The URL can be used to link to this page

10/12/2021 - PacketUtilities Committee Meeting Agenda October 121, 20211) 5:00 p.m. Pursuant to the Governor's "Stay Home - Stay Safe " Order, the City is prohibited from conducting meetings unless the meeting is NOT conducted in -person and instead provides options for the public to attend through telephone access, internet or other means of remote access, and also provides the ability far persons attending the meeting (not in person) to hear each other at the same time. Therefore, Remote access only Link: https:llusD2web.zoom.usli/87233803406 Webinar ID: 872 3380 3406 2021 Water CFC Updates — Presentation Storm Drainage Comprehensive Plan — Update: McCormick Sewer PS 91 Repairs — Update Proposed PW FTE — Discussion: o Water Cross Connection Control Program o Stormwater Utility IDDE Program o Wastewater FOG Program Pottery Sewerage LS Emergency Repair — Update 390 — 580 Zone Old Clifton Road Intertie — ARPA Funds Public Works Board Awards — Update- * Sewer Lift Stations (Control Upgrades) 0 390 Zone Low Pressure Booster Station o Melcher Pump Station Rehabilitation Foster Pilot Pro]ect — Update o Draft Modeling & Impact Analysis Submitted o Update Conceptual Mitigation & Augmentation Plan - 2022 o Record of Examination (ROE) Approval - 2023 2019 Water System Plan - Update Next Meeting: November 9, 2021 Future Aeenda Items: ■ Splash Pad — Update ■ McCormick Water Campus (580 Res, Well #12 & Main) -Update ■ Well #11 DOH-DWSRF $5M Loan —2022 ■ Well #13 DOH-DWSRF $5M Loan - 2023 ■ 2022 (Consumer Confidence) Water Quality Report ■ 2021 NPDES Phase II Annual Report ■ Option to Levy Excise Taxes on WIS ■ Bay Street - Street Lighting & Marquee ■ Water System Fluoridation ■ Sanitary Side Sewer Policy Back to Agenda This CREDIT AGREEMENT FOR CAPITAL FACILITY CHARGES {"Credit Agreement') is entered into between the City of Port Orchard, a Washington municipal corporation ("City" or "Port Orchard") and McCormick Communities, LLC, a Washington limited liability company ("McCormick"). City and McCormick are each a "Party" and together the "Parties" to this Credit Agreement. RECITALS A. The City owns and operates a municipal water system that services the areas known as McCormick Woods and McCormick West, which together comprise hundreds of acres of land owned by McCormick as depicted in Exhibit A (the "McCormick Property'). B. Many acres of the McCormick Property have received preliminary plat approval, and other acres have received final plat approval, and McCormick has sold some of the resulting lots to builders. C. One area of the McCormick Property is served by the City of Bremerton water system, but the majority of the McCormick Property is served by the McCormick Woods water system which is owned and operated by the City of Port Orchard, and is within the area previously served by the McCormick Water Company, Inc. On September 1, 1998 the City purchased the assets of the McCormick Water Company, Inc. and undertook by contract the obligation to serve the McCormick Property "1998 PSA" . C—D. On December 30, 2015 McCormick Communities, LLC purchased the assets of McCormick Land CoMmy and GEM I. LLC and assigned the obligations thereof with certain exceptions. This purchase and assignment included all rights and interest to all entitlements. including water and water rights as well as all claims. Therefore. McCormick is the only remaining -party (apart from the City) with an interest in the 1998 PSA. E. Due to a variety of reasons, including the Foster v. Devartment ofEcoloery decision regarding water rights, tie City has been unable to provide water to the McCormick Property as agreed _to in AufAhe 1998 e4a4w4PSA on the schedule desired by McCormick. If the City could not timely provide these water services, then under the 1998 PSA McCormick has the right to select a different purveyor to provide water service for fiutu re development. Instead, McCormick desires to construct the additional needed public facilities to serve its future development and the City has agreed to provide credits for water connection fees as reimbursement as authorized in POMC 13.04.030. D-.F_On July 10, 2007, Port Orchard and the prior owner of the McCormick Property, GEM 1, LLC ("GEM") entered into a REIMBURSEMENT AGREEMENT FOR ❑TILTTY SYSTEM IMPROVEMENTS ("2007 Agreement'), in which the City and GEM agreed CREDIT AGREEMENT FOR CAPITAL FACILITY CHARGES Page 1 FG:535M94.5 1445653.14 - 366922 -0029 that the City was "unable to fLnd" the Water Facilities described and depicted in Exhibit A to this 2007 Agreement, which were needed to serve the McCormick Property, and the City and GEM agreed that if GEM constructed these Water Facilities, GEM would receive reimbursement as described in this 2007 Agreement. -&G. GEM chose not to construct these Water Facilities, but the 2007 Agreement remains in effect and McCormick as owner and developer of the McCormick Property is GEM's successor-im-interest to the 2007 Agreement_ H. On February 9, 2021 the City Council approved the FIRST AMENDMENT TO 2007 REIMBURSEMENT AGREEMENT FOR UTILrrY SYSTEM IMPROVEMENTS {"First Amendment") in which the City and McCormick agreed to amend the list of projects in the 2007 Agreement, and McCormick agreed to (1) improve the City's Well 12 water campus; (2) construct a new 580 zone reservoir up to 1.1 million gallons in size; (3) construct a second transmission main between the new 580 zone reservoir and the then -existing water system within McCormick Woods, in order to facilitate future separation of the Port Orchard and Bremerton water systems; and to (4) drill and make operational a pilot well at the proposed location of a new Well 12. -F-I. Pursuant to the First Amendment. the Parties also a reed to ne otiate in 2ood faith to enter into subsequent 6greementsl to (1) determining appropriate reimbursement for McCormick's Well 12 project; f2) address construction of a future 660 Zone reservoir and booster pump station; (3) address construction of traffic improvements; (4) extend existing entitlements: and (55,) address full waiver of McCorrick's claims against the City and the parties' aUeernent on satisfaction of performance under the 1998 PSA. Back to Agenda Catrnented [IMUI: Se Sections 4 and 10 &First n C-]_Pursuant to this First Amendment, McCormick is constructing these improvements to the City's water system at a cost of approximately �3.4 ion, for which McCormick is Co.trrtettted [mi]: Cost isa t car+f�dyd, so aeedto oeafy receiving $1,000 reimbursement per equivalent residential unit ("ERU') within the ibis rmmbcr heko fia=g ate_ McCormick Property that connects to the City's water system. McCormick expects to receive, over time, approximately $1.7 million in reimbursement for approximately 1,713 lots that have received preliminary plat approval, resulting in a shortfall in reimbursement of approximately $1.7 million. -If the City were to A%pproveal by the Ci-y of additional lots in the future. this may result in reduce 44s-- he projected shortfall 5-4 millielt. I.K. At least five additional improvements to the City's water system are needed to enable the City to serve the McCormick Property. The City has included these five additional improvements in the current Capital Improvement Plan that the City Council adopted by Ordinance No. 022-21 on May 11, 2021. These improvements, hereinafter described as the "Five CIP Projects" are: Commented [JM31= Heimhmsemng to MC ror tim project a. CEP No. 9: Well 12 Development, Treatment, and Booster Pump Station heady aunder the First Amendment- ( $ 7.000,000) CREDIT AGREEMENT FOR CAPITAL FACILrI`Y CHARGES Page 2 FG-53519394.5 1445653.14 - 366922 -0029 b. CIP No. 13: 390 to 580 Zone Booster Station, 2nd Lift c. CIP No. 14: 390 to 580 Zone Transmission Main (to Glenwood d. CIP No. 15: 580 to 660 Zone Booster Station; f$750,000) e. CIPNo. 16: 660 Zone Storage ($2,850.000) 4nL. The CEP estimates the total cost of these Five CEP Projects to be L Q'",�z,--�L,^^^11,840,625.; M. The Five CIP PPprojects must be constructed in order for the City to supply water to the McCormick Property as agreed -to in the 1998 P S A between the City and the McCormick Water Company. -1. N. In addition. avnroval of water riahts for Well 12 and the Citv's Well 11 nroiects are needed in order to provide adequate water supplies for McCormick's development and the City at large. The City is working diligently as part of the Foster pilot proawn to secure these water lights. However, whether these water rights are ultimately Secured and on what schedule is out of the City's hands. O. These Five CIP Projects will enable the City to serve not only the McCormick Property, but also existing and future development outside the McCormick Property. The 660 Zone Storage (CIP No. 16), together with the 580 Zone eStorage that McCormick is constructing pursuant to the First Amendment, will increase the City's total water storage capacity by 50% in all pressure zones. The 660 Zone Storage will be located at one of the highest elevations in the City, which will enable this storage, together with the transmission facilities being constructed by McCormick, to serve the entire City in the event of shortfalls in water supply or storage in other areas of the City. YP_Both the 580 and the 660 zone water storage being constructed by McCormick are sized to serve areas outside of the McCormick Property, and to serve all future growth in the 580 pressure zone. Without these improvements, rya limited number of new homes e-a�t could be constructed in the McCormick Property or in any of the other properties in the 580-pressure zone unless Port Orchard and Bremerton entered into an updated agreement for Port Orchard to buy additional water supplies for an extended period. I-QThe drilling and activation of Well 12 will provide added supply to the City's current 580 pressure zone so that Port Orchard will no longer need to purchase water from the City of Bremerton. This will enable Port Orchard, together with its activation of Well 11, to separate its water system from Bremerton's, so that Port Orchard can manage its water quality policy (e,g., provide fluoridation) independently. CREDIT AGREEMENT FOR CAPITAL FACILITY CHARGES Page 3 FG-53519394.5 1445653.14-366922-0029 Back to Agenda Commented []SR4]: This is part o£MrPrk's project work as a regwed component to complete the mleme so needs to be included m this list m order for MC to get CFC medds: for this work Ahn, the City will need to obtain the Fly nghts. (dedication m easenrrt) for die land where ffiis is located. Commented [ISR51: City estimates 9 d MC is building 25% of the CIPpmUect, &_ t- this mmi er repreamts 25%ofCIPIC FC alko don- Back to Agenda M-R_In anticipation of execution of this Credit Agreement, McCormick has commenced work on the Five CIP Projects and at the time of execution of this Credit Agreement has expended approximately $500,000 towards design and construction. N:S_In order for the City to fulfill its obligations to provide water to the McCormick Property under the 1998 PSA, and in order for McCormick to continue to develop its property, the City and McCormick agree as follows: - AGREEMENT The City and McCormick affirm that the First Amendment to 2007 Reimbursement Agreement for Utility System Improvements remains in effect, as do the un-amended sections of the 2007 Reimbursement Agreement. 2. McCormick will finance and construct the Five CIP Projects described in Recital -I;� as described in the Summary of Improvements attached to this Credit Agreement. The Parties recognize and agree that McCormick's scope of work and this Summary of Improvements may change as these Projects are engineered, and such changes will be discussed'Mth the City. and, if approved. will be reflected in future CIPs. As partial compensation, McCormick will receive credit against CFC charges for each ERU developed within the McCormick Property. This credit shall be toe pepeensage ^f fixed dollar amount which will reflect the costs of the 4he r1,r _wart_ tt#. i __. ,,, _ ie .tom_ Five CIP Projects, divided by the number of ERUs that McCormick is expected to develop within the McCormick Property 2 DOD J. The estimated maximum amount of credit at the time of this Agreement is $11,840,625. The fixed credit amount will be increased by CPI-U annually consistent with the City's automatic adjustment to the CFC charges in accordance with POMC 13.04.065. vary in the a,+ue as the City .,.outs ^^ For example, the current CFC charge is $11.572 and the estimated maximum fixed credit is $5,920. This $5.920 will be adjusted each year in accordance with the CPI-U referenced in POMC 13.04.065. 4. At the time of execution of this Credit Agreement this maximum credit amolult is estimated to beealexlaied as follows: a. the CFC charge is $11,571 per ERU; b. the cost of the Five CIP Projects to be funded by CFCs is $14-A:7911,840,625 millio c. the number of ERUs that McCormick reasonably expects to develop over 20 years is 2,D0D; d. dividing S "' `'„�z-�'.s0411,840,625.^'�'" ^^ by 2,000 ERUs results in a credit per ERU of $;,"� �'.5Q5,920.DD, so that the CFC paid per ERU within the McCormick property is $ 4 - 505.651.00 based on the current CFC charge of 11 571. CREDIT AGREEMENT FOR CAPITAL FACILITY CHARGES Page 4 FG-53519394.5 1445653.14 - 366922 -0029 McCormick and the City anticipate that McCormick will construct the Five CIP Projects within the next five years (although drilling of Well 12 may take longer because the City needs to first secure water rights under the Foster program, but McCormick will receive the anticipated credit per ERU over the next 20 years. When the $4-0-9; l 1. 40.625 m:,,iea-invested by McCormick in the Five CIP Projects is adjusted for the time value of money over 20 years, the additional financing cost to McCormick is betweenIS1,933,991 and $2,544,9006 depending on the rate at which new ERUs are develo financing cost is not reimbursable under this CFC Credit Agreement. it presents value to the City and supports the City entering into this Agreement with McCormick and provides significant public benefit for the Development Agreements under which the plats listed below may be extended. 6. McCormick will finance, design, and construct the Five CIP Proiects to comely with City and other applicable standards, inclu dins obtaining all necessary permits. This includes, as applicable, review and approval by the Washington State Department of Health, Office of Drinking Water. The City will approve the plans before construction begins. .6-7. As additional consideration to McCormick for financing and developing the Five CEP Projects, the City and McCormick are simultaneously, together with the execution of this Credit Agreement, also executing amendments to the following agreements to extend the periods of preliminary plat approval of the subdivisions within the McCormick Property that create the lots whose development will create the ERUs for which the City will Back to Agenda Commmented [IM61: McCo midcmayneedto update these mmLers ifthe dranmes to the aF numbers atrect these numbers — charge CFCs: a. Development Agreement McCormick North Phase III, recording Commented []SR7]: ThBpW is ewrenllym proms fix as 201012210340. "' a" ar"`- The new eapuntm date will be pushed °at_ Tf we want to extend this beyond that new expiration date, then that DA should b. Annexation Agreement No. 085-11, McCormick West, recording number be processed with the Amendment. 201112190136,and c. Development Agreement for McCormick Woods Phases III, IV, and V Preliminary Plats, recording number 201309160217; -8. This Credit Agreement is effective immediately upon its execution and shall continue for a term of 20 years. AgFeefaeat if the mafket does not allow MeGemimiek to develep i4s lots and obtain �he .9-9. McCormick shall by December of each year provide a report. signed and stamped by a licensed engineer and accompanied by supporting documentation, to the City demonstrating ef-the approximate ongoing_total of its investment in the Five CIP Projects, together with the approximate total of credits per ERU received within the McCormick Oroperti Provided however, 494o te-ae as each of the Five Protects is commenced, McCormick's shall post a bond for completion of that project in order to secure its completion and transfer to the City. This shall be required in order to have credits apply in accordance Mth this Agreement. However, the costs of such bond(s) may CREDIT AGREEMENT FOR CAPITAL FACILITY CHARGES Page 5 FG-53519394.5 1445653.14 - 366922 -0029 Commented []SR8]: This section needs more wo& the City is concerned abort (1) receiving project completion (accepting a real asset in exchange for the credits); and (2) —Irmg sorethe value of the work slays well ahead of the credits being issued by the City. We are willing to work with MC to � the bonding costs. A cash set aside is also an option if MC is interested m that Let's diseusa options drat work with both parties. Back to Agenda be included in the credit calculation. provided however. that the credit in no case may exceed the total amount in the City's CIP for these Five Projects. Bonds may be released for each of the Five Projects in accordance with the requirements for project completion contained in POMC 13.04.030. a. H,o r��!" ., Iv aits it 1, as I I a A,oA ., h..,,A shall ba i:e ffm4ed 4A 4Tp"--.•,.,;. k f rho T;W C.7n Pi:aj o..r.. 7„ tha even t that A/f..h.,...,-,:. k,S outstanding i a-w4, o.,r be p Qm o�; Iasi; H, R., $4 nn nnn bQp R IIsa "H,o rnr ..,adi#- it 11aSPOG AiV@4 410 City, @NF ,•.,,RRG0 10. McCormick Shall Chant Property Rights to the City. All intellectual data, including but not limited to engineering work, surveys, plan sets, and designs initiated by McCormick and its engineers and/or consultants for the Five CIP Projects shall be provided to the City upon request and McCormick will provide the City Alth ownership lights in the intellectual data so that if McCormick fails to complete any of the Projects. the City will have all of the rights necessary to utilize the intellectual data in order to complete the work. In addition. McCormick agrees that for any real property where any portion of any of the Five CIP Projects is located that is not in currently the City's ownership at the time this Agreement is executed, that McConnick Mll provide property lights to the City. in the fonn of an easement or dedication. that Aill provide the City all of the lights necessary to enter and utilize that property in perpetuity for the purposes of ouninR. operating, maintaining. improving. expanding, or constructing water facilities. These property rights shall be provided to the City no later than the time period described in Section 11 below, however, if McCormick fails to complete the Projects} in accordance with this Agreement. McConnick Aill be required to promptly transfer the property rights to the City upon its default or abandonment of work on the Project(s). 