Transportation Impact Fee Rate StudyTransportation
.� p
INNOVATIVE I PRACTICAL
Solutions
I EQUITABLE
Exhibit A
Ordinance No. 007-21
TRANSPORTATION IMPACT FEE RATE STUDY
NOTE:
Fees in this document on pages 14 - 16 are outdated.
Fees are updated every year on March 1st.
Refer to the current Fee Schedule.
2020 UPDATE
FINAL REPORT
December 2020
Prepared for:
City of Port Orchard
Prepared by:
Transportation Solutions, Inc.
16932 Woodinville -Redmond Rd NE
Suite A206
Woodinville, WA 98072
City of Port Orchard 2020 Transportation Impact Fee Rate Update
Table of Contents
1. Introduction....................................................................................................................................... 1
Definitionof Impact Fees.................................................................................................................................... 1
Statutory Basis for Impact Fees.......................................................................................................................... 1
2. Impact Fee Analysis............................................................................................................................ 2
Methodology...................................................................................................................................................... 2
Current Impact Fee Methodology...................................................................................................................... 2
Projects Eligible for Impact Fees......................................................................................................................... 2
EligibleProject Costs........................................................................................................................................... 3
ImpactFee Calculation....................................................................................................................................... 3
Sample Transportation Impact Fees................................................................................................................... 6
3. Additional Issues for Consideration..................................................................................................... 6
Anticipated Annual Revenues from Impact Fees................................................................................................ 6
AnticipatedGrant Revenue................................................................................................................................ 6
Anticipated Need for Other Public Funds........................................................................................................... 7
4. Transportation Impact Fee Rate Comparison....................................................................................... 7
5. Credits and Adjustments..................................................................................................................... 7
ImpactFee Credits.............................................................................................................................................. 7
IndependentFee Calculation.............................................................................................................................. 8
Construction Cost Index Adjustment.................................................................................................................. 8
6. Conclusions........................................................................................................................................ 8
Appendices
Appendix A. Transportation Impact Fee Project List
Appendix B. Transportation Impact Fee Rate Schedule
Appendix C. Comparison of 2019-2020 TIF Rates in Western Washington
1 :-& ..i T..L.1....
Table 1. Impact Fee -Eligible Transportation Improvement Projects...................................................................... 5
Table 2. Transportation Impact Fee Comparison for Typical Land Uses................................................................. 6
Transportation Solutions, Inc. i December 2020
City of Port Orchard 2020 Transportation Impact Fee Rate Update
1. Introduction
This document summarizes the development of an updated transportation impact fee rate for the City
of Port Orchard. It describes the existing impact fee rate, the basis for the fee, the rate methodology,
the impact fee project list, and the recommended fee rate.
Definition of Impact Fees
Impact fees are a comprehensive grouping of charges based on new development within a local
municipality. These fees are assessed to pay for capital facility improvement projects necessitated by
new development growth (including but not limited to parks, schools, and streets/roads).
Transportation impact fees are collected to fund improvements that add capacity to the transportation
system, accommodating the travel demand created by new development. The Revised Code of
Washington (RCW) Section 82.02.050 identifies the intent of impact fees as the following:
• To ensure that adequate facilities are available to serve new growth and development;
• To promote orderly growth and development by establishing standards by which counties, cities,
and towns may require, by ordinance, that new growth and development pay a proportionate
share of the cost of new facilities needed to serve new growth and development; and
• To ensure that impact fees are imposed through established procedures and criteria so that
specific developments do not pay arbitrary fees or duplicative fees for the same impact.
Statutory Basis for Impact Fees
Transportation impact fees are a financing mechanism authorized by the Growth Management Act
(GMA) of Washington State (see RCW 36.70A.070 and 82.02.050). State law imposes strict limitations on
impact fees. These limitations are intended to assure property owners that the fees collected are
reasonably related to their actual impacts and will not be used for unrelated purposes.
If impact fees are imposed, the funds collected from developments can be expended only on
transportation system improvements which are: (a) identified in the comprehensive plan as needed for
growth, and (b) reasonably related to the impacts of the new development from which fees are
collected.
Specifically, condition (a) requires that impact fees are not used on improvements needed to remedy
existing deficiencies. Those needs must be entirely funded from public sector resources. Condition (b) is
satisfied if the local government defines a reasonable service area, identifies the public facilities within
the service area that require improvement during the designated planning period, and prepares a fee
schedule taking into account the type and size of the development as well as the type of public facility
being funded.
To achieve the goal of simplicity, impact fee calculations are applied on an average basis for the entire
transportation system, rather than project -by -project. This is a key difference between impact fees and
State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA) mitigation, whereby pro-rata shares of specific project
improvements are collected.
Pre -calculated impact fees are easier to administer than traditional SEPA development mitigation, at the
point of development review. However, more complex administrative procedures are necessary to track
Transportation Solutions, Inc. 1 December 2020
City of Port Orchard
2020 Transportation Impact Fee Rate Update
the funds collected from each development. This is necessary to assure that the funds are expended
only on eligible transportation system improvements and to assure that impact fee revenues are used
within six years. Fees not expended within six years must be refunded with interest to the current
owner of the property.
