intertied with the City of Port Orchard's 580 Zone system and meters are in place between the two systems. Future plans for water storage to serve the Bremerton area and the City of Port Orchard's 580 Zone on the north side of Old Clifton Road are outlined in the Cooperative Water System Development agreement. At this time the area is being developed such that water supply to the area could physically be provided by either entity and/or through interties. 2.4.3 Other Water Systems Several water systems operate adjacent to the City of Port Orchard's existing water system facilities and within the City's established service area. Other adjacent systems include the Sunnyslope Water System to the north and west of McCormick UGA and the Clifton Water system to the west of Anderson Hill Road. No interties exist or are contemplated with these purveyors Several small systems occur within the vicinity of ultimate service area boundary for Port Orchard and are recognized by the Kitsap County CWSP. These include the Clifton Water System, the Clifton Water Works and the Weyer Lane Water System. Although no specific plans for takeover of these systems is contemplated in this Plan, the City does acknowledge that assistance to these purveyors could be provided as the Port Orchard water system expands into the areas served by the independent water systems noted. At such time that it may become necessary due to source failure or the desire of the smaller Basic Planning Data P� ACE Page 2-7 City of Port Orchard 2009 Water System Plan systems to receive direct service from a larger purveyor, direct connection to the Port Orchard system may provide a practical solution. 2.5 TOPOGRAPHY The City of Port Orchard is situated along the Sinclair Inlet of the Puget Sound. The city and service area generally slope toward the north and east. Elevations in the service area range from 320 feet in the southern portion of the area currently served by the Port Orchard system to sea level along the shores of the Puget Sound. The general character of the topography in the area is that of small hills, ravines and other minor land forms. Area topography is shown on the existing system map included at the back of this document. The topography of the area necessitates four pressure zones: the High, Intermediate and Low zones that serve the main portion of the system and two pressure zones in McCormick UGA area of the system. 2.6 LAND USE AND ZONING Land use and zoning within the service area is under the jurisdiction of the City of Port Orchard and Kitsap County. Figure 2-2 shows the Urban Growth areas for the City of Port Orchard in relation to the service area while Figure 2-3 presents Zoning/Land Use. As indicated, the City of Port Orchard has a significant Urban Growth Area and expects significant development in the future. As shown on Figure 3-3, the majority of the service area is designated for residential use with the highest concentration and density of residential development occurring in the downtown area and newer residential construction occurring in the area south of Tremont Street. More rural and less dense residential development occurs in the southern portion of the service area. The western portion of the service area has experienced significant development since publication of the previous water system plan with the development of the McCormick Woods community. Additional development within the McCormick UGA is proposed in this area and includes the McCormick North and McCormick West projects proposed for development prior to 2010. Also, the Glenwood Road JPA area east of McCormick Woods is zoned "Urban Low Residential" which allows development at a density of 4-9 dwelling units per acre. Development of the area is proposed during the six -year life of this Plan and would require extension of water service. This extension of service would be accomplished by the developing property owners and provides an opportunity for interconnection of the water system serving the 580 Zone with the main city water system. Basic Planning Data Page 2-8 P� ACE IIIIIII Yr� �d� jjp .ilenKS L Legend ij 11111 �_��nu�nlll--- .Illlnl City Limits - Port Orchard �i�` ndlllllllll 111--.rn_—\��III �'` 1 'llllll I■1------�---� ol etail Water Service Area Water Body Planning Areas M Glenwood Road JPA =�Z -• Orchard LIGA Hill Bremerton West LIGA J vlQi&M RE City of Port Orchard 2009 Water System Plan V-, � rItTjj-ltTirlfjT-, fTL�71J: .11 Basic Planning Data Page 2-10 P� Legend QRetail Water Service Area City Limits - Port Orchard Water Body Urban Growth Area Zoning Business Park Business Professional Commercial - Community Facilities - Employment - Industrial/Office YZ Mixed Use District - Parks and Open Space Residential, Low Density Residential, Medium Density - Residential, High Density a BARNEY 0 �p �'j I �q 15TH 16T 18UTH � > O O w 13TH 303 T = A - 310 > < ¢ = 9TH TH q�� Oa 6TH 4TH 6TH 5TH4TH J a a co ° � 304 1sr 1 3 KEA PFZSENP� - WERNER L - -� 13 z E F F G Jf E •. a 2 CD I+'•� o > .•�''� 166 �~4J J - ITT w MAPL, • � ..-J Q� O FIR u u �, �O S H. ''� 2 T T MA •\r••� w z S 00 = R • I LLAIR = = < ir, '� •• BERGER z w _ __ _ _ ( r �� ' 1 .. - �ALMONBERRY � Y U w w > Q o • :gym �U - •,I �l _ Iion i 16 r v - UBUR H zz J O C _ ECHO Y Y J U IXOD w �_ =IiN -��' �i � ■■■■ u•. I , � -nix 9... N� i. � Toe _ 4' �A,� • N R ■ , Q ,N s W < _LL _ }- - Q — ENA - U LAK - _ Y O N \ Y m0 E 0 2,000 4,000 6,000 Feet m lU/ S 1 inch = 6,000 feet Figure 2-3 Zoning Map 6PACE City Port Orchard of City of Port Orchard 2009 Water System Plan V-, � rItTjj-ltTirlfjT-, fTL�71J: .11 Basic Planning Data Page 2-12 P� City of Port Orchard 2009 Water System Plan 2.7 POPULATION AND EMPLOYMENT Table 2-1 indicates historical and projected population and employment within the existing City and service area. Population and employment data, by Block Group, for the year 2003 was obtained from the Puget Sound Regional Council (PSRC). The corresponding population and employment within the service area was estimated by calculating the percentage of each Block Group within the service area and multiplying the percentages by the total population and employment for the Block Groups. Population projections were developed using Puget Sound Regional Council population and employment growth rates. The growth rates were applied to the existing population and employment estimates to establish projected population and employment figures. Office of Financial Management (OFM) information, local zoning and land use were reviewed to verify consistency with other City and County Plans. As indicated in Table 2-1, the current (2008) water service area includes a population of approximately 10,800 people and, based on regional growth projections and information on currently proposed developments, could increase to approximately 18,700 people by 2030. This represents a total increase in population of over approximately 42% and annual growth rate of approximately 1.92%. Employment within the service area is estimated at approximately 4,500 currently and estimated to reach nearly 5,700 by 2030. This represents an overall employment increase of approximately 22% and an annual growth rate of approximately 1 %. Please note that the City does not currently serve the entire service area and residents of the rural outlying area receive water from individual or small community ("six-pack") wells. Section 3 presents a summary of the number of connections served and both historical and projected water system demands. Section 3 also details the number of water system customers and water system demands separately for the main City and McCormick Woods systems. As noted in Table 3-1, in 2008 approximately 5,800 Equivalent Residential Units were served by the City. Nearly 5,000 ERUs are within the City System and just over 800 are served by the McCormick Woods System. This indicates an estimated population of 9,500 actually receiving water service in 2008. Recent development proposals and the economic decline of 2008 have been considered in finalization of this Water System Plan. While ultimate development projections have not changed significantly, the timing and expected type of development has. For example, the McCormick Woods West project was initially projected at occurring earlier in the planning horizon and with fewer units at a higher household size. Since the original Water System Plan was developed, the number of units has increased but significantly smaller lots and household sizes are anticipated. This is accounted for in the population projections presented in Table 2-1 and later in this Plan where water demands and system requirements are identified (Sections 3 and 6 respectively). As noted in Table 2-1, 1545 units are proposed for the McCormick Woods West development. That development is adjacent to the existing McCormick Woods system and initially will receive water supply only from the McCormick system. An additional 1000 units are proposed for the Glenwood Basic Planning Data PACO Page 2-13 City of Port Orchard 2009 Water System Plan JPA that is geographically located between the Port Orchard and McCormick systems. Water system facilities serving the JPA will provide the link between the Port Orchard and McCormick systems allowing for one integrated water system in the future. Table 2-1 Population and Employment City of Port Orchard Water Service Area Year Population Employment 2008 10,816 4,426 2010 11,047 4,547 2015 12,673 4,731 2020 14,634 5,058 2025 18,246 5,392 2030 18,787 5,696 Notes: The City of Port Orchard Water Service Area is Shown on Figure 2-2 and is significantly larger than the actual area served. Development of McCormick Woods West is assumed to be phased addition of 1545 dwelling units with 2.2 persons per household. Development of the Glenwood JPS is assumed to be phased addition of 1000 dwelling units with 2.5 persons per household. Basic Planning Data Page 2-14 P SECTION 3 WATER DEMANDS AND CONSERVATION - 3.1 GENERAL Identification of historical and projected water system demands is critical in evaluation of the water system's ability to meet the needs of current and future populations of the water service area and provides the basis for water system modeling and analysis. The following paragraphs outline the methodology used for assessing historical water use and developing future water demand projections. Please note that although this planning process has had the benefit of the most current (2000 Census population and employment) data available at a high level of detail (block groups), water demands are extremely vulnerable to influences such as weather patterns and conservation programs. In addition, the types of water users (commercial versus residential) will have a significant impact on seasonal variations in demands and peaking factors. Water system demands have been presented for two scenarios; one assuming water use patterns will continue consistent with historical trends, and one that assumes conservation will reduce per capita water use. Following discussion of overall water system demands is historical and projected demands for the two separate water systems served by the Port Orchard water utility: the City of Port Orchard system that serves the central city area, and; the McCormick Woods system that serves the recently western portion of the City annexed in August 2009. 3.2 HISTORICAL WATER DEMANDS In order to calculate future water system demands and associated source of supply and water system requirements, two steps are required: comparison of water purchases to actual water sales and determination of historical water use characteristics of the various types of connections served. A summary of overall water supply is provided in Table 3-1 while Sections 4 and 6 provide more detailed information of individual sources of supply for each of the two system comprising the Port Orchard water utility by facility. As indicated in Table 3-1, non -revenue water refers to water loss through leaks, breaks and unmetered water use. The City's non -revenue water is estimated at 9.24% in 2004 before consideration of construction uses through hydrant meters. Non -revenue water has been of significant concern to the City in the past, especially as it related to water use at McCormick Woods Golf Course. City meters indicate that more than 35 million gallons of water were directed to the golf course with only a portion of that water was recorded for billing purposes. A top priority in control of future water use and conservation is clarification of water use for irrigation and consideration of new policies governing the metering of and payment for irrigation water. Part of the solution to irrigation at the McCormick Woods Golf Course will be use of the recently completed McCormick Woods Well 413, a dedicated irrigation well, and isolation of that facility from the potable water system. � Water Demands & Conservation P� ACE Page 3-1 City of Port Orchard 2009 Water System Plan A summary of water use by customer class is presented in Table 3-2 and Figure 3-1. This information provides generalized data for detailed water demand forecasting, especially when larger scale residential or commercial activities are proposed. For the purpose of this Plan, detailed historical demand data is summarized to provide total per capita water use documentation for future demand projections. Table 3-3 presents more detailed data on a monthly basis and as discussed below, provides the basis for more detailed analyses and design criteria. As indicated, residential water sales constitute the bulk of water sales in the City with single- family connections accounting for approximately 66% of the total annual water demand. In 2008, commercial customers used almost 20% of total water demand; irrigation (through dedicated irrigation meters) accounted for 4%, governments other than the City of Port Orchard used 9% and the City of Port Orchard used approximately 0.5% of the annual total. Review of seasonal water use summary presented in Figure 3-2 presents a clear picture of how water use varies from winter to summer months. Please note that the data presented is for billing months and typical represents a one month lag from actual water use. Of particular note on Figure 3-2 is the significant residential water use increase in the summer months. This increase is in addition to the metered irrigation water use that is also indicated. Since commercial use remains relatively consistent through the year, this information suggests that lawn watering would be a key target area for conservation activities. Commercial and other government use categories show a less dramatic increase in the dryer summer months. In the commercial category, especially in a waterfront community such as Port Orchard, it is often difficult to distinguish between increased outdoor water use in the summer and increased use due to increased recreational and commercial activities. A combination of monitoring outdoor water use and consideration of water efficient fixtures might assist in reducing summer peaks and overall water use. The same is typically true for "other governmental" uses such as schools. Additional discussion of conservation activities is provided later in this Section. Table 3-3 presents detailed information on the City's historical water demand for the past five years. Review of this data, together with daily water production data from each source, indicates the overall peak day for the City is estimated at 2.5. It is noted, however, that while the peaking factor for the Port Orchard portion of the system is approximately 2.25, water production rates in for wells serving the isolated McCormick Woods portion of the system indicate a that the peaking factor has reached 4.0 on occasion. The reason for this has been identified as operational issues leading to reservoir overflows that have since been corrected. Correction of this issue, coupled with removing golf course irrigation from the domestic water system and the use of low water use fixtures in any new construction in this area will significantly mitigate peak summer demands on the system in the future. A peaking factor of 2.25 has therefore been assigned to the entire water system. The peak hour demand all portions of the system has been estimated at approximately 4.2 times the average day demand. Water Demands fr Conservation Page 3-2 P City of Port Orchard 2009 Water System Plan Table 3-1 Historical Production and Sales (in Gallons) 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 Water Production 353,856,256 353,029,556 401,393,259 371,879,025 375,163,798 Water Sales 344,208,960 335,442,170 370,730,343 332,178,228 333,977,780 Non -Revenue Water 9,647,296 17,587,386 30,662,916 39,700,797 41,186,018 % Non -Revenuer 3% 5% 8% 11% 11% Authorized Other uses 2 Unknown 1,222,062 7,097,592 367,350 671,000 Leakage Unknown 16,365,324 23,565,324 39,333,447 40,515,018 % Leakage 3 Unknown 4.6% 5.9% 10.6% 10.8% Average Daily Production 0.969 0.967 1.100 1.019 1.028 (MGD) Average Daily Demand 0.943 0.919 1.016 0.910 0.915 (Sales) (MGD) Notes: t "Non -Revenue Water" is water that the City does not receive compensation for through normal billings. Water for construction trucks or construction hydrant meters are included in "Authorized Other Uses" below because of inconsistent past tracking. The City has initiated a diligent tracking system in association with its Water Use Efficiency program and future water use tracking will include more detail. 2 "Authorized Other Uses" of water include fire fighting, construction water use, flushing, city water system operations and maintenance, and other uses where water consumption can be accounted for and either metered or estimated with reasonable accuracy. 3 "Leakage" refers to unaccounted for water that is lost through breaks, leaks, and theft (including unauthorized hydrant usage and/or system connections). Inconsistent tracking prior to 2004 prohibits calculation of leakage rates for those years. Table 3-2 Historical Water Sales by Customer Class (in Gallons) 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 Residential 228,390,430 218,931,450 248,250,196 218,930,021 218,790,710 Commercial 65,845,100 63,394,600 67,327,246 62,471,667 62,263,780 Irrigation 14,757,000 2,094,740 2,491,198 2,534,067 17,238,670 City 2,258,260 36,780,500 34,355,660 31,973,313 2,764,620 Other Government 31,254,910 1,688,760 1,441,773 1,190,336 31,850,960 Churches 1,703,260 12,552,120 16,864,270 15,078,825 1,069,040 Total 344,208,960 335,442,170 370,730,343 332,178,228 333,977,780 Res. Connections 3563 3622 3651 3742 3800 Average Use (Gal/ Res Conn(ERU)/Day) 176 166 186 160 158 Total Estimated ERU's 5370 5550 5452 5678 5801 Notes: Historical water sales is based on City billing records. Water Demands & Conservation PACE Page 3-3 Monthly Table 3-3 Water Production (vs. Annual Sales) City System McCormick Woods System 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 January 22,143,600 25,981,108 20,446,000 20,032,200 22,466,000 5,176,933 3,093,787 3,286,079 3,463,927 2,121,215 February 18,204,500 16,195,917 20,531,697 18,377,900 23,185,700 2,734,006 2,884,617 3,536,402 2,816,473 3,013,291 March 18,969,800 16,649,432 29,124,400 19,792,200 21,473,500 3,111,893 3,631,430 3,216,806 3,251,058 2,567,763 April 20,125,400 17,272,206 24,939,700 19,170,200 26,020,800 5,088,328 3,641,387 3,762,701 3,429,163 3,246,993 May 23,618,280 23,291,500 24,122,500 24,244,536 24,282,700 5,339,239 5,338,398 7,914,235 6,994,259 5,434,819 June 21,114,200 23,913,600 26,387,615 29,810,680 27,835,700 16,248,232 7,049,121 12,078,809 14,141,880 8,740,858 July 31,913,564 30,529,300 37,398,796 35,541,982 35,509,300 16,994,443 15,155,410 16,436,247 15,815,020 14,928,081 August 28,530,768 35,134,000 35,082,400 31,460,200 30,226,214 13,458,770 13,572,380 17,412,431 13,443,500 10,654,643 September 22,399,300 27,002,800 27,156,000 27,029,300 26,607,100 5,667,620 10,350,207 12,787,402 10,191,954 8,087,176 October 21,372,300 21,902,300 23,574,374 21,979,100 22,157,100 3,735,504 3,736,488 5,875,716 3,656,486 4,332,712 November 20,932,400 19,732,400 20,030,300 20,213,038 22,443,200 3,117,832 3,087,523 3,354,148 3,309,559 3,683,254 December 20,648,700 20,675,800 19,676,914 20,487,518 22,296,600 3,210,644 3,208,445 3,261,586 3,226,892 3,849,079 Production 269,972,812 278,280,363 308,470,697 288,138,854 304,503,914 83,883,444 74,749,193 92,922,562 83,740,171 70,659,884 Sales 275,043,460 268,265,670 294,408,343 262,980,228 264,268,780 69,165,500 67,176,500 76,322,000 69,198,000 69,709,000 ERUs 4,741 4,849 4,724 4,890 4,986 629 701 728 788 814 Use per ERU 156 157 179 161 167 275 264 287 241 235 TOTAL (City Plus McCormick Woods) 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 January 27,320,533 29,074,895 23,732,079 23,496,127 24,587,215 February 20,938,506 19,080,534 24,068,099 21,194,373 26,198,991 March 22,081,693 20,280,862 32,341,206 23,043,258 24,041,263 April 25,213,728 20,913,593 28,702,401 22,599,363 29,267,793 May 28,957,519 28,629,898 32,036,735 31,238,795 29,717,519 June 37,362,432 30,962,721 38,466,424 43,952,560 36,576,558 July 48,908,007 45,684,710 53,835,043 51,357,002 50,437,381 August 41,989,538 48,706,380 52,494,831 44,903,700 40,880,857 September 28,066,920 37,353,007 39,943,402 37,221,254 34,694,276 October 25,107,804 25,638,788 29,450,090 25,635,586 26,489,812 November 24,050,232 22,819,923 23,384,448 23,522,597 26,126,454 December 23,859,344 23,884,245 22,938,500 23,714,410 26,145,679 Production 353,856,256 353,029,556 401,393,259 371,879,025 375,163,798 Sales 344,208,960 335,442,170 370,730,343 332,178,228 333,977,780 Non -Revenue 9,647,296 17,587,386 30,662,916 39,700,797 41,186,018 ERUs 5,370 5,550 5,452 5,678 5,800 % Non -Rev. 2.73% 4.98% 7.64% 10.68% 10.98% Water Demands & Conservation P� ACE Page 3-4 City of Port Orchard 2008 Water System Plan Residential 64% FIGURE3-1 AVERAGE WATER DEMAND BY CUSTOMER CLASS --y Churches Other 8% 2% Government 4% FIGURE 3-2 SEASONAL VARIATION IN DEMANDS BY CUTOMER CLASS 1 11 I_I_I I I I. m 00,000,000 c 50,000,000 Jan/Feb March/April May/June July/Aug Sept/Oct ■ Res ■ Comm Irrig ■ City OtherGov Churches Commercial 18% on Nov/Dec Water Demands & Conservation P� Page 3-5 City of Port Orchard 2009 Water System Plan Figure 3-3 Total Monthly Water Production 3.3 PROJECTED WATER DEMANDS Water system demand projections have been developed based on documented past water use and historical growth trends identified in Part 2 of this document. Separate projections for water use with and without conservation are presented in Table 3-4 and 3-5. The projections assume that development within the established service area will be served by the water system and that property within the area will develop according to the general zoning designations currently in place. The projections reflect significant growth in certain parts of the service area, especially in the western area surrounding McCormick Woods and development within the Glenwood Road JPA and are based on the growth projections developed in Section 2. Note that 1000 ultimate ERUs associated with the area in and around the Glenwood JPA have been included with the McCormick Woods or 580 Zone projected demands. This is because the area will likely be served by gravity from the facilities proposed for the McCormick Woods development. As described under the system analysis section of the Plan, however, the Glenwood JPA area will serve as an interconnect between the main City system and the McCormick Woods system. This will allow for source and storage to the JPA to be a combination of the two currently separate systems and reduce the overall capital improvement requirements for the development. Water Demands fr Conservation � Page 3-6 P� ACE City of Port Orchard 2009 Water System Plan Table 3-4 ERUs and Demands by Pressure Zone without Conservation (Demands Expressed in Million Gallons Annually) 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2020 2025 2030 Zone Use Use Use Use Use Use Use Use Use ERUs (m) ERUs (m) ERUs (m) ERUs (m) ERUs (m) ERUs (m) ERUs (m) ERUs ERUs (m) ERUs (mg) City Low 2,264 136.36 2,285 137.59 2,308 138.99 2,331 140.39 2,355 141.81 2,379 143.25 2,400 144.56 2,521 151.82 2,648 159.49 2,783 167.59 City High 2,767 166.66 2,792 168.17 2,821 169.87 2,849 171.59 2,878 173.33 2,907 175.08 2,934 176.68 3,081 185.56 3,237 194.93 3,401 204.84 City Total 5,032 303.02 5,077 305.76 5,128 308.86 5,180 311.98 5,233 315.14 5,286 318.33 5,334 321.24 5,602 337.38 5,885 354.42 6,184 372.43 McCormick Woods 580 818 77.63 822 78.01 824 78.16 825 78.31 827 78.46 828 78.62 830 78.77 838 79.53 846 80.29 854 81.04 McCormick West 580 _ - - - - 300 28.47 775 73.55 1,545 146.62 1,545 146.62 Glenwood 580 - - - _ - 100 9.49 500 47.45 800 75.92 1,000 94.90 580 Total 818 77.63 822 78.01 824 78.16 825 78.31 827 78.46 828 78.62 1,230 116.73 2,113 200.52 3,191 302.83 3,399 322.57 Total 5850 380.65 •• .00. •1 1 .1.1 •� . •.• 6564 90 9076 . .• 11 CITY pd/ERU 165 165 165 165 165 165 165 165 165 580 Zone d/ERU 260 260 2601006. Notes: Demand Projections without conservation are based on the average production rate for the past five years and include unaccounted for water of approximately 10% Demand Projections without conservation are the basis for the system analysis performed and presented in subsequent sections of the Plan. This provides a conservative estimate of demands and provides a safety margin in conceptual design of facilities. Prior to design of any new facilities, demand projections from the most recent years, together with the associated weather patterns that may have affected those demands, should be considered. Water Demands fr Conservation 6�A \\J Page 3-7 City of Port Orchard 2009 Water System Plan Table 3-5 ERUs and Demands by Pressure Zone with Conservation 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2020 2025 2030 Zone Use Use Use Use Use Use Use Use Use Use ERUs (mg) ERUs (mg) ERUs (mg) ERUs (mg) ERUs (mg) ERUs (mg) ERUs (mg) ERUs (mg) ERUs (mg) ERUs (mg) City Low 2,264 136.36 2,285 136.76 2,308 137.30 2,331 137.84 2,355 138.38 2,379 138.91 2,400 140.18 2,521 147.22 2,648 154.66 2,783 162.52 City High 2,767 166.66 2,792 167.15 2,821 167.81 2,849 168.47 2,878 169.13 2,907 169.78 2,934 171.33 3,081 179.94 3,237 189.03 3,401 198.63 City Total 5,032 303.02 5,032 303.91 5,032 305.11 5,032 306.31 5,032 307.50 5,032 308.69 5,032 311.51 5,032 327.16 5,032 343.68 5,032 361.15 McCormick Woods 580 818 77.63 822 77.71 824 77.56 825 77.41 827 77.26 828 77.11 830 77.25 838 78.00 846 78.74 854 79.49 McCormick West 580 300 27.92 775 72.13 1,545 143.80 1,545 143.80 Glenwood 100 9.31 500 46.54 800 74.46 1,000 93.08 580 580 Total 818 77.63 822 77.71 824 77.56 825 77.41 827 77.26 828 77.11 1,230 114.48 2,113 196.67 3,191 297.00 3,399 316.36 8431 CITY pd/ERU 165 164 163 162 161 160 160 160 160 160 580 Zone pd/ERU 260 259 258 257 256 255 255 255 255 255 Notes: Demand Projections with conservation are based on the average production rate for the past five years and the City of Port Orchard's Water Use Efficiency goal of reducing demands by 5 gallons per household over the next five years. The City remains committed to achieving this goal and as demonstrated in Paragraphs 3.4 and 3.5, has developed a strategy for achieving this goal and providing all required reporting in accordance with Municipal Water Law. However, as noted in Table 3-4, analysis of the system has been accomplished using the more conservative water Demands Without Conservation presented in Table 3-4. This provides a conservative estimate of demands and provides a safety margin in conceptual design of facilities. Prior to design of any new facilities, demand projections from the most recent years, together with the associated weather patterns that may have affected those demands, should be considered. Water Demands Er Conservation Page 3-8 6;m�ci City of Port Orchard 2009 Water System Plan 3.4 WATER USE EFFICIENCY RULE The City of Port Orchard developed a Water Use Efficiency Goal for compliance with the Water Use Efficiency Rule of the Municipal Water Law. The City has adopted the following goal after the requisite public process and is developing a plan for monitoring progress toward the established goal and reevaluation of water use efficiency measures on an annual basis. Additional documentation regarding the Water Use Efficiency Program sis provided in the Appendices. GOAL #1: Over the next six year period the City of Port Orchard will reduce Single -Family Residential water consumption by 5 gallons per day per home. This reduction in single-family residential use will save approximately 2.5 million gallons per year over this six year period. The following measures will be evaluated and/or implemented to assist in attaining this goal: • Include water conservation information in the City's annual Consumer Confidence Report (annual water system report to consumers). • Evaluate the inclusion of inserts as part of the monthly water bills that presents information regarding the importance of water conservation and actions individuals can implement to reduce their water use. • Investigate a Water Conservation School Outreach Program that may include school presentations, preparation of curriculum material, water conservation education handout material, and tours of water system facilities. • Prepare a portable display of water conservation devices and selected material for display at the City's numerous events and festivals. • Recommend consumers to contact PUD #1 to obtain dye tablets for in home leak detection. 3.5 WATER CONSERVATION PROGRAM Water conservation is an important and viable means of reducing water system demands and in the City of Port Orchard's 1995 Water System Plan, a target goal of a 10% reduction in per capita demand prior to the year 2000 was established. The premise of the program established in the previous Water System Plan remains unchanged, with the City relying heavily on the conservation messages of larger agencies as a means of education and awareness and implementing internal measures conducive to stewardship of clean water as a finite resource. Key elements of the conservation program are outlined in the following paragraphs. 3.5.1 Internal Conservation Measures Water meters are a key element of an effective conservation program. Source meters are provided and maintained on all permanent sources and recommended for emergency Water Demands fr Conservation P� ACE Page 3-9 City of Port Orchard 2009 Water System Plan interties. Individual customer meters are required on every connection to the Port Orchard Water system. ■ Source Meters — The City currently has master source meters in place at all of its well supplies and at the metered intertie with Bremerton. Meters are recommended for emergency interties. ■ Water Meters - All connections to the water system are metered. Irrigation meters are available for interested customers and required on new irrigation accounts. ■ Hydrant Meters - Hydrant meters are currently required for all water drawn from hydrants except that associated with emergency use (such as a fire). Hydrant permits are required in addition to the permit fee, permit holders are charged for water use. ■ Consumption History - Consumption history is provided as requested by customers and is not shown on bi-monthly billings to promote conservation. ■ Non -Revenue Water - The City's on -going maintenance and repair schedule provides for routine inspection of facilities and results in the prompt repair of leaks and valve failures that contribute to non -revenue water. In addition, field crews perform routine maintenance and operation in a conscientious manner to reduce the amount of water used for these activities. Hydrant meters are for all non -emergency water use. ■ Leak Detection — The City retains the services of leak detection specialists annually to identify leaks in the system. The last leak detection analysis was performed in 2005 and no major leaks were identified. All identified leaks were subsequently repaired. ■ Pressure Regulation - The City maintains five separate pressure zones in order to ensure that adequate fire flows and pressures are maintained to all areas of the system. By effective management of the pressure zones, water consumption can be reduced by controlling pressures at a safe level in accordance with State Department of Health guidelines. Isolated areas of high pressure are controlled by the use of individual pressure reducing valves 3.5.2 Conservation Program Promotion Utilizing public information and promotional materials to encourage conservation is key to any conservation strategy. The City of Port Orchard's annual newsletter is recommended as way to distribute conservation tips and raise awareness. Water bills also provide an area for conservation program promotion. Further program promotion through distribution of conservation materials produced by others (i.e. AWWA, DOH, and Kitsap County PUD) is proposed. 3.5.3 Rate Setting to Encourage Conservation The City has implemented a water rate schedule to encourage conservation that employs a block rate structure whereby water use in excess of established thresholds is priced higher. The new rate structure will provide a threshold for evaluating conservation by various customer types and help determine what type of education and conservation Water Demands fr Conservation Page 3-10 P�E City of Port Orchard 2009 Water System Plan programs will be most useful in the future. Annual review of the impact of any adjustments to the water rate schedule on conservation and water use will be accomplished as part of overall Water Use Efficiency tracking and reporting in accordance with State regulations. Review of irrigation policies and charges is also highly recommended. A summary of current water rates is provided in Section 10 of this Plan. 3.5.4 Encouraging Water Saving Devices The City of Port Orchard has adopted the most current version of the Uniform Building and Plumbing Codes to regulate and enforce the provision of low water use fixtures in all new construction. Future consideration of low water use landscaping provisions in the City Code is recommended. 3.5.6 Water Efficient Toilets and Appliances The City relies on the public messages of regional water purveyors and the appliance industry to promote water efficient appliances, especially washing machines. The City of Port Orchard recognizes that toilets are responsible for more than 30% of indoor residential water use. It is estimated that the vast majority of toilets within the city are high flow toilets (toilets installed before 1980 are typically 5 to 7 gallons/flush, toilets installed between 1980 and 1992 are 3.5 gallons/flush and toilets installed after 1992 are 3.5 to 1.6 gallons/flush.) If each of the high flow toilets were converted to low flow 0.6 gallons/flush), it is anticipated that approximately 16,000 gallons of water per household would be saved each year in our community. Savings of nearly 8 million gallons per year could be realized with conversion to low flow toilets throughout the City. Residents who take advantage of the program receive a cash rebate of $100 on the installation of a low flow toilet. The low flow toilet program provides another indicator for use in annual Water Use Efficiency program evaluation, reporting and tracking. 3.5.7 Water Reuse and Recycling The City of Port Orchard and Karcher Sewer District jointly own a wastewater treatment plant that was recently upgraded to increase capacity and generally improve the plant operations. The two agencies are working together to pursue opportunities for reuse of treated effluent form the plant. Several businesses have expressed interest in participating in this program. All potential water reuse opportunities will be considered with respect to DOE and DOH requirements. Specific review and analysis of irrigation opportunities is recommended. Water Demands fr Conservation P� Page 3-11 City of Port Orchard 2009 Water System Plan 3.6 CONSERVATION PROGRAM IMPLEMENTATION AND MONITORING Water Use Efficiency and Conservation program monitoring to quantify and document the effectiveness of the conservation program is accomplished through an ongoing data collection effort that relates to conservation. In accordance with State requirements, Port Orchard will achieve this by annual review of water use records and comparison to previous years. Water use data is kept by customer classification in order to identify annual and specific trends for summer and winter water use. This data, coupled with information regarding weather and implementation of any new conservation programs, provides a mechanism for monitoring overall water conservation efforts. The first annual water use efficiency report sets the baseline for future evaluation and is provided in the Appendices. Continued participation with neighboring purveyors and the South Kitsap WUCC is required to ensure that consistent conservation messages are being delivered throughout the South Kitsap County area and region and develop new ideas for water conservation mechanisms and programs. City employees are encouraged to participate in water conservation data collection, seminars, and workshops that are relevant to their particular field. Water Demands fr Conservation Page 3-12 P�E SECTION 4 EXISTING WATER SYSTEM 4.11 OVERVIEW The City of Port Orchard's water system is best described as two separate water systems, the original city system that serves the majority of the City through a series of wells, storage reservoirs and distribution facilities; and the isolated McCormick Woods system which serves the more recently developed McCormick Woods community with a separate water supply wells, storage tanks and distribution system facilities. Although the two systems are planned to be connected, as discussed in Section 6, they are referred to and described in this section as the Port Orchard and McCormick Woods systems. Analysis of each system and the proposed strategy for interconnection are put forth in Section 6. Both systems are fully metered and together they serve a total of approximately 3550 connections, most of which are single family residential. The existing systems are indicated on the water system plan map at the back of this document and generally illustrated on the hydraulic profile shown on Figure 4-1. 4.2 PORT ORCHARD [CITY] SYSTEM The area known as Port Orchard's City System is exclusive of the 580 Zone System and serves approximately 5000 ERUs. The area is consistent with a small city with primarily single family residential connections and a downtown area with small commercial establishments. In addition, the City System provides service to multi -family residences, schools, commercial complexes, and the government offices of both the City of Port Orchard and Kitsap County.. The system includes the older portions the City along the waterfront as well as the more rapidly developing uplands. The Port Orchard water service area is generally bounded by the waterfront on the north, Sedgwick Road in the vicinity of State Highway 16 on the south, Anderson Hill Road on the west, and the West Sound Utility District on the east. The system consists of three pressure zones to regulate pressure within the community, although individual PRVs reduce pressures in areas of undulating topography where high pressures would be expected. These Zones have historically been referred to as the High, Low and Intermediate Zones. This Plan includes the Hydraulic grade line of each zone for ease and clarity in describing the system(s). The Low or 260 Zone is extends from sea level to an approximate maximum service elevation of 210 feet and serves approximately 33% of the existing population and employment base served by the City System. The 260 Zone is fed primarily by Wells 6 and 7 but can receive backup supply from a wholesale meter connection to the City of Bremerton system west of the City. Well water is pumped through the City Hall Pump Station which includes a stilling basin that is utilized for settling and hydrogen sulfide dissipation. Fire flow in the higher elevations of the 260 Zone is supplemented by parallel pipes and "high flow" hydrants from the 390 Zone. The 260 Zone has approximately 2.15 million gallons of storage in three facilities: the Morton Street Standpipe, Park Reservoir and Maple Street Elevated Tank. Existing Water System P� ACE Page 4-1 City of Port Orchard 2009 Water System Plan The High or 390 Zone of the City System serves approximately 66% of current connections to the City System in the residential uplands of the City and commercial area in the east. The 390 Zone serves elevations from approximately 210 feet to just over 300 feet. Well No. 9 located at the Van Zee Park site is the primary source to the 390 Zone, although additional supply can also be received from the City wells or Bremerton supply in the 260 Zone through the Melcher Street pump station. Approximately 2.1 million gallons of storage in this zone are provided in the Old Clifton, Sedgwick and South Sidney reservoirs. To improve pressures in the higher elevations of the City located east of Blackjack Creek the High Zone was expanded in 1983 with a 12-inch main that crosses the Creek. Interties with West Sound Water System in this area, as well as the ability to revert back to serving the area from the low zone provide the necessary reliability for the isolated portion of the 390 Zone. An intertie to the West Sound Water System provides a backup source to the southernmost reaches of the City limits. The 6-inch intertie is located on the 1 million gallon Sedgwick Reservoir site. The Intermediate or 336 Zone was created in 1984 to provide satisfactory water pressure to a small area north of Kendall Street in the vicinity of Harrison Avenue. The 336 Zone is supplied by a PRV from the 390 located just south of Kendall and Harrison and storage is provided from the 390 High Zone. The 336 is fed by the 390 Zone and because of hydraulic continuity and the small size of the Zone, it has been considered and analyzed together with the 390 Zone. 4.3 580 ZONE (McCORMICK) SYSTEM The 580 Zone (McCormick) System began as a private water company serving a residential, golf course and clubhouse and commercial development in an unincorporated portion of the Port Orchard water service area and was taken over by the City of Port Orchard in 1998. A December 26, 2001 interlocal agreement details various aspects of water system construction, assumption of the system by Port Orchard and the terms of an intertie with the City of Bremerton that can supply water to the McCormick Woods area. A copy of that agreement is included in the Appendices. Water system planning for this portion of the water system has been accomplished through updates to the original water system plan and was completed in 2000 and 2003 under the title McCormick Woods Water Company Water Comprehensive Plan Amendment(s). The McCormick Woods System consists of an independent source of supply, a network of 6- to 16-inch distribution and transmission mains and pumping and storage facilities. Three groundwater wells (McCormick Woods Wells 1, 2, and 3) have historically provided water supply to the area. In 2009, during finalization of this Water System Plan, an additional domestic supply well was constructed to replace the three previous wells. Golf Course irrigation is accomplished by a private well (413), a recently developed well dedicated to this purpose. Storage consists of a 450,000 gallon steel reservoir connected to the system by a 16-inch transmission main and two low level concrete tanks located adjacent to the wells. Water from the three supply wells is pumped directly to these two lower reservoirs provide equalizing storage for the system. A pump Existing Water System Page 4-2 PA E City of Port Orchard 2008 Water System Plan station transfers water from the two intermediate tanks to the 450,000 gallon reservoir. The overflow elevation of the 450,000 gallon reservoir is 580 feet and the entire McCormick Woods system is served by gravity from the 580 reservoir. As such, the McCormick Woods system is referred to as the 580 Zone. An existing agreement with City of Bremerton provides for up to an additional 350 gpm (285 acre feet per year) subject to the conditions contained in the aforementioned December 26, 2001 agreement. Existing Water System P� ACE Page 4-3 City of Port Orchard 2009 Water System Plan -j rGIJUITTITITHEr U-I --19.2 Existing Water System ��++ Page 4-4 C 1400 MCCORMICK WOODS HGL 580' 5W'ZONE MCCORMICK WELLS 01,2 83 PORT ORCHARD HIGH ZONE HGL 390 MEDIUM ZONE INC PRV PORT ORCHARD W WC INTERMEDIATE ZONE HGL 336' PORT ORCHARD LOW ZONE HGL 260' LEGEND If PRESSURE REDUCING VALVE x VALVE NIC NORMALLY CLOSED �M METER OE OVERFLOW ELEVATION 0.a� �Lm�` CITY OF EXISTING BREMERTON RESERVOIR INTERTIE W/SW OE= 590' EXISTING o MCCORMICK WOODS PUMP STATION 0,12 MG WELL dB EXISTING IRRIGATION RESERVOIRS (NOT CONNECTED) OE= 431' u u OI 1 MG 1-0 MG 1-0 MG SIDNEV AVE OLD CLIFLON SEDGEWICK RESERVOIR MELCHER RESERVOIR RESERVOIR OE= 390' PUMP STATION OE= 397 OE= 390' INTERTIE Wr � WESTSOUN❑ WELL 96 WE.LL#9 UTILITY DISTRICT GRND ELEV275' GRND ELEV275' DEPTH 577' rtTm - CITYOF 0.1 MG M BREMTERTON 2.0 MG MAPLE STREET INTERTIE PARK RESERVOIR RESERVOIR HGL 256ZONE OE= 26V OE= 260' CITY HALL PUMP STATION WELL#A WELL#5 ri, WELL #6 WELL#7 GRND ELEV20' GRND ELEV 15' GRND ELEV 30 GRND ELEV 15' 0 DEPTH 22C' - - - I ^'C' ❑—� R[16' DEPTH 5TT -- -- EXISTING CITY OF PORT ORCHARD HYDRAULIC PROFILE PACE FIGURE 4-1 City of Port Orchard 2009 Water System Plan -j rGIJUITTITITHEr U-I --19.2 Existing Water System PA E Page 4-6 City of Port Orchard 2008 Water System Plan 4.4 WATER SUPPLY 4.4.1 City System Supply to the Port Orchard System is primarily through City -owned and operated groundwater wells, some of which are flowing artesian wells. A summary of existing and pending water rights is presented in Table 4-1 and summarized water rights information is contained in the Appendices. The requisite water rights self assessment is also contained in the Appendices in accordance with Municipal Water Law requirements. As noted the City maintains four existing water rights the various wells that serve serving the Port Orchard portion of the system normal conditions (PO Wells 5, 6, 7, and 8/9). The only treatment provided in the Port Orchard system is removal of hydrogen sulfide and the addition of chlorine and fluoride. To improve supply and meet the projected demand within the service area, the Well 10 was drilled in 2006 under an initial water right application for 500 gpm. The new well is expected to yield in excess of 1,500 gpm. An additional 1,000 gpm water right application is currently under consideration by the Department of Ecology and if granted, will result in a Well 10 total water right of 1500 gpm. Transfer of water rights from Wells 4, 5, and 6 may also be considered in the future. City Well 4 has an artesian flow of about 40 gpm located under the City Hall parking lot. Occasionally when water from Well 4 is not used, it overflows into the Bay. The Department of Ecology has requested the City modify the well operations to eliminate water waste. Because of the small quantity of water from Well 4 and its location, it is recommended that the well be sealed and the water rights transferred to Well 10. Likewise, the City wishes to abandon Well 5 and transfer any water rights associated with it to Well 10. Currently Well 7 water also flows to the City Hall facility. The recommendation includes treating Well 7 water elsewhere and bypassing the City Hall site and allowing for additional parking or other City uses. 4.4.2 580 (McCormick) System The McCormick Woods or 580 Zone of the system is served by three existing domestic supply wells (MCW Wells 1, 2, and 3) from the shallow aquifer underlying the area. No treatment except chlorination is provided in the McCormick Woods system. As discussed earlier, the 580 Zone is intertied with the City of Bremerton's water system. By agreement, fluoridated water is prohibited from entering the Bremerton system until the systems are separated. The City has made application to combine water rights for McCormick Woods Wells 1, 2, and 3 into a new Well 11 proposed for drilling into the deep level aquifer. By doing this, the City would obtain an additional 150 gpm, bringing the total McCormick Woods water right to 750 gpm. Well 11 was drilled in 2009, and brought on line in 2009/2010. Well 4B is a private well currently owned by McCormick Woods for the purpose of golf course irrigation. Existing Water System P� ACE Page 4-7 City of Port Orchard 2009 Water System Plan Table 4-1 Sources of Supply Water Quantit Well No./ Diam./ Certificate/ Installed Description/ Depth Agreement Q� Qa Capacity Comment Location (gpm) (acre ft) ( m) P05 10 inches G1-00091 1 CL 40 Decommission. Move Port Orchard Blvd 240 Feet 1946 .. 