The URL can be used to link to this page

05/18/2021 - Work Study - PacketMayor: Rob Putaansuu Administrative Official Councilmembers: Bek Ashby (Mayor Pro-Tempore) Finance Committee Economic Development & Tourism Committee Transportation Committee, Chair KRCC/KRCC PlanPol-alt /KRCC TransPol PSRC-alt/PSRC TransPOL-Alt/PRTPO Shawn Cucciardi Finance Committee E/D & Tourism Committee, Chair Kitsap Economic Development Alliance Fred Chang Economic Development & Tourism Committee Land Use Committee Jay Rosa pepe Utilities/Sewer Advisory Committee Land Use Committee Transportation Committee Lodging Tax Advisory Committee, Chair KRCC-alt John Clauson Finance Committee, Chair Utilities/Sewer Advisory Committee Kitsap Public Health District-alt Cindy Lucarelli Festival of Chimes & Lights Committee, Chair Utilities/Sewer Advisory Committee, Chair Kitsap Economic Development Alliance Scott Diener Land Use Committee, Chair Transportation Committee Department Directors: Nicholas Bond, AICP Development Director Mark Dorsey, P.E. Director of Public Works/City Engineer Tim Drury Municipal Court Judge Noah Crocker, M.B.A. Finance Director Matt Brown Police Chief Brandy Rinearson, MIMIC, CPRO City Clerk Meeting Location: Council Chambers, 3rd Floor 216 Prospect Street Port Orchard, WA 98366 Contact us: (360) 876-4407 cityhall@cityofportorchard.us City of Port Orchard Council Work Study Session May 18, 2021 6:30 p.m. The City is prohibited from conducting meetings unless the meeting is NOT conducted in -person and instead provides options for the public to attend through telephone, internet or other means of remote access, and also provides the ability for persons attending the meeting (not in -person) to hear each other at the same time. Therefore, Remote access only Link: https://us02web.zoom.us/i/81265060569 Zoom Webinar ID: 812 6506 0569 Zoom Call -In: 1 253 215 8782 CALL TO ORDER Pledge of Allegiance 1. Final Draft Downtown Subarea Plan & Proposed Amendments to Comprehensive Plan and Development Regulations (Bond) Page 2 Estimated Time: 45 minutes 2. Water System Capital Facility Charge (Crocker) Estimated Time: 60 minutes 3. WASPC Grant -Mental Health Field Response Team (M. Brown) Page 173 Estimated Time: 15 minutes 4. Council Meetings Structure (Mayor) Estimated Time: 15 minutes Good of the Order Please turn off cell phones during meeting and hold your questions for staff until the meeting has been adjourned Meeting materials are available on the City's website: www.citvofportorchard.us or by contacting the City Clerk's Office, 360.876.4407 The City of Port Orchard does not discriminate on the basis of disability. Contact the City Clerk's office should you need special accommodations. Back to Agenda Issue Title Meeting Date Time Required Attendees City of Port Orchard Work Study Session Executive Summary Final Draft Downtown Subarea Plan & Proposed Amendments to Comprehensive Plan and Development Regulations May 18, 2021 45 minutes Nick Bond, DCD Director Action Requested at this Meeting: Discuss the final draft of the Downtown Subarea Plan, and the amendments to the Comprehensive Plan and development regulations that are proposed to implement the Plan and provide feedback to City staff and consultants. Issue: In 2019, the City and its consultant team, led by GGLO LLC, began work on a subarea plan and planned action EIS that includes the existing Downtown and Kitsap County Government Campus countywide centers. The subarea plan development process has addressed several issues, including: development of more housing in this area of the city, in accordance with a $50k grant from the Department of Commerce; providing for the proposed South Kitsap Community Events Center on the downtown waterfront; accommodating current and future redevelopment projects in the Downtown and County Campus areas; and incorporating the recommendations of the City's Parks Plan update. The initial draft Subarea Plan was released for public review and comment in October 2020. The Planning Commission held an EIS scoping meeting in September 2020 and a public meeting on the EIS in February 2021, and the City issued a Final Environmental Impact Statement (FEIS) in April 2021. A final draft Subarea Plan was released to the public in April 2021. On May 4, 2021, the Planning Commission held a public hearing on the final draft Subarea Plan and proposed amendments to the Comprehensive Plan and development regulations and voted to recommend approval of the Plan to City Council. The Land Use committee reviewed the Plan and proposed amendments on May 5, 2021 and recommended that the Plan be forwarded to the full Council for review at the next work-study meeting. This meeting is a final opportunity to review the materials proposed for adoption. There are two unresolved issues that have emerged since the May 4, 2021 Planning Commission meeting. One is a minor change to the revisions in the DMU zone related to the location of parking when a building has streets on all sides (such as when an entire city block redevelops). See the redline changes to the ordinance in Section 5. The other revision being discussed relates to direction provided by the City Council at the March work study meeting. Here, staff is seeking Page 2 of 174 Back to Agenda Executive Summary Page 2 of 2 the Council's direction on whether the area south of Kitsap Street, north of Dwight Street, on either side of Sidney Avenue, should be rezoned to Neighborhood Mixed Use (NMU) or remain zoned Residential 2 (R2) - see first attachment, showing zoomed -in view of the area. This area has been depicted in the Subarea Plan with NMU zoning, but staff has been informed that some Council members would prefer that this area retain the current R2 zoning. GGLO has prepared an alternative page that can be substituted in the Subarea Plan to change the zoning proposed for this area from NMU back to R2 (see second attachment, revised page 75 in Section 3 of Subarea Plan). Relationship to the Comprehensive Plan: The Downtown Subarea Plan will be adopted as Appendix D of the City's Comprehensive Plan. Alternatives: Revise the draft Subarea Plan and/or proposed amendments to the Comprehensive Plan and development regulations. The City received a grant from the Department of Commerce under E2SHB 1923 to prepare a subarea plan and development regulations for the Downtown and County Campus centers and has committed to fulfill the terms of this contract (Contract C081-19). Recommendations: Staff recommends that the City Council review the final draft Downtown Subarea Plan and provide feedback to staff. Staff is requesting direction on whether NMU or R2 zoning should be provided in the Kitsap/Dwight neighborhood, as described above. Attachments: - Zoom -in Potential Area of NMU Zoning to be revised - Potential Substitute Page 75, Section 3 of Plan (reduced NMU area) - Ordinance w/Exhibits Exhibit 1: Final Draft Downtown Subarea Plan, April 2021 Exhibit 2a: Version of Revised City Zoning Map (expand NMU) Exhibit 2b: Version of Revised City Zoning Map (reduce NMU/retain R2) Exhibit 3: Amended Land Use Element Exhibit 4: Amended POMC 20.39.040 Land Use Table Exhibit 5: Amended POMC 20.127.130 Community Framework Maps Page 3 of 174 FA { F A emZ. i .ff s ! f f 16 rivol I ol ! DIVIS11! Page 4 of 174 # SECTION 03 Back to Agenda�N LEGEND ® BUSINESS PROFESSIONAL MIXED USE (BPMU) COMMERCIAL CORRIDOR (CC) ® COMMERCIAL MIXED USE (CMU) GREENBELT (GB) PARKS AND RECREATION (PR) PUBLIC FACILITY (PF) CIVIC AND INSTITUTIONAL (CI) 0 DOWNTOWN MIXED USE (DMU) 0 NEIGHBORHOOD MIXED USE (NMU) RESIDENTIAL (R1) RESIDENTIAL 2 (132) RESIDENTIAL 3 (R3) ♦ +# .. # ' • r . iw} `` 40 _ Commercial Heavy to Commercial Mixed -use RESIDENTIAL4(R4) r• 16++' , COMMERCIAL HEAVY (CH) .j:• ' _ GATEWAY MIXED USE (GMU)+ , ��' Changed are outlined in black dashed line. :;. �,j�c�#•# �# O i • + # #i! �' fir* f' ■ r � � # ap ilk W + KT1A '�`JWi '' ��i �" Commercial Heavy and ` �." �_}+'lIIN+�.1J"*.#tw;w�� *'• Y` Commercial Mixed -use ■ �+ " �� ' Mixed -use .zn A, ; ■off%# - . ��• to Gateway atewa �"' w DIVAL17— I Y U y 6 I-41 1 Nist �7 n 4 ,r ■ # ,may # ir 7 # 'L'� Residential 2 to MILE HILL Neighborhood # -M Mixed -use $ ' ,■ ` T• ,■ # 41 LIFE Mr ■ Proposed Zoning Map Adjustments Encourage development along existing neighborhood arterial corridors. Provide a buffer from commercial to residential areas and preserve established single family neighborhoods. a' Page 5 of 174 Downtown Port Orchard Subarea Plan I Port Orchard, WA 1 05.06.2021 75 Back to Agenda ORDINANCE NO. -21 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF PORT ORCHARD, WASHINGTON, PURSUANT TO RCW 36.70A.600(1)(f) AND (4), ADOPTING THE DOWNTOWN SUBAREA PLAN; ADOPTING AMENDMENTS TO THE CITY COMPREHENSIVE PLAN PURSUANT TO RCW 36.70A.130(2)(a)(i); ADOPTING AN AMENDMENT TO THE CITY ZONING MAP; ADOPTING NEW REGULATIONS AND AMENDMENTS TO CHAPTERS 20.35, 20.38, 20.39, 20.124, 20.127 AND 20.202 OF THE PORT ORCHARD MUNICIPAL CODE; PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY AND CORRECTIONS; AND ESTABLISHING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, the City of Port Orchard is a non -charter optional municipal code City as provided in Title 35A RCW, incorporated under the laws of the State of Washington, and planning pursuant to the Growth Management Act (GMA), Chapter 36.70A RCW; and WHEREAS, with the passage of the GMA in 1990, codified at Chapter 36.70A RCW, local governments are required to adopt and maintain a comprehensive plan; and WHEREAS, in June 1995, the City Council adopted a Comprehensive Plan for the City of Port Orchard and its urban growth area pursuant to the requirements set forth in the GMA; and WHEREAS, the City of Port Orchard completed its most recent periodic update of its Comprehensive Plan in June 2016, as required by the GMA; and WHEREAS, in 2019, the State Legislature passed E2SHB 1923 creating RCW 36.70A.600 and providing for grant funding to jurisdictions taking specific actions to increase residential building capacity; and WHEREAS, one of the actions recommended in RCW 36.70A.600 (1) is to adopt a subarea plan pursuant to RCW 43.21C.420; and WHEREAS, the City received a grant from the Washington State Department of Commerce under E2SHB 1923 to prepare a subarea plan and accompanying development regulations (Contract C081-19); and WHEREAS, the City's Downtown and County Campus areas are designated Countywide Centers in the City's Comprehensive Plan, and Section 2.7.6 of the Comprehensive Plan directs the City to develop a subarea plan for each identified center in the Comprehensive Plan; and Page 6 of 174 Back to Agenda Ordinance No. _-21 Page 2 of 19 WHEREAS, the City has combined the Downtown and County Campus centers ("Downtown Subarea"), and has prepared a single Downtown Subarea Plan ("Subarea Plan") to satisfy the subarea planning requirement of Section 2.7.6 of the Comprehensive Plan; and WHEREAS, the City most recently adopted annual amendments to the City's Comprehensive Plan pursuant to RCW 36.70A.470 and 36.70A.106 on July 14, 2020; and WHEREAS, RCW 36.70A.130(2)(a)(i) allows the initial adoption of a subarea plan and associated amendments to the jurisdiction's comprehensive plan outside of the annual amendment process if the plan clarifies, supplements or implements jurisdiction -wide comprehensive plan policies, and the cumulative impacts of the plan are addressed by appropriate environmental review under chapter 43.21C RCW; and WHEREAS, the City prepared an update to the City Zoning Map to provide consistency between the Map and the zoning changes provided in the Subarea Plan; and WHEREAS, the City prepared amendments to the Land Use Element of the Comprehensive Plan, and new regulations and amendments to Chapters 20.35, 20.38, 20.39, 20.124, 20.127 and 20.202 of the Port Orchard Municipal Code (POMC), to provide appropriate policies and development regulations for the Downtown Subarea, to provide consistency between the Comprehensive Plan, the POMC and the Subarea Plan, and to implement the Subarea Plan, per the requirements of RCW 36.70A.040(3); and WHEREAS, on August 14, 2020, the City issued a SEPA Determination of Significance (DS) for the Subarea Plan based on the likelihood that the proposal may have significant adverse environmental impacts, and identified three alternative subarea proposals for analysis in an Environmental Impact Statement (EIS), including a no -action alternative; and WHEREAS, on September 1, 2020, the Planning Commission held a duly -noticed scoping meeting and request for comments regarding the scope of the EIS; and WHEREAS, on January 11, 2021, the City submitted the draft Subarea Plan and associated comprehensive plan amendments to the Department of Commerce along with a 60-day request for review; and WHEREAS, on February 2, 2021, the Planning Commission held a duly -noticed public meeting on the Draft Environment Impact Statement (DEIS) for the Subarea Plan, and received public comments; and Page 7 of 174 Back to Agenda Ordinance No. _-21 Page 3 of 19 WHEREAS, on April 27, 2021, the City issued by providing notice consistent with WAC 197-11/460 of the Final Environmental Impact Statement (FEIS) for the Subarea Plan, which addressed issues of current land uses, development capacity, future development mix and location of densities and uses, transportation, utilities, public facilities and amenities, cultural resources, and natural resources, and there have been no appeals; and WHEREAS, on May 4, 2021, the Planning Commission held a duly -noticed public hearing on the Subarea Plan and the amendments to the Land Use Element, the Zoning Map, and to Chapters 20.35, 20.38, 20.39, 20.124, 20.127 and 20.202 POMC, and after receiving public testimony the Planning Commission recommended their approval; and WHEREAS, on May 5, 2021, the City submitted the final Subarea Plan, and the amendments to the Land Use Element, the Zoning Map, and to Chapters 20.35, 20.38, 20.39, 20.124, 20.127 and 20.202 POMC, to the Department of Commerce with a request for expedited review; and WHEREAS, on May 5, 2021, the City Council's Land Use Committee reviewed the Subarea Plan and the amendments to the Land Use Element, the Zoning Map, and to Chapters 20.35, 20.38, 20.39, 20.124, 20.127 and 20.202 POMC, and recommended that they be forwarded to the full City Council for review and approval; and WHEREAS, the City Council, after careful consideration of the recommendation from the Planning Commission, all public comment, and the Ordinance, finds that this Ordinance is consistent with the City's Comprehensive Plan and development regulations, the Growth Management Act, and Chapter 36.70A RCW, and that the amendments herein to the City's Comprehensive Plan, Zoning Map, and Chapters 20.35, 20.38, 20.39, 20.124, 20.127 and 20.202 POMC are in the best interests of the residents of the City; NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PORT ORCHARD, WASHINGTON, DO ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1. Findings and Recitals. The recitals set forth above are hereby adopted and incorporated as findings in support of this Ordinance. SECTION 2. Adoption of the Downtown Subarea Plan. The Downtown Subarea Plan, attached hereto as Exhibit 1, is hereby adopted into the City of Port Orchard Comprehensive Plan as Appendix D. Page 8 of 174 Back to Agenda Ordinance No. -21 Page 4 of 19 SECTION 3. Adoption of Amended City of Port Orchard Zoning Map. The City of Port Orchard Zoning Map is hereby amended as set out in Exhibit 2 hereto., SECTION 4. Adoption of Amended Land Use Element of the Comprehensive Plan. The Land Use Element of the City's Comprehensive Plan is hereby amended as set out in Exhibit 3 hereto. SECTION S. Adoption of Amendments to Section 20.35.040 POMC. Section 20.35.040 POMC is hereby amended to read as follows: 20.35.040 Downtown mixed use (DMU). (1) Intent. The downtown mixed use district is intended to provide for mixed use, pedestrian -oriented development in downtown. To promote walkability and to encourage street -level retail activity, auto -oriented uses and ground -floor residential uses are restricted. Building type options include live -work, single -story shopfront and mixed -use shopfront. Downtown mixed use should be applied in areas where the existing or proposed land use pattern promotes the highest levels of pedestrian and mixed -use activity in the community and may be applied in areas designated commercial in the comprehensive plan. (2) Building Types Allowed. The allowed building types are as follows: (a) Live -work unit. (b) Single -story shopfront. (c) Mixed use shopfront. (d) Accessory buildings (POMC 20.32.010(16)). Page 9 of 174 Back to Agenda DMU Building Types Ordinance No. _-21 Page 5 of 19 (3) Lot Dimensions. (a) There are no minimum or maximum lot sizes in the DMU district. (b) There is no minimum lot width in the DMU district. DMU Lot Dimensions (4) Maximum hard surface coverage is 100 percent. Page 10 of 174 Back to Agenda Ordinance No. _-21 Page 6 of 19 (5) Building Setbacks. (a) Primary street: not applicable. (b) Side street: not applicable. (c) Side interior: not applicable. (d) Rear: not applicable. (6) Build -to Zone. (a) Building facade in primary street: 80 percent minimum (percent of lot width). (b) Building facade in side street: 40 percent minimum (percent of lot width). (c) Build -to Zone percentages may be decreased (1) if a public pedestrian -oriented space is provided, if the reduction is no more than the minimum needed to accommodate the pedestrian oriented space, or (2) for public civic buildings such as a community center or library. x�. DMU Building Placement (7) Parking Location. Parking shall be allowed as follows except where another standard is specified in Chapter 20.127 POMC: (a) Front yard: not allowed. (b) Corner yard: not allowed. (c) Side yard: allowed. (d) Rear yard: allowed. (e) For proposed buildings with frontage on all four (4) sides. the director shall determine where parking shall be allowed, based upon (1) consistency with an adopted subarea plan; Page 11 of 174 Back to Agenda Ordinance No. -21 Page 7 of 19 (2) consistency with the City's critical areas and shoreline master program regulations; and/or (3) traffic and circulation impacts of the proposed parking location(s), including vehicular and pedestrian safety. (8) Building Height. (a) Maximum height: three stories/38 feet unless an alternative maximum building height is specified pursuant to the downtown height overlay district (POMC 20.38.600 through 20.38.670). DMU Building Height SECTION 6. Adoption of Amendments to Section 20.38.610 POMC. Section 20.38.610 POMC is hereby amended to read as follows: 20.38.610 DHOD Intent. The intent of the downtown height overlay district (DHOD) is to implement the Downtown Subarea Plan, protect scenic views on north facing slopes in the vicinity of Sinclair Inlet and downtown, protect property values, provide access to light, ensure that the scale of development in downtown Port Orchard does not negatively impact the historic character of the community, and otherwise protect the general health, safety, and welfare of the community. The intent of the DHOD is to be achieved by establishing height limits for buildings and by establishing a method of measuring Page 12 of 174 Back to Agenda Ordinance No. -21 Page 8 of 19 buildings that is different than the methods used elsewhere in this title to recognize the generally sloping characteristics of the overlay district. SECTION 7. Adoption of Amendments to Section 20.38.640 POMC. Section 20.38.640 POMC is hereby amended to read as follows: 20.38.640 DHOD Height Limits (1) DHOD Height Zones Established. Within the DHOD as shown on the zoning map, there are three different DHOD height zones with height limits established as follows: (a) DHOD 3: 48 feet — three stories. (b) DHOD 4: 58 feet — four stories. (c) DHOD 5: 68 feet — five stories. (2) DHOD Height Bonus. A 10-foot (one story) height bonus not to exceed 20,000 feet in area may be granted to exceed the applicable maximum height provided in subsection (1)(a) of this section if the applicant agrees to construct and operate (or lease to an operator) a grocery store in the same building for which the bonus is sought, with the grocery store space measuring at least 10,000 square feet in area. In addition to the 20,000-square-foot bonus limit, the area of this additional 10 feet of building height shall not exceed 95 percent of the area of the floor immediately below this bonus height (floor). Any height bonus shall require a development agreement between the developer and the city that provides assurances to the city guaranteeing that the ground floor commercial space will be developed and operated as a grocery store upon project completion. (3) DHOD Height Zone Map. The height zones described in this section shall be applied as reflected on the DHOD Height Zone Map as shown in Figure 1. Page 13 of 174 Back to Agenda Ordinance No. _-21 Page 9 of 19 g �, W-.A 4#x - - �. 1R Figure 1: DHOD Height Zone Map crTY or PORT ORCHARD Downtown Height Overlay Districts - DY10� 3 DHOW 4 i Dnoo s SECTION 8. Adoption of Amendments to Section 20.38.650 POMC. Section 20.38.650 POW is hereby amended to read as follows: 20.38.650 DHOD Height Measurement Building heights shall be measured one of two ways based on whether the parcel to be developed abuts Bay Street or whether it does not abut Bay Street. (1) Building heights for lots abutting Bay Street shall be measured from the average grade of the property line that abuts Bay Street rather than from the grade plane as defined in Chapter 20.12 POMC (see "building height" and "grade plane"). If this property line is below the City's minimum flood elevation or forecasts for sea level rise, the property line may be elevated to the required minimum ground floor flood elevation Page 14 of 174 Back to Agenda Ordinance No. _-21 Page 10 of 19 for the purpose of measuring height. (2) Building heights for lots not abutting Bay Street shall be measured in accordance with the definition of building height as found in Chapter 20.12 POMC. SECTION 9. Adoption of Amendments to Section 20.38.810 POMC. Section 20.38.810 POW is hereby amended to read as follows: 20.38.810 VPOD Intent. The intent of the view protection overlay district (VPOD) is to implement the Downtown Subarea Plan, protect scenic views on north facing slopes in the vicinity of Sinclair Inlet, protect property values, provide access to light, and otherwise protect the general health, safety, and welfare of the community. The intent of the VPOD is to be achieved by establishing height limits for buildings and by establishing a method of measuring buildings that is different than the methods used elsewhere in this title to recognize the generally sloping characteristics of the overlay district. SECTION 10. Adoption of Amendments to Section 20.39.040. Section 20.39.040 POMC is hereby amended as set out on Exhibit 4 hereto. SECTION 11. Adoption of Amendments to Section 20.124.130. Section 20.124.130 POMC is hereby amended to read as follows: 20.124.130 Downtown Mixed Use Parking Standards. Except as otherwise provided in this section, development within the downtown mixed - use zone (DMU) shall provide parking in accordance with the off-street parking requirements set forth in this chapter. (1) Parking shall not be required for ground floor uses in the DMU zone in the Downtown Subarea (see the Downtown Port Orchard Subarea Plan). (2) For multifamily residential uses in the DMU zone, the off-street parking standard shall be a minimum of one parking space for each dwelling unit, regardless of the number of bedrooms. (3) No new street level parking lot or parking garage that fronts directly on Bay Street shall be allowed between Port Street and Seattle Avenue. Page 15 of 174 Back to Agenda Ordinance No. _-21 Page 11 of 19 (4) Exemptions. The following uses and buildings within the DMU zone shall be exempt from the parking standards set forth in this chapter: (a) Existing buildings and uses along both sides of Bay Street from Orchard Avenue to Seattle Avenue shall be exempt from the parking requirements set forth in this chapter. SECTION 12. New Section 20.124.135 Adopted. A new Section 20.124.135 POMC is hereby adopted as follows: 20.124.135 Downtown Subarea Residential Parking Standards. For residential uses in the Downtown Subarea, excluding the DMU zone parking standards in POMC 20.124.130, the off-street parking standard shall be a minimum of one parking space for each dwelling unit, regardless of the number of bedrooms. An additional .25 parking spaces shall be required for each unit located on a site that is not served by adjacent on -street parking. SECTION 13. Adoption of Amendments to Section 20.127.130. Section 20.127.130 POMC is hereby amended as set out in Exhibit 5 hereto. SECTION 14. New Chapter 20.202 Adopted. A new Chapter 20.202 POMC is hereby adopted as follows: POW 20.202 Off -site Improvement Requirements. 