The methodology and results described below are consistent with the requirements of the GMA. The
procedures and recommendations described herein can be formally enacted by an impact fee ordinance
incorporating this memo by reference.
2. Impact Fee Analysis
Methodology
The conceptual basis for the transportation impact fee is that growth (i.e. new development) should pay
a proportionate share of the cost to provide future transportation capacity. This proportionate share is
calculated based on the estimated cost of growth -related transportation improvement projects
identified in the Comprehensive Plan and on an estimate of growth's share of capacity utilization for
each project. The impact fee analysis is limited to projects that provide capacity improvements needed
for growth. Projects related to maintenance, such as pavement overlays and physical obsolescence, as
well as improvements necessary to mitigate existing capacity deficiencies, are not eligible for impact fee
funding. However, agencies have been encouraged by the Department of Commerce to consider
multimodal transportation improvements and, to that end, shoulder widening, sidewalks, bike lanes and
parallel trails are reasonable to include as both motorized and nonmotorized capacity enhancements.
Current Impact Fee Methodology
The Port Orchard transportation impact fee program was developed and adopted in 2015 as ordinance
number 023-15 and later reorganized under ordinance number 019-17. The impact fee methodology is
based on proportionate growth share of impact fee eligible project costs.
As of December 2020, the transportation impact fee rate is $2,552 per new PM peak hour trip. A
separate impact fee rate of $560 per new PM peak hour trip is applied to growth in the McCormick
Woods PUD. This rate represents the difference between the citywide rate and a GEM1 fee rate of
$1,992 per trip which was required per the McCormick Woods Development Agreement adopted in
2005.
Projects Eligible for Impact Fees
Not all planned transportation projects and programs are eligible for impact fees. Planned improvement
project are divided below into the following categories in order to establish a list of qualifying projects
that will form the basis for the Port Orchard impact fee rate:
• Project Improvements
• Planned Transportation Projects needed within 20 years
• Maintenance Projects
Protect Improvements
Project improvements are transportation improvements necessary for a specific development that do
not provide significant system benefits. These are typically low -volume local streets that serve driveways
and parking areas. They may provide connections to other developments, but not for the purpose of
Transportation Solutions, Inc. 2 December 2020
City of Port Orchard
2020 Transportation Impact Fee Rate Update
significant system capacity. Other project improvements include safety improvements and new access
connections to existing arterials that serve only one development. Project improvements are typically
required by other development regulations or as SEPA mitigation for specific development impacts not
anticipated in the Comprehensive Plan. Project improvements are not eligible for impact fees. For the
purpose of this rate analysis, roadway extensions that connected existing developments, but were not
significant arterials, were considered project improvements that could be required under other City
codes and regulations but would not be included in the impact fee calculation.
Planned Transportation Proiects
The Port Orchard 2021-2040 Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) identifies transportation
projects which are needed to serve traffic growth for the next twenty years. Projects with capacity
benefits are eligible for impact fee funding. Capacity -related improvements may include adding turn
lanes, lane widening or separating non -motorized modes, adding signals or roundabouts for intersection
capacity, or other improvements. The methodology for roadway capacity calculation is described in the
Transportation Element of the Comprehensive Plan. The proportional share of these projects reasonably
related to growth are eligible for impact fees.
Maintenance Proiects
Maintenance programs, general studies, and non -capital activities are generally not eligible for impact
fees. A component of ongoing pavement preservation could be eligible for impact fees if it is
demonstrated that growth increases the magnitude of pavement reconstruction requirements. For
instance, if existing conditions require a two-inch asphalt overlay, but added traffic from growth
requires a three-inch asphalt overlay to achieve the same pavement life, the cost of the additional inch
of asphalt could be attributed to growth. If the overlay or reconstruction provides increased lane width,
intersection improvements, or shoulder widening the cost of the expansion could be considered eligible.
Eligible Project Costs
Impact fee eligible projects and their estimated costs are identified in Table 1. These costs include
various elements which are necessary for the construction of transportation improvements, including
design, permitting, right-of-way, construction, and construction management. Ongoing or future
maintenance is not an eligible impact fee cost. TIP projects which are not capacity -related, or which are
considered maintenance projects/programs are not included in the TIF project list.
Impact Fee Calculation
The impact fee was calculated based on the increase in PM peak hour vehicle trips resulting from
growth, the cost of improvements related to growth, and the City's transportation financing strategy, as
defined in the 2016 Comprehensive Plan. The calculation methodology is described below.
Local Funding Responsibility
Roadway projects are generally eligible for state and federal grant funds. These funds are not
predictable and vary in amount by grantor. Additionally, cost -sharing agreements with Washington State
Department of Transportation (WSDOT) and Kitsap County are anticipated to reduce some of the City's
project cost responsibility.
This analysis assumes the City will be responsible for 50 percent of total impact fee -eligible project costs
over the 20-year planning horizon, with the other 50 percent anticipated to be funded by grant and
intergovernmental revenue roadway projects.