513 828 0 Rights to Well 10 P06 10 inches G1-*04166C 250 Maple Street 806 Feet Cert. 3334-A 1955 350 560 140 Free Flowing Artesian P07 10 inches G1-24586C 750 1,210 725 Free Flowing Artesian Port Orchard Blvd 804 Feet 1984 P08 12 inches 450 Back Up Only SidneyAvenue 577 Feet G1-25019C 1987 500 , 560 1 350 P09 12 inches 450 Sidney Avenue 624 Feet 500 12 inches 281 Feet 175 12 inches 350 McW 1, 2, & 3 600 450 To be combined 210 Feet G1-24437P 1984 with MCW Well 5 12 inches 183 Feet 350 Total Exis ing Water Ri hts2 2,200 2,200 Well 10 10 inches G1-26119A 1,000 gpm and 1600 T24N-R1 E-S25 1074 Feet Application 1991 500 Pending AF additional requested Well 4 G1-26728A To be moved to Well T24N-R1 E-S26 Artesian Application1992 50 0 10 McW 11 G1-28162A 1000 0 Additional 1000 gpm T23N-R1-E-S9 Application2002 McW 5 G1-26454A Additio Total 700 gpm up T23N-R1 E-S9 Application1992 nalp150 0 to 1243 gpm MCW 4B G1-26447A Owned by McCormick T23N-R1 E-S9 Application1992 400 9 Woods Land Co. Total Pending Water Rights 2100 Bremerton Supply 8-inch Interlocal N/A N/A Automatic 260 Zone meter Agreement Bremerton Supply 8-inch Interlocal 350 285 Automatic 580 Zone meter Agreement West Sound Utility 6-inch Interlocal N/A N/A Manual Mitchell Intertie 1 connection Agreement West Sound Utility 6-inch Interlocal Sed ewick Intertie 2 1 meter Agreement N/A N/A Automatic 390 Zone 1. The instantaneous quantity (Qi) represents the total instantaneous quantity that may be withdrawn from Well 8 or Well 9 or by the combination of Well 8 and Well 9. Annual Quantity (Qa) is supplemental to the existing rights. 2. The instantaneous quantity (Qi) total does not include claimed amounts. The Qa total does not include supplemental amounts. 3. The annual quantity of water authorized represents a portion of the total water rights owned by the City of Port Orchard. The total annual quantity withdrawn by the City of Port Orchard under G1-26119, G1-26447, G1-26454 and sources shall not exceed 3,528 acre-feet per year. (Source Report of Examination for Well 10) Well 10 includes an additional 1600 acre-feet of water beyond the 3528 figure. Existing Water System � —6— Page 4-8 6�fffAE City of Port Orchard 2008 Water System Plan 4.5 PUMPING Due to the topography of the area and for reliability and operational flexibility, the City of Port Orchard relies on three pump stations in addition to well pumps to move water throughout the system. The pump stations are detailed in Table 4-2. The City Hall Booster Station pumps water from the Wells 4 at Kitsap Street and Well 7 near Port Orchard Boulevard and High Avenue into the City's Low or 260 Zone. The Station consists of a stilling basin to allow sand sediment to settle and provide time for dissipation of hydrogen sulfide. Chlorine and fluoride injection is also accomplished at the City Hall Booster station. This station is over 60 years old and needs upgrading. The Melcher Street Pump Station was constructed in 1960 and supplements supply from the 260 Zone to the 390 Zone. The Station is equipped with two pumps and standby power. The Well 6 pump station pumps treated water from the Well 6 clear well into the 260 Zone. It is located on Maple Street west of Bethel Avenue. This station is over 60 years old and needs significant upgrading. The McCormick 580 pump station transfers water from two 60,000 low level concrete reservoirs on the McCormick Well site to the 450,000 gallon reservoir that serves the McCormick Woods development. The station is equipped with three separate pumps that were originally designed to maintain pressure in the system during varying demand conditions but have since been redirected through a 16-inch transmission main on Old Clifton Road to the reservoir. Emergency power is provided at the station. Table 4-2 Pump Stations Station Name gpm @ Head Motor HP Zone Served City Hall 690 gpm @ 300 feet 75 260 (Low) 620 gpm @ 300 feet 60 260 (Low) Melcher Street 1000 gpm @ 154 feet 75 390 (High) 750 gpm @ 154 feet 50 390 (High) Well 6 Booster 400 gpm @ 300 feet 30 260 (Low) McCormick 580 125 gpm @ 170 feet 10 580 (McW) 350 gpm @170 feet 20 580 (McW) 350 gpm @170 feet 20 580 (McW) Existing Water System P� ACE Page 4-9 City of Port Orchard 2009 Water System Plan 4.6 STORAGE RESERVOIRS As mentioned previously, the City owns and operates nine separate storage reservoirs that are described in Table 4-3. In addition, two 50,000 stilling basins provide additional storage to the Low Zone. Table 4-3 Storage Reservoirs Date Capacity Construction Zone Reservoir Constructed (MG) Dimensions Type Served Park 2.0 130' dia. Buried Concrete 260 Zone Morton Street 1990 0.1 14.59' dia. Standpipe 260 100' high Zone Maple Street 0.05 260 Zone South Sidney 1961 0.1 13.6' dia. Elevated 390 73'high Zone Old Clifton 1977 1.0 100' dia. Concrete 390 30' high Zone Sedgwick 2000 1.0 68' dia. Steel 390 40' high Zone McCormick Woods 580 1995 0.45 42' high Steel 580 Zone 431 25' dia. Pumped McCormick Woods Tank 1 1986 0.06 Concrete to 15' high 580 Zone 431 25' dia. Pumped McCormick Woods Tank 2 1992 0.06 Concrete to 15'high 580 Zone 4.7 DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM As indicated on the Water System Plan Map included at the back of this document, the system consists of a network of pipes ranging in size from 16 inches in diameter to less than 4 inches in diameter. The system was constructed over a number of years as the City developed but the majority was installed in the 1960s. Pipe Size and materials are categorized in Table 4-4. One pressure reducing valve supplies the 336 Intermediate Zone from the 390 Zone. The 390 and 260 Zones are connected by the Melcher Street Pump Station supplying water to the 390 Zone. Flow from the 390 Zone to the 260 Zone can only occur by manually opening valves located at seven separate intersections. Existing Water System Page 4-10 P City of Port Orchard 2008 Water System Plan Table 4-4 Pipe Size and Material Pipe Size Estimated Quantity Pipe Material Estimated Quantity Less than 4-inch 23,505 Asbestos Cement (AC) 10,008 4-inch 49,415 Cast Iron (CI) 105,604 6-inch 36,841 Copper (COP) 1,743 8-inch 121,262 Ductile Iron DI 82,561 10-inch 21,689 Galvanized (GALV) 1,265 12-inch 24,605 PVC 67,020 16-inch 21,136 Steel 2,196 18-inch 2,422 Unknown 23,804 TOTAL 300,873 TOTAL 300,873 Existing Water System P� ACE Page 4-7 7 SECTION 5 ;M=� MINIMUM DESIGN CRITERIA 5.1 INTRODUCTION Minimum design criteria for the City of Port Orchard's water system must be in accordance with the standards and requirements put forth by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, the Washington State Department of Health (DOH), Kitsap County, and the City. The minimum design criteria of the City must also be in accordance with the criteria established by the Kitsap County Coordinated Water System Plan (2004 Revision). Minimum design criteria addressed in this appendix include water supply requirements, storage volume, distribution system and transmission main capacity, and water quality standards. These criteria are used to determine deficiencies in the existing water system and establish design requirements for the future water system within the City's service area. 5.2 STATE AGENCY REGULATIONS The Washington State Department of Health's "Water System Design Manual" (August 2001) is the primary document governing the sizing and design of Group A public water systems in the state of Washington. This publication sets forth the minimum design guidelines and planning requirements for the supply, storage, distribution, and quality of potable water within Group A public water systems. 5.3 REFERENCE DATUM The datum used for planning of facilities in this study and for City design work is based on NAD 83 State Plane Washington North. 5.4 GENERAL CONSIDERATIONS 5.4.1 Design Period In planning water facilities, it is necessary for the design to be adequate over a specific period of time. The period of design for this study is approximately 20 years. This means that in the year 2025, the facilities proposed in this study may have reached their maximum supply capacity, assuming that the population projections are reached. Many of the components of the water system, however, have much longer useful lives than 20 years and will continue to serve the community far beyond the design period. 5.4.2 Planning Initial system construction and additions should conform to the comprehensive plan. Minimum Design Criteria P� ACE Page 5-1 City of Port Orchard 2009 Water System Plan Public water systems should be designed to provide fire fighting capability in accordance with the requirements of the local Fire Marshal. Phased development is permitted where full development will take several years. 5.4.3 Reliability Multiple water sources are recommended in combination with adequate emergency reserve in gravity storage to allow for interruption of supply at one point, while still maintaining water supply to the system at the design rate. Looping of the water mains to improve circulation quality and fire flow is an on -going goal of the City. Pumping stations are to contain multiple booster pumps of sufficient capacity to meet the maximum day demands with the largest pump out of service. Auxiliary power is required where adequate gravity storage is not provided. 5.5 WATER SUPPLY RECOMMENDATIONS AND REQUIREMENTS The DOH "Water System Design Manual" sets forth the following recommendations for water supply systems and pump stations, with additional requirements for booster pump stations. 5.5.1 Water Supply and Source Pump Stations Source capacity must meet the maximum day demand of the system. It is also recommended that the source is sufficient to meet the maximum day criteria while concurrently replenishing the fire suppression storage volume within 72 hours of its depletion. Port Orchard recognizes that alternate and independent sources of supply, such as interties with other water systems, coupled with adequate storage capacity may provide a sufficient level of reliability on an interim basis. Water source pump stations should be capable of providing the maximum day demand for the system with 18 hours of pumping. Pump stations shall be provided with a minimum of 20 pounds per square inch (psi) at the inlet side of the pumps under peak hour demand or fire flow plus maximum day demand rate conditions. Pump stations shall have an automatic shut-off in place for when the inlet pressure drops below 10 psi. Minimum Design Criteria Page 5-2 P City of Port Orchard 2009 Water System Plan Pump stations shall have power connections available to independent primary public power sources or provision for in -place auxiliary power if the pumps provide fire flow, or are pumping from ground level storage. 5.5.2 Booster Pump Stations Open system Booster Pump Stations, which transfer water to a higher pressure zone governed by an atmospheric storage tank, shall be capable of providing source capacity as established for water supply sources in Section 5.5.1. Closed system Booster Pump Stations, which transfer water to a higher pressure zone closed to the atmosphere, shall provide peak hourly demand with a minimum of 30 psi of pressure at all connections. It is recommended that this capability be provided with the largest pump off-line. Closed system BPS shall provide fire flow in conjunction with maximum daily demand with 20 psi of residual pressure. Additionally, since this system is located in an area governed by the Public Water System Coordination Act of 1977 (PWSCA), this capability must be provided with the largest pump off-line. 5.6 WATER DISTRIBUTION RECOMMENDATIONS AND REQUIREMENTS 5.6.1 Water Pressure Water systems shall be designed to provide peak hourly demand with a positive pressure of 30 psi at every connection to the system (Normally at the property line of the service connection. For fire flow, the distribution system shall be designed to provide the required fire flow and maximum daily demand at a residual pressure of 20 psi throughout the system. Required fire flow shall be established by the local Fire Marshal. Maximum pressures in the distribution system shall not exceed 100 psi When pressures exceed 80 psi, the customer should provide and maintain individual pressure reducing valves (PRV) in accordance with the provisions of the Uniform Plumbing Code (UPC). 5.6.2 Pipe Sizing and Materials Maximum velocity in distribution pipelines shall not exceed 8 feet per second (fps) under peak hour demand conditions. Flow velocities during fire events may exceed this maximum limit, but shall remain below 10 fps. Minimum Design Criteria P� ACE Page 5-3 City of Port Orchard 2009 Water System Plan Minimum pipe diameter for all distribution mains and mains providing fire flow is 6-inches nominal inside diameter, except for looping and dead-end mains beyond hydrants as approved by the City. All pipelines shall be designed and constructed to ultimate domestic and fire flow conditions as determined by the City. Dead end mains are generally not accepted by the City, except in phased development projects or where no potential for future interconnection of facilities exists. Approved dead end mains, which will not serve fire hydrants, may be 6-inches in diameter in residential areas and 8-inches in commercial areas or as hydraulically justified and approved by the City. New water mains shall be constructed of cement mortar lined, ductile iron pipe conforming to AWWA C 151 and C 104, minimum thickness Class 52 conforming to ANSI/APWA C 105-72. All water main fittings are to be cement mortar lined, ductile iron conforming to AWWA C 110 or C 153, with 250 psi minimum working pressure. All push -on and mechanical joints are to conform to AWWA C 1 1 1, and restrained joints shall conform to City requirements. All water system pipelines shall be constructed of "lead-free" materials (less than 8% lead content). Minimum cover over pipes 12-inches in diameter and smaller shall be 36 inches minimum, and 48 inches minimum cover over pipes greater than 12-inches in diameter. Maximum cover over pipe shall be 60 inches. Transmission and distribution pipelines shall be at least 10 horizontal feet from any existing or proposed sanitary sewer utilities and 5 horizontal feet from other utilities, measured edge -to -edge. At least 18 inches of vertical separation (measured edge -to - edge) shall be maintained between the top of a sanitary sewer main and the bottom of a water line. A minimum vertical separation of 6 inches, measured edge -to -edge, is required between all other utilities. Exceptions to these minimum standards must meet the special requirements set forth by the Washington State Department of Ecology and must be approved by the City. 5.6.3 Valves Valves shall be ductile iron and shall be installed in a configuration that permits isolation of lines. Minimum Design Criteria Page 5-4 P City of Port Orchard 2009 Water System Plan Valves should be installed at intersections, and with normal maximum spacing at 500 feet in commercial, industrial, and multi -family areas, 600 feet in residential areas, and 1/4 mile in transmission mains. Additional isolation valving may be required by the City and will be determined on a case -by -case basis. Air entrainment, air release, or combined air -vacuum relief valves are to be installed at appropriate points of high elevation in the system. All piping in the system shall be sloped to permit escape of any entrained air. Zone isolation valves shall be installed at zone boundaries to permit future pressure zone realignment without the need for pipe realignment. A blow -off assembly or fire hydrant shall be installed on all dead end runs and at designated points of low elevation to provide a means for adequate flushing of the system. The blow -off assembly shall be installed in a utility right-of-way, except where a written access and construction easement is provided to the water utility. In no case shall the location be such that a possibility of back-siphonage into the distribution system exists. The blow -off assembly shall be sized to achieve a minimum flow velocity of 2.5 feet per second in the main. 5.6.4 Fire Hydrants Fire hydrants shall comply with the minimum requirements established by the local Fire Marshal having jurisdiction and meet the type, location and spacing requirements of the agency having jurisdiction in the project area. In general, minimum spacing for hydrants in commercial and multi -family areas shall be 300 feet on center and 600 feet on center in single-family residential areas. 5.6.5 Cross Connection Control Where the possibility of contamination of potable water exists, water services shall be equipped with appropriate cross connection control assemblies in accordance with DOH requirements and the City's Cross Connection Control Program. The need and location of cross connection assemblies shall be determined by the City. 5.7 STORAGE RECOMMENDATIONS AND REQUIREMENTS Storage requirements are based on five components; operational storage, equalizing storage, standby storage, fire suppression storage and dead storage. The minimum requirements for each of the components of the total storage requirement are summarized below. The minimum amount Minimum Design Criteria P� ACE Page 5-5 City of Port Orchard 2009 Water System Plan of storage required shall be adequate to provide for equalizing storage plus the larger of standby or fire suppression storage. The recommended storage volume is equal to the sum of the equalizing, standby and fire suppression storage components. Figure 5-1 illustrates the various storage components of total required storage. Part 6 of this document includes a complete analysis of the City's water storage requirements and existing capacities. FIGURE 5-1 WATER STORAGE RESERVOIR SCHEMATIC Overflow Elevation Fill Mode Off Fill Mode On Operational Storage Equalizing Storage "Effective Volume" Standby Storage and/or 7 Fire Suppression Storage Total Volume Potential Total Head Dead Storage 30 PSI requires 69 feet of elevation from Highest Elevation Served to the bottom of Equalizing Storage 20 PSI requires 46 feet of elevation from Highest Elevation Served to the bottom of Fire Suppression Storage and/or Standby Storage HIGHEST ELEVATION SERVED 5.7.1 Operational Storage innshoof The operational storage is the volume of water available to supply the system under normal operating conditions while the source is considered "off". This volume varies according to the sensitivity of the water level sensors controlling the source pumps and the configuration of the tanks designed to provide the required volume while preventing excessive cycling of the pump motor(s). The volume of operational storage is therefore dependent upon pump design parameters, and is not impacted by the minimum design parameters set forth by DOH. 5.7.2 Equalizing Storage Equalizing storage is the volume of water required to supplement source pumping capacity when system demands exceed the source pumping capabilities. The volume of equalizing storage must be sufficient to meet hourly water system demands in excess of the rate of Minimum Design Criteria Page 5-6 P City of Port Orchard 2009 Water System Plan supply and must be at an elevation sufficient to meet these demands at a minimum delivery pressure of 30 psi. The amount of required equalizing storage is to be calculated in accordance with the DOH "Water System Design Manual" 5.7.3 Standby Storage Standby storage is required in order to augment the available supply of water during a period of restricted flow from the supply source. Restriction of flow may be caused by a pumping equipment failure, supply line failure, maintenance or repair, or other conditions that may cause interruption in supply. For single source systems, standby storage requirements are twice the average day demand for a system, deliverable at 20 psi. For a multiple source system, the standby storage is calculated as twice the average day demand, less the flow available with the largest source out of service, multiplied by the amount of time the remaining sources will be pumped each day. It is recommended that standby storage not be less than 200 gallons per connection per day. 5.7.4 Fire Suppression Storage Fire suppression storage must be equal to the amount of water required to accommodate fire demand while maintaining a minimum system pressure of 20 psi. Fire flow requirements are determined by the Fire Marshal having jurisdiction and generally conform to the procedures utilized by the Washington Surveying and Rating Bureau as set forth in a pamphlet entitled "Guide for Determination of Required Fire Flow" published by the Insurance Services Office, Municipal Survey Service. 5.7.5 Dead Storage Dead storage is the amount of water not available to all customers at the minimum design pressure. Dead storage is not considered when determining volumes to provide operational, equalizing, standby or fire suppression storage. 5.8 GENERAL FACILITY PLACEMENT All piping, pumping, source, storage and other facilities, shall be located in public rights -of -way, dedicated utility easements or on City -owned property. Utility easements must be a minimum of 15 feet in width, and piping shall be installed no less than 5 feet from the easement's edge. Any exceptions to this minimum easement will be at the discretion of the City. Unrestricted access shall be provided to all public water system lines, appurtenances, and fire hydrants. The location of utilities shall be in accordance with the standards and guidelines established by local jurisdiction criteria. Where existing utilities or storm drains are in place, new facilities shall conform to these standards as nearly as practicable and yet be compatible with the existing installations. Minimum Design Criteria P� ACE Page 5-7 City of Port Orchard 2009 Water System Plan 5.9 WATER QUALITY STANDARDS Section 8 of this Plan puts forth detailed information regarding the maximum contaminant levels allowed in drinking water supplies as put forth by the Washington State Department of Health (DOH) at the time of publication of this Plan. Additional requirements of the federal Safe Drinking Water Act (SDWA) are also discussed, along with the City's plans for additional future monitoring. 5.10 STANDARD PLANS AND DETAILS In accordance with WAC 246-290-120, the City maintains standard plans and details on file with the State Department of Health. These standards address construction requirements for: the installation of hydrants, valves, fittings and meters; repair or replacement of system components with similar components; and maintenance or painting of surfaces not contacting potable water. The standard plans and specifications also constitute a waiver from formal submittal and approval of specific distribution main improvements provided that construction of such projects are certified by a registered professional engineer and provided that the City submits required documentation to DOH prior to placing the distribution pipeline into service. All other water system improvement projects require submittal to and approval by the Washington State Department of Health. A copy of the City's standards is on file at the City and is included in the Appendices to this document. The City uses the current version of the WSDOT specifications and corresponding APWA specifications. Minimum Design Criteria Page 5-8 P _ J SECTION 6 SYSTEM ANALSYIS -fie 3 �4 6.1 OVERVIEW This section presents the analyses performed to evaluate the City of Port Orchard water systems' ability to meet the needs of current and projected customers of the City. It is important to recognize that while the State Department of Health requires that physically independent systems be analyzed separately, the City operates the Port Orchard ("City") System and the 580 Zone ("McCormick Woods") System under one utility. A fundamental element of this Plan is the desire to interconnect the two systems as soon as practical. The analyses presented herein therefore identify system requirements for the existing systems independently. Future improvements, however, are based on the overall plan to connect the two systems as development occurs in the Glenwood JPA, between the City and 580 Zone (McCormick Woods) Systems. This plan for interconnection is supported by the recent (2009) annexation of the McCormick Woods area into the City of Port Orchard and the Department of Ecology's consideration of water rights applications. Ecology has established source of supply requirements and issued water rights for the combined systems servicing the City's overall water service area. The McCormick Wood's portion of the system underwent a detailed analysis that resulted in an amendment to the City's Comprehensive Water System Plan in 2003. It has been reanalyzed herein and is referenced through this document as the 580 Zone (McCormick) System. This reanalysis supersedes the previous Plan amendment and provides for a comprehensive review of the City's complete water system assets. It also provides the requisite analysis for future interconnection of the independent systems and addresses more detailed and current development projections for the western portion of the service area. The analyses put forth herein utilize current (2008) data and the projected growth scenarios through the year 2030 that were established in Sections 2 and 3. The primary focus of the analyses is to determine the type and magnitude of improvements required to meet the projected needs of the anticipated population of the service area. For large scale and costly facilities such as source of supply, transmission lines and storage reservoirs, the ultimate service area needs have been considered to ensure general facility improvements will be of sufficient capacity and location to meet the City's needs well in the future. For distribution system facilities, the primary goal is to develop a more detailed program for to meet the fire flow requirements of current and future development, and the regular renewal and replacements to protect the investment of ratepayers to the system. Transmission, storage and pumping facilities required to connect the City System serving the main portion of the City to the 580 (McCormick) System currently serving the recently annexed McCormick Woods area. As noted, the interconnection is planned to occur "through" the Glenwood JPA area and timing will be dependent on development, possibly as early as 2015. Development in the Glenwood JPA area should be conditional on implementation of interconnecting facilities identified in this Plan. System Analysis P� ACE Page 6-1 City of Port Orchard 2009 Water System Plan 6.2 WATER SUPPLY As discussed in Section 5, the water supply requirements for the City are based on guidelines established by the Washington State Department of Health's (DOH) "Water System Design Manual" dated August 2001. Based on these requirements, the source of supply must be able to deliver water at a rate equal to maximum day demand. For reliability the various sources should be able to replenish lost reservoir capacity due to emergency event, equipment or facility failure within 72 hours (Standby Supply). In addition, it is strongly recommend by DOH, but not required, that fire suppression capacity be replenished from the source of supply within 72 hours also. Tables 6-1 and 6-2 present the available capacity of sources of supply for the City and McCormick systems and provide information regarding water rights capacity as well installed "reliable" capacity. The reliable capacity is based on the available yields from each source of supply provided by City staff. For well sources, 75% of that capacity was used to prevent 24 hour pumping of wells and provide a factor of reliability. System reliability is further ensured by not including emergency interties in the source analyses. This approach is based on the desire to operate the system independent of neighboring jurisdictions. Tables 6-3 and 6-4 present source analyses for the water system(s) through the year 2030. Table 6-3 focuses on installed and actual available capacity (with reliability considerations as discussed above). Table 6-4 presents the source analyses according to existing and projected water rights. The following paragraphs provide an overview of the source conditions and analyses for the City and 580 Zone (McCormick Woods) systems operated by the Port Orchard water utility. 6.2.1 City System As shown in Table 6-3, based on installed capacity and excluding supply from either Bremerton or West Sound Utility through emergency interties, the City system is deficient in source capacity under current and ultimate development scenarios. The addition of the Well 10 in 2010 will greatly improve the source conditions, but a slight deficit does remain. There are two significant concerns related to water supply in the City System. First, the City's wells have experienced declining yields in recent years and are not pumping at full capacity. Secondly, significant expansion to the southern portion of the service area and the development in the McCormick Woods area will require additional supply. To provide for declining well yields and operational constraints and offer conservative estimates it is recommended that the well source capacity (both for pumped wells and artesian wells) be rated on the basis of an 18 hour operating day. The peak well draws typically occur during the driest time of the year when aquifers are low and over pumping can cause silting and future capacity reductions. Overuse of wells during these periods is an important operational consideration. Addressing declining well yields could be resolved by Well 10, a new well that is being developed and expected to be online in 2010. Well 10 is a deep well that was drilled to a System Analysis � Page 6-2 P� ACE City of Port Orchard 2009 Water System Plan confined aquifer located in the east area of the City, near the waterfront. Testing of Well 10 indicates that as much as 2,000 gallons per minute or more may be available although current water rights are limited to 500 gpm (Qi) and a yearly allotment of 806 Acre -Feet (Qa). This quantity will augment supply from the declining production capacity of existing City wells and help accommodate projected growth throughout the service area. In addition, the well may able to accommodate a transfer of water from wells and water rights in the 260 Low Zone. This may result in a Well 10 capacity of greater than 1,500 gpm with an ultimate design goal of up to 2,000 gpm. Unfortunately, the remote location of the well in relation to existing and proposed development presents challenges with transmission and a new transmission line from east to west is required. The size of the transmission main is estimated at 12-inch diameter and proposed route alternatives are currently being identified in a 2009 engineering study. One alternative is construction of a raw water transmission line from Well 10, along Perry Avenue and ultimately to the Well 6 Site for treatment at an upgraded treatment plant designed to accommodate water from both the existing Well 6 and proposed Well 10. At Well 6, Well 10 water could also be supplied to the 260 Zone as required. Because the Well 6 facilities are in very poor condition, constructing a combined Well 6 and Well 10 facility may be considered. In this case, pumping from this facility would be to both the 260 and 390 Zones as required. Treated water could be routed north and west to an existing waterline crossing of Blackjack Creek. This route would avoid a new crossing of Blackjack Creek, which would be an environmental and permitting improbability. Other alternatives under consideration include: Routing treated water from the treatment plant at the Well 6 site through the downtown corridor and to an existing 12-inch 390 Zone pipeline; Construction of a treatment facility at the Well 10 site, and; Construction of either a raw water or finished water transmission line on a newly constructed boardwalk along the waterfront. Each of these alternatives appear to be more costly than the aforementioned Perry Avenue alternative, which has therefore been used for planning purposes in this document. However, the engineering report and routing study will provide a comprehensive look at the costs and benefits associated with each alternative. Water rights for Well 10 include consideration of the entire ultimate service area population but depending on development, additional wells may be required for the south and western portions of the service area. Improving the ability to transfer water between the 260 and 390 Zones is important to reducing dependency on emergency interties and increasing system reliability. Upgrades to the Melcher Pump Station are instrumental to this and discussed further in Section 6.3. 6.2.2 580 System Source Analysis The 580 System currently consists of the recently annexed McCormick Woods area in the western portion of the City and eventually will be connected to the City System via System Analysis P� ACE Page 6-3 City of Port Orchard 2009 Water System Plan development of the Glenwood JPA. Source of supply to the 580 system is a combination of City owned groundwater wells augmented by water supply from the City of Bremerton. The City is proceeding with consolidation of McCormick Wood Wells 1, 2, and 3 which are currently drawing from a shallow aquifer, to a new well (Well 1 1) in the deep aquifer. The new Well 11 will result in allocation of an additional 150 gpm (beyond the current 600 gpm) for a total water right of 750 gpm. Construction of Well 11 is proposed for 2009 and will necessitate upgrade of the treatment facility currently serving McCormick Woods Wells 1, 2, and 3. It is anticipated treatment will consist of removal of hydrogen sulfide and chlorination. Room for future fluoridation should be planned, but not constructed at this time due to the agreement with Bremerton that prohibits the possibility of fluoridated water into the Bremerton system discussed below. The existing Interlocal Agreement with the City of Bremerton provides for a maximum of 350 gpm and up to 285 acre-feet per year of uninterruptible supply until such time that the City of Port Orchard can secure new water rights to replace the Bremerton supply. The agreement requires Port Orchard to "make diligent, continuous, and best efforts to acquire water rights to replace Bremerton water." A connection from Bremerton to the McCormick Woods area was established in 2008 to augment supply in the 580 Zone. The supplemental supply is through a recently constructed pump station and 16-inch transmission main up Old Clifton Road. The existing Interlocal Agreement specifically calls for Bremerton to provide an "uninterruptible supply". Provision of supply during a power outage is considered the responsibility of Bremerton. In addition to supplying up to 350 gpm to the 580 Zone, Bremerton utilizes the 580 Zone to supply development lying North of Old Clifton Road that is served by the City of Bremerton. By agreement, Bremerton uses Port Orchard's 580 reservoir to store water for this isolated area of the Bremerton system. Water is metered into the Port Orchard system and out of the Port Orchard system to achieve a net zero water use for the Bremerton Service area. The existing Interlocal Agreement contemplates separation of the 580 Zone and Bremerton systems and construction of an independent Bremerton storage facility on the Port Orchard 580 Zone reservoir site and at the writing of this plan, negotiation of easements to accommodate this are under negotiation. The exchange of water with Bremerton through the 580 Zone is complicated by the fact that the Interlocal Agreement prohibits introduction of fluoridated water into the Bremerton water system. The City of Port Orchard currently fluoridates water from all sources except the wells serving the McCormick Woods area. As the City proceeds with interconnection of the City System and the 580 Zone and replaces Bremerton supply to the 580 Zone, fluoridated water will be introduced to the 580 Zone. When this occurs, Port Orchard will need to provide notice to Bremerton that independent storage and transmission facilities will be required to serve Bremerton customers north of Old Clifton Road. Alternatively, the agreement as it relates to fluoridation could be modified to remove this limiting factor to the development of the 580 Zone System. System Analysis � Page 6-4 P� ACE City of Port Orchard 2009 Water System Plan Source deficiencies in the 580 Zone are indicated after the year 2020, primarily due to development within the Glenwood JPA, and will be corrected by a combination of transferring water from the City system to the 580 Zone via the Glenwood JPA, and development to future sources in the 580 Zone. As development in the Glenwood JPA area occurs, implementation of the interconnecting facilities identified in this Plan should be constructed. The City has applied for but withdrawn an application for new water rights at the 580 Zone reservoir site. The need for a new well, improved transmission and/or transfer of water rights should 2030 all be considered as development proposals become more clear. System Analysis P� ACE Page 6-5 City of Port Orchard 2009 Water System Plan Table 6-1 Sources of Supply (2008) Source Name/ Existing Source 2008 Comments Primary Water Number Capacity Status Active Zone Rights (gpm) Capacity* Served (gpm) 390 and 260 Zones (City S stem) 5 40 Active 30 Claim submitted in 1997. Possibly invalid 260 50 based on date of first using water. 6 140 Active 105 260 350 7 550 Active 413 260 750 8 0 Backup 0 Wellfield. Back-up to Well 9 Only. 390 0 9 450 Active 340 Wellfield. Adjacent to Well 8. 390 500 Pending Well Development. 500 gpm is 10 0 2010 assumed to be available by 2010; 1,000 gpm 390 and Up to by 2015; and, 1,500 gpm by 2020. 260 2000 While not a source on its own, the Melcher Melcher Pump 750 Active 750 Pump Station is a backup supply from the 390 N/A Station 260 to 390 Zone. Not considered in existing conditions evaluation. By Agreement. Augments supply during high Bremerton Active demand or emergency conditions. Not 260 N/A included in source evaluation. West Sound 6-inch Manual emergency intertie not included in Mitchell connect Manual 0 source capacity evaluation. 260 N/A Intertie 1 West Sound 6-inch 6-inch metered, automatic intertie. Included Sedgewick Yes in source capacity evaluation. 390 N/A Intertie 2 meter 580 Zone (McCormick Woods) Uninterruptible Supply by Agreement. Bremerton 350 Yes 350 Assumed to be used until additional supply is 580 350 brought online in 201 1-2012. MCW 1,2,3 875 Yes 600 To be combined into Well 11 in 2009 580 600 New well to combine rights from McW Wells Well 11 0 2009 150 1, 2, 3, and add 150 gpm in 2009. 580 150 MCW 4B 0 Yes 0 Private irrigation well owned by McCormick MCW 400 Land Co. Not included in source evaluation. *75% of current operating capacity but not to exceed water right amount. For Bremerton Supply to the 580 Zone, the full allotment is assumed available in accordance with interlocal agreement. System evaluated based on operation independent of emergency interties with others stems. Table 6-2 Sources of Supply by Zone and Year Source available by Active Capacity 2008 2010 2015 2020 2025 2030 260 Zone 548 1048 1548 2048 2548 2548 390 Zone 340 340 340 340 340 340 Subtotal City 888 1388 1888 2388 2888 2888 McCormick 580 950 1100 1100 1100 1100 1100 Subtotal 580 950 1100 1100 .. 1100 1100 .. 1100 .. Source Available by Rights 2008 2010 2015 2020 2025 2030 260 Zone 1150 1150 1650 1650 1650 1650 390 Zone 500 500 500 500 500 500 Subtotal City 1650 1650 2150 2150 2150 2150 McCormick 580 1 100 1 100 1 100 1 100 1 100 1 100 Subtotal 580 1 1100 1100 1100 1 1100 1100 1 1100 Total 1 2750 2750 3250 1 3250 3250 1 3250 System Analysis � Page 6-6 P� ACE City of Port Orchard 2009 Water System Plan Table 6-3 Source Analysis (By Capacity) SOURCE (gpm) ADD MDD MDD FSS Surplus Zone ERUs (MGD) (MGD) (gpm) (pm) Required Existing (Deficit) Cit -260 2,244 0.40 0.80 555 83 638 548 -90 Cit -390 2,742 0.49 0.98 678 83 761 340 -421 00 0 City -Subtotal 4,986 0.89 1.78 1233 83 1316 888 -428 MCW-580 814 0.23 0.46 317 83 400 950 550 580 Zone Subtotal 814 0.23 0.46 317 83 400 950 550 Total :ii 1.12 Z23 1549 166 Cit -260 2,285 0.41 0.81 565 83 648 1048 400 Cit -390 2,792 0.50 0.99 690 83 773 340 -433 City -Subtotal 5,077 0.90 1.81 1255 83 1338 1388 50 oN MCW-580 822 0.23 0.66 457 83 540 1100 560 580 Zone Subtotal 822 0.23 0.66 457 83 540 1,100 560 City-260 2,400 0.43 1.22 849 83 932 1548 616 Cit -390 2,934 0.52 1.04 725 83 808 340 -468 ,n City -Subtotal 5,334 0.95 2.27 1574 83 1657 1888 231 FS MCW-580 1,130 0.32 0.90 628 83 767 1100 333 Glenwood JPA 100 0.03 0.08 56 83 580 Zone Subtotal 1,230 0.34 0.98 684 166 767 1,100 333 INV Cit -260 2,521 0.45 0.90 623 83 706 2048 1342 Cit -390 3,081 0.55 1.10 762 83 845 340 -505 0 City -Subtotal 5,602 1.00 1.99 1385 83 1468 2388 920 0 MCW-580 1,613 0.45 1.29 897 83 1174 1100 -74 Glenwood JPA 500 0.14 0.28 194 83 580 Zone Subtotal 2,113 1 2 1,091 166 1,174 1,100 (-74) Cit -260 2,648 0.47 0.94 655 83 738 2548 1810 Cit -390 3,237 0.58 1.15 800 83 883 340 -543 ,n City -Subtotal 5,885 1.05 2.10 1455 83 1538 2888 1350 0 MCW-580 2,391 0.67 1.91 1330 83 1858 1100 -758 Glenwood JPA 800 0.22 0.64 445 83 580 Zone Subtotal 3,191 1 0.89 1 2.56 1 1,775 166 1,858 1,100 -758 Cit -260 2,783 0.50 9 688 83 771 2548 1777 Cit -390 3,401 0.61 1 841 83 924 340 -584 0 City -Subtotal 6,184 1.10 0 1529 83 1612 2888 1276 M MCW-580 2,399 0.67 2 L2.72 1334 83 OV 1973 1100 -873 Glenwood JPA 1,000 0.28 0 556 83 580 Zone Subtotal 3.399 1,890 166 1,973 1 1,10 1 -873 Table 6-3 Source Analysis by Capacity Notes: 1. Source Analysis is based on active capacities indicated in Tables 6-1 and 6-2. They do not include emergency interties and are based on 75% of current operating capacity. 