11. Completion of Five CIP Projects. With the exception of the Well 12 Project which may be delayed due to water rights issues. McCormick agrees that it will complete the Five CIP Projects Althin five (5) years of the execution date of this Agreement. Well 12 shall be completed within this five-year performance period, or within 12 months of the granting of the required water rights, whichever period is longer. Upon completion of each of the Five CIP Projects as outlined hereumder, the City may accept responsibility for the operation in accordance with POMC 13.04.030 provided construction is completed. the Project has been accepted, any transfer property documents are completed. accepted. and recorded. and a two-year warranty and maintenance bond is in place. such acceptance not to be unreasonably conditioned. withheld or denied. In accordance Mth POMC 13.04.030(6). the Proiect will be deemed completed when all of the following occurs: 1. The City deems it substantially complete; 2. All punch list items are finished: 3. The improvement passes final inspection: 4. McCormick has put a two-year warranty and maintenance bond in place: 5. The City releases the perfonnance bond Lif applicable): 6. McCormick has completed all property dedications: 7. McCormick has provided the City with a Bill of Sale for the improvements containing the certified construction costs (stamped by licensed engineer) to the City for determination of the maximum credits available under this Aueement: and S. The City Council accepts the proiect as public. The CREDIT AGREEMENT FOR CAPITAL FACILITY CHARGES Page 6 FG-53519394.5 1445653.14-366922-0029 Back to Agenda City will confirm completeness of the CIP Project by issuing a Final Notice of Completeness to the Developer. 12. 9—Certification of Project Costs. Upon completion of each of the Five CIP Projects as described in Section 11 above. McCormick shall ;;PP34da th^ !-+4.—;4h ^{ of this AgFeement may not exceed these actLwl-e bmit certified project costs to the City for review and acceptance by the City Engineer. Once these costs and the executed Bill of Sale are reviewed and accepted by the City Engineer, not to be unreasonably withheld, conditioned, or delayed the Maximum Water CFC Credit due to McCormick will be established and will equal the Maximum CFC Credit as so certified in accordance with this Section 12. If the Maximum Water CFC Credit due is less than the Maximum Allowable Credit based on the certifications. then the City will continue to apply the $5.920 credit (as adjusted by CPI-U) until the Maximum Water CFC Credit reimbursement is reached, or this Agreement expires. whichever occurs first. McCormick acknowledges that this may result in some of the 2.000 ERUs receiving no for a partial) CFC credit as the full reimbursement is reached. 13. Satisfaction of 1998 PSA. The Parties recognize and agree that ^^^°-'-1VtiQ13 ^fth^ Tli— C-4P P jeete in accordance Alth Section 9 of the First Amendment to the 2007 Reimbursement Agreement for Utility System Improvements. the execution of this Credit Agreement may a9t be s„ff:eient .^ 444y satisfyies the City's obligations under the September 1, 1998 Agreement for Purchase and Sale of Assets of McCormick Water Company, Inc., assurned the 12osition of MLC/GEM 1 under the 1998 PSA hereb aives nv and all [JM91= s� secbm9 &Fast Am=lmetto 20D7 claims, whether currently existing now- or arising in the future, asainst City that arise out walunt of its performance under the 1998 PSA. This waiver shall be broadly construed. 44-14. Non -Waiver of Breach. The failure of a Party to insist upon strict performance of any of the covenants and agreements contained herein, or to exercise any option herein conferred in one or more instances shall not be construed to be a waiver or relinquishment of said covenants, agreements, or options, and the same shall be and remain in full force and effect. 4L15. Resolution of Disputes and Governing Law. If any dispute arises between the City and McCormick under any of the provisions of this Credit Agreement, jurisdiction of any resulting litigation shall be filed in Kitsap County Superior Court, Kitsap County, CREDIT AGREEMENT FOR CAPITAL FACILITY CHARGES Page 7 FG-53519394.5 1445653.14 - 366922 -W29 Back to Agenda Washington. This Agreement shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of the State of Washington. The non -prevailing party in any action brought to enforce this Agreement shall pay the other parties' expenses and reasonable attorneys fees. 444-16. Written Notice. All written communications regarding enforcement or alleged breach of this Credit Agreement shall be sent to the parties at the addresses listed below, unless notified to the contrary. Unless otherwise specified, any written notice hereunder shall become effective upon the date of both emailing and mailing by registered or certified mail, and shall be deemed sufficiently given if sent to the addressee at the address stated below: 16RKIINFL11AEM Eric Campbell 12332 NE 115th Place Kirkland, WA 9803 3 eric&msl22roupl1c.com Nick Tosti 805 Kirkland Avenue, Suite 200 Kirkland, WA 98033 nicktostiffgmail.com Cf1Y11A Rob Putaansuu, Mayor City of Port Orchard 216 Prospect Street Port Orchard WA 98366 muta ansutiacityofportorchard. us A copy shall also be transmitted to the City Clerk at the above address. 44-17. Assignment. Before completion of the Five CEP Projects, any assignment of this Credit Agreement by McCormick without the written consent of the City, which shall not unreasonably be withheld, shall be void. McCormick may assign this Credit Agreement after completion of the Five CEP Projects by giving written notice of assignment to the City. 4-5-18. Modification. No waiver, alteration, or modification of any of the provisions of this Credit Agreement shall be binding unless in writing and signed by a duly authorized representative of the City and McCormick. 4�19. Severability. The provisions of this Credit Agreement are declared to be severable. If any provision of this Credit Agreement is for any reasons held to be invalid or unconstitutional by a court of competent jurisdiction, such invalidity or unconstitutionality shall not affect the validity or constitutionality of any other provision. 4 -20. The Parties agree to perform all obligations under this Credit Agreement in good faith and with due diligence. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed this Agreement on this _ day of October, 40492021. CREDIT AGREEMENT FOR CAPITAL FACILITY CHARGES Page 8 FG-53519394.5 1445653.14-366922-0029 Back to Agenda MCCORNUCK COMMUIITFIES, LLC By: Its: APPROVED AS TO FORM: [arrwela01aID) .t4plR►N11 By: Its: Mayor APPROVED AS TO FORM: Patrick Schneider Jennifer S. Robertson Attorney for McCormick Conu mities Attorney for Port Orchard ATTEST: Brandy Rinearson Port Orchard City Clerk CREDIT AGREEMENT FOR CAPITAL FACILITY CHARGES Page 9 FG-53519394.5 1445653.14 - 366922 -W29 Back to Agenda STATE OF WASHINGTON ) ) ss. COUNTY OF KTTSAP ) I certify that I know or have satisfactory evidence that Mr. Rob Putaansuu is the person who appeared before me, and said person acknowledged that he signed this instrument, on oath stated that he was authorized to execute the instrument and acknowledged it as the Mayor of Port Orchard to be the free and voluntary act of such party for the uses and purposes mentioned in the instrument. Dated: 20 (print - type name) NOTARY PUBLIC m and for the State of Washington, residing at: My Commission expires: CREDIT AGREEMENT FOR CAPITAL FACILITY CHARGES Page 10 FG-53518394.5 1445653.14 - 366922 -W29 Back to Agenda STATE OF WASHINGTON ) ss. COUNTY OF ) I certify that I know or have satisfactory evidence that Mr. is the person who appeared before me, and said person acknowledged that (he/she) signed this instrument, on oath stated that (he/she) was authorized to execute the instrument and acknowledged it as the _ of McCormick Communities. LLC to be the free and voluntary act of such party for the uses and purposes mentioned in the instrument. Dated: 20 (print - type name) NOTARY PUBLIC in and for the State of Washington, residing at: My Commission expires: CREDIT AGREEMENT FOR CAPITAL FACILITY CHARGES Page 11 FG-53518394.5 1445653.14 - 366922 -W29 Back to Agenda Table 1. Phase 1 Capital Improvement Projects Proble m Solutio Phase I I Project ID Project Name Basin Descript n Scope Type ion Identify a Replace reference undersize reach and The two d culverts conducta existing with fish site culverts passable assessmen are box t to undersize culverts or determine Culvert d for fish a bridge. the Retrofits 1 Anderson Creek Culvert Retrofits Anderson Creek passage Coordinat necessary or and have a the culvert Replacem not been project size. ent 8 able to be with water Develop a inspected main summary in the past replaceme sheet, 10 years. nt on Old figure, and Clifton analogous Road. cost estimate. Replace the failing The culvert Develop a existing with new project culvert is modem summary failing, fish sheet and which is passable figure. The culvert. details in impairing The 30% the Culvert upstream design has summary Retrofits 2 Annapolis Creek Culvert Replacement Annapolis Creek estuary conditions been sheet and or ,and completed cost Replacem contributi by Reid estimate ent e ng to local Middleton will come flooding Currently from and in the design process of work that property selecting a is damage. preferred underway. alternative 5eptember2021 V HERRERA Draft City of Port Orchard 5tormwaterand Mtersheds Program Capital Improvement Projects 1 Back to Agenda Replace Identify a the failing reference culvert reach and with new conducta modern site The fish assessmen existing passable t to culvert at culvert. determine Culvert SE Coordinat the Retrofits 3 SE Sal monberry Road Lower Blackjack Creek Culvert Replacement Lower Blackjack Creek Salmonber e with necessary or ry Road Bethel and culvert Replacem crossing Sedgwick size. ent d has Read Develop a collapsed. Corridor summary Stormwate sheet, r figure, and Improvem analogous ent cost ro'ects. estimate. The Restore mainstem natural Develop of channel conceptua Blackjack configurati I solution Creek and ❑n and for floodplain the function restoratio surrvundi on n of fluvial Floodplain ng blackjack process and 4 Blac kj ac k Creek Flo odplain Restoration and Stormwater Management Lower BlackjackCreek floodplain Creek to and Stream are improve floodplain Restorati❑ impaired. function, The stormwate summary n floodplain sheet, currently treatment, figure, and infiltration, lacks analogous adequate and water cost water storage estimate. for low storage. flows. September2021 HERRERA Draft City of Port Orchard Storrnwaterand Watersheds Program Capital Improvement Piojects 2 Back to Agenda Conduct There are site multiple storm assessmen outfalls t to that need confirm rehabil itati existing conditions Outfall on. The and Condition outfalls Rehabilitat develop Assessmeconceptua 5 Blackjack Creek Storm Outfall Assessment and Retrofits Lower BlackjackCreek have a the nadequat outfalls. ntarid I solutions. Rehabilitat e energy Create a ion dissipation summary infiltration, sheet, {figure, and and water analogous quality treatment, c ost _ estimate. Construct adequatel Oid and y sized undeirsize stormwate d r stormwate conveyanc Conduct r e hydrologic infrastruct infrastruct modeling ure is ure to sire the resulting throughou regional in t the facility. frequent neighborh Develop flooding ood and conceptua stormwate of the construct I plan for roadway a regional conveyanc r Conveyan 5 Central Sidney 5tormwater Improvements Downtown -County Campus and facility/ a systemce and private stormwate and Water properly. r park to regional ❑ stormwate provide facility r runoff flow location.. Treatment currently control Create a discharges and water summary untreated quality sheet, to treatment figure, and Unnamed in analogous Stream accordant cost negatively a with estimate. affecting current aquatic stormwate organisms. r requireme nts. September2021 H E R RE RA Draft City of Port Orchard Stonnvote rand Watersheds Program Capital Improvement Projects 3 Back to Agenda The Develop Downtow project The n Basin summary Downtow Stormwate sheets and n-County r Plan is figures for Campus underway. approxima Basin has It includes tely five inadequat infrastruct projects. Stormwate e ure, The details r 7 Downtown Basin Stormwater Upgrades Downtown -County Campus convey condition in the Cvnveyan ce and e, wateerr assessmen summary Water quality t, and sheet and Quality treatment, modeling. cost and flow The work estimate Treatment control to will define will come manage approxima from the Stormwate tely five Downtow r runoff. new n Basin capital Stormwate - -projects, r Plan. Identify a reference reach and There are conducta multiple site undersize Remove assessmen d fish undersize tto barrier d culverts determine Culvert B Glenwood Road Ruby Creek Culvert Replacement Ruby Creek culverts nd the necessary Retrofits replacep ❑r drainage with fish culvert Replacem Issues passable sizes. ent a Develop a near culverts. Glenwood summary sheet, Road. figure, and analogous cost estimate. September2021 4 HERRE RA Draft City of Port Orchard Stormwaterand Watersheds Program Capital Irnprovement Projects Back to Agenda Realign Conduct Johnson desktop Creek and and field There are Pon assessmen Orchard t to 18 fish Boulevard determine barrier to restore road a n d culverts alongstream stream Culvert channel Johnson alignment Retrofits function and and fish locations many of Replacem g Johnson Creek Stream Realignment Johnson Creek which are passage, for new ent" (Full This will culverts. Stream unnecessa involve Develop ry, Realignme Johnson removing alternative ntj the 18 s analysis Creek also culverts with has and summary alignment potentially sheet, issues. installing figure, and fish analogous passable cost culverts, estimate. Remove two 30" The pipes in Conduct the field Johnson easement assessmen Creek and t to define estuary restore estuary has been the footprint. Estuary Filed by estuary.Develop Johnson Creek Estuary Restoration Johnson Creek developm p a Restoratio 10 ent and This will summary n require sheet, contains property figure, and potentiaily acquisition analogous contamina at the cost ted soils. mouth of estimate. Johnson Creek. U HERRERA 5eptember2021 Draft City of Port Orchard 5ton-nwaterand Watersheds Program Capital Improvement Projects Back to Agenda Identify a reference reach and There are conducta th ree site failing Remove assessmen culverts the three t to along failing determine Culvert McCormic culverts the Retrofits 11 McCormick Woods Drive Culvert Barrier Replacement Anderson Creek k Woods and necessary or Drive that replace culvert Replacem need to with fish sizes. ent a be passable Develop a removed culverts. summary and sheet, replaced. figure, and analogous cost estimate. Sta rmwate r outfalls in the Confirm Eastern number of Shoreline Acquire ❑utfalls on are not access to public and accessible all for shoreline private 12 Port Orchard East Shoreline Acquisition and Easement Right Lower Black'ackCreek 1 inspection properties property. Develop a Shoreline Acquisitio and east of maintenan Rockwell summary n ce. The Park to sheet, figure, figure, and shoreline eastern is city limit. cu rrentiy cost i naccessi bl estimate. e to the public, ber2021 �:J HERRERA Draft City of Port Orchard 5ton'nwaterand Watersheds Prograrn Capital Improvement Projects Back to Agenda The Rockwell Area has inadequat e water quality treatment. The area also has a high Develop groundwa conceptua ter table I plan for and steep Install water grade water quality resulting quality treatment 13 Rockwell Area Stormwater Improvements Lower Blackjack Creek in high treatment system(s). Water Quality stormwate system(s) Create a Treatment rflow forthe summary rates and Rockwell sheet, sediment Area. figure, and accumulati analogous on at the cost following estimate. intersectio ns: Bay Street and Seattle Avenue; Bay Street and Rockwell Avenue. September2021 HERRERA Draft City of Port Orchard Sto rmwate r a nd Watersheds Program Capital Improvement Projects Back to Agenda Conduct desktop and field assessmen Ross Install t to Creek and beaver identify the dam locations surroundi analogs or for beaver ng other in- dam floodplain stream analogs or Floodplain are elements other in- and 14 Ross Creek Beaver Dam Analogs Installation Ross Creek impaired. to stream Stream The improve elements Restoratio floodplain floodplain along n currently connectivi Ross lacks ty in the Creek. adequate most Develop a water effective summary storage. areas. sheet, figure, and analogous cost Restore estimate. Conduce a The Ross estuary desktop function and field Creek estuary is and assessmen impaired processes t to define Estuary and there in Ross estuary Restoratio 15 Ross Creek Estuary Restoration and Beach Recreation Area Ross Creek is limited Creek and footprint. n public open Develop a Shoreline privately summary Acquisiti❑ recreation owned sheet, n access beaches figure, and the nearby for analogous beaches. recreation cost activities. estimate. 5eptember2021 iO HERRERA Draft City of Port Orchard Sturmwater and Watersheds Program Capital Improvement Projects Back to Agenda Identify a reference reach and conducta site assessmen t to determine There is a the failing necessary culvert culvert under size. Sidney Replace Develop a Culvert Road SW. the culvert summary Retrofits 1 b ° Sidney Road SW Ruby Creek Culvert Replacement and Bridge Installation Ruby Creek The culvert is a under sheet, figureand , or `nr fish barrier Sidney analogous us Replacem due toe Road SW. ent plunge estimate pool and that builds elevation from the drop. estimate already available from the Brian Abbott grant applicatio Silver n. Conduct a Creek, a site Type F assessmen Floodplain tributary Redirect t to define to flow into a a and Blackjack deep pipe, conceptua Stream Creek, trapezoida I solution. Restoratio 17 Silver Creek Rehabilitation Lower Blackjack Creek requires I channel, Develop n rehabilitate or through summary Stormwate on to private sheet, r Ccnveyan restore its property. figure, and original analogous Ce fluvial cost function. estimate. September2421 e4 HERRERA DraftCity of Fort Orchard Sto rm v4a te r a n d Watersheds Program Capital Improvement Projects Back to Agenda Identify a reference reach and There is a conducta failing fish Remove site harrier culvert under assessmen culvert Sedgwick t to under Road and determine Culvert 5edgwick the Retrofits 18 South Blackjack Creek Culvert Removal and Bridge Installation Lower Blackjack Creek Road. The replace necessary or culvert with a bridge Replacem large span needs to bridge size. ent a be Develo a P removed Coordinat summary and a with TIP sheet, replaced. � projects. figure, and analogous Cost estimate. September 2021 4 HERRERA ❑raft City of Port Orchard Sto rmwa te r a nd Watersheds Program Capital Improvement Projects 10 Back to Agenda Old and undersize d stormwate r infrastruct ure is resulting in frequent flooding on Sherman Avenue and private property Conduct in nearby hydrologic cul-de- modeling sacs. Construct to size the There is a regional regional no visible facility facility. stormwate that Develop r includes conceptua conveyanc infiltration. I plan for Water 19 b South Sidney Regional Facility Lower Blackjack Creek e system This regional Quality nearby. project facility Treatment stormwate will location. r runoff require Create a currently property summary discharges acquisition sheet, untreated figure, and to analogous Blackjack cost Creek estimate. negatively affecting aquatic organisms. There is also a need for residential pedestrian connectivi ty between Brava Terrace and South Sidney. 