1935 - Ordinance - Amending Ordinance 1748 by Amending Zoning MapCity of Port Orchard
216 Prospect Street
Port Orchard, WA 98366
ORDINANCE NO. 1935
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF PORT ORCHARD, WASHINGTON
AMENDING PORT ORCHARD ZONING ORDINANCE NO. 1748 BY
AMENDING THE CITY OF PORT ORCHARD ZONING MAP TO
CHANGE THE ZONING CLASSIFICATION OF CERTAIN PROPERTY
FROM R4.5 TO R12 SUBJECT TO THE CONDITIONS OF
PRELIMINARY PLAT APPROVAL FOR THE PLAT OF INDIGO
POINTE, APPLICATION NO. SUBDIV 03-01/R-1145
TAX PARCEL NUMBER 022301-2-044-2000
LEGAL DESCRIPTION: SOUTH 264 FEET OF THE SE'/a OF THE NE'A OF THE NW
1/4; EXCEPT THE WEST 330 FEET THEREOF; EXCEPT ROADS, ALSO THE SE '/a
OF THE NE '/a OF THE NW '/a, EXCEPT THE WEST 454 FEET AND EXCEPT THE
SOTH 264 FEET, SECTION 2, TOWNSHIP 23N, RANGE 01E, WM, CITY OF PORT
ORCHARD, COUNTY OF KITSAP; SEE ATTACHED ATTACHMENT "A"
WHEREAS, Jim James, applicant, and Ervin Shipman, owner, submitted an
application, dated February 10, 2003, requesting approval of a rezone from R4.5 to R12 along
with a subdivision application to subdivide an existing parcel (3.97-acre area) into 24 lots; and
WHEREAS, A Mitigated Determination of Non -Significance was issued on
February 14, 2003; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission considered the application at a Public
Meeting on August 18, 2003 and scheduled a site visit on September 6 and continued the public
meeting to September 15, 2003, continued to October 06, 2003; and
WHEREAS, the City Council held a pubic hearing on November 10, 2003 at
which the applicant submitted new information and therefore the Council continued the meeting
to December 01, 2003, and again to December 22, 2003; and
WHEREAS, at the December 22, 2003 public hearing, the Council clarified that a
density of up to 12 dwelling units of single family detached housing was consistent with the
Comprehensive Plan — Medium Density Designation and remanded the application back to the
Planning Commission; and
Ordinance No. 1935
Page 2 of 16
WHEREAS, the applicant revised the proposed plat to provide 20 residential lots
providing for single family detached dwelling units, open space and protective easements; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission held a second Public Meeting on January
21, 2004, continued the discussion on February 2, 2004 and adopted Resolution No. 003-04
recommending approval of the application, subject to conditions; and
WHEREAS, the City Council held a second public hearing on March 8, 2004; and
WHEREAS, the Comprehensive Plan designation for the property is Medium
Density Residential and the proposed development is consistent with the goals and policies of
the Comprehensive Plan; and
WHEREAS, the proposed rezone is not detrimental to the health, safety, and
welfare of the community and is in harmony with the general purposes of the Zoning
Ordinance, Growth Management Act, and Comprehensive Plan; and
WHEREAS, being fully advised, the Council finds and concludes as follows:
FINDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS
The Council adopts the findings and conclusions set forth in the staff report as its
own, a copy of which is attached as Attachment "B" and incorporated by this reference; now,
therefore,
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PORT ORCHARD, WASHINGTON
DOES ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS:
SECTION 1. Based upon the recommendations of city staff and the planning
commission and the findings and conclusions contained herein, the City of Port Orchard Zoning
Map, adopted by Ordinance No. 1748, is hereby amended by changing the zoning classification of
the property described in Exhibit "A" from R4.5 to R12, subject to the conditions set forth in
Planning Commission Resolution Nos. 002-04 & 003-04 attached hereto as Attachment "C" and
"D"; except as amended as follows:
Conditions Number 9 is amended to read as follows:
9. All 36" DBH or greater trees shall be preserved and the site plan shall be modified to
accommodate their preservation unless an arborist determines such tree to be a
safety hazard due to existing or potential root, trunk or primary limb failure due to
damage or disease. The cost of the arborist report shall be at the expense of the
applicant.
