Loading...
06/15/2021 - Work Study - PacketPlease turn off cell phones during meeting and hold your questions for staff until the meeting has been adjourned Meeting materials are available on the City’s website: www.cityofportorchard.us or by contacting the City Clerk’s Office, 360.876.4407 The City of Port Orchard does not discriminate on the basis of disability. Contact the City Clerk’s office should you need special accommodations. City of Port Orchard Council Work Study Session June 15, 2021 6:30 p.m. The City is prohibited from conducting meetings unless the meeting is NOT conducted in-person and instead provides options for the public to attend through telephone, internet or other means of remote access, and also provides the ability for persons attending the meeting (not in-person) to hear each other at the same time. Therefore; Remote access only Link: https://us02web.zoom.us/j/82196907053 Zoom Meeting ID: 821 9690 7053 Zoom Call-In: 1 253 215 8782 CALL TO ORDER Pledge of Allegiance ACTION ITEM: 1.Adoption of an Ordinance Temporarily Modifying Port Orchard Municipal Code Chapter 5.60.015 to Shorten the Application Deadline for Public Firework Displays (Bond/Archer) Page 2 DISCUSSION ITEMS: 1.End of the Legislative Session Report (Weiss) Estimated Time: 20 minutes 2.Ordinance Adopting Planned Action EIS for Downtown Subarea Plan (Bond) Page 7 Estimated Time: 30 minutes 3.Water and Sewer Redevelopment Exceptions (Crocker) Estimated Time: 20 minutes 4.City Hall Reskin (Mayor) Page 23 Estimated Time: 15 minutes Good of the Order Mayor: Rob Putaansuu Administrative Official Councilmembers: Bek Ashby (Mayor Pro-Tempore) Finance Committee Economic Development & Tourism Committee Transportation Committee, Chair KRCC/KRCC PlanPol-alt /KRCC TransPol PSRC-alt/PSRC TransPOL-Alt/PRTPO Shawn Cucciardi Finance Committee E/D & Tourism Committee, Chair Kitsap Economic Development Alliance Fred Chang Economic Development & Tourism Committee Land Use Committee Jay Rosapepe Utilities/Sewer Advisory Committee Land Use Committee, Chair Transportation Committee Lodging Tax Advisory Committee, Chair KRCC-alt John Clauson Finance Committee, Chair Utilities/Sewer Advisory Committee Kitsap Public Health District-alt Cindy Lucarelli Festival of Chimes & Lights Committee, Chair Utilities/Sewer Advisory Committee, Chair Kitsap Economic Development Alliance Scott Diener Land Use Committee Transportation Committee Department Directors: Nicholas Bond, AICP Development Director Mark Dorsey, P.E. Director of Public Works/City Engineer Tim Drury Municipal Court Judge Noah Crocker, M.B.A. Finance Director Matt Brown Police Chief Brandy Rinearson, MMC, CPRO City Clerk Meeting Location: Council Chambers, 3rd Floor 216 Prospect Street Port Orchard, WA 98366 Contact us: (360) 876-4407 cityhall@cityofportorchard.us City of Port Orchard 216 Prospect Street, Port Orchard, WA 98366 (360) 876-4407 • FAX (360) 895-9029 Agenda Staff Report Agenda Item No.: Action Item 1 Meeting Date: June 15, 2021 Subject: Adoption of an Ordinance Temporarily Prepared by: Nick Bond, DCD Modifying Port Orchard Municipal Charli Archer, City Attorney Code Chapter 5.60.015 to Shorten the Atty Routing No.: 366922.0011 – DCD Application Deadline for Public Atty Review Date: June 9, 2021 Fireworks Displays Summary: The City regulates public firework displays within the City at Port Orchard Municipal Code (POMC) Chapter 5.60, which are defined as an entertainment feature where the public is or could be invited, admitted and/or permitted to view the display or discharge of larger fireworks designed primarily for display and classified as such by the U.S. Department of Transportation, as further defined by RCW 70.77.131 and WAC 212-17-025. The City’s regulations require the submission of an application for a public firework display permit at least forty (40) business days prior to the date of the event. The City has been in a continued state of emergency since March 2020, and subject to restrictions established by the Governor and state and local health officials cautioning against the conduct of special events and large gatherings. However, on May 13, 2021, Governor Inslee announced a statewide reopening date of June 30, 2021, and the transition of all counties to Phase 3 of the Healthy WA: Roadmap to Recovery reopening plan, effective May 18, 2021. That announcement (see Exhibit 1) stated that the Governor anticipates a “full reopening” on June 30 but stated the “announcement does not mean that Washington’s state of emergency will lift on June 30.” The Governor’s Office, Health Officials, and the WA Dept of Labor and Industries continue to work on specific guidance as to implementation of this directive after June 30. Since the Governor issued his statement about reopening on June 30, 2021, the City has received an inquiry regarding a potential public firework display on July 10, 2021 – an event historically held in the City. The City’s current code requirement of forty (40) days advance notice would bar this event from occurring on that date, assuming the event can proceed under all applicable federal, state regulations governing firework displays, as well as any applicable COVID-19 regulations. By this Ordinance, the Council would temporarily suspend the forty (40) day advance notice requirement and set it at a shorter time period, as recommended by