Transportation Solutions, Inc. 3 December 2020
City of Port Orchard
2020 Transportation Impact Fee Rate Update
Exceptions were applied to the following projects which are anticipated to be fully funded by the City of
Port Orchard or by local development, with no grants or intergovernmental revenue:
• Bethel/Sedgwick Corridor Phase 1 Design (TIP #1.3)
• Old Clifton Rd Design — 60% (TIP #1.5A)
• Old Clifton Rd & Campus Parkway roundabout (TIP #1.5C)
• Old Clifton Rd & McCormick Woods Dr roundabout (TIP #2.08)
• Glenwood Connector Roadway (per development agreement)
• Feigley Rd improvements (per development agreement)
Proportionate Share of Project Cost
Growth's proportionate share of each improvement project was calculated as the proportion of added
capacity which will be used by new development trips, per the Port Orchard travel demand model.
The Port Orchard travel demand model was most recently updated and recalibrated in 2019. It
incorporates trip generation data published in the Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE) Trip
Generation Manual, tor" Edition and calibrated to fit 2019 weekday PM peak hour traffic counts. The
travel demand model trip distribution and traffic assignment procedures were calibrated based on
regional and national guidance, including the Kitsap County travel demand model and Federal Highway
Administration travel demand model calibration guidance, in addition to local engineering expertise and
traffic counts.
To generate 2040 PM peak hour travel demand forecasts, the calibrated 2019 PM travel demand model
was modified to include housing and employment growth forecasts identified in the Port Orchard
Comprehensive Plan. A total of 7,352 new weekday PM peak hour trips are anticipated citywide
between 2019 and 2040. These new trips were assigned to the transportation network, resulting in
traffic growth forecasts for each intersection and roadway segment on the TIF project list.
The proportionate growth share of TIF project costs was calculated by dividing the 2019-2040 PM peak
hour trip growth by the capacity contribution, in vehicles per hour, of each improvement project:
Proportionate Share ofproject Costj= PM peak hr trip growth
Added PM peak hr capacity
The resulting proportionate share for each TIF project is identified in Table 1. Total project costs and
growth share are summarized below:
Total TIF Project Cost $145,863,474
Anticipated Grant & Intergovernmental Revenue
$78,597,474
Anticipated City & Developer (Non -Grant) Responsibility
$67,266,000
Growth/Development Share of Project Cost
$36,343,224
Transportation Solutions, Inc. 4 December 2020
City of Port Orchard
2020 Transportation Impact Fee Rate Update
Table 1. Impact Fee -Eligible Transportation Improvement Projects
TIP
IDl
Project Name
Cost
Estimate ($)
Local
Share' ($)
GrowthGrowth Share
Share' ($)
N
DA
Glenwood Connector Roadway
2,000,000
2,000,000
100%
2,000,000
1.1
Tremont St Widening CN Phase
23,600,000
7,570,000
24%
1,851,656
1.3
Bethel/Sedgwick Corridor Ph. 1 Design
1,211,000
1,211,000
24%
293,489
1.4
Old Clifton Rd/Anderson Hill Rd
Roundabout
2,420,000
968,000
81%
786,112
1.5A
Old Clifton Rd Design - 60%
562,000
562,000
100%
562,000
1.5C
Old Clifton Rd/Campus Pkwy Roundabout
1,600,000
1,600,000
100%
1,600,000
1.7
Vallair Ct Connector
2,498,000
1,249,000
8%
96,697
2.01
Sidney Ave (N) Widening
13,113,000
6,557,000
48%
3,144,444
2.02
Sedgwick Rd West Design/ROW
1,444,000
722,000
100%
722,000
2.03
Sedgwick Rd West Constr.
4,331,000
2,166,000
100%
2,165,500
2.04A
Bethel/Sedgwick Corridor Ph. 1
ROW/Constr.
14,360,000
7,180,000
24%
1,740,094
2.04B
Bethel/Sedgwick Corridor Ph. 2
17,498,000
5,249,000
28%
1,464,306
2.04C
Bethel/Sedgwick Corridor Ph. 3
6,111,000
1,833,000
5%
97,776
2.04D
Bethel/Sedgwick Corridor Ph. 4
9,179,000
4,590,000
45%
2,067,975
2.04E
Bethel/Sedgwick Corridor Ph. 5
11,059,000
5,530,000
100%
5,529,500
2.05
Sidney Rd (S) Widening
7,820,000
3,910,000
66%
2,593,367
2.06
Pottery Ave (N) Widening
1,998,000
999,000
28%
277,500
2.07
Old Clifton Rd Shoulder & Ped. Impr.