The following two conditions are added:
Ordinance No. 1935
Page 3of16
50. Any plat reconfiguration will not include more than 20 lots. If the stormwater tract
is converted to residential use, the proposal shall be brought back to Council under
the provisions of a "Plat Amendment".
51. Prior to final construction approval, the applicant shall install protective screening
from light and glare to affected property owners across from the proposed plat
access. The protective screen shall consist of a 25 foot landscape strip planted
with 5 gallon laurel hedges at 3 feet on center. A one-year maintenance
agreement shall be approved by the City Engineer.
SECTION 2. This rezone is site plan specific and is subject to the City Council's
approval of the preliminary plat for "Indigo Pointe", SUBDN No. 03-01/R-1145, within 30 days of
the effective date of this Ordinance. Pursuant to Part 2, Section 11 of the City of Port Orchard
Planning and Development Procedures, any major modification, deviation, or departure from the
originally approved site plan or application shall constitute a violation of the zone adjustment
approval unless the City Council has reviewed and approved a modified site plan after conducting a
public hearing. The City Council may subject modified site plans to new conditions.
SECTION 3. This Ordinance shall be in full force and effect five (5) days after
posting and publication as required by law. A summary of this Ordinance may be published in lieu
of the entire Ordinance, as authorized by State law.
PASSED by the City Council of the City of Port Orchard, signed by the mayor and
attested by the clerk in authentication of such passage this 22nd day of March 2004.
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
City Attorney
4er' ` . G7C'
KIM E. ABEL, MAYOR
John Clauson, Councilman
Ordinance No. 1935
Page 4 of 16
ATTACHMENT A
The South 264 feet of the Southeast Quarter of the Northeast Quarter of the Northwest Quarter;
Except the West 330 feet thereof; Except roads, also the Southeast Quarter of the Northeast
Quarter of the Northwest Quarter; Except the West 454 feet and Except the South 264 feet, All in
Section 2, Township 23 North, Range 1 East, W.M., Kitsap County; Except Roads.
Ordinance No. 1935
Page 5 of 16
ATTACHMENT B
IV. FINDINGS
Subdivision
1. The administrative review finds that the proposed subdivision does not make all
appropriate provisions for the public health, safety, and general welfare as required by
Ordinance No. 1702 (Subdivision), however a revised plan meeting all the
recommended conditions could be found to serve the public use and interest. In
addition, the request for rezone does not explicitly meet the definition for medium
density residential to support the request for 12 units, it currently supports 8 units per
net useable acres, (VI-8, Section 3 of the Comprehensive Plan).
Tree Retention
2. The applicant is proposing to retain 16 of 109 (170-61) trees. Therefore 93 trees need
to be replaced at a ratio of 3:1 = 279 replacement trees or as determined by the
Council. The applicant is proposing to replace 147 trees. The tree retention plan is
not consistent with adopted requirements. Only 10% are being retained, 90% are
being removed. The Council should determine the appropriate replacement number.
Critical Areas/Habitat Management Plan
3. The Habitat Management Plan has been deemed adequate by the Department of Fish
and Wildlife.
Fire Prevention Code
4. Fire hydrants were not indicated on the plans.
5. Maximum spacing of fire hydrants is 400 feet between hydrants. This would require
two fire hydrants one located in front of lot 20 and the other located in front of lot 16.
Stormwater
6. A Level 3 downstream analysis will be required prior to final plat approval.
Water/Sewer
7. Adequate water and sewer are available to serve the proposed subdivision.
Parks
8. The proposal does include plans for parks.
Open Space
9. The proposal includes open space areas as noted on the site plan.
Ordinance No. 1935
Page 6 of 16
V. CONCLUSIONS
1. The rezone from R4.5 to R12 is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan Designation of
Medium Density Residential
2. The development should be conditioned to meet the requirements of the Critical Areas
Ordinance; and specific measures to protect the Class I Wildlife Habitat Areas.