staff. Importantly, the issuance of a permit for a firework display requires the approval of South Kitsap Fire and Rescue, and all applicants are on notice that the City cannot guarantee the approval of that outside agency for the event to occur on shortened time. Relationship to Comprehensive Plan: N/A Page 2 of 27 Staff Report 1 Page 2 of 2 Recommendation: Staff recommends Council adopt an Ordinance temporarily altering the application deadline for public fireworks display permits. Motion for Consideration: I move to adopt an Ordinance, temporarily modifying POMC 5.60.015 to shorten the application deadline for public firework displays, subject to conditions. Alternatives: Do not approve. Fiscal Impact: None. Attachments: Ordinance, Exhibit 1 – Governor Inslee May 13, 2021 reopening announcement. Page 3 of 27 ORDINANCE NO. ____ AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF PORT ORCHARD, WASHINGTON, RELATING TO SPECIAL EVENTS; TEMPORARILY AMENDING PORT ORCHARD MUNICIPAL CODE 5.60.015 PERTAINING TO PUBLIC FIREWORK DISPLAYS; PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY; AND ESTABLISHING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, the City of Port Orchard has adopted regulations for public firework displays within the City, defined as an entertainment feature where the public is or could be invited, admitted and/or permitted to view the display or discharge of larger fireworks designed primarily for display and classified as such by the U.S. Department of Transportation, as further defined by RCW 70.77.131 and WAC 212-17-025; and WHEREAS, the City has been in a continued state of emergency since March 2020, and subject to restrictions established by the Governor and state and local health officials cautioning against the conduct of special events and large gatherings; and WHEREAS, on May 13, 2021, Governor Inslee announced a statewide reopening date of June 30, 2021, and the transition of all counties to Phase 3 of the Healthy WA: Roadmap to Recovery reopening plan, effective May 18, 2021; and WHEREAS, the Council desires to allow public firework displays to be held, consistent with and subject to all then-applicable direction from the Governor and public health officials, following the statewide reopening, and to temporarily waive the application time periods set out in the POMC for public firework displays to be held in July, August and September 2021; and WHEREAS, in light of the limited applicability of this suspension, this Ordinance will not be codified but will nonetheless temporarily supersede any relevant codified provisions in Chapter 5.60 POMC to the maximum extent permitted by law; now therefore, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PORT ORCHARD, WASHINGTON, DO ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1. Temporary Amendment of POMC 5.60.015. For public displays of fireworks occurring in July, August and September 2021, the City Council authorizes the temporary suspension of the timelines set out in POMC 5.60.015(2)(b), provided: 2) Permit applications shall be received by the DCD permit center for review by the fire authority: (b) No later than 4:30 p.m. at least twenty (20) days prior to the date of an intended public display. Page 4 of 27 Ordinance No. ____ Page 2 of 3 SECTION 2. In addition to all requirements set out in Chapter 5.60 POMC and any other applicable code provisions, all applicants for a permit for a public display of fireworks shall sign an acknowledgment that: (1) All displays shall be subject to all regulations and guidance disseminated by all federal, state and local officials pertaining to the COVID-19 pandemic that are in effect on the date of the display, including but not limited to social distancing, sanitization of facilities, and face coverings; and (2) In the event the Governor does not reopen the state on June 30, 2021, the City reserves the right to rescind any permit issued, and the applicant waives all claims against the City arising from or relating to the rescission of the permit; and (3) The permit requires approval by South Kitsap Fire and Rescue. The City does not control this agency and cannot guarantee that this agency will authorize a display to occur on the shortened timelines set out in this Ordinance. (4) The applicant shall be solely responsible for ensuring that, prior to the display, the display has obtained all necessary permissions from all applicable state and local agencies that govern the proposed display, including but not limited to the Washington Department of Labor & Industries and the Department of Transportation. The submission of an application to the City and/or grant of a City permit does not guarantee that the event will receive the necessary authorizations from all applicable agencies in time to hold the event. SECTION 3. If any section, sentence, clause or phrase of this ordinance should be held to be invalid or unconstitutional by a court of competent jurisdiction, such invalidity or unconstitutionality shall not affect the validity of constitutionality of any other section, sentence, clause or phrase of this ordinance. SECTION 4. This ordinance shall be in full force five days after posting and publication as required by law. A summary of this ordinance may be published in lieu of publishing the ordinance in its entirety. PASSED by the City Council of the City of Port