3,372,000
1,686,000
100%
1,686,000
2.08
Old Clifton Rd/McCormick Woods Dr
Roundabout
1,600,000
1,600,000
100%
1,600,000
2.09
Melcher St Widening
749,000
375,000
7%
25,279
2.1
Fireweed Rd Widening
468,000
234,000
5%
11,700
2.12
Sherman Ave Widening
656,000
328,000
5%
16,400
2.13
Tremont St Widening Ph. 2 - PO Blvd
10,684,000
5,342,000
100%
5,342,000
2.14
Pottery Ave (S) Widening
5,245,000
2,623,000
16%
415,119
2.16
Blueberry Rd Widening
749,000
375,000
22%
80,518
2.17
Geiger Rd Widening
468,000
234,000
5%
11,700
2.18
Salmonberry Rd Widening
281,000
141,000
21%
28,803
2.19
Piperberry Way Extension
468,000
234,000
11%
25,665
2.21
Old Clifton Rd/Feigley Rd Roundabout
243,000
122,000
26%
31,150
DA
Feigley Rd Improvements
76,474
76,000
100%
76,474
Total
145,863,474
67,266,000
54%
36,343,224
'Project ID number in Port Orchard 2021-2040 Transportation Improvement Program. DA = development agreement project
2Portion of project cost which is anticipated to be funded by City of Port Orchard and developer funds (i.e. not funded by
grants or intergovernmental revenue)
3Portion of added capacity which is used by growth (i.e. new development). Developer -funded projects are assigned 100%
growth share.
Transportation Solutions, Inc.
5
December 2020
City of Port Orchard
2020 Transportation Impact Fee Rate Update
Impact Fee Rate
The citywide transportation impact fee rate was calculated by dividing the sum of the growth share of
TIF project cost by the total citywide PM peak hour trip growth forecast, as shown:
Development share of project costs _ $36,343,224
Citywide PM trip growth 7,352 new trips $4,943 / PM peak hour trip
Sample Transportation Impact Fees
Table 2 summarizes the fee rates which would be paid by several typical developments If the above
calculated rate were adopted in an impact fee ordinance. A comprehensive transportation impact fee
rate schedule is included in Appendix B.
Table 2. Transportation Impact Fee Comparison for Typical Land Uses
Land Use Type
ITE
1
LUC
Trip
Rate
Per Unit
2015 TIF
Rate ($/unit)
2020 TIF
Rate ($/unit)
Single -Family Home
210
0.99
DU
2,552
4,894
Low -Rise Multifamily
220
0.56
DU
1,582
2,768
Senior Attached Housing
252
0.26
DU
638
1,285
General Office
710
1.15
1,000 ftz
3,803
5,684
Shopping Center
820
2.51*
1,000 ftz
6,406
12,110
Light Industrial
110
0.63
1,000 ft2
2,476
3,114
'Land Use Code and trip rates per Institute of Transportation Engineers Trip Generation Manual101" Edition
*Includes 34% reduction for pass -by trips, per Institute of Transportation Engineers Trip Generation Handbook
3. Additional Issues for Consideration
Anticipated Annual Revenues from Impact Fees
The anticipated annual revenue from the proposed transportation impact fee, based on the travel
demand growth forecast of 7,352 new trips by 2040, is shown below:
350 trips $4,943
* = $1,730,050 / year
year PM trip
The transportation impact fee is anticipated to generate an average of $1,730,050 per year. This
represents a 20-year average and may be more or less in any given year.
Anticipated Grant Revenue
Transportation improvement projects are generally eligible for state and federal grant funds. These
funds are not predictable and vary in amount by grantor. The financing plan in the Transportation
Element identifies a 50 percent grant and intergovernmental funding goal for roadway projects. This
assumption is applied in the impact fee rate calculation.
Transportation Solutions, Inc. 6 December 2020
City of Port Orchard
2020 Transportation Impact Fee Rate Update
Anticipated Need for Other Public Funds
The anticipated impact fee revenue does not fully fund the non -grant share of TIF project costs. The
anticipated need for other public funds is summarized below:
Total TIF Project Cost $145,863,474
Anticipated Grant & Intergovernmental Revenue $78,597,474
Growth/Development Share of Project Cost $36,343,224
Remaining Unfunded Commitment (2019-2040) $30,922,776
The City will need to identify other revenue sources to fund the remaining unfunded revenue
commitment of $30,922,776 associated with the TIF projects. This represents an annual funding
commitment of $1,546,139.
4. Transportation Impact Fee Rate Comparison
The City of Bellingham Public Works Department has compiled a list of transportation impact fee rates
for 79 public agencies in western Washington. The full comparison chart is included in Appendix B.
Provided below are current transportation impact fee rates for several agencies which are located near
Port Orchard. The updated impact fee rate of $4,943 per PM trip would be just above the western
Washington average rate, but far from the highest in western Washington.
Western WA Maximum Transportation Impact Fee:
City of Poulsbo Transportation Impact Fee:
City of Gig Harbor Transportation Impact Fee:
Proposed Port Orchard Transportation Impact Fee:
Western WA Average Transportation Impact Fee:
City of Bainbridge Island Transportation Impact Fee:
Kitsap County Transportation Impact Fee:
Western WA Minimum Transportation Impact Fee:
5. Credits and Adjustments
Impact Fee Credits
$14,064 (City of Sammamish)
$5,397
$5,020
$4,943
$4,363
$1,687
$700
$589 (City of Oak Harbor)
An applicant may request a credit for impact fees in the amount of the total value of system
improvements, including dedications of land, improvements, and/or construction provided by the
applicant. Credits should be considered on a case -by -case basis and shall not exceed the impact fee
payable.