20.202.001 Purpose. The purpose of this chapter is to specify requirements for off -site improvements serving various development activities under the Building Codes and to establish limits and parameters for requiring off -site improvements when imposed outside of SEPA, CUP, or other development review processes. This chapter seeks to protect the public health, safety and general welfare of the public, to ensure safe walking conditions, pedestrian connectivity, and ADA accessibility. 20.202.002 Scope. (1) This chapter applies to the following activities under the IBC and IRC: a. New Construction or Moved Buildings. b. Additions to existing buildings. b. Changes of occupancy classification. d. Remodels and Alterations. (2) Proposed improvements within a public right of way shall require the submittal of Page 16 of 174 Back to Agenda Ordinance No. _-21 Page 12 of 19 plans completed by a professional civil engineer and/or surveyors licensed in the state of Washington consistent with the state licensure requirements and engineering best practice. In addition, all work shall be compliant with the City of Port Orchard Public Works and Engineering Standards and Specifications. 20.202.003 Definitions. "Off -site Improvement" is defined as an improvement to public right of way adjacent to, along the frontage of, or in proximity to proposed development and may include cement concrete curb and gutter, driveway, sidewalks, curb ramps, paving, pedestrian or bicycle pathway(s) (in lieu of sidewalks in accordance with transportation plan), safety measures, other right-of-way elements (such as streetlighting, landscape strip, etc.), and drainage improvements. 20.202.004 Off -site Improvements. (1) Off -site improvements shall be required for all New Construction, Additions, Change of Occupancies as defined in Chapter 3 of in the International Existing Building Code, Moved Buildings, and Remodels/Alterations to existing buildings. The maximum level of off -site improvement that may be imposed by project type is shown in Table 20.202, however this limit shall not apply to projects that have limits or conditions imposed by SEPA, CUP, or other conditioning documents. The City shall determine the order of preference when determining off -site improvement requirements, considering the general health, safety, and welfare and environmental protection as primary objectives. Secondary objectives may include considerations for transportation corridors and proximity to schools and parks. Projects involving more than one project type (New Construction, Additions, Change of Occupancy, and/or Remodel/Alteration) shall apply the most restrictive criteria in Table 20.202. The Director or designee is authorized to interpret, establish, modify, or eliminate the off -site improvement requirements shown in Table 20.202 for individual cases where there are practical difficulties (such as critical areas or steep topography) involved in the implementation of the requirements of this chapter. The Director or designee, shall determine the order of preference when determining off -site improvement requirements, considering health, safety, and welfare, along with environmental protections as the primary objectives. Page 17 of 174 Back to Agenda Ordinance No. _-21 Page 13 of 19 Table 20.202 Offsite Improvement Determinations. Project Type Threshold Off -site Improvement Requirement (ii) (v) New Construction Commercial All new and No Limit Defined. (includes multi- moved buildings Improvements to family 3 or more be determined by units) (iii) the Director. Single family All new and No Limit Defined. and two-family moved buildings Improvements to dwellings. be determined by the director. Fee - in -Lieu available pursuant to POMC 20.202.005. Single family All new and None required. and two-family moved accessory buildings. structures and garages. Additions Commercial 50% or greater No Limit Defined. Large (iii) increase in floor Improvements to area. be determined by the Director. Commercial Less than 50% Offsite Small (iii) increase in floor improvement area. requirements up to 20% of additional valuation based on the adopted ICC Building Valuation Table. Single-family Additions None required. Page 18 of 174 Back to Agenda Ordinance No. _-21 Page 14 of 19 and two-family dwelling Change of Occupancy Large (iii) Change of Off -site occupancy Improvements classification to limited to the 50% or more of greater of the the building. following: -20% of the remodel valuation (iv) -20% of the change in the building valuation based on the most current ICC Building Valuation Table. Fee -in -lieu available pursuant to POMC 20.202.005. Small (iii) Change of Off -site occupancy Improvements classification to limited to the less than 50% greater of the but greater than following: 10% of the -10% of the building. remodel valuation (iv) -10% of the change in the building valuation based on the most current ICC Page 19 of 174 Back to Agenda Ordinance No. _-21 Page 15 of 19 Building Valuation Table. Fee -in -lieu available pursuant to POMC 20.202.005. Exempt Change of No off -site Occupancy improvements classification to required. 10% or less of the building. Remodel/Alternations Large (iii) Remodel Off -site valuation 50% or Improvements up greater than ICC to 20% of the building remodel valuation. valuation. (iv) Fee -in -lieu available pursuant to POMC 20.202.005. Small (iii) Remodel Off -site valuation less Improvements up than 50% but to 10% of the greater than remodel 10% of ICC valuation. (iv) building Fee -in -lieu valuation. available pursuant to POMC 20.202.005. Exempt Remodel No off -site valuation 10% or improvements less than ICC required. building valuation. Page 20 of 174 Back to Agenda Ordinance No. _-21 Page 16 of 19 Or, Water or Fire Damage repairs that are valued at less than 50% of the ICC building valuation. i. The director or designee may alter, lower, and impose additional requirements as needed to protect health, safety, and general welfare of the public. ii. Costs for utility construction or relocation may be included in the owner/developer's percentage of off -site improvements requirements. iii. For campus sites, the director shall determine the required frontage improvements. iv. The remodel valuation limit shall be defined as the estimated construction cost of the project submitted by the contractor or owner at the time of building permit submittal as a percentage of the most recent version of the International Code Council Building Valuation Data. The estimate shall detail all major cost elements of the project. The remodel valuation limit shall not apply to projects that have requirements imposed by SEPA, CUP, or other conditioning document. v. The project cost limits above shall not apply to projects which are eligible for a transportation impact fee credit under POMC 20.182. (2) The following development standards and related off -site improvements shall apply to all applicable project types listed in Table 20.202. a.. Alleys. When a lot adjoins an alley or street intersection, improvements shall also be installed at the alley or street intersection. Alleys shall be installed to City of Port Orchard Standards when any access to the site is provided from the alley. b.. Off -site improvements are dependent on the project type and threshold listed in Table 20.202 and shall require the development of cement concrete curb and gutter, driveways, sidewalks, and curb ramps, paving, safety measures, other right-of-way elements (streetlighting, landscape strip, etc.), and drainage of all dedicated streets along the lot frontages, except, in cases where the topography or other conditions make it impractical. c. Access to property. Driveway approaches shall be in accordance with the PWESS. Public roads fronting the property shall be comprised of an all-weather surface or will Page 21 of 174 Back to Agenda Ordinance No. _-21 Page 17 of 19 need to be paved to provide an all-weather surface. d. Where a site has existing improvements such as sidewalks, curbs, gutters, and paving, these improvements shall be replaced if they are non-ADA compliant, broken, damaged, or hazardous. Pavement shall also be required to be replaced when it does not meet the current standard pavement section for residential or arterial streets contained in the PWESS. 20.202.005 Fee in Lieu of. Upon approval of the director, a fee may be paid in lieu of construction of the required off -site improvements. In addition, the director or designee shall determine the eligibility of off -site improvements and fee in lieu amount. The fees shall be paid at the time of permit issuance and deposited in the fee in lieu of off -site improvements. SECTION 15. Corrections. Upon the approval of the city attorney, the city clerk and/or code publisher is authorized to make any necessary technical corrections to this ordinance, including but not limited to the correction of scrivener's/clerical errors, references, ordinance numbering, section/subsection numbers, and any reference thereto. SECTION 16. Severability. If any section, subsection, paragraph, sentence, clause, or phrase of this ordinance is declared unconstitutional or invalid for any reason, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining parts of this ordinance. SECTION 17. Effective Date. This ordinance shall be published in the official newspaper of the city and shall take full force and effect five (5) days after the date of publication. A summary of this ordinance in the form of the ordinance title may be published in lieu of publishing the ordinance in its entirety. Page 22 of 174 Back to Agenda Ordinance No. _-21 Page 18 of 19 PASSED by the City Council of the City of Port Orchard, APPROVED by the Mayor and attested by the City Clerk in authentication of such passage this 25th day of May 2021. Robert Putaansuu, Mayor Brandy Rinearson, MMC, City Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM: Sponsored by: Charlotte A. Archer, City Attorney Scott Diener, Council Member PUBLISHED: EFFECTIVE DATE: Page 23 of 174 Back to Agenda Ordinance No. _-21 Page 19 of 19 EXHIBITS: 1. Downtown Subarea Plan 2. Amended City Zoning Map 3. Amended Land Use Element of the Comprehensive Plan 4. Amended POMC 20.39.040 (Use Table) 5. Amended POMC 20.127.130 (Community Design Framework Maps) Page 24 of 174 -,•�r�_ - � ,4�� - . x -- r. Vie= ... �Y'+ yam ®r. l 1. , _ .� -� I __ -_ T _ - F:`�■- - Back to Agenda PROJECT INFORMATION Port Orchard is a small but growing city in the Puget Sound region of Washington State. It enjoys an outstanding natural setting in close proximity to major urban employment centers. This setting and its role as Kitsap County Seat, Port Orchard has the opportunity to be an important regional center for growth. Keeping these opportunities in mind the Department of Community Planning at City of Port Orchard, along with its consultants are conducting a subarea plan and planned action EIS for the Port Orchard Downtown and County Government Campus. These areas have land uses and conditions that are unique to the City and would benefit from the subarea process as they will need to accommodate a proportionate share of the City's growth allocation in accordance with Vision 2050. The subarea and planned action EIS planning process will address issues such as current land uses, development capacity, future development mix and location of densities and uses, transportation, utilities, public facilities, amenities, and natural resources. The result of the planning process will be a subarea plan which will be incorporated in the City Comprehensive Plan. The subarea plan requires early and continuous public participation consistent with RCW 43.21 C.420. The planned action EIS shall meet the requirements of RCW 43.21 C.440(1) (b)(ii). The subarea plan and planned action EIS, which will be partly funded by an E2SHB 1923 grant administered by the Washington State Department of Commerce, must also comply with the requirements of the Engrossed Second Substitute House Bill (E2SHB) 1923 (Chapter 248, Laws of 2019). Additionally, the subarea plan shall address the PSRC Countywide Center criteria. Page 27 of 174 Downtown Port Orchard Subarea Plan I Port Orchard, WA 1 04.20.2021 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS Back to Agenda City of Port Orchard Department of Community Development 216 Prospect Street Port Orchard, WA 98366 planning @cityofportorchard.us Mayor: Robert Putaansuu City Council Members: Bek Ashby John Clauson Fred Chang Cindy Lucarelli Scott Diener Jay Rosapepe Shawn Cucciardi Planning Commission: Trish Tierney Stephanie Bailey Annette Stewart Mark Trenary David Bernstein Phil King Joe Morrison City Staff: Nicholas Bond, AICP, Director Keri Sallee, Long Range Planner Jim Fisk, Associate Planner Stephanie Andrews, Associate Planner Contact: Nick Bond nbond@cityofportorchard.us Keri Sallee kSallee@cityofportorchard.us Page 28 of 174 CCBack to Agenda `M Urban Design, Architect Real Estate and Economic Analysis GGLO Heartland 1301 First Avenue, Suite 300 1301 First Avenue, Suite 200 Seattle, WA 98101 Seattle, WA 98101 Contact: Contact: Jeff Foster Mark Goodman jfoster@GGLO.com mgoodman@htland.com Mitch Ptacek mptacek@gglo.com Civil Engineer - Sanitary Sewer and Water Infrastructure Engineers and Environmental Services BHC Consultants, LLC 1601 Fifth Avenue, Suite 500 EA Engineering, Science and Technology, Seattle, WA 98101 Inc., PBC Contact: 2200 6th Ave #707, John Gillespie Seattle, WA 98121 john.gillespie@bhcconsultants.com Contact: Rich Schipanski rschipanski@eaest.com Transportation Engineer Transportation Solutions, Inc. Civil Engineer - Storm Water 8250 165th Ave NE, Suite 100 Redmond, WA 98052 Reid Middleton, Inc. Contact: 728 134th Street SW, Suite 200 Andrew Bratlien Everett, WA 98204 andrewb@tsinw.com Contact: Julian Dodge jdodge@reidmiddleton.com Page 29 of 174 Downtown Port Orchard Subarea Plan I Port Orchard, WA 1 04.20.2021 5 CONTENTS Back to Agenda 09 SECTION 1 - INTRODUCTION 1.1 INTRODUCTION 1.2 STUDY AREA 1.3 PSRC FRAMEWORK 15 SECTION 2 - EXISTING CONDITIONS SUMMARY ANALYSIS 2.1 HISTORY 2.2 RECENT ACHIEVEMENTS AND CURRENT PLANNING 2.3 EXISTING BUILT FORM AND CONTEXT 2.4 PREVIOUS PLANNING EFFORTS 2.5 EXISTING LAND USE AND ZONING 2.6 CIRCULATION, ACCESS AND PARKING 2.7 UTILITIES 2.8 ENVIRONMENT AND OPEN SPACE 2.9 MARKET CONDITIONS ASSESSMENT 2.9.1 ECONOMIC PROFILE 2.9.2 DEVELOPMENT PIPELINE 2.9.3 BUILD -ABLE LANDS 2.9.4 BASELINE ASSESSMENT AND ACTIVITY UNITS 2.9.5 MARKET YIELD ASSESSMENT 59 SECTION 3 - DRAFT SUBAREA PLAN GOALS AND VISION 3.1 PROPOSED ALTERNATIVES 3.2 URBAN DESIGN FRAMEWORK 3.2.1 WEST DOWNTOWN 3.2.2 EAST DOWNTOWN Page 30 of 174 I. Back to Agenda TS 3.2.3 COUNTY GOVERNMENT CAMPUS 3.3 LAND USE AND HOUSING 3.4 ENVIRONMENT AND OPEN SPACE 3.5 CIRCULATION, ACCESS, AND PARKING SECTION 04 - APPENDIX A - PUBLIC OUTREACH PLAN AND OUTREACH SUMMARY B - HEARTLAND ECONOMIC PROFILE AND BUILD -ABLE LANDS ANALYSIS Page 31 of 174 Downtown Port Orchard Subarea Plan I Port Orchard, WA 1 04.20.2021 7 Back to Agenda INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK Page 32 of 174 SECTION 01 IBack to Agenda)N 1.1 Introduction 1.1. PLAN BACKGROUND AND CONTEXT The 2014 City of Port Orchard periodic Comprehensive Plan update incorporated a new "centers" strategy to guide future planning and designated the first ten "local centers" (See section 2.7 of the Port Orchard Comprehensive Plan). The Centers strategy evolved from the State Growth Management Act of the early 1990's as a means to combat urban sprawl development patterns that defined the post-war era. This strategy strives to accommodate growth in designated areas while preserving the existing character of the community, thereby retaining more open space and the dominant pattern of existing development. The centers approach to planning is provided in Vision 2050, the regional plan completed by the Puget Sound Regional Council, and in the County -wide Planning Policies adopted by all jurisdictions in Kitsap County. The latest Comprehensive Plan designated eight "countywide centers" and four designated "local centers". In addition, the City identified the Downtown and the County Campus as a potential candidate for a Regional Center designation under Puget Sound Regional Council Vision 2050. This plan addresses how the City will meet Center goals through appropriate land use designations, annexation, development of capital facilities and utilities, and related measures. In late 2019 the City received a Department of Commerce E2SHB 1923 Grant intended to develop plans and actions that will increase residential building capacity. The grant provided partial funding for the City of Port Orchard to contract with consultants to complete the Downtown and County Campus Centers Subarea Plan and planned action EIS. The Center boundaries identified in the Comprehensive Plan do not meet the latest PSRC requirements for Regional Centers. After consultation with PSRC it was decided to expand the study area boundary to identify recommendations of expansion of the current Centers. The City and their consultants explored design alternatives for the subarea to be analyzed under the Environmental Impact Statement (See Section 3). Due to most of subarea being previously developed land, the alternatives include a single redevelopment plan for the East Downtown, West Downtown, and Government Campus while considering different programmatic approach to identified developable lands. The alternatives considered are as follows: • Alternative 1 - No Action • Alternative 2 - Residential Focus • Alternative 3 - Mixed -Use Focus COMMUNITY AND STAKEHOLDER ENGAGEMENT This original Public Participation Plan (See Appendix A) was developed just prior to state and local mandated closures to prevent the spread of corona -virus. This resulted in project delays and the cancellation of the City's plans to conduct in person workshops with neighborhood residents and property owners. The City has instead relied on internet surveys and public hearings before the Planning Commission that were held remotely. INITIAL GOALS 'Establish a vision for a vibrant urban center that is economically feasible and context sensitive' The city is defined by its physical and social environments and the ways in which they are connected. This subarea plan seeks to lay out a vision for Port Orchard that is founded on connectivity and the idea that stronger connections will ultimately lead to a stronger community. The following initial goals were derived from City of Port Orchard Department of Community Development initial project definition goals summary: • Develop a Subarea Plan that establishes a vision for Port Orchard as vibrant urban center that supports denser residential living in a walkable neighborhood. • Increase Housing supply consistent with the goals of E2SHB grant. • Focused growth in designated centers to support residential living in walkable neighborhoods. • The plan should meet the PSRC criteria for designation as a countywide center. • Prepare a Planned Action EIS to identify potential SEPA regulatory compliance barriers and encourage economic development. • Plan for the City of Port Orchard to accommodate growth as a proposed high capacity transit community under Vision 2050. Page 33 of 174 Downtown Port Orchard Subarea Plan I Port Orchard, WA 1 04.20.2021 SECTION 01 1 INTRODUCTION Back to Agenda 1.2 Study Area City of Port Orchard Centers • County Campus • Downtown Study Area • 329 total acres Principle Arterials • Bay Street & Bethel Ave • Port Orchard and Mitchell Streets • Sidney Ave and Cline Ave Existing Land Use • Neighborhoods - Residential • Private Property / Commercial Uses • Government - City / Kitsap County • South Kitsap High School • Marina Waterfront Targeted Redevelopment Areas • West Downtown Waterfront • East Downtown Waterfront • County Campus s 44 #;♦ > t K y R • Downtown a _' �• Plan Center ;�..�- ,•�; r r — L PER ■•J la a& sWe rj' n ® ! - -- • IN k Y e��dsi afar+ a. - N - g County Campps k F- .0 4 tj •=Plan Center,:."-. s11.0. A� �' a'= .ern rga�is�, I ° �. a� r. '� fit`' � � ,� ° 1 I _ � � '• L � i.4 WY ILI.r I I • I� '� .q • - - ,. ■ � alb s F ! ram.? r-- i L ' ■Ir i., 4 d 1 ",� + °' '� a !• r■ k �� a .+ �' ty_ / rsi 7 rr leg STUDYAREA MAP AND PREVIOUS COMPREHENSIVE PLAN CENTERS SCALE: 1 " = 1000' 1/ Page 34 of 174 10 SECTION 01 IBack to Agenda)N DEFINING THE SUBAREA BOUNDARY The original Subarea Boundary consisted of the Downtown and the County Government Campus Centers as delineated in the Comprehensive Plan. After initial evaluation and consultation with the City and PSRC three additional study area boundaries were developed for consideration. The goals of the study area boundary evaluations included: • Include sufficient context to allow the plan to include a holistic approach. • Preference for boundaries to cross streets such that planning can encompass a corridor approach. • Provide sufficient developable land inventory. • Provide a strong basis for a future PSRC Regional Centers Application. €: •. � wEgwy�� •_�,,• F • r Tif 119.82 Acres rr .R Original Centers .......... T ji• S Al a", 1 The selected subarea boundary is a combination of option 1 and option 3. The selected boundary Guidance from PSRC suggested that it would be easier to reduce the boundary for a centers application than it would be to propose a large application boundary than what was previously studied. While the study area is extensive (329 acres), changes will not be proposed in all areas. Planned development is envisioned to primarily occur in or near the existing urban centers, along existing principle Arterials, and at currently underutilized parcels (see Section 2 and enclosed Appendix B). Z s ion ,L g j % v ; � •, r � � 20].83 Acres t upcion z UrMV r 1 it air' � i ■ :� •�w • •• .P • r Er` 222.89 Acre 3 •'� tirrlt'f City of Port Orchard 2019 Urban Center Alternatives Urban Center Options Option =a 3 Cfty of Part Or -- Depa—nt of Common ty Development 216 Proapeci Street P.0 O—W M 98366 Ph.ne (366) 876 033 Fax (360) 8M4980 trofp non r STUDYAREA OPTIONS O SCALE: N.T.S. Page 35 of 174 Downtown Port Orchard Subarea Plan I Port Orchard, WA 1 04.20.2021 11 SECTION 01 1 INTRODUCTION Back to Agenda 1.3 PSRC Regional Centers Framework SUBAREA BOUNDARY r )PULATION AND EMPLOYMENT The City has no designated Regional Growth centers at this time, but the Downtown and County Government Campus Centers are being considered as a candidate for a future combined regional growth center. The selected subarea boundary does not meet the PSRC existing activity unit requirements, but it will identify the location of potential future capacity. URBAN GROWTH COUNTYWIDE CRITERIA • Existing density - 18 activity units per acre minimum • Planned target density - 45 activity units per acre minimum • Mix of uses - Regional growth centers should have a goal for a minimum mix of at least 15% planned residential and employment activity in the center. • Size - 200 acres minimum - 640 acres maximum • Transit - Existing or planned fixed route bus, regional bus, Bus Rapid Transit, or other frequent and all -day bus service. May substitute high -capacity transit mode for fixed route bus. Service quality is defined as either frequent (< 15-minute headways) and all -day (operates at least 16 hours per day on weekdays) -or- high capacity • Market potential - Evidence of future market potential to support planning target • Role - Evidence of regional role • Clear regional role for center (serves as important destination for the county) • Jurisdiction is planning to accommodate significant residential and employment growth under Regional Growth Strategy COUNTYWIDE CENTER CRITERIA • Identified as a countywide center in the countywide planning policies • Located within a city or unincorporated urban area • Demonstration that the center is a local planning and investment priority: • Identified as a countywide center in a local comprehensive plan; subarea plan recommended • Clear evidence that area is