Orchard, APPROVED by the Mayor and attested by the Clerk in authentication of such passage this 15th day of June 2021. Robert Putaansuu, Mayor ATTEST: Page 5 of 27 Ordinance No. ____ Page 3 of 3 Brandy Rinearson, MMC, City Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM: SPONSOR: N/A Charlotte A. Archer, City Attorney Councilmember Page 6 of 27 City of Port Orchard Work Study Session Executive Summary Issue Title: Ordinance Adopting Planned Action EIS for Downtown Subarea Plan Meeting Date: June 15, 2021 Time Required: 30 minutes Attendees: Nick Bond, DCD Director Issue: The final draft Downtown Subarea Plan and associated development regulations were reviewed by the City Council at the May work-study meeting, followed by a public hearing at the May 25 Council meeting. An ordinance adopting a Planned Action for the Environmental Impact Statement (PA EIS) that was prepared for the Downtown Subarea Plan has been submitted for Council’s review at tonight’s work-study meeting. The ordinances approving both the Downtown Subarea Plan and the PA EIS for the Subarea Plan will be brought to Council for approval at the June 22 Council meeting. In August 2020, the City issued a SEPA Determination of Significance (DS) for the Downtown Subarea Plan and updated regulations, based on the likelihood that the development proposals in the Subarea Plan may have significant adverse environmental impacts which would require mitigation. The DS identified three alternative Subarea Plan proposals that were analyzed in the EIS, which was released in April 2021. There were 3 alternatives evaluated in the EIS: No Action, Residential Focused, and Mixed-Use Focused. The Residential and Mixed-Use alternatives varied in the balance of residential and commercial development that would be permissible under the EIS. The EIS addressed a number of issues, including: current land uses, development capacity of land within the Subarea Plan, future development mix and locations of densities and uses, transportation, utilities, public facilities and amenities, cultural resources, and natural resources. Approval of the Planned Action ordinance will allow development proposals for a wide range of permit types that are located within the boundaries of the Downtown Subarea Plan to benefit from an expedited permitting process, because their environmental impacts and required mitigation measures have been previously addressed in the EIS. A Planned Action Ordinance has the effect of completing project-level SEPA review on certain types of development up to specific thresholds. In this case, the ordinance proposes allowing up to the following amounts of development (consistent with the Mixed-Use Focused Alternative 3 from the Final EIS) within the Downtown Subarea without further review under SEPA: Action Requested at this Meeting: Discuss the draft ordinance for the Planned Action EIS that was prepared for the Downtown Subarea Plan and provide feedback to DCD staff and the City Attorney. Page 7 of 27 Executive Summary – Planned Action EIS Page 2 of 2 • 848,600 square feet of nonresidential uses. Under this category, the following square footages are reserved for the following land uses (leaving 244,600 square feet for other non-residential development within the subarea): o Community events center – 24,000 square feet of gross indoor floor area. o Kitsap County Courthouse Campus – 580,000 square feet of gross indoor floor area. • 1,288 units or 752,283 square feet gross of indoor floor area of residential household living, whichever threshold is reached first. Residential household living is defined in POMC 20.39.100. • Public park and recreation facilities included in the City of Port Orchard Comprehensive Plan. Alternatively, the City could modify the above limits to reflect Alternative 2 (the Residential Focus Alternative) from the Final EIS and allow: • 673,500 square feet of nonresidential uses. Under this category, the following square footages are reserved for the following land uses (leaving 69,500 square feet for other non- residential development within the subarea): o Community events center – 24,000 square feet of gross indoor floor area. o Kitsap County Courthouse Campus – 580,000 square feet of gross indoor floor area. • 1,610 units or 1,010,100 square feet gross of indoor floor area of residential household living, whichever threshold is reached first. Residential household living is defined in POMC 20.39.100. • Public park and recreation facilities included in the City of Port Orchard Comprehensive Plan. Relationship to the Comprehensive Plan: The Downtown Subarea Plan will be adopted as Appendix D of the City’s Comprehensive Plan. Alternatives: Revise the allowable land uses and/or total amounts of development allowed under the PA EIS Ordinance (Section 4) to reflect the Residential Focused Alternative from the EIS; do not adopt an ordinance approving the PA EIS (the City would not be reimbursed for work under its Department of Commerce grant if a Planned Action ordinance is not approved). The second option would require any proposed development within the area covered by the Downtown Subarea Plan to go through a complete individual SEPA environmental review and potentially be assessed mitigation requirements as part of a development permit application, instead of being fully or partially covered by the existing SEPA review