5eptembeMal DraftCity of Port Orchard 5torrnwaterand Watersheds Program Capital Irnprovement Projects HERRERA 101 Back to Agenda Old and undersize d sto rmwate r infrastruct u re is resulting in localized flooding. There is Develop currently conceptua no water I plan for quality Install water treatment quality in the stormwate treatment 5tormwate area, r and r Stormwate conveyanc conveyanc Conveyan 20 Westbay Stormwater Improvements Lower Blackjack Creek r runoff a and a ce and currentiy water upgrades. Water discharges quality Create a Quality untreated treatment infrastruct summary Treatment to Sinclair sheet, Inlet ure. figure, and negatively analogous affecting cost aquatic estimate. organisms. The area has steep slopes and limited right-of- way, making this a difficult project. Notes: a. All culvert projects require reference reach measurement of the following: bank full width (BFW), channel slope, qualitative sediment gradation, large woody material( LWM ),and stream flows. b. Priority projectfor the City. September2021 Draft City of Port Orchard Stormwater and Watersheds Program Capital Improvement Projects 8P HERRERA 12 Back to Agenda Table 2. Projects by Other City Departments [Does not include all projects in the TIP]. Stormwater Component Problem ID Project Name Basin Lead Department Description and Potential Solution There is inadequate treatment and storage for stormwater associated with SE Saimonberry Road to SE Lund Avenue roadway improvements. Install bioretention swales abutting the roadway on 1 Bethel and Sedgwick Road Corridor Phase 4 Lower Blackjack Creek both sides to treat the stormwater. Place curb cuts Public Works (Streets) every 30 feet to allow the runoff to enter the bioretention swale. Install new pipes and catch basins to convey stormwater to a new infiltration fond. Properties have been acquired. There is inadequate treatment and storage for 2 Ramsey Road Widening Lower BlackjackCreek stormwater associated with SE Sedgwick Road to Public Works (Streets) BlackjackCreek Foot Bridge Removal and Utility Lower Blackjack Creek SE Salmonberry Road roadway improvements. Remove dilapidated bridge and directionally bore 3 Public Works [Water} Undergrounding utility crossing under stream. The intersection of Hull Avenue and Sherman Avenue has inadequate collection conveyance, water quality treatment, and flow control to 4Hu11 Avenue Stormwater Improvements Johnson Creek manage stormwater runoff. Public Works {streets) Install stormwater conveyance, water quality treatment, and flow control. _ Lippert Street has inadequate conveyance, water quality treatment, and flow control to manage stormwater runoff. Flooding south of Lippert Street 5 Lippert Sidewalk Retrofit and Pavement Repair Johnson Creek is occurring in several different areas possibly due Public Works (Streets) to perched groundwater. Install conveyance, water quality treatment, and flow control. The Old Clifton Corridor (near the intersection of SW Old Clifton Road and Anderson Hill Road SW) has inadequate conveyance, water quality 6 Old Clifton/en Hill Intersection Ross Creek treatment, and flow control t❑ manage stormwater 9 Public Works (streets) Improvements mprovements runoff, Install conveyance, water quality treatment, and flow control. Public Works (Landfill} 7 Ross Creek Limb Restoration Ross Creek Restore fluvial processes to creek. Portion of the project is under private property. September2021 H ERR E RA Draft City of Port Orchard Stormwater and Watersheds Program Capital Improvement Projects Back to Agenda Table 3. Other Non -City Projects ID Project Name Basin Problem Description and Potential Solution Responsible Party/Property Owner 1 Annapolis Creek Culvert Removal p Annapolis Creek p Remove failing culverts at South Kitsap High School and install beaver dam analogs to promote pooling. South Kitsap School District 2 Annapolis Creek Estuary Restoration Annapolis Creek Need to restore estuary processes upstream of the culvert. Kitsap County Lower BlackjackCreek 3 Blackjack Creek Bridge Upgrades Culvert Replacement Near Ross Point Enlarge undersized old bridge to expand delta for creek. Replace faiIingculvert near Ross Poi ntwith a fish passable structure. Washington Department of Transportation Washington Department of Transportation 4 Ross Creek S Fish Barrier Near Sinclair Inlet Marina Anderson Creek Remove culvert and structure impeding fish passage and replace with precast or box culvert solution. Connect South Kitsap Water Reclamation Facility(SKWRF) purpie pipe system already in piace to a proposed managed aquifer recharge (MAR) facility at Veterans Memorial Park. Washington Department of Transportation West Sound Utility District 6 Reclaimed Water Stream Augmentation for Karcher Creek Karcher Creek 7 Replace Caseco Ln. Culvert SKWRF Culvert/Barrier Removal Caesco Creek Aging undersized culvert needs to be replaced with a fish passable structure. Washington Department of Transportation Washington Department of Transportation 8 Karcher Creek Remove barriers to fish passage at SKWRF. Restore sediment transport processes to beach. Annapolis Creek p 9 South KitsapMall Culvert Removal Yacht Club Culvert Replacement Remove massive old failing culvert under the mall and parking area to restore fish passage and habitat Replace damaged culvert under Yacht Club property with fish passable structure. South Kitsap Mall Yacht Club 10 Mel cher Creek Ui HERRERA Draft City of Port Orchard Stormwater and Watersheds Program Capital Improvement Projects Back to Agenda lhj Johnson CrV-L-A _ _ r r C�Cni r +rat �+,��4 •,�'.:'u:'E: ti� �*ti _, = - j •��' *fir; [ 3 i !!�_ 4 F h • r' r R1-_ 1 i �_�• 1 COUk4 r tr"& Crte!k upper &ladt.�atk Cr "k Legend fort Orchard C'rty Limits Port Orr ha ref Urba n G ruwtt► A.sea B remerto n watersr]e-d 130undari&S WaterbodiLs Streams klH"e B6&jad Cteeh 1awl ', Saere- Sw kvaLn Creek NJ Capital Irtiproverr'&nt Projt°.cts ' Culti,ert Retrofits or Replatfirne n: Estuary Restoration Flea-dpiain and Stream. Restoration 04jtfwi Condition Assessm-pnt and Rehaiailitatiort Shoreline-Acgwsition -• Starmm atcr Conupyance and _ Water 0ualaw Treatmsen: Water Qualloe Treatment i=='.',t3;:3r- :_.eDc�e, Ea. sr aera t s �3 _i,D_A. _ :; --, .-:ra��E rSP�.a'dthe f -'ems = .or^ nun'? Figure 1- Port Orchard Stormwater and Watersheds Comprehensive Platy - Capital Improvement Projects_ LI 1 I`� yftiles HERRERA � 'A+.r4+=�'i-: h: 6.7�T[r'u:.9ed'• j• •� rze��_ cn•.� rz a.z.c Septernber2021 Draft City of Port Orchard Stormwater and Watersheds Program Cap;taI Improuernent Projects C& HERRERA Back to Agenda �4V. AJ tr T . r•: �L cm T Johns Creek _ e t97fi07r'.4)I' Crag Creelr bus% Creek Gt�k i couk r Creek Rocky Creek J�� a�iQi Deywnf:own-Counly i { F Campus Creek • ap 11 1 Creek r A 7 41 ".. l :rrek ,aF Karthtar �. 5gwre ., Cera�r Creek -- Upper 86ckjask [trek Maxar, ' eo =ye,=3'.h5tar =" ecgra _s, C NE: _. A rt; _s D I Legend Fiat re 2. - Port Orchard Stormwater and Watersheds Otner Projects Waterbodies Comprehensive Plant -Other Projects. Port Orchard City Limits Strearr�s r� Port Orthard Urban G ru'wtn ArF-a Bremerton '' 1 I'v 4t fes Watershed boundari s 1u 1 E R R E RA � x-.i.�•"rl'•:-•:i}i3:r%:.A�.Fs.xs:=.ru7rr. �rn.,r••,.r.�-..: Septernber2021 Draft City of Port Orchard Stormwater and Watersheds Program Capital improvement Projects V HERRERA Back to Agenda ■ - -W, a .... ..... . . . . . . . . . . . . . Personnel Position Request Form Back to Agenda City of Port Orchard 2021 - 2022 Budget Departmerrt/Program: Position Title: Additional Hours Requested: Public Works Utilities Compliance Specialist Salaries & Benefits (lobe cafculared by payroff -HR provided percentages hd) Personnel Request: 2 New position - EullTime ❑ New Position - Part Time ❑ Change Existing Employee Ho ❑ Pmmotion/Position Title Chan ❑ Overtime Hours Requested Salary 80,038.40 Overtime Health & Life Benefits 28,039.80 Retirement-PERS/LEOFF 10,658.85 Social Security/Medicare 6,286.83 Labor & Industries Workers Comp 2,663.44 Unemployment Insurance & WA PFML 222.92 Justification: Other - [VEBA, Clothing Allowance, etc) This position is responsible for administering the City's Utilities Compliance Program, which consolidates the following required inspection and compliance requirements: State required Cross Connection Control Program, as required by Washington. Municipal sanitary sewer system program for Fats, 0 i I and Grease (FOG) Administrative Code [WAC). Maintenance and inspection program for private businesses that connect their stormwater management systems to the Cityrs Municipal Separate Storm Sewer System (MS4). 1/3 each fund Total Salary & Benefits $ 127,910.14 Additional Expenses Advertising Expense 1,000.00 Drug Screening Training 500.00 Computer 2,000.00 Cell Phone Svs 600.00 Supplies Uniforms Vehicles, Vehicle Equipment shared Other (describe) Total Additional Expenses Total Cost $ 4,100.00 Proposed Funding Source General Fund Revenue 1,000.00 City Street Fund Revenue Criminal Justice Fund Cumulative Reserve for Municipal Facilities [REET] Street Capital Projects Fund Water 0perating Fund 43,670.05 Storm Drainage Fund 43,670.05 Sewer Operating Fund 43,670.05 Grants-Federal/State/Local Other (describe) For Finance Department Use 0y nl Total Source of Funds $ 132,010.14 I Reviewed and verified by Payroll Back to Agenda CITY OF PORT ORCHARD NOTICE TO CONSULTANTS Back to Agenda REQUEST FOR QUALIFICATIONS (RFQ) CITY OF PORT ORCHARD AND MCCORMICK WOODS WATER SYSTEMS INTERTIE 2021-2022 AD READY DESIGN (PS&E) The City of Port Orchard solicits Statements of Qualifications (SOQ) from qualified A&E consulting firms with expertise in the preparation of the 2021-2022 Ad Ready Design (100% PS&E) for a future INTERTIE BETWEEN THE CITY OF PORT ORCHARD WATER SYSTEM AND THE MCCORIVHCK WOODS WATER SYSTEM Project (the "Project'). Submittals meeting the criteria described herein shall be submitted to the City of Port Orchard, RE: WATER SYSTEMS INTERTIE PROJECT 2021-2022, 216 Prospect Street, Port Orchard, WA 98366, and Mark R. Dorsey, P.E., Public Works Director/City Engineer no later than 2:00 p.m. on October 14, 2021. Information related to this RFQ, including any addenda, will be posted to the City's website at httys://www.cityofi)ortorchard.us/bids-and-proposals/. Any questions regarding this project should be directed to Mark R. Dorsey, P.E., (360) 876-4991 or pub licworks(a, c ityo fportorchard. us. Project Description The Work to be performed by the Consultant shall consist of the Schematic (30%), Design Development (60%) and the 100% Ad Ready Design (Plans, Specifications & Estimate) necessary for the future construction of an intertie between the City of Port Orchard and McCormick Woods water systems in or near the Old Clifton Road corridor including pressure reducing stations and/or booster pump stations, as required. The Work to be performed will also include all necessary topographic surveying and mapping geotechnical data gathering and analysis, Cultural Assessment, site development for stations (critical area assessment, stormwater assessment, structural design, landscape design) as required, utility relocation and/or design inclusion, and compliance with State and Local Regulations. The City intends to utilize the City's standard consultant agreement for this work. The Project shall occur in 2021-2022, with the option for the City of Port Orchard to extend the consultant agreement for additional time if necessary at the City's sole discretion. RFO Schedule: (Dates are estifnates and subiect to change by the Citv) Event Date RFQ Release September 17, 2021 Submittals Due October 14, 2021 Interviews/Presentations October 28, 2021 Notify A arent Successful Firm November 4, 2021 New Contract in Place November 23, 2021 Funding Source American Rescue Plan Act of 2021 (ARPA) Submittal Page 1 of 5 Submittals should include the following information: Back to Agenda ■ A cover letter/statement of interest demonstrating the firm's interest in the project and highlighting its qualifications to meet the City's needs; ■ Firm name, email address, phone and fax numbers; ■ Name of Principal -in -Charge and Project Manager; ■ A brief overview of the firm, and the number of employees in each firm proposed to project; • A statement of the consulting firm's qualifications, including brief resumes of staff proposed to work on the project. The information should be focused on the firm's demonstrated ability to meet the criteria set out below, and experience with similar projects to the Water Systems Intertie. ■ Description of the most recent projects performed by the consulting firm, that included a similar scope of work. The consulting firm's SOQ shall be limited to 10 pages, double sided excluding resumes, cover sheet and cover letter. Submittals shall include a completed and signed Non -Collusion Affidavit form (Attachment A). Please submit THREE copies of your SOQ to: City of Port Orchard, RE: WATER SYSTEMS INTERTIE PROJECT 2021-2022, 216 Prospect Street, Port Orchard, WA 9 83 66, and Mark R. Dorsey, P.E., Public Works Director/City Engineer no later than 2:00 p.m. on October 14, 2021. Submittals will not be accepted after that time and date. Evaluation Criteria Submittals will be evaluated by City staff based upon the responsiveness of the submittal to this RFQ, and based on the following criteria: 1. Demonstrated Qualifications of Proposed Project Manager, including ability to work without significant monitoring, provide strategic recommendation, and ability to communicate information to the community and Council. (15 points) 2. Demonstrated Qualifications/Expertise of Firm and/or Team (20 points) 3. Demonstrated Ability to meet Schedule (20 points) 4. Description of General Approach to this Project (15 points) 5. Familiarity with Port Orchard Municipal Code and Related Regulatory Requirements (10 points) 6. Relevant Past Performance/References (10 points) 7. Demonstrated potable water, pressure reducing, and pumping systems experience (10 points) Evaluations will be based on criteria outlined herein, which may be weighted by the City in any manner it deems appropriate. Interviews, if considered necessary, will be held with selected Consultants based on an evaluation of the Qualifications. All submittals will be evaluated using the same criteria and weighting. General Terms and Conditions The City reserves the right to accept or reject any or all proposals, to waive all minor technicalities, and to accept the proposal or proposal determined to be the most advantageous to the City. Additionally, the Page 2 of 5 Back to Agenda City may accept a proposal subject to an exception if, in the sole judgement of the City, or exceed the City's specifications. The City of Port Orchard reserves the right to amend the terms of this "Request for Qualifications" (RFQ) to circulate various addenda, or to withdraw the RFQ at any time, regardless of how much time and effort consultants have spent on their responses. This Project is contingent upon the acquisition of a funding package, and as such, the City reserves the right to cancel this Project and any associated contracts depending on the quality of said funding package, solely at the City's discretion. All questions shall be submitted to Mark R. Dorsey, P.E., (360) 876-4991 or yublicworks(ib,cityofportorchard.us. Unauthorized contact regarding this RFQ with other City employees may result in disqualification. Any oral communications will be considered unofficial and non -binding on the City. Any questions will be answered in writing and posted on the City's website at https://www.cilyoMortorchard.usfbids-and-proposalsl. It is the responsibility of individual firms/teams to check the website for any amendments or Q & A's to this RFQ. 7f you would like to schedule a tour of the area and existing facilities, please contact Tony Lang 360.535.2490 tlang(&,,citrafportorchard.us. The City reserves the right to reject any and all submittals and to waive irregularities and informalities in the submittal and evaluation process. This RFQ does not obligate the City to pay any costs incurred by Consultants in the preparation and submission of their Statement of Qualifications. Furthermore, the RFQ does not obligate the City to accept or contract for any expressed or implied services. The City reserves the right to request that any Consultant clarify its submittal or to supply any additional material deemed necessary to assist in the evaluation of the submittal. Modification of a submittal already received will be considered only if the request is received prior to the submittal deadline. All modifications must be made in writing, executed and submitted in the same form and manner as the original submittal. Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) Information The City of Port Orchard in accordance with Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act (Section 504) and the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA), commits to nondiscrimination on the basis of disability, in all of its programs and activities. This material can be made available in an alternate format by emailing the Public Works Department at publicworks&cityofportorchard.us or by calling (360) 876-4991. Title VI Statement The City of Port Orchard in accordance with Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, 78 Stat. 252, 42 U.S.C. 2000d to 2000d4 and Title 49, Code of Federal Regulations, Department of Transportation, subtitle A, Office of the Secretary, Part 21, nondiscrimination in federally assisted programs of the Department of Transportation issued pursuant to such Act, hereby notifies all bidders that it will affirmatively ensure that in any contract entered into pursuant to this advertisement, disadvantaged business enterprises as defined at 49 CFR Part 26 will be afforded full opportunity to submit bids in response to this invitation and will not be discriminated against on the grounds of race, color, national origin, or sex in consideration for an award." Page 3 of 5 Ownership of Work Product I Back to Agenda Any and all data, reports, analyses, documents, photographs, pamphlets, plans, specifications, surveys, films or any other materials created, prepared, produced, constructed, assembled, made, performed or otherwise produced by the consultant or the Consultant's subcontractors for delivery to the City under this RFQ shall be the sole and absolute property of the City. Such property shall constitute "work made for hire" as defined by the U.S. Copyright Act of 1976, 17 U.S.C. §101, and the ownership of the copyright and any other intellectual property rights in such property shall vest in the City at the time of its creation. Ownership of the intellectual property includes the right to copyright, patent, and register, and the ability to transfer these rights. Material which the Consultant uses to prepare a proposal in response to this RFQ but is not created, prepared, constructed, assembled, made, performed or otherwise produced for or paid for by the City is owned by the consultant and is not "work made for hire" within the terms of this RFQ. Public Records Request This RFQ and all public records associated with proposals submitted in response to this RFQ shall be available from the City for inspection and copying by the public where required by the Public Records Act, Chapter 42.56 RCW (the "Act"). To the extent that public records then in the custody of the Consultant are needed for the City to respond to a request under the Act, as determined by the City, the Consultant agrees to make them promptly available to the City. Additional Terms and Conditions To view the City's full terms and conditions for this project, please refer to the contract for this project on the City's website at https://www.cityofportorchard.us/bids-and-proposals/. By this reference, the terms and conditions in the contract are incorporated into this RFQ. Dates of publication: Kitsap Sun: September 17th and September 24th, 2021 editions Daily Journal of Commerce: September 17th and September 24th, 2021 editions City of Port Orchard Website: September 17, 2021 Page 4 of 5 Back to Agenda ent A NON -COLLUSION DECLARATION I, by signing the proposal, hereby declare, under penalty of perjury under the laws of the United States that the following statements are true and correct: 1. That the undersigned persons), firm, association or corporation has (have) not, either directly or indirectly, entered into any agreement, participated in any collusion, or otherwise taken any action in restraint of free competitive bidding in connection with the project for which this proposal is submitted. 2. That by signing the signature page of this proposal, I am deemed to have signed and agreed to the provisions of this declaration. (Authorized Signature) Title: Page 5 of 5 Washington state Public Works Board Post Office Box 42525 Olympia, Washington 98504-2525 September 9, 2021 ARM110-10 JI City of Port Orchard 214 Prospect St Port Orchard, WA 98366 Dear Ms. Brown, Back to Agenda Thank you for submitting a Public Works Board Construction Loan application for consideration by the Public Works Board (Board). Congratulations, your Sewer Lift Stations project has been awarded $800, 000.00. The Board approved your construction application at their August 6, 2021 board meeting. The approval date is also the loan award date. Any eligible costs incurred from this date forward are reimbursable with the Construction loan fund. Our office just completed the underwriting for this project, and the loan interest rate is 0.94% with a loan term of 20-years. We plan on issuing the contract for signature in the next couple of weeks. Applicants awarded Public Works Board contracts will need to return an executed contract within six months of receipt. Failure to do so will result in withdrawal of the award. Once again, thank you for applying to the Public Works Board. Please feel free to contact your Project Manager, Jason Freeze (360) 725-3161, or email by at iason.freeze(a)commerce.wa.gov if you have any questions. Sincerely, Connie Rivera PW B Program Director CC' Application File Administrative services provided by the Department of Commerce (360) 725-2744 Fax (360) 586-8440 www.pwb.wa.gov Washington state Public Works Board Post Office Box 42525 Olympia, Washington 98504-2525 September 9, 2021 ARM110-10 JI City of Port Orchard 214 Prospect St Port Orchard, WA 98366 Dear Ms. Brown, Back to Agenda Thank you for submitting a Public Works Board Construction Loan application for consideration by the Public Works Board (Board). Congratulations, your 390 Zone Low Pressure Booster Station project has been awarded $650,000.00. The Board approved your construction application at their August 6, 2021 board meeting. The approval date is also the loan award date. Any eligible costs incurred from this date forward are reimbursable with the Construction loan fund. Our office just completed the underwriting for this project, and the loan interest rate is 0.94% with a loan term of 20-years. We plan on issuing the contract for signature in the next couple of weeks. Applicants awarded Public Works Board contracts will need to return an executed contract within six months of receipt. Failure to do so will result in withdrawal of the award. Once again, thank you for applying to the Public Works Board. Please feel free to contact your Project Manager, Jason Freeze (360) 725-3161, or email by at iason.freeze(a)commerce.wa.gov if you have any questions. Sincerely, Connie Rivera PW B Program Director CC' Application File Administrative services provided by the Department of Commerce (360) 725-2744 Fax (360) 586-8440 www.pwb.wa.gov Washington state Public Works Board Post Office Box 42525 Olympia, Washington 98504-2525 September 9, 2021 ARM110-10 JI City of Port Orchard 214 Prospect St Port Orchard, WA 98366 Dear Ms. Brown, Back to Agenda Thank you for submitting a Public Works Board Construction Loan application for consideration by the Public Works Board (Board). Congratulations, your Melcher Pump Station Rehabilitation project has been awarded $500,000.00. The Board approved your construction application at their August 6, 2021 board meeting. The approval date is also the loan award date. Any eligible costs incurred from this date forward are reimbursable with the Construction loan fund. Our office just completed the underwriting for this project, and the loan interest rate is 0.94% with a loan term of 20-years. We plan on issuing the contract for signature in the next couple of weeks. Applicants awarded Public Works Board contracts will need to return an executed contract within six months of receipt. Failure to do so will result in withdrawal of the award. Once again, thank you for applying to the Public Works Board. Please feel free to contact your Project Manager, Jason Freeze (360) 725-3161, or email by at iason.freeze(a)commerce.wa.gov if you have any questions. Sincerely, Connie Rivera PW B Program Director CC' Application File Administrative services provided by the Department of Commerce (360) 725-2744 Fax (360) 586-8440 www.pwb.wa.gov DW00461@ECY.WA.GOV CITY OF PORT ORCHARD ESSB 6091 PILOT PROJECT AN w A 6V Back to Agenda Presented by City of Port Orchard to Department of Ecology on November 1, 2018 Presented by Department of Ecology to Joint Legislative Task Force on November 15, 2018 i • LAW OFFICE OF THOMAS M. PORS 0 ROBI NSON` 114kj=LC Back to Agenda TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. Project Description............................................................................................... 1 2. Pending Groundwater Applications................................................................... 3 3. Vicinity Maps......................................................................................................... 4 4. Port Orchard Water Rights.................................................................................. 5 5. City of Port Orchard Projected Population Growth and Demand Forecast.......................................................................................... 5 5. Preliminary Impact Evaluation........................................................................... 10 7. Conceptual Mitigation Strategy......................................................................... 15 8. In -Kind Water Mitigation — Streamflow Augmentation ................................. 17 9. Blackjack Creek Habitat Project(s) .................................................................... 18 10. Preliminary "Net Ecological Benefits" Analysis ............................................... 22 APPENDIX A— Stream Augmentation Plan APPENDIX B — Lower Blackjack Creek Restoration Project Back to Agenda Project Description The City of Port Orchard is one of five pilot projects designated by the Washington Legislature under Section 301 of ESSB 6091 for the demonstration of mitigation sequencing under the conditions established in the bill, codified at RCW 90.94.090. The City presents this draft Conceptual Mitigation Plan to be furnished to the Joint Legislative Task Force on Water Resource Mitigation (Task Force) consistent with this pilot project legislation. The Task Force is charged with the task of developing and recommending a mitigation sequencing process and scoring system for the mitigation of groundwater impacts to surface water resources including minimum instream flows and closed streams and lakes. The City of Port Orchard is located ❑n the Kitsap Peninsula along the southern shore of Sinclair Inlet on the Puget Sound, across from the City of Bremerton and the Puget Sound Naval Shipyards. The City's water service area includes a variety of residential densities and newer subdivisions, a downtown commercial center, and port. Port Orchard's population is rapidly increasing, and its aging water system needs to be revitalized with new wells and other water system infrastructure, while combining what are essentially two systems into one. The City System includes the older portions of Part Orchard along the waterfront and three pressure zones including a rapidly growing upland area. The McCormick Woods System developed as an independent community that is now within the City's boundary and service area and is in the process of being connected into the City System. Port Orchard has an intertie with the City of Bremerton, but cannot rely on Bremerton water far long-term growth. To update its aging wells located at the bottom, northern end of the system, Port Orchard has applied for water right changes and new water rights for new Wells 12 and 13. These applications are for the deep sub- sea level aquifer, which will reduce impacts on Kitsap County streams from existing shallower municipal wells, but which could result in smaller impacts to a larger geographic area. Well 12 — McCormack Woods1580 Zone Reservoir Site. The City wants to drill Well 12 at the site of an existing reservoir to serve the expanding McCormack Woods area to the Southeast of the downtown and port, pursuant to pending application G1-28162A. A 1500-foot well at this location would tap an aquifer 1,000 feet below sea level and allow the City stop pumping from the shallower Wells MC 1, MC 2, and MC 3. The City has also applied to add Well 12 as a point of withdrawal for existing water rights for Wells MC 1, 2, 3, & 4B, and PO 11, which will allow the resting of shallower aquifer wells in a manner that reduces impacts on local streams. Well 13 — Bethel Junction Reservoir Site. The City has amended pending application G1-28476A for a deep aquifer well at the top of the City pressure zones. Well 13 would tap an aquifer 1,000 feet below sea level and allow the City stop pumping from older wells at the bottom of the old City water system. The City has also applied to add Well 12 as a point of withdrawal for existing water rights for Wells PO-6, PO-7, & PO-10. In -Kind Mitigation. By transferring water rights from shallower to deeper wells, Port Orchard is reducing impacts on local surface streams due to the buffering effect of additional aquitards, which helps to minimize the impacts of new additional water rights. To the extent the groundwater modelling and impact analysis demonstrates net ground water capture from additional water rights to the shallow aquifers connected to local streams, Port Orchard will pipe water from its system to infiltration galleries designed to Back to Agenda replace diminished groundwater recharge to those streams at the highest reasonably accessible reaches of those streams. Compensatory Mitigation. Port Orchard has consulted with the Suquamish Tribe, Washington Department of Fish & Wildlife, Washington Department of Ecology, and Kitsap County Public Utility district to identify projects that will improve fish habitat in local streams and result in net ecological benefits as contemplated by ESSB 6091. The preliminary result of this consultation and research into area tribal fisheries and fish habitat is selection of the Blackjack Creek Watershed Protection and Restoration Plan, described below, for compensatory mitigation projects. The impact modelling and consultation process is ongoing, therefore the final mitigation plan for these pilot project applications is subject to refinement. The City of Port Orchard recognizes that groundwater is an important resource to the people of Kitsap County and to the native peoples who retain treaty rights to hunt and fish in their usual and accustomed places. This Conceptual Mitigation Plan is the starting point for identifying appropriate in -kind and out -of - kind habitat mitigation measures for addressing any impacts to nearby surface waters and fish habitat attributable to the requested water rights and water right changes. This document is intended to provide the ❑epartment of Ecology with information necessary to furnish a conceptual mitigation plan for Port ❑rchard's pilot project applications to the Joint Legislative Task Force on Water Resource Mitigation in compliance with ESSB 6091, Section 301, Paragraph 12 {RCW 90.94.090(12). Back to Agenda Pending Groundwater Applications The City of Port Angeles has two sets of water right applications pending with the Department of Ecology that are within the scope of the ESSB 6091 Pilot Project. The Well 12 set of applications includes Application G1-28162A, originally filed on December 24, 2002 for 1,000 gallons per minute (gpm) and 1, 080 acre-feet per year (AFY), plus the following water right change applications to add Well 12 as an additional point of withdrawal: • CG1-24437P (MC Wells 1, 2 &3) in the amount of 600 gpm, 450 AFY; • CG1-26454P (PO Well 11) in the amount of 150 gpm, 242 AFY; and • CG1-26447P {MC Well 413) in the amount of 400 gpm, 645 AFY). The Well 13 set of applications includes Application G1-28476A, originally filed on January 12, 2007 for 1,000 gpm and 1,600 AFY, plus the following water right change applications to add Well 13 as an additional point of withdrawal: • GG1-*04166C (PO Well 6) in the amount of 350 gpm, 560 AFY; • CG1-24586C (PO Well 7) in the amount of 750 gpm, 1210 AFY; and ■ CG1-26119P (PO Well 10) in the amount of 500 gpm, 806 AFY. Attached is a 11" x 17" map of the City's pressure zones with locations of all existing wells and main lines. 1 � � � - suu@emlcn j � icliXd� I+nrce,�� np,x . ' DpiniRz a �'leo p Dewe[io �Kp.f 1 . wit- 7 / sk: m~h ;/i' Allync;•x,erww • nxnrdal� � ,y�lj�ii .�.- "'•�= do aj _ .:Fwononee��oaie Back to Agenda Port Orchard Water Rights Table I PERMIT CERTIFICATE OR CLAIM # SOURCE NAME/ NUMBER SUPPLEMENTAL LIMf'I'ATION? WATER RIGHT QUANTITY Instantaneous Flow Rate Qi Annual Volume (Qa) Su lP ' G1-*0416601 Cert_ 3334A PO 6 No 350 560 G1-245860" PO 7 No 750 1210 G1-25019C PO 8 and 9 Yes' 500 560 G1-26119P" PO 10 Partial- 500 211.5/594.5 G1-26729P PO 4 Partial- 50 11/59 G1-24437P" McCormick 1, 2, 3, PO 11m No 600 450 G1-26454P11 PO 11m Partial-- 150 63/179 G1-26447P A i- McCormick 4B Partial- 400 169.5/475.5 TOTAL MCTNICIPAL QUANTITY 3,300 3,528 INTERTIES City of Bremerton 12/17/2001 intedocal agreement) 350 178 APPLICATIONS G1-28162A PO 12 1000 1080 G1-28476A PO 13 1000 1600 'The annual quantity (560 AFY) of G1-25019C is supplemental to existing rights from Cert. 3334-A, G1-24586C, and G1- 000911CL, but provides the City with additional pumping capacity. "The aggregate cap limitation on permits G1-26119, G1-26447, G1-26454 and G1-26729 grants the City an additional 1,308 acre-feet per year of primary rights for the four water rights combined, and limits the total annual quantity withdrawn from all City of Port Orchard sources, which "shall not exceed 3,528 acre-feet per year." For purposes of Table 4-1 and the City's water right self -assessment, the 1308 AFY of new primary Qa is apportioned among the four water rights. "' MC Well 5 was renamed PO Well 11; it was intended to replace MC wells 1, 2 & 3, with a combined Qi of 750 gpm and a combined Qa of 672 AFY, but is not online at this time. "'Change application pending to add Well 12 or 13 to this water right; change application is part of the Pilot Project application. Back to Agenda City of Port Orchard Projected Population Growth and Demand Forecast 45,000 40,000 35,000 30,000 25,000 20,000 15,000 10,000 5,000 0 Year Estimated Population 2018 11,388 2024 13,462 2028 14,988 2038 19,377 2048 24,727 2058 31,248 2068 39,198 Table 1. Population estimates, Water Service Area Estimated Population Growth within Water Service Area 2018 2024 2028 2038 2048 2058 2068 Figure 1. Population growth projection, Water Service Area Notes: Refer to map (below) for geography used by OFM to retrieve 2018 population estimate. The initial population estimate of 11,388 was provided by OFM. This estimate is for the Water Service Area only and excludes City and Urban Growth Area boundaries from consideration. C. Back to Agenda An annual growth rate of 2% is used to estimate population from 2018 — 2068. This is the average annual growth rate computed by PACE for the Water Service Area from 2016 — 2036. This 2% rate was selected for its position in the middle range of potential growth estimates, which are listed below: 1. OFM calculates —0.87% average annual growth for the Water Service Area, years 2010 — 2018. (Source: SAEP file prepared October 11, 2018) 2. Kitsap County's Countywide Planning Policies calculate —2.57%average annual growth for the City of Port Orchard, UGA excluded, years 2010 — 2036. (Source: 2016 Kitsap County Comprehensive Plan, Table A-1) In §6.2.2, Population, the City of Port Orchard's 2016 Comprehensive Plan references (2) the Countywide Planning Policies with the caveat that "[this] is not a population growth projection, but rather tells the City how many new residents it must plan for." City of Port Orchard, Water Service Area, and Urban Growth Area Boundary 7 Back to Agenda Water System Demand Forecast Year Total Service Area Population ADD with Conservation (AFY) Average Annual Water Rights (AFY) MDD with Conservation (gpm) Maximum Instantaneous Water Rights (gpm) Source Capacity (gpm) 2017 11,310 1,232 3,528 1,450 3,300 2,820 2027 14,595 1,499 3,528 2,417 3,300 2,820 2037 18,898 1,902 3,528 3,066 3,300 2,820 2047 24,143 2,412 3,528 3,889 3,300 2,820 2057 30,536 3,044 3,528 4,906 3,300 2,820 2068 39,198 3,903 3,528 6,292 3,300 2,820 City of Port Orchard Projected ADD and Available Supply 4,500 4,000 3, 500 3,000 >. 