2. Potential exists for increased Well 10 for total yield of 1500 to 2000 gpm. 3. 2011 through 2025 source analysis includes 1,000 gpm of new water from Well 10. Additional water from Well 10 can be delivered to other areas of the City with pump station upgrades. 4. Source requirements for McCormick Woods and Glenwood JPA combined due to planned interconnection of these areas. Supplemental water from the City 390 Zone is planned for ultimate source and storage to Glenwood Area at the time of development of the JPA and interconnection of the systems. 5. Water from Bremerton at a rate of 350 gom of uninterruptible supply is included in the analyses for 2011 and 2025. The City is seeking to replace that supply in accordance with the terms of an Interlocal Agreement. System Analysis rPA E Page 6-7 City of Port Orchard 2009 Water System Plan Table 6-4 Source Analysis (by Water Rights) SOURCE (gpm) @ ADD MDD MDD FSS Surplus Zone ERUs (MGD) (MGD) (gpm) (pm) Required Existing (Deficit) Cit -260 2,244 0.40 0.80 555 83 638 1150 512.3 City-390 2,742 0.49 0.98 678 83 761 500 -26 00 0 City -Subtotal 4,986 0.89 1.78 1233 83 1316 1650 334. CD MCW-580 814 0.23 0.46 317 83 400 1100 E700.1 580 Zone Subtotal 814 0.23 0.46 317 83 400 1,100 700. Total:0i Cit -260 2,285 0.41 0.81 565 83 648 1150 502.2 Cit -390 2,792 0.50 0.99 690 83 773 500 -273 City -Subtotal 5,077 0.90 1.81 1255 83 1338 1650 311.9 No MCW-580 822 0.23 0.66 457 83 540 1100 559.9 580 Zone Subtotal 822 0 1 457 83 540 1,100 559.9 City-260 2,400 0.43 1.22 849 83 932 1650 718.4 City-390 2,934 0.52 1.04 725 83 808 500 -308 ,n City -Subtotal 5,334 0.95 2.27 1574 83 1657 2150 493.2 o MCW-580 1,130 0.32 0.90 628 83 767 1100 333.0 a Glenwood JPA 100 0.03 0.08 56 83 580 Zone Subtotal 1,230 0.34 0.98 684 166 767 1,100 333.0 Cit -260 2,521 0.45 0.90 623 83 706 i 1650 826.1 943.8 Cit -390 3,081 0.55 1.10 762 83 845 500 -345 o City -Subtotal 5,602 1.00 1.99 1385 83 1468 2150 682.1 o MCW-580 1,613 0.45 1.29 897 83 1174 1100 -74 N Glenwood JPA 500 0.14 0.28 194 83 580 Zone Subtotal 2,113 0.59 1.57 1,091 166 1,174 1,100 -74 i Cit -260 2,648 0.47 0.94 655 83 738 1650 912.3 Cit -390 3,237 0.58 1.15 800 83 883 500 -383 ,n City -Subtotal 5,885 1.05 2.10 1455 83 1538 2150 612.1 o MCW-580 2,391 0.67 1.91 1330 83 1858 1100 -758 04 Glenwood JPA 800 0.22 0.64 445 83 580 Zone Subtotal 3,191 0.89 2.56 1,775 166 1,858 1,100 -758 Cit -260 2,783 0.50 0.99 688 83 771 1650 879.0 Cit -390 3,401 0.61 1.21 841 83 924 500 -424 o City -Subtotal 6,184 1.10 2.20 1529 83 1612 2150 538.2 Mo MCW-580 2,399 0.67 1.92 1334 83 1973 1100 -873 `\1 Glenwood JPA 1,000 0.28 0.80 556 83 580 Zone Subtotal 3,399 0.95 2.72 1,890 166 1,973 1,100 -873 i Table 6-4 Source Analysis by Capacity Notes: 1. Total Surplus/Deficit is calculated with one fire accounted for in the entire system. Therefore the additive source required per zone is slightly larger than the total required. 2.2011 through 2025 source analysis includes 1,000 gpm of new water from Well 10. Additional water from Well 10 can be delivered to other areas of the City with pump station upgrades. 3. Source requirements for McCormick Woods and Glenwood JPA are combined due to planned interconnection of these areas. Supplemental water from the City 391 Zone is ultimately planned for the Glenwood Area. 4. Potential exists for increased water supply from Well 10 for a total yield of 1500 to 2000 gpm. 5. Water from Bremerton at a rate of 350 gpm of uninterruptible supply is included in the analyses for 2011 and 2025. The City is seeking replacement of that supply in accordance with the terms of an Interlocal Agreement. System Analysis Page 6-8 JJJ City of Port Orchard 2009 Water System Plan 6.3 PUMPING There are three pump stations in the City System and one in the 580 Zone (McCormick Woods) System. Evaluations of facilities within each system are presented below: 6.3.1 City System Pumping Analysis The two pump stations serving the City System were evaluated using all three criteria established by DOH and discussed in Section 5. Both stations were of adequate capacity under current conditions and configuration but the City Hall Pump Station is antiquated and in need of rehabilitation. One option would be to eliminate it and transfer water rights to another well in the system. Regardless of the transfer of water rights, bringing Well 10 online will require upgrade of the Melcher Pump Station to accommodate a third pump for transfer of Well 10 water into the water system west of Blackjack Creek. Well 6 has an artesian flow with a head of about 5 psi. The well discharges to a clear well to remove hydrogen sulfide, and is then treated with chlorine and fluoride prior to being pumped into the system. Only one pump is available, and no standby power exists at this site. All of the facilities are old and need major upgrading. One option to accomplish this would be to pump Well 10 water to the Well 6 site and construct a new storage clear well and treatment for both wells. A pump station could be constructed to pump the combined water to both 260 and 390 Zones as required. 6.3.2 580 Zone(McCormick) System Pumping Analysis The McCormick Wood's 580 Pump Station is of adequate capacity to meet the immediate service area needs of the McCormick Woods Development. However, treatment to include hydrogen sulfide may need to be added for the proposed new Well 11 developed in 2009 to replace McCormick Wells 1, 2, and 3. In order to provide water from Well 10 to the 580 and above pressure zones, a new transfer pump station will be necessary to the transfer water from the 390 Zone to McCormick Woods 580 Zone. In addition, this station will provide water for the future development of in the 580 Zone and Glenwood Road JPA areas. Based on the results shown in Table 6-2 there is a source shortage in the McCormick Woods area in 2011 and 2025. Additional water rights have been applied for and will be sufficient to make up for the future deficiency (proposed Well 12). However, there is no guarantee that these additional water rights will be approved, and is uncertain whether this request is still active. Also, the City, with this pump station, will be able to provide a second source of water to the 580 and 660 Zones. The recommendation is to design a transfer pump station with two 650 gpm pumps with room for a third 600 gpm pump that would be necessary if the additional water sources are System Analysis P� ACE Page 6-9 City of Port Orchard 2009 Water System Plan not developed in the 580 Zone. This will also provide for the largest pump to be out of service as well the capability to provide an additional source of supply to the area. A detailed engineering report will be required prior to final design of the required facilities. 6.4 STORAGE ANALYSIS The recommended storage capacity for a water system per DOH and minimum requirement established for the City of Port Orchard is equal to the sum of the equalizing, standby, and fire suppression storage. Each of the storage components are described below. Table 6-3 shows the existing and projected storage requirements for the City and 580 Zone Systems independently. 6.3.1 City System Storage Analysis Storage facilities serving the City system are detailed in Section 4 and include a total of 4.25 million gallons of storage in six separate reservoir. Three reservoirs (Park, Morton Street and Maple Street)serve the 260 Zone with 2.15 million gallons of storage. The other three reservoirs (South Sydney, Old Clifton and Sedgwick) provide the 390 Zone with 2.1 million gallons of water. The 390 Zone reservoirs also serve a small service area that is fed through PRVs and operates as an Intermediate Zone at a Hydraulic Grade Line of 336. THE characteristics of available storage are indicated on Table 6-5. As indicated there is a deficit in 390 High Zone storage currently but and through the planning horizon of 2025. Consideration of a small -pressurized zone to serve the higher elevation immediately surrounding the Sedgwick Tank would rectify the problem by reducing the dead storage quantity. Automatic interties with pressure reducing valves from the 390 High Zone to the 260 Low Zone are also recommended to alleviate this issue and improve system reliability through increased availability of standby storage. 6.3.2 580 Zone(McCormick) System Storage Analysis Three reservoirs currently serve the 580 (McCormick) System. A total of .57 million gallons of storage is provided in the 580 Reservoir (0,45 million gallons and McCormick Woods Tanks 1 and 2 (0.06 million gallons each). The storage deficit shown for McCormick Woods which includes only McCormick Woods West and Glenwood JPA areas is anticipated due to growth in the immediate area, especially in the Glenwood JPA. The projections, however, do not include the McCormick Woods North or areas served by the City of Bremerton. An additional 1.7± million gallon reservoir of usable storage is proposed to satisfy the deficit outlined in Table 6-3. Based on the results shown in Table 6-2, additional source would be required to serve the McCormick Woods West and Glenwood JPA area. Although additional water rights have been applied for (Well 11), the current applications may not be sufficient to meet the ultimate development capacity of the area and there is no assurance that the water rights will be granted. Therefore, in order to provide a future source of water to the 580 and above System Analysis � Page 6-10 P� ACE City of Port Orchard 2009 Water System Plan zones, a new transfer pump station would be required form the City's 390 Zone. The new pump station would supply proposed development in the Glenwood JPA and augment supply to the McCormick Woods and McCormick Woods West areas. It is recommend that the pump station be sized for installation of two 650 gpm pumps with additional space provided for a proposed third 600 gpm pump in the event that an additional source is not constructed within the 580 Zone. This will increase capacity and reliability to serve the area in the event that the largest pump is out of service. Figure 6-1 provides an overview of the system, in hydraulic profile format, with the proposed well, pump station and storage improvements recommended in the previous system analyses. System Analysis P� ACE Page 6-11 City of Port Orchard 2009 Water System Plan Table 6-5 STORAGE ANALYSIS cc Q >- Zone ERUs ADD (mgd) MDD (mgd) PHD (gpm) Existing Storage (m9) COMPONENT REQUIREMENTS AVAILABLE STORAGE TOTAL REQUIRED Equal (gal) Standby Storage g (gallons) Fire (gal) Operational (gal) Dead (gal) Total Effective (al) Total Required q (al) Surplus (Deficit) (al) Cit -260 2,244 0.40 0.80 961 2,250,000 61,970 604,357 360,000 200,967 677,895 1,371,138 1,026,327 344,811 Cit -390 2,742 0.49 0.98 1,158 2,000,000 122,754 486,659 360,000 173,911 973,349 852,740 969,412 (116,672) 00 0 City Subtotal 4986 0.89 1.78 2,119 4,250,000 184,724 1,091,016 360,000 374,877 1,651,244 2,223,879 1,995,740 228,139 N MCW 814 0.23 0.46 867 570,000 0 162,800 360,000 10,714 0 559,286 522,800 36,486 580 Subtotal 814 0.23 0.46 867 570,000 0 162,800 360,000 10,714 0 559,286 522,800 36,486 Total 5,800 1.12 2.23 2,912 4,820,000 184,724 1,253,816 360,000 385,591 1,651,244 2,783,165 1,798,540 984,625 Cit -260 2,285 0.41 0.81 977 2,250,000 61,970 456,930 360,000 200,967 677,895 1,371,138 878,900 492,238 Cit -390 2,792 0.50 0.99 1,178 2,000,000 122,754 558,4701 360,000 173,911 973,349 852,740 1,041,224 (188,483) City Subtotal 5077 0.90 1.81 2,155 4,250,000 184,724 1,015,400 360,000 374,877 1,651,244 2,223,879 1,920,124 303,755 N MCW 822 0.23 0.66 874 294,960 0 164,400 360,000 10,714 257,441 26,805 524,400 (497,595) 580 Subtotal 822 0.23 0.66 874 294,960 0 164,400 360,000 10,714 257,441 26,805 524,400 (497,595) Total 5,899 1.13 2.47 2,956 4,544,960 184,724 1,179,800 360,000 385,591 1,908,685 2,250,684 1,724,524 526,160 Cit -260 2,400 0.43 1.22 1,023 2,100,000 0 480,060 360,000 200,967 677,895 1,221,138 840,060 381,078 Cit -390 2,934 0.52 1.04 1,234 2,100,000 134,110 586,740 360,000 173,911 973,349 952,740 1,080,850 (128,109) ,n City Subtotal 5334 0.95 2.27 2,257 4,200,000 134,110 1,066,800 360,000 374,877 1,651,244 2,173,879 1,920,910 252,969 o MCW 1130 0.32 0.90 1,147 294,960 7,117 226,000 360,000 10,714 135,756 148,490 593,117 (444,626) a Glenwood JPA 100 0.03 0.08 232 172,207 34,783 20,000 360,000 0 135,756 36,451 414,783 (378,333) 580 Subtotal 1230 0.34 0.98 1,379 467,167 41,900 246,000 360,000 10,714 271,512 184,941 1,007,900 (822,959) Total 6,564 1.29 3.25 3,420 4,494,960 176,010 1,312,800 360,000 385,591 1,787,000 2,322,369 1,848,810 473,559 Cit -260 2,521 0.45 0.90 1,071 2,100,000 0 504,180 360,000 200,967 677,895 1,221,138 864,180 356,958 Cit -390 3,081 0.55 1.10 1,292 2,100,000 142,856 616,220 360,000 173,911 973,349 952,740 1,119,076 (166,335) o City Subtotal 5602 1.00 1.99 2,363 4,200,000 142,856 1,120,400 360,000 374,877 1,651,244 2,173,879 1,983,256 190,623 o MCW 1613 0.45 1.29 1,577 196,598 71,517 183,280 360,000 10,714 0 185,884 614,797 (428,913) a Glenwood JPA 500 0.14 0.28 587 97,272 88,117 280,000 360,000 0 0 97,272 728,117 (630,845) 580 Subtotal 2113 0.59 1.57 2,164 293,870 159,633 463,280 360,000 10,714 0 283,156 1,342,913 (1,059,758) Total 7,715 1.59 3.57 4,311 4,396,598 302,489 1,583,680 360,000 385,591 1,651,244 2,359,763 2,246,169 1 13,594 Cit -260 2,648 0.47 0.94 1,121 2,100,000 0 529,650 360,000 200,967 677,895 1,221,138 889,650 331,488 Cit -390 3,237 0.58 1.15 1,354 2,100,000 152,091 662,683 360,000 173,911 973,349 952,740 1,174,774 (222,033) ,n City Subtotal 5885 1.05 2.10 2,475 4,200,000 152,091 1,192,333 360,000 374,877 1,651,244 2,173,879 2,064,424 109,455 o MCW 2391 0.67 1.91 2,268 210,645 175,250 618,960 360,000 10,714 0 199,931 1,154,210 (954,279) N Glenwood JPA 800 0.22 0.64 854 155,906 128,117 448,000 360,000 0 0 155,906 936,117 (780,211) 580 Subtotal 3191 0.89 2.56 3,122 366,551 303,367 1,066,960 360,000 10,714 0 355,837 2,090,327 (1,734,489) Total 9,076 1.94 4.65 5,381 4,410,645 455,458 2,259,293 360,000 385,591 1,651,244 2,373,810 3,074,751 (700,941) System Analysis Page 6-12 PA E City of Port Orchard 2009 Water System Plan Table 6-5 STORAGE ANALYSIS COMPONENT REQUIREMENTS AVAILABLE STORAGE TOTAL REQUIRED Q >- Zone ERUs ADD g (m d) MDD PHD Existing Storage Equal Standby Fire Operational Dead Total Total Surplus } (mgd) (gpm) (mg) (gal) Storage (gal) (gal) (gal) Effective Required (Deficit) (gallons) (al) (al) (gal) 360,000 1,221,138 916,560 304,578 Cit -260 2,783 0.50 0.99 1,174 2,100,000 0 556,560 200,967 677,895 Cit -390 3,401 0.61 1.21 1,419 2,100,000 161,848 680,240 360,000 173,911 973,349 952,740 1,202,088 (249,348) o City Subtotal 6184 1.10 2.20 2,593 4,200,000 161,848 1,236,800 360,000 374,877 1,651,244 2,173,879 2,118,648 55,230 Mo MCW 2399 0.67 1.92 2,275 265,405 176,317 623,440 360,000 10,714 0 254,691 1,159,757 (905,066) a Glenwood JPA 1000 0.28 0.80 1,032 241,431 154,783 560,000 360,000 0 0 241,431 1,074,783 (833,353) 580 Subtotal 3399 0.95 2.72 3,307 S 506,836dk 1,100 1,183,440 360,000 R96,122 2,234,540 (1,738,418) Total 9,583 2.05 1 4.92 5,901 4,706,836 1 492,948 2,420,240 720,0001 385,591 1,651,2441 2,670,001 1 4,353,188 (1,683,188) 1. Operating Range of 2 feet assumed in each facility. 4. Required storage equals equalizing equals equalizing plus standby and fire storage 2. Source quantity increases from Well 10 and identified in Table 6-2 are included. (Stacked Storage). 3. Storage Analysis does not consider water transfer between the 260 and 390 Zones. 5. Consideration of individual sprinkler systems in new residential construction may warrant consideration of nested storage. System Analysis (;;i�-O Page 6-13 City of Port Orchard 2009 Water System Plan M�� rrriFfrfff.� T fsL7l TsFgirl System Analysis Page 6-14 PA C 600 500 400 300 200 100 x R 0 MCCORMICK WOODS HGL 580' PORT ORCHARD HIGH ZONE HGL 390 PORT ORCHARD LOW ZONE HGL 260' CPAC�E 0.45 MG EXISTING RESERVOIR OE= 580' INITIAL 600t GPM =UTURE 1200GPM 580' ZONE MCCORMICK WFIIS412&3 r Combine to Well 11 7 �1- MEDIUM ZONE N/C \fY�/ PRV PORT ORCHARD INTERMEDIATE ZONE HGL 336' N/C WELL #10 N/C $ N/C PROPOSED HGL 660' 1.1 MG PROPOSED RESERVOIR M CITY OF BREMERTON INTERTIE W/ 580 ZONE EXISTING MCCORMICK WOODS PUMP STATION 0.12 MG EXISTING RESERVOIRS OE= 431' CITY OF BREMERTON INTERTIE W/ 660 ZONE 0.1 MG 1.0 MG 1.0 MG SIDNEY AVE MELCHER OLD CLIFTON SEDGEWICK RESERVOIR PUMP STATION RESERVOIR RESERVOIR OE= 390' GRADE 650-1000 OE= 390' OE- 390' GPM INTERTIE W/ M WESTSOUND WELL #8 WELL #9 UTILITY DISTRICT GRND ELEV 275' GRND ELEV 27.i DEPTH 5TP CITY HALL PUMP STATION .... CITY OF 0.1 MG M BREMTERTON 2.0 MG MAPLE STREET INTERTIE PARK RESERVOIR RESERVOIR HGL 256' ZONE OE= 260' OE= 260' LEGEND PRESSURE REDUCING VALVE g VALVE N/C NORMALLY CLOSED a METER OE OVERFLOW ELEVATION GRND ELEV 15' WELL #4 WELL #5 14, WELL #6 WELL #7 DEPTH GRND ELEV 20' GRND ELEV 15' GRND ELEV 30' GRND ELEV 15' UNKNOWN DEPTH 220' DEPTH 240' DEPTH 806' DEPTH 577' CITY OF PORT ORCHARD WATER SYSTEM PROPOSED HYDRAULIC PROFILE FIGURE 6-1 City of Port Orchard 2009 Water System Plan r' iR�� FFTiFYTffff T f- E1 E ►FJ9S System Analysis Page 6-16 PA E City of Port Orchard 2009 Water System Plan 6.5 DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM ANALYSIS 6.5.1 Hydraulic Modeling Software As an aid in the identification and analysis of present and future demands and recommended improvements, the water system was evaluated using the H2O Net hydraulic model software developed by MWH Soft, Inc. This particular software allows graphical representation of the water system within the AutoCAD working environment. With this analysis tool, various modifications, parameter changes, and improvements can be easily evaluated. Thus, the identification of problem areas and the development of possible solutions are expedited. By having the water system model on the computer, developer extensions, and other improvements can be modeled as they occur, allowing design and construction of the most effective and cost efficient system. Version 6.0 of the H2O Net software was used for water system analysis. The program has the capability to simulate all components of a water system, including pipes, pumps, pressure reducing valves, and reservoirs. This includes the previously calibrated McCormick Woods water system model that was received from a separate consultant, converted from Water CAD to H2O Net, and integrated with the City's model. This provides one model that can be used to analyze the entire water system. The City's water system model involves the use of approximately 475 pipes and 400 nodes. Nodes serve as connection points for pipes and can be assigned external demands to simulate water uses within the system. All metering points, pumps, pressure reducing valves, and reservoirs are also included in the model. Output reports from the model can indicate high or low node pressures and pipe velocities. To express flow in pipes, the Hazen -Williams equation for turbulent flow as a function of pipe length, diameter, head loss, and roughness was used. H2O Net software allows the user to enter all necessary attribute data needed to model the pipes. In addition to assigning external demand data for each node, pressure reducing valve downstream pressures, and tank elevations during fire flow testing were input. 6.5.2 Hydraulic Model Calibration In order for the hydraulic computer model to accurately reflect the operation of the water system, it must accurately model all facilities in the existing water system. After all water facilities were accounted for in the model, demands were evenly distributed between nodes in their associated pressure zone. A point demand was established from water use data for 17 individual accounts demonstrating high water use to better represent actual flow through the system. The remainder of demand was spread equally throughout the system according to general land use and population characteristics. To verify that the hydraulic model was accurate and closely replicates the current operation of the existing system, information from fire flow tests were collected by the City prior to this planning effort. However, because no specific testing was accomplished as part of this System Analysis P� ACE Page 6-17 City of Port Orchard 2009 Water System Plan Plan, and because the City operates its reservoirs within a very small range (two feet) assumptions were made regarding tank levels during the time of the fire flow tests. With this data, scenarios were created in the hydraulic model with water system facility parameters set to the reservoir levels that occurred during the fire flow tests. After running simulations, slight adjustments were made to the minor head losses for the various components of the water system model until the modeled fire flows and static pressures matched those of the actual tests. Test static pressures and modeled static pressures calibrated to approximately 10% in all instances. In general, inconsistencies may be attributed to slightly incorrect elevation data. Tested fire flows and modeled fire flows also showed significant correlation. 6.5.3 Hydraulic Analysis The model was used to determine areas where system deficiencies exist, or are likely to develop, under various flow conditions. These deficiencies include areas of high or low pressure, areas with high flow velocities in the pipelines, and areas with low available fire flow. The system was analyzed using the minimum design criteria put forth in Section 5, which are based on recommended Department of Health criteria. Present and future conditions were analyzed using the following pertinent design criteria: ■ Steady state analysis and conditions. ■ An acceptable pressure range of 40 psi to 100 psi for domestic flows. ■ A minimum system pressure of 30 psi throughout the City under peak hour demand conditions. ■ A minimum system pressure of 20 psi under maximum day demand plus required fire flow conditions. ■ A maximum pipeline velocity of 12 feet per second under fire flow conditions. ■ The analysis was performed assuming supply from the reservoirs only and the Melcher Pump Station inactive. ■ System modeling was completed with the reservoir elevations set at the average of the operational storage component, so only the effective storage was considered. ■ By using these criteria, existing and potential issues were identified and are discussed below and presented in the Capital Facilities Plan. System Analysis � Page 6-18 P� ACE City of Port Orchard 2009 Water System Plan 6.5.4 Pressure Evaluation The following scenarios were modeled: Average daily demand (ADD) and maximum daily demand (MDD) for current water usage and that of future years 2010 and 2025. The results indicate that the water velocities in all of the modeled pipes are within acceptable limits, i.e. less than five feet per second (fps), for each scenario. Concerning pressure, the results indicated that for all scenarios, system pressures fell generally within the specified working range of 40 to 100 pounds per square inch (psi). Results that were above or below this range were mainly a function of the City's varied ground elevations. 6.5.4.1 City System Pressure Analysis Specific observations related to pressure are summarized below: Pressures below 40 psi were observed in an 8-inch diameter main on Taylor Street between Cline and Sidney Avenues. In addition, lower working pressures were observed in the 4-inch diameter mains on Dwight Street between Sidney Avenue and Kitsap Street. To facilitate fire flows, it is recommended that the City upgrade these 4-inch mains to 8-inch diameter pipes as part of any long term Capital Improvements Plan (CIP) they have in place. Pressures above 100 psi were observed in the 8-inch diameter main feeding the Eaglecrest Neighborhood, in the 12-inch diameter main from Old Clifton Road where it crosses under Highway 16, on Bay Street along the length of the waterfront; and in 6 and 8-inch diameter mains in the areas bounded by Bethel Road on the west, Sroufe Street on the south, Mitchell Avenue on the east, and ending at South Kitsap High School. All these pipes are modeled as being fed by the 12-inch diameter main on South Street. In addition, high pressures were observed in the vicinity of Perry Avenue and Tracy Avenue in the old section of the City. To reduce system pressures in these areas of the City System, the following upgrades are recommended: • Install pressure -reducing valves (PRVs) at the Eaglecrest Neighborhood (on Eaglecrest Place near Melcher Street) and on the 12-inch main near the intersection of Kendall and Maple Streets. Reduction of pressure to working limits along the waterfront on Bay Street would require the installation of four to six PRVs and the creation of a third pressure zone. Therefore, unless the City is experiencing significant problems, it is not recommended that these upgrades be performed. The high pressure observed in the 12-inch main under Highway 16, is a function of local elevation of the pipe, and does not need to be reduced. System Analysis PACE Page 6-19 City of Port Orchard 2009 Water System Plan Table 6-6 City System Low Pressure Zone Anal sis(Residual Below 20psi) Fire Flow Range ( m) Low (260) Zone Deficient Area Description High (390) Zone Deficient Area Description < 1,000 Near Melcher Pump Station 4-inch pipe at High Antermed Zone break at Sidney Ave and Kendall St 4-inch mains between Sidney Ave. and Kitsap St . 6-inch pipe terminating at Goldenrod and West Streets The Intermediate Zone near South Street 4-inch pipe terminating below Tremont Street 4-inch pipe on Melcher St. from West St. through Sroufe St. 6-inch diameter pipe on Sroufe St. between Bethel and Mitchell 1,000-1,500 The High/Low Zone cut off on Kendall and Maple 6 inch pipe terminating on Granat Street The Intermediate Zone 1,500-2,000 8- and 4-inch diameter lines on Sherman Rd. 6-inch on South Flower Street between Melcher and Cline Streets 6-inch pipe on Goldenrod Street The Low/High Zone cut off above Kitsap High School 8-inch pipe terminating on Lippert Drive 6-inch pipe end node on Tracy near Chester Streets 6-inch pipes on Mitchell Avenue between Sroufe St. and Plisko Lane through connection with the 8-inch pipe from Plisko through Taylor St 12-inch main at Kendall and Maple feeding the Bethel/Mitchell area 2,000-3,000 10-inch dead end main at the west end of Bay Street 6-inch pipe on Sedgwick Rd. and the 12-inch from Tank 5 crossing Most nodes in the old town area between Morton, Sedgwick Rd. Bay, and Tracy Streets 10-inch main on Sidney between Fireweed Rd and Alpha Lane and The nodes on DeKalb Street near Tank 4 between Forest, Park and Melcher Streets 6-inch main on Sherman Road at Echo Court 8-inch main on Forest Park St. between Sidney Rd. and West Ave. 8-inch main on Pottery (from Group Health to Ea lecrest) 3,000-4,000 6-inch pipes along Bay Street Alternating 10 and 12-inch pipeline along Pottery from Hovde to Hwy 16 12-inch pipes on Cline Ave. near Taylor Street The 10-inch diameter on Sidney at Goldenrod Roads 8-inch mains on Sidney Ave. between Sweaney and The 8 to 6-inch connection on Sherman Road near Hwy 16 Dwight Streets The 10-inch main on Sidney Ave. between Bothwell St. and South St. The 8-inch pipe on Pottery Rd. from Tremont St. through Alder Lane The 10- pipe on Lloyd Parkway System Analysis PACE Page 6-20 City of Port Orchard 2009 Water System Plan 6.5.4.1 580 (McCormick) System Pressure Analysis Within a small area of the 580 Zone, modeled pressures are as high as 120 psi for a few customers. The high pressures affect only a few customers and individual PRVs are recommended to resolve the issue. Low pressures are anticipated in the vicinity of the McCormick Woods West development. To provide system pressures in the 40 — 100 psi range, a closed booster pump station is proposed for construction as a condition for development to occur in this area. The installation of this booster station will create a new City 660 Zone for service. Table 6-7 580 Pressure Zone Deficient Areas (Residual Below 20 psi) Fire Flow Range ( pm) Deficient Area Description < 1,000 4-inch main on Turnberry Place Southwest 4-inch main on Killeen Place Southwest 4-inch main on Southwest Galway Court 4-inch main on Kinfig Place Southwest 6-inch main South of St. Clare Drive Southwest (Pipe P-115) 6-inch main South of St. Clare Drive Southwest (Pipe P-1 14) 6-inch diameter main just east of Hawkstone Avenue Southwest 1,000-1,500 8-inch loop just South of St. Clare Drive SW (Pipes P-107,P-108,P-109,P-1 17) 8-inch main on Baltray Place Southwest 8-inch main on Broadstone Place Southwest 8-inch main just east of Turnberry Place Southwest 6-inch main just northwest of McCormick Woods Reservoir 4-inch main on Ashridge Avenue Southwest 6-inch main just northeast of McCormick Woods Reservoir 8-inch main on Southwest Dunraven Court 4-inch main just west of McCormick Woods Reservoir System Analysis P� ACE Page 6-21 City of Port Orchard 2009 Water System Plan 6.5.5 Fire Flow Evaluation Fire flows for the system were modeled at different demands for the 2030 MDD scenario to determine the extent of deficiencies present. The minimum pipe diameter modeled for the analysis was 4-inches and fire flow demands for specific node classes were as specified by Uniform Fire Code and Insurance Services Office (ISO) guidelines. The analysis indicated generally that adequate flows were available for all pressure zones, but that some deficiencies are present. The minimum pipe diameter modeled for the analysis was 4- inches. In addition, it was assumed for all analyses that the Melcher Street pump station was off, no wells were actively pumping, and the connection to the Bremerton system was closed. Critical pressure for nodes in all the fire flow analyses was set at 20 psi. The model tests were also run with all pumps turned off to assess the ability of the system to operate with supply only from storage reservoirs. To determine the general availability of fire flow in the system, an initial fire flow demand of 2,000 gpm was applied to every node in the City of Port Orchard's system and 1,500 gpm to every node in the 580 Zone. Individual zones were then modeled separately at flows ranging up to 4,000 gpm within the City of Port Orchard, along with individual high users. Fire flow demands for individual high users were as stipulated by the ISO guidelines. The results of the fire flow analysis indicated generally that adequate flows, up to 4,000 gpm, were available for all of the City pressure zones and 1,500 gpm in the 580 Zone. Figure 6-2 shows available fire flows, as determined by modeling, throughout the City under current MDD conditions. Fire flows of 1,500 gpm are available in the residential portions of the 580 Zone and approximately 2,700 gpm at the Club House. A number of areas were observed to have deficiencies, i.e. node pressures dropping below 20 psi during fire events. 6.5.5.1 City System Fire Flow Analysis A general summary of High and Low Zone results for these areas is presented below. Available Fire Flows of less than 1,000 gpm are found at dead and closed pipe ends, in pipes with diameters of less than 6-inches, and in the vicinity bound by Central Street on the north, Mitchell Avenue on the east, Sroufe Street on the south, and Rockwell Avenue to the west. In addition, the Intermediate Pressure Zone has nodes that are not capable of a 1,000 gpm flow. At the South Kitsap High School, the 8- inch diameter High Zone main that dead -ends there was found to have a flow of 2,000 gpm. System Analysis � Page 6-22 P� ACE City of Port Orchard 2009 Water System Plan The Eaglecrest Neighborhood, the Intermediate Pressure Zone area, and the 6-inch diameter mains on South Flower Street and Goldenrod Street have fire flows below 1500 gpm. Potential problem areas were revealed in the with the 6-inch pipes in the southeast and at the northeast corner of the High Zone that includes Bethel Road and Mitchell Avenue. Specific areas of the Low and High Pressure Zones were listed previously in Table 6- 6 with the accompanying fire flow ranges at which residual pressure was observed to decrease below 20 psi. The following paragraphs presents a summary of the analysis performed to determine availability of fire flows at specific facilities requiring high fire flows: City System — 390 High Zone: South Kitsap High School: this node can only flow 1,500 gpm, and so a separate fire line would have to be run from the nearest Low Zone hydrant (at least 300 ft away) to get the remaining 2,000 gpm necessary to reach the 3,500 gpm typically required for schools. Upsizing pipes may be needed to obtain a 3500 gpm Fire Flow and completion of this well with the Well 6 project will help increase flows this area. Hi Joy Bowl: this node can only reach 2,400 gpm of the required 3,000 gpm for commercial facilities. In addition, nodes in the Bethel/Mitchell area sequentially show residuals pressures below 20 psi through the connection with the 12-inch diameter main from South Street to the Melcher Pump Station. The Pancake House and South Kitsap Mall are located on the same mains and experience the same problems. Group Health: this node can only reach 2,500 of the required 3,500 gpm for institutions. Peninsula Work Release: this node on Lloyd Parkway can meet the required 3,500 gpm of an institution but when this demand is applied, nodes north of this location have residual pressures at or below 20 psi. Shari's Restaurant: 3,000 gpm fire flow on this node on Sedgwick Road causes pressure to drop slightly below 20 psi. However, this area typically has low pressure due to its proximity to Tank 5 and so this is not considered to be a significant problem. System Analysis PACE Page 6-23 City of Port Orchard 2009 Water System Plan City System — 260 Low Zone: The High Users in this area are Holiday Inn Express, Kitsap County Admin Building (J160), and Tweten's Lighthouse Restaurant. All of these nodes can reach 3,000 gpm as required by code. However, nodes in the Intermediate Zone and areas near the Melcher Pump Station that are connected to the Low Zone drop below 20 psi residual pressure. In addition, the 4-inch diameter pipe located between Dwight and Kitsap Streets drops below 20 psi at the fire flow demand on the above users. A maximum flow for these nodes, the High Users, is approximately 1,500 gpm. Analyses of fire flow results indicate that several areas in the existing water system have velocities above 12 fps during fire events. These areas are primarily along Bay and Kitsap Streets in the Low Zone and in the Bethel Road and Mitchell Avenue areas in the High Zone. 6.5.5.2 580 (McCormick) System: Within the 580 Zone, available fire flows of less than 1,000 gpm were observed at dead ends, in pipes less than 8-inches in diameter and areas where transmission or main distribution piping capacities are inadequate. The high user in this area is the McCormick Woods Clubhouse. Under the build out MDD scenario, the Clubhouse can maintain a fire flow of approximately 2,700 gpm while maintaining a minimum 20 psi pressure within the overall water system. System Analysis � Page 6-24 P� ACE City of Port Orchard 2009 Water System Plan Insert Fire Flow Map System Analysis PACE Page 6-25 City of Port Orchard 2009 Water System Plan System Analysis Page 6-26 A E City of Port Orchard 2009 Water System Plan Areas of inadequate fire flow within this zone can be attributed to long dead end water mains, undersized water mains, and lack of global and localized water main looping. 6.5.5.3 Fire Flow Improvements Improvements in fire flow to meet future demand conditions consists of replacing existing 4 and 6-inch diameter mains with a minimum of 8-inch diameter mains, looping water mains, and installing interties to connect to the water system of adjacent water purveyors. The general areas identified for fire flow improvements include City System: • The area bounded by Dwight Street on the north, Mitchell Avenue on the east, Sroufe Street on the south, and Rockwell Avenue to the west. • The Eaglecrest Neighborhood. • The Intermediate Pressure Zone. • 6-inch mains on South Flower and Goldenrod Streets. • 4-inch pipes in the downtown area of Port Orchard. • 4-inch main running from Pottery and May St. to Sroufe St. and Sidney Ave. • 6-inch main terminating on Granat Street. • 4-inch mains on Hull and Division Streets. • 4-inch mains on Dwight and Seattle Streets. • 4-inch main on Turnberry Place Southwest. • 4-inch main on Killeen Place Southwest. • 4-inch main on Southwest Gilway Court. • 4-inch main on Kinfig Place Southwest. • Two 6-inch mains south of St. Clare Drive Southwest (P-1 14 & P-1 15). • 6-inch main east of Hawkstone Avenue Southwest. • 8-inch loop south of St. Clare Drive Southwest. • 8-inch main on Baltray Place Southwest. • 8-inch main Broadstone Place Southwest. • 8-inch main east of Turnberry Place Southwest. 580 Zone (McCormick) System: • 6-inch main northwest of McCormick Woods Reservoir. • 6-inch main northeast of McCormick Woods Reservoir. • 4-inch main west of McCormick Woods Reservoir. • 4-inch main on Ashridge Avenue Southwest. • 8-inch main on Southwest Dunraven Court. System Analysis PACE Page 6-27 City of Port Orchard 2009 Water System Plan 6.5.8 Small Main Replacements It is recommended that the City embark on a small water main replacement program to be implemented over a number of years and in conjunction with new development, street overlays, and sewer system improvements. This will improve flow and accommodate for future demand capacity. A summary of recommended small water main replacements is summarized below: City System: The 4-inch diameter water mains in downtown Port Orchard, including the following pipes should be replaced with 8-inch mains: ■ The 4-inch line that connects from Sherman Avenue to Cline Avenue. ■ The 4-inch line that connects from Dwight Street to Kitsap Street. ■ The 4-inch line that connects from Sidney Avenue to Bay Street. ■ The 4-inch pipe running from Pottery Road and May Street to Sroufe Street and Sidney Avenue. ■ The entire 6 and 8-inch main network feeding off of the 12-inch main at Maple Street and serving the Bethel and Mitchell High Zone area. ■ The 6-inch water main on Bay Street should be upgraded to a 12-inch diameter pipe. ■ The 6-inch mains on South Flower Street and Goldenrod Street. 580 Zone (McCormick) System: Small mains recommended for replacement within the 580 Zone of McCormick Woods are listed in the Fire Flow Improvements Section above. In the event of property rezoning, the system may not be capable of meeting the increased fire flow requirements. If this is the case, the water mains will require re- examination to determine necessary improvements. It is recommended that the City monitor new construction and rezoning activities in the interest of fire protection. 6.5.9 Analysis of CIP Alternatives The following CIP Alternatives were modeled to assess their impact upon system fire flow capacity. The alternatives are as follows: Alternative 1: Installation of PRVs to interconnect the High and Low Zone. Alternative 2: Installation of New Well #10 (assumed flow range of 1,000 to 1,500 gpm) and accompanying 12-inch diameter transmission main along Perry, Bay, Rockwell Streets, and Cline Avenue. System Analysis � Page 6-28 P� ACE City of Port Orchard 2009 Water System Plan The analysis of benefit comparison for the two CIP options based on available fire flows was conducted separately on the High Zone (including Intermediate Zone) and Low Zone. Results for Alternative 1 indicated that fire flows in the old town area of the City were increased by the installation of PRVs at Maple and Kendall Streets and at Dwight Street and Mitchell Avenue. In addition, the analysis indicated that Low Zone fire flows were increased by the installation of a PRV at the intersection of Pottery Road and Melcher Street. For Alternative 2, Low Zone fire flows were observed to have an average improvement of approximately 34% (1,000 gpm). In particular, fire flows in the vicinity of the waterfront area were found to increase as much 70% over existing flows. In addition, fire flows in the High Zone improved by an average of 10% (170 gpm) when Alternative 2 was modeled. 6.5.10 Interconnecting the 580 Zone and the City's System A plan is proposed to extend a 12-inch main beginning at the intersection of Sidney Road SW and SW Sedgwick Road to the southwest through the Glenwood Road JPA area and then west to the McCormick Woods Loop Road (10-inch main). The elevation along Sedgwick Road is approximately 300 feet and a booster station would need to be constructed with an initial pump capacity of 650± gpm (2 — 650 gpm pumps and with a future capacity of 1,200± gpm). The station would transfer water from the 390 Zone to the 580 Zone. The future size of the pump station will depend on if additional wells are developed at the 580 Reservoir site. Additional analysis is recommended at the time of design to identify a specific pump station location and other design parameters. An alternate booster pump station location is possible but would require a longer transmission main would be required, consequently making this the more costly alternative to the proposed alternative presented above. 6.5.11 New 660 Pressure Zone In order for development to occur above elevation 478'- 480'±, a constant pressure booster station will be required. The station will be required to operate for all flow conditions including from 0-1,500 gpm fire flow and have standby power capabilities which would allow continuous operation in the case of a power outage. The booster station will pump from the 580 Zone storage facilities into a new 660 distribution system. 