and mitigation requirements that were prepared for the PA EIS. Recommendations: Staff recommends that the City Council review the ordinance for the PA EIS and provide feedback to DCD staff and the City Attorney. Attachments: Ordinance. Page 8 of 27 1 ORDINANCE NO. ***-21 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF PORT ORCHARD, WASHINGTON, ESTABLISHING A PLANNED ACTION FOR THE DOWNTOWN SUBAREA PURSUANT TO THE STATE ENVIRONMENTAL POLICY ACT; PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY AND CORRECTIONS; AND ESTABLISHING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, the State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA) and implementing rules provide for the integration of environmental review with land use planning and project review through designation of "Planned Actions" by jurisdictions planning under the Growth Management Act (GMA); and WHEREAS, the City of Port Orchard (“City”) has adopted a Comprehensive Plan complying with the GMA; and WHEREAS, in 2019, the State Legislature passed E2SHB 1923 creating RCW 36.70A.600 and providing for grant funding to jurisdictions taking specific actions to increase residential building capacity; and WHEREAS, the City received a grant from the Washington State Department of Commerce under E2SHB 1923 to prepare a subarea plan and the development regulations as described in this chapter (Contract C081-19); and WHEREAS, the City previously had conducted planning for the Downtown Center and the County Campus area; and WHEREAS, this updated planning initiative combined both areas into a single area and updated the comprehensive plan and land use code applicable to these areas consistent with Chapter 36.70A RCW; and WHEREAS, on August 14, 2020, under RCW 43.21C.440, the City issued a SEPA Determination of Significance (DS) for the Subarea Plan and updated regulations as a Planned Action based on the likelihood that the proposals may have significant adverse environmental impacts, and identified three alternative subarea proposals for analysis in an Environmental Impact Statement (EIS), including a no-action alternative; and WHEREAS, on April 26, 2021, the City issued a Final Environmental Impact Statement (FEIS) for the Subarea Plan and updated regulations, which addressed issues of current land uses, Page 9 of 27 2 development capacity, future development mix and location of densities and uses, transportation, utilities, public facilities and amenities, cultural resources, and natural resources, and there have been no appeals; and WHEREAS, the FEIS adequately addresses the significant impacts of the updated Subarea Plan and regulations; and WHEREAS, on June 22, 2021, the City Council adopted the Downtown Subarea Plan, and amendments to the City’s Comprehensive Plan and development regulations to implement the Subarea Plan in conjunction with this Planned Action Ordinance; and WHEREAS, in accordance with RCW 43.21C.440, the City desires to designate a Planned Action for the Downtown Subarea Plan; and WHEREAS, consistent with RCW 43.21C.440(1)(b)(i), the Planned Action is in conjunction with a subarea plan adopted under Chapter 36.70A RCW and has had its significant impacts adequately addressed by an EIS under the requirements of SEPA, Chapter 43.21C RCW; and WHEREAS, this Planned Action is for the purpose of implementing development projects in the subarea; and WHEREAS, these projects will be located within the Urban Growth Area and will not include essential public facilities; and WHEREAS, designation of a Planned Action expedites the permitting process for subsequent, implementing projects consistent with the Subarea Plan because those impacts have been previously addressed in a planned action environmental impact statement, and thereby adoption of this Planned Action Ordinance encourages desired growth, investment, and economic development; and WHEREAS, the Downtown Subarea Plan FEIS identifies impacts and mitigation measures associated with planned development in City’s Downtown countywide center; and WHEREAS, the City has adopted Comprehensive Plan amendments and development regulations specific to the Downtown Subarea Plan which will guide the allocation, form, and quality of desired development; and WHEREAS, the City's SEPA Rules, set forth in POMC Chapter 20.160, provide for Planned Actions within the City; and WHEREAS, the City as lead agency provided public comment opportunities through an Page 10 of 27 3 EIS scoping period from August 14 through September 4, 2020, and a public comment period for the Draft Downtown Subarea Plan and Draft EIS from January 19 through February 18, 2021, and held public meetings and hearings as part of a coordinated Downtown Subarea Plan public participation and outreach program during 2020 and 2021; and WHEREAS, the City held an EIS public scoping meeting on September 1, 2020, and provided notice of the meeting on August 13, 2020, by mail to all businesses and property owners located within the boundaries and within 1,000 feet outside of the boundaries of the area included in the Downtown Subarea Plan, which exceeds the minimum notice requirements contained in RCW 43.21C.440; and WHEREAS, the City provided notice of the September 1, 2020 EIS scoping meeting on August 14, 2020, by emailing all affected federally recognized tribal governments and agencies with jurisdiction over the