3. The proposed development does not meet all minimum requirements of the adopted
Codes, but the proposal as conditioned, can be consistent with applicable codes for
Zonin.-, Critical Areas, Fire and the adopted Stormwater Design Manual.
4. Safe pedestrian walkways are provided by the provision of sidewalks along Goldenrod.
5. The proposed design does provide for parks.
Ordinance No. 1935
Page 7 of 16
ATTACHMENT C
CITY OF PORT ORCHARD
PLANNING COMMISSION
RESOLUTION NO. 002-04
A RESOLUTION BY THE CITY OF PORT ORCHARD PLANNING COMMISSION
RECOMMENDING THE APPROVAL OF A REZONE REQUEST (R-1145) TO REZONE A 3.97-
ACRE PARCEL FROM R 4.5 TO R12. THE PROPERTY, KNOWN AS INDIGO POINTE, IS
LOCATED AT THE SOUTH 264 FEET OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF THE NORTHEAST
QUARTER OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER; EXCEPT THE WEST 330 FEET THEREOF;
EXCEPT ROADS, ASLO THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF
THE NORTHWEST QUARTER, EXCEPT THE WEST 454 FEET AND EXCEPT THE SOUTH
264 FEET, ALL IN SECTION 2, TOWNSHIP 23 NORTH, RANGE 1 EAST, W.M., KITSAP
COUNTY; EXCEPT ROADS.
ASSESSOR'S ACCOUNT N UMBER: 022301-2-044-2000
WHEREAS, A Mitigated Determination of Non -Significance was issued on 14 February 2003; and
WHEREAS, the proposed purposes of the rezone request is to support a subdivision request to develop one
3.97-acre parcel into 20 single-family detached dwelling unit lots; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission held a Public Meeting for the Rezone on August 18; September 6;
September 15; and October 6, 2003; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission recommended denial expressing concerns outlined in Resolution Nos.
336-03 & 337-03; and
WHEREAS, the City Council held a Public Hearing for the Rezone on November 10, 2003; December 01,
2003 and December 22, 2003 in which the council clarified that °a density of up to 12 dwelling units of
single family residential detached housing is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan — Medium Density
Residential Designation; and
WHEREAS, Subsequent to the Planning Commission Meeting, the applicant submitted a revised Site Plan and
revised Habitat Management Plan; and
WHEREAS, at the December 22, 2003 hearing, the City Council remanded the application back to the
Planning Commission for their consideration of the revised application and the Council's finding that the R-
12 Zoning Designation allowing single family detached housing is appropriate within the Medium Density
Comprehensive Plan Designation; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission held a Public Meeting for the Rezone on January 21, 2004, and
continued the discussion on February 2, 2004; and
Ordinance No. 1935
Page 8 of 16
WHEREAS the Planning Commission approved the Habitat Management Plan as revised, including the
revised recommendations on page three of the revised Habitat Management Plan; and
WHEREAS the Planning Commission determined that all significant trees identified as Lack of Protection to
be removed; shall be replaced at a ratio of 3:1 to be planted at a minimum height of three feet and all non-
exempt, including the L-treesshall be replaced at the 3:1 ratio with a minimum height of three feet. The mix
of trees shall be determined by the City Engineer based on the Landscape Planting table in the zoning
ordinance (pg.169); and
WHEREAS the Planning Commission adopted the Tree Retention Plan as proposed by the applicant as
meeting the intent of the Significant Tree Ordinance; and
WHEREAS the application asconditioned is in compliance with preliminary requirementsof the City Zoning
Ordinance; and
WHEREAS theapplication asconditioned isin compliancewith preliminary requirementsof theadopted
stormwater manual and Fire Code; and,
WHEREAS the application as submitted is in compliance with preliminary requirements of the Critical Areas
Ordinance in regard to the requirements of the Habitat Management Plan; and
WHEREAS the application as submitted is in compliance with the Goals and Policies expressed in the City
Comprehensive Plan in regard to Medium Density Residential; and
WHEREAS the Planning Commission heard testimony in favor and in opposition of the proposal from the
applicantsand the community; and therefore
CONCLUSION, Based upon the facts testimony, staff report and materials presented at the meeting, we
therefore conclude the application conformsto the requirementsof the Comprehensive Plan and as such is
found to be a furtherance of the health, safety, morals, and general welfare of the goals of the community and
the City' sComprehensive Plan,
BE IT RESOLVE) that the Planning Commission of the City of Port Orchard hereby recommends that the
Council approve Rezone R-1145 subject to the conditions of preliminary plat approval, SUBDIV 03-01,
known as" Indigo Pointe".