6.5.12 Additional 580/660 Zone Reservoir As shown in Table 6-2, there is a proposed 1.1 million gallon storage deficit based on the 2025 projections for the McCormick Woods area. This includes the McCormick Woods West and Glenwood JPA areas and the new 660 Zone service area. To eliminate this storage deficit, a new 1.1 million gallon reservoir is proposed at the City's 580 Reservoir site. The reservoir height should be the same as the existing 0.57 million gallon reservoir. PACE System Analysis Page 6-29 City of Port Orchard 2009 Water System Plan 6.5.13 Melcher Pump Station Upgrade In order to allow for the possible transfer of water from the City's Low Zone to the 580 Zone, significant improvements are needed at the Melcher Pump Station. Pumping capacity of the station should be increased by a minimum of 650 gpm which would allow for the transfer of water to the 580 Zone. This improvement may not be needed for some time if water from Well 10 is pumped directly into the 390 Zone. Additional flow may be needed depending on the development of any new wells at the 580 Zone Reservoir site. Based on Table 6-1, the Melcher Pump Station should be increased to approximately 1,300 gpm unless Well 10 water is pumped directly to the 390 Zone system. This could be reduced by the amount of additional water from wells developed in the 580 Zone. 6.5.14 Hydraulic Analysis General Conclusions: The current water system is sufficient to handle domestic use ADD and MDD flows through 2025 while generally maintaining working pressures above 40 psi. Pressures below 40 psi exist at higher elevations near tanks as to be expected, on the 4-inch diameter pipes modeled in the Low Zone, and through the entire Intermediate Pressure Zone and the Melcher Pump Station feed line. These areas become problems during fire flow events and may require larger diameter mains, 8-inch diameter minimum, to be installed as the City upgrades its water system. Based upon fire flow results, the Bethel Road and Mitchell Avenue sections of the High Zone may need larger or additional looping of water mains to maintain 20 psi residual pressures while providing adequate flows. Specifically, an 8-inch diameter looping main could be installed from the 12-inch diameter main on Kendall Street south and through the existing loop to connect to the 8-inch main at Plisko Lane and Mitchell Avenue. The Melcher Pump Station may also be able to alleviate this area in the event of a fire flow. Primary distribution mains within the 580 Zone are generally large enough to supply fire flow capacity to the rest of the distribution system. However, areas within the 580 Zone will require future looping and upsizing to meet required fire flows. Future water main extensions should be analyzed on a case by case basis to determine adequate pipe capacity. A general replacement plan for smaller diameter mains in the north section of the Low Pressure Zone should be implemented. After replacement of the mains in this area has taken place, smaller diameter mains in the eastern and southern portions of the High Pressure Zone should be replaced. A general main replacement plan should be implemented in the 580 Zone in addition to the construction of a future reservoir. The 6-inch diameter lines in the southeastern portion of the High Pressure Zone may need to be replaced by 8-inch lines depending on the local uses or any prospects for future commercial or industrial growth. System Analysis � Page 6-30 P� ACE City of Port Orchard 2009 Water System Plan 6.6 SYSTEM ANALYSIS OVERVIEW — LIMITING FACTORS In summary, the biggest challenge facing the City of Port Orchard is meeting the needs of future development while maintaining sufficient yield from its permitted supply. While water rights are sufficient to meet both near and long terms needs of the City, the ability to withdraw, treat and supply water is currently limited. Construction of Well 10 supply, treatment and transmission is critical to alleviating the declining supply yields from existing wells. Consideration of additional water rights at and/or transfer of rights to Well 10 may become equally important if yields from other wells continue to decrease. Another critical consideration for operating and regulatory simplification is combining the two water systems into one system. While construction of additional storage and continued use of the Bremerton supply to 580 Zone provides an interim solution, development of the Glenwood JPA cannot occur without an intertie between the City and McCormick Systems. This will bring additional supply to 580 Zone, allow for integration of the systems, provide operating independence, improve reliability and reduce paperwork, testing and confusion associated with operating under two separate water system Identification numbers. Lastly, portions of the City Water System will soon approach the end of their useful life. Funding for needed upgrades and replacement of the aging water infrastructure is needed to improve fire flows, replace undersized mains and take a proactive approach to renewals and replacements prior to more costly replacements following facility failure. An aggressive approach to acquiring funding from current Economic Recovery program grants, low interest bonds or low interest loans is recommended and discussed further in Section 10. System Analysis PACE Page 6-31 FY SECTION 7, `i A!iiu-. - % V. MW CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PLANS - 7.11 OBJECTIVES Previous sections of the Plan have concentrated on projected demographics with the City and service area, evaluation of existing facilities in relation to these projections and identification of recommended systems improvements. This section presents, in summary form, the recommended future water system and system improvements for the area currently served by the City. It is noted that specific projects for Developer Extensions or new developments are not included in this CIP and will be determined at the time of application for water availability. The objectives of the improvements plans are to group various system needs, to evaluate alternatives that are cost-effective and operationally sound, and then to organize and prioritize the recommended improvements for implementation by the City in its annual budgeting process. 7.2 PROJECT COST ESTIMATES AND SCHEDULES In order to provide long range planning of proposed water system improvements, detailed cost estimates are required. These cost estimates are based on a variety of factors, including: documented costs of performing similar kinds of work in the recent past; engineering judgment; the availability of labor; the time of year of construction; competitive conditions; and other intangibles affecting construction costs at the time that the work is performed. The planning level estimates provided in this Plan are intended to be conservative estimates which will be refined during the design process. It is important to realize that the actual design of the improvements and possible changes made during that design could significantly alter the cost of the project from the estimate shown. Prior to the initiation of the projects shown in the Plan, any changes should be reviewed and the cost estimate updated to reflect current conditions. The cost estimates presented in the Water System Capital Facilities Plans, are based on 2008 prices (Engineering New Record Construction Cost Index of 8680.0.) and reflect total project costs. These costs include construction costs plus a contingency of 10 percent and overhead costs such as project administration, engineering, legal fees, taxes, etc. Overhead costs have been computed at 35 percent of construction cost. 7.3 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN The combined Capital Facilities Plan for the City is presented in Table 7-1. Specifics on the water system improvements are contained in Section 6 of this Plan and the brief summary that follows. A tentative schedule for improvements, by year is put forth in Section 10. Capital Improvements P� ACE Page 7-1 City of Port Orchard 2009 Water System Plan Project 1 Telemetry Upgrades This project includes various upgrades of old telemetry equipment at the various well and reservoir locations. A detailed analysis is recommended to further define the scope of the needed improvements. Project 2 Well 11 /Treatment Upgrades This project includes the drilling of a new deep aquifer well that will produce 750 gpm, installing a well pump and controls, modifying treatment to include hydrogen sulfide removal, and reusing the existing chlorination system. Because the well would also serve the Bremerton service area, fluoride would not be initially added, but room would be left to add this in the future. McCormick Wells 1, 2, and 3 would be eliminated. Two small reservoirs could be utilized as a clear well and facility where aeration of the water could occur to remove hydrogen sulfide from the water. Project 3 Well 10 In order to activate this new well, a well pump with controls and piping is needed. It is anticipated that a small building will be constructed to house the well, on -site generator, and controls. On - site piping would include a 12-inch pipe to connect to the Well 10 transmission main (project 5). Additionally, on -site drainage will be provided. The site is expected to be landscaped for public use. Project 4 Wells 6 and 10 Treatment Improvements This project combines treatment for the new Well 10 and the upgrade/replacement for treatment of existing Well 6. The new facility will be constructed on the Well 6 site. Treatment will include hydrogen sulfide, chlorination, and fluoridation. A pump station will be constructed to deliver water to both the 260 and 390 Zones as needed. Project 5 Well 10 Transmission Main This project includes the design and construction of a transmission main to deliver water from the Well 10 site along Perry Avenue North, Bay Street, and Maple Avenue to the Well 6 site. From the Well 6 site, the transmission main may head west and south along the west side of the cemetery to the extension of Kendall Street and connect to a 12-inch, 390 Zone main at that location. Final design will determine actual final location of the main. Project 6 PRVs High to Low Zone This project involves installing three PRVs to provide connection between the 390 and 260 Zones to improve storage for its 260 Zone, circulation, and water quality. Capital Improvements Page 7-2 P CAP CA E City of Port Orchard 2009 Water System Plan Project 7 City Hall Pump Station Elimination/Well 7 Treatment Because of reduced and minimal flows, the City desires to eliminate Wells 4 and 5 by transferring water rights to Well 10. By installing treatment for Well 7 at the well site, or alternative locations, City Hall facilities can be abandoned. This facility is in need of upgrades if it is to remain in service. The budget for this project needs to be verified once a final scope is determined for this project. The preliminary budget contained in this Plan assumed the abandonment of Wells 4 and 5 and elimination of Well 7, which will allow for the abandonment of the structure of this site. Also included is the on -site treatment of Well 7 to eliminate the treatment of Well 7 on the City Hall site. Project 8 1.7± Million Gallon 580 Reservoir This project includes the construction of a new reservoir sized for ultimate development in the 580 and 660 Zones. Preliminary studies indicate the reservoir should have about 1.7± million gallons of usable storage. Project 9 390 to 580 Booster Pump Station This project includes construction of a 390 to 580 transfer booster station as described in section 6.3. The initial pump station includes two (2) 650-gpm pumps with room for a future 600-gpm pump. This size needs to be verified based on final location and elevation of storage, as locating storage for the 580 Zone at a lower elevation will require upsizing this pump station. It is assumed that the station will be constructed as development requires it. Project 10 390 to 580 Transmission Main This project would provide a pipeline to transfer water from the City's 390 Zone to the McCormick Woods area. It would be constructed by development as required. Project 11 580 to 660 Constant Pressure Booster Station This project involves construction of a water booster station that would pump from the City 580 reservoir(s) to the new 660 Zone. This station would need to provide for both peak hourly demands and fire flow demands for the 660 Zone. The facility will require complete backup power. Project 12 Melcher Street Pump Station Upgrade This project includes installing additional pumps and controls to accommodate the added transfer of water from the 260 Zone to the 390 Zone. The final configuration of the Well 10 transfer of water to the 390 Zone will determine the need and timing of this project. Capital Improvements P� ACE Page 7-3 City of Port Orchard 2009 Water System Plan Project 13 390 Zone Storage Section 6.4 discusses the existing and future storage shortage in the City's 390 Zone. Several alternatives are available to correct this shortage. These include: installing pumping and standby power to pump the dead storage and make it usable; constructing a small pressurized zone to serve the high area around the Sedgwick tank. This would allow the water elevation in that tank to drop further eliminating some of the dead storage and increasing the available storage; or, additional storage could be constructed (250,000 gallons) with most of it near the 390 elevation. This may require an elevated tank. A detailed study of these options would be needed to assess the most cost-effective alternative. As a further alternative, West Sound Utility District has contacted the City to see if the City would be interested in a joint use reservoir being constructed on the City's Sedgwick Reservoir site. If sufficient storage were available from a joint use reservoir at the needed elevation, this may provide a viable option. Because of the many options available, we have provided a budget of $500,000 for this project. A final budget would be set up after a study is completed to evaluate the options. Projects 14, 15, and 16 Water Main Replacement Program These multiple main replacements are discussed in detail in the Plan and detailed on Tables 7-1 A, 7-1 B and 7-1 C following the CIP. Capital Improvements Page 7-4 P City of Port Orchard 2009 Water System Plan Table 7-1 City of Port Orchard Water System Capital Improvement Plan Project Description Cost Estimate Financing 1 Telemetry Upgrades $75,000 Conn Charge/Rates 2 Well 11 (McCormick) Treatment Upgrade $675,000 Developer/Conn Charge 3 Well 10—Pum , Generator, and Building $650,000 Conn Charge/Rates 4 Wells 6 and 10 Treatment Improvements $2,000,000 Conn Charge/Rates 5 Well 10 12-inch Transmission Main $1,600,000 Conn Charge/Rates 6 PRVs High to Low Zone Melcher/Pottery & Ea lecrest $55,000 Conn Charge/Rates Mitchell & Dwight $55,000 Conn Charge/Rates Kendall & Maple $55,000 Conn Charge/Rates 7 City Hall Pump Station Elimination/Well 7 Treatment $735,000 Conn Charge/Rates 8 1.7 Million Gallon 580 Reservoir $2,200,000 Developer/Conn Charge 9 390 to 580 Booster Pump Station $450,000 Developer/Conn Charge 10 390 to 580 12-inch Transmission Main (9,000± If) $1,600,000 Developer/Conn Charge 11 580 to 660 Constant Pressure Booster Station $450,000 Developer 12 Melcher Street Pump Station Upgrade $250,000 Developer/Conn Charge 13 390 Zone Storage $500,000 Conn Charge/Rates Subtotal $11,350,000 14 2009 - 2015 Watermain Replacement Program Phase 1 (See Table 7-1 A) High Priority $1,868,000 Rates Medium Priority $1,110,000 Rates Low Priority $3,352,000 Rates Subtotal $6,330,000 2009 - 2015 Recommended Improvements $17,680,000 15 East City Water Main Replacement Program (See Table 7-1 B) High Priority $353,000 Rates Medium Priority $598,000 Rates Low Priority $1,423,000 Rates Subtotal $2,374,000 16 Miscellaneous Improvements (See Table 7-1 C) High Priority $1,476,000 Rates Low Priority $2,653,000 Rates Subtotal $4,129,000 Long Range Recommended Improvements $6,503,169 Total CI P $24,183,169 Notes: Estimates are presented in 2008 dollars (ENR 8680) Capital Improvements PA E Page 7-5 City of Port Orchard 2009 Water System Plan Table 7-1A Recommended Pipe Upgrades Phase 1 2006 — 2012 Watermain Replacement Program (Project 14) Street Existing Pipe Diameter and Type Priority Replacement Length (LF) Diameter (inches) Cost Seattle Avenue 4" Cl 1A 842 8 $231,670 Division Street 4" CI 1A 859 8 $236,143 Hull Avenue 4" CI 1A 1 3524 8 $969,018 Melcher-Tacoma-Cline 4" Cl 1A 1569 8 $431,420 Subtotal $1,868,251 Dwight Street 4" Cl 1 B 896 8 $246,400 Harrison Ave 4" Cl 1 B 629 8 $173,057 Prospect Street 6" Cl 1 B 940 8 $258,418 Dekalb Street 4" Cl 1 B 861 8 $236,775 Ada - Taylor Street 4" Cl 1 B 713 8 $196,020 Subtotal $1,110,670 Coles Lane 4" Q 1 C 100 8 $ 25,000 Dekalb Street 4" Cl 1C 899 8 $247,170 Kitsap Street 4" Cl 1 C 902 8 $247,924 Cline - Dwight 4" Cl 1 C 977 8 $268,799 Kendall - Grant - Smith 4" Cl 1 C 873 8 $240,004 Cline Avenue 4" Cl 1 C 1377 8 $378,620 Smith Street 4" DI 1 C 705 8 $193,962 Sroufe Street 4" Q 1 C 256 8 $ 70,518 Sroufe Street 4" AC 1 C 948 8 $260,609 Bay Street 2" PVC 1 C 758 6 $189,535 Sidney Park Way 2" CO 1 C 1037 6 $259,250 Cline Avenue 2" CO 1 C 190 6 $ 47,500 Taylor Street 2" CO 1 C 200 6 $ 50,000 Taylor Street 2" CO 1 C 200 6 $ 50,000 Sroufe Street 2" Q 1 C 663 6 $165,833 off Kitsap Street 1" Galy 1 C 157 6 $ 39,125 off Cline Avenue 1" Galy 1 C 121 6 $ 30,355 Sroufe Street 1" Q 1 C 52 6 $ 12,905 Garrison Avenue 1" Q 1 C 308 6 $ 76,925 Sidney- Kitsap- Ba 4" Cl 1 C 2091 8 $522,750 Subtotal $3,351,784 Recommended Pipe Upgrades Phase 1 Total $6,330,705 Notes: Estimated Replacement Costs for Watermains: Pipe Types: AC - Asbestos Cement 6" Diameter $250 per foot Cl - Cast Iron 8" Diameter $275 per foot CO - Copper 12" Diameter $300 per foot PVC - PVC Galv - Galvanized * Cost equals 100 ft x $250/ft = $25,000 DI - Ductile Iron Q - unknown Capital Improvements Page 7-6 PA E City of Port Orchard 2009 Water System Plan Table 7-1 B Recommended Pipe Upgrades Phase 2 East City Water Main Replacement Program (Project 15) Street Existing Pipe Diameter and Type Priority Length Diameter Cost Mitchell Avenue 8" 2A 1 176 12 $352,800 Subtotal $352,800 Farragut Avenue 4" Cl 2B 367 8 $100,842 Chester Street 4" Cl 213 237 8 $ 65,225 Mahan Street 4" Cl 2B 240 8 $ 66,000 Stockton Street 4" DI 213 284 8 $ 77,982 Farragut Avenue 4" Cl 2B 1047 8 $287,826 Subtotal $597,875 Dekalb Street 4" 2C 857 8 $235,675 Bethel Avenue 2" Q 2C 802 6 $200,400 Farragut Avenue 2" IP 2C 744 6 $185,978 Mitchell Road SE 2" Galy 2C 832 6 $208,040 Mile Hill Drive 2" Galy 2C 397 6 $ 99,358 Farragut Avenue 2" IP 2C 201 6 $ 50,250 Bethel Road SE 1.5" Galy 2C 600 6 $150,000 Stockton Street 1 "DI 2C 284 6 $ 70,893 Bethel Avenue 3/4" Cl 2C 380 6 $ 95,000 Guy Wetzel Street 21P 2C 320 6 $ 80,000 Morton Street 4" DI 2C 173 8 $ 47,575 Subtotal $1,423,169 Recommended Pipe Upgrades Phase 2 Total $2,373,844 Notes: Estimated Replacement Costs for Watermains: Pipe Types: AC - Asbestos Cement 6" Diameter $250 per foot Cl - Cast Iron 8" Diameter $275 per foot CO - Copper 12" Diameter $300 per foot PVC - PVC Galv - Galvanized * Cost equals 100 ft x $250/ft = $25,000 DI - Ductile Iron Q - unknown Capital Improvements PA E Page 7-7 City of Port Orchard 2009 Water System Plan Table 7-1 C Recommended Pipe Upgrades Phase 3 Miscellaneous Improvements (Project 16) Replacement Street Existing Pipe Diameter and Type Priority Length Diameter Cost West Avenue 4" Cl 3A 712 8 $195,745 South Street 4" Cl 3A 1044 8 $286,971 Garrison Avenue 4" AC 3A 1313 8 $360,976 West Avenue 4" AC 3A 1313 8 $360,976 Melcher Street 4" Cl 3A 987 8 $271,425 Subtotal $1,476,093 Garden Drive 4" Cl 3B 220 8 $ 60,500 Becky Avenue 4" DI 3B 351 8 $ 96,448 Dallas Street 4" DI 3B 677 8 $186,101 Poplar Street 4" DI 3B 997 8 $274,230 Flower Avenue 4" Cl 3B 716 8 $196,818 Jones Drive 4" Cl 3B 440 8 $121,000 Bill Avenue 4" Cl 3B 340 8 $ 93,500 Berry Parallel to West Street 4" DI 3B 254 8 $ 69,737 Berry Parallel to West Street 4" DI 3B 124 8 $ 34,155 Bethel Street 2" PVC 3B 1220 6 $305,000 Shamrock Lane 2" Galy 3B 75 6 $ 18,750 Garden Drive 2" Galy 3B 161 6 $ 40,250 Alder Lane West 2" Cl 3B 622 6 $155,590 Guthrie Street 2" Galy 3B 314 6 $ 78,500 Radey Street 2" Galy 3B 580 6 $145,000 Sidney Avenue 1.5" Galy 3B 410 6 $102,500 Guthrie/South Street 1.5" Galy 3B 1115 6 $278,783 Flower Avenue 1.5" Galy 3B 490 6 $122,500 Becky Avenue 8" DI 207 12 $ 62,175 Sunset Lane West 4" Cl 480 8 $132,000 Parallel to West Street 4" Cl 290 8 $ 79,750 Subtotal $2,653,286 Recommended Pipe Upgrades Phase 3 Total $4,129,379 Notes: Estimated Replacement Costs for Watermains: Pipe Types: 6" Diameter $250 per foot AC - Asbestos Cement 8" Diameter $275 per foot Cl - Cast Iron 12" Diameter $300 per foot CO - Copper PVC - PVC * Cost equals 75 ft x $250/ft = $18,750 Galv - Galvanized DI - Ductile Iron Capital Improvements Page 7-8 PA E SECTION 8 WATER QUALITY 8.11 INTRODUCTION (Ak, W lq IIAII jjjjU, R •A 'r ,..q� This chapter summarizes the City of Port Orchard's status with respect to regulated drinking water contaminants covered by WAC 246-290 and anticipated water quality regulations and discusses water quality issues facing the City. 8.2 REGULATORY BACKGROUND The City's water system is regulated by the federal Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) and the state Department of Health (DOH). EPA has delegated primacy (primary enforcement responsibility for water quality) to the State of Washington under the provisions of the federal Safe Drinking Water Act (SDWA). In order to maintain primacy, the state must adopt drinking water regulations at least as strict as the federal regulations. In 1974, the SDWA was enacted, requiring EPA to set enforceable health -related drinking water quality standards for all public water systems (PWSs) serving 25 persons or more. EPA set interim standards in 1975 based upon the 1962 USPHS guidelines. The health -related standards, also known as National Primary Drinking Water Regulations (NPDWRs) or "primary standards," set maximum contaminant level goals (MCLGs) and maximum contaminant levels (MCLs) for a number of contaminants. In 1986 and 1996, the SDWA was amended, resulting in a substantial increase in the number of regulated compounds. Water utilities were also required to monitor for a large number of unregulated compounds for which MCLs had not been developed. Currently there are National Primary Drinking Water Regulations (NPDWRs) for 84 contaminants. These standards were adopted by DOH, are as set forth in the Drinking Water Regulations WAC 246- 290, and are put forth in Table 8-1. The SDWA also required EPA to set non -enforceable secondary drinking water standards for contaminants that adversely impact the aesthetic water quality. These standards are not enforced and are referred to as secondary MCLs. � Water Quality (PACE' Page 8-1 City of Port Orchard 2009 Water System Plan Table 8-1 Primary Drinking Water Standards for Contaminants Inorganics Primary MCL (m /L) Inorganic Chemicals Secondary MCL (m /L) Antimony (Sb) 0.006 Chloride (CI) 250.0 Arsenic (As) 0.05 Copper (Cu) 1.0 Asbestos 7 million fibers/liter Fluoride (FI) 2.0 Barium (Ba) 2.0 Iron (Fe) 0.3 Beryllium 0.004 Manganese (Mn) 0.05 Cadmium (Cd) 0.005 Silver (A) 0.1 Chromium (Cr) 0.01 Sulfate (SO4) 250.0 Cyanide 0.2 Zinc (Zn) 5.0 Fluoride (F) 4.0 Trihalomethanes MCL (m /L) Lead (Pb) 1 TTHM 0.102 Mercury (Ha) 0.002 Physical Characteristics MCL Nickel (Ni) 0.1 Turbidity 5 NTU Nitrate (as N) 10.0 Color 15 std color units Nitrite (as N) 1.0 Hardness None Established Selenium (Se) 0.05 Specific Conductivity 700 umhos/cm Sodium (Na) 1 Total Dissolved Solids 500 m /L Thalium (TI) 0.002 Physical Characteristics MCL ( Ci/L) Microorganisms MCLG (mg/L Radium 226 3 Cryptosporidium 0 Combined Radium 226 & 228 5 Giardia lamblia 0 Gross Alpha Particle Activity (Excluding Uranium) 15 Legionella 0 Organic Chemicals MCL Total Coliforms 0.05 Volatile Organic Chemicals 40 CFR 141.61(a) Viruses (enteric) 0 Synthetic Organic Chemicals 40 CFR 141.61(a) Source: WAC 246-290-310 Notes: ' Although the State Board of Health has not established a MCL for lead and sodium, there is enough public health significance connected with sodium levels to require inclusion in inorganic and physical monitoring. 2 The MCL for TTHM is calculated on the basis or a running average or quarterly samples. 8.3 CURRENT REGULATIONS, DATA, AND IMPACTS This section discusses drinking water regulations, the current operations data, and impacts on the City. The data shows that the City has high quality water from the well sources and in the distribution system. The regulations discussed in this section include: • Total Coliform Rule (TCR) • Fluoride Regulation • Lead and Copper Rule (LCR) • Phase I - Volatile Organic Compounds (VOCs) • Phases 11 and V - Synthetic Organic Compounds (SOCs) & Inorganic Compounds (IOCs) • Iron and Manganese • Wellhead Protection • Stage 1 Disinfectants/Disinfection Byproducts Rule • Radionuclides Rule Water Quality Page 8-2 PA E City of Port Orchard 2009 Water System Plan • Arsenic Rule • Consumer Confidence Reports Rule (CCRs) • State Regulated Contaminants 8.3.1 Total Coliform Rule The TCR requires utilities to develop a coliform monitoring plan. The City is currently required to collect a minimum of 10 routine coliform samples every month. Based on current regulations, the City will be required to increase its number of monthly routine samples when it serves over 8500 people. If one or more coliform bacteria are detected in a sample (positive sample), the City is required to collect and analyze three repeat samples for each positive sample. One repeat sample must be taken from the same location as the original positive sample. A repeat sample must be collected within five service connections of each side of the original positive sample location. All routine and repeat samples that are positive for coliform must be analyzed for fecal coliform or Escherichia coli (E. coli.). Fecal coliform or E. coli are indicators of potential recent sewage or animal waste contamination of the water and are cause for increased public health concern. The most recent update to the City's Coliform Monitoring Plan is included in the Appendix. . The City collects nine samples in the City's system and two samples in McCormick Woods per month. The sample locations are divided among the City's wells, storage tanks, and set sample stations in the distribution system. Samples are analyzed by a Ecology -certified laboratory as required. The McCormick Woods system had 0 of 60 (0%) samples showing positive for Coliform for the years 2003 and 2004. The City's system had 1 of 96 (1 %) positive in 2003 and 4 out of 96 (4%) positive in 2004. The goal is 0% samples with total coliform per month, and the MCL is greater than 5% samples with total coliform per month. The City tests positive total coliform samples for E. coli. As the City's customer base continues to grow, the sampling requirements will increase. No action besides continued monitoring are required at this time. 8.3.2 Fluoride Regulation An MCL of 4.0 mg/L for fluoride concentration in drinking water was promulgated by EPA in 1985. The purpose of the fluoride MCL is to reduce the public health risk of contracting skeletal or dental fluorosis (mottled tooth enamel) due to excessive fluoride concentrations in drinking water. Water quality must be monitored for fluoride annually for surface water supplies and every third year for groundwater supplies. There is a 2.0 mg/L secondary MCL for fluoride. Water Quality P� ACE Page 8-3 City of Port Orchard 2009 Water System Plan The City triennially collects samples for fluoride analysis from its well sources. Data reports were reviewed for samples collected in 1993 and 2002. For these samples reported concentrations in treated water varied from 0.5 to 0.9 mg/I and untreated concentrations were less than 0.2 mg/L for all well sources. The CCR's for 2003 and 2004 show Fluoride concentrations varying between less than 0.2 mg/L and 1.0 mg/L. The City's water is fluoridated to 1.0 mg/L. Because the City's source concentrations of fluoride are well below the MCL, fluoride is added. However, the City receives unfluoridated water from the City of Bremerton. The quantity of unfluoridated water the City receives will vary. It is anticipated that fluoride concentrations will vary throughout the City when City of Bremerton water is used. 8.3.3 Lead and Copper Rule EPA adopted the Lead and Copper Rule for drinking water in 1992. Lead or copper in tap water is predominantly related to corrosion of plumbing system components, including copper pipes, lead -based solder used to join segments of copper pipe, and brass faucets that contain lead and copper. The rule requires samples be collected from targeted high risk sites. The Lead Action Level is exceeded if more than 10 percent of the samples collected from the targeted sites exceed 15 micrograms per liter (pg/L) in a 6-month monitoring period. The Copper Action Level is exceeded if more than 10 percent of the samples exceed 1.3 mg/L in a 6-month monitoring period. If the monitoring results for a public water system (PWS) exceed the Lead Action Level, the water system must conduct a public information campaign and if either the Lead or Copper Action Level is exceeded, the utility must implement and optimize corrosion control strategies. The City conducts regular sampling in the distribution system. Sampling performed in 2003 showed no levels above the action level for either Lead or Copper. The Copper concentrations varied from 0.2 to 0.4 mg/I and the Lead concentrations varied from 2 to 7 pg/L, all well below the action level. The City is not required to take Lead and Copper samples in 2005. The City has low lead and copper concentrations in the samples. No impacts are anticipated. 8.3.4 Phase I — Volatile Organic Compounds In 1987, EPA promulgated MCLs for eight Phase I VOCs as shown in Table 8-1. In addition, monitoring was required for an additional 51 unregulated organic compounds. Groundwater systems were required to sample each entry point into the distribution system. State regulatory agencies with primacy were allowed to reduce the sampling Water Quality Page 8-4 P City of Port Orchard 2009 Water System Plan frequency for groundwater systems if VOCs were not detected and the system is considered not vulnerable. If no VOCs were verified during the initial 12-month monitoring period, the utility is required to monitor every 36 months. The City collects samples for VOC monitoring every 3 years for every well except wel-I Well 8, which is sampled every three months. City reports were reviewed for samples collected in 2000. The results are shown in Table 8-3 below. Confirm whether there is any other data. Table 8-2 Volatile Organic Compounds (VOC) EPA Regulated Compound Sample Results µg/L 223 Tracy 134 Bay 980 Mitchell Chloroform 0.7 1.0 1.1 Bromodichloromethane 0.2 0.3 0.5 Chlorodibromomethane ND 0.2 0.4 Bromoform ND ND 0.2 Total Trihalomethane 0.9 1.5 2.2 Because chloroform is regulated as a THM and the MCL for TTHM is 100 Pg/L, the amount of chloroform detected in the samples was not a concern. Based on historical data, the City groundwater complies with the established MCLs. No impacts are anticipated other than the continued cost of monitoring. 8.3.5 Phases II and V — SOCs and IOCs On January 1, 1993, EPA established regulations for 38 Phase II and 23 Phase V Synthetic Organic Compounds (SOCs) and Inorganic Compounds (IOCs). The contaminants regulated under Phase II and Phase V are listed in Table 8-1. A 9-year compliance cycle containing three 3-year compliance periods was established in 1993. Systems must complete base monitoring and increase monitoring based on trigger levels. Monitoring requirements for asbestos, nitrate, and nitrite are distinct from the standardized monitoring framework set up for the other SOC/VOCs. Asbestos monitoring is conducted every 9 years unless the MCL is exceeded; then quarterly monitoring is required. Nitrate monitoring requires an initial round of quarterly samples followed by annual monitoring. If the nitrate results exceed 50 percent of the MCL, the system is required to continue taking quarterly samples. Nitrite monitoring requires an initial sample and then, if the initial sample exceeds 50 percent of the MCL, Water Quality P� ACE Page 8-5 City of Port Orchard 2009 Water System Plan may require quarterly monitoring. No waivers are given for nitrate and nitrite monitoring due to the acute danger of methemoglobinemia. The City monitors each well every 3 years for IOCs. Table 8-3 summarizes the sample concentrations collected by the City for Phase II IOCs. None of the samples collected at the wellheads had any inorganic contaminant concentrations that exceeded an established MCL. Table 8-3 Inorganic Contaminant Monitoring Results 2000-2004 Inorganic Contaminant Concentration Range Measured for All Active Wellheads (mg/L) Established MCL(b) (mg/L) Asbestos State waiver through December 2010 7 mf/L(a) Antimony less than 0.005 0.006 Barium less than 0.10 2 Beryllium less than 0.003 0.004 Cadmium less than 0.001 0.005 Chromium less than 0.01 0.1 Cyanide less than 0.05 0.2 Mercury less than 0.0005 0.002 Nickel less than 0.04 N/A Nitrate (as N) less than 0.1 to 0.3 10 Nitrite (as N) less than 0.01 1 Selenium less than 0.005 0.05 Thallium less than 0.002 0.002 Note: (a) MF/L - million fibers per liter greater than 10 microns in length. (b) From Table 8-1. Nitrate and nitrite are of interest because their presence is indicative of heavy fertilizer use or water contaminated with sewage. The nitrate concentrations as tested in 2001 for Wells 5, 6, 7, and McCormick Woods were less than 0.1 mg/L with a value of 0.3 mg/L for Well 8. The nitrate concentrations as tested in 2005 were less than 0.5 mg/L for Wells 4, 6, 7, and 8, well below the MCL of 10 mg/L. The City samples for Nitrate yearly at each source. For Phase II and Phase V SOC monitoring, the City samples two samples each three years at each well except Well 9 which is sampled once per quarter. Organic Waivers are currently granted for Dioxin, Glyphosphate, Diquat and Endothall for all sources; for EDB and other soil fumigants for Wells 4, 6, 7, 8 and 9 through December 2007. All sample concentrations tested have been below applicable MCLs. No treatment impacts on the City are expected due to these regulations. Water Quality Page 8-6 P City of Port Orchard 2009 Water System Plan 8.3.6 Iron and Manganese EPA established secondary MCLs for iron and manganese based on aesthetic considerations. The MCLs for iron and manganese are 0.3 mg/L and 0.05 mg/L, respectively. Table 8-4 Untreated Iron and Manganese Concentrations (2002) Well Number Iron, mg/L (MCL = 0.3 MG/L) Manganese mg/L (MCL = 0.05 MG/L) 4, 5, 7 Less than 0.1 0.04 6 Less than 0.1 0.04 8 Less than 0.1 Less than 0.01 Neither iron nor manganese is considered toxic at the concentrations found in the City's water supply. EPA has listed manganese on the Drinking Water Contaminant Candidate List to be used in selecting contaminants for regulation. Manganese is identified as a high priority for EPA to determine whether it should be regulated. It is anticipated that if manganese is regulated as a primary contaminant, the MCL will be much higher than the current secondary MCL. No treatment impacts on the City are expected due to this regulation. 8.3.7 Wellhead Protection Federal and State laws require the City to implement a wellhead protection program. The first phase of implementation was to define protection areas for each wellhead. These areas were delineated in the Port Orchard Wellhead Protection Area Investigation (AGI Technologies 1997). The Wellhead Protection Plan will be updated as part of bringing any new wells online. 8.3.8 Stage 1 Disinfectants/Disinfection Byproducts Rule The Stage 1 D/DBP Rule regulates the concentration of disinfectants such as chlorine, chlorine dioxide and chloramines, which are oxidants used to control waterborne disease. The D/DBP Rule also regulates DBPs such as THMs, haloacetic acids (HAAs), bromate, and chlorite. DBPs are formed when disinfectants used to control microorganisms react with natural organic matter (NOM) in water. Water Quality P� ACE Page 8-7 City of Port Orchard 2009 Water System Plan Table 8-5 Stage I Disinfection Byproducts Rule Compound MCL MDRL THM 80 µg/L HAA5 60 µg/L Bromatelal 10 µg/L Chlorite"' 1 mg/L Chlorine Dioxide(c) 0.8 mg/L Chlorine"' 4 mg/L Chloramines"' 4 mg/L Notes: Required only for systems using ozone. Required only for systems using chlorine dioxide. Required only fors stems using the identified disinfectant. The City disinfects drinking water with sodium hypochlorite at each well site, with Wells 4, 5, and 7 receiving combined treatment. Each well treatment site may be considered a "Water Treatment Plant" under the D/DBP Rule. The City is required to collect one set of TTHM and HAA samples at each treatment plant per year. When water is supplied through one of the Bremerton water system connections for more than 15 days in any given calendar quarter, the City is required to collect one set of TTHM and HAA samples for that quarter. It is unlikely that the City would develop a DBP problem from the water produced by City wells. 8.3.9 Radionuclides Rule Radionuclides can naturally occur in water supplies. EPA has revised the current radionuclides regulation, which has been in effect since 1977, by requiring new monitoring provisions that will ensure that all customers of community water systems will receive water that meets the MCLs for radionuclides in drinking water. EPA also has promulgated a standard for uranium as required by the 1986 amendments to the SDWA. The current standards are: combined radium 226/228 of 5 pCi/L; a gross alpha standard for all alpha emitters of 15 pCi/L, not including radon and uranium; a combined standard of 4 mrem/year for beta emitters. The new MCL for uranium is 30 pg/L. This final rule will provide improved health protection through monitoring improvements for the combined radium-226/228 standard (a carcinogen) and for uranium (a kidney toxin and carcinogen) in drinking water. The rule became effective on December 8, 2003. New monitoring requirements will be phased -in between that date and the beginning of the next Standardized Monitoring Framework period, December 31, 2007. Water systems will determine initial compliance under the new monitoring requirements using the average of four quarterly samples or, at state discretion, using appropriate grandfathered data. The City currently samples for Water Quality Page 8-8 P City of Port Orchard 2009 Water System Plan Radium 228 at each well two samples every three years. 2005 sampling data shows no detectable Radium 228 in Wells 4, 6, 7, 8, and 9. There are no anticipated treatment impacts to the City. 8.3.10 Arsenic Rule Arsenic is a naturally occurring element found in water supplies. EPA promulgated a rule controlling arsenic concentrations in drinking water in January 2001. Increased skin cancer occurrence and possibly increased internal cancer are health risks associated with elevated arsenic concentrations in drinking water. The previous MCL of 50 Pg/L will be lowered to 10 /jg/L effective January 2006. The City has sampling data from 2002-2004 for all wells. The values are from less than 0.002 to 0.002 mg/L. With the MCL set at 10 ug/L, no treatment impacts are anticipated. 8.3.11 Consumer Confidence Reports Rule EPA issued the CCR Rule 19 August 1998. The CCR Rule establishes requirements for water systems to provide annual reports to all customers. The first CCR was required to be issued to customers by 18 October 1999. The City has prepared and distributed CCRs for the years 2003 and 2004. The CCRs for these years are included in Appendices. 8.3.12 State Regulated Contaminants The State Department of Health regulates the following additional contaminants and qualities that are not currently regulated by the EPA. Sodium, Hardness, Conductivity, Turbidity and color have "State Reporting Levels" that are shown in Table 8-6 along with the City's testing data from 2002. Table 8-6 State Regulated Contaminants Contaminant Concentration Range Measured for All Active Wellheads (m /L) Established State Reporting Level MCL Sodium 3.37 to 6.53 5 mg/L Hardness 44 to 68 10 mg/L Conductivity 86 to 131 10 US/cm 700 uS/cm Turbidity less than 0.05 to 0.35 0.1 NTU 1 NTU Color less than 5 5 color units 15 color units Water Quality P� ACE Page 8-9 City of Port Orchard 2009 Water System Plan 8.3.13 Cross Connection Control The City's Cross Connection Control Program (CCCP) is established by Port Orchard Municipal Code 13.04.100, a copy of which is included in the Appendices to this Plan. The cross connection control program is in compliance with WAC 246-290-490 and addresses the nine key elements required for Cross Connection Control. Please refer to Section 9.7 for additional information. 8.4 ANTICIPATED REGULATIONS This section discusses regulations that are expected to be issued by EPA that may impact the City. The regulations discussed in this section include: • Stage 2 Disinfection Byproduct Rule • Ground Water Rule (GWR) (formerly Groundwater Disinfection Rule) • Radon Rule 8.4.1 Stage 2 Disinfection By-product Rule The Stage 2 Disinfectant and Disinfection Byproducts Rules (DBPR) is one part of the Stage 2 Microbial and Disinfection Byproducts Rules (M-DBP) which are the final phase in the M-DBP rulemaking strategy affirmed by Congress as part of the 1996 Amendments to the Safe Drinking Water Act (SDWA) The Stage 2 DBPR focuses on public health protection by limiting exposure to DBPs, specifically total trihalomethanes (TTHM) and five haloacetic acids (HAAS) which can form in water through disinfectants used to control microbial pathogens. The Stage 2 DBPR will apply to all systems that add a disinfectant other than ultraviolet light. Under the Stage 2 DBPR systems will conduct an evaluation of their distribution system to identify the locations with high disinfection byproduct concentration. These locations will then be used by the systems as the sampling sites for DBP compliance monitoring. Under the Stage 2 DBPR compliance wit the maximum contaminant levels for TTHM and HAAS will be calculated for each monitoring location in the distribution system. This approach, referred to as the locational running annual average (LRAA) differs from current requirements which determine compliance by calculating the running annual average of samples from all monitoring locations across the system. The Stage 2 DBPR will also require systems to determine if they are experiencing short term peaks in DBP levels referred to as "significant excursions". Systems experiencing significant excursions would be required to review their operation practices and work with the State to determine actions that may be taken to prevent future excursions. Water Quality Page 8-10 P City of Port Orchard 2009 Water System Plan The proposed Stage 2 DBPR was published August 2003. A public meeting was held December 2004. The final rule has not yet been published. The City will be required to modify the existing DBP Monitoring Plan to reflect the Stage 2 DBPR requirements. An Initial Distribution System Evaluation (IDSE) will need to be conducted to identify the locations with high disinfection byproduct concentrations. These locations will then be used for DBP sampling locations. The sampling results will then be analyzed with a locational running annual average (LRAA) rather than then running annual average (RAN now used. The City will also need to determine if any "significant excursions" are being experienced, and if so review their operational practices to prevent further excursions. 8.4.2 Groundwater Rule The 1996 SDWA Amendments require EPA to promulgate NPDWRs requiring disinfection as a treatment technique for all PWSs, including groundwater systems as necessary. A proposed Ground Water Rule (GWR) was issued in May 2000. The Proposed Rule develops a multiple barrier approach for the GWR, including the following: • System sanitary surveys conducted by the State and identification of significant deficiencies; • Hydrogeologic sensitivity assessments for undisinfected systems; • Source water microbial monitoring by systems that do not disinfect and draw from hydrogeologically sensitive aquifers or have detected fecal indicators within the system's distribution system; • Corrective action by any system with significant deficiencies or positive microbial samples indicating fecal contamination; and • Compliance monitoring for systems which disinfect to ensure that they reliably achieve 4-log (99.99 percent) inactivation or removal of viruses. EPA proposed the Groundwater Rule in May of 2000. As of August 2005, EPA is still having discussions about the GWR and has not yet formally resubmitted its final rule for review. It will most likely be finalized early next year, after the Stage 2 DBP rules are promulgated. The City is disinfecting its groundwater supplies. Impacts of groundwater disinfection include: • Potential for increased DBP formation • Increased corrosiveness of the water • Capital and O&M costs for disinfection facilities. Water Quality P� ACE Page 8-7 7 City of Port Orchard 2009 Water System Plan 8.4.3 Proposed Radon Rule Of all the contaminants addressed by the Radionuclides Rule, Radon-222 has been the most scrutinized and of greatest concern to water utilities. Radon-222 is an inert, noble gas formed from the radioactive decay of Radium-226, as part of the Uranium-238 decay series. Radon is produced in the rock and soil matrix and readily migrates to groundwater where it dissolves. The 1996 SDWA Amendments directed EPA to withdraw the proposed 300 picocuries per liter (pCi/L) MCL for radon and have the National Academy of Sciences (NAS) conduct a risk assessment for radon in drinking water using the best available science. NAS also investigated the health risk reduction and cost analysis for various radon MCLs under consideration. EPA issued a Proposed Radon in Drinking Water rule in November 1999. The proposed radon MCL is 300 pCi/L. The proposed alternative radon MCL is 4,000 pCi/L. If the equivalent drinking water level is greater than the proposed MCL, then EPA has established guidelines for a multi -media radon mitigation program to reduce indoor air radon concentrations. Either the state or the utility must develop and obtain approval of a multi -media radon mitigation program to qualify for the alternative MCL. Utilities using the alternative MCL may be required to state in their CCR that they meet the alternative MCL but not the MCL. If radon removal is necessary, the most likely treatment option is aeration. Liquid -phase granular activated carbon (GAC) is another option; however, GAC is much more expensive, and the spent carbon may be considered a hazardous waste. If aeration is selected, radon air emissions may have to be addressed. However, the additional risk from emitting radon from aeration relative to the risk posed by background radon levels in outdoor air is not significant. 