future development anticipated for the planned action, in compliance with RCW 43.21C.440; and WHEREAS, on May 4, 2021, the Planning Commission held a public hearing on the Downtown Subarea Plan after due notice provided on April 15, 2021, to all parties of record and all affected federally recognized tribal governments and agencies with jurisdiction over the future development for the Subarea Plan; and WHEREAS, on May 21, 2021 the City Council provided notification of a public hearing to be held on May 25, 2021, by newspaper publication, publication on the City’s website and outreach on social media channels; and WHEREAS, the City Council held a public hearing on May 25, 2021, on the Downtown Subarea Plan, and considered public comment; and WHEREAS, the City provided notice of intent to adopt a Planned Action Ordinance for the Final EIS on June 11, 2021 to all parties of record and all affected federally recognized tribal governments and agencies with jurisdiction over the future development for the Downtown Subarea Plan; NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PORT ORCHARD, WASHINGTON, DOES HEREBY ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1. Recitals. The recitals set forth in this ordinance are hereby incorporated as if fully set forth herein. Page 11 of 27 4 SECTION 2. Purpose. The City Council declares that the purpose of this ordinance is to: A. Designate the Downtown Countywide Center, as adopted in the Downtown Subarea Plan (Appendix D) of the City’s Comprehensive Plan, as a Planned Action Area for the purposes of environmental review and permitting of subsequent, implementing projects pursuant to SEPA, RCW 43.21C.440; B. Combine environmental analysis, land use plans, development regulations, City codes and ordinances together with the mitigation measures in the Downtown Subarea Plan EIS to mitigate environmental impacts and process planned action development applications within the Planned Action Area; C. Determine that the EIS prepared for the Downtown Subarea Plan meets the requirements of a Planned Action EIS pursuant to SEPA; D. Establish criteria and procedures, consistent with state law, that will determine whether subsequent projects within the Planned Action Area qualify as Planned Actions; E. Provide the public with information about Planned Actions and how the City will process implementing projects within the Planned Action Area; F. Streamline and expedite the land use permit review process by relying on the EIS completed for the Planned Action; and G. Apply the City's development regulations together with the mitigation measures described in the EIS and this Ordinance to address the impacts of future development contemplated by this Ordinance. SECTION 3. Findings. The City Council finds as follows: A. The City is subject to the requirements of the GMA (RCW 36.70A), and is applying the Planned Action to an Urban Growth Area (UGA); and B. The City has adopted a Comprehensive Plan in compliance with the GMA, and has amended the Comprehensive Plan to incorporate a subarea plan (Downtown Subarea Plan - Appendix D) specific to the Downtown Countywide Center; and C. The City is adopting development regulations concurrent with the Downtown Subarea Plan to implement the Plan, including this ordinance; and Page 12 of 27 5 D. An EIS has been prepared for the Planned Action Area, and the City Council finds that the EIS adequately identifies and addresses the probable significant environmental impacts associated with the type and amount of development planned to occur in the designated Planned Action Area; and E. The mitigation measures identified in the Downtown Subarea Plan EIS, incorporated herein by reference, together with adopted City development regulations, will adequately mitigate significant impacts from development within the Planned Action Area; and F. The Downtown Subarea Plan and Final EIS identify the location, type and amount of development that is contemplated by the Planned Action; and G. Future projects that are implemented consistent with the Planned Action will protect the environment, benefit the public, and enhance economic development; and H. The City provided several opportunities for meaningful public involvement in the Downtown Subarea Plan and EIS, including a public scoping meeting prior to the publication of notice for the planned action ordinance; have considered all comments received; and, as appropriate, have modified the proposal or mitigation measures in response to comments; and I. Essential public facilities defined in RCW 47.06.140 are excluded from the Planned Action and not eligible for review or permitting as Planned Actions unless they are accessory to or part of a project that otherwise qualifies as a planned action; and J. The Planned Action applies to a defined area that is smaller than the overall City boundaries and smaller than the overall County designated UGA; and K. Public services and facilities are adequate to serve the proposed Planned Action, with implementation of Subarea Plan and mitigation measures identified in the EIS. SECTION 4. Procedures and Criteria for Evaluating and Determining Planned Action Projects within the Planned Action Area. A. Planned Action Area. This Planned Action designation shall apply to the area shown in Exhibit A, incorporated herein by reference. B. Environmental Document. A Planned