PASSED this 2nd day of February, 2004
CITY OF PORT ORCHARD
PLANNING COMMISSION
ATTEST:
Gil Michael, Chair
Rob Wenman
City Planner
Ordinance No. 1935
Page 9 of 16
Ordinance No. 1935
Page 10 of 16
ATTACHMENT D
CITY OF PORT ORCHARD
PLANNING COMMISSION
RESOLUTION NO. 003-04
A RESOLUTION BY THE CITY OF PORT ORCHARD PLANNING COMMISSION
RECOMMENDING THE APPROVAL OF A SUBDIVISION REQUEST (SUBDN 03-01) TO
DIVIDE ONE 3.97-ACRE PARCEL INTO 20 — SINGLE FAMILY DETACHED DWELLING
UNIT LOTS; ALONG WITH A REZONE APPLICATION FROM R4.5 TO R12. THE
PROPERTY, KNOWN AS INDIGO POINTE, IS LOCATED AT THE SOUTH 264 FEET OF
THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF THE NORTHWEST
QUARTER; EXCEPT THE WEST 330 FEET THEREOF; EXCEPT ROADS, ASLO THE
SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER,
EXCEPT THE WEST 454 FEET AND EXCEPT THE SOUTH 264 FEET, ALL IN SECTION 2,
TOWNSHIP 23 NORTH, RANGE 1 EAST, W.M., KITSAP COUNTY; EXCEPT ROADS.
ASSESSOR'S ACCOUNT NUMBER: 022301-2-044-2000
WHEREAS, A Mitigated Determination of Non -Significance was issued on 14 February 2003;
and
WHEREAS, the proposed purposes of the rezone request is to support a subdivision request to
develop one 3.97-acre parcel into 20 single-family detached dwelling unit lots; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission held a Public Meeting for the Rezone on August 18;
September 6; September 15; and October 6, 2003; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission recommended denial expressing concerns outlined in
Resolution Nos. 336-03 & 337-03; and
WHEREAS, the City Council held a Public Hearing for the Rezone on November 10, 2003;
December 01, 2003 and December 22, 2003 in which the council clarified that "a density of up
to 12 dwelling units of single family residential detached housing is consistent with the
Comprehensive Plan — Medium Density Residential Designation; and
WHEREAS, Subsequent to the Planning Commission Meeting, the applicant submitted a revised
Site Plan and revised Habitat Management Plan; and
WHEREAS, at the December 22, 2003 hearing, the City Council remanded the application back
to the Planning Commission for their consideration of the revised application and the Council's
Ordinance No. 1935
Page 11 of 16
finding that the R-12 Zoning Designation allowing single family detached housing is appropriate
within the Medium Density Comprehensive Plan Designation; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission held a Public Meeting for the Rezone on January 21,
2004, and continued the discussion on February 2, 2004; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission approved the Habitat Management Plan as revised,
including the revised recommendations on page three of the revised Habitat Management Plan;
and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission determined that all significant trees identified as Lack of
Protection -to be removed; shall be replaced at a ratio of 3:1 to be planted at a minimum height
of three feet and all non-exempt, including the L-trees shall be replaced at the 3:1 ratio with a
minimum height of three feet. The mix of trees shall be determined by the City Engineer based
on the Landscape Planting table in the zoning ordinance (pg.169); and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission adopted the Tree Retention Plan as proposed by the
applicant as meeting the intent of the Significant Tree Ordinance; and
WHEREAS, the application as conditioned is in compliance with preliminary requirements of
the City Zoning Ordinance; and
WHEREAS, the application as conditioned is in compliance with preliminary requirements of
the adopted Stormwater Manual and Fire Code; and,
WHEREAS, the application as submitted is in compliance with preliminary requirements of the
Critical Areas Ordinance in regard to the requirements of the Habitat Management Plan; and
WHEREAS, the application as submitted is in compliance with the Goals and Policies expressed
in the City Comprehensive Plan in regard to Medium Density Residential; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission heard testimony in favor and in opposition of the
proposal from the applicants and the community; and therefore