8.5 CITY OF BREMERTON SUPPLY The City of Bremerton's water supply is primarily from a surface water source treated with chlorination and pH adjustment. The City's well water is disinfected and fluoridated. On the occasions when the City of Bremerton's water supply is used, the level of fluoride in the water will be decreased in the areas served by the mixed supply. If this is a rare event, no significant impact should be felt. If this happens regularly, the benefits from fluoridation would be reduced for the areas receiving mixed water supply. 8.6 TREATMENT IMPROVEMENTS The City has implemented groundwater disinfection and fluoridation at each well. Potential treatment improvements include installation of rechlorination facilities to ensure that chlorine Water Quality P� Page 8-12 City of Port Orchard 2009 Water System Plan residuals are maintained throughout the system and consideration of aeration facilities to control taste and odor issues stemming from elevated levels of hydrogen sulfide in Wells 4 and 5. Determination of the need for increased aeration will be dependent on the success of the Well 10 drilling effort that is currently underway. If yields are sufficient, this well may reduce dependency on Wells 4 and 5 and eliminate the need for taste and odor control. However, the quality of water received from the new well is expected to require some level of treatment. Additional studies regarding treatment at the new facility and its impact on other existing well will be required before source development is complete. Water Quality P� ACE Page 8-13 flAk, SECTION 9 -Mal OPERATIONS PROGRAM" 9.1 INTRODUCTION Operations and Maintenance plays a crucial role in a utility's capacity to provide a safe and reliable source of potable water. An aggressive preventive maintenance program will prolong the life of a water system along with increasing a system's reliability. The climate in which water utilities now operate is fundamentally different than that of 20 or even 10 years ago. A growing regulatory burden, increasing operations costs and aging infrastructure now demand that water utilities have in place an organized, efficient and aggressive operations and maintenance program. This Section outlines the overall operation of the City of Port Orchard's water system and provides a summary of day-to-day operations, routine maintenance of the system, and emergency operating procedures. Detailed information related to specific facilities such as operations manuals are not included herein but considered an integral part of overall system operation and maintenance. Similarly, the City has prepared a vulnerability assessment of its water system and maintains a City-wide Emergency Response Plan that incorporates water system emergency response. 9.2 GENERAL INFORMATION Primary Contact: Mark Dorsey, P.E., Public Works Director/City Engineer 216 Prospect Street Port Orchard, WA 98366 Telephone: 360.876.4991 FAX: 360.876.4980 Emergency 24 Hour: City Operations/Shop Jay Cookson 1535 Vivian Court Port Orchard, WA 98367 Phone: (360) 876-2722 FAX: (360) 876-4607 Emergency: 9-1-1 State Dept of Health Identification Number: 68900 Environmental Protection Agency System ID: WA5368900 9.3 RESPONSIBILITY AND AUTHORITY The City of Port Orchard water system is one component of the City's Public Works Department and under the direct supervision of the Public Works Director/City Engineer. Among the responsibilities of this position is preparation of the annual budget, preparation of the capital Operations Program P� ACE Page 9-1 City of Port Orchard 2009 Water System Plan improvement plan for Public Works and implementation of the approved improvements. In addition to reporting to and implementing direction from the mayor and seven member City Council, the Public Works Director oversees in-house field operations of the water system. Day - today management of field operations and maintenance of the system is the responsibility of the Public Works Foreman. A field staff of 11 employees carries out water system operations, maintenance and emergency response. 9.4 PERSONNEL CERTIFICATION Under regulations established by the Washington Department of Health (DOH), the City is required to maintain the services of a State Certified Water Distribution Manager 1 (WDM-1). A listing of current water system operations related certifications held by City staff is provided in Table 9-1. Table 9-1 Water System Certification Operator Certifications) Jay Cookson Water Manager II Ray Petty Water Manager II, Dan Castillo Water Manager II George Thompson Water Manager II, Cross Connection Control Specialist Von Nix Water Manager II, Cross Connection Control Specialist Marc Fournier Cross Connection Control Specialist Dave Boltz Cross Connection Control Specialist Jill Satran-Loutin Water Distribution Specialist Alan Rckett Water Distribution Specialist Bill Thiele Water Distribution Specialist Linda Rosa Water Distribution Specialist The City of Port Orchard encourages state certifications of water system personnel and sponsors attendance at appropriate safety and technical seminars. 9.5 ROUTINE OPERATIONS The City of Port Orchard maintains a detailed routine operation and maintenance program in order to insure proper operation of all mechanical facilities and maximize the efficiency and life of the system. Routine operations includes making daily rounds to visually check system facilities and reservoir reading devices on a regular basis, monitoring flow, service and main line repairs, meter repairs and calibration and responding to customer inquiries, as necessary. Additionally, preventative maintenance, such as regularly servicing pumps and motors, exercising valves and hydrants, cleaning and painting reservoirs, and flushing pipelines, is required to ensure adequate overall operation and maintenance of the system. The following sections generally outline the routine operations and maintenance practices and schedule for primary system components. Operations Program Page 9-2 P City of Port Orchard 2008 Water System Plan In addition to the routine operation and maintenance, the City repairs service lines, mains, meters and fire hydrants as needed. The City has a program for replacing all meters in the system with touch -read devices over time. The City anticipates a telemetry upgrade in 2006 that will allow for enhanced continuous electronic monitoring to ensure proper operation, accuracy and intrusion. 9.5.1 Supply Wells The supply wells are visited daily to check security, monitor source quality and quantity, and verify site conditions. In addition daily monitoring of water quality as described in later in this Section is accomplished. The City has an approved Wellhead Protection Plan to ensure on -going protection of the groundwater supply. 9.5.2 Storage Reservoirs Storage reservoirs are visited daily to verify security and check overall site conditions. Reservoirs are drained and cleaned, or otherwise inspected periodically and at least every five years. Inspection of the integrity of reservoir coatings is accomplished as part of the reservoir cleaning process and reservoirs are spot painted as required to prevent rusting or degradation of coating systems. Complete recoating of reservoirs is scheduled based on the results of these periodic cleanings and inspections. 9.5.3 Pump Stations Pump Stations are checked daily to verify site conditions and security and the proper operation of all equipment. Pump data is recorded by the operational telemetry system and monitored to identify any irregularities in the system. Pumps are serviced regularly as determined by hours of service. 9.5.4 Valves and Hydrants Port Orchard has a valve maintenance schedule which includes annual exercising of all valves in the system. Hydrants are exercised biannually and tested as appropriate. Pressure regulating valves are inspected monthly and calibrated as required. 9.5.5 Distribution System The City maintains an annual leak detection program whereby outside leak detection specialists are utilized to identify leaks within the distribution system. All leaks identified are repaired. In addition, City staff respond to reported leaks and water quality issues immediately. Dead-end mains are flushed at least annually to provide necessary cleaning of these potential water quality problem areas. Additionally, water mains are flushed as necessitated by customer complaints or pipeline repairs or other operations that may result in water quality degradation. The City maintains a record of all flushing operations to assist with determination of non -revenue water and long range conservation monitoring. Operations Program P� ACE Page 9-3 City of Port Orchard 2009 Water System Plan 9.5.6 Inspection Water system personnel also assist with new construction inspection, especially for developer extension projects. Additional assistance can be obtained by direct contract with contractors listed on the City's small works roster of approved contractors. This resource is utilized when City personnel are not available, not qualified for the type of construction being accomplished or when the project costs exceed the statutory limits.4 9.6 WATER QUALITY MONTORING The City of Port Orchard's water quality monitoring program and results of recent testing are detailed in Section 8 of this Plan. The City's Cross Connection Control Program and Coliform Monitoring Programs are included in the Appendices. Copies of most recent water quality tests and Port Orchards Consumer Confidence Reports are also included. As noted in Section 8, the City is currently working on compliance with Stage 2 Disinfection By Products (DBP) Monitoring. Recognizing that the State of Washington Department of Health has recently assumed primacy for DBP monitoring, any program additions, changes or modifications will be submitted to the appropriate DOH representatives. 9.7 CROSS CONNECTION CONTROL The City's Cross Connection Control Program (CCCP) is established by Port Orchard Municipal Code 13.04.100, a copy of which is included in the Appendices to this Plan. The cross connection control program is in compliance with WAC 246-290-490 and addresses the following nine key elements required for Cross Connection Control: Element 1: Establish Legal Authority Port Orchard City Code 13.04.100 establishes legal authority to implement a cross connection control program and references Ordinances relevant to the implementation of the Cross Connection Control Program. Element 2: Procedures/Schedules for Hazard Evaluations The City evaluates new and existing service connections to make sure the connection does not pose a danger to the distribution system. Premise isolation with a Reduced - Pressure Backflow Assembly (RPBA) are required on all commercial connections. Element 3: Procedures/Schedules to Eliminate/Control Cross Connections The City requires installation of approved RPBA's to protect the public water supply. At a minimum, annual testing of the backflow devices at the owner's expense is required. Port Orchard is currently developing a customer education program for property owners using Operations Program Page 9-4 P City of Port Orchard 2008 Water System Plan irrigation systems for additional control and protection of groundwater sources. This is expected to include special mailings to customers in areas of the system where irrigation systems are commonplace (i.e. McCormick Woods). Element 4: Provide Qualified Personnel The City of Port Orchard maintains fulltime certified Cross Connection Specialists, as indicated in Table 9-1. Element 5: Procedures/Schedules for Backflow Preventer Inspection and Testing At a minimum, the City requires annual testing of the backflow devices at the owner's expense. Element 6: Assembly Testing Quality Assurance/Quality Control (QA/QC) The City ensures that results from backflow prevention assembly inspections and tests are documented and reported in an acceptable manner. The City also monitors tester certifications and test kit calibrations and requires test reports to be filled out completely and to be submitted in a timely manner. Element 7: Backflow Incident Response Plan The City follows procedures identified in WAC 246-290-490 for responding to a backflow incident and implementing enforcement. Element 8: Public Education Port Orchard provides cross connection educational material for customers that include pamphlets, periodic bill inserts, and as noted under Element 3 above, special mailings for public education regarding irrigation systems. Educational materials used in the past or currently under consideration include reports on the cross connection control program, its purpose and rationale. This information may also be included in Consumer Confidence Reports. Element 9: Establish/Maintain Cross -Connection Control Records The City's Cross Control Specialists (CCS) have developed and maintained cross connection control records in WAC 246-290-490(3)(j) and (8). A data base is maintained track all relevant information including master list of service connections, inventory information, backflow incidents and annual summary reports. Element 10: Meet Additional Reclaimed Water Requirements The City of Port Orchard is working with Karcher Sewer District to develop reclaimed water use opportunities within the system. Evaluation of any potential opportunities will include consideration of cross connection control in accordance with all applicable rules, regulations and standards. Property owners will have ultimate responsibility for cross Operations Program P� ACE Page 9-5 City of Port Orchard 2009 Water System Plan connection associated with reclaimed water use and the City may require a more frequent schedule of device inspection and control, depending on the specific application of reclaimed water. 9.8 EMERGENCY PLAN The City of Port Orchard has performed a vulnerability assessment of its system in accordance with Environmental Protection Agency requirements and maintains a City-wide response program that includes water system operation under emergency conditions. As stated previously, all key pumping supply facilities are equipped with either permanent on -site power or provisions for connecting an emergency power generator. An adequate supply of parts, disinfectant and maintenance equipment is kept on -hand to respond to routine emergencies or system failures. All storage reservoirs are equipped with shut-off valves in the event of contamination and the City is currently working on upgrade of the telemetry monitoring system to increase its ability to detect and respond to emergency conditions. The City enjoys good working relationship and informal mutual aid agreements with neighboring water purveyors and agencies. This arrangement is very beneficial for local emergency conditions but does not provide the security of back-up assistance in more widespread emergency conditions that would limit resources. A small works roster of contractors available to assist under emergency conditions is maintained and updated regularly. The City is also a member of the "One Call System" for which the City has a 24 hour to and from response time. This system, which was established by the major utilities providers in the Puget Sound region, provides coordination and assistance for preventing damage to existing facilities during maintenance work or new construction. 9.9 WATER SHORTAGE RESPONSE Redundancy in water supply wells in the Port Orchard water system and interties with the City of Bremerton and Annapolis Water District provide a great deal of protection against an emergency related water shortage. In the event of a drought related water shortage, the City will work with neighboring purveyors to develop a consistent drought awareness program and recommendations for reducing water demands. In addition, the City would work with high water users (government facilities, irrigation accounts, etc.) to request curtailment in water use until water supplies can be reestablished. Operations Program Page 9-6 P SECTION 10 FINANCING & IMPLEMETATION 10.1 GENERAL The purpose of this section is to present a strategy for implementation of the recommendations and findings previously discussed in this Comprehensive Plan and, together with the proposed improvements identified in previous sections, and outline a definitive program for future development of the City of Port Orchard's water system. The City's general plan for implementation of this Plan is outlined in subsequent discussions of the following: financial considerations, funding sources, current rates and charges, methods of financing capital improvements. More detailed financial analyses and strategies are expected with ongoing yearly reviews and updates of rates and charges. Funding options for new development within the service area is discussed and generally considered the responsibility of the developer. 10.2 FINANCIAL CONSIDERATIONS Financial review and recommendations are made based on estimated future expenses, operating experience and plans for future projects. The major considerations in estimating expenses include the following: • Administration, operation, maintenance and the day-to-day expenses of operating and maintaining the water and sewer systems; • The charges associated with water production and purchases; • Financing capital improvements which are necessary to provide adequate service and extension to existing and new service areas; • Replacement and updating of existing facilities that require renewal because they are obsolete or no longer serviceable; and, • Debt service requirements to provide for repayment of interest and principal for all outstanding bonds for previous system improvements. 10.3 WATER SYSTEM BUDGET The financial policies and financial status of the of the City's water utility have been reviewed to evaluate the ability to provide the level of service and recommended improvements outlined in this document. In developing the anticipated six -year budget for the water utility, data from the 2007 water rates study was used and updated based on the recommendations contained in this plan. It was noted that past budgeting has been accomplished for the water and sewer utilities together. The budget presented in Table 10-1 separates the two utilities using assumptions of allocation of certain expenses (such as labor costs and overall public works equipment that is utilized for administration, operation and maintenance of the utility). It is recommended that the City Financing and Implementation P� ACE Page 10-1 City of Port Orchard 2009 Water System Plan continue to refine the splitting of costs between the utilities to ensure that adequate revenues are generated for the utilities independently and to ensure that one utility is not subsidizing the other. This will become increasingly important as outside funding sources are sought for system upgrades and improvements. Table 10 -1 was prepared to project Water Department financial performance which includes revenue from new services and customer revenue from the sales of water. Line item system operating expenses have been estimated for the years 2009 through 2013. Where additional staff are anticipated to meeting the growth of the water utility, new staff have been added. Capital expenses have also been estimated and projected for this time period. Funding for the CIP included in this plan is shown in the line item describe as "Funding Capital Improvement Program". $8 million dollars is show in the 5 year period from 2009 to 2013 for funding needed Capital Improvements. This corresponds roughly with the funding needs included in this plan. Key to this projection is the continued growth of the water utility. The table includes 310 new ERU's per year for this 6 year period. The Table also assumes a loan or bond funding to help fund the CIP program of $5 million. A repayment interest of 4.5% is assumed in the projections. If a low interest loan or grant was secured for some or all of the water improvement needs there would be money available to make additional system upgrades. It is important to note that the anticipated budget is presented as a starting point for more detailed financial analyses and determination of the need for outside funding assistance. A key recommendation of this Plan is for the City to continue to monitor yearly revenue and expense requirements to insure a sound financial utility continues. Financing and Implementation Page 10-2 P City of Port Orchard 2008 Water System Plan Table 10-1 Water Utility Six -Year Budget REVENUE Historical I Projected REVENUE (NEW SERVICES) 2007 2008 2009 2010 1 2011 2012 2013 Number of Connections (ERU's) 4,657 4,967 5,277 5,587 5,897 6,207 6,517 Connection Charges (GFC) 416,295 955,575 1,395,000 1,395,000 1,395,000 1,395,000 1,395,000 Charge In Lieu of Con. 20,000 20,000 20,000 20,000 20,000 20,000 20,000 Total Revenue from New Services 436,295 975,575 1,415,000 1,415,000 1,415,000 1,415,000 1,415,000 OPERATING REVENUES Unmetered Sales Customers-WW 2,000 2,000 2,000 2,0001 2,000 2,000 2,000 Metered WA Sales -Gen Customers 810,000 863,919 917,838 971,756 1,025,675 1,079,5941 1,133,513 Loss In Revenue Due to MW Annexation -52,500 -52,500 -52,500 -52,500 -52,500 Rate Adjustment (7/1/08) 107,990 216,334 229,814 243,294 256,774 270,253 Public Fire Protection Services 540 540 540 540 540 540 540 Sales to Public Municipalities - WA 6,000 6,000 6,0001 6,000 6,000 6,000 6,000 Metered Sales -Public Authorities 72,500 72,500 72,500 72,500 72,500 72,500 72,500 Late Payment / Penalties* 14,500 14,500 14,500 14,500 14,500 14,500 14,500 Misc Svs. Rev.-Wa SW SVS T-Off 2,000 2,000 2,000 2,000 2,000 2,000 2,000 Rent -Utility Properties 35,500 35,500 35,500 35,500 35,500 35,500 35,500 Other Wa SW Revenues 2500 2500 2500 25001 25001 2500 2500 Total Operating Revenue Water 945,540 1,107,449 1,217,2121 1,284,611 1 1,352,0091 1,419,408 1,486,806 TOTAL ESTIMATED REVENUE 1,381,835 2,083,024 2,632,2121 2,699,6111 2,767,0091 2,834,408 2,901,806 EXPENSES Historical Projected Operating Expenses -Water 2007 2008 2009 2010 1 2011 2012 2013 Purchased Water 1,000 200 200 200 200 200 200 Maintenance Structures & Im rov. 550 750 750 750 750 750 750 Maintenance of Wells 2,500 10,000 5,000 5,000 5,000 5,000 5,000 Power Purch for Pumping -Water 86,400 91,843 97,629 103,780 110,318 117,268 124,656 Pumping Labor & Expense -Water 30,000 31,500 33,075 34,729 36,465 38,288 40,203 Maintain Structures -WA Pump 1,000 1,050 1,103 1,1581 1,216 1,276 1,340 Maintain Pump Equipment -Water 40,000 42,000 44,100 46,305 48,620 51,051 53,604 Chemicals -Water Treatment 12,000 12,660 13,356 14,091 14,866 15,684 16,546 Maint, Operation,Lbr, Exp-Water 55,000 57,750 90,638 95,169 99,928 134,924 141,670 Maint Distrib Rsrvr & Stand Pipes 25,000 27,500 30,250 33,275 36,603 40,263 44,289 Maint Transmsn & Distrb Mains-Wa 63,000 66,150 69,458 72,930 76,577 80,406 84,426 Maint of Svs- Wa Trnsmsn Distrbn 50,000 55,000 60,500 66,5501 73,205 80,526 88,578 Maintenance Of Meters -Water 25,000 26,250 27,563 28,941 30,388 31,907 33,502 Maint of Hydrants -Water 2,000 2,100 2,205 2,315 2,431 2,553 2,680 Meter Readings Cust Ex -Water 21,739 22,609 23,513 24,454 25,432 26,449 27,507 Customer Record & Collection Exp* 80,962 84,200 87,568 91,071 94,714 98,503 102,443 Admin/General Salaries 68,786 71,537 74,399 77,374 80,469 83,688 87,036 General Salary -Clerical 67,064 69,747 72,537 75,438 78,456 81,594 84,858 Office Supplies & Other Expense 14,000 14,700 15,435 16,2071 17,017 17,868 18,761 Admin Expense Transferred Overhead -2,100 -2,100 -2,100 -2,100 -2,100 -2,100 -2,100 Outside Services Employed 6,000 6,300 6,615 6,946 7,293 7,658 8,041 Property Insurance 14,000 14,420 14,420 14,420 14,420 14,420 14,420 Injury & Damages -Liability Ins 23,000 23,690 24,401 25,133 25,887 26,663 27,463 Employee Benefits -Vacation 13,500 14,040 14,602 15,186 15,793 16,425 17,082 Employee Beneifts-Sick Leave 8,000 8,320 8,653 8,9991 9,359 9,733 10,123 Employee Benefits -Holiday 8,088 8,412 8,748 9,098 9,462 9,840 10,234 Maint of General Plant 22,000 22,880 23,795 24,747 25,737 26,766 27,837 Transport. of Equipment Expense 16,000 16,800 17,640 18,522 19,448 20,421 21,442 City Gross Earn-Util Tax 44,552 47,248 49,944 52,640 55,336 58,032 60,728 City Gross Earn Ut Tax State- 49,052 52,828 55,524 58,220 60,9161 63,612 66,308 TOTAL EXPENSES 848,093 900,3841 971,519 1,021,547 1,074,204 1,159,667 1,219,626 Financing and Implementation rPA E Page 10-3 City of Port Orchard 2009 Water System Plan CAPITAL EXPENSES Historical Projected Capital Expenses Water 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 City Hall Payment 36,000 36,000 36,000 36,000 36,000 36,000 36,000 Equipment Replacement 7,500 7,500 7,500 7,500 7,500 7,500 7,500 Water/Sewer Bond Debt Service - 475,000 463,750 452,500 441,250 430,000 Funding Capital Improvement Plan - 1,000,000 4,000,0001 1,000,000 1,000,000 1,000,000 Payment To McCormick - 127,500 127,500 127,500 127,500 127,500 127,500 Total Capital Requirements 43,500 171,000 1,646,000 4,634,750 1,623,500 1,612,250 1,601,000 LOAN/GRANT/BOND FINANCING 5,000,000 Yearly Account Balance 1,01 1 ,640 14,694 -2,956,686 69,305 62,491 81,181 FUND BALANCE 1 500,000 1,511,640 6,526,333 3,569,647 3,638,952 3,701,443 3,782,624 10.4 FUNDING SOURCES Table 10-1 illustrates the need for additional capital to fund the Capital Improvement Plan. In this table $5 million in financing is assumed. Additionally rates need to keep up with the cost to operate and maintain the system and provide for depreciation of the system. The newly adopted rates cover a portion of the water system depreciation but do not intended to fully fund depreciation. A depreciation fund is not shown on this table because of the need to fund the CIP and system replacement program. The following listed revenue sources are either currently utilized by the City or are potentially available for funding operation and maintenance expenses and financing capital improvements to the water systems. Careful review of each potential source of funding (primarily grants and low interest loans) is recommended to develop the most cost effective financial strategy for future system operation. In addition, regular consideration of evaluation of connection charges and rates as discussed below is recommended as a follow-up to this Plan. 10.4.1 Rates Rates and charges are utilized to finance expenses which were not paid either when the system (or portion thereof) was initially constructed, or by the assessment of general facility charges. These expenses typically include: operation and maintenance expenses; water production and purchase costs; customer accounting and collection expenses; administration and general expenses; taxes; debt service requirements; and renewal and replacement or capital expenses. The City's current water rates are shown in Table 10-2. The rates are established by Ordinance No. 013-08 effective July 1, 2008, and remain in effect at the publishing of this Plan. Financing and Implementation Page 10-4 P City of Port Orchard 2008 Water System Plan Table 10-2 Existing Water Rates (As of J ly 1, 2008) Size of Service Bi-MonthlyRate 3/4 inch $22.50 1 inch $23.50 1 1/2 inch $26.50 2 inch $29.50 3 inch $35.50 4 inch $47.50 6 inch $68.50 8 inch $89.50 10 inch $113.50 Consumption Charge 0 - 3,000 gallons $18.50 3,000 — 5000 gallons $22.50 5,001 — 50,000 gallons $2.10 per 1,000 gallons 50,001 — 100,000 gallons $2.20 per 1,000 gallons 100,001 — 150,000 gallons $2.30 per 1,000 gallons 150,001 plus gallons $2.40 per 1,000 gallons Capital Facility Charge $4500/Equivalent Residential Unit (3/4" meter) It is recommended the City review the then current rates and charges on a yearly basis. Consideration of elimination of the water allocation included in the base rate would provide the City with more readily available data for water consumption analyses and evaluation of conservation programs. In addition, it is recommended that the City review and consider a more stringent tiered or block rate structure where base water consumption is charged at a lesser rate than higher volumes of use. This type of rate structure has been very effective in encouraging conservation in general, although no amount of water included in the base water rate and a larger differential between rate would typically be more effective. This provides customers a way to save on their water bills through conservation and mandates that the high water users pay a fair share of system facilities and operation costs determined by volume. Another rate structure that may be appropriate and warrants consideration is a simple differential rate between winter and summer water use to encourage conservation during the typically high demand summer months. 10.4.2 Connection Charges New connections to the City of Port Orchard are required to pay connection charges in addition to the costs associated with the purchase and installation of the water meter. As shown in Table 10-2, there is currently one charge to cover the cost of Capital Facilities within the system. This Facility Charge, or CFC, is intended to provide an equitable means of for new customers of the system to pay their fair share of City-wide capital improvements. General facilities are typically identified as storage reservoirs, sources of Financing and Implementation P� ACE Page 10-5 City of Port Orchard 2009 Water System Plan supply, transmission mains, pump stations and oversized pipes to serve large areas, and the facilities and equipment required to maintain the system as a whole. It is important that CFCs are maintained at a level that will support construction of new facilities and to ensure that growth pays for growth. State regulations dictate the method of calculating CFCs and provide guidance on what projects and costs can be included in the calculation. Recalculation of Capital Facilities Charges should be should be accomplished on a regular basis and is recommended as a follow-up at the close of a comprehensive water system planning effort. Local Facilities Charges, or System Development Charges as often referred to, are another type of connection charge that the City uses to insure new customers pay their equitable fair share of the existing water system. LFCs are intended to cover a connecting parties' equitable share of water system facilities in the immediate vicinity of property connecting to the system. Presently, the City requires developers to pay all costs associated with extension of service to the property being developed. When local facilities have been constructed and paid for by a previous developer, a latecomer agreement may exist requiring benefited properties which connect to a water line to pay their pro rata share of the cost to install facilities. In instances where no latecomer agreement exists, a System Development Charge is used to insure all customers pay their equitable fair share of the water system. 10.4.3 Local Improvement District (LID) Financing Local Improvement District (LID) is a means by which improvements can be financed by those property owners directly benefiting from the improvements. This method of financing is typically accomplished by the majority of benefited property owners signing a petition for the improvements. It is possible, however for a LID to be formed by City Ordinance. LID financing is generally used for local facilities improvements and initial financing is typically by bond sales or loans. The costs of improvements are typically allocated and assessed against properties within a LID area, although revenue from rates can also be used to repay the bonds required to finance a LID improvement. 10.4.4 Developer Financing New facilities constructed within the service area should be financed by the developers of presently unimproved property or property that redevelops. All of the improvements required for service to property within new plats, or commercial and industrial developments will be designed and constructed in accordance with the City's developer extension policies which are set forth in the "Developers Handbook". This document is available from the City under separate cover. Financing and Implementation Page 10-6 P City of Port Orchard 2008 Water System Plan 10.4.5 Combination Financing by Developers and the City It may be necessary in some cases to require the developer to construct facilities which are oversized for the current development in order to provide for the comprehensive development of the City's water system. The City in such instances may elect to enter into an agreement to reimburse the developer for the extra costs associated with increasing the size of facilities over that required to serve the property proposed for development. Oversizing should be considered when it is necessary to construct any water main 8-inches in diameter in single-family areas for Comprehensive Plan compliance. Construction of any water main in multi -family, commercial or industrial areas that is larger than the size required to serve the current development proposal is considered oversizing. 10.4.6 Bond Financing Bond financing is another methods of financing water system improvements and can be achieved by the sale of either general obligation or revenue bonds. General obligation bonds must have the support of the majority of the voters in the City and are paid through assessments against properties within the City. Revenue bonds, however, do not require voter approval and may be financed by whatever funds are available to the City for the payment of debt service. This might include revenues from water sales, general fees, latecomer charges or other funds. 10.4.7 Grant Financing Grant financing has become increasingly scarce for utility systems in recent years but is still available for some specific circumstances. Current grant programs for water system facilities include the State of Washington Centennial Clean Water Fund and State Revolving Fund for Water Pollution Control. These programs are aimed at eliminating pollution sources and/or correcting documented existing pollution problems. They are therefore not appropriate for ongoing rehabilitation and replacement projects. They may be considered, however, in the event that particular health hazards have been identified and documented and it is determined that improvements to will provide a solution to the existing pollution problems. 10.4.8 Public Works Trust Fund (PWTF) Loans Public Works Trust Fund financing is a low interest loan program which can be used to finance utility system improvements. Interest rates range from 0.5% to 2% depending on the level of local participation and the loans must be repaid within twenty years. This type of financing has been very beneficial to utility systems throughout Washington but unfortunately has been suspended during development of this Water System Plan. Those projects which may be eligible for Public Works Trust Fund financing, when it is active again, are identified in the Capital Facilities Plan. Financing and Implementation P� ACE Page 10-7 City of Port Orchard 2009 Water System Plan 10.4.9 State Revolving Fund (SRF) The State Revolving Fund is a program that is similar to the PWTF program and administered by PWTF staff. Water source and treatment projects are prioritized under the competitive SRF application process. Loan interest rates are similar to PWTF rates, except that a loan fee is required in lieu of a local match. 10.4.10 Rural Development Direct Loans and Grants The Rural Development division of the United States Department of Agriculture, through Rural Utility Service, is authorized to provide financial assistance for water and waste disposal facilities in rural areas and towns of up to 10,000 people. Interest rates are set quarterly and are based on current market yields for municipal obligations. The terms on the loans can vary, with a maximum being 40 years of the useful life of the improvement or facilities to be financed, whichever is less. Rural Development Loans are federally financed, and as such, federal rules and regulations apply. It is important to note that the City of Port Orchard is approaching a population of 10,000 and eligibility for such financing will likely be restricted in the near future. Another limiting factor to obtaining grants funding from Rural Development is that water rates must be documented at a much higher level than the current Port Orchard Rates before grants become available. 10.4.11 American Recovery and Reinvestment Act (ARRA) Funding In 2009, the federal government enacted the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act (ARRA) funding as a means of creating jobs and stimulating the national economy. ARRA funding has helped finance water system improvements and other municipal infrastructure projects through grants and low interest loans. Additional funding is expected in 2010 and the City of Port Orchard may elect to pursue such funding. Careful consideration of the scope and type of projects that are most likely to be funded is required prior to investing resources into the development of funding applications. Low Impact Development (LID), source of supply and resource conservation projects in particular should be evaluated for application for funds. Monitoring the availability of ARRA funds and other unique opportunities for funding such as low rates bonds may provide unexpected opportunities for financing high priority CIP projects. 10.5 FINANCING CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS 10.5.1 General Facilities The most difficult improvements to finance are general facilities such as reservoirs, water pump stations, transmission mains, treatment facilities and other facilities which will benefit a large area. This is because this type of facilities is generally needed before water service can be provided and often times before customers are available to assist in financing. In new and expanding areas where water or sewer service is not currently available, general facilities are typically financed by one of the following methods: Financing and Implementation Page 10-8 P City of Port Orchard 2008 Water System Plan • Requiring the initial developer to pay for improvements with a pay -back arrangement as the area develops (latecomer charges); • Passing a general obligation bond which is approved by voters; • Forming a LID and assessing the benefited properties equally; • City financing of improvements and assessing a General Facilities Charge (GFC) to each property within the benefited area as development occurs. These charges must be sufficient to cover all costs incurred, including interest on money and an allowance at a rate that will amortize the investment; or, • City obtained grants or low interest loans to assist in construction of these type of improvements. In established areas of the City, financing general facilities presents a different type of problem. The general facilities are normally paid for when the system is constructed and the costs are assessed against existing customers. As the system expands and new connections are added, a charge in lieu of assessment can be levied or connection charges imposed to offset the original construction costs. This money, in addition to the funds from monthly rates for renewals and replacements, should be adequate to finance general facility improvements. Theoretically, if the facilities charges are adequate, sufficient funds will be available to complete general facility projects as required. 10.5.2 Local Facilities Local facilities such as local distribution mains and appurtenances benefit a smaller area than general facilities. The costs for construction of these improvements can be directly attributable to the properties within an identified area which receive direct benefit from the improvements. Methods of financing local facility improvements are summarized below: • Formation of a ULID; • Developer Extension Agreement and Financing; • Local Facilities Charges (LFCs) (currently not used); • Pay -back (Latecomer) Agreements; or, • Grants and other outside assistance to reduce local costs, including City participation. Funding new local improvements through rate increases is not recommended because it would result in all customers paying improvements which benefit only a small area. Renewal and replacement of local facilities is typically financed through rates. Financing and Implementation P� ACE Page 70-9 City of Port Orchard 2009 Water System Plan 10.5.3 Private Facilities Individual service lines, backflow preventers and other site specific appurtenances are financed by the individual customer receiving the direct benefit from such facilities. 10.6 FINANCING STRATEGY The Capital Improvements Plan identified in Section 7 identifies approximately $22.2 million in water system improvements, including developer financed improvements. Of these improvements, approximately $15.9 million is recommended for the next six years including developer funded projects with approximately $5.8 million at least partially financed by connection charges and $6.3 million in system renewal and replacements that would be funded through rates or Local Facilities Charges. Because of the need for significant source improvements to accommodate the projected increase in population, it is imperative that growth, and water consumption be monitored closely to ensure that requisite improvements are accomplished in advance of system expansions and new connections. It is recommended that the City fund the recommended improvements in the following manner. First, any grants or low interest loans should be utilized to finance needed projects. Next, cash on hand from GFCs, LFCs, rates and any other sources of money should be utilized. Any short -fall in these funding sources required to finance the required system improvements may be obtained from selling revenue bonds. Bond issues, however, must consider available funding for repayment of the bonds. 10.7 DEVELOPER EXTENSION POLICIES The City of Port Orchard, as a municipal corporation, has a responsibility to the public to ensure that water mains installed in public streets and easements are constructed in accordance with currently accepted standards for public works. Therefore, the City has adopted a developer extension regulation which is set forth in its' Developers Handbook. The requirements set forth in that document are intended by the City as a contract with the developer, incorporating minimum standards which are prerequisite to acceptance by the City of facilities which are to become part of the City's water system. By reference, the latest version of the referenced document is incorporated into and made part of this Comprehensive Plan. 10.8 ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW As part of this planning process and in order to comply with the requirements of the State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA), an environmental checklist has been prepared and circulated for comment. A copy of the SEPA checklist and associated Declaration of Non -Significance is contained in the Appendices to this document. Financing and Implementation Page 10-10 P Attachment 5: Water System Plan and Small Water Program Consistency Statement Ch Management This checklist is intended to ensure consistency of water system planning documents with adopted local comprehensive plans and development regulations. Each local planning jurisdiction in which the water utility provides service will review the relevant water system planning information and provide a signed consistency statement to the utility for submittal to the Department of Health. If the local planning agency will not respond, the highest authority within the utility (chair of governing body, executive director of private companies, etc.) must sign to verify consistency of the plan information. Water System Name:;L-- of Pet' 0V.3.e..r•e1 PWS ID: (61 00 Planning Document Title: Wa,6y SMeie-w. P1cky, Plan Date: ?0"I Local Planning Jurisdiction: 1";}san CWATZZt - Consistency Statement Page(s)In Planning yes — No — Not (Reference Municipal Water Law Section 5 and 8, Document (completed by Applicable amendment to chapter 90.03.386 and chapter 43.20 RCW) utility) The retail set -vice area, and any other areas not served by a separate public water 1-1 P system, and land use identified in the WSP is consistent with the adopted J.