a local priority for investment, such as planning efforts or infrastructure • The center is a location for compact, mixed -use development; including: • A minimum existing activity unit density of 10 activity units per acre • Planning and zoning for a minimum mix of uses of 20 percent residential and 20 percent employment unless unique circumstances make these percentages not possible to achieve. • Capacity and planning for additional growth • The center supports multi -modal transportation, including: • Transit service • Pedestrian infrastructure and amenities • Street pattern that supports walkability • Bicycle infrastructure and amenities • Compact, walkable size of one -quarter mile squared (160 acres), up to half -mile transit walkshed (500 acres) Alternate Subarea Study Boundaries (PSRC Existing Conditions Analysis) Total Population Covered Employment Total Acres* Activity Units/Acres Option 0-Current Comp Plan 733 1,607 120 20 Option 1 1,275 2,113 259 13 Option 2 1,163 2,018 208 15 Option 3 1,424 1,697 223 14 Option 4 - Selected Subarea Study Boun 1,806 dift1 329 12 Source: PSRC, 2020 TOTAL ACRES: PSRC references the total acreage of the Study Area, which includes the gross parcel and public right of way acreage. Analysis contained later in the report referencing gross and net buildable lands does not include existing public right of way. Page 36 of 174 12 SECTION 01 Back to Agenda)N INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK Page 37 of 174 Downtown Port Orchard Subarea Plan I Port Orchard, WA 1 04.20.2021 13 Back to Agenda INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK Page 38 of 174 Back to Agenda 2 Existing Conditions Page 39 of 174 Back to Agenda INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK Page 40 of 174 SECTION 02 1 EXISTIBack to AgendaVS 2.1 History ,A. HISTu.,. OF PORT ORCHARD The City acknowledges that the Port Orchard and the broader Kitsap Peninsula is home to two Native American tribes, the Suquamish Tribe and the Port Gamble S'Klallam Tribe. The City of Port Orchard and Sinclair Inlet are within the Tribe's adjudicated Usual and Accustomed (U&A) fishing, hunting and gathering area. The Tribe has a strong historical and present connection in Sinclair Inlet that is significant and well documented. Ethnographic and archaeological evidence demonstrates that the Suquamish Tribe inhabited the area in and around Port Orchard and Sinclair Inlet and has utilized its natural resources (including fish and shellfish) for thousands of years. Sinclair Inlet has been and continues to be an important cultural, historical, economical, and a place of well-being of the Suquamish Tribe. Significant tribal salmon fisheries exist in the inlet. Port Orchard, located in south Kitsap County, was platted as Sidney in 1886 by Frederick Stevens who wanted to name the future town after his father, Sidney Merrill Stevens. He chose a site on the southern shore of the Sinclair Inlet, part of Port Orchard Bay. Sidney quickly became known for its lumber industry, pottery works, small businesses, and agricultural opportunities. In 1890 it became the first town to incorporate in Kitsap County. Sidney residents took an active role in bringing the Puget Sound Naval Station (later Puget Sound Naval Shipyard) to Kitsap County. The navy employed many residents of Port Orchard and greater Kitsap County from the turn of the century onwards, and became the most important employer in the county. In 1893, after building a courthouse and donating it to the county, Sidney was chosen as county seat. After 1903, Port Orchard continued to grow due to the expansion of the naval yard during the Great Depression, World War II, the Korean War, and the 1960s, and due to Port Orchard's reputation as a quiet waterfront community located in a beautiful environment and close to Seattle. 1950's Street in Port Orchard, WA _ F 1940's Kitsap County Court House 1970'a Port Orchard Marina 1908 Ferry Docks Page 41 of 174 Downtown Port Orchard Subarea Plan I Port Orchard, WA 1 04.20.2021 15 SECTION 02 1 EXISTING CONDITIONS Back to Agenda 2.1 History SINCLAIR, INLET Commercial Filled Tidelands City ' County Bldg \� Port Orchard Blackjack Blvd Ravine Creek / Ravine Historic Geographic Influenced Development Pattern Westbay 160 L Upland Bluff 1/(pk' .M Page 42 of 174 16 SECTION 02 1 EXISTIBack to AgendaVS NATURAL FEATURES AND GEOGRAPHY The geography and natural landscape of Port Orchard is defined by its waterfront on Sinclair inlet, the multiple stream ravines, and the steep topography that divides them. Just as these stream valleys bring rains to Sinclair Inlet, the valleys at Port Orchard Boulevard and Bethel Avenue now discharge residents and visitors into the West and East Downtown as they travel from the uphill and inland neighborhoods. The original waterfront shoreline was generally located at the current site of Bay Street prior to the infill of historic waterfront tidelands. These filled lands present a challenge potential redevelopment due to flood risks, poor soil conditions, and a high water table farrT terminal rocery k produce mov, tag e� St livery navy Viei r hotel dance ha it V Historic Waterfront Figure -Ground - 1914 I If 4 i ILI Historic Waterfront Figure -Ground - 1982 Page 43 of 174 Downtown Port Orchard Subarea Plan I Port Orchard, WA 1 04.20.2021 17 SECTION 02 1 EXISTING CONDITIONS Back to Agenda 2.1 History O 1908 - Port Orchard - Ferry Docks 1950's - Port Orchard - Bay Street Page 44 of 174 A,, 18 SECTION 02 1 EXISTIBack to AgendaVS 2020 - Port Orchard - Ferry Docks 2020 - Port Orchard - Bay Street Page 45 of 174 Downtown Port Orchard Subarea Plan I Port Orchard, WA 1 04.20.2021 19 SECTION 02 1 EXISTING CONDITIONS Back to Agenda 2.2 Existing Built form and Context The analysis has identified three distinct areas within the broader study area, the West Downtown, the East Downtown and the County Government Campus. All three areas have a different built -form and character. They areas are divided by the geographic barriers including the change in topography between West Downtown and the County Campus, and the Blackjack Creek Ravine between the County Campus and Bethel Corridor. The West Downtown Neighborhood The West Downtown Neighborhood is the current and historical cultural and civic hub of the community. Its is also the recreational hub with ferry connections to the neighboring cities. The area includes a mix of land uses like the City Hall and public library, the Kitsap Bank and restaurants and retail services. Restaurant and Retail along Bay Street The East Downtown Neighborhood The East Downtown is geographically separated from the West Downtown and was developed later with a more auto - centric development pattern. The neighborhood includes a mix of commercial uses from the junction of Bay Street and Bethel Ave and the waterfront. Further it extends in south to Mitchell Corridor which is higher in density with a mixture of single-family homes surrounding South Kitsap High School. Single Family Homes Around Mitchell Corridor County Campus The Kitsap County Government campus is both the heart of the Center and the City's largest employer. The Port Orchard Blvd and Black Jack Creek valley's along with the historic steep shoreline isolates the Center from the Downtown. The County Campus is surrounded by single family houses separated from the campus by Sidney and Cline Ave which are also the neighborhood arterials providing vehicle and transit access to downtown. Single Family Homes Around County Campus Page 46 of 174 20 SECTION 02 1 EXISTPack to AgendaVS Ad �1W W' s w �� .a'E• �rtis �' ■. .3r .. 1� e, ° __ °r a .r •,�. W e"': "` g d`7 � ° — - - + f ir Geographic Districts Map O Page 47 of 174 Downtown Port Orchard Subarea Plan I Port Orchard, WA 1 04.20.2021 21 SECTION 02 1 EXISTING CONDITIONS Back to Agenda 2.3 Recent Achievement and Current Planning BAY STREET PEDES I KIAN PATHWAY The City of Port Orchard is constructing a new 1.0 mile long multi -purpose path/trail, broken into 11 segments beginning at the downtown Port Orchard ferry facility and ending at the Annapolis ferry facility. The completed multi -purpose trail will become a part of the Mosquito Fleet Trail. A future extension is also being planned from downtown to east of Port Orchard blvd. This portion of the Mosquito Fleet Trail along Bay Street, also known as the Bay Street Pedestrian Pathway, will be a significant segment of the off -road link in the Mosquito Fleet Trail, which eventually will connect Kingston to Southworth along the eastern shore of Kitsap County. It will also provide a much needed recreational facility within downtown Port Orchard, and a safe alternative transportation mode for its citizens and workforce. Users are expected to include lunchtime walkers, bicycle commuters, families with children, and recreational cyclists on both organized and independent tours. The trail is also likely to experience heavy multiple use during special events organized and hosted by the City of Port Orchard. BAY/ BETHEL STREET INTERSECTION REDESIGN Roundabouts are safer than traditional traffic signals or stop sign controlled intersections, and they accommodate vehicles of various sizes, including emergency vehicles, buses, semi -trucks with trailers, farm and logging equipment. Studies show roundabouts reduce injury crashes by 75% at intersections where stop signs or traffic signals previously existed. Roundabouts improve the flow of traffic because users don't have to wait for a green light to get through the intersection. Other benefits of a roundabout include vehicles moving in the same direction which helps improve traffic flow. Roundabouts reduce maintenance and repair costs when compared to traffic signals. ,, X SOUTH KITSAP COMMUNITY EVENTS CENTER SINCLAIR INLET PPOP V M v uTr swvR[[nr[ �SiE.PNN ��•• �••�� -. PP WPeeER - _. viw[Hc w 0- - _ - -.--f . �µw;:`-• SITE 6 '• i oPosen ,. .! i rcrrs.P a.nrc f r 4! /. r e • oPwa.r The South Kitsap Community Events Center (SKCEC) is a collaboration between the City of Port Orchard, and the Kitsap Regional library. Concepts suggested a 24,000-square- foot multi -use facility that includes 9,000 square feet for the new Library. In 2019, the Kitsap Public Funding District allocated up to $12 million in phased funding to support the p roj e ct. Under Rice Fergus Miller's guidance, a site has been selected at the corner of Bay Street between Port Street and Orchard Ave. Initial concepts placed the new facility in downtown Port Orchard with a project scope that would include shoreline restoration, public open space, and parking solutions. Page 48 of 174 22 SECTION 02 1 EXISTPack to AgendaVS WATERFRONT LIFT STATION AND PLAZA 2 IL New multi -use building The City of Port Orchard (City) uses its Marina Pump Station to collect all the City's wastewater and discharges it to the West Sound Utility District's (District) Wastewater Treatment Facility (WWTF). With the City's rapidly growing development, the Marina Pump Station must remain reliable and capable of handling the expected increased flow rates through projected build -out. The existing station is a critical piece of the City's sewer system and must remain effective during high flow events. Currently, the Marina waterfront is used frequently by the City's residents and visitors. When proposing alternatives to upgrade the Marina Pump Station, the City stressed the importance of maintaining the aesthetics of the waterfront environment for generations to come. This Predesign Report analyzes alternative pump station improvements based on current, future, and build -out peak hour flow rates, reliability, expected resiliency, and cost. PARKS PLAN UPDATE The City currently has approximately 70 acres of park area, as well as trails and other open space. However, the Parks Plan has not been substantively updated since 2011. Once updated, the Parks Plan will provide a 20-year vision for the City's parks, recreation, open space, and trails, as well as a 6-year action plan for implementing short- and medium - term steps to succeed in this vision. Steps in development of the Parks Plan update will include research, public involvement, and the creation of recommendations for all aspects of Port Orchard's park system, including a community demand, supply and needs analysis. The Parks Plan will also include a framework for fiscally sound decision -making over a multi -year planning period. The Parks Plan functions in coordination with the City's Comprehensive Plan and Shoreline Master Program. Page 49 of 174 Downtown Port Orchard Subarea Plan I Port Orchard, WA 1 04.20.2021 23 SECTION 02 1 EXISTING CONDITIONS Back to Agenda 2.4 Previous Planning Efforts SUMMARY As the team prepares to draft a subarea plan for the City of Port Orchard we reviewed the previous planning efforts done by the city. We found a lot of similarities in the recommendations of these planning efforts and we plan on addressing them in the Sub -area plan. Following are the planning efforts: 1. Comprehensive Plan of 1966 2. Port Orchard Waterfront Revitalization Plan Kasprisin Plan -1983 3. Downtown Port Orchard: Suggestion for Revitalization - 1999 4. Port Orchard: Economic Development Plan - 2004 1 WI. � fr�11.:.. r r I 043 w,.* L L4UNro .a. MR ^ mot d64WW ,f a, r� yy W L+3 AT• !9S[ iF+rn } ■I W.-Um •.►� ARM ='YIK��hi Idihm IM�0�1 �wOl } xul r'• _ — UNj Cil [Ft[TR14 '� Li {" IlJ!1 I Ti 145'L S piJ�i illsll KslY InI L•I M Wrnaa._.. ak,u 2004 Port Orchard Economic Development Plan - Streetscape and Pedestrian Connections Concept Plan Page 50 of 174 24 SECTION 02 1 EXISTIBack to AgendaVS 2.1. PREVIOUS PLANNING EFFORTS 0 Awaterfront park and restaurant on the newly filled tidelands COMPREHENSIVE PLAN - 1966 • A new yacht club marina, boat sale are on filled In 1966, Port Orchard completed a comprehensive plan for tidelands at the north of Blackjack Creek the city and downtown area. As a point of reference, the redevelopment recommendations for the downtown and And an expanded, east -west commercial wall to the waterfront area are summarized below. north side of the existing Bay Street complex, a civic center / auditorium was included in the development. Key recommendations include: 0 A relocation of city hall to Sidney Street and the • A scenic waterfront beach drive, from the De Kalb Blackjack Creek extension (present by-pass proposal) Street right-of-way connecting to Bay Avenue East of . A new waterfront motel. the West Bay Commercial area. • A substantial fill of the tidelands along the waterfront from the De Kalb Street waterway to include Blackjack Creek and West Bay. —Ferry Auditorium Comprehensive Plan - 1966 Page 51 of 174 Downtown Port Orchard Subarea Plan I Port Orchard, WA 1 04.20.2021 25 SECTION 02 1 EXISTING CONDITIONS Back to Agenda 2.4 Previous Planning Efforts 2.1. rhtVIOUS PLANNING EFFORTS KASPRISIN PLAN - 1983 The objectives of this study are to develop recommendations for revitalization the downtown and waterfront areas of the City of Port Orchard. Key Recommendations: • Waterfront Drive • Substantial tidelands infill • Waterfront Park • Yacht Club and Marina • Expanded east -west commercial corridor • Relocate City Hall to Sidney and new highway bypass SR 160 • New waterfront motel Sidney Hotel Hill Climb S I� Kasperian Plan - 1983 • Building and landscape improvements • Return waterfront and stream right-of-ways to public use • Downtown as a historic marine center • Integrate plans with Kitsap transit • Prioritize by-pass • Waterfront pedestrian walkway • Visual access to the waterfront from upland areas • Prioritize water dependent / related uses on th waterfront • Improve connections to uphill neighborhoods through possible hill -climb and lookout at "Fort Hill" Page 52 of 174 26 SECTION 02 1 EXISTIBack to AgendaVS I Blackjack Creek Pedestrian Bridge Blackjack Creeku West Bay111 P " f 4 .13 • � I I L � � r� � f ° 'x / � J/ A. -` 9 I I I I J Page 53 of 174 Downtown Port Orchard Subarea Plan I Port Orchard, WA 1 04.20.2021 27 SECTION 02 1 EXISTING CONDITIONS Back to Agenda 2.4 Previous Planning Efforts 2.1. PREVIOUS PLANNING EFFORTS REVITALIZATION PLAN - 1999 In 1999, the University of Washington Department of Urban Design and Planning, prepared a revitalization strategy for downtown. This planning process included an opinion survey focused on the transportation and buying habits/preferences of individuals living in and passing through downtown Port Orchard. Key Recommendations: • Add strategic anchors • Up -zone to allow 24-30 dwelling units / acre • Increase height limits to 55' measured from Bay Street • Improve pedestrian connectivity Suggestion for Revitalization - 1999 • Develop mixed -use commercial pier along the waterfront P"A5E TWO L dop Page 54 of 174 28 SECTION 02 1 EXISTIBack to AgendaVS m Mouth of Blackjack Creek Mouth of Blackjack Creek Ci i Page 55 of 174 Downtown Port Orchard Subarea Plan I Port Orchard, WA 1 04.20.2021 29 SECTION 02 1 EXISTING CONDITIONS Back to Agenda 2.4 Previous Planning Efforts 2.1. t KEVIOUS PLANNING EFFORTS EDAW PLAN - 2004 The City selected a team of consultants led by EDAW, Inc. (urban design and planning) and including Property Counselors (market analysis) for these studies. Key Recommendations: • Frame the District. • Enhance the Streetscape • Strengthen the Sense of Place in the Core • Emphasize Port Orchard's Rich History • Activate the Area • Preserve and Reinforce View Corridors • Better Connections with the Waterfront • Enhance Streetscape from Bethel to Port Orchard Boulevard • Strengthen Connections with the County • Create a Pedestrian Corridor for the Downtown Core • Tie Waterfront Park with an Expanded Waterfront Greenway O 3 N Marina 0 j' r --in IQP r P - 5 Fj U m� 11 1 I a _ X >, DEKALB ST. ni— I , . - --- — �. Page of 174� K 30 SECTION 02 1 EXISTIBack to AgendaVS 0PP0KTUNlTlf-5 City Center - Specialty Retail Core Retain active on street uses 0 Underutilized - infill or redevelop; Encourage mix of uses, empha5i5 on residential ner core munni Marquee - Explore alternatives for Downtown idenity Encourage authenticity in architecture Enhance 5treet5cape - improve experience of pede5trian5 - v15ual enhancement of street corridor View Corridors - preserve views to water terminate views at Land mark features Activity Generators - Link and encourage development of added active uses ■ Parks * Greenway5 - Extend, enhance, maximize pedestrian linkages and water access Identity - 5torytellmg elements - add focus on art, ,r hi5tory, architecture Key Intersection - Enhance mter5ection to provide focus and sense of place °°— a� Downtown Gateway - Enhance landscaping to highlight entrance Ems-♦ a% e eae ^� Page 57 of 174 Downtown Port Orchard Subarea Plan I Port Orchard, WA 1 04.20.2021 31 SECTION 02 1 EXISTING CONDITIONS Back to Agenda 2.5 Existing Land Use and Zoning CUKKtN I LHIV LJ USE (_HA mHC I tK15 I ICS Updated in 2019, Port Orchard's adopted land use code takes a form based approach to establish standard procedures for all land use and development. The code attempts to foster predictable built results and a high -quality public realm by using physical form (rather than separation of uses) as the organizing principle for the code. Because the code does not include density limits such as maximum floor -area -ratios, we used assumed residential densities included in the City Comprehensive plan amendment to establish assumed residential densities. The primary land use designations within the study area is medium density residential and Mixed -use commercial, however the study area include nearly all land use designation. The study are also includes two large public facilities campuses, the Kitsap County Campus and South Kitsap High School. Most land in the city is devoted to housing. Commercial areas and the downtown offer a range of goods and services, provide employment for local residents and those living in surrounding rural areas, and provide additional tax revenue to help fund public services and facilities. Industrial lands allow for light manufacturing and warehousing businesses, which also provide job opportunities and support the area's economy. The Land Use element establishes goals and policies that seek to: • Accommodate changes in population and demographics • Encourage development in urban areas, reduce sprawl, and deliver services efficiently • Ensure land use designations reflect need and demand • Minimize traffic congestion and encourage the development of a multi -modal transportation system • Protect open spaces and the natural environment • Promote physical activity • Support a range of employment opportunities OVERLAY DISTRICT The city's development regulations include land use overlay districts which are applied in parts of the City, as summarized below. • Downtown Height Overlay District • Government/Civic Center District • View Protection Overlay District City of Part Orchard 1? ti Centers 4 { Annopo hs ' -IF.rujlSk_ L, ;il• r' lLL-_� _I 80%h01 Lund County Campus 110 rg—& WR1 OY Lawar Mll11 9 HI{I I� hA�orml�k Y4onds Old CJftn Inn Park - SadgvAck Bethel Sedgwlck Sidney South Bethel Tremont ...I,.. i VAPOrMikHill Port Orchard Comp Plan Centers 32 Page 58 of 174 SECTION 02 1 EXISTIBack to AgendaVS —T r� DOWNTOWN PORT ORCHARD CENTER Port Orchard's downtown is the cultural, civic, and recreational hub of the community. The downtown currently contains a mix of land uses, including Port Orchard's City Hall and public library, numerous retail and service businesses, a marina and ferry dock, public parking, and a waterfront park and trail. With access from the water and from state highways 3 and 16, it remains the City's primary center for community events and activities. The City continues to work toward a balance of historic preservation, environmental restoration, and economic improvement for the downtown center. Downtown Port Orchard coupled with the County Campus may be a future candidate as a regional center. As of 2018, the Downtown Port Orchard Center measured 70 acres containing 197 residents and 787 jobs. This equates to 14 activity units per acre under the PSRC Regional Centers Framework. COUNTY CAMPUS CENTER The City of Port Orchard has benefited from being the Kitsap County seat, as well as Kitsap County long serving as the City's largest employer. Kitsap County has proposed several phased development scenarios to provide options for the expansion of County facilities within the City of Port Orchard over the next 40 years. The District included land use and regulation proposals derived from the Kitsap County Campus Master Plan created in 2003, which was designed to accomplish the expansion of community facilities and allow uses that would serve to buffer the residential areas from the Campus. Page 59 of 174 Downtown Port Orchard Subarea Plan I Port Orchard, WA 1 04.20.2021 33 SECTION 02 1 EXISTING CONDITIONS Back to Agenda 2.5 Existing Land Use and Zoning LEGEND ® BUSINESS PROFESSIONAL MIXED USE (BPMU) RESIDENTIAL 1 (R1) COMMERCIAL CORRIDOR (CC) RESIDENTIAL 2 (R2) ® COMMERCIAL MIXED USE (CMU) RESIDENTIAL 3 (R3) GREENBELT (GB) RESIDENTIAL 4 (R4) PARKS AND RECREATION (PR) COMMERCIAL HEAVY (CH) P PUBLIC FACILITY (PF) ® GATEWAY MIXED USE (GMU) CIVIC AND INSTITUTIONAL (CI) ® DOWNTOWN MIXED USE (DMU) 0 NEIGHBORHOOD MIXED USE (NMU) � J r r—_—�— ►1 l O N '� ywF 1• e ■ p qy i r. r�F I KITSAP j ��~ z z z p �/ w� U DEKALB 0Q �� w DEKAL.Fr i DWIGHT ! 1 I DIVISION I TAYLOR I O I I ! a SMITH 11 TAYLOR + i KENDALL �`�— PLISKO I 1 I MILE HILL I i I I I i-_—_----------- SROUFE I I Existing Zoning Map b N Page 60 of 174 34 SECTION 02 1 EXISTIBack to AgendaVS LEGEND DOWNTOWN HEIGHT OVERLAY DISTRICT DHOD 3 DHOD 4 DHOD 5 VIEW PROTECTION OVERLAY DISTRICT � J t • — liOc / ►► Py �TO/V y4F E KITSAP I 1 - j .01 �-r z LU w Z'000 p r ♦/ w+----� �� " i z U DEKALB 0 Q w DEKALB--�—i v� DWIGHT ! 1 I DIVISION m r i Qf Ctf � 0 I TAYLORQf I O I I ! --- SMITH 11 TAYLOR I + i KENDALL �` PLISKO I I-%--�_- 1 I MILE HILL I i I I I i-_—_----------- SROUFE I I Existing Height Overlay Map �N Page 61 of 174 Downtown Port Orchard Subarea Plan I Port Orchard, WA 1 04.20.2021 35 SECTION 02 1 EXISTING CONDITIONS Back to Agenda 2.5 Existing Land Use and Zoning LEGEND STOREFRONT VARIED LANDSCAPED MARINE GATEWAY TRAIL 0 HIGH VISIBILITY CORNER Note: Dashed lines indicate conceptual planned streets or trails � J _ 1 �� ♦�^ r—_—�— ►1 l O N '� ywF 1• e ■ p qy i r. r�F I KITSAP j ��~ z z z p �/ w� U DEKALB 0 w DEKALB——i DWIGHT ! 