CONCLUSION, Based upon the facts, testimony, staff report and materials presented at the
meeting, we therefore conclude the application conforms to the requirements of the
Comprehensive Plan and as such is found to be a furtherance of the health, safety, morals, and
general welfare of the goals of the community and the City's Comprehensive Plan,
BE IT RESOLVED that the Planning Commission of the City of Port Orchard hereby
recommends that the Council approve a request by the applicant for SUBDIV 03-01/R-1145,
subject to the following conditions:
Ordinance No. 1935
Page 12 of 16
Zoning/Land Use:
1. The Final Plat shall depict native growth vegetation buffers and easements to be noted
on the face of the plat with all the restrictions against construction or clearing in these
areas. These areas will also be fenced and addressed in the CC&R's.
2. The mitigation as listed on page 3 of the addendum to the Indigo Pointe Habitat
Management Plan shall be noted on the face of the plat, and included in the CC&R's:
• The native vegetation zones (buffers) shall be enhanced by removal of non-
native vegetation and planting of native shrubs and trees. An attached plant
list provides a variety of trees and shrubs to be considered. Evergreens and
deciduous trees shall be at least six-ft in height but less than 12-ft in height.
• Once the buffers have been planted the area shall remain as a no touch area
where only potential blow -down trees are removed. Danger trees shall be
taken down and left on the ground.
• The native vegetation and no touch zones shall be isolated with split rail fencing
prior to occupation by the new land owners.
• Lawn areas shall be limited to 20% of each lots open space. Additional open
space areas shall be planted with shrubs or native plants that are draught
tolerant and require minimal watering during summer months.
• The downspouts from the rooftop shall be directed to a sump that will infiltrate
the water into the ground water system.
• Lawn chemicals shall be limited to compost or organic fertilizers and no
pesticides shall be used on the lawns or plantings in the yards where rain runoff
can carry the chemicals to the creek or the storm drain system.
• All trees and native riparian shrubs shall be planted during the optimal season
of November to March. No trees or shrubs should be planted during the dry
cycle of the year. The trees and shrubs that are planted should be monitored
during the dry period of the year and watered if they appear to be stressed by
drought conditions. The supplier of the vegetation shall be liable for the health
of the plants for a period of no less than 5 years. The landscape firm that
plants the native vegetation zones shall prepare a monitoring plan that
addresses the issue of plant replacement and buffer condition for a period of no
less than 5 years.
• The owner (developer) of the project shall provide each buyer with a document
outlining the importance of the habitat outside the property lines in addition to
the no touch zones. This document should include Best Management Practices
for yard care, the Conservation Management Area and storm drain systems.
3. The provisions for tree and native vegetation enhancement planting shall be completed
and approved prior to final plat approval.
4. The provision for native planting of open space outside of the 20% limited to lawn area
on individual lots shall be required as a condition of building permit approval.
5. A Clearing and Grading Plan shall be submitted and approved by the department
identifying building envelopes and the significant vegetation that will remain after site
Ordinance No. 1935
Page 13 of 16
preparation is completed. Grading shall be minimized to that necessary for
construction.
6. An occupancy permit shall not be issued for any building within the Habitat
Management Area if bare soils are present or with no visible groundcover growth.
Installation of native plant species is highly encouraged. All building permit applicants
shall be made aware of this requirement prior to permit approval.
7. The streets shall meet City standards and the street shall be dedicated to the City as
Public right-of-way.