2,500 LL C 2,000 - 1,500 i 1,000 - 500 - I 2010 2015 2020 2025 2030 2035 2040 2045 2050 2055 2060 2065 2070 Year -ADD with Conservation;AFY) Average Annual Water Hip hts (AFY) ADD without Conservation (AFY) H. Back to Agenda City of Port Orchard Projected MD❑ and Available Supply 8,000 7,000 6,000 5,000 a 4,000 3,000 2,000 - 1,000 - -- 2010 2015 2020 2025 2030 2035 2040 2045 2050 2055 2060 2065 2070 Year MDD with Conservation (gpm) Source Capacity (gpm) Maximum Instantaneous Water Rights (gpm) MDD without Conservation (gpm) The planning projections provided are preliminary and for illustrative purposes only. More conservative planning assumptions would increase demands and the need for additional water supply. Based on the preliminary projected 3,903 acre-feet per year Average Daily Demand (ADD) in 2068, the City of Port Orchard would need an additional 375 acre-feet per year of annual quantity of water rights to meet future demand projections. Based on the preliminary projected 6,292 gallons per minute Maximum Day Demand (MDD), the City of Port Orchard would need an additional 2,992 gallons per minute of instantaneous water rights to meet future demand projections. 4 Back to Agenda Preliminary Impact Evaluation Surface water impacts attributable to additional groundwater withdrawals derive from a reduction in the quantity of groundwater available at the interface between the surface waters and surrounding soils. The best available method of predicting and quantifying these impacts involves the application of hyd rogeol og ic principles to the geological features in the project area through a numerical groundwater -flow model. Impacts associated with Port Orchard's pending water right applications will be identified most comprehensively through the application of USGS's hydrogeological numerical model for the Kitsap Peninsula (Frans and Olsen, 2016). The USGS Kitsap model was developed in cooperation with the Public Utility District No. 1 of Kitsap County, and was first published in May 2016. Groundwater flow on the Kitsap Peninsula was simulated using the groundwater -flow model, MODFLOW-NWT. The USGS Kitsap model must be modified before use for water right investigations due to the MODFLOW solver package used by the USGS, which allows some wells to change from assigned production rates, thus skewing the model results for impacts from new water sources.l Investigation and Methodology For purposes of this Conceptual Mitigation Plan, the City of Port Orchard retained the services of hydrogeologists with the firm Robinson Noble, Inc. to use the USGS Kitsap model to run preliminary steady- state model runs for a baseline condition and predictive -impact runs associated with the City's pending applications. Five scenarios were simulated using the calibrated model to provide representative examples of how the model would demonstrate the effects of potential changes in groundwater withdrawals on stream baseflows. Scenario 1 modelled the effects of moving current production at Wells 6, 7, and 10 to proposed deep aquifer Well 13 at the maximum future withdrawal rates, adding 1,600 additional acre-feet per year of consumptive use.' Scenario 2A modelled the effect of moving current production at Well 11 and McCormick Well 3 to proposed Well 12 at a maximum future withdrawal rate, adding 1,080 additional acre-feet per year of consumptive use. Neither of those scenarios attempted to limit future annual withdrawals to that necessary to meet projected growth demands but rather modelled the requested additional annual quantities requested an the water right applications. Scenario 2B modelled the effects of changing the withdrawal of existing water rights from shallow to deeper aquifers in the McCormick Hills portion of the water system without adding any new production (current production from McCormick Well 3 was moved to Well 12). Scenario 3A modelled the effect of moving current production at McCormick Well 413 to Well 11 with no increase in annual production. Scenario 3B modelled the effect of moving current production at McCormick Well 4B to proposed Well 12 with no increase iin annual production. The five model runs did not incorporate septic and irrigation return flows to the shallow aquifer system and streams, and over -estimated future annual consumption; therefore, the model results overstate the ' The USGS model uses the Newton solver. When using this solver, if the hydraulic head in a well -containing cell falls below a specified threshold the well's production rate is automatically ramped downward. For example, during the published USGS steady- state simulation, 1,432 wells lowered their production rates from their assigned values (310 wells turn completely off). To solve the problem, Robinson Noble modified the model to eliminate variable production from existing wells, and shared the new model calibration statistics with one of the USGS model authors, who indicated that she considered the adjusted model to be calibrated for the intended use. (Frans, pers. comm.) 2 Annual quantities are expressed in acre-feet per year (afy). One acre-foot equals 325,851 gallons of water, enough to cover one acre with one foot of water. The addition of 1,600 afy is only for illustrative purposes. 10 Back to Agenda potential impacts and present a worst -case scenario for purposes of designing a mitigation plan. A preliminary estimate of streamflow impacts for purposes of determining mitigation feasibility is presented in Table 4, but this analysis will need to be updated following refinements to the demand projections and more comprehensive modeling of impacts at a later date. Table 1: Modeled Scenarios Scenario 1 Scenario 2 Scenario 213 Scenario 3A Scenario 3B Baseline Predictive Baseline Predictive Baseline Predictive Baseline Predictive Baseline Predictive Port Orchard Well 560 - - Port Orchard Well 7 1,210 - - Port Orchard Well10 806 - Port Orchard Well11 - 242 242 242 420 Port Orchard Well12 - 1,772 450 420 Port Orchard Well 13 - 4,176 - 0 a` McCormick Well 1 - - - McCormick Well 3 450 450 McCormick Well4B - - 420 - 420 - Total 2,576 4,176 692 1,772 692 692 420 420 420 420 G1-28476A G1-28162A G1-24437P G1-26447P G1-26447P Water Rights G1-*04166C G1-24437P Simulated G1-24586C G1-26454P G 1-26119 P Impacts were predicted by comparing results from the baseline and predictive runs for each scenario for modeled stream reaches and lakes south of Sinclair Inlet or Gorst Creek that are within approximately 15,000 feet of Port Orchard Wells 12 or 13 and are closed to further appropriation or have instream flow limitations (locations of the wells and stream reaches investigated are shown on the location map below). The specific streams examined in the modeling were: ■ Gorst Creek, including Parrish Creek ■ Anderson Creek 11 Back to Agenda ■ Ross Creek • Blackjack Creek, including Square Creek • Salmonberry Creek • Long Lake ■ Curly Creek ■ The uppermost reach and tributary of Coulter Creek ■ The two northeastern most tributaries of the Union River Preliminary Findings The preliminary results indicate that when transferring rights to deeper wells, steady-state increases in overall streamflow equivalent to about 5 to 10 percent of the transferred production amount can occur, depending on the depths of the aquifers involved. However, steady-state negative impacts can still occur an specific streams when the new well moves production closer to those specific streams, and in some cases, those negative impacts can offset positive impacts elsewhere. Production of additional water quantities for future growth results in a cumulative, steady-state (long-term) impact that is about half of the well production rate, without accounting for return flows. Specific results are presented on the following tables in acre-feet per year (reductions in flow are in parentheses). Table 2: Scenarios Results scenario 1 scenario 2A scenario 2B Scenario 3A Scenario 313 Net Change in Production (afy) 1,600 1,080 0 0 0 Gorst Creek (including Parrish) (150) (252) (9) 11 (26) Anderson Creek (33) (23) 8 2 0 Ross Creek (55) (21) 9 (1) 1 Blackjack Creek (including Square) (403) (120) 41 14 25 a Sullivan Creek (3) (2) 0 (1) 0 5almonberry Creek (95) (13) 2 (4) 2 m U Long Lake (7) (1) 0 (0) 0 a Curly Creek (42) (5) 0 (2) 1 Coulter Creek (upper only) - - - - - Union River (upper east tribs only) (26) (62) (6) 4 (7) Total (814) (500) 45 22 (5) G1-28476A G1-28162A G1-24437P G1-26447P G1-26447P G1-04166C G1-24437P Water Rights Simulated G1-24586C G1-26454P G 1-26119P Table 3: Scenarios Results (Combined) Scenarios 1, 2A, 3A Scenarios 1, 2A, 3B Net Change in Production (afy) 2,680 2,680 0 a Gorst Creek (including Parrish) (391) (428) 12 Back to Agenda Anderson Creek (55) (56) Ross Creek (77) (75) Blackjack Creek (including Square) (509) (498) Sullivan Creek (6) (5) 5almonberry Creek (112) (106) Long Lake (8) (8) Curly Creek (49) (46) Coulter Creek (upper only) - - Union River (upper east tribs only) (85) (96) Total (1,291) (1,319) For purposes of determining conceptual mitigation feasibility, two alternative preliminary analyses were done to predict potential streamflow impacts based on projected growth demands of 375 additional acre- feet per year of annual quantity. To provide an additional 375 acre-feet of water annually would require and additional Qa of 740 acre-feet including mitigation for streamflow augmentation. New production was split 60% from Well 13 and 40% from Well 12. The resulting projected impacts to streamflow are shown in gallons per minute in Table 4. Table 4: Projected Streamflow Impacts from ADD increase of 375 AFY AFY GPM Net Change in Production (afy) 740 459 Gorst Creek (includ Ing Parrish) -116 -72 Anderson Creek -16 -10 Ross Creek -21 -13 Blackjack Creek (Ii ncl udi ng Square) -140 -87 M a Sullivan Creek -1 -1 Salmon berry Creek -30 -19 v u Long Lake -2 -1 m ° Curly Creek -13 -8 a Coulter Creek (upper only) ❑ 0 Union River (upper easttribs only) -26 -16 Total -365 -226 375 233 Production reserved for Water System 365 226 Production reserved for Mitigation 13 Back to Agenda �L�°°�� Legendo, iq g P a' °` Rica Well Location .,. Streams Modeled for ImpacE - - • 9UP, St •. i a � — 191h St a F. Ton `'� E Bcavrr r Gpelr.Rtl. _ St a6[h 51 y' a �. Pun 1y ;Il dre8anrd t^ s r� Mai ,•� $t � r ru4ef sows C. jaSinclair _ Inter _ I MOT r a ce � v4 Valley Rd fir; -- moor u� , rr . or w 1 §E Salmonherry RLr r -F IJa I� If , ` Va11cY Rdm' 7. Passage ® Nnte Baserrwp from PMJE9 IGtsM Onunty ESHI Arr.Gls Ocicder 2018 7 23,24 MR ❑l E ROBINSON 1738.005G 8C9e V = 7000 Well and Stream Location Map NOBLE City of Pot[ Orchard: Conceptual Mitigation Plan Limitations of Model and Preliminary Impact Analysis The findings presented here are preliminary and for purposes of illustrating worst -case scenario impacts for mitigation planning purposes. The final impact analysis will be based on refinements in the population and water demand forecasts, including of return flaw based ❑n further analysis of sewe red and non- sewered areas of the City service area. Future modelling will be designed through consultation with the Department of Ecology and stakeholders and would likely include return flows from septic systems and irrigation, and other model refinements. Transient model runs may also be provided to refine the timing, location and quantification of impacts. The primary significance of the preliminary model runs is to estimate the total potential mitigation quantity for additional water rights if additional annual water quantities were utilized. Based on the preliminary population and demand projections, in -kind streamflow augmentation mitigation is estimated to range from 10 gallons per minute to 87 gallons per minute for four of the potentially affected creeks. The need for additional seasonal/peaking sources to meet maximum day demands could impact streams at different times during the year, which will require more sophisticated transient modelling results and streamflow monitoring to accurately determine. 14 Back to Agenda Conceptual Mitigation Strategy The statutory mitigation sequence in ESSB 5091, Section 301(8), designates three progressive tiers of mitigation for the pilot project applications. This section of Port Orchard's Conceptual Mitigation Plan describes its preliminary assessment of how it complies with the statutory sequence. 1. Tier 1—Avoidance. Avoiding impacts [to instream flows] by (i) complying with mitigation required by adopted rules that set forth minimum flows, levels, or closures; or (2) making the water diversion or withdrawal subject to the applicable minimum flows or levels. 2. Tier 2 — Minimization. Where avoidance is not "reasonably attainable," minimizing impacts by providing permanent new or existing trust water rights or through other replacement water supply resulting in "no net annual increase in the quantity of water diverted or withdrawn from the stream" and "no net detrimental impacts to fish and related aquatic resources." 3. Tier 3 — Compensation. Where avoidance and minimization are not "reasonably attainable," compensating for impacts by providing "net ecological benefits to fish and related aquatic resources" in the water resource inventory area through in -kind or out -of -kind mitigation or a combination thereof, that improves the function and productivity of affected fish populations and related aquatic habitat. Out -of -kind mitigation may include instream or out -of -stream measures that improve or enhance water quality, riparian habitat, or other instream functions and values for which minimum flows or closures were established in that watershed. Tier 1 Analysis -- Avoidance modelled impacts (Tables 2 and 3 above) to new appropriations. Therefore, there is no minimum flow that Port Orchard's new water rights can be "subject to." Impacts from deep aquifer wells (such as Port Orchard's proposed Wells 12 and 13) cannot be avoided by interruptible conditions because the impacts dissipate over time and distance, unlike surface water diversions or shallow wells near streams. Tier 2 Analysis -- Minimization By transferring water rights from shallower to deeper wells, Port Orchard is reducing impacts on local surface streams due to the buffering effect of additional aquitards, which helps to minimize the impacts of new additional water rights. To the extent the impact analysis demonstrates net groundwater capture from the shallow aquifers connected to local streams, Port Orchard's streamflow augmentation plan will be utilized to replace diminished groundwater recharge to those streams. Port Orchard's conceptual mitigation strategy is to match the projected impact to the stream flows of Blackjack, Anderson, Ross and Parish creeks with piped replacement water to the highest reasonably accessible reaches of those streams. Preliminary impact analysis at Table 4, above, indicates that these four creeks represent over 80% of the total modeled streamflow impact from projected additional groundwater pumping by the City. See Appendix A for more details about streamflow augmentation. Port Orchard's streamflow augmentation plan utilizes in -kind water replacement mitigation where reasonably achievable. Streamflow gauges will be installed and data collected prior to impact in order to field verify the timing and extent of future streamflow reductions attributed to Port Orchard's new water rights. This plan meets ESSB 5091's Tier 2 standard of "no net annual increase in the quantity of water diverted or withdrawn from the stream." Port Orchard also believes that replacing 100% of the surface water impacts year-round also complies with the second Tier 2 standard "no net detrimental impacts to fish and related aquatic resources," because there are no impacts to fish and related aquatic resources from deep aquifer withdrawals other than the modelled stream flow reductions. 15 Back to Agenda To the extent that "in -place" replacement water mitigation is not reasonably available in upper reaches of these creeks, Port Orchard's Tier 3 mitigation plan will insure "net ecological benefits to fish and related aquatic resources." Tier 3 Analysis -- Compensation In consultation with the Suquamish Tribe, Washington Department of Fish & Wildlife, and Kitsap County PUD No. 1, Port Orchard is proposing to implement one or more projects in the Blackjack Creek Watershed Assessment and Protection And Restoration Plan (ESA, December 29, 2017), described below. These projects will provide compensatory mitigation to substantially improve fish habitat in Blackjack Creek, with the goal of providing environmental benefits in excess of the impacts to area surface waters that cannot be replaced with In -Kind Water Mitigation sources. [See Blackjack Creek Habitat Restoration Project, below and at Appendix B. ] Selection of project elements will be based upon consultations with stakeholders after the refinement of demand projections, impact modelling and grant funding decisions by the Department of Ecology. Port Orchard will also contribute design, management, and maintenance services to the project, and will be responsible for monitoring and reporting conditions to insure long-term survival of planted species and operation of water supply to the project. 