1406 - Ordinance - Amending Ordinance No. 895 Comp Plan MapORDINANCE NO. 1406+/
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF PORT
ORCHARD, WASHINGTON AMENDING CITY OF
PORT ORCHARD COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
ORDINANCE NO. 895; BY AMENDING THE
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN MAP CERTAIN
PROPERTIES THEREIN
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PORT ORCHARD,
WASHINGTON, DOES ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS:
WHEREAS, W.E. Lumsden and Chuck Childress, et al,
owners of record, have initiated a comprehensive plan
ordinance amendment requesting redesignation of property
described in said petition, and all legal requirements have
been performed; and
WHEREAS, the City of Port Orchard Planning
Commission has transmitted to the Council of the City of Port
Orchard their findings and recommendations (Attachment "A")
that the Comprehensive Plan Map be amended for the reasons
stated therein;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED, that the City
Council of the City of Port Orchard does hereby adopt the
findings and recommendations of the Port Orchard Planning
Commission as it's own and does hereby redesignate certain
property on the Comprehensive Plan Map from Kitsap County
designation of Semi -Rural to Industrial.
LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Section 34, Township 24
North, Range 01 East; the NW 1/4 of the SW 1/4 Section 34,
except the West 225 feet thereof and except the North 30 feet
of said NW 1/4, SW 1/4; together with the South 1/2 of the NE
1/4 of the SW 1/4 and that portion of the NE 1/4, SE 1/4
lying Westerly of State Highway #16, except road.
PASSED by the City Council of the City of Port
Orchard, APPROVED by the Mayor and attested by the Clerk in
authentication of such passage this 28th day of December,
1987.
i
LESLI J. WEATHERILL, MAYOR
ATTEST:
Patricia Hower, City Clerk
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
City Attorney
Sponsored By:
Councilman Grable
BE IT RESOLVED, that the Planning Commission of the City of Port
Orchard hereby respectfully recommend that the City Council,
simultaneously with the acceptance of the annexation petition,
designate the subject property °Industrial" on the Comprehensive
Plan.
PASSED this 21 day of September 1987
CITY OF PORT ORCHARD
PLANNING C014MISSION
ATTEST:
Ruth Strube, Secretary
0. John Hokanson, Chairman
2
Attachment "T."
Ordinance No. 1406
CITY OF PORT ORCHARD
PLANNING COMMISSION
RESOLUTION NO. 85-87
A RESOLUTION BY THE PORT ORCHARD PLANNING COMMISSION
RECOMMENDING THAT THE CITY COUNCIL DESIG14ATE THE BELOW
DESCRIBED PROPERTY "INDUSTRIAL" ON THE COMPREHENSIVE
PLAIT, SIMULTANEOUSLY WITH THE ACCEPTANCE OF THE
ANNEXATION PETITION, SUBMITTED BY LUMSDEN, SHEARER,
HASELWOOD AND CHILDRESS.
LEGAL DESCRIPTION: SECTION 34, TOWNSHIP 24 NORTH, RANGE O1 EAST;
THE NW 1/4 OF THE SW 1/4 SECTION 34, EXCEPT THE WEST 225 FEET
THEREOF AND EXCEPT THE NORTH 30 FEET OF SAID NW 1/4, SW 1/4;
TOGETHER WITH THE SOUTH 1/2 OF THE NE 1/4 OF THE SW 1/4 AND THAT
PORTION OF THE NE 1/4, SE 1/4 LYING WESTERLY OF STATE HWY#16,
EXCEPT ROAD.
WHEREAS, The City of Port Orchard has received a Notice of Intent
to Petition for Annexation. As a condition of acceptance'of this
annexation petition, the City Council is requiring the simultan-
eous adoption of a Comprehensive Plan Designation for the subject
property, and
WHEREAS, a SEPA checklist has been submitted and has received a
declaration of non -significance, and
WHEREAS, the property owners have requested that their property be
designated "Industrial" on the Comprehensive Plan map, and
WHEREAS, a public hearing was held on 21 September 1987 and that
the Planning Commission considered the findings of facts, the
testimony and material presented at the hearing, and
WHEREAS, the existing gravel pit operation has been in operation
for many years, and
WHEREAS the gravel pit operation, office, shop and contractor's
storage yard have been granted unclassified use permits from the
County.
WE THEREFORE FIND: that the most compatible and suitable zoning
designation on the Comprehensive Plan map for the above described
property to be for "Industrial" because of the traditional and
existing uses.
CONCLUSION: Based on the findings of facts, the testimony and
materials presented at the public hearing, we therefore conclude
that a designation of Industrial, would be in harmony with the
general purposes and intent of the zoning ordinance and
comprehensive plan.
1