Action determination for a site-specific project application within the Planned Action Area shall be based on the environmental analysis contained in the Final EIS issued by the City on April 26, 2021. The mitigation measures contained in the findings of Page 13 of 27 6 the Final EIS shall, along with adopted City regulations, provide the framework that the City will use to apply appropriate conditions to qualifying Planned Action projects within the Planned Action Area. C. Planned Action Designated. Land uses and activities described in the Final EIS, subject to the thresholds described in Subsection 4(D) and the mitigation measures contained in the findings of the final EIS, are designated Planned Actions or Planned Action Projects pursuant to RCW 43.21C.440. A development application for a site-specific Planned Action project located within Planned Action Area shall be designated a Planned Action if it complies with the mitigation measures contained in the findings of the final EIS and meets the criteria set forth in Subsection 4(D) of this Ordinance and all other applicable laws, codes, development regulations and standards of the City are met. D. Planned Action Qualifications. The following thresholds shall be used to determine if a site-specific development proposed within the Planned Action Area was contemplated as a Planned Action and has had its environmental impacts evaluated in the Planned Action EIS: (1) Qualifying Land Uses. (a) Planned Action Categories: The following general categories/types of land uses are defined in the Downtown Subarea Plan and are considered Planned Actions: i. Single-family detached (including new manufactured homes). ii. Designated manufactured home, manufactured or mobile home (except for new designated manufactured home). iii. Two-family. iv. Single-family attached (2 units). v. Single-family attached (3 or 4 units). vi. Single-family attached (5-6 units). vii. Multifamily (3 or 4 units). viii. Multifamily (5 or more units). ix. Public use (includes a community event center and county campus/courthouse expansion as shown in the subarea plan). x. Museum, library. xi. Park, recreation field. xii. Special Event Facilities (limited to the community event center described in the subarea plan). xiii. All overnight lodging. xiv. Business Services. xv. Conference Center (limited to the community event center described in the subarea plan). xvi. All Restaurants. xvii. All retail establishments (not to exceed 50,000 square feet). Page 14 of 27 7 xviii. Convenience Store without fuel pumps. xix. Brewery (under 15,001 square feet). (b) Planned Action Uses: A land use shall be considered a Planned Action Land Use when: i. it is located within the area shown in Exhibit A; ii. it is one of the land uses included under Section 4(D)(1)(a) above; iii. it is listed in development regulations applicable to the zoning classifications applied to properties within the Planned Action Area. iv. the application for development is submitted after the effective date of this ordinance. A Planned Action may be a single Planned Action use, or a combination of Planned Action uses together in a mixed-use development. Planned Action uses include accessory uses. (c) Public Services: The following public services, infrastructure, and utilities are also Planned Actions: Multi-modal transportation improvements, water and sewer improvements, and stormwater improvements, considered in capital plans associated with the Downtown Subarea Plan. i. Applicants for public services, infrastructure, and utility projects shall demonstrate consistency with the Downtown Subarea Plan, Port Orchard Shoreline Master Program, and POMC 20.162 (Critical Areas Regulations). ii. Essential public facilities defined in RCW 47.06.140 are excluded from the Planned Action and not eligible for review or permitting as Planned Actions unless they are accessory to or are part of a project that otherwise qualifies as a planned action. (2) Development Thresholds: (a) Land Use: The following amounts of various new (net increase in) land uses are contemplated by the Planned Action: i. 848,600 square feet of nonresidential uses. Under this category, the following square footages are reserved for the following land uses: a. Community events center – 24,000 square feet of gross indoor floor area. .b. Kitsap County Courthouse Campus – 580,000 square feet of gross indoor floor area. Page 15 of 27 8 ii. 1,288 units or 753,283 square feet gross of indoor floor area of residential household living, whichever threshold is reached first. Residential household living is defined in POMC 20.39.100. iv. Public park and recreation facilities included in the City of Port Orchard Comprehensive Plan. (b) Further environmental review may be required pursuant to WAC 197-11- 172, if any individual Planned Action or combination of Planned Actions exceed the development thresholds specified in this Ordinance and/or alter the assumptions and analysis in the Final EIS. (3) Transportation Thresholds: (a) Concurrency. All Planned Actions shall meet the transportation concurrency requirements and the level of service (LOS) thresholds established in the Port Orchard Comprehensive Plan. All applicants under this Planned Action shall submit a transportation concurrency application that meets the requirements of POMC Chapter 20.180. (b) Traffic Impact and