16 Back to Agenda In -Kind Water Mitigation — Streamflow Augmentation Appendix A includes a streamflow augmentation plan developed in 2006 for an earlier City of Port Orchard water right project that was not implemented, including maps and a conceptual project design for infiltration galleries to replace flows in the four nearest and most impacted creeks to the City of Port Orchard's Wells 12 and 13. The preliminary estimates of the maximum discharge rates to these creeks are based on the preliminary steady-state modelling and growth projections described above, using very conservative assumptions. Final streamflow augmentation discharge rates, listed in gallons per minute, will be refined following more detailed population and water demand forecasting and additional groundwater modelling as described in the Preliminary Impact Evaluation section. If additional modelling or future monitoring data demonstrates seasonal variation in impacts, the discharge rates will be adjusted so long as reasonably available technology allows for variable discharge rates. Streamflow gauges will be installed and monitored prior to impact to obtain base -line conditions and field -verify impacts from pumping additional water rights. Source Quantity Period Effective Mitigation Area Available Anderson Creek To be determined Year-round Downstream of infiltration Infiltration Gallery (10 gpm estimate) gallery (constructed) Ross Creek Infiltration To be determined Year-round Downstream of infiltration Gallery (constructed) (13 gpm estimate) gallery Blackjack Creek To be determined Year-round Downstream of infiltration Infiltration Gallery (87 gpm estimate) gallery (proposed) Parrish/Gorst Creek To be determined Year-round Downstream of infiltration Infiltration Gallery (72 gpm estimate) gallery (proposed) 17 Back to Agenda Blackjack Creek Habitat Project Project Goal: Create net ecological benefits to fish and related aquatic resources (including wetlands and floodplain), that improves the function and productivity of affected fish populations and related aquatic habitat. Blackjack Creek was selected because the Suquamish Tribe conducted a recent assessment of the watershed that identified critical ecosystem components and key ecological attributes (KEAs), their current status, and human -caused pressures on KEAs. The goal of the watershed assessment was to develop a Watershed Plan for protection and restoration strategies and actions in the Blackjack Creek watershed that will protect and restore watershed, riparian, floodplain and stream habitats. In particular, the Tribe focused on protecting and restoring processes and habitat functions that support the recovery and self -maintenance, resilience and persistence of native salmonid populations and their life history diversity, such that salmonid populations can support tribal harvest for future generations. Thus, the goal of the Blackjack Creek Assessment and project identification was an ideal match for the goal of achieving net ecological benefits from habitat mitigation under ESSB 6091. Fish Habitat Resources Consulted: BLACKJACK CREEK WATERSHED ASSESSMENT AN PROTECTION AND RESTORATION PLAN, ESA, December 29, 2017, prepared for Suquamish Tribe. This recent assessment/plan was developed with support from a National Estuary Program (NEP) Watershed Protection and Restoration Grant from the Washington Department of Ecology (Ecology #SEANEP-2014-SuquTr-00072) and US EPA assistance agreement #00J99801 (Puget Sound Tribal Capacity Building). Project Area: The Blackjack Creek watershed covers an area of 12.3 square miles in eastern Kitsap County and is considered one of the largest and most productive salmon watersheds in the south Kitsap subregion (May and Peterson, 2003). The watershed supports two genetically distinct runs of chum salmon, a summer run and a late fall run, as well as Chinook and coho salmon, steelhead, and cutthroat trout. The Blackjack Creek watershed downstream of State Route (SR) 16 (see Figure 1, Lower Blackjack Creek) is characterized by a combination of residential and commercial land uses within the City of Port Orchard. Throughout this area, the lower mainstem of Blackjack Creek flaws through a steep ravine of mostly forested riparian corridor that varies in width (generally between 600 feet and 1,100 feet). The overall riparian conditions in the Lower Blackjack Creek subbasin range from functioning (generally along the mainstem) to impaired (in some of the tributary streams due to tree removal and development with impervious and semi -pervious surfaces). In tributary streams where riparian conditions are impaired, the degree of imperviousness could alter downstream functions in the mainstem, especially those related to flaw and water quality. Improving or retrofitting stormwater systems to provide improved treatment and attenuation would help mitigate potential impacts from ongoing land development adjacent to tributary streams. 18 Back to Agenda aII-ER— T PDR ORCHARD 1f) I.. R � � 0 � J Mapped Fluodsk in Subba in __ i�, — •: Lawer Blackyack Middle 61aajack _ Ruby Creek . Square Creek ' 1j Square Lake Upper Blackjac4 Su66aw Boundary OT 2.000 Fne - QVWmrshed Boundary Figure 1. Blackjack Creek Watershed and Subbasins Conversely, riparian conditions are functioning along the mainstem of Blackjack Creek where the stream flows through a steep ravine upstream of the estuary. The ravine provides some of the best riparian habitat in the watershed in terms of intactness, connectivity, riparian zone width, and vegetation composition. These qualities support stream functions that maintain suitable spawning, rearing, and migratory fish habitat conditions within the lower mainstem, and are likely the cause for relatively large amounts of spawning activity for chum and coho salmon in the subbasin. Protecting this high -quality habitat through purchase, easements, or strengthened land use development standards would be appropriate in this portion of the lower mainstem reach. A challenge in the ravine is ongoing and unpermitted human habitation that can have impacts on water quality, vegetation, and stream bank erosion. Addressing this source of impact is also important to preserving riparian and instream habitat conditions of the mainstem. The natural characteristics of the estuary have been highly altered or lost entirely by development including significant fill of historic intertidal area. Natural tidal exchange at the mouth of the stream is substantially constricted by the Bay Street crossing. An active tidal delta remains with a 19 Back to Agenda limited amount of intertidal mudflat and fringing salt marsh extending approximately 1,500 feet upstream. Restoration of the tidal delta through removal of fill, structures, and riprap along with riparian planting would increase important rearing and migratory habitat forjuvenile salmonids passing through the delta as well as providing a holding area for adults moving into Blackjack Creek. Proposed Habitat Mitigation Projects. Thirteen (13) actions were identified in the Blackjack Creek watershed assessment for the Lower Blackjack Creek subbasin (see Table 7 and Figure 3). Detailed descriptions of these 13 actions are provided in Appendix B. The City of Port Orchard proposes to construct one or more of these projects, to be chosen in consultation with the Suquamish Tribe, the Department of Fish & Wildlife, and the Department of Ecology, as the Tier 3 component of its Conceptual Mitigation Plan. Final selection of the project(s) will occur after completion of the impact modelling and identification of impacts not mitigatable with water replacement measures. The City is applying for grant funding from the Department of Ecology under the Streamflow Restoration Grant Program for some of these projects. The availability of grant funding for project construction will also be a factor in the final mitigation proposal. Table 7. Recommen dedActions— Lower Blac kjackCreek subbasin River Mile or Reach Location Action LBJ1-TidaIDelta/NearshoreRestorat ion Estuary/Nearshore O.O/Mouth 1-1312-Viewin Platform LB13-Protect Riparian Habitat LB14- LargeWoody Debris Placement LBJ5- LowerMainstem RM a.O-3.2 Invasive Plant Removal LBJ6-Removalof Abandoned Foot Bridge LB17-MaintainorExpand Protective2oning LBJ8-Restorationbetween SedgwUand SE Dogwood Road and also Right UpperMainstern RM 3.2-4.3 Bank Tributary LBJ9-Fish Passage Improve ments(at Ieast 4 road crossings LBJ1O4sh Passage Improvements@ SR16 Tributaries n/a LBJ11-Restoration@Confluenceof Blackjackand Ruby Creeks LBJ12-Reviewand ImproveRegulationsand Requirements LBJ 1 3-Sto rm waterRetrof its 20 Back to Agenda ti r r r r =r. is tj • • ti.. • yIN 12;,oy �•F a .� .. ,r . ■ ++ a, ' . © Subbasin � Streams + ■ River Mile Markers rr �� 0 Culvert r - Riparian Cover Classification _ c•� Built ,. Forest Bare Earth . s Grassland, Pasture �% Shrubs Water iV rue. r SOURCE: NAIP. 2016: ESA, 2016: Open Street Maps, 2016; Kltsap County, 2016 160024 - Blackjack Creek Watershed Assessment FEMA, 2007 Figure 3. Protection and Restoration Actions — Lower Blackjack Creek Subbasin 21 Back to Agenda Preliminary "Net Ecological Benefits" Analysis A formal procedure for evaluating "net ecological benefits" has not been established at the time this document was assembled. Recognizing that this Conceptual Mitigation Plan is intended to inform the Joint Legislative Task Force regarding the question of how water resource mitigation projects can be evaluated, the following is provided as a preliminary "net environmental benefit" assessment. Ecological Resources The primary ecological area affected by Port Orchard's pilot project application are the tributary streams to Sinclair Inlet near the City's well sites, within Water Resource Inventory Area (WRIA) 15. The most significant ecological unit within this area is Lower Blackjack Creek. This a critical habitat area for multiple salmonid species, including ESA -listed Chinook salmon, which has been altered by human habitation. The ecological resources in the watershed have been studied by multiple agencies and the Suquamish Tribe, and 13 projects have been identified to restore natural resource function for the benefit of multiple fish species. Project Benefits Port Orchard's Well 12 and Well 13 projects will resolve multiple public health and safety issues related to aging water system infrastructure by allowing the replacement of old wells and siting of new high -capacity, deep aquifer wells at the top of the system. This will both extend the useful life of the City's wells for more than a generation and provide system reliability and cost efficiencies. The Well 12 project will also move some of the City's water production in the McCormick Hills sector from shallower to deeper aquifers, which reduces impacts on area streams. Projected population growth in the City's water service area and urban growth area will also be covered with the addition of annual quantity to meet future demand projections, providing stability and reliability to the City's and Kitsap County's multiple inter -related planning efforts, which is consistent the Growth Management Act. Containing this planned growth inside urban areas reduces many environmental impacts associated with growth by controlling and mitigating stormwater runoff, managing traffic impacts, and enforcing zoning and other development regulations designed to mitigate environmental impacts associated with growing populations. Project Detriments The long-term effect of additional annual groundwater withdrawals includes a decrease in shallow aquifer discharge to surface streams, as described in the Preliminary Impact Evaluation section of this conceptual mitigation plan. Port Orchard will replace these flows by pumping water to infiltration galleries adjacent to these streams, to the extent such water flow replacement is reasonably attainable. Due to the diffuse nature and geographical spread of shallow aquifer capture from deep aquifer withdrawals, it is not possible to mitigate all modelled impacts to surface streams, especially those located outside the City's water service area. Unmitigated flow impacts can reduce the usable habitat in these streams and decrease water temperature, potentially resulting in impacts to resident or anadromous fish. These unmitigated impacts in streams and steam segments for which the City cannot provide flow replacement mitigation are difficult to measure due to limitations on the accuracy of the Kitsap Groundwater Model and limited habitat assessments for streams other than Blackjack Creek inside the affected area. The extent of unmitigated environmental detriments due to the project is relatively unknown but expected to be minor relative to current conditions. 22 Back to Agenda Net Ecological Benefit Projects included in the Blackjack Creek Watershed Assessment were designed based on concepts generated by 5uquamish Tribe and WDFW. Final selection of projects will be made after completion of impact modelling and consultation with the 5uquamish Tribe and other stakeholders. The goal of that selection process and the implementation of selected projects is to meet the statutory requirement of "net ecological benefits to fish and related aquatic resources." Further details concerning the net environmental benefit determination await development of final guidance regarding net environmental benefit determinations by the Department of Ecology, streamflow restoration funding grants, and the impact evaluation and consultation processes described above. 23 Back to Agenda APPENDIX A - Streamflow Augmentation Plan STREAM AUGMENTATION PLANS JUNE 2006 KITSAP COUNTY, `lVASHINGTON SHEET# DESCRIPTION 1 COVER SHEET ""r 2 INDEX MAP f AUGMENTATiON LOCATION h 3 ROSS CREEK LOCATION PLAN F ! 4 ANDERSON CREEK LOCATION PLAN 5 BLACKJACK CREEK LOCATION PLAN 6 PARISH CREEK LOCATION PLAN T NOTES 8. DETAILS ... VICNITY IAAP I Y.T.S IGGLDSMITH 8L ASSO --1ATESY PREPARED FOR: CITY OF PORT ORCHARD, WA c!o OEM I, L-L-C. 4978 S-W. LAKE FLORA ROAD PORT ORCHARD, WA 95367 (360) 5m3395 FAX: (360) 876-3511 1 441k ,- r= SEl�pa'4" SERVICE T P y "L - 5/T. RLWS DRIVr'l- f LD CATION -J� - R EEf GMEANTAflDNr--'~--- . pW C NTROE ET AT 1 0 GPtil f --- }{�EEDETAII.Y� 0 "• �' s _ r 1 ANDERSON,CREF,t� ------- r. 1 ��. TATIQpf FLOW CDNT. SET @ 3-5 ' (SEE DEf Ir y -- — KIST1hlG 0 �l NDUUTFL IY�FPE t5 -- i V.i ER SERVICE TAN M..T-u r:� l Back to Agenda AUGMENTATION LOCATION D DEPTH OF PERF. PIPE ROSS CREEK I.0 FT. ANDERSON GREEN LO FT. BLACKdAcK CREEK 2.0 FT - PA WISH CREEK FT- 2.0 , ,&.GOLi7SMITH ,ASsbClarEs4 Back to Agenda GENERA' -NOTES L THE PURPOSE OF THIS PLAN SET It To ILLUSTRATE THE LOCO TION AND APPROACH TO STREAM AVGMENTAT ION IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE PORT ORCHARD WATER RIGHTS MITIGO TION PLAN FOR APPLICATIONS 0I-261I9. 6I-26A47. 0,-26464. AND GI-267ES (ROBINSON AND NODEL; ZOOS]. E. FPRO VIDEO ET THE CITY OF PDRT ORCHA RMA71ON SHOW. HEREON IS FROM OIs Rw SE DATA PRO AND SNETOHES OF AUGIENTATIOH APPROACH ET GOLDSMITH AND ASSOCIATEi 3. THIS EXHIBIT IS NOT A SURVEY OR ENGINEERING OE61GN AND WOULD NOT BE 3UI7ADLE FOR PERMIT OR CONSTRUCTION. �ELS�am To aTwu ------------- DETAIL NOTES: I. TAP ON EKISTING WATER MAIN MOULD OE A STANDARD CITY OF PORT ORCHARD TYPICAL WATER SERVICE CONNECTION PER 8ECTION 6.0 WATER -' SYSTEMS STANDARDS OF THE CITY OF PMT ORCHARD DEVELOFERS HAN DBDON 12DOW. 2. FLOW CONTROL APPARATUS AND VALVE BOX CAN SE SEPARATE v OF APPURTENANCES,NOR AVENDOR RIT FROM A •A TERWORN5 OR IRRIGATION SYSTEMS MANWACTVRER. 3. NO SPECIFIC PIPE MATERIAL IS REQUIRED FOR THE GRAVEL FILLED INTERFLGM DIGTRIBUT ION. HOWEVER. [RUSHED GRAVEL SHOULD OONTAIH MINIMAL FINES. RM. LL[ - NOTES & DETAIL FOR OF 7 FLOW CONTROL 7 -F 4 Back to Agenda APPENDIX B Blackjack Creek Restoration Projects Port Orchard Creek Habitat Project Considerations Excerpts from Blackjack Creek Watershed Assessment and Protection and Restoration Plan Prepared by ESA for the Sucluamish Tribe 6100*001ky,1k51=1►II]=1IMTO1101► 6-1 Recommended actions for the protection and restoration of saImonid habitat in the Blackjack Creek watershed are presented below by subbasin. Several of the actions were recommended in previous assessments and plans and have been modified based on current conditions and for the purposes of this Watershed Plan. Actions were preliminarily identified and discussed in the Recommended Strategies and Actions Memorandum (ESA, 2017b), and presented to project partners and stakeholders at a workshop in November 2017, and subsequently refined based on feedback and input. 5.1 Lower Blackjack Creek The Blackjack Creek watershed downstream of State Route (SR) 16 is characterized by a combination of residential and commercial land uses within the City of Port orchard. Throughout this area, the lower mainstem of Blackjack Creek flows through a steep ravine of mostly forested riparian corridor that varies in width (generally between 600 feet and 1,100 feet). The overall riparian conditions in the Lower Blackjack Creek subbasin range from functioning {generally along the mainstem} to impaired (in some of the tributary streams due to tree removal and development with impervious and semi - pervious surfaces). In tributary streams where riparian conditions are impaired, the degree of imperviousness could alter downstream functions in the mainstem, especially those related to flow and water quality. Improving or retrofitting stormwater systems to provide improved treatment and attenuation would help mitigate potential impacts from ongoing land development adjacent to tributary streams. Conversely, riparian conditions are functioning along the mainstem of Blackjack Creek where the stream flows through a steep ravine upstream of the estuary. The ravine provides some of the best riparian habitat in the watershed in terms of intactness, connectivity, riparian zone width, and vegetation composition. These qualities support stream functions that maintain suitable spawning, rearing, and migratory fish habitat conditions within the lower mainstem, and are likely the cause for relatively large amounts of spawning activity for chum and coho salmon in the subbasin. Protecting this high quality habitat through purchase, easements, or strengthened land use development standards would be appropriate in this portion of the lower mainstem reach. A particular challenge in the ravine is ongoing and unpermitted human habitation that can have impacts on water quality, vegetation, and stream bank erosion. Addressing this source of impact is also important to preserving riparian and instream habitat conditions of the mainstem. 1 Back to Agenda The natural characteristics of the estuary have been highly altered or lost entirely by development including significant fill of historic intertidal area. Natural tidal exchange at the mouth of the stream is substantially constricted by the Bay Street crossing. An active tidal delta remains with a limited amount of intertidal mudflat and fringing salt marsh extending approximately 1,500 feet upstream. Restoration of the tidal delta through removal of fill, structures, and riiprap along with riparian planting would increase important rearing and migratory habitat forjuvenile salmonids passing through the delta as well as providing a holding area for adults moving into Blackjack Creek. Thirteen (13) actions are identified for the Lower Blackjack Creek subbasin (Table 7 and Figure 3). Table 7. Recommended Actions — Lower Blackjack Creek 5ubbasin River Mile or Reach Location Action LB11 Tidal Delta/Nearshore Restoration Estuary/Nearshore O.O/Mouth LB12—Viewing Platform 1-1313—Protect Riparian Habitat LBJ4— Large Woody Debris Placement LB15— LowerMainstem RM 0.0-3.2 Invasive Plant Removal LBJ6—Removal of Abandoned Foot Bridge LBJ7—Maintain or Expand Protective Zoning LBJS—Restoration between Sedgwick and SE Dogwood Road and also Right Upper Mainstem RM 3.2-4.3 Bank Tri butary LB19-4ish Passage Improvements (at least road crossings LBJ1O—Fish Passage Improvements @ 5R16 Tributaries n/a LB111—Restoration @ Confluence of Blackjack and Ruby Creeks LB112—Review and Improve Regulations and Requirements LB113-5tormwater Retrofits Back to Agenda �J I r �.y 4 f r s 16 a rx i - ■ , m la R f L`1.dJ-�JY S rr + ' ' • E Subbasin 2" r Streams ■ River Mile Markers f r 19 Culvert r x ` Riparian Cover Classification x ► Gem ':. �r, i Built Forest Bare Earth 7 - +r - a Grassland, Pasture ,. Shrubs 0 2, Water l:�.