- g P' yes comprehensive plan and adopted development regulations and policies. For WSPs only: The growth projection used to forecast water demand for the retail set -vice area is consistent with the adopted city/county's population growth P. projections (and commercial development projection if applicable). If different '/�5 growth projection was used, the alternative growth projection and methodology proposed is acceptable based on explanation given. For WSPs only: New potential large water users (that may have a significant S • S Impact on the water system) that the city/county is aware of have been identified p yes In the WSP. For city -owned systems only: All policies regarding water service outside ',�•a the corporate boundaries are, included in this WSP. These policies are consistent P eAW U ye.S with the adopted comprehensive plan and development regulations. Where the local planning agency Is unable to sign a Consistency Statement: Provide documentation of efforts to coordinate with local agencies with a 60-day timeline for local agency to respond. Include: name of contact, date, type of effort attempted, and response from local agency. I certify that the above statements are true to the best of my knowledge and that these statements suppoEN a I subject -planning document is consistent with adopted comprehensive pl and other policies. 2 D8 Da e Name, Title, & Jurisdiction "For any issues of inconsistency, please provide comments on how they can be resolved. ** Attachment 5 1 March 2004 Revision KITSAP COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT 614 DIVISION STREET MS-36, PORT ORCHARD WASHINGTON 98366.4682 Larry Keeton, DIreotor (360) 337-7181 FAX (360) 337.4925 HOME PAGE -vim J(.kltsaogov.coJdcd(.kltsaogov.coJdcd/ July 2, 2008 Mary Ausburn, AICP PACE Engineers, INC 16012"d Avenue, Suite 1000 Seattle, WA 98101 Re: City of Port Orchard Water System Plan Dear Ms Ausburn. RECEIVED JUL 0 8 2008 The Kitsap County Department of Community Development (DCD) thanks you for your response to our comment letter dated December 14, 2007. We find that you have adequately addressed DCD's comments. Attached, please find the signed consistency statement. If an electronic version of the Plan is available, we would appreciate receiving a copy. If there are any questions, please feel free to contact me at kkI1LIston(@co.kitsaR.wa.us co.kitsap.wa.us or 360.337.7181. Associate Planner ' Kitsap County DCD TOLL FREE FROM: BAINBRIDGE IS. 842-2081 OLALLA 851-4147 A d C a w r, G d E 0Q 0 W O y'9 a x M O M O CV p N CO a Q c c u h ;g 8 0�� a� `�•� ,� Q• U U� a qy� v� `•' a•FUU W.p v N. .e � O w � y y as 0-0 y oil W ,� 8aN q • b.� o o•..' •`�•G o 923 °3IgT �q •p aq y '; - 0 Ap; p G °3 q o .�Y �° o• }3 g 3 IZo loll �Ig �p Z '��'.]a oaf �i T � ..f � � G � � « S' •O Yy $ w f'A a o y « y °� � � �d � �� yb �',NW �• c �Q u�Q]Q!; � �•�� a10i Q�� •o C N �� H � �'CC°� �'c �w' c d CI cGvW cG 3 y a Q 3 VI 3 V] a a 3" 03 3 3 3� r N N E- C O y E tS c w iuqp ua a M 0 •i�i CO A Q zi3 A 9 0 13 a •b C _ c a� J Q Z ti 0 A ii p� � � b � T •S � A .x Sj 0 U ,�QQ7 gq fib" u d to fY+ t$ �Ti ts Wa o v �ay b g " j o N I� ', aKi auf i� •9 Ej 94 30 a'°i c o� �a 'p°� C� o •�� g' w w3 �5 os S••� g 6 3 x 0 �� Ys OL 6n.9 ` d o .� .�I�- • •p a poq n U a ,''`��j� OE z�3 � A3 �8 cG3 d u3 v�o o a 63g g3 Ps CL CL N6 o o o o u� „ Q O v �6 6 v�i � N �•�o to 0 'S N l0 R N G E s c mtr3 sE a � e VQd9 tt td 0o M U T�CUj {y •� pO N td tlto d Q papi �y � O G o Q. W �yn q N U a vm� •-�O 3 w p :41 4b C x.boMV am dab ti C q ti C. a i .El ca 0 fV y E 8 Ug�Sm N C i7 d 0 a > d a y dam r yyy� Q c �a 33:�4w TE City of Port Orchard Procedures for Extension of Service The City of Port Orchard's procedures for extension of service within the City Limits are codified and contained in the City's Developer handbook, a copy of which is on file with the City of Port Orchard. 1. Service Request Process The City responds to requests for service on an on -going basis. If the request is for a service installation within the City limits, fees are paid and the City personnel tap the main and install the service line from the main to the property line and set the meter. If the request for service is a Developer Extension within the City limits, the Developer must complete the application to construction an extension and the application must be approved by the City. The remainder of the processes is detailed on the Developer Handbook. Service requests and Developer Extension requests outside of the City limits are handled on a case - by -case basis and coordinated with the Kitsap County building permit process. 2. System Capacity Assessment The City of Port Orchard's water system has been constructed with the capacity to accommodate additional individual service connections within the City limits and immediate surrounds. A source of supply analysis was completed as part of the City's comprehensive planning process and indicated the capacity to serve the projected population of the water service area established by the Coordinated Water System under current zoning conditions. For Developer Extensions, the City requires developers to demonstrate the ability to construct facilities sufficient capacity exists and what, if any improvements are required to provide adequate service. The City, however determines final requirements for water system improvements. 3. Additional Conditions for Service The primary policy of the City Council is that water service will be provided to properties within the city limits. If capacity is available, water service will be provided to residents of the Urban Growth Area (UGA) outside the City limits, Properties within the UGA requesting water service area are expected to annex to the City before service is provided. The City Council may consider exemptions to this policy if it is determined to be In the best interest of the community. In such Instances, the City will accept a Developer's Extension Agreement which prohibits the property owner from protesting future annexation proposals. Until such time that the property is annexed, customers will pay a 50% surcharge on their water bills. 4. Time Extension and Appeal Process If needed, Developers can request time extensions for completing water service projects. Time extension requests are reviewed by the City Engineer and/or Public Works Staff. Disputes and appeals are also addressed by City Council. Attachment 9: Water Reclamation Checklist for Systems with 1,000 or more Connections The Municipal Water Supply - Efficiency Requirements Act, Chapter 5, Laws of 2003 (Municipal Water Law), amended Chapter 90.46 of the Revised Code of Washington (RCW) to require public water systems serving 1000 or more connections to evaluate opportunities for reclaimed water when completing their water system plans (WSP). This checklist may be used to ensure that your WSP includes sufficient information about opportunities for reclaimed water and your system's efforts to develop those opportunities. Water System Name: City of Port Orchard Date: lanuary 2006 2004 PWS ID: 68900 Please see attached. 1. An evaluation of water reclamation opportunities is found in the WSP on pages: At a minimum, include the following in your evaluation of reclamation opportunities: • An inventory of large water users. • Identification of potential reclaimed water users. • Estimates of how much water could be saved by development of reclaimed water projects • Identification of opportunities that your system intends to pursue within the next six years • A brief analysis of the financial and operation feasibility of identified opportunities The form on the opposite side of this page is provided to assist you in conducting an inventory of potential users and estimate savings. Use of this form is optional. 2. Provide the results of that evaluation. If new or additional reclaimed water opportunities are available, include a brief description of activities you are considering undertaking or those activities you will undertake to pursue development of those opportunities. If reclaimed water opportunities are not available, include a brief description of the interaction with the local wastewater facility (or other entity within the area you serve that may be a generator of reclaimed water) to evaluate opportunities to develop reclaimed water. 3. If evaluation of water reclamation is not included because such an evaluation has been completed by the wastewater facility, or other entity, please include a copy of that evaluation. 4. If water reclamation is mandated for this water system through local government agreement, contract, local regulations, ordinances, or other mechanism, please provide a copy of the governing mechanism. 5. If reclaimed is available within the service area of your water system please include the following information: • Name of Facility • Class of Water Received (A, B, C or D) • Reclamation Permit Number • Amount of Reclaimed Water received • A brief description of how this water is used, including information on cross connection control • Date when your utility began receiving reclaimed water Attachment 9 1 March 2004 Revision City of Port Orchard Water Reclamation Information 1. Evaluation • Large Water Users RESTAURANTS Mary Mac's Pancake House Shari's Tweten's HOSPITALMURSING HOMES Group Health Harrison Hospital Ridgemont Terrace Stafford Suites SCHOOLS Cedar Height Jr High Sidney Glen Elementary South Kitsap High GOVERNMENT Kitsap County Admin Bldg Kitsap County Juvenllle Home Penninsula Work Release MISCELLANEOUS Days Inn Hi Joy Bowl Holiday Inn Express South Kitsap Mall Potential Reclaimed Water Users None identified at this time. Estimate of Water Saved by Development of Reclaimed Water Projects Not Applicable. Reclaimed Water Opportunities to Pursue The City has recently completed a wastewater treatment plant upgrade with the Karcher Sewer District. Although no firm opportunities for water reuse have been identified — several Inquiries have been made. Both the City and the District support water reuse where practical, cost effective and within the If the District were to get a customer with the potential to use reclaimed water or if the District were determined reclaimed water could be a feasible option for a customer, available opportunities would be pursued. Financial and Operation Feasibility Financial and operational feasibility would need to be analyzed on a case by case basis 2. Results • Activities to Consider as New or Additional Reclaimed Water Opportunities become Available Provision of reclaimed water from the recently upgraded joint use wastewater treatment plant will be accomplished as requests are made or opportunities for reclaimed wastewater become available. • Interaction with the Local Wastewater Facility to Evaluate Reclaimed Water Opportunities As mentioned, the City and Karcher Creek Sewer District recently participated in upgrade of their joint use wastewater treatment facility. The District actually operates the plant but the City will assist in the evaluation of reclaimed water potential within its service area. 3. Other Evaluation Evaluation Completed by the Wastewater Facility (or other entity) Not Applicable. 4. Mandated Water Reclamation • Documentation of Mandated Water Reclamation Not Applicable. Attachment 9 2 March 2004 Revision 5. Available Reclaimed Water Reclaimed Water Status at Karcher Creek treatment Plant is unknown. • Name of Facility • Class of Water Received (A, B, C or D) • Reclamation Permit Number • Amount of Reclaimed Water received • A brief description of how this water is used, including information on cross connection control • Date when your utility began receiving reclaimed water Not Applicable. Attachment 9 3 March 2004 Revision I a a a o a Ni 14 � W a •5� � v R V (a� N {P%�$ N um N y 0 aa� B w v a z If ^ yyyyyy w • w .. • � �1 wW0 � a� � §§ §# |71 - � �44 7 - — k � 14 k\} .»!/ E[f!« - \ ƒ \ ±§ [§ d a ; I e § § ; C3 i aw i vo W ,N 114 o� s; n a F s k 04 i4 G • • • O • . ` W � Cry .` � . .: - R • • • • W W o• • . City of Port Orchard 216 Prospect Street, Port Orchard, WA 98366 (36o) 876-4407 0 FAX (36o) 895-9029 Agenda Staff Report Agenda Item No. Public Hearing 6B Subject: Downtown Overlay District Design Review for Proposed Development at 710 Bay Street, File No. DRB oo1-io Meeting Date: Prepared by: Atty Routing No: Atty Review Date: April 13, 2010 James Weaver Development Director RV Summary: On March 2, 20io, Rudolf Swenson submitted a Building Permit application for a Fa9ade improvement for his property at 710 Bay Street. The facade improvement triggered the criteria per POMC Chapter 16.20 for review by the Design Review Board. Generally, building permits do not require public hearings. The proposed fagade improvements include brick materials, black wrought iron railings and fixtures, and arched windows with keystone rock surrounds. Additional revisions to the property include adding a second story to the existing single - story structure and revising the front facade that will update the building and allow more visibility to his business that specialized in custom jewelry. Part of the request that is before the City Council is to remove a portion of the city owned facade that is located directly in front of the applicants structure. Also of note is the applicant's request to have a cantilevered section of the new second story, overhang the sidewalk by three feet with a second floor bay window extending out another one foot. The applicant is not requesting to exceed the building height limit of thirty-nine feet that would require additional permitting and/or amenities. After proper public notice of the public meeting as required in POMC Section 16.20.229, the applicant met with the Design Review Board (DRB) to review the proposal for conformance with POMC Sections 16.20.218-225. After deliberation and discussion, the DRB passed Resolution No. DRB-ool-olo by issuing the following statement "NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Design Review Board of the City of Port Orchard hereby recommends to the City Council that the project DRB-ooi-lo, located at Rio Bay Street should be approved as submitted". It should be noted by the City Council that no revisions or conditions were attached to the DRB resolution. The DRB members voted unanimously to support the design. Recommendation: Open the Public Hearing. Fiscal Impact: None Attachments: DRB Resolution No. DRB-oo1-10 Applicable Project submittal Data CITY OF PORT ORCHARD DESIGN REVIEW BOARD RESOLUTION NO. DRB-001-10 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF PORT ORCHARD DESIGN REVIEW BOARD RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF PROJECT DRB-001-10 WHEREAS, The Design Review Board is appointed by the Mayor and tasked by the City Council to provide input into issues related to architectural design and; WHEREAS, The Design Review Board makes recommendations to the City Council as appropriate in conformance with Port Orchard Municipal Code Chapter 2.20 and; WHEREAS, The City in conformance with the City of Port Orchard Municipal Code and as outlined Chapter 2.78, has created a Design Review Board (DRB) consisting of a minimum of five and maximum of seven members of the public and; THE DESIGN REVIEW BOARD OF THE CITY OF PORT ORCHARD, WASHINGTON, MAKES THE FOLLOWING FINDINGS WITH RESPECT TO THE PROPOSED PROJECT DRB-001-10 LOCATED AT 710 BAY STREET. BASED UPON THE FOREGOING FINDINGS THE DESIGN REVIEW BOARD HEREBY; CONCLUSIONS Conclusions: 1. The Design Review Board finds that it is within their authority to make recommendations to the City Council through a Design Review Board Resolution. 2. The Design Review Board voted on a motion to approve Design Review Board Resolution N o. D R B-001-10. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Design Review Board of the City of Port Orchard hereby recommends to the City Council that the project DRB-001-10 located at 710 Bay Street be approved as submitted. PASSED by the Design Review Board of the City of Port Orchard this 23rd Day of March, 2010. Design Review Board Resolution DRB-001-10 Page 1 of 2 Design Review B Member ATTEST: 91 R. Weaver, City Development Director Design Review Board Resolution DRB-001-10 Page 2 of 2 CITY OF PORT ORCHARD Planning Department 216 Prospect Street RECF/VeD MAR 0 2 ZO Port Orchard, WA 98366 cil fu Phone (36o) 876-4991 • Fax (36o) 876-498o PLAN1V/1V &'r R MARD Date Received: 3a1 D By: �_ Receipt #:�A Fi1e p: D R lS-0 D f - IU ENT APPLICATION FOR PROJECT REVIEW BY DESIGN REVIEW BOARD FEES: Paid with any associated Land Use permit (Conditional Use Permit, Rezone, etc.) filed in conjunction with this project. A Pre -Application meeting is required. See Land Use Form 011. INCOMPLETE APPLICATION WILL NOT BE PROCESSED. This application must include the following: ❑ ONE original notarized Application, plus eight copies (9 total) ❑ ONE original Contact Information sheet. (attached) ❑ List of property owners within 300', map, and signed statement (1 set) (See attached instructions) ❑ Mailing labels for the list of property owners. (3 sets) (See attached instructions) ❑ Complete legal description of the property. (8 copies) — ❑ Preliminary architectural renderings with elevations and details of architectural features: - 0 8 sets: 11" x lT' r� —❑ 1 set: 8 /2" x 11" ❑ Site plans, sufficiently complete to show comprehensive project design, drawn to scale no smaller than 1 inch equals 30 feet showing location and size of all of the following: (8 copies) ❑ structures ❑ buffer areas, yards, open spaces, common areas or plazas ❑ walkways ❑ outdoor light fixtures showing the area of illumination ❑ parking areas ❑ fencing ❑ mechanical and utility equipment ❑ outdoor furniture, trash receptacles, accessories, and other such items ❑ landscaping details if required) ❑ Detailed information on the following: ❑ The type and finished color of exterior siding, windows and roofing to be used, signs and trim to the extent known (provide samples of factory finishes, if possible) (8 copies) ❑ How mechanical and utility equipment will be screened (8 copies) ❑ Color, type, and specification of all fencing materials (8 copies) ❑ The type, model, color, height, wattage, for all outdoor light fixtures (8 copies) ❑ The type, model, and color of all outdoor furniture, trash receptacles, and accessories (8 copies) ❑ Complete and detailed narrative of the proposal, including written responses as to how the project is in conformance with Downtown Overlay District design standards found in POMC 16.20.211 - 16.20.225: (8 copies) ❑ CD-ROM which contains all submitted documents in Adobe PDF or Microsoft Word format. Other documentation may be required other than what is listed above. Page 1 of 6 Planning form 017/Review by Design Review Board (Rev. 09/09) File #: PK16 - 001- 10 Print clearly (use Ink) or type: nn Property address: f ��Q 34J( S y Assessor's Parcel Number(s): 4650 0 Lj 05 Z — t0200 W Total Area: Zoning Classification: L,—MV &_t0 f ,- L Did you meet with Planning Department staff in a Pre -Application meeting? ONO ❑ YES: data Is the property within 200' of the shoreline? ❑ NO ❑ YES: shoreline designation Are there Critical Areas on the Property? AO ❑ YES: Signature o0VOwner (Must be notarized) Print Name of Owner STATE OF WASHINGTON ) SS COUNTY OF KITSAP ) I certify that I know or have satisfactory evidence that Via A &V \ C3 Sl1Jp � is the person who appeared before me, and said person acknowledged that (he/she) signed this instrument and acknowledged it to be (his/her) free and voluntary act for the uses and purposes mentioned in the instrument. WITNESS MY HAND AND OFFICIAL SEAL this davof A 20M. n c me�= (rR� ry ec�lS�n W)TATIY PUBLIC in and for the State of Washington, residing at QbK-n XCx ( ON 'W-�01 My appointment expires: a-i-ao(S Page 2 of 6 Planning form 017/Review by Design Review Board (Rev. 09109) ?]dorado Stone - Brick Page 1 of 1 BRACCIANQ ROMA BR1(K This brick's color palette has an overall hue of subtle brick -rods with a smattering of Charcoal. blacks to create a warm overall color blond. Shown here with an over®rout technique. VIEW OTHER PROFILES 0 RomaDrIck ViaBrick TundraBrick Modonatirick VIEW ALL BRICK PROfILHS WHERE TO BUY PRIVACY POLICY! LEGAL NOTICE REQUEST BROCHURE ittp://www.eldoradostone.coin/brick/ 3/5/201( 31dorado Stone - Brick Page 1 of I HiWM lLWl1?E_"�rvBiTh'1. Yayy- x rF` Color shown: Gorton PRIVACY POLICY / LEOaL NOTICE TRIM MOLDING For a finished appearance around doors and windows, the deep outside dimensions allow for either stone or brick to finish inside the return providing a very clean transition hotweon materials. Sizo: I l.5' L x I.S" LV X 2 11 Crown Cetall Brick Surround Half Hounds Wall Cap Column Cap Trim Molding 1.5 Choose Accents' Colors y=i Contparo sizos WHERE TO EUY REQUEST SR00HURE ittp://www.eldoradostone.coin/brick/ 3/5/201( CITY OF PORT ORCHARD Planning Department 20 Prospect Street Port Orchard, WA 98366 Phone (36o)876-499t•Fax (36o)876-498o CONTACT INFORMATION This sheet must accompany your application PROJECT NAME: A. Applicant Information Are you the owner of the pro'perty? AYES Name: �xr�d�O14 e>"I .tery Company Name/DBA: _iA4S g'T Mailing Address: i9/ ;80 � T City/State/Zip Code: f0/L ro Phone No. _3fiQ — �f7/�-4/?,1) E-mail Address: -_&L ig4gt'V B. Primary Contact Person/Authorized Name: 5A�+2 `�' Company Name/DBA: Mailing Address: City/State/Zip Code: _ Phone No. E-mail Address: C. Owner Information (if different than Name Company Name/DBA: Mailing Address: City/State/Zip Code: _ Phone No. E-mail Address: L File# DRO-001-0 RFc��VF MqR � NNpoRToZ�I� OFpq�, 4f, O ❑ NO If not. Part C nmst be completed 5,ZI5ZFAJ Fax nNo�.w.�3A60 •- �4 7 % 1 E:. �1JWl Information 'V-tf� Fax No Fax No. Signature of Property Owner Authorizing Application Date Signature of Applicant Date Planning form 017/Review by Design Review Board (Rev. 09/09) Page 3 of 6 p�0 Q rn rn ° -O 0 ° Q z� Qz z0 �0 c n O m� � m _ DO o �0 m m D -Zi v -1 41-314'— 5-0 t t6'-1-3/4"_4'-Ol 6 I N L rn rn rn W< §z N a r v J A ___..__..___.__..-...__.__ ALL-PURPOSE STRUCTURES INC. RINGS AND THINGS ALL-PURPOSE 710 BAY ST. STRUCTURES w ::w`:=u PDRT ORCHARD, WA Z� z0 m n' o o 0 t' m � A o m v qv 91111 uL-PUMSESTRUCTUMSWC. RINGS AND THINGS N ALL-PURPOSE°,',;'; ,:';°; ° , �;,.�;;;; 710 BAY ST. STRUCTURES ........... PORT ORCHARD, WA 25'-0" 6z2 9L 6x'2 SL 6x2 5L Q N 2 F. F.D R Z ^' r 0 O �w V Q Q z0 Z n o -0 J 0 0 o ci 4 z M 10 m R D O N /n.. G z rn Z% o \ O H0 o £ m m A' m z D � p� 5 on 8 00 oR s T 04 m Q GB �OPPN 02 n q--u� � �kN9i PFAN.'yJM W/T'FMV`AM iRPH B' SIDE WALK s Q ,J ALL-PURPOSE STRUCTUM INC. RINGS AND THINGS W ALL-PURPOSE 710 BAY ST. STRUCTURES "'""''""°r.wM"°' PORT ORCHARD, WA 91 Z 0 n m 0� m o _o 0 o Zd L'J nLL-PU"OSEsraucrUMSINC, RINGS AND THINGS -P ALL-PURPOSE 710 BAY ST. STRUCTURES """"°'°°'w""""" PORT ORCHARD, WA Ul z 4) CN1 � rnrn X Fn Z r N T O rn O /70 Dr Q Z rn w O 0] r 0 - O z rn D Fr r - R Z T D rzn T 03 O< mrn 0 rn rn� N a o 89 z �n z� Grp ° --------$- m� T ZO O OPEN-7 0-4 myoa D ------ 70 Om NOWITyjTR y v 8' SIDE WALK z rn O (P n O z u -. ..-.e..« ALL-PURPOSE STRUCTURESINC RINGS AND THINGS t� ALL-PURPOSE '°'°" "°"""° ° ^w 710 BAY ST. STRUCTURES twua.iw. ;w W+RY Ne'vu N,pss.iw " PORT ORCHARD, WA 9 .!i N z a C 6 z c) obi og rmai:n— a -PUUOSESTRUCTMSMC. RINGS AND THINGS ON ALL-PURPOSE 710 BAY ST. STRUCTURES FORT ORCHARD, WA l�= [§)§lBa� 9°!r B wd\§ 000. §)/§B /\ )(§§§§[ )[) ;;» \ k22\ �)®§ \i§\ \\/ )\ i>2 \ \ ALL _, STRUCTURES WC. �mANDIHq AL D#UmE 2 20 s YST yR cUS .^ mRo cam, WA sb z� ,0 n a 00 a _a0 y O y m �z DCN Sy Da 2N z �v 29'-G' _.•...a: softm , uL-PUUOSSSTRUCTUMsMC. RINGS AND THINGS 00 ALL-PURPOSE ." "^. °o" ° °'.`•° STRUCTURES '°' mow„:........° "' w 710 BAY ST. PORT ORCHARD, WA U. ( �\ \ � RINGS AND THINGS ALL-PURPOSE ' _ 7» BAY ST STRUCTURES __. PORT ORCHARD, WA \ \ 0 3 E IN \ § {{ § { . _=er RINGS AND z w7 STRU �{ ' . _ _. ., R ORCHARD, WA ALL-PURPOSE STRUCTURESINC. 1408 HUBBARD STREET • SUMNER, WA 98390 800-678 761 Superior Quality Roofing and Siding • Standard and Custom • Metal Building Insulation • Pro -Seal Sealant Flashings • Fiberglass for Skylights • Dektites and Flashers • SunSky Light Panels • Screw Fasteners • Retrofit Dektites Discover the Strength and Beauty of Colored Steel NONE Brown Desert Brown Light Brown Beige Weathered Copper Forest Green Evergreen Light Green 0 1 MEN Dark Blue Light Blue Red Light Stone MEN White Grey Charcoal Black Manufactured in Washington for the Pack Northwest Note: The colors are reproduced as accurately as possible using modern printing inks and methods. See your local dealer for actual panel color samples when making your final decision. Champion Metal cf W.A. Color Chart (All Ceram -A -Star® 1050CC SMP Paint System) Note: Color availability subject to stock on hand. * Specifications subject to change without notice. 12" Coverage 36" Coverage 24" Coverage Color Snap-Loc Ultra -Panel Wide -Rib Hi -Rib 4-V 2.5" Corr. Plain Galvanized 26 29 29 30 29 26 30 29 26 30 29 26 Beige 29 29 26 26 26 Black 26 29 29 Brown 26 29 29 29 26 29 26 29 26 Charcoal 26 29 29 26 26 26 Dark Blue 26 29 29 26 26 26 Desert Brown 26 29 29 26 26 26 Evergreen 26 29 29 29 26 29 26 1 29 26 Forest Green 26 29 29 26 26 26 Grey 26 29 29 29 29 29 Light Blue 26 29 29 29 29 29 Light Brown 26 29 29 29 29 29 Light Green 26 29 29 29 29 29 Light Stone 26 29 29 26 26 26 Red j 26 j 29 j 29 29 29 29 Weathered Copper 26 29 29 26 26 29 29 29 26 29 E26 29 E26White ** Exposed Fastener Panels 40-Year Warranty ** Snap-Loc Panels 50-Year Warranty Snap-Loc t."Net Q,I Widlit J T 'i Ultra -Panel '" ""`""'°'�I Wide -Rib ! Y6"N[It'oveen&e WiEW Hi -Rib �� xrrwtcww.a. 4-V v�wvewcemo+. 1. 24"NctCme,.gc Width— -y 2.5" Corrugated ** On Painted Products / 25-year on Galvanized March 8, 2010 Re: Rings & Things Project 919�® �9NN�Fpo ,9�o�o To The Design Review Board: /� 4 Our proposed project is an extensive remodel of the existing footprint of the 710 Bay St. location. This will comply with the design review board criteria stated within the DOD as a late 19`h to early 20` century construction motif. In the remodel, although not a T requirement, we will comply with the DOD to extend the width of the existing 8' sidewalk to the desired 10' width; this will allow us to square off the face of the 710 building. Starting with the back of the 710 building, we have an existing courtyard 16' X 25' that will be converted to an enclosed workshop area. During this construction phase a new water main and repair of existing courtyard drains will be repaired and updated. The staircase in the back will be redirected for an emergency exit. The building will be undergoing a ventilation upgrade to include heat and air conditioning, including exhaust fans. The new unit will be installed by Hank's Sheet Metal on the roof. Shielding of the unit is too being determined. This remodel requires the removal of the marquee in front of the 710 building to allow for a 2nd story loft with natural lighting from northern exposure widows for our gem grading lab. This loft will cantilever over 50% of the sidewalk per the requirements of the DOD for rain protection and will not exceed the height requirements. It will also include canned lighting underneath the cantilever, for night illumination for the public, and for store signage. The face of our building will include a new entry door with time lock mechanism, new 6' arched windows with an updated brick front with Bracciano Roma Brick. The brick will form a window surround for the sill area with a Keystone arch to conform to the arch of the window. The existing alley gate will be replaced with a wrought iron motif gate matching the interior railing for stair and loft area of the gem lab. The upstairs loft will include hardy plank siding with an 8' window center and 4' bay windows, 1 on each side of center. The loft also includes 2 — 2' X 4' windows, 1 facing east and 1 facing west, and 1 — 3' window facing south for additional natural light. Exterior building lights will consist of wall sconce lights in wrought iron Victorian motif, with 2 hung on the upper loft area on either side of the 8' window and 4 matching sconces hung between the windows and door of the lower level. Underneath the north facing windows will be 10 removable hanging baskets, with a wrought iron motif for the hangers and baskets, for summer use. Below the baskets will be a metal roofed awning 18" in width the full length of the front face, with an 8" wrought iron motif at the base. All additions, front and back and the awning will be snap locked steel roofing with evergreen as the color. (Color choice was dictated by the neighboring Moon Dog back side metal siding to prevent a collage of colors.) Our roofing will match their siding. Print Parcel Search Map Page 1 of 1 Kitsap County Parcel Search [Click here to Print] http://kewppub3.co.kitsap.wa.us/ParcelSearch/PRINT.ASP?CMD=ZOOMOUT&APAN=&... 3/2/2010 Kitsap County Assessor's Property Report Property Report Tax Account No. Process No. Property -Class; Other retail trade Parcel Information Situs Address Tax Code Area: 10805 j # of Buildings: 1 Acres: Jurisdiction: IPORT ORCHARD-1 View Rating Sec-Twp-Rng: 126 24N 1E Zoning: lCity Status: Neighborhood 8402601 Last Inspected: 07/31/07 Taxpayer Information Name: Mailing Address: SWENSEN RUDOLPH & SHIRLEY BAY ST Page I of I .08 A - Active http://kcwppub2.co.kitsap. wa.us/pls/ilisw/tis.online_lis_info_pkg.acct_info?p_in_rp_acct_i... 3/2/2010 PROPERTY OWNERS LIST VERIFICATION I, , do hereby certify that the attached names and addresses are for the property owners within 300' of my property lines, and not less than two parcels deep, and are true, correct, and complete to the best of my knowledge. Dated this day of , 20,_ Signature Print Name: Page 4 of 6 Planning form 017/Review by Design Review Board (Rev. 09/09) I SAMPLE ADDRESS LIST 4050.1-023-0004 252401-3-017-2003 4027-019-008-0003 John Doe 4059.006-009.0000 Jane Doe (111640426) 111 Doe Street Dave Smith C/O American MTGE., Co. Port Orchard, WA 98366 111 Smith Street 223 Water Street Port Orchard, WA 98366 Chicago, IL 86531-1234 4027-019-008-0003 Jane Doe 211 Smith Street Port Orchard, WA 98366 46�a- 14-mt - OooS mAroso�YL 7UL YEA 1 S,Tn SNnuSH NIX-d'r/-<11'Lc� ,,/cAv4,A Rider& 1JbcaveL '7/4 BAY s �,'Rfdz� r14'P2 Sr, '-pd- 98a�.G 4116--50-6(4-CC4-60d-L ?A-"e LLC - ,r w A q8/ --61U'L ?a RCe;IS MAR 0 2 ?010 CITY OF PO 'I'vfNG Arm ^r' f MENT Page 6 of 6 Planning form 017/Review 6y Design Review Board (Rev. 09/09) r VERNMENT�L6t vj1 p- `A'p21D1D \ i 007�'i' 9, ID CXIY. Ob Cb�f fOh V`' i I BANK STREET o0l-90 00, U b� ah qa lQ o0J-01 001-01 C!L- 0o y� n � A b b 'b b b % -b O b b b O b b A Z I I 00 00,�/ A DE KALE Ir 005-00� 1 / , / 011-00 0 00+ Ol ro w pld, u, 15, j L 010-00 0 15'0 Lj o 0 0 007-00 16 0 0 0 4V,'("81 STREET 011-10 OIJ-00 i 001-01 001-01 � 007-�0 f To lbe . o°b a`y0 c 001-01 007-01 I O b b m1 b O O O b O O f o 0 0 0 008-00 A 0 ` 41, 49 4 KITSA � � B HN Z Uzi � w con 4 M. U O Fsl e Zww CVci�ZWv�i r 1� 00 , cn F m e _ o - oa� a ac R o y VJ m d � R C a m .y z M� co a a a 0 d W U E O El 0 I a an o en � � ❑ on °J. u v n Ei 0 E 0 A _ o .m. ti C ry ;S b C £F0 N Mr N ' V if ttl O e y v Lc: tvp h U zz U"V V O d pp to •�o� y °-ems 8 : c s` �."• o a.0 CO �w p m H� 4A v El -U a a0z 4 a+Ir 10 C O O 'zJtw O —,❑ C{ C Q O C •[ p $ U O. Ei U O L_ C0 ,h vZi 'd NO i6A O L 0 Ulm "O C 'b ° Ei Acn V 3 c 5 0 '�� U u y - ®)� f}!$kl42,] ■�!) e}«!i!•),!|791 ]}ƒ) b P pY YY LN V V_ `O y � XyY �p^ S 3 �o C .�— rt Y Y m i P Y w � ! \ \)•~!/r \ } )}{t}{\ \ r City of Port Orchard 216 Prospect Street, Port Orchard, WA 98366 (36o) 876-4407 • FAX (36o) 895-9029 Agenda Staff Report Agenda Item No. Business Item'7B Meeting Date: Subject: Adoption of Resolution No. oig-1o, Prepared by: Authorizing the Purchase of a 2010 Vehicle from the Storm Drainage Atty Routing No: Utility Fund Atty Review Date: April 13, 2010 Mark R. Dorsey, P.E. Public Works Director NA NA Summary: On March 23rd Staff presented a request to purchase a 2olo Ford Escape XLS from the State Bid List for the Storm Drainage Utility. Council postponed this item until staff was able to proceed with formal bid process to seek bids for a hybrid vehicle. Staff used the formal bid process to secure bids for a hybrid small sport utility vehicle (SUV) and a non -hybrid SUV. Bids will be opened on April 12 and the results will be provided prior to the Council meeting. The City budgeted $26,000 in the 2olo budget for this vehicle. If the bid proposal selection comes in over the $26,000, then a budget amendment will be required. Staff will provide an amended Staff Report, bid documents, and resolution once the bid has been closed and the bids tallied on Monday, April 12th. City of Port Orchard 216 Prospect Street, Port Orchard, WA 98366 (36o) 876-4407 0 FAX (36o) 895-9029 Agenda Staff Report Agenda Item No. Business Item 7C Subject: Adoption of Ordinance No. oo5-1o, 2009 Water System Plan Meeting Date: April 13, 2010 Prepared by: Mark Dorsey, P.E. Public Works Director Atty Routing No: 042-10 Atty Review Date: April 6, 2olo Summary: The Growth Management Act (GMA) requires that each city that plans under the GMA must periodically review, and, if needed, revise its capital facilities plans to ensure compliance with the Growth Management Act. The City of Port Orchard's Water System Plan was developed in consideration of the goals of the GMA for the development of local capital facilities plans, and reflects a careful balancing of these goals within the local conditions of the City of Port Orchard. This update and amendments were developed from and are consistent with the Port Orchard Comprehensive Plan. The 2009 Water System Plan was prepared by Public Works staff and PACE Engineers, Inc. On February 5, 2010 the City of Port Orchard issued a Programmatic SEPA Threshold Determination of Non -Significance (DNS) for the proposed 2009 Water System Plan. The City published the DNS on February 5, 20io and received comments on the SEPA determination from the City of Bremerton. The comment period ended on February 19, 2olo and the appeal period ended on March 5, 2olo. A public hearing was conducted by the City Council earlier this evening. The attached Ordinance No. oo5-1o, adopts the City of Port Orchard 2009 Water System Plan. It is anticipated that once adopted, the 2009 Water System Plan will be incorporated into the 2010 Port Orchard Comprehensive Plan, scheduled for December 2010. Recommendation: Approve Ordinance No. oo5-1o, thereby adopting the City of Port Orchard 2009 Water System Plan. Motion for consideration: I move to approve Ordinance No. 005-10, thereby adopting the 2009 Water System Plan. Fiscal Impact: None Alternatives: NA Attachments: Ordinance No. 005-1o, adopting the 2009 Water System Plan Introduced by: Requested by: Drafted by: Reviewed by: Introduced: Public Hearing: Adopted: ORDINANCE NO. 005-10 Public Works Director Public Works Director Public Works Director City Attorney April 13, 2010 April 13, 2010 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF PORT ORCHARD, WASHINGTON, ADOPTING THE 2009 WATER SYSTEM PLAN FOR THE CITY OF PORT ORCHARD WHEREAS, The Growth Management Act (GMA), Chapter 36.7oA RCW, requires that each city that plans under the GMA must periodically review and, if necessary, revise its capital facilities plan to ensure compliance with the GMA; and WHEREAS, in 2009 the City commenced a comprehensive review and update of its existing Water System Plan; and WHEREAS, the 2009 Water System Plan has been prepared by the City with the assistance of PACE Engineers, Inc.; and WHEREAS, on February 5, 2010, the City's SEPA official issued and published a Determination of Non -Significance; and WHEREAS, on April 13, 2010, a public hearing was held to consider the proposed 2009 Water System Plan, and to receive written and oral comment from members of the public regarding the provisions of the proposed plan; and WHEREAS, after considering input from the public, the City Council finds that the 2009 Water System Plan serves the public health, safety, and general welfare of the citizens of Port Orchard; and WHEREAS, the City Council also finds that the 2009 Water System Plan is consistent with the goals and policies of the City's Comprehensive Plan and with the Growth Management Act, Chapter 36.7oA RCW; now, therefore, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PORT ORCHARD, WASHINGTON, DO ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: SECTION i. The City's 2009 Water System Plan is hereby adopted in the form set forth in Exhibit A attached hereto and incorporated by this reference. Ordinance No.005-10 Page 2 of 2 SECTION 2. If any section, sentence, clause or phrase of this ordinance should be held to be invalid or unconstitutional by a court of competent jurisdiction, such invalidity or unconstitutionality shall not affect the validity of constitutionality of any other section, sentence, clause, or phrase of this ordinance. SECTION -i. This ordinance shall be in full force and effect five (5) days after posting and publication as required by law. A summary of this Ordinance may be published in lieu of the entire ordinance, as authorized by State Law. PASSED by the City Council of the City of Port Orchard, APPROVED by the Mayor and attested by the Clerk in authentication of such passage this 13th day of April 2010. ATTEST: Patricia J. Kirkpatrick, CMC, City Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM: Gregory A. Jacoby, City Attorney Lary Coppola, Mayor Sponsored by: Robert Putaansuu, Councilmember City of Port Orchard 216 Prospect Street, Port Orchard, WA 98366 (36o) 876-4407 0 FAX (36o) 895-9029 Agenda Staff Report Agenda Item No. Business Item 7D Meeting Date: April 13, 2010 Subject: Adoption of Resolution No. 020-10, Prepared by: James Weaver Approving the Design Review Board's Development Director Recommendation for Proposed Atty Routing No: NA Development at'710 Bay Street, File Atty Review Date: NA No. DRB oot-10 Summary: On March 2, 2olo, Rudolf Swenson submitted a Building Permit application for a Fagade improvement for his property at 710 Bay Street. The fagade improvement triggered the criteria per POMC Chapter 16.20 for review by the Design Review Board. Generally, building permits do not require public hearings. After proper public notice, as required in POMC Section 16.2o, a public hearing was conducted on April 13th regarding the building permit application for the property, located at 710 Bay Street, and approved via the Design Review Board Resolution No. DRB-ool-olo. The Design Review Board recommendation included the following statement "NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Design Review Board of the City of Port Orchard hereby recommends to the City Council that the project DRB-ool-lo, located at Flo Bay Street should be approved as submitted". It should be noted by the City Council that no revisions or conditions were attached to the DRB resolution. The DRB members voted unanimously to support the design. Recommendation: The DRB recommends that the City Council approve Resolution No. 020-10, affirming DRB Resolution No. oo1-1o. Motion for consideration: I move to adopt Resolution No. 02o-1o, approving the Design Review Board's Recommendations for Proposed Development at 710 Bay Street, File No. DRB oo1-1o. Fiscal Impact: None Alternatives: Approve City Council Resolution No. 020-10, with conditions as proposed by City Council or deny City Council Resolution No. 020-10. Attachments: Resolution No. 020-10 DRB Resolution No. DRB-ool-lo Applicable Project submittal Data Introduced by: Requested by: Drafted by: Introduced: Adopted: RESOLUTION NO. 020-10 Development Director Development Director Development Director April 13, 2010 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF PORT ORCHARD, WASHINGTON, APPROVING THE DESIGN REVIEW BOARD'S RECOMMENDATION FOR PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT AT 710 BAY STREET, FILE NO. DRB 001-10 WHEREAS, The Design Review Board is appointed by the Mayor and tasked by the City Council to provide input into issues related to architectural design; and WHEREAS, The Design Review Board makes recommendations to the City Council as appropriate in conformance with Port Orchard Municipal Code Chapter 2.20; and WHEREAS, The City in conformance with the City of Port Orchard Municipal Code and as outlined Chapter 2.78, has created a Design Review Board (DRB) consisting of a minimum of five and maximum of seven members of the public; and WHEREAS, the Design Review Board of the City of Port Orchard, Washington, based upon the findings and conclusions in Design Review Board Resolution ooi-1o, recommended approval to the City Council for the proposed project DRB-oot-lo located at 710 Bay Street; now, therefore, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PORT ORCHARD, WASHINGTON, HEREBY RESOLVES AS FOLLOWS: THAT: The Port Orchard City Council hereby approves the Design Review Board's Recommendations for Proposed Development at 710 Bay Street, File No. DRB ooi-io. PASSED by the City Council of the City of Port Orchard, SIGNED by the Mayor and attested by the Clerk in authentication of such passage this 13th day of April 2010. Lary Coppola, Mayor ATTEST: Patricia J. Kirkpatrick, CMC, City Clerk CITY OF PORT ORCHARD DESIGN REVIEW BOARD RESOLUTION NO. DRB-001-10 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF PORT ORCHARD DESIGN REVIEW BOARD RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF PROJECT DRB-001-10 WHEREAS, The Design Review Board is appointed by the Mayor and tasked by the City Council to provide input into issues related to architectural design and; WHEREAS, The Design Review Board makes recommendations to the City Council as appropriate in conformance with Port Orchard Municipal Code Chapter 2.20 and; WHEREAS, The City in conformance with the City of Port Orchard Municipal Code and as outlined Chapter 2.78, has created a Design Review Board (DRB) consisting of a minimum of five and maximum of seven members of the public and; THE DESIGN REVIEW BOARD OF THE CITY OF PORT ORCHARD, WASHINGTON, MAKES THE FOLLOWING FINDINGS WITH RESPECT TO THE PROPOSED PROJECT DRB-001-10 LOCATED AT 710 BAY STREET. BASED UPON THE FOREGOING FINDINGS THE DESIGN REVIEW BOARD HEREBY; CONCLUSIONS Conclusions: 1. The Design Review Board finds that it is within their authority to make recommendations to the City Council through a Design Review Board Resolution. 2. The Design Review Board voted on a motion to approve Design Review Board Resolution N o. D RB-001-10. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Design Review Board of the City of Port Orchard hereby recommends to the City Council that the project DRB-001-10 located at 710 Bay Street be approved as submitted. PASSED by the Design Review Board of the City of Port Orchard this 23rd Day of March, 2010. Design Review Board Resolution DRB-001-10 Page 1 of 2 Design Review B Member ATTEST: �r� R. Weaver, City Development Director Design Review Board Resolution DRB-001-10 Page 2 of 2 CITY OF PORT ORCHARD Planning Department 216 Prospect Street PFCE,V�® MAR 02.0n Port Orchard, WA 98366 Qp V Phone (36o) 876-4991 • Fax (36o) 876-4980 pCA/V1V�NG D AR BARD Date Received.