Claims for credit should be made before the payment of the impact fee. Credits for the construction
should be provided only if the land, improvements, and/or the facility constructed are listed as planned
transportation projects in the Rate Analysis and Impact Fee Ordinance. Credits are not generally given
for code -based frontage improvements or right -or -way dedications, or direct access improvements to
and/or within the subject development (project improvements) unless the improvement is part of a
project listed in the Rate Analysis and Impact Fee Ordinance.
Transportation Solutions, Inc. 7 December 2020
City of Port Orchard
2020 Transportation Impact Fee Rate Update
Independent Fee Calculation
An applicant may submit an independent fee calculation for a proposed development activity. The
documentation submitted should be prepared by a traffic engineer licensed in Washington State and
should be limited to adjustments in the trip generation rates used in the fee calculation.
Construction Cost Index Adjustment
Transportation impact fees should be adjusted yearly to account for inflation. Annual adjustments will
be based on the All -Urban Consumers Index (CPI-U) for the Seattle -Tacoma -Bellevue area for the
previous 12-month period from December to December as specified by the Bureau of Labor Statistics,
United States Department of Labor. The CPI adjustment would take effect on March 1.
6. Conclusions
The recommended transportation impact fee rate is $4,943 per new PM peak hour trip.
Transportation Solutions, Inc. 8 December 2020
City of Port Orchard
2020 Transportation Impact Fee Rate Update
Appendix A. Transportation Impact Fee Project List
Transportation Solutions, Inc. December 2020
City of Port Orchard
Transportation Impact Fee Project List - 2020 Update
DA
Glenwood Connector Roadway
2,000,000
2,000,000
100%
2,000,000
1.1
Tremont St Widening CN Phase
23,600,000
7,570,000
24%
1,851,656
1.3
Bethel/Sedgwick Corridor Ph. 1 Design
1,211,000
1,211,000
24%
293,489
1.4
Old Clifton Rd/Anderson Hill Rd Roundabout
2,420,000
968,000
81%
786,112
1.5A
Old Clifton Rd Design - 60%
562,000
562,000
100%
562,000
1.5C
Old Clifton Rd/Campus Pkwy Roundabout
1,600,000
1,600,000
100%
1,600,000
1.7
Vallair Ct Connector
2,498,000
1,249,000
8%
96,697
2.01
Sidney Ave (N) Widening
13,113,000
6,557,000
48%
3,144,444
2.02
Sedgwick Rd West Design/ROW
1,444,000
722,000
100%
722,000
2.03
Sedgwick Rd West Constr.
4,331,000
2,166,000
100%
2,165,500
2.04A
Bethel/Sedgwick Corridor Ph. 1 ROW/Constr.
14,360,000
7,180,000
24%
1,740,094
2.04B
Bethel/Sedgwick Corridor Ph. 2
17,498,000
5,249,000
28%
1,464,306
2.04C
Bethel/Sedgwick Corridor Ph. 3
6,111,000
1,833,000
5%
97,776
2.04D
Bethel/Sedgwick Corridor Ph. 4
9,179,000
4,590,000
45%
2,067,975
2.04E
Bethel/Sedgwick Corridor Ph. 5
11,059,000
5,530,000
100%
5,529,500
2.05
Sidney Rd (S) Widening
7,820,000
3,910,000
66%
2,593,367
2.06
Pottery Ave (N) Widening
1,998,000
999,000
28%
277,500
2.07
Old Clifton Rd Shoulder & Ped. Impr.
3,372,000
1,686,000
100%
1,686,000
2.08
Old Clifton Rd/McCormick Woods Dr Roundabout
1,600,000
1,600,000
100%
1,600,000
2.09
Melcher St Widening
749,000
375,000
7%
25,279
2.1
Fireweed Rd Widening
468,000
234,000
5%
11,700
2.12
Sherman Ave Widening
656,000
328,000
5%
16,400
2.13
Tremont St Widening Ph. 2 - PO Blvd
10,684,000
5,342,000
100%
5,342,000
2.14
Pottery Ave (S) Widening
5,245,000
2,623,000
16%
415,119
2.16
Blueberry Rd Widening
749,000
375,000
22%
80,518
2.17
Geiger Rd Widening
468,000
234,000
5%
11,700
2.18
Salmonberry Rd Widening
281,000
141,000
21%
28,803
2.19
Piperberry Way Extension
468,000
234,000
11 %
25,665
2.21
Old Clifton Rd/Feigley Rd Roundabout
243,000
122,000
26%
31,150
DA
Feigley Rd Improvements
76,474
76,000
100%
76,474
Total
Total Project Cost
Local Share (Development + City) (%)
Growth/Development Share ($)
2019-2040 PM Peak Hour Trip Growth (vph)
2020 Transportation Impact Fee Rate ($/trip)
Remaining Unfunded Commitment ($)
Annual Funding Commitment ($/yr)
145,863,474
$145,863,474
46%
$36,343,224
7,352
$4,943
$30,922,776
$1,546,139
67,266,000
54%
36,343,224
City of Port Orchard