► - �� Feet � r SOURCE: NAIP, 2015; ESA, 2016; Open Street Maps, 2016; K4E;ap County, 2016 160024 - Blackjack Creek Watershed Assessment FENiA, 2007 Figure 3. 3 Protection and Restoration Actions — Lower Blackjack Creek 5ubbasin Back to Agenda Back to Agenda Action LBJ7—Tidal Delta Restoration Develop a master plan for the Blackjack Creek tidal delta and adjacent nearshore that includes a comprehensive review of opportunities to restore tidal processes and estuarine habitat, land ownership and feasibility, and potential impacts from sea level rise. Meanwhile, implement restoration in the estuary and/or nearshore Description if/when opportunities arise. Restoration actions could include: removal of intertidal fill, armoring, concrete and other debris; restoration of riparian habitat by planting native vegetation; and improvement of forage fish spawning habitat by beach restoration. [this action is modified from Aquascape Projects 71, 72, and 731 Restoration of the tidal delta improves the lateral connectivity of the estuary, allowing for tidal exchange, the formation of distributary channels, and fluvial deposition. Increases and improves natural shoreline habitat for beach spawning Outcome species. Planting native vegetation restores riparian processes (long-term wood recruitment, shading, bank complexity, and food chain support). This action would also include public involvement and community education due to its location in the City and along major transportation corridors. R3.2 Remove constraints to lateral connectivity (Tidal) R4. Restore riparian processes Strategies Addressed R8. Debris Prevention and Removal R9. Public Involvement LBJ1 Photographs: Left: Mouth of Blackjack Creek facing downstream (pedestrian bridge in background). Right: Blackjack Creek estuary upstream of Bay Street bridge. Back to Agenda Action LBJ2-Viewing Platform Appropriately sited (to avoid environmental impacts) viewing platform and/or interpretive area near Description pedestrian bridge or in the vicinity of estuary. [this action is modifiied from Aquascape II Project 811 Promotes community education and awareness of historical habitat impacts, salmon, and saImonid Outcome habitat improvement and protection in the watershed. Strategies P1.2 Improve compliance and/or strengthen land use regulations Addressed R9. Public Involvement LBJ2 Photographs: Existing pedestrian bridge across tidal delta, facing north from Bay Street bridge Action I LBJ3-Protect Riparian Habitat Acquire and protect high quality riparian habitat along Blackjack Creek through acquisition and/or Description conservation easements; continue protection and development restrictions in lower Blackjack Creek ravine. [this action is modified from Aquascape II Project 701 Addresses riparian and floodplain processes by protecting peak and base streamflow, sediment loading, in -stream wood, channel and floodplain complexity, water temperature, and food chain support. This action would also address the ongoing and unpermitted human habitation and the Outcome associated impacts on water quality, vegetation, and stream bank erosion. This action would improve and increase compliance of land use regulations to protect watershed functions and upland, wetland, and riparian habitats through better enforcement and landowner practice. Strategies P1.1 Acquisitions and c r ervation easements P L 2 Improve. compliance.arid/pr strengthen land use regulations Addressed R8. Debris Preventio d Removal ] t F :,r-: '-i r¢77 r s 1-13J3 Photograph: III parian habitat in lower blackjack Creek ravine. Back to Agenda Back to Agenda Action I LBJ4-Large Woody Debris Placement Investigate conditions and develop strategy for LWD addition within the lower two miles of Blackjack Creek. This action would involve LWD placement until full riparian function is restored and would Description specifically target saImonid habitats that would hen efit most from acceleration of forest succession. [this action is modified from Aquascape II Project 771 Prevents further channel incision and improves habitat through placement of in -channel large woody material. This action focuses on increasing the amount of instream wood to increase hydraulic roughness and restore channel complexity in the intermediate period while riparian forests are Outcome developing. Wood placement promotes scour and deposition processes that form complex substrate, pools and bars, and secondary channel formation to improve adult holding and spawning, and juvenile rearing habitat. Strategies R5. Place in -channel large woody debris Addressed LBJ4 Photograph: Example of in -channel habitat in lower Blackjack Creek Action I LBJ5-Invasive Plant Removal Invasive plant removal and riparian restoration in tidally -influenced portion of lower mainstem and Description upstream where invasives are present Restores riparian processes of long-term wood recruitment, stream shading, bank and flood plain complexity, and food chain support. This action would also improve degraded instream habitat Outcome structure and condition through the removal of accumulated litter and debris. It would allow for habitat -forming processes such as sediment and organic material supply and transport, nutrient cvclinLy. and localized hvdroloay. Strategies R4. Restore riparian processes Addressed I R8. Debris Prevention and Removal F-i LBJ5 Photograph: In►►asive plants occur in the tidally influenced portion of Iower Blackjack Creek Back to Agenda Back to Agenda Action I LBJ6- Removal of Abandoned Foot Bridge Remove abandoned foot bridge (Kendall Street bridge) crossing at RM 0.7 and develop options for Description utility relocation Reconnects isolated off channel habitats through removal of the bridge. This action would restore longitudinal connectivity, improving sediment and organic material supply and transport, nutrient Outcome cycling, and localized hydrology, as well as allowing for lateral channel migration, promotion of side channel and off -channel habitat formation, flood plain connectivity, sediment storage, and decreasing stream energy during peak flow events. Strategie"IR18.Debris evention and Removal Addresse LBJ6 Photographs: Left: Pedestrian bridge crossing Blackjack Creek at RM 0.7, facing downstream. Right: Bridge from above facing east. Action I LBJ7-Maintain or Expand Protective Zoning Maintain or expand the current Greenbelt (Gb) zoning and comprehensive plan land use designations as shown in the Port Orchard Comprehensive Plan Land Use Map and City Zoning Map Description to ensure protection of the riparian corridor and stream and to reduce potential impacts from development and redevelopment below (north and east of) SR-16 (extending beyond current 200- footShoreline (as designated under the Shoreline Management Act) Protects watershed functions and upland, wetland, and riparian habitats through strengthened Outcome protections and better enforcement. This action would improve riparian processes by protecting and restoring riparian functions such as shade, wood recruitment, and natural bank stabilization. Strategies I P1.2 Improve compliance and/or strengthen land use regulations Addressed 10 Back to Agenda LBJS-Restoration on Mainstem between 5edgwick and 5E Dogwood Road Action and Right Bank Tributary Restore stream channel, riparian and associated wetland between Sedgwick and SE Dogwood Rd on the mainstem of Blackjack Creek. Also restore riparian and associated wetlands along right bank tributary present upstream of RM4. This tributary flows east to west and crosses under SIR 16 via Description multiple culverts that are addressed in action 1_13J9 (below). Restoration may also consider allowing for the presence of beaver and/or designing beaver dam analogs as an element where appropriate. This action is at the upper end of the subbasin. [this action is modified from Aquascape II Project 721 Restores lateral connectivity of riparian and floodplain, allowing for lateral channel migration, restoration of sediment and organic material supply, storage, and transport, promoting or restoring the formation of side channels and ofF channel habitats, floodplain connectivity, and decreasing stream energy during peak flow events. This action would address loss of groundwater recharge Outcome functions by increasing the lateral extent of the hyporheic zone thereby reducing summer water temperatures and maintaining base flows. It would restore riparian habitat processes of long-term wood recruitment, stream shading, bank and floodplain connectivity, and food chain support. In addition, this action would improve habitat conditions within and adjacent to agricultural lands by reducing unrestricted livestock access and the potential for bank erosion through exclusion methods. 131.1 Acquisitions and conservation easements Strategies R2. Restore wetland and floodplain storage processes R3.1 Remove constraints to lateral connectivity (Riverine) Addressed R4. Restore riparian processes R6. Improve habitat conditions within and adjacent to agricultural lands LBJ8 Photograph: Upper mainstem of Blackjack Creek and associated wetlands, facing south from SE Dogwood Rd. 11 Back to Agenda Action I LBJ9—Fish Passage Improvements (multiple) A right bank tributary to the mainstem crosses Dogwood Rd. SE and SE Cedar Rd, both complete barrier culverts. A partial barrier culvert runs under State Hwy 16 is 50' upstream from the upper culvert. Juvenile coho and coastal cutthroat trout have been documented at SE Dogwood Road Description crossing by Wild Fish Conservancy. Action proposes fish passage improvements @ Dogwood Road SE, SE Cedar Road, SR16, and Ferate Avenue SE/SE Rose Road. Remove/ replace full and partial barriers. [this action is WFC Project N] Improves fish passage by addressing barriers to longitudinal migration potentially resulting in a 3,700' gain in fish habitat. Also reconnects isolated habitats and restores continuous corridors Outcome essential for fish movement, food, shelter, and reproduction. This action also addresses the supply and downstream transport of sediment, organic material (e.g., wood and detritus) and nutrients. Strategies R1. Reconnect isolated habitats and remove barriers to fish passage Addressed 1-6J9 Photograph: Partial barrier culvert under State Highway 16. 12 Back to Agenda Action I LBJ10-Fish Passage Improvements @ 5R16 Fish passage improvements @ three culverts on mainstem Blackjack at 5R16; all assessed by WSDOT as 67% passable and have individual PI Total scores of 32.03 (#996755), 31.75 (#996756), and 31.75 Description (#990038). All three are on U.S. District Court injunction list. These partial passage barriers were identified as a high priority by the watershed assessment (ESA, 2017a). Outcome Improves fish passage by addressing barriers to longitudinal migration. Also reconnects isolated habitats and restores continuous corridors essential for fish movement, food, shelter, and reproduction. This action also addresses the supply and downstream transport of sediment, organic material (e.g., wood and detritus) and nutrients. Strategies R1. Reconnect isolated habitats and remove barriers to fish passage Addressed LBJ10 Photographs: Left: Culvert # 996755. Center: Culvert #996756. Right: Culvert #99009. 13 Back to Agenda Action I LBJ77-Restoration @ Confluence of Blackjack and Ruby Creeks Re -meander channel, restore wetlands and riparian vegetation, and targeted LWD placement at Description confluence of Lower Blackjack Creek and Ruby Creek west of SR16 and east of Sidney Road SW. Restoration may also consider allowing for the presence of beaver and/or designing beaver dam analogs as an element where appropriate. Improves wetland floodplain storage to buffer against increased bank erosion from peak flows that occur downstream in steeper portions of the stream that have erodible deposits. Improves instream Outcome habitat conditions (specifically, groundwater recharge functions) of summer base flows, dissolved oxygen, and temperature. Planting of native riparian vegetation would result in long-term wood recruitment, stream shading, bank and floodplain complexity, and food chain support. R2. Restore wetland and floodplain storage processes Strategies R3.1 Remove constraints to lateral connectivity (Riverine) Addressed R4. Restore riparian processes R5. Place in -channel large woody debris Action I LBJ92 Review and Improve Regulations and Requirements Review and improve land use regulations and stormwater requirements for two residential areas near 1,000 foot -long tributary (east of Bethel Road) and near shorter tributaries (adjacent to Lippert Drive and SE Lund Avenue); improvements could include tree retention and additional impervious Description surface limits, and additional expectations for use of LID to minimize runoff from future developments. Review and development of strengthened regulations should he informed by and consistent with the spatial information developed as part of this watershed assessment. Strengthen regulations to protect watershed functions and upland, wetland, and riparian habitats from the potential impacts from ongoing development and redevelopment adjacent to tributary Outcome streams. This action would address riparian and floodplain processes by protecting headwater and floodplain wetlands, and protecting and restoring riparian functions such as shade, wood presence and recruitment, and natural bank stabilization. Strategies P1.2 Improve compliance and/or strengthen land use regulations Addressed Action LBJ13--5tormwater Retrofits Coordinate with City of Port Orchard Public Works to identify existing stormwater facilities that should be prioritized for retrofit of runoff detention and water quality functions; support Description implementation of high priority retrofit actions. This action applies to the entire Lower Blackjack Creek subbasin. Improve flood storage and attenuation processes by implementing low impact development activities such as new stormwater runoff facilities, facility retrofits, and flow control and water Outcome quality treatment for stormwater runoff. This strategy addresses the negative effects of altered stormwater runoff regimes associated with increased impervious surface coverage by restoring natural storage functions. Strategies I R7. Improve/retrofit stormwater attenuation capacity and treatment within and adjacent to Addressed developed areas Back to Agenda OF PORT ORCHARD Water System Plan Reviewing Agency: State of Washington Department of Health, Southwest Drinking Water Operations Contact: Contact: Date - Comment Document PDF Page internal comments No. Section Page Number Number Comment Responsibility Response GENERAL 1 BHC To Do. Also include all tables and figures in the TOC Please include your sub appendices in your table of contents. 2 Please submit your WSP as one complete document instead of BHC To Do multiple PDFs_ One large PDF per ODW instructions The plan approval period will last until 2029 unless projections Jacki This is acceptable to the City. Done are extended to at least ten years 3 from the time of plan approval. For example, if you intend to gain approval this year for a 10 year approval period, projections must extend through 2031. Please update the plan wherever it states that "lead-free" BHC To Do when the chapters come back to BHC from materials are "{less than 8 percent lead the city. Check all chapters and appx and cross out content}." Lead-free now means "a weighted average of U25 when completed: 4 percent calculated across the wetted Ch1, Ch2, Chi, Ch4, Ch5, Ch6, Ch7, Ch8, Ch9 surfaces of pipes, pipe fittings, plumbing fittings, and fixtures Apendices and 0.2 percent for solder and flux." 5 Provide Local Government Consistency Determinations from Jacki Determination of non{esponsiveness attached. done Kitsap County CWSP administrator and Kitsap County - A Gear statement of intent to annex systems would help in the N/A There are no plans to annex any systems at this time. done 6 event you would like to access the Drinking Water State Revolving Fund process - Several sections of this plan require the stamp and signature of BHC To Do a professional engineer licensed in 7 the state of Washington. The engineer may place their seal at the beginning of the report W cover all sections or place it on the appropriate sections as indicated in the comments below. Jacki Revised to read, "it is anticipated that this intertie would only be done Throughout the document, it is stated the City of Pat Orchard activated to provide water from Bremerton to Port Orchard since (City) fluoridates the water in the Bremerton's system has many more source and pumping 181 1-1 City s main system, but not in the McCormick Woods system redundancies. In the unlikely event that Bremerton was in need 8 because the City of Bremerton will of water from the Port Orchard system, two options exist: 1 j Port ..4 32 3-19 not accept fluoridated water. Explain how the emergency Orchard temporarily suspends fluoridation durng the emergency intertie agreement will address and flushes the fluoridated water before supplying Bremerton, or fluoridation once the main City system consolidates with the 2) Bremerton suspends their non -fluoridated water policy during McCormick Woods system. the emergency." CHAPTER 1 - DESCRIPTION OF WATER SYSTEM Page 1 of 8 Back to Agenda OF PORT ORCHARD Water System Plan Reviewing Agency: State of Washington Department of Health, Southwest Drinking Water Operations Contact: Contact: Date - Comment Document PDF Page internal comments No. Section Page Number Number Comment Responsibility Response Jacki The 2nd sentence in Section 1.11.3 that read "Municipal water done suppliers such as the City of Port Orchard have a duty to serve customers within their retail service area {WAC 246-290- 9 1.11.3 1-23 Page 1-23 in Section 1.11.3. Please consider changing the 100{4}(a){iv}}." was changed tD read "Municipal water suppliers reference to the requirement W provide maps [WAC 246-290- such as the City of Port Orchard have a duty to serve customers 101)(4)(a)(m}] to the statute that imposes the duty to serve in within their retail service area {RCW 43.2D.26D}" RCW 43.20.260. BHC done, Cadito updated 10 Figure 1-2, Page 1-9. The map includes the Maple Street Tank and the Sidney Elevated Tank, but there is no mention in the narrative about these tanks. Explain the use of these tanks. Jacki Jacki to address, Tom assist? Chapter 1, Page 1-12, Table 1-1, Chapter 4, Page 4-10, Table 4-1, and Appendix C3. Water Right G1-26729P is attached to 1'I Port Orchard Well 4 in Table 4-1. It is attached to Port Orchard Well 5 in Appendix C3. It was determined after the 2018 sanitary survey that Well 4 did not exist. Please clarify status of Well 4 and clarify which well the water right is attached. CHAPTER 2 - PLANNING DATA & WATER DEMAND BHC The sentence referenced that read "The average demand per done 2-13 ERU between 2015 and 2017 was 250 gpd in the McCormick 12 table 5 