• 3 /p By., cs' Receipt k_ /A File #:_D R B-OD I - 10 FNr APPLICATION FOR PROJECT REVIEW BY DESIGN REVIEW BOARD FEES: Paid with any associated Land Use permit (Conditional Use Permit, Rezone, etc.) filed in conjunction with this project. A Pre -Application meeting is required. See Land Use Form 011. INCOMPLETE APPLICATION WILL NOT BE PROCESSED. This application must include the following: ❑ ONE original notarized Application, plus eight copies (9 total) ❑ ONE original Contact Information sheet. (attached) ❑ List of property owners within 300', map, and signed statement (1 set) (See attached instructions) ❑ Mailing labels for the list of property owners. (3 sets) (See attached instructions) ❑ Complete legal description of the property. (8 copies) ❑ Preliminary architectural renderings with elevations and details of architectural features: —❑ 8 sets: 11" x 17" —❑ 1 set: 81/2" x 11" ❑ Site plans, sufficiently complete to show comprehensive project design, drawn to scale no smaller than 1 inch equals 30 feet showing location and size of all of the following: (8 copies) ❑ structures ❑ buffer areas, yards, open spaces, common areas or plazas ❑ walkways ❑ outdoor light fixtures showing the area of illumination ❑ parking areas ❑ fencing ❑ mechanical and utility equipment ❑ outdoor furniture, trash receptacles, accessories, and other such items ❑ landscaping details if required) ❑ Detailed information on the following: ❑ The type and finished color of exterior siding, windows and roofing to be used, signs and trim to the extent known (provide samples of factory finishes, if possible) (8 copies) ❑ How mechanical and utility equipment will be screened (8 copies) ❑ Color, type, and specification of all fencing materials (8 copies) ❑ The type, model, color, height, wattage, for all outdoor light fixtures (8 copies) ❑ The type, model, and color of all outdoor furniture, trash receptacles, and accessories (8 copies) ❑ Complete and detailed narrative of the proposal, including written responses as to how the project is in conformance with Downtown Overlay District design standards found in POMC 16.20.211 — 16.20.225: (8 copies) ❑ CD-ROM which contains all submitted documents in Adobe PDF or Microsoft Word format. Other documentation may be required other than what is listed above. Page 1 of 6 Planning form 017/Review by Design Review Board (Rev. 09/09) Print clearly (use Ink) or Property address: ' //� 5 J File #: 90 - 00 L 16 Assessor's Parcel Number(s): 0 / - .w Z - e'306 I Total Area: Zoning Classification: (' )- nWt&-2-a-+IV t- Did you meet with Planning Department staff in a Pre -Application meeting? ❑ NO DYES:_ dace Is the property within 200' of the shoreline? ❑ NO Are there Critical Areas on the Property? ANIO STATE OF WASHINGTON SS COUNTY OF KITSAP ❑ YES: shoreline designalion ❑ YES: Signature of'Owner ( ust be notarized) .49 o[ 4 6 5we&l�SC'o Print Name of Owner I certify that I know or have satisfactory evidence that QuA \r\ "� SW04V'fX1 is the person who appeared before me, and said person acknowledged that (he/she) signed this instrument and acknowledged it to be (his/her) free and voluntary act for the uses and purposes mentioned in the instrument. WITNESS MY HAND AND OFFICIAL SEAL this a- ) of M a'xi:AA 20M. afNe0�1c1��rytt_;_�i1�cn mf� N AR Y PUBLIC in and for the State of Washington, residing at �b(_"7t2)axA( 0\ "t"o7 My appointment expires: Page 2 of 6 Planning form 017/Review by Design Review Board (Rev. 09/09) A� HEADWATERS C"OSATPOAHNYE „ L L D O RN D® BRICK k HOME BRICK PHOTO GALLERY ACCENTS GROUT INSTALLATION DOWNLOADS CONTACT rr {a Y ?ldorado Stone - Brick Page 1 of 1 > TRIM MOLDING For a finished appearance around doors and windows, the deep outside dimensions allow for either stone or brick to finish inside the return providing a very clean transition botwean materials. Size: II.oL x 4.S'vV x L II Crown Detall Brick Surround Half Rounds Wail Cap ------ ---- __ Column Cap Trhn Molding d) Choose Accents' Colors 4:7 Comparo Sizes Cola :ihrruo: corlona PRIVRCY POLICY! LEGRL NOTICE WHERE TO BUY REQUEST BROCHURE lttp://www.eldoradostoiie.com/brick/ 3/5/201( PROJECT NAME: A. Applicant Information Are you the owner of the in Name: Company Name/DBA: Mailing Address: l4/� City/State/Zip Code: _lee Phone No. Al_-6 E-mail Address: B. Primary Contact P Name: I Company Nan1C/DBA: Mailing Address: City/State/Zip Code: _ Phone No. E-mail Address: CITY OF PORT ORCHARD Planning Department 216 Prospect Street Port Orchard, WA 98366 Phone (36o)876-4991•Fax (36o)876-4980 CONTACT INFORMATION This sheet must accompany, our application AYES ❑ NO If not. Part C must be completed qy -�5'i U T,�)2i.gwA. G>/a Fax No. .360 •- 2 %6 Information Fax No. C. Owner Information (if different than applicant) Name: 54-M C. ry� /-N✓F)TJ�� Company Name/DBA: Mailing Address: City/State/Zip Code: Phone No. Fax No. E-mail Address: Signature of Property Owner Authorizing Application Date Signature of Applicant Date Page 3 of 6 Planning form OW/Review by Design Review Board (Rev. 09109) N 4 rn O rn ° r 0 w rn ° To - 0 Z o Z z0 �00 T m_ D O o_ m X V m D Z X 1v n z Z D O O D 41-3/4"l-0"1 t6'-1-3/4"—T4'-O"l rn �D IN rn rrn w m � O qZ 7 71 mn ,1 �a n� a '� SN J � 9 1 uL-PMOSHSTRUCTUMSM. RINGS AND THINGS ALL-PURPOSE °°°' "°" ' °° w^°° 710 BAY ST. STRUCTURES "' "M =_-` �'"" PORT ORCHARD, WA FN O< F zb y0 < Z O z'm � c� v M v; o 0 m� 171 ti o m z 4 tv �n IN uL-PUUOSESTRUCTUUMC. RINGS AND THINGS ALL-PURPOSE o°'�'°°°"�BMO " " ^""'"" — PO BAY C D, — STRUCTURES xo PORT ORCHARD, WA �25'-O" 6x2 SL 6x2 9L 6x BEAM C y OZ Dn n Fo ON wn � 3 aw BEAM A S2 lIN ti Z A N FD r R z m r `6 0 N z z Z® -� n z n n m m 1 F o.0 0 4z J � m-u � m D Q a7 �l < o 40 o m� m ° Fm D o Orn �0 O N S NZ Z m Dg n �O A Dtli PT CC ` A _ OGO F LOPW 0 1, B'51DE WAM �_ i----___7_ O� O y m n n o TA O N 00 A A CC-) :; ALL-PURPOSE STRUCTURES INC. RINGS AND THINGS LWALL PURPOSE °''°.wm 710 BAY ST. STRUCTURES ,. PORT ORCHARD, WA Z-O -;i�: G)O -0 o m 0 M X p `I m 0 N o Z D yb l lffluiNln� wAr IY41.T ALL-PURPOSESTRUCTURESWC, RUNGS AND THINGS -P�l ALL-PURPOSE ......"°" ° °" °" 710 BAY ST. STRUCTURES luena.tssf.i.ew. me.nei.wslmlutyae °"�`"'°�°'w°�'�° PORT ORCHARD, WA z N C) � > D Ni D z N � D � cT D rnrn X Q r � Z w rn O O O ' Ni r - z rn D rn C! Q O w O o rn An ❑ O rn N� nA Nz 0o pig O O rnrn �o NN — -----0 - 2 f 77II�� Z p O a v "Z �OPEN� n ry�.y r17 r m� O _-- D _-- �0q �7 ,a O Bm m y�+✓ r� iy NDOW Gx6 5TORF FRONT W TRAN50M DOOR W/ TRAN50M x4 4w W1 TPJ 8' SIDE WALK ALL-PURPOSE STRUCTURES NC RINGS AND THINGS ALL-PURPOSE ^°°° 710 BAY ST. STRUCTURES 0 °u> s° °r ........ v PORT ORCHARD, WA N Cl r➢- rn 0 w m '0 0 p z� _zo z� n 00 d O rr 1* 0 v _O o rn > z r x o 3 9 z c) 0 O OPEN TO BELOW p4. ON 16 O AN v? O n p.1W-.------——.____— &WINDOW p GA BAY WINDOW 6x4 BAY WINDOW O„�_88,_O„,_8,6,_O„,_2. ffALLPUMSESTRIJCTU 6SMC. RINGS AND THINGS O� ALL-PURPOSE , a°`. ;.°; e; ° .; WWII w 710 BAY ST. STRUCTURES „ _ w.•np PORT ORCHARD, WA r (; ,wl,: §/:�: ,§/§_ §2§!/§\, ZE :»!B; , ;§®§`§ §m§(/ `\]o lF \22§§ \ );§g&:§!)®z /,!e ~ " �E!!;%§ {Term [))) \ \/\ /§§2\)� §2 §( ) \(} \2) a «®K\ \§}} § § {) //))\ @!; ! >1\,]M �1#� _,m=_r RINGS AND `OSE d 2os Ay s R c�S ^ f~- POR o c�,WA 29'-G" -,. ,uL-PUMSE STRUCTUM WC. RINGS AND THINGS 00 ALL-PURPOSE 710 BAY ST. STRUCTURES v,.,.,°°.°p:'w`;: M1v„�,. w> "' ' PORT ORCHARD, WA Y Ya ALL-PURPOSE STRUMSR.C. RINGS AND THINGS \p ALL—PURPOSE '° °°x°° °°a °° ° ,.w^ ° 710 BAY ST. STRUCTURES nnl uF-inf.i wv�l'wx wF Nlull F.lal """ PORT ORCHARD, WA m \ Q z m \o & � 100 §��!§ \ //r ¥ �.r\ . " �%(, 6 ) \fV/ } !) &, m /}m { { \ } L-PUMSE STRUM& INC RINGS AND THINGS ALL-PURPOSE ' , _ _. '® R � CHARD,*& ALL-PURPOSE STRUCTURES INC. 1408 HUBBARD STREET • SUMNER, WA 98390 1-800-678-7761 Superior Quality Roofing and Siding • Standard and Custom • Metal Building Insulation • Pro -Seal Sealant Flashings • Fiberglass for Skylights • Dektites and Flashers • SunSky Light Panels • Screw Fasteners • Retrofit Dektites Discover the Strength and Beauty of Colored Steel Brown Weathered Copper Desert Brown Forest Green Dark Blue Light Blue Light Brown wetgteen Red Beige Light Green Light Stone White Grey Charcoal Black Manufactured in Washington for the Pacific Northwest Note: The colors are reproduced as accurately as possible using modern printing inks and methods. See your local dealer for actual panel color samples when making your Anal decision. Champion Metal cf WA. Color Chart (All Ceram -A -Star® 1050CC SNIP Paint System) Note: Color availability subject to stock on hand. * Specifications subject to change without notice. 12" Coverage 36" Coverage 24" Coverage Color Snap-Loc Ultra -Panel Wide -Rib Hi -Rib 4-V 2.5" Corr. Plain Galvanized 26 29 29 30 29 26 30 1 29 26 30 1 29 26 Beige 29 29 26 26 26 Black 26 29 29 Brown 26 29 29 29 26 29 26 29 26 Charcoal 26 29 29 26 26 26 Dark Blue 26 29 29 26 26 26 Desert Brown 26 29 29 26 26 26 Evergreen 26 29 29 29 26 29 26 29 26 Forest Green 26 29 29 26 26 26 Grey 26 29 29 29 29 29 Light Blue 26 29 29 29 1 29 29 Light Brown 26 29 29 29 29 29 Light Green 26 29 29 29 29 29 Light Stone 26 29 29 26 26 26 Red 26 29 29 29 29 29 Weathered Copper 26 29 29 26 26 26 White 26 29 29 29 26 29 26 29 1 26 ** Exposed Fastener Panels 40-Year Warranty ** Snap-Loc Panels 50-Year Warranty Snap-Loc ie^Ncr �.aa,—i T i Ultra -Panel Id an„ "'"overagf Pidth �s Wide -Rib I F—°---� Hi -Rib V�H 2.5" Corrugated 24" Net CTvcrage Width F_ ** On Painted Products / 25-year on Galvanized March 8, 2010 1� b ;!�� 1 Re: Rings & Things Project A >j�, '90 O F Z 0 To The Design Review Board: iy Q 0 kS R(, Our proposed project is an extensive remodel of the existing footprint of the 710 Bay St. location. This will comply with the design review board criteria stated within the DOD �l�cO as a late 19'b to early 20` century construction motif. In the remodel, although not a T requirement, we will comply with the DOD to extend the width of the existing 8' sidewalk to the desired 10' width; this will allow us to square off the face of the 710 building. Starting with the back of the 710 building, we have an existing courtyard 16' X 25' that will be converted to an enclosed workshop area. During this construction phase a new water main and repair of existing courtyard drains will be repaired and updated. The staircase in the back will be redirected for an emergency exit. The building will be undergoing a ventilation upgrade to include heat and air conditioning, including exhaust fans. The new unit will be installed by Hank's Sheet Metal on the roof. Shielding of the unit is too being determined. This remodel requires the removal of the marquee in front of the 710 building to allow for a 2"d story loft with natural lighting from northern exposure widows for our gem grading lab. This loft will cantilever over 50% of the sidewalk per the requirements of the DOD for rain protection and will not exceed the height requirements. It will also include canned lighting underneath the cantilever, for night illumination for the public, and for store signage. The face of our building will include a new entry door with time lock mechanism, new 6' arched windows with an updated brick front with Bracciano Roma Brick. The brick will form a window surround for the sill area with a Keystone arch to conform to the arch of the window. The existing alley gate will be replaced with a wrought iron motif gate matching the interior railing for stair and loft area of the gem lab. The upstairs loft will include hardy plank siding with an 8' window center and 4' bay windows, 1 on each side of center. The loft also includes 2 — 2' X 4' windows, 1 facing east and 1 facing west, and 1 — 3' window facing south for additional natural light. Exterior building lights will consist of wall sconce lights in wrought iron Victorian motif, with 2 hung on the upper loft area on either side of the 8' window and 4 matching sconces hung between the windows and door of the lower level. Underneath the north facing windows will be 10 removable hanging baskets, with a wrought iron motif for the hangers and baskets, for summer use. Below the baskets will be a metal roofed awning 18" in width the fall length of the front face, with an 8" wrought iron motif at the base. All additions, front and back and the awning will be snap lacked steel roofing with evergreen as the color. (Color choice was dictated by the neighboring Moon Dog back side metal siding to prevent a collage of colors.) Our roofing will match their siding. Print Parcel Search Map Page 1 of I Kitsap County Parcel Search [Click here to Print] http://kcwppub3.co.kitsap.wa.us/ParcelSearch/PRINT.ASP?CMD=ZOOMOUT&APAN=&... 3/2/2010 Kitsap County Assessor's Property Report Page I of l Property Report Tax Account No. Process No. Situs Address 650.014.002.0004 1738673 12 BAY ST Pro wy-Class:_ 590- Other retail trade Parcel Information Tax Code Area: 10805 # of Buildings: 0 Acres: OS Jurisdiction: IPORT ORCHARD7 View Rating: Sec-Twp-Rng: 126 24N IE jZoning: Cit Status: A -Active Neighborhood: 18402601 Last Inspected: 07/31/07 Taxpayer Information Name: ISWENSEN RUDOLPH & SHIRLEY Mailing Address: 1710 BAY ST PORT ORCHARD IWA 98366 http://kcwppub2.co.kitsap. wa.us/pl s/ilisw/lis.online_lis_info_pkg.acct_info?p_in_ip_acct_i... 3/2/2010 PROPERTY OWNERS LIST VERIFICATION I, , do hereby certify that the attached names and addresses are for the property owners within 300' of my property lines, and not less than two parcels deep, and are true, correct, and complete to the best of my knowledge. Dated this day of , 20_ Signature Print Name: Page 4 of B Planning form 017/Review by Design Review Board lRev. 09/09) SAMPLE ADDRESS LIST 4650.1-023-0004 252401-3-017-2003 4027.019-008-0003 John Doe 4059-006-009-0000 Jane Doe (111640426) 111 Doe Street Dave Smith C/O American MTGE,, Co. Port Orchard, WA 98366 111 Smith Street 223 Water Street Port Orchard, WA 98366 Chicago, IL 66531-1234 4027-019-008-0003 Jane Doe 211 Smith Street Port Orchard, WA 98366 cO1 - eoo5 mA�So�rZ 7UL �Ay S � KNnuS'H N�Qr�tS LC� Tbu/CATr r�laeYd `14BAvS .-Po. 9934.6 2,jje,,lil phElG LLC 71'7/1-75nau4 i D- 61aAuv r w to MAR 02?010 PITY OF pni" _ nIG . ^rtIMENT Page 6 of 6 Planning form 017/Review by Design Review Board (Rev. 09109) V E R IV U E N IF 16,\Xj 01"If w 001-0.1 l2c- ,4 7 007 o 001-01 % YI 01-00 BANK STREET 001-00 po 00-6 001-01 Cl- "T-W q1 of - A07-00 00222 �00 VO\ 005-0 004-011 010-091 -- 115o i Vf -oo 16AF 012-00 013-00 001-0 001-02 - Tl'—r 007P0 3�00 0 001-01 0 cis O v��, Uz [ 3 'ubCd CZw eel1�111` 1 w �cgm��vt--oo 00 Y c c a C C c c U R L h v a 0 d dl R ca 9 .v. 00o col h � m� v v C7 9 E u C/ ) bA bA O y C C.^ py o x o a c� tCa > C O b C U) a v 00 ao 0 a; O v C NJ *0 u TJ yti C v c m c U.° as �v° o cy q Q. u h Z 3 U 0 w y a y z N p v -O o y-tj a o y cn 3 -O . U C4 z p v c y cC,4v w� O y' C cd v O c'`-' 'O= '�+ . 'O v •n �. a, co"C _.� �y o y .x E ro U R cc 0 a o Q y 0 0 3- n. c= m 3 cn cvtl A O OA `" ro N O O y .� O 0 zi y z a p .= -0 .4 zu, = y ce C ' 4 p 0fA G cc p '.0 bbb 00 a• p C L C y o a G V Y E N g!\ �� r City of Port Orchard 216 Prospect Street, Port Orchard, WA 98366 (36o) 876-4407 0 FAX (36o) 895-9029 Agenda Staff Report Agenda Item No. Business Item 7E Meeting Date: April 13, 2oio Subject: Adoption of Contract No. CO21-10, Prepared by: Patti Kirkpatrick, CMC Authorizing the Mayor to Execute a City Clerk Memorandum of Agreement Between Atty Routing No: NA the City of Port Orchard, the City of Atty Review Date: NA Bremerton, and the Port of Bremerton for Festival Foot Ferry Services Summary: During the 2010 Budget cycle, the Council approved use of Hotel/Motel Tax Funds to be used towards extended hours of operation for foot ferry service for Festivals occurring on Sunday or during a Holiday weekend. The City Clerk negotiated a partnership and subsequent agreement with the City of Bremerton and the Port of Bremerton to equally split the costs of operating the foot ferry during these Festivals. The attached Memorandum of Agreement outlines the terms and conditions as to the responsible parties for payment of the foot ferry services and number of operating hours on an hourly rate of $146.25 per event day. In addition, Kitsap Harbor Tours will charge the normal fare of $2 each way for children over the age of five (5) and adults and will reduce the amount due by the amount collected. This agreement has been reviewed by the City Attorney and is similar to the agreement signed in 20o9 by all three parties. Recommendation: Staff recommends adoption of Contract No. CO21-lo, authorizing the Mayor to execute a Memorandum of Agreement between the City of Port Orchard, the City of Bremerton, and the Port of Bremerton for festival foot ferry services. Motion for consideration: I move to adopt Contract No. CO21-1o, authorizing the Mayor to execute a Memorandum of Agreement between the City of Port Orchard, the City of Bremerton, and the Port of Bremerton for festival foot ferry services. Fiscal Impact: Each entity will pay one-third of the invoice from Kitsap Harbor Tours less any revenue received on that festival event day. Attachments: Contract No. CO21-10, Memorandum of Agreement 2o10 FESTIVAL FOOT FERRY FUNDING — AGREEMENT (MOA) Contract No.0O21-10 THIS AGREEMENT (hereafter "Agreement") is made and entered into by and between the City of Port Orchard, The City of Bremerton, and the Port of Bremerton (collectively referred to as the "parties") as follows: RECITALS WHEREAS, the undersigned parties recognize that civic festivals provide mutual benefit to each municipal entity by increasing tourism; and WHEREAS, the provision of transportation services to and from civic festivals promotes the accessibility of the festivals to the public; and WHEREAS, the undersigned parties recognize the need and desirability of providing extended hours for foot ferry service during civic festivals; and WHEREAS, the undersigned parties wish to partner to share the costs of providing extended hours for foot ferry service between the City of Bremerton and the City of Port Orchard during the following Holiday Festivals as follows: Kitsap Harbor Festival Sunday, May 3oth — 7:30a.m. to 7:45 p.m. Monday, May 31st — 1o:oo a.m. to 4:45 P•m- Fathom's of Fun Sunday, July 4th — Noon to 8:45 p.m. (Tentative) The Cruz Sunday, August 8th Blackberry Festival Sunday, Sept 5th — Monday, Sept 6th — —1o:oo a.m. to 7:45 p.m. lo:oo a.m. to 6:45 p.m. 1o:oo a.m. to 5:45 P.m. Now, therefore, the parties hereto, hereby agree as follows: AGREEMENT 1. The undersigned members shall each pay their equal share (one-third) of the total costs to operate the foot ferry on the festival event days identified above. 2. The City of Port Orchard shall be the contact with Kitsap Harbor Tours for purposes of administering this Agreement. The City of Port Orchard shall equally divide the invoice(s) received into one-third shares and submit invoices to the Port of Bremerton and the City of Bremerton for payment. 2oio Foot -Ferry Funding Agreement: City of Bremerton, Port of Bremerton, and City of Port Orchard Page i of 3 The City of Bremerton and Port of Bremerton agree to reimburse the City of Port Orchard for their proportionate share in a timely manner or within 3o days of receipt of the invoice. 4. This Agreement shall be effective from May 1, 2010 through September 30, 2010. The obligation to pay, as set forth in the preceding paragraphs, shall not terminate upon the expiration of this agreement. The failure of any party to insist upon strict performance of any of the terms and conditions of this Agreement shall not be construed to be a waiver or relinquishment of same, but the same shall be and remain in full force and effect. 6. Nothing contained in this Agreement shall be construed to create a liability or a right of indemnification by any third party. 7. If any provision of this Agreement shall be held invalid, the remainder of this Agreement shall not be affected thereby if such remainder would then continue to serve the purposes and objectives of both parties. 8. Each individual executing this Agreement on behalf a party represents and warrants that such individual is duly authorized to execute and deliver the Agreement. 9. All notices and other communications to be given by either party may be given in writing to the appropriate party as follows: Patty Lent, Mayor City of Bremerton 345 Sixth St. Suite 600 Bremerton, WA 98337 (360)473-5722 Cary Bozeman, Executive Director Port of Bremerton 8850 S.W. State HwY.3 Port Orchard, WA 98367 (36o)674-2381 City Clerk City of Port Orchard 216 Prospect St. Port Orchard, WA 98366 (36o)876-7024 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, this Agreement has been executed by each party on the date set forth below: Executed this 13th day of April 2010. City of Port Orchard Lary Coppola, Mayor 2010 Foot -Ferry Funding Agreement: City of Bremerton, Port of Bremerton, and City of Port Orchard Page 2 of 3 ATTEST: Patricia J. Kirkpatrick, CMC, City Clerk Approved as to form: Port Orchard City Attorney Executed this day of 2010. City of Bremerton Patty Lent, Mayor Approved as to form: Bremerton City Attorney Executed this day of 2010. Port of Bremerton Cary Bozeman, Chief Executive Officer Approved as to form: Port of Bremerton Attorney 2010 Foot -Ferry Funding Agreement: City of Bremerton, Port of Bremerton, and City of Port Orchard Page 3 of 3 City of Port Orchard 216 Prospect Street, Port Orchard, WA 98366 (36o) 876-4407 0 FAX (36o) 895-9029 Agenda Staff Report Agenda Item No. Business Item 7F Subject: Approval of Contract No. CO22-10, Authorizing the Mayor to Execute an Agreement with BHC Consultants for the Bay Street Pump Station Upgrade Pre -Design Report Meeting Date: April 13, 2010 Prepared by: Mark Dorsey, P.E. Public Works Director Atty Routing No: NA Atty Review Date: NA Summarv: BHC Consultants, LLC are listed on the City of Port Orchard 2010 Professional Services Roster and are currently under contract with the City to prepare the Tremont Street Widening Sanitary Sewer Design, developed in conjunction with the recommendations outlined in the 2009 Sanitary Sewer Comprehensive Plan Update (also prepared by BHC Consultants.) Given their extensive knowledge of the City's sanitary sewer system, the Public Works Department has selected BHC Consultants, LLC to prepare the Bay Street Pump Station Upgrade Pre -Design Report. The pre -design report scope and budget provided will identify issues and evaluate alternatives to select the preferred alternative for the Bay Street Pump Station Upgrade project. Primary tasks include Project Initiation, Field Survey, Geotechnical Exploration, Electrical/Instrumental & Controls, Evaluation of Alternatives, Pre -Design Report and Project Management. The total estimated cost for the tasks listed above is $55,800. Recommendation: Staff recommends that the City Council authorize the Mayor to execute Contract No. CO22-10, with BHC Consultants, LLC in an amount not to exceed $55,800 for the Bay Street Pump Station Upgrade Pre -Design Report, with 2010 budgeted funds from Water Sewer Capital Outlay. Motion for consideration: I move authorize the Mayor to execute Contract No. CO22-10, with BHC Consultants, LLC in an amount not to exceed $55,800, for the Bay Street Pump Station Upgrade Pre -Design Report, with 2010 budgeted funds from Water Sewer Capital Outlay. Fiscal Impact: $58,000 budgeted for 2010 within Water Sewer Capital Outlay (594.38.63)• Alternatives: Deny the authorization. Attachments: BHC Proposal Dated 1/19/2010 Contract No. CO22-10 January 19, 2010 City of Port Orchard 216 Prospect Street Port Orchard, WA 98366 Attn: Mark R. Dorsey PE Public Works Director Subject: Bay Street Pump Station Upgrade Pre -Design Report Scope and Budget Dear Mark: We are pleased to submit the following scope and budget for the Bay Street Pump Station Upgrade Pre -Design Report. The scope and budget includes items pertaining to the pre - design portion of the Bay Street Pump Station Upgrade, but does not include final design items, bid advertisement, or services during construction. The Pre -Design Report will identify issues and evaluate alternatives, described below, to select the preferred alternative for the Bay Street Pump Station Upgrade so that the final design can be subsequently authorized. Task 1: Project Initiation City Responsibilities: Provide record drawings of the sewers in Bay Street and the Bay Street Pump Station Subtasks 1.1 Review record drawings and available documents for existing conditions in and around the Bay Street Pump Station. 1.2 Obtain 100-year flood elevation from City. Determine new structure elevations to provide suitable offset above 100-year flood elevation. 1.3 Summarize the projected wastewater flows into the Bay Street Pump Station based on the Comprehensive Sanitary Sewer Plan for review with City staff. 1.4 Conduct initial project meeting (Meeting 1) with City staff and BHC Consultants team members to discuss project goals, key issues, strategy for completion of the project by setting key milestone dates, and available documents for existing conditions. 1.5 Evaluate condition of existing structures and determine suitability for continued use. Evaluation shall be based on a visual examination of the structures and will not include entry into the wetwell. Define configuration of new structures and their means of connection to the existing structures. BHC Deliverables: Minutes of the initial project meeting via email. Condition assessment in PDF format via email. Task 2: Field Survey City Responsibilities: City datum for survey reference Subtasks Perform topographic survey and right-of-way determination using APWA layering standards including: 2.1 Manmade features including roads, existing structures, fences, and other visible manmade features. 2.2 Utilities, including visible surface structures, manholes, catch basins valves, hydrants, risers, power poles, transformer pads, etc. Manholes and catch basins to include invert elevations and pipe sizes and types. Locate the next manhole upstream or downstream from the site. A utility locator service will be employed to locate public and private underground utilities. BHC cannot accept liability for the accuracy, errors or omissions on the part of the locator service. It is recommended that the location of underground utilities critical to design be potholed to verify their location and depth, but is not included in this scope of work. 2.3 Existing contours at a 1-foot contour interval referenced to existing base map vertical datum. 2.4 Mapping limits to be centered on the line of 3 power poles with the middle pole located at the pump station on the north side of Bay Street in front of the Goodwill parking lot between Bay Ford and the Comfort Inn, limits to extend north and south from said power pole alignment approximately 50-feet north and south, including utilities as described above with the addition of traffic striping, ditches, curbs, pavement and other visible manmade features. 2.5 Road right-of-way and parcel lines will be determined from existing controlling monuments, prior recorded surveys and agency records, e.g. City, County, State road plans. This information will be added to the base mapping file. If a title company is needed to provide deeds or easements related to the project, any fees for their services are not included in this scope and will be directly payable by the City. 2.6 Compile contours, planimetrics, utilities, and rights -of -way into an existing conditions base drawing for use by design team. BHC Deliverables: Electronic file of survey data and base map Task 3: Geotechnical Exploration City. Responsibilities: Existing geotechnical data in project vicinity Subtasks 3.1 Review published geologic data that includes the site and surrounding area. 3.2. Review existing in-house files for the site area, as appropriate. 3.3 Contact the Washington Utilities Coordinating Council "One Call" service to locate utilities in the project area. 3.4 Explore soil conditions at the site by advancing two hollow stem auger and/or mud - rotary borings. We anticipate exploration depths of 25 and 60 feet below ground surface. The 60-foot boring is intended for our use in evaluating liquefaction potential of the site soils at depth. Perform soil sampling at 5-foot depth intervals in the borings in general accordance with American Society for Testing and Materials (ASTM) D 1586 test method. The borings will be backfilled on completion and pavements will be patched. 3.5 Perform geotechnical laboratory testing to include gradation and moisture content determinations on select samples obtained from the borings. 3.6 Provide recommendations for earthwork and grading, including excavations, subgrade preparation, the need for dewatering, the reuse of on -site materials and fill placement and compaction criteria. 3.7 Provide recommendations for lateral earth pressures for use in wet well design. 3.8 Provide limited recommendations for shallow foundation support, as needed. 3.9 Provide geotechnical seismic design information in general accordance with American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials (AASHTO) and 2009 International Building Code (IBC). 3.10 Provide estimates of liquefaction potential of the on -site soils based on an AASHTO or 2009 IBC design level earthquake. 3.11 Prepare a written report of recommendations along with the supporting data. The report will include findings and recommendations, summary logs of the explorations and a site plan showing the exploration locations. The following items are excluded from this scope of work: slope stability analyses, shoring and/or dewatering design recommendations, deep foundation design recommendations, drilling permits, traffic control services. If requested and/or required these can be provided as an additional element of service. BHC Deliverables: Geotechnical Report Task 4: Electrical, instrumentation, and Controls Consultation City Responsibilities: Identify known facilities to be included in underground ducts, provide as -built drawings. Subtasks 4.1 Attend site visit and perform condition assessment on existing facilities. 4.2 Provide an opinion describing the duct facilities needed and the approximate costs to underground existing power lines from the existing power pole east of the Bay Street Pump Station, removing the pole at the station and to the next pole west of the station for a total distance of about 100 yards. 4.3 Evaluate the electric power, controls, and panels required to upgrade the pump station with new pumps for two options, including explosive hazard classification issues: 4.3.1 Operating with constant speed drives 4.3.2 Operating with variable speed drives 4.4 Estimate the approximate generator size required for the upgraded Bay Street Pump Station in a stand-alone, noise attenuating enclosure. 4.5 Provide preliminary estimate of probable costs for electrical and instrumentation work. Task 5: Evaluation of Alternatives Citv Resoonsibilitiar Review pump station alternatives; provide decision on preferred alternative. Subtasks 5.1 Evaluate projected flow rates for existing, 25-year, and build -out conditions to verify the capacity conclusions reached in the Comprehensive Sanitary Sewer Plan. 5.2 Evaluate continued use of the existing Bay Street Pump Station force main in comparison with connecting directly into the Marina -Treatment Facility force main. Estimate the affect this change would have on pumping capacity and operating conditions for the Marina Pump Station; and on the new pumps that would be needed for the Bay Street Pump Station. 5.3 Evaluate the pros and cons of a wet pit/dry pit sewage pump station versus a submersible pump station. Evaluate constant speed motor drives versus variable speed motor drives in terms of capital costs for pump equipment, wet well size, wastewater flow management, operating costs and maintenance. 5.4 Evaluate three alternatives for pump station location: reuse the existing facility, reuse a portion of the existing facility, and locate a new facility at the existing site. 5.5 Prepare overlay drawings of the site plan and sections illustrating the three alternatives in sufficient detail to allow approximate quantities to be estimated. 5.6 Perform preliminary constructability review, including traffic and local business disruptions, of known issues with the existing Bay Street Pump Station and design alternatives and summarize them in Pre -Design Report. 5.7 Summarize alternatives in a table including pros, cons, constructability issues, and budget level costs. 5.8 Meet with City to discuss alternatives analysis (Meeting 2). City to provide decision on preferred alternative. BHC Deiiverabies: Plan and section drawings of alternatives, summary table of alternatives, and Meeting 2 minutes. Task 6: Pre -Design Report City Responsibilities: Review Draft Pre -Design Report Subtasks 6.1 Prepare site plan and two sections of the existing Bay Street Pump Station structures showing the key features and installed equipment. 6.2 Summarize the results of the alternative evaluations and recommendations performed in Task 5. 6.3 Provide estimate of probable project costs for the recommended alternative. 6.4 Prepare a preliminary schedule for project design and construction showing key activities. 6.5 Assemble Draft Pre -Design Report and review with consultant team for quality control. 6.6 Provide Draft Pre -Design Report to the City for review. 6.7 Meet with City staff (Meeting 3) to review comments on the draft Pre -Design Report. 6.8 Provide final Pre -Design Report to the City. BHC Deliverables: Draft Pre -Design Report in two print copies plus pdf and Final Pre -Design Report in three print copies and pdf; Meeting 3 minutes. Task 7: Project Management City Responsibilities: Review status reports and process invoices for payment within 30 days of receipt Subtasks 7.1 Conduct project coordination and management for the duration of the project including monthly progress reports, invoices at four week intervals, team coordination including sub -consultants, schedule development, and updates. 7.2 Develop a scope and budget for final design and construction services of the preferred alternative developed in pre -design. BHC Deliverables: Status reports and invoices at four -week intervals; scope and budget for final design and construction services. BHC proposes the following estimate of work hours and the resulting costs to accomplish the above scope of work: Task BHC Work Hours Estimated Cost 1 - Project Initiation 23 $3,950 2 - Field Surve ESM 4 3 - Geotechnical Ex loration GeoEn ineers $5,,5 4 4 - E&IC Consultation Casne En ineerin $12905 5 - Evaluation of Alternatives 3 $5,645 6 - Pre- Desi n Report 94 $11,830 7 - Pro ect Mana ement 68 $8,450 42 $6,365 050 .'- mmunications Fee Total Estimate Cost Notes: fee for subs plus BHC coordination BHC is willing to perform the above Engineering Report for a fee not to exceed $55,800. BHC will undertake to complete the above work program within four months from our receipt of your notice to proceed. Sincerely, BHC Consultants LLC John C. Wilson PE Project Manager CITY OF PORT ORCHARD PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT CITY CONTRACT NO. CO22-10 THIS Agreement is made effective as of the 13th day of April, 2010, by and between CITY OF PORT ORCHARD, WASHINGTON (00CITY") 216 Prospect Street Port Orchard, Washington 98366 Contact: Mayor Lary Coppola Phone: 360.876.4407 Fax: 360.895.9029 and BHC Consultants, LLC ("CONSULTANT') 1601 Fifth Avenue, Suite 500 Seattle, WA 98101 Contact: John C. Wilson, P.E. Phone: 206.505.3400 Fax: 206.505.3406 Tax Id No. 26-1363237 for professional services in connection with the following Project: Bay Street Pump Station Upgrade Pre -Design Report TERMS AND CONDITIONS 1. Services by Consultant A. Consultant shall perform the services described in the Scope of Work attached to this Agreement as Attachments "A." The services performed by the Consultant shall not exceed the Scope of Work without prior written authorization from the City. B. The City may from time to time require changes or modifications in the Scope of Work. Such changes, including any decrease or increase in the amount of compensation, shall be agreed to by the parties and incorporated in written amendments to the Agreement. 2. Schedule of Work A. Consultant shall perform the services described in the scope of work in accordance with the Schedule attached to this contract as Attachments "A." If delays beyond Consultant's reasonable control occur, the parties will negotiate in good faith to determine whether an extension is appropriate. B. Consultant is authorized to proceed with services upon receipt of a written Notice to Proceed. 3. Terms. This Agreement shall commence on April 14, 2010 ("Commencement Date") and shall terminate December 31, 2010 unless extended or terminated in writing as provided herein. BHC Consultants — Bay St Pump Station Upgrade Pre -Design Contract No. CO22-10 Page 1 of 6 4. Compensation TIME AND MATERIALS NOT TO EXCEED. Compensation for these services shall not exceed $55,800.00 without written authorization. 5. Payment A. Consultant shall maintain time and expense records and provide them to the City monthly, along with monthly invoices in a format acceptable to the City for work performed to the date of the invoice. B. All invoices shall be paid by City warrant within sixty (60) days of receipt of a proper invoice. C. Consultant shall keep cost records and accounts pertaining to this Agreement available for inspection by City representatives for three (3) years after final payment unless a longer period is required by a third -party agreement. Copies shall be made available on request. D. If the services rendered do not meet the requirements of the Agreement, Consultant will correct or modify the work to comply with the Agreement. City may withhold payment for such work until the work meets the requirements of the Agreement. 6. Discrimination and Compliance with Laws A. Consultant agrees not to discriminate against any employee or applicant for employment or any other person in the performance of this Agreement because of race, creed, color, national origin, marital status, sex, age, disability, or other circumstance prohibited by federal, state, or local law or ordinance, except for a bona fide occupational qualification. B. Consultant shall comply with all federal, state, and local laws and ordinances applicable to the work to be done under this Agreement. C. Consultant shall obtain a City of Port Orchard business license prior to receipt of written Notice to Proceed. D. Violation of this Paragraph 5 shall be a material breach of this Agreement and grounds for cancellation, termination, or suspension of the Agreement by City, in whole or in part, and may result in ineligibility for further work for City. 7. Suspension and Termination of Agreement A. This Agreement may be terminated by the City at any time upon the default of the Consultant or upon public convenience, in which event all finished or unfinished documents, reports, or other material or work of Consultant pursuant to this Agreement shall be submitted to City, and Consultant shall be entitled to just and equitable compensation for any satisfactory work completed prior to the date of termination, not to exceed the total compensation set forth herein. Consultant shall not be entitled to any reallocation of cost, profit or overhead. Consultant shall not in any event be entitled to anticipated profit on work not performed because of such termination. Consultant shall use its best efforts to minimize the BHC Consultants — Bay St Pump Station Upgrade Pre -Design Contract No. CO22-10 Page 2 of 6 compensation payable under this Agreement in the event of such termination. If the Agreement is terminated for default, the Consultant shall not be entitled to receive any further payments under the Agreement until all work called for has been fully performed. Any extra cost or damage to the City resulting from such default(s) shall be deducted from any money due or coming due to the Consultant. The Consultant shall bear any extra expenses incurred by the City in completing the work, including all increased costs for completing the work, and all damage sustained, or which may be sustained by the City by reason of such default. B. The City may suspend this Agreement, at its sole discretion, upon one week's advance notice to Consultant. Such notice shall indicate the anticipated period of suspension. Any reimbursement for expenses incurred due to the suspension shall be limited to the Consultant's reasonable expenses, and shall be subject to verification. The Consultant shall resume performance of services under this Agreement without delay when the suspension period ends 8. Standard of Care Consultant represents and warrants that it has the requisite training, skill and experience necessary to provide the services under this agreement and is appropriately accredited and licensed by all applicable agencies and governmental entities. Services provided by Consultant under this agreement will be performed in a manner consistent with that degree of care and skill ordinarily exercised by members of the same profession currently practicing in similar circumstances. 9. Ownership of Work Product All data materials, reports, memoranda, and other documents developed under this Agreement whether finished or not shall become the property of City, shall be forwarded to City at its request and may be used by City as it sees fit. Upon termination of this agreement pursuant to paragraph 6 above, all finished or unfinished documents, reports, or other material or work of Consultant pursuant to this Agreement shall be submitted to City. City agrees that if it uses products prepared by Consultant for purposes other than those intended in this Agreement, it does so at its sole risk and it agrees to hold Consultant harmless therefore. 10. Indemnification/Hold Harmless Consultant shall defend, indemnify and hold the City, its officers, officials, employees and volunteers harmless from any and all claims, injuries, damages, losses or suits including attorney fees, arising out of or resulting from the acts, errors or omissions of the Consultant, its agents, employees, or sub consultants in performance of this Agreement, except for injuries and damages caused by the sole negligence of the City. This indemnification and hold harmless shall apply regardless of whether the claim is brought pursuant to the Worker's Compensation Act, RCW Title 51, or otherwise, and the Consultant waives any immunity whatsoever with respect to such indemnification. 11. Insurance The Consultant shall procure and maintain for the duration of the Agreement, insurance against claims for injuries to persons or damage to property which may arise from or in connection with BHC Consultants — Bay St Pump Station Upgrade Pre -Design Contract No. CO22-10 Page 3 of 6 the performance of the work hereunder by the Consultant, its agents, representatives, or employees. A. Minimum Scope of Insurance Consultant shall obtain insurance of the types described below: 1. Automobile Liability insurance covering all owned, non -owned, hired and leased vehicles. Coverage shall be written on htsurance Services Office (ISO) form CA 00 01 or a substitute form providing equivalent liability coverage. If necessary, the policy shall be endorsed to provide contractual liability coverage. 2. Commercial General Liability insurance shall be written on ISO occurrence form CG 00 01 or a substitute form providing equivalent liability coverage and shall cover liability arising from premises, operations, independent contractors and personal injury and advertising injury. The City shall be named as an insured under the Consultant's Commercial General Liability insurance policy with respect to the work performed for the City. 3. Workers' Compensation coverage as required by the Industrial Insurance laws of the State of Washington. 4. Professional Liability insurance appropriate to the Consultant's profession B. Minimum Amounts of Insurance Consultant shall maintain the following insurance limits: Automobile Liability insurance with a minimum combined single limit for bodily injury and property damage of $1,000,000 per accident. 2. Commercial General Liability insurance shall be written with limits no less than $1,000,000 each occurrence, $2,000,000 general aggregate. 3. Professional Liability insurance shall be written with limits no less than $1,000,000 per claim and $1,000,000 policy aggregate limit. C. Other Insurance Provisions The insurance policies are to contain, or be endorsed to contain, the following provisions for Automobile Liability, Professional Liability and Commercial General Liability insurance: I. The Consultant's insurance coverage shall be primary insurance as respect the City. Any insurance, self-insurance, or insurance pool coverage maintained by the City shall be excess of the Consultant's insurance and shall not contribute with it. 2. The Consultant's insurance shall be endorsed to state that coverage shall not be cancelled by either party, except after thirty (30) days prior written notice by certified mail, return receipt requested, has been given to the City. D. Acceptability of Insurers BHC Consultants — Bay St Pump Station Upgrade Pre -Design Contract No. CO22-10 Page 4 of 6 12. 13. 14. Insurance is to be placed with insurers with a current A.M. Best rating of not less than A: VII. E. Verification of Coverage Consultant shall furnish the City with original certificates and a copy of the amendatory endorsements, including but not necessarily limited to the additional insured endorsement, evidencing the insurance requirements of the Consultant before commencement of the work. Assigning or Subcontracting Consultant shall not assign, transfer, subcontract or encumber any rights, duties, or interests accruing from this Agreement without the express prior written consent of the City, which consent may be withheld in the sole discretion of the City. Independent Contractor Consultant is and shall be at all times during the term of this Agreement an independent contractor. Notice Any notices required to be given by the City to Consultant or by Consultant to the City shall be in writing and delivered to the parties at the following addresses: Lary Coppola Mayor 216 Prospect Street Port Orchard, WA 98366 Phone: 360.876.4407 Fax: 360.895.9029 15. Disputes 16. 