2020 Transportation Impact Fee Rate Update
Appendix B. Transportation Impact Fee Rate Schedule
Transportation Solutions, Inc. December 2020
City of Port Orchard Traffic Impact Fee Rate Schedule — Residential (2020 Update)
Code'
ITE Land Use Category
ITE Trip
Rate
Rate per
it3
Impact Fee per Unit
210
Single -Family Detached Housing
0.99
DU
$4,894
$2,768
220
221
230
Low -Rise Multifamily Housing (1-2 floors)
Mid -Rise Multifamily Housing (3-10 floors)
Mid -Rise Residential w/ 1st Floor Commercial
0.56
DU
0.44
DU
$2,175
0.36
DU
$1,779
240
Mobile Home Park
0.46
DU
$2,274
251
252
Senior Housing Detached
0.30
DU
$1,483
Senior Housing Attached
0.26
DU
$1,285
253
Congregate Care Facility
0.18
0.26
DU
$890
$1,285
254
Assisted Living
bed
260
270
Recreational Home
Residential PUD
0.28
DU
$1,384
0.69
DU
$3,411
-
Accessory Dwelling Unit (<— 450 so
Accessory Dwelling Unit (> 450 so
0.56
DU
$2,768
-
0.28
DU
$1,384
Institute of Transportation Engineers, Trip Generation Manual (10th Edition)
2 Trip generation rate per development unit for PM peak hour of the adjacent street traffic (4-6 PM)
3 DU = Dwelling Unit
ORCHARD_
Transportation ion Solutions
•� p
INNOVATIVE I PRACTICAL I EQUITABLE
Citv of Port Orchard Traffic Impact Fee Rate Schedule - Non -Residential LUC 1-799 (2020 Update)
ITE
Code'
PORT AND
i
ITE Land Use Category
TERMINAL
Base Trip
RatT
%Primary
Trips
Net Trip
Rate
Rate per
Unit 3
Impact Fee
per Unit
30
Intermodal Truck Terminal
Park and Ride with Bus Service
1.87
1.870
1
$9 243
2125
90
INDUSTRIAL110
1 0.43
*
0.430
s ace
General Light Industrial
Industrial Park
Manufacturing
Warehousing
Mini Warehouse
Utilities
ISoecialitv Trade Contractor
0.63
0.630
KSF
$3114
130
0.40
0.400
KSF
$1 977
140
0.67
0.670
KSF
$3 312
150
0.19
*
0.190
KSF
$939
151
0.17
0.170
KSF
$840
170
180
LODGING
2.27
1.97
2.270
KSF
KSF
$11,221
9 738
1.970
310
Hotel
0.60
0.600
room
$2,966
311
All Suites Hotel
0.36
*
0.360
1 room
$1 779
312
Business Hotel
0.32
0.320
1 room
$1 582
320
RECREATIONAL
Motel
0.38
*
0.380
room
,
411
Public Park
0.11
0.110
acre
$544
416
Campground/RV Park
0.27
*
0.270
site
$1 335
430
Golf Course
0.28
*
0.280
acre
$1 384
432
Golf Driving Range
1.25
*
1.250
tee
$6179
433
Batting Cages
2.22
*
2.220
cage
$10 973
434
Rock Climbing Gym
1.64
1.640
KSF
$8107
435
Multi -Purpose Recreational Facility
3.58
3.580
1 KSF
$17 696
437
Bowlinq Allev
1.16
*
1.160
KSF
$5 734
444
Movie Theater
14.60
*
14.600
screen
$72168
445
Multiplex Movie Theater
13.73
*
13.730
screen
$67 867
488
Soccer Complex
16.43
*
16.430
field
$81 213
490
Tennis Courts
4.21
4.210
court
$20 810
491
Racquet/Tennis Club
3.82
1
1 3.820
court
$18 882
492
1 Health Fitness Club
3.45
*
3.450
1 KSF
$17 053
493
lAthletic Club
6.29
6.290
1 KSF
$31 091
495
INSTITUTIONAL
1 Recreational Community Center
2.31
2.310
1 KSF
11 418
520 1.
Public Elementary School
1.37
1.370
1 KSF
1 $6 772
522
Public Middle/Junior High School
1.19
*
1.190
KSFE$4,795
882
530
Public High School
0.97
0.970
KSF
537
Charter Elementa School
0.14
0.140
student692538
School District Office
2.04
2.040
KSF
084540
Junior/Communi Colle a
1.86
1.860
KSF194
560
Church
0.49
0.490
KSF
$2 422
565
Day Care Center
11.12
44%
4.893
KSF
$24185
566
Cemetery
0.46
*
0.460
acre
$2 274
571
Prison
0.05
*
0.050
bed
$247
575
Fire & Rescue Station
0.48
*
0.480
KSF
$2 373
590
MEDICAL
Library
8.16
*
8.160
KSF
40 335
610
Hospital
1 0.97
1
1 0.970
1 KSF
1 $4 795
620
Nursing Home
0.59
*
0.590
KSF
$2 916
630
Clinic
3.28
*
3.280
KSF
$16 213
640
Animal Hospital/ Veterinary Clinic
1 3.53
1*
3.530
KSF
$17 449
650
OFFICE
Freestandina Emer enc Room
I1.52
1.520
KSF
7 513
710
lGeneral Office
1.15
*
1.150
KSFJ$12,110
712
Sin le -Tenant Office <5 000 s
2.45
*
2.450
KSF715
Sin le Tenant Office >5 000 s
1.71
1.710
KSF720
Medical/Dental Office
3.46
3.460
KSF730
Govemment Office Buildin
1.71
1.710
KSF732
US Post Office
11.21
11.210
KSF
733
Government Office Complex
1 2.82
1
1 2.820
1 KSF
$13 939
750
lOffice Park
1.07
*
1.070
KSF
$5 289
760
1 Research and Development Center
1 0.49
*
0.490
0.420
KSF
KSF
$2 422
$2 076
770
1 Business Park
1 0.42
*
' Institute of Transportation Engineers, Trip Generation Manual (10th Edition)