8. There shall not be any access from the lots to Goldenrod Street. All lots shall abut the
plat's public road for ingress and egress.
9. The removal of all 36DBH and greater trees shall be approved by the City Council prior
to Construction Plan approval.
10. Prior to final construction plan approval, a revised tree retention/protection plan shall
be submitted subject to the approval by the City Engineer. Tree root protection zones,
and proposed measures to protect required trees shall be included on the plan.
11. A note shall be added to the face of the plat providing that all trees selected for
retention shall remain subject to the provisions of the Tree Retention Section of the
Zoning Ordinance.
12. Danger Trees felled within the mitigation and leave areas shall be replaced at a 3:1
ratio.
13. One conifer tree measuring at least 5' in height shall be planted in the front yard, and
one in the back yard of each lot, and all planting strips shall be planted with sod prior
to final plat approval. 37 total 2.5 caliper deciduous trees measuring at least five (5)
feet in height shall be planted along each side of the roadway. All non-exempt trees
including "L" trees shall be replaced 3:1 with a minimum height of three (3) feet with a
mix approved by the City Engineer based on page 169 table Ordinance 1748.
14. A lighting plan shall be submitted and deemed acceptable to Puget Sound Energy
standards and to the City Engineer prior to placement of any outdoor illumination. At a
minimum, street illumination should be located at the entrance, lot 19 and lot 13.
15. All conditions identified by City Departments and other agencies must be met prior to
the recording of the final plat.
Fire Prevention Code:
16. Before Fire District approval, plans shall be submitted indicating fire hydrant locations.
Plans shall indicate current fire hydrant locations, as this will impact hydrant locations
within the subdivision or project. Maximum spacing of fire hydrants is 400 feet
between hydrants.
17. A minimum fire flow of 1,000 gallons per minute, measured at a residual pressure of
20 psi, is required for one- and two-family dwellings not exceeding 3,600 gross square
feet. All other buildings (including larger one and two-family dwellings) require a
minimum fire flow of 1,500 gallons per minute and may require more depending on
building size and type of construction as per Appendix III -A of the Uniform Fire Code.
18. The Fire Marshall and the City Engineer shall review and approve the construction
plans for the utilities prior to issuance of an excavation permit.
Ordinance No. 1935
Page 14 of 16
19. Before any construction on homes can begin, the fire department access must be
provided and accepted by the Fire Marshall.
Stormwater Ordinance and Design
20. Stormwater quantity control, water quality treatment, and erosion and sedimentation
control shall be designed in accordance with the City of Port Orchard Municipal Code,
Chapter 15.32 Stormwater Management or as amended at the time of
Excavation/Stormwater Permit Application.
21. Construction plans and profiles of all roads, stormwater drainage facilities and
appurtenances, prepared by the developer's engineer, shall be submitted to the City
for review and acceptance as part of the application for an Excavation/Stormwater
Permit. A civil engineer licensed in the State of Washington shall prepare the submittal
documents. The fees and submittal requirements shall be in accordance with the City
Code in effect at the time.
22. Any offsite improvements that create additional impervious surface such as lane
widening or roadway improvements are required to provide stormwater mitigation in
accordance with the City of Port Orchard Municipal Code, Chapter 15.32 Stormwater
Management.
23. The project proponent shall be responsible for installing any necessary off -site
downstream drainage improvements. Procurement of any permits or easements
necessary to install off -site improvements shall be the responsibility of the project
proponent.
24. A Level 1 Downstream Analysis is required in accordance with the Chapter 2 of the
City of Port Orchard Stormwater Design Manual.
25. The design of the stormwater quantity control facility will be in accordance to Chapter
5 of the City of Port Orchard Stormwater Design Manual.
26. The design of the stormwater quality control facility will be in accordance to Chapter 6
of the City of Port Orchard Stormwater Design Manual.
27. All stormwater system improvements will be completed prior to approval of the Final
Plat and issuance of any building permit applications.
28. When construction on a site has not been completed and approved by the City by
October 1 of a given year or exposed ground surfaces are not permanently stabilized
by that date, no work shall be permitted on the project site until Level 2 Erosion and
Sedimentation Controls have been implemented on the project site. Level 1 Erosion
and Sedimentation Controls area required on site at all times during construction.