17 John C. Wilson, PE BHC Consultants, LLC 1601 Fifth Avenue, Suite 500 Seattle, WA 98101 Phone: 206.505.3400 Fax: 206.505.3406 Any action for claims arising out of or relating to this Agreement shall be governed by the laws of the State of Washington. Venue shall be in Kitsap County Superior Court. Attorneys Fees In any suit or action instituted to enforce any right granted in this Agreement, the substantially prevailing party shall be entitled to recover its costs, disbursements, and reasonable attorney's fees from the other party. Extent of Agreement/Modification This Agreement, together with attachments or addenda, represents the entire and integrated Agreement between the parties hereto and supersedes all prior negotiations, representations, or BHC Consultants — Bay St Pump Station Upgrade Pre -Design Contract No. CO22-10 Page 5 of 6 agreements, either written or oral. This Agreement may be amended, modified or added to only by written instrument properly signed by both parties. CITY OF PORT ORCHARD, CONSULTANT WASHINGTON By: Date: M Lary Coppola Name: Mayor Title: Attest: In Patricia J. Kirkpatrick, CMC City Clerk Date: BHC Consultants — Bay St Pump Station Upgrade Pre -Design Contract No. CO22-10 Page 6 of 6 City of Port Orchard 216 Prospect Street, Port Orchard, WA 98366 (36o) 876-4407 0 FAX (36o) 895-9029 Agenda Staff Report Agenda Item No. Business Item Subject: Meeting with Initiating Parties Regarding Notice of Intent to Petition for Blueberry Road Annexation Meeting Date: April 13, 2010 Prepared by: Atty Routing No: Atty Review Date: James R. Weaver Development Director NA NA Summaa: A Notice of Intent to Petition for Annexation was received on March 16, 2010, to annex 57 parcels totaling approximately 49 acres. The parcels are located south of Blueberry Road, west of Bethel Road, and north and east of the City's existing boundary, in that Portion of Section 2, Township 23 North, Range 1 East, Willamette Meridian, In Kitsap County, Washington. The parcels are in the City's currently recognized Urban Growth Area. Four parcels have a County Comprehensive Plan designation of Urban High -Intensity Commercial/Mixed Use with zoning of Highway/Tourist Commercial, three parcels have a County Comprehensive Plan Designation of Urban Restricted with zoning of Urban Low Residential, and the remaining 50 parcels have a County Comprehensive Plan Designation of Urban Low -Density Residential with zoning of Urban Low Residential. RCW 35.13.125 requires the Council to determine whether it will accept, reject, or geographically modify the proposed annexation, whether it will require the simultaneous adoption of a comprehensive plan, and whether it will require the assumption of all or of any portion of existing city indebtedness by the area to be annexed. The decision whether to "accept" the proposed annexation is entirely within the Council's discretion. By accepting a notice of intent to annex, the Council is not committing itself to annex if/when a sufficient petition is presented to it. The decision to accept merely allows the annexation to go forward procedurally and allows a petition to be circulated. Recommendation: Staff recommends that the Council allow a petition to be circulated for annexation of the property described in the Notice of Intent and require the simultaneous adoption of comprehensive plan and zoning designations, and the assumption of existing City indebtedness by the area to be annexed. Motion for consideration: I move to allow the applicant to circulate a petition for annexation of the property described in the Notice of Intent and to require the simultaneous adoption of comprehensive plan and zoning designations, and the assumption of existing City indebtedness by the area to be annexed. Alternatives: Allow circulation of the annexation petition as proposed, geographically modify the proposed annexation, or reject the annexation. Attachments: Notices of Intent to Petition for Annexation Exhibit A: Legal Descriptions and Map Valuation certification NOTICE OF INTENT TO PETITION FOR ANNEXATION TO THE CITY OF PORT ORCHARD MqR Zb-" Proposed Annexation Name Blueberry Road p l OFp 62010 Total Assessed Valuation of Proposed Annexation $14.334.420.no �NN//�GORrQ Total Assessed Valuation Represented by Signature(s) $1,936,290.00 �FP R4F/ Percent of Assessed Valuation Represented by Signature(s) (__ 13,51 %) ARrMQNT The Honorable Mayor and City Council: We, the undersigned, being the owners of not less than ten percent (10%)'in value, according to the assessed valuation of general taxation of the property described in Exhibit A attached hereto, lying contiguous to the City of Port Orchard, Washington, do hereby advise the City Council of the City of Port Orchard that it is our intention to commence annexation proceedings under the provisions of RCW 35.13,130 through 35,13.160, so that the territory described in Exhibit A can be annexed to and made a part of the City of Port Orchard. It is requested that the City Council of the City of Port Orchard seta date, not later than sixty days after the filing of this request, for a meeting with the undersigned to determine whether the City Council will accept, reject, or geographically modify the`proposed annexation, whether it shall require the simultaneous adoption of the comprehensive plan, if such plan has been prepared and filed for the area to be annexed as provided;for in RCW 35.13.177 and 35.13,178, and whether it shall require the assumption of all or any portion of existing city indebtedness by the area to be annexed. WARNING Every person who signs this petition with any other than his or her true name, or who knowingly signs more than one of these petitions, or signs a petition seeking an election when he or she is not a legal voter, or signs a petition when lie or she is otherwise not qualified to sign, or who makes herein any false statement, shall be guilty of a misdemeanor.' Printed Name: CAPSTONE HOMES Signature: ' G.-../ z 1308, 1128, 1273, 1284, 1296, 1309, Property Address/Location: 1261, & 1297 SE KODA CIR Date: ylej'l-b Tax Parcel Number(s): _5496-000-024-0002 5496-000-027-0009 5496-000-003-0007. 5496-000-022- Planning Fenn 00I/Notice of Intent. 10 Petition for Aooaualioa Application (Rev. 09/09) NOTICE OR INTENT TO PETITION FOR ANNEXATION TO THE CITY OF PORT ORCHARD Rjs Proposed Annexation Name BlueberryRoad OP � 4U10 AnnexationTotal Assessed Valuation of Proposed Total Assessed Valuation Represented by Signattuc(s) $937,330.00 PLANNING�q R Percent of Assessed Valuation Represented by Signature(s) ( 6.54 %) & C/�q CH4 0 The Honorable Mayor and City Council: We, the undersigned, being the owners of not less than ten percent (10%) in value, according to the assessed valuation of general taxation of the property described in Exhibit A attached hereto, lying contiguous to the City of Port Orchard, Washington, do hereby advise the City Council of the City of Port Orchard that it is our intention to commence annexation proceedings under the provisions of RCW 35.13,130 through 35.13.160, so that the territory described. in Exhibit A can be annexed to and made a part of the City of Port Orchard, It is requested that the City Council of the City of Port Orchard set a date, not later than sixty days after the filing of this request, for a meeting with the undersigned to determine whether the City Council will accept, reject, or geographically modify the proposed annexation, whether it shall require the simultaneous adoption of the comprehensive plan, if such plan has been prepared and filed for the area to be annexed as provided for in ROW 35.13.177 and 35.13.178 and whether it shall require the assumption of all or any portion of existing city indebtedness by the area to be annexed. WARNING Every person who signs this petition with any other than his or her true name, or who knowingly signs more than one of these petitions,. or signs a'petition seeking .an -election when he or she is not a, legal voter, or signs a petition when he or she is otherwise not qualified to sign, or who makes herein any false statement, shall be guilty of a misdemeanor. Printed Name: CHELAN HOMES INC Signature: 1 1129, 1153, 1189, & Property Address/Location: 1141 SE KODA CIR Date: 7 hy-A& Tax Parcel Number(s): 5496.000.012-0006 5496-000-014-0004 5496-000-017-0001, & 5496-000-013-0005 . Planning Form 004/1flolice of Intent to Petifion for Annoxalion Applical ion (Rev. 09109) EXHIBIT A Blueberry Road Annexation Parcel Nos. and Legal Descriptions 5496-000-015-0003 LOT 015, COYOTE RIDGE, ACCORDING TO THE PLAT RECORDED IN VOLUME 31 OF PLATS, PAGE(S) 227 - 229, INCLUSIVE, RECORDS OF KITSAP COUNTY, WASHINGTON; SITUATE IN KITSAP COUNTY, WASHINGTON. 5496-000-004-0006 LOT004, COYOTE RIDGE, ACCORDING TO THE PLAT RECORDED IN VOLUME 31 OF PLATS, PAGE(S) 227 - 229, INCLUSIVE, RECORDS OF KITSAP COUNTY, WASHINGTON; SITUATE IN KITSAP COUNTY, WASHINGTON. 022301-3-066-2001 02231E *****PORTION OF THE FOLLOWING DESCRIBED PROPERTY LYING OUTSIDE PORT ORCHARD CITY LIMITS (SEE ALSO 022301-3-066-2100)***** THAT PORTION OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: BEGINNING AT A POINT 650 FEET SOUTH OF THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER; THENCE WEST 660 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 216-2/3 FEET; THENCE EAST 660 FEET, THENCE NORTH 216-2/3 FEET TO POINT OF BEGINNING; EXCEPTTHE EAST 10 FEETTHEREOF. 5496-000-021-0005 LOT021, COYOTE RIDGE, ACCORDING TO THE PLAT RECORDED IN VOLUME 31 OF PLATS, PAGE(S) 227 - 229, INCLUSIVE, RECORDS OF KITSAP COUNTY, WASHINGTON; SITUATE IN KITSAP COUNTY, WASHINGTON. �iF,Ifd�I�II�bI:II4Q�i� LOT 008, COYOTE RIDGE, ACCORDING TO THE PLAT RECORDED IN VOLUME 31 OF PLATS, PAGE(S) 227 - 229, INCLUSIVE, RECORDS OF KITSAP COUNTY, WASHINGTON; SITUATE IN KITSAP COUNTY, WASHINGTON. 5496-000-024-0002 LOT 024, COYOTE RIDGE, ACCORDING TO THE PLAT RECORDED IN VOLUME 31 OF PLATS, PAGE(S) 227 - 229, INCLUSIVE, RECORDS OF KITSAP COUNTY, WASHINGTON; SITUATE IN KITSAP COUNTY, WASHINGTON. 5496-000-027-0009 LOT 027, COYOTE RIDGE, ACCORDING TO THE PLAT RECORDED IN VOLUME 31 OF PLATS, PAGE(S) 227 - 229, INCLUSIVE, RECORDS OF KITSAP COUNTY, WASHINGTON; SITUATE IN KITSAP COUNTY, WASHINGTON. 5496-000-003-0007 LOT 003, COYOTE RIDGE, ACCORDING TO THE PLAT RECORDED IN VOLUME 31 OF PLATS, PAGE(S) 227 - 229, INCLUSIVE, RECORDS OF KITSAP COUNTY, WASHINGTON; SITUATE IN KITSAP COUNTY, WASHINGTON. 5496-000-022-0004 LOT 022, COYOTE RIDGE, ACCORDING TO THE PLAT RECORDED IN VOLUME 31 OF PLATS, PAGE(S) 227 - 229, INCLUSIVE, RECORDS OF KITSAP COUNTY, WASHINGTON; SITUATE IN KITSAP COUNTY, WASHINGTON. EifZ�II�I�I�II�L'�II44�B3 LOT 023, COYOTE RIDGE, ACCORDING TO THE PLAT RECORDED IN VOLUME 31 OF PLATS, PAGE(S) 227 - 229, INCLUSIVE, RECORDS OF KITSAP COUNTY, WASHINGTON; SITUATE IN KITSAP COUNTY, WASHINGTON. 5496-000-006-0004 LOT 006, COYOTE RIDGE, ACCORDING TO THE PLAT RECORDED IN VOLUME 31 OF PLATS, PAGE(S) 227 - 229, INCLUSIVE, RECORDS OF KITSAP COUNTY, WASHINGTON; SITUATE IN KITSAP COUNTY, WASHINGTON. 5496-000-002-0008 LOT 002, COYOTE RIDGE, ACCORDING TO THE PLAT RECORDED IN VOLUME 31 OF PLATS, PAGE(S) 227 - 229, INCLUSIVE, RECORDS OF KITSAP COUNTY, WASHINGTON; SITUATE IN KITSAP COUNTY, WASHINGTON. 5496-000-005-0005 LOT 005, COYOTE RIDGE, ACCORDING TO THE PLAT RECORDED IN VOLUME 31 OF PLATS, PAGE(S) 227 - 229, INCLUSIVE, RECORDS OF KITSAP COUNTY, WASHINGTON; SITUATE IN KITSAP COUNTY, WASHINGTON. 5496-000-012-0006 LOT 012, COYOTE RIDGE, ACCORDING TO THE PLAT RECORDED IN VOLUME 31 OF PLATS, PAGE(S) 227 - 229, INCLUSIVE, RECORDS OF KITSAP COUNTY, WASHINGTON; SITUATE IN KITSAP COUNTY, WASHINGTON. 5496-000-014-0004 LOT 014, COYOTE RIDGE, ACCORDING TO THE PLAT RECORDED IN VOLUME 31 OF PLATS, PAGE(S) 227 - 229, INCLUSIVE, RECORDS OF KITSAP COUNTY, WASHINGTON; SITUATE IN KITSAP COUNTY, WASHINGTON. 5496-000-017-0001 LOT 017, COYOTE RIDGE, ACCORDING TO THE PLAT RECORDED IN VOLUME 31 OF PLATS, PAGE(S) 227 - 229, INCLUSIVE, RECORDS OF KITSAP COUNTY, WASHINGTON; SITUATE IN KITSAP COUNTY, WASHINGTON. 5496-000-013-0005 LOT 013, COYOTE RIDGE, ACCORDING TO THE PLAT RECORDED IN VOLUME 31 OF PLATS, PAGE(S) 227 - 229, INCLUSIVE, RECORDS OF KITSAP COUNTY, WASHINGTON; SITUATE IN KITSAP COUNTY, WASHINGTON. 022301-4-002-2006 02231E BEG 666 2/3FT W OF NE COR OF SW1/4 SE1/4 S 325FT W 646 2/3FT N 325FT E 646 2/3FT TO BEG EXC TH PTN IF ANY LY WHIN BLUEBERRY RD 022301-4-003-2005 02231E S1/2 NW1/4 SW1/4 SE1/4 EX E 15FT 101**11F Q IIli1tb34Ql1 02231E (LOT D OF SHORT PLAT NO. 3457 RECORDED UNDER AUDITOR'S FILE NO. 8402290097) THE SOUTH HALF OF THE WEST HALF OF THE NORTH HALF OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 2, TOWNSHIP 23 NORTH, RANGE 1 EAST, W.M.; TOGETHER WITH A NON-EXCLUSIVE EASEMENT FOR INGRESS, EGRESS AND UTILITIES OVER, ACROSS AND UNDER THE NORTH 20 FEET OF THAT PORTION OF THE EAST HALF OF THE NORTH HALF OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF SAID SECTION 2, LYING WEST OF THE WEST MARGIN OF RAMSEY ROAD; ALSO TOGETHER WITH A NOW EXCLUSIVE EASEMENT FOR INGRESS, EGRESS AND UTILITIES OVER, ACROSS AND UNDER THE EAST 30 FEET OF THE NORTH HALF OF THE WEST HALF OF THE NORTH HALF OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF SAID SECTION 2. 022301-4-056-2001 02231E (PAR 3 SHORT PLAT NO 1873 RECD UNDER AUD NO 7906010181) W 154FT OF FDT OF LAND TH PTN SE1/4 SE1/4 DAF BAAP 1980FT S OF NE CDR El/2 SE1/4 TH S 130FTTH W 660FT TH N 130FTTH E 660FT TO POB EXC TH PTN CNVYD TO ST OF WA FOR STATE RD NO14 PER AUD NO 158000 & EXC W 30FT CNVYD TO KITSAP CO FOR RD PER AUD NO 304253.>>>TOGETHER WITH THAT PORTION DESCRIBED UNDER SUPERIOR COURT CAUSE NO. 012 027010, AND RECORDED UNDER AUDITOR'S FILE NO. 200109280099, RECORDS OF KITSAP COUNTY, WASHINGTON, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: THAT PORTION OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 2, TOWNSHIP 23 NORTH, RANGE 1 EAST, W.M., KITSAP COUNTY, WASHINGTON, AND MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: BEGINNING AT THE EAST QUARTER CORNER OF SAID SECTION 2; THENCE SOUTH 01*42'11 WEST ALONG EH EAST LINE OF SAID SECTION 2 A DISTANCE OF 2110.00 FEET; THENCE NORTH 89*02'06 WEST, A DISTANCE OF 476.00 FEET TO THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF PARCEL 3 OF SHORT SUBDIVISION NO. 1873 RECORDED UNDER AUDITOR'S FILE NO. 7906010108 AND THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE CONTINUING NORTH 89*02'06 WEST ALONG THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID PARCEL 3, A DISTANCE OF 154.00 FEETTO THE EASTERLY RIGHT OF WAY MARGIN OF RAMSEY ROAD S.E.; THENCE SOUTH 01*42'11 WEST ALONG SAID RIGHT OF WAY MARGIN A DISTANCE OF 16.11 FEET TO AN OLD FENCE; THENCE SOUTH 88*44'14 EAST ALONG SAID FENCE A DISTANCE OF 154.26 FEETTO THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF SAID FENCE; THENCE NORTH 00*48'06 EAST ALONG SAID FENCE A DISTANCE OF 16.91 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING. >>>EXCEPT FOR THAT PORTION DESCRIBED UNDER SCC NO. 012 027010, AND RECORDED UNDER AUDITOR'S FILE NO. 200109280099, RECORDS OF KITSAP COUNTY, WASHINGTON, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: THAT PORTION OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 2, TOWNSHIP 23 NORTH, RANGE 1 EAST, W.M., KITSAP COUNTY, WASHINGTON, AND MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: BEGINNING ATTHE EAST QUARTER CORNER OF SAID SECTION 2; THENCE SOUTH 01*42'11 WEST ALONG THE EAST LINE OF SAID SECTION 2 A DISTANCE OF 1980 FEET; THENCE NORTH 89*02'06 WEST, A DISTANCE OF 476.00 FEETTO THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF PARCEL 3 OF SHORT SUBDIVISION NO. 1873 RECORDED UNDER AUDITOR'S FILE NO. 7906010108 AND THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE CONTINUING NORTH 89*02'06 WEST ALONG THE NORTH LINE OF SAID PARCEL 3, A DISTANCE OF 154.00 FEET TO THE EASTERLY RIGHT OF WAY MARGIN OF RAMSEY ROAD S.E.; THENCE SOUTH 01*42'11 WEST ALONG SAID RIGHT OF WAY MARGIN A DISTANCE OF 18.03 FEET TO AN OLD FENCE; THENCE SOUTH 89*22'01 EAST ALONG SAID FENCE A DISTANCE OF 54.36 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 88*44'05 EAST ALONG SAID FENCE A DISTANCE OF 60.17 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 89*46'55 EAST ALONG SAID FENCE A DISTANCE OF 39.48 FEET TO THE EAST LINE OF SAID PARCEL 3; THENCE NORTH 1*42'11 EAST ALONG THE EAST LINE OF SAID PARCEL 3 A DISTANCE OF 17.51 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING. 5496-000-034-0000 TRACT C (COMMON AREA), COYOTE RIDGE, ACCORDING TO THE PLAT RECORDED IN VOLUME 310F PLATS, PAGE(S) 227 - 229, INCLUSIVE, RECORDS OF KITSAP COUNTY, WASHINGTON; SITUATE IN KITSAP COUNTY, WASHINGTON. 022301-4-029-2005 02231E A PORTION OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER, SECTION 2, TOWNSHIP 23 NORTH, RANGE 1 EAST, W.M., DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: BEGINNING ATTHE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF SAID SECTION 2; THENCE N1*43'20 E A DISTANCE OF 1316.54 FEET; THENCE N89*01'W 269.73 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE S9*28'24 W 78.01 FEET; THENCE S35*05'08 W 42.71 FEET; THENCE N88*18'54 W 176.00 FEET; THENCE N2*19'20 W 110.55 FEET; THENCE S89*01'E 217.82 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING. 5496-000-020-0006 LOT020, COYOTE RIDGE, ACCORDING TO THE PLAT RECORDED IN VOLUME 310F PLATS, PAGE(S) 227 - 229, INCLUSIVE, RECORDS OF KITSAP COUNTY, WASHINGTON; SITUATE IN KITSAP COUNTY, WASHINGTON. 5496-000-025-0001 LOT 025, COYOTE RIDGE, ACCORDING TO THE PLAT RECORDED IN VOLUME 310F PLATS, PAGE(S) 227 - 229, INCLUSIVE, RECORDS OF KITSAP COUNTY, WASHINGTON; SITUATE IN KITSAP COUNTY, WASHINGTON. 5496-000-028-0008 LOT 028, COYOTE RIDGE, ACCORDING TO THE PLAT RECORDED IN VOLUME 310F PLATS, PAGE(S) 227 - 229, INCLUSIVE, RECORDS OF KITSAP COUNTY, WASHINGTON; SITUATE IN KITSAP COUNTY, WASHINGTON. K pil-fdlb][13 V11PI*F LOT 019, COYOTE RIDGE, ACCORDING TO THE PLAT RECORDED IN VOLUME 310F PLATS, PAGE(S) 227 - 229, INCLUSIVE, RECORDS OF KITSAP COUNTY, WASHINGTON; SITUATE IN KITSAP COUNTY, WASHINGTON. 022301-4-036-2006 02231E THAT PORTION OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 2, TOWNSHIP 23 NORTH, RANGE 1 EAST, W.M, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: BEGINNING AT A POINT 1980 FEET SOUTH OF THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF SAID SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF SAID SECTION 2; THENCE SOUTH 330 FEET; THENCE WEST 380 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE WEST 280 FEET; THENCE NORTH 194 FEET; THENCE EAST 280 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 194 FEETTO THE POINT OF BEGINNING; EXCEPT ROAD. >>>EXCEPT FOR THAT PORTION DESCRIBED UNDER SUPERIOR COURT CAUSE NO. 012 027010, AND RECORDED UNDER AUDITOR'S FILE NO. 200109280099, RECORDS OF KITSAP COUNTY, WASHINGTON, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: THAT PORTION OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 2, TOWNSHIP 23 NORTH, RANGE 1 EAST, W.M., KITSAP COUNTY, WASHINGTON, AND MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: BEGINNING AT THE EAST QUARTER CORNER OF SAID SECTION 2. THENCE SOUTH 01*42'11 WEST ALONG THE EAST LINE OF SAID SECTION 2 A DISTANCE OF 2110.00 FEET; THENCE NORTH 89*02'06 WEST, A DISTANCE OF 476.00 FEET TO THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF PARCEL 3 OF SHORT SUBDIVISION NO. 1873 RECORDED UNDER AUDITOR'S FILE NO. 7906010108 AND THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE CONTINUING NORTH 89*02'06 WEST ALONG THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID PARCEL 3, A DISTANCE OF 154.00 FEET TO THE EASTERLY RIGHT OF WAY MARGIN OF RAMSEY ROAD S.E.; THENCE SOUTH 01*42'11 WEST ALONG SAID RIGHT OF WAY MARGIN A DISTANCE OF 16.11 FEET TO AN OLD FENCE; THENCE SOUTH 88*44'14 EAST ALONG SAID FENCE A DISTANCE OF 154.26 FEET TO THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF SAID FENCE; THENCE NORTH 00*48'06 EAST ALONG SAID FENCE A DISTANCE OF 16.91 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING. 022301-4-008-2000 02231E LOTA SHORT PLAT 1712, AS RECORDED UNDER AUDITOR'S FILE NO. 7902090134, AMENDED UNDER AUDITOR'S FILE NO. 8306280142, RECORDS OF KITSAP COUNTY, WASHINGTON, BEING A PORTION OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER, SECTION 2, TOWNSHIP 23 NORTH, RANGE 1 EAST, W.M., KITSAP COUNTY, WASHINGTON. 022301-4-082-2009 02231E LOT A SP 4379 RECORDED UNDER AUDITOR NUMBER 8612040113. THAT PORTION OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 2, TOWNSHIP 23 NORTH, RANGE 1 EAST, W.M., KITSAP COUNTY, WASHINGTON, MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: BEGINNING ATTHE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF SAID SECTION 2; THENCE ALONG THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID SECTION 2, N89*23'10 W 1319.07 FEETTO THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER; THENCE ALONG THE EAST LINE OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER, N1*43'58 E 999.62 FEET, THENCE N89*26'50 W 384.00 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE CONTINUING N89*26'50 W 258.01 FEETTO A POINT ON A LINE WHICH IS 13.32 FEET EAST OF AND PARALLEL TO THE WEST LINE OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER; THENCE ALONG SAID PARALLEL LINE, N1*58'26 E 326.32 FEET TO THE NORTH LINE OF SAID NORTHEAST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER; THENCE ALONG SAID NORTH LINE, S89*28'03 E 256.64 FEET; THENCE S1*43'58 W 326.38 FEETTO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING. SUBIECTTO AN EASEMENT FOR INGRESS, EGRESS AND UTILITIES, OVER, UNDER AND ACROSS THE WEST 16.68 FEET AND THE NORTH 20 FEET OF THE ABOVE DESCRIBED PROPERTY. TOGETHER WITH AN EASEMENT FOR INGRESS, EGRESS AND UTILITIES, OVER, UNDER AND ACROSS A 20 FOOT STRIP OF LAND THE NORTH LINE BEING DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: BEGINNING ATTHE NORTHEAST CORNER OF THE ABOVE DESCRIBED PROPERTY; THENCE ALONG SAID NORTH LINE OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER AND THE NORTH LINE OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER, S89*28'03 E 1007.96 FEET TO THE WESTERLY RIGHT OF WAY OF RAMSEY ROAD SE AND THE TERMINUS. 022301-4-084-2007 02231E LOT B SHORT PLAT NO. 7175 RECORDED UNDER AUDIOR'S FILE NOS. 200008300062/0063, IN VOLUME 16 PAGE 56 OF SHORT PLATS. BEING A PORTION OF LOT C SP 4379 RECORDED UNDER AUDITOR NUMBER 8612040113. THAT PORTION OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER AND THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 2, TOWNSHIP 23 NORTH, RANGE 1 EAST, W.M., KITSAP COUNTY, WASHINGTON, MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: BEGINNING ATTHE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF SAID SECTION 2; THENCE ALONG THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID SECTION 2, N89*23'10 W 1319.07 FEETTO THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER; THENCE ALONG THE EAST LINE OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER, N1*43'58 E 994.60 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE CONTINUING N1*43'58 E 5.02 FEET; THENCE N89*26'50 W 144.00 FEET; THENCE N1*43'58 E 326.46 FEET TO THE NORTH LINE OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER AND THE NORTH LINE OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER; THENCE ALONG SAID LINE, S89*28'03 E 528.00 FEET; THENCE S1*43'58 W 331.67 FEETTO THE SOUTH LINE OF THE NORTH ONE-HALF OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER; THENCE ALONG SAID SOUTH LINE, N89*26'50 W 384.00 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING. SUBJECT TO AND TOGETHER WITH AN EASEMENT FOR INGRESS, EGRESS AND UTILITIES, OVER, UNDER AND ACROSS A 16.68 FOOT AND 20 FOOT STRIP OF LAND THE WESTERLY AND NORTHERLY LINES BEING DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: BEGINNING ATTHE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF THE ABOVE DESCRIBED PARCEL; THENCE N89*26'50 W 498.01 FEETTO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE ALONG THE WESTERLY LINE OF THE 16.68 FOOT EASEMENT, N1*58"26 E 326.32 FEET; THENCE ALONG THE NORTH LINE OF THE 20 FOOT EASEMENT, WHICH IS SAID NORTH LINE OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER, AND THE NORTH LINE OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER, S89*28'03 E 1264.60 FEET TO THE WESTERLY RIGHT OF WAY OF RAMSEY ROAD SE AND THE TERMINUS. EXCEPTTHAT PORTION CONVEYED TO GREGORY L. HALL BY AUDITOR NUMBER 8702040095. >>LESS TAXABLE ACCOUNT 022301-4-084-2106 SEGREGATION FOR SENIOR CITIZEN EXEMPTION. 022301-4-083-2008 02231E LOT B SP 4379 RECORDED UNDER AUDITOR NUMBER 8612040113. THAT PORTION OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 2, TOWNSHIP 23 NORTH, RANGE 1 EAST, W.M., KITSAP COUNTY, WASHINGTON, MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: BEGINNING AT THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF SAID SECTION 2; THENCE ALONG THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID SECTION 2, N89*23'10 W 1319.07 FEET TO THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER; THENCE ALONG THE EAST LINE OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER, Nl*43'58 E 999.62 FEET; THENCE N89*26'50 W 144.00 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE CONTINUING N89*25'50 W 240.00 FEET; THENCE N1*43'58 E 326.38 FEET TO THE NORTH LINE OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER; THENCE ALONG SAID NORTH LINE, S89*28'03 E 240.00 FEET; THENCE 51*43'58 W 326.46 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING. SUBJECTTO AND TOGETHER WITH AN EASEMENT FOR INGRESS, EGRESS AND UTILITIES, OVER, UNDER AND ACROSS A 16.68 FOOT AND 20 FOOT STRIP OF LAND, THE WESTERLY AND NORTHERLY LINES BEING DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: BEGINNING AT THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF THE ABOVE DESCRIBED PARCEL; THENCE N89*26'50 W 258.01 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE ALONG THE WESTERLY LINE OF THE 16.68 FOOT EASEMENT, N1*58"26 E 326.32 FEET; THENCE ALONG THE NORTH LINE OF THE 20 FOOT EASEMENT, WHICH IS SAID NORTH LINE OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER, AND THE NORTH LINE OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER, S89*28'03 E 1264.60 FEET TO THE WESTERLY RIGHT OF WAY OF RAMSEY ROAD SE AND THE TERMINUS. 022301-4-105-2101 02231E (BEING DESCRIBED FOR TAX PURPOSES ONLY AS THAT PORTION OF LOT A LYING OUTSIDE OF ANNAPOLIS WATER DISTRICT) LOT A SHORT PLAT NO. 7175 RECORDED UNDER AUDITOR'S FILE NOS. 200008300062/0063, VOLUME 16 PAGE 56 OF SHORT PLATS, BEING THAT PORTION OF LOT C SHORT PLAT NO. 4379 RECORDED UNDER AUDITOR'S FILE NOS. 8612040113 AND 8702040095 THAT PORTION OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 2, TOWNSHIP 23 NORTH, RANGE 1 EAST, W.M., KITSAP COUNTY, WASHINGTON, MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: BEGINNING AT THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF SAID SECTION 2; THENCE ALONG THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID SECTION 2, N89*23'10 W 1319.07 FEET TO THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER; THENCE ALONG THE EAST LINE OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER, N1*43'58 E 994.60 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE CONTINUING N1*43'58 E 5.02 FEET; THENCE N89*26'50 W 144.00 FEET; THENCE N1*43'58 E 326.46 FEET TO THE NORTH LINE OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER THENCE ALONG SAID LINE, S89*28'03 E 144.00 FEET, MORE OR LESS, TO THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF SAID SUBDIVISION; THENCE S1*43'58 W 331.56 FEET MORE OR LESS TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING. SUBJECT TO AND TOGETHER WITH AN EASEMENT FOR INGRESS, EGRESS AND UTILITIES, OVER, UNDER AND ACROSS A 16.68 FOOTAND 20 FOOT STRIP OF LAND THE WESTERLY AND NORTHERLY LINES BEING DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: BEGINNING AT THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF THE ABOVE DESCRIBED PARCEL; THENCE N89*26'50 W 498.01 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE ALONG THE WESTERLY LINE OF THE 16.68 FOOT EASEMENT, N1*58"26 E 326.32 FEET; THENCE ALONG THE NORTH LINE OF THE 20 FOOT EASEMENT, WHICH IS SAID NORTH LINE OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER, AND THE NORTH LINE OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER, S89*28103 E 1264.60 FEET TO THE WESTERLY RIGHT OF WAY OF RAMSEY ROAD SE AND THE TERMINUS. 022301-4-105-2002 02231E (BEING DESCRIBED FOR TAX PURPOSES ONLY AS THAT PORTION OF LOT A LYING INSIDE OF ANNAPOLIS WATER DISTRICT) LOT A SHORT PLAT NO. 7175 RECORDED UNDER AUDITOR'S FILE NOS. 200008300062/0063, VOLUME 16 PAGE 56 OF SHORT PLATS, BEING THAT PORTION OF LOT C SHORT PLAT NO. 4379 RECORDED UNDER AUDITOR'S FILE NOS. 8612040113 AND 8702040095 THAT PORTION OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 2, TOWNSHIP 23 NORTH, RANGE 1 EAST, W.M., KITSAP COUNTY, WASHINGTON, MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: BEGINNING AT THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF SAID SECTION 2; THENCE ALONG THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID SECTION 2, N89*23'10 W 1319.07 FEET TO THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER; THENCE ALONG THE EAST LINE OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER, N1*43'S8 E 994.60 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE CONTINUING N1*43'58 E 5.02 FEET; THENCE N89*26'50 W 144.00 FEET; THENCE N1*43'58 E 326.46 FEET TO THE NORTH LINE OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER THENCE ALONG SAID LINE, S89*28'03 E 144.00 FEET, MORE OR LESS, TO THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF SAID SUBDIVISION; THENCE 51*43'58 W 331.56 FEET MORE OR LESS TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING. SUBJECT TO AND TOGETHER WITH AN EASEMENT FOR INGRESS, EGRESS AND UTILITIES, OVER, UNDER AND ACROSS A 16.68 FOOT AND 20 FOOT STRIP OF LAND THE WESTERLY AND NORTHERLY LINES BEING DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: BEGINNING AT THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF THE ABOVE DESCRIBED PARCEL; THENCE N89*26'50 W 498.01 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE ALONG THE WESTERLY LINE OF THE 16.68 FOOT EASEMENT, N1*58"26 E 326.32 FEET; THENCE ALONG THE NORTH LINE OF THE 20 FOOT EASEMENT, WHICH IS SAID NORTH LINE OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER, AND THE NORTH LINE OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER, 589*28,03 E 1264.60 FEETTO THE WESTERLY RIGHT OF WAY OF RAMSEY ROAD SE AND THE TERMINUS. 022301-4-085-2006 02231E LOT D SP 4379 RECORDED UNDER AUDITOR NUMBER 8612040113. THAT PORTION OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 2, TOWNSHIP 23 NORTH, RANGE 1 EAST, W.M., KITSAP COUNTY, WASHINGTON, MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: BEGINNING ATTHE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF SAID SECTION 2; THENCE ALONG THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID SECTION 2, N89*23'10 W 1319.07 FEET TO THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER; THENCE ALONG THE WEST LINE OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER, N1*43'58 E 994.60 FEET TO THE SOUTH LINE OF THE NORTH ONE-HALF OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER; THENCE ALONG SAID SOUTH LINE, S89*26'50 E 384.00 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE CONTINUING S89*26'50 E 241.35 FEET TO THE WESTERLY RIGHT OF WAY OF RAMSEY ROAD SE; THENCE ALONG SAID RIGHT OF WAY, N1*29'30 E 331.73 FEET TO THE NORTH LINE OF SAID NORTHWEST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER; THENCE LEAVING SAID RIGHT OF WAY ALONG SAID NORTH LINE, N89*28'03 W 239.96 FEET; THENCE S1*43'58 W 331.67 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING. SUBJECT TO AND TOGETHER WITH AN EASEMENT FOR INGRESS, EGRESS AND UTILITIES, OVER, UNDER AND ACROSS A 20 FOOT AND 16.68 FOOT STRIP OF LAND THE NORTHERLY AND WESTERLY LINES BEING DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: BEGINNING AT THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF THE ABOVE DESCRIBED PROPERTY; THENCE ALONG THE NORTHERLY LINE OF THE 20 FOOT EASEMENT, WHICH IS SAID NORTH LINE OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER AND THE NORTH LINE OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER, N89*28'03 W 1264.60 FEET; THENCE ALONG THE WESTERLY LINE OF THE 16.68 FOOT EASEMENT, S1*58'26 W 326.32 FEET TO THE TERMINUS. >>> EXCEPTTHAT PORTION CONVEYED TO KITSAP COUNTY FOR SE BLUEBERRY ROAD AND RAMSEY ROAD SE, AS DESCRIBED UNDER AUDITOR'S FILE NO. 200801030172, RECORDS OF KITSAP COUNTY, WASHINGTON. 022301-4-072-2001 02231E (LOT C OF SHORT PLAT NO.3457 RECORDED UNDER AUDITOR'S FILE NO.8402290097) THE NORTH HALF OF THE WEST HALF OF THE NORTH HALF OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 2, TOWNSHIP 23 NORTH, RANGE 1 EAST, W.M., IN KITSAP COUNTY, WASHINGTON; TOGETHER WITH A NON-EXCLUSIVE EASEMENT FOR INGRESS, EGRESS AND UTILITIES OVER, ACROSS AND UNDER THE NORTH 20 FEET OF THAT PORTION OF THE EAST HALF OF THE NORTH HALF OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF SAID SECTION 2, LYING WEST OF THE WEST MARGIN OF RAMSEY ROAD. 5496-000-030-0004 LOT 030, COYOTE RIDGE, ACCORDING TO THE PLAT RECORDED IN VOLUME 310F PLATS, PAGE(S) 227 - 229, INCLUSIVE, RECORDS OF KITSAP COUNTY, WASHINGTON; SITUATE IN KITSAP COUNTY, WASHINGTON. 5496-000-032-0002 TRACT A (STORMWATER FACILITIES), COYOTE RIDGE, ACCORDING TO THE PLAT RECORDED IN VOLUME 310F PLATS, PAGE(S) 227 - 229, INCLUSIVE, RECORDS OF KITSAP COUNTY, WASHINGTON; SITUATE IN KITSAP COUNTY, WASHINGTON. 5496-000-033-0001 TRACT B (STORMWATER FACILITIES), COYOTE RIDGE, ACCORDING TO THE PLAT RECORDED IN VOLUME 31 OF PLATS, PAGE(S) 227 - 229, INCLUSIVE, RECORDS OF KITSAP COUNTY, WASHINGTON; SITUATE IN KITSAP COUNTY, WASHINGTON. 022301-4-106-2001 02231E THAT PORTION OF THE EAST HALF OF THE NORTH HALF OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 2, TOWNSHIP 23 NORTH, RANGE 1 EAST, W.M., IN KITSAP COUNTY, WASHINGTON, BEING MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: THE EAST HALF OF LOT OF KITSAP COUNTY SHORT SUBDIVISION NO. 3457, RECORDED UNDER AUDITOR'S FILE NO. 8402290097, AS MEASURED ALONG THE NORTH AND SOUTH LINES THEREOF. 022301-4-107-2000 02231E THAT PORTION OF THE EAST HALF OF THE NORTH HALF OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 2, TOWNSHIP 23 NORTH, RANGE 1 EAST, W.M., IN KITSAP COUNTY, WASHINGTON, BEING MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED FOR TAX PURPOSES ONLY AS FOLLOWS: THE WEST HALF OF LOT A OF KITSAP COUNTY SHORT SUBDIVISION NO. 3457, RECORDED UNDER AUDITOR'S FILE NO. 8402290097, AS MEASURED ALONG THE NORTH AND SOUTH LINES THEREOF. 022301-3-065-2002 02231E *****PORTION OF THE FOLLOWING DESCRIBED PROPERTY LYING OUTSIDE PORT ORCHARD CITY LIMITS (SEE ALSO 022301-3-065-2101)*****THAT PORTION OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: BEGINNING 13-1/3 FEET WEST AND 325 FEET SOUTH OF THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF SAID SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER; THENCE SOUTH 325 FEET; THENCE WEST 646-2/3 FEET; THENCE NORTH 325 FEET; THENCE EAST 646-2/3 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING; EXCEPT THE EAST 10 FEET THEREOF. 5496-000-010-0008 LOT 010, COYOTE RIDGE, ACCORDING TO THE PLAT RECORDED IN VOLUME 310F PLATS, PAGE(S) 227 - 229, INCLUSIVE, RECORDS OF KITSAP COUNTY, WASHINGTON; SITUATE IN KITSAP COUNTY, WASHINGTON. 022301-4-007-2001 02231E THE W 345FT OF FDP BEG 345FT N OF SE COR OF SW1/4 SE1/4 N 325FT W 660FT S 325FT E 660FT TO BEG EXC W 30FT FOR RD SHORT PLAT NO.1418 RECD 7712300247 022301-4-053-2004 02231E LOT B SHORT PLAT 1712, AS RECORDED UNDER AUDITOR'S FILE NO. 7902090134, AMENDED UNDER AUDITOR'S FILE NO. 8306280142, RECORDS OF KITSAP COUNTY, WASHINGTON, BEING A PORTION OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER, SECTION 2, TOWNSHIP 23 NORTH, RANGE 1 EAST, W.M., KITSAP COUNTY, WASHINGTON. 022301-4-063-2002 02231E LOT D OF SHORT PLAT NO.1418, AS RECORDED UNDER AUDITOR'S FILE NO. 7712300247, RECORDS OF KITSAP COUNTY, WASHINGTON, BEING A PORTION OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER, SECTION 2, TOWNSHIP 23 NORTH, RANGE 1 EAST, W.M., KITSAP COUNTY, WASHINGTON. 5496-000-009-0001 LOT 009, COYOTE RIDGE, ACCORDING TO THE PLAT RECORDED IN VOLUME 310F PLATS, PAGE(S) 227 - 229, INCLUSIVE, RECORDS OF KITSAP COUNTY, WASHINGTON; SITUATE IN KITSAP COUNTY, WASHINGTON. 5496-000-031-0003 LOT 031, COYOTE RIDGE, ACCORDING TO THE PLAT RECORDED IN VOLUME 31 OF PLATS, PAGE(S) 227 - 229, INCLUSIVE, RECORDS OF KITSAP COUNTY, WASHINGTON; SITUATE IN KITSAP COUNTY, WASHINGTON. 5496-000-018-0000 LOT 018, COYOTE RIDGE, ACCORDING TO THE PLAT RECORDED IN VOLUME 31 OF PLATS, PAGE(S) 227 - 229, INCLUSIVE, RECORDS OF KITSAP COUNTY, WASHINGTON; SITUATE IN KITSAP COUNTY, WASHINGTON. 022301-4-103-2004 02231E LOT A SHORT PLAT NO. 525311-1 RECORDED IN VOLUME 13 PAGE 201OF SHORT PLATS, AUDITOR'S FILE NO. 9607190055. THAT PORTION OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 2, TOWNSHIP 23 NORTH, RANGE 1 EAST, W.M., KITSAP COUNTY, WASHINGTON, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: BEGINNING AT POINT 990 FEET NORTH OF THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF SAID SOUTHEAST QUARTER; THENCE WEST 660 FEET, THENCE NORTH 330 FEET; THENCE EAST 660 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 330 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING; EXCEPT THAT PORTION DEEDED FOR HIGHWAY AND ROADS; ALSO EXCEPT THE WEST 170 FEET THEREOF; ALSO EXCEPT THE FOLLOWING DESCRIBED PARCEL: BEGINNING AT THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF SAID SECTION 2; THENCE N1*43'20 E A DISTANCE OF 1316.54 FEET; THENCE N89*01'W 269.73 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE S9*28'24 W 78.01 FEET; THENCE S35*05'08 W 42.17 FEET; THENCE N88*18'54 W 176.00 FEET; THENCE N2*18'20 W 110.55 FEET; THENCE S89*01'E 217.82 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; ALSO EXCEPTTHE NORTH 15 FEET AND THE EAST 15 FEET THEREOF AS CONVEYED TO KITSAP COUNTY FOR ROAD RIGHT-OF-WAY PURPOSES BY INSTRUMENTS RECORDED UNDER AUDITOR'S FILE NOS. 9606120189 AND 9606120191; SUBIECTTO COVENANTS, CONDITIONS AND RESTRICTIONS AS SET FORTH BY KITSAP COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS RESOLUTION NO. 061-1990. 5496-000-001-0009 LOT 001, COYOTE RIDGE, ACCORDING TO THE PLAT RECORDED IN VOLUME 31 OF PLATS, PAGE(S) 227 - 229, INCLUSIVE, RECORDS OF KITSAP COUNTY, WASHINGTON; SITUATE IN KITSAP COUNTY, WASHINGTON. K LI:i'4�I�II4�}E�bI�I:? LOT 007, COYOTE RIDGE, ACCORDING TO THE PLAT RECORDED IN VOLUME 31 OF PLATS, PAGE(S) 227 - 229, INCLUSIVE, RECORDS OF KITSAP COUNTY, WASHINGTON; SITUATE IN KITSAP COUNTY, WASHINGTON. 5496-000-011-0007 LOT 011, COYOTE RIDGE, ACCORDING TO THE PLAT RECORDED IN VOLUME 31 OF PLATS, PAGE(S) 227 - 229, INCLUSIVE, RECORDS OF KITSAP COUNTY, WASHINGTON; SITUATE IN KITSAP COUNTY, WASHINGTON. 5496-000-016-0002 02231E LOT 016, COYOTE RIDGE, ACCORDING TO THE PLAT RECORDED IN VOLUME 31 OF PLATS, PAGE(S) 227 - 229, INCLUSIVE, RECORDS OF KITSAP COUNTY, WASHINGTON; SITUATE IN KITSAP COUNTY. WASHINGTON. 5496-000-026-0000 LOT 026, COYOTE RIDGE, ACCORDING TO THE PLAT RECORDED IN VOLUME 31OF PLATS, PAGE(S) 227 - 229, INCLUSIVE, RECORDS OF KITSAP COUNTY, WASHINGTON; SITUATE IN KITSAP COUNTY, WASHINGTON. 5496-000-029-0007 LOT 029, COYOTE RIDGE, ACCORDING TO THE PLAT RECORDED IN VOLUME 31OF PLATS, PAGE(S) 227 - 229, INCLUSIVE, RECORDS OF KITSAP COUNTY, WASHINGTON; SITUATE IN KITSAP COUNTY, WASHINGTON. 022301-3-013-2104 02231E THAT PORTION OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION 2, TOWNSHIP 23 NORTH, RANGE 1 EAST, W.M. LYING OUTSIDE THE CITY OF PORT ORCHARD DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: BEGINNING AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF THE EAST 1/2 OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER; THENCE SOUTH 325 FEET; THENCE EAST 640 FEET; THENCE NORTH 325 FEET; THENCE WEST 640 FEET TO THE BEGINNING; EXCEPT ROADS. SITUATE IN KITSAP COUNTY, WASHINGTON. a 02 LU o o "6i u rc .F +� lEiif 3 a O 2 ... e .... 00 0�0009 g '-I ILr i_ _� -Fri JL— — L: 771 L\ Certification of Letter of Intent City of Port Orchard 1, James R. Weaver, Development Director of the City of Port Orchard, do hereby certify that I received on March 16, 2010, a Notice of Intent to Commence Annexation Proceedings for an area located south of Blueberry Road, west of Bethel Road, and north and east of the City's existing boundary, in that Portion of Section 2, Township 23 North, Range I East, Willamette Meridian, In Kitsap County, Washington. The petition contained signatures of property owners, which were verified by comparing them with the Kitsap County Assessors records. The assessed valuation of the area proposed to be annexed is $_14 334,420.00. The assessed valuation of signatures represents $2,873,620. The signatures therefore constitute more than the required 10 percent, which figure would be $1,433,442.00. SIGNED this 17°i day of March, 2010. Jana ss . Weaver I�y /rchard Development Director City of Port Orchard 216 Prospect Street, Port Orchard, WA 98366 (36o) 876-4407 0 FAX (36o) 895-9029 Agenda Staff Report Agenda Item No. Business Item 7H Meeting Date: Subject: Authorizing Pet License Exemption Prepared by: to Have More Than Three Licensed Animals Atty Routing No: Atty Review Date: April 13, 2010 Patti Kirkpatrick, CMC City Clerk NA NA SummM: On March, 29, 2010, my office received a request for a pet license variance from Mr. and Mrs. Stefen Burlew to have their five pets licensed within the City. The Burlew's recently moved to Port Orchard from Tennessee where animals were not required to be licensed. However, the Burlew's want to be good citizens and are asking for a variance for their remaining two pets. Three of the five animals have been spayed and/or neutered — one cat and two dogs, and licenses have been issued. The remaining two pets are indoor cats and they have also been spayed and/or neutered. Port Orchard Municipal Code (POMC) 7.12.ogo allows a pet owner to seek a pet license variance from the City Council to allow additional pets outside the restriction of allowing only three (3) licensed pets, dogs or cats or a combination thereof, at a single-family residence inside City limits. At its January 26, 2010, meeting the Council granted a pet license variance for four dogs to a Ms. Leslie Hassett, with the understanding that as the number of pets reduce the variance goes away as well. Recommendation: Staff recommends authorizing the City Clerk to grant a pet license variance to Mr. and Mrs. Stefen Burlew for their two indoor cats and for them to comply with all other regulations and licensing requirements of Port Orchard Municipal Code Title 7. Motion for consideration: I move to authorize the City Clerk to grant a pet license variance to Mr. and Mrs. Stefen Burlew for their two indoor cats and for them to comply with all other regulations and licensing requirements of Port Orchard Municipal Code Title 7. Fiscal Impact: None. Alternatives: Not authorize the pet license variance for two indoor cats; however, this is not Staffs recommendation. Attachments: March 26, 2oro, Burlew letter and vet bill m I -A J-1- �CSL nub,- 3-3LO - - -- --------- vc, -0-c-Q- L o � \n-g c CIO CITY OF PORT ORCHARD Oft -C-LER-KS-OFFIC-E-------- aa1 f t� 1 NV W IV Animal Clinic Of North Clarksville 1567 Ft. Campbell Blvd. Clarksville, TN 37042 931-645-9890 "Our Goal Is To Make Your Pet Happy" FOR: Jessica Sutfin 381 RoselaNm Dr CLARKSVILLE, TN 37042 Date For Oty Description 09-23-08 Midnight 1 Anesthesia Included In Surgery Fee 09-23-08 1 Castration: Feline/Ferret Pkg 09-23-08 1 Thank you with Tender Loving Care Printed: 09-23-08 at 9:52a Date: 09-23-08 Account: 21266 invoice: 289318 1. Keep Midnight warm and in a confined area for the next 24 hours. Restrict exercise for 10 days. no Jumping!'' 2> Give clear liquids only for 3 hours after hospital dismissal. 3. Do not give aspirin of Tylenol. They may be harmful to your pet. 4. No bathing for 10 days. 5. Sutures will dissolve. A return visit is not necessary. 6. Notify us if you observe any vomiting after the first 24 hours, diarrhea, severe pain, bleeding, excessive chewing, or refusal to eat after the first 48 hours. 09-23-08 Pead 1 Anesthesia Included in Surgery Fee 09-23-08 1 OVH: Feline Pkg 09-23-08 1 Thank you with Tender Loving Care FELINE SPAY HOME CARE INSTRUCTIONS 1. Give only small amounts of water for 3 hours after dismissal from the hospital. 2. Keep Pearl safe from injury for the first 24 hours. Keep warm and dry. 3. do NOT give aspirin or tylenol. They can kill Pearl. 4. NO bathing til suture removal 5. Return for suture removal in 10 days unless otherwise instructed. 6. Notify the clinic if there is any vomiting, diarrhea, excessive pain, or bleeding after the first 24 hours. Old balance Charges Payments 0.00 155.00 0.00 After 30 days all unpaid balances will incur a service charge of 1.5°% (18% per year) with minimum charge of 6.85 each 30 days past due. Patient Total charges Pearl 90.00 Net Price 0.00 65.00 0.00 New balance 155.00