1 I DIVISION I TAYLOR I O I I ! a SMITH 11 TAYLOR + i KENDALL �` PLISKO I 1 I MILE HILL I i I I I SROUFE I I Existing Block frontages Plan o• Page 62 of 174 36 SECTION 02 1 EXISTIBack to AgendaVS 2.6 Circulation, Access and Parking VEHICULAK uxCULAI ivim mime f.CCESS Minor arterial roads serve as key elements in the county transportation system. These minor arterial roads link together state routes or connect the state route system to Port Orchard, to other major centers, and to the ferry system. For example, Bethel Road is a two lane north/south road located in eastern Port Orchard. As a north/south road, Bethel Road connects and intersects with Sedgwick Road, Lund Avenue, and SR 166. Bethel Road terminates in Port Orchard at Bay Street. Bay Street is the East-West connector for downtown waterfront. Cline Ave and Sydney Ave are the primary vehicle connectors for county campus and downtown Port Orchard. PEDESTRIAN CIRCULATION AND ACCESS There are an assortment of pedestrian facilities located throughout Port Orchard and its UGA. Pedestrian facilities include sidewalks, trails and designated crosswalks. The majority of sidewalks are located along commercial corridors and in some neighborhoods. However there are some breaks in the sidewalks, continuous sidewalks would improve the safety and utility of the pedestrian environment. TRANSPORTATION STUDY See existing conditions summary and EIS development analysis provided by TSI Traffic Engineers to be incorporated into the EIS and enclosed in the document appendix. Page 63 of 174 Downtown Port Orchard Subarea Plan I Port Orchard, WA 1 04.20.2021 37 SECTION 02 1 EXISTING CONDITIONS Back to Agenda 2.6 Circulation, Access and Parking .t Functional Classlticaton Pnr1#jp4ffl A eltal #, qor Arsp4W Vehicle Circulation and Access S-E� MILE WILL �*Reference TSI existing transportation conditions analysis for the Port Orchard Subarea Plan. N Page 64 of 174 38 SECTION 02 1 EXISTIBack to AgendaVS N�nmoto[ite� Faeiii[ies $Ike Lane Mcaqurto Flee[ Trail S Sidewalk ---• planned MuMrmudal Pamway Planned Sidewalks and Bike Lane, Local Street Urban Genrer 10 / ` �-lAll I- 1/4 MILE, 5 MIN WALK dO 1/4 MILE, 5 MIN WALK ' �r LU EL 1/4 MILE MIN WALK 1 F i Pedestrian Circulation and Access rhi _} Ole 000 Y Lu 5E AfilLfi H RLL IN *Reference TSI existing transportation conditions analysis for the Port Orchard Subarea Plan. Page 65 of 174 Downtown Port Orchard Subarea Plan I Port Orchard, WA 1 04.20.2021 39 SECTION 02 1 EXISTING CONDITIONS Back to Agenda 2.6 Circulation, Access and Parking Transit • Ppihl 4f Inrues! Park & Ride —�- Annapolis Fool Ferry Pod Orchard Fad Ferry Route 4 - Tramohl Route 5 - Sidney Route 8 - Bethel Routs 9 - South Park Route 81- Aahapolis Commuter Roa#e M-! rWhwnrlh ShvMose Purdy Gonnection CUrffanCentcr City 5veet Ferry Dock Transit Service Plan �*Reference TSI existing transportation conditions analysis for the Port Orchard Subarea Plan. N Page 66 of 174 40 Back to Agenda City of Port Orchard Half -Mile Buffer from Ferry Terminals and Ferry Bus Drops OFerryTerminal_Buffers Urban Growth Area = Port Orchard UGA High Speed Transit (Ferry Terminals) 112 Mile Buffer Map �N Page 67 of 174 Downtown Port Orchard Subarea Plan I Port Orchard, WA 1 04.20.2021 41 Back to Agenda INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK Page 68 of 174 42 SECTION 02 1 EXISTIBack to AgendaVS 2.7 Utilities and Capital Facilities TRANSPORTATION See existing conditions summary and EIS development analysis provided byTSI Engineers to be incorporated into the Downtown Subarea EIS. STORM WATER See existing conditions summary and EIS development analysis provided by Reid Middleton Civil Engineers to be incorporated into the Downtown Subarea EIS. WATER SERVICE See existing conditions summary and EIS development analysis provided by BHC Civil Engineers to be incorporated into the Downtown Subarea EIS. SEWER SERVICE See existing conditions summary and EIS development analysis provided by BHC Civil Engineers to be incorporated into the Downtown Subarea EIS. Page 69 of 174 Downtown Port Orchard Subarea Plan I Port Orchard, WA 1 04.20.2021 43 SECTION 02 1 EXISTING CONDITIONS Back to Agenda 2.8 Environment and Open Spaces EXIS i iimu i ivima Port Orchard is a community which provides a full range of parks, recreation, open space, and ecosystem services by protecting native wildlife habitat, restoring and preserving natural systems, enjoying majestic marine and mountain views, and ensuring new development enhances the natural environment. The existing City parks system is supplemented by the schools of the South Kitsap School District, and the Kitsap County Parks and Recreation Department. EXISTING COMPREHENSIVE PLAN - PARK VISION The City of Port Orchard 2016 Comprehensive Plan Update identifies twelve (12) Centers. The vision of the Parks Element and Comprehensive Parks Plan is to ensure that every center contains and/or is connected to a park by safe non -motorized routes. The Port Orchard Parks and Trails map on the following page depicts existing park facilities in relation to the ten local centers as well as the planned trail connections between local centers depicted with dashed lines. Walking/jogging/running paths were a top priority identified in the 2015 Parks Survey. Connecting local centers and parks with safe non -motorized routes, including those in public right-of-way such as bike lanes and walking shoulders, will increase access to active transportation for all residents and benefit the entire community. The Non -Motorized section of the Transportation Element provides further detail on existing and future trails. Page 70 of 174 44 SECTION 02 1 EXISTIBack to AgendaVS O City Boundary Flood Hazard Area ® 0.2%Annual Chance Flood Hazard ® FEMAZoneAE ® FEMAZoneA - Floodway Wetlands Watercourses Potential Wetlands Geologic Hazard Areas of Concern _ High Hazard Areas Bald Eagle Management Area 0 Waterbodies APLL f�f ■ 1 • _ ' co 1 _ ■� I J J _ m ' R ALY - F'- 1 K ST a DE Lb ST r Q� D IG DWI HT ST DIVI ION T -i ! ;1 WEAN' ST 0 IW U W DA ST D' e-rAY IL W Y W -j O LOR ST TA LOR ST OLVES RD - � z O =� SMI ST SET YLOR ST a . K NDA L ST P ISKO LN :�E SROUFE ST O U Port Orchard Environmental Map W U) 0 J rn MI E HILL DF Page 71 of 174 Downtown Port Orchard Subarea Plan I Port Orchard, WA 1 04.20.2021 45 SECTION 02 1 EXISTING CONDITIONS Back to Agenda 2.8 Environment and Open Spaces Public Park e Natural Corridor - — - Bike/Ped Path i A, ■9 40� 4� R f. R 3. �® 7 it 4t, # a Bay Street Pedestrian Pathway + ' •wjft draw ° * e Om / 1r - ,� 14 KITSAP ST ,;y' q iAla 04 dam. tdoA rsjaori RInep a I.., la. DEKALB ST z S ME'Sr 16, it *l/ 7 DWIGHT ST 4 � ----;E■ I.g tna ra * � • All IF DIVISIplug BE ON ST Kit o p Irate I r �._ti 10 t � i � d .� Q � ,_�■ tiA p Rw p ? TAYLOR ST011 '16 K + Z =a ' qIrllm a40 EE ru AIL 4. 9 in �4 - .mod • �.9;EL or- e ------------ a I *'� f------------ ;'� 4• Ia -4 r rd r ww EEEEA 40 26 so x elm am 9 j .r%6 m t t @ w ak r# tK JI M M r Ip E-A 1 ► - � y pa wr Parks and Natural Open Space Corridors n. t. s. Page 72 of 174 46 SECTION 02 1 EXISTIBack to AgendaVS SHORELINE MASTER PROGRAM The City of Port Orchard classification system consists of five shoreline environments that are contained in the recommended classification system identified in WAC 173- 26-211(5). The State's Shoreline Master Program Guidelines describe the purpose of environment designations in WAC 173-26-191(1(d)). Shoreline management must address a wide range of physical conditions and development settings along shoreline areas. Effective shoreline management requires that the Shoreline Master Program prescribe different sets of environmental protection measures, allowable use provisions, and development regulations for each shoreline segment. Assigning shoreline designations, each with different policies and regulatory measures, provides a regulatory framework for environmental protection and development depending on the development and resources present in specific areas. Please note, shoreline use and development determined by the Department and classified by the Administrator is regulated under one or more of the following applicable sections. SHORELINE DESIGNATION AND FLOOD ZONE The study area includes High Intensity and Urban Conservancy shoreline designations. In addition to the shoreline designations the study area has a history of flooding during high tides, king tides, and storm events. The prevalence of flooding events is expected to increase due to anticipated sea level rise. Legend NATURAL - UR13AN CON5ERVNdGY - HIGH 144TENSITY SHORELINE RES.IDENRALL Shwilne Segmeal Lines Ill OIwd uoa City Boundary wakgwdies Page 73 of 174 Downtown Port Orchard Subarea Plan I Port Orchard, WA 1 04.20.2021 47 Back to Agenda INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK Page 74 of 174 48 SECTION 02 1 EXISTIBack to AgendaVS 2.9 Market Conditions Assessment A detailed study of Economic Profile and Capacity Analysis can be found in the Section 06 - Appendix under B - Heartland Economic Profile and Build -able Lands Analysis dated 6th June 2020. 2.9.1 Economic Profile POPULATION GROWTH • Current and Historical (Source: Washington OFM) *flag years with annexations • Foretasted (PSRC Forecasts) • Overall Port Orchard has added over 3,613 residents since 2010 • The City's growth rates was higher than other Kitsap County communities and the County in part due to annexations. FORETASTED POPULATION GROWTH • Currently available forecasts produced by the Puget Sound Regional Council (PSRC) call for an additional 7,146 residents in Port Orchard by 2040 • Neighboring Bremerton is anticipated to add more than 25,000 new residents during the same time period. DEMOGRAPHICS • Composition (family households vs non -family) • Housing tenure • Age • Gender • Race and ethnicity - Port Orchard's population is more racially diverse than Kitsap County - Port Orchard, Bremerton and Silverdale share similar levels of racial diversity. • Household income - Port Orchard has a median household income of over $70,000 - Port Orchard's median income is slightly lower than the median income for Kitsap County, but exceeds that of neighboring Bremerton. • Educational attainment - Over one-third (36%) of Port Orchard's population has college degree (Associates, Bachelors or Graduate/Professional). This is five percentage points below Kitsap County as a whole. - Just under 10% of the total population of Port Orchard has not graduated high school. This is higher than all the comparison geographies. HOUSING INVENTORY IN THE STUDY AREA (ASSESSOR) • Housing growth in the City • Number of housing units by Type (single, multifamily, mobile, group quarters) • Port orchard has added 1,379 housing units inclusive of annexations, since 2010, an average of over 150 units peryear HOUSEHOLD COMPOSITION • Port Orchard has the highest percentage of family households of the comparison geographies. • Family households make up to 68% of households in Port Orchard, which is slightly higher than Kitsap County • Non -family make up almost half of Bremerton household composition. • Single family housing is the predominant existing land use in the study area (38% of land) • Single family housing represents 62% of total housing inventory (by unit) • There are 742 housing units in the study area Page 75 of 174 Downtown Port Orchard Subarea Plan I Port Orchard, WA 1 04.20.2021 49 SECTION 02 1 EXISTING CONDITIONS Back to Agenda 2.4.2 Development Pipeline DEVILLUr-ivir-N I' Firr-L111JIL The Map Below illustrate the development pipeline, representing projects that are known to be in planning or permitting stages of development. All parcels in the development pipeline were excluded in the gross build -able land area calculations in Step 1. lot ell M ti ILI 41L Stidy Area ........... PpOlne J Development Pipeline Page 76 of 174 50 SECTION 02 1 EXISTIBack to AgendaVS KITSAP BANK CAMPUS MASTER PLAN Planning for the redevelopment of the existing Kitsap Bank Campus, to revitalize and create a sense of place on the Port Orchard waterfront. Design of the waterfront will capture beautiful views of the surrounding Puget Sound and Olympics. Elements of the redevelopment include a blend of public and private spaces; residential over commercial, office and community centers surrounded by parks and open waterfront spaces. Organic themes are drawn from the natural beauty of the site, incorporating warm woods, stone and natural materials into the architecture and landscape. Mitigation of stormwater is integral to landscape planning and incorporated into the overall site plan in functional and aesthetically pleasing design. The entire project is planned for phased redevelopment. OAK 429 BAY STREET 1 COUNTY COURTHOUSE The purpose of the Kitsap County Campus Master Plan is to provide for the expansion of County facilities on the Port Orchard Campus over the next 40+ years. This Plan provides phased development scenarios to en -sure that the County has options for expansion and includes recommended zoning changes to facilitate this expansion. This Plan offers suggestions for design guidelines that the City and community may want to pursue in order to further shape future public and private development. The development of a mixed -use building located at 429 FT Bay Street consisting of 39 residential units, 500 square feet of commercial space with enclosed parking provided on the L.d. ground. I _.i. li AFFA� LOJI F II Ilfll I� I I I I AIR MASE J I i 76 R1ASE i 2W_ I I J i !i 1 13 LEMP i L _ _J L_I_.J Page 77 of 174 Downtown Port Orchard Subarea Plan I Port Orchard, WA 1 04.20.2021 51 SECTION 02 1 EXISTING CONDITIONS Back to Agenda 2.4.3 Exiting Buildable Lands The map below, highlight both the net vacant and redevelopable lands along with the planned development pipeline. These maps indicate where future development capacity is located within the Study Area. rwd ® f U37 01 r Hill ., �, u-n.r C= — ■ lj IL + � Mir }I Lv ` OFF, ........... � 1 3 2 I M 1 J Fj 4• fi - r = i' - - Study Area ► , + 4 yacank1Red-evelopable MIXED USE ZONE � CIVIGf4PEN SPACE ZONE L b•••I.,le•Yii�i„-u-.Mlil Yj�.n-1�-I�I�iI-WII,�IFi�11-r - _ -' � l G M M ERGUIL ZQN E + RE$1DENTIAL Z-0NE Capacity by Land Use Category Page 78 of 174 52 SECTION 02 1 EXISTIBack to AgendaVS r +'r ff AF r� F +'RTIT y�� „ ,,,... 2 L � f _ i 1 i C c _ D. ......... Capacity by Vacant and Redevelopable Land 4W A ' L SUAy Area Va[antRedeve"able SiO�le-FaH, kI UEM19lLX V4CaM Untllrli-FILRod Page 79 of 174 Downtown Port Orchard Subarea Plan I Port Orchard, WA 1 04.20.2021 53 SECTION 02 1 EXISTING CONDITIONS Back to Agenda 2.4.3 Build -able Lands BVILUHDLC LHINU HrCCA The gross buildable land area is the sum of all land area for all parcels meeting one or more of the criteria listed to the right. This does not include existing public right of way which accounts for approximately 85 acres of land within the Study Area. Certain parcels were excluded from this calculation to improve the accuracy of the analysis (see Parcel Exclusions). City of Port Orchard Review. In addition, the City of Port Orchard conducted a detailed review of the study area to inform designation of vacant and redevelopments parcels and to better reflect known parcel level conditions in the City. PARCEL EXCLUSIONS Properties with zero total assessed value were manually reviewed for ownership, land use and were visually inspected. Properties that were significantly improved or public facilities, including city owned beach -front parks, were excluded. All the parcels in the pipeline were also excluded including the current phased expansion of the County Courthouse. The development capacity in the pipeline is re -incorporated in Step 3c. Examples of Exclusions: • Government Services (Prop Class) • Parks (Prop Class) • Cemeteries • Educational Services • Utilities • Condominiums GROSS BUILDABLE LANDS CRITERIA VACANT Using data from the Kitsap County Assessor, this analysis identifies vacant parcels using the assessed values of the improvements. Lots with zero improvement value are then compared against other factors such ownership and property class descriptions to determine vacancy. UNDERUTILIZED Using Kitsap County Assessor data, this analysis calculates an improvement ratio by dividing the assessed improvement value by the total assessed value. This ratio of assessed improvement value to total assessed value is a commonly used indicator for a property's level of improvement. A ratio less than 0.5 indicates the land is worth more than the improvements. This analysis uses an improvement ratio of 0.5 as the threshold. Any parcels with an improvement ratio under this threshold are considered underutilized. SINGLE-FAMILY Any Single -Family use, as defined by assessor property class field, in a high -density base -zone, is deemed to be redevelopable. Page 80 of 174 54 SECTION 02 1 EXISTIBack to AgendaVS 2.4.4 Market Yield Assessment FUTURE CAPACITY SCLimHn,iv ANALYSIS Using the zoning assumptions and FAR ranges, the analysis leverages variation in development densities to simulate different market conditions impacting the range of capacity across the subarea. The three scenarios, presented to the right, reflect the following: > The impact of surface versus structured parking on capacity -- serving as a reflection of different market conditions (for example, structured parking would require more favorable market conditions). > The concentration of commercial development as a standalone product as well as a share of mixed -used developments. > The overall range of capacity within the subarea The tables on the following page (Exhibit 49-51) provide details on each scenario in terms of assumptions for the proportion of structured versus surface parking and the proportion of commercial uses in mixed -use development. A detailed breakdown of FAR assumptions by zone and scenario is provided in the appendix. Scenario 1: Baseline Capacity • Mostly residential development • Standalone commercial development only in commercial only zones. Some commercial incorporated into mixed -use developments • Majority surface parking meaning lower density development Scenario 2: High Capacity, Residential Heavy • Mostly residential development • Standalone commercial development only in commercial only zones. Some commercial incorporated into mixed -use developments. • Majority structured parking, meaning higher density development Scenario 3: High Capacity Commercial Heavy • More balanced mix of residential and commercial • Some standalone commercial development in mixed - use zones plus commercial development in commercial only zone. Increased commercial incorporated into mixed -use developments • Majority structured parking meaning higher density development Exhibit 49. FAR Allocation Assumed in Zones Permitting Commercial & Residential Building Forms for Each Scenario Commercial Only Residential Mixed -Use Structured Parking Surface Parking Below Grade Parking Surface Parking 1 -Baseline 0% 0% 25% 75% 2 - High Capacity, Res Heavy 0% 0% 75% 25% 3 - High Capacity, Comm Heavy 10% 10% 60% 20% Exhibit 50. FAR Allocation Assumed in Zones Permitting Only Commercial Building Forms for Each Scenario Commercial Only • Structured Parking Surface Parking 1 -Baseline 25% 75°/a 2 - High Capacity, Res Heavy 75% 25% 3 - High Capacity, Comm Heavy 70% 30% Exhibit 51. Commercial Use & Res Uses permitted Commercial Capacity Percent (%) Of Total By Base Zone SCENARIO 1 SCENARIO 2 SCENARIO 3 NMU 5% 5% 24% CMU 25% 25% 40% ❑MU 25% 25% 40% GMU 25% 25% 40% BPMU 20% 20% 36% CC 25% 25% 40% CH 100% 100% 100% Cl 100% 100% 100% Page 81 of 174 Downtown Port Orchard Subarea Plan I Port Orchard, WA 1 04.20.2021 55 SECTION 02 1 EXISTING CONDITIONS Back to Agenda 2.4.5 Baseline Assessment SCENAKIU "1 - BASELINE CAr/A%_j FY Net CATEGORY/ZONE Devlopable Commercial Residential Residential Area Capacity Capacity Capacity The Baseline Capacity scenario more closely reflects near (Acre) (5F) (5F) (Units) term market conditions in Port Orchard. In this scenario CIVIC AND OPEN SPACE 3.5 362,900 0 0 housing is the predominant highest and best use in mixed RESIDENTIAL ZONES 7.9 0 UKN 120 use zones. In addition, a large majority of development is COMMERCIALZONES 2.6 92,100 0 0 assumed to be surfaced park, thus reducing overall densities MIXED USE 20.5 278,600 800,900 1,247 achieved. TOTAL with Pipeline 34.5 733,600 800,900 1,367 • Mostly residential development Pipeline 11.2 347000 NA 246 total withoutppelioe 23.3 386,600 800,900 1,121 • Standalone commercial development only in zones prohibiting residential building form. Scenario 2 Table • Some commercial incorporated into mixed use developments. SCENARIO 3 - MIXED -USE FOCUS • Majority surface parking meaning lower density The High Capacity, Commercial Heavy capacity scenario development. reflects more favorable economic conditions in Port Orchard and broader Kitsap market area, with an emphasis Net on commercial and office development. In this scenario CATEGORY/ZONE Devlopable Commercial Residential Residential a significant share of development in mixed use zones Area Capacity Capacity Capacity is assumed to be commercial. As in Scenario 2, a larger (Acre) "'; (Units) proportion of development is assumed to incorporate CIVICANDOPEN5PACE 3351,400 p 0 structured parking, thus increasing overall densities achieved. RESIDENTIAL ZONES 7.9 0 UKN 120 • More balanced mix of residential and commercial COMMERCIALZONES 2.6 65,200 0 0 MIXED USE 20.5 206,200 566,200 954 • Some standalone commercial development in mixed TOTAL with Pipeline 34.5 622,800 566,200 1,074 use zones plus commercial development in commercial Pipeline 11.2 347006 NA 246 only zone. Increased commercial incorporated into Total without Pipeline 23.3 275,806 566200 828 mixed use developments. • Majority structured parking meaning higher density development Scenario 1 Table SCENARIO 2 - RESIDENTIAL FOCUS CATEGORYIZONE Net Developable Commercial Residential Residential Area Capacity Capacity Capacity The High Capacity ,Residential Heavy capacity scenario (Acre) (5F) (5F) (Units) reflects more favorable economic conditions in Port Orchard CIVIC AND OPEN SPACE 3.5 361,800 0 0 and the broader Kitsap County market area. In this scenario RESIDENTIAL ZONES T9 0 UKN 120 housing is still the predominant highest and best use in mixed COMMERCIALZONES 2.6 89,400 0 0 use zones. Alternatively, a larger proportion of development MIXED USE 20.5 418,200 596,155 991 is assumed to incorporate structured parking, thus increasing TOTAL with Pipeline 34.5 869,400 596,155 1,111 overall densities achieved. Pipeline 11.1 347000 N4 246 • Mostly residential development Total without Pipeline 23.3 522,400 596,155 865 • Standalone commercial development only in commercial only zones. Some commercial incorporated Scenario 3 Table into mixed use developments. • Majority structured parking meaning higher density developments Page 82 of 174 56 SECTION 02 1 EXISTIBack to AgendaVS EXISTING CONDITIONS Development Scenarios with Subarea Plan Recommendations Study Area (acres) Commercial (square footage) Residential (square footage) Residential (units) Existing 329 761,645 n/a 742 *Note: All scenarios include assumed development pipeline projects. EXISTING ACTIVITY UNITS Development Total Covered Residen- Activity Activity Units Activity Units Scenarios Population Employment tial Units Units/Acre Dedicated to Dedicated to Housing Employment Existing 1,806 2,150 742 12 46% 54% • Population, employment and existing activity units provided by PSRC. • Activity units calculated as total population + employment / 329 acres Page 83 of 174 Downtown Port Orchard Subarea Plan I Port Orchard, WA 1 04.20.2021 57 Back to Agenda INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK Page 84 of 174 Back to Agenda 3 Subarea Plan Goals and Vision and Alternatives Page 85 of 174 SECTION 03 1 VISION AND ALTERNATIVES Back to Agenda INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK Page 86 of 174 SECTION 03 1 VISION AI`BacktoAgendaES 3.1 Proposed Alternatives Approach The proposed design concepts are a single vision for achieving the broader goals outlined in this subarea plan. In the downtown areas, this includes promoting a vibrant walkable community that showcases the City's waterfront. In the County Government Campus planning area and the uphill neighborhood the plan incorporates planned expansion at the county campus, provides development flexibility along the Sidney and Cline arterials, and preserves residential areas throughout most of the neighborhood. Due to existing neighborhood constraints and the