Ordinance No. 1935
Page 15 of 16
29. The Engineer of Record shall certify that the as -built live and dead storage detention
pond volumes meet the design criteria.
30. The Engineer of Record shall certify that the as -built water quality treatment facility
meet the design criteria.
31. Contractor is responsible for permanent stabilization and restoration of the project site.
32. Submit As -built construction plans with two sets of blueprint copies to Public Works
Plan Center. As -built drawings will accurately represent construction changes
accepted by the City due to unforeseen field conditions or plan design improvements.
Include all sheets containing road and drainage plans, profiles, and associated details.
As -built drawings will be stamped RECORD DRAWING and be certified by a
professional engineer or land surveyor.
33. Submit Electronic Media of the As -built drawings for road and site layout, water and
sanitary sewer, and stormwater facilities that accurately represent construction
changes accepted by the City due to unforeseen field conditions or plan design
improvements.
34. Submit the Operation and Maintenance Manual for review and acceptance by the
Department of Public Works prior to approval of the final plat. The Manual shall be
prepared by a Professional Engineer and meet the requirements of Public Works.
a. Final Plat Map
35. Prior to final plat approval, the following documents shall be submitted to the City for
review and approval prior to recording:
36. A complete application form, including notarized signatures of the owners of record.
37. A Plat Certificate for the property (not more than 30 days old at the time of Final
submittal).
38. Perimeter lot closures for final review.
39. A Copy of the Declaration of Covenants, Conditions and Restrictions.
40. Utility easements shall be created and must appear on plat and in the covenants
before final plat recording.
Subdivision Code
41. All lots shall be surveyed and recorded.
42. A copy of all easements shall be submitted and recorded on the face of the plat.
Parks
43. Prior to Final Plat approval, the developer shall provide the City $4,000 to upgrade
playground equipment in a park determined by the City.
Ordinance No. 1935
Page 16 of 16
A. Roads
44. The Developer should provide the City with $200.00 to pay for the following signs and
posts:
45. 1 Street Sign
46. 1 Stop Sign
47. 1 Dead End Sign
Construction
48. As a good neighbor, the developer will work with the neighbors to minimize dust and
develop a plan that meets EPA requirements.
Schools
49. To reduce impact to the school system, mitigation fees will be paid at the time of
building permit issuance, if the City adopts a general implementing ordinance for
school impact fees prior to the date that a complete building permit is accepted. The
proponent can also mitigate the impact to the school system by negotiating a
settlement with the South Kitsap School District.
PASS® this2"d day of February, 2004.
CITY OF PORT ORCHARD
PLANNING COMMMON
ATTEST:
Gil Michael, Chair
Rob Wen man
City Planner
NOTICE OF CITY OF PORT ORCHARD
ORDINANCE
The following is a summary of an Ordinance approved by the Port Orchard City Council at their regular
Council meeting held March 22, 2004.
ORDINANCE NO. 1935
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY PORT ORCHARD, WASHINGTON,
AMENDING PORT ORCHARD ZONING ORDINANCE NO. 1748 BY
AMENDING THE CITY OF PORT ORCHARD ZONING MAP TO
CHANGE THE ZONING CLASSIFICATION OF CERTAIN PROPERTY
FROM R4.5 TO R12 SUBJECT TO THE CONDITIONS OF
PRELIMINARY PLAT APPROVAL FOR THE PLAT OF INDIGO POINTE,
APPLICATION NO. SUBDIV 03-011R-1145.
Copies of Ordinance No. 1935 are available for review at the office of the City Clerk of the City of Port
Orchard. Upon written request a statement of the full text of the Ordinance will be mailed to any
interested person without charge. Thirty days after publication, copies of Ordinance No. 1935 will be
provided at a nominal charge.
City of Port Orchard
Michelle Merlino
Deputy Clerk
Publish: Port Orchard Independent
March 31, 2004
Kitsaole¢als6i)soundnublishing com