2 Trip generation rate per development unit, for PM Peak Hour of the adjacent street traffic (4-6 pm).
3 DU = Dwelling Unit; KSF = 1,000 square feet; VSP = Vehicle servicing position
* Pass -by and diverted trip rate data not available. Primary trip rates may be applied based on local data, development context, and engineering judgment
Citv of Port Orchard Traffic Impact Fee Rate Schedule - Non -Residential LUC 800-999 (2020 Update)
ITE
Code'
ITE Land Use Category
Base Trip
Rate
% Primary
Trips3
Net Trip
Rate
Rate per
Unit°
Impact Fee
per Unit
RETAIL
810
811
Tractor Supply Store
Construction Equipment Rental Store
Building Materials and Lumber Store
1.40
0.99
66%
0.924
0.733
1.524
3.074
KSF
$4 567
$3 621
$7,535
74%
KSF
812
2.06
4.33
74%
71 %
KSF
813
Free -Standing Discount Superstore w/ Grocery)
KSF
$15196
814
Variety Store
6.84
66%
4.514
KSF
$22 315
815
1 Free Standing Discount Store w/o Grocery)
4.83
83%
4.009
KSF
$19 816
816
Hardware/Paint Store
2.68
74%
1.983
KSF
$9 803
817
Nurse Garden Center
6.94
74%
5.136
KSF
$25 385
818
Nurse Wholesale
5.18
74%
3.833
KSF
$18 948
820
Shopping Center
3.81
66%
2.515
KSF
$12 430
823
Factory Outlet Center
2.29
66%
1.511
KSF
$7 471
840
Automobile Sales New
2.43
100%
2.430
KSF
$12 011
841
Automobile Sales Used
3.75
100%
3.750
KSF
$18 536
842
Recreational Vehicle Sales
0.77
100%
0.770
KSF
$3 806
843
Automobile Parts Sales
4.91
44%
2.160
KSF
$10 679
848
Tire Store
3.98
72%
2.866
KSF
$14165
849
Tire Superstore
2.11
72%
1.519
KSF
$7 509
850
Supermarket
9.24
64%
5.914
KSF
$29 231
851
Convenience Market
49.11
49%
24.064
KSF
$118 948
853
Convenience Market w/Gas Pumps
49.23
17%
8.369
VFP
$41 368
854
Discount Supermarket
8.38
1 51%
4.274
KSF
$21125
857
Discount Club
4.18
63%
2.633
KSF
$13 017
861
Sporting Goods Superstore
2.02
66%
1.333
KSF
$6 590
862
Home Improvement Superstore
2.33
58%
1.351
KSF
$6 680
863
Electronics Superstore
4.26
60%
2.556
KSF
$12 634
866
Pet Supply Superstore
3.55
66%
2.343
KSF
$11 581
867
Office Supply Superstore
2.77
66%
1.828
KSF
$9 037
875
Department Store
1.95
1 66%
1.287
KSF
$6 362
876
Apparel Store
4.12
66%
2.719
KSF
$13 441
879
Arts and Crafts Store
6.21
66%
4.099
KSF
$20 259
880
Pharmacy/Drug Store w/o Drive-Thru
8.51
47%
4.000
KSF
$19 771
881
Pharmacy/Drug Store w/ Drive-Thru
10.29
38%
3.910
KSF
$19 328
882
Mari'uana DispenseDispensery
21.83
10000
1 21.830
KSF
$107 906
890
Furniture Store
0.52
47%
1 0.244
KSF
$1,208
899
SERVICES
Li uor Store
16.37
64%
1 10.477
KSF
51
787
911
Walk-in Bank
12.13
65%
7.885
KSFJ$65,705
912
Drive-in Bank
20.45
65%
13.293
KSF918
Hair Salon
1.45
65%
0.943
KSF920
Co Print and Ex ress Shi Store
7.42
66%
4.897
KSF925
Drinkin Place
11.36
100%
11.360
KSF930
Fast Casual Restaurant
14.13
57%
8.054
KSF
931
lQuality Restaurant
7.80
56%
4.368
KSF
$21591
932
High Turnover Sit -Down Restaurant
9.77
57%
5.569
KSF
$27,527
933
Fast Food w/o Drive-Thru
28.34
57%
16.154
KSF
$79 848
934
Fast Food w/ Drive-Thru
32.67
50%
16.335
KSF
$80 744
935
Fast Food Restaurant w/ Drive-Thru w/o Indoor Seating
42.65
50%
21.325
KSF
$105 409
936
Coffee/Donut Shop w/o Drive-Thru
36.31
57%
20.697
KSF
$102 304
937
Coffee/Donut Shop wl Drive-Thru
43.38
50%
21.690
KSF
$107 214
938
Coffee/Donut Shop wl Drive-Thru w/o Indoor Seating (Espresso Stand
83.33
11 %
9.166
KSF
$45 309
939
Bread/Donut/Bagel Shop w/o Drive-Thru
28.00
57%
15.960