absence of large tracts of developable land the alternatives are based on a single concept plan. The distinction between each alternative is whether the assumed program of future development will consist primarily residential and standalone commercial or if it will have greater vertical mixed -use development. Alternatives Alternative 1 - No Action No action would be taken to adopt new development policies. The existing Downtown and County Campus Centers would each be retained in their present configurations; no combination or expansion of these subareas would take place; no changes to zoning or other land use regulations would be made. The capacity assumed in this alternative assumes that development will still occur, but at a density similar to existing conditions with very limited structured or below -grade parking. Alternative 2 - Residential Focus This alternative assumes a mostly residential development with commercial development only occurring in standalone buildings in nonresidential zones. The maximum building height and densities would see limited increases in locations with minimal view impacts. The alternative assumes a greater mix of structured parking to achieve greater density than the existing baseline development patterns. Potential zoning changes would focus on increasing residential capacity in existing commercial zones. Alternative 3 - Mixed -Use Focus This alternative assumes an increase in mixed -use residential, commercial retail, and office development. The maximum building height and densities would see limited increases in locations with minimal view impacts. The alternative assumes greater mix of structured parking to achieve greater density than the existing baseline development patterns. Potential zoning changes would focus on increasing residential capacity in both existing commercial and residential zones. Page 87 of 174 Downtown Port Orchard Subarea Plan I Port Orchard, WA 1 04.20.2021 59 Back to Agenda ALTERNATIVE 1 - NO ACTION BASELINE CATEGORYIZONE Net Devlopable Area (Acre) Commercial Capacity (SF) Residential Capacity (SF) Residential Capacity (Units) CIVIC AND OPEN SPACE 3.5 351,400 0 0 RESIDENTIAL ZONES 7.9 0 UKN 120 COMMERCIAL ZONES 2.6 65,200 0 0 MIXED USE 20.5 206,200 566,200 954 TOTAL with ipe me 34.5 622,800 566,200 1,074 Pipeline Total without Pipeline 11.2 23.3 347,000 275,800 NA 566,200 246 828 ALTERNATIVE CATEGORYIZONE 2 - RESIDENTIAL FOCUS Net Devlopable Commercial Residential Residential Area Capacity Capacity Capacity (Acre) (SF) (SF) (Units) CIVIC AND OPEN SPACE 3.5 362,900 0 0 RESIDENTIAL ZONES 7.0 0 UKN 102 COMMERCIAL ZONES 0.0 0 0 0 MIXED USE 24.8 310,600 1,010,100 1,509 TOTAL with ipe me 35.4 673,500 1,010,100 1,610 Pipeline Total without Pipeline 11.2 24.2 347,000 326,500 NA 1,010,100 246 1,364 ALTERNATIVE 3 - MIXED -USE FOCUS Net CATEGORYIZONE Devlopable Commercial Residential Residential Area Capacity Capacity Capacity (Acre) (SF) (SF) (Units) CIVIC AND OPEN SPACE 3.5 361,800 0 0 RESIDENTIAL ZONES 7.0 0 UKN 102 COMMERCIAL ZONES 0.0 0 0 0 MIXED USE 24.8 486,800 752,283 1,186 TOTAL with ipe me 35.4 848,600 752,283 1,288 Pipeline 11.2 347,000 NA 246 Total without Pipeline 24.2 501,600 752,283 1,042 Summary of Changes from Buildable Lands Baseline Capacity Analysis • Proposed land use changes including: proposed zoning changes and height increases. • Additional buildable land assumptions due to zoning changes and assume redevelopment areas. See updated buildable lands map in section 3.3. • Proposed required parking modifications. Ref: Document of City of Port Orchard Downtown Subarea Plan - Economic Profile and Capacity Analysis prepared by Heartland Group, May 14th, 2020 Page 88 of 174 60 Back to Agenda ALTERNATIVE COMPARISON Development Scenarios with Net Developable Commercial Residential Residential Subarea Plan Recommendations Area Capacity Capacity Capacity (acres) (square feet) (square feet) (units) Existing - 761,645 n/a 742 Alternative 1 - No Action 34.5 622,800 566,200 1,074 Alternative 2 - Residential Focus 35.4 673,800 1,010,100 1,610 Alternative 3 - Mixed -Use Focus 35.4 848,600 752,283 1,288 *Note: All scenarios include assumed development pipeline projects. Alternatives show new proposed development ACTIVITY UNITS SUMMARY Development Scenarios Total Population Covered Employment Residential Units Activity Units/Acre Activity Units Dedicated to Housing Activity Units Dedicated to Employment Existing 1,806 2,150 742 12 46% 54% Alternative 1 4,051 3,396 1,074 23 54% 46% Alternative 2 4,663 3,617 1,610 26 60% 40% Alternative 3 4,128 3,889 1,288 25 54% 46% • Total Population assumes 2.09 persons per unit per Washington's Office Financial Management 2020. • Employment assumed 1 employee per 500 sf of commercial development. • Activity units calculated as total population + employment / 329 acres Page 89 of 174 Downtown Port Orchard Subarea Plan I Port Orchard, WA 1 04.20.2021 61 SECTION 03 1 SUBAREA PLAN 3.2.1 West Downtown Planning Area "ANINtu Al. i REDEVELOPMEN i AKtA West Downtown is Port Orchard's current and historical Potential Shoreline cultural, civic, and recreational hub of the community. The Restoration area includes a mix of land uses, including Port Orchard's City Hall and public library, numerous retail and service businesses, a marina and ferry dock, public parking, and a Pedestrian Plaza waterfront park and trail. With access from the water and from Bay Street to from state highways 3 and 16, it remains the City's primary the waterfront center for community events and activities. Anticipated future Back to Agenda development includes the South Kitsap Community Events Traffic Center and a new Kitsap Bank headquarters as part of a Calming ;�; • �. larger mixed -use development. The concept plan works to balance historic preservation, environmental restoration, and economic improvement. Potential Stream Daylighting ♦ I 1 Surface Parking' Pedestrian Hill Climb to Prospect Street �\\ce Potential Stream Daylighting , n i t o / Gay Iel .0 n i � Z _ East Downtown - Redevelopment Concept Plan Diagram .LJLIJ r Page 90 of 174 62 SECTION 03 Back to Agenda\N Two-way traffic at Passenger Ferry Frederick Ave New slow waterfront Terminate Streets at the "shared street" to create waterfront with a small plaza, front doors on Sinclair Inlet overlook, or pocket park •Ii ■r■i■r■r■r rkinn� z Surfacerri c-- g' n Parking _ _ _ rn Lo di g/ P rki g z C _ T ■ 5 ta`o�e Rend ood� LEGEND Ne\ghb°rh . Q RESIDENTIAL 0 O i L - - J (Preferred Front Orientation) -C �� RESIDENTIAL/ MIXED USE 0 (Preferred Front Orientation) T'— s a� r — COMMERCIAL/RETAIL (Preferred Front Orientation) EK4LB ST OFFICE / OFFICE MIXED -USE (Preferred Front Orientation) -CIVIC (Preferred Front Orientation) OPEN SPACE (Park, plaza, or other) SURFACE PARKING EXISTING PIPED STREAM N 1 " = 200' Page 91 of 174 Downtown Port Orchard Subarea Plan I Port Orchard, WA 1 04.20.2021 63 SECTION 03 1 SUBAREA PLAN Back to Agenda Community Events Center l90'V Residential Mixed Use e Y I T _ANo a cn w C a I w Roof Deck: j. 0 o: y < , Commercial 1 Office Y 0 1 w 0 W i i East Downtown - Redevelopment Concept Plan 7� ' Residential Mixed Use Page 92 of 174 64 SECTION 03 Back to Agenda\N Key OBay Street corridor design and frontage improvements © Consolidate curb cuts where feasible to improve pedestrian safety © Waterfront plaza / overlook OKayak launch dock © Proposed Hill Climb Opaving Traffic calming / specialty at Crosswalk to Orchard Street Plaza and viewpoint OWaterfront open space Frederick Street improvements Qand conversion to two-way traffic OTrail Improvements New waterfront pedestrian oriented shared street Street termination plaza and overlook i & i■�a .101sI �_' _�_ LEGEND RESIDENTIAL (Preferred Front Orientation) RESIDENTIAL/ MIXED USE (Preferred Front Orientation) COMMERCIAL/RETAIL (Preferred Front Orientation) OFFICE / OFFICE MIXED -USE (Preferred Front Orientation) CIVIC (Preferred Front Orientation) OPEN SPACE (Park, plaza, or other) i SURFACE PARKING EXISTING PIPED STREAM N (i) 1 " — 100, Page 93 of 174 Downtown Port Orchard Subarea Plan I Port Orchard, WA 1 04.20.2021 65 SECTION 03 1 SUBAREA PLAN Back to Agenda 3.2.2 East Downtown Planning Area BANNED AL i REDEVELOPMEN i .,,,,A The East Downtown is geographically separated from the West Downtown and was developed later with a more auto - centric development pattern. This area includes a mix of commercial uses primarily on larger parcels fronting Bay Street or Bethel Ave. WSDOT is currently in the process of redesigning the Bay and Bethel intersection to replace the current signal with a new round -about. The concept plan strives to break -down the scale of existing large sites to provide a more walkable land -use pattern. Large surface parking lots and many vacant properties provide an opportunity for new economic development more reminiscent of the existing historic development character of West Downtown. East Downtown - Redevelopment Concept Plan Diagram "Finer Grain" mixed -use development oriented toward Sinclair Inlet that reinforces views to the water. Page 94 of 174 66 SECTION 03 Back to Agenda\N ay 100 Extend Mitchell Corridor to terminate at the waterfront e Adeotxa� table Rborhood Ne�g r LEGEND 41 RESIDENTIAL (Preferred Front Orientation) RESIDENTIAL / MIXED USE j w i (Preferred Front Orientation) COMMERCIAL/RETAIL (Preferred Front Orientation) / OFFICE MIXED -USE -OFFICE (Preferred Front Orientation) CIVIC (Preferred Front Orientation) OPEN SPACE J (Park, plaza, or other) SURFACE PARKING EXISTING PIPED STREAM JL TN 1 " = 200' Page 95 of 174 Downtown Port Orchard Subarea Plan I Port Orchard, WA 1 04.20.2021 67 SECTION 03 1 SUBAREA PLAN Back to Agenda 3.2.3 County Government Campus Planning Area BANNED AL i REDEVELOPMEN i AK,, The Kitsap County Government campus is Port Orchard's largest employer. The Port Orchard Blvd and Blackjack Creek valleys, along with the historic steep shoreline isolates this part of the Center from Downtown and inhibits accessible pedestrian connections. Sidney and Cline Ave act as neighborhood arterials providing vehicle and transit access between Highway 16 and the downtown. Kitsap County is currently developing a phased development for the expansion of County facilities within the City of Port Orchard over the next 40 years. The County Campus expansion is currently anticipated to occur over five phases. The anticipated scope of development was included within the pipeline projects analyzed as part of this plan. The subarea plan encourages development to occur along the existing Sidney and Cline arterial corridors. Neighborhood mixed -use zoning is proposed to be expanded across the street from the County Campus to provide a buffer or transition between the County Government Campus and established single-family neighborhoods. Note that neighborhood mixed -use allows for both single family and small-scale or less intense commercial uses. Existing County Government Campus Page 96 of 174 68 �4 Vl SECTION 03 1 SUBAREA PLAN Back to Agenda 3.3 Land Use and Housing LAND USE INTi.�HON The primary land use designations within the study area is medium -density residential and Commercial Mixed - use, however the study area includes nearly all zoning designations. The study are also includes two large public facilities campuses, the Kitsap County Campus and South Kitsap High School. Within the individual study areas the West Downtown contains the historic City main -street. LAND USE AND HOUSING GOALS Goal LUH - 01 Develop a land use pattern that is environmentally sustainable and economically vibrant and accommodates additional housing and businesses. Goal LUH - 02 Encourage increased development in the center and along existing primary circulation corridors to create vibrant walkable neighborhoods. Goal LUH - 03 Ensure that proposed new development largely maintains existing views. Goal LUH - 04 Transform the existing East Downtown from a largely car dominant development pattern to an extension of the existing walkable downtown West Downtown area. Goal LUH - 05 Ensure that future residential development protects and restores natural ecosystems and critical areas, including wetlands, streams and wildlife habitats. LAND USE POLICIES Policy LUH - 01 Revise the existing Comprehensive Plan Center boundaries to establish a new Downtown Center that reflects this subarea plan boundary. Policy LUH - 02 Rezone parcels along Cline and Sidney Avenue from R2 to Neighborhood Mixed -use to provide a moderate increase in development and provide a transition to the residential zones. Policy LUH - 03 Extend the varied block frontage designation along Cline Street from Kitsap Street to Kendall Street. Policy LUH - 04 Revise frontage requirements along the new waterfront street and in the East Downtown to reflect the proposed concept design plan. Policy LUH - 05 Rezone the Commercial Heavy Parcels in the East Downtown to Commercial Mixed -use (CMU). Policy LUH - 06 Rezone the Commercial Mixed -use Parcels on the east side of Bethel between Dekalb Street to Mile Hill Drive from Commercial Mixed -use (CMU) Corridor to Gateway Mixed -use (GMU). Policy LUH - 07 Allow for buildings up to 5-stories on the east side of Bethel between Dekalb Street to Mile Hill Drive. Policy LUH - 08 Modify the Downtown Height Overlay District as follows: • Allow the building height for new development along Bay Street to be measured from the future road elevation consistent with Sea level rise contemplated in the Shoreline Master Plan. • Amend 20.38.640 (1) as follows: (1) DHOD Height Zones Established. Within the DHOD as shown on the zoning map, there are three different DHOD height zones with height limits established as follows: (a) DHOD 3: 48 feet - three stories. (b) DHOD 4: 58 feet - four stories. (c) DHOD 5: 68 feet - five stories. • Amend the height along the block south of Bay Street between Robert Geiger and Frederick to allow 5 stories except within 50 feet of Robert Geiger Street which shall be limited to 4 stories. Policy LUH - 09 Add an exemption to 20.35.040 to allow the minimum build -to percentage to be decreased (1) if a public pedestrian -oriented open space is provided, if the reduction is no more than what is needed to accommodate the open space, or (2) for public civic buildings (such as a community center or library). Policy LUH - 10 Support the acquisitions by the County of the needed parcels to implement the county campus expansion plan. Page 98 of 174 70 SECTION 03 Back to Agenda�N � J moot, . .......... �� 'r r ✓� `STO L _� J �M ' KITSAP � i � � �.i� '• . is '=��. i ,�� j � :f� ..� � - '.- 2 r w } czn w v Z w O —j Z U DEKALB o � QE � co Q w. w DEKALB Ld DWIGHT DIVISION J � O TAYLOR f O a -- SMITH TAYLOR ! KENDALL PLISKO �{ MILE HILL SROUFE • 1 Subarea Plan Boundary �N Page 99 of 174 Downtown Port Orchard Subarea Plan I Port Orchard, WA 1 04.20.2021 71 SECTION 03 1 SUBAREA PLAN Back to Agenda � J ray, 1 ram^ r TO N � y�F 1• B ■ p qy i r. r�F I KITSAP j .01 �-r z z z p �/ w+——,r1 ,� U DEKALB FA Q w DEKALB---i DWIGHT ! 1 I DIVISION I TAYLOR I O I I ! a l 1 i SMITH 11 TAYLOR + i KENDALL �`�— PLISKO I 1 I MILE HILL I i I I I i-_—_----------rl SROUFE I I Existing Block Frontage Plan o• Page 100 of 174 72 SECTION 03 Back to Agenda\N � J •fir v� �� 1J Oho 11/ qy L � KITSAP 1 - j '000W } z (N �/ W . V z U DEKALB 0 Q �� ---i w DEKALBLn DWIGHT I .7E i ► I DIVISIONQf � i TAYLOR I I 0 SMITH I► TAYLOR + i KENDALL �` PLISKO 11I i 1 I MILE HILL I i I I I i-__—_—_--_— SROUFE _--I I I Proposed Block Frontage Plan �N Page 101 of 174 Downtown Port Orchard Subarea Plan I Port Orchard, WA 1 04.20.2021 73 SECTION 03 1 SUBAREA PLAN LEGEND ® BUSINESS PROFESSIONAL MIXED USE (BPMU) M mRAKAGRrim rnRRimp trr� Back to Agenda <�J ray, 1 ram^ r i°c TO N '� ywF 1• e ■ p qy i r. r�F I KITSAP j z z z p �/ w+——,r1 U DEKALB 0 w DEKAL.Fr i DWIGHT ! 1 I DIVISION I TAYLOR I O I I ! a l 1 i SMITH 11 TAYLOR + i KENDALL �`�— PLISKO I 1 I MILE HILL I i I I I i-_—_----------- SROUFE I I Existing Zoning Map b N Page 102 of 174 74 SECTION 03 Back to Agenda\N LEGEND ® BUSINESS PROFESSIONAL MIXED USE (BPMU) COMMERCIAL CORRIDOR (CC) ® COMMERCIAL MIXED USE (CMU) GREENBELT (GB) PARKS AND RECREATION (PR) PUBLIC FACILITY (PF) CIVIC AND INSTITUTIONAL (CI) 0 DOWNTOWN MIXED USE (DMU) 0 NEIGHBORHOOD MIXED USE (NMU) RESIDENTIAL (R1) RESIDENTIAL 2 (132) RESIDENTIAL 3 (R3) RESIDENTIAL 4 (R4) COMMERCIAL HEAVY (CH) ® GATEWAY MIXED USE (GMU) 971 O� Note: Changed are outlined. ll°c ►1 l �O 11, � yw � pR Eqr i1 r►1 � FT�F< O Sp:C' I • T KITSAP �^ 1 1 - j ��- z w z o ♦ +----1 �## z U DEKALB Q �� w DEKALB~—�-1 DWIGHT ' .7E ; 1 1 I DIVISION 1 TAYLOR I I a SMITH 11 TAYLOR + i KENDALL �`�— PLISKO I 1 I MILE HILL I i 1 SROLIFE I I I i____-----------I I I Proposed Zoning Map Adjustments Encourage development along existing neighborhood arterial corridors. Provide a buffer from 1 N commercial to residential areas and preserve established single family neighborhoods. Page 103 of 174 Downtown Port Orchard Subarea Plan I Port Orchard, WA 1 04.20.2021 75 SECTION 03 1 SUBAREA PLAN Back to Agenda � J � /�_� ��~, ► ram^ f • t• �— /r ►► Py �T011v KITSAP I 1 - j .01 �-r z w Z p r ♦/ w+----� i z U DEKALB 0 Q L3 w DEKALB--�—i DWIGHT ! 1 I DIVISION m r i Qf Ctf � 0 I TAYLORQf I O I I ! l 1 i SMITH 11 TAYLOR + i KENDALL �` PLISKO I 1 I MILE HILL I i I I I i-_—_----------- SROUFE I I Existing Height Overlay Map Page 104 of 174 76 SECTION 03 Back to Agenda\N LEGEND DOWNTOWN HEIGHT OVERLAY DISTRICT DHOD 3 DHOD 4 DHOD 5 VIEW PROTECTION OVERLAY DISTRICT Note: Changed are outlined. A, � J •fir v� �071 1�J i / f'~~� i y Oho 11/ qy L � KITSAP 1 - j W } z (N W V z U DEKALB Ln [if w DEKALB--�—i DWIGHT I .7E i ► I DIVISION M i � i TAYLOR I I 0 SMITH I► TAYLOR + i KENDALL �` PLISKO 11I i 1 I MILE HILL I i I I I i-__-_—_--_- SROUFE _--I I I Proposed Height Overlay Map Adjustments Encourage development height increases in locations that do not impact existing protected �N views. Page 105 of 174 Downtown Port Orchard Subarea Plan I Port Orchard, WA 1 04.20.2021 77 SECTION 03 1 SUBAREA PLAN Back to Agenda = Pipeline Project © Vacant/ Redevelopable Single Family in Higher Density Vacant Underutilized Study Area BqY ` A14, '�' 01 �T f rTWIIGHT - DIVISION�� d + � m �� Q �. ■ I O , 4� p 1:A • j ~ 71) r" • 461 oil . .� a !f N■ Existing Buildable Lands or Potential Infill Development Map MILE HILL N A,a ■.� 0 "tea 1 Page 106 of 174 78 SECTION 03Back to Agenda AN Pipeline Project Vacant/ Redevelopable Single Family in Higher Density Vacant Underutilized Added in the Subarea Plan � J •fir v� �� oho 11, qy L � KITSAP 1 - j W } z (N W V z U DEKALB [if --�—i w DEKALBLn DWIGHT I .7E i ► I DIVISION m i Qf � i TAYLOR I I I ! O SMITH I► TAYLOR + i KENDALL �` PLISKO 11I i 1 I MILE HILL I i I I I i-__—_-_--_— SROUFE ---I I I Updated Build -able Lands or Potential Infill Development Map that incorporates additional lands that were added due to zoning changes or anticipated development included in the subarea plan. (�N Page 107 of 174 Downtown Port Orchard Subarea Plan I Port Orchard, WA 1 04.20.2021 79 SECTION 03 1 SUBAREA PLAN Back to Agenda 3.4 Environment and Open Space ENVIRONMENT AND OPEN SPACE OVERVIEW In addition to multiple public parks the defining Environment and Open Space features in the study area includes the shoreline along Sinclair inlet and numerous historic creek valleys. The existing waterfront includes large tracts of surface parking developed prior to the adoption of the Shoreline Management Act. Environment and Open Space goals strive to both enhance the environment and the public realm for City residents and guests. ENVIRONMENT AND OPEN SPACE GOALS Goal EOS - 01 Provide improved public shoreline access and recreational opportunities at the waterfront. The Port Orchard waterfront offers excellent recreational opportunities for fishing, beach walking, wildlife viewing, kayaking and paddle boarding, and more. Goal EOS - 02 Plan for resiliency and to mitigate flooding during high - tides and as a result of sea -level rise identified in, "PO SMP Sea Level Rise Advisement Report 10-2-2020." Goal EOS - 03 Consider opportunities to incorporate new open space within required shoreline buffers such that they can serve dual -purposes. (For example refer to Stormwater buffer with pedestrian boardwalk Concept for existing Blackjack Creek Outlet) Goal EOS - 04 Improve safety and security along existing open spaces and around Blackjack Creek. Goal EOS - 05 Protect, enhance and maintain the values and functions of Port Orchard's natural areas, open spaces, and critical areas. Goal EOS - Ob Consider and support opportunities for restoration including but not limited to shoreline riparian areas, barrier culverts, storm water, etc. or redeveloped buildings) where feasible to reduce impervious footprint. Goal EOS - 08 Support the restoration of existing streams including Blackjack Creek, a high priority salmon and steelhead watershed in the West Sound region and consider options for removal of artificial fill to improve estuarine habitat at the mouth of Blackjack Creek. Conceptual Waterfront Plaza and kayak launch at Port Street Stormwater buffer with pedestrian boardwalk Concept for existing Blackjack Creek Outlet Goal EOS 07 ENVIRONMENT AND OPEN SPACE POLICIES In redevelopment of parking areas encourage the use Policy EOS - 01 LID and innovative approaches, such as raingardens Encourage the future replacement of existing shoreline and bioswales, where site conditions allow to reduce armoring that allows for pedestrians access to the water. runoff and protect water quality, including consideration (For example refer to Shoreline Armor with Water Access of underground parking areas (including under new Page 108 of 174 80 SECTION 03 1 SBack to Agenda Concept for the West Downtown waterfront) Policy EOS - 02 Encourage the creation of a public kayak launch dock. Policy EOS - 03 Where road ends terminate at the waterfront, they should incorporate a public plaza, overlook, or pocket park. Improvements should also consider shoreline habitat improvements and enhancements, including potential removal of hard armor and fill to establish "pocket beach" parks. Policy EOS - 04 Convert Orchard and Port Streets to pedestrian plazas with limited vehicle access. Policy EOS - 05 To enhance shoreline ecological functions in the subarea, the City shall emphasize the importance of the following actions: planting riparian vegetation, especially trees, that naturally stabilize banks and shade the intertidal zone; removing hard armor where feasible; replacing hard armor with soft bank protection where feasible; reducing the footprint of hard armor (like revetments) and replacing with lower footprint alternatives (like vertical bulkheads pulled landward) where feasible; improving stormwater and wastewater treatment; daylighting piped stream channels; and restoring buffers for both marine and freshwater habitats. Pulling armor landward will improve access to beaches at higher tides. Policy EOS - Ob Support the expansion of Etta Turner Park to include a riparian buffer with bio-retention from adjacent development. Policy EOS - 07 Support shoreline restoration and consider the creation of new open space at the Blackjack Creek Estuary and Etta Turner Park. Restoration shall study the removal of artificial fill to improve estuarine habitat. Design shall work with Etta Turner Park to frame the Blackjack Creek corridor from Bay Street to the Sinclair Inlet and should focus on estuary restoration. Policy EOS - 08 Support efforts to acquire property for conservation and provide mitigation in and around the Blackjack Creek estuary. Policy EOS - 09 As development occurs the City will issue a notice to the local tribe on a project by project basis to allow for review and comment regarding significant developments with potential impacts to cultural and Tribal treaty natural resources. Dry season Stormwater buffer with pedestrian boardwalk Urban waterfront parkscape. Page 109 of 174 Downtown Port Orchard Subarea Plan I Port Orchard, WA 1 04.20.2021 81 SECTION 03 1 SUBAREA PLAN Back to Agenda ENVIRONMENT AND OPEN SPACE PROPOSED PROJECT LIST Funding No. Project Name Description Agency Cost Source Port Orchard Blvd The historic creek that previously existing t.b.d. t.b.d. t.b.d. Estuary at the location of Port Orchard Blvd is now OCreek Restoration piped to its terminus at Sinclair Inlet. The plan encourages estuary restoration at the outflow of this creek. Port Orchard Boat The historic creek that originates near the t.b.d. t.b.d. t.b.d. Launch