Mitigation. The responsible City official shall require the project to mitigate impacts consistent with the mitigation measures contained in the findings of the final EIS. (4) Elements of the Environment and Degree of lmpacts. A proposed project that would result in a significant change in the type or degree of adverse impacts to any element(s) of the environment analyzed in the Final EIS, would not qualify as a Planned Action. (5) Changed Conditions. Should environmental conditions change significantly from those analyzed in the Final EIS, the City's SEPA Responsible Official may determine that the Planned Action designation is no longer applicable until supplemental environmental review is conducted. (6) Substantive Authority. Pursuant to SEPA Substantive Authority as provided in POMC 20.60, impacts shall be mitigated through the measures included in the findings of the Final EIS. E. Planned Action Review Criteria. (1) The City's SEPA Responsible Official may designate as "planned actions", pursuant to RCW 43.21C.030, applications that meet all of the following conditions: (a) The proposal is located within the Planned Action area identified in Exhibit A of this ordinance; Page 16 of 27 9 (b) The proposed uses and activities are consistent with those described in the Final EIS and Subsection 4(D) of this ordinance; (c) The proposal is within the Planned Action thresholds and other criteria of Subsection 4(D) of this ordinance; (d) The proposal is consistent with the Port Orchard Comprehensive Plan and the Downtown Subarea Plan; (e) The proposal's significant adverse environmental impacts have been identified in the Final EIS; (f) The proposal's significant impacts have been mitigated by application of the mitigation measures identified in the findings of the Final EIS, and other applicable City regulations, together with any modifications or variances or special permits that may be required; (g) The proposal complies with all applicable local, state and/or federal laws and regulations, and the SEPA Responsible Official determines that these constitute adequate mitigation; and (h) The proposal is not an essential public facility as defined by RCW 36.70A.200(1), unless the essential public facility is accessory to or part of a development that is designated as a planned action under this ordinance. (2) The City shall base its decision on review of a SEPA checklist or an alternative form prepared by the City for use in this Planned Action area pursuant to state law, the mitigation measures in the findings of the Final EIS, and review of the application and supporting documentation. (3) A proposal that meets the criteria of this section shall be considered to qualify and be designated as a planned action, consistent with the requirements of RCW 43.21C.030, WAC 197-11- 164 et seq., and this ordinance. F. Effect of Planned Action. (1) Designation as a Planned Action Project by the SEPA Responsible Official means that a qualifying proposal has been reviewed in accordance with this Ordinance and found to be consistent with the development parameters and thresholds established herein, and with the environmental analysis contained in the Planned Action EIS. Page 17 of 27 10 (2) Upon determination by the City's SEPA Responsible Official that the proposal meets the criteria of Subsections 4(D) and (E) and qualifies as a planned action, the proposal shall not require a SEPA threshold determination, preparation of an EIS, or be subject to further review pursuant to SEPA. G. Planned Action Permit Process. Applications for planned actions shall be reviewed pursuant to the following process: (1) Development applications shall meet all applicable requirements of the Port Orchard Municipal Code (POMC). Applications for planned actions shall be made on forms provided by the City and shall include a SEPA checklist. (2) The City's SEPA Responsible Official shall determine whether the application is complete, as provided in POMC Chapter 20.24. (3) If the application is for a project within the Planned Action Area defined in Exhibit A, the application will be reviewed to determine if it is consistent with the criteria of this ordinance and thereby qualifies as a Planned Action project. (4) SEPA Decision. (a) The decision of the City's SEPA Responsible Official regarding qualification of a project as a Planned Action will be the same decision type as the underlying permit for which the Planned Action is evaluated. The SEPA Responsible Official shall notify the applicant of his/her decision. Notice of the determination on decisions involving a planned action shall also be mailed or otherwise verifiably delivered to federally recognized tribal governments and to agencies with jurisdiction over the planned action project, pursuant to RCW 43.21C.440. (b) If the project is determined to qualify as a Planned Action, it shall proceed in accordance with the applicable permit review procedures specified in POMC Chapter 20.22, except that no SEPA threshold determination, EIS or additional SEPA review shall be required. (c) Notice of the application for a planned action project shall be consistent with Chapter 20.22 POMC. (5) If notice is otherwise required for the underlying permit, the notice shall state that the project has qualified as a Planned Action. If notice is not otherwise required for the underlying permit, no special