KSF
$78 890
940
Bread/Donut/Bagel Shop w/ Drive-Thru
19.02
50%
9.510
KSF
$47 008
941
Quick Lubrication Vehicle Stop
4.85
72%
3.492
VSP
$17 261
942
Automobile Care Center
3.11
72%
2.239
KSF
$11 068
943
Automobile Parts and Service Center
2.26
72%
1.627
KSF
$8 043
944
Gasoline/Service Station
14.03
58%
8.137
VFP
$40 223
945
Gas Station w/Convenience Market
13.99
12%
1 1.679
VFP
$8 298
947
Self -Serve Car Wash
5.54
58%
3.213
stall
$15 883
948
Automated Car Wash
77.50
58%
44.950
stall
$222188
950
960
Truck Stop
Super Convenience Market/ Gas Station
22.73
22.96
58%
35%
13.183
KSF
VFP
1 KSF
$65,166
$39 722
8.036
7.310
970
lWinery
1 7.31
100%
I$36133
' Institute of Transportation Engineers, Trip Generation Manual (10th Edition)
2 Trip generation rate per development unit, for PM Peak Hour of the adjacent street traffic (4-6 pm).
3 Average primary trip rates, per Trip Generation Handbook (3rd Edition), 2017. Additional primary rates based on similar land use and engineering judgment.
Pass -by rates should be used with caution and refined using local data whenever possible. ° DU = Dwelling Unit; KSF =1,000 square feet; VSP = Vehicle servicing position
3
City of Port Orchard
2020 Transportation Impact Fee Rate Update
Appendix C. Comparison of 2019-2020 TIF Rates in Western Washington
Transportation Solutions, Inc. December 2020
Comparison of 2019-2020 TIF Base Rates in 74 Cities and 5 Counties in Western Washington
With Bellingham and Whatcom County Cities Highlighted for Emphasis
[Based on information available. Average includes both Cities and Counties. See TIF rate table on next page for additional details.]
Data compiled Nov. 2019 by Chris Comeau, AICP-CTP, Transportation Planner, Bellingham Public Works ccomeau@cob.or¢ or (360) 778-7946
*Western WA State Average TIF
Sammamish
North Bend
Kenmore
Issaquah
Duvall
Lynnwood
1 $7,944
Renton
$7,820
La Center
$7,561
Bothell
$7,406
Shoreline
$7,397
Redmond
$7,357
Shoreline
$7,224
Carnation
$7,141
Newcastle
$6,475
Fife
$6,413
Marysville
$6,300
Edmonds
$6,249
Buckley
$6,074
Camas
$5,974
Des Moines
1 $5,573
Poulsbo
1 $5,397
Bellevue
$5,293
Mount Vernon
1 $5,100
Gig Harbor
$5,020
Port Orchard (Proposed)
$4,943
Auburn
$4,895
Kent
$4,518
Puyallup
$4,500
Pierce County
$4,479
Covington
$4,461
Edgewood
$4,413
W WA Average TIF*
$4,363
Sultan
$4,350
Mercer Island
$4,287
Woodinville
$4,211
Milton
$4,190
Federal Way
$3,999
Bonney Lake
$3,995
Maple Valley
$3,986
Mount Lake Terrace
$3,985
Mill Creek
$3,900
Kirkland
$3,815
Shelton
$3,736
Tumwater
$3,705
Ridgefield
$3,683
Monroe
$3,524
Stanwood
$3,523
SeaTac
$3,508
Washougal
$3,398
Arlington
$3,355
Clark County
$3,333
Lake StevensW'$'�,959
$3,257
Enumclaw$3,239
Olympia$3,213
University Place$3,199
Ferndale$3,163
Battleground,024
Thurston County
Sedro-Woolley(Proposed)
$2,809
AnacortesEf$$2:'�,453
$2,731
Burlington$2,665
Sumner2,632
Port Orchard (Existing)2,552
Granite Falls,500
Sequim,491
Snohomish County
Everett
$2,400
Vancouver
$2,153
Orting
$2,149
Lynden
$2,111
Bellingham
$2,025
Lacey MENEEMEMENEEMi
$2,013
Mukilteo
� $1,875
Bainbridge Island
$1,687
Snohomish
$1,603
Blaine
$1,558
Yelm $1,497
Tukwila
$1,244
Burien
$948
Kitsap County
$700
Oak Harbor
$589
$0
$2,000 $4,000 $6,000
$8,000
$14,064
$11,630
$9,600
$8,882
$8,756
$10,000 $12,000 $14,000 $16,000
Cost Per P.M. Peak Hour (4:00- 6:00pm) Vehicle or Person Trip