Estuary County Government Campus is currently Restoration piped from approximately Austin Ave to © its outfall east of the boat launch. The plan encourages the creek to be daylit west of intersection of Bay and Robert Geiger Streets with estuary restoration at Sinclair inlet. Port Street Shared Port Street is proposed to be transformed to t.b.d. t.b.d. t.b.d. Viewpoint, and a pedestrian plaza or shared street to provide ©Plaza, Shoreline Restoration pedestrian access and views to Sinclair Inlet. The plaza should terminate with a viewing plaza with potential access to the water. Orchard Street Plaza Orchard Street is proposed to be transformed t.b.d. t.b.d. t.b.d. and viewpoint to a pedestrian plaza or shared street to provide pedestrian access and views to 0 Sinclair Inlet. The existing elevated viewing deck and pump station at the terminus of this corridor will be replaced with an at grade viewing plaza. Kayak Launch A publicly accessibly kayak launch dock is t.b.d. t.b.d. t.b.d. © proposed near the location of the former pier north of Port Street. Prospect Street Hill The redevelopment of the parcels located at n/a t.b.d. t.b.d. Climb the corner of Bay Street are encouraged to 0 include a publicly accessibly hill climb from Prospect Street to Bay Street. The hill climb should align with either Port Street or Orchard Street. Bay Street Pedestrian Widen the existing Bay Street Pedestrian Path t.b.d. t.b.d. t.b.d. Path Enhancements from Port Orchard BLVD to the Downtown Port Orchard Ferry Terminal to provide O multi -model access and meet existing design standards. Improvements may include viewpoints and street terminations and new landscape amenities and furniture. Blackjack Creek Provide a new waterfront park on the City t.b.d. t.b.d. t.b.d. Estuary Park and Etta parcel along the west side of Blackjack Creek Turner Park expansion and expand Etta Turner Park to provide an Qand enhancements expanded riparian buffer. These parks should 0 include natural features and wildlife habitat. Incorporate wetland boardwalks, provided that they can comply with shoreline mitigation requirements. Waterfront shoreline New development should provide waterfront t.b.d. t.b.d. t.b.d. enhancement shoreline restoration at the current auto 0 dealership and the Westbay center sites in compliance with requirements contained within the City SMP and the State SMA. Nage 11 U Ot 1 (4 82 Back to Agenda Environment and open space Proposed Project List �N Page 111 of 174 Downtown Port Orchard Subarea Plan I Port Orchard, WA 1 04.20.2021 83 SECTION 03 1 SUBAREA PLAN Back to Agenda 3.5 Circulation, Access, and Parking CIRCULATION, ACCESS, AND PARKING OVERVIEW Downtown Port Orchard contains a well established transportation network centered on Bay Street, and Bethel Ave. Mitchell Street, Cline Ave, and Sidney Ave. These are primary minor arterials from uphill neighborhoods to the waterfront. The Downtown walk-on ferry terminal provides service to Bremerton with connections to Seattle. Improvements envisioned as part of the development include orienting new development toward the water and improving pedestrian access throughout the area. CIRCULATION, ACCESS, AND PARKING GOALS Goal CAP - 01 Improve Bay and Bethel corridors such that they are safer for all users and that they define a place rather than act as just a highway. Goal CAP - 02 Ensure that adequate parking is available to support the marina and allow for downtown businesses to thrive while promoting a walkable main -street character. Goal CAP - 03 Encourage development in the West downtown to face the waterfront and Bay Street Goal CAP - 04 Provide improved pedestrian circulation within the West Downtown between the waterfront and Prospect Street. Goal CAP - 05 Transform the existing East Downtown from a largely car dominant development pattern to an extension of the existing walkable downtown West Downtown area. Goal CAP - Ob Discourage new development from locating parking between new development and the waterfront. Goal CAP - 07 Encourage the replacement of the existing Bay Street sidewalk marquee. Goal CAP - 08 Encourage new development to be oriented perpendicular to Sinclare Inlet to frame views toward the waterfront. CIRCULATION, ACCESS, AND PARKING POLICIES Policy CAP - 01 Develop a corridor design plan for Bay Street between Port Orchard Blvd and the eastern terminus of the Study area, and for Bethel Ave between Bay Street and SE Mill Hill Dr. The corridor plan shall address elements such as multi -modal circulation, frontage design and improvements, and bike and pedestrian safety improvements. The plan shall accommodate raising the elevation of Bay Street in response to the City's Sea Level Rise Study referenced in the 2021 SMP Update. Work with WSDOT to explore opportunities for potential traffic calming measures. Policy CAP - 02 Where appropriate, encourage urban low impact development stormwater management features in the roadway design, such as bio-swales between the on - street parking lanes and sidewalks. Policy CAP - 03 Phase out all -day commuter parking in the West Downtown to support parking for downtown businesses. Policy CAP - 04 Support Kitsap Transit to study the feasibility and need of adding additional park and ride facilities away from the downtown waterfront to serves ferry riders. Policy CAP - 05 Create a new waterfront street from Harrison Ave to Fredrick Ave that includes parking, sidewalks, and landscape improvements and accommodates ferry transit drop-offs. Policy CAP - Ob Support the reconfiguration of the marina parking lot to increase parking and improve multi -modal circulation from Bay Street to the waterfront. Policy CAP - 07 Include a hill -climb from Bay Street to Prospect Street aligned with either Orchard Ave or Port Street. Policy CAP - 08 Redesign Orchard and Port Street to pedestrian plazas with limited vehicle access. Policy CAP - 09 Convert Fredrick Ave to a two-way street with parallel Page 112 of 174 84 SECTION 03 Back to Agenda\N parking on each side or widen street for angled parking Policy CAP - 10 Encourage the creation of a loop street or private access drive to break down the scale of the auto -dealership site, provide waterfront access, and provide additional on - street parking. Policy CAP - 11 Extend Mitchell Ave north across Bay Street as a new private access drive to terminate at the waterfront. Policy CAP - 12 Provide new frontage improvements, including parallel parking and sidewalks on both sides of Harrison Ave. At least one of the sidewalks should extend to the waterfront. Policy CAP - 13 Modify residential parking requirements in all zones to be consistent with the current DMU parking requirements of one stall per unit regardless of the number of bedrooms. Consider establishing a maximum number of parking stalls allowed and allowing for further reductions when located near transit. Policy CAP - 14 Vacate Harrison Street R.O.W. between Bay Street and Prospect Alley. Policy CAP - 15 The Bay Street corridor plan frontage design standards shall include design standards for the removal of the existing sidewalk marquee. The marquee should be replaced with new overhead protection weather protection that is incorporated with the structure of new development. Policy CAP - 16 Revise the Shoreline Master Program to discourage parking along the waterfront. Policy CAP - 17 Expand POMC 20.124.130(1) to apply to all DMU zones in the in the east and west downtown. Policy CAP - 18 Revise POMC 20.124.130(3) to exempt public civic buildings (such as a community center or library). Policy CAP - 19 Allow for required parking to be met with an off -site shared parking agreement. Policy CAP - 20 Require that any new development or Level III improvements as defined in POMC 20.127.020, shall provide street frontage improvements consistent with City design requirements. Encouraged Low -impact Stormwater management such as street front bioswales. Conceptual Woonerf or shared Street Concept Image Page 113 of 174 Downtown Port Orchard Subarea Plan I Port Orchard, WA 1 04.20.2021 85 �W 1116 M i r r'� _ a.p v` m401mi r_ ;law 1 SECTION 03 Back to Agenda\N Conceptual Street Section Key Plan Street Cross -Section A -A I New Waterfront Street Between Frederick and Sidney Ave (Looking West) Street Cross -Section B-B I New Waterfront Street Between Sidney and Harrison Ave (Looking West) Page 115 of 174 Downtown Port Orchard Subarea Plan I Port Orchard, WA 1 04.20.2021 87 SECTION 03 1 SUBAREA PLAN Back to Agenda ENVIRONMENT AND OPEN SPACE PROPOSED PROJECT LIST Funding No. Project Name Description Agency Cost Source Bay St /Port Orchard Reconfigure intersection alignment to t.b.d. t.b.d. t.b.d. O Blvd Intersection improve visibility and pedestrian circulation and safety. St / Cline Ave Reconfigure intersection alignment to t.b.d. t.b.d. t.b.d. ©Bay Intersection improve visibility and pedestrian circulation and safety. Fredrick Ave Convert Fredrick Ave to two-way traffic to t.b.d. t.b.d. t.b.d. Improvements serve the marina and the new waterfront © street. Include frontage improvements and explore street expansion to maintain angled parking. O New Waterfront Street Provide a new waterfront "shared" street t.b.d. t.b.d. t.b.d. between Frederick and Harrison Ave. Sidney Ave. Frontage Provide frontage improvements including t.b.d. t.b.d. t.b.d. © Improvements Street Trees/landscaping, sidewalk expansion, and street furniture from Prospect St to the waterfront. Harrison Ave Frontage Provide frontage improvements including n/a t.b.d. t.b.d. 0 Improvements Street Trees/landscaping, curb and sidewalks and street furniture from Bay St to the waterfront. Bay Street and Bethel Develop a corridor plan for Bay Street t.b.d. t.b.d. t.b.d. Ave Corridor between Port Orchard Ave and the eastern terminus of the Study area, and for Bethel Ave between Bay Street and SE Mill Hill Dr. The corridor design shall address elements O such as multi -modal circulation, frontage design and improvements, and bike and ped safety improvements. The plan shall accommodate raising the elevation of Bay Street in response to the City's Sea Level Rise Study referenced in the 2021 SMP Update. Bay St / Mitchell Ave Reconfigure intersection alignment to t.b.d. t.b.d. t.b.d. Intersection improve visibility and pedestrian circulation © and safety. Design will incorporate the extension of the Mitchell Street across Bay Street as a new private access drive. Bay St / Guy Wetzel Rd Reconfigure intersection alignment to t.b.d. t.6.d. t.b.d. • 0 Intersection improve visibility and pedestrian circulation and safety. Page 116 of 174 88 S /7 �5 Back to Agenda ORCHARD Page 118 of 174 r ��Ololoo J rm, Z-9 NZ, l n � r OF PORT OF 321 ZONTNG I evil] I i7!TU: :A 0 9 A //%/ i �o f !% FM R r1 , r w MIL r OF PORT OF 321 70NTNG I ivili I i7!vr-. Back to Agenda Exhibit 3 Chapter 2. Land Use 2.1 Introduction The Land Use element represents the heart of the Comprehensive Plan, as land use goals, policies, map designations, and decisions connect and relate to all other elements. The purpose of this section is to provide a framework to guide future land use to help the city grow in an orderly, rational, and efficient way and help the community realize its potential during the 20-year planning horizon. The goals and policies contained herein recognize that haphazard and disorderly development can reduce efficiency and increase the cost of utilities, roads, and other services, consume valuable open space, and result in higher taxes and fees for service to fund infrastructure and services. The Growth Management Act (GMA) requires plans to contain land use elements that describe the proposed distribution, location, and extent of land uses. Once adopted, land use goals and policies will be functionally implemented in Port Orchard's development regulations. The challenge of this element is to plan for population and employment growth while ensuring development occurs in accordance with the community's aspirations and values and the requirements of the GMA. 2.2 Key Issues and Concepts As a community, Port Orchard is growing due to a healthy birth rate, immigration, and annexation. This plan accommodates Port Orchard's 2036 population and employment growth allocation, as distributed through the Vision 2040 framework and agreed upon in coordination with other Kitsap County municipalities in the Countywide Planning Policies. Port Orchard's land use and zoning designations currently provide sufficient land capacity within city boundaries to accommodate the projected 8,235 additional residents who will make Port Orchard their home (during the 2010-2036 planning period). In conjunction with the findings of the Buildable Lands Report, the Future Land Use Map shows how the 6,235 additional projected and allocated residents in the adjacent Urban Growth Area can be accommodated. Residents have emphasized that it is critical to manage new growth in a way that protects the small town character of the community while allowing for new and innovative development that responds to changing household needs and growth pressures. In 2000, the city's population density was 1,943 residents per square mile. By 2012, taking into account new annexations, density had dropped to 1,213 residents per square mile. This decrease in density is due to the annexation of several areas, including the Bethel Corridor, which had far lower densities than the existing city. Based on population allocations for 2036 and no additional annexations, Port Orchard must plan for a density of 2,068 residents per square mile, an increase in density of 70%. Port Orchard's population appears to be aging, but this trend has likely been skewed by recent annexations. Figure 1 shows the changes in different age groups from 2000 to 2010, with a significant increase --in both proportional and absolute terms --in people aged 40-69, reflecting the aging of the baby boomer generation. As Port Orchard's population ages, the city needs the flexibility to adapt to the changing needs and desires of this age group and the foresight to plan for those changes as well. Port Orchard Comprehensive Plan Adopted: June 2016 Revised: Nov 2019, July 2020, May 2021 Page 121 of 174 Back to Agenda Exhibit 3 MW 70-79 60-69 50-59 40-49 U 30-39 20-29 10-19 0-9 15 10 5 0 5 10 15 ■ Male in 2000 ■ Female in 2000 Male Increase in 2010 Female Increase in 2010 Population in hundreds Figure 1 The fundamental goal of the Land Use element, as established by the GMA, is to establish broad, general direction for the City's land use policies. This element provides the City's policy plan for growth over the next twenty years. It also implements many of the goals and objectives in the other plan elements through suggested land use designations and other action recommendations. The Land Use Element specifically considers the general distribution and location of land uses, and the appropriate intensity and density of land uses given development trends and allocated population. The City's development regulations and permitting processes are used to direct growth in a manner consistent with the provisions of this element. To accomplish this, the Land Use element establishes goals and policies that seek to: • Accommodate changes in population and demographics • Encourage development in urban areas, reduce sprawl, and deliver services efficiently • Ensure land use designations reflect need and demand • Minimize traffic congestion and encourage the development of a multimodal transportation system • Protect open spaces and the natural environment • Promote physical activity • Support a range of employment opportunities 2.3 Current Land Use Characteristics Figure 2 shows the percent of land uses and zoning based on the city's total land area as of 2020. Most land in the city is devoted to housing. Commercial areas and the downtown offer a range of goods and services, provide employment for local residents and those living in surrounding rural areas, and provide additional tax revenue to help fund public services and facilities. Industrial lands allow for light manufacturing and warehousing businesses, which also provide job opportunities and support the area's economy. Figure 2-4 shows the amount of developable land in residential land use areas. Port Orchard Comprehensive Plan Adopted: June 2016 Revised: Nov 2019, July 2020, May 2021 Page 122 of 174 Back to Agenda Exhibit 3 Zoning By Percentage of Total Land Acreage PR � 2.3 PF � 4.7 NMU Q.5 LI � 2.3 GMU Q.6 G 6 9.5 UMU 0.8 CMU � 6.2 CI � 2 CH � 2.5 GC � 3.3 BPMU 49 R6 � 5.4 R4 7.1 R3 17.9 R2 1 a R1 4.9 Q 5 10 IS Figure 2 Port Orchard Comprehensive Plan Adopted: June 2016 Revised: Nov 2019, July 2020, May 2021 Page 123 of 174 Back to Agenda Exhibit 3 2.4 Land Use Designations The City's comprehensive plan land use element identifies 7 different land use designations which are listed in Table 1. These land use designations are implemented through the city's zoning regulations contained in the municipal code. Each land use designation may correspond to one or more zoning designation. As the City develops sub -area plans for its designated centers as described in section 2.7, the city may wish to create new zones and standards consistent with this plan, its goals and policies, and these land use designations. When doing so, the city should ensure that it doesn't significantly alter the land capacity for the city such that the City's population and employment growth allocations adopted in the countywide planning policies can't be accommodated. Likewise, if sub -area plans are likely to accelerate population and employment growth rates, the City should take reasonable measures to ensure that it doesn't surpass its 2036 growth targets. Table I Range of Pass]ble Antwipated [lesidentlai Land Use Designations Uses Uses Corresponding Zoning Maximum Remilem5ai Onelopment Density far mm itt" Buildable lands Purposes. ptect en of cnU[a areae, liabit at management areas, Greenbelt greenbelts and deslgnaled Open space to a6aw low density residential development. Ureentlelt [GB} -S dmilmg unils ner net. acre Low Densry Residential 5iagle4a mlly detached housing ReudeniralI IRI) 7,26A.8 7 Units Per Ave L enha -, nn3 PerAve Residenrial2 (R2j 9.8-ZI.7 10 Unhs Per Ave Mediumpensiiv Residential $ingleFa ml1v detached and attached hauling, apartment k5identwl3 (R31 9.g-26 16 Units Per Acre baitding: RasMential6 (R6I 9.8.17-7 8 Units Per Ave High Density Resldfmial Single Family Attached Housing, Apartment Bindings Residential4 (R7I. Residential S (R5} 9 8- 4 Za Unl}s Per Acre Civic and im0tutJonal Civic and Open Scale Governmentse ki - ut]liiles, parks, sshua]s and related Parks and Reveatiorn IPR} NA NA cnrnmpnityFacrlitiez Puh]icFaCl16%IM NA NA K"OeFsUalIx Use n is P& AM Nelghttorhood Mixed Usr [NMUJ 9,6-54 16 Units Per Atre 6usi mu Prarmipnat Mixed Use {BPIufU} 16,535 8 Units Per Ave commercial Mixed Use (CMU) I7-Z6 16 Units Per Ave Camrnemial Donmtown Mixed Use IDMU) 0a]A 2R Units Per Acre Gateway Mixed Use IGMUJ 0-54 Z0 Units Per Acre commercial Corridor (CC) 0-04 4 Units Per Au Retail, oRlee, mixed -use commerclallresldentlal, and Cammeroal Heavv ICHI NA NA prafesslonal servines Industsia[ Flex 11F) 0-4.5 A Units Per Acre Manlsdanuriq and assem v. bulk %orageand Light In uvrlal ll NA NA Urban Indust vial warehaueing, tr-aAsler and nudirlg servkes. Heavy IrWuvrlal (HI) NA NA N., , n:nd,A.rgytu arx atnio —I.- lu, lalwe newt, in bm rr h- Cawry I.,lld% a Lamk an !PI Table 1 2.5 Overlay Districts The city's development regulations include land use overlay districts which are applied in parts of the city, as summarized below. • Downtown Height Overlay District (DHOD) • Self Storage Overlay District (SSOD) • Ruby Creek Overlay District (RCOD)View Protection Overlay District (VPOD) Port Orchard's overlay districts accomplish varying objectives including implementing subarea plans, providing regulations for the development in centers, regulating specific uses, and determining building heights. The creation of a new overlay district may be appropriate as the City continues to develop subarea plans under the Centers approach to growth. Port Orchard Comprehensive Plan Adopted: June 2016 Revised: Nov 2019, July 2020, May 2021 Page 124 of 174 Back to Agenda Exhibit 3 2.6 Land Use Goals & Policies Goals are not listed in any particular order. Port Orchard strives to: Goal I. Retain Port Orchard's small town commercial and residential character while accommodating allocated growth citywide. Policy LU-1 Ensure that land use and zoning regulations maintain and enhance existing single- family residential neighborhoods, while encouraging that new development provides a mixed range of housing types. Policy LU-2 Limit industrial development to locations accessible from arterials or freeways and discourage industrial access through residential areas. Policy LU-3 Update and establish building and site design standards that support an attractive and functional built environment in all areas of the City. Policy LU-4 Encourage the subdivision of large parcels and, through private subdivisions and public acquisitions, the creation of a continuous street grid similar in scale to the downtown's, especially in designated centers of local importance. Goal 2. Ensure that sufficient land is available for development to accommodate allocated growth in population and employment. Policy LU-5 Ensure land use and development regulations enable a supply of housing units within the city and adjacent UGA that will accommodate forecasted population growth. Ensure land use and development regulations enable a supply of commercial retail and office space within the city and adjacent UGA that will accommodate forecasted employment growth. Policy LU-6 Ensure adequate land is available for light industrial and commercial uses, including high technology, medical, and office uses, in appropriate areas to diversify Port Orchard's economic base and provide for the community's changing needs. Policy LU-7 Monitor the rate of residential, light industrial and commercial growth against the 20- year targets established in VISION 2040 and the Countywide Planning Policies, and if growth appears to deviate from a rate that complies with these targets, consider adopting reasonable measures such as reducing/increasing adopted transportation levels of service, reducing/increasing impact fees, or accelerating/delaying projects within the City's Capital Improvement Program. Policy LU-8 Provide a variety of housing types and employment opportunities that meet the needs of diverse socioeconomic interests. Port Orchard Comprehensive Plan Adopted: June 2016 Revised: Nov 2019, July 2020, May 2021 Page 125 of 174 Back to Agenda Exhibit 3 Policy LU-9 Notify adjacent military facilities of relevant local land use decisions. Goal 3. Implement a strategy to develop centers. Policy LU-10 In consultation with stakeholders and the general public, develop a comprehensive strategy to implement centers as a means of directing and prioritizing residential and commercial growth. Policy LU-11 Within centers, set minimum building densities that enable lively and active streets and commercial destinations. Such limits may take the form of: minimum floors or building height, floor -area -ratios, and lot coverage; and maximum street setbacks and parking spaces. Goal4. Ensure that both public services and infrastructure are developed in an efficient and cost-effective manner. Policy LU-12 Prioritize capital facilities and transportation investment in those locations targeted for growth and higher land use densities. Policy LU-13 Coordinate with Kitsap County to develop a plan and timeline to annex UGA land adjacent to the city, consistent with the city's capability to provide municipal services and applicable law. Policy LU-14 Identify land in the UGA that is useful for public purposes, such as utility corridors, transportation corridors, parks, schools, and other public uses. Goal S. Protect, enhance, and maintain the values and functions of Port Orchard's natural areas, open spaces, and critical areas. Policy LU-15 Evaluate a range of incentives to encourage compact development to preserve open space throughout the city, possibly to include density credits, incentive zoning, and transfer of development rights. Policy LU-16 Prioritize the development of new parks, open space, and passive and active recreational opportunities in underserved neighborhoods and centers. Policy LU-17 Incentivize infill development to preserve