Chapter 2, Page 2-13, Paragraph 2. The Average Daily System..." was revised to read "The average demand per ERU Demand {ADD} used conflicts with the ADD in Table 2-5. between 2015 and 2017 was 220 gpd in the McCormick Please clarify. System..." This paragraph no longer conflicts with Table 2-5 CHAPTER 3 - SYSTEM ANALYSIS Jacki Revised to read, "The most recent update to the City's done Coliform Monitoring Plan is included in Appendix E. The 13 3.22 3-10 Section 3.2.2, Total Coliform Rule subsection. Please update City oDllects fifteen samples in the City's system and three number of required samples. samples in McCormick Woods per month." BHC The peach areas are outside of the Citys service area and are done 14 3-28 not being addressed in this document. No revision to Fig 34 was Figure 3-3. What do the peach areas depict? made 15 3-14 Table 34 MCL concentrations should be in m /L. BHC The units MGlL were revised to read rniA done Capacity and hydraulic analyses must no stampedand signed BHC An engineer stamp has been placed at the beginning of the TO DO: Chuck to ensure this is completed on Final 16 by a professional engineer. It is recommended the engineer water system plan to cover all engineering in the report document stamp the beginning of the water system plan to cover all engineering in the report. BHC TO DO: add a statement about whether actual population is lower or higher than projected 17 Explain haw assumptions and future demands compare to population used in the model for 2018 and 2019 2018 and 2019 data. Nick Bond is working on getting the data to do this. Page 2 of 8 Back to Agenda OF PORT ORCHARD Water System Plan Reviewing Agency: State of Washington Department of Health, Southwest Drinking Water Operations Contact: Contact: Date - Comment Document PDF Page internal comments No. Section Page Number Number Comment Responsibility Response Chapter 3, Page 3-10. The Total Coliform Rule (TCR) became Jacki Text reading "An MC of 4.0 mglL for fluoride concentration in done 18 3-10 the Revised Total Coliform Rule (RTCR) in 2014. EPA reduced drinking water was established by EPA in 1985" was revised to the target fluoridation level to 0.7 milligrams per liter (r lL}. read " EPA has reduced the target fluoridation level to 0.7 Please update- mi I I ig rams per liter m L ." Chapter 3, Page 3-12. Please correct the maximum BHC Text currently reading "...the MCL for TTHM is 100 pglL..." was done 19 3-12 contaminant level (MCL) for Total Trihalomethanes (TTHM). It revised to read "...the MCL for TTHM is 80 pg1L..." is set at 80 micrograms per liter IL . Jacki This paragraph was revised to read, 'The City disinfects drinking done water with calcium hypochlorite at wells 6 and 7 and with on -site chlorine generation at wells 8, 9, and the McCormick Woods water system. Each well treatment site may be considered a 'Water Treatment Plante under the DID BP Rule. The City is required to collect two sets of TTHM and HAA5 samples from 20 3-15 the portions of the distribution system with the oldest water each year. When water is supplied through one of the Bremerton water system connections for more than 15 days in any given calendar quarter, the City is required to collect one set of TTHM Chapter 3, Page 3-15, Disinfection Byproducts. Disinfection and HAA5 samples for that quarter. It is unlikely that the City byproducts {DBP} samples TTTHM and HAA5) are to be taken would develop a DBP problem from the water produced by City in the distribution system at a site with the longest water e. wells." Chapter 3, Page 3-30, Average Day Demand Nigh Pressure Jacki Customers are already aware. A new sentence was added to done Al Water customers in the high pressure areas should be the end of the last paragraph on Page 3-30 that reads "All new 21 3-30 notified that pressures above 80 psi could cause damage tD customers will be notified in advance of connecting to the water plumbing and hot water tanks and issues should be reported to system if they are in areas where water pressures are the water department- anticipated to he above 80 psi." Jacki A footnote was added to the reads "Water pressures are as done 22 3-31 Chapter 3, Page 3-31, Table 3-10. Explain how the listed areas predicted by the model. Field testing has shown that no in the 580 Zone are deficient. pressure deficiency exists in the system that is in service." Submit e Worksheet 4-1Capacity Slum mary trom the BHC Nearly complete; needs to incorporate updated 23 Water System Design Manual or a similar table that identifies water rights info and number of commercial and the limiting factor for each water system separately and as a government connectios in 2017 (if available) combined water system. Determine where to insert Tbl 4-1 in the WSP CHAPTER 4 -WATER RESOURCE ANALYSIS Page 3of8 Back to Agenda OF PORT ORCHARD Water System Plan Reviewing Agency: State of Washington Department of Health, Southwest Drinking Water Operations Contact: Contact: Date - Comment Section Document PDF Page Comment Responsibility Response internal comments No. Page Number Number Tom Pors done Understood. Please note that the Cityrs total Oi of 3300 gpm includes 400 gpm from Permit G1-26447P, currently associated with McCormick Well 413, which is located at the McCormick 24 4-15 Woods golf course. The City has applied to Ecology to divide Permit G1-26447P and to associate the Cityrs portion of this Chapter4, Table 4-3. ODW cannot grant additional capacity water right (400 gpm, 645 acre-feet/year] with Wells 11 and 12. for water rights not yet secured. The Port Orchard Water The City agrees that its total existing instantaneous quantity is System is limited to 2,150 gallons per minute {gpm} and the 2900 gpm until this change application is approved. McCormick Woods Water System is limited to 750 gpm. Jacki -- Efficiency measures now include: 1 _ done updated Include water conservation information in the City's annual Program Consumer Confidence Report (annual water quality report approved by to consumers)_ 2_ Evlauate the Council on 9/14 inclusion of inserts as part of the monthly water bills that Systems of this size are required to have six additional (non- present information regarding the impoerance of water mandatary) water use efficiency measures. Since the goal is conservation and actions individuals can implement to related only to residential water use, all six measures must reduce their water use. 3. Investigate a 25 4.1 4-1 apply to residential customers. We note only four: Water Conservation School Outreach Program that my ❑ Additional consumer education (multiple education efforts include school presetnations, preparation of curriculum all count as one additional consumer education effort, materials, water conservation education handout material, evaluated or not) and tours of water system facilities. ❑ Required low water use fixtures in new construction 4. Provide water conservation materials at public outreach ❑ Rebate on low flow toilet replacement events_ 5_ Use ❑ Dye tablets for in -home leak detection Conservation Rate concepts in rate setting. 6. Show Please evaluate additional methods or apply the goal (and the measures) to additional customer classes (such as commercial consumption history on water bills. or industnal). Chapter4, Section 4.4.3, Well 12 Project Paragraph and Well BHC done 4-10 and 13 Project Paragraph. The instantaneous water Fight and 26 Appendix C4 annual water right in the paragraphs do not agree with Table 4- 1 and the Water Right Self Assessment in Appendix C3. Please clarity. {actuafly appendix C4 } CHAPTER 6 - OPERATIONS AND MAINTENANCE Section 62 General Information, Identification Numbers. Both IMCCDrmickWoods- Revised to read, "State Dept of Health Identification done 27 62 6-1 system IDs are listed as "City System". One is assigned to IJacki Number (McCormick Woods System): 40529_ Please verify- Page 4 of 8 Back to Agenda OF PORT ORCHARD Water System Plan Reviewing Agency: State of Washington Department of Health, Southwest Drinking Water Operations Contact: Contact: Date - Comment Document PDF Page internal comments No. Section Page Number Number Comment Responsibility Response Jacki Revised to, "Day-to-day management of field operations done Section 6.3 and Figure 6-1. Please clarify roles and and maintenance of the system is the responsibility of the responsibilities. The narrative mentions a Public Works Supervisor, but is not identified in Figure 6-1. Explain how the Utility Manager and the Operations Manager through the 28 6.3 6-2 Utility Manager interacts with the operations team. The current Public Works Foreman." Utility Manager is our main system contact, but the Also, figure 6-1 was updated. organization chart indicates the position only oversees stormwater. Section 6.7, Element 2. Explain frequency of existing service Jacki done connection hazard evaluations for residential and norr- Revised to read, "Hazard evaluations are performed when residential connections. Explain how existing commercial and tenant or use changes are initiated by the owner or industrial sites with frequent tenant changes are evaluated or if consumer. All known commercial and/or industrial sites 29 65 all have cross connection control. have backflow prevention commensurate with the degree of hazard. The City is in the process of creating a new staff position to perform periodic inspections of premises for compliance with the Cross Connection Control and the FOG Elimination and Reduction Programs." Section 6.7, Element 3. Explain if there is a combination of in- Jacki Revised to read, "The City allows a combination of fixture done premises and premises isolation protection or if all are and premises isolation to protect the water supply as 30 6-5 premises isolation. determined adequate by a City Crass Connection Specialist-" Section 6.7, Element 4. Identify a person or position who is the Jacki Revised to read, "The Cross Connection Control Program done 31 6-6 crass connection control speaalist (CCS) lead and reviews the is managed by the Utilities Manager or the Operations Cross Connection Control Program [CCCP]. Manager if the Utility Manager is unavailable." Jacki Revised to read, "A data base, maintained) by the PW Clerk done and overseen by the Utilities manager, tracks all relevant 32 6-6 information including a master list of service connections, Section 6-7, Element 9. Explain who maintains the CCC inventory information, backflow incidents, and annual database. summary reports-" Jacki Text in Table 6-2 that read "DOE NW Regional Office 425-649L done Section 6.8, Table 6-2 Emergency Call -Up List. For the ODW 70D0" was revised to read "DOE NW Regional Office of Drinking 33 6.8 6-7 Regional Office, use telephone number (360) 236 3030, which Water 360-236-3030" is the main number. Regional engineers can be re -assigned within the office and make phone numbers obsolete. Jacki/BHC Text previously reading "Figure 6-2" was revised to read "Figure done 34 682 6-8 6 3' and previous "Figure 6-3" was revised to read "Figure 6-4." Section 6.8.2, Pages 63 and 6-9, Paragraphs after Table 6-3. Removed unnecessary figures per Sophia Petro - Verify references to figure numbers in the narrative. Page 5of8 Back to Agenda OF PORT ORCHARD Water System Plan Reviewing Agency: State of Washington Department of Health, Southwest Drinking Water Operations Contact: Contact: Date - Comment Document PDF Page internal comments No. Section Page Number Number Comment Responsibility Response Figure 6-2, Page 6-10. Ensure the detection procedures are Jacki Removed unnecessary figures per Sophia Petra and revised the done consistent with the Revised Total Coliform Rule. Acute and CallfDnn Monitoring Plan in Appendix E2. 35 Appendix E2 nonacute violations are no longer applicable. Contact the regional coliform program manager, Charese Gainor at swro.coli@doh.wa.gov or (360) 236-3045, for assistance. Jacki/BHC Removed unnecessary figures per Sophia Petra. done Figure 6-3, Page 6-11. Some of the steps appear to be 36 missing part of the statements. Also, confirm your procedures with chemical monitoring program manager, Sophia Petro at sophia.petro@doh.wa.gov or (360) 236-3046. Jacki Added to section, "If there is suspicion of an unknown done substance present in the water, due to a consumer taste and/or odor complaint or other potential contamination, the Utilities Manager and Operations Manager are notified immediately_ While it is impossible to anticipate every possible scenario and each instance must be analyzed on its awn merit, the following steps are a general procedural 37 682 6-8 guideline- 1 - Ascertain if the complaint is valid; 2-Inquire of nearby consumers if they have experienced the same or a similar issue; 3-Collect a bacteriological sample; 4.Inspect the area for possible crass connections; Explain procedures for unknown substance suspected in water 5-Flush the surrounding area,- system- Describe the water quality parameters measured to 6-Contact the DOH-ODW helpline for advice if the determine the type of test to be taken. problem persists_" CHAPTER 7 - MINIMUM DESIGN CRITERIA & Chapter 7, Page 7-1, Section 7.3. states datum used is NAD 83 BHC Text that previously read ".._is based on NAD 83 State Plan done State Plane Washington North; this agrees with Section 3.12, Washington North." was revised to read "...is based on North 38 Page 3-1. Appendix G, Chapter 8 Design Standards, Section American Vertical Datum 88 (NAD 88)." Appendix G was not 8.1.A, Paragraph 6 states NAVD 88 datum is used. Please changed. clarify. Jacki Text that previously read ".._600 feet in residential areas," was done Appendix G, Chapter 8 Design Standards, Section 8.1.13, Item revised to read "...8DO feet in residential areas," 39 13. States 800 feet between isolation valves in residential areas. Chapter 7, Page 7-4, Section 7.6.3, states 600 feet between isolation valves in residential areas. Please clarify. CHAPTER a - CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN Page 6 of 8 Back to Agenda OF PORT ORCHARD Water System Plan Reviewing Agency: State of Washington Department of Health, Southwest Drinking Water Operations Contact: Contact: Date - Comment Document PDF Page internal comments No. Section Page Number Number Comment Responsibility Response Table 8-1- CFC is not defined in chapter 8. Jacki Definition added following table 8-1: "CFC = Capital Facilities done 40 Charges; charged to the customer when a new connection to the water system is applied for and used to partially fund the CI P." CHAPTER 9 - FINANCIAL PROGRAM Section 9.5.1, Paragraph 2, Page 9-6. Preconstruction grants Katy Revised to read, "The Washington State Department of done don't exist at this time. The consolidation grant cycle is now Health {DOH} typically has four DWSRF funding 41 . 9.51 9-6 August of each year. opportunities each year: grants for consolidation in April and May; loans for preconstruction are open year-round; construction loans in October and November; and emergency loans openyear-round-" Section 9.5.1, Last Paragraph, Page 9-7. The infrastructure Jacki Revised to read, 'To keep current with infrastructure funding done database is through the Washington State Office of the State programs, a database is provided by the Washington State 42 Treasurer and located at hops:llwawv.wafunddirectory.wa.govl. Office of the State Treasurer. The City can use this database to Please update. monitor available funding and contact information. The database can be accessed at https:/lwww. wafunddirectory.wa.govl." APPENDIX D - MODEL CALIBRATION MEMO 43 Appendix D, BHC Memorandum. Please have the engineer BHC To Do sign his stamp - APPENDIX E -WATER QUALITY MONITORING & 44 Please ensure that McCormick Woods' CCR for 2020 does not Jacki Subsequent issues do not include the fluoride reference for done state that fluoridation is added. McCormick Woods Appendix E2, Section A.3 Source of Supply Table 1. The Jacki Appendix E2 has been updated and replaced in Appendix E2 done 45 capacities indicated for P06, P08, P09, MIW1, and MW2 do not match the current Water Facilities Inventory (WFI) form. Please clarify - Appendix E2, Section C Routine, Repeat, and Triggered. The Jacki Appendix E2 has been updated and replaced in Appendix E3 done 46 number of routine samples per month in Sept - May recently increased from 10 to 15 for the City. Please update the City sampling locations or rotation to account for this change. Jacki Appendix E2 has been updated and replaced in Appendix E4 done Appendix E2, Section D2 Triggered Source Monitoring. As a consecutive system to Bremerton, following an unsatisfactory 47 sample, you must also notify your wholesaler who must collect triggered samples from their well sources. See WAC 246-290- 300(3)rh){viXA}{C}. Please add to your coliform monitoring plan to account for this coordination. Appendix E2, Section F System Map. The provided map is Jacki/BHC Appendix E2 has been updated and replaced in Appendix E5 done 48 quite small and lacking detail. Please provide a larger map that includes the location of the storage tanks. Page size l l x14 would bepreferred- revised Page 7 of 8 Back to Agenda OF PORT ORCHARD Water System Plan Reviewing Agency: State of Washington Department of Health, Southwest Drinking Water Operations Contact: Contact: Date - Comment Document PDF Page internal comments No Section Page Number Number OOrt Responsibility Response Jacki Appendix E2 has been updated and replaced in Appendix E5 done Appendix E2, Sections G Response Checklist. This section is 49 incomplete. It is intended to be completed in advance so a process can be developed and clear for all. Please consider completing to find the weak points in your existing process. Appendix e c i orm monitoring plan is lacking a Jacki Appendix E2 has been updated and replaced in Appendix E5 done discussion on assessments such as what triggers one, who will 50 complete, etc. Please consider adding information on this requirement. APPENDIX G - WATER SYSTEM STANDARDS Appendix G, Chapter 8 Design Standards. This must be Jacki City Engineer signed done 5-1 stamped and signed by a professional engineer licensed in the state of Washington - 52 Appendix G, Chapter 8 Design Standards. Include a reference Jacki Added, "The City of Port Orchard is a party to the Kitsap done W the Coordinated Water System Plan. County Coordinated Water System Plan." Added, "All materials used for construction, operations, and Jackillan done J `3 maintenance of water facilities, water distribution systems, Appendix G, Chapter 8 Design Standards. Include references and other associated water appurtenances shall conform to to NSF 60 and 61 1 NSF 60 and NSF 61." APPENDIX I - WELLHEAD PROTECTION PLAN 54 Appendix I, Wellhead Protection Plan. Have a hydrogeologist Joe I I stamp and sign their portion of the report- done Section 4.5 Water Right Evaluation, first sentence references Other corrections to be made Table 1-1. Change that to Table 4-1 pickups Page 8of8