notice is required by this ordinance. See Subsection 4(G)(3)(a) regarding notice of the Type 1 decision. Page 18 of 27 11 (6) To provide additional certainty about applicable requirements, the City or the applicant may request consideration and execution of a development agreement for a Planned Action project, consistent with RCW 36.70B.170 et seq and Chapter 20.26 POMC. (7) If a project is determined to not qualify as a Planned Action, the SEPA Responsible Official shall so notify the applicant and prescribe a SEPA review procedure consistent with the City's SEPA regulations and the requirements of state law. The notice shall describe the elements of the application that result in failure to qualify as a Planned Action. (8) Projects that fail to qualify as Planned Actions may incorporate or otherwise use relevant elements of the Final EIS, as well as other relevant SEPA documents, to meet their SEPA requirements. The SEPA Responsible Official may limit the scope of SEPA review for the non- qualifying project to those issues and environmental impacts not previously addressed in the Final EIS. SECTION 5. Monitoring and Review. A. The City should monitor the progress of development in the designated Planned Action area as deemed appropriate to ensure that it is consistent with the assumptions of this Ordinance and the Final EIS regarding the type and amount of development and associated impacts, and with the mitigation measures and improvements planned for the Planned Action Area. B. This Planned Action Ordinance shall be reviewed by the SEPA Responsible Official no later than eight years from its effective date. The review shall determine the continuing relevance of the Planned Action assumptions and findings with respect to environmental conditions in the Planned Action area, the impacts of development, and required mitigation measures. Based upon this review, the City may propose amendments to this ordinance and/or may supplement or revise the Final EIS. C. The ability to utilize the Planned Action process for development under this Ordinance shall terminate on April 26, 2031, unless extended following the review in subsection B above. For purposes of utilizing the planned action process, submittal of a complete permit application (deemed complete under POMC 20.24) of the following types prior to the termination date shall be considered a Planned Action for the life of the permit: 1. Conditional Use Permit (POMC 20.50) 2. Building Permits (includes Residential, Commercial, Plumbing & Mechanical, Demolition) (POMC Title 20, Subtitle X) 3. Shoreline Substantial Development Permit (POMC 20.164) 4. Shoreline Conditional Use Permit (POMC 20.164) 5. Shoreline Variance (POMC 20.164) Page 19 of 27 12 6. Variances (POMC 20.28) 7. Land Disturbing Activity Permit (POMC 20.140 and POMC 20.150.100) 8. Stormwater Drainage Permit (POMC 20.150) 9. Preliminary Plat (POMC 20.88) 10. Short Plat (POMC 20.86) 11. Binding Site Plan (POMC 20.94) 12. Street Excavation Permit (POMC 12.04) 13. Street Use Permit (POMC 12.24) 14. Final Plat (POMC 20.90) 15. Development Agreement (POMC 20.26) 16. Right of Way Permit (POMC 12.04) SECTION 6. Conflict. In the event of a conflict between this Ordinance or any mitigation measures imposed thereto, and any Ordinance or regulation of the City, the provisions of this Ordinance shall control, except that the provisions of the City’s critical areas code, shoreline master program or any International Building Code shall supersede. SECTION 7. Corrections. Upon the approval of the city attorney, the city clerk and/or code publisher is authorized to make any necessary technical corrections to this ordinance, including but not limited to the correction of scrivener’s/clerical errors, references, ordinance numbering, section/subsection numbers, and any reference thereto. SECTION 8. Severability. If any section, subsection, paragraph, sentence, clause, or phrase of this ordinance is declared unconstitutional or invalid for any reason, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining parts of this ordinance. SECTION 9. Effective Date. This ordinance shall be published in the official newspaper of the city and shall take full force and effect five (5) days after the date of publication. A summary of this ordinance in the form of the ordinance title may be published in lieu of publishing the ordinance in its entirety. PASSED by the City Council of the City of Port Orchard, APPROVED by the Mayor and attested by the City Clerk in authentication of such passage this 22nd day of June 2021. ____ Robert Putaansuu, Mayor Page 20 of 27 13 ATTEST: ___ Brandy Rinearson, MMC, City Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM: Sponsored by: ___________________________ Charlotte A. Archer, City Attorney Scott Diener, Council Member PUBLISHED: EFFECTIVE DATE: EXHIBIT A: Map of Planned Action Area Page 21 of 27 14 EXHIBIT A Page 22 of 27 Option 1:Covers 20%-25% Peak Demand1,600 sf Array Page 23 of 27 Option 1:Covers 20%-25% Peak Demand1,600 sf Array Page 24 of 27 Option 2:Covers 40%-50% Peak Demand3,200 sf Array Page 25 of 27 Option 2:Covers 40%-50% Peak Demand3,200 sf Array Page 26 of 27 X X X X XXXXXXXXX X XX X X PROSPECT STREETBAY STREETKITSAP STREETBANK STREETXXXX XXXXX X X X XXXXXXXXX X XX X X PROSPECT STREETBAY STREETKITSAP STREETBANK STREETXXXX XXXX1,600 SFArray1,600 SFArrayPage 27 of 27