and protect open space, critical areas, and natural resources. Policy LU-18 Identify land in the UGA that is useful for open space corridors, including land for recreation, wildlife habitat, trails, and connections of critical areas. Port Orchard Comprehensive Plan Adopted: June 2016 Revised: Nov 2019, July 2020, May 2021 Page 126 of 174 Back to Agenda Exhibit 3 Policy LU-19 Protect the quality and quantity of groundwater used for public water supplies through zoning designations, development regulations, and the local critical areas ordinance. Goal 6. Reduce congestion and greenhouse gas emissions, promote public health, reduce auto dependency, and increase multimodal transportation opportunities for accessing retail services, health care services, and places of employment. Policy LU-20 Ensure orderly development, concurrency of infrastructure provision, and protection of environmentally sensitive areas through an effective and predictable permitting process. Policy LU-21 Remove barriers to low -impact development in zoning, subdivision, and street regulations. Encourage the minimization of impervious surface areas in development. Policy LU-22 Promote local food security and public health by enabling the establishment of urban agriculture, community gardens, farmers markets, and food production and distribution infrastructure. Policy LU-23 Enable land use patterns that allow all residents to safely and efficiently access commercial services, especially grocery stores and healthcare facilities, without an automobile. Policy LU-24 Encourage the expansion of transit networks that enable both incorporated and unincorporated neighborhoods outside of the city to access job centers within Port Orchard. Goal 7. Encourage the development of active, vibrant, and attractive destinations throughout the community. Policy LU-25 Incorporate the following principles in planning for commercial areas: • Create lively and attractive places at a human scale. • Support a mix of retail, office, and residential uses in multistory structures. • Create transitions between commercial areas and surrounding residential neighborhoods. • Protect residential areas from excessive noise, exterior lighting, glare, visual nuisances, and other conditions that detract from the quality of the living environment. • Encourage multi -modal transportation options, especially during peak traffic periods. • Promote an intensity and density of land uses sufficient to support effective transit and pedestrian activity. • Promote a street pattern that provides through connections, pedestrian and vehicular access. Port Orchard Comprehensive Plan Adopted: June 2016 Revised: Nov 2019, July 2020, May 2021 Page 127 of 174 Back to Agenda Exhibit 3 • Establish urban and architectural design standards that support an attractive and functional pedestrian environment, such as block size limits and requiring street - facing windows and doors. • Encourage pedestrian travel to and within commercial areas by providing: • Safe and attractive walkways. • Close groupings of land uses. • Parking lot design that provides safe walking routes and pedestrian connections between adjacent properties. • Off-street surface parking to the backs or sides of buildings to maximize pedestrian access from the sidewalk(s). Goal 8. Connect new and existing neighborhoods to each other, to commercial and employment centers, and to public facilities. Policy LU-26 Require adequate transitions between different land uses to mitigate potential negative impacts of noise, light, and air pollution. Policy LU-27 Require new development to provide connections to and through -access for existing and planned trails and roads. Explore strategies to encourage existing development to provide the same as part of a city- and region -wide trail and open space network. Goal9. Encourage the ongoing development of downtown as an active, vibrant community, commercial, social, and civic center while respecting its historic character. Policy LU-28 In conjunction with the Centers strategy, enhance downtown Port Orchard's role as the center of the South Kitsap region, reflecting the following principles in development standards and land use plans: • Encourage land uses that support transit centers and promote pedestrian activity. • Promote a mix of uses, including retail, office, and housing. • Encourage uses that will provide both daytime and evening activities. • Support civic, cultural, and entertainment activities. • Provide sufficient public open space and recreational opportunities. • Enhance, and provide access to, the waterfront. • Develop enhanced design guidelines and design review requirements that promote attractive, pedestrian -scale development and redevelopment within the City's historic downtown area. Policy LU-29 Consider conducting a downtown parking study to assess current and future parking needs and develop solutions and strategies to address identified constraints or oversupply. Port Orchard Comprehensive Plan Adopted: June 2016 Revised: Nov 2019, July 2020, May 2021 Page 128 of 174 Back to Agenda Exhibit 3 Policy LU-30 Ensure land use designations and development support existing maritime industries, promote creative uses of the waterfront, and facilitate the planning and construction of waterfront parks and gathering places. 2.7 The Centers Strategy 2.7.1 Introduction The post-war 1920s have become synonymous with the beginning of a development pattern known as urban sprawl. Sprawl expands development over large amounts of land, resulting in long distances between homes, jobs, and stores. It also significantly increases dependence on the automobile and traffic on neighborhood streets and highways, as driving is required for nearly every activity. This development pattern also draws economic resources away from existing communities and spreads them thinly and inefficiently, far away from a community's historic core. This increases spending on new roads, new water and sewer lines, and police and fire protection. This ultimately leads to the degradation of the older city, higher taxes, and fewer available resources for already existing communities. In the early 1990s, Washington sought to combat this adverse development style by adopting the GMA. Among other ambitions, the GMA suggested a new development pattern broadly known as Centers. In 2014, the City designated ten "local centers" in its Comprehensive Plan, in accordance with the criteria provided in the Puget Sound Regional Council's (PSRC) VISION 2040, which is a regional strategy for accommodating the expected 2040 population of the Puget Sound region. In subsequent years, VISION 2040's criteria and terminology for centers have been revised, and the City has revised its center terminology and boundaries for consistency. Based on the new criteria, the City now has eight designated "countywide centers" and four designated "local centers". In addition, the City identifies two countywide centers as a Candidate Regional Center. Compact development Power Sewer enables efficiency in �� capital facilities construction and CD service delivery Roads Water A. Least Dense I B. Moderately Dense L1IJ C. Most Dense Port Orchard Comprehensive Plan Adopted: June 2016 Revised: Nov 2019, July 2020, May 2021 Page 129 of 174 Back to Agenda Exhibit 3 Figure 3 — The advantages of infrastructure and land use concurrency 2.7.2 What are Centers? Traditional neighborhoods often had smaller business districts that served surrounding residential areas. These districts typically had retail shops, markets, and services that were a short walk from the homes in the area. Additionally, these districts created a unique identity that solidified the neighborhood. With the increased cost of fuel and the economic recession, residents of Port Orchard have expressed a preference for the development of smaller, local retailers and service providers in places that knit people and commerce together on a local level. Centers are focused areas of development that have key uses which enable the City to deliver services more cost -efficiently and equitably pursue a development pattern that is environmentally and economically sound, and provide a means of influencing growth and change through collaboration with the community in planning for the future of these areas. This strategy helps to accommodate growth in designated areas while preserving the existing character of the community, thereby retaining more open space and the dominant pattern of existing development. Centers accomplish these objectives by: • Concentrating a thoughtful mix of supporting uses. • Allowing more intense development while maintaining appropriate scale. • Offering a wider variety of housing types that meets the needs of the broader community. • Minimizing the dependence on vehicle trips. The Centers strategy is a comprehensive and long-term approach to planning for a sustainable future that helps preserve those aspects of the community that residents' value. This approach is intended to maximize the benefit of public investment in infrastructure and services and promote collaboration with private interests and the community to achieve mutual benefits. Providing opportunities for residents, jobs, stores, services, and open spaces to be located in close proximity can reduce the reliance on cars for shopping and commuting and offer better access to daily wants and needs. Increasing residential and employment densities in key locations makes transit and other public services convenient for more people and therefore makes these services more efficient. Port Orchard Comprehensive Plan Adopted: June 2016 Revised: Nov 2019, July 2020, May 2021 Page 130 of 174 Back to Agenda Exhibit 3 The criteria for the designation Centers are found in the Puget Sound Regional Council (PSRC) Regional Centers Framework Adopted March 22, 2018 and in Vision 2040, which is a regional strategy for accommodating the expected 2040 population of the Puget Sound region. According to VISION 2040, centers serve important roles as sub -regional hubs and secondary concentrations of development. They provide a dense mix of housing and services, such as stores, medical offices, and libraries. They serve as focal points where people come together for a variety of activities, including business, shopping, living, and recreation. They often have a civic character with community facilities, such as municipal buildings and other public places. Local centers should be served by regular local transit and regional express transit service and should have a complete network of sidewalks and access to bicycle paths and transit facilities. The Regional Centers Framework defines five different types of Centers: 1. Regional Growth Centers 2. Manufacturing Industrial Centers 3. Countywide Centers 4. Local Centers 5. Military Installations Several of the identified center types include subtypes. Port Orchard Comprehensive Plan Adopted: June 2016 Revised: Nov 2019, July 2020, May 2021 Page 131 of 174 Back to Agenda Exhibit 3 Figure 5 — Rendering of a concept for a pedestrian -focused town center 2.7.3 Designated Centers (Existing and Planned) The following centers have been designated in the City's comprehensive plan by center type: Regional Centers. The City has no designated regional centers at this time. Downtown Port Orchard was evaluated as part of the Downtown Subarea Planning Process as a candidate for reginal center designation but achieving the PSRC requirement for 45 activity units per acre was determined to be too large of a change to Downtown Port Orchard. As Downtown continues to grow and evolve, its candidacy as a regional center should be revisited in the future. Manufacturing Industrial Centers. The City has no designated Manufacturing Industrial Centers currently. The City's only industrial park is too small to be considered either a Manufacturing Industrial Center or a Countywide Center. Port Orchard is served by the nearby Puget Sound Industrial Center — Bremerton. Countywide Centers. The City has 7 designated Countywide Centers. Not all of these Countywide Centers meet the minimum activity units per acre threshold per the PSRC Regional Port Orchard Comprehensive Plan Adopted: June 2016 Revised: Nov 2019, July 2020, May 2021 Page 132 of 174 Back to Agenda Exhibit 3 Centers Criteria for Countywide Centers (8 activity units per acre). The City intends that these Countywide Centers which don't presently meet the activity unit threshold set by PSRC will meet that threshold in the future. These centers may temporarily be recognized as candidate countywide centers or local centers until the activity unit threshold is met. The City's designated Countywide Centers are as follows: 1. Downtown Port Orchard 2. Tremont Center 3. Lower Mile Hill 4. Upper Mile Hill 5. Sedgwick Bethel 6. Bethel Lund 7. Sedgwick Sidney (Ruby Creek Neighborhood) Local Centers. The City has designated the following local centers: 1. Annapolis 2. Old Clifton Industrial Park 3. McCormick Village 4. Bethel South Center (Salmonberry) Military Installations. The City has no military installations within the City Limits. f CITY OF PORT ORCHARD ... 2021 CENTERS �naolla ¢r'rM.� •_ L—,,HI Hill .r :. e ou i de llc .« ( e � �ptic�lA lcll 11 0 Ulb-1 rorr—nh Al.s c ar 2.7.4 General Center Goals and Policies Port Orchard Comprehensive Plan Adopted: June 2016 Revised: Nov 2019, July 2020, May 2021 Page 133 of 174 Back to Agenda Exhibit 3 The following are a list of general goals and suggested policies that Centers should seek to fulfill. Although Centers have common elements, it should be acknowledged that each Center is unique and have/will have a different set of priorities. Centers goals should be tailored to the specific Center in question. Generally, Centers should seek to: Policy CN-1 Prioritize the City's residential, commercial and light industrial growth and infrastructure investments within designated Centers, in accordance with VISION 2040 and the Countywide Planning Policies. Policy CN-2 Focus future growth in designated, higher intensity areas in an effort to encourage the preservation of open space and maintain surrounding neighborhood character. Policy CN-3 Shorten commutes by concentrating housing and employment in strategic locations, which provides residents opportunities to live and work in the same neighborhood. Policy CN-4 Provide commercial services that serve the population of the Center, surrounding neighborhoods, the city, and the region (dependent on the suitability of the scale of each Center). Policy CN-5 Support pedestrian and transit uses by promoting compact, mixed -use areas with appropriate infrastructure that provide a variety of activities. Policy CN-6 Balance objectives for accommodating growth, encouraging compatibility, promoting housing affordability, and offering a wide range of housing types. Policy CN-7 Provide access to parks and public pedestrian spaces by creating them within each Center or by creating connections to existing public and open spaces. Policy CN-8 During subarea planning for Centers, develop an implementation plan that addresses how the City will meet Center goals through appropriate land use designations, annexation, development of capital facilities and utilities, and related measures. Policy CN-9 The City shall direct growth to Centers of all types through focused regulations and directed capital projects. Policy CN-10 The City should support employment growth, the increased use of non -automobile transportation options, and the preservation of the character of existing built-up areas by encouraging residential and mixed -use development at increased densities in designated Centers. Policy CN-11 The City shall ensure that higher density development in Centers is either within walking or biking distance of jobs, schools, and parks and is well -served by public Port Orchard Comprehensive Plan Adopted: June 2016 Revised: Nov 2019, July 2020, May 2021 Page 134 of 174 Back to Agenda Exhibit 3 transit. (Centers Goals 1,2,3,4,5,6; Housing, Parks, Economic Development, Transportation, and Capital Facilities Elements) Policy CN-12 The City shall create and designate zoning that allows a mix of uses to accommodate concentrations of employment and housing. (Centers Goals 2,3,4; Economic Development and Housing Elements) Policy CN-13 The City shall encourage a broad range of housing types and commercial uses within designated Centers, through zoning and development regulations that serve a local, citywide, or regional market. (Centers Goals 3,5; Housing and Economic Development Elements) Policy CN-14 The City shall encourage the creation of public open space, private open space, and parks within and serving designated centers. 2.7.5 Specific Center Descriptions and Policies 2.7.5.1 Downtown Port Orchard (Countywide Center) In 2021, the City completed a subarea plan for Downtown Port Orchard which is adopted by reference in appendix D. This plan combined two previous centers, the Downtown Port Orchard and County Campus Centers into one center. The center was evaluated for possible designation as a Regional Urban Growth Center, but there was a lack of support for increasing the level of activity in the center to a planned target of 45 activity units per acre. The boundaries of this center are shown on the map below: 2.7.5.2 Tremont (Countywide Center) Port Orchard Comprehensive Plan Adopted: June 2016 Revised: Nov 2019, July 2020, May 2021 Page 135 of 174 Back to Agenda Exhibit 3 1. Purpose. The purpose of the Tremont sub -area plan is to ensure that future development in the Tremont Corridor is guided by specific guidelines and land use regulations that have been generated by community wide involvement. This Comprehensive Plan and Tremont Corridor District plan incorporates existing comprehensive or other documents related to properties within the Tremont Corridor Sub Area. This plan will establish certain important Visions, Goals, and Policies as well as standards and guidelines within the Tremont Corridor sub -area. c 4sr � LL 3 �, .nuiarr e scxsrr _,cam - aay uer r-t ux�iv r°eBFity' 4 E � 04 � caa�nr 3 f Gai�a�aoo cuueo G n�nxan 2. Vision. The Tremont Corridor is one of three primary entry points into the City of Port Orchard from Highway 16. Presently the area is a mix of single-family residences, commercial, health care facilities and multi -family residences. The expanded Harrison Hospital Urgent Care Campus and Kaiser Permanente facilities are the anchors for businesses along the corridor, particularly from Pottery Avenue west to Highway 16 forming the basis for a Hospital Benefit District. The Tremont Corridor is a through -way for travelers and residents wanting to access shops and services in the core of the city and businesses and homes in outlying areas. The Tremont Corridor also announces to residents and visitors alike that the city has economic vitality and provides services and opportunities to its citizens and residents in the south Kitsap area. Tremont Corridor residents and Port Orchard citizens have determined that they would like to see the corridor developed in way that encourage professional businesses that support the health care facilities already in place and businesses that allow the continuing free flow of traffic from Highway 16 into the downtown areas. Focus should be placed upon pedestrian connections within the district as well as providing a regional connection to the South Kitsap areas served by the hospitals and emergency service providers within the district. Port Orchard Comprehensive Plan Adopted: June 2016 Revised: Nov 2019, July 2020, May 2021 Page 136 of 174 Back to Agenda Exhibit 3 Tremont Avenue will be improved and widened with sidewalks, street trees and a landscaped island that will create a boulevard style of roadway. The Tremont corridor is promoted to include design standards that will necessitate new development to provide a consistent, attractive landscape edge while maintaining a human scale to new and redevelopment projects. A system of trails that are pedestrian and bike friendly connecting the Tremont Corridor to the Port Orchard marine walkway with trails through natural areas are key to the success of the Tremont district. The Tremont district is envisioned with some multi -family residences to accommodate the combination of residential and employment land uses within walking distances of the major health care facilities. Some cafes and neighborhood services are also envisioned to support those living, working or visiting the health care facilities. Regulations and design guidelines should help to ensure that parking is provided in a manner that is beneficial to the neighborhood and enhances the flow of transportation through the district. In addition, Tremont Corridor stakeholders envision monument signage that are tastefully designed and constructed of natural materials. The corridor from Pottery Avenue east to Sidney Road consists primarily of single-family residences and small clinics. Single family uses are encouraged as a desired mix of services and residential uses within this district. 3. Housing and Employment. As of 2018, the Tremont Countywide Center measured 215 acres containing 1,092 residents and 702 jobs. This equates to 8 activity units per acre under the PSRC regional centers framework. 4. Tremont Center Goals Goal 10. Encourage development within the area that supports the major hospital and medical installations (Harrison Hospital and Kaiser Permanente) and assists the emergency response agencies in the corridor (South Kitsap Fire District). Policy CN-26 Encourage regulations that enhance existing businesses while providing incentives that promote economic growth in the corridor while maintaining sensitivity to residents in the area. Policy CN-27 Encourage professional and office uses that support the medical industry and create pedestrian oriented health care focus. Policy CN-28 Promote the creation of a hospital benefit district that will create opportunities for additional community and economic development funding. Port Orchard Comprehensive Plan Adopted: June 2016 Revised: Nov 2019, July 2020, May 2021 Page 137 of 174 Back to Agenda Exhibit 3 Goal 1 I. Encourage residential units in walking distance to employment, services, and health care facilities. Policy CN-29 Require sidewalks or interconnected pedestrian paths or a system of trails for non - motorized transportation with all new development. Goal 12. Encourage development of an efficient multimodal transportation system and develop a funding strategy and financing plan to meet its needs. Policy CN-30 Encourage all new developments to limit direct access to Tremont Street. Policy CN-31 All future City paving projects on streets within the Tremont Corridor should include continuous 6-foot paved walkways for pedestrian use. Policy CN-32 Developments abutting public rights -of -way within the Tremont Corridor should include sidewalks and bicycle lanes Policy CN-33 The City shall help to facilitate the development of trail systems that connect the Tremont Corridor with transportation facilities in the surrounding areas. Policy CN-34 Encourage the expansion of Kitsap Transit's service to increase trip frequency within the Tremont Corridor. 2.7.5.3 Lower Mile Hill Countywide Center The Lower Mile Hill Countywide Center consists of the lower sections of the Mile Hill Road commercial corridor and adjacent multi family development. The area is served by Kitsap Transit. The City should work to develop a sub area plan for this area prior to the next periodic comprehensive plan update. As of 2018, the Lower Mile Hill Countywide Center measured 70 acres containing 174 residents and 288 jobs. This equates to 7 activity units per acre under the PSRC regional centers framework. Port Orchard Comprehensive Plan Adopted: June 2016 Revised: Nov 2019, July 2020, May 2021 Page 138 of 174 Back to Agenda Exhibit 3 2.7.5.4 Upper Mile Hill Countywide Center The Upper Mile Hill Countywide Center consists of the upper sections of the Mile Hill Road commercial corridor and contains a mix of multi family and single family development. The area is served by Kitsap Transit. The City should work to develop a sub area plan for this area prior to the next periodic comprehensive plan update. As of 2018, the Upper Mile Hill Countywide Center measured 65 acres containing 287 residents and 373 jobs. This equates to 10 activity units per acre under the PSRC regional centers framework. Port Orchard Comprehensive Plan Adopted: June 2016 Revised: Nov 2019, July 2020, May 2021 Page 139 of 174 Back to Agenda Exhibit 3 2.7.5.5 Sedgwick/Bethel Countywide Center The Sedgwick/Bethel Countywide Center consist of the Sedgwick Rd corridor from Geiger to the West to the city boundary to the East including the Bethel and Sedgwick intersection. In addition to commercial development and commercially zoned vacant land, this area includes a future park site and land zoned for multifamily development. The area is served by Kitsap Transit. The City should work to develop a sub area plan for this area prior to the next periodic comprehensive plan update. As of 2020, the Sedgwick/Bethel Countywide Center measures 161 acres containing 58 residents and 505 jobs. This equates to 4 activity units per acre under the PSRC regional centers framework. Port Orchard Comprehensive Plan Adopted: June 2016 Revised: Nov 2019, July 2020, May 2021 Page 140 of 174 Back to Agenda Exhibit 3 2.7.5.6 Bethel Lund Countywide Center The Bethel/Lund Countywide Center consists of the Bethel commercial corridor near the intersection of Lund Avenue including nearby residential areas. The area is served by Kitsap Transit. The City should work to develop a sub area plan for this area prior to the next periodic comprehensive plan update. As of 2018, the Bethel/Lund Countywide Center measured 114 acres containing 267 residents and 1,195 jobs. This equates to 13 activity units per acre under the PSRC regional centers framework. Port Orchard Comprehensive Plan Adopted: June 2016 Revised: Nov 2019, July 2020, May 2021 Page 141 of 174 Back to Agenda Exhibit 3 j � s e I � � 1 — F ¢I — _ t5• I c� � - roGcsSmn 'il 7 a r I .T\ —I F J ^.,ER[nno[ HCWrz 2.7.5.8 Sedgwick/Sidney (Ruby Creek Neighborhood) Countywide Center The Sedgwick/Sidney Countywide Center is a rapidly developing area of the city at the intersection of Sidney Road SW and Sedgwick Ave that has seen more than 220 units of multifamily housing develop since 2010 along with significant new commercial development. The area is served by Kitsap Transit. The City should work to develop a sub area plan for this area prior to the next periodic comprehensive plan update. As of 2018, the Sidney/Sedgwick Countywide Center measured 148 acres containing 450 residents and 252 jobs. This equates to 5 activity units per acre under the PSRC regional centers framework. Port Orchard Comprehensive Plan Adopted: June 2016 Revised: Nov 2019, July 2020, May 2021 Page 142 of 174 Back to Agenda Exhibit 3 2.7.5.8 Old Clifton Industrial Park Local Center The Old Clifton Industrial Employment Local Center is located at the site of reclaimed sand and gravel mine. Its close proximity to transportation facilities and its isolation as a result of past mining activities make it an ideal site for industrial and employment uses. The site is served by Kitsap Transit and is located along Old Clifton Road near SR-16. The City should work to develop a sub area plan for this area prior to the next periodic comprehensive plan update. Port Orchard Comprehensive Plan Adopted: June 2016 Revised: Nov 2019, July 2020, May 2021 Page 143 of 174 Back to Agenda Exhibit 3 2.7.5.9 McCormick Woods Local Center The McCormick Woods/Old Clifton Mixed Use Center includes a portion of the McCormick Woods master planned community, the recently developed city park McCormick Village Park, the site a future South Kitsap High School (an additional high school), recreational facilities including trails and a golf course, and areas zoned for multifamily and commercial development. The area is not presently served by Kitsap Transit. The City should work to develop a sub area plan for this area prior to the next periodic comprehensive plan update. Port Orchard Comprehensive Plan Adopted: June 2016 Revised: Nov 2019, July 2020, May 2021 Page 144 of 174 Back to Agenda Exhibit 3 2.7.5.10 Annapolis Local Center The Annapolis Local Center is located on the Sinclair Inlet shoreline east of the city's Downtown Countywide Center. This center includes Mitchell Point and the Annapolis Pier, from which Kitsap Transit operates a foot ferry service to Bremerton during the work week. Commuter parking is located east of the pier. The area also includes a number of historic buildings, commercial services, and residences, as well as a public dock and kayak launch point. The Bay Street Pedestrian Pathway will end at the foot ferry facility. Port Orchard Comprehensive Plan Adopted: June 2016 Revised: Nov 2019, July 2020, May 2021 Page 145 of 174 Back to Agenda Exhibit 3 2.7.5.11 Bethel South (SalmonberU) Local Center The Bethel South Local Center consists of the underdeveloped intersection of Salmonberry and Bethel and the nearby residential areas. The area is served by Kitsap Transit. The City should work to develop a sub area plan for this area prior to the next periodic comprehensive plan update. Port Orchard Comprehensive Plan Adopted: June 2016 Revised: Nov 2019, July 2020, May 2021 Page 146 of 174 Back to Agenda Exhibit 3 2.7.6 Road Map to Implementation Further planning for each identified local center is required in order to implement the City's vision for the overall centers strategy. The city is committed to undertaking a sub area planning process for each center, to better identify center boundaries, develop a vision, goals, and policies for each center. This planning process will also provide recommendations for amending the development regulations, zoning designations, design guidelines and capital facility plans to reflect and implement the sub area plans. Sub -area plans for the centers will be adopted into the City's comprehensive plan. Port Orchard Comprehensive Plan Adopted: June 2016 Revised: Nov 2019, July 2020, May 2021 Page 147 of 174 Back to Agenda EXHIBIT 4 I 20.39.040 Use table. (Gray shading separates categories into residential, commercial and industrial, and civic/parks) Use Category Specific Use R1 11211131114 R5 R6 GB RMU NMU CMU DMU GMU BPMU CC CH IF LI HI Cl PR PF Definition/Standards Residential Uses All household living, as listed below: Ingle -family detached (including new manufactured homes) P P P - - P P P - - P - - - - - - - -- 20.39.600 - 615 Designated manufactured home, manufacti mobile home (except for new designated manufactured homes) - - P - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 20.39.600 - 615 New designated manufactured home P P P - - P P P P - - P - - - - - - - - Two-family - P P - - P - P P - - P - - - - - - - 20.39.600 - 615 Single-family attached (2 units) - P P - - P - P P - - - P - - - - - - - 20.39.600 - 615 Single-family attached (3 or 4 units) - P P P P P- P P P P P P P- P -- - 20.39.600 - 615 Single-family attached (5 or 6 units) - - P P P P - P P P P P P P - P - - - 20.39.600 - 615 Multifamily (3 or 4 units) - - P P P - - P P P P P P P - P - - - 20.39.600 - 615 Multifamily (5 or more units) - - P P P - - P P P P P P P - P - - - - 20.39.600 - 615 Manufactured or mobile home park - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 20.39.600 - 615 Boarding house - - - C C -- -- -- C - P C - - - - - - Congregate living facilities - - C C C -- -- -- C P C - - - - - - - Lodging house - - C C C -- -- -- C - P C - - - - - - Group home (up to 8 residents), except as f P P P P P P P P P - - P - - - - - - 20.39.600 - 615 Adult family home P P P -- -- P P P P - P - - - - - - - Page 148 of 174 Back to Agenda EXHIBIT 4 Use Category Specific Use R1 R2 R3 R4 R5 R6 RMU NMU CMU DMU GMU BPMU CC CH IF LI HI CI PR PF Definition/Standards All group living (9 or more residents) - - - C C - [GB P C P C - P P - - - - 20.39.610 Social services facilities - - - - - - - - - - - P P P P P - - 20.39.615 Secured high risk social services facilities - - - - - - - - - - C C C C - - - Public Uses All civic uses, as listed below: Community college, university, trade or tecr school (8,000 square feet or less) - - - - - - - - - P P P P P - - - - 20.39.240 Community college, university, trade or tecr school (more than 8,000 square feet) - - - - - - - - - - - C C C C - C 20.39.240 Club or lodge - - - - - - - - P P P P - - - - P - - 20.39.240 Public use -- -- --- - P P P P P P P P P P P P P 20.39.240 Museum, library - - - - - - - - P P P P P - - - - - P 20.39.240 Place of worship C C C C C -- -- -- P - P P P - - - P - - 20.39.240 School (K-12) - - - - - - - - - - - - C - - 20.39.240 Jail or detention center - - - - - - - - - - - C C C - C 20.39.240 Transit park and ride lot -- C C C-- C C P C C P P P P P P- P Transfer station - - - - - - - - - - - - P - - P 20.39.230 Transit bus base - - - - - - - - - - - P P - - P 20.39.210 All open space and park uses, as listed belm Cemetery C - - - - - - - - - - - - - P - - 20.39.410 Golf course C C C - - C - - - - C - - - - - P P 20.39.410 Park, recreation field - - - - - - - - P P P P - - - - - P P 20.39.410 Animal shelter or adoption center - - - - - - - - - - - - C C I C IC IC C - C 20.39.200 Page 149 of 174 Back to Agenda EXHIBIT 4 Use Category Specific Use R1 R2 R3 R4 RS R6 GB RMU NMU CMU DMU GMU BPMU CC CH IF LI HI CI PR PF Definition/Standards All utilities, as listed below: Minor utilities P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P 20.39.415 Major utilities - - - P P P P P P 20.39.415 Wireless telecommunication facilities, as list below: Amateur radio operator tower P P P -- -- -- P -- - - - - - - - - - -- - - 20.39.270 Small cell wireless telecommunication facilit P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P 20.39.270 Wireless telecommunication tower (exclude cell facilities) C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C- C 20.39.270 Commercial Uses All day care, as listed below: Family day care (6 children or fewer) P P P -- -- P P -- - P - - - - - 20.39.505 Group day care (mini day care) (7 to 12) C C C - - C C C P P P P P - - - - 20.39.505 Day care center (13 or more) - - - - - - - C C C - P C P P - - - - - - 20.39.505 All indoor recreation, except as listed below -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- C P C P P P - - - - C - Shooting range - - - - - - - - - - - C C - -- C 20.39.510 Special event facility - - C C C C C C C C- C C C 20.39.510 Commercial entertainment, except as folio - - - - - - - - P P P P P P P - - - - - Adult entertainment -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- - - - - - - C C - - - 20.39.515 All outdoor recreation, except as listed belo, - - - C C C P - P P - - - - C C Campground, travel trailer park, RV park (dc include mobile home park) - -- - - - - - -- - - - - -- C C 20.39.530 Horse stable, riding academy, equestrian ce - - - - - - - - - - - - - C C 20.39.530 Page 150 of 174 Back to Agenda EXHIBIT 4 Use Category Specific Use R1 R2 R3 R4 IRS R6[GB RMU NMU CMU DMU GMU BPMU CC CH IF LI HI CI PR PF Definition/Standards Shooting range - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - C 20.39.530 Marina (upland areas) - - - - - - - C C C C C C C C C C 20.39.575 All overnight lodging, as listed below: Level 1: Vacation rentals or similar short -ter house/room rentals P P P P P P P P P P P P P - - - - - - - 20.39.535 Level 2: Bed and breakfast (up to 7 rooms) C C C - - C C - P P - - - - - - 20.39.535 Level 3: Motel - - - - - - - - - - - P P - - - - 20.39.535 Level 4: Hotel - - - - - - - - - P P P - P P - - - - - 20.39.535 All medical, except as listed below: - - - - - - - - - C C P P P P P - - - P Hospital - - - - - - - - - - - C C C C - - - C 20.39.520 All office, except as listed below: - - - - - - - C C P P P P P P P - - - - Bail bonds - - - - - - - - C C C C P P - - - - - 20.39.525 Surface parking: commercial parking, comrr- lease parking or park and ride, remote park - - - - - - - C C P P P P P P - P - C 20.39.350 Commercial parking garage - standalone - - - - - - - - - C C C C P P P - - - - C 20.39.350 Electric vehicle charging stations P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P 20.12 All personal service, except as listed below: - - - - - - - C C P C P P P P C - - - - Funeral home - - - - - - - - P - P P P P - - - - - 20.39.545 Crematorium - - - - - - - - - - - P P P P P P - - 20.39.545 Indoor animal care - - - - - - - - C P - P - P P P - - - - - 20.39.550 Outdoor animal care - - - - - - - - - - - - C C C C - - - - 20.39.555 Business services - - - - - - - C P P P P P P P P - C - -- 20.39.570 Conference center - - - - - - - - - C C C C C - - C I C 20.39.310 Page 151 of 174 Back to Agenda EXHIBIT 4 Use Category Specific Use R1 R2 R3 R4 R5 R6 RMU NMU CMU DMU GMU BPMU CC CH IF LI HI CI PR PF Definition/Standards All restaurants except as listed below: - - - - - - [GB P P P P P P P PFood truck - - - - - - P P P P P P P P P - - P - - 20.39.562 All retail sales, as listed below: Retail establishment (up to 5,000 gross flooi P P P P P P P P P - P - 20.39.565 Retail establishment (5,001 - 15,000 gross fl area) - - - - - - - - - P P P P P P - - - 20.39.565 Retail establishment (15,001 - 50,000 gross area) - - - - - - - - - - - P P P P - - - - - 20.39.565 Retail establishment (over 50,000 gross floo - - - - - - - - - - - C P P - - - - 20.39.565 Fireworks sales in accordance with Chapter 5.60 POMC - - - - - - - - - - - - P P - - - - Recreational marijuana sales - - - - - - - - - - P P I P 1 120.64 Convenience store with fuel pumps - - - - - - - - - - - C - - - - 20.39.565 Convenience store without fuel pumps - - - - - - - - C C C - - P P P - - - 20.39.565 Fuel station, including fuel pumps and fuel without convenience store - - - - - - - - - - - - C - P - - - Automobile service station - - - - - - - - - - - - C - P - - - 20.39.300 All vehicle and tool/construction equipment and rental, as listed below: Light vehicle and light tool or construction equipment sales and rental - - - - - - - - - - - - P P P - - - -- 20.39.565 Heavy vehicle and heavy tool or constructioi equipment sales and rental - - - - - - - - - - - - - P P P P - - - 20.39.565 All vehicle service and repair, as listed below Car wash - - - - - - - - - - - - P P P - - - - 20.39.625 Page 152 of 174 Back to Agenda EXHIBIT 4 Use Category Specific Use R1 R2 R3 R4 R5 R6[GB RMU NMU CMU DMU GMU BPMU CC CH IF LI HI CI PR PF Definition/Standards Vehicle service and repair, minor - - - - - - - - - - P P P P -- -- -- -- 20.39.640 Vehicle service and repair, major - - - - - - - - - P P P P - - - 20.39.645 Vehicle service and repair, commercial vehi - - - - - - - - P P P - 20.39.650 Industrial Uses All heavy industrial - - - - - - - - - - - - P - - - 20.39.605 All light manufacturing, except as listed belc - - - - - - - - - - - - P P P - - -- Commercial laundry, dry cleaning or carpet cleaning facility - - - - - - - - - - - - P P P - - - 20.39.610 Brewery, distillery under 5,000 square feet - - - - - - - - P P - P - - - - - - Brewery, distillery 5,001 - 15,000 square fee - - - - - - - - - C C - C P P - - - - Brewery, distillery over 15,000 square feet - - - - - - - - - - - - - - P P - - - Craft shop - - - - - - - P P P P P - P P P P P - - - 20.39.610 Food and beverage processing, boutique (ar used for processing less than 3,000 square 1 - - - - - - - P P P P P - P P P P P - - - 20.39.610 Food and beverage processing, industrial - - - - - - - - - P P P P - - - 20.39.610 Recreational marijuana production - - - - - - - - - - - P P - - - 20.64 All research and development - - - - - - - - P P P P P P - - - 20.39.615 Resource extraction - mining, dredging, raw mineral processing, except: - - - - - - - - - - - - - - C - - - 20.39.620 Timber harvesting in the absence of concurs development - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Sand and gravel mining - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - C C - - -- Stockpiling of sand, gravel or other aggregal materials C P - -- P 20.39.620 Page 153 of 174 Back to Agenda EXHIBIT 4 Use Category Specific Use R1 R2 R3 R4 R5 R6 GB RMU NMU CMU DMU GMU BPMU CC CH IF LI HI CI PR PF Definition/Standards Sheet metal, welding, machine shop, tool ar equipment manufacturing, vehicle painting - -- -- -- -- -- -- -- C P P P - P 20.39.610 All warehouse, storage and distribution, as I- below: -- -- -- -- -- -- -- C C C C C -- -- -- Enclosed storage -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- - P P P P P - 20.39.655 Self-service storage, mini -warehouse - - - - - - - - C C C C - - 20.39.655 Storage yard - - - - - - - - C C P P - - P 20.39.470 All waste -related service, including wastewa treatment facilities, decant facilities and rec, centers -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- C - - P 20.39.660 Recreational marijuana processing - -- -- -- -- -- -- -- P P 20.64 Agricultural Uses All agriculture, as listed below: Agricultural processing, excluding marijuan processing -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- C P P - 20.39.500 Community garden P P P P P P P P P - -- P P 20.39.500 Nursery P P P P P- -- - - 20.39.500 Winery C C C C P P P P-- - 20.39.500 Accessory Uses Accessory uses not otherwise listed below, z determined by the administrator: Accessory dwelling units, as listed below: Accessory apartment (attached dwelling) P P P -- -- P P -- P - 20.39.600, 20.68 Backyard cottage dwelling P P P -- -- P P -- P - 20.39.600 Drive -through facility - -- -- -- -- -- -- -- C P P P P - 20.39.610 Page 154 of 174 Back to Agenda EXHIBIT 4 Use Category Specific Use R1 R2 R3 R4 RS R6 GB RMU NMU CMU DMU GMU BPMU CC CH IF LI HI CI PR PF Definition/Standards Home occupation P P P P P P P P P - - P - - - - - - - 20.39.615 Home business P P P - - P P - - - P - - - - - - - 20.39.620 Livestock keeping P P P - - - P - - - - - 20.39.625 Outdoor display - - - - - - - - P P P P P P P P P - 20.39.630 Outdoor storage as listed below: Low -impact - - - - - - - - - - P P P P P - - 20.39.635 High -impact - - - - - - - - - - - - P P P - - 20.39.635 Self -storage as accessory use to apartment building - - - P P -- -- - - - - - - - - 20.39.640 Vehicle service and repair, accessory to a residential use P P - - - P P - - - - - - P P - - - - - - 20.39.645 Park as accessory use to residential develop P P P P P P - P P P P P P - - - - - - - - Medical marijuana cooperative P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P--- - 20.64 Key: P = Permitted Use C = Conditional Use -- = Use Not Permi Page 155 of 174 Back to Agenda EXHIBIT 5 20.127.130 Community design framework maps. (1) Figure 20.127.130 below is an overview map of the applicable planning areas within Port Orchard. Examine the map to determine which map or figure relates to individual properties. (2) Figures 20.127.130(1) through (16) include community design framework maps for applicable mixed use and nonresidential zones throughout Port Orchard. Figure 20.127.130 Port Orchard Community Design Framework Maps Index :. Sr r � } 4 M�4;F_ _ MAP. I yrb 1 TIAP 3 MAP A _ — } t , P - � '�-, •, r- MAC I�.. - iz 1 � � ' •� } - ; MAP 1, t. F _: ' Legend Y .r � I - _ ' - MAP , - - Jdr GrondsA- - !' Port Orchard Centers I MAP 4 - ZZ� 1.1_ no _ Lower nlle Nr -r as WK lh&v I Nrk I _J - �114 � � rrcrna,n H.Ipiml e.6r Di,,.;rs I � I Upw Milo HIII C OS IM'H PaANNO Page 156 of 174 Back to Agenda EXHIBIT 5 Figure 20.127.130(1) Map #1 - Downtown West Page 157 of 174 EXHIBIT 5 Back to Agenda Figure 20.127.130(2) Map #2 - Downtown East JA� Page 158 of 174 Back to Agenda EXHIBIT 5 Figure 20.127.130(3) Map #3 - County Campus 4 L EEE= LL rl � ❑ yq ��. � � T r LLM ff j ig PH O �J V+aM cyc�wq �y � LiMfNpcQ Tnfl �J a. Noeeq'�mv. � Gybwitivy 'mea rONtAhbf Xn[epb.eA wd lyreury � mKepol 1 Q N�r4biq weec<anen I-T-FI 1 M;PI PI , � qP it 71 Fi11 _� frammw's mn�c il 0 5J, 1.0•]0 Fe�c OriLnca:y :aperirn: s:.Jc. 2G00 Figure 20.127.130(4) Map #4 - Lower Mile Hill Page 159 of 174 Back to Agenda EXHIBIT 5 Ll FT f _' r..a xnrx ra "�i �. Nnegirvs � VY�Y MOTEOOfY daa w}fnic W^s< - �L j� fexa rvdf llx.6wn memcPetll IIL\11 '0 Q NyrMxbr,%f„«ft«Mn { -- ��'; Sno w6pa magovl mrrwriry dng. .: framcxorirmfta pLn>Fprdal W •. _�I nun�q�n�nnnq ��- -- r o scq ipao N Page 160 of 174 Back to Agenda EXHIBIT 5 Figure 20.127.130(5) Map #5 - Upper Mile Hill Page 161 of 174 Back to Agenda EXHIBIT 5 Figure 20.127.130(6) Map #6 - Bethel North Page 162 of 174 Back to Agenda EXHIBIT 5 Figure 20.127.130(7) Map #7 - Lund Bethel Page 163 of 174 Back to Agenda EXHIBIT 5 Figure 20.127.130(8) Map #8 - Bethel South Page 164 of 174 Back to Agenda EXHIBIT 5 Figure 20.127.130(9) Map #9 - Sedgwick Bethel SR16 Page 165 of 174 Back to Agenda EXHIBIT 5 Figure 20.127.130(10) Map #10 - Bethel Cedar Page 166 of 174 Back to Agenda EXHIBIT 5 Figure 20.127.130(11) Map #11 - Bethel Lider Page 167 of 174 Back to Agenda EXHIBIT 5 Figure 20.127.130(12) Map #12 - Tremont Page 168 of 174 Back to Agenda EXHIBIT 5 Figure 20.127.130(13) Map #13 - Cedar Heights Page 169 of 174 Back to Agenda EXHIBIT 5 Figure 20.127.130(14) Map #14 - Sidney Glen Page 170 of 174 Back to Agenda EXHIBIT 5 Figure 20.127.130(15) Map #15 - Sidney Sedgwick Page 171 of 174 Back to Agenda EXHIBIT 5 Figure 20.127.130(16) Map #16 - McCormick Woods Page 172 of 174 n__1- i_ A Issue Title: Meeting Date: Time Required: Attendees: City of Port Orchard Work Study Session Executive Summary WASPC Grant — Mental Health Field Response Team May 18, 2021 15 minutes N/A Action Requested At This Meeting: Council's support for the joint grant application. Issue: The Kitsap County Sheriff's Office is requesting to partner with South Kitsap Fire Rescue, Kitsap Mental Health, and the City of Port Orchard and its Police Department to seek a grant from the Washington Association of Chiefs and Sheriffs to fund a mental health field response team. The specific grant requires a joint proposal from two or more collaborating law enforcement agencies that incorporates mental health professionals into field response planning and response. KCSO desires a commitment from the City to the joint submission of the application. The grant also requires the participation of a mental health professional, as defined in RCW 71.05.020(38), to perform field response professional services. The mental health professional may assist patrolling law enforcement officers either in the field or in an on -call capacity. The mental health professional may also provide preventative, follow-up, training on mental health field response best practices, or other services at the direction of the local law enforcement agency. If awarded, grant funds will be utilized to allow South Kitsap Fire & Rescue and Kitsap Mental Health to allocate existing FTE for the purpose of providing two full-time designated crisis responders (DCRs) and partial funding for a specialized fire/medic response person. This would create new field response teams to provide services to benefit all partners, consisting of a DCR and fire/medical responder. Kitsap Mental Health will provide the DCRs, and South Kitsap Fire Rescue will provide the specialized fire/medical responder. With support from the grant funding, the Kitsap County Sheriff's Office will provide additional support to this effort with its full-time crisis intervention officer (CIO). The Port Orchard Police Department will contribute the existing services performed by its shared Page 173 of 174 M__1- i_ A r_ Executive Summary Page 2 of 2 Community Health Navigator as part of the program by continuing to provide services and follow-up to 1st responder referrals for behavior health and dependency issues. The goal of the program will be to have two mental health field response teams, primarily focused on the south end of Kitsap County, with on -call twenty -four-hour coverage. It is intended to also increase the response/assessment opportunities that occur upon jail intake of subjects in crisis. Should the joint proposal be approved by WASPC, the collaborating agencies will develop an Interlocal Agreement and program formation materials to cover implementation and management. This will be provided to the Council for review, approval, or additional guidance. The pass -through grant funding will be managed by the Kitsap County Sheriff's Office. The City is not expected to incur any costs. The funding period is July 111, 2021, through June 301", 2022. If the program remains successful, all participating agencies will intend to reapply in 2022. Alternatives: Not support the participation of the City of and provide further guidance. Recommendation: Staff recommends the council support the participation of the City of Port Orchard in the joint grant application for a Mental Health Field Response Team. Relationship to Comprehensive Plan: N/A Attachments: Grant application if it is completed by